Loading...
1971/03/3071- 180 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 23, 1971, 1:30 p,~. Councilmen Thom and Pebley stated they would prefer this account be placed with an Anaheim bank. The City Council requested the City Manager to discuss with the California Angels the possibility of placing this account with an Anaheim bank, and also contact local banks to determine what arrangements could be possible for such a service, and bring the item back to the Council on March 30, 1971. CATV: Assistant City Manager Robert Davis reported that some cities (Fresno, California, for example) have inclu4ed in their ordinance for a Cable Antenna Television system franchise the provision that a one-time fee of up to $50,000 be paid to the city om granting of an exclusive franchise. The City Council instructed the City Manager's office to revise the proposed ordinance and specifications to include a provision for a one-time fee to be paid to the City of Anaheim, and also change the franchise designation from "non-exclusive" to "exclusive," for full Council considera- tion March 30, 1971. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Thom moved to adjourn; Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 2:40 p.m. Signed . .. ~f ~ City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30, 1971, 1:30 p.m. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. M~rdoch ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Don McDaniel Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Wesley Sundin of the Salvation Army gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Stephenson led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. RESOLUTION - MINNIE ROJAS: A Resolution extending best wishes for a rapid re- covery and sincere hope for good fortune in the years to come to Minnie Rojas and his family was unanimously adopted by the City Council. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION: A Resolution con~nending the Orange County Council of Y.M.C.A. for their Annual Good Friday Breakfast, to be held April 9, 1971, was issued by Mayor Dutton and unanimously approved by the City Council. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council regular meetings held March 2, 9, 16 and 23, 1971, were approved on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom. Councilmen Stephenson and Dutton abstaine~on the March 23, 1971, minutes. MOTION CARRIED. from voting .MIiqUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council regular meetings he~l~.F~h~~,- 16a~23~, ,rovedon mo~_~_.~7~,am~itm~ P--e~'ey, seconded by Councilman Thom. Coun_gi stained from voting on ~~~nutes. ~TION C~RIED. 7][-181 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES ~ March 30, 1971, 1:30 p.m. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $1,698,295.89, in accordance with the 1970-71 Budget, were approved. PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDONMENT NO. 70-6A: Public hearing was held on proposed abandonment of existing eight-foot public utility easements lying within Lots 66 and 79 in Tract No. 6585, requested by Jack Perich of S. & S. Construction Company, pursuant to Resolution No. 71R-96, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin and notices thereof posted in accordance with law. Property located east of Euclid Street, north of Sallie Lane. Report of the City Engineer was submitted, recommending approval. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the City Council; there being no response, he declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-118: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 71R-118 for adoption, approving Abandonment No. 70-6A as recommended by the City Engineer. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLP~iON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF THAT PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPED HEREIN. (No. 70-6A) Roll Call Vote: Al'ES: COUNC ILb~N: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-118 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - HOUSEMOVING PERMIT: Application submitted by Mary L. Myrdahl, requesting permission to move a dwelling from 18714 South Gridley, Cerritos, to 407 South Ohio Street, Anaheim, was reviewed by the City Council, together with report of the Development Services Department recommending said permit be granted subject to the following conditions: Compliance with all site development standards of the R-1 Zone. 2) Dedication of an additional 2~ feet along the alley to the rear of the lot. Payment of park and recreation fees. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the City Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-119: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 71R-119 for adoption, granting said Housemoving Permit, subject to the recommendations of the Development Services Department. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSEMOVING PERMIT TO MARY L. MYRDAHL, TO MOVE A DWELLING FROM 18714 SOUTH GRIDLEY, CERRITOS, CALIFORNIA, TO 407 SOUTH OHIO STREET, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-119 duly passed and adopted. 71- 182 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30~ 1971, 1:30 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING - SANTA ANA CANYON SCENIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY (SC) ZONb:: Proposing amendments to the Anaheim Municipal Code by the addition to Title 18, Zoning, Chapter 18.59, Scenic Corridor Overlay (SC) Zone; amendment to Title 17, Sub- divisions, Chapter 17.06, Land Development and Resources; alterations to the Street Cross Section Standards; establishment of a Street Tree Program; and establishment of fees for landscaping along Santa Ana Canyon Road. The City Planning Con~nis$ion, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-13, recommended adoption of an amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code by adding Chapter 18.59, Scenic Corridor Overlay (SC) Zone, as depicted on Exhibit A; amendment to Title 17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 17.06, Grading,Excavations and Fill in Hillside Areas, as depicted on Exhibit B; alterations to the Street Cross Section Standards to allow inclusion of a median strip on arterial highways; a significant street tree program be estab- lished to reinforce the "green" appearance of the canyon, as depicted on Exhibit D; and a fee be established for landscaping in lieu of fees for curbs, ~utters and sidewalks along Santa Aha Canyon Road, as depicted on Exhibit E. The City Clerk submitted correspondence received at open meeting from !{arvey A. Berger of Berger Development Company, and Lawrence A. Muckenthaler, opposing subject overlay Zone, and also a statement from the League of Women iToters of Orange County favoring adoption of the subject Overlay Zone. Co~ncilman Dutton noted 17 similar letters had been received from various Orange Coonty cities urging adoption of the Scenic Corridor overlay Zone, the format for which reportedly was drawn up by James A. Kowalski, Counsellor-Coordinator of MDTA Programs in Environmental/Ecological Education at Orange Coast College. Associate Planner Don McDaniel noted that, subsequent to adoption bv the City Planning Commission of the Resolution recommending the Scenic CorridOr ~oncept, legal problems were revealed involving implementation of the Scenic Corridor ordinances as proposed. He thereupon advised that the Development Services Department has requested that the City Council refer the proposed ordinances back to the City Planning Commission in order that these problems may be resolved. He further suggested the City Council may wish to continue with the public hearing on this subject in order to obtain the views of those present at this meeting. The Council agreed. ~yor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the City Council. Julie Cessop, 4809 Wasatch Drive, presented approximately 930 affi- davits favoring the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone and signed by residents of Orange County cities, which affidavits were similar to those previously noted ~y Co,~ncilman Dutton. Mrs. Bernard W. Jordan, President of Anaheim Beautiful, urged the ~ity ~]ouncil to approve and support the Scenic Corridor plan. Mrs. Ken Burnap, President of the Anaheim-Garden Grove Chapter of the League of Women Voters, read the statement of the Orange County League of Women Voter~ ~ecommending adoption of the Scenic Corridor plan. Councilman Dutton noted the reference in the statement to a report prepared by Eckbo, Dean, Austin & Williams recommending "Conservation/Open Space Zoning and no further development crest-to-crest in the Santa Ana Canyon," and asked, if Mrs. Burnap agreed with this, who would pay for the purchase of this approximately 15,000 acres of land and also maintain it in perpetuity° Mrs. Burnap mentioned the Williamson Act as one method of financing such a project, although she acknowledged this was not too popular because of the requirement that such land be kept in agricultural reserve for 10 years and the penalties that were involved should the landowner decide to make any other use of his land. She also mentioned the possibility of joint powers agreements, such as between Anaheim and Orange County, or Orange and Riverside Counties; or that special districts could be formed to implement a tax to be used only for the preservation of this region. 7 1- 183 ~ity }{ail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30~ 1971, 1:30 p.m. Mrs. Burnap further stated it was understood funds still are set aside for the Yorba Park project, and that HUD funds are available at the State level earmarked for Yorba Park. Councilman Dutton expressed the opinion these procedures would constitute inverse condemnation of privately owned land in the canyon. City Manager Keith Murdoch reminded Mrs. Burnap that the Yorba Park financing referenced would only cover property within the river bed, and that the area covered by the Eckbo, Dean, Austin & Williams report included all of the property crest-to-crest of the Santa Ana Canyon. Mrs. Burnap acknowledged this fact, and reiterated that the Orange County League of Women Voters favored the Scenic Corridor as a means of re- viewing what is done in the canyon. Robert McQueen, President of the Santa Ana Canyon Improvement Asso-- ciation, stated they realize development of tbe canyon is inevitable, but they would like to see the green areas and environment maintained as much as possible in this development, and thus were in favor of the Scenic Corridor p]an being reviewed to attempt to eventually provide the proper controls. Frank Minissale, residing at the corner of Mohler Drive and Santa Ana Canyon Road, stated he owned an acre and a half of land with 20 olive trees on it, and he did not intend to remove any of these in any developing be does. He objected to the setback requirements as set forth in the proposed Santa Ana Canyon Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone, and also to anybody who is located 2, 5 or 25 miles from his property, or in other towns, attempting to tell him how he should develop it, as is the case in some of the petitions submitted. Regarding setbacks, he stated that a 75-foot setback requirement ~ould result in a landowner being required to give up 200% more of his property for setbacks in the canyon than is required elsewhere in Anaheim, and if this is done landowners shou~l be compensated. Replying to Councilman Stephenson, Mr. Minissale advised he did not approve of windbreaks set up in straight rows, and did not believe developers should be required to go 'to extreme expense in planting trees; however, he did feel it was necessary to plant some trees. Replying to Councilman Ruth, Mr. Minissale advised that of 8500 square feet of property purchased from the State, if the present setback re- quirements remain in the proposed plan, he would be left with 100 square feet in a triangular shape, which would be impossible to develop, although he still would be required to maintain the property; out of 53,000 square feet of prop- erty, he would only be allowed to develop 6,000 square feet. He added that the City Planning Commission had stated they would not impose these requirements on him; however, he had no written assurance of this. Referring to Mr. Minissale's remark that he did not believe residents of other towns in Orange County should be allowed to dictate what goes on in the canyon, Councilman Dutton reminded him that a part of the canyon still is in the County and not a part of the City of Anaheim. Leo Deterding, a resident of the Santa Ana Canyon, expressed opposi- tion to the 50- to 75-foot setback requirement along the Santa Ana Canyon Road, with no compensation to the owners, and to the requirement that this land be landscaped and maintained by the owners. He suggested those desiring these requirements should purchase that land at the prevailing market price and then form an improvement district so everybody in the County who drives through the area would have to pay for it. Mr. Deterding maintained he had 400 feet of property fronting on Santa Ana Canyon Road, and it would be economically impossible for him to give up a 50-foot setback and also landscape and maintain', that land. He offered to give that 50-foot by 400-foot strip of land to any zz~dividual who would land- scape and properly maintain it, ownership to revert back to him in the event the property was not properly maintained. 7 i- i84 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 302 1971~ 1:30 p.m. He contended the canyon would develop properly if government didn't try to force regulations on it. Mr. Deterding further stated that he was in the process of removing the 9 remaining eucalyptus trees from his property before the Scenic Corridor zone was established and he was forced to retain them. He contended eucalyptus trees never should be located in residential developments. Replying to Councilman Roth, Mr. Deterding stated he presently owns approximately 6 acres of land in the canyon, and if the proposed setback re- quirements were adopted he would lose a little over half an acre, which he maintained would be worth $15,000.00. Donna Pulliam, 7000 Eucalyptus Drive, favored retaining the Santa Aha Canyon as an open space, and added that since highways somehow get financed, it also should be possible to finance this project in the same manner. She also stated she had no objection to the eucalyptus trees on her property, and maintained a little care would make them a desirable tree. Replying to Councilman Roth, Mrs. Pulliam advised she had lived in the canyon for 10 years and presently owns 2 acres of land. Mrs. Margaret Deterding, owner of an acre of property in the canyon, mentioned that eucalyptus trees are a fire hazard, and especially so in the canyon, and she felt there should be legislation passed forbidding any future developer to leave eucalyptus trees in an area where they would infringe on any type of dwelling. Landon Exley, Vice President and General Manager of Pacesetter Homes, 4540 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, expressed concern about what future effect the proposed setback requirements would have on the overall beauty of the area ~f the setback areas were not properly maintained. He suggested consideration 0e given to the City and/or County acquiring these 50- or 75-foot wide strips of land, planting them to their own desires and maintaining them, and then taxing the entire community to cover this expense. Albert Yorba, Esperanza Road, objected to the proposed setback re- quirement and to the requirement that one tree be replanted for every three -~moved, since, in his 175 acres, located on the north side of the river and bordering the flood control channel (much of which he contended was taken up !n easements), he has many trees on one small piece of land, whereas one parcel -f 90 acres has no trees at all, and thus the one-for-three requirement would ~ot be equitable for ~ll parcels of land. James Liberio, ]720 West La Palma Avenue, requested that the afore- mentioned correspondence from Harvey Berger, opposing the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone, be read in its entirety, which was done by the Deputy City Clerk. He then requested that a decision on the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone be made this date to allow development to begin because it already has been two years since the canyon property owners started proceedings to annex ~ the City of Anaheim so that their land could be developed. Mabel Travis, 155 Maude Lane, stated there is one house and a street between her home and the Riverside Freeway, and this had caused no problems until the freeway recently was rebuilt and raised; now the entire freeway traffic not only is in their vision, but the noise has become so loud it is impossible to carry on a conversation on the patio; and therefore she believed the setbacks and landscaping along the freeway are necessary. Laura Dominguez, referring to an earlier suggestion that the canyon property might be put into a preserve for 10 years, stated taxes on this un- developed land are high and thus canyon landowners need to be able to develop their property now for economic reasons. Ray Spehar, Fullerton, advised he believed the Santa Ana Canyon Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone as now proposed should be scrapped, since there are many legal aspects still unresolved. ~ity Halls Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30, 1971, 1:30 p.m. Mr. Spehar stated he was in no way threatening the City of Anaheim; however, if the Santa Ana Canyon Scenic Corridor Overlay (SC) Zone is approved, he and some others involved would obtain legal counsel to protect their rights in the canyon area. He also questioned the effect the proposed Scenic Corridor zone would have on his commercial property at La Palma Avenue and Imperial Highway. He advised that adoption of this plan would result in a loss of 3 of his 10 commercial acres at that location. He further contended that the windbreak of trees requirement could result in his proposed shopping center at that location being completely hidden from view, and the 150-foot planter area requirement would take up most of the area intended for parking. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Mr. Geisler advised that he believed the Santa Ana Canyon Scenic Corridor Overlay (SC) Zone plan as now proposed may be too broad in its con- cept and could, if adopted, result in any existing development in the canyon becoming a non-conforming use. In reply to Councilman Pebley's query as to whether developers must wait until the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone has been adopted, Mr. Geisler ad- vised that the present City Council requirement that development plans must be submitted for review by the Development Services Department and approved by the Council should suffice to allow development to go forward in the canyon as it has heretofore. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the Santa Ana Canyon Scenic Corridor Overlay (SC) Zone was referred back to the City Planning Commission and Planning Staff for further study and evalu- ation. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Dutton asked that in the study a determination be made between a Scenic Highway and a Scenic Corridor. RECESS: Councilman Dutton moved for a 10-minute recess. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:10 p.m.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order, all Councilmen being present. (3:20 p.m.) PUBLIC DANCE HALL PERMIT: Application filed by William W. Mitchell for public dance hall permit to allow dancing daily from 9:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. at Electric Circus, 937-945 South ¥~ott Avenue, was submitted, together with report and recommendation of the Chief of Police that the permit be denied on the basis that the operation of this business at this location would create a disturbance to other businesses and residents in the immediate areas and would further pose a potential problem for the Police Department. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council. A1 Young, owner of The Purple Lion, 919 South Knott Avenue, whose restaurant is located in the same complex as subject business, stated that part of the problem created by the Electric Circus is that on Wednesday, Thurs- day, Friday and Saturday nishts they have been offerin8 special events~ and this has resulted in an overflow parking problem as early as 9:00 P.M. on those evenings, causing his own business to fall off by as much as 40 percent because of no place to park. Also, an area of the parking lot has been fenced off to provide a playground for a child care center, further decreasing avail- able parking spaces. He contended that operation of the Electric Circus has resulted in a number of young adults attempting to obtain admission to his restaurant after subject establishment has reached capacity, and disrupting business when refused admittance without an identification card. 71-186 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30, 1971, 1:30 P.M. Odra L. Chandler, Attorney, 608 South Harbor Boulevard, represent- ing the Applicant, advised the Electric Circus has a temporary liquor license, and his investigation has not revealed anything illegal about their operation since the premises formerly had been used for a similar type business. He stated that there had been no authentication by the owner of The Purple Lion that the problems he had been encountering were caused by the ex- istence of the Electric Circus, nor did Mr. Young cite any problems that had occurred within the premises of the Electric Circus; thus it appeared the ob- jection was that the Electric Circus was too successful and attracting too many people. Mr. Chandler stated the Fire Department has determined that subject place of business can accommodate 220 patrons at one time, and the owner has been turning away any overflow customers since that determination was made. He also advised that a security guard has been hired to control the parking lot, and five security guards are on duty daily inside the premises. Referring to the report from the Chief of Police where it stated that the establishment has attracted overflow crowds, resulting in large num- bers of persons loitering in the parking lot and adjacent private property, Mr. Chandler contended this situation could not be blamed on the establishment itself. Mr. Chandler further noted that the report states there are 105 park- ing spaces in the business complex, whereas he had counted 136 spaces. He ad- vised the Applicant has approached other property owners in the area regard- ing leasing some of their land for additional parking; however, he believed if there is not sufficient parking available for the business complex, the lessor should be responsible for providing this and not the lessee. ite agreed the entertainment at subject establishment could be classi- fied as "Hard Rock Music;" however, he believed it was legal entertainment for the zoning in the area. b~. Chandler also stated he understood the Inn Crowd had had a pub- lic dance hall permit for these premises, and thus it was his belief there was nothing unusual in the way the Electric Circus was operating. He asked that a temporary permit be granted to the Electric Circus, Tending investigation into the situation by the Council. Councilman Pebley advised he had received several phone calls from Knott Avenue residents complaining about the situation in the area, and he had referred these calls to the Police Department. Councilman Stephenson reminded Mr. Chandler that a dancing permit is not transferrable, and the Applicant should have obtained his permit prior to investing his money in the business. Mr. Chandler advised that the Applicant is in the process of pur- chasing the business at that location and has recently installed a complete kitchen facility to serve meals. He further stated he did not believe a busi- ness should be closed down if the area is zoned for t~he type of business car- ried on and management conforms to the rules and regulations as set forth, as he understood is the situation with some other Anaheim establishments al- legedly operating a public dance hall under a dinner dancing place permit. At the request of the Council, Chief of Police David Michel reported that, contrary to statements by Mr. Chandler, he understood the Inn Crowd, for- merly at that location, had not offered the same type of music entertainment as is now being presented, and thus did not cause the noise problem that has brought complaints from area residents. Chief Michel stated he believed the Electric Circus has been operat- ing approximately six weeks; however, normal procedure is to apply for a per- mit prior to actually going into business, and not doing so on the assumption the permit will be granted. 71-187 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30, 1971~ .!:30 P.M. He advised that police officers have reported management on the premises has been cooperative to work with; however, there have been numer- ous complaints received about the noise of the music from the establishment, which is magnified by the public address system. He further advised com- plainants have stated pictures on the walls of their homes have shaken from the vibrations of the loud music. Chief Michel read the log of complaints received about the noise, drinking in the parking lots, cars parking on private property, etc., al- though complainants had asked that they not be identified to avoid any pos- sible retaliation. He further advised that fire inspectors had reported as many as 350 to 400 patrons in the premises at one time, although management has since agreed to turn away customers after their allowed capacity of 220 has been reached. In reply to Councilman Roth, the City Attorney advised that the pertinent ordinance does not specify how loud noises would have to be to constitute a "disturbance of the peace." Councilman Thom stated that his interpretation of the report by the Chief of Police would be subject business actually is causing a public nuisance. Councilman Stephenson expressed the opinion there are not enough parking spaces provided to accommodate 220 patrons at this establishment and also serve the other businesses in that complex. Also he believed the re- port and recommendation of the Police Department should be concurred with. MOTION: Councilman Stephenson offered a motion to deny subject request. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. Mayor Dutton, with approval of the Council, invited Mr. Chandler to again address the Council prior to action on the foregoing motion. Mr. Chandler advised that the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board had issued a temporary permit to Electric Circus, the Fire Department has decreed the number of patrons that can be accommodated at one time in the premises, Health and Sanitation Departments have approved the premises, a Board of Equalization permit has been issued, and management is willing to comply with any requests by the Council; and thus he believed the public dance hall permit should be approved. Councilman Dutton advised he was in favor of delaying action on this application for one week to allow the Council to personally investigate the situation. Councilman Pebley concurred. The City Attorney advised that there presently is no zoning per- mitting a public dance hall by zoning rights and at subject location the plans submitted for the Conditional Use Permit (CUP No. 617) indicated a restaurant, but showed no dance floor. He suggested if action is continued for one week, the Applicant may wish to investigate the possibility of ap- plying for a conditional use permit for a public dance hall. Chief Michel advised the former business at this location had a dinner dancing place permit and not a public dance hall permit. On Roll Call, at the request of Councilman Thom, the foregoing motion failed to carry by the following tie vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Thom NOES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Dutton ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEN: Pebley ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None 71- 188 .City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30, 1971~ 1:30 P.M Mr. Young advised that, although he believed there is a police problem in connection with operation of the Electric Circus, his experience has been that the management has Been very cooperative, and he was in agree- ment with the suggestion that action be delayed one week to allow further in- vestigation by the Council and to permit the management to correct the "public nuisance" aspects of the operation. Councilman Dutton offered a motion to defer action on subject ap- plication for one week to allow investigation by the City Council, and also to determine the status of zoning, permits and liquor licenses involved. Coun- cilman Roth seconded the motion. Roll Call was requested: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Pebley and Dutton Stephenson and Thom None MOTION CARRIED. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held March 8, 1971, pertaining to the following applications were submitted for City Council information and consideration: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1226: Submitted by Joel Lewis, Jr., to establish a towing service and impound yard on R-A zoned property located on the east side of Lakeview Avenue, north of La Palma Avenue; and further described as 1290 North Lakeview Avenue, with waivers of: (70-71-5 to M-1 pending) a. Minimum required landscaped setback. b. Required 6-foot masonry wall. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-39, ~r~nLed said conditional use permit, and Waivers a. and b. for a period of two years and 90 days, subject to conditions, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1227: Submitted by Harold D. Stevenson, to expand an existing motel on R-A zoned property located on the east side of Beach Bou- levard, north of Ball Road, with waiver of: (Variance No. 674, Reclassifica- tion No. 56-57-24) a. Ymximum building height. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-40, granted said conditional use permit and granted waiver of the maximum build- ing height, in part, subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 662: Pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-43, recom- mending termination of all proceedings on Conditional Use Permit No. 662 on the basis that the petitioner has not exercised the right granted by this petition and has not met any of the conditions attached to the approval; and inasmuch as Reclassification No. 7~-71-31, which includes property considered in Conditional Use Permit No. 662, was recommended for R-3 zoning. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-43, terminated said conditional use permit. VARIANCE NO. 2156: Submitted by Dr. and Mrs. Edward H. Abrams, requesting a one (1) year extension of time for construction of three additions to an ex- isting residential structure on R-O zoned property located on the west side of Dwyer Drive, south of Westmont Drive. The City Planning Con~ission, by Motion, granted a one-year exten- sion of time to said variance, to expire March 17, 1972. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no fur- ther action taken. 71-189 City Hall~ Anaheim~..CRl. ifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30, 1971., 1:30 P.M- CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - WORK ORDER NO. 609-B: On report and recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Roth moved that Change Order No. 1, Work Order No. 609-B, for the additional amount of $3,584.84, be authorized, for the Cerritos Avenue Street Improvement. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-120 - AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 702: In accordance with recom- mendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 71R- 120 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVE- M~NT: THE WILKEN WAY STREET I~fPROVEMENT, FROM OERTLEY STREET TO APPROXI- MATELY 99 FEET EAST OF HARBOR BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 702. (R.J. Noble Company - $13,682.40) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-120 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-121 - WORK ORDER NO. 612-B: Councilman Dutton offered Resolu- tion No. 71R-121 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 71R-103 BY CHANGING THE DATE FOR THE OPENING OF SEALED PROPOSALS (THE ]lEACH BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENT, WORK ORDER NO. 612-B. - Bids to be Opened April 15, 1971, 2:00 P.M.). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-121 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - PLAY EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on the recom- mended purchase of Play Equipment for Chaparral Park and advised that the one manufacturer, Northwest Design Products, has submitted a quotation for said equipment in the amount of $3,836.38, including tax. He thereupon recom- mended the purchase be authorized. On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Dutton, pur- chase was authorized in the amount of $3,836.38, including tax, as recommen- ded by the City bianager. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMERS: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of four 150 KVA Pad Mounted Trans- formers, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX General Electric, Los Angeles ............ $6,090.00 'McGraw Edison, Los Angeles ............... 6,652.80 Westinghouse Electric, Los Angeles ......... 6,703.20 Wagner Electric, E1 Segundo ............ 7,064.40 71-190 ~.ity Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30, 1971, 1:30 P.M. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the low bid of General Electric was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $6,090.00, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-122 - BUS LOADING ZONES: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 71R-122 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF BUS LOADING ZONES ALONG ANAHEIM BOULEVARD AND STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-122 duly passed and adopted. ORDiNanCE NO. 2920 - BUS ZONES: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2920 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.050 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO BUS ZONES. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. Anaheim Public Library Board - Minutes - February 16, 1971. b. Before the Civil Aeronautics Board - Application of Los Angeles Airways, Inc., for an exemption pursuant to Section 416(b) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, and for other relief. c. Before the Civil Aeronautics Board - Application of Los Angeles Airways, Inc., for an amendment of ~ s certificate of public convenience and necessity for Route No. 84. d. City of Tustin - Resolution No. 71-12 - Urging action to alle- viate the problem of litter and waste disposal created by the sale of bev- erages in disposable, non-returnable containers. e. City of Fountain Valley - Resolution No. 6051 - Urging the Lea- gue of California Cities and the County Supervisors' Association of Califor- nia to seek action to alleviate the problem of litter and waste disposal cre- ated by the sale of beverages in disposable, non-returnable containers. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2918: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 2918 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (Portions of Katella Avenue and Santa Ana Street) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2918 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2919: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2919 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. 71-191 pC. ity Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- March 30, 1971, 1:30 P.M. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AM~NDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.20, SECTION 14.20.070(a) OF TH]~ ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO TRAFFIC. (Approaching Through Highways - Stop Required - Erection of Stop Signs - Determination of Four-Way Stops) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2919 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2921: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 2921 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-19 - R-3) STADIUM PAYROLL ACCOUNT: Request of the California Angels for permission to create a Stadium Payroll Account with the Santa Ana Office of the Bank of California, for the purpose of handling the part-time payroll for Stadium events where the Angels are the tenants was submitted to the Council on March 23, 1971, and deferred to this date for action to allow additional time to confer with the California Angels and also local banks, to determine what arrangements could be made for this service locally. bir. Murdoch reported that the three Anaheim banks contacted by his office had quoted their fees charged for such a service, and since the Bank of California Santa Ana Office had agreed to handle this account for the An- gels in conjunction with the other Angel accounts, his reconm~endation re- mained that this request be approved. On moLion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley, ~uthorization was granted for preparation of a Resolution to create a Stadium Payroll Account with the Santa Ana Office of the Bank of California, as recom- mended by the City Manager, designating the Mayor and Finance Director of the City of Anaheim to sign all warrants, drafts and checks to be drawn against this account, which account is to be used for handling the part-time payroll for Stadium events where the California Angels are the tenants. MOTION CAR- RIED. CAWV - AMENDMENT: On March 23, 1971, the City Manager's office was instructed to revise the proposed ordinance and specifications for a Cable Antenna Televi- sion System franchise, to include a provision for a one-time fee to be paid to the City of Anaheim upon granting of a CATV System franchise, and to change the franchise designation from "non-exclusive" to "exclusive," for action at this meeting, and a full Council vote~ Mr. Davis reported that if a fee of $50,000.00 was requested upon granting of a franchise it was felt that it possibly would be unreasonable to not grant an exclusive franchise. Mr. Geisler suggested that if an exclusive franchise was to be gran- ted, the $50,000.00 one-time fee should be the minimum fee and not the speci- fic amount. Those companies meeting specifications would then be in a position of bidding higher than the minimum and the exclusive franchise would go to the highest bidder. Mr. Davis stated that the suggestion of Mr. Geisler would change the concept under which they had been operating as they were interested in obtaining the best company, and by setting the $50~000.00 figure possibly four or five bids will be received and the Council could then screen the bids and award the franchise to the one felt to be best qualified. Referring to Council discussion, Mr. Geisler advised that the Coun- cil might set a condition that Anaheim products be used, where possible, in such a CAtV System; however, he was not sure such a requirement could be le- gaily enforced. 71-192 City~_Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30, 1971, 1:30 P.M. Councilman Stephenson left the Council Chambers. (4:55 P.M.). On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Roth, authoriza- tion was granted to amend the proposed CATV System franchise ordinance and spe- cifications to provide for a $50,000.00 fee, franchise designation to remain "non-exclusive." MOTION CARRIED. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND HARBOR DISTRICT ISSUES - LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES: Mr. Murdoch reported a request had been submitted by the League of California Cit- ies that Anaheim be prepared to vote on the following items : Special Districts - Re consolidating or removing Districts, etc., such as exploring restructuring of Sanitation Districts (possibly regarding the fee paid Directors) and also consolidation of Districts or many of the functions of the various water districts. Harbor District - Expansion or Dissolution of the Harbor District - Assemblyman Briggs has announced he intends to introduce legislation calling for a vote of the people on the dissolution of the Orange County Harbor Dist- rict, or expansion to include functions of Regional Parks and Beaches. Mr. Murdoch advised that the previous attitude of the City of Ana- heim re the Harbor District was fairly non-committal and that it was felt that wbatever method was used, District or County Department, both functions should be included. By general Council consent, subject was deferred to April 6, 1971. JOINT MEETING - PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION: Mr. Murdoch reported a request from the Parks and Recreation Commission for a joint meeting with the City Council the week of April 5, 1971, for the purpose of discussing budget mat- ters and the policy regarding park site acquisition and development. The Council agreed to a joint meeting at 11:00 A.M., Tuesday, April 1971, at the Palms Restaurant, 1110 East Orangethorpe Avenue. PRELIMINARY PLANS - GOLF COURg%: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Council- man Pebley, preliminary plans for the Walnut Canyon/Nohl Ranch Area Golf Course, displayed on the west wall of the Council Chambers, (on file in the City Mana- ger's office), was approved. Councilman Thom voted "No" on the foregoing motion. MOTION CARRIED. PARTICIPATION - FRESNO DEFENSE OF UTILITY USERS TAX LAW SUIT: Mr. Geisler advised that a request has been submitted that all Charter Cities contribute in the defense of appeal taken by the City of Fresno, in litigation regarding the levy- ing of a utility-users tax. He stated that the suggested amount is $250.00, and recommended approval. Mr Murdoch also recommended approval on the grounds that refusal to allow this tax violates a basic right of a Charter City to levy taxes or set various sources of revenue. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Thom, author- ity was granted for the City of Anaheim to assist the City of Fresno in their appeal up to an amount of $250.00, with the understanding that this assistance is given as an aid to another Charter City, even though the City Council of the City of Anaheim has gone on record opposing a Utility-Users Tax, for the Fiscal Year 1970-71. MOTION CARRIED. 71-193 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30, 1971, 1:30 P.M CREA CONVENTION: Councilman Roth reported that at the recent California Real Estate Association Convention held in Palm Springs, the Anaheim Convention Center was voted as the site for the 1973 Convention. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION APPOINTMENT - EX-OFFICIO MEMBER: Mayor Dutton appointed Councilman Roth to replace him as an ex-officio member of the Parks and Recreation Commission, to represent the City Council. Said ap- pointment was ratified by the City Council. CONGRESSIONAL CITIES CONFERENCE o REPORT: Mayor Dutton reported briefly on the recent meeting in Washington, D.C., of the United States Conference of May- ors and National League of Cities,with Congressmen, which he and Councilman Stephenson attended. RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved to recess to 7:30 P.M. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:20 P.M.). AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. (7:30 P.M.). PRE SENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Alona M. Farrens DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Edward Granzow ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ASSISTANT PLANNER: John Graichen PUBLIC HEARING - ROUTE FOR HIGHWAY 39 - HUNTINGTON BEACH FREEWAY: To consider and recommend the route of the Huntington Beach Route 39 Freeway which is proposed to bisect the City of Anaheim from approximately Katella Avenue on the south, to Santa Ana-Riverside Freeway on the north. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-12, amended by Resolution No. PC71-42, recommended adoption of the Orange-Blue Route for the proposed Highway 39-Huntington Beach Freeway, and that in con- sideration of the design criteria for the Freeway route careful considera- tion and adoption of the following should be the minimums in the adoption of the freeway design: 1. That the State Highway Commission acquire sufficient right- of-way in order that the freeway could be constructed below-grade or that landscaping and berming may be installed thereby providing sufficient dis- tance between the noises and odors from the freeway traffic and the resi- dential uses that are adjacent to said freeway. 2. That the State Highway Commission provide adequate space suf- ficient in size for future rapid transit system. 3. That the State Highway Commission construct the freeway below- grade or a depressed freeway; however, should conditions exist that would render it impossible to construct a fully below-grade facility, either a partially depressed route combined with landscaped earth berming on both sides or an at-grade freeway with fully landscaped berms in order to mini- mize the noise and detrimental effects to the adjacent residential areas. 4. That the State shall provide monies to schools and libraries adjacent to the adopted route which may be used to adequately buffer the buildings from noises from the freeway; and further, that additional dense landscaping be provided along the freeway right-of-way adjacent to said schools and libraries to further buffer the noises. 5. That the City should exercise its prerogative by requiring the design to be acceptable prior to executing any freeway agreements on the route, in order that the freeway will create the least possible disrup- tive effects on the community. City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC71-12 further recommended the City Council give consideration to the feasibility of acquiring from the State large remnant parcels or groups of parcels which may be combined to form small neighborhood parks - particularly at on and off-ramps - said par- cels to be a minimum of 5 acres or of sufficient size, since the City could 71-194 ~ity Halls Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30~ 1971, 7:30 P.M. eliminate many possible eyesores, thereby creating for the citizens of adja- cent residential areas an additional noise and visual buffer zone, and at the same time expand the City park land system. Assistant Director of Development Services Ronald Thompson intro- duced Wally Rothbart and Larry Norton, of the State Division of Highways, and requested that they explain the proposed routes for Highway 39 to the Council. Mr. Rothbart announced the State Division of Highways would hold a public hearing on the route for Highway 39 at the Retail Clerks Auditorium in Buena Park, on March 31, 1971. He advised it was felt a freeway would be needed for the Highway 39 corridor within the next ten or twenty years, because the expected in- creased population and proposed shopping areas would create a traffic volume that probably could not be handled by the present major arterials. Mr. Rothbart made reference to the Project Digest prepared by the State Division of Highways (copies made available to those in attendance) and presented slides depicting the proposed Route 39 Freeway from Huntington Beach to Azusa, and the suggested routes that would traverse the 16-1/2 miles of freeway from Lampson Avenue in Garden Grove to the Pomona Freeway. He ad- vised that it is anticipated the route will be adopted in 1972 or 1973, ac- quisition of property to begin in 1979 or 1980, and construction commenced in 1980. In reply to Councilman Pebley, Mr. Rothbart advised property for highways and freeways generally is purchased about three years prior to con- struction because funds are not available until that time; however, they do attempt to prevent any development in the path of the freeway, once the route is adopted. Replying to Council comments on the situation in the Santa Ana Can- yon Scenic Corridor where it is proposed 75-feet of land on each side of the Freeway be landscaped and maintained by the property owner, Mr. Rothbart ad- vised such land is not purchased by the Highways Department for these purposes because, under present legislation, they are not allowed to purchase any land that is not needed for actual construction of the freeway. He explained that, at present, if what is actually needed for a freeway comes up to a property line, or within about five feet inside the boundary, that property owner could be left situated next to the freeway; however, if the land needed for construc- tion infringes on property to the extent of damaging part of the property, then the State purchases the entire parcel. He added that recent legisla- tion would award payment of up to $5,000.00 to property owners left situated next to a freeway to compensate for any possible decrease in valuation; how- ever, this legislation was passed contingent on Federal funds being available= which funds, thus far have not been made available. Replying to Council questioning as to what the State considers in the criteria for a scenic highway, Mr. Rothbart advised that a scenic highway is usually not a freeway, that the designed speeds for a freeway preclude a scenic highway. He further advised a buffer strip on each side of a freeway, in his opinion, should be at least 200-feet wide, landscaped to hide it from view of residences. Assistant Planner John Graichen briefed the City Council on the evidence submitted to and considered by the C{ty Planning Commission as a basis for their recommendation on the proposed route for Highway 39 Freeway, and explained that the two primary areas of concern studied were the effects of the various proposed routes on the community and the traffic service. He advised that the Planning Staff had determined the Green Route alighment tra- versed less land in Anaheim and offered fewer detrimental community effects than any other route proposed; however, the Orange-Blue Route presented fewer detrimental community effects than the Orange Route, and also offered the most efficient traffic service. 71-195 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES- March 30~ 1971~ 7:30 P.M. Replying to Councilman Pebley, Mr. Graichen advised that they had not recommended the Orange Route because although the Orange-Blue alignment could be more costly to the State than the Orange Route, the Orange Route would block any future expansion of the Fullerton Airport. Mr. Thompson advised that the Traffic Engineer also had recommen- ded the Orange-Blue Route. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the City Council~, Mrs. Naida Jenkins, 339 Lorena Drive, stated she favored adoption of the Orange Route. Public Works Director Thornton Piersall advised he believed the Orange-Blue Route would be less detrimental to the existing industrial de- velopments in the area. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone else wished to address the Council- there being no response, declared the hearing closed. ' RESOLUTION NO. 71R-123: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 71R- 123 for adoption, recommending adoption of the proposed Orange-Blue Route of the Highway 39 Freeway, in accordance with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLAN~ING COMMISSION IN APPROVING THE ORANGE-BLUE ROUTE OF FREEWAY 39 THROUGH THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-123 duly passed and adopted. The City Council requested that a representative of the City of Anaheim attend the State Division of Highways public hearing in Buena Park, on March 31, 1971, to present the Resolution of the City Council regarding the route for Highway 39. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn to April 6, 1971, 11:00 A.M., at the Palms Restaurant, 1110 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Anaheim, for a joint meeting with the Parks and Recreation Commission, and also moved waiver of further notice of said adjournment. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 8:15 P.M. City Clerk (1:30 P.M. Session) Signed Deputy City Clerk (7:30 P.M. Session)