1962/01/0953'72
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 9, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session°
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons~ Fry, Thompson and Schut%eo
COUNCILMEN: None°
CITY MANAGER: Keith Ac Murdocho
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson°
CITY CLERK: Dene Mo Williamso
CITY ENGINEER: James Po Maddox~
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton Eo Piersallo
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A. Reese.
Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order°
MINUTES: Approval of City Council minutes of January 2, 1962, was held over
for one week, January 16~ 1962~ on motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by
Councilman Coons° MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-19: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-19 for
passage and adoption°
Refer to Resoldtion Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF JANUARY 9~ 1962o
(Warrants Nos° 15902 to 1.61349 both inclusive, totaling $1,099,953o61o)
On roll call. 'the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler~ Coons, Fry~ Thompson and Schu%teo
None.
None°
The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 62R-19 duly passed and adoptedo
REQUEST - OFFICE TRAILER~ 1354 SOUTH LOS ANGELES STREET: Communication dated
January 9, 1962~ from To Jo Griffin, Business Manager~ McClures-Anaheim~
withdrawing their request for permission to install a trailer for sales
offices in 'their used car lot was submitted and read~
Pursuant to said communication~ Councilman Chandler moved that the
request to withdraw the matter be granted° Councilman Coons seconded the
motion° MOTION CARRIED.
SIDEWALK WAIVER, 323 EAST BALL ROAD: Communication received January 9~ 1962~
from Mro Wo Ac Hu%ton~ Manchester Feed and Milling Company, requesting that
their request dated December 27~ 1961~ for waiver of sidewalk requirements
at 323 East Ball Road~ be removed from the Council Agenda, was submitted and
read°
Pursuant to said request~ Councilman Coons moved that the request
· to withdraw said matter be granted° Councilman Fry seconded the motion°
MOTION CARRIED~
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-2'7 ~ EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Mro Orval Mo
Halvorsen for a ten day extension of time after the completion of the City's
contract for the widening of Euclid Avenue to comply with Conditions Nos°
2 and 3 of Resolution No.. 7310, was submitted°
Mro Murdoch advised that the City has an agreement for the con-
struction of this improvement, and recommended said extension of time be
granted°
On the recommendations of the City Manager~ Councilman Chandler
moved that the extension of time be granted to put in the improvements to a
time concurrent with the performance of the contract by the City of Anaheimo
Councilman Fry seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED.
53'73
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 9, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 118 - REVISED PLANE: Request of Mr~ Do Eo Walters for
approval of revised plot plan for their proposed trailer park, was submitted.
Revised plans were reviewed by the City Council and compared with
the original file, and Mro Murdoch read the recommendations of the City
Planning Department with reference to deviations from the conditions of the
proposed Trailer Park Ordinance°
Mro Do Eo Walters~ 6507 Templeton Avenue, Huntington Park, addressed
the Council advising that the requirements of 'the City of Anaheim are con-
sidezably more stringent than those of the County or State, that the plans
were prepared on the basis of other trailer parks in the area°
Mro Walters was advised that the trailer parks referred to were
developed under County standards before annexation to the City of Anaheim°
Councilman Goons moved that revised plans submitted be referred
back to the applicant to be re-drawn to conform with requirements of the
proposed Trailer Park Ordinance in accordance with Condition Nco 1 of Resolu-
tion NCo 6982° Councilman Chandler seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED°
PUBLIC HEARING - REMOVAL OF PARKING METERS: In accordance with Council instruc-
%ion~ public hearing was held on the request received from the Down%own
Merchants Association for 'the removal of parking meters in the downtown
area for a trial period of six months° Publicity of said public hearing was
given by the local newspapers~
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council~
Mr° Joe Farber, owner and operator of "Lucky Lady Store"
addressed 'the Council on behalf of the Downtown Merchants Association,
explaining that Anaheim was losing the American tradition of "downtown"~ as
well as many customers to Buena Park and ?ullerton because of the parking
si%uationo Although they request the removal of the parking meters for a
trial period of six mon%hs~ they realize that this was not going to be the
end of their problem~ and that some time in the future a request may be
made for diagonal parking on the streetso He advised that in other cities
where.the parking meters were removed~ the merchants had shown an over-
whelming increase in businesso
A petition containing twenty.-f'ive signatures favoring removal of
the parking meters and stating their reasons therefor~ was presented°
Mro Farber briefly reviewed the total amount collected from the
meters and expenditures made for parking lOtSo He further advised that
he had heard that some of the Councilmen objected to the removal of the
meters because the employees of the downtown district would take advantage
by parking in the now metered area°
Mro Sowder of Weber Book Store reported that when the meters were
capped~ their business improved°
Mro Rusty Roquet requested to see the petition favoring the
removal of the meterso He advised that he was opposed to the removing of
the parking meters because of lack of control over the all-day parking, and
suggested that buildings now existing on lots purchased for off-street
parking purposes be removed~ and the lots improved~ thereby alleviating
this situation. He noted the annual, revenue received from the meters~ and
explained that the downtown area was presently receiving a tax relief from
the County Assessor, which in his opinion was in keeping°
Mro O. Go Neal of Karl's Shoe Store addressed the Council favoring
the removal of the meters~ however recommending that the two hour parking
time limit be maintained~ as in his opinion, two hours would be sufficient
for the average customer to transact business° He also felt that this might
not be the complete answer to the problem~ and that the long vacancy factor
in the downtown area indicated that there was something wrong~ He stated
that according to information obtained from their main office~ sales
increased eleven per cent to twenty five per cent in the cities where
5374
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California .- COUNCIL MINUTES - January 9~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M~
parking meters were removed~ Mro Neal further advised that when parking
meters were originally installed, there was a definite purpose and need
for them; however now that the off.-street parking lots have been purchased~
he felt the Council would be justified in removing them°
Mro Joe Hurst felt that if this was to be an experiment, that
all restrictions should be removed°
Mr. Farber further reported that a meeting is contemplated by
the merchants within the month for the purpose of considering general
instructions to be given to their employees regarding the removal of the
parking meters and requesting them not to use the parking stalls previously
metered.
Mr~ James Morris asked if the parking meters were removed and 'the
revenue therefrom ceases9 would this also stop the purchase and improvement
of the parking lots~
Mro Murdoch advised that it is within the perogative of the
City Council to author expenditures from the general funds, and that another
means of acquiring additional parking is by the establishment of a parking
districto
Mr° Morris felt Lhere is an additional need for four or five
tlmes more parkin9 in the downtown area if the downtown area is to compete
with the Broadway Shopping Cen%ero
Mr~ Earl KaltenOach, Architect and designer of shopping centers,
reported that in some areas ~he "Mall" type development had been successful~
Mro Joe Whi'te~ 809 West Broadway, asked the area considered
"downtown district°"
Mayor Schutte replied the area considered is between Harbor
BouJevard and Olive Street~ and Cypress and Broadway°
Mr. White felt ~he downtown merchants should ascertain how many
parking spaces are needed to meet their employees~ requirements°
The Mayo~ asked :if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there bein9 no response~ declared the hearing closed°
In answer 'to Councilman Thompson's inquiry, Mro Heath~ District
Commercial Manager of the Pacific Telephone Company, stated they would do
everything possible %o encourage their employees to cooperate in this effort°
Councilman Coon~ referred to an accounting made by Miss Beatrice
MiJiez~ Finance Dzrectoz for [he City, noting the total revenue received
from the installation of meters to be $451,294o02, and the total expendi-
ture and incumberances ~o be $1~091~668o24o
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-20: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution Nco 62R-20
for adoption, removing all parking meters for a trial period of six months~
the six months trial period 'to commence February 1, 1962~
Said resolution was read in full by Mro John Dawson, Assistant
City Attorney,
Refer 'to ResoJution Book°
A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUIHORIZING AND
DIRECIING THE DIRECIOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SUPERINTENDENI OF STREETS IO
REMOVE CERTAIN PARKING ~EIERS INSTALLED PURSUA~ TO ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTIONS 14~44o020 AND 14o44~,030o
53 v5
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California ,- COUNCIL MINUTES - January 9~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
On roll call %he fobegoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILP{EN:
Chandler~ Coons~ Fry, Thompson and Schutte~
None~
None°
The Mayor declared Resol. u'~ion No. 62R-20 duly passed and adopted~
ORDINANCE NO. 16'72: Councilman Thompson offered Ordinance No~ 1672 for final
reading°
Refer to Ordinance Book~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF' ANAHEIM REPHALtNG SECTIONS 14~32o080 AND
14.,32,,090, CHAPTER 14~32, TITLE 14~ OF THE ANAHEIM ~aUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO PARKING.
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Nco 1672 and
having knowledge of the con~ents therein~ Councilman Coons moved the reading
in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Fry seconded the motion°
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call 'the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNC I LMEN:
Chandle~ ~ Coons~ Fr¥~ Thompson and Schutte.
None
None
Mayor Schutte declared Ordinance No. 16.72 duly passed and adopted~
HEADqUARIERS FIRE STATION .- PRELIMINARY PLANS: Mr, Earl Kaltenbach, Jro, Architect,
presented a colored rendering and preliminary plans for the Fire Headquarters
Station, Such plans we:re reviewed ah the Council Table by the City Council~
City Manager~ and Mro Edward j,, St.:ringer~ Fi:re Chief°
On the recommendations of {.he Fi~e Chief', Councilman Coons moved
thaz fhe preliminary plans be acoep'zed with ihe exception %hat the small
bath:room ne×{ to the Batalllon Chief,s Off~ce on 'the second floor be
eliminated, and two pay telephone ~ooths be ~nstalled in that space.
Councilman Fry seconded f:he motlon, MOTION CARRIED.
Mro Murdoch read communication dated January 9, 1962~ from Earl G~
Kaitenbach~ Jr.~ AbicA,, and Assoc[at:es, regaxding the addition of the
basement fall-out shelter ~o the ~l:~e Headqua~.ters Station~ and requesting
approval of Zhe increase zn fee fo~ said addition :in the amount of $~,~17~00.
Mr~ Kaltenbach briefed the preliminary cost estimate which they
prepared, and copies were gLven ~o each Counc[i.mano
Action on the requested fee fox-add.i. Lional services was held over
for one week~ January 16~ t962, ~o a!low for study of the cost estimate and
recommendations from the Civy Managex~s Office~
}.EASIBILrIY STUDY - CITY HALL RESTROOMS: P,{r,, Robe:[ Davis~ Assistant City
Manager~ reported on the feasiOili%y study made by the firm of Botich -
Munns~ zegard~ng additional restro0ms ~r~ the iiqht well off the City Hall;
tha'~ basically it does appear from thi~ s'Ludy t~a% we can proceed at this
tlme~ tearing 'the jail facllrhy in the light well~ to construct two floors
of reszrooms, and at a later date add three floors of office area to fill
in the light well, ~f it is desired; and recommended that the Architect be
author[zed to proceed with the deta:led working drawings and plans for the
construction of %he two fi. bors of restrooms~ and that the office area be
deferred until a later date°
53'76
City Hall, Anaheim, California .~. COUNCIL MINUTES - January 9, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Mro Davis further reported that the estimated budget cost for the
restrooms is approximately $38,000~00, and the estimated cost for the
3300 square feet of office area, approximately $64,800°00.
On the recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman
Coons moved that the feasibility study be accepted, and that the Architect
be authorized to proceed in the preparation of detailed plans and specifi-
cations for the construction of restroom facilities only, and to brin9
this to contract shape as soon as possible. Councilman Thompson seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
MAJOR MEDICAL INSURANCE - BLUE CROSS: On the recommendations of Mr. Roy
Heissner, Assistant Personnel Director, Councilman Coons moved that the
City keep the current contract with Blue Cross in effect until April 1,
t962, so that the next three months can be used for negotiation.
Councilman Chandler seconded 'the motion° MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 188: Submitted by Wischnack, et al., (John B.
Kilroy Company) Authorized Agent, requesting permission to establish a
planned unit shopping center including restaurants, service station,
bank and retail s'tores~ on property located on the east side of Dowling
Avenue between Anaheim Road and La Palma Avenue, was submitted to the
City Council for their information°
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 185,
Series 1961-62, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 188 for a restaurant
and cocktail lounge, subject to conditions. Mr. Richard Reese, Plannin9
Director, reported that the application is a portion of property included
within Application 6I.-62.~61, and is requested for the re-location of
previously approved Conditional Use Permit Noo 163 for a Hofbrau Restaur-
ant on Anaheim Road, 'to a site south of Coronado Street, extended, on the
east side of Dowling Avenue~
taken.
File was reviewed b'y the City Council, and no further action
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved to recess¢ to 7:00 O'Clock P.M, Councilman
Coons seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIED. (5:00 O~Clock P.M.)
AFTER RECESS:
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order°
COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
COUNCILMEN: None..
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdocho
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson.
CITY CLERK: Dene M~ Williams.
PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A~ Reese.
CITY ENGINEER: James P~ Maddox.
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: Thornton E. Piersallo
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Schutte led the audience in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-21: On the recommendations of the Traffic Engineer, that
said resolution be adopted, so tha[ turns can be made from the left ~urn
lane~ Councilman Coons offered Resolution Noo 62R-21 for adop~iono
Refer to Resolution Book,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ESTABLISHING A
NO PARKING AREA ON LINCOLN AVENUE IN FRONT OF 2123 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler~ Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutteo
None,
None,
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-21 duly passed and adopted.
5377
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 9~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim against the City filed by Robert B. Mclnroe in
the amount of $17.63, due to damage to transistor radio, was submitted.
Councilman Chandler moved said claim be denied and referred to the City
Attorney's Office and Insurance Carrier. Councilman Fry seconded the
motion° MOTION CARRIED.
CANCELLATION OF CITY TAXES: Cancellation of City Taxes was authorized on
motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Coons, on property pur-
chased by %he Anaheim School Dis%tic% as recorded in Book No. 5926, Page
382, Official Records of Orange County, on November 29, 1961. MOTION
CARRIED.
TRANSFER OF FUNDS: Transfer of $12,500~00 from State Contingency Fund, Project
No. 107, Unit No. 4, to Project Nco 94 (La Palma Street Improvement) was
authorized on motion by Councilman Thompson, seconded by Councilman Coons°
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-27: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No 62R-22 for
adoption. ·
Refer to Resolution Book~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY FOR THE WIDENING AND
IMPROVEMENT OF A PORTION OF CERRITOS AVENUE.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and $chutte.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-22 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-22: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution No. 62R-23 for
passage and adoption, accepting grant deed.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL
PURPOSES. (Marcellino Herrera, et ux.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and $chutte.
None°
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-23 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-24: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-24 for
passage and adoption, accepting deed°
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL
PURPOSES. (3ce L Lane, et ux.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and $chutte.
None.
None.
5378
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 9~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-24 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-25: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution No. 62R-25 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMING THE
NECESSITY FOR, AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF,
REAL PROPERTY F OR HIGHWAY STREET WIDENING AND WELL SITE PURPOSES
(Steam Realty) ·
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote~
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None°
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 62R-25 duly passed and adopted.
VARIANCE NO. 1434: Submitted by William A~ Sim, requesting permission to waive
minimum front and rear yard setback requirements on property located at
the southeast corner of Orangewood Avenue and Loara Street (lots 1 through
4, Tract 4417)o Said variance was granted by the City Planning Commission
pursuant to Resolution Nco 181, Series 1961-62, subject %o conditions.
No further action was taken by the City Council°
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Submitted for Council information were the
following:
Conditional Use Permit NCo 170 - City Planning Commission's
Resolution NCo 186, Series 1961-62, amending Resolution Nco 148, Series
1961-62, granting Conditional Use Permit No° 170o
Variance No° 142] - City Planning Commission's Resolution No.
187, Series 1961-62, amending Resolution Nco 152, Series 1961-62, granting
Variance No~
Conditional Use Permit Now 154 .- City Planning Commission's
Resolution No. 188, Series 1961-62, amending Resolution No. 73, Series
1961-62, granting Conditional Use Permit No.154.
No further action was taken by the City Council on the above°
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 180: Submitted by Delos
and Goldie Patterson, requesting permission to establish a 37 unit Motel
on property locaked at the southeast corner of Lincoln and Dale Avenues.
Public hearing was continued from the meeting of December 26, 1961,
to allow the applicant an opportunity to revise plans of development to
conform with setback and parking requirements.
Correspondence dated January 3, 1962, submitted by Mr. Delos
Patterson requesting that all action on Conditional Use Permit No° 180
be terminated, was submitLedo
Mro Stuhley, Authorized Agent, explained to the Council the
reasons that Mro Pa%terson requested these proceedings be terminated,
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-26: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No° 62R-26
for adoption°
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL
PROCEEDINGS WITH REFERENCE TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 180.
5379
~.ity Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 9~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutteo
None°
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 62R-26 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 186: Submitted by Leo Freedman,
requesting permission to construct a theater,-convention hall on property
located on the east side of Harbor Boulevard, between Katella Avenue and
Midway Drive (approximately 1205 feet north of Katella Avenue)°
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 155, Series
1961-62, granted said Conditional Use Permit subject to the following
conditions:
1~ Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, with
the provision that parking area be provided on the basis of one parking
space for every five (5) seats in 'the assembly building°
2o Dedication of 60 feet for the proposed road from %he Convention Hall
site to Harbor Boulevard~
3~ Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve-
ments for the proposed road from the Convention Hall site %o Harbor
Boulevard, subject to the approval of %he City Engineer and in accordance
with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of %he City Engineer.
4. Installation of street lights on the proposed road from the Convention
Hall site to Harbor Boulevard in accordance with a street lighting plan
approved by the Director of Public Utilities°
5o Dedication of a roadway sixty (60) feet in width to provide access from
[he subject property to the freeway frontage road easterly of subject
property, the alignment of said roadway %o be subject %o the approval of
the City Engineer.
6. Posting of a bond for the period of two (2) years to insure the prepar-
ation of street improvement plans and installation of all improvements
for 'the access road, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and
in accordance with the adopted siandard plans on file in %he Office of
· the City Engineer°
7o Installation of street lights on the proposed access road in accordance
with a street lighting plan approved by the Director of Public Utili%i~
at the time of development of subject property.
An appeal was filed by Mr. Freedman to a condition established by
the City Planning Commission and public hearing scheduled°
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mro Leo Freedman addressed the Counczl stating that because of
the City Planning Commission:s objection and 'their apprehension regarding
the flow of traffic to Katella Avenue, they have re-designed the. parking
area~ He further reported 'that bids for the construction of the Standard
Station would be opened Januar~ ll~ 1962, which station is to be located on
Harbor Boulevard, and what has been requested by his associates to be named
Freedman Street. He further advised that part of the Shirley Irvine Ranch,
which is eleven and one-half acres north of subject property~ will be
utilized for parkingo '
Revised plans referred to were submitted 'to the City Council for
their review° Those interested came forward to the Council Table and dis-
cuss~on was held.
Revised plans indicated an access along the south side of the
Charterhouse Hotel property~
5380
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 9~ 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Richard Reese noted that the revised plans included property
on which the Planning Commission did not act°
Mr. Murdoch reported that if Code requirements are to be followed
it would require additional parking facilities to accomodate the restaurant
as shown on the revised plans°
Mr. David Cadwell, Attorney for the lessees of the Circle
Theater, introduced Dr. Tesman, President-Manager of the future lessee
corporation. Mr. Cadwell asked if the Council was including in their
approval the Key Club operation which is tied into the theater operation°
Provisions of Ordinance NCo 1665 were read by Mr. Dawson~ Assis-
rant City Attorney, who reported that if the Council wanted to take action
upon the theater-restaurant, being a subsidiary use, and presented on the
revised plans, it could be allowed under the provision of the present use
permit°
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there
being no response, declared the hearing closed°
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-27: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-27
granting Conditional Use Permit NCo 186, and also for %he subsidiary use
for a restaurant as shown on revised plans submitted to the City Council
this date, and further subject %o the following:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1,
revised, submitted %o the City Council, signed by Councilman Coons
and dated January 9, 1962, and Exhibit No. 2, with the provision that
parking shall comply with the Anaheim Municipal Code for any use or
incidental use made of 'the property.
2. Dedication of sixty feet for %he proposed road from the convention hall
site to Harbor Boulevard°
3. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all
improvements for the proposed road from the convention hall site to
Harbor Boulevard~ subject to the approval of the City Engineer, and
in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office
of the City Engineer,. Installation of sidewalks shall be temporarily
waived until demanded by the City of Anaheim.
4. Installation of street lights on the proposed road from %he convention
hall site %o Harbor Boulevard, and in accordance with a street
lighting plan approved b'y the Director of Public Utilities.
5o Said permit is granted for the incidental use~ %hat is a restaurant
and cocktail lounge and//or private club containing the same facilites,
as shown on the revised plans marked "Exhibit No. 1" dated January 9,
1962.
Refer ~o Resolution Book~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 186~,
On roll call the forego[n9 resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC I L~IEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler~ Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None~
None.
The Mayoz declared Resolution No. 62R-27 duly passed and adopted~
STREET NAME: Council action on proposed street name was withheld pending further
investigation and zecommendation from the City Manager.
5381
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 9, 1962, 3:00
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-54: Submitted by Ernest N. and Renee
J. Kaye, et al, requesting a change of zone from R-A %o CL1, property
located on the north side of La Palma Avenue between Brookhurs% and
Columbine Street (2141 West La Palma Avenue)°
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 170,
Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification subject to the following
conditions:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos° 1 and 2.
Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the east boundary of
subject property and the installation of a six (6) foot ornamental
masonry wall along the north boundary of subject proper%y~
Provision of %zee wells in the parkway portion of the subject property
abu%tin9 La Palma Avenue and the provision of a six (6) foot land-
scaping strip abutting the front property line of subject property,
plans for said landscaping %o be submitted to and subject to the
approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and said land-
scaping to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection.
4. Recordation of C-i, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone deed restrictions
limiting use of subject property to business and professional offices
only.
Dedication of 53 feet from the monumented centerline of La Palma Avenue
(50 fee% existing).
6. Payment of $2°00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on La
Palma Avenue.
7. Installation of sidewalks and driveways on La Palma Avenue in accor-
dance with %he adopted standard plans on file in %he Office of the City
Engineer.
8. Provision of a five ($) foot utility easement along the westerly boundary
of subject property to adequately serve the subject property and other
properties.
9~ Provision of %rash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division~ which are adequate in size,
accessible to trash-truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid
fence or wall~
10. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment
of Item Nos. 47 5, 6, 7 and 8.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mr. Richard Reese~ Planning Director, noted the location of
subject property and the uses in %he immediate vicinity. He summarized the
findings of the City Planning Commission resulting in their recommending
approval of said reclassification subject to condi%ionso
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there
being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-28: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-28 for
adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing %he zone
as ~equested, subject to the conditions of the City Planning Commission, and
further subject to 'the applicant or owner dedication of access rights to
Lotus Street and Glen Avenue on %he north side of subject property°
Refer to Resolution BOOko
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IHE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGF_D (61-62-54 -
The foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None~
Noneo
The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 62R-28 duly passed and adopted.
5382
~.ity Hall, Anaheim~ CaIifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 9~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61.-62-,55: Submitted by Moritz Mo Loitz,
requesting a change of zone from R-O %o R.-3, property located at the
northwesterly corner of' Citron and LaVerne Streets (911 North Citron
Street).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 171,
Series 1961-62~ recommended said reclassification be denied°
The Mayor asked if anyone wished 'to address the Council.
Mr~ Richard Reese~ Planning Director, explained the location of
subject property noting the uses and zoning in the immediate vicinity~
Mro Philip McGraw~ Attorney representing the petitioner, called
attention to the proposed plans of development and pictures in %he file
showing the present state of %he property° He explained their plans were
%o develop nine single story units~ He called attention %o the commercial
development on La Palma Avenue~ the R-3 development to the North~ and the
two churches in the immediate area° In his opinion, this development would
increase property values and be a definite improvement to the entire area.
He could not conceive of this property being used for single family
development considering the continuing development along the adjacent
streets~ He further sta~ed :[% had been reported to him that the objections
voiced at the City Planning Commission were on two story construction, and
in his opinion, the basils of the City Planning Commission:s denial was
unsound°
Plans were reviewed by the City Council, and it was noted that
if the property was split into lots~ 'the lots would face on %o LaVerne
Street facing 'the back yards and a so]id fence of %hose lots on %he south
side of LaVerne Stree%.~
xl~zam Morris, 915 Autumn Drive, spokesman for the residents
in 'the neighborhood immediately adjacent to the subject property~ presented
a petition of opposition pt~rpor[ed]y containing 160 signatures of residents
within a two block area° '[he reasons for their opposition to the R-3
zoning were, briefly:
Decrease of their property values°
2o Increased traffic condi'tion at the in'tersec%ion of LaVerne and Citron
Streets°
A possibill'ty of greater density than nine units after the rezoning is
gran%edo
4o Ihe establishment of a precedent for the rezoning of the remaining
property on the west. side of Citron Street northerly to La Palma Avenue°
5. The possibility of acquiring transient-type tenants if economics made
necessary the reduction in ren't,~
6. Over-crowding of' schools~
Mro Morris further reported that almost all of the construction
within a five block area of subjec~ property within the past year has been
within the $28~000.00 to $40,000000 single family dwelling price range,
and that this neighborhood was over-whelmingly R-i~ He suggested that the
subject property be spl. i~ into R~] lots for the development of single
family dwell[ngso
Discussion was held regarding the statistics pertaining to the
number of children ~n R,-3 projects compared to R~i developments.
Mr~ Murdoch reported tha~ statistics, so far, show the multiple
family residential areas inclade a considerable lower number of school
children or children per acre than the single family residential; however,
the statistics that apply at the present 'time may not continue as the
demand for apartments lessens~
5383
Gity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - J~ang,ar¥ 9~ 1962, 3:00
gr~ Mcgraw further advised that it was his understanding 'that %he
petition of opposition was circulated on the basis that there would be
twenty-two units in the development, and that they would stipulate that
this be restricted to nine units, single story structure~ Mr. Mcgraw
requested the matter be continued for ~wo weeks,
Mr~ Malcolm LocKwood~ 916 Win'te~. Street, stated in his opinion~
the area by the block wall on Citron Street could be planted so %ha% i%
would not be offensive if R,-,1 lots faced i't~ Mr,, Lockwood stated he was
opposed to the rezoning and that he was one who circulated the petition, and
the people were informed that there would be nine units constructed with a
possibility 'that 'they could go as high as twenty-two unitso
Mrs~ Howard Olson~ 912 West Citron Street, addressed the Council
in opposition fearing that development would not be in conformance with the
present plans~ and stated she wo'u:d favor an R--2 Zoning°
'The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
'there being no response, declared the ihearing closed°
Further discussion was held by the Cit'v ounc~~; at 'the conclusion
C ~*
%hereof, Councilman Yhompson moved [hat the public hearing be reopened and
continued for two weeks (January 23, ]952) for further investigation°
Councilman Chandler seconded the motlon,~ MOl'ION CARRIED,
RECESS: Councilman Chandler mo~ed for a zen'-mfnu[e recess~ Councilman Coons
seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. (9:50 P~M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Schutte called the meetlng %o order, all members of the City
Co'uncil being present.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NOg 61-,62-56: Submitted by Richfield Oil Corpora-
tion (Leonard Smith, Authorized Agent)request:lng a change of zone from
to C.-I and C-3¢ two parcels of property located at the southwest corner of
Euc!ld Avenue and Broadway (30i,-32! South Euclid Avenue)~
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No~ 172,
Ser~es 1961.~.62, recommended said reciassi, fication subject to the following
conditions:
1~ Development substantially-in a(;cordance wi'Lb Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, with
the installation of a m;nimum '~ix (6) foot s~zip of landscaping along
the Euclid Avenue and Broadway St:feet f:ronLages of the proposed
Neighborhood Commercial,. portion of subject proper'ty, plans for said
landscaping to be submi~i:ed to and subject to the approval of the
Supezinbendent of Parkway Maintenance and to be installed pr:for to
Final Building Inspection.,
2~ Installation of a six (6) foci masonry wall along 'the south and west
bodndaries of subject property f~om L:he grade level of the abutting
properties prior to ~:[nai. Building Inspection,,
3. Recordation of commercial deed restr:[ctlons limiting 'the proposed C-3,
Heavy Commercial¢ Zone proper'fy to service station use only, or any C-l,
Ne:~ghborhood Commezcfai~ Zone use.
4o Recordation of standard deed res[r:i.c[Jons llmi'ting the maximum height
of any' buildings on subjecz proper-fy [o one (1) story,.
5o Dedicatzon of 45 feet from the monumented
feet existing)., z~zne of Broadway (30
6. Dedication of 53 feet from the monument, ed centerl, ine of Euclid Avenue
(30 feet existing)~
7. Preparation of street improvement p~ans and installation of all improve-
ments for Broadway and Euclid Avenue~ sub~ect [o 'the approval of the
City Engineer and in accordance wit;h the adopted standard plans on file
in 'the office of 'the City Engineer.
8. Payment of $2~00 per fz'ont foot for street lighting purposes on Broadway
and Euclid Avenue.
9. Tzme limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days forthe accomplishment
of Item Nos~ 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8~
5384
Ci'__2~y Hall, Anaheim, Californ'ia, COUNCIL MINUTES - January 9~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
'The Mayo:r asked if anyone wished to address the Council~
Mz~ Richard Reese no[ed the location of subject property and
summarized the evidence pzesented befoze the City Planning Commissiono
Mr, Leonard SmLth, Authorized Agent~ addressed the Council
advising of theiz willingness to comply with condit:ions ~ecommended by
the ~'
~[y Plannl. ng Commisslon~ and f~rther s[azed he was prepared to
present a signed deed of aedlca~ion foz street w:l. dening,:
[he Mavo~ asked .~± an,;one else wished to address the Council~
'there being no retponse, de;:ia:ed the bea~lng ciosed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R 29: Co..n~;'[iman Coons offezed Resolution No~ 62R-29
for adoption~ autlhorlz:~ng !.~',e prepa~a!:~on of necessary Ordinance changing
bne zone as ~eq'ue~[ed~ s.~bje,'~ to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission°
Refez zo Resoi,.;~ .or', Boo~
A RESOLUI-ION OF' FNE C~IY COUNCIL OF' [HE CITY OF' ANAHEIM FINDING AND DEtER-
MINING IHAT IIILE i8 OF iiSI: ANA~{Efh~ MUNfCiPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AME}~DED AND FHA[ ['HE. ~OUNDARiES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED
On loll ca~' :r',e fs:'ego'ing re~oi'at[on was du.'£y passed and adopted
by zhe ol_o~:ng
AYES: COUNC ~ LMEN:
NOES: COUNC [ LMEN:
ABSENF: COUNC i LMEN:
Chand ie.t ~ Coons~ P~W~ Thompson and Schutte
None,
None,
the ?~a~or, de~ ~are:d Reso~,'.ion. No. 62R-29 duly passed and adopted
CORRESPONDENCE: 'The fci.io~':ing corre?ondence was received and ordered filed on
motion by Counc;lman Coonh. '~econded sy Councilman Fry° MOTION CARRIED.
Ha~.~y Milier~ :egar'dlng News~ehter,
W:iil,.am f, Kouz~ D.D~S,, cop'~ of ieh[er sent to Pr'esiden% of
Anaheim Chamrre~ of Comme~re~
Gienr~ B Van{e, State Fire Marshall.~ copy of letter senh to
A, Bepr s[.:~ ,a, Bes:',:Lls~ copy of letter sent Fire Marshall°
Ca! :{o:rnia State 8ca:id o± Equal'[zaLion~ distribution of local
sale_ tax au;i. ng :_~e 4~h quart:e:r~,
ORDINANCE NO. i668: Co,.n~:~ima;: l:.r~ offered O~d,nance No, 1668 for final reading°
Refer
AN ORDINANCE OF [H~ Cf[¥ O~- ANAHEIM AMENDING lILLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RFLA[iNG iO ZONiNS, (59 60-93
AfLet hea~ng earl f'~[i :2lhe tltle of Ozdinance No~ 1668 and
having knowledge bt :,ne o~e:nL~, in.,e~iet..~, Councilman Fry moved the reading
[n full of said Ordinance :;e ~a:ved Councilman Coons seconded ~he mo~ion,
~40IiOH UNANIP{OUSLY CARRf~D (Counc~;man C~',andie-r tempora~iPy absent.)
On roi.l ~,aii tFe foregoing Ord"nance was duly passed and adopted
by the follo~:ing vote:
AYES: COLJNC i L~v1EN
NOES: SOUNC [ L~,,IEN:
ABS ENi': COUNC I L~4EN:
ABSTAINED FROM
Coons~ F:ry~ Thompson and Schu%te.
None~
No n e,
COiJNC iLMEN: Chandler,
Mayor ScButLe deccan, ed Ordinance No,~ 1668 duly passed and adop~ed.
5385
City Hall~ Anaheim, Californla - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 9, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 1669: Councilman Coons offered Ordinance Nco 1669 for final reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING, (60-61.-60 .-. M-l)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No~ 1669 and
having knowledge of the contents therein~ Councilman Coons moved the reading
in full of said Ordinance be waivedo Councilman Fry seconded the motion
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ' '
On roll call [he foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandier, Coons~ Fr'y~ Thompson and Schutte,
None°
None,
Mayor Schutte declared Ordinance No,:, 1669 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1670: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No~ 1670 for final
reading°
Refer to Ordinance Book°
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING I'!TLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING~ (57-58-52 ~ R-3, Tract Nco 25.17)
After hearing read in fuji.[be title of Ordinance No~ 1670 and
having knowledge of the con[ents therein~ Councilman Coons moved the reading
in full of said Ordinance be waived~ Councilman Fry seconded the motion~
MO[ION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED~
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC I LMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler~ Coons~ Fry, Thompson and Schutte,
None,,
None°
Mayor Schutte declared Ordinance No., i670 duly passed and adopted°
ORDINANCE NO. 167]: Councilman Schu~te offered Ordinance No~ 1671 for final
reading°
Refer to Ordinance Book~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING [ITLE 18 O~ THE ANAHEIM. MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING,
After hearth9 read in full 'the title of Ordinance Nco 1671 and
having knowledge of the con%er~%s 'there:[n~ Councilman Coons moved the reading
in full of said Ordinance Oe wa2ved~ Councilman Fry seconded the mo%iono
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED~ ·
On roll call the foregoing Ord[mance was duly passed and adopted
by 'the following vote:
AYES; GOUNGILMHN:
NOES; COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandl@r, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schu~te~
None.
None.
Mayor Schutte declared Ordinance No, 1671 duly passed and adopted~
5386
City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES - January 9, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 1673: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1673 for first
readin9.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14o32,
SECTION 14o32o190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE~ RELATING TO PARKING,
(No Parking Any Time - both sides of East Street from Water to South Streets)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance NOo 1673 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived° Councilman Coons seconded
the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
FINANCIAL AND OPERATING REPORT: Financial and Operating Report for the month
of December, 1961, was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman
Chandler~ seconded by Councilman Coons° MOTION CARRIED.
ANAHEIM BUILDING DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT: Anaheim Building Report was ordered
received and filed, noting that 1961 was the second highest year in building
in the history of Anaheim~ on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by
Councilman Fry° MOTION CARRIED.
SIDEWALK WAIVERS: Discussion was held by the City Council on the possibility
of changing the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to sidewalk requirements
wherein a policy could be es'tablished allowin9 waiver of sidewalk ins%alia-
%ions to be handled administratively under certain circumstances°
Request of Mr° William Jo Wesolek considered by the City Council
at their meeting of January 2~ 1962, was used as an illustration°
Alternate methods of handling similar requests by the postin9 of a bond
to guarantee said instal=az~on were discussed°
ELECTRICAL VAULT~ CENTRAL LIBRARY - POLICE FACILITIES: On the recommendation of
the City Manager~ Councilman Fry moved that Smith, Powell and Morgridge,
Architects for %he Police Facilities Building, be authorized to prepare
plans for an underground e!ectrical vault under the police properiy storage
room° Said vault to provide sufficient electrical capacity for the Police
Facilities Building, the Central Library and for possible future building
or buildings on the site~ and to be inter-connected with underground
conduit to serve the Library and from the power source on Harbor Boulevard
at an estimate additional cost of $25~000.00o Councilman Coons seconded
the motion° MOTION CARRIED~
Mr° Murdoch further explained that the Architect for the Library
and the Police Facility Architect each would show on his plans bringing the
conduit to a mid-point°
AGENDA ITEMS: Mro Murdoch referred to a previous discussion with the City
Council wherein the Council expressed a policy that they would like to
follow regarding requests for hearings or presentations by individuals or
groups, wherein such requests submitted would be in writing~ stating the
purpose of the address or hearing before the City Council~ so that the
Council could determine whether or not this was something that had been
exhausted previously, or whether the request should be scheduled on the
Council Agenda°
He further explained that this is brought to the City Council at
this time as it has come to his attention that a request had been filed
which would come under the provision of this policy; that a request has
been filed by Mrs° Rogers for a hearing on the crossing guard issue at
Euclid and Crescent Street°
Discussion was held by the City Council; at the conclusion thereof
Councilman Chandler moved that the City Clerk be requested to write Mrs°
Rogers informing her that if she had new evidence to present to the City
Council~ the nature of the new evidence should be set forth in detail in a
letter to the Council so that the Council is prepared with reports from
proper departments° Councilman Coons seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED°
5387
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 9, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
POLICY OF THE COUNCIL: Councilman Coons moved that it be the policy of the
City Council that when people want to appear to make an oral presentation
before the City Council, that they submit their request in writing and 9ive
a brief summary of the nature of their presentation so that the Council can
determine if the area has been previously discussed and exhausted. The
decision to schedule such requests to be at the discretion of the City
Councilo Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ZONING CODE: Councilman Coons moved that the City
Attorney's Office prepare an amendment in the proper form to remove the
height limitation restrictions in that area bound by Harbor Boulevard on
'the West, Olive Street on the East, Santa Ana Street on the South~ and
Sycamore Street on the North° Councilman Fry seconded the motion° MOTION
CARRIED,
ADJOURN: Councilman Coons moved to adjourn° Councilman Fry seconded the motion°
MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 10:25 P.M.
SIGNED: ~~
City Clerk
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 16, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
COUNCILMEN: None°
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Joe Geisler°
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton Eo Piersall.
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A~ Reese~
Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meetings held January 2, 1962 and
January 9, 1962, were approved on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by
Councilman Thompsono MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING, HOUSE MOVING PERMIT: Submitted by Joe Anton, requesting per-
mission to move a dwelling from 414 West La Palma Avenue to 843 Yvonne
Place, Anaheim.
Petition of protest containing sixteen signatures of property
owners within 300 feet of 843 Yvonne Place, was submitted and read,
Application file and plans showing proposed improvements and the
front elevation were reviewed by the City Council.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mro Joseph Anton, 414 West La Palma Avenue, applicant, advised
that he built this home eight years ago at an approximate cost of $18,000~,
that with the addition of the proposed improvements, ~he dwelling would
contain two thousand square feet of livable area. Also, that an air condi-
tioning system would be installed and the exterior of the home improved with
rock facing, and the landscaping will be maintained by a professional
gardener. Mr° Anton further advised that he has taken his plans to a local
loan institution and was advised that the move-in of this dwelling with the
improvements proposed, will not hinder the loan values of homes in the area~