Loading...
1972/02/29City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES February 29. 1972. 1:30 P.M. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: The City Council of the City of Anaheim met COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Edward Granzow ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. in regular session. INVOCATION: Chaplain Robert Weber, of Martin Luther Hospital, gave the In- vocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman William J. Thom led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. INVITATION ANAHEIM MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION: Father Patrick Hill, of St. Boniface Church, on behalf of the Anaheim Ministerial Association, invited the Council members to attend a luncheon, Tuesday March 7, 1972, from 12:00 Noon to 1:00 P.M., at Zion Lutheran Church, for the purpose of discussing how religious leaders can more effectively and beneficially "exercise moral leadership in the community. All Councilmen indicated they would attend, with Councilman Dutton, who will be out of town. PROCLAMATIONS: The following Proclamations were issued by unanimously approved by the City Council: Red Cross Month- March, 1972. Easter Seal Month February 28, through April 2, 1972. Y.M.C.A. Week March 5 to 11, 1972. 72-107 the exception of Mayor Dutton and MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council regular meetings held February 15 and 22, and adjourned regular meeting held February 10, 1972, were approved on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. WAIyER_OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or Resolution. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $894,892.34; in accordance with the 1971 -72 Budget, were approved. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 71-72-25 AND VARIANCE NO. 2326: Submitted by Michael Robert Kral, requesting a change of zone from R -A to R- 3 to construct a 23 -unit, two story apartment complex on property located on the north side of Savanna Street, west of Knott Avenue, with waivers of: a. b. c. d. Minimum net land area per dwelling unit. Maximum height of a building within 150 feet of an R -A Zone. Minimum side yard depth. Minimum distance between buildings. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -26, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following con ditions: Cigt Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL. MINUTES February 29. 1972. 1:30 P,M. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposi- tion. 72-109 Henry Williamson, 3538 Savanna Street, requested the apartment com- plex not be approved for subject property on the basis that there presently was inadequate street parking and the proposed development would add more cars to the narrow street. He alleged that area residents had not been properly informed of the City Planning Commission hearing, and thus had not attended. Mr. Williamson stated he was certain that the area eventually would be developed for apartments because of the deep, narrow lots, but he did not want it at this time. C. Camp, 3603 Savanna, noted the required parking provided in the proposed apartment complex probably would not accommodate visitors, who then would have to park on the street which has curbs and gutters on only two par- cels and is not a through street. He stated 957. of the area residents were opposed to the project, and in reply to a Council question, advised he could have a petition to that effect submitted within an hour. Councilman. Pebley noted that at the time the General Plan for the area was under consideration in 1969 the residents had indicated they were agreeable to changing the designation from low density to medium density, and he suggested the possibility of continuing the public hearing for a week, so an investigation could be made to determine if the residents no longer agreed with this projected density. Councilman Roth advised that a favorable petition with 9- signatures was presented at the City Planning Commission hearing. He also stated that he felt the proposed zoning was an appropriate use because of the size of the property, and added that he felt the present property owners may find it difficult to retain their long, large lots for single family use because of the taxes. In reply to Mr. Camp's question on how rezoning and development of subject property as apartments would affect the single family homeowners' taxes, City Attorney Joseph Geisler advised that assessment evaluation of a property is based on its market value, and not on zoning. Councilman Pebley noted that land that could be used for apartment development would command a much higher price than that to be used for single family use. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Councilman Pebley stated that because of the foregoing discussion, he no longer wished to request a continuance. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -69: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -69 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing thee zone as requested, subject to the City Planning Commission recommendations. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD. BE CHANGED. (71-72-25 R-3) Roll Call Vote: 72 -111 City Hall, Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES FFbruary 29. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts advised that revised plans were submitted at the February 23, 1972 City Planning Commission hearing, which would eliminate the side -on lots along Santa Ana Canyon Road, and thus pre- clude the necessity for the variance. However, the City Planning Commission had denied the revised plans on the basis that the area was designated low density on the General Plan. 1TIDN: Councilman Roth stated that in view of the work session the City Council and City Planning Commission had the previous day, and the resulting possibility that R -2 -5,000 standards will be revised in the near future, he felt a 45 -day continuance was appropriate and he therefore offered a motion to continue subject applications for 45 days. Coiuncilman Pebley seconded the motion. Prior to action on the foregoing motion, Councilman Thom asked what were the purported technical problems on which the Developer was re- questing a continuance? He stated he had been advised that the reasons, in reality, were based on the forthcoming election and the reluctance of two incumbent candidates to vote on this issue. Mayor Dutton asked if the Developer was present and wished to ex- plain his reasons for the continuance request. Morrie C. Nickle, Vice- President, Classic Development Corporation, 12700 Knott Avenue, Suite B, Garden Grove, advised that they had revised their plans because objection to the side -on lots on Santa Ana Canyon Road was expressed at the City Planning Commission hearings, and they felt that it would require re- engineering in order to comply with what they felt the City wanted; that the proposed open drainage canal with concrete walls would have to be changed to an underground pipe, and this also would require a re- vision of the map. Mr. Nickle advised that he personally had had no development ex- perience in Anaheim, and thus it would require time to revise the maps. Councilman Thom indicated that as a result of Mr. Nickle's explana- tion, he would not object to a continuance of the matter. Councilman Pebley expressed concern that large, one -story homes are being crowded onto R -2 -5,000 lots, and stated he would like these appli- cations continued until the Planning Staff submits recommendations on revis- ing the R-2-5,000 Standards. He added that he did not like to see such lots covered 60% by dwellings. Councilman Dutton stated that he was in favor of a continuance be- cause he felt the R -2 -5,000 Standards should be revised; Councilman•Stephen- son agreed. In view of the fact that a public hearing must be continued to a date certain, Councilman Roth amended his original motion to continue the public hearing on Reclassification No. 71 -72 -30 and Variance No. 2327, and to also defer action Tentative Tracts Nos. 7617, 7730, 7731, 7732, 7733, 7734, 7735, 7736, 7737, 7738 and 7739 to April 18, 1972, 1:30 P.M. Council- man Pebley seconded the amended motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING VAR?ANCE NO. 2328 (TRACT NO. 7448): Submitted by Alice E. Simp- son and Vera W. Myers, to establish an R-3 Multiple family subdivision on County Al Zoned property located on the south side of Ball Road, east of Belhaven Street, with waiver of: a. Minimum local street setback. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -22, denied said variance. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Gerald D. Burns, Covington Brothers, Agent, and public hearing scheduled this date. 72 -113 City Ball. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES Febru ary 29. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Mr. Conway presented 17 letters from residents of the apartment complex protesting the no parking zone. Councilman Stephenson advised he understood Sunday was the slowest day of the week at Disneyland: He added that he felt there was adequate parking for residents at both ends of the bus zone. Councilman Thom stated he visited the area on a Wednesday or Thurs- day about 6 :30 or 7:00 P.M. and found traffic pretty well stacked up in the open area; also, last Sunday around 3:00 or 3:30 there were three buses par- ked in the zone and the other available parking area was full. He added he felt the apartment residents had a parking problem because of the bus zone on weekends and also weekday evenings; that he real- ized the buses needed to park there on weekends, but the residents needed it on weekdays because many of them are elderly and do not want to walk far. Traffic Engineer Edward Granzow advised the bus zone was used primarily during the summer. In reply to Councilman Thom, he stated that he and R.T.D. repre- sentatives had surveyed the entire area and had deteriined the existing lo- cation would least affect most of the area people and would provide an area where the buses could maneuver without traveling through residential areas. He added that the Disneyland Hotel, located on the east side of the street where the bus zone exists,had at that time stated they had no objection to the proposed use as a bus zone. Mr. Granzow stated that another reason for choosing this location was to prevent a jaywalking problem being created by apartment residents and visitors parking across the street from the apart- ments. Councilman Thom asked if the bus zone could be posted to allow use by residents at specified times. Mr. Granzow advised that the R.T.D. provides its own signs; that to post the zone as suggested would mean a special sign would have to be created. Councilman Stephenson suggested moving the bus zone closer to the north corner to allow more parking directly across the street from the apart- ment complex. Following Council discussion, the Traffic Engineer was requested to explore with R.T.D. the possibility of moving the bus zone or to make some other appropriate recommendation and report back to the Council. John Wetstone, Manager of the 44-unit apartment complex, advised that presently all of the day street parking is being utilized by the con- vention center construction workers. sip MODIFICATION PRY4CESS MOTEL, (RSCLA SIFICCION NO. 46-67-61 AND VARIANCE NO. 880): Request of John Krajacic was submitted to alter an existing non -con- forming,free- standing sign at the Princess Motel, 1769 South West Street, together with report of the Development Services Department recommending that the requested sign modification be approved on the basis that the ex- isting sign would be upgraded and the total sign area would not be increased. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, sign modification request was approved as recommended by the Development Services Department. MOTION CARRIED. uccummy war MIDI- PARR: Request of Donald J. Fears, President, Anaheim Beauti- ful, was submitted to name the mini -park at the northeast corner of Clemen- tine Street and Lincoln Avenue "Colony Park." Also submitted was report of the Parks and Recreation Director recommending approval. 72-115 Citv Hall. ,Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES February 29. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -29, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT I. 1290: Submitted by De Witt R. Lee, et al, to estab- lish an automobile service station within 75 feet of a residential struc- ture in an R-A Zone. C-1 zoned property is located at the southeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -25, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1289 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 69 -70 -20 AND CONDITIONAL U E PST NO. 1140): Submitted by Western Avenue Southern Baptist Church of Anaheim, to permit the establishment of an apartment development for the elderly on R -3 zoned property located on the west side of Western Avenue, south of Lincoln Avenue, with waivers of: a. Minimum dwelling unit floor area. b. Minimum number of off street parking stalls. c. Minimum building site area per dwelling unit. d. Minimum storage area per carport. e. Maximum building height. f. Maximum exterior stairway projection. g. Vehicular access to garages shall be from an adjacent alley only. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -23, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. The City Council reviewed this action and took no further action. ORDINANCE NO. 3015.(RECLASSIFICATION NO. 69- 70 -20): Councilman Pebley of- fered Ordinance No. 3015 for first reading, amending Ordinance.No. 2937, deleting certain conditions relative to Reclassification No. 69-70-20. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2937 BY DELET- ING CERTAIN CONDITIONS THERETO. (Deleting Conditions Nos. 4 and 7) CONDITIONAL USE PE TWIT NO. 1140 TERMINATION: The City Planning Commission, at its meeting held February 7, 1972, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -24, recommended termination of Conditional Use Permit No. 1140, on the basis that the Petitioner no longer plans to exercise the use permitted, and that Conditional Use Permit No. 1289 was approved for the same property. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-72: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -72 for adoption, terminating all proceedings on Conditional Use Permit No. 1140. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1140, AND DE- CLARING RESOLUTION NO. 69R -660 NULL AND VOID. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -72 duly passed and adopted. motion. 72 -117 City Hall. Anaheim. Ca/Xfornia -sown S February 29. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Mr. Horvath: further advised that in 1969 they were told they could have their commercial zoning (Orange County Zone Change No. 66 -24), but it was not brought before the Board of Supervisors because an access road would have to be provided first and it would need the approval of the adjacent pro- perty owners; the access road would have cost from $25,000.00 to $35,000.00 and the other property owners did not want to pay that, although they subse- quently applied for similar zoning. The law now has been changed and the road does not have to be provided before the Board of Supervisors acts on the ap- plication, and thus it is now up for consideration. Following Council discussion, Councilman Thom withdrew his original In reply to Council questioning, City Attorney Joseph Geisler ad- vised that if Orange County Zone Change 69-29 was not adopted, Mr. Whizen would not lose the present commercial use of his property, but could continue it as a non conforming use as long as he made no changes. W. Roberts advised that Mr. Whizin's property and 4 acres immed- iately to the west are in the Agricultural zone; however, 8 or 9 acres to the west of that has County C -1 Zoning. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council reaffirmed their position and concurred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission relative to Orange County Zone Change 69-29, with the exception of that portion originally covered under Orange County Zone Change 66-24, encompassing approximately 2.97 acres which have been pur- portedly used for commercial purposes since 1886 and owned by Mr. Whizen. MOTION CARRIED. COUNCIL POSITION R- 2 -5.000 ZONE: The City Manager read an excerpt from the joint Planning Commission and City Council February 28, 1972 work session, request ing clarification of the City Council's position regarding the purpose and intent of the R-2-5,000 Zone as well as the relationship of the R -2 -5,000 Zone to the implementation of the low and low- medium residential density categories set forth in the Anaheim General Plan. Councilman Thom stated he always had been of the opinion R- 2 -5,000 was implemented as a zone down from the R-3 Zone, and thus was low medium and not low density; that the transition was R -1 to R- 2 -5,000 to R -3 Zoning. He added that he believed R-2-5,000 Zoning was inappropriate for the Hill and Canyon area. Councilman Stephenson asked for the opinion of those Councilmen in office at the time the zone was adopted. Councilman Dutton stated that he understood the original intent was for a little higher density than R- 1 Zoning as far as units per acre were con cerned, but still on the low side, to allow single family residences on 5,000 square foot lots rather than 7,200 square foot lots, although at that time the majority of Anaheim homes were on 6,000 square foot lots. He added that the original intent was to make it possible to develop land that was a little less desirable than R -1 property and yet allow low medium and medium income people to obtain decent homes; however, he felt use of the zoning has been abused to the point that now large 5 and 6- bedroom homes are being built on these small lots, creating a higher people -per -acre density. Councilman Pebley advised that at the time the R- 2 -5,000 Zoning was contemplated, inspection of similar zoning developments in neighboring cities revealed lot coverage of from 30% to 32%, leaving sufficient open space around the homes, which was what was intended when the Anaheim Zone was instituted. He suggested site development standards be Set up for the 1-2 -5,000 Zone limit- ing lot coverage to 309: and allowing 2 -story homes, adding that a more proper zone name might have been R- 1- 5,000; or that an R -1 -6,000 Zone be instituted, limiting lot coverage to 35 He added that what is currently being developed on R -2 -5,000 lots is not what was originally intended. 72-119 City Nall. Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES February 29. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. He cited as an appropriate situation the RFD Zone of La Palma, which allows up to 6 lots per acre, but requires submission of precise plans for side, rear and front yards as well as house plans prior to approval of final tract maps or issuance of building permits, thus establishing good guidelines for a developer. Councilman Pebley inquired as to what length driveway was proposed for Tract No. 7485 development and was informed it was 20 feet. He voiced objection to this since he believed 20 feet was not sufficient for parking a car on a driveway and still allow room for opening the garage door without necessitating blocking the sidewalk. Mr. Matzick advised that the project for Tract No. 7485 and the ones immediately west of that have as conditions of approval that all house and site plans be reviewed and approved by the City Council prior to develop- ment. Mr. Roberts advised that in about three weeks Mr. Matzick's com- pany would present for Council approval revised tentative tract maps on pro- perty that has an approved Resolution of Intent to R -2- 5,000. In reply to Mr. Murdoch's statement that when an applicant complies with all conditions for an approved zoning he expects the ordinance automat- ically adopted on the property, Mr. Geisler advised that, although there may be a moral obligation to adopt the zoning, there is no legal one. Mr. Matzick stated that his company would make every effort to de- sign the homes in their project according to any new site development stand- ards if they can be supplied with the standards as quickly as possible. VOTE: Mayor Dutton called for a vote on the foreoing Motion and the Motion was unanimously carried. Mr. Mhrdoch requested clarification on whether the Council considers the density factor for R -2 -5,000 should be determined by number of units or number of persons. Councilman Pebley advised he considered living environment the major criteria. RECESS: Councilman Thom moved for a Recess. Councilman Pebley seconded the mo- tion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:00 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present. (4:10 P.M.). DEWS OF EASE)E 11 RESOLUTION NO. 72R-73: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -73 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Modular Technology, Inc., aka Tanco Development Corporation) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -73 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE OF MATERIAL 653.9 ACSR WIRE: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of 36,300 pounds, 18 50 -inch reels of 653.9 ACSR Wire as follows: a. Financial and Operating Reports: b. 1971 Annual Report Fire Department. 72 -121 Citv Hall. Anaheim. Californ a COUNCIL MINUTES Febru4}ry 29, 1972. 1:30 F.M. P` CHASE OF SERVICES LOWERS OIL LINES: On report and recommendation of the City Engineer, the amount authorized April 20, 1971, to be reimbursed to Standard Oil Company of California for lowering of three oil lines in con- nection with street improvement in Knott Street from 660 feet north of to 387 feet north of Cerritos Avenue, (Work Order No. 619 -A), was increased from $6,300.00 to $8,782.00, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. COR4SPONpEN The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley: Utilities Department August (revised), September, October, November, December, 1971. Fire Department January, 1972. c. City of Fullerton Resolution No. 5371 Urging the League of California Cities and the County Supervisors' Association of California to modify the rules established by Public Utilities Commission Case No. 8209 for undergrounding existing utility lines. d. City of Fullerton Resolution No. 5372 Urging the League of California Cities and the County Supervisors' Association of California to support an increase in the amount of funds now being set aside for un- dergrounding of existing utility lines. e. City of Brea Resolution No. 72 -14 Urging County Supervi- sors to permit construction of electrical generating facilities in the in- terest of public safety and welfare. f. Costa Mesa Chamber of Commerce Resolution No. 72 -9 Urging Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company to reconsider its proposed method of charge for business telephone service, and giving reasons therefor. g. Southern California Water Company Advice Letter No. 408 -W, re Tariff Area Maps. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 3016: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3016 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, VOLUME III, HOUSING, AND THE APPENDIX, 1970 EDITION, WITH AMENDMENTS THERETO, AND AMENDING TITLE 15, CHAPTER 15.36 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE. (Public Hearing, March 21, 1972, 1:30 P.M.) RE#OLUTIOI NO. 72R-74 ANAHEIM HILLS LAND AGREEZENT: The City Manager reported that the two separate land agreements, being the original agreement of sale and waiver modifying agreement of sale, have been consolidated into one single agreement with no changes, and thereupon recommended the consoli- dated agreement be approved. Councilman Thom, advising that, as in the past, he would vote "No" on this agreement, requested clarification on whether General Fund monies could be used to satisfy this obligation if funds from the two golf course activities were not sufficient. The City Attorney advised that such procedure would be the pre- rogative of the City Council; that if it appeared funds would be available at a later date, they may choose to make payments out of other funds, but if it appeared revenue from activities would not be forthcoming to make the payments, then the Council could elect to not make such payments, in which event the land would not revert to the Grant Corporation, since they have no right of foreclosure, but the funds previously paid in would be lost to the City. 72 -123 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES February 29. 1,72. 1:30 P.M. Council discussion followed, and it was determined that since the Anaheim Hills Golf Course would be visible from the road, renaming the road would be an aid in locating the Course. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -75: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 72R -75 for adoption, changing the name of Walnut Canyon Road, between Santa Ana Canyon Road and Nohl Ranch Road to Anaheim Hills Road. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THAT THE NAME OF THAT PORTION OF WALNUT CANYON ROAD, FROM SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD TO NOHL RANCH ROAD, BE CHANGED TO ANAHEIM HILLS ROAD. SAG= PARK LITTLE LEAGUE PARKIN AREA: Mr. Murdoch submitted a request dated February 16, 1972, from Don Williams, President of the La Palma Little League, for permission to improve the entrance and parking area adjacent to the Little League field at Sage Park, and pay the cost of that improve- ment from the $5,000.00 pledge to the City according to Council action Feb- ruary 2, 1971, at which time the Little League field was approved. He there- upon recommended their request be granted. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Roth, the request of La Palma Little League was granted, as recommended by the City Manager. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-76 BALL- SUNKIST NO. 4 ANNEXATION (UNINHABITED: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 72R -76 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXA- TION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED BALL SUNKIST NO. 4 ANNEXATION (UNINHABITED). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -76 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -77 EARTHQUAKE SAFETY FEES: On report and recommendation of of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -77 for adoption, authorizing collection and transmittal of Earthquake Safety Fees. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RELATING TO THE STRONG- MOTION INSTRUMENTATION PROGRAM (EARTHQUAKE. SAFETY) OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND ESTABLISHING THE FEES FOR THE AUGMENTATION THEREOF. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-77 duly passed and adopted.' INSTRUCTION CLASS ELECTION INSPECTORS: On report of Mts. Daoust, Councilman Pebley moved the City Clerk be authorized to pay $3.00 to each Election In- spector for the April 11 General Municipal Election who attends an instrucr tion class prior to election day and picks up the appropriate election sup- plies. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 72 -124 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES Fe)ruary 29. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. UNION 1 CgIC ILROAD DEPOT: In reply to Councilman Roth, the City Manager ad- vised that thus far no response has been received to a letter sent to Union Pacific Railroad by the Right-of-Way Division, indicating the City's interest in the acquisition of the Depot presently scheduled for destruction. DATA PROCESSING. FIXED ASSETS ACCOUNTING: Councilman Thom expressed appreciation for having received a report on the Data Processing System and requested the Finance Director be directed to advise by the next regular meeting what pro- ress has been made toward obtaining r a g firm of White Steichen for setting up fixed r assets accounting procedures pr occedur that the issue can be resolved as quickly as possible. es so REPORT ANAHEIM HILLS GOLF COURSE: With reference to Anaheim Hills Golf Course, and particularly an Anaheim Bulletin article discussed by the City Council at their meeting held August 31, 1971, Councilman Dutton reminded Councilman Thom of his stated intent to report on information and statistics he was com- piling on the golf course issue that he had obtained from different sources, some within the City, and at that time he assured the Council in the near future he would make available the source of the information obtained from within the City. Signed Councilman Thom replied that he would make this report at the appro- priate time. PROPOSED TOURIST INFORMATION CENTER CITY OF ANAHEMCHAMBER OF COMMERCE: Council- man Dutton reported on the proposed tourist information center to be located on Royal Coach property, and a telephone conversation in which Pat Ford of Royal Coach Inns stated he had recommended to his headquarters office that the proposed center be instituted. He added that there still must be a determination on what the fee would be, whether it would be on a continuing basis, cost to the City, and if it would interfere with the Visitor and Convention Bureau operations. PERKISSIc4 TO LEAVE THE STATE: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Council- man Stephenson, Mayor Dutton was granted permission to leave the State for 90 days. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the request of Councilman Stephenson, Councilman Pebley moved to Recess to Executive Session for the purpose of discussing a personnel matter. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:55 P.M.). Aimmu At the conclusion of Executive Session, and upon return of all Coun- cilmen to the Council Chambers, Councilman Thom moved to adjourn. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 5:25 P.M. City Clerk 1 72 -122 City Hall. Anaheim. California COtJICIL MINUTES February 29. 1272. 1 :30 P.M He added that the only thing the Grant Corporation has a right to is the revenue from the two courses. Councilman Thom commented that since the golf course funds previously were added to the General Fund, this money would be lost to the Anaheim taxpayers in that manner. Councilman Pebley stated that, as he had done October 28, 1970, at the time this land purchase originally was authorized, he would abstain from voting on the consolidated agreement in view of the fact that he had engaged in business activity with the Robert H. Grant Corporation for several years, although he had no personal interest in the land acquisition. REIOLUTION NO. 72R -74: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -74 for adoption. AYES: NOES: ABSTAINED: ABSENT: Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN "AGREEMENT OF SALE" BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE ROBERT H. GRANT CORPORATION AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXE- CUTE SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. Roll Call Vote: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson and Dutton Thom Pebley None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -74 duly passed and adopted. CONDITItAL USE PERMIT NO. 658 EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Richard Kenneth Brooks, Jr., for a one -year extension of time to Conditional Use Permit No. 658, for compliance with certain conditions pursuant to Resolution No. 71R- 335, was submitted at the February 22, 1972 meeting and continued to this date for further investigation. Also submitted at that time were reports of the City Engineer and Development Services Department. Councilmen Stephenson and Dutton stated they had examined the pro- perty and found a chain from which a piece of paper was suspended, blocking the exit off Church Haven Way from this property, which they did not feel was satisfactory compliance of Condition No. 3, and also that no buffer for the homes to the north had been provided. Following Council discussion, Councilman Dutton moved that the ex- tension of time be denied and compliance with all conditions be required im- mediately. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED STREET NAME CHANGE WALNUT CANYON ROAD TO ANAHEIM HILAS ROAD: City Plan- ning Commission Resolution No. PC71 -141 was submitted at the August 3, 1971 Council meeting, recommending that the name for Walnut Canyon Road, between Santa Ana Canyon Road and the extension of Nohl Ranch Road, be renamed Anaheim Hills Parkway. At that time the matter was deferred for a determination on whether a greater portion of the road going into the Canyon area also should be so re- named. The City Manager suggested that, since the new alignment of Walnut Canyon Road will "T" into Nohl Ranch Road, it would be more appropriate to cony tinue the extension as kohl Ranch Road, and thus he recommended the original City Planning Commission Resolution be considered without change, except that the proposed name be Anaheim Hills "Road," inasmuch as that street no longer is proposed to be a parkway with a median. 72-120 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES February 29, 197a. 1 :30 P.M. TOTAL A1T. INCLUDING TAX General Electric Supply Company, Anaheim $12,262.57 Graybar Electric Company, Inc., Anaheim 12,278.43 Western Electric Supply Company, Anaheim 12,196.80 Alcan Cable, Fullerton 12,923.19, On recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Pebley moved that the bid of General Electric Supply Company in the amount of $12,262.57, in- cluding tax, be accepted and purchase authorized as the lowest and best bid on the basis that the reels are returnable to that company. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EOUIPMENT 69 KV INSULATORS, CLAMPS AND STUDS: The City Manager re- ported on informal bids received for the purchase of 200 Insulators, 150 Clamps and 100 Studs for 69 KV service as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid. BEM T1 AMOUNT. INCLUDING TAX General Electric Supply Company, Anaheim $7,141.16 Westinghouse Electric Supply, Anaheim 7,425.08 McGraw-Edison, City of Commerce 407.93 (Partial) Ohio Brass, Pasadena 8,310.84 Graybar Electric Company, Anaheim 7,282.80 On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the low bid of General Electric Supply Company was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $7,141.16, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT GOLF COURSE: The City Manager reported on informal bids re- ceived for the purchase of a Spreader, Tractor Mower and 7 -Gang Mower, primar- ily for use at Anaheim Hills Golf Course as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bids: Toro Pacific, Gardena B. Hayman Company Santa Fe Springs SPREADER TRACTOR IOWER 7 -GANG MOWER Ryan Parkmaster Spartan $1,360.50 $10,243.00 $3,038.50 Jacobson Jacobson Jacobson $1,144.00 $10,995.00 $3,095.00 On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the low bids of Toro Pacific for the Tractor Mower at $10,243.00, plus tax, and the 7 -Gang Mower at $3,038.50, plus tax, and B. Hayman Company for the Spreader at $1,144.00, plus tax, were accepted and purchase authorized. To this motion, Councilman Thom voted "No." MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF MATERIAL CALIFORNIA POPPY SEED: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of 500 pounds of California Poppy Seed for Ana- heim Hills Golf Course as follows, and recommended acceptance of the bid of Ger- main Seed Company, due to immediate availability of seed. VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT INCLUDING TAX Germain Seed Company, Los Angeles Ferry -Morse Seed Company, Anaheim $3,150.00 3,150.00 On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Roth, the bid of Germain Seed Company was accepted as the lowest and best qualified bid meeting. delivery specifications and purchase authorized in the amount of $3,150., including tax. To this notion, Councilman Thom voted "No." MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF SERVICES POLICE DEPARTMENT AL} CONDITIONING: On recOlmnendation of the City Manager, Councilman Stephenson offered a motion authorizing overhauling and updating of the air conditioning system at the Police Department by the manufacturer, York Division of Borg-Warner Corporation, at an amount not to exceed $9,300.00, per their proposal dated February 10, 1972. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. IOTION.CARRIED. 72-118 Ci4v H41. Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES February 29, 1972. 1 :30 P.M. Mr. Murdoch recalled that originally if the area was considered ap- propriate to accept R -3 density, a dual process was undergone wherein the area was first zoned R -3, or high density, thereby recognizing the area would accom- modate greater density than single family, and then changed to R- 2- 5,000; how- ever, that process has changed, and apparently the thinking now is that this zoning should not be used in only areas acceptable for medium density but should be allowed in areas projected for less than that. In Council discussion, the development at East Street and Vermont Avenue was cited as a desirable R- 2- 5,000 project; West Street and Chalet Avenut to Brookhurst Street area and the Rio Vista Street area as successful R -1 to R-2-5,000 to R -3 transitional zoning. Councilman Stephenson stated he felt consideration should be given to how mulch of each lot is usable so that there would be no more developments like the Holstein homes at the mouth of the Canyon where 20% of the lots are on a bank, and are unbuildable. For Planning Staff use in setting R -2 -5,000 Zone site standards, Mr. Murdoch summarized Council discussion to mean zone changes to accommodate the smaller lots should remain low medium density, not medium nor low; coverage of lots should leave adequate open space for livability. Councilman Pebley stated he felt density should be determined by the number of bedrooms in a home; that 4 units per acre for R-1 homes with 5 bedrooms would yield higher density than 5 R -2 -5,000 homes with 3 bedrooms. Councilman Roth stated he felt the most important point was that the Planning Staff be directed to develop site development standards for lot cover- age. He added that reports from the real estate profession predict single family dwelling will be required more during the 1970's than multiple units. MOTION: Following Council discussion, Councilman Thom offered a Motion that the City Planning Commission be advised that as far as General Plan Amendment No. 122 is concerned, R -1 Zoning is for low density and R- 2 -5,000 Zoning low medium density, adding that he was using General Plan Amendment No. 122 as the base since that had been the area generally under consideration in the joint meeting discussion. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. Councilman Pebley asked that a clarification be made on whether den- sity is considered per -unit or per person. Mr. Murdoch advised that the General Plan and a General Plan Amend- ment considered total areas, which could be comprised of several zonings to constitute a "general" desired density. Councilman Pebley suggested a moratorium on all R- 2- 5,000 Zoning until such time as the Planning Staff makes recommendations on development standards including lot coverage. Councilman Thom agreed, and thereupon withdrew his foregoing Motion. Councilman Stephenson withdrew his second to the Motion. MOTION: Councilman Pebley moved a moratorium be placed on all future R -2 -5,000 Zoning -until the Planning Staff can make recommendations to the City Planning Commission and the City Council as to lot coverage and site development stand- ards for the R -2 -5,000 Zone. The City Attorney advised that any property presently approved for R -2 -5,000 Zoning where construction has not been started prior to adoption of new standards for the zone would have to be developed according to the new standards. Noting a developer was present, Councilman Pebley invited him to pre- sent his views. Larry Matzick of Ponderosa Homes advised that a similar moratorium in Cerritos had cost his company considerable time and money; his company at- tempts to adapt development plans to the site, and Tract No. 7485 presently is in the final engineering design. stages. 72-116 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL .MINUTES February 29. 1972. 1;30 P.M. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 69-70 -58(12 EXTENSION OF TLmORARy AIRY PERMIT: The City Clerk reported on request from George Drayton, President, Drayton, Inc., for an extension of time to the temporary occupancy of his building at 2836 East La Palma Avenue. She stated it was understood revision is in process on the required parcel map and Mr. Drayton has stated he is prepared to post the necessary bond for street improvements when the parcel map has been recorded. On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Dutton, a 30 -day extension of the temporary occupancy permit was granted, to expire March 30, 1972. MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE COUNTY USE PERMIT NO. 3248: Excerpt from the Minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held February 23, 1972 was submitted, pertaining to Orange County Use Permit No. 3248 for establishment of a model home complex, tempor- ary sales office and signs in connection therewith for a period of two years, for first sale of dwellings in Tract No. 7413 in the R- 2- (2000) (Conditional) "Group Dwellings" District, located on the east side of Fairmont Boulevard, approximately 250 feet north of Esperanza Road, recommending the Orange County Planning Commission be advised that the City of Anaheim has no objection to the proposed use as it would generally conform to the land uses permitted in Anaheim's immediate area; however, that the developers should be advised that the City of Anaheim would not allow off-site signing within the City to ad- vertise a complex in County territory. It was moved by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom that the recommendation of the City Planning Commission be sustained and forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE COUNTY ZONE CHANGE NO. 69 -29: Excerpt from the Minutes of the City Plan- ning Commission meeting held February 23, 1972, pertaining to Orange County Zone Change No.69-29, proposing that 5 parcels of land comprising 18 acres, located on the south side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, approximately 2 miles east of Imperial Highway be rezoned from 80-AR- 10,000 "Agricultural- Residential" and 100 -C -1- 10,000 "Local Business" Districts,to County CH/35 "Commercial Highway" District was submitted, recommending a letter be forwarded to the Orange County Board of Supervisors,correcting the record to indicate it was not the City of Anaheim who had granted zoning on properties within this area, but Orange County; and that the City of Anaheim reiterates its original posi- tion taken July 28, 1969, that the proposed zoning be denied. MOTION: Councilman Thom offered a motion to concur with the Planning Commis- sion recommendations. Prior to a second on the foregoing motion, and in response to a re- quest from the audience, Mayor Dutton invited an attendee to address the Coun- cil. Francis Horvath, 4527 Roxbury Road, Corona Del Mar, real estate bro- ker representing Mr. Whizin, owner of 2.97 acres of property within subject area on which there presently is a cafe, gas station and Peralta School house, stated he had sold this property to Mr. Whizin and they had been attempting to get proper zoning on the property since 1964, so it could be rebuilt. He added that this particular property has been used commercially since 1886 and, in fact, it was mentioned in Ramona's book as a place where the principal characters had spent a night at the Inn. Mr. Horvath stated that prior to purchasing this property, they had asked the Orange County Planning Commission and Anaheim Planning Commission if any.zoning changes were contemplated for the property which would prohibit continuance of the existing commercial use and the answer was "no;" however, they have never been permitted to improve the property in any way, not even to paint, because Anaheim was opposed to commercial zoning in the area and the property was in the Anaheim sphere of influence. 72-114 Citv Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES February 29. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Donald J. Fears advised that this name was suggested because of its relationship to history and the great heritage of Anaheim. On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the mini -park at the northeast corner of Clementine Street and Lincoln Avenue was named "Colony Park," as requested. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 69-70-10. VARIANCE NO. 2121. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7103 EXTEN- SION OF TIME: Requestof Larry C. Matzick, Ponderosa Homes, dated February 22, 1972, was submitted for a one -year extension of time to Reclassification No. 69- 70-10, Variance No. 2121 and Tentative Tract No. 7103, together with reports of the City Engineer and Development Services Department recommending a one -year extension of time be granted, to expire March 10, 1973. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, a one -year extension of time for Reclassification No. 69- 70 -10, Variance No. 2121 and Tentative Tract No. 7103 was granted as requested, to expire March 10, 1973. MOTION CARRIED. CITY PINNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held February 7, 1972, pertaining to the following applications were submitted for City Council information and consideration: VARIANCE NO. 2319: Submitted by Edward F. Ross, to permit continued operation of a chiropractic office on C -1 zoned property located at the northeast corner of Euclid Street and Catherine Drive, with waivers of: a. Requirement that all parking be provided to the rear of the residential structure. b. Minimum number of required parking stalls. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72-14, granted said variance, for one physician only, subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 2325: Submitted by Loren E. Smith, to establish a storage yard for vacation trailers, campers and boats on R-A zoned property located on the west side of Mountain View Avenue, south of Katella Way, with waiver of: a. Permitted uses. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -19, granted said variance, subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 2329: Submitted by Church of Christ, to construct a 48- square foot sign on R-A zoned property located on the south side of Ball Road, east of Loara Street, with waiver of: a. Maximum sign area. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -18, granted said variance, subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1286: Submitted by National Diversified Investors, to establish a travel trailer and camper storage facility on M-1 zoned property located on the west side of State College Boulevard, north of Via Burton Street, with waivers of: a. Permitted uses. b. Minimum required front setback. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No PC72 -20, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. CDITIONAL USE PPM= Jam. 12821 Submitted by Canyon Terrace Development Comr patty, to permit on -sale beer in conjunction with a proposed Italian delicates- sen and restaurant on C-1 zoned property located on the east side of Tustin Ave- nue, north of Santa Ana Canyon Road, with waiver of: a. Minimum numiber of required parking stalls. 72 -112 City Hall. Anaheim. California COMM MIS Fitbruary 29. 1972, 1:30 P.M. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject property, existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He added that Tentative Tract No. 7448 previously was approved on this property, and the variance request is to waive the required landscaped setback on four lots within the tract because the Developer is proposing to provide one open parking space within the required setback area on those lots on the local streets, and thus the landscaping would be reduced. He outlined the proposal on a layout of the subdivision placed on the wall, and advised the City Planning Commission had denied the variance because they felt this particular development did not provide as much open area as other such complexes. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent wished to address the Council. Gerald D. Burns, Vice President, Covington Brothers, 2451 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Fullerton, stated he had nothing to add to Mr. Roberts' presentation. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposi- tion; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -71: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 72R -71 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2328 subject to the following Interdepart- mental recommendations: 1. That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of Re- classification No. 70- 71 -57, now pending, and subject to the approval and re- cordation of a final map for Tract No. 7448. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim mar- ked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (RtANTING VARIANCE NO. 2328. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -71 duly passed and adopted. SUS Z WALNUT STREET: Request was submitted from Jack C. Conway, Attorney representing residents in the 1500 and 1600 block of South Walnut Street, for removal of the no- parking bus zones on the east side of the street to allow residents to park there. Also submitted was report of the City En- gineer recommending no change be made. Mayor Dutton asked if the Petitioner was present and wished to ad- dress the Council. Jack C. Conway, 10182 Squires Circle, Villa Park, stated there were 80 to 100 residents in the apartment house complex in the 1500 and 1600 blocks. on South Walnut Street, and they would like to be able to use the parking space across the street reserved for R.T.D. buses used to transport people to and from Disneyland. He contended that 99% of the time no buses were parked in this zone because there was enough room in the Disneyland parking lot; the only times they were used were Saturday and Sunday. He suggested the bus zone be in effect on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays only, allowing residents and their visitors to park there on week- days. 72 -110 Citv Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES February 29. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson,Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -69 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -70: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -70 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2326 in part, granting Waiver "b," sub- ject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission,amending Condition No. 2 as follows, to reflect the submission of revised plans, Wai- vers "a," "c," and "d" having been withdrawn by the Petitioner: "2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, mar- ked Revision No. 1 of Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4." Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2326, IN PART. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -70 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC NEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71 -72 -30 AND VARIANCE NO, 2327: Submitted by Ernest Danker, et al, requesting a change of zone from current County Zoning to City R-2-5,000 (Portion A), and City C-1 (Portion B), to permit construc- tion of total of 593 R -2 -5,000 lots on Portion A. Property located on the north side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east of the intersection of Walnut Canyon Road and Santa Ana Canyon Road, extending easterly to the intersection of Santa Ana Canyon Road and the Riverside Freeway, with waiver of: a. Requirement that lots rear upon Arterial Highways. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -30, recommended said reclassification be denied, and pursuant to Resolution No: PC72 -31, denied said variance. TiTATIVE TRACTS NOS. 7617. 7730. 7731. 7732. 7733. 7734. 7735. 7736. 7737. 7738. 7739: Developer Classic Development Corporation. Property located between the Riverside Freeway on the north, and Santa Ana Canyon Road on the south, east of the intersection of Walnut Canyon Road and Santa Ana Canyon Road, and containing: Tentative Tract No. 7617 38 proposed Tentative Tract No. 7730 64 proposed Tentative Tract No. 7731 49 proposed Tentative Tract No. 7732 63 proposed Tentative Tract No. 7733 67 proposed Tentative Tract No. 7734 69 proposed ,Tentative Tract No. 7735 56 proposed Tentative Tract No. 7736 47 proposed Tentative Tract No. 7737 41 proposed Tentative Tract No. 7738 51 proposed Tentative Tract No. 7739 48 proposed R- 2- 5,000 R-2 -5,000 R-25,000 R-2 -5,000 R 2 -5, 000 R- 2 -5, 000 R -2 -5,000 R-2 -5,000 R- 2- 5,000 R- 2- 5, 000 R -2 -5,000 zoned lots. zoned lots. zoned lots. zoned lots. zoned lots. zoned lots. zoned lots. zoned lots. zoned lots. zoned lots. zoned lots. The City Planning Commission, at its meeting held February 7, 1972, denied said tentative tracts. The City Clerk submitted correspondence dated February 22, 1972, from M.C. Nickle, Vice President of Classic Development Corporation, request- ing a 45 -day continuance for subject reclassification and tentative tracts., 72 -108 Citv Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL mums February 29. 1972. 1:30 P.M. 1. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Savanna Street, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above- mentioned require- ments. 2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Savanna Street for street light- ing purposes. 3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15c per front foot along Savanna Street for tree planting purposes. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 6. That a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east, west, and north property lines. 7. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent properties. 8. That subject property shall be served by underground facilities. 9. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the build- ing permit is issued. 10. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. 11. That sewer connection fees shall be paid in accordance with the Savanna Street sewer assessment area on file in the office of the City Engineer. 12. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro- perty, Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. 13. That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, and 11, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -27, granted said variance, in part, granting Waiver "b," subject to the follow ing conditions, Waivers "a," "c," and "d" having been withdrawn by the Pe- titioner: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Re- classification No. 71- 72 -25. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim mar- ked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4,.and 5; provided, however, that the waivers of the minimum land area per dwelling unit, minimum side yard and minimum dis- tance between buildings have been withdrawn and the project will be developed with only the waiver of the 150 foot distance between R- A'and two -story R -3. The City Clerk reported revised plans have been filed which omit one of the three types of units originally designated. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He added that the General Plan designates this area as appropriate for med- ium residential density. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and was satisfied with the recommendations of the City Planning Cosinission,to which he received an affirmative reply from Raymond Patscheck, 17321 Irvine Blvd., Tustin, Agent.