Loading...
1966/10/119724 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11, 1966~ 1:30 P.Mo The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein. COUNCILMEN: None ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis. DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. LIBRARY DIRECTOR: William J. Griffith. Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. INTRODUCTIONS: A group of students from Orangeview Junior High School, in attendance at the Council Meeting, were introduced to the Council together with their teacher, Mr. Muncie. Councilman Pebley introduced Anaheim Post Master Marshall McFie, also present in the Council Chamber. PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were briefed by the City Clerk: "Zip Code Week" - begining October 10, 1966. "Support Your Local Police Week" - October 24 through 29, 1966. "Navy Week" - October 24 through 30, 1966~ and "Navy Day" - Thursday, October 27, 1966. "Jaycee International Week" - October 28 through November 1, 1966. The foregoing proclamations of the Mayor were ratified by the City Council, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutteo MOTION CARRIED° MINUTES: Approval of the Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meetings held September 27 and October 4, 1966, was deferred to the next meeting. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED~ REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Financial demands against the City, in the amount of $775,565.09, in accordance with the 1966-67 Budget, were approved. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - HOUSEMOVING PERMIT: Public hearing was held September 13, 1966, to consider request of Walter La Force for permission to move a metal building from 17762 Edwards, Huntington Beach, to 2810 East Orange Street, Anaheim, at which time the hearing was continued to this date, the applicant to submit estimated cost for improving the structure to meet City of Anaheim Metal Building Standards. Mayor Krein asked if the applicant wished to address the City Council. Mr. Walter La Force, 1225 Haven Drive, reported that costs for improving the building to meet standards of the Anaheim Municipal Code would not be prohibitive, and he requested said housemoving permit be granted. Report dated September 13, 1966, from the Zoning and Building Divisions was read by the Mayor, recommending that permission be granted, subject to the structure complying with City Council Policy No. 526 relative to metal buildings. 9725 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOe 66R-648: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-648 for adoption, granting said permit subject to the recommendation of the Zoning and Building Divisions. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A MOVING PERMIT TO WALTER LA FORCE TO MOVE A BUILDING FROM 17762 EDWARDS, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, TO 2810 EAST ORANGE STREET, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA° Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-648 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - HOUSE MOVING PERMIT: Application submitted by W. R. Hemphill requesting permission to move three dwellings from 19081 Newport, Costa Mesa, to 2402, 2408 and 2412 Rainbow Avenue, Anaheim, was reviewed by the City Council together with recommendations from the Building and Zoning Divisions. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council for or against the proposed housemoving. Mrs. Robert Hudson, 1001 Irene Place, submitted and read petition of opposition, signed by owners of approximately 17 homes in the immediate area, being of the opinion that the signatures represented a minimum of 51 percent of properties located within 300 feet of subject property. She advised that, in the opinion of those objecting to the proposed housemoving, the dwellings to be moved were of lesser value than existing homes in the neighborhood. The City Council reviewed photographs of the dwellings in question, as contained in the files. Deputy City Attorney Alan Watts called attention to Section 15.32.020 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, noting findings of the City Council which formed the criteria for granting housemoving permits, one of which reads as follows: "(c) That less than a majority of the property owners in the area object to the moving of the house, building or structure onto the property where it is proposed to be moved." It was noted that Variance No. 1831, scheduled to be submitted for City Council information this date, would have no bearing on any action to be taken on subject housemoving permit. Councilman Pebley moved that public hearing be continued two weeks (October 25, 1966, 1:30 PoM,), and that the petition of opposition be referred to the City Clerk for checking to determine if the signatures do, in fact, constitute more than 50 percent of the property owners within 300 feet of subject property. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 873: Submitted by Doyle and Shields Company, Inc., requesting permission for an on-sale liquor establishment with waivers of number and location of free-standing signs; C-1 zoned progerty located at 912 South Euclid Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-58, denied the waivers for location and number of signs, and granted the cocktail lounge in a commercial shoppin~ center, muBject to the following conditions: 9726 City Hall, Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. 1. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from abutting streets, and all sound shall be buffered from the adjacent residential developments to the north and east, prior to final building inspection. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3, provided however, that hours of operation shall be limited to between 8:30 PoM~ and 1:30 AoM. six nights a week. Subsequent to the City Planning Commission action on subject application, the Commission on September 19, 1966, adopted Resolution No. PC66-85, amending Resolution No. PC66-58 by including special findings and conditions as stipulated to by the agent for the petitioner, and which were inadvertedly omitted from the former resolution; additional conditions as follows: 3. That there will be no topless or suggestive entertainment in the theme- type night club, as stipulated by the petitioner. 4. That the costumes worn by the waitresses and women employees will not be topless or suggestive, and will be in good taste in accordance with the "Roaring Twenties" theme proposed, as stipulated by the petitioner. Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered by the City Council and the City Clerk directed to schedule a public hearing. Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He briefed the history of the shopping center, and advised that the City Planning Commission granted the requested use subject to conditions and stipulations, and denied the requested sign waivers. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council. Mrs. Patricia Mitchell, 1650 West Crone Avenue, advised that her children patronized the food market at the shopping center, and one of them attended music lessons on the premises twic~ a week during the evening hours; that she often went to the center in the evening and'would prefer not to have the type of establishment proposed in the area. Mrs. William L. Brooks, 955 Roberts Street, advised she was one of the owners of apartments across the alley to the east of subject property. She objected to the noise which would emanate from the proposed operation. She further advised that their property had been damaged several times in the past when automobiles backing into the alley ran into their fence. Mr. Charles Murphy, 630 Alvy Street, requested clarification as to the type of business proposed. Mayor Krein asked if the petitioners or their representative wished to address the City Council. Mr. Terry Tognazzini, of Tog Enterprises, representing the petitioners, advised that the club would be called "The Firestation", and would be open six nights per week from approximately 8:00 PoMo to 2:00 A.M., featuring a six-piece Dixieland band; that there would be no topless or suggestive entertainment or costumes. He compared the establishment to a club in San Diego, called "Micky Finn's", and noted that no one under 21 years of age would be admitted, in accordance with their liquor license. The club's primary function would be to provide entertainment, and he noted that approximately 70 parking spaces would be available in the lot in front of the club, and it would not be necessary to park on the streets to the East. Mr. Tognazzini further advised that he had obtained approximately 154 signatures of residents within two blocks of the property who had no objection to the conditional use permit. In his opinion, those who were objecting seemed to reside primarily on streets further away, and he thereupon read the petition and a portion of the names, advising that approximately 35 of the signors were from Beacon Avenue, and approximately 75 were from Roberts Street. 9727 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~ 1966~ 1:30 P.Mo A rendering of the front elevation for the proposed establishment was displayed, and Mr. Tognazzini advised that the hours of operation would preclude any influence on children who pass the area during the day. The building was solid brick walls on three sides, and the doors in front were to be closed, so that any noise would not be evident with the possible exception of the area to the West. In response to Council questioning, Mr. Tognazzini reviewed details of the proposed operation, as reported at the City Planning Commission hearing, and advised that, although the entertainment would commence at 8:30 PoMo, concluding at 1:30 AoMo, they would prefer to open at 7:30 or 8:00 PoM, Concerning efforts to find another location for the proposed club, he advised that he had preferred to locate closer to the commercial- recreation area; however, three months of investigation proved that costs for available land in the Harbor Boulevard-Katella Avenue section were prohibitive; therefore, a large shopping center seemed to be the only solution. He noted the heavy traffic on Ball Road and Euclid Street, and called attention to the fact that by 8:00 PoMo, the majority of the parking spaces in the shopping center were vacant. Councilman Pebley indicated his approval of the establishment proposed, but deemed it inappropriate for a C-1 zoned shopping area. Councilman Schutte stated he would not object to the business if there were any method of controlling noise after 10:00 P.M. Mr. Tognazzini noted an existing food market across the street which remained open 24 hours a day, a nearby restaurant was open until 2:00 AoMo, and a donut shop which remained open until a late hour. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council. Mrs. L. W. Pitts, 1615 Beacon Street, stated it had been her understanding that the business would not open until 9:00 PoMo She advised that noise from the donut shop operation was already a problem, and noted the difference between the operation of the night club and the 24 hour market where no liquor was consumed. She expressed concern relative to the already heavy traffic on Euclid Street, advising of the difficulties residents experience in attempting to enter the flow of traffic from side streets. Mrs. Pitts was of the opinion that the majority of persons residing on Roberts Street who signed the petition of approval were tenants, rather than property owners. A Mr. Klinzmann, owner of Allied World of Music, addressed the Council advising that Mr. Tognazzini had explained the proposed operation to a group of merchants in subject shopping center, and they were in favor of the proposed business. Mrs. Jean Langlois, 1623 Beacon Street~ stated it was her understanding that, if approved, the conditional use permit would include the two conditions which were added under the Planning Commissions supplementary resolution. Councilman Chandler advised that existing laws govern the entertainment and costumes of employees, and was of the opinion that such conditions should not be made a part of a conditional use permit, or any other zoning action governing land use. He noted that the operation would require an entertainment permit, which by law would be investigated under the jurisdiction of the Chief of Police. Councilman Dutton stated that he agreed with Councilman Chandler that said conditions should not be made a condition of land use. Deputy City Attorney Alan Watts concurred with the foregoing statements and advised that controls are provided through required entertain- ment permits, and after recommendations of the Chief of Police are reviewed 9728 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. by the City Council, the Council may grant or deny said permit. Mrs. William L. Brooks, 955 Roberts Street, questioned the 75 signatures on the petition, which were purported to come from Roberts Street, being of the opinion that there were not that many persons residing in the one block in question. Mr. Dale Metcalf, Attorney for the petitioners, addressed the Council advising that the applicant is in full accord with the two ad- ditional conditions and had stipulated to said conditions during the Planning Commission hearing. Mayor Krein declared the hearing closed. Council discussion was held, and Councilman Dutton was of the opinion that the establishment would be a reasonable petition, but was not a proper use of land in a commercial shopping center. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-649: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-649 for adoption, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 873. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 873. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-649 duly passed and adopted. (Petition of approval was retained by Mr. Tognazzinio) PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 875: Submitted by Warren C. Hodges requesting permission to establish a walk-up restaurant with waiver of minimum required parking spaces; C-2 zoned property located at 922 West Lincoln Avenue (southeast corner Lincoln Avenue and Illinois Street). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-60 granted said conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a corner return with a 15-foot radius for street widening purposes. 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Illinois Street, for street lighting purposes. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view from abutting street. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the time that the Building Permit is issued or within a period of ]80 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant. That Condition Nos. 3 and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No. 1. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He summarized the evidence presented to and considered by the City Planning Commission, advised that the 18 use- able parking spaces, proposed in lieu of 21 spaces required, were approved. Attention was called to letter received in the office of the City Clerk October 3, 1966, from Michael Kragie, protesting the granting of minimum parking space waiver~ 9729 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~ 1966, 1:30 P.Mo Because of a possible conflict of interest, Councilman Chandler withdrew from the discussion and action on this issue. The Mayor asked if the proponent or his representative wished to address the City Council. Mr. Harold Hartley, Authorized Agent, 918 West Lincoln Avenue, noted that their original plans included more parking spaces; however after consulting with the Development Services Department Staff, plans were modified prior to submission to the City Planning Commission, in order to provide additional planters for landscaping to complement the attractive Spanish-style architecture of the Taco-Bell Restaurant. Mr. Milo F. De Armey, owner of the drive-in restaurant at 1008 West Lincoln Avenue, advised that he resided at 115 South Illinois Street; that he and four other interested parties who attended the City Planning Commission hearing had shared expenses for filing the appeal. He stated that no notice of public hearing before the City Council had been posted on the property in question. Mr. De Armey called attention to a serious parking problem in the subject area along Lincoln Avenue, and made reference to similar requests which had been denied by the City on the basis of insufficient parking provisions. Mayor Krein asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-650: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-650 for adoption, sustaining the action taken by the City Planning Commission, granting subject conditional use permit, subject to the recommendations of the Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 875. Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAINED: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley and Krein Schutte Chandler None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-650 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Chandler returned to the Council Table. ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: In accordance with telephone request, Chamber of Commerce petition was ordered taken off agenda to be rescheduled October 25, 1966. TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 4567~ REVISION NO. 1 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of H. A. Darby, on behalf of Lusk Corporation, dated September 9, 1966, was submitted for one year extension of time to record Tentative Tract No. 4567; property located east of Nohl Canyon Road and northerly of Lincoln Avenue (Reclassification No. 65-66-51 and Variance No. 1745). In accordance with recommendations of the Zoning Division, one year extension of time was granted, as requested, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Council Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. ANAHEIM - ELEMENTARY COUNCIL - PARENT~-TEACHER ASSOCIATION: Mrs. Darwin D. Born, President of the Anaheim Elementary Council, Parent-Teacher Association, submitted and read letter dated October 10, 1966, expressing the Elementary Council's concern that the projected East Anaheim and South Euclid Street Branch Libraries be completed as soon as possible, and requesting information as to the status thereof. Assistant City Manager Robert Davis reported on land acquisition 9730 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. and projected construction program for the two branch libraries. Mrs. Born expressed her thanks for the explanation. PROPOSED ABANDONMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 66R-651: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-651 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS' INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES, TO WIT, A PORTION OF A STEARNS RANCHO RESERVATION, UPON, OVER, ACROSS AND ALONG THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; AND DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION. (Public hearing November 1, 1966, 1:30 P.M. - East side State College Boulevard south of Orangewood Avenue) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R~651 duly passed and adopted. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held September 26, 1966, pertaining to the following applications, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 879: Submitted by Jane H. Bright requesting permission to expand a private educational institution to include primary school children; R-3 zoned property located at 331 North Harbor Boulevard. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-86, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. Attention of the Council was called to communication dated October 11, 1966, from Mr. and Mrs. Hugo P. Buchelt, protesting the expansion. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 886: Submitted by Mrs. Argrettis W. Bixby re- questing permission to establish a boarding house for six handicapped children; R-1 zoned property located at 544 South Dorchester Street. Denied by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-89. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 888: Submitted by Giacomo and Agostina Lugaro requesting permission for on-sale beer and wine in an existing restaurant; C-1 zoned property located at 524 North Magnolia Avenue. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-90. VARIANCE NO. 1827: Submitted by Doyle Hill and Delmar Jackson requesting waiver of maximum free-standing height; M-1 and P-L zoned property located at 1239 North East Street. Denied by the City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-91. VARIANCE NO. 1830: Submitted by Lloyd Moriarty requesting waivers of minimum lot width and minimum front setback; R-0 zoned property located on the west side of West Street, south of La Palma Avenue. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-92. VARIANCE NO. 1831: Submitted by W. R. Hemphill requesting waiver of minimum lot width; R-1 zoned property located at 951 North Gilbert Street. 9731 qity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-93. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOn 756: The City Planning Commission granted 180 day extension of time, to expire March 9, 1967; property approved for establishment of a cat boarding facility in an existing structure, located at 928 South Webster Street (Applicant - Marvin L. Streiff). VARIANCE NOn 1742: The City Planning Commission granted one year extension of time to Variance No. 1742 to expire March 23, 1967; property approved for various waivers, and located at 1320 and 1326 Belmont Avenue (Petitioner - John To Schaefer). The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken on the above numbered conditional use permits and variance applications. STREET NAME CHANGE - GARNET STREET - ARCHER STREET: City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC66-103 was submitted recommending street name change for Garnet Street, portion of Tract No. 2299 running northerly from Broadway, east of Brookhurst Street, to Archer Street. RESOLUTION NOn 66R-652: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-652 for adoption, approving said street name change, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CHANGING THE NAME OF GARNET STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, TO ARCHER STREET. (Tract No. 2299) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-652 duly passed and adopted. ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION - PROPOSED CHANGE, STREET CLASSIFICATION: ExcerPt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission Meeting held October 10, 1966, was submitted recommending that the Orange County Planning Commission be urged to approve a change in street classification for Orangewood Avenue from a secondary to a primary highway, extending from the west bank of the Santa Aha River on the west to a point 600 feet from Eckhoff Street, located in the westerly section of the City of Orange. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, action taken by the City Planning Commission was sustained, and copy of said recommendation was ordered forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED° CHANGE ORDER NOn 1- JOB NO~ 5020: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley moved that Change Order No. 1, Job No. 50207 consisting of additional work and materials, in the total amount of $5,332.25 be authorized. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-653 JOB NOn 951: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-653 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE LEMON, SANTA ANA AND ATCHISON STREETS SEWER IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO~ 951. (Rogers and Davies Pipeline Contractors) 9732 City Hall, Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~ 1966~ 1:30 PoMo Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-653 duly passed and adopted. TRANSFER OF FUNDS: On report and recommendation of the Deputy City Attorney, Councilman Dutton moved that the City Council authorize payment of ad- ditional appraisers fees in the matter of the Anaheim Union Water Company litigation, and transfer of $2,500.00 for this purpose from the Council Contingency Fund to Account No. 531-257, was authorized. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED~ CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested to cancel county taxes on property acquired by the City of Anaheim for mdnicipal purposes, pursuant to Resolution No. 66R-626, formerly assessed to James H. Beatty, deed recorded October 3, 1966, as Document No. 667, in Book 8066, Page 117, Official Records of Orange County, California. MOTION CARRIED. TRANSFER OF FUNDS: On the recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, transfer of funds was authorized from the Council Contingency Account to Account No. 620-901.2, for the purpose of settling litigation, James Ho Beatty property (Pioneer Parksite), in the amount of $1,750.00, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of one 2000 KVA transformer, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid, that of General Electric, Los Angeles, in the amount of $9,494.16, including tax: General Electric, Los Angeles H~ Kw Porter, Los Angeles Maydwell-Hartzell, Inc., Los Angeles Rs Ao Young, Glendale Westinghouse Electric, Los Angeles Parks & Co., Long Beach $9,494.16 9,635.60 9,817.60 9,969.44 9,994.40 9,994.40 On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Schutte moved that the low bid of General Electric be accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $9,494.16. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied, as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the Insurance Agent, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte: a. Claim submitted by Jim Ingram for damages purportedly resulting from parkway tree limb falling on vehicle on or about August 10, 1966. b. Claim submitted by Howard Turney for damages purportedly resulting from collision with city fire plug due to an inadequate safety provision, on or about September 27, 1966. co Claim submitted by Selwyn J. Monarch, on behalf of Mrs. Aurora Esquerra, for injuries purportedly resulting from a fall on city property, on or about May 7, 1966. MOTION CARRI ED~ CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Request to file late claim, submitted by Mario ?. Gonzalez on behalf of Janis Adams, together with claim for injuries and damages purportedly resulting from a dangerous condition at 317 East La Palma Avenue, on or about April 9, 1966, was presented to the City Council. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Council granted permission to file late claim, and denied said claim due to insufficiency of form. MOTION CARRIED° 9733 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. ANNUAL REPORT - ENGINEERING DIVISION: On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, Annual Report of the Engineering Division for the Fiscal Year 1965-66 was ordered received and filed. MOTION CARRIED. METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT - RATES: Metropolitan Water District Resolution No. 6881, establishing rates for water sold and delivered, commencing July 1, 1965 through and including July 1, 1969, was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton: Ho City of San Bernardino - Board of Water Commissioners Resolution No. 163 urging the establishing of a federal water pollution laboratory in Southern California. b. Bylaws Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County. c. Minutes - Orange County Mosquito Abatement District - Meeting of September 15, 1966. MOTION CARRIED° RESOLUTION NO. 66R-654: On the recommendations of the Deputy City Attorney, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-654 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES; AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO, 66R-646. (Union Oil Company of California) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-654 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2324: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2324 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-7 C-i) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2324 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2325: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2325 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (66-67-2 - C-i) ORDINANCE NOo 2326: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2326 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-117 - R-3) 9734 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~ 1966~ 1:30 P.Mo ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following Alcoholic Beverage license applications were presented by the Assistant City Manager to the City Council for their information: ao Application submitted by Alan March and Stella Theresa Dagg for Person. to Person Transfer of On-sale Beer license for the Rocket Room, 405 South Brookhurst Street (R-A zone - C-1 pending; legal non-conforming use). b. Application submitted by Rochan E. Ford for Original On-sale Beer license, unnamed business at 2816 West Lincoln Avenue (C-1 zone, Conditional Use Permit No. 872). No Council action was taken on the foregoing applications. RESOLUTION NO° 66R-655 - AWARD OF JOB NOo 5022: In accordance with recommenda- tions of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-655 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER- FORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STORM DRAIN IN WESTERN AVENUE, FROM APPROXIMATELY 54 FEET NORTH OF ROME AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 22 FEET NORTH OF BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 5022. (Harmon T. May & Sons - $35,646.5O) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-655 duly passed and adopted. JOB NO° 988 - ANAHEIM STADIUM SCOREBOARD: Mr. Robert Davis reported on the status of the Anaheim Stadium Scoreboard pertaining to the halo spectacular lighting sequence, the football pressbox control unit, the operation manuals, service information, parts lists and the up-dated wiring diagrams, and ten prepared tape programs, and recommended acceptance of the scoreboard at this time, subject to withholding of $25,000.00 from final payment until the football pressbox control unit has been installed and is in complete operation. RESOLUTION NO° 66R-656: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works and the Convention Center and Stadium Director, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-656 for adoption, accepting completion of scoreboard as recommended, authorizing the filing of notice of completion and withholding $25,000.00 from final payment, in accordance with the contract. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE ANAHEIM STADIUM SCOREBOARD° Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-656 duly passed and adopted. 9735 City Hall~ Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-657: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-657 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EXPRESSING SUPPORT OF APPLICATION NO. 48808 OF ORANGE COAST SIGHTSEEING COMPANY, INCo, NOW BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-657 duly passed and adopted. RECLASSIFICATION NOo 65-66-12: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Council accepted agreement by Bob Leaverton Plumbing Co., Inc., pertaining to drainage waters as condition of Reclssification No. 65-66-12 (M-1 property located at 935 South Manchester Avenue). MOTION CARRIED° INSURANCE CONSULTANT - CITY OF ANAHEIM: Mr. Robert Davis reported on the employment of an Insurance Consultant to investigate the entire City Insurance Program and make recommendations concerning possible duplication and inadequacies, and proposed changes, advising that four proposals have been received. That after representatives of each firm were interviewed by Finance Director Douglas Ogden and himself, it was their recommendation that the proposal of Bayley, Martin and Fay, Inc., be accepted, fees for time and services not to exceed $3,000.00, in accordance with funds previously budgeted. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council authorized employment of the firm of Bayley, Martin and Fay, Inc., as Insurance Consultants for the City of Anaheim, fees not to exceed $3,000.00. MOTION CARRIED° RESOLUTION NOo 66R-658: On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-658 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONCURRING IN THE INTENT AND PURPOSE OF THE NORTHERN ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE TRAFFIC STUDY, AND ENDORSING THE ACTION OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FOR USE OF ITS COMPUTER PROCESSES FOR THIS PURPOSE° Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-658 duly passed and adopted. PROPOSED RINKER ANNEXATION NO. 2: It was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Pebley, that petition for annexation to the City of Anaheim of uninhabited territory designated as Rinker Annexation No. 2, be referred to the City Clerk for checking (west of Orchard Drive, north of Orangethorpe Avenue - proposed Tract No. 6286). MOTION CARRIED. CITY VEHICLE BUMPER STICKERS: At the request of Councilman Dutton, the City Council indicated approval of proposed application of bumper stickers on city vehicles in recognition of "Support Your Local Police Week". RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved to recess to 7:00 PoM. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° (3:30 PoMo) 9736 .City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Kreino COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis. DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan Go Orsborn. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. ASSISTANT PLANNER: Charles Roberts. INVOCATION: Reverend Tom Pendell, of the First Methodist Church gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Schutte led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 66-67-18 AND VARIANCE NO. 1824: Submitted by Henry E. and Dorothy A. Lestmann requesting change of zone from C-1 (deed restricted) to C-l, General Commercial, and further requesting waivers of (1) Maximum building height, and (2) Minimum building setback; property located at the southwest corner of Orange and Magnolia Avenues (601 South Magnolia Avenue). The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolutions Nos. PC66-76 and PC66-77, recommended denial of said reclassification, and denied said variance. Mr. Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, advising that the petitioners propose a service station at the corner, with a commercial building on the westerly portion of the property, the latter having a five foot setback from the west boundary; that said commercial building would abut the south building line, and would be located within 150 feet of single family residential properties. He summarized the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission, and noted findings made by the Commission precedent to their action. Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council, and Mayor Krein asked if the petitioners or their representative wished to address the Council. Mr. Donald M. Brown, Architect and Authorized Agent, 1720 West La Palma Avenue, noted that deed restrictions were imposed on subject property as condition of Reclassification No. 60-61-11, at which time a medical center was proposed; that the medical development did not material- ize because of other similar developments in the area. He referred to revised plans submitted prior to the City Planning Commission hearing, which indicated a ten foot front setback on Orange Avenue. Mr. Brown reported on their investigation pertaining to comments and opinions expressed at the Planning Commission hearing, advising that by eliminating a large rear setback, the problem of accumulated trash, noisy compressor units near residential properties and an additional access drive to the property would be solved. The market which was one of the proposed lessees would have compressors on the north side of the building, concealed by an orr~mental block wall for aesthetics and security purposes. In addition, with the building located as proposed, more parking would be available, and greater ease of ingress and egress would be realized. He further noted planter areas on the north and east, designating driveway approaches. Mr. Brown further advised that each of the proposed tenants of the shopping area and the service station had conducted studies as to the need for their particular businesses in the area, and he requested that the proposed development be approved. 9737 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11.~ 1966~ 1:30 PoM. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition. Mr. Roger Crosley, 2417 Westhaven Drive, was of the opinion that although the petitioners had attempted to improve the proposed development, the use would be detrimental to the neighborhood. He objected to the service station because of late hours and noise; and objected to the market because of traffic, especially during the evening hours, and lighting for the area. Further, if the deed restrictions were lifted, he was concerned that any use allowable in the C-1 zone could be developed. In Mr. Crosley's opinion, the approval of unlimited C-1 zoning on subject property would establish a precedent for additional requests for commercial uses in the area. He noted that the proposed waiver of setback requirements on the south property line would result in a 12 foot structure abutting his property line, and 30 feet from his residence; and he requested that, if approved, a 5 to 10 foot building setback be required on the south boundary. Mr. Dick Shimeall, 2767 West Broadway, representing the Magnolia School Board and St Paul's Presbyterian Church, addressed the City Council objecting to the potential traffic hazard for children attending the school across Orange Avenue to the north, and to the noise from the compressor units to be located on the north side of the property in question. He further objected to noise from the service station which would disturb services at the church across Magnolia Avenue to the east. He further objected to the addition of more traffic to the neighborhood, and he noted existing food markets and stores in the area. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council. Mr. Brown addressed the Council in rebuttal, being of the opinion that the proposed development would be a great improvement, providing greater safety to the school children and other pedestrians by eliminating existing unimproved berm on the north side of the property. He noted that school and church hours do not coincide with peak traffic hours, and advised that the service station lubrication service doors would open to the west, with the store building acting as a buffer to protect residential properties to the west. Further, service station attendants would take steps to minimize noise during church services. If the property were to be used for residential purposes, Mr. Brown was of the opinion that small lots with two-story homes would be the only feasible development, and this would afford less privacy to neighbors than the proposed use. Further, the medical-dental facility would create more of a traffic hazard than the use proposed. In response to Council questioning, Mr. Thompson reported that the deed restrictions limit the use of the property to medical and dental facilities and pharmacies, or to professional offices, and to single story construction only. Mr. Shimeall again addressed the Council advising that his opposition was based on noise and traffic hazards, which in his opinion would be far less under the uses presently allowable. Mayor Krein declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-659: At the conclusion of Council discussion, Council- man Schutte offered Resolution No. 66R-659 for adoption, disapproving subject reclassification, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (66-67-18) Roll call vote: 9738 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~ 1966~ 1:30 PoMo AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-659 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-660: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 66R-660 for adoption, sustaining the action taken by the City Planning Commission denying subject variance. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NOo 1824. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-660 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 66-67-20 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 884 (RECLASSIFICATION NOo 62-63-43): Submitted by Clifton M. Martin requesting change of zone from C-1 (deed restricted) to C-l, General Commercial, and permission to establish a wedding chapel and dining facilities; property located at 1916 West Ball Road. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-78, recommended denial of said Reclassification No. 66-67-20, and pursuant to Resolution PC66-79, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 884, subject to the following conditions: o That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the amendment of deed restrictions to include in Reclassification No. 62-63-43 these uses requested. That any air conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view from abutting streets, prior to final building inspection. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. RECLASSIFICATION NOo 62-63-43: Pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-80 the City Planning Commission recommended ammendment to deed restrictions of Resolution 62R-1099, Reclassification No. 62-63-43, by including the establishment of a wedding chapel and restaurant facilities in the permitted uses. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He referred to findings of the City Planning Commission in recommending denial of Reclassification No. 66-67-20, that to remove deed restrictions would permit heavier uses than originally intended for subject property. Mayor Krein asked if the applicant wished to address the City Council. Mr. Joseph Bush, 5782 South Ohio, Yorba Linda, representing the petitioner, advised that they were in accordance with the action taken by the City Planning Commission. He briefly explained the business proposed, noting that the dining facilities would be used in conjunction with the wedding chapel for receptions, and would also be used as dining facilities for various groups, however, would not be opened as a public restaurant. In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Bush adviSed that his wife would operate the proposed business, and they have no intention of selling or providing alcoholic beverages on the premises. 9739 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~ 1966~ 1:30 PoM. Discussion was held by the City Council, it being noted that subject property was adjacent to a church facility. Deputy City Attorney Alan Watts was of the opinion that a condition could be imposed on the Conditional Use Permit which would prohibit the serving of alcoholic beverages on the property; however, he pointed out the possibility that a wedding party might bring their own beverages to a wedding reception, which would not require the operator of the facility to have an alcoholic beverage license. Mr. Bush stated they will be willing to stipulate to their clients that no alcoholic, beverages would be served nor allowed on the premises. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-661: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-661 for adoption, disapproving Reclassification No. 66-67-20 as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED~ (66-67-20) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Dutton and Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-661 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-662: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-662 for adoption, granting said conditional use permit, subject to recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and further subject to the condition that no alcoholic beverages would be served on the premises, as stipulated by the petitioner. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 884. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Dutton and Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-662 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-663: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-663 for adoption, authorizing the amendment of deed restrictions filed as condition of Reclassification No. 62-63-43 by including the establishment of a wedding chap~! and dining facilities in the uses permitted, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO° 62R-1099 IN RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 62-63-43. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Dutton and Chandler 9740 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~. 1966, 1:30 P.Mo The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-663 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO° 66-67-21: Submitted by Eltinge & Graziadio Development Company requesting change of zone from R-A to C-I, to allow establishment of a market and department store; property located north and west of a parcel of land at the northwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Beach Boulevard, having frontages on those streets. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-81 recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Beach Boulevard and Lincoln Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 2. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a 10-foot sewer and public utility easement along the easterly boundary of subject property. 3. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a 10-foot sewer and public utility easement along the west and north boundaries of the existing service station site. 4. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 5. That any air conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view, prior to final building inspection. 6. That the required interior landscaped areas shall be planted with trees and shall be serviced with irrigation facilities and permanently maintained. Said planting shall be protected by either bumper stops or curbs. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing commercial developments in the immediate area. He compared subject develop- ment with one recently approved by the City Council at the southeast corner of Orangethorpe Avenue and Lemon Street, and advised of plans to include a future food market facility. The Mayor asked if a representative of the applicants wished to address the Council. Mr. Cal Queyre!, of Anacal Engineering Company, Authorized Agents, reported he would be happy to answer any qu&stions. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-664: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-664 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD'BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (66-67-21 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Dutton and Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-664 duly pagmed and adopted. 9741 City Hal.l~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11, 1966, 1:30 PoM. PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL P'LAN AMENDMENT NO. 86: Public hearing was scheduled this date to consider amendment to the General Plan by relocating a fire station symbol, presently located on the west side of Euclid Street northerly of the Santa Ana Freeway, to the east side of Loara Street immediately north of the flood control channel, approximately midway between North Street and Catalpa Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-84, recommended approval of General Plan Amendment No. 86. Assistant Planner Charles Roberts noted the existing and proposed locations of the fire station symbol on the General Plan Map, posted on the west wall of the Council Chamber, and briefed findings of the City Planning Commission in recommending the relocation of said symbol. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council for or against the proposed General Plan Amendment. Mrs. Edith Swanek, 1265 West Catalpa Avenue, addressed the Council requesting additional information, and advised that Loara is a dead-end street, which in her opinion would create difficulties for fire equipment traveling to La Palma Avenue or to Euclid Street. She was concerned that sirens would disturb residents of the area, and asked about the park which had been projected for the neighborhood. Mr. Roberts noted that this public hearing was concerned only with a General Plan fire station symbol relocation, and advised that the present symbol was located at the southwest corner of Euclid Street and Westmont Drive, which had been deemed inadequate due to existing traffic problems; that after designation of the Euclid Street property for a fire station, a subsequent analysis by City Departments determined the proposed Loara site appropriate. Regarding potential noises and traffic problems, Mr. Roberts advised that all fire equipment is governed to a maximum speed of 35 miles per hour, and sirens are utilized only when necessary. Concerning the park, Mr. Roberts reported that there was no record of any park plans for the site on Loara Street. Assistant City Manager Robert Davis reported that the Loara Street property had been purchased for public purposes, the primary intent being to provide alternate access to the existing park to the east, and if the fire station was developed, sufficient area would remain on the property for said access. He noted that subject property had never been designated for a park, and advised that there was a remaining privately owned parcel between the existing park and subject property, which was presently landlocked. Mr. Davis further advised that the relocation of the symbol was proposed on the basis of the analysis of the area to be served by the facility, in accordance with the National Board of Fire Underwriters' requirements; that major problems existed in connection with the original site; and subsequent to designation thereof for fire station purposes, the State Division of Highways indicated plans for an overcrossing at the Santa Ana Freeway on Crescent Avenue, which would give better coverage of the area from the new location. Mayor Krein asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council. Mrs. E. C. Testi, 1260 West Catalp~ Avenue, questioned the desirability of fire trucks coming out where school children must walk to the elementary school to the south, and noted the narrow width of Loara Street. Mr. Davis advised that the fire station would be setback sufficiently to provide adequate turning radius for the equipment, and the speed limits of the area would be observed. 9742 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES October 11~ 1966~ 1:30 P.Mo In answer to further questions of Mrs. Testi, Mr. Davis reported that a portion of the property had been filled with clean, solid fill materials. Regarding access to the park, he noted that if the privately owned parcel were acquired by the City, a pedestrian bridge would be a feasible means for access to the park, with the intermediate parcel being used as an off-street parking area. Mr. Davis further advised that no zone change was required for a fire station; that the design of fire stations in the City of Anaheim was planned to be comparable to the existing development of the area, and the City had no intention of any development to the east with the exception of off- street parking. Mr. Richard D. Berg, 1261 West Catalpa Avenue, advised than when he purchased his residence approximately three years ago, the City Staff had advised him that there would be a park on subject property; that a subsequent telephone call to the City brought the same information. He noted his observance of a fire station in another City, being of the opinion that the trucks cons- tituted a noise nuisance to the neighborhood. Mr. Berg further advised that approximately 400 children walk along Loara Street to the school, and he felt that the trucks would be unable to travel even 25 miles per hour in safety. He noted the service station at the corner of Crescent Avenue and the post office development on the west side of Loara Street, which had already resulted in an increase in traffic. It was suggested that other land was available in the area, specific reference being made to vacant property on Crescent Avenue between Euclid and Loara Streets, which Mr. Berg felt would be an ideal location for the fire station, being removed from the residential district, but in close proximity to the shopping center and to Loara Street. In conclusion, Mr. Berg was of the opinion that the proposed location of the facility would be detrimental to the residential atmosphere, and to the property values in the neighborhood, as well as creating a hazard to the safety of their children. Council discussion was held, and it was noted that there are existing sidewalks on Loara Street, with the exception of one small section opposite subject property. At the conclusion of the discussion, it was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley, that subject public hearing be continued to Wednesday, November 9, 1966, 7:00 P~Mo, to allow further consideration by the full City Council. MOTION CARRIED° In answer to Mr. Berg's inquiry, Mayor Krein advised that the Council- men who were not present this evening, would have access to the testimony and information given at this hearing. PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS NOS° 80 AND 83: Public hearing was scheduled this date to consider amendments to the Circulation Element-Highway Rights-of- Way of the Genera] Plan, as follows: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO° 80: Blue Gum Street between La Palma Avenue on the Mouth and Orangethorpe Avenue on the North - reclassified from primary to secondary highway. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-82 recommended that General Plan Amendment No. 80 be approved, changing the designation of Blue Gum Street on the Circulation Element-Highway Rights-of-Way from a primary highway to a secondary highway, and further recommended that the City Council recommend to the Orange County Planning Commission that the designation of Blue Gum Street be amended on the Orange County Master Plan of Streets and Highways to classify said street as secondary highway; and further that the Council recommend to the City of Placentia a change in street design- ation for Blue Gum Street within~its jurisdiction to a secondary highway. 9743 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 11~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO~ 83: Coronado Street between Dowling Street on the East and Blue Gum Street on the West - reclassified from secondary highway to local street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-83 recommended that General Plan Amendment No. 83 be approved, changing the designation of Coronado Street between Dowling Street on the east and Blue Gum Street on the west, to a local street; and further recommended that the City Council recommend to the Orange County Planning Commission that the designation of Coronado Street be amended on the Orange County Master Plan of Streets and Highways to classify said street as a local street. Planning Supervisor Ronald Grudzinski noted the location of the proposed amendments on the General Plan Map, and advised that neither of the two streets have been fully dedicated to their ultimate widths. He advised that Traffic Engineers and their staff from both the City of Anaheim and the County of Orange, had analyzed both Blue Gum and Coronado Streets, and found traffic was not sufficient to warrant their present designations. City Engineer James P. Maddox reported that Coronado Street presently connects with westbound traffic on the Riverside Freeway, however bids will be received in December 1966 for construction of the interchange which will be the first link of the new Orange Freeway, and upon completion of the interchange, said Coronado Street connection will no longer exist. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council for or against the proposed amendments to the General Plan, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-665: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-665 for adoption, approving General Plan Amendment No. 80 as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 80. (Blue Gum Street between La Palma Avenue and Orangethorpe Avenue) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Dutton and Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-665 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-666: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-666 for adoption, approving General Plan Amendment No. 83 as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 83. (Coronado Street between Dowling Street and Blue Gum Street) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Dutton and Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-666 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-667: On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 66R-667 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 9744 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - October lip 1966~ 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 66R-459 AND ESTABLISHING RATE OF COMPENSATION FOR A NEW JOB CLASSIFICA- TIONo (Binding Clerk) ADJOURNMENT: the motion. ADJOURNED: Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte and Krein None Dutton and Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-667 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Schutte seconded MOTION CARRIED° 8:15 P.M. City Clerk~ City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNC%L MINUTES - October 18~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: None. COUNCILMEN: Dutton, ?ebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein. DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Alona Mo Farrens. The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim was called to order by the Deputy City Clerk, and adjourned for lack of quorum to the next regular meeting, October 25, 1966, 1:30 PoM. ADJOURNED: 1:30 PoMo Deputy City Clerk