1974/04/3074-434
City _.~all. Anaheim..California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Aoril 30. ~74. 1:90 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom.
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins
CITY CT~RK: Aloha M. Fattens
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPI~r~ SERVICES: Ronald Thompson
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts
PERSOKNE~ DIRECTOR: Garry O. Mcltae
I~VOCATION: Reverend Paul Keller of the First Fresbyterian Church
gave the invocation.
_~~: Councilman Ralph G. Sneegas led the Assembly in the
Pledge of Allegiance.
I~OCLAN~TIONS: The following Proclamations were issued by Mayor Thom
and unanimously adopted by the City Council:
"Better Hearing Month" - Hay, 1974.
"Respect for Law Week" - Hay 1-7, 1974.
"National Public Works Week" - Hay 19-25, 1974.
~l~rflol~ OF GON~RATULATI0~$: On behalf of the citizens of Anaheim, the City
Council unanimously adopted a Resolution of Congratulations to the
City of La Habra on the occasion of their being selected by the
National Municipal League as one of the ten cities in the United
States to be designated as an "All-America City" for 1974; said
Resolution to be presented to the La Habra City Council Hay 7, 1974.
Ftla~IITATIO~- I~SS A~IM 1974: Mrs. Fran Hauck, Pageant Chairma~ introduced
Donna Lynn Adrain, Miss Anaheim 1974, personally to each Council
Member and to the audience.
The Mayor presented Miss Adrain ~rlth a dozen red roses
and an engraved replica of Anaheim Stadium and'on behalf of the
City Council, extended to her best wishes for a successful reigning
year.
~CTION- YOUTH IN GOVERN~KT DAY: Ken Clements, lh~blic Information
Officer, introduced students who will be participating in Youth in
Covernment Day, Thursday, May 9, 1974, and Meyor Thom welcomed them
to the meeting.
~': Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meetings held March 19 and
.~, 19'74~ were approved on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman
~ee~ae, To this motion, Council Members Kaywood and Seymour abstained.
WAi~O~.~EADIA~- 0RDINANCE~ AND RE~OLDTI01/~: CouncilmanThem moved to waive the
reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions~ and that consent to th·
waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council. Members unless, after reading
of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of
such ordinance or Resolution. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion.
I~I01IUNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
REP~.T~ 1fINANCIAL DE,Ah'DS AC~AINST THE Crib: Demands against the City in the amount
'of $329,599.79, in accordance with the 1973-74 Budget, were approved.
lrOBT-~C ~T~C._. - Va~_TANCE NO. 2580 AND ENVTR_O~MR~AL IMPA_rrE ~R_I~___T NO. 118: Applica-
tion by Raymond Spehar to establish a carwash and service station on C-I(SC)
zOned property located at tbs northeast corner of La Palms Avenue and Imperial
Highway, with the following Code waivers, was submitted:
74-435
City Hall, Ana~e~.~, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Avril 30. 1974..1:~0 P..M,
a. Permitted signing in the SC Zone.
b. Permitted uses in the C-1 Zone.
c. Permitted uses in the C-1 Zone.
d. Minimum structural setback adjacent to residential zone.
e. Minimum landscaped setback adjacent to residential zone.
f. Permitted uses in the SC Zone.
g. Minimum structural setback adjacent to arterial highway.
h. Minimum landscaped setback adjacent to arterial highway.
i. Minimum screen landscaping adjacent to residential zone.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-65,
reco~nded that the City Council certify to having reviewed and considered.
the information contained in EoI.R. No. 118 and that the final E.I.R. has
been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act
and the State Guidelines; and further, denied Variance No. 2580.
Appeal of the action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed
by the applicant and public hearing set this date.
Mr. C. J. Queyrel, representing Raymond Spehar, Applicant, requested
withdrawal of the variance application and E.I.R. No. 118, advising that through
redesign many of the Code waivers requested could be eliminated.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Sneegas,
withdrawal of Variance No. 2580 and E.I.R. No. 118 was authorized. MOTION
CARRIED.
PUBLIC ~.,?r~_. ~ PROPOSED ASSESSl~!~ F(l~t S_~ ~H~R0VEI~NTS COHPI~ED BY C~TY AT
1152 l~tT~~ I~JLEVARD.(A.P. NO, 7~-~0-14): Public hearing to determine the
as.sess~ent to be levied against the property owned by Mr. Paul F. Schlue at
1152 North Kraemer Boulevard (A.P. No. 74-20-14) for construction of required
street improvements by City was held. Submitted was a report dated April 17,
1974, by the Director of Public Works recommending that an assessment of
$2,870.72 be levied against subject property.
Mr. Paul F. Schlue, owner of the property located at 1152 North
Kraemer Boulevard briefed the history of the situation (Council Minutes of
August 14, 1973) and advised he was under the mistaken beliefthat since the
City acquired the property, they were responsible for any street improvements.
He stated he now knows that a property owner is responsible for any improvement
along his property.
Mr. Schlue referred to the report of the Public Works Director wherein
it states the City could legally charge him for right of way acquisition and
engineering costs which totals $2,963.56 in addition to the $2,870.72 for the
construction work. He emphasized that he strongly concurs with the Public
Works Director when he stated it may be considered inappropriate to pay a
property owner for the necessary right ofway and then make him pay for it
as a portion of the improvements.
Mr. Schlue expressed the opinion he felt the engineering costs were
exhorbita~t and pointed out the discrepancy relating to the driveway approach
in the Director's report and the actual engineering plan. He then distributed
copies of the plan to the Council. In conclusion, Mr. Schlue stated that since
he was paid what he considers a nominal amount because of condennlation proceed-
ings, he questions the City's right to assess him for the improvements.
Councilman Pebley pointed out that he (Mr. Schlue) had the choice of
dedicating the land and having the City install the improvements or being paid
for the land, having the improvements installed and bearing the costs therein
himself. Councilman Pebley referred to the public hearing held August 14, 1973,
and stated in his opinion, the present situation Mr. Schlue now finds himself
in was the unfortunate result of a poor business Judgment.
Mr. Schlue agreed he felt he misjudged the situation at the time.
Mayor Thom stated he felt the assessment of $2,870.72 was appropriate
to levy against the property, however to levy the additional $2,963.56 for land
acquisition and engineering expenses would be inappropriate, with'which the other
Council members concurred.
74-436
itt ~
City Hall. Anaheim. California- COUNCIL ~_NUTES- A~ril 30. 197&. 1:30 P.M,
Councilman Seymour stated that if the Council waived the proposed
assessment against Hr. Schlue's property and absorbed the cost therefor,
Anaheim taxpayers would, in essence, be paying for his im~rovements which
would be inequitable.
Hr. Schlue again referred to the square footage discrepancy on the
driveway approach and City Engineer Sames Haddox explained that the plan
distributed today was only a preliminary estimate plan, noting it had not
been signed by the Director of Public Works.
Councilman Pebley requested that the square footage actually
installed be measured and Hr. Schlue be billed accordingly to which the City
Engineer stated he would do.
Hr. Schlue voiced the opinion he felt the price paid to him in 1971
for a portion of his property was an unfair price for commercial property.
Councilman Pebley stated that Hr. Schlue must realize thatthe
price paid to him by the City was not I.R.S. or State taxable; that it was
tax-free income.
Councilman Seymour interjected that thevalue of property is
partially determined by what can be done with the property; that if a
developer came in with a proposal for that property,.he would be required
to make proper dedication and install full street improve~ents also.
RESOII1TION NO. 74R-1~: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 74R-199
for adoption, levying a maximum assessment of $2,870.72, subject to adjustment
if on-site inspection by the City Engineer's Office determines that lesser
square footage than that reflected in said Public Works Director's Report
was installed, against property located at 1152'North Kraemer Boulevard.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THAT
CERTAIN PROPERTY SH(KILD BE LEVIED FOR STREET IMI~OVEI~NTS AND THE~
OF THE ASSESSMENT THEREF(H.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL ~HBERS:
COUNCIL I~NB~RS:
COUNCIL HEHBERS:
Kay.sod, S~ymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom.
None
None
The Nayor declared Resolution NO. 74R-199 duly passed and adopted.
AM~'SE~ DEVICES _P~__MIT~: The f~lowing applications were submitted and granted,
subject to provisions of Chapters 3.24 and 4.20 of the AnaheimNunicipal Code,
as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded
by Councilman Pebley:
(a) Submitted by Robert Burton Lewis to allow one television ping
pong game and five pinball and arcade games at Grant City, 2140 East Lincoln
Avenue.
(b) Submitted by Stewart Alston Hiller to allow one Juke box and
two pinball machines at Pasta Time, 1710 West Lincoln Avenue.
MOTION CARRIED.
YELL~.~CONPANY- ADDITIONAT. P~UMITS F(~_nDITIr~i~ e~u~: Reques= of Edward A.
Slagle, ~esident, Yellow Cab ~any, dated ~rch 22, 1974, ~s su~it~ed
for five new pe~i~s for five additional ~icabs.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Seymour,
the request was approved. NOTION CARRIED.
REOUEST - A/iAHEIH.HILLS - TRACTS NOS. 8215 A_.UD 8219: Request of J. M. Sickler,
President, Anaheim Hills Inc., for acceptance of landscaping (experimental
planting materials) on the southerly graded slopes of Tract Nos. 8215 and
8219, (combined into one and recorded as Tract No. 8215),. adjacent to the
74-437
City Hall. Anaheim, California- COUNCIL M~qUTES- April 30, 1974, 1;30
Anaheim Hills Golf Course, was submitted together with report by the City
Engineer and recommendation by the Development Services Department that the
slopes nOt be accepted.
Upon the advice of legal counsel, Councilman Seymour advised he
would abstain from discussion and vote since he is the sales agent of record
for Tracts 8215 and 8219 (Westfteld Development).
Councilman Sneegas advised he too would abstain from discussion and
vote because he is purchasing a home in Tract 8215.
Mr. John Millick, representing Anaheim Hills, Inc., explained that
he feels there has been some misunderstanding in the technical acceptance of
the slopes in question. He advised it is their intent to keep in effect that
portion of the bond representing the "experimental" planting which they are
conducting with the Park and Recreation Department and Golf COurse Division
to find a method of landscaping specific slopes adjacent to native or undis-
turbed slopes whereby the man-made slopes and the native slopes would appear
compatible. Mr. Millick explained the request is for acceptance of slopes for
the on-site, on-tract landscaping (internal portion of tract that does not
face on golf course), which meets Code requirements. He further explained the
temporary irrigation system would also remain to maintain the "experimental"
slopes.
Zoning Supervisor Roberts explained Staff's recommendation that the
landscaped slopes not be accepted and that the bond not be released at this
time, noting that the slopes in question were experimental in nature and it
was uncertain whether the slopes would survive with natural rainfall only.
Hence, it.was also unknown whether the developer would be required to install
a permanent irrigation system. He advised that if a p~rmanent system is
necessary, it is unknown whether the water meters supplying the other slopes
would be adequate to supply the "experimental" slopes also.
Mr. Roberts stated he personally felt there would be no problem in
releasing the slopes at this time provided that if a permanent irrigation
system is necessary, that Anaheim Hills Stipulate to correcting the water
meter sizing if necessary; however he did feel the bond in effect should be
retained.
In response to Mayor Thom's question, Assistant CityAttorney William
Hopkins advised he concurred with Mr. Roberts.
Mr. John Millick stated Anaheim Hills so stipulates.
On motion by Councilwoman ~aywood, seconded by Councilman Thom,
Development Services Staff was directed to issue permits on slopes within' the
interior of Tract No. 8215 and release said slopes as appropriate, provided
that the developer install the necessary water meter sizing and permanent
irrigation system, if required, on the man-made slopes adjacent to the golf
course, asstipulated to by Anaheim Hills. MOTION CARRIED. (Councilmen Sneegas
and Seymour abstained.)
RECLASSIFICATI~ I~0, 7)-74-22(1): Zoning Supervisor Roberts submitted a request for
an amendment to Condition No. 8 of Resolution No. 73R-477, Reclassification No.
73-74-22(1), proposed R-H-22,000(SC) Zone, and distributed an area map to each
Council Member. He noted that subject property constitutes 25% of the Mohler
Drive Annexation No. 2 and that the owners desire to subdivide subject property
by parcel map into four lots and then comply with the site development standards
of the R-~-22,000 Zone.
Mr. Roberts advised that the owners of subject property have indicated
they are selling two of the lots and will build on the other two themselves. He
pointed out that Condition No. 8 of Resolution No. 73R-477 states that prior to
approval of a final tract map or in this case a parcel map, floor plans and
elevations for the proposed houses shall be submitted to and approved by the
City Council. In view of the fact that this parcel map involves only four
lots, Staff recommends that Condition No. 8 be amended to read that floor
plans and elevations for the proposed houses shall be submitted to and ap-
proved by the City Council prior to issuance of a building permit.
74-438
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Avril 30. [.974, 1;30 P.M.
RESOI/~IC~ NO. 74R-200: Councilman Seymour offered Resolutim~ No. 74R-200
for adoption, amending Condition No. 8 of Resolution No. 73R-477.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEINAi~ND~RESOL~ION
NO. 73R-477 RELATING TO RECLASSIFICATION NO. 73- 74-22.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom.
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
COUNCIL MEMBERS: ..None
The ~ayor declared Resolution No. 74R-200 duly pasaed and adopted.
OLDL)LAiICE NO. 3291: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3291 for first
reading.
RESOLU~IONNO. 74R-201 - WORK ORDERNO. 100-322-397(1973 w~xO A~&T~T COIr~___i~_):
Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman
Thom offered Resolution No. 74R-201 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI~ FINAI~Y ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURI~SHING OF ALL LABia, SERVICES AND EQUIPI~NT
NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE CUTTING AND REMOVAL OF ALL RANK GROWTH AND WEEDS,
AND REMOVAL OF RUBBISH, REFUSE AND DIRT UPON ANY PARCEL GR PARCELS OF REAL
PHOPERTY iH ANY PUBLIC STREET IN THE CITY OF AHAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 322-297.
Roll Call Vote:
A~ES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUHCIL t~NBERS:
C(IINCIL HEldBERS:
COU-HCIL NEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom.
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-201 duly passed and adopted.
RESOI/~IONNO. 74R-202 - DEEDS OF EASFA~/~: Councilm~n Pebley offered Resolution
No. 74R-202 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIHACCEPTINO CERTAIN
DEEDS AND (HDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Henry Fuererberg, et al; Robert H.
Grant Corporation; La Cresta - Nichols Joint Venture, et al; Sherwood Village -
Anaheim Homeowners Association; Whittle, Pralle and Case;. Pete Hiltscher, et al)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom.
COUNCIL MEMBERS:. None
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-202 duly passed and adopted.
EqUeSTrIAN CENTER: City Manaser reported that Anaheim Hills, Inc., is interested
in the possibility of a lease of City-owned vacant property located adjacent
to the Anaheim Hills Golf Course. Said property being a portion of the
potential site for the development of the third 9-hole segment for the course.
The original purchase price of the land was $10,000 per acre, however, taking
into consideration the fact that Anaheim Hills paid $350,000 for improvements,
the per acre price comes to somewhat less. Using the $10,000 figure however,
and assuming that the increased value of the property amounts to $12,000 per
acre, the proposal is to lease the five acres for a five-year period for the
purpose of establishing a temporary equestrian center, with payments to be
74-439
City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCILMINUTES - April 30. 1974. 1:30 P.M.
ten percent of the present land value ($12,000 per acre). This would amount
to $6,000 per year, or $30,000 for the full term of the lease.
Councilman Thom inquired, since the proposed use of the property
would be a commercial venture, whether a lease at ten percent of the gross
receipts on the property was considered.
Mr. Murdoch replied that a percentage of a gross figure is an accepted
approach for this type of an agreement and added it would probably be preferable
to establish a minimum figure as well.
Mr. John Millick, representing Anaheim Hills, Inc., suranarized the
negotiations conducted between Anaheim Hills and the City Staff in connection
with the proposed lease. As a result of these negotiations, Anaheim Hills
agreed to the increased value of the land at $12,000 per acre and to an in-
crease in the percentage from seven to ten percent. He indicated that the
proposed temporary equestrian center, because of its size and configuration
and the high cost of capital improvements necessary, would not be expected to
return a profit. He indicated that Anaheim Rills would prefer a straight land
lease at ten percent, which he remarked is four percent more than other proper-
ties leased within the City.
In response to Councilwoman Kaywo0d's question regarding the ultimate
disposition of the equestrian center after the first five years and a secondary
five-year option, Mr. Millick assured her that Anaheim Hills does intend to
continue to provide an equestrian center but at another location, in the former
agricultural preserve which would be closer to the planned equestrian estates
and immediately accessible to the proposed riding and hiking trail system,
without having the necessity for horses to cross any roadways. He noted that
no definitive.site planning for grading has been completed for the agricultural
preserve and there's also a year's lead time to supply utilities to that area.
It was further considered that in order to provide an immediate equestrian
amenity, and in view of the fact the golf course would most likely not be
expandtn~ within the next five years, the proposal would be an excellent interim
use for the property, which would also bring some income to the City from land
which would otherwise be sittingvacant.
Councilman Seymour asked how large the ultimate equestrian facility
is planned to be and whether or not the location has changed.
Mr. Millick replied that they propose a 15-acre equestrian site and
that the location is to be in the former agricultural preserve, and also that
no chan~es are projected in the location at this time, but a relocation decision
may be made on a future date when the results of the site planning and grading
are known.
Councilman Seymour recalled that in 1971 Anaheim Hills had planned a
15-acre equestrian center which was supposed to be under construction within
nine months to a year, and now this proposal calls for a facilitywhich is
one-third the original size to fulfill a temporary need for five years. He
inquired as to whether there has been any change in thinking or direction on
this project.
Mr. Millick replied that the only drawback on construction of the
permanent facility at this time is a lack of utilities to the area and referred
to the necessary agreement between the Cities of Orange and Anaheim to provide
a reservoir to deliver potable water into the agricultural presarve area. He
noted that ~htle the property was still covered by the Agricultt~ral Preserve
Agreement, there was some question as to whether or not the equestrian center
would be a permitted use and lacking any firm decision on this, Anaheim Hills
was reluctant to proceed with the project.
Councilwoman Kaywood asked whether the City is under any contract to
provide the additional 9 holes at the Anaheim Hills Golf Course.
Mr. Murdoch replied that while the third 9 holes are discussed in
the terms of the lease, there is no requirement that these be developed. In
further answer to Council questions he advised that in addition to the five
acres under discussion, the City owns approximately 30 additional acres in
this immediate area.
74-440
City Ball. ~heim. California- COt~IL ~fr~E$- A~ril 30. 197~. 1:30 P.M.
Councilman Seymour stated that although the proposal sounds philo-
sophically reasonable and the percentage quoted of the l~nd values fair, prior
to making any decision, he vould like to have a professtona~ ap~raisal as to
the value of the property in question. In addition, he requested }ir. Millick
to consider ~hether there is any possibility tha~in fac~the permanent eques-
trian center could be located at this site under a ~round lease with the City.
Nz. Hillick replied that Anaheim Hills wouldnoC object to the re-
quested proposal. In regard, to locating the permanent facility on this site,
he stated that they have not yet co~leted any expansion site studies as to
the feasibility of this, but it is something they vouldinvestigate.
In an~er to Council questions, Hr. Mardoch ~vtsed that the pro-
posed third 9 holes ~ould be the shortest set of 9 holes at the Anaheim Hills
Golf Course, but that the 5 acres under consideration~ould be necessary to
complete this expansion. In addition, he stated that 'although the need for
development of the third 9-hole ~esment of the golf course ~ould not interfere
with the first 5-year term of the lease, he felt tht.s~dtttonsl se~aent may
be varranted vithin the 10-year period.. He explained the logic of establishing
the additional holes and that most ~olf courses experience considerably more
play when they provide 27 or 36 holes vith various co~binations.
Councilman Pebley remarked that if there is any possibility of estab-
lishin$ any permanent equestrian facility on this site, he vould prefer to sell
the property to Anaheim Hills rather than enter a lease a~reement.
Further discussion ensued relative to the cost of ~he land without
i~provements, during which Hr. Nillick described the status of in~provements
to the area and advised that Anaheim Hills, Inc., is willing to put in the
capital improvements on this property although' the recovery factor is only
al~proximately 75% on same upon relocation of the center.
At the conclusion of discussion, Hr. Hillick advised that it vould
make good economic sense to pursue permanent establislvaent of the equestrian
center on this site if the City is not interested in ex~ndtn~ the golf course
a~d if the site proves feasible for this purpose, home,er he coatended that
there still might be circulation reasons which ~ould make another location
superior.
By general Council consent, further actto~ sa l~ase of subject 5
acres adjacent to Anaheim Hills Golf Course vas withheld, pending receipt of
professional appraisal of the land value.
REsmr~IommNO. 7~R-203 - __~mm~q~h-r_~lt Cl~YOF ~erem_r,~O~-,:,~man~.~,~ ~JIP~NT
~lR(}&lilllom~m~g C{illfI~COtTECILOIqCR_IHT~A~.JUSTIC[ ~w: The City llsn~ger reported
on the recon~ended budget adJust~nent to permit purchase of 15 portable radios
(walkie-talkies) at a savings of 75% of their actual cost by entering an agree-
ment with the City of Garden Grove to purchase this additional UHR co~nica-
tion equipment through Orange County Council on Criminal 3ustice Grant Funds.
The agreement requires a 25% matchin~ amount ($3,998.18), which sum is avail-
able for transfer within the Police Department 'Budget.
e~rn=~lON NO. 7~R- 203: On report and reco~nendation by the City Nanager,
Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 74R-203 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A ~S{~I~ION OF THE CITY C0UI~IL Off TI~ CITY Off AI~I~IM, i~Flt(Nl]~ ~
~ ~ TH~ CITY OF ~IN AND T~E CI~ OF ~ ~ ~
EXECI~E SAID ~~T.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL H~NBERS: Eayvood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom.
NOES: COqINCILNENBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL~ERS: None
The Hayor declared Resolution No. 74R-203 duly passed and adopted.
74-441
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL M!___NUTES - April 30. 1974. 1:30 P.M.
AUTHORIZATI~- MANAG_R_MEN% SEM!_.NA!3_S F~RPOLICE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEl,: The City
Manager presented request for authorization to send Supervisory Police Personnel
(total number of 46 officers) to attend Management-Cost Related Seminars over a
three-month Period at a total cost of $6,440. Additionally he reported that the
program is fully reimbursable through P.O.S.T. (Police Officers Standards and
Training).
Mr. Murdoch stated he would prefer to personally review the number of
personnel who are to attend, but otherwise recommended approval.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood,
the City Council authorized attendance at Police Management-Cost Seminars over
a three-month period for the sum of $6,440, total number of officers to attend
subject to review by the City Manager. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF EOUII~NT - FOUR-DOOR SEDAN: The City Manager reported on the recommended
purchase'of one additional four-door sedan for the Building Division, said pur-
chase to be added to those items purchased from Santa Ana Dodge who submitted
the iow bid of $3,271.73. Further, he reported that since this item was not
budgeted, it will be necessary to transfer this sum from the Council Contingency
Fund.
In answer to Councilman Seymour, Mr. Murdoch reported that the
vehicle would be used by the new Building Inspector who was.added to the Building
Division'personnel in order to improve their level of service, who up to this
time, has been using a'car pool vehicle. Since he uses this almost exclusively,
it removes one vehicle from the car pool circulation and this has proven ineffi-
cient.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the
purchase of one additional four-door sedan from Santa Ana Dodge in the amount of
$3,271.73, including tax, and transfer of this sum from Council Contingency Fund
was authorized. MOTIONCARRIED.
PURCHASE OF SUPPLIES - ENVELOPES: The City Manager reported on informal bids re-
ceived for the purchase of envelopes as follOws and recommended acceptance of
the iow bid:
Vendor
Coast Envelope Co., Los Angeles .........
F~ilwell Envelope Co., San Gabriel .......
Business Envelope Co ...............
National Envelope Co ...............
Federal Envelope Co ...............
$7,443.22
7,466.93
no bid
no bid
no bid
On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the
iow bid of Coast Envelope Company was accepted and purchase was authorized in
the amount of $7,443.22, including tax. MOTION CARRIED.
DIESEL REPO%~RING -1960 MODEL CAB F~RWARD $Rarm_&VE F_T~.F PUMP~.-R: The City Manager
reported that another Seagrave Fire Pumper, Engine No. 6602, is in need of major
and costly engine repair or repower, and it is again recommended by the Fire
Chief, as well as the Mechanical Maintenance Superintendent, that this engine
be repowered with diesel at an approximate cost of $10,000 to $12,000.
In answer to Council questions, Mr. Mardoch advised that the unit on
inspection was found to have severe cracking in the left cylinder assembly and
past experience suggests the same would probably be true of the right side
element. It is anticipated that with diesel repOvering the unit rill have ten
more years of line service life. The Fire Chief also requests that funds for
such repowering be transferred from Council Contingency Fund.
On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood,
the Council authorized the repowering of the 1960 Seagrave Fire Pumper No.
6602 and the transfer of $10,000 from the Council Contingency Fund for this
purpose. MOTION CARRIED.
74-442
City Hall. Anaheim, Californ£a - COUNCIL MIllES - A~ril 30. 1974. 1:30
PURC~ OF EOUIPMENT - 8 "PROXIMITOR" 104 DIGITAL SENSORS: The City 'Manager
reported on the recomended purchase of eight Proximitor 104 Digital Sensors
for use in the Anaheim Stadium parking lot and advised that Canoga Controls
Corporation has submitted a quotation for said equipment in the amount of
$4,696.65, including tax. lie thereupon recommended the purchase be
authori zed.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, secondedby Councilwoman Kaywood,
the purchase was authorized in the amount of $4,696.65, including tax, as
reco~nended by the City Manager. MOTION CARRIED.
APPROVAL OF HOUSE PLANS - TR~.CT NO, 7419: Developer, American National Housing
Corporation; property located on the north side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, west
side of Walnut Creek Channel, containing 159 RS-5000 zoned lots.
Zoning Supervisor reported that the building plans have been sub-
mitted by the developer and have been checked by Staff and are identical to
those approved for the tract immediately to the west of subject property which
units were built by the same developer. On thisbasis, they would recommend
approval of the building plans. He noted further, that there is some legal
question as to whether or not the final map can be approved this date inasmuch
as the E.I.R. which has been submitted (E.I.R. No. 122) has not yet been
acted upon by Council, although it has been reviewed by the City Planning
Co~mission and scheduled for Council'action on May 14, 1974, in order to meet
the 30-day interim period requirement.
Mr. Gene Kadow, representing Ameri~anNattonal Housing Corporation,
9092 Talbert, Fountain Valley, advised that the E.I.R. was submitted three
weeks ago and it was anticipated by the Developer that it would be considered
along with the final map. He stated that they were not aware of the State
re~ulation requiring the 30-day period and notified Council he would appreciate
it if there was any legal way in which these items could be considered and
approved this date since the firm has monetary arrangements pending the ap-
proval of the final map.
Mayor Thom advised Mr.'Kadow that the Council has no choice in the
matter, that if they were to approve the final map prior to considering and
acting on the E.I.R., this would negate the environmental impact report process
and subject the City to the risk of litigation.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the
house plans submitted for Tract No. 7419 were approved .and action on the ap-
proval of the final map of Tract No. 7419 was continued to May 14, 1974, to
be considered with Environmental Impact Report No. 122. MOTION CARRIED.
FINAL MAP TRACTNO. 778}: Developer Wittenberg Corporation; property located on
the north side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east side of Walnut Canyon Channel,
containing 57 RS-5,000 zoned lots.
Zoning Supervisor Roberts reported that the developer has submitted
house plans which are identical to the plans submitted for the tract immediately
adjacent and approval is recommended. E.I.R. No. 77 was filed in connection
with this tract and has been approved. Further, Mr. Roberts reported that a
small portion of Tract No. 7785 abuts Santa Ana Canyon Road and specific wall
plans have been approved by the Council for the wall on this road in the ad-
jacent tract. This developer has indicated that he intends to continue with
this type of wall for that portion of Tract 7785 . abutting Santa Arm Canyon
Road. It is, therefore, reco,,,ended that wall plans for subject tract be
approved.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the
City Council approved house and wall plans proposed for Tract No. 778~ as
submitted. MOTION CARRIED.
Regarding the final map, the City Engineer recommended approval
and reported that said final map conforms substantially with the tentative
map previously approved, that bonds have been forwarded to the City Attorney
for approval and required fees paid.
74-443
City Hall. Anaheim. C~l~fornia- COUNCIL MINUTES- April 30, 1974, 1:30
On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Tho~moved that Final
Map of Tract No. 7785 be approved subject to approval of required bonds by
the City Attorney. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. MOTIO~ CA~RIED.
CLAIM AGAINST Tt~ CITY: Claim filed by Emanuel Omc las for personal property
damages sustained to his vehicle purportedly as a result of being hit by a City
vehicle in a driveway at 425 East Adele Street on or about April 11, 1974, was
denied as recommended by the City Attorney and ordered referred to the insurance
carrier on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION
CARRIED.
COP. RESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on
motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood:
a. City of Fullerton - Resolution No. 5697 - endorsing the services
of the Assessment Treatment Services Center and encouraging the County of
Orange to provide the necessary funding.
b. Westminster Chamber of Commerce - Resolution - endorsing Propo-
sition W.
c. Westminster Chamber of Commerce - Resolution - urging support of
Senate Bill 2961 regarding wage-price controls.
d. Correspondence from John V. Lynch, RepubliCan Candidate, 70th
Assembly District - regarding the proposed Chino Hills Airport Facility.
e. Intergovernmental Coordinating Council of Orange County - Agenda -
April 24, 1974.
Intergovernmental Coordinating Council of Orange County - Minutes -
March 27, 1974.
Intergovernmental Coordinating Council of Orange County - Special
Executive Co~ittee Meeting - March 27, 1974.
f. Orange County Transit District - CorresPondence regarding the
District's activities.
g. Co~__!nity Redevelopment Comaission - Minutes - April 10, 1974.
h, Anaheim Public Library Board - Minutes - March 18, 1974.
i. Financial and Operating Reports for the Mmnth of March, 197%for
the Electrical Division.
ORDINANCE NO. 3288: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3288 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 1, CHAPTE~ :1.04, SECTIONS
1.04.540 AND 1.04.550 OF THE ANAHEIM I~JNICIPAL CODE RELATIN~ TO ALLOWANCE FOR
EXPENSES TO I~MBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT CO~fISSION AND PROVIDING FOR
APPROI~IAT IONS THEREFOR.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3288 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3289: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3289 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.62,
SECTIONS 18.62.030, 18.62.050, 18.62.090, 18.62.045 OF THE ANAHEIM
H~NICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Raywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom.
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3289 duly passed and adopted.
74-444
Cttvliall, A~aheim. California- COUNCIL MINUTES- Avril 30. 1974. 1:30 P.,M
OV~l~ NO. 3290; Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3290 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING SECTION 1.04. 345 OF THE
ANAHEIM t~NICIPAL CODE.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL I~NBERS:
COUNCIL NENBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom.
~ne
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3290 passed and adopted.
0RDINANC~ NO. 3292: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3292 for first reading.
AN ~DINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIMAI~NDINGTITLE i8 OF'THE AI~.HEIM
I~/NICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING (64-65-91 - Portion A,C-1; Portion ~R-1)
0RI)~ NO, 3293: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3293 for first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF AHAHEIM .AI~IDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANA~IEIM
I~INICLPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (55-56-46(1) - R-3)
REOUE~T FOR SOLICITATION P~E~MIT - UNIFICA_TION ~: (Continued from meeting of
April 23, 1974, pending further information from the City Attorney's Office.)
Assistant City Attorney William Hopkins reported that the Unification Church
is a bonafide non-profit organization, registered as such with both the
Internal Revenue Service and State Franchise Tax Board. He advised that
they do not intend to sell anything but will give flowers when a donation
is received. He added that they would not be soliciting from house to house
but would restrict this activity to connnercial areas. In further answer to
Council questions, ~tr. Hopkins related that the organization has a Van Nuys
address and headquarters in New .York, but no local (within.lmaheim) Chapter.
During brief Council discussion, Councilman Pebley indicated that
he had received complaints from Anaheim Citizens regardim~ the amount of
solicitationwhtch is conducted in the city and stated, that he felt any such
solicitation drives should be restricted to or~ntzationa which are local
and whichwould use the monies derived for the benefit of citizens in Anaheim.
The Ctty Manager advised that when requests from local organiza-
tions for solicitation permits are received, these are generally handled
administratively; those received from groups located outside of the City are
submitted for City Council consideration.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the
City Council denied the permit requested by the Unification Church, 14154
Van Owe. n, Van Nuys, Californi~ to solicit funds within the City of Anaheim
from Aprtl 4 through May 31, 1974. MOTION CARRIED.
OLrF~T~IRE_.- CITY OF ~A ANA_~I/: IqOPO~).._a~=~-sliNrlI. I/~_NIAOB-_~ENiTY
~r~dum from the City Attorney's Office re~rdini the corre~ence r~
ceived fr~ the Honorable Jerry ~ Patterson, ~yor of ~ta ~, was su~
~tced for Council consideration ~oge~her with copies of the letter, que~
tio~ire and S~ta ~ Resolution No. 74-42. ~ecifically, the questionnaire
seeks the Cou~il's ~ini~ regardi~ the
1. ~eCher Cities should be given local option
laws consistent with the United Sta~es Supre~ Court opinion in ~he case of
Miller vs California.
2. ~ether the "Co~nity Standard" should be changed from State-
wide to local co--nary standards.
Mr. Hopkins reported that the City Attorney's Office recommends
that said questionnaire be answered as follows:
1. A~ainst Cities having local option to enact their own obscenity
laws.
2. For defining "Co~nity Standard' so as to'reflect local conr
munity standards in the area from which the Jury is drawn.
74-445
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 30. 1974. 1:30 P.M.
Mayor Thom interpreted the City Attorney's response (No. 2 above) as
allowing "Co,m,~nity Standards" to be established by the area from which the
jury is drawn, in Anaheim's instance, the North Orange County Judicial District,
which Mr. Hopkins indicated was correct.
Mayor Thom remarked that this conclusion and recor~endation was very
logical and thereupon moved that the City Attorney's Office be directed to.
respond to the questionnaire as outlined and recommended above. Councilman
Seymour seconded the motion.
In response to Councilman Seymour's question regardingwhere the
proposed actionwould leave the City of Anaheim, Mr. Hopkins related that
Santa Ann has directed this letter and questionnaire to all Orange County
Cities in an attempt to solicit from them an expression of their opinions so
as to forward a recommendation on the obscenity law to the State Legislature
for action at that level. In addition, he pointed out that the alternative to
Judicial District Standards would be something on a larger scale, such as a
State-wide Standard.
During brief discussion, COuncilman Pebley very strongly felt that
the local Jurisdiction being the closest and most answerable to the citizenry
should be able to establish obscenity standards, and once such ordinances are
adopted, the courts would administer them in the same manner as parking tickets
and other municipal matters are adjudicated.'
Mayor Thom pointed out that the City Attorney's Office has not recom-
mended this due to the fact a local standard technique would be difficult to
enforce. He voiced the opinion that such laws would be more manageable if
standards were set through Judicial districts.
Councilman Sneegas agreed with Councilman Pebley's co~euts,, noting
that the larger the area for establishment of the obscenity stamdard or
criteria, the further away from the people such control will be.
Councilman Thom withdrew his previous motion instructing the City
Attorney's Office to reply in the manner' in which they had recomended.
Councilman Seymour withdrew the second.
Councilman Seymour moved that the City Attorney's Office be directed
to respond to the questionnaire by notifying the City of Santa Ama that Anaheim
would favor and advocate that the State Legislature pass an enabling law giving
the cities local option to enact their own obscenity laws. Councilman Pebley
seconded the motion. To this motion, Mayor Thom voted "no". I~)TION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 74R-_2Q4- REIMBURSEMENT A~nR~.M~NT FOR COST OF ENVLn_~mm~__~T%L I_M~_ACT
REPORTS IN CONNECTIONWITHANNEXATION PROC,RRnINGS: The City Manager submitted the
form proposed for a reimbursement agreement'which provides a method by which
the City of Anaheim would recover the cost associated with environmental impact
reports which pertain to annexation proceedings before the Local Agency'Forma-
tion Commission. He noted that there may be difficulty in application of this
agre~ue~nt to large areas petitioning for annexation and may consider a different
procedure for these, however, most annexations are single.parcels or there are
only two or three owners involved and this method should be workable.
In answer to Council questions, the City Manager reported that the
necessity for -these E.I.R.'s in connection with an annexation was determined
in a recent court case, and noted that there is no reason that the City. should
absorb the costs of said environmental impact reports.
Councilman Sneegas felt it would be more equitable if the proponents
of environmental impact reports were required to pay a portion of their cost.
RESOLUTION NO. 74R-204: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 74R-204 for
adoption apprOving as to form the reimbursement agreement for costs associated
with environmental impact reports on annexation proceedings.
Refer to Resolution Book.
74-446
City Balla. Auaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April ~0, 197&. l: 3~ P.M.
A I~1(1{ OF TH~ CITY C~IL OF TH~ CITY OF A~IM AP~~ A
l~, AND FORM OF P~IMBURSEENT AGREEMENT COVEK~ ~II~H~I~T
TO ~ CITY OF AN~IM FOR COSTS INCURRED IN TH~ EVALUAT[6N OF ENVIRON'.
~I[TAL II. ACT REI~TS P~LATING TO ANI~XTATION PROC~DII~ BY T~ LOCAL
ACERCY FO~TION CO)~(ISSION.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
COb~. IL I~I~L~/~ S:
COUNCIL EMBERS:
COUNCIL
COUNCIL EMBERS:
· ayvood, Seymour, Pebley and Thom..
None.
None.
Sneega8.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-204 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLtITI(~NO$.. 74R-205 AND 74R-206 - INPI~HINOF 19~4'A~.~TOT~.
FAIR LAB(~ ~DS ACT: Personnel Director Garry MoRse reported on t~o actions
necessary to implement the 1974 Amendments to the Fair Labor 5~andards Act
as follows:
1. It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution
to amend the existing salary Resolution No. 74R-95 for certain Job classes
to adjust the pay rates upward to meet the new Federal Minimum Wage hies
of $2.00, effective May 1, 1974.
Mr-. MoRse explained that since ~he City orAl,helm has o~ly
nov come under the law, it is not necessary to adopt the $2.0Oper hour
minimum wage, $1.90 would be applicable. Hovever, sir~e the $2.00 minimum
~ill apply to employees in Federally funded programs ~hovill be vorking
wi~h employees in City-financed positions, it is recommended that the City
· ~opt a untform minimumwage of $2.00 per hour, effective l%~y I, 1974,
2. It is recommended that the City Council adopt a'resolution
to amend Personnel Rule 6 - Premium Pay- to provide for-overtime paTm~nt
ac the =ate of one and one-half times the resular hourly rate of pay when
temporary, seasonal, or part-time employees perform~rk in excess of 40
hours in a work week, effective Hay 1, 1974.
~.~IiITI(~ NOS. 74R-205 AND 74R=206: Councilman Snee~as Offered Resolution
Ros, 741[-205 and 74R-206 for adoption;
Refer to Resolution Book.
e~OLl~I(~ NO. 74R- 205:
A RE~ILUTIoN OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AI~NDING RESOLUTION
74R-95 ~ND ESTABLISHING NEW RATES OF PAY FOR SEVERAL PART-TIM~ JOB
CLAS$IFICAT IONS.
NO. 74R- 206:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAIiEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 74R-53, PERSONNEL RULE 6, PREMIUM PAY, SECTION 6.0, RELATING TO EXTENDING
OVERTII~ COMPENSATION PROVISIONS TO TEMPORARY, SEASONAL, AND PART-TII~
EMPLOYEES.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CO01CIL ~MB~RS:
COUNCIL ENBRRS:
COUNCIL ENBRRS:
Kay~ood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneesas .and Thom.
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 74R-205 and 74R-206 duly
passed and adopted.
Mr. ~urdoch further reported that the recently adopted legislation
regarding the Fair Labor Standards Act also required certain Administrative
actions, a list of which has been distributed to Council. One of si~nifi-
cance, however, was that employees who work either full or part-time for the
74-447
Cit~ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 30, 1974, 1:30 P.M.
City in more than one capacity, i.e., a full-time employee who works part-time
at the Stadium or Convention Center as well, because of the new provision re-
garding overtime pay after 40 hours, will no longer be permitted to be employed
in more than one capacity. This has been accomplished by an Administrative
Regulation and will primarily affect certain employees at the COnvention Center
and Stadium.
REO~EST F0~ ST~TI$%ICS.- kpARTI~S VF~RSUS SING~..R-FAMILY HO~S: Councilwoman Kaywood
requested that the City Staff supply her with a report on the ratio.of apart-
ments to single-family homes in the Clty, both in existing and approved pro-
jects; the vacancy factor in apartments; the cost of providing increased police
and fire protection to apartments versus single-family dwellings.
Mr. Ron Thompson, Assistant Director of Development Services, related
that 7% percent of the dwelling units in the City are mobile homes; 42~ percent
are apartments; and 50 percent are single-family dwellings. Me advised that
these percentages do not take into consideration any approved projects, only
those which are existing.
In answer to Councilman Seymour, Mr. Thompson advised that the per-
centages for condominiums and townhouses are included in the apartment figure.
Mr. Murdoch related that it requires a rather extensive survey to
obtain a specific current vacancy factor and inquired whether an approximation
would be sufficient, with which Councilwoman Kaywood indicated agreement.
Regarding a comparison of Police and Fire costs, it was established
that this would be on a per dwelling unit basis, and Mr. Murdoch pointed out
that there is a difficulty in such comparison since there is a substantial
variation depending upon the occupancy and location of the multiple-family
areas. However, he advised that the requested information will be compiled
from existing records.
STATUS OF BICYCI~ TRAIL PROGRAM: Councilman Seymour requested an update on the
status of the Bicycle Trail Program planned.
Mr. Murdoch reported that the plan is being pursued by the Parks and
Recreation Department and that an application has been filed with SCAG for an
allocation of $33,000 to produce the plan for such a bikeway system. He noted
that there should be no particular difficulty in attaining this allocation,
but that it has not yet been formally approved. The Study which will be
conducted with these funds will be 9rtmarily directed at a bike trail system
which will use power line easements, flood control properties, etc. He re-
ported that technical help in the preparation of this study has been solicited
on a volunteer basis without success, and it will be necessary to assign this
project once the funds are available.
Councilman Seymour inquired whether matching funds are also available
from the County for development of bike trails, to which Mr. M~rdoch replied
that monies are available on a 50-50 matching basis. However, these have not
yet been requested by the City of Anaheim since the concept originally proposed
by the Sub-committee of the Parks and Recreation Commission, which required re-
moval of parking and use of arterial highways, was not acceptable to Council.
Councilman Seymour remarked that according to the last information he
has received, the best approach to take on the bicycle trails would be to use a
combination of utility and flood control easements and railroad rights-o~way.
He related that he is concerned as to the timeliness of the development of the
City's bike system plan so as to ensure the City has the availability of funds
through SCAG and the County, and if the factor which is holding up any such
application is development of the plan, he would be interested in pursuing that
plan as rapidly as possible.
Mr. Murdoch reported that the $33,000 allocation from SCAG could
reasonably be expected in one month's time. No further action was taken by
the Council at this time.
74-448
City Hall. Anaheim. California- C00NCIL ~NFTES- A~ril 30. 1974. 1:30 P,M
~,~C~S~= XnCUTIVE SESSION: Councilman Sneesas moved to recess to Executive
Session as requested by the Personnel Director and City M~a~er. 'Councilman
Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CAIqI~IED.(4:20 P.M.)
~: The Mayor called the meetin~ to order; all Councilmen bein$ present
with the exception of Councilman Pebley. (5:29 P.M.)
J~~: Councilman Thom moved to adjourn to Thursday, Nay 2, 1974, 9:30 A.M.,
for the purpqse of a combined City Council - Department Head Budset Study
meeting. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARrIED.
Adjourned: 5:30 P.M.
City Clerk
_J I I _I I I . ,II II l.lJI I