1974/12/0374-1172
City Hall, Anahet~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 3~ 197&m 1:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of'Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneesas and Thom
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
P~SENT:'CITY MANAGER: leith A. Murdoch
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert H. Davis
CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Malcolm Slaughter
CITY CLERK: Alona M. Hougard
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson
PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Don HcDaniel
ASSISTANT PLANNER: Robert Kelley
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Garry O. McRae
PARKS, RECREATION AND THE ARTS DIRECTOR: John J. Collier
UTILITIES DIRECTOR: Gordon W. Hoyt
FINANCE DIRECTOR: M. R. Ringer
FIRE CHIEF: James Riley
Hayor Thom called the meeting to order.
INVOCATION: Dr. Harry greif of Grace Lutheran Church gave the Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Ralph G. Sneegas led the Assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
SOLID CITIZENS AWARDS: Mayor Thom presented Mrs. John Kenworthy and Mr. William
Erickson with Solid Citizen Award Certificates signed by all members
of the City'Council, and expressed appreciation for their service to
the community in attending Council meetings.
MINUTES: Councilwoman Kaywood corrected the Minutes of the Council Macring held
November 12, 1974, Page No. 74-1103, Paragraph No. 5, to reflect "In reply to
concern expressed by Councilwoman Kaywood, Zoning Supervisor Roberts advised
that short stub streets willcontinue with the same principal street name and"
and continuing on with "that this situation, etc."; and further correct the
Adjourned Regular Meeting held November 18, 1974, to reflect the absence of
Co~munity Center Authority Hember Laurence Henderson. She thereupon ~oved for
approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council Maeting held November 12,
1974 and Adjourned Regular Meetings held November 18 and 19, 1974. Councilman
Seymour seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER. 9F ~ING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the
re&ding in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the
waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after reading
of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of
such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION
L~~USLY CARRIED.
REPORT - F,!~ANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount
of $3,021,040.14, in accordance with the 1974-75 Budget, were approved.
ANAHELNCHAI/B..ER OF CO~ERCE REPORT - BICEHE~IAL CELEBRATION: Mr. Joseph A. Wade,
President of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce and Chair~mi of the Chamber's
Bicentennial Committee, read his letter dated September 3, 197&, (copies furnished
each Council Member), reviewing plans to furnish the City with a quality program
for the bicentennial celebration, and requesting support from the City Council,
approval of a short-term budget, and to proceed with planning for a total budget
cost, depending upon the level of involvement to be determined by the Council.
In response to question by Councilman Seymour, Mr. Wade advised that
the Committee's 1975-76 budget could a~ount to between $15,000 and $20,000,
however the amount may be controlled through in-depth cooperation from the
schools, and by April 1, 1975 the Chamber should be able to m~ke amore accurate
projection from which the City CoUncil may determine the depth of its participa-
tion.
74-1173
City Hal~l ,Anaheimm California - COUNCIL MINUTES -, December 31 1}74m !:30 P.M.
Other methods by which the proirammight be partially self supporting
were noted, such as application to the various national or$~nizations for 'grants,
selling bicentennial lapel pins and other items, and the sale of advertising
space in programs for any special events in connection v iCh the celebration.
It was pointed out by Mayor Thom that the Chamber of Commerce does not
have the resources in their budget to provide the financial needs for the bicen-
tennial program, and need some assistance if the City desires to participate in
the celebration along with other cities in the nation.
Councilman Seymour was of the opinion that it would be a ~orthy involve-
ment, and the City Council should provide leadership therefor. He expressed
some concern regarding the 1975-76 projected budget, however stated he understood
the need for support by the Council, and noted the willingness of the Chamber of
Co~rce to take the lead in formulating and executing plans for the celebration.
Mayor Thom noted that for minims1 assistance from the City there can
be a program of a maEnitude which ~ould cost the City considerably ~ore, due to
the fact that there ~ould be altruistic participation and donations of time and
services. He further pointed out that the $1,500 "seed ~onay" ite~ contained in
the short-termbudget would be for the purpose of purchasing items for resale.
Hr. Wade called attention to the urgent need for & secretary to handle
necessary telephone and paper work in connection with the prosram.
In answer to question by the Mayor, City Attorney Alan Watts advised
that the requested participation by the Council could be effected by a~endment
to the existing agreement vith the Chamber of Coe~erce.
In reply to Councilman Sneesas, Hr. Watts was not certain whether the
bicentennial trust fund authorized by the Council at their'meetin$ of November 12,
1974, had been established. He pointed out that if the Bicentennial Coanittee
was incorporated as a non-profit corporation, or desiEnated as a committee of
the Chamber of Commerce if the Chamber is a non-profit orlanization, then dona-
tions from entities and individuals would be tax exempt as a charitable deduction,
and taxes would not have to be paid by the Committee on that income.
Mr. Larry Sierk, Executive Vice President of the Chamber of Coerce,
advised that the Chamber is a non-profit corporation, however, there is one
clause in their tax exempt status which provides'that should there be an excess
of funds at the conclusion of a specific program a dissolution would be applied
to that account, so that the funds would not be converted to the Chamber operation.
R~SOLUTIOI/ NO. 74R-595: At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Seymour
offered Resolution No. 74R-593 for adoption, naming the Bicentennial Coemittee
as presently structured by the Chamber of Commerce as the City's official Bicen-
tennial Conemittee; approving the short-ter~budiet presented by the Committee,
and further authorizing transfer of funds in the amount of $9,000 from the
Council Continiency Account to the appropriate vehicle for disbursement to the
Bicentennial Committee during the period between this date end July 1, 1975.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANA~re-IMDESIGNATING THE CHAMBER
OF COI~t~CE AS ITS AGENT FOR THE ANERI~ ItZVOL~I~ BIC~qi~KIAL CELEBRATION
AND&P~ROPRIATING CERTAIN FUNDS THEI~FOR; ~ AUTHORIZI~ T~ EXECUTION OF AN
~ TO THE AGF2rf AGREEHENT BET~ THE CITY OF~INAND THE CHA~ER OF
COI~IFACE.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL ~S: lay~ood, Seyeour, Pebley, Sneelas and Thom
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-593 duly passed and adopted.
Hr, Wade further advised that the Co. tree would furnish the City
COuncil with quarterly financial reports on their activities.
74-1174
City Hall, A~ahe~mv California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 3, 1974, 1:30 P.M.
CONTINUED F..~NAL TRACT NO. 7787: Developer, Wittenberg National Company; property
located north of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east of Anaheim Hills Road, and contains
50 RS-SO00 zoned lots.
Council consideration of said tract was continued from the meetings of
October 29, and November 19, 1974.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour,
Final Tract No. 7787 was continued two weeks (December 17, 1974) in accordance
with request by the Developer. MOTION CARRIED.
AMUSEMENT DE"~ICES PERMIT: Application filed by Clarence M. Rach for Amusement Devices
Permit to allow one pool table in the bar area at the Anaheim MunicipalGolf
Course, located at 430 N. Gilbert Street, was submitted.
No action was taken on the foregoing application, inasmuch as an
Amusement Devices Permit for pool tables at subject location vas granted on
September 29, 1970 and is still tn effect.
AMUSEMENT DEVICES PERMIT: Application filed by J. C. Proctor for Amusement Devices
Permit to allowseveral amusement and mechanical devices at the Little Dude
Cafe, 1445 South Anaheim Boulevard, was submitted and granted subject to provi-
sions of Chapters 3.24 and 4.20 of the Anaheim Municipal Code as recommended by
the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman
Kaywood. MOTION CARRIED.
AMUSEMENT AND ENTERTAINNENT PREMISES - POOL ROOM - PERMIT: Application filed by Dale
S. Malec and Thomas A. Richey for Amusement and Entertainment Premises Permit to
allow the installationof 14 pool and billiard tables at a family billiard center,
3015 West Ball Road, was submitted and granted subject to provisions of Chapters
3.28 and 4.24 as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman
Seymour,' seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood. MOTION CARRIED.
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. 74-13E: Submitted by The Rinker Company, proposing to
construct storm drain facilities on property located north of Santa Ann Canyon'
Road, east of Imperial Highway, which facilities will project into existing
utility easement.
Also submitted was report of the City Engineer recommending approval
of said request, subject to approval of drainage facility plans by the City
Engineer.
RESOLUTION NO. 74R-594: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 74R-594 for
adoption, granting Encroachment Permit No. 74-13E, subject to the recommendations
of the City Engineer.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OFT HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIMAPPROVINGTHE TERNS AND
CONDITIONS OF AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR ANDCITY CLERK TO
EXECUTE SAID ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WITH IMPERIAL PROPBRTIBS, A PARTNERSHIP (74-13E)
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kay~ood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-594 duly passed and adopted.
REALI~ OF SBRRANO AV~NUE - EXTENSION OF TIME, CONDITIONAL USE'pERMIT NO. 1348
AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7915, REVISION NO. 1 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71-72-44}:
Request of J. Donald Olson, Executive Vice President, General Manager, Hallcraft
Homes, was submitted for an extension of time to Conditional Use Permit No. 1348
and Tentative Tract No. 7915, Revision No. 1, together with reports from the
Developsmnt Services Department and the City Engineer, the latter recommending ..
that one-year extension of time be granted to said tentative tract. Also sub-
mitted was an excerpt of the Minutes of the City Planning Comtssion meeting
held November 25, 1974, granting one-year extension of time to Conditional Use
Permit No. 13&8, to be retroactive to October 18, 1974 and to expire October 18,
1975.
74-1175
City Ha. ll~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 3~. 1974~ 1:30 P.M.
The City Clerk advised that continuance of the matter pertaining to
the possible realignment of Serrano Avenue has been requested by the City
Engineer. Further, the Development Services Department has recommended an
additional condition to Tentative Tract No. 7915 reading:. "That prior to approval
of the final tract map, final specific plans for development of the property
shall be approved by the City Planning Commission and the City Council."
Councilwoman Kaywood inquired whether there were any 6- to 10-foot
front setbacks projected in the tract.
Assistant Development Services Director Ronald Thompson advised that
precise development plans have not been filed, however it was his recollection
that the front setbacks proposed averaged 15 to 20'feet. He advised that the
reason for the recom~endation of an additional condition was that the proposed
5-foot realisament of Serrano Avenue, as requested by Willdan Associates,
Engineers for Anaheim Hills, Inc., could affect some setbacks, and it would be
well for the City Council to then review specific tract plans.
Councilman Seymour questioned the ultimate effect of the proposed
realignment on the tentative tract and if the two matters should not be considered
simultaneously because of possible commitments. Hr. Thompson replied that the
problem might concern the lending institution, hoWever the project may be capable
of being adjusted to a new alignment ~rlthout substantial alteration.
City Engineer James P. Maddox reported that he had spoken today with
Mr. Schor representingAnaheim Hills, Inc., who stated their preference that the
City Council Cake action on the requested extension of time today, as they are
involved in litigation with reference to the tract.
A majority of the Council Members indicated it would be well to take
up the extension of time after the requested realignment is considered, and
Coancilman Seymour stated he would favor acco~aodating the Applicant's request
if it was clearly Justified that a continuancewould drastically affect the
tract, but he did not favor taking an administrative action which could result
in a problem when the decision is made on the realignment.
Mr.'Gordon Wells, representing Hallcraft Homes, owners of subject
property, addressed the Council pointing out that they were not requesting the
realignment and have not received any proposal therefor. He advised that their
reason for the requested extension of time was financial, they were in the
process of obtaining a loan commitment for construction, and he failed to see
the relationship between the realignment and subject request.
Mr. Thompson explained that a realignment could affect subject tract
sufficiently to require a variance application, by causing the relocation of
buildings, the loss of some units, or a change in setbacks.
Mr. Wells was of the opinion that any realignment would have to be
approved by his company as Owners of the property adjoining the street.
Mr. Bill Holzwarth, Santa Aha, Attorney representing the Owners,
advised that the tentative map is a crucial factor in obtaining a bank construc-
tion loan for which Hallcraft Homes are currently negotiating. He briefed the
background of the arrangement and agreement between his Clients and Anaheim
Hills, Inc., and advised there was a disagreement relative to a time schedule
concern/ng payments to Anaheim Hills, Inc., and if the requested extension of
time is not granted at this time, there will possibly be a foreclosure of prop-
erty. If the disagreement is resolved, Hallcraft Hemes will have to be in a
position to make im~ediate payment to Anaheim Hills, Inc.
Councilman Seymour questioned whether the Owners werewilling to make
a cossaitment to the City of Anaheim stipulating that a new alignment of the
street would be accepted without concern, debate or question, though it may
affect the property. ~
Mr. Holzwarth noted that the extension of time application had been
pending for some weeks, and during that time the Applicants had not been advised
of any proposed realignment, therefore at this time, they were not in a position
to know how such a realignment would affect them.
74-1176
City Hall~ .~maheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 3~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M.
Councilwomen Kaywood reiterated her question concerning front setbacks.
Mr. Milton Madole, of Toups Engineering, Santa Ann, addressed the
Council advising that subject development is a townhouse project with all units
located a minimum of 30 feet from Serrano Avenue, and having setbacks of 3 to 7
feet. He called attention to the lengthy planning process in connection with
subject tract, with the original site plan approved for 220 units, and the
subsequent approval of a plan a year later consisting of 218 units, and reflect-
ing precise dimensions. He advised that if the street is realigned as much as
5 feet, it will destroy the plan.
On motion by Councilmen Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, requested
extension of time to Tentative Tract No. 7915, Revision No. 1, and Conditional
Use Per,it No. 1348 was continued one week (December 10, 1974) to be considered
in conjunction with the proposed realignment of Serrano Avenue. MOTION CARRIED.
CITY PLANNING CO~IISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Co,mission at
their meeting held November 11, 1974, pertaining to the following applications
were submitted for City Council information and consideration:
1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS: On motion by Councilman
Sneegas, seconded by Councilmen Pebley, the City Council ratified the determina-
tion of the Director of Development Services that the activities proposed in the
following actions fall within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1 of the
City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirement for an environmental impact report
and are, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file said
report:
Conditional Use Permit No. 1493
Variance No. 2641
Variance No. 2650
MOTION CARRIED.
2. ENVIRO~a~TAL II(PACT - NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS: On motion by Councilwomen
Kaywood, seconded by Councilmen Seymour, the City Council finds that the follow-
ing projects will have no significant effect on the environment and are, there-
fore, exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report.
a. Schweitzer Park: The City of Anaheim Parks, Recreation and the
Arts Department proposes to develop a City park on a 7.2 acre site northwest of
the intersection of Dale Avenue and Broadway.
b. Rio Vista Park: The City of Anaheim Parks, Recreation and the Arts
Department proposes to develop a City park on a 5 acre site located south of
Rio Vista School, east of Rio Vista Street and north of Dutch Avenue.
MOTION CARRIED.
3. COnDITIOnaL USE PERMIT NO. 1493: Submitted by La Palms Storage Partners,
Ltd., to permit anM-2 use (outdoor storage of recreational vehicles) in the
M-1 iow on property located on the north side of La Mesa Street and on the
south side of Armando Street, south of La Palms Avenue, with Code waivers of:
a. Required enclosure of outdoor uses. (granted in part)
b. Minimum off-street parking.
C. Minimum structural setback adjacent to freeway frontage road.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-219,
granted said conditional use permit in part, ruling that waiver "a" would apply
only to the proposed sliding gate at the southwest corner of subject property in
close proximity to the outdoor storage area of the proposed development, subject
to conditions.
4. VARIANCE NO. 2641: Submitted by Aldor Corporation to establish a truck and
trailer rantal and repair facility in the M-1 Zone located at the southwest cor-
ner of Miralome Avenue and Kraemer Boulevard, with Code waivers of:
74-1177
City ~11~ Anaheha, California - COUNCIL HINU~ES - December 3m .1974~ 1:30 P.M.
a. Per~itted uses.
b. Pet~aitted outdoor uses.
c. Minimum front setback abutting an arterial highway. (granted in
part)
d. Permitted signing. (Withdrawn by Petitioner)
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-221,
granted said variance in part, granting waiver "c" in part to allow the display
of a maximum of 10 recreational vehicles in the 50-foot front setbacks, and that
absolutely no servicing of any kind will occur in said setbacks, subject to
conditions.
5. VARIANCE NO. 2650: Submitted by Richard K. Boas, et al, to reconstruct an
existing free-standing sign on C-3 zoned property located on the east side of
Beach Boulevard, north of Lincoln Avenue, with Code waiver of:
a. Permitted sign location.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-223,
granted subject variance, subject to conditions.
6. VARIANCE NO. 2525 - EXTENSION OF TIHE: Submitted by Lee C. S~r~ts, General
Partner, Tri-Freeway Business Complex, Ltd., requesting an extension of time to
cmsplete financing arrangements to establish a mini-warehouse on H-1 zoned prop-
erty located southeast of Brookhurst Avenue and the Santa Ana Freeway.
The City Planning Commission granted one-year extension of time to
said variance, to expire July 23, 1975.
7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1423 - EXTENSION..OF TI.HE: Submitted by
Gary Martin, President of the Trustees, Knott Avenue Christian Church, requesting
an extension of time to comply with conditions of approval for the expansion of
Church facilities and construction of a two-story educational classroom building
with offices and storage facilities on R-A zoned property located on the west
side of Knott Avenue, north of Orange Avenue.
A one-year extension of time was granted by the City Planning Co~anis-
sion, to expire September 5, 1975.
COUNCIL ACTION: The foregoing applications (Item Nos. 3 through 7) were reviewed
by the City Council and no further action was taken.
8. VARIANCE NO. 2649: Submitted by Werner and Jean Franz to establish four
R-E (SC) lots on the northwesterly side of Lakeview Avenue, southeasterly of
Santa Ana Canyon Road, with Code waiver of:
a. Minimum lot size.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC74-222,
granted said variance.
The City Clerk read co~munication received in her Office this date
from Brian E. Bittke, President, Peralta Hills Improvement Association, indicat-
ing the Association's intent to appeal subject variance.
Review of action taken by the City Pl&nning C~ssion on Variance No.
2649 was requested by Councilwoman Kaywood, and the City Clerk was instructed to
schedule the matter for public hearing before the City Council.
9. .GENERAL PLAN AM~/DH~T NO. 136: On the reco~aendationa of the City Clerk,
p~bltc h~r~n$ was scheduled December 24, 1974, 1:30 P.H* to consider adding.
specific language to the General Plan, to per, it agricultur~t and open space
uses in the R-A Zone, on ~otion by Council~an Thom, seconded by Councilm~n
Selmour. HOTION CARRIED.
!9' ~ TO TITI~ 18~ ANA~.IMND.~....ICIPAL CODE: On the recoms~ndations of
the City Clerk, it was moved by Councilman Tho~, seconded by Councilman Seymour,
that public hearing be scheduled December 24, 1974, 1:30 P.N. to consider an
a~end~ent to Title 18, Zoning, of the AnaheimHunicipal Code to repeal Chapter
18.80, entitled "floor space requirea~nts in specific areas" in its entirety.
~OTION CARRIED.
74-1178
City Hall~ Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES - December 3~ 1974.~ 1:30 P.M.
11. A~DNENT TO TITLE 18~ ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE: In accordance with recommen-
dation of the City Clerk, Councilman Pebleymoved that public hearing be scheduled
January 7, 1975, to consider proposed amendment to the Anaheim Municipal Code,
Title 18, Zoning, pertaining to site development standards in all one family
residential zones as follows:
1. To amend front setback requirements to provide for a varied setbacks.
2. To amend parking requirements to provide increased standards.
Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE T,RACT NO. 8683: Owner, Wilshire Woods, Inc.; property located at 278 North
Wilshire Avenue and contains one proposed R-3 zoned lot.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, Tentative
Tract No. 8683 was continued to be considered in conjunction with Variance No.
2652. MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8828: Owner, The William Lyon Company; property located at the
northwest corner of Orangethorpe Avenue and Oak Knoll Drive and contains 17
proposed RS-5000 zoned lots.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood,
Tentative Tract No. 8828 was continued to be considered in conjunction with
Conditional Use Permit No. 1500 and Variance No. 2655. MOTION CARRIED.
ENVIROI~fENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY - INDIRECT SOURCE REGULATIONS - PARKIN~ MANAGEMENT
PLAN: Planning Supervisor Don McDaniel briefly s-~rized report from the Development
Services Department Planning Division regarding the control of "indirect sources"
of air pollution in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). Indirect sources are those facilities which attract
large volumes of automobile traffic. The regulations will include all non-
residential projects having 1,000 or more parking spaces, effective January 1,
1975, and all such projects having 250 or more parking spaces effective June 30,
1975.
Alternatives available to the City in the administration of these
regulations were noted by Mr. McDaniel, the first being facility-by-facility
review by the EPA; the second, request that the EPA delegate the authority to
the City for facility-by-facility review, however on the basis end the criteria
established by the EPA; and the third, prepare a Parking Management Plan (PMP)
for Anaheim. He explained that such additional factors as social, economic,
etc., would be included in the Parking Management Plan, but not in either of the
two facility-by-facility review plans.
In conclusion, the report stated that compliance with the EPA regula-
tions apparently can be accomplished by extending the City's present environmental
impact report review process to include necessary analysis and evaluation of the
air quality impact of those projects subject to said regulations. The greatest
degree of flexibility and local control will be available to those cities having
a ParkingManagament Plan. The following was reco~nded by the Department staff:
1. That Council request authority from EPA to review and approve pro-
Jects until such time as a Parking Management Plan has been prepared end approved.
2. That a change to the Zoning Code be adopted which would require
Council approval for all non-residential projects having 250 or more parking
spaces. Such projects should be subject to Council approval to assure compliance
with EPA requirements. Under the present regulations, such a facility could be
constructed without Council approval or the preparation of an EIR if it was in
accordance with the Code and no reclassification was required.
3. That concurrently with the above recommendations a PMP be prepared
for the City of Anaheim by either:
a. M~nitoring and assisting Huntington Beach and Santa Aha during
preparation of the methodology and guidelines for PMP's; or
b. Using a model plan from SCAG which may be available at a later
date.
With reference to Recomm~ndation No. 1, Councilwoman Kaywood inquired
whether it would be as time consuming of the staff as preparation of the Parking
Management Plan.
74-1179
City ~11~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 3~; 1974, 1:30 P.M.
Mr. McDaniel replied that at this time, there are only a limited number
of facilities with parking areas of the size involved in the regulations, and
the Parking Management Plan would require a great deal of future planning.
Mayor Thom asked how the environmental impact report review process
would be expanded to encompass the review of projects and the preparation of the
Parking Management Plan, in view of the com~mnt made that no guidelines have
been established by the EPA.
Assistant Planner Robert Kelley reported that the procedure would have
to include a more detailed analysis of the air pollution effect of a particular
project, and the material would have to be compiled for and submitted to the Air
Pollution Control District for analysis of statements in the E.I.R The City
Council would act in place of the EPA to evaluate a project to see that it con-
forms to the requirements, and would have the authority to disapprove a project
if there should be a very negative reaction from the Air Pollution Control
Board.
Hr. Kelley further advised that the City Council would determine
whether a project conforms to the requirements in one of three ways:
1. That by its very nature it contributes to the release of air poi-
lution (i.e., park-and-ride facilities).
2. If it can be demonstrated that in some way the facility would
reduce the amount of vehicular miles traveled (i.e., the provisiOn of a facility
in an area which is more centrally located and more convenient).
3. By demonstrating that the project is essential to the coemunity and
that all possible steps have been taken to reduce the amount of miles traveled.
If one of these is applicable, apparently the Council would then
certify to the EPA that the project is in compliance with the regulations and
therefore is approved.
Councilman Seymour stated he welcomed the opportunity for the City to
provide input and some local control, and it was his personal opinion that the
City Council should aggressively pursue contacts with their Congressmen and
Senators in Washington and attempt to influence them to the degree that adequate
controls be attached to the EPA in carrying out this mandated legislation.
Deputy City Attorney Mac Slaughter recalled that the City had Joined
in litigation against both the Transportation Control Pian and the Indirect
Sources Regulations. The case filed in the California District Court has been
transferred to Washington, D. C., due to the fact that they have been sued by
Districts throughout the Country. The Los Angeles City Attorney's Office will
have a staff member present at the pre-trial meeting December 9, 1974, in
Washington who will also represent Anaheim.
Councilwoman Kaywood commented that it appeared the initial problem
with the EPA regulations was that they were va~e as to the requirements and so
rapidly implemented that there was no time for thorough review.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour,
reco~endations of the Development Services Department were ordered implemented,
~)TION CARRIED.
TENTATIV~ TRACT NO. 8679~ REVISION NO. 1: Request of Lewis R. Schmid, President of
~h~td Development Company, Inc., for deletion of Condition No. 1 of approved
Tentative Tract No. 8679, Revision No. 1, and for reVision of the approved
tentative map reducing the street widths to 54 feet, was submitted to the City
Council at their regular meeting held November 26, 1974. Revision to the map to
reduce street widths was approved; however, the deletion of Condition No. 11 was
continued to this date at the request of the Developer.
Hr. Maddox reported that Condition No, 11 of the tentative trac~ would
require the establishment of a homeowners' association for the purpose of main-
raining the slope areas. This condition is a requirement, contained in the pro-
posed Hillside Grading Ordinance.
74-1180
City Hall~.Anaheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES - December 3~ 19744 1:30 P.M.
Councilwoman Kaywood noted problems which occurred in the past in
Anaheim Hills and the Westridge Development, and expressed the opinion that the'
condition should not be deleted.
Hr. Lewis R. Schmid, 1681 Langley Avenue, Irvine, placed maps of the
tracts comprising the entire Westridse D~velopment on the east wail-of the
Council Chambers, and stated that the condition is contained in an ordinance
which has not yet been adopted, and is not applicable to Tract No. 8679. He
referred to the map pointing out those homes in Westridse which had received
weed abatement notices, advising that the area is one where the elevation of the
street is at a lower level than the building pads, a situation which is not
prevalent in subject tentative tract. He advised that of the 339 homes in the
total development, less than 10% received the abatement 'notices, 3.83% residing
in homes where they could not see the slopes, and 5.60% simply did not take care
of their banks. Other weed abatement notices regarding off-site areas were sent
to the Developers. In other areas of the Westridge Development, a situation had
occurred where slopes were not cut nor filled, but left in their natural state
with no sprinkling systems nor planting, resulting in an area of potential fire
hazard, and Hr. Schmid noted that although they have a similar situation in
subject tract, they intend to install sprinklers and establish planting as
required by FHA regulations. He noted that slopes in subject tract are visible
from the lots, and the only off-site situation is an area 20 to 30 feet in width
which will probably be dedicated to the City to be included in a park.
In reply to Councilwoman Kayvood's question, Mr. Schmid reported that
the highest slopes in subject tract are less than 50 feet. He was of the opinion
that to require all future homeowners in the tract to pay $20 to $32 per month
for the maintenance of the slopes, which are confined to one area, was discrimina-
tory; and to require a homeowners' association to be formed was to impose a form
of taxation, and unnecessary expense for those who do not have slopes. In addi-
tion, there could be an invasion of privacy, in that the maintenance people
would n~ed to have access through properties to the slope areas. He felt that
inasmuch as their particular situation would not create the problems experienced
in Westridge, the condition would not be applicable to subject tract.
Councilwoman Kaywood noted that the problem which occurred in Westridge
was not due to lack'of care, but that all efforts to plant and maintain the
slopes had failed.
Hr. Schmid stated that in checking with construction company representa-
tives and the City Fire Department, it was learned 'that the slopes had not been
established before people moved into the homes.
Councilwoman ~ayvood replied that when there are construction delays,
people are anxious to, move into their new homes', and they asstme when they do
move in that anything which has not been finished will be completed.
In the opinion of Hr. Schmid, if a bond is properly established to
ensure the control and planting of the slopes, it could not be released until
the work is finished.
Councilman Pebley felt that the Developer had a Eood point, and if a
bond could be postedto insure the establish~ant of sprinklers and planting of
slopes and the maintenance thereof until such time as work is completed and
people have moved into the homes, it should be done.
Councilman Seymour remarked that the $20 to $32 amount for maintenance
which homeowners would be assessed through Associations seemed a very high
figure.
Hr. Schmid advised that the range quoted was correct, and he noted
that maintenance of parks in Orange County currently cost $5,200 per acre per
year. In his opinion, to form an association for this purpose would remove any
incentive for the residents to take care of the slopes, and 'ha suggested that
the City Council give additional review to the proposed Hillside Grading
Ordinance. Also noted was the fact that sprinklers and planting would be placed
at the direction of the City.
74-1181
City Hg..!l~ Anaheim,.' California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 3~.1974.v 1:30 P.M.
Further discussion was held, and Councilman Selmour noted his famil-
i&rity with the problems at Westridge, and pointed out that only in a few"
instances did some residents fail to provide water to the plantings. Other
factors contributed to the problem, and he felt that through a lack of comunica-
tion and education, many property owners inadvertently pulled some plantings
which they thought were weeds. The slopes Will not be successfully planted and
maintained without some strong assurances that the sprinkling facilities and
planting are adequate, and the property owner will be provided with sufficient
information.
Councilwoman Kaywood suggested that Condition No. 11 be retained as a
condition of the tentative tract, and after the homes are occupied, the home-
owners can vote to dissolve the Association. She noted that the figures obtained
at the Canyon Area General Planning Task Force ~eetings, co~prised of developers,
homeowners, planning staff and representatives from the City Council and City
Plannin~ Commission, were considerably lower than the ~20 to ~32 mentioned here.
Mr. Schmid stated that they had constructed over 400 homes along hill-
sides, and never had a problem nor a complaint. He noted that some of the
e~ployees of maintenance businesses also pull plants instead of weeds, and per-
haps the homeowner would be more astute.
Councilman Seymour noted that there was not a question as to the
integrity or performance of the Developer, and he invited Mr. Schmid to attend
one of the Task Force meetings.
Councilwoman Kaywood called attention to the a~ount of work that many
homeowners are currently putting in on the slopes, some being of the opinion
that if they had'been aware of the time which would be involved, they would not
have bousht a home with a slope on the lot. Many feel that the entire area
~ould benefit if the slopes were professionally and uniformlymaintained.
Councilman Seymour stated that possibly the matter could be resolved
through using the Task Force as a vehicle, and perhaps before the homes, in sub-
Ject tract are constructed, the condition can be removed.
No further action was taken by the City Council.
CRANGE ORDER NO. 1 - NORII ORDER NO. 714-A: On report and recommendation of the City
Em~ineer, Councilman Sneesas moved that Change Order No. 1, Work Order No.
714-A, consisting of extra work in connection with the Nohl Ranch Road-Walnut
Canyon Road Street Improvement, increasing the original contract a~ount by
$17,084.16 (Anaheim City portion, $3,220.81), be authorized. Councilman Pebley
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 74R-595 - AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 1008: In accordance with recoa=aenda-
tiona of the City Engineer, Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 74R-595
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RE~OLUTION OF THE CITY COI~CIL OF ~ CITY OF ANAHE~ACC~NG A SEALED
P~I~OSALANDA~ARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOb'EST RESPONSIBL[ BIDDER FOR THE FURNISH-
II[C OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, HATERIALS AND EQUIPHENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND
T~ANSPORTATION, INCLUDIN6 PO~ER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORNING ALL WORX NECES-
SARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COHPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IHPROV--E~fENT: FIRE STATION
NO. 9, 6180 NONL RANCN ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHE~, ~ORK ORDER NO. 1008.
(Bailey Construction Company, Inc. - $42,600.00)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kayvood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
COUNCIL NEHB~: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-595 duly passed and adopted.
74-1182
City Hall* ~aheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 3~ 1974v. 1:30 P.M.
CONSTRUC~TIO~. DRAWINGS~ SPECIFICATIONS AND COST ESTIMATE - PARK BUILDINGS (BOYSEN~
TWILA REID AND HANZANITA PARKS - WORK ORDER NOS. 843~ 812 AND 794): Council consider~
ation of construction drawinss, specificatiOns and cost estimate for park build-
in~s to be constructed at Boysen, Twila Reid and Manzanita Parks was continued
from the meeting of November 19, 1974 for a sumamry report from the Parks,
Recreation and the Arts Department.
Report from the Director of Parks, Recreation and the Arts Department,
dated November 26, 1974, was submitted describing the facilities proposed for
construction at the three parks. Also submitted was report from the Engineering
Department, dated November 22, 1974.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by' Councilman Seymour,
construction drawings, specifications and cost estimate for said park buildings
were accepted by the City Council. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 74R-596 - WORK ORDER NOS. 794~ 811 AND 843: Councilwoman Kaywood
offered Resolution No. 74R-596 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING
THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF
A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: PARK BUILDINGS AT:
BOYSEN PARK ............. WORK ORDER NO. 843
TWILAREID PARK .......... WORK ORDER NO. 812
MANZANITA PARK ........... WORK ORDER NO. 794
APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
C0~STRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUC-
TION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - January 2, 1974, 2:00 P.M.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL HE~BERS: Kaywood, Selmour, Pebley, Sneesas and Thom
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
COUNCIL HEHBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-596 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 74R-597 -MORK ORDER NO. 829: Upon receipt of certification from the
Director of Public Works, Councilman Pebley Offered Resolution No. 74R-597 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANA~RIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE
CO~PLETIONAND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND
EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER,
AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOW-
lNG PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: ADDITION AND REMODELING OF THE ANAgRIM POLICE FACILITY,
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 829. (Anaheim Construction Company, Inc.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL HEI~ERS:
NOES: COUNCIL ~ERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL HEHBERS:
Kay.sod, Seymour, Pebley, Sneesas and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-597 duly passed and adopted.
TRACT NO. 7706 - OVERSIZE TRACT SEWER: On report and recommendation of the City
Ensineer, Councilman Sneegas moved that payment of $2,892.75 differential cost
to oversize a sewer in Tract No. 7786 be authorized. Councilman Pebley seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
74-1183
City ~!l, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL HINUTES - December 31 1974, 1:30
SALE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY. - RESOLUTION NO. 74R-598: On the recom~endations of the
City Attorney, Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 74R-598 for adoption,
accepting the offer of Mr. F. J. Arnold to purchase a 20-foot by 10-foot parcel
of land acquired from Dyke Water Company as a well site some years ago, in the
a~ount of $25.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN OFFER TO
PURCHASE CERTAIN CITY-OWNED PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A DEED
THERETO. (C.P. 271 - F.J. Arnold, Purchaser.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-598 duly passed and adopted.
PURCHA~.E OF MATERIAL - ALUMINUH CABLE: The Assistant City Manager reported on informal
bids received for the purchase of 65,000 feet of 350 MCHAluminum-. U.R.D. Cable
for the Electrical Division, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low
bid:
VENDOR TOTAL AHOUNT~ INCLUDING TAX
CAB-LEX, Los Angeles $62,010.00 - 2%-lOth
General Electric Supply Company, Anaheim 61,657.92
Graybar Electric Co., Anaheim 63,794.51
Westinghouse Electric Supply Company, Anaheim 66,006.20
Electric Supplies Distributors, Santa Ann - - 61,830.86
Okonite Company, Los Angeles NO QUOTE
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the
loW bid of Cab-Lex (2% - 10th differential) was accepted and purchase authorized
in the amount of $62,010.00, including tax. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHA~E OF EQUIPMENT - WOOD CROSS ARMS: The Assistant City Manager reported on
informal bids received for the purchase of 512 KV arms and 104 KV arms, as
follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid:
VENDOR TOTAL AHOUNT~ INCLUDING TAX
Cascadian Lumber, Eugene, Oregon $ 7,714.68
Niedermeyer-Martin, Portland, Oregon 11,212.68
Westinghouse Electric Supply Co., Anaheim - - 10,767.48
Koppers Company, Wilmington, Calif. 8,032.68
General Electric Supply Company, Anaheim - - - 8,649.60'
Graybar Electric Co., Anaheim 7,854.60
J. H. Baxter Company, Los Angeles 7,886.40
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the
low bid of Cascadian Lumber was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount
of $7,714.68, including tax. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF BqUIPHENT - CAB AND CHASSIS: The Assistant City Manager reported on
informal bids received for the purchase of nine 24,000 G.V.W. cab and chassis,
four for the Public Works Department and five for the Utilities Department, as
follows and recommended acceptance of the low bid:
VENDOR BASE PRICE OPTION 1 ~ ! ~
Hendricks G.H.C. $7,294.00 $39.00 $ 777.00 $225.00 $144.00
McCoy Ford 7,063.32 46.77 1,115.02 N.A. 'N.A.
International Harvester
(2 units) w/Options 1, 3 and 4 @ $7,496.17
(5 units) w/Options 1 and 9 @ 6,675.11
(2 units) w/Option 9 @ 6,654.11
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman SeymoUr, the
Iow bid of International Harvester was accepted and purchase authorized in the
total amount of $65,376.68, including tax. MOTION CARRIED.
74-1184
City H~!, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 3~ 1974~ 1:30 P.M.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids received
for the purchase of one Derrick-Digger and Body for the Electrical Division as
follows, and recommended acceptance of the Iow bid:
VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT~ INCLUDING TAX
California Truck, Los Alamitos
Utility Body, Commerce
R-O Products, Olather, Kansas
Arko Equipment
Calavar Equipment
$62,484.22
66,755.62
95,026.99
NO QUOTE
NO QUOTE
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the low
bid of California Truck was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of
$62,484.22, including tax. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - FIRE DEPARTMENT EquIPMENT: Mr. Davis reported on proposed
purchase of a test, maintenance and repair equipment for the self-contained
breathing apparatus used by Firemen when entering a fire situation, as recommended
by the Fire Ch/ef. He advised that in the past, the apparatus has been sent to
a service agency located in Santa Barbara for maintenance, and due to the time
the Department is without the equipment, and the need for more adequate testing
"in-house", he recommended the budgeted purchase from the sole source, Scott
Aviation Company.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, pur-
chase was authorized in the amount of $2,750.00, as recommended, by the Assistant
City Manager. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF MOBILE STRUCTURE - FIRE STATION NO. 9: The Assistant City Hanager reported
on the reco~nded purchase of a 24 foot by 60 foot mobile structure to house fire
personnel for the temporary station in the Anaheim Hills area (Fire Station No. 9),
and advised that the one quotation received was for a Viking Norsewood Coach in
the amoUnt of $16,060.45, including tax. He thereupon recommended the purchase be
authorized.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Pebley, pur-
chase w~s authorized from Majestic Mobile Home Sales, Inc., in the amount of
$16,060.45, including tax, as recommended by the Assistant City Manager. MOTION
CARRIED.
CORRESPONDE.NC.E: The followingcorrespondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom:
a. Anaheim Public Library Board -'H inures - Highlights - October 21,
1974.
b. Financial and Operating Reports for the Month of October, 1974 for
the Water Division.
MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 3380: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3380 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORD~//ANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNIcIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (74-75-7 - R-A)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Selmour, Pebley, Sneesas and Thom
COUNCIL NEHBERS: None
COUNCIL 14EHBERS: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3380 duly passed and adopted.
SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION: On the recomsmndations of the City Attorney, Councilman.
Seymour ~oved that the City Clerk be'instructed to notify the Orange County
Superintendent of Schools and the Regis~rar of Voters of the Council's intent to
call a Special Municipal Election for the purpose of submitting a $150,000,000
electrical revenue bond issue to the voters, and requesting consolidation there-
of with the School Biennial Governing Board Member Election to be held on March 4,
1975. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
74-1185
MINUTES - ce ar 3, 1974, 1130 P.M,
~OL~IO] NO. 74R-5991 ~ repor~ ~d rsc~da~lou by ~h~ City l~o~ey and City
~alineer, go~cll~n Se~ur offered Resolution No. 74R-5~9 for adoption,
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF TItE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIHAPPROVINGANDAUTItORIZING
THE EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THAT CERTAIN AGREENENT OF THE 26TH DAY OF
~_RCH, 1974, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITIES OF ANAHEINAND GARDEN GROVE FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A STORM DRAIN AT EUCLID STREET AND ORANGEb'OQD AVENUE.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL HEHBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL HEHBERS:
Kaywood, Selmour, Pebley, Sneesas and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 74R-599 duly passed and adopted.
P~SOL~_.I~NO.. 74R-600: On report and recommendation by the City Attorney, Councilmen
~eegas offered Resolution No. 74R-600 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AHAHEIMAUTRORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE MAYORAND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE CERTAIN AGREEMENTS WITH THE SOUTHERN CALIFOR-
NIA EDISON COMPANY. (Condemnation No. 10 - Lewis Substation)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNClL I~I~EI~: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
COUNCILHD2~RS: None
COUNCIL HEHBERS: None
Thd Hayor declared Resolution No. 74R-600 duly passed and adopted.
~ENg~J~T COHMITTEE: At the request of Councllw~n Kaywood, Councilamn Sneesas
re~rted that 'the Greenbelt Comities is advisory to the Greenbelt Co. lesion;
that they ~et on the last ~ednesday evenin~ of each ~nth in the Oranse Cowry
~nistration Buildins, and there are three openi~s on the Co. tree at the
present
O~IG~COUNI~ HUNi~ R~!&TIONS COI~ISSION .,i~ID~GE .C~O~ CR~II~L 5UST!CZ COUNCIL:
CounCilvoman ~od reported Chag the ~anse Co~Cy Leasue of Cities has
requested non.sCions ~o the Oranse County B~n ~laCi~s Co~ission (~y be a
~n Co~cil ~mber) and ~o the Oranse County Crtni~l J~Cice Council (~st be
~yor or Council Hember) ~o be considered aC their ~c~er 12, 197~ executive
~etln~.
~~ ~ 0~6~ ~l~: Co~cllw~ ~od re.fred on complaints received
fro~ residents adjacent to the ney section of the Oranse Fr~vay (between Oranse-
thor~ and ~tella Avenues), relative to noise ~d auto. bile li~ts shininS into
~s as reset of the roadway elevation. S~ asked ~ether there co~d be a
reco~ndation to the State to provide protection for these ho~s, such as a
~, walls ~d l~dscap~g.
Diayor Thom recalled that he had received similar complaints in the
past. and had asked the Public Works Department to contact the State and see
what could be done.
Councilman Selmour stated it was his understamiin~ that the State
Division of Hiihways is a~enable to cooperative prograsm for freeway landscapin$.
Nr. Diaddox advised that the general policy has been to delay freeway
landscaping for t~o to three years to allow for settlinLand itablizin$, in
addition to financial limitations. The State has indicated they ~ould be inter-
ested in Joint participation with the City.
74-1186
City Hall, ..Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL ~MINUTES - December 3~ 1974~. 1:30 p.M.
The City Attorney indicated there was no obstacle to the City's
furnishing water for the landscaping.
At the conclusion of the discussion, by general Council consent, the
Director of Public Works was instructed to schedule a meeting with the State
Division of Highways to explore the possibilities of obtaining'some protection
for the residents adjacent to the Orange Freeway.
ORANGE COUNTY CULTURAL cENTER BENEFIT: Councilwoman Kaywood reported there will be a
Christmas Candlelight Concert conducted by Carmen Dragon, being held as a
benefit for the Orange County Cultural Center on December 14, 1974, 8:00 P.M. at
The City.
JOINT I~EETIN~ - PARK AND RECREATION CO~IISSION: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded
by Councilman Seymour, the City Clerk was instructed to schedule a Joint masting
with the Park and Recreation Co~ission, December 19, 1974, 7:30 P.M., to be
held in the Management Control Center, 114 South Claudina Street, to discuss
problems of various youth athletic groups relative to available facilities for
their usage. MOTION CARRIED.
APPOINTMENT - ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH PLANNING COUNCIL: On motion by Councilman Thom,
seconded by Councilman Seymour, William F. Daly was appointed as the City's
Representative to the Assembly of Delegates, Orange County Health Planning
Council. MOTION CARRIED.
EXECUTIVE S~SION: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Council~an Thom, the
City COuncil recessed to Executive Session, at the request of the Assistant City
Manager. MOTION CARRIED. (3:56 P.M.)
AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION: Mayor Thom called the meeting to order, all members of the
City Council being present. (5:12 P.M.)
APPOINTMENTS - CHIEF OF POLICE~ DIRECTOR OF DEVEI~.PHEN~. SERVICES: City Manager
leith ~urdoch announced the appointment of Harold A. Bastrup as Chief of Police,
effective im~ediately, and also announced the appointment of ~nald Thompson to
the position of Development Services Director, effective February 7, 1975.
Councilman Seymour moved that said appointments be approved.
Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOUR~T: Councilman Pebleymoved to adjourn to Wednesday, December 4, 1974, at
7:00 P.M., in the Multipurpose Room of the Anaheim Main Library for the purpose
of a Joint Meeting with the Redevelopment Com~ission.
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 5:14 P.M.
Signed
City Cl%rk
Anaheim Central Library, Multipurpose Room
COUNCIL MINUTES - December 4~ 1974, 7:00 P.M.
P~ESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
Councilwoman Eayvood
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in Adjourned Regular
Session.
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood and Thom (arrived 7:30 P.M.)
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour, Pebley and Sneegas
REDEVELOPHENT CO~ISSION: Oseid, Cotler, Fry,"McDaniel, Leo and
Morris
REDEVELOPMENT CO~4ISSION: Mendez
CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: leith A. Murdoch
CITY CLERK/AGENCY SECRETARY: Aloha M. Hougard
FINANCE DIRECTOR: M. R. Ringer
REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR: Knowlton Fernald
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronal4 Thompson
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Malcolm Slaughter
City Clerk, Aloha M. Housard,'called the Adjourned Resttlar Council
meeting to order end. adjourned same for' lack of a quorum.
Adjourned: 7:05 p.m.
Signed '~~
City Clerk