Loading...
1966/06/289511 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 289 1966 - 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session° PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Pebley~ Schutte and Kreino COUNClL~EN~ Chandler° CITY MANAGER: Keith Ao Murdocho ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis° CI/Y ATTORNEY: 3oseph Geisler° CITY CLERK: Dene Mo Williams° DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan Go Orsborno CITY ENGINEER: 3ames Po Maddox~ ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Michelsono ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Grudzinskio Mayor Krein called the meeting to order° PRESENTATION - Y.M~C.Ao AWARD - MAYOR KREIN: Mro Scott Murdoch, spokesman representing the Anaheim YoMoC.A.~ presented Mayor Krein with a portrait of the Mayor~ and a plaque denoting appreciation for his contribution to the youth of the community by serving as Chairman of the "Big Gifts Committee" in the YoM.CoAo Building Fund Drive° Mayor Krein expressed his appreciation to Scott and to the YoMoC~Ao PRESENTATION - FRIENDS OF THE ANAHEIM PUBLIC LIBRARY: Mrs° Elizabeth Jo Schultz~ Member of the Library Board of Trustees~ introduced Mro Earl Dahl and Mrs° F1Qrence Powers~ of Friends of the Anaheim Public Library~ who pre- sented the City Council with the first five numbered facsimile copies of the first Anaheim Telephone Exchange Directory~ published in 1895 by the Sunset Telephone and Telegraph Company° PROCLAMATION: Mayor Krein submitted a proclamation urging citizens to attend the first "Glorious Old Fashioned Fourth" Pageant at Anaheim Stadium~ July 49 1966o Said Proclamation was unanimously ratified by the City Council° MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held June 14~ 1966, were approved on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED° WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLU/IONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions~ and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilman~ unless after reading of the title~ specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution° Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $1~124~181o82, in accordance with the 1965-66 Budget~ were approved. RECESS: Mayor Krein recessed the Council Meeting for the purpose of convening as the Redevelopment Agency° (l:n5 PoMo) AFTER RECESS: (2:20 PoMo) The City Council reconvened and Mayor Krein called the meeting to order~ all Members of the Council being present with the exception of Councilman Chandler~ PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Application filed by Carmen Moreno~ on behalf of Sociedad Progresista Mexicana No~ 14~ for permit to conduct public dance to be held July 10~ 1966~ at 608 West Vermont Avenue~ was submitted and granted in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Schutte~ MOTION CARRIED° REQUEST - WHITE FRONT STORES: Communication dated June 7, 1966, from George Silverstein~ Manager~ White Front - Anaheim~ requesting permission to conduct a special promotion on the parking lot of the White Front Store; 2222 South Harbor Boulevard~ from July 7 through July 17~ 1966~ was sub- mittedo 9512 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1966, 1:30 P.M. Reports from the Director of Public Works, Police Department, Fire Department and City Manager were reviewed by the City Council° It was noted that the request stipulated the area to be used would cover approximately 50 parking spaces~ including a 30 foot by 100 foot tent area° At the conclusion of the discussion that followed~ on motion by Councilman Pebley~ seconded by Councilman Du/ton~ the foregoing request was approved~ subject to provisions set forth in City Council Policy Noo 605. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST - BUSINESS LICENSE~ JEROME'S CULLEY SUPPLY COMPANY: Communication dated June 10~ 1966~ from Robert V. Faust~ Attorney representing Jerome Amaniera~ requesting City business license for Jerome's Culler Supply Company~ to be located at 2016~ South Anaheim Boulevard (M-1 Zone), was submitted and reviewed by the City Council together with reports from the License and Development Services Departments; it being noted that the use would be permitted by right in an M-2, Heavy Industrial Zone. Mro George Beltz, representing the petitioner~ addressed the Council describing the nature of the proposed operation, which would consist of purchasing and collection of culler and glass debris, and storing these materials~ pending resale to wholesale outlets; no proc- essing~ manufacturing or production of products to be conducted on the premises~ On the recommendations of the Development Services Department, it was moved by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Pebley~ that permission to conduct the outdoor storage operation be denied, and the petitioner be advised of his right to file application for Conditional Use Permit for the requested use in an M-1 Zone., MO/ION CARRIED. (Councilman Schutte left the meeting~ 2:25 P.M.) VARIANCE NO. 1788: Communication dated June 6~ 1966~ from Jerry Ao Brody~ Attorney representing Mrs° Helen Bouck~ requesting waiver of street widening dedication along Harbor Boulevard~ required as condition of the granting of Variance Noo 17889 was submitted and reviewed by the City Council~ together with reports from the City Engineer and the Development Services Department Zoning Division; property located at 319 North Harbor Boulevard. On the recommendations of the Development Services Department~ it was moved by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Pebley~ that said request be denied° (Councilman Schutte returned to the meeting~ 2:28 P.M.) ~rso Helen Bouck, lessee of subject property~ addressed the Council advising that the owner of the property did not wish to make dedication for street widening at this time, and she requested that the dedication be waived to allow the use of the existing structure for the sale of art objects and small antiques (no furniture), in conjunction with residential use~ Council discussion was held~ and it was noted that Variance Noo 1788 was granted by the City Planning Commission for a period of two years, subject to conditions; that excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held May 23~ 1966, was submitted~ wherein request to delete Condition No. 1 of Resolution No. 2012~ Series 1965-66, was denied° At the conclusion of the discussion~ Councilmen Dutton and Pebley withdrew their former motion and second to deny subject request, and it was moved by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton~ that Council action on the foregoing request be deferred two weeks (July 129 1966, 1:30 P.M.)~ to allow the owner of subject property and his attorney an opportunity to be present, MOTION CARRIED. 95t3 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1966, 1:30 P.M. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held June 6~ 1966, pertaining to the following applica- tions, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 845: Submitted by Thomas P. Walker~ requesting permission to establish a restaurant; M-1 zoned property having frontages on State College Boulevard and Via Burton Street (adjacent to southeast corner of the intersection.) Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. 2061, Series 1965-66o CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 846: Submitted by James S. Morris, requesting permission to establish a walk-up restaurant with waiver of minimum required parking spaces; C-1 zoned property located at 400 South Brookhurst Street~ Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution Noo 2062, Series 1965-66. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 847: Submitted by Doctors Philip McFarland, 3o Po Conaty~ Mo Lo Neff, and T. 3. Lawton, requesting permission to establish a restaurant and cocktail lounge; M-1 and P-L property located at '1105 East Katella Avenu]eo Granted by the City Planning Commission~ subject to conditions~ pursuant to Resolution Noo 2063, Series 1965-66. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 848: Submitted by Dale Io Sellon, requesting permission to establish a walk-up restaurant in conjunction with existing restaurant, with waiver of minimum required parking 'spaces; C-1 zoned property located at 32'2 South Brookhurst Street. Granted bY the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No° 2064, Series 1965-66. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 849: Submitted by Everett Dean, requesting permission to establish a walk-up restaurant with waivers of minimum required parking spaces and parking lot interior landscaping; C-1 zoned property located at 2802 West Lincoln Avenue° Granted by the City Planning Commission for the establishment of a wa]k-up restaurant on1¥~ subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution NOD 2065~ Series 1965-66_ VARIANCE NO. [797: Submitted by Mr~ and Mrs° Casey Burns requesting per- mission to expand an existing R-3 structure with waivers of minimum required parklng spaces~ minimum building site area per dwelling unit~ maximum height within 150 feet of a single-family residential zone~ mini- mum parking space sLze and to permit an accessory building to abut a side property l~ne ~% the front 75% of a building site; R-3 zoned property located at 420 North Vine Street. Granted by the Cit¥ Planning Commission, subject to conditions~ pursuant ~o Resolution Nog 2067, Series 1965-66, VARIANCE NOg 1798~ Submitted by Southern California Edison Company, requesting permission to establish retail sales on M-1 and P-L zoned property~ located at 1500 South State College Boulevard. Granted for a period of six months only by the City Planning Commlssion~ sdbject to condition~ pursuant to Resolution No~ 2068~ Series 1965-66~ CONDI[IONAL USE PERMIT NOo 090 - REVISED PLANS: Excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held June 6, 1966, approving Revised Plans marked Exhibits 1 through 5~ Revision Noo 3. City Hallo Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 28, 1966~ 1:30 P.M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 735 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held June 6~ 1966~ granting one year extension of time~ to expire September 13, 1967. VARIANCE NO~ 1771: City Planning Commission Resolution Noo 2077~ Series 1965-66~ amending their Resolution Noo 1979, Series 1965-66, Finding No. 1 - clarification of commercial structure height. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo ~22: City Planning Commission Resolution No. 2076~ Series 1965-669 amending Resolution No. 1978, Series 1965-66~ legal description~ and adding Condition No. 5~ to require development in accord- ance with plans submitted° The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken on the above numbered variance and conditional use permit applications° CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 850: Submitted by Robert J. Drabkin and Nicholas E. Plotnoff~ requesting permission to establish a pawn shop in existing structure~ C-2 property located at 139 South Anaheim Boulevard° Granted by the City Planning Commission~ subject to conditions~ pursuant to Resolution NOo 2066~ Series 1965-66o Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was requested by Councilman Dutton~ and the City Clerk was instructed to schedule the matter for public hearing before the City Council° STREET NAME CHANGE - KATELLA AVENUE: City Planning Commission Resolution Noo 2075~ Series 1965-66~ was submitted recommending change in street name of a portion of Katella Avenue to Katella Way (two stub streets in the vicinity of the Santa Aha Freeway Overpass). RESOLUTION NO~ 66R-432: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Noo 66R-432 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CHANGING THE NAME OF PORTIONS OF KATELLA AVENUE TO KATELLA WAY. (Near Santa Ana Freeway overpass) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Pebley~ Schutte, and Kreino None° Chandler° The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 66R-432 duly passed and adoptedo PRECISE ALIGNMENT - LA PALMA AVENUE: On motion by Councilman Pebley~ seconded by Councilman Dutton~ public hearing was scheduled July 19~ 1966, 1~30 P.Mo~ to consider City Planning Commission Resolution No. 2074~ Series 1965-66~ recommending the establishment of the precise alignment of La Palma Avenue~ between Taylor Street and the Imperial Highway on the East° MOTION CARRIED. AWARD O~ CONTRACT - JOB NO. 5021: On the recommendations of the City Engineer~ it was moved by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Pebley~ that award of contract for 3ob Noo 5021~ the South Street Storm Drain~ Phase III~ be deferred to July 19~ 1966~ 1:30 MOTION CARRIED° RESOLUTION NO. 66R-433 - WORK ORDER NO. 1887: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution Noo 66R-433 for adoption~ Refer to Resolution Booko 9515 City Hail~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28~ 1966, 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUC- TION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: CONSTRUCTION OF TWO CONCRETE WATER VAULTS FOR DOMESTIC AND FIRE WATER LINES AT THE CONVENTION CENTER~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ WORK ORDER NO. 1887; APPROV- ING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES~ DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened July 21~ 1966~ 2:00 P~Mo) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein. None. Chandler~ The Mayor declared Resolution No, 66R-433 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-434 - PROJECT NO. 304A~ PHASE 2: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution Noo 66R-434 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUC- TION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF HAS/ER STREET AND KATELLA AVENUE~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ PROJECT NO. 304-A~ PHASE 2; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES~ DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUC- TION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS~ SPECI- FICATIONS~ ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING /HE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened 3u1¥ 21~ 1966~ 2:00 P.M.) Roi1 cai1 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Kreino None. Chandler° The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 66R-434 duly passed and adopted~ PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS - FINAL ACCEPTANCE: Upon receipt of certifications from the Director of Public Works. Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Nos, 66R-435 and 66R-436 for adoptiono Refer to Resolution Booko RESOLUTION NO~ 66R-435 - JOB NO. 1006: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISH- ING OF ALL PLANT~ LABOR~ SERVICES~ MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT~ TO ~IT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF PORTIONS OF KATELLA AVENUE AND HARBOR BOULEVARD~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 1006. (R, 30 Noble Company) RESOLUTION NO~ 66R-436 - PROJECT NO. SS 386B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILIIIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER~ FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT~ TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMEN/ OF LA PALMA AVENUE~ FROM PAULINE STREET TO MAYFAIR AVENUE~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO~ SS 386B~ (Sully-Miller Contracting Company) 9516 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28~ 1966, 1:30 P.Mo Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Pebley~ $chutte and Kreino COUNCILMEN: None. COUNCILMEN: Chandler° The Mayor declared Resolution Nos° 66R-435 and 66R-436 duly passed and adopted° DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Nos~ 66R-437~ 66R-438 and 66R-439 for adop~tion~ Refer to Resolutio~n Book~ RESOLUTION NO. 66R-437: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Fredericks Development Corporation) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-438: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Robert and Beverly Mo O~Neill) RESOLU/ION NOo 66R-439: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES~ (Arno Ho Stovall~ 3r~ and Dorothy MQ Wileman) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Pebley~ Schutte and Kreino Noneo Chandler° The Mayor declared Resolution Nos~ 66R-437~ 66R-438 and 66R-439 duly passed and adopted,~ EMINENT DOMAIN LITIGATION SETTLEMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 66R-440: On report and recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Krein offered Resolution Noo 66R-440 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM COMPROMISING CERTAIN EMINENT DOMAIN LITIGATION WITH THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CiTY CLERK TO EXECUTE A GRANT DEED IN FAVOR OF THE CiTY OF GARDEN GROVE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, (triangular shaped parcel~ Verano Street - $2~700o00) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Pebley~ Schutte and Kreino None° Chandler° The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 66R-440 duly passed and adopted° CLAIMS AGAINSI THE CITY: The following claims against the city were denied~ as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the insur- ance agent~ in accordance with Council policy~ on motion by Councilman Pebley~ seconded by Councilman Dutton: (a) Claim submitted by Mrs° Dolores Eo Conway for damages to vehicle, purportedly received when a city-owned truck trailer struck the automobile on or about June 6~ 1966, 9517 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 289 1966, 1:30 P.M. Claim filed by Samuel Hurwitz, Attorney, on behalf of George Bennett~ for purported false arrest and/or false and wrongful imprisonment and/or personal injuries, on or about March 109 1966. MOTION CARRIED. TRANSFER OF FUNDS: On the recommendations of the Accounting Officer, it was moved by Councilman $chutte~ seconded by Councilman Pebley, that transfer of funds from Traffic Safety~ In Lieu~ Parking Meter~ Recreation, Special Gas Tax Improvement and Parksites~ Playgrounds and Recreation Funds, to the General Fund for reimbursement of amounts advanced by the General Fund during the fiscal, year~ be authorized. MOTION CARRIED. UNCOLLECTABLE ACCOUNTS: On the recommendations of the City Attorney~ Councilman Pebley moved that $2~157o05 from the Miscellaneous Accounts Receivable~ $4i~630~02 from the Customer Service Accounts Receivable~ and $13o44 from the Collection Officers Returned Bank Items Account~ be written off as Dad debts~ as requested and itemized in communication dated June 239 1966 from 3ohn Woodstra~ Accounting Officer° Councilman Dutton seconded the motions, MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NOw 66R-4al: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Noo 66R-441 for adoptiono Refer to Resolution Booko A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO CITIES. (Third amended budget) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Pebley, Schutte and Kreino None~ Chandler° The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 66R-441 duly passed and adopted° RESOLUTION NO. 66R-442: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution NOo 66R-442 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book° RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAY IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Effective July 19 1966) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Pebley~ Schutte and Krein. None~ Chandler. /he Mayor declared Resolution No~ 66R-~42 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-443: On report and recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Noo 66R-443 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORANGE COUNtrY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WITH REFERENCE TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STORM DRAINAGE CHANNEL BETWEEN THE SANTA ANA RIVER AT BALL ROAD AND MIRALOMA AVENUE. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein. None, Chandler, The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 66R-443 duly passed and adopted° 9518 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved for a fifteen minute recess° Councilman Dutton seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. (3:20 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present~ with the exception of Councilman Chandler° APPOINTMENTS: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the following appointments were deferred one week (July 5~ 1966) for a full City Council~ (a) Two Library Board Members~ (b) Members - Mother Colony House Advisory Board° MOTION CARRIED° RESOLUTION NO. 66R-444: On report and recommendation of the City Manager~ Councilman Pebley offered ~esolution Noo 66R-444 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A SECOND AMENDATORY AGREEMENT TO THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWfEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND BECHTEL CORPORATION ON AUGUST 18~ 1964, WITH REFERENCE TO A LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE, ($200.~00 payment~ completed plans and specifi- cations) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Pebley~ Schutte~ and Krein. None. Chandler° The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 66R-444 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-4aE: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-445 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECU/ION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE EXTENDING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT FOR SOIL AND MATERIAL CONTROL TESTS~ DATED AUGUST 2, 1960, FOR A TERM OF FIVE YEARS COMMENCING JULY 1~ 1966, AND ENDING JUNE 304 1971o Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and Krein. None° Chandler. The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 66R-445 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Pebley: (a) Minutes~ Anaheim Public Library = meeting June 1, 1966o (b) Minutes~ Community Center Authority - meetings May 23 and April 18; 1966o (c) Minutes~ Anaheim Parks and Recreation Commission - meeting June 9, 1966~ (d) Financial and Operating Reports for May~ 1966. MOTION CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLIGATION: Application submitted by Louis A. and Fay Mo Canary for Person to Person Transfer of Off Sale Beer and Wine License, for Speedee ~art NOo 210, 2437 ~est Ball Road~ (C-1 Zone) was presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information, No Council action was taken on said application~ 9519 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1966, 1:30 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by Leeds Enter- prises~ Inc~ for New On-Sale Beer License~ premises located at 1221 South Beach Boulevard~ was presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information° ON motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Attorney was authorized to file conditional protest with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application~ on the basis that the existing zoning does not permit the sale of beer on the premises. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST - CREST HOTEL: Request of Ho E. Roddewig, Vice President, Crest Hotels~ for permission to erect five off-site signs on city property~ at various locations along Freedman Way (later reduced to two signs), was continued from the meeting of June 21, 1966 for further investisation. The City Council reviewed supplemental report from the Development Services Department~ dated June 28, 19660 Attention was called to communication dated June 27, 1966, from Southern California Edison Company, advising that the proposed sign locations are in the vicinity of the Edison Company right-of-way~ and formal request from the applicants for use of said right-of-way will require an undetermined amount of time to process. At the conclusion of the discussion that followed, and on the recommendation of' the Development Services Department~ Councilman Pebley moved that the request be denied. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST - TRIANGLE RESTAURANT: Communication dated June 23, 1966, from William S. Garman~ Attorney representing Triangle Family Restaurant~ was submitted requesting removal of recently installed "No Parking" signs posted on Parry Street~ which were a serious deterent to the restaurant business~ as there was no private off-street parking provided therefore~ It was noted that the business is open until 12:00 midnight~ Also submitted and reviewed were reports from the City Engineer and the Chief of Police~ it being noted that the city off-street parking lot north of the restaurant would also be affected by the ordinance which prohibits parking between 9:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M., except when an event is taking place at La Palma Stadium° , Mro Garman, 730 North Euclid Avenue, Suite 101, addressed the City Council requesting that the hours of restriction be changed to allow restaurant patrons to park until their closing hour° Administrative Analyst John Roche, reported that abandonment of Parry Street north of the restaurant property was pending~ and it would become a portion of the municipal parking lot north of Anaheim Boulevard~ upon which parz~ng was to be restricted in the same manner~ At the conclusion of Council discussion, determination on the foregoin9 issue was deferred one week (July 5, 1966, 1:30 P.M.) for visual inspection of /he area in question° RESOLUTION NO. 66R-446: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No, 66R-~46 for adoption~ Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEI~ AND SAFETY STRIPING SERVICE~ DATED AUGUST 7, 19649 AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID A~ENDMENT. Roll call vote~ AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schu~te and Krein None Chandler 9520 qity Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28~ 1966, 1:30 P.M- The Mayor declared Resolution NOo 66R-aa6 duly passed and adopted° ORDINANCE NO. 2297: Councilman Schutte offered Ozdinance No° 2297 for adoption° Refer to Ordinance Book° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-92 - C-1 and R-3) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte and Krein NOne Chandler Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2297 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NOo 2298: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance Noo 2298 for adoption° Refer to Ordinance Book° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONI!NG~ (63-64-62(2) - R-3) Roll call vote~ AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Pebley, $chutte and Krein None Chandler Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2298 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NOo 2299: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2299 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-63(2) - C-O) Roli call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ Dutton~ Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Chandler Mayor Kreln declared Ordinance No° 2299 duly passed and adopted° ORDINANCE NO. 2300: Councilman Kretn offered Ordinance No. 2300 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING IO ZONING. (65-66-100 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES~ COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Pebley, $chutte and Krein None Chandler Mayor Krein declared Ordinance Noo 2300 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO~ 2301: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No, 2301 for first reading~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE R£LATING TO ZONING° (65-66-91 - C-i) 9521 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28~ 1966, 1:30 P.M. ORDINANCE NOw 2302: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance Nos 2302 for first reading.. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING~ (65-66-101 C-3) RESOLUTION NOg 66R-~447: On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution Nco 66R-447 for adoptiono Refer-to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZ-NG THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND ANAHEIM I~!ON HIGH SCHOOL DISTRiCT~ WITH REFERENCE TO IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF KNOTT AVENUE. Roll call vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN: NOES~ COUNCILMEN~ ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ Dutton~ Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 66R-447 duly passed and adopted° RECESS; Councilman Pebley moved to recess to 6:55 P.Mo Councilman Dutton seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. (4:15 AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to ordero PRESENT~ ABSENT: PRESENT~ COUNCILMEN~ Dutton~ Pebley~ Schutte and Kreino COUNCILMEN~ Chandler° CITY MANAGER~ Keith Ac Murdocho CITY ATTORNEY~ Joseph Geisler° CITY CLERK~ Dene Mo Williams° DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan Go Orsborno CITY ENGINEER~ James P:, Maddoxo ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelsono ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph Oo Peaseo PERSONNEL DIRECTOR~ Roy Heissnero ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompsono PLANNING SUPERVISOR~ Ronald Grudzinskio ASSISTANT PLANNER: Marvin Kriegero INVOCATION: Reverend Art Greer~ of the West Anaheim Baptist Church~ gave the Invocation° FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Schutte led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flago CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS NOS. 73 AND 74: Public hearing was held May 10, 1966~ to consider proposals to amend the Circulation Element of the Highway Rights of Way~ of the General Plan~ to establish the width of the south side of La Palma Avenue~ a primary street, as 53 feet betwee~ Anaheim Boulevard and the Atchison~ Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Righ~ of Way on the East (Amendment NCo 73); and Harbor Boulevard on the West (Amendment No~ 74)° The hearing was continued ~o ~his date to allow the gathering of topographical information as to the actual locations of existing buildings on both sides of the street~ how the proposed street widening would affect said properties~ and other pertinent information. Stakes were placed at various points on properties to illustrate the effect of ~he proposed widening.: Assistant Planner Marvin Kreiger advised that La Palma Avenue will extend from the City of Torrance on the West to Imperial Highway when the Riverside Freeway overpass is constructed~ He called attention to two exhibits posted on the east wall of the Council Chamber~ pointing out the areas which would be affected by widening the South side of the Street,, 9522 City Hall~ Ananeim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28~ 19669 1:30 P.M. Mro Kreiger reported on meeting held with the City Engineer and Traffic Engineer~ concerning the various methods explored in an effort to meet traffic requirements without change~ he advised that as long as there was no change in the land use of any properties which would cause an increase in traffic density~ the existing right of way would serve current needs for some time to come if on-street parking is prohibited and the roadway is restripedo If approved~ the General Plan Amendment would be excercised only when a requested change of use was approved by the City Planning Commission and City Council~ In answer to Council questioning~ As~ stent City Engineer Ralph Pease reported that it is contemplated that in the next 5 to 10 years~ 4 lanes on La Palma Avenue would not accommodate the projected traffic loado He was of the opinion that a plan for ultimate street widening, similar to the method used on South Harbor Boulevard~ would be feasiblel and as dedication was received for one side of an entire city block~ that side of the street could be widened and improvedo Discussion was held concerning the depth of properties remaining after street widening~ and Mro Krieger noted that most of the lots would be very shallow as they side on La Palma Avenue rather than front on La Palma Avenue~ therefor any future development would in all probability be by means of land assembly° Mr,~ Krieger further advised that without the recommended amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan~ and if the land use in the area changed or an additional major industry was added to the northeast section of tke city that would generate cross-town traffic, there would be no means of acquiring add]tionai right of way for street widening° Mr. Schutte was of the opinion that with the opening of the River- side Freeway much of the traffic traversing La Palma Avenue would be diverted to the freeway° Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council° Brs~. Ortega~ owner of two R-3 lots at the corner of La Palma Aven~e and Philadelphia Street~ advised that they purchased the property for apartment development~ and upon inquiring learned that a 20 foot de- dication on La Palma Avenue would be required; this would place the roadway through their' home~, ~r. Murdoch reported that if widening was to occur to an ultimate slx lane road~ it would involve nearly every house in the residential section, requiring the acquisition of all the houses on the south side either by purchase of the properties at the market value at the time of purchase, or if the use of 'the property changed ~o the substantial benefit of the property owner iz might warrant the dedication of the necessary right of way. Mro Murdoch further advised that this was a problem that could not be ignored~ as La Palma Avenue was one of the arterial highways and widening will eventually be required° ~rso Ortega stated that if only the portion needed for widening was purchased by the city~ the remaining area would be insufficient to develop° Mro Murdoch advised that this would be an individual situation, if there is sufficient portion of the lot left after dedication for logical use~ there would be no need for the city to acquire the entire parcel; however~ if there is insufficient property left for development after street widening~ the city very likely would be required to purchase the entire parcel or pay severage damages° Mrs,. Catherine Ao White~ Anaheim Mattress Company, 102-106 West La Palma Avenue, advised that when they constructed their new building~ they were informed that no widening would be required from the south side; any widening would be from the north~ and as it appears now should the street be widened as recommended~ it would bring the street through their showroom° 9523 Ci&~Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 289 19669 1:30 P~M. Mro Thompson of Development Services Department~ reported that at the time the new mattress company building was constructed, La Palma Avenue was listed as an"exception" and there was no basis for requiring additional right of way° Attention was also called to the service station presently under construction at the southeast corner of La Palma Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard° This, Mro Thompson explained is the reason it is felt the amendment is necessary so that future development would not extend into the ultimate right Of way° Mro James Fo McKenzie~ owner of property at the southwest corner of La Palma Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard, stated that the widening would bring the street through the pump islands of the service station. He questioned why the widening could not be taken from the north side. Mr~ Thompson again reported that the change would not affect existing uses~ and would be effective only if future change or use was made of the property~ or until traffic conditions became critical° Mr. L~ Jo Holt~ owner of property at Claudina Street and La Palma Avenue~ stated if the widening occurred as recommended, there would not be sufficient property remaining to developo In his Opinion there would be more complica~ons involved and expense, ~taking the widening from the south side than it would be from the north; in addition~ sale and rental of the properties are affected by this pending project° In checking the map posted on the east wall of the Council Chambers~ it was noted that basically the same problems would exist if the widening was from the north side of the street° Mro Holt further advised that in his opinion~ the decision should be soon so that people in the area will know what can be done with their lando Mro Charles Edwards~ 206 East La Palma Avenue~ asked if the north side of La Palma would ever be widened~ and also asked whether the curbing would be replaced by the city if the street was widened° As to the first question~ Mro Edwards was advised that it was not known at this time if widening would be necessary from the total area on the north side; however~ in some areas it would be required. A§ to the timing~it would depend on traffic development. Mr. Murdoch advised of the city's policy relative to relocating existing curbs,~ Mr~ Henry Munoz~ 214 East La Palma Avenue, noted the increase in speed since the opening of the street across the railroad track° Mayor Krein asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. There being no response, declared the hea~ng closed, In response to Councilman Dutton~s question~ Mr. Murdoch advised that a study to determine the feasibility of possible widening of the street from the north side could be completed in approximately 60 days° At the conclusion of Council discussion, it was moved by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Pebley that decision on General Plan Amendments Noo 73 and 74 be continued to September 6, 1966, 7:00 o~clock P.M. to allow completion of proposed study exploring the possibilities of widening on the north side of La Palma Avenue° MOTION CARRIED. PRESENTATION: Mro Michael Zehra introduced his daughters, Victoria and Dianne~ who presented the City Council with large framed copies of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution of the United States~ on behalf of the Zehra familyo Mr~ Zebra extended thanks to the City Manager~ Public Information Office and the Public Works Department for the beautiful frames which had been made for the Documents° 9524 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28~ 1966~ 1:30 P.Mo PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO, 65-66-112: Submitted by Mr~ and Mrs° Lawrence Ao Muckenthaler requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-l; property located on the west side of Loara $treet~ immediately south of the Orange County Flood Control Channel~ north of Crescent Avenue° The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No, 2049~ Series 1965-66, recommended approval of said reclassification~ subject to the following conditions: 1o That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2000 per front foot along Loara $treet~ for street lighting purposes~ 2o That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Loara $treet~ for tree planting purposes. 30 That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works, 4o That the sidewalks shall be installed along Loara Street~ as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer° 50 That Condition Nos° 1 and 2~ above mentioned~ shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof~ or such further time as the City Council may granto 6o That Condition Nos° 3 and 4~ above mentioned~ shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections, 7~, That any air conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view from abutting street° Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property~ the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area~ and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission° Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council for or against the proposed reclassification~ there being no re sponse~ declared the hearing clo~edo RESOLUTION NO~ 66R-448: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Noo 66R-4~8 for adoption~ authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested~ subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission° Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AJ~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (65-66-112 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Pebley~ Schutte and Krein None Chandler The ~ayor declared Resolution Noo 66R-~8 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NQo 60-61-38 AND CONDITIONAL USE P£R~IT NO. 839: Submitted by Richard Eo and L~ Mable Ostroot~ requesting a change of zone from C-1 (deed restricted) ~o C-l, General Commercial zone on ~he commercial portion of property originally reclassified R-3 and C-i~ and to establish an automobile service station at the corner of said parcel~ within 75 feet of a single family residential zone and at the intersection of a primary street and a collector street; property located at the northeast corner of Nutwood Street and Ball Road° The City Planning Commission~ pursuant to Resolution Noo 2047, Series 1965~66~ recommended that deed restrictions establishing subject property in the C-i~ General Cor, mercial zone limited to multiple family residential or business and professional development be removed° 9525 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Pursuant to Resolution NCo 2048~ Series 1965-66, the City Planning Commission denied Conditional Use Permit Nco 8390 Mro Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate areao He briefed the history of the original zoning action~ and advised that multiple family residential development was no longer permissible in the C-l, General Commercial Zone. He called attention to findings of the City Planning Commission and the recommended approval of the deed restriction removal, and their denial of Conditional Use Permit Nco 8390 Mayor Krein asked if a representative of the petitioners wished to address the City Council~ Mro Lo Do Shank~ 12311 West Chapman Avenue, Garden Grove~ Authorized Agent, requested approval of removing the deed restrictions and of the conditional use permit for the proposed service station. He called attention to findings of the City Planning Commission~ that the surrounding area is primarily residential in character, and advised that to the south~ the area is primarily residential~ however, on the north side of Ball Road~ the adjoining properties were zoned C-1. Relative to the Planning Commission findings concerning existing service station area~ Mro Shank advised that there were three stations at one corner~ and four at another, all located one half mile from subject property~ and in his opinion~ the requested station would provide con- venient access for the neighborhood to automobile service and repairs. He noted that they proposed to construct a food market with adjoining stores on the balance of subject commercial property. Mro Shank presented copies of a chart for Council review, illustrating the expenditures and income on subject property since the year of 1959~ reflecting a loss on the original investment. He advised that dedication for street widening brought the right-of-way too close to the existing dwelling on the corner to use the structure for residential purposesl that said dwelling was to be removed and a ranch-style service station would be constructed° He submitted a model of the proposed station~ and requested that the conditional use permit be granted as the highest and best use of the corner portion of subject property° Plans for the service station were reviewed by the City Council and discussion held~ The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposztion~ there being no response~ declared the hearing closedo RESOLUTION NOo 66R-449: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution Nco 66R-~9 authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone of subject property from C.-], Deed Restricted~ to C-i~ General Commercial zone, unrestrioted~ .as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book~ Roll call vote: AY ES: COUNCILMEN: NOES .~ COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley~ Schutte and Krein None Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No,, 66R-449 duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION: Councilman Pebley offered a resolution sustaining the action of the City Planning Commission~ denying Conditional Use Permit No~ 8390 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 6~81 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINC~S NO. 60-61-38; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONSENT TO REMOVAL OF DEED RESTRICTIONS." See Council Minutes of August 16, 1966, Page 9622, for correction. 9~26 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1966, 1:30 Roll call vote on the foregoing resolution: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Schutte and Krein ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler The Mayor declared the foregoing resolution failed to carry° RESOLUTION NO. 66R-450: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-450 for adoption~ granting Conditional Use Permit Nco 839, subject to the following conditions: lo That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Ball Road and Nutwood Street, for tree planting purposes~ and shall be complied with prior to the time that the Building Permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof~ whichever occurs first~ or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant° 2o That the sidewalks shall be installed along Ball Road and Nutwood Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3o That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works° That Condition Noso 2 and 39 above mentioned~ shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspectionso 5o That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with adopted Service Station Minimum Site Development Standards° 6,, That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos° 1~ 2~ 3~ and 40 Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO~ 839° Roll call vote~ AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton9 Schutte and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 66R-450 duly passed and adopted° PROPOSED SALARY ADJUSTMENT -GITY PERSONNEL: City Council consideration of pro- posed salary adjustments for City personnel was continued from the meeting of June 219 1966, to allow presentations from organizations representing employees; copies of report and recommendations from the Personnel Director having been previously furnished each Councilman~ Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council. Mro Eo Co Williamson, President of the Anaheim Municipal Employ- ees Association9 noted that those positions recommended for no increase in salary appeared to be within the lower income brackets, and was of the opinion the increased cost of living should be considered in all classifi- cations. Mro Williamson commended the recommendations that 25% of accrued, unused sick leave be paid to the employees~ or their survivors~ upon death or relirement, and the up-grading of Certain classi{icatlons when employees work in positions above their regular job classifications° Personnel Director Roy Heissner reported that all the recommen- dations submitted were based on statistical data compiled from Orange and Los Angeles Counties, using an index of the sixteen largest California cities as a cross reference° 9527 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28~ 1966~ 1:30 Sgto Gene Boyle~ representing the Anaheim Police Association~ briefed the contents of their communication dated June 289 1966, endorsing the recommendations of the Personnel Director~ however~ recommending that sworn personnel in the department be included in "premium pay"~ as set forth in Personnel Rule 6~ Section 6°3 through 6.35. Mro Heissner reported that a check of the sixteen largest cities in the State revealed none of them pay shift diferential to Police Officers; however~ the County of Orange has recently initiated such a plan for the Sheriff's Department° Mro Murdoch explained that it is not a common practice to pay shift differential to Police Patrolmen~ just as the recommendations for upgrading do not apDly to all classifications, In certain positions~ these benefits were common practice~ while in others~ they are not~ and those salaries reflect this condition or requirement, In answer to Councilman Peble¥'s question~ $gto Boyle advised that all Police Patrolmen work rotating shifts~ spending approximately eight months per year working evenings or nights; that only a few positions were permanently scheduled on the day shift° Martell Thompson~ President of the Firemen~s Association~ addressed the Council in appreciation of the recommendations for upgrading~ and reported that because of their hours of work~ firemen would not neces- sarily benefit by the upgrading proposal; that acting temporarily as Engineer~ Captain or Batallion Chief is considered an honor~ and personnel rotate in the "acting" capacitieso Regarding the salary increases proposed~ Mro Thompson advised the Firemen~s Association recommended an additional increase of 2.5% for the positions of Captain and Batallion Chief, In conclusion~ Mro Thompson requested that the City Council consider the value of a longevity plan for City emplDyees~ whereby salaries would be according to merit and work loads. Mro Heissner reported that supervisory positions are judged in comparison to those in other City departments. In answer to Council questioning~ he advised that supervisory positions are constantly being reappraised in light of their responsibilities~ duties and shifts~ etc. Mro Murdoch extended appreciation to the Firemen~s Association for the position taken on the upgrading recommendations~ and noted the benefits realized when personnel are given an opportunity to experience some of the responsibility of positions in a higher classification. Mro A1Coughlin~ 2316 Romneya Drive, representing the Inter- national Brotherhood of Electrical Workers~ Local Union No. ~7~ urged the City Council to adopt recommendations of the Personnel Director~ advislng that the union in agreement therewith. Council discussion was held relative to the diferential in compensation for Department Heads and their assistants~ specifically in the City Clerk's office° At the conclusion of the discussion~ and on the recommendations of the City Manager~ Councilman Krein moved that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare necessary resolutions adopting the salary adjustments as recommended by the Personnel Director~ to be effective July 8~ 1966; and the upgrading and sick leave accrual proposals to be effective July 1~ 1966~ Councilman Dutton seconded the motion, MOTION CARRIED. Mro Heissner advised that the various requests made for addi- tional considerations would be reviewed and recommendations to the City Council would be forthcoming at a later date in addition to a mid-year review, 9528 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1966, 1:30 P.M. MEMORANDU~ OF UNDERSTANDING - I.B.£.~., LOCAL NO. 47: Mro Murdoch reported that a proposed Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Anaheim and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers~ Local Union No. 47, was being prepared by the City Attorney for consideration by the Council at a later date° ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Schutte moved to adjourn. Councilman Pebley seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIED~ ADJOURNED: 9:15 SIGNED: .~~, ~ City Clerk