Loading...
1974/03/1274-229 City Hmll, Anaheim, California = COUNCIL MINUTES - March 12, 1974, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton COUNCIIMEN: None ASSISIL~NT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: AIen R. Watts CITY CLERK: Aloha M. Fattens UTILITIES DIRECTOR: Gordon W. Hoyt ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDENT: George Edwards CITY ENGINEER: James P. Meddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: 'Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. FlAG SALUTE: Councilman Mark A. Stephenson led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held February 12, 1974, were approved on motion by CounciLman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $1,693,958.15, in accordance with the 1973-74 Budget, were approved. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - REClASSIFICATION.NO. 73-74-30, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO..1439, TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8533, REVISION NO. 1AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPOKT NO. 109: Submitted by Robert H. Grant Corporation for change in zone from Ctty ot AnaheimR-A and County of Orange A-1 to City of AnaheimR-2 and for certain Code waivers to establish a 171-unit planned residential development on the north and south sides of Nohl Ranch Road, westerly of the intersection of Imperial Highway and Nohl Ranch Road. Tract No. 8533, Revision No. 1 contains 173 proposed R-2 zoned lots. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Nos. PC74-20 and PC74-21, reco~ended disapproval of Reclassification No. 73-74-30; denied Conditional Use Permit No. 1439; and reconanended that Enviromnental Impact Report No. 109 be adopted es the Council's Environmental Impact Statement in conjunction with c~nts forwarded by letter dated November 27, 1973 from the Orange Unified School District. At their regular meeting held January 21, 1974, the City Planning Co~nission denied the tentative map of Tract No. 8533, Revi- sion No. 1. Public hearing on Reclassification No. 73-74-30 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1439 vms originally scheduled on February 19, 1974 and continued to March 5, 1974 et the Applicant's request. Subsequent to that, the matters were continued from M&rch 5, 1974 to this date because of concern expressed regard- ing the conflict with the Orange Unified School District Bond Election also scheduled March 5, 1974. The City Clerk submitted letter dated March 5, 1974 from Westridge Homeowners Association protesting the proposed development and re,nesting that the area be developed as single-family residential. Mr. Don Frederickson, Grant Company of California, 221 West Dyer Road, Santa Ann, stated that his company has been giving the planned residen- tial development proposed under Reclassification No. 73-74=30 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1439 serious consideration and due to previous conunitments allegedly made by representatives of Anaheim Hills, Inc., as well as the con- cern expressed by the existing Westridge Development property owners and the City of Anaheim Planning Con~ission, they have concluded that it would be in the best interests of all parties for them to withdraw the pending zoning 74- 230 C.!ty Ha!l, A .n~. heim, California - COUNCIl. MINUTES - March 12. 1974, 1:30 P,M. petitions and draft environmental impact report (Reclassification No. 73-74-30, Conditional Use Permit No. 1439, Environmental Impact Report No. 109 and Tent&- tire Tract No. 8533, Revision No. 1) and resubmit a new plan for a single-family development. Mr. Frederickson stressed that the Grant Company felt the original concept vas a good one ~hich would have been a credit to the area and that they have decided to change the plan as a result of their desire to maintain good working relationships and lines of communication with the Westridse Homeowners and ocher Stoups in the canyon, and not because of external pressure. He re- marked that this change in approach is being undertaken at considerable economic consequences to the Grant Company of California,but that they feel it will be in the best interests of everyone in the long run. Mayor Dutton stated that he vas happy that the Grant Company had decided to take this approach and that he could not concur withMr. Frederickson's statement regarding the proposed project. He remarked that after thoroughly studying the proposed plans, he vas of the opinion that they were the poorest plans he had ever seen proposed for the Anaheim Hills area and certainly not in consonance with ~hat the City and Anaheim Hills, Inc., are trying to achieve in 'that particular area. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Council approved the withdrawal of Reclassification No. 73-74-30, Conditional Use Permit Ho. 1439, Tentative Tract No. 8533, Revision No. 1, and E.I.R. No. 109, as requested by the Applicant, without preJudice. MOTION CARRIED. CONTINU~D API~.ICATION - FIRE~0RKS DISPLAY PERMIT (CALIFORNIA ANGELS),: Application filed by Mr. R. Bob Souza, General Manager, California Display Company, for permit to allows public fire~orks display on 3uly 4, 1974 at the Anaheim Stadttun, was discussed on February 12, 1974,and continued to this date to allow time for further discussion between Tommy Walker Productions and the California Angels. Mr. Dick Foster, Administrative Assistant to the General Manager, California Angels, read the following statement of the Club position on this matter: "The California Angels, recognizing the Anaheim City Council wish to hold a spectacular fireworks celebration in honor of the nation's bicentennial, are willing to relinquish rights to a night game on July 4, 1976, in order that Tonany Walker Productions may stage an Old Fashioned Fireworks display at Anaheim Stadium. Should the Angels be scheduled at home on that date, they would play in the afternoon, or play a t~i-nisht doubleheader on July 3, thus eliminating a twi-light or night g~ne on the 4th. The Angels wish to cooperate fully with the City Council of Anaheim in the staging of a Fireworks Spectacular on Independence Day (night) of 1976. Mr. Walker has been advised of the Angels' position and has been pledged full cooperation, as stated. Furthermore, the council has assurance from the Angels that, in the future, ye will not stage a fireworks show on a date close to the Fourth of July if the club is not scheduled to be at home on the Fourth of July. /s/ Dick Foster Dick Foster, Administrative Assistant to the General Manager" Councilman Dutton responded, saying that he vas personally very happy to see the spirit of cooperation evidenced by the Angels' position. He advised that the City of Anaheim is one of the cities which has entered into the bicen- tennial program and that this is a fine and co.~endable attitude ~hich the Angels have taken. The Mayor asked if Mr. Walker had any comments to add. Mr. T~y Walker, Tommy Walker Productions, Disneyland Hotel Plaza, advised that he had a good discussion with Mr. Dalton and is happy with the out- co~ as it relates to the July 4, 1976 fireworks show. Further he advised that he would like, and feels it is necessary in all fairness to both himself and the Angels, to have a legal interpretation of the lease bet~eeen himself and the City. 74-23! City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU~$ -Narch 12, !974, 1:30 In order to accomplish this, he requested that the Council authorize the City Attorney to prepare a contract through 1976, on the same terms as previously, subject to the California Angels prior rights. Councilman Thom inquired whether this request meant that Mr. Walker was still desirous of putting on the fireworks show for the 4th of July in '1974, 1975 and 1976. Mr. Walker answered that there has already been publicity regarding the fact that the California Angels will present a 4th of July fireworks Show this year and that he, in the best interests of all concerned, would not cause any problems relative to this event. He advised that his request was prompted in an attempt to receive a Jud~nent on the clause in the Angels' contract which protects previously scheduled events. Councilman Sneegas stated that the way he interprets Hr. Walker's statement is that he (Ton~ny Walker) is willing to abide by the situation as it now stands; however, Hr. Walker would like to have an opinion as to the validity of his contract. Councilman Sneegas remarked that he felt this request to be appropriate and that it would be of assistance not only to T~y Walker but to the Angels as well to have a legal determination made by a judge as to whether or not the Angels do have the right, according to their contract, to set their playing times. Councilman Stephenson commended both parties on their attitude and on the compromise. Mr. Watts advised that prior to the meeting, in a discussion between himself and Mr. Walker's attorney, the subject matter of Judicial interpretation of the City's agreement with the Angels was introduced. In order to accomplish this, since Mr. Walker is not a party to that contract, his attorney is sugges- ting that the City enter into an arrangement with Mr. Walker and have some judge review this and interpret the rights and liabilities of each party in- volved. Mr. Watts counseled that he has not completely reviewed the implica- tions of this action, however, initially itwould seem to be,in his opinion, contradictory to the Angels' contract. Mr. Jerry Utti, Attorney for Tommy Walker Productions, commented that the City Attorney's Office at one time was authorized to prepare a seven-year, long-term lease with Mr. Walker, one of the conditions of this contract being that it is subject to the prior rights of the California Angels. However this lease was never actually documented aside from a letter agreement. Mr. Utti related that the City Attorney and himself have a difference of opinion as to certain portions of this lease and consequently what he is sussesting to all parties concerned is that once this documentation is complete, To~y Walker can then file for a declaratory relief action concerning the dif- ference of opinion as to what the rights of the California Angels are, whereby the contract could be reviewed in court and the differences of opinon resolved by a judge. He noted that there is sufficient time to pursue this in an amic- able manner and without a great deal of expense. He advised that Mr. Walker is willing to forego his right to pursue any available remedies for not being able to produce the fireworks show this year in an attempt to clarify the situation in the longer term. He concluded that it is essential that the City obtain a Judicial determination as to what the rights of the California Angels are with respect to the City's ability to schedule other events during the baseball season, Council~an Snee~as agreed that this is necessary in view of the many other functions for which the Stadium is used and felt that the Angels, as well as the City, should be fully co~nizant of their rights. Mr. Watts replied that he would be prepared to make a recommendation to the Council on this matter at the next Council meeting. 74-2:12 City Hall~ Anahe. im~ California - COUNCIL HINU~S -Hatch 12~ 1974~ 1;30 Hr. Walker commented that he does not want to institute any lawsuit other than this type of "friendly lawsuit" action and would be most happy to accept the Judgers decision. However, prior to that decision he indicated that according to his principles he is obliged to fight for his rights. Councilman Dutton inquired.as to the California Angels' position on such legal action. Mr. Foster indicated that they would abide with the Council's decision. Hr. Walker further advised that he concurred with Hr; Foster's state- merit regarding the protection of the &th of July fireworks show and felt that regardless of the decision, as to who will conduct this show, a policy should be established that for a period of ten days to t~o weeks prior to, and a week thereafter, there would be no other fireworks shows permitted 'at the Stadium. He stated he would gladly abide by such a policy. Hr. Tom Liegler, Stadium-Convention Center Director, advised that he felt it to be his responsibility to bring certain information to the Council 'which should be incorporated into their consideration of this matter. He stated that if the Council is considering a long-term agreement with entertainment attractions or with To~y Walker Productions for fireworks shows,he felt they must take into consideration the other groups which might also wish to produce such entertainment or fireworks shows during that period of time as well. He related that the same type of Judgment must be used when bringing circuses and similar attractions to the City; that there are numerous shows and organizations which would desire to use the Anaheim Stadium. Further Mr. Liegler explained that he would need some guidance from Council as to exactly what type. of agreement the Council will want to enter into withMr. Walker, noting that there is an existing letter agreement. Said letter agreement he advisedwas based, upon the original philosophy of Stadium rental in the earlier years which called for a $5,000 deposit which covered all oper- ational costs. Over a period of years, these costs have grown so much that Council has changed the policy. He remarked that he will need to know what Council's intentions are on these matters when such agreements or contracts are entered into. Councilman Dutton expressed agreement withMr. Liegler and remarked this should be a t~o-way process; i.e., that the Council also needs the benefit of Mr. Liegler's thinking on these costs and other factors at the time such agreements are entered into. Application filed byHr. R. Bob Souza, General Hanager, California Fireworks Display Company, for a permit to allow public fireworks display on July 4, 1974 at the Anaheim Stadium mas sTanted, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. The City Council took no further action on declaratory relief litiga- tion, pending further report from the City Attorney. FACILI~S B~ INSTgTJmD BET~ENOCTOBER 15TItANDAPRIL 15TIt: Letter from Hr. Cai Queyrel, Anacal Engineering Company, dated February 22, 1974, requesting permis- sion to remove from subject tract located south of Santa Aha Canyon Road, west of Imperial Highway, approximately-125,000 cubic yards of excess dirt. Said letter indicates that downstre~n facilities are consttmcted, however, upgrading and additional facilities are required on final plans. Also submitted was report of the City Engineer, recom~endin$ that the requested waiver from construction of ultimate drainage facilities prior to grading be granted, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the area be graded so as to drain onto Avenida Bernardo North and away ffrom private property located to the west and north of the proposed grading area. 7~w33-3~- City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES -Narch 12, 1974, 1:30 P,M, 2. That a cash bond be posted for cleanout of the existing drainage facilities if cleanout becomes necessary due to silting from this project, and that a bond be posted to insure that the construction of required additional ultimate drainage facilities commence by August 15, 1974 and be completed by October 15, 1974. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Council granted the requested waiver of requirement that between October 15th and April 15th, all required ultimate drainage facilities be stalled and functional prior to the commencement of grading operations, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Engineer as set forth above. MOTION CARRIED. AMUSEMENT DEVICES PERMIT: Application filed by Melecio Andrus Roque, Jr., for Amusement Devices Permit to allow three billiard tables at The Alibi, 821 South Brookhurst Street, was submitted and granted, subject to Chapters 3.24 and 4.20 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Stephenson. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC DANCE PEP. MIT: Application filed by Jack Dean George, on behalf of the Santa Ann and Tustin Police. Associations, for a permit to conduct public dance on April 5, 1974, 10:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., at the Anaheim Convention Center, was submitted and granted, subject to the provisions of Chapters 3.28 and 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, final arrangements to be made with the Police Department, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas. MOTION CARRIED. NEGATIVE DECIARATION - STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NOHLRANCH ROAD AND WALNUT CANYON ROAD: Report from Development Services Department, Planning Division, reconvnending that the street improvement project on Nohl Ranch Road and Walnut Canyon Road, be exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, was submitted for Council consideration. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council finds and determines that this project will have no si~nificant effect on the environment and is exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report. MOTION CARRIED. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held February 20, 1974, pertaining to the following applications were submitted for City Council information and consideration: (The City Clerk reported that the 22nd day or last day for appeal of these items viii be March 14, 1974, 5:00 P.M.) EXEMPTION FROM FILING OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS - VARIANCE NO. 257~.AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1455: On motion by Councilman ~neegas, Seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Council ratified the determination of the Director of Development Services that the proposed activities under Variance No. 2578 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1455, fall within the definition of Section 3.01, Class II, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements for an enviromnental impact report, and are therefore categorically exempt from the re~irement to file an environmental impact report. MOTION CARRIED. 1. VARIANCE NO. 2578: Submitted by Beacon Bay Enterprises to establish two free-standing mom meat-type signs on C-1 zoned property located at the north- east corner of Euclid Street and Pampas Lane, with waivers of: a. Maximum number of free-standing signs. b. Minimum distance between signs. c. Minimum height of free-standing signs. The City Plarmin8 Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-39, granted said variance in part, denying waivers "a" and '~" and granting waiver "c", subject to conditions. 74~ 234~ -- City Hall. ~aheim. Californ.ia - COUNCIl, MINUTES -March .12, 1974, 1;:30 2, CON~IT!ONAL USE PERMIT NO.. 1455: Submitted by Anaheim Properties, Inc., to establish t-~o transportation terminals in an existing building on M-1 zoned proper~y located on the south side of Howell Avenue, east of Lewis Street. The City Planning Cc~a=~ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-38, granted said conditional use permit,.subJect to one condition. The foregoing applications were reviewed by the City Council and no further action was taken. 3.....APPROVAL OF PRECISE PIANS - TENTATIVE TRACTNOS, 7946, 7947;AND7948 {RECLAS[IF,!CAT~,ON NO, 72-73-10): Precise plans were submitted by ARC Develop- meut Corporation for Tract Nos. 7946, 7947 and 7948; property located at the northwest corner of Cerritos Avenue and W&lnut Street. Said plans were reviewed by the City Planning Commission at their meeting of February 20, 1974, and, by motion, the City PlanningC_o~mission dis- approved these on the basis that said precise plans reflect substantially the sa~e plans which were disapproved by the Planning C~lssion and remain unaltered in concept end in principle. Mr. Roberts reported that the precise plans proposed for the remainder o[ the project are substantially the same as those approved by the City Council for Tract No. 7945. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City Council approved the precise plans submitted for Tract Nos, 7946, 79~7 and 79~+8. To this motion, Councilman-Thom voted "no". HOTIONCARRIED. 4, CO~..ITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1336 - RE~UESTREGARDING SIX-FOOTMASONRY WALL: ReqUest "~or aP~rova'l of a six-foot high solid masonry w e all in the front setback and also for clarification of intent of Code requirements regarding property located at the northeast corner of State College Boulevard and Wa~ner Avenue. The City Planning Cmmnission reviewed said request at their meeting of Febtmary 20, 1974,and, by motion, approved the request to construct a six- foot hish solid masonry wall in the front setback of subject multiple-family residential development which has "front-on" units on State College Boulevard, since the requested screening weuld serve the same purpose for retaining resi- dential enviromnent in a multiple-family residential development as for a single- fmily residential developmant. The City Council took no further action on said request, thereby raining the action taken by the City Planning Commission. 5, TENTATIVE TRACTNO, 8340 {RECLASSIFICATION NO, 73-74-44)': O~ner, Casa E~rador, Ltd.; property located at 2011 West Katella Avenue, containing 75 proposed R-2 sorted lots (74 units). On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Dutton, action on Ten,driveN ap, Tract No. 8340, was continued to be considered in conjunction with Reclassification No. 73-74-~. MOTION CARRIED. RESOIirr,,IONN~,,~, 74R-99 - 1974-75 I~EEDABATEMENT CONTRACT: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 74R-99 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TNg CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING THE NECESSITY PURSIIANT TO ~O~NT CODE SECTION 39576.5 TO CONTRACT FOR THE CUTTING AND REfl0VAL OF ALL RANK GROI/TR AND BEDS, AND REI4OVAL OF RUBBISH, REFUSE AND DIRT UPON ANY PARCEL OR PARCELS O~. REAL PROPERTY OR ANY PUBLIC STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALLING FOR BIDS TREREON, AND AUTRO- RIZING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE T~qtRl~OR, ACCOUNT NO. 322-297, (1974-75) (Bids to be Opened - April 4, 1974, 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 12, 1974, 1:30 P,M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Hayor declared Resolution No. 74R-99 duly passed and adopted. RESO,.I~ION NO. 74R-100 - AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 708-B: In accordance ~rlth recom- mendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 74R-100 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PIANT, lABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER- FORHING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: NO}IL RANCH ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENT, FROM HILLCREST STREET TO IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, IN TNE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 708-B. (R. J. Noble Company - $51,586.65) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCII~IEN: Stephensont Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-100 duly passed and adopted. RESO.LUTION NO. ?4R-101 - AWARD OF ~DRK ORDER NO. 712-A: In accordance with recom- mendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Sneegas offered ~esolution No. 74R-101 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO T~E LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, IABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCI/JDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER- FORMING ALL ~DRK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE WEST STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT, FROM.187 FEET SOUTH OF TO 510 FEET SOUTH OF IA PALMA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 712-A. (Sully-Miller - $5,976.00) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCIIMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dut=on None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-101 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOS. 74R-102 AND 74R-103 - FINAL ACCEPTANCES: Upon receipt of certifica- tions from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Nos. 74R-102 and 74R-103 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 7&R-102 - WORK ORDER NO. 684-B: A RESOLUTION OF T~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING TNE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, lABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: T~E EUCLID STREET & CERRITOS AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT, SOUTHWEST COKNER, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 684-B. (Baxter-Griffin Company) 76 - 236 City Hall, A..nahe~n, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mar~.h 12., 1974, !F3.0 P.M. RE~OLUT~0N NO,. 74R-103 - ~ORK ORDER NO, 225,3: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, [AIM)R, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUII~BNT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING PO~ER, FUEL AND WATER, A~D THE PERFORHANCE OF ALL ~)RK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COHPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE WATER IMPROVEMENT ALONG THE ROUTE 57 FREEWAY FROH lA PALHA AVENUE TO SOUTH OF BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ~ORK ORDER NO. 2253. (Brown & Hensley Engineering & Construction, Inc.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCII~4EN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NGES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 74R-102 and 74R-103 ~aly passed and adopted. PURC .BASE OF gqU.!...1~. T - SPARE PARTS INVENTORY - WATER CEN~L .~ONT~. ,~ A~rD..~EI~TRY SYSTEM.: ~e Assis~an~ C~y ~nnger reported ~ t~ rec~nded purcha~ of certain elec~r~ic c~en~ par~s ~o be used by ~he Electrical Division for the pur- pose of crea~ing an inventory, for ~he ~a~er Central Control and Telemetry SysCo. Mr. Davis advised that the American Chain and Cable Company, Inc., Bristol Datamaster Division, es manufacturer of the City's Water Central Control and Telemetry System, is the only manufacturer of the electronic components re- quired and thereupon recommended purchase in the amount of $4,481.66, including tax. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Council accepted the bid submitted by American Chain and Cable Company, Inc., Bristol Datamaster Division, and authorized purchase in t~e amOUntof $4,481.66, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. .I~RCNAS~ OF ~UIPMENT - ONE RAXE-O-VAC: The Assistant City Manager reported on the r~mied purchase of one "Rake-O-Vac" for the Parks and Recreation Department and advised that the one manufacturer, Toro, has submitted a quotation for said equipment in the amount of $3,?01.25, including tax. He thereupon recommended the purchase be authorized. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Dutton, pur- chase ~s authorized in the amount of $3,701.25, including tax. NOTION CARRIED. PURCI~.S~ OF EQUIPMENT - ONE 3./4-TON PICKUP TRUCK: The Assistant City Manager re- ported on the recommended purchase of one 3/4-ton pickup truck for the Street Maintenance Division and ~urther recommended said truck be added to the a~ard ma~e by Council to Santa Ana Dodge on January 2, 1974. The cost quoted by Santa Aha Dodge for this truck, per bids received at that time, ~as $3,465.00, including tax, On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City Council authorized the purchase of one 3/4-ton pickup truck from Santa Aha Dodge at a cost of $3,465.00, including tax; said equipment to be added to the order approved on January 2, 1974. NOTION CARRIED. APPLICATION. FOR v~.&VE TO PRESENT [ATE. CLAIM: It was moved by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Snee~as that permission to pre~ent late cilat~ submitted by Kenneth E. Hagen, on behalf of Naomi Roslyn Kunsewtecki for porsorml injuries purportedly sustained on or about May 24, 1973, be denied as recoemended by the City Attorney's Office. HOTION CARRIED. CLAIM~,. ~,A~INS,~ TI~ CITY: The following claims ~ere denied am recommended by the City Attorney and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas: a. Claim submitted by Josephine Clay for personal injuries and prop- er~y damages Purportedly as a result of being struck by City vehicle, on or about January 9, 1974. 7~4~.°23~~ City Ha.ll, Anaheflna California - COt~ClL MIl/Ulll$ - )larch 12, 1974, 1:30 b. Claim submitted by Sterling V. David for personal injuries pur- portedly sustained as a result of being hit on upper forehead by golf ball at Anaheim Municipal Golf Course, on or about February 9, 1974. c. Claim submitted by Robert E. Allen for personal property purpor- tedly ~ustained as a result of stopped-up City se~er line, on or about February 25, 1974. MOTION CARRIED. RESO~ION NO. 74R-104 - REVO.C~.TION OF ENCROACII~ENT PERMIT N0. 71-5E: In accordance vith request submitted by the licensee, Councilman Sneiias offered Resolution No. 74R-10~ for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF TI~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AGREEING TO THE CANCELLATION OF A LICENSE TO ENCROACH UPON AN EASEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT OF CANCELLATION. (Vana R. & Ann S. Alpeter, Encroacbment Ps,nit No. 71-5E) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIIHEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCII24EN: None ABSENT: COUNCII24~N: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-10~ duly passed and adopted. RESO~ION NOS, 74R-105 AND 74R-106 - EXTENDING TRASH CONTRA~TS - ANAHEIM DISPOSAL tOM ....~/NARREN JAYCOX COMPANY: In accordance with recon~nendationa of the Director of Public Works, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution Nos. 74R-105 and 74R-106 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO~ 74R-105: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY. OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO A CONTRACT RELATING TO TRASH COLLECTION (C. V. TAORMINA, DBA ANAHEIM DISPOSAL COMPANY). (Five year extension from June 30, 1974 to June 30, 1979) RESOLUTION NO. 74R-106: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CTTY OF ANAHEIH AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AMElqIH~NT ID A CONTRACT RELATING TO TRASH CO?.?.~.CTION (JAYCOX). (Five year extension from June 30, 1974 to June 30, 1979) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIIMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCII2iEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 74R-105 and 7&R-I06 duly passed and adopted. RESOIIITION W, 74a-107 - ADDI~I. ON .TO cONTaACT - DOl~LD J, FEARS/A~CttlTECTURAL SERVICES PBASE tV, UTILITIES SERVICE CENTER: Councilman Snee$&s offered Resolution No. 74R-107 for adoption, Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF TI~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING TI~ HAYORAI~ CITY CLERK TO E~CUTE AN AME~NT TO A COKTRACTREIATING TO THE DESIGN OF PHASE IV OF TI~ UTILITIES YARD BETI4EEN DONALD J. FEARS, ARCHITECT, AND T}~ CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Increase of $1,320.00; total amount of agreement not to exceed $11,120.00) Roll Call Vote: 7~.-238~- City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES -March 12, 1974, 1:30 P,M, AYES: COUNCIIMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-107 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. Orange County League of California Cities - NOTICE - Appointments. Orange County League of Califomia Cities - Minutes - February 14, 1974. b. Public Utilities Conanission - Resolution No. A-4223 - Amending Rule 17.1, setting forth the special procedure for implementation of the Calif- ornia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, which requires the preparation and submission of Environmental Impact Reports. c. Orange County Board of Supervisors - Resolution No. 74-260 - Restricting the purchase of gasoline within the territorial limits of Orange County in order that persons may only purchase gasoline on alternate days de- 'pending on their license number and further prohibiting purchases of gasoline when a gasoline tank is more than half full and requesting the Governor to issue the necessary orders and regulations. d. City of Seal Beach - Resolution No. 2294 - Opposing AB 16 which would reqire that cities provide the 27. formula at age 50 or "California High- way Pat-roi" formula retirement plan for police officers. e. City of Buena Park - Resolution No. 5208 - Expressing its opposi- tion to public employer-employee regulations legislation. f. KORJ-FM Editorial - Re: Gasoline. g. Correspondence from Smnes R. Jamieson - Re: Bast Anaheim School District Alternatives. h. Community Redevelopment Comnission - Minutes - February 13, 1974. t. Anaheim Public Library Board - Minutes - January 21, 1974. MOTION CARRIED. ORD~ NOS. 3269 THROUGH AND INCLUDING 3274: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordina~ce Nos. 3269 through 3274, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. O~I.NAI~ ,NO, 3269: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAMELMREPEALING TITLE 18, ctlAPTER 18.84OF TIlE ANAIIEIMMUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Building Line Setbacks) O,RDI~ NO, 3270: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAI~IMAMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAMEIMMUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (73-74-13 - RS-5000) O~..1)INANCE' N0, 3271: AN ORDINANCE OF TIlE CITY OF ANAMEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF TI~ ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (73-74-32 - R-A) Oig), INAN,,~E ,,,NO, 3,272: -AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANA~IM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3252, ~ PRO TUNC, RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69 (6/+) -M-l) OK1)I~ NO. 327~: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE. 18 OF T~E ANAREIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-47 (8) - M 1) ORDI~ NO, 3274: ~ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF TME ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69 (67) - M-l) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCII2~EN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Ordinance Nos. 3269 through 3274, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. 7~..'2'39 ? City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 12.. 1974, 1:30 P.M, ORDINANCE NO. 3275: Councilman Sneegas offered Ordinance No. 3275 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61 (60) - C-R) RESOLUTION NO,. 74R-108 - ACCEPTI,N,G SUR. PLUS F.IRE ENGIKE F.RO.M, .COUNI~f OF Olt~lqG~: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 74R-108 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SURPLUS COUNTY OF ORANGE FIRE TRUCK, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION THEREOF. (County Unit No. 5103) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIIMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCIII~EN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-108 duly passed and adopted. PROPOSED ORDINANCE = POSTING OF GASOLINE PRICES: City Attorney Watts reported that pursuant to Council direction on February 26, 1974, he has met with Mr. Young of the Planning Division, Development Services Department, to collaborate on preparation of an urgency ordinance whichwould require that all gasoline ser- vice stations either post the prices at which they are currently selling gaso- line or remove the price sign unit. Mr. Watts noted that a principal problem arises in preparation of this draft ordinance from the fact that some of the gasoline service stations display their price signs on the pole which carries the logo sign. He requested clarification from Council as to ~hether or not they had intended that if the service station owner did not wish to post his prices, that the entire logo sign unit be removed? Councilman Sneegas advised that he had been contacted by several service station operators who have advised him that they are planning to meet with the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, Energy Committee, this evening at 7:00 p.m. Since these service station operators are extremely concerned about the ramification of a city ordinance and would like the opportunity to have some input into the regulations of their business, perhaps any decision should be deferred. He noted that some of these gasoline dealers are faced with a problem of being located right on the City of Anaheim Boundary and are in com- petition with stations just across the street ~hich would be subject to differ- ent or no regulations because they are in an adjoining city and this could create a great deal more unnecessary confusion. Councilman Thom inquired as to whether the Federal Emergency Regula- tions did not preempt the City from regulation in this area. Mr. Watts replied that he has not analyzed the particular issue as to ~hether the F.E.O. has promulgated regulations whichwould occupy the area under discussion, i.e.', the posting of gasoline prices. However, he advised that there is a State law~htch authorizes the regulation of signs insofar as misleading advertising is concerned so that the ability of the City Council to enact such ordinance is established. Mr. Watts submitted a display of photographs indicating a variety of methods which are currently used and have been used in the past to display gasoline prices, noting that this would compound the difficulty of drafting the ordinance requested by the City Council. (Said display of photographs was reviewed by the City Council.) Councilman Pebley expressed the opinion that since the Counties of Los Angeles and Orange have entered the field of gasoline regulation with the odd/even purchasing plan, that it is most likely that either the County or State government will also pass legislation to require the posting of gasoline prices. 7~'-:240 City Hall. t~ah. eima California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Hatch 12, 1974j 1~:30 P.M~ Councilman Sneegas observed Chat for the past three to four years the trend which the City of Anaheim has followed has been to attempt to secure a reduction of the number of signs at service stations. He remarked that he felt in order to avoid confusion and resentment it is necessary to allow the gasoline service stations their input into such regulations since they know best what they are capable of meeting. Councilman Stephenson remarked that in the past every service station in the City displayed at least one sign indicating the prices for which they were selling the various grades of gasoline and that it is only since the gaso- line shortage that these signs have not been evident. He remarked that he felt the public deserves better treatment and certainly should be able to learn the cost of the gasoline at a service station before arriving at the pump. He indicated Chat he felt the directive given to the City Attorney was silly and chat there is no need to require that the sign be removed, just that the prices be posted. Councilman Sneegas related his views on the Federal Governmentts role in the current gasoline shortage situation and that he felt less govermnental intervention in this area of the economy would improve the situetion. Councilman Sneegas moved that the decision on any requirement regard- ing posting of gasoline prices be deferred until after the meeting between the service station operators and Chamber of Commerce. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. ~OTION CARRIED. Mr. Rom Thompson advised that the Development Services Department has also been invited to participate in this meeting and that they will be happy to report back on the outcome. RESO!J~TION ~. 74R-109 - BECIt~L PO~R CORPORATION - SECOND ~~NT ~ (IN~ OF ~35~658.00)~ Hr. George E~ards, Electrical Superintendent, reported that the engineering ~rk at ~he Mwis 230 KV - 69 ~ Subs~ation for ~ich ~he Bechtel Po~r Corporation has been contracted as c~sul~an~s, has proven to be more c~plex ~han orisi~lly envisioned and he outlined s~e o~che reasons, i.e., the division of ~he c~s~ruccion into C~ phases ~ich necessitated their de- tailed ins~ction of ~he cyins-in o~ the relayins se~en~s; ~he ~ac~ ~hac when ~he ori~i~l contract and a~ee~nt ~re dra~ up, the power Cransfo~er had been eliminated. As plannins proceeded,it became evident ~hac Bechtel did have ~o bec~ involved wi~h ~he ~rans~o~er and they did per~o~ ~his ~rk, the ~ds for s~e beins e~ended ~ich ~re allocated co other portions of the job. Further, delive~ of ~cerials has been delayed because of strikes and ~he National scene in seneral which will cause bo~h ~he 230 ~ equi~enc and p~r Cransffo~er co be delivered in October. Consequently the total scope of the work is much more complex than originally anticipated and for specific reasons stated in the letter of January 23, 1974, Bechtel Power Corporation has requested that the additional scope of the work be authorized and that the contract agreement be amended to include an additional $35,658.00, in payment, for the additional engineering services required. Councilman Pebley left the Council.Chambers. (2:40 P.M.) Councilman Thom inquired as to where these additional funds would come Mr. Edwards advised that it appears with this additional $35,658.00, the project still remains within the previously budgeted funds for 1973-74. RE~LUTION NO. 74R-109: On report and recommendation of the Electrical Superin- tendent, Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 74R-109 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A I~SOLUTION OF TI~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAI~IMAPPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETI~EN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AN1) BECHTEL PONER CORPORATION, AND AUTHORIZING TI~ MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. (Increase of $35,658.00) City F~ll, Anaheim, California = COUNCIL MINUTES - March 12, 1974s 1:30 P,M, Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCIII~N: Stephenson, Sneegas, Thom and Dutton COUNCII~N: None COUNCIII~EN: Pebley COU~CIIItEN: · None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-109 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO,., 74R-110 - SUP,PORTING T~ cOUNTY OF ORANGE PRIORI,~ PIA~ OF,E~.~- TURE .FOR ANAHEIH - ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO TH]/ STATE BSACH,-~AI~, RECREATIOI/A~ .AND HISIDRICAL FACILITIES BOND ACT OF 1974: Hr. Davis reported that the State BeaCh, Park, Recreational and Historical Facilities Bond Act will be on the June, 1974 Ballot, and that a section of this legislation required that e ach county shall con- sult with all cities and districts within the county for the purposes of pre- paring a master plan for providing park and recreational services, portions of which will be funded by the bond act if it is successful. The master plan is to be prepared by June 30, 1975 and the County of Orange has requested, so that the citizens will be aware of the parks that would be affected by their vote on the bond act, that each one of the cities submits priority list for develop- ment of parks, together with a resolution from the City Council in support of the County's Master Plan. Mr. Davis advised that the priority plan of expenditures for the City of Anaheim includes the Juarez, Rio Vista, Poincianna and Canyon Site No. 1 parks, in that order. The estimated bond fund distribution for the City of Anahetm vould be $50~,356. Councilman Pebley returned to Council Chambers. (2:45 P.~.) RESOLUTION NO, 74Ril10: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 7~R-110 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPPORTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE PRIORITY PlAN OF EXPENDITURE FOR ANAHEIM ESTABLISHED I:'URSUANT TO TX STATE BEACH, PARK, RECREATIONAL AND HISTORICAL BOND ACT OF 1974. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIl.MEN: NOES: COUNCII/~N: ABSENT: COUNCII/~EN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-110 duly passed and adopted. PO R CC tISSZON O Za - SUSI' NDIN¢ PROPOSED CmSGES, PROPOSED FIlL CLAUSE {ISSU~D~C~ 1. 1974): Utilities DireCtor Cordon Hoyt sub- mitred a copy of the F.P.C. order issued March 1, 1974, (Docket No, E-8570) for the City Council's information. He reported that the action taken by the F.P.C. on the 71.6% wholesale electric rate increase filed by Southern Calif- ornia Edison vas to suspend the base increase for five months to August 197~. The Co~mission also rejected the proposed fuel clause without preludice, since it did not meet with F.P.C. regulations. Mr. Hoyt noted that he has learned from Southern california Edison that they do intend t° file within the next ~vo weeks, a fuel clause which vi11 conform to F.P.C. regulations. ever, at this time, they do not know vhat the new fuel clause viii look like or how it vi11 york. The amount of this fuel clause adJus~nent and how often it will chan~e are also unknown factors at this time. Mr. Hoyt noted that Anaheim's retail electrical rates are essentially the same as Edison's in surrounding conmunities at the current time and they cannot be increased without exceeding the Edison retail rates. He advised that the rates originally requested by Southern California Edison would have creased the City of Anaheim's average monthly cost to a point where, even with the increases in retail rates recommended, the City vould suffer a net loss of $2,400,000 per year. City Hall. Agaheim~ California = COUNCIL NINUTES = Narch 12, 1974, 1.130 P,N, Hr. Hoyt further related that the Edison Company can ask the F.P.C. to waive the 30-day rule when it files the revised fuel clause. In the event this rule is waived, the clause adjustment can go into effect very quickly. On the otherhand, the F.P.C. may enforce the 30-day rule and may suspend the rule clause for up to five months. In view of all the uncertainties abounding in the situation, Mr. Hoyt advised that it is his recommendation that the Council take a "wait and see" attitude and make no change in the retail rates at this time. When Edison does file the clause, following evaluation of same, further recommendations viii be presented to the City Council. In answer to Councilman Pebley, Mr. Hoyt advised that there is cur- rently over & million dollars per month in excess of the electrical power cost being collected because of the February 19, 1974 retail rate increases. However, he pointedout that this balance will be reduced as the new rates become effec- tive. Councilman Pebley remarked that he would not favor the City of Anaheim 're~ail rates being higher than Edison rates. Mr. Hoyt assured Councilman Pebley that the City of Anaheim retail rates could be held even with Edison rates throughout this difficult adjustment period. He pointed out again that Anaheim is the largest single Southern Calif- ornia Edison customer and that Edison is charging their industrial customers 10~ less than the rates given to the City of Anaheim. He expresse4 confidence that one of the current litigations will prove successful. As reconsnended by the Utilities Director, no further action was taken by the City Council at this time. RESOLUTION NO. 74R-111 - ANAHEIM HILLS NO. 9 ANNEXATION (5.5 ACRES UNINI{ABIT~D): Pursuant to authority granted by the Local Agency Formation Co~aission, Resolu- tion No. 74-20, Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 74R-111 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANA~IM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED ANAHEIM HILLS NO. 9 ANNEXATION. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIII~N: Stephenson, Sneeg&s, Pebley, Thom and Dutton COUNCIII~EN: None COUNCII~4EN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-111 duly passed and adopted. ~ESO.~N N9., 74R-112 - ~T~ .NC HIPELI~. L!¢~.!E - Tt~ ATCHISON, IDPE~A .AND .gANT~ ~' (WA~R' PII~LII~ AT !AKL~. ~ .AND ORA~TRORi~?: Councilman 'StePh'~naon offered Resolution No. 74R-112 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A I~ESOLUTION OF TI{E CITY COUNCIL OF TI~ CITY OF ANAI~IM AUTI~RIZING ~ ~YOR A~ CI~ C~RK ~ E~ A PI~LI~ LI~NSE ~ A~RIZl~ PAY- ~ ~~R. (Water Line at ~kevi~ and Oransethorpe; c~sati~, $150.00) Roll Call Vote: AYES: ~0ES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thomand Dutton COUNCIII~EN: None COUNCIII~EN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-112 duly passed and adopted. 74- 243 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MIFOTES - ~rch 12, 19.74, 1:30 P,M, ADJO~P. NMENT: Councilman Thom moved to adjourn. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 2:55 P.M. Signed City Ha, ll, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 19, 1974, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCIIREN: None PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts CITY CLERK: Aloha M. Fattens STADIUM-CONVENTION CENTER DIRECTOR: Thomas F. Liegler CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Don McDaniel Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Ralph G.' Sneegas led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATION: The following proclamation was issued by Mayor Dutton and unani- mously approved by the City Council: "Vietnam Veterans Day" - March 29, 1974 MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held February 19, 1974, were approved on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councihnan for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANI- MOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $992,198.22, in accordance with the 1973-74 Budget, were approved. CONTIN~D PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 73-74-20, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 99: Submitted by Joan Berry, et al, for change in zone from R-A to C-1 at the southwest corner of Crescent Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. The City Planning Cc~tssion,.pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-37, found no changes necessary in its action taken September 17, 1973 regarding E.I.R. No. 99. Action taken by the Planning Commission on that date is set forth in Resolution No. PC7~-213, finding that E.I.R. No. 99 is adequate as an informative document and follows the City's established guidelines, that there would be no significant adverse enviror~ental impact and'recommended that the City Council adopt E.I.R. No. 99,except that under "Environmental Impact-Whole Concept", Paragraph No. B, Subparagraph Nos. 8 and 9 should be