Loading...
1966/10/259745 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES October 25, 1966~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein. COUNCILMEN: Schutte. ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER: Fred Sorsabal. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph Pease. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Grudzinski. TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Edward Granzow. Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Krein proclaimed the week of November 1 to 7, 1966, as "American Art Week". Said proclamation was ratified by the City Council. PRESENTATION - ANAHEIM HOST LIONS CLUB: On behalf of the Citizens Recreation Association, Inc., of the Anaheim Host Lions Club, check in the amount of $2,000.00, to be applied to cost of construction of the La Palma Community Recreation Building, was presented by Mr. H. M. Nyhus. On behalf of the City Council., Mayor Krein accepted said check, and extended thanks to the Citizens Recreation Association. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Meeting held September 27 and October 4, 1966, were approved on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED° WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED° REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amounts of $136,601.74 and $701,882.24, in accordance with the 1966-67 Budget were approved. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - HOUSEMOVING PERMIT, VARIANCE 1831: Application of W. R. Hemphill for permission to move three dwellings from 19081 Newport, Costa Mesa, to 2402, 2408 and 2412 Rainbow Avenue, Anaheim, was scheduled for public hearing before the City Council October 11, 1966, at which time the hearing was continued to this date to allow the City Clerk to check petition of opposition and determine if signatures thereon constituted more than 50 percent of the property owners within 300 feet of subject property. The City Clerk submitted for Council review a map illustrating the 300 foot radius from subject property, containing 13 properties shown in red, represented on the petition of opposition; 7 properties in grey which were represented on supplementary petitions submitted October 19, 1966, requesting that any houses moved onto subject property be of equal value to the surrounding homes. It was noted that 22 properties within the radius were not represented on either petition, that a total o£ 42 properties were within 300 feet of subject property~ and the petitions did not represent a majority of properties within 300 feet of subject property. Mr. W. R. Hemphill, petitioner, submitted information, which he stated had been taken from the Anaheim Board of Realtors comparative sales publication, pertaining to prices of recent home sales, listings and appraisals in the area, in comparison with an area having identical homes to those to be moved, located on Broadway between Euclid and Brookhurst Streets. Also submitted was map of the subject area depicting those properties within the 300 foot radius~ 9746 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Hemphill listed improvements which would be made to the houses to be moved, such as new plumbing and copper piping, new foundations, redecorating, etc., and advised of his plans to sell the homes. Photographs illustrating the finished appearance of the houses to to be moved, and improvements previously made to subject property, were submitted for Council review. Mr. Hemphill further advised that the lots would be approximately 28 percent larger than those in the area. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition to the housemoving permit, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-668: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-668 for adoption, granting said housemoving permit, subject to completion of Variance No. 1831. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE MOVING PERMIT TO Wo Ro HEMPHILL TO MOVE DWELLINGS FROM 19081 NEWPORT, COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, TO 2402, 2408 AND 2412 RAINBOW AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-668 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATIONS NOS. 66-67-24 AND 66-67-25: Initiated by the City Planning Commission requesting change of zones on property described as the Blue Gum-Coronado Annexation, located south of Miraloma Avenue, north and east of the Riverside Freeway, north of La Palma Avenue and west of Blue Gum Street, with one portion located on the east side of Blue Gum Street between Coronado and Orange Streets. RECLASSIFICATION NOo 66-67-24: Requesting change of zone for Parcels 1 and 4 from R-A, Agricultural (interim zoning) to R-A - permanent zoning; and on Parcels 2 and 3 from M-l, light industrial (interim zoning) to M-1 permanent zoning. RECLASSIFICATION NOo 66-67-25: Requesting change of zone on Parcels 1 and 4 from R-A, Agricultural zoning to M-l, Light Industrial zone. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-101 recommended approval of Reclassification No. 66-67-24, establishing permanent zoning for properties designated as the Blue Gum-Coronado Annexation; and pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-102, recommended approval of Reclassification No. 66-67-25, subject to the following conditions: 1. Parcel One: Reclassification to M-1 with a resolution of intent only to be passed pending completion and finalization of plans for the Orange Freeway and the following: a. That dedication shall be made to the City of Anaheim on all streets within the area, according to the Circulation Element of the General Plan. b. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, such as curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer at the time the property is developed. c. That a preliminary title report shall be furnished prior to the adoption of the ordinance rezoning the property, showing legal vesting of title, legal description, and containing a map of the property. d. That all plans for development of the property shall be submitted to and approved by the Architectural Control Committee on the basis of com- patibility of development, both structurally and architecturally. 9747 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25, 1966~ 1:30 PoM. 1. Parcel Four: Reclassification to M-1 with a resolution of intent only to be passed, with zoning to be conditioned upon the following: a. That dedications shall be made to the City of Anaheim on all streets within the area, according to the Circulation Element of the General Plan Highway Right of Way, prior to the adoption of the ordinance rezoning the property. b. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, such as curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer at the time the property is developed. co That a preliminary title report shall be furnished prior to the adoption of the ordinance rezoning the property, showing legal vesting of title, legal description, and containing a map of the property. That all plans for development of the property shall be submitted to and approved by the Architectural Control Committee on the basis of compatibility of development both structurally and architecturally. do 3. That all site development standards of the M-1 Zone, as applicable, shall be complied with, in accordance with the time limitation established by said Zone. Planning Supervisor Ronald Grudzinski referred to map of the annexation area, posted on the east wall of the Council Chamber, noting locations of the four parcels as follows: Parcel 1 - Irregularly shaped, having a frontage of approximately 2300 feet on the north side of the Riverside Freeway, with easterly boundary approxi- mately 665 feet west of Blue Gum Street, and the northerly boundary approxi- mately 310 feet south of the Miraloma Avenue centerline. Parcel 2 (2 portions) - Portion A, irregularly shaped, located at the north- east corner of Blue Gum and Coronado Streets, having frontages of approximately 610 feet on Blue Gum Street, with approximately 180 feet on Coronado Street. Portion B, irregularly shaped, located at the southwest corner of Coronado and Blue Gum Streets, having frontages of approximately 620 feet on Coronado Street, with approximately 1050 feet on Blue Gum Street. Parcel 3 - Rectangularly shaped, located at the northwest corner of Coronado and Blue Gum Streets, having frontages of approximately 640 feet on Coronado Street, with approximately 970 feet on Blue Gum Street. Parcel 4 - Rectangularly shaped, located at the southwest corner of Blue Gum Street and Miraloma Avenue, with frontages of approximately 310 feet on Blue Gum Street, with approximately 1330 feet on Miraloma Avenue. Mr. Grudzinski noted action taken by the City Council to adopt interim zoning for subject area, annexed to the City of Anaheim in August, 1966, and advised that pursuant to the City's policy, the recommended permanent R-A and M-1 zone were the nearest comparable zoning to that established under the jurisdiction of the County of Orange. That Reclassifica- tion No° 66-67-25 recommended that a resolution of intent be adopted for the R-A portion of the area, to allow M-1 developments where decided by property owners, while not limiting that portion exclusively to industrial development; that industrial development had taken place on certain properties within P&re~ls 2 and 3, and adoption of Resolution of Intent for M-1 zoning on Parcels 1 and 4 would place these parcels in a comparable position to un- developed properties in the Northeast Industrial area (Resolution of Intent for M-1 zoning established under Reclassi£ication No. 61-62-69). Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council ~or or against the recommended reclassifications. Mr. Vincent Joyce, 15421 South Van Buren, Midway City, advised that he was the owner of a portion of Parcel 4, and it had been his under- standing that, upon annexation, the zoning on the property would be comparable to that in the County° He reported that on August 8, 1966, the County of Orange issued a building permit for construction of a triplex on 9748 ~Anaheima California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25, 1966~ 1:30 PoMo his property; that he was desirous of proceeding with the development at this time. Discussion was held by the City Council and staff, it being noted that the County building permit was issued prior to completion of annexation proceedings. Mr. Grudzinski reported that no one appeared before the City Planning Commission in opposition to the proposed reclassifications, however Mr. Joyce had subsequently contacted the Development Services Department, and they had obtained verification from the County that a building permit was issued as reported. Mayor Krein asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed on Reclassifications Nos. 66-67-24 and 66-67-25. Further discussion was held relative to the City's Policy of honoring uses permitted by the County prior to annexation, and to the additional policy of discouraging residential encroachment into the industrial areas. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-669: At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-669 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the interim zoning to permanent zoning, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (66-67-24 - R-A and M-l) Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-669 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-670: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-670 ~or adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone on Parcels 1 and 4 from R-A to M-l, subject to conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (66-67-25 M-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-670 duly passed and adopted. Regarding the building permit issued to Mr. Joyce under County jurisdiction, the City Attorney was requested to investigate the matter to determine if the applicant ~ad proceeded sufficiently to justify continuance. 9749 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25, 1966, 1:30 PoMo PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS NOS~ 18 AND 52: Reactivated by the City Planning Commission, encompassing properties located at the intersection of East Street with Sycamore Street and La Palma Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-105, recommended disapproval of General Plan Amendment No. 18, and pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-104, recommended approval of General Plan Amendment No. 52. Mr. Grudzinski referred to the East Street study map, posted on the west wall of the Council Chamber, encompassing properties on both sides of East Street from Lincoln Avenue northerly to the Riverside Freeway, and reviewed various zoning actions previously considered by the City Council in said area. He reported that a study of subject area had resulted in the Planning Commission's direction to reactivate subject General Plan Amendments, which pertained to properties already developed for commercial purposes. Attention was called to commercial uses established along East Street at Lincoln Avenue, Sycamore Street, La Palma Avenue and Romneya Drive, and Mr. Grudzinski noted that a C-0 use had recently been approved by the City Council on the west side of East Street between Sycamore and Wilhelmina Street (Reclassification No. 65-66-120). In conclusion, Mr. Grudzinski reported that three exhibits have been presented to the Commission, one illustrating a neighborhood commercial symbol at Sycamore and East Streets, one indicating proposed commercial symbol at La Palma Avenue and East Street, and one proposing commercial symbol between these two intersections. He noted findings of the Planning Commission in the recommended disapproval of General Plan Amendment No. 18 for a neighborhood commercial symbol at the southwest corner of North and East Streets, and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 52 for a neighbor- hood commercial General. Plan symbol at the southwest corner of Sycamore and East Street. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council with regard to the proposed General Plan Amendments. Mr. A. C. Anderson, 741 North Rose Street, advised of the current appraised values on the relatively new homes in his block, and concurred with recommendations of the Planning Commission regarding the General Plan Amendments, requesting that no neighborhood commercial or general commercial be indicated on East Street between La Palma Avenue and Wilhelmina Street. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO~ 66R-671: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-671 for adoption, disapproving General Plan Amendment No. 18 as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DISAPPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO~ 18. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-671 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-672: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-672 for adoption, approving General Plan Amendment No. 52, Exhibit "A", as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. 9750 C_ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25~ 1966~ 1:30 PoM. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMEND- MENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NOo 52. (Exhibit "A") Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-672 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDONMENT: Public hearing was held on proposed abandonment of a portion of a public utility easement, property located south of Cerritos Avenue and east of State College Boulevard, pursuant to Resolution No. 66R-620, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin October 13, 1966~ and notices thereof posted in accordance with law. Report of the City Engineer, dated September 29, 1966, recommending approval of requested abandonment, was submitted for Council consideration. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council for or against said abandonment, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-673: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-673 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF THAT PORTION OF AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES UPON, ALONG, OVER AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY° (Lot 9, Tract No. 6094) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-673 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Application filed by Carmen Moreno, on behalf of Sociedad Protectora Femenil, Inc. #11, Santa Ana, for permit to conduct public dance November 13, 1966, at Carpenters Hall, 608 West Vermont Street, was submitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED° AMUSEMENT DEVICE PERMIT: Application filed by Vincent Lancisero for amusement device permit to allow juke box at Lynbrook Family B~lliards, 2220 West Lincoln Avenue, was submitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chapter 3.24 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED° RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-96~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 822 AND VARIANCE NO0 177] EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of A. H. Stovall, Jr., received September 27, 1966, was submitted for 180 day extension of time to Reclassification No. 65-66-96, Conditional Use Permit No. 822 and Variance No. 1771. 180 day extension of time was granted by the City Council, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED~ REQUEST USE OF MOBILE HOME: Communication dated September 24, 1966, from Mr. Bill Ditmar, was submitted requesting permission to maintain a mobile home as a residence for his father on R-A property, located on the north side of Ball Road east of Gaymont Drive (2901 West Ball Road). Also submitted and reviewed by the City Council was report from the Zoning and Building Divisions dated October 25, 1966. ' 9751 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P~M. Mr. Ditmar was present and advised that a house trailer was located on the property at the time the City of Anaheim annexed the territory in 1956, and a trailer was being used at the time he purchased the property in February of 1962. He explained circumstances relating to the health of his elderly parent, and the necessity of his being located close to their home. Regarding inadequate electrical service to the trailer, noted as result of recent inspection, Mr. Ditmar advised that he would comply with Building Code provisions. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, request to continue use of mobile home was granted for a period of one year, as recommended by the Zoning and Building Divisions, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the centerline of the street, along Ball Road, for street widening purposes. 2. That provisions of the trailer section of the uniform Building Code be met by the petitioner. MOTION CARRIED° TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NOo 5989: Developer - Butler and Harbour Inc., property located on the north side of Orangethorpe Avenue, west of Boisseranc Street, and contains 59 proposed R-2 5000 zoned lots (Reclassification No. 66-67-19 and General Plan Amendment No. 87). In accordance with request of the petitioner, Council consideration of subject tentative tract was continued, to be heard in conjunction with public hearing on Reclassification No. 66-67-19 and General Plan Amendment No. 87, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED° CITY OF FULLERTON - SPECIAL PERMIT NO. 17 AND VARIANCE NO~ 1254: Proposed establishment of service station; property located at the southwest corner of State College Boulevard and Orangethorpe Avenue. Excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held October 24, 1966, was submitted, noting notice of special use permit and variance was ordered received and fi]ed. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, action taken by the City Planning Commission was sustained, and copy thereof ordered forwarded to the Fullerton City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE COUNTY TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NOn 4633: Property located on the south side of Yorba Linda Boulevard, west of the Imperial Freeway, and contains approximately 8.3 acres, proposed for subdivision into 26 single family lots. Excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held October 24, 1966, was submitted recommending that the Orange County Planning Commission be urged to approve said tentative tract. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Councl] concurred with action taken by the City Planning Commission, and ordered copy thereof be forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED° ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO. 5804: Proposed establishment of administration offices for Placentia Unified School District, and establishment of a school bus storage area with facilities for servicing and maintenance of said buses in the A-1 (0) General Agricultural (oil production district); property located on the north s~ide of Orangethorpe Avenue approximately 500 feet west of Jefferson Street. 9752 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25~ 1966: 1:30 PoMo Excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held October 24, 1966, was submitted recommending that the Orange Planning Commission be urged to approve said use variance. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Council concurred with action taken by the City Planning Commission and ordered copy thereof forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-674 - JOB NO~ 1003: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-674 for adoption, rejecting all bids received for Job No. 1003, the reconstruction of La Palma Park bleachers. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED UP TO THE HOUR OF 2:00 P~Mo ON OCTOBER 13, 1966, FOR PUBLIC WORKS JOB NOo 1003. (La Palma Park bleachers) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-674 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-675 - JOB NO~ 1003: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 66R-675 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND ERECTING STEEL BLEACHERS AT LA PALMA PARK, AT HARBOR AND ANAHEIM BOULEVARDS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1003; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETCo: AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF° (Bids to be opened November 17, 1966, 2:00 PoMo) Roil call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-675 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO~ 66R-676 - AWARD OF SS PROJECT NOo 306-A: In accordance with recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-676 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF EAST STREET, FROM SYCAMORE STREET TO BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, SS PROJECT NO. 306-A. (Sully-Miller Contracting Co. $205,777.65) Roll call vote: 9753 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25~ 1966~ 1:30 PoM~ AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-676 duly passed and adopted. JOB NO. 448-A - REPORT: Mr. Fred Sorsabal submitted and read for Council information report of Thornton E. Piersall, Public Works Director, dated October 24, 1966, concerning sealed proposals received for furnishing and in- stalling carpeting at the Convention Center, to be awarded by the Community Center Authority at a later date. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-677 - JOB NOo 1203: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-677 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE GROVE STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM LA PALMA AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 1270 FEET SOUTH OF LA PALMA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1203; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETCo; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF° (Bids to be opened November 17, 1966, 2:00 PoM.) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-677 duly passed and adopted. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolutions Nos. 66R-678 to 66R-691, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-678: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Fredricks Development Corporation) RESOLUTION NOo 66R-679: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES~ (Robert Wasserman) RESOLUTION NO° 66R-680: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (Greschner, Buckeim, and Steinbrink) RESOLUTION NOo 66R-681: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Delta Construction Co.) RESOLUTION NOo 66R-682: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (Delta Construction Co.) RESOLUTION NO, 66R-683: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR EASEMENTS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Henry and Rosa C. E. Steinbrink) 9754 City Hall: Anaheim? California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P.Mo RESOLUTION NO. 66R-684: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES~ (Aaron Eo and Margaret E. Swain> Sr.) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-685: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Incentive Aid Foundation) RESOLUTION NOo 66R-686: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASMMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL POWER POLES AND POWER LINES° (Robert C. McKay) RESOLUTION NOo 66R-687: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR POWER POLES AND POWER LINES. (Dale I. Sellon) RESOLUTION NO. 66R-688: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR POWER POLES AND POWER LINES° (James Stanford and Anna L. Morris) RESOLUTION NO~ 66R-689: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Thomas P. Walker) RESOLUTION NO° 66R-690: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES IN, ON, OVER AND ACROSS CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY° RESOLUTION NO. 66R-691: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Joseph M and Mary M. Anton) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 66R-678 to 66R-691, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-692: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-692 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A QUITCLAIM DEED REMISING~ RELEASING AND QUITCLAIMING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY TO ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT~ Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-692 duly passed and adopted. SETTLEMENT OF EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS RESOLUTION NO. 66R-693: On report and recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-693 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 9755 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25~ 1966~ 1:30 PoMo A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COMPROMISE OF CERTAIN EMINENT DOMAIN LITIGATION, AND DIRECTING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE CERTAIN PAYMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH° (Henry and Emma C. Wagner - $2,800.00 - State College Boulevard and Ball Road Highway and Public Utility purposes) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-693 dully passed and adopted. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: Mr. Sorsabal reported on informal bids received for the purchase of 500 88 KVL~h~e Post Insulators, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the second iow bid, on the basis of earlier delivery date that of NGK Insulator~ Los Angeles, in the amount of $13,260.00 including tax. Eo S. Condon, Los Angeles NGK Insulator, Los Angeles Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Anaheim reference only) (Late bid - $13,124.80 13,260.00 13,371~54 On the recommendations of the Assistant to the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that the bid of NGK Insulator, in the amount of $13,260.00, be accepted and purchase authorized as the lowest and best qualified bid. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: Mr. Sorsabal reported on budgeted purchase of 39 radios (21 for police patrol units, 13 for police motorcycle units and 5 for the Public Works Department), advising that the City has standardized on Motorola Radio equipment, and quotation has been received from Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc., of E1Segundo, as follows: 21 Police Patrol Units 13 Motorcycle Units 5 Public Works Units $698.10 each 750.50 each 631.80 each Total less trade in 25 units plus 4% tax Total $14,660.10 9,756.50 3,159.00 27,575.60 1~902.08 25,673.02 1~103.02 $26,776.04 Mr. Sorsabal further reported that the equipment is serviced by the County of Orange under the City Service Agreement, and a comparison of the low quotation for this type of equipment received from Motorola by the County in February of 1966, proved that the foregoing amounts were comparable to those quoted in said low bid. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, purchase of 39 radios from Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc., as needed, was ~utborize~ in a total .~o~t of $26,776 04, including sales tax ~nd tra~e ~n ~llow~nce~ MOTION CARRIED~ SOUTH EAST STREET PARKING RESTRICTIONS: The City Clerk reported on telephone call received in her office this date from Mr. Norman T. Jarvi requesting that Counci] cons{deration o~ request to li£t par~ing restrictions on South East Street, between Santa Ana and Water Streets, be deferred one week. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the foregoing issue was continued one week (November 1, 1966). MOTION CARRIED° PETITIONS - SCHOOL CROSSINGS: Petition received September 27, 1966, containing approximately 100 signatures, was submitted requesting safe guards for elementary school crossings in the vicinity of Adelaide Price School, and suggesting the fo]lowing measures: 9756 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25~ 1966~ 1:30 PoM~ 1. Crossing guards or school safety patrols at the busy intersections of Euclid and Crescent, and Crescent and Loara. 2. Some sign indication at Euclid and Crescent that this is part of the children's route to a school in this area. o Signs on the driveways of Security First National Bank and the Post Office on Crescent between Euclid and Loara, stressing the need for safety on account of school children. 4. The trimming of hedges in the area which are at the moment to high for drivers to clearly see small children crossing. Also submitted and read were reports from the Chief of Police and the City Engineer, dated October 14 and 19, 1966, respectively. Council discussion was held, and further reference made to the intersection of Orange and Magnolia Avenues, where children cross a wide thoroughfare (Magnolia Avenue) to reach Mattie Lou Maxwell School. Councilman Pebley reported on his visual inspection thereof, being of the opinion that the "walk" signal timing could be extended to allow additional time for the children to cross. Traffic Engineer Edward Granzow advised that the "walk" phase of the traffic signal at said location is on for 14 seconds before the "don't walk" phase begins flashing, which allows completion of crossing the street before said flashing ceases, while warning others that they do not have sufficient time to leave the curb and cross the street in safety. Further, that the "walk" time period is automatically~increased between the hours of 11:00 A.Mo and 12:00 Noon, when young children are using the crossing. Mr. Sorsabal noted the cooperation which had been given to school and parents by the Police Department and Traffic Engineering Division regarding these matters, and expressed the opinion that a coordinated safety education effort with the schools, parents, police and traffic engineers, would reduce or possibly eliminate the problems. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council. Mrs. Sally Benson, Safety Chairman for the Adelaide Price School Parent-Teacher Association, advised that she represented many women who walk or drive their children to and from school because they feel the available routes are not safe. She reported that they have written to the Anaheim Merchants Association to request school warning signs on private commercial property in the area; further, they have contacted the Post Office Department and received excellent cooperation from postal vehicle drivers. She noted that many motorists do not take sufficient care to watch for the children, possibly because many are not aware that a school exists in the area. She advised that the Parent-Teacher Association members would be happy to meet with City representatives for further suggestions, and she thanked the City Council for their consideration of the problems. Mrs. Rosalind Jacobs, 1800 Gramercy, Apartment 26, advised that she walked her child to and from school each day, and was of the opinion that small children need some assistance as they are not sufficiently responsible to be aware of all factors involved. She requested that a school warning sign be placed at the intersection of Euclid Street and Crescent Avenue. In response to Councilman Dutton's question, Mrs. Jacobs felt that more signs would be the primary factor to alleviate the situation particularly since people coming to the shopping centers from other areas are not usually aware of the school locations. Mr. Granzow briefly reported on existing regulations for locations of school warning signs. Mayor Krein asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council; there was no response. 9757 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES October 25~ 1966, 1:30 PoM. The Mayor advised that the City would be happy to work with the Parent-Teacher Association and the schools in an effort to alleviate the problems. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED~ (3:15 PoMo) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present with the exception of Councilman Schutte. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton: a. Minutes - Community Center Authority - Meeting of September 12, 1966. b0 Financial Report - Fiscal Year 1965-1966. c. Financial & Operating Reports for the Month of September, 1966. 'MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2325: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2325 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (66-67-2 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2325 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2326: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2326 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (65-66-117 - R-3) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2326 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2327: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2327 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING~ (65-66-67 - R-3) ORDINANCE NOo 2328: C!ounc{lman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2328 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (65-66-96 - C-i) ORDINANCE NO. 2329: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2329 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.40, SECTION 14.40.060, PARAGRAPHS I, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 90P THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO SPEED LIMITS~ (35 mph, various streets) 9758 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P.Mo ORDINANCE NOo 2330: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2330 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-87 - C-l) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following Alcoholic Beverage License applications were presented by Mr. Sorsabal to the City Council for their information: a. Application submitted by Ira Allen Shames for Original Off-Sale General license, unnamed business at 112-114 North Jefferson Street (C-1 zone). b. Application submitted by Rolf Engen, Inc., Stanley W. Root, Vice President, for Original Off-Sale General license, unnamed business at 806 West La Palma Avenue (C-1 zone) c. Application submitted by Kenneth and Barbara Jean Charlnoes for Person to Person Transfer of On-Sale Beer license at The Hangout, 1249 West Lincoln Avenue (C-2 zone). d. Application submitted by Leo J. Freedman~ President, King of California, Inc., for Person to Person Transfer of On-Sale General license (bonafide eating place) at the Crest Hotel, #7 Freedman Way (R-A zone, Conditional Use Permit No. 574). No Council action was taken on the foregoing applications. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by Cole's Markets, Inc., for Off-Sale General license at 1201 South Knott Avenue (R-A zone - C-1 reclassification pending), was presented to the City Council for their information. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler, the City Attorney was authorized to file conditional protest with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application, on the basis of inappropriate zoning. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by Francis S. and Ruth Mo Nicolette for On-Sale General license (bonafide eating place) for unnamed business at 1270-1272 North Magnolia Avenue (M-1 zone; conditional use permit required), was presented to the City Council for their information. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Attorney was authorized to file conditional protest with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application on the basis of inappropriate zoning. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by George Alexander Gade, President of Gade Inc., for On-Sale Beer and Wine license (bonafide eating place) at Rancho Buffet Restaurant, 601 East Orangethorpe Avenue (M-1 zone; conditional use permit required). On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Attorney was authorized to file conditional protest with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application on the basis of inappropriate zoning. MOTION CARRIED° STADIUM CLUB SIGNS: City Attorney Joseph Geisler reported that Automatic Canteen Corporation, Concessionaires, have requested permission to erect a sign on the Anaheim Stadium property advertising the Stadium Club. Councilman Krein moved that said sign request be granted, sign to be in conformity with the basic concepts of the City's Sign Ordinance and subject to approval of the design thereof by the Stadium Manager. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° At the suggestion of Councilman Pebley, Councilman Chandler moved that installation of a small neon sign designating the Stadium Club over the 9759 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25, 1966~ 1:30 PoMo entrance doors to the Stadium lobby leading to elevators to the Stadium Club be authorized, said sign not to conflict with other tenants and be subject to approval by the Stadium Manager. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° RECESS: Councilman Krein moved to recess to 7:00 PoM. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° (3:50 P~Mo) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein. COUNCILMEN: Schutte. ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER: Fred Sorsabal. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph Pease. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Alan G. Orsborn. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. INVOCATION: Reverend G~ Paul Keller, of the First Methodist Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Chandler led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-13: Submitted by Verna Rowe re- questing change of zone from R-3 to P-l; property briefly described as located south of Lincoln Avenue and West of Empire Street. City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-87 re- commended said reclassification subject to the following conditions: 1. That a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject property be submitted to the City of Anaheim for approval and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 2. That a minimum 6-foot wide screen planting area be provided around the perimeter of the new portion of the parking lot; that down lighting standards not to exceed the height of the 6-foot masonry wall be installed; that concrete bumper blocks shall be placed adjacent to the screen planting area which is adjacent to the masonry wall; and that 2% of the interior of the new parking area be landscaped with trees, prior to final building and zoning inspections. 3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No. ]. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 66-67-26: Submitted by Verna Rowe requesting change of zone from R-3 to R-2 5,000; property briefly described as located on the west side of Empire Street south of Lincoln Avenue, adjacent to the east to property described in Reclassification No. 66-67-13. The City Planning Cormnission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-88 recommended said reclassification subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Empire Street, for tree planting purposes. 2. That a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject property be submitted to the City of Anaheim for approval, and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 3. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Empire Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifica- tions on file in the office of the City Engineer, and shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. 9760 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25~ 1966~ 1:30 P.Mo That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. Mr. RoDald Thompson noted the location of subject properties and in summarizing the hearing before the City Planning Commission, advised that, the requested P-1 classification was to expand the Lin-Brook parking lot~ and the R-2 5,000 zone, was to provide for single-family development on the Empire Street frontage. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Russell Penniman of Penniman and Company, Agent for the petitioner, advised that the P-1 zoning was originally requested, and as result of interest evident from the property owners in the area relative to the potential use of the property to the east, a subsequent application was filed for the R-2 5,000 zone on the remaining undeveloped property. Mayor Krein asked if anyone in opposition wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-694: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-694 authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED~ (66-67-13 - P-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-694 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-695: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 66R-695 for adoption authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (66-67-26 - R-2 5000) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-695 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-23, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 885 AND VARIANCE NO. 1828: Submitted by Henry Wagner requesting change of zone from R-A to M-l; property briefly described as located at the northwest corner of State College Boulevard and Ball Road, comprising four parcels noted as A, B, C and D. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-98 recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 9761 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25, 1966~ 1:30 PoMo That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Ball Road and State College Boulevard, including a 35-foot radius corner return, for street widening purposes. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, along Ball Road and State College Boulevard, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Ball Road and State College Boulevard, for street lighting purposes. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Ball Road and State College Boulevard, for tree planting purposes. That a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject property be submitted to the City of Anaheim for approval and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view from abutting streets, and sound buffered from adjoining residential property, prior to final building inspection. That the portion of subject property indicated on Exhibit No. 1 for a service station site, shall be developed substantially in accordance with adopted Service Station Minimum Site Development Standards. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 885: Requesting permission to establish a walk-up restaurant on Portion B of Reclassification No. 66-67-23, and a restaurant with on-sale liquor on Portion D with waiver of required front landscaping setback on Parcels B and D from a 10 foot minimum setback to three feet. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-99 granted in part Conditional Use Permit No. 885, allowing requested walk-up restaurant and restaurant with on-sale liquor, and denying waiver of land- scape setback requirement, subject to the following conditions: That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 66-67-23. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view from abutting streets, and sound buffered from adjoining residential property, prior to final building inspection. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file in the City of Anaheim, marked~ Exhibit No. 1, provided, however, that development plans for the proposed restaurants shall be submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council for approval; and further provided that setbacks and landscaping and any signs proposed shall conform with the re- quirements of the M-i, Light Industrial, Zone. VARIANCE N0~ 1828: Requesting permission to establish retail stores on Portion C of subject property was denied by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-100o Mr. Ronald Thompson noted location of subject property and the zoning and uses in the immediate vicinity. He advised that the reclassifica- tion would be a portion of approximate 45 acre R-A parcel; that Portion A is proposed for a service station, Portion B a walk-up restaurant, Portion C retail stores, and Portion D a restaurant with on-sale liquor. Mr. Thompson summarized the action of the City Planning Commission calling attention to the findings therein, and further advised that the service station on Portion A would be a permitted use under a M-1 zoning. 9762 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25~ 1966~ 1:30 PoM. In answer to Councilman Pebley's question, Mr. Thompson advised that a concept plan of development was filed. Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the City Council. Mr. McKay, representing the E. H. Sargent & Company located to the west of subject property, addressed the Council expressing approval of the M-1 zoning and advising that they were not necessarily opposed to the two restaurant facilities, but were concerned regarding the retail sales use of the property proposed to be located between the two restaurants. Mr. McKay was of the opinion that should the development materialize, the City Council could be placed in a position whereby the Council would be forced to allow the retail sale use of the property. He called attention to the vacancies in the existing shopping center east of subject property, and in conclusion stated that the E. H. Sargent & Company would like to see the reclassification granted and the conditional use permit and variance denied. Mr. Sidney Weger, Agent representing the applicant, addressed the Council advising that apparently the only issue was the two or three stores requested to be located between the walk-up restaurant and the dinner restaurant. He explained that there would be no difference in the structure, that the only difference would be the use to which it was put, and gave as an example a "retail laundry". Mr. Weger stated that at this time they had no plans for any specific use, however the property would not meet its full potential if restricted to M-1 zoning. Attention was called to the proposed development of the southeast corner, whereby several shops of an oriental nature would be established and added to the area if the development materialized. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-696: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-696 for adoption authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (66-67-23 M-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-696 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-697: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-697 granting Conditional Use Permit No. 885, subject to the conditions established by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOr 885. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte 9763 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25~..1966~ 1:30 PoMo The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-697 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-698: Inasmuch as certain retail sales activities are considered incompatible with industrial zoning, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-698 denying Variance No. 1828. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1828. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-698 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-27 AND VARIANCE NO. 1829: Submitted by Elie Filip requesting change of zone from R-1 to R-3 and waiver of minimum lot width, minimum of floor area, maximum building height and minimum building setback; property briefly described as located on the east side of Bush Street between Lincoln Avenue and Broadway (112 South Bush Street). City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-94 recommended said reclassification subject to the following condition: 1. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view from abutting streets. City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-95 granted Variance No. 1829 excepting therefrom waiver of minimum floor area per dwelling unit, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassifica- tion No. 66-67-27. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection. 3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3. Mr. Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property, and in summarizing the hearing held before the City Planning Commission, advised that pursuant to Variance No. 329 granted in April of 1955, a two story duplex was constructed on the property. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Richard O. Mather, Building Contractor representing the applicants, presented the Council layout maps of the existing and as proposed structure. He reported that no additional yard area would be built upon, and that two thirds of the alteration expense is in existance as an existing two car garage and storage building would be remodeled to provide three car space by installing an additional overhead garage door; the existing third garage on the floor level of the said two story structure would be converted into a bedroom, bath and closet to complete a third living unit of approximately 450 square feet. Regarding the establishment of a precedent, Mr. Mather was of the opinion that similar situations were too few to make this a problem. In summary Mr. Mather stated that the applicants would like to remodel the existing structures without disturbing the yard to create another unit for additional income purposes. 9764 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25~ 1966, 1:30 PoMo The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was determined that the only precedent that should be considered, is whether approval · should be given to a 450 square foot apartment on a substandard lot in an older zoned area of the city. RESOLUTION NO. 66R-699: At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-699 authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (66-67-27 - R-3) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCIl/MEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-699 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 66R-700: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-700 granting Variance No. 1829 as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO~ 1829. ~ Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-700 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 66-67-28 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 887: Submitted by Tustin Savings & Loan Association requesting change of zone from R-A to C-1 and permission to establish a private educational institution; property briefly described as located on the west side of Magnolia Avenue north of Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-96 recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Magnolia Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Magnolia Avenue, for street lighting purposes. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Magnolia Avenue, for tree planting purposes. 9765 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES October 25, 1966~ 1:30 PoMo 4. That a document shall be recorded which reserves a definite and certain parcel of land in close proximity for the provision of required parking spaces for the structure considered in subject reclassification; and that this document shall be binding on the owners, heirs, successors and assigns. 5. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 6. That any air-conditioning proposed shall be properly shielded from abutting streets, prior to final, building inspection. 7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-97 granted Conditional Use Permit No. 887, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 66-67-28. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 4. That Condition Nos 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection. 5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. l, 2, and 3. Mr~ Ronald Thompson noted the location of the property, and in summarizing the hearing before the City Planning Commission advised that subject property is being purchased by the Central Baptist Church of Orange County for the expansion of the existing church-school facilities, with a two story building housing church offices, a book store and print shop. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either for or against subject applications, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO~ 66R-701: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-701 authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (66-67-28 - C-i) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-701 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO~ 66R-702: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 66R-702 granting Conditional Use Permit No. 887, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.887. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein None Schutte 9766 City Hall, Anaheim~.....California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 25: 1966~ 1:30 PoM. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 66R-702 duly passed and adopted. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 7:35 P.M. SIGNED City Clerk City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 1, 1966~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdocho CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddoxo DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Grudzinski. CONVENTION CENTER AND STADIUM DIRECTOR: Thomas Liegler. Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. INTRODUCTION: Safety and Training Coordinator, Thomas Tyre, introduced a group of new city personnel employed during the month of October, 1966. On behalf of the City Council, Mayor Krein welcomed the employees to the City Family. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Krein proclaimed the week November 18 through 24, 1966, as "Farm-City Week". Said proclamation was unanimously ratified by the City Council. MINUTES: Approval of the Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Meetings held October 11, 18 and 25, 1966, was deferred one week, November 9, 1966. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the readingof such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED° REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $529,784.31, in accordance with the 1966-67 Budget, were approved. PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDONMENT: Public hearing was held on proposed abandonment of a portion of an easement for road purposes; property located along the east side of State College Boulevard, South of Orangewood Avenue (Portion of Lot 2, Tract No. 71), pursuant to Resolution No. 66R-651, duly published