Loading...
1966/01/259191 City Hall~ Anaheim, California -. COUNCil MINUTES - January 25, 1966~ 1:30 P. M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session, PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein. COUNCILMEN: None° CITY MANAGER: Keith Ac Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CITY A7TORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn, CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR: John Collier. ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Ronald Thompson. ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Marvin Krieger. PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER: Howard "Bud" Nagel, Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. INTRODUCTION: Mr. Robert Seaman was introduced as the new Manager of the Disneyland Hotel, by Public Information Officer "Bud~' Nagel. Mro Seaman was welcomed by the City Council. INIRODUCTiON: I'ne firs~ group of ne~iy employed personnel attending the Council meeting ~ ~ par~, of t~e C~y s orientation program, was re- co~jnlze~. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Krein proclaimed the month of February, 1966, "American Music Said proclamation was unanimously ratified by the City Council. MINUTES: Minutes of t~'~.e Anaheim Clty Council Meeting held January 11, 1966, were approved~ on motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Schutte~ MOTION CARRIED, WAIVER OF READING --ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of' all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver cf reading ils hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of t~e [itie, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution° Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MO~ION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. DEMANDS AGAINST L~E CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $1,328,279.24, in accordance with the 1965~66 Budget, were approved, on motion by Coun.$ilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING-. RECLASSIFICAIiON NO. 65-66-64 (LA PALMA.-RIO VISTA ANNEXATION): Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission establishing permanent zoning on territor'y described as La Palma-Rio Vista Annexation~ bounded by the R~verside Preeway, Dow!lng Avenue, the Santa Aha Freeway and the present Anaheim City limits, as follows: Parcels 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12 and 13 - R-A~ Parcel 2 R-2; Parcels 4, 6 and 11 - R-i~ and Parcel 7 - Approval of sub]ect reclassification was recommended by the City Planning Commission.~ pursuant to Resolution No. 1883~ Series 1965-66. Associate Planner Marvin Krleger noted Exhibit A, posted on the east wall of the Council Chamber, depicting proposed permanent zoning of parcels wlthin the La Palma~Rio Vista Annexation, and advised that said proposed zones are identical to the i~terim zoning established by Ordinance No. 2227. He further noted existing uses in ~ubj~t territory. Mayor Krein asked ~f anyone wished to addre$~ the City Council relative to the proposed reclassification,"~here being no ~e~pon~e, declared the hearing closed. 9192 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-51: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-51 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended. Refer to Resolution Book· A RESOLUTION OF THE CIIY COUNCIL OF 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66.-6a - R-A, R-l, R~2 and R-A(O)) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: HOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN; Dutton, Pebley~ Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-51 dul. y passed and adopted. SIGN REQUEST: Request of William H. Kunz of Los Angeles Outdoor Advertising, for permission to replace existing 960 square foot directional billboard sign with a 560 square foot .directional sign~ to be permitted for a minimum of five vears~ at 833 South Manches~er Avenue, was suomitted and reviewed by the Clty Council together ~ith plans and eleYat~ons of %he proposed sign, advertising tk~e Wax M~seu~ at ±S50 $o~tn Harbor Bouie~ard. Also submitted and reviewed ~ere reports from the Building and Zoning D~vlsions of the De~,elop~ent Services Department, recommendations of the Zonlng Divisfon bei~'~g noted as follows: It appears likely thai appro~ai er disapproval of the proposed billboard will set a definite pattern for s~miiar requests for advertising struct,Jres along this portion or the 5an~a Aha Freeway. if it is considered b? the Cit}, Council that °'Wide World in Wax" qualifies as an "area of major attraction', and that an advertising structure is appropriate in the freeway location specified, it is strongly recommended that an effort be made to integrates in a single structure~ the advertising copy of all of ~i'te attractions served by the Boulevard off-ramp~ rather than permitting each to erect its own billboard. It was moved oy Councilma~ Chand].er, seconded by Councilman Pebley, that said sign reques~ ce granted to March l~ i968, ~he expiration date of the existing sign~ tha~ c, epy o~. ,t~'c 5ii te in accordance with the representa- tion by the applicanms$ That the ad','ertL$ing wzli be limited to enterprises qualifying for a guide sign under Chapter 18.62.020(b){1), of the Anaheim Municipal Code. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. William H~ Kurtz, Vice President of Los Angeles Outdoor Advertlsing~ requested clarification of the time limit, advising that they requested an extension to their expiration date to insure that the cost of the sign replacement will ce warranted~ He noted the steel structure of the proposed new $ign~ and the reduction ~n size, as compared to the existing b:llboardo Attention was called to the Anaheim Municipal Code provisions governing signs near freeways~ and to the recommendations of the Development Services Department. No further action was taken by the City Council. SiGN REQUEST: Request of Wiltard W. Wohlford, of' H. & R. Block, Inc., for permission to install a projecting electric sign at 126 East Lincoln Avenue (3 foot 6 inch projection}, was submitted and reviewed by the City Council together with plans and departmental reports. Said sign permlt was granted as requested, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by ~ ~ ~ ~oun~lman Peble¥ MOTION CARRIED. ~jty Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. DINNER DANCING PLACE PERMII: Application filed by John Cammarata for Dinner Dancing Place permit to allow dinner dancing from 6:00 P.M. to 2:00 A.Mo at Lucky~s Pizza Parlor, 933 South Knott Avenue, was submitted and granted subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton~ MOTION CARRIED. SIDEWALK WAIVER - 801 EAST BALL ROAD: Request of John B. Kilroy Company for waiver of sidewalk requirement at 801 East Ball Road, was submitted. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Chandler moved that temporary waiver of sidewalk requirements at 801 East Ball Road be granted, subject to no permanent planting or permanent type improvements being permitted within the area reserved for future sidewalks. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion, MOTION CARRIED. (W. So Stevenson) RECLASSIFICAIION NO. 64-65-19 AND CONDITIONAL USE PER, II NO. 614 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of So W. Farrell, dated December 27, 1965, was submitted for 180 day extension of time to subject application for compliance with certain conditions pursuant to Resolutions Nos. 64R-707 and 64R-708. Reports from the City Engineer and the Development Services Department were submitted and reviewed by the City Council. 180 day extension of time was granted, subject to compliance with certain conditions, within two weeks time (February 8, 1966), relative to dedication of vehicular access rights to Tonia Place, posting of bond to guarantee street improvements and drainage facilities, and payment of street lighting and street Tree fees, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. 1751: Submitted by Stanley L. Rosen requesting waivers of minimum required front and rear yard, and minimum lot width and area; R-A property located at 844 South Western Avenue (See R-1 zone pending - Reclassifica- tion No. 62-63-40). The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held January 3, 1966, granted said variance, subject to conditions. Letter dated January 12, 1966, from M. L. McGaughy regarding wall on the south property line, was read by Councilman Pebley. Mr~ Arthur Kovack, 603 Valley View, Fullerton, owner of subject property, addressed the Council indicating he would be willing to install a wall on the south boundary. Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was requested by Councilman Pebley, in the event that bond to guarantee installation of a wall on the south property line has not been received prior to the time legal notices for said public hearing are required to be published and posted° CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held January 3, 1966, pertaining to the followinq applications, were submitted for City Council information 'and consideration: VARIANCE NO. 1753: Submitted by Mrs. Ina Walker? Buena Vista Genvelesgeot Hospital, requesting waivers of number and location s~gn~ C-1 property located a~ 1444 South Euclid $%r~t. -' Granted by the City Planning Commission, subje¢~ to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. 1892, Series 1965-66. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 795: Submitted by ~. P. Ralston, Opal Steib, and Albert Gudes requesting permission for a church auditorium and school in an existing structure, located on R-A property at 1831 and 1837 West Orange Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Re~olution No. 1891, Series 1965-66, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. 9194 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES .~ January 25~ 1966, 1:30 P.M, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 797: Submitted by Delmar Jackson and Doyle Hill requesting permission to establish a restaurant with waivers of minimun building setback and required landscaping; M-1 and P-L property located northerly and westerly of a parcel at the northwest corner of East Street and Kenwood Avenue. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. 1893, Series 1965-66. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. '798: Submitted Oy William and Margaret Sangster and Lonnie and Mary Dunn, requesting permission to establish a coffee shop with waivers of minimum required building setback and required landscaping; M-1 and P-L proper'i} located adjacent to property at the southeast corner of State College Boulevard and Orange~ood Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1894~ Series 1965-66, granted said conditional use permit irt part, denying request for waiver of the required 50 foot building setback and required landscapin9 in the parking area in the M-i zone~ subject to conditions. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken on the above numbered conditional use permit and variance applications. TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 6143[' Deveioper~ Bayport Financial Corporation; tract locazed on the north: side o:: Oranget.hcrpe Avenue, west of Dowling Avenue, and contains 36 proposed R~,3 lots, At the req~Jest of the pe/it~oner~ Council consideration of Tentative Tract 0i43 wa_~ c, ov.t~r~d to ~a consiflered ~r: cor:j:_::t~on ~ith public hearing on Reclassification No, 65~66-78 and 'Variance No~, 1756, on motion by Councilman Chandler~ seco~:,,ded hy Councilman Scnutte~ MOTION CARRIED. ORAN____G. E COUNi'~ USE VARIANCE NO, 5d;74: Req~e,! [.u pern~? continued use of a farm labor camp and a farm implement storage area in 'the A-I(O) Generai Agri- cultural (Oil Production} District at the northeast corner of Orangethorpe Avenue and Richfield Road east of Atwood, ~he City Planning Commission at their meeting held January 17, 1966, recommended that the Orange County Planning Commission be urged to approve Orange County Use Variance No~ 5674 for a maximum period of three years~ On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council concurred in the action taken by the City Planning Com- mission and ordered a copy thereof forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED~ ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO. 5678: Request to permit the establishment of a real estate office, parzing irt connection therewith in the front half of the parcel, and a sign greater than the peru:~t~ed size ~l~owed in ~he RP Residential Professional District, on the east side of Brookhurst Street, approximately 800 feet north of Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held January 17, 1966, recommended that the Orange County Planning Commission grant Orange County Use Variance No~ 5678, subject to requiring dedication of Brookhurst Street 60 feet from the center line of the street for widening purposes, and that the requested sign was generally in conformance with existing signs in the area. The City Council concurred with the action taken by the City Planning Commission, and ordered copy thereof forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2241: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance 2241 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.190 OF fHl ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (No parking- portions of Vermont Avenue 9195 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCil MINUTES - January 25, 1966, 1:30 P.M. PROPOSED ABANDONMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 66R-52: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-52 for adoption, Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF IHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES UPON~ OVER, ACROSS, ALONG AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; RESERVING A PUBLIC UTILITY OVER- HANG EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC POWER LINES AND CROSS-ARMS OVER, ACROSS~ ALONG AND THROUGH SAID PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; AND DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND 'THE PUBLICATION OF '[HIS RESOLUTION, (Public hearlng February 15, 1966, 1:30 P.M.; nor±heMs: corner of State College BoJievard and Katella Avenue) Roll call 'vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Pebley, Schutte~ Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-52 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC iMPROVEMENr PROJECTS: in accordance ~ith recommendations of the City Engineer~ Councalmsn Peble,/ offered Resolutions Nos, 66R-53, 66R-Sa and ~d~p~o,~ Refer t.) Resol,,.,tlon Book.. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-5~ - PROJECi NO. 110, UNIF 3; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil OP rHE CilY O~ ANANELM ACCEP/'iNG A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONERACf iO iht LOWESi RESPONSiBI,E BIDDER FOR [HE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANE~ LABOE~ aER,~ICES~ MAi'hR~ALS AND EQUiPMENf AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSRORi'AJION~ iNCLUDiN5 POI~'~ER~ FUEl, AND WAIER~ AND PERFORMING ALL ~ORK NECESSARY iO CONSiRUCI AND COaPLEIE IHt FOLLOWING P~LIC IMPROVEMENT: FURNISHING AND iNSiALLiNL C~ i'EAPFIC SIGNALS AND SAFE~Y LIGHTING AT THE iNI'ERSECi'/ON O~ EASi SfREEi' AND LA PALb'~A AVENUE~ iN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PROJEC[ NO. llf~ UNII 3, ; :'~ '-}4itchel~ IRC. - $6~580.00} RESOLU[iON NO, At'R-Sa - PkOl~'.ll- SS NO. 304-A - UNif 2: A RESOLUTION OF THE CifY COUNCIL OF f'dE CiIY O~ ANAHEIb~ ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CON~RACI !0 iRE LO'~ES] RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANF~ LABCR~ SERVfCES~ tvIAI'EEiALS AND EQUiPMENI' AND ALL U~ILITIES AND TRANSPORAI!ON, INCLUDINQ PO~EE~ FUEL AND t~AiER~ AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY IO CONS~EUC~ AND CON~PLEI'E THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE iMPEOVEr~ENi' 0~' KAEELLA AVENUE, FROM HASEER SIREEr TO APPROXIMATELY 13bO FEE~ EASI OF [,Et~llS SIEEE!~ iN IHt Ci['ff OF ANAHEiM~ PROJECT SS NO. 3O4-A UNii 2 O. E, H~r,derson Constz'uctkon Co, $41~251.70) RESOLUIiON NO, ©6R-55 .- PROJEC! SS NO. SOS-A: A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIl, OF IHt Cf'TY OF ANAHEim:, ACCEP~zNG A SEALED PROPOSAL AWARDING A CONIRACT fO FHE IC~'ESF RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT~ LABOR, SERVlCES~ I'/AIERIALS AND EQULPMEN! AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTA- TION, !NCLUD!N~ PC',,~ER, E!JEL AND ~vAI'ER~ AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY i0 CONSiNUC[' AND CONIPLEi'E !'HE FOLL0XlHO PUBLIC IYPBOVEMENT: YHE OF CRANGE'P~OOD AVENUE, YROt~ SrAi'E COI.LEGE BOULEVARD TO APPROXIMATELY 2862 FEET EAS[ OF S'FA~E COLLEGE BOULEVARD, iN '~E CITY OF ANAHEI~ PROJECT SS lO. 303-A, {Su!ly-M~l[er Contracting Co. - $58,516.30) Roll call ,,',ate: ,AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: nBSEN, r: COUNCI LI,AEN: Dutt~ Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein Id,l, None None l'he ~a',~oz declared Resolutions Nos. 66R-53, 66R-54 and 66R-55~ dui'/ passed and adopxea. ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-56 - JOB NO. 947: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-56, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND 'THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC iMPROVEMENT, TO WiT: THE iMPROVEMENT OF PORTIONS OF BALL ROAD AND WESTERN AVENUE~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ JOB NO. 947~ (R. J. Noble Company) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None £he Mayor declared Resolution No, 66R-56 duly passed and adopted. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman ScLutte offered Resolutions Nos. 66R-57, 66R-58 and 66R-59 for adoption° Refer ~o Re:solution Bock. RESOLUTION NO, 66R-$7: A RESOLUTION OF THE CI[¥ COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO '~U4E CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT' FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UIILI'IY PURPOSES. (Homer C~ and Maude Gu-ttridge) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-58: A RESOLUTION OF THE CIi'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPI'iNG A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO IHE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERIY FOR AN EASEMEN[ FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UfILITY PURPOSES. (Jack E. and Marjorie P~ R~!ey) RESOLUTION NO. 66R--59: A RESOLU[ION OF iHE CITY COUNCil OF ~HE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENf DEED CONVEYING TO '[HE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Arno H. Stovail - Shell 0il Company) Roil call ~ote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Du~ton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 66R-57, 66R-58 and 66R-59, duly passed and adopted. RINKER ANNEXATION: The City Clerk reported tqat signature on petition requesting annexation of certain uninhamlted territory to the City of Anaheim, described as ~he Rinker Annexation~ represents the ownership of the entire area. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-64: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-64 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIEY OF ANAHEIM ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A PETITION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF CER'IAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY 'TO 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, DESiGNATiNG THE TERRITORY AS 'I~E RINKER ANNEXATION; DESCRIBING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRII'ORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE DAY, HOUR AND PLACE WHERE AND WHEN ANY PERSON OWNING REAL PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY SO PROPOSED 'TO BE ANNEXED MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AND SHOW CAUSE ~]Y SUCH [ERRITORY SHOULD NOT BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Public Hearing March 1, 1966, 1:30 P.M.) Roll call vote: 9197 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-64 duly passed and adopted, CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim submitted by J. B~, Fredericks Co., for damages pur- portedly resultin9 from power failure January 6, 1966, was denied and referred to the City Attorney and City's Insurance Agent, on motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. (T, Stich) CORRESPONDENCE: Resolution No, 2259 of the City of Orange, expressing support and devotion to the members of the Armed Forces of this Country fightin9 in Vier Nam, was ordered received and fiIed on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley., MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The Assistant City Manager Robert Davis reported on informal bids received for the design and installation of an exhaust system for the Property' Maintenance Shop No. 2, as follows, and noted the difference in concept on each of the three proposals. He called attention to recommendations of the Property Maintenance Division that the second low bid of Alert Bi!ower & Pipe Co., in the amount of $4,200.00, including tax, be accepted on the basis that the other quotations were for systems of a lesser amount of force power and would not be adequate for the purpose: Rees Blow Pipe Company, Los Angeles Alert Blower & Pipe Co)~ Compton R. & W. MEg:. Company, E1 Monte $3,779.36 4,200.00 4,700.00 On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager and the Property Maintenance Division~ Councilman Schutte moved that the second iow bid of Alert Blower & Pipe Co., Compton~ be accepted as the lowest and best bzd, ;~ *he amount of Sq,2Oq. O0 including tax. Councilman Pebley secondeJ ~.~e mo~on, MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: Mr. Davls reported on informal bids received for the purchase of office furniture for Anaheim Stadium Offices, as follows, and recommended that the award be divided between the two lowest bidders for the low quotations on each individual izem: Anaheim Business Machines, Anaheim Anaheim Office Furniture and Supply Architectural Furnishings Quality Office Furniture & Business Machines (one item short) O, K. Stationers Webers Book Store Brewer"s Stationery Total including tax $3,253.97 .... 997,36 " " 5,553.60 No Quote No Quote No Quote 5,952.29 On the recommendations of ~he Assistant City Manager, Councilman Schutte moved that purchase be authorized as recommended, low quotations of Anaheim Offlce Furniture and Supply Company in the amount of $997.36, and Anaheim Business Machines in %he amount of $3~253.97. Councilman Outton seconded the motion. ~tOFiON CARRIED. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY AGREEMENT: The Assistant City Manager reported on proposed agreement for the sale by the City to the Southern California Water Company of 565 water services within the City of Stanton, which were acquired through purchase of the Dyke Water facilities; payment for said services to be $176,381,29~ RESOLUTION NO. 66R.-60: On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-60 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 9198 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE SALE TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY OF CERFAIN PORTIONS OF THE DYKE ~A2ER COMPANY WATER FACILITIES NOW OWNED BY THE CITY, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF STANTON. Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAINED: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Scnutte, Chandler and Krein None Pebley None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-60 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-61: Mr. Davls reported on a proposed agreement for the City of Anaheim to purchase a portion of the Southern California Water Company's System (Thornton and Brady Streets) for $21,750.00; at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution NOD 66R-61 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUI'ION OF. 'FHE CifY COUNCIL O~' I'HE CiTY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZINS 'THE EXECUTION OF AN AGRE£MENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF WATER SYSTEM PROPERTY AND ~ACiLiflES OWNED BY FHE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY. dali AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABS'IAINED: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Ouzton, Schutte, C~andler and Krein None Pebley None The Mayor dec!ared Resolution No. 66R-61 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-62: Councziman Dutton offered Resolution No, 66R-62 for adoption., Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUYION OF YHE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING iI-]E ~XECUTION OF AN AGREEMENF BETWEEN THE CITY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY EXi'ENDING THE rERM OF A CERTAIN OPTION AGREEMENT. Roil call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEN: Pe~ley ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 66R-62 duly passed and adopted. EMINENT DOMAIN - PARKSITE: Assistant CCtv Attorney John Dawson reported on the status of Eminent Domain proceedings for a park site on Rio Vista Avenue, adjacent to the Placentia Elementary School site (Brady property approxi- mately five acres) . (Prevzously considered by the City Council). RESOLUTION NO. 66R-63: Councilman Schu'tte offered Resolution No. 66R-63 for adoption~ Refer to Resolution Book~ 9199 Clt¥ Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25, 1966~ 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR, AND DIRECTING tHE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF~ REAL PROPERTY FOR PARK AND RECREATION PURPOSES. ($30,000.00 per acre) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-63 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2239: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2239 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF rHE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAl, CODE RELATING TO ZONING, (65-66-61 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None Zhe Mayor declared Ordinanae No. 2239 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2240:Counc:~man'" Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2240 for adoption. Refer tu Ordinance Book° AN ORDINANCE OF tHE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING i'O ZONING. (65-66-58 - R-A(O)) Roll cai 1 vo~e: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None Rhe Mayor declared Ordinance No~ 2240 duly passed and adopted. DEDICATION OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-111: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte, dedication of Vehicular Access R~ghts by William D~ and Jac~lyn C. Procopio to Euclid Street~ in connection wlth Reclassification No. 64-65-111, was accepted by the City Council and the recordation thereof was authorized. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2242: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2242 for first reading~ AN ORDINANCE OF I'NE CITY OF ANAHHIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE~NAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING ro ZONING. (64'-65-111 - C-l) ~ ORDINANCE NO. 2243: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No, 2243 for first reading~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING rO ZONING. (65.-66-43 - C-l) ~ ORDINANCE NO. 2244: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No, 2244 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-49 - R-A and R-1 - ~agner-Rio Vista Annexation area) ~200 City Hall, Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - January 2~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. ANIMAL CONTROL OPERATIONS: Mr. Davis referred to report from Administrative Assistant Fred Sorsabal (copies furnis[hed each Councilman), recommending that the City of Anaheim Ara:ma1 Control operations be transfered to the County of Orange, and setting forth the basis for said recommendations. The City Council directed that consideration of the foregoing matter be deferred one week February 1, 1966) for further study, STADIUM COMMISSION - NOMINATION: Couns:iman Dutton s~bmitved the name of Mr. Arthu;£ Cossid to be cot: ,idereJ for appointment to ~he Stadium Com- mis~ior:, INTRODUCTION: Sergeant Harold Bastrup~ Anaheim Police Training Officer, intro- duced nine Police Officers attending the Council meeting in conjunction with the officer ~raini~:g pr~.g.ram, RECESS: O,'~ co,ion z;y Co_mcilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council recessed to Executive Session to consider possible litigation in connectzon with action indicated against the City~ MOTION CARRIED. AFTER RECESS: : e City Comte:! returned ~rom Ex.ez~z/:~e Session, and furt. her recessed ~o ~7:00 P,M., on motion ny Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutt,~r..~'~ ~OTiON CARRiED~ (2:50 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: ~ayor Kre~t~ nailed the meet:ng to order, PRESEN7; ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCil,MEN: Dutt, on, Peb~e,,,~ Scbutte, Chandler and Krein. ~OUNCiLMEN: ASSISTAN? CIfY MANAGER: Bob Davis. ~'~ ATTORNEY: 2oseph Geisie~ CiTY CLERK: Oene M.. Williams. DEV'/LOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G~ Orsborn, CiTY ENGINEER: Jsmes P. Maddox. ASSOCIAT'H PLANNER: Rpnald Thompson. ASSiS I'AN f PLANNER: ~ ra:'~zis FLAG SALUfE: Counciima;: Chai:d].ier led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING -. CONDiflONAL USE PER~i'I NO. 783 AND GENERAL PLAN A~ENDMENT NO. 69: SubmlLted by Donald E, and Alice Jean Pierotti requesting permission to establish a medical hospital and center~ with related uses; R-A property located on the east side of' Jefferson Street, south of ~alnut Street, [he City Planning Commission, purs~ant to Resolution No. 1845, Series 1965-66, denied said conditional use permit and pursuant to Resolution No. 1846~ Series 1965-66, recommended disapproval of General Plan Amendment Nco 69. Appeal from a.;tion taken c~ t. he Planning Commission was filed by the Authorized Agent, and public hearing scheduled December 14, 1965; at whlch time the applicant's representative requested a continuance to allow further consideration of the Oommission~s recommendations, Associate Planner Ronald I'hompson noted the location of subject property in the Northeast Industrial Area, and briefed his December 14, 1965, resume of the Planning Commission's f:ndings and action° Ne displayed the exhiOit which illustrated those areas recommended by the Commission a~ more appropriate to serve the needs of the community, while preserving the integrity of the industrial area~ Mayor Krein asked if the applicants or their agent wished to address the City Council. Mr Rotherham, 415 ~est Chapman Avenue, Placentia, real estate agent for the developers~ was of the opinion that, subject property was a logical location for the proposed industrial hospital; that it could not be termed as being located within the heart of the Northeast Industrial Area, due to 920i City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25, 1966~ 1:30 P.M. its proximity to a 100 acre settling basin on the South. Mr. Rotherham submitted letters from The Primus Holding Company, Attorney Samuel Hurwitz, Mrs. John W. Walls, J. S. Belond, and Autonetics, owners of property in the immediate area, all expressing approval of the proposed hospital with the exception of the latter, who maintained a neutral position. Mr. Rotherham further advised of his investigation into the status of properties within the areas shown on the Planning Staff exhibit as more appropriate for the use, notin9 the various problems involved in developing any one of said properties. In conclusion, Mr. Rotherham advised that subject property was the first choice of the twenty-two interested doctors, and in his opinion, hospitals are in a category with churches and schools, being self-contained facilities that do not establish precedents for other uses. Mr. LeRoy Rose, Architect representing the developers, displayed and commented on four exhiOits, as follows: (1) Illustration of estimated population growth for the eastern portion of the City, and into the Santa Ann Canyon, as projected by the research program for the area, on file with the Anaheim Planning Division. (2) Locatlon of all existing and approved hospitals proposed in the City, (3) Rendering of the proposed development, in color, including a 300 to 400 bed major general hospital (100 beds for the first stage), a convalescent hospital, proposed medical and professions suites, and possible projected restaurant and Oan~. (4) Plot plan, illustrating future La Palms Avenue extension which will adjcin the southeast corner of the property. Mr. Rose advised that although there are several hospitals in Anaheim, none were located in the eastern section of the City between subject location and the City of Corona; that the proposed facility would not only serve industrial needs, but N~ose of the present and projected population. He noted that major facilities for surgery and other general medical needs would be available. Councilman Chandler asked the difference between an industrial hospital and other hospitals. Dr~ Daniel Ninberg advised that an industrial hospital would primarily handle industrial accidents, minor accidents and surgical cases. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition~ Mr. Robert A~ Crigler, realtor representing Sprayon Products, Inc., addressed the Council advising their paint and chemical industrial plant, under construction adjacent to subject property on the North, will be completed in approximately sixty days, and although they have no objections to hospitals, they do feel that the subject property should be retained for industrial development. Th~ basis o£ ~helr decision to purchase their property was the City's policy o£ retention of the area for industrial uses. As an industrial realtor, Mr. Crigler further advised of three other clients of national manufacturing concerns interested in subject area for potential location of their facilities. In his opinion these manufacturers would lose interest, should the hospital be allowed at the location proposed. Mr. Crigler displayed a colored rendering of the Sprayon plant, and described their bottling or packaging operation, which will ultimately be a ~nree shire operation and include frequent truck deliveries. He noted hospi- 9202 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25, 19.66' 1:30 P.M. tal authorities would in all probability have serious objections to' any noise emanating from Sprayon Products, even though it would not be excessive for a manufacturing facility. Further, he called attention to industrial uses on nearby properties, and the accessibility to the railroad tracks and the freeway, rendering the area ideal for industrial development. In rebuttal, Mr. Rotherham stated that the hospital will be semi-insulated against sound, and the building would be located from 500 to 600 feet away from the chemical facility. That they realize they would have little basis for complaint, if their request is granted, and that they were aware that other industrial development will undoubtedly take place on surrounding properties. In answer to Councilman Dutton, Mr. Thompson noted the location of the future approximately eighty acre Orange County Water District settling basin, which will be located between La Palms Avenue extension and the Riverside Freeway. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Council discussion was held, and Councilman Dutton noted the need for a hospital facility, but was of the opinion that it should be buffered from industrial uses, and that the integrity of the Northeast Industrial Area should be preserved. RESOLUTION NO. 66R~65: Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that the hospital use would be incompatible with the existing and future industrial uses in the area, and thereupon offered Resolution No. 66R-65 for adoption, denying Conditional Use Permit Nob 783. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI'I7 OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 783. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-65 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-66: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 66R-66 for adoption, disapproving General Plan Amendment No. 69. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DISAPPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 69. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-66 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 1752: Submitted by Starer Brothers Markets re- questing waiver of maximum height of free-standing sign within 300 feet of a residential structure~ C-1 property located at 256~ West Broadway. Said variance was denied by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution 1881, Series 1965-66. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by the applicants, and public hearing scheduled this date. 9203 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zonin9 in the immediate area, calling attention to findings of the Plannin9 Commission in denyin9 said variance. Mayor Krein asked if a representative of the petitioners wished to address the Council. Mr. Daniel H. Mack, 21700 Barton Road, Colton, Counsel for the applicants, advised that the requested sign was part of the total de- velopment as designed by a professional architect, and he questioned the basis for the 25 foot height limitation. He was of the opinion that the sign ordinance should be reviewed with reference to the particular si- tuation, and he failed to see how the proposed sign could be detrimental to the area. In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Mack stated that the pro- posed sign would be appropriate for the maximum development of their pro- perty, and would attract more customers. He advised the term "surroundin9 area", pertainin9 to a neighborhood shopping center, has 9really increased over the years, that today people tend to drive 9rearer distances to shop. It was noted that the request is for an increase of nearly 100 percent in the allowable he19ht of the sign. Mr. Barker, of Federal S19n and Signal, Santa Aha, noted that this location was approved for C-1 zonin9 by the City, and normally this use would be sufficiently removed from residential properties to allow the the sign as requested. He further noted that the proposed sign area would be out of proportion, if placed on a short pole, and was of the opinion that the lighted portion of the sign (a maximum of 50 percent of the total 300 square feet) would be ob3ectionable at a lower level. Councilman Pebtey asked if there was an existing sign in this area similar to the one proposed. Mr. Co B. Brown, Engineer for Starer Brothers, advised that an identical sign is installed at a 53 foot height on Collins Avenue near the Newport Freeway, in the City of Orange. Mr. Mack advised that the variance to the sign ordinance was a reasonable request~ and the requested height would not disturb residents since the sign does not blink, and is not garish in character. The Mayor asked if anyone had opposition to present. Mr. Manuel Mendez, 2556 Rowland Avenue, presented and read a petitlon of opposition signed by approximately 33 residents of Rowland Avenue and Skywood Place, and advised that the existin9 si9n at the service station located at the southeast corner of Magnolia Avenue and Broadway, is disturbin9 to the residents. He further requested that lights on the market parkin9 lot be shielded from view of adjacent residences. Mr. Mendez failed to see a hardship which would warrant the granting of subject variance, and stated the residents are of the opinion Yhat the commercial area has already depreciated the value of their properties by several thousands of dollars. Mr. Bazny Armstrong, 2581 Rowland Avenue, addressed the Council in support of statements made by Mr. Mender. He asked how late in the evening the parking lot lights would remain lighted~ Mr. C~ B. Brown, in rebuttal, advised that the lighting of the parking lot would be in accordance with Anaheim's regulations; however, the purpose of the hearing was to decide on the requested sign. Mayor Krein declared the hearing closed. 9204 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25~ 1966, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-67: At the conclusion of the discussion that followed, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-67 for adoption, upholding the action taken by the City Planning Commission denying Variance No. 1752. Refer to Resolution Books A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1752. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolufion No, 66R-67 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-59 AND AREA DEVELOPMENT PLANS NOS. 23 AND 24: Initiated by the City Planning Commission at the request of the City Council for C-1 zoning, properties located both on the east and west sides of Harbor Boulevard from Santa Ann Street to South Street, extending east- erly to Helena Street and from Water Street to South Street, extending westerly to Pine Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1886, Series 1965-66, recommended reclassification be denied on the basis of findings set forth therein. In accordance with Resolution No. 1884 and Resolution No. 1885, Series 1965-66, recommended Area Development Plans Nos. 23 and 24 be disapproved, and farther recommended that "No Parking" zones be establ{shed on Harbor Boulevard for a period of one year, or until such time as the City Council determines further "No Parking" is the most feasible method of resolving existing traffic problems. Mr. Nutto of the City Planning Division, briefly summarized the hearing held before the City Planning Commission, and advised that the reclassification was initiated by the City Planning Commission as a result of a public hearing held October 19, 1965, by the City Council on the subject of parking along Harbor Boulevard° Area Development Plans Nos. 23 and 24 Exhibits A and B, were prepared as a part of the study, and subject properties advertised for C-I zoning in order to give latitude in zoning~ The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr, Herb Cook, 724 South Pine Street, was of the opinion that the problem should be approached with the future in mind. He pointed out that the lots fronting Harbor Boulevard and also the alley to the rear of said lots, were too small to singly accommodate commercial development. Re- cognizing the value of the Harbor Boulevard frontage, it was his further opinion that C-1 zonlng should be established with a parking zone on the side streets, in order to attract developers that would by means of land assembly, make commercial development possible. Mr. Nu~to reported that Area Development Plans 2 and 16, projecting commercial on the Harbor Boulevard frontage with parking to the rear, both east and west, had been approved by the City Council~ ~r. 'Tony Padilla, owner of 537 South Harbor Boulevard, advised that he was not prepared to dedicate, donate or give any of his property for street widening without due compensation. Mrs. Marguerite Coons, 625 South Harbor Boulevard, referred to communication submitted advising that all necessary dedication for street widening fronting her property has been made. Mrs, Coons requested that temporary access be permitted to her property by means of a community drive between her property and the lot to the north owned by ~r. Rose, in the event a "No Parking" zone is established. 9205 ~ty Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25, 1966, 1:30 P.M. Mrs. Coons further advised that the traffic generated by her business, should temporary access be granted, could not compare with that generated by tine Southern California Auto Club to the south. Mr. Charles Meeks, 624 South Harbor Boulevard, advised that he favors the reclassification to C-l, as /he means of attracting purchasers who could assemble property for development, and he and others with small lots could sell their land and move their family to areas more conducive to residential living. Dr. William Kott, 601 South Harbor Boulevard, stated that if the basic problem was that of traffic, in his opinion, it would not be solved by reclassifying the area any particular zone. He suggested that where necessary dedlcatior~ or promise to dedicate as result of zoning has been made, rte dedications be accepted by the City, and the City proceed to wider 'chose areas Councilman Schutte felt that the three foot width between the sidewalk and curb would be sufficient to widen the street to alleviate the traffic. The City Council agreed to the widening of a minimum of one half block upon acquisition of necessary dedication~ and also remembered that a study was requested to determine how many owners would dedicate so that widening co::ld proceed. Mr~ Robert Davis reported that apparentlv there was some mis- understanding, as ~de R~g~-of-W~v and Land Section-had contacted all owners on the wes~ slde of Harbor Boulevard between Water and South Streets, and further reported that in this block all right-of-way has been obtained wlth the exception of the property owned nv Mtn Waterman and Dr. Knit (written agreement to dedicate filed); however, one property owner has requested return of the deed pending commercial zoning of the property. Dr. Kott stated that if those areas for dedication that have been obtained were wider~ed, :'~ ,:s opl-'.~o,~ ~,':e n',~joritv o~ the people will be sat~:~fied, Mr~ Lather Moore~ 617 Pine Street, asked if the zoning issue on t~e east side of Pine Street could be considered terminated~ and also when installation of street lights on Plne Street could be expected. Mr. Davis advised that safety lighting of intersections can be accomplished in the regular city program, however if ornamental lighting is desired, it would require the formation of a stree~ lighting assessment district,, Dr. Homer Nelson~ owner of the southeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and South Street, requested the suggestion of Councilman Schutte be pursued; if the taking of three feet on each side would be adequate to accomplish a four lane hlghway and parking, and because of the shallow lots, another study should be made rather than require a ten foot dedication. In answer to Council questioning~ Mr. Maddox reported that the three foot width would not accomplish the project~ and would not provide for four lanes and parking nor provide for left, hand turn pockets. Mr. Padilla asked if the property owners would also be required to dedicate five feet for the widening of the alley~ in his opinion, a total of fifteen feet would be quite an amount considering the small size of the lots. Betty Roth, 842 South Helena Street, referred to a former meeting wherein it was suggested that the street be striped for a trial period; in her opinion, to stripe the street, would start the project and be helpful. ,ts a maiter o! ~nformatlon, it: was reported that when facilities presently installed are removed for street widening, the City assumes the cost of relocation of said facilities. 9206 C$ty Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25, 1966, 1:30 P.M. There being no further evidence submitted, Mayor Krein declared the hearing closed. Further discussion was held by the City Council, and it was determined, as suggested by Councilman Pebley, that the City Engineer be instructed.to cause a house to house canvass on both sides of Harbor Boulevard fro6 Santa Ann Street to South Street, to ascertain if necessary dedication for street widening can be obtained; further, that notes on such canvass be made of individual parcels, the result of said canvass to be reported in 30 days at which time the date Harbor Boulevard is to become a four lane highway, and the matter regarding parking will be determined. (On or before March 1, 1966), RESOLUTION. NO. 66R-68: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-68 authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing to C-O zoning those lots fronting both sides of Harbor Boulevard between Santa Ann and South Streets, which have not already been reclassified commercially, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 45 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Harbor Boulevard, for street widening purposes. All corner parcels shall include a 15-foot radlds ~orner a% any corner. 2. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Harbor Boulevard and Santa Ann Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. That the sidewalks shall be repaired along Harbor Boulevard, as re- quired by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer° 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 5. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Harbor Boulevard, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 6. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with Area Development Plan Nco 23 Exhioit A and No~ 24 Exhibit A, on file wizh the City of Ar~anetmo 7° Each parcel may be ciasslfied separately upon compietlon of the foregoing conditions. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND 'THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-59 - C-O) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No, 66R-68 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-69: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-69 approving Area Development Plan No. 23 Exhibit A. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 23, EXHIBIT "A". Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schut±e, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-69 duly passed and adopted. 9207 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUIION NO. 66R-70: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-70 approvin~ Area Development Plan No. 24, Exhibit A. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 24, EXHIBIT "A". Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None 'The Mayor declared Resoluzion No. 66R-70 duly passed and adopted, EXISTING ALLEY: Ihe present condition of the existing alley on the west side of the 600 block of South Harbor Boulevard was discussed, and the City Council requested that the holes in this alley be filled. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-63 AND AREA DEVKLOPMENT PLAN NO. 9: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission for C-1 zoning on certain parcels located on both sides of Harbor Boulevard, between South Street and approximately 329 feet south of Vermont Avenue, designated as follows: Portion A - Block bounded on the west by Harbor Boulevard, on the east by Helena Street~ on the north by South Street,, and on the south by Hampshire Street. Portion B -- SoutFeast corner, HarOor Boulevard and Hampshire Street, two ]c%~ ~r.o. r:. g or: Hampshire, one lot fronting Harbor, Portion C ~-West side Harbor Boulevard, south of South Street (Automobile Club of Southern Californiaj. Portion D - West aide Harbor Boulevard~ at easterly terminus of Bellevue Drive° Portion E - Sout)-~west corner~ Harbor Boulevard and Vermont Avenue. T~e City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1888, Series 1965-66~ recommended disapproval of C-1 zoning on Portions A and B, on the basis that commercial zoning would be premature at this time; and further recommended ~he estaoiishment of "No P=rklng~' on Harbor Boulevard from South Street to Ball Road for a period of one year, or until such time as the City Council deems is necessary to determine if this is a feasible method of resolving traffic problems; and further, that all travel lanes on Harbor Boulevard be striped. The Planning Commission further recommended that C-O zoning be approved for Portions C and D, a~d approval of C-1 zoning on Portion E, subject to the following conditZons: 1. That the owner of subject proper±y shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of lan~ 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street~ along the west side of Harbor Boulevard, for street widening purposes, including a 15-foot radius corner return at Vermont Avenue (south of Vermont Avenue only)~ 2. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 45 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along the west side of Harbor Boulevard for street widening purposes (north of Vermont Avenue only). ' 3. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along the west side of Harbor Boulevard such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; Or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted wi~h the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements, 9208 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25, 1966, 1:30 P.M. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. Area Development Plan No. 9 was recommended for disapproval by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1887, Series 1965-66. Assistant Planner Francls Nutto noted the existing and proposed commercial uses of subject and adjacent properties, and advised that although subject application was similar to the previous one just considered, in some aspects it differs. On Portion A, he noted that C-1 was considered for properties between Harbor and Helena Street; however where residential pro- perty owners on major streets and highways seek relief, the owners of pro- perties adjacent to the rear are not generally in favor of commercial uses adjoining their properties. Attention was called to Area Development Plan No. 9, posted on the east wall of the Council Chamber, and Mr. Nutto reported that in conduct- in9 the study of the area, the Staff attempted to take a positive approach based on the premise that the Council would 9rant C-1 zonin9 for subject properties. Due to the fact that there is no North-South alley through some of these properties, the only feasible development would be from Harbor Boulevard through to Helena Street on the East, and to Pine Street (extended) on the West; and it was the recommendation of the Staff that, should the Area Development Plan be adopted a 20,000 square foot minimum parcel size be maintained, as is requlred in C-O zones. Mr. Nutto further reported that the alley~ which would be neces- sary for commercial development, east of Harbor Boulevard, between South and Hampshire Streets, has been depicted on the Area Development Plan as extending north from Hampshire Street, to the south boundary of the large parcel at the southeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and South Street, at which point the alley would extend westerly to Harbor, allowing for com- mercial development of the entlre parcel.. He noted the three lots on Portion B, which the Staff felt could develop without a secondary alley access. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council. Mrs. Ann Madison~ Real Estate Agent representing owners of property at 866 South Barbor Boulevard, was of the opinion that until such time as posslble land assembly for large developments takes place, the individual property owners should be allowed the highest use of their lots. She advised that C-1 zoning is favored over C-O by the residents of Portion A, in order that combination of residential and business uses could be allowed. She called attention to petition in favor of C-1 Zoning, submitted and signed by owners of ten properties in Portion A (copies furnished each Councilman), and also submitted a suggested plan for access to future commercial off-street parking areas, ~ich would eliminate the necessity for an alley through these shallow parcels. Mr. J. J. O:Connor, Real Estate Department, Automobile Club of Southern California, 2601 South Pigueroa Street, Los Angeles, noted that thelr property (Portion C) is zoned R-A, with a conditional use permit for the ex~sting facility. In his opinion, this property should be zoned C-i, as are both the parcels to the North and South. Mr. O'Connor advised that they agree the street should be widened; however, certain improvements would be affected if a portion of their pro- perty was dedicated to the City for such widening, and expense would be incurred, due to the loss of a double-faced pylon sign with footings and lettering, necessary removal and replacement of existin9 metal letters and the brick panel adjacent to the front ent~ancel relocation of sprinkler system, and relocation of five foot electric sign. In summary, Mr. O'Connor advised that any dedication of property for street widening must be considered by their Board of Directors. 9209 C_it¥ Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. John Langford, 839 South Helena Street, called attention to petition submitted for Council consideration (copies furnished each Council- man), signed by approximately twenty-five residents of Helena and Hampshire Streets, opposing the proposed zone change for Portion A. He noted that the majority of properties included in Portion A are a part of a subdivision, upon which deed restrictions were recorded prohibiting any commercial uses without the approval of the majorlty of property owners. Mr. Langford noted the availability of C-1 and C-O zoned pro- perties on Harbor Boulevard to the North, and failed to see any justification, for commercial zoning on the properties fronting on Helena Street. He re- quested that Portions A and B be disapproved for C.-.1 zoning, and that the Harbor Boulevard traffic problem be resolved as a separate problem. Discussion was held bv the City Council regarding possible C-O zoning of the Harbor Boulevard frontage, and Mr. Langford recognizing the problems of property owners on said street, advised that their primary objection was to any intrusion upon the residential integrity of Helena Street. Mayor Krein asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council. Mrs. Wesley Jones, 856 South Helena Street, was of the opinion that any commercial zoning of Portion A, or any part thereof, would be premature, She expressed concern for the preservation of their residential area, and particularly oboected to commercial zoning of the entire parcel on the south side of South Street, extending from Harbor Boulevard to Helena Street. Mro Strobel, 832 South Helena Street, requested that the owner of property at the southwest corner of South and Helena Streets be required to lower the height of the existing shrubbery, which blocks the view of South Street traf±lc~ Mrs. Ann Madison again addressed the Council advising that the proposed 10 foot street widening dedication, together with the 20 feet for an alley, would leave lots of approximately 73 feet in depth on Portion A. She re-stated her previous request for C-1 zoning on Portion A. Mr. Gordon Hammond~ owner of property at 852 South Harbor Boulevard~ advised that they no longer reside at that location, and although he sympathized with Helena Street residents, he felt the pro- perties on Harbor Boulevard have lost their residential characteristics, and many have already deteriorated. In his opinion, C-O development would not be economically feasible, however most people would be willing to dedicate property for street widening if granted C-1 zoning. Mayor Krein being of the opinion that a good cross section of the evidence pro and con had been presented, declared the hearing closed. Council discussion was held, and Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that to afford a promise of future relief to Harbor Boulevard property owners, and give consideration to residents on Helena Street, C-O zoning could be approved on the Harbor Boulevard frontage only for Portions A and Bo At the conclusion of the discussion, it was de~erm[ned %ha% the City Engineer be instructed to cause a house ~o house canvass on both sides of Harbor Boulevard from South Street to approximately 329 feet south of Vermont Avenue, said canvass to include those properties under consideration in Reclassification No, 65-66-63, and fronting or siding on to Harbor Boulevard, the purpose of said canvass to ascertain if neces- sary dedication for street widening can be obtained; further, that notes on such canvass be made of individual parcels, the result thereof to be reported in 30 days, at which time the date Harbor Boulevard is to become a four lane highway and the matter regarding parking will be determined (on or before March 1, 1966). ~210 City Hatt~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO, 66R-71: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-71 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zones of Portions A, B and D to C-O (Portion A C-O Zoning 137.75 feet from monumented centerline of Harbor Boulevard, except the two southernmost lots, which front on Hampshire Street, and would be C-O for a depth of 179.75 feet from the monumented centerline), and Portions C and £ being changed to C-1 zoning, subject to the following conditions: That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Harbor Boulevard, for street widening purposes, including a 15- foot radius corner return at Vermont Avenue (south of Vermont Avenue only). That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 45 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Harbor Boulevard, for street widening purposes, including a 15- foot radius corner return at South Street and Hampshire Street (north of Vermont Avenue e That the sidewalks shall be installed along South Street as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifi- cations on file in the office of the City Engineer, prior to final building inspection. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Harbor Boulevard, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required bv the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifi- cations on file in the office of the City Engineer; or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering re- quirements. That Condition Nos~ 1, 2 and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 6. Plans for any development under C-0 zoning must be submitted to the Clty Council for approval. 7. Each parcel may be classified separately, upon completion of the foregoing conditions. Refer to Resolution Book, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-63 - C-1 and C-O) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-71 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-72; Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-72 disapprovin9 Area Development Plan No, 9. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CIrY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DISAPPROVING AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 9. Roll call vote: 9211 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENI: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-72 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Dutton moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (10:41P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meetin9 to order, all members of the City Council being present. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-66: Submitted by Frank Muller, Sr. Foundation, requesting change of zone from R-A to M-i; property located on the east side of Crescent Way, approximately 915 feet north of Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1882, Series 1965-66, recommended approval of said reclassification subject to the following conditions: ' 1. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Crescent Way, for street lighting purposes. 2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Crescent Way, for tree planting purposes. 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection. a. Yhaz Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council for or against the oroposed reclassification, Mr. Clifton P. Wolfe, 629 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, Authorized Agent, indicated his presence representing %he proponents. There being no further response Mayor Krein declared the hearing closed. ' RESOLUTION NO. 66R-73: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-73 for adoption~ authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to M-l, as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-66 - Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-73 duly oassed and adopted. ANAHEIM STADIUM PERSONNEL: Assistant City Manager Robert Davis reported on proposed method of staffing Anaheim Stadium, advising that studies have 9212 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25, 1966, 1:30 P.M. been under way by the Personnel Department, City Manager's Office, and the Stadium and Convention Manager, together with representatives of the Cali- fornia Angels, resulting in a recommendation to the City Council that the C~ty attempt to directly employ the personnel for main%chance and staffing of the stadium, in lieu of contracting for each individual function. In accordance with the organizational plan proposed by Mr. Liegler, Stadium and Convention Manager, the personnel would function under three persons, a Maintenance Supervisor, Parking Supervisor, and Staff Supervisor, eventually serving both Stadium and Convention Center. It was further re- commended that the position of a Mechanical Repairman be established in the Mechanical Maintenance Division, and Mr. Davis briefly described the areas of responsibility for each recommended position. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-7a: On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-74 for adoption, amending Resolution No. 66R-21 (Salary Resolution - Mid-Year Review) to include the four classifications as recommended. Refer %o Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 66R-21 ESTABLISHING RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR NEW JOB CLASSES. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-7m duly passed and adopted. TRANSFER OF FUNDS: Mr~ Robert Davis recommended that, in order to accomplish the employment by the City of Anahelm Stadium personnel, two additional posi- tions should be added %o the Personnel Office budget, an Administrative Aide and an Intermediate Typist Clerk. He advised that approximately $4,000.00 would be required to carry out the additional expense to the department for the balance of the fiscal year 1965-66. Councilman Krein moved that the positions of Administrative Aide and Intermediate Typist Clerk for the Personnel Department be approved, and that transfer in the amount of $4,000.00 be authorized from the Council Contingency Account to the Personnel Department Budget Account. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ANAHEIM STADIUM SCOREBOARD PROTECTION: Mr. Geisler reported that at the suggestion of the City Council, an attorney was consulted relative to method of protect- ing use of Anaheim Stadium scoreboard reproductions. He further reported that the scoreboard symbol can be registered in a manner similar to a copy- righf, or patent; that costs to the City for special attorney services to research this matter would be approximately $1,000.00. TRANSFER OF FUNDS: Councilman Chandler moved that the ~) registration mark be added to all literature carrying a photograph or reproduction of the scoreboard, together with the date; that the protection of the scoreboard by possible patent, copyright or service mark be explored; and transfer of $1,000.0©, be authorized from the Council Contingency Account to defray the COSt Of attorney fees for such service. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ANAHEIM STADIUM COMMISSION: Councilman Chandler moved that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare an ordinance disbanding Anaheim Stadium Commission; and further moved that Certificates of Merit be issued to the Commission members, for the services they have rendered. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Chandler suggested the remaining members of the Stadium Commission be considered for appointment to other Commissions, 9213 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. ANAHEIM STADIUM AND CONVENTION CENTER POLICY: Councilman Chandler moved that the City Attorney be instructed to draft a resolution o~ policy establish- ing an Executive Committee to include two City Councilmen and the Stadium - Convention Center Manager, for the purpose of establishing rates and rentals for use of Anaheim Stadium and the Convention Center. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 12:00 Midnight. City Clerk City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 1v 1966~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein. COUNCILMEN: None, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CITY ATIORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Marvin Krieger. CIVIL DEFENSE COORDINATOR: Paul Hayes. ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT: Fred Sorsabal. 'TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Edward Oranzow. Mayor Krein called the meetin9 to order. PRESENTATION OF HEALTH AWARDS - ANAHEIM RESTAURANTS: Councilman Schutte and Mr, Robert Stone, of the Orange County Health Department, presented Award of Excellence Plaques to the following restaurant establishments. Mr. Stone advised that as of ,7~r:~arv 25, 1966, there were 231 eligible restaurants in the City of Anaheim, lal of which have received the plaques, or approximately 61 percent: Dog House, 2207 South Harbor Boulevard. Mexicana, 1750 West Lincoln Avenue. Chalet, 721 West Katella Avenue. Jiffy Burger, 520 East Lincoln Avenue. Scotty~s Coffee Shop, 604 East Lincoln Avenue. Jack-In-The-Box, 1285 East Lincoln Avenue. Mayor Krein thanked Mr. Stone and congratulated the restaurant operators for their cooperation and achievement. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Krein proclaimed Sunday, February 27, 1966, "Heart Sunday", and the month of February, 196.6, as "Heart Month". Said proclamation was unanimously ratified by the City Council. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Meeting held January 18, 1966, were approved, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.