1962/01/235406
(lily HaiL~ Anahelm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
The City Coumil. of [he City of Anaheim met in regular session°
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Chandler~ Coons~ Fry~ Thompson, and Schutteo
COUNCILMEN: None,
CITY ATFORNEY: Preston Turner°
ASSISTANT CIIY AT'rORNEY: John Dawson~
C/TY MANAGER: Keith Ac Murdoch,,
CF]FY ti. ERE: Dene Mo Wi11. iamso
CiTY ENGINEER: 2ames P~ Maddoxo
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton Eo Piersallo
PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard Reeseo
ZONING COORDINATOR: Harbin Kreid%o
aa.lied the mee±in9 "to order~
AMENDMENt' [0 EHE MINUTES - HOUSE MOVING PERMIT: Councilman Chandler moved that
i~,e reco~:d ,:~how and C. here be added ~o ihe minutes of January 16, 1962
meeultg page 5388, that :be peCiiion of opposition submitted contained
nam~ of a. !he ~e':!denis who are owners of property on Yvonne Place;
~ :'Lher~ tha~ a p:opeD'-'%y owner informed 'the Council tha% ~he Architectural
CommitTee wc.~ id r,oL appro.ie the plans fo:' an older b~ilding %o be moved
onto zbe 1oi if a majority of the o~her owners objected° Councilman Thompson
e:.'on,fle~ .3e motion~ MOI'[ON CARRIED.
MINUSES: Ml~:':!.e~ ct ::.he Ci':~ Co:_mciJ meeting of January 16~ 1962~ as amended
"~e,.e appro~'ed o:. mot. ton ~.+ Councilman [hompson~ seconded by Councilman Fryo
MOT iON CARR l ED,~
REEOLUflON NO~ O2R 48: Co,mc :~!man Chandler offered Resolution Nco 62R-48 for
pa:~sa§e and adopLlon~
Refer to Re~,o-'~u,,' on Book,:
A RESOLUE[ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
DiRECFING THE PAYMENE OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF JANUARY 23~ 19620
Wa~ran ~ Nos. ~6L35 (~.o ]Q:3'79~ both inclusive~ totaling $755~462o25o)
foregoing reso!u.~ion was duly passed and adopted
AYES-- COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC[ LMEN:
ABSENi': COUNCILMEN:
Cbandle::~ Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutteo
None°
None°
Fr;e Ma~'o: de<ia;red Resolution No,, 62R-48 duly passed and adopted°
Oil WELL DRiI,LiNG PERMii[ - STANDARD OIL CO~IPANY: Decision on application of
S[anda'~d 0 i. Compa~w' for O"i We.il D~iiling Permit was deferred from %he last
meeting fo~ ~ :-:re~
Counc']iman .and..e~ wi-Lhdz'ew from [he Council Meeting during ~he
Mayo: Sc?x~eue requecd:ed a clarifica-.?.ion of the Court cases referred
Lev,
v pe '
o,d .hat .:[r~ce ine la.,c meeting~ he has studled ~he
and br].e~iy summarized %he facLs of %he c. ase~
A,u~e'e~:~ i72 CA 2nd ,142~ wherein an application
~: ~h':ee io_s ~ad ~een sought in a residential.
nde'r .'ease c~ Richf~el.d Oil Company; %hat these
ar~ lnd:¢'c. TJal area and 'the oil beneath the
~:u.~e~r,d ~y Lr~e Richfield Oil Comp~y~ Fur~her~
~ ,:o% Le den,ed any subsian%iaI properS'y righ%~
oppo:i. ,,-,',LF Lo ~ecove;-and reduce to possession
: L~a:_ ~o grant an additional drilling permit
pa":i..~_, aT OL~ in ~FiS residential area would be
5407
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUIES - January 23~ 1962~ 3:00
detrimental to the peace~ health, safety and public welfare, and in substance
found the appiican% had a substitute method for recoverinq the oil beneath
his property~ and to grant an additional permit would be ~etrimental to the
.... ~o~ndin9 properties° The other case mentioned, Wood vs. the City Planning
Commlssion~ was also a case where the application for Drilling Permit was
denied under an ordinance very similar to Anaheim's~ where it was found that
the location of the drill site would be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and public welfare; further, it also appeared that the applicant
offered no evidence lo %he contraryo
The decisions in all these cases turned on the same point, whether
o~ not the ruling was arbitrary, or whether a person had been deprived a
subsian'tia! property right, whether it would be detrimental to the public
welfare? the safety of 'the area, or whether it would constitute a nuisance
o~ fire hazard°
Mr~ Turner reiterated that the Council could deny this applica-
tion if it were found to be detrimental %o %he surrounding area; however,
an effort must be made %o find some means whereby the property owners could
recover the oil beneath their properties, and with the perfection of
directional drilling 6echniques, it would be extremely difficult for the
Ci~zy Co~ncll to find that there was no place in the City of Anaheim where
the applicant could drill.~
Discussion was held pertaining to the evidence submitted to the
City Council° At the conclusion thereof~ Councilman Coons moved that it be
a finding of fact on the part of the City Council:
1~ That the exploratory area proposed is that area in the City of
Anaheim.~ sounded on the North by Orange Avenue between Euclid Avenue and
Gi!beri Street; bounded on the West by Gilbert Street between Orange Avenue
and [he Sou%bern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way; on the South by the Southern
Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way~ between Gilbert Street and the extension of
Loara $treet~ if it is extended; bounded on the East by Loara $treet~ or 'the
extension thereof~ between the Southern Pacific Railroad Tracks and Ball Road;
and bounded on the East by Euclid Avenue between Ball Road and Orange Avenue.
2o That 'the area described can be adequately explored and
developed from the site selected and one least offensive to the surrounding
area~
3,, That the grant:lng of such permit and the drilling for or prod-
uclng of oil thereunder will not create a nuisance°
4,, That %he granting of such permit will not be detrimental to
%he public health~ safety or welfare~
5~ That the granting of such a permit, or the drilling for or
producing of oil thereunder in the location specified, will not create a
fire hazard or other hazard detrimental to the public welfare.
6:, Thaz the granting of such a permit will afford equal pro-
tection to ali property owners within the area affected by the granting of
such permit~
7~ That the granting of such permit will not deny to any property
owner the enjoyment of a substantial right granted to other owners in the
same vicinity affected by said permit°
8. That the granting of such permit will conserve property values
and encourage the most appropriate use of the land in the immediate vicinity
and area affected by the granting of said permit.
9,, That the granting of said permit will not be detrimental to
the orderly development and expansion of the City of Anaheim in the direction
of building development according to a well ordered and zone planned~ as is
evidenced by the overlays of the area prepared by the Planning Department.
~0. That the granting of said permit will not be in violation of any
State law, regulation or Court decision~ or any of Anaheim,s City Ordinances.
5408
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
11o That the granting of said permit will not violate any Deed or
Tract Restrictions relating %o any tract or property affected by said
permit, unless said permit is consented %o, or the said restrictions
waived in the manner specified in said Deed or Tract Restrictions or in
the manner required by law, provided, however, that in the event that
any applicant for permit has inadvertantly obtained an oil and gas lease
covering property containing such restrictions, that such applic&nt shall
be given a reasonable opportunity to obtain a waiver of such restrictions,
or may be permitted %o Quit Claim such property.
Councilman Thompson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-49: Resolution No. 62R-49 was offered by Councilman
Coons, granting the applicant a right to drill an exploratory area
previously described, subject to the following conditions:
Compliance with the conditions specified in Title 17, Section 17.12.050
through Section 17.12.410 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
The drill site will be moved approximately 250 feet northerly, the
north line of which will be the south line of the 20-foot private road
along the north line of the Nicholas Stehly property, with the dimen-
sions of such drill site remaining the same, i.e., 200 feet along the
east and west boundaries and 400 feet along the north and south
boundaries.
3. All access to and from the drill site for operations will be from
Brookhurst Avenue along said 20-foot private road.
Said access road will be .maintained in good condition with asphalt or
by oiling and the drill site area will be asphalted to eliminate dust.
Trucking to and from said site will be limited to the hours of 8:00
AcM. and 6:00 P.M. except for emergencies.
Ail machinery in connection with both drilling and producing operations
will be powered by electricity obtained from the City of Anaheim, and
no electricity will be generated on the drill site, however, it may be
necessary to convert alterna%in9 current to direct current for their
purposes~
The drilling rig and related equipment will be soundproofed by double
covering of soundproof and fireproof material, and shall be painted
"Vista Green", or equal in color.
Ail buildings containing any equipment or machinery will be soundproofed°
The soundproofed rig will be kept closed at nights during the hours of
6:00 P.M. and 8:00 A.M. except in emergencies or for personnel entry
during such hours, also except for the running of the water string in
each well which may necessitate opening the derrick door between the
hours of 6:00 A~M. and 8:00 P.M.
10~ Prior to commencement of any operations on said drill site~ Standard
will make further acoustical survey readings a% various times of the
day and night from the edge of the residential areas surrounding such
site. Standard will deliver such data to the City of Anaheim prior to
commencement of drilling operations. Similar periodic readings will
be taken during drilling operations for comparison and control of the
noise level from such operations.
11o Also, any further conditions or restrictions set forth in the Anaheim
Municipal Code will be observed°
12~ During exploratory drilling, all drilling eq~pmen% on the drill site
will be surrounded by a tarpaulin covered chain-link fence of a minimum
height of six feet.
,5409
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1962~ 3:00
13. Upon completion of all exploratory drilling and at the expiration of the
thirty day test period, if oil and gas in payin9 quantities is not
developed, the drillin9 ri9 and all equipment will be immediately remomd
from the drill site and the site will be restored, insofar as practicable,
to its original condition, except, however, for replantin9 of any trees
that may have been removed from such site.
14o No wells will be produced beyond a thirty day test period until:
a. Pipe lines have been installed to transport such production from
such site to Standard~s or other available gathering pipe lines
in the general area.
b. The drill site has been surrounded by a concrete block or cinder
block wall, engineered and at a height in accordance with specifi-
cations of the Anaheim Planning Department, no% less than eight feet,
or more than ten feet high, such wall to be se% back five feet from
%he exterior boundaries of said drill site° Grown trees or high
shrubs approved by the Anaheim Parkway Maintenance Authorities to
amply screen the wall will thereupon be plan%ed and maintained
wi%bin such five-foot setback strips to surround such wall and
drill site.
15. All production and other tests will be conducted in accordance with
safe oil field practice and in full compliance with industry and
municipal fire and safety standards.
16o The number of production tanks and other equipment will be kept to a
minimum on the drill site for our requirements in connection with
operations. Production tanks will be used only for oil produced from
the site or oil required in connection with drilling or PrOduction
activities thereon.
17. It is the desire of the City of Anaheim to encourage the completion of
drilling operations at the earliest possible time, consistent with good
oil field practices. The City Council on its own motion, or at the
request of applicant, at any time after nine months from the date of
of this permit or after the completion of four producing wells, which-
ever shall first occur, may give personal written notice to applicant
to appear before the Council for the purpose of (a) determining the
feasibility of the use of more than one drilling rig during a given
period of time and (b) the period of time during which such multi-rig
drilling is to be conducted. In any event, all development must be
completed within two years from date of this permit.
18. Limit the height of tanks to the height of said wall.
19. Subsurface type equipment will be utilized in pumping wells.
20. Any further safety or other conditions or restrictions that may be
imposed by the Anaheim Planning Department or any other authorities
having jurisdiction in such matters.
21. Subject to conditions Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12
outlined in Exhibit "3" submitted by the petitioner.
22. Subject to the requirement that upon completion of drilling, or after
abandonment, each well site shall be restored to its former condition
with all holes filled and leveled, and all trash and debris removed;
that upon abandonment, a twenty-five (25) foot concrete surface plu9
shall be required, with a steel plate welded over the top of each
drilling hole at least four (4) feet below the natural ground level,
that the abandonment shall conform to all applicable state, county and
city regulations, and that compliance with said regulations shall be
effected sixty (60) days after abandonment.
Refer to Resolution Book.
5410
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DESIGNATING A DRILL
SITE AND GRANTING STANDARD OIL COMPA?fY OF CALIFORNIA PERMISSION TO DRILL
FROM SAID DRILL SITE IN ACCORDANCE WIT" CONDITIONS SET FORTH THEREIN.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the loll.win9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
TEMPORARILY ABSENT:
Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None.
None.
COUNCILMEN: Chandler.
Mayor Schutte declared Resolution No. 62R-49 duly passed and
adopted°
Councilman Chandler returned to the Council meeting, 3:45
PUBLIC HEARING, VACATION AN]D ABANDONMENT: Public hearing was held on proposed
abandonment of an 8 foot public utility easement over the northerly 13 feet
of lot 1 and lot 2 of Tract No~ 1599, pursuant to Resolution No. 62R-10,
duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin January 12, 1962.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there
being no response~ declared the hearing closed.
Mr. Murdoch reported this request for abandonment has cleared all
of the interested outside utility and the City departments.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-50~ Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 72R-50 for
passage and adoption°
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLU/ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACA-
TION AND ABANDONMENT OF THAT PORTION OF AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY
PURPOSES UPON, ALONG, OVER AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL
PROPERTY. (Southerly eight feet of the northerly thirteen feet of lots
1 and 2, Tract No. 1599.)
On roll call, the foregoing resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
TEMPORARILY ABSENT:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, and Schutteo
None.
None.
COUNCILMEN: Thompson.
The Mayor declared Resolution No° 62R-50 duly passed and adopted.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-~8: Request of John F. Rothman, Rothman-Steen and
Associates, dated January 18, 1962, for reconsideration of Reclassification
Application No. 61.-62-38, and also requesting a new hearing in order to
present new and additional evidence, was submitted, including a copy of
Declaration of Trust, dated July 25, 1930o
Mr. Rothman addressed the Council explaining briefly that Mr,
Lahm~r hag a 11£~ es{a~e in suBje¢{ proper~y, and by order thereof~ cannot
subdivide and sell this property for single family housing.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion
thereof, it was moved by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilm~ Chandler,
that the six months waiting period be waived, and that the applicant be
granted permission to file a new application for the reclassification.
MOTION CARRIED.
5411
~Hal].~ Anabeim~ California., COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1962~ 3:00 P.Mo
VARIANCE NOt 1422~ FRONT ELEVATION PLANS: Front elevation plans submitted by
Campbell at the meeting of Sanuary 1.6, 1962~ were fur%her considered by the
City Co~n¢il~ and on mo'tion by Councllman Coons, seconded by Councilman
Chand!er~ said plans were referred back to Mr. Campbell for revision,
improvement~ and more detail~ to be again submitted for City Council con-
side~ation at their next meeting January 30, 1962, 7:00 O~Clock P.M.
MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 59-60-19 - REVISED PLANS: Request of Mr. Nell Reitman for
approval of revised plans in connection wi'th motel development pursuant to
Reclass:fication NoG 59.:60-i9, Ordinance No~ 1426, was submi~ted.
Revised plans were reviewed by the City Council and compared with
the pians previously considered, and the recommendations of the City Plan-
ning Department were read by the City Manager~
Councilman Chandler moved that revised plans be approved~ subject
the followin9 conditions:
1o Landscaping of setOack area, plans to be submitied to the Superintendent
of Parkway Malnienance for approval.
2° Plans for entrance canopy and fire extinguisher location be submitted to
Anaheim Fire Department for approval.°
3~ Provision of adequate 'trash s.torage, subject to approval of Sanitation
Departmen~
Councilman Coons seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED.
and signed by Councilman Coons°)
(Revised plans dated
rF3~LPORARY BUSINESS LICENSE - MOBILE OFFICES~ INCOME 'TAX SERVICli: Request of W. M.
Fr'ye~ Business Consultants, Inc~, for 'Temporary Business Licenses and permis-
sion to loca'[e temporaz.¥ mobile offices for Income Tax Services at East
Anaheim Shopping Cen~er a'[ Pl. acentia and Center; Eastown Shopping Center at
North East Street and Romneya Drive; and Dow's at Lincoln and Brookhurst,
was submitted (copies havin9 been furnished each Councilman)°
D:~scussion was held by the City Council, and ii was determined that
thls ['/pe of' service was available to people in the community from permanently
es~ablLshed places of business in the proper zone. At %he conclusion of %he
discussion~ Councilman Thompson moved that said request be deniedo Council-
man Coons seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIED.
PEARSON PARK -. NAMING OF LATH HOUSE: Communication dated January 18, 1962, from
Ca].ifornia Garden Clubs, Inc~, Orange County District, Mrs° Kenneth $trom-
quiet, D~..strict Di~ec±oz, suggesting that the lath house in Pearson Park be
known as the Rudy Boysen Garden Cen%er~ was submitted~
Councilman ~ry moved that the Sounc:]l concur with the suggestion,
and that the ~a'[h house in Pearson Park be known as the Rudy Boysen Garden
Cenfer~ Councilman Coons seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIED.
.REQUEST - PERMISSION TO US~ LA PALMA PARK: Request of Zhe Girl Scouts %o use La
Palma Park facili'ties for their Golden Anniversary ~ ~ -~
~e~ebrai~on was submitted
and explained by M~ Robe~% Davis~ Aesir-tan% Ci'ty Manager.
It wat~ determined ~;,¢ hhe City Council. that requite of ~his nature
be h~:ud ed adminis-tra~ive!.y t:~ the C'" + ,
· - ~.~,}, Manager s Off}ce.
METROPOLiI'AN WAFER DISIRICr RESOLUFION NO. 60,~6: Metropolitan Water District
Resoiut_.~on No,, 6046 opposing Assembly Bill No.: 2728 was submitted and
briefed b'/ Mr~ h~rdoch~ '
5412
City Ha]l~ Anaheim~ California - COUNGIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Action on said matter was held over for one week, January 30,
1962, for further :nformationo
PLANNING CO~ISSION ITEMS: Actions 'taken by the City Plmning Commission at
their meeting held January 8, 1962, pert~ning to the following applica-
tions~ were submitted for Ci±y Council information and consideration:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 183- Submit'ted by Rinse-Away Corpora-
tion~ City Plannin9 Commission Resolution Noo 189, Series 1961-62~
grantin9 Condilional Use Permii NOo 1.83o
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 185 - Submitled by Clyde and Helen
Hunter; C:iIy Planning Commission Resolution Noo 190~ Series 1961-62~
gran~ing Condi?:ional Use Permi2 Noo 185o
VARIANCE NO. 1438 = Submit%ed by Co Go Vaughan; City Planning
Commission Resolufflon No,, 194s Series 1961-62~ granting Variance Noo 1438o
No ~z~b~,~ action was taken by the City Council on the above
n,~mbered app!ica'i~,onso
TENTATIVE MAP '[RACT NOo 4533: Developer~ William Rogers~ Tract located
on lhe nor~h :~ide of Wagner Aver?~e, 935 fee-t west of' S'un~is-~ Stree%~
con'~alnixg 2'. RA
[he C~.-i:, Planning Commission a! their mee~ling of January 8s 1962~
approved sald lents'live map s'ubject S,o the following conditions:
£'~e developer sr~aii provide an approximately 30 foot wide
Lo! "A" along ~.he nor+~heriy line of the "Not A Part", also
Lot 'B" s~,al? Oe provided along %he easterly line of "Not A
Pa:'i~' and Lo[ ~'A"~ and shall extend to Street "A"o An
ag:~eement as fro the cost. of Lots "A" and "B" shall be entered
in'lo between the developers and -[he City of Anaheimo
Reqt~'Lremenl Lha'i~ should ~his subdivision be developed as more
~.an one s~bdivision~ each subdivision thereof shall be sub-
m~i.~ed in ten-ts[lye form for approval°
SubjecL [o the approval of plot and building plans by tae
Planning and Building Depar%mentso
Ded~ca~ion of ~ehlcu!ar access rights on Wagner Avenue~ except
ai~ ~t±reet open~.n~So
Mx~ Ma::':..~n Kre~'d-L exp?.ained the Location of the tract~ and further
recommended Lf' sa'id ienta.~'ive map i~ approved? -that the following conditions
in addition '~o hbe C'°.'~y Planning Commission recommendations be included as
~:o~di%ions of approval:
Co::sL:"~ic$:~.on of a six (6) foo-t, masonry wall, along the planned
hfgbwa~ rigrt{t ,of-way line of Wagner Avenue~ provided tha~
~a:id stix (6) loot xatJ sha[~! ne reduced to %he height of 42
i::~es wlt?in ?~e required front yard of Lot No~ !o
!nsi~li. ation of reasonable landscaping in ~he 7~ foo~ wide
~mtemen'~ed po:Lion of t. he parkway for t~e full dis~ance of
said wall consi:~uct2on~ pJans for said landscaping to be
sunm't~ted io and subjeo~ 'ho %he approval of the Superintendent
of Park~aF Maln~enance and to Be installed prior to Final
Building Inspec~!.on of %he subject %ract~ The City of Anaheim
snail assume the responsibility for said landscaping following
the insta].)ation by %he developer a~ acceptance by the Ci~y
of said landscaplng~
Wr,~ Iacobsen~ representing McDanie! Engi. neering~ Tract Engineer~
addressed the Counc~! explaining tbei. r proposed sabdivision and their
in'ten%ions relaiive io ~he use of 1. ots"A" and "B" marked "Not A Part"°
5413
City Ha;.il~ Anaheim~iforn:[a .- COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Discussion was he].d Oy 'the Ci-ty Council~ and Mro Jacobsen s%ipula-
~.ed !o !ne con%in'uance of ~aid mai-~_er for fur'[her ~}.nvestigation by the City
A~[orae¥~s Office: re,aLive [o an agreement pertaining Lo ]o~s "A" and "B"~
On the -t!p:_:}a'h[_on of Mr. Mcoo'sen~ Council_man Frs moved that acfion on
Tentative Map of l'.rac'L No,. 4533 be continued fo~ one week (Sanua~y 30~ 1962)~
3:0[) P,,~., Codnci.~man Coon:s ::seconded the motion,, MOTION CARRIEDo
[-E[:iAf'iVE MAP OF' [RAC~ NO. 4545: S~:bd-~videz.~ R,~ Ao Karos~et al; -gract loca-
ted ~q'=.(8 fee_ ,uoru~' oi q~mmn,n= Avenue and 527~86 fee-[ west of Lewis Street
and cor, Lains .iS proposed R-: io!:s,
f.he G'it'? PLann.Lng Commission ac 'hhel~ meeting of 5andar¥ 8~ 1962~
approved said teni;ati've map subject -~o the foilowing conditions:
Req,xirement that shou}.d this suodivision be developed as
more than one subdivlsi, on~ each subdivision thereof shall be
~ubm'~,[ted ~n Len%a'tive form for app~ovalo
2~ Subllect Lo the approval of pl. ot and b,~ilding pla~s by the
Piann[ng and ',:he Bt'ilding Depar[mentso
3~. Provision fo: utility easements to Orangewood Avenue for
cizcuiaLion of zhe waCer system~
Mz~ Mar-._in Kre~d[ oc'tif, ned the boundaries of the +~enta~ive tract~
adv[~;'.ng t!nat ,~aid i~rac% conforms ~o -L]he existing development in the area~
and .~efe~ed [o ~_ne f:nd:~n9 of '~e City Planning Comm2ssion~ that the
e,t:.a:JL..~,m-:t of ',-he R.A pa~:cei oma-tied from subject tract and containing
~e~ ina: one ac? Ln s~ze may be provided for r~[~ '.he filin9 of a petition
MY'? Rona.!d Ka::oa propo:~ed -~bdivilde'? of the '[.racZ~ advised %hat
'the ..~m~ ~ pa.z'-ce7 ~r~ q~e~!:lon on O~angewood Avenue is being retained by %he
pzesen't o~ne:r a-_~ ~.i~ rome ~:ite; ~',a:. he ~mders~ands [he owner has filed for
Co~:n,zl~[man Cband ez. moved itha-L Tents'hi_ye Map of Tract Noo 4545 be
app:o~ed :~:~ject ho "[ne rezommenda[[ons of: [he Ci'ti-Planning Commission~
and rux[r:e.~- s'mje,~L '-.o the p~osec~:[:i_on ho complehion of ~he variance con-
cezn,ng the R~A ~:',~b$ :andazd [o~.~ Coanc:_.lman Coons seconded the motion°
MOT EON CARRIED
L£GH'I SiGNAL~._LNTERSECi'ION OF LINCOLN AVENUE AND HIGHWAY 39: Excerpt from
'Lpe mlr~zLes of 'the C~:F P~annin9 Commission mee-ttng be].d 3anuary 8~ 1962~
recommending to h~e C~[~ Com('f,.] Cha'h the Traffic Engineer be instructed to
cond::: ~ a a_ ~d? of ":~,e I. figh[, sZgnal, sysi. em at the intersection of Lincoln
Ave~ue and H::grwa~ ~9 wa-..~unmit~:ed together w[~%? report of t~ Traffic
Eng:lnee::~ w~!ch was ~ead ~n i ~].1. by M:~, Murdoch~
Co:nc;~man Coons moved ..hat the exc. erpL from 'the City Planning
Comml:~:.:ion and '[.rte report of [be !b:affic Englnee:~ be received and filed~
Com~-: i!man Chandler. :-e.::onded -':he mo[iono MOIION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 02R-51: On [P.e reco.mmenda'[!ons of: the Ci%} Engineer~ Councilman
Thompsor, offered Reso]ut'~on No,~ 62R. 5i for pass. age and adop[ion~ awarding
con'(:rac-: for ?',e L:incoJ. n Ave~te Sewer improvemeni:~ ,Job Noo 1242~ ~o the
Low h:~dder~ Lo K,~ DooK~r:s Con:~hzuc-S:lor~ Company~ :=n the amount of $12~206~55~
Refer %o Reaolu[.:lon Book.,
A RESOLUTION O~ THE CiTY COUNCIL O~ THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT 'FO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PI.,ANT~ LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATiON~ INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
}hJG Ai.I. WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE [HE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
I~PROVEMEN[: THE LINCOLN AVENUE ' RiO VISTA STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT IN
RIO VISTA STREET FROM APPROXIMATELY i48 FEET SOUTH OF LINCOLN AVENUE TO
LINCOLN AVENUE~ AND IN LINCOLN AVENUE PROM RIO ViSI"A STREET TO APPROXIMATELY
1384 ~EiET EAST OP RIO ViSI'A S~REET IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1242~
(L K, Dobk:in-~ Con~:ruct:lon Company.)
5414
~it'y Hal.l~ Anaheim..~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES .- January 23~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
On roll call, the foregoing resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler~ Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schu%te.
None°
None,
Ihe Mayor declared Resolution No~ 62R-51 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-57: Councilman Fry offered Resolution Nco 62R-52 for passage
and adoption°
Refer %o Resolution Booko
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVF~ENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVF~ENT OF ORANGE
AVENUE, FROM APPROXIMATELY 900 FEET EAST OF DALE AVENUE TO DALE AVENUE, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 670; AND APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS~
PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF;
AIFfHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SAID PLANS~ SPECIFICATIONS~ ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CON-
STRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened February 159 1962~ 2:00 P.M.)
On roll. call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by hh.e following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler~ Coons~ Fry~ Thompson and Schutteo
None~
None~
The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 62R-52 duly passed and adop%edo
RESOLUTION NO° 62R-53: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No° 62R-53 for passage
and adop~i. Ono
Refer %o Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF ANAHEIM
ROAD, FROM THE RIVERSIDE FREEWAY TO DOWLING AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
JOB NO. 671; AND APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION
OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS,
ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE
INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be
opened February 8~ 1962~ 2:00
On roll ~alI %he foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
b~ '[he following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENI': COUNCILMEN:
Chand±er, Coons~ Yry~ Thompson and $¢hutte.
None~
None,
The Mayor declared Resolu±ion Nco 62R-53 duly passed and adopted°
RESOLUIION NO~ 62R.-54: Council. man Fry offered Resolution Nco 62R,-54 for passage
and adoption~
Refer to Reso]u[ion Book°
5415
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD
(PLACENTIA AVENUE) SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET NORTH OF
LINCOLN AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 1130 FEET NORTH OF LINCOLN AVENUE, IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1240; AND APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES,
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS~ ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF.
(Bids to be opened February 1.57 19629 2:00 P.M~)
On .roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandl. er~ Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte,
None.
None~
The Mayor declared Resol. ution Noo 62R-54 duly passed and adopted~
RESOLUTION NO, 62R-55: On certification of the Director of Public Works~ that
Santa Aha Valley Conszruct~on Company has completed contract for construc-
zion of the Broadway Storm Drain~ Job Noo 5002, in accordance with plans
and speciflca[ionss Councilman Coons offered Resolution Noo 62R-55 for
passage and adoption°
Refer. toRe:~o~u'c~.on~ Booko
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLEtiON AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND ~QUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL
AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: CONSTRUCTION OF A STORM DRAIN IN
BROADWAY STREEI'~ FROM LOS ANGELES STREET TO EAST STREET, IN THE CITY OF'
ANAHEiM~ JOB NO, 5002~ (Santa Aha Valley Construction Company)
Or, roll ca/] (:he toregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the ioi]owing vote~
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler~ Coons, Fry~ Thompson and Schutte.
None°
None~
The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 62R~55 du±y passed and adopted°
RESOLUTION NO, 62R-56: Councilman Thompson offered Resolution Noo 62R-56 for
passage and adoption~
Refez 'to Resolution Book~
A RESOLUFION OF YHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ORANGE
COUNI'Y ~OR THE PAVING OF CERRITOS AVENUE BORDERING THE SCHOOL AT THE CORNER
OF CERRIYOS AVENUE AND EUCLID STREET.
On roll call the ±oregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Cb. andler~ Coons~ Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None.
None~
'[he Mayor declared Resolution No~ 62R-56 duly passed and adopted~
5416
Ci't¥ Hall~__Anaheim~ California ,- COUNCIL MINUIES - January' 23~ 1962, 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO~ 62R-57: Co~mcilman Coons offered Resolution Nco 625-57 for
passage and adop%ion~
Refer Lo Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
AND THE ATCHISON~ 'TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY CO~PANY FOR THE INSTALLA-
TION OF FOUR FLASHING LIGHT SIGNALS AT THE BROADWAY STREET CROSSING OF
SAID RAILWAY COMPANY'S TRACK (CROSSING NO. 2-167.9)o
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons~ Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None.
None°
The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 62R-57 duly passed and adopted.
DEEDS OF EASEMEMr: Coo~ncilman Thompson offered Resolution Nos° 62R-58 to 62R-65,
both inclusive~ for passage and adoption°
Refer [o Resolution Book°
RESOLUTION NO, 62R~58: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR STREET AND HIGH~AY PURPOSES. (Joseph
William Heinz~ e't UXo)
RESOLUTION NO. 62R~59: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAl, PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Theresa Ao Rees)
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-60: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES,
(Edward P,, Backs~ et dx)
RESOLUTION NO~ 62R~-61: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPFING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Ellen Se]l~ e% al)
RESOLU[ION NO, o2R,--62: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRAMI' DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY ~OR AN EASEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A
SEWER LINE~ (Ha~ley L~ Hoskins, et ux)
RESOLUTION NO, 62R,63: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(General Foods Corporation)
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-64: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Thomas R, Coughlin, et ux)
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-65: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Broadway Vil!age of Anaheim)
On roll call the foregoing resolutions were duly passed and
adoption by the fo!lowin9 vote:
5417
~ Anahe~m~ California ,- COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M,
AYES: COUNC LLMEN:
NOES: COUNC[LMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler~ Coons, Fry~ Thompson and Schutte.
None,~
None~
Ti~e Mayor declared Resolutions Nos, 62R-58 'ho 62R-6b~ both
in¢.l~sive~ duly passed and adopted~
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-66: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-66 for
passage and adopt:iOno
Refex to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUFION OP' THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORiZiNG THE ACCEPTANCE OF' A RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT OVER AND ACROSS
CERFAfN PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINES.
(Ozange Count:~ Wa[e-z- Distzict)
On roll cat! the foregoing zesolutton was duly passed and adopted
nv,, h.he following '~ohe:
AYES
NOES
ABS EN
COUNCILMEN: Clhandier~ Coons~ Fry~ Thompson and Schutte.
COUNC [ LMEN: None o
COUNCILMEN: None ~,
the Mayor dec l ~.red Resolution No o 62R-66 duly passed and adopted°
RESOLUFION NO.: 62R~{',7: Co.~nc]. man Fr? offered Resolution Noo 62R-67 for passage
and adop ~ r
Refe:r to Re~,o},~t<on Book
A REFOLUFION OP IHE C£FY COUNCIL UP THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING FO iHE C[¥Y OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL
PURPOSES ~ a,~:tLc ~ater Company)
Or: ~o~i cai~ ::ne foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
(.he fo] lowing vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC ! LMEN:
ABSENi': CO: INC ILMEN:
Cgandler, Coons~ Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None o
None o
Fne Mayor declared Resolution Noo 62R.-,.6'7 duly passed and adopted°
RESOLU'IiON NO, 62R-68: Corer il. man Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-58 for
passage and adoptlon.
Re~e~ ±o RehoJ,JL[on Book
A RE'SOLUTiON OF IHE CL'I'Y COUNCIL OP THE CrlY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A DEED
QUIrCLA[.~iNG [O 'IHE C~¥ O~ ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR EASEMENTS
fOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. (Pacific Wa%e~ Co~,)
On roll cai] the forego:lng resolution was duly passed and adopted
0¥ t~,.,~e ~oi!owing vole:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCi LMEN:
ABSENI: COUNCIL~EN:
Chandter~ Coons~ Fry~ Thompson and Schutte.
None~
None,,
The ~ayo~ declared Resolution No~ 62R-68 dul'y passed and adopted.
5418
~:i. ty ~al~ Anahei~!~ Ca}ifornia ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
RESOiUI'iON NO,, ~:2R-,69: Councilman Coons offered Resolution Nco 62R-69 for
passage and adoption.,
Refez to Resol'otlon Book°
A RESOLUTION OF FEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A BILL
OF' SALE i'RANSFERRING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ALL RIGHT~ TITLE AND INTEREST
[N AND TO CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. (Pacific Water Co~)
On roil ca!.l ~he foregoln9 resolution was duly passed and adopted
o'~. ~e fo~Lcw:~ng vote:
AYES: COUNC f LMEN:
NOES: COUNC i LMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None.
None.
The MaFo~ declared ResoLution No., 62R-69 duly passed and adopted~
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-70: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No~ 62R-70 for
passage and adoption,,
Refe:r to Resolution Book°
A RESOI.,U['ION OF i'HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE
PURCHASE AND ACQUISITION O~ CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES
AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 7241o (Santa Aha Street Wa%er Company)
Oa 'roll call toe foregoing resolution was duly passed and
adopzed b ¢ 't:~e f o_, ~o~ing vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENI: COUNCILMEN:
Chandl. er~ Coons~ Fry~ Thompson and Schut%e.
None ,,
None ,:
'['~,e Mayor declared ResoluLion NCo 62R-70 duly passed and adopted.
RECESS: Coun,(~:,iman ~_~y moved to recess to 7:00 P.M, Councilman Coons seconded
the mo:.ior~ MO~ION CARRIED, (5:00 P.M~)
A~FER RECESS: Ma¢or Schdi[e ca[led ±he meeting 'to order, all members of %he
~LAG SALUTE: May'o:r Schuht, e !ed the audience in 'the Pledge of Allegiance to
'hhe t-lags,
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARiNG~_.RECLASS!FICAFION NO, 61-62-55: Submitted by Moritz M,
Lol[~z~ Owne:~ Joseph Stephenson~ Authox'ized A9ent, requestin9 a chan9e of
zone f~om R-.O ~o R-3~ pzope~t~ located a't 911 North Citron Street (north-
we~vie}iv (:o}'ner of C'ii:ron St~eef and La Ve~ne Street)
7he C ~¥ Plann[ng Commission pursuant 'to their Resolution No. 171~
Set.es ~9~,~-62~ recommended said re¢.iassif:ication be denied°
P~.~.:'ic hea:~ing was contlntied from the meeting of January 9~ 1962o
Plans and the file were reviewed by the Ci%¥ Coun¢i[o
Thte Mayo:!' asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
M:r., Philip McGraw, Attorney representing the purchaser of subject
p:r'operty~ Mz:~, Stephenson~ addressed the Council. and submitted a map of the
a::ea, :tnd:ca±lng L'hose signatures on 'the protes~ petition filed at the
m~':.-f',ng of ~s:;., ~,.~ g. 1962~ ~na't az:e o~.~_~ide the Lhree hundred foot radius
)J [1~,~ ::,io[:;~:t .. wtl ~?~ tt~ ~:::/a': !~, ~:o~'slde~ed Lne sphere of influence
~ .<::, ~,l,-~ :fa-.-::~, ~'.: ~:f t~,e ~('") s,.gna',:ures on said petition~ 70
54L9
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1962, 3:00
Mr~ McGraw also filed a petition containing eighteen signatures of
those favoring the R-3 zoning, which signatures with the exception of
are within three hundred feet of subject property; and also submitted three
photographs indicating conditions and uses of property in this immediate area.
He restated %heir request, and was of the opinion that the property in
question was not suitable for single family dwellings because of the exist-
ing conditions in the area and the size and location of the property. That
%hey propose a nice~ nine-unit apartment development of single story
constructlon with a six foot wall on the west and north property lines,
which they believe is the highest and most logical use of the property.
Mr~ Lee Mims, 926 Winter Street, addressed the Council in opposi-
tion to the requested R-3 zoning, being of %he opinion %hat %he property
could Pest be developed as three R-1 lots, and thereby maintaining of their
single family residential property; %ha% if the request for R-3 zoning is
gran%ed~ all %he property owners on %he west side of Citron Street from La
Verne Street %o La Palma Avenue will also request R-3 zoning~
/he Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council~
%here being no response~ declared the hearing closed.
Plans were reviewed and discussion held by the City Council.
RESOLUI'ION NOo 62R-'71: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-71
for passage and adoption~ authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance
changing %he zone as requested~ subject %o the following conditions:
1o Dedication of 32 feet from %he monumented centerline of Citron Street.
2o Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all
improvements for Citron Street~ subject to the approval of the City
Engineer, and in accordance with the adopted Standard Plans on file in
the office of the City Engineer°
3o Payment of $2~00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Citron
Street and La Verne Street°
4o Payment of a Park and Recreation fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit~ to be
collected as part of the building permit°
5o Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works~ Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible
to trash truck pickup~ and adequately enclosed by solid fence or wall,
prior to Final Building Inspec%iono
6o Fil~[ng of Deed Restrictions limiting %he use of the property to single
story development°
7o 'Iime limitation of 180 days for the accomplishment of Items 1~ 2 and 3.
Removal of the existing residential dwelling on the property°
Installation of a six foot block wall on the north and west property
lines°
lOc Subject to review and approval, by the City Council of the building plans
before the issuance of a Building Permit.
Refer %o Resolution Book~
A RESOLU[ION O~ THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH5 CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND D~TBR-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE R£LATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT TH£ BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGF. D.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by Cbc ~ol/owing vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, and Thompson.
Schut%e.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-71 duly passed and adopted.
5420
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1962, 3:00 P.M.
PLANNING STUDY: Councilman Thompson moved that the property on the west
side of Citron Street, be%ween La Verne Street and La Palms Avenue, where
the lots are 200 fee% deep, be referred to the City Planning Commission
for study a% %heir meeting of March 19, 1962, with recommends%ions %o %he
City Council~ Councilman Coons seconded the motion° Councilman Schut%e
voted "No"~ MOTION CARRIED.
VARIANCE NO. 1407: Submit%ed by Jesse and Dolores No Arriola, requesting per-
mission %o waive minimum floor area, parkin9 space and exterior sideyard
requirements, and also requesting encroachment of at%ached garage into
interior sideyard; property located at 225 East La Palms Avenue (northeast
corner of La Palms Avenue and Part Street).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No~
107~ Series 1961-62, denied said Variance.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was
ordered by the City Council, and public hearing was held November 21~ 1961,
a% which 'time %he hearing was closed and action by the City Council deferred
to this date for consideration in conjunction with Precise Plan Study of
the area°
Findings of the City Planning Commission resulting from their
hearing on Precise Plan Study Nco 31-70-4 were reviewed by Mr~ Martin
Kreidt~ and report submitted by the Urban Renewal Assistant on the Planning
Department Staff, regarding subject area, was submitted and read° That
fzom their study and findings, the City' Planning Commission reaffirms their
denial of Variance Application No. 1407.
The Mayor asked if the applicant was present and wi~ed to
address the Council~ There was no response.
Mayor Schu'tte advised that he had spoken with the applicant, Mr.
Arriola, and was advised by him that he did not wish to proceed with his
request for a variance if the additional, dedication requirements were a
condition of the variance.
RESOLUIION NOD 62R-72: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-72 for
passage and adoption, sustaining 'the action of the City Planning Commission
and denying Variance No. 1407o
Refer 'to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE
NOo !.407o
On roll call. the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
'the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None°
None°
'The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 62R-.72 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING~ VARIANCE NO. 1433: Submitted by Gall Vary, requesting permission
to construct a four-plex, and to waive minimum rear yard setback require-
ments on property located at 761 North Claudina Street, (southwesterly
corner of North and Claudina Streets)°
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution Nco
~80~ Series 1961-62, denied said Variance.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was
filed by the applicant~ and public hearing scheduled before the City Council
this date°
5421
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Mro Martin Kreidt reported on the location of the unimproved R-2
zoned property, and presented map showin9 the zoning and land use of the
area surrounding said property, and a summary of the Interdepartmental Staff
investigation~ and also a summary of the evidence presented to the City
Planning Commission at their public hearing, including their findings and
recommendations resulting therefrom~ He further advised that two years ago
the applicant requested to develop subject property under this same plan,
and was granted Variance Nco 1127 by the City Plannin9 Commission, which
the applicant later withdrew because of opposition in the immediate
neighborhood°
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council°
Mro Gail Vary, applicant, addressed the Council requesting
favorable consideration of his request, and advised that his previous
applicalion~ Variance Nco 1127, had been unanimously approved by %he City
Planning Commission, and that his present plans are identical with the
exception of %he necessary revisions to conform with the new R-3 Code unit size
requirements~ that to keep the front se%back in conformity with his
neighbors required the application for waiver of rear yard setback.
Vary further advised that in accordance with conditions of the prior
variance, he has installed sidewalks and curbs on Claudina Street and
North Street°
Mro Vo Eo McCallum, 758 North Claudina Street, resident directly
across Claudina Street from subject property, and also speaking for Mro
Baker, property owner in the immediate area, addressed the Council in
opposition to the requested variance, advising that most of the houses in
this R-2 district were single family residences, and referred to the 28
signatures on the petition filed by Mr° Baker in opposition to the original
variance; that to grant this variance permitting R-3 use of the property
would be spot zoning, and was of the opinion that if subject property
wanied an R-3 Use~ then the entire area should be zoned R-3 for the benefit
of all the property owners°
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed°
Plans were reviewed by the City Council, and in answer to Council-
man Coons question~ Mr. Vary stated that the plans could be adjusted so each
dwelling uni't would conform to the footage requirements of the R-3 Code.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-73: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-73 for
passage and adoption~ granting Variance Nco 1433, subject to the following
conditions:
Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nco 1, with the
exception that said plans be altered so that each dwelling unit will
comply to '%he R-3 Ordinance, as to dwelling area~
Payment of Park and Recreation fee of $25°00 per dwelling unit ~o be
col}ected as part of the building permito
Refer to Resolution Book~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. i433o
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMIN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry and Thompson
Schutte.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-73 duly passed and adopted,
5422
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING~ VARIANCE NO. 1435: Submitted by Raymond Spehar, requesting per-
mission to waive 60% maximum coverage requirements on property located on
the southwest corner of Euclid and Chalet Avenues.
The City Plannin9 Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
182, Series 1961-629 denied said variance.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was
filed by Robert Eo Johnson9 Authorized Agent and public hearing scheduled
before the City Council this date°
Petition of Protest containing 31 signatures, submitted at open
In~e~,~ng wa~ re~? _n ~. ;~7 the City Clerko
Mr~ Martin Kreidt outlined the location and zoning of subject
property, and the zoning and development of the area, and summarized the
evidence presented to the City Planning Commission at their public hearing
resulting in their denial of said variance on the basis of their findings
contained in Resolution Noo 182, Series 1961-62.
Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council, and it
was noted that the plans were identical to those previously considered by
the City Council~ at which time the applicant was advised that if he
desired to develop in accordance with revised plans~ a proper application
for variance from Code requirements must be filed.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mr. Samuel Ao Yreedman, 1714 Chalet Avenue, addressed the
Council in opposition, and summarized the history and conditions of
the R-3 zonJ. ng of subject property~ He was of the opinion that to waive
the Code requirements would destroy the values of at least fifteen homes
in 'the immediate vicinity~ and would cause additional traffic conjestion
at the only entrance to Anawood, thereby creating a regrettable nuisance.
Mro Robert Johnson, Agent and developer, explained their plans
for a deluxe apartment development with central semi-enclosed patio, and
that they propose 'to construct 7 units and provide ample parking. Further,
that this will be approximately a $909000° development, and he did not
believe that it would be detrimental to the homes in the area.
Mrs° Highlen9 1330 Falcon, addressed the Council in opposition
specifically referring to the increase in density~
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
'there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R.-74: Councilman Coons offered Resolution Noo 52R-74
for passage and adoption, sustaining the action taken by the City Planning
Commission, and denying Variance No° 1435~
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE
NO. 1435o
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons9 Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None~
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-74 duly passed and adopted.
5423
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - JanuarY 23~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
RECESS: Councilman Coons moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Fry seconded
the motion° MOTION CARRIED. (9:20 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order, all members of the Council
being present°
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO.. 61-62-60: Submitted by Raymond and Jack
Hazard~ requesting a change of zone from R-A to M-1 and P-L on property
located on the southeasterly corner of Anaheim Road and Dowling Street.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
183, Series ].961-62~ recommended said reclassification, subject %o the fol-
lowing conditions:
!o Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nco 1.
Installation of landscaping in the P-L, Parking Landscaping, Zone
portion of subject property~ plans for said landscaping to be submitted
to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maint-
enance~ and said landscaping to be installed prior %o Final Building
Inspection°
3o Dedication of 45 feet from the monumented centerline of Anaheim Road
(20 feet existing).
4o Dedication of 53 feet from %he monumented centerline of Dowling Avenue
(20 feet existing)°
5o Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve-
ments for Dowling Avenue and Anaheim Road, subject to the approval of
'the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on
file in the office of the City Engineer, at the time of development.
6o Payment of $2°00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Dowling
Avenue and Anaheim Road at the time of development~
7o Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment
of Item Nos° 3 and 4o
Nrc Martin Kreidt indicated on the map the location of subject
property and the property contained in Reclassification No. 61-62-61, and
summarized the evidence reported %o the City Planning Commission at their
hearing~ and their findings and recommendations resulting therefrom.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Nrc Stevenson, representing John Bo Kilroy Company, Agent,
advised they were in accordance with the recommendations of the City Plan-
ning Commission~
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed°
RESOLIffION NO. 62R-75: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 62R-75,
authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance~ changing the zone as
requested~ subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (61-62-60 - M-1 and P-L)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-75 duly passed and adopted.
.5424
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-61: Submitted by Robert W., Albert
Ho, Herman R~ and Louise Wischnack, Owners, John B. Kilroy Company, Agents,
requesting a change of zone from R-A to M-1 and P-L, on property located on
the easterly side of Dowling Street~ between Anaheim Road and La Palma
Avenue, its southwesterly corner bein9 approximately 820 feet~ more or
less north of the northeasterly corner of Dowlin9 Street and La Palma Ave°
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
184~ Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification subject to the
following conditions:
1,, Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1.
Installation of landscaping in the P-L, Parking Landscaping, Zone,
plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the
approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, said land-
scaping to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection.
Dedication of 53 feet from the monumented centerline of Dowling Ave.
(20 feet existing).
Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve--
men'ts for Dowling Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer
and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office
of the City Engineer at the time of development.
5o Payment of $2°00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Dowling
Avenue at the time of development°
6o Provision of a ten (10) foot utility and drainage easement along the
southerly boundary of subject property to adequately serve the subject
property and other properties, at 'the time of the installation of
service facilities~
'7° Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment
of Item Noo 3~
Communication dated December 29, 1961~ from W. S. Stevenson~
2ohn Bo Kilroy Company, requesting a change in the width of the required
easement for drainage and utility purposes along the southerly property
line~ from ten feet to five feet, was submitted~
Also submitted was communication dated January 23, 1962, from
W~ So Messenger~ John Bo Kilroy Company, giving notice that if the width
of the public utility easement is changed from ten to five feet, that the
owners of the property will accept storm water from Dowling Street as
provided for on the street improvement plans for Dowling Street~ and
execute a "save harmless" agreement acceptable to the City Attorney's
Of£1ce~ absolv[n9 the City of any damage caused by such storm water.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there
being no response~ declared the hearing closed°
RESOLUTION NO. 62R.-76: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-76
for passage and adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary
ord~nance~ changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations
of 'the City Planning Commission~ with the following amendment to condition
number 6 '[hereof:
Provision of a ten (!0) foot utility and drainage easement along the
southerly boundary of subject property to adequately serve the subject
property and other properties~at the time of the installation of service
facilities, be reduced to a five (5) foot utility easement only, subject to
the execution and recordation of necessary hold harmless agreement to run
with the land to cover the City's obligation for drainage; said agreement
to be acceptable 'to the City Attorney and City Engineer.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHCULD BE
CHANGED. (61-62-61 - M-1 and P-L)
5425
City Ha]l~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutteo
None°
None°
The Mayor declared Resolution NCo 62R-76 duly passed and adopted.
COMMUNICATION - SAVANNA SCHOOL DISTRICT: Communication dated January 16, 1962,
from D. L. Smeltzer, District Superintendent and Secretary to the Board of
Trustees, Savanna School District, requesting that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission and the City Council give careful study and evaluation to the
9rantin9 of future R-3 and Commercial type zoning within the Savanna School
District area, was submitted°
Mr~ Martin Kreidt reported that the City Planning Commission
received and filed said communication at their meeting of January 22, 1962.
Councilman Coons moved that said communication from the Savanna
School District be received and filed. Councilman Fry seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on
motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Chandler° MOTION CARRIED.
City of Long Beach, Resolution Nco C-18021, urging the con-
struction of a Naval Hospital in the Long Beach Area.
b~ Feather River Project Association, Agenda and reports~
c. California State Board of Equalization - Amounts of self-
assessed taxable transactions and retail sales and use tax
collections~ third calendar year quarter, 1961.
CANCELLATION OF COUN/Y TAXES: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by
Councilman Coons~ the Orange County Board of Supervisors were requested to
cancel County taxes on property acquired by the City of Anaheim for munici-
pal purposes, pursuant to Resolution No. 7332, property formerly assessed to
C. W. Fick, recorded December 5, 1961~ as Document No. 2816, in Book 5933~
page 801; and also, pursuant to Resolution No. 7331, property formerly
assessed to Arthur Co Korn, Deed recorded December $~ 1961, as Document
NCo 281'7, in Book 5933, page 8041 Official Records of Orange County°
MOTION CARRIED~
ORDINANCE NO. 1674: Councilman Thompson offered Ordinance No. 1674 for final
readingo
Refer to Ordinance Book~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE
OF MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF SAID CITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,215,000.
(1960 Election, Series C)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1674, and
having knowledge of 'the contents therein~ Councilman Thompson moved the
reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Coons seconded the
motion~ MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons~ Fry, Thompson and Schutte.
None o
None.
Mayor Schutte declared Ordinance No. 1674 duly passed and adopted,
5426
City Hall, Anaheim, Calif9rnia - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 23, 1962, 3:00
CONDEMNATION SETTLEMENT: On the recommendations of the Assistant City Attorney,
John Dawson, Councilman Coons moved that the City Council authorize the City
Attorney's Office to settle pending Eminent Domain suits, covering twenty-
three parcels of property, totaling $192,970. Said property located in the
area north of La Palma Park~ west of North Lemon Street° Councilman Fry
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Mayor Schutte left the meeting, 10:05 P.M.
CONDEMNATION - STERN REALTY: On motion by Councilman Chandler~ seconded by
Councilman Coons~ the Finance Officer was authorized to prepare check in
the amount of $13,500o %o be deposited with the Court in codemnation suit
City vs~ Stern Realty. MOTION CARRIED.
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE APPLICATION: Assistant City Attorney 3ohn Dawson reported
that preliminary investigation on application received for new off-sale
beer and wine license filed by Vigilant Enterprises, Inco~ 11752 East
Ka%ella Avenue (area of Ninth and Katella Avenues) indicates that the
property is presently in an R-A Zone.
Councilman Coons moved that the City Attorney's Office be auth-
orized %o file a protest on said application if upon fur%her investigation
it is found %o be in the improper zone. Councilman Chandler seconded the
motiono MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Chandler moved that the City Attorney's Office also
be authorized %o withdraw said protest without bringing it before the City
Council if~ after the protest is filed, it is determined to be an allowable
use° Councilman Coons seconded the mo%lone MOTION CARRIED.
AMENDMENT TO CODE, HOUSE MOVING APPLICATION: Councilman Chandler moved that the
City Attorney's Office be instructed to prepare necessary amendment to
ordinance regulating house moving applications, placing the responsibility
of determination with the City Council° Councilman Coons seconded the
mo%lone MOTION CARRIED.
AD3OURNMENT: Councilman Coons moved to adjourn° Councilman Thompson seconded
motion° MOTION CARRIED.
AD3OURNED: 10:20 P.M.
~' City Clerk