Loading...
1962/01/305427 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session° PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: 3oseph Geisler. CITY ENGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt. Mayor Schutte called the meeting to order. AMENDMENT TO MINUTES - OIL DRILLING PERMIT: Councilman Coons moved that the minutes of January 23, 1962~ at page 5409 pertaining to Oil Well Drilling Permit of Standard Oil Company be amended as follows: Condition No. 16. The number of production tanks and other equipment will be kept to a minimum on %he drill site for Standard Oil Company requirements in connection with operations. Production tanks will be used only for oil produced from the site or oil required in connection with drilling or production activities thereon. Condition No. 21. Subject to conditions numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 outlined in Exhibit "3" submitted by the petitioner, except as amended by these conditions~ Councilman Thompson seconded the motion. Councilman Chandler abstained from voting. MOTION CARRIED. MINUTES: Minutes of the City Council meeting of January 23, 1962, as amended, were approved on mo%ion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Thomp- son° MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE - LEE D. BARR: Councilman Chandler offered the follow- ing Resolution of Condolence for passage and adoption: RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim has been informed of the death of Lee D. Bart, and WHEREAS, Lee D. Bart served the City of Garden Grove as member of the Garden Grove City Council from %he date of its incorporation as a city June 18, 1956, to the time of his death January 28, 1962. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that we ex%end to the family of Councilman Bart our sincere sympathy and condolence in their hour of bereavement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we express, to the City Council of the City of Garden Grove, our deepest regret on account of their loss of Mr. Bart as a member of the City Council, and as a highly respected and faithful public servan%~ BE IT FUR/HER RESOLVED, that this Resolution be spread upon the Minutes. ATTEST: /s/ Dene M. Williams CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM /s/ A.J. Schuf, t;e--- MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM 5428 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None° The Mayor declared the foregoing resolution unanimously adopted. PUBLIC HEARING~ PROPOSED REALIGNMENT OF LEWIS STREET BETWEEN CERRITOS AVENUE AND BALL ROAD: Public hearing was held pursuant to Legal Notice duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin January 18, 1962, to consider the adop- tion of an amendment 'to the Circulation Element of the General Plan in order to establish the realignment of Lewis Street between Cerritos Avenue and Ball Road. The City Plannin9 Commission pursuant to 'their Resolution No. 176, Series 1961-62, recommended to the City Council the extension of Lewis Street in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan and that the Public Utilities Commission be petitioned to grant the necessary grade crossin9 in order to provide said extension, after finding the following fac'ts~ That the extension of Lewis Street should be provided in a straight alignment in accordance with Alternate "K" with the installation of a grade crossing at the transection of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Line subject 'to 'the provision of proper safeguards including flashing signals, a median strip and the installation of a gate system. 2. That it was the unanimous opinion of the property owners in the subject area that Lewis Street be extended in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan in order to provide adequate traffic cir- culation in the subject area and to protect 'the land use and development in the subject area~ 3. That the Engineering Division, Department of Public Works, is hereby directed to develop a Precise Detailed Plan for the layout of the grade crossing, showing the median strlps, 'the location of signals and gates, and all necessary safeguards for the installation of said grade crossing° 4o That it is hereby recommended %hat the present zoning of the properties in the subject area remain in the existing M-i, Light Manufacturing, and P-L, Parking Landscaping, Zones, and that %he alignment of Lewis Street remain as presently projected on the Circulation Element of the General Plan~ 5. That the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council %hat %he Public Utilities Commission be petitioned for a grade crossing in accordance with Finding Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council° Mr. Martin Kreidt reported on the public hearing held before the City Plannin9 Commission explaining Exhibits "A" through "L" (with the exception of "I"), indicating the possible street alignments, and presented maps showing land ownership affected, and present use and zoning in the area, together with an illustration of recommended safeguards for the railroad crossing° He further reported that 'the cost of 'the extension and safety devices would be approximately $50,000°, and read in full the findings of the Ci'ty Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 176. Mr. Jim Manning, representing American Thermos Products Company, addressed the Council advising that they purchased their present eighteen acre plant site six years ago, and developed with future expansion in mind. He further reported that business from this plant has increased from eight- een per cent to thirty three and one-third per cent of the total sales of their company; that Exhibit "E" as suggested would cut through the area of their new proposed addition, and curtail their expansion program. He advised that the company favored the straight alignment of Lewis Street from Ball Road to Cerritos Avenue. 5429 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Mro H. E. Freeman, District Freight and Passenger Agent, Southern Pacific Railway, addressed the Council favoring the straight alignment of Lewis Street, as the correct and most logical alignment. Mr. A. M. Shelton, Engineering Department~'Santa Fe Railroad, addressed the Council advising that the Santa Fe in this location is a high speed track acc~nmoda%in9 sixteen to eighteen trains daily~ and the straight alignment of Lewis Street would cause a very acute angle crossing; further~ because of the acuteness of the angle and the distance the warning devices must necessarily be placed, it would be difficult for the motorist to fully view the crossing and the warning devices would lose their effectiveness; that an overpass or underpass should be considered if the straight alignment is maintained; however in his opinion~ other means of access to Cerritos Avenue and Ball Road should seriously be considered. Mro William So Hibbard, Transportation Engineer for the Public Utilities Commission, speaking as a Staff member only~ advised of a similar situation wherein the Public Utilities Commission recommended against this type of grade crossing° He explained a study made by the Commission wherein automatic gates over a ten year period had reduced accidents by sixty two per cent; however, in this case~ it would be more hazardous as the train would be approaching at an acute angle from the right of the driver. He roughly estimated the cost of a grade separa±ion to be approximately $700,000. to $800,000° Mro David Kaylor, representing William D~ Greschner Company, lessee of approximately twenty acres adjacent to Lewis Street, addressed the Council favorin9 the extension of Lewis Street as it now exists in a straight alignment. Mr. Freeman again addressed the Council. suggesting that the actual cost for a grade separation at this location be obtained. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed° Further discussion was held pertaining to the alternate routes studied, and the recommended safe%'y devices° RESOLUTION NO. 62R.-77: At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Coons offered Resolution No° 62R-7'7 for passage and adoption~ concurring in the recommendations of the City Planning Commission and authorizing an application to be made before the Public Utilities Commission for a grade crossing~ Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THAT THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN NOT BE AMENDED, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO MAKE APPLICATION TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION FOR A GRADE CROSSING FOR THE EXTENSION OF LEWIS STREET ACROSS THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD TRACKS~ On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schut%e. None. None, The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-77 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING~ HOUSE MOVING PERMIT: Public hearing was held on application of Sol Peisach for House Moving Permit to move a dwelling from 11207 Parkmead, Santa Fe Springs, California, to 3345 Thornton Avenue, Anaheim~ California° 5430 Qity Hall~ An~he~m~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Plan and picture from the file were reviewed by the City Council. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearth9 closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-78: Councilman Fry offered Resolution Nco 62R-78 for passage and adoption, 9ranting House Moving Permit. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE MOVING PERMIT TO SOL PEISACH TO MOVE A DWELLING FROM 11207 PARKMEAD, SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, TO 3345 tHORNTON AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler~ Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None~ None. SIDEWALK WAIVER¶ 3345 THORNTON AVENUF: Request of Sol Peisach for waiver of sidewalk requirements at 3345 Thornton Avenue was submitted° On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Fry, temporary waiver of sidewalk requirement was granted as requested, on condition %hat planting within the parkway area be restricted to shrubs, vines and similar semi-permanent t~pes of p~anting. 'MOIIOr~ CARRIED° VARIANCE NO. 1170: Architectural plans were submitted for Council approval, by the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, of the building addition to be located at 208-216 C]emenzine Street and 225 Chartres Street, which is west of the ex~sting central, off:ce telephone building at 217 North Lemon Street° Correspondence dated Januarv 29~ 1962, from C. So Kleinau, Chief Engineer, Pacific re].ephone and Telegraph Company (copies furnished each Councilman) regarding progress made pertaining to Variance Nco 1170 was submitted° Mr.. Jo Edward Smith of the Pacific Telephone Company addressed the Council. explaining plans of construction and presented a sketch of the three story building~ indicating the architect of the new buildin9 to be the same as the existin9 building~ Plot plan was reviewed by the City Council. Mr~ Smith requested parking requirements as stipulated %o in their let%er dated December 3~ ].959~ be deferred, to be complied with prior to the issuance of the Occupancy Permit~ and further requested completion of the vacation of the alley proceedings~ so that they may proceed with the addition° He thereupon submitted for acceptance an Easement Deed for alley purposes of 'the alternate location° Mr, Murdoch stated that the variance covered in detail the parking requirements, and that subsequent to 'the establishment of Variance Nco 1170, the Telephone Company has added additional property for parking purposes° Regarding ornamental street l{ghting, he s{ated that street lighting on Clementine Street was paid for by the proper-by owners some years ago by means of an assessment district, and in accordance with past policy, the street l~ghting requirement would apply to the Chartres Street frontage only, if it :s determined 'that any should be requiredo 5431 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU/ES - January 30, 1962, 3:00 P.M. At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Coons moved that the Plot Plan and rendering submitted by the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company be accepted and approved in accordance with Variance No. 1170. Councilman Thompson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-79: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution Nco 62R-79 for ad.oPtion° Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASFJ~ENT FOR ALLEY AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None° None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-79 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 4533: Developer, William Rogers; Tract Engineer, McDaniel Engineering Company° Tract located on the north side of Wagner Avenue, 935 feet west of Sunkist Street, and contains 21, R-1 lots. The City Planning Commission at their meeting of January 8, 1962, approved said Tentative Map~ subject to conditions° On the approval of the applicant, action by the City Council on said tentative map was continued from the meeting of January 235 1962, for further information pertaining %0 Lots "A" and "B". The following recommendationsof the City Planning Commission as additional conditions of approval were submitted and read: 1. Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the planned highway right-of-way line of Wagner Avenue abutting Lo% No. 1, provided that said six (6) foot wall shall be reduced %o the height of 42 inches within the required front yard setback of Lot Noo 1o 2° Installation of reasonable landscaping in the 7½ foot wide uncemented portion of the Wagner Avenue parkway of Lot Noo 1, for the full distance of said wall construction, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection of the subject tract. The City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping following %he installation by the developer and acceptance by the City of said landscaping° Mr. Murdoch reported that there appears to be three alternative methods of handling Lots "A" and "B", as follows: (1) That Lots "A" and "B" be obtained by the City of Anaheim prior to the approval of the Final Map~ a% a price to be negotiated between the City and the developer; (2) To include the area covered in Lots "A" and "B" within the lots in the subdivision adjacent to Lots "A" and "B"; (3) To include a notation on the Final Map that Lots "A" and "B" are "non-building sites". Mr. A. R. McDaniel, representing the subdivider, addressed the Council advising that they would be agreeable to the first two alternatives, however requested relief from the two additional conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission pertaining to the six foot masonry wall and landscaping requirements~ and stated his reasons therefor. 5432 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30~ 1962~ 3:00 On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Chandler moved that Tentative Map of Tract Nco 4533 be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1o The developer shall provide an approximately 30 foot wide Lot "A" along the northerly line of the "Not A Part", also Lot "B" shall be provided along the easterly line of "Not A Part" and Lot "A", and shall extend to Street "A". That Lots "A" and "B" be conveyed to the City of Anaheim prior to the approval of the Final Map at a price to be negotiated between the City and the developer; or, Lots "A" and "B" be eliminated and included in the lots within the subdivision adjacent to said Lots "A" and "B". 2o Requirement that should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. Subject to the approval of plot and building plans by the Planning and Building Departments. 4. Dedication of vehicular access rights on Wagner Avenue, except at street openings° Councilman Coons seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Coons seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIED. (5:07 P.M.) AFTER RECESS PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry and Thompson. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte. The Mayor Pro Tem Fry called the meeting to order° FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Pro Tem Fry led the audience in the Pledge of Alleg- iance to the Flag. VARIANCE NO. 1221 - LIGHTING PLANS: Communication from Welton Becket and Associates submitting their plans showin9 area lighting system for the Broadway-Hale employee parking lots at Westmont Drive and Loara Street was submitted. Plans were reviewed by the City Council and compared with the original planspreviously submitted. Mr. Jim Lewis, representing Melton Becket and Associates, addressed the Council explaining that their electrical engineer inter- preted Condition Nco 3 of Resolution No. 5935, granting Variame No. 1221, to mean 'that the lights should not shine in the neighboring back yards, nor should the source of light be seer from the neighboring back yards, and proceeded with their plans accordingly; that the lights will be mounted on thirty-five foot standards and directed at an angle so as not to shine in the neighboring back yards, costing approximately $3,500. as compared to an approximate cost of $10,000o to place the lights below the six foot wall. Discussion was held by the City Council and it was determined that this requirement was one of the important conditions in granting the variance, and any amendment to the variance would necessarily require a new application before -the City Plannin9 Commission~ Catalog showing the type of lights intended for the parking lot was submitted and reviewed by the City Council (said catalog retained by Mr. Lewis). At the conclusion of the discussion, request for approval of lighting plans was denied, as the plans submitted did not follow the action included in 'the granting of Variance No. 1221, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED. ,5433 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30, 1962,' 3:00 P.M. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 60-61-04: Request of Robert E'. Johnson for approval of revised plans of development contemplated for Lot 139, Tract 2779, was submitted. Correspondence dated'January-'30~ 1962 from-Mr. S. A. Freedman~ objecting to approval'-of more than five units or sixty per cent of lot coverage, stating his reasons therefor, was submitted, (copies furnished each Councilman). Revised plans were reviewed by the City Council, and it was noted that the only apparent change was the reduction from seven to six units. Discussion was held by the City Council regarding the possibility of restricting parking on Chalet Street~ the entrance of the subdivisionl also, it was reported that prior to annexation of this territory to the City of Anaheim, the property was zoned R-3 in the County of Orange. Mr. Johnson addressed the Council and advised that the former plans were rejected on the basis of containing more than sixty per cent lot coverage. At the conclusion of %he discussion, Councilman Chandler moved that the plot plan and rendering be approved, subject to the approval by the City Council of the final building plans. Councilman Thompson seconded the motion. vote: On roll call the foregoing motion failed to carry by %he following AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler and Thompson. Coons and Fry. Schutte. Councilman Coons moved that this matter be carried over until the next meeting (February 6, 1962), when all members of the Council are present. Councilman Thompson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 54-55-32, REVISED PLANS: Request of the Anaheim Company, Co C. Phillips, President, for approval of revised plans allowing the construction of two four unit apartment buildings instead of two eight unit apartment buildings on Lots Nos° 28 and 29, Tract Noo 3301, was submitted. Revised plans were reviewed by the City Council. Mr. C. C. Phillips addressed the Council advising that Variance No. 1436 requesting waiver of minimum side yard setback requirements and also waiver of height limitations, to allow two story construction on Lots 24 to 27 and 30 to 35 is presently before the City Planning Commission. That the two lots in question (28 and 29) were omitted from the Variance because by shifting the lot lines the seven and one-half foot sideyard setback could be accomplished° It was noted that a portion of the property is within 150 feet of a point of a parcel of property across the street presently zoned R-A~ and thereupon determined that a Variance to the height limitation would necessarily have to be obtained on these two lotso Mr. Phillips requested architectural approval of the revised plans at this time in order to avoid further delay, subject to obtaining necessary Variances. It was moved by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Thompson, that the City Council constitute the Architectural Committee established pursuant to Ordinance No. 998, and approve the revised plans for development as submitted for Lots 28 and 29, and the subsequent plans as included in Variance No° 1436, providing that they do not substantially vary, and further subject to obtaining necessary Variances. MOTION CARRIED. ~434 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. TRACT NO. 3812: Request of Mro Bill Bregder, President of Bregder Construction Company, for approval of roof plan change, substituting medium shake roof with number 1 red cedar shingles roof was submit%ed and approved on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Thompson. MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 140: Request of Ab R. McDaniel for amendment to Condition No. 4 of Resolution NOb 7131, pertaining %o Conditional Use Permit NOb 140, eliminating sidewalk requirements and permitting construc- tion of industrial type street section, was submitted. Mr. McDaniel reported that they proposed to construct sidewalks %o the easterly point of the Standard Oil Company lease, and requested that sidewalks from that point easterly to the proposed convention hall be deleted. Survey Site Plan as part of Conditional Use Permit Nob 140 was reviewed by the City Council° Pertaining to the south side of the proposed street, Mro Maddox, City Engineer, recommended that standard curbs be required for the following reasons: 1o To properly delineate the travelway for cars, 2o To protect pedestrians from traffic, 3o To limit and properly define ingress and egress to parking lots~ 4° To provide additional water-carrying capacity, and further recommended sidewalks be required for the following reasons: 1o Considerable pedestrian traffic will be generated between hotel~ service station, nearby restaurants and the proposed theater (and later with further development), 2° Concrete sidewalks define (by color) a place for walking, 3o Lower maintenance cost and less possibility of accidental falls or twisted ankleso It was determined by the City Council that a meeting should be arranged between Mr~ Freedman, applicant~ and Mr° Maddox, City Engineer~ to further consider this request~ No further action was taken by the City Council° CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 170: Request was submitted by Mro Craig Jewett to eliminate requirement of dedication and improvement of Pacific Electric Company property, presently under lease by Mr° Jewett~ for the purpose of providing additional parking. Mr° James Maddox, City Engineer, advised that the dedication of Pacific Electric property (leased by applicant) will be accomplished by the City at a time of ultimate improvement of Ball Road and Knott Avenue~ and thereupon recommended deletion of that portion of Condition NOb 4, City Planning Commission Resolution No° 148, Series 1961-629 which requires dedication across leased property~ providing a bond is posted %o cover Costs of all improvements across these two parcels of property. Mro Jewett reported that he had contacted the Pacific Electric Company and had been advised that they prefer to make all the dedication along this street at one time, and thereupon requested permission to proceed with his portion of 'the improvements so that the building can be in use during the time the City is negotiating with the Pacific Electric Company. At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Coons moved that the City Engineer's recommendation be accepted, and the applicant be allowed to post a bond to guarantee the improvements of the additional frontage which will be in the Pacific Electric Railroad Right-of-Way° Councilman Thompson seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. 5435 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30, 1962, 3:00 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-20: Request of William and Olive Hinkley for exten- sion of time to comply with conditions pursuant to Resolution No. 7279, was submitted° One year extension of time was granted by the City Council, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Coons° MOTION CARRIED° TRACT NO. 4060: Request was submitted by Jeffry Ho Millet, Millet-King & Associates, on behalf of So Vo Hunsaker and Sons, for one year extension of time on the approval of Tentative Map, Tract No. 4060. On motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Chandler, one year extension of %ime~ Tract No. 4060, from January 24, 196~, was granted° MOTION CARRIED. ~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 56-57-45: Request was submitted by Mro Eugene Ac Fahrion for an amendment to the R-3 limitations placed on property facing Broadway Street (copies of the letter were furnished each Councilman). Minutes of the public hearing previously held on this matter were reviewed, and it was determined that Mr. Fahrion was requesting relief from the requirement of single story development facing Broadway, permitting development under the present R-3 regulations, thereby allowing two story construction 150 feet from property zoned R-i.o It was also noted that the requirement of single story development facin9 Broadway had been inadvertan%ly omitted from the ordinance and Deed Restrictions. At the conclusion of the discussion, it was moved by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Thompson, that action on Mr. Fahrion's request be continued and pub].ic hearing before the City Council be scheduled at the earliest date consistent with matters presently scheduled, on the question whether or not the ordinance shall be amended. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved fora ten minute recess° Councilman Coons seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. (9:15 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Pro Tem Fry called 'the meeting to order~ all members of the Council being present with the exception of Councilman Schutteo RECLASSIFICATION NO. 59-60-55 - IRACT NO. 3535: Request of Jay Franklin for clarification of position regarding building two story apartment buildings adjacent to a proposed trailer park° Mr, Joseph Geisler, Assistant City Attorney, summarized the history pertaining to the R-3 development, and explained actionstaken by the developer subsequent to the approval by the City Council° He stated in view of action taken, and also considering the approval of the trailer park on the adjacent property9 the question was whether or not such approval of the R-3 development would permit the two story construc'tion as shown upon the plans° Mr, Charles B. Frank submitted a memorandum agreement betweeen he and Mr. Franklin~ wherein Mro Franklin agreed to construct a six foot high concrete block wall along the westerly boundary of Mr. Frank's property° Mr. Frank stated he did not want to impose any undue hardship on Mro Franklin; however, they had been required to build a six foot high concrete block wall along the south boundary of the Plan%at%on Trailer Park, which was an obi%ga%ion of Mr. Franklin's~ and for which a bond had been posted. This agreement, in effect,mos merely trading construction of walls~ 5436 ~,lty Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Mr, Frank further advised they did not object to two story construction, providing a few trees were planted along the wall for screening and further, that the windows facing toward the proposed trailer park be raised, which he had been informed were Mr~ Franklin's plans. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-80 (POLICY): Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-80 for adoption, makin9 it a findin9 and Policy of the City Council that R-3 two story development or approved development mould be allowed next to R-A zoned property which has been developed or approved for development for uses other than those specifically permitted in the R-A Zone. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM INTERPRETING ~q4E R-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ZONE REQUIREMENTS WITH REFERENCE TO TWO STORY BUILDINGS AND ESTABLISHING A POLICY OF THE CITY COUNCIL WITH REFERENCE THERETO. On roll call 'the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry and Thompson, None~ Schutte~ Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No~ 62R-80 duly passed and adoptedo REQUEST - SOLICITATION OF FUNDS: Application to solicit funds for religious pur- poses submitted by' Rev~ David O. Champion of the Western Missionary Army was considered. Reference was made to the Anaheim Municipal Code, pertaining to regulations governing solicitation of fundso At the conclusion of Council discussion~ it was moved by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Chandler, that said request be denied on the basis that the application was not in proper form, and that the City Clerk or City Attorney forward to the Western Missionary Army necessary form for correct application° MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NOo 61-62-48 - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 179~ AND VARIANCE NO. 1420: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-48: Submitted by Edward D, and Viola Griggs, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R.-3, property located on the west side of Knott Avenue between Lincoln and Orange Avenues (9181 Knott Avenue). City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 177, Series 1961-62~ reco:mended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: Subject 'to the approval of Petitions for Conditional Use Permi~ Nco 179 and Variance NCo 1420o 2. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2o 3, Installation of landscaping in the proposed ~n~ranc~ way of subjec~ property in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, said landscapin9 to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection. 4. Dedication of 53 feet from the monumented centerline of Knott Avenue (30 feet exzsting)o Preparation of street :mprovement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Knott Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance ~ith the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer, 5437 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINU/ES - January 30~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. 6. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Knott Avenue. 7. Payment 'of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 8. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division~ which are' adeq~/a%~ in-size, accessible %o trash-truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed-by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection. 9. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the westerly 300 feet of the southerly boundary of subject property, along the westerly 344 fee% of subject property, and along the westerly 300 feet of %he northerly boundary of subject property, said walls to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection. 10. Posting of a bond for an eighteen (18) month's period of time to insure the ins%alia%ion of walls in accordance with the requirements of Code, Section 18.32.090, along the northerly and southerly boundaries of the easterly eighty (80) fee% of subject property. 11. Subject to %he approval of construction plans for the installation of carports by %he Building and Planning Departments, with the stipulation that the rear wall of %he proposed carports may be constructed a% the location of the required walls in which case the rear walls shall be at least the equivalent of a six (6) foot masonry wallo 12o Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 4, 5, and 6. Mr. Martin Kreidt noted %he location of the property and surrounding uses thereof, and summarized the action of the City Planning Commission. Regarding the 33°62 R-A road easement~ he stated it was assumed this property would be taken into ownership by the adjacent R-1 property owners to the West. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney appearing on behalf of %he applicant, addressed the Council and presented revised plans explaining the changes made for %he improvement of the development° He reported %he only change not included on the revised plans was the wooden wall of the carports, which will be corrected in accordance with City Planning Commission's recommenda- tions. Mr. John Simpson, 3309 West Deerwood Drive, resident in the general area, addressed the Council objecting %o the large number of variances and conditional use permits being granted in %his area. · He also advised he had not studied %he reclassification application. Mayor Schutte returned to the meeting, 10:30 P.M. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address %he Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed° RESOLUTION NO. 62R-81: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-81 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, in accordance with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission~ substituting, however, Conditions No. 9 and 10 %hereof, to read as follows: "Installation of a six foot-masonry wall around %he entire perimeter of the property as required by %he Anaheim Municipal Code, and %he posting of a bond in an amount satisfactory %o the City Engineer to guaran- tee %he installation of said masonry walls, on demand by Zhe CiZy or aZ Zhe expiration of eighteen months~ whichever occurs sooner." Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING YHAT TITLE 18 OF YHE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD B5 AMENDED AND THAT YHE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61-62-48 - R-3) 5438 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES NOES ABSENT COUNCILMEN:' Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. COUNCILMEN: None. COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared-Resolution No. '62R-'81~duiy passed and adopted. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 179: Submitted requesting permission to establish garden type apartments on property previously described under Reclassification No. 61-62-48~ Clty Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 178, Series 1961-62, granted said Conditional Use Permit No. 179, subject to %he following conditions: 1. Subject to the approval of Petition for Reclassification No. 61-62-48 and Petition for Variance No. 1420~ 2. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos° 1 and 2. 3. Installation of landscaping in the proposed entranceway of subject property in accordance with Exhibit Nos~ 1 and 2, said landscaping to be installed prior %o Final Building Inspection. 4. Dedication of 53 feet from the monumented centerline of Knott Avenue (30 feet existing). 5. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improvements for Knott Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 6. Payment of $2~00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Knott Avenue. 7. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit %o be collected as part of the Buildin9 Permit° 8. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, .access- ible to trash-truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection. 9. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the westerly 300 feet of the southerly boundary of subject property, along the westerly 344 feet of subject property, and along the westerly 300 feet of the northerly boundary of subject property, said walls %0 be installed prior to Final Building Inspection. 10. Posting of a bond for an eighteen (18) month"s period of time to insure the installation of walls in accordance with the requirements of Code, Section 18o32.090, alon9 the northerly and southerly boundaries of the easterly eighty (80) feet of subject property. 11. Subject to the approval of construction plans for the installation of carports by the Building and Planning Departments, with the stipulation %hat the rear wall of the proposed carports may be constructed at the location of the required walls in which case the rear walls shall be at least the equivalent of a six (6) foot masonry wall. 12. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 4, 5~ and 6. The Mayor asked if anyone wished ko address the Council. As evidence pertaining ~o ~his use was ~aken on %he proceeding application, there was no response, and the public hearing was declared clmed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-87: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-82 9ranting Conditional Use Permit No. 179, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, substituting, however, Conditions No. 9 and 10 thereof, to read as follows: "Installation of a six foot masonry wall around the entire perimeter of the property as required by the Anaheim Municipal Code, and the posting of a bond in an amount satisfactory to the City Engineer to guarantee the installation of said masonry walls, on demand of the City or at 'the expiration of eighteen months, whichever occurs sooner." 5439 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 179. On roll call, the foregOing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution.No. 62R-82 duly passed and adopted. VARIANCE NO. 1420: Requesting waiver of "single story height limitations and waiver of enclosed garage and walls on property described in the foregoing Reclassification No. 61-62-48o City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 179, Series 1961-62, granted said Variance subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to the approval of Petition for Reclassification No. 61-62-48 and Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 179. 2. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. 3. Installation of landscaping in the proposed entrance way of subject property in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, said landscaping to be installed prior to Final Buildin9 Inspection. 4. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall alon9 the westerly 300 feet of the southerly boundary of subject property, along the westerly 344 feet of subject property, and alon9 the westerly 300 feet of the northerly boundary of subject property, said walls to be installed prior to Final Buildin9 Inspection. 5o Postin9 of a bond for an eighteen (18) month% period of time to insure the installation of walls in accordance with the requirements of Code, Section 18.32.090, along the northerly an~ southerly boundaries of the easterly eighty (80) feet of subject property. 6. Subject to the approval of construction plans for the installation of carports by the Building and Planning Departments, with the stipulation that the rear wall of the proposed carports may be constructed at the location of the required walls in which case the rear walls shall be at least the equivalent of a six foot masonry wall. 7. Dedication of 53 feet from the monumented centerline of Knott Avenue (30 feet existing). 8. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improvements for Knott Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer° 9. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Knott Avenue. 10. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25°00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 11. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible to trash-truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall~ prior to Final Building Inspection. 12. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 5, 7, 8, and 9. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. As evidence~rtainin9 to this variance was taken on Application 61-62-48, there was no response, and thereupon the Mayor declared the h~arin9 closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-83: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-83 for passage and adoption, 9ranting the variance in accordance with the recommendations of the City Plannin9 Commission; however substituting Con- ditions 4 and 5 with the following: "Installation of a six foot masonry wall around the entire perimeter of the property as required by the Anaheim Municipal Code, and the posting of a bond in an amount satisfactory to the City Engineer or guarantee the installation of said masonry walls, on demand of the City or at the expiration of eighteen months, whichever occurs sooner." 5440 ~ity Hallj Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30j 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NUMBER 1420. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-83 duly passed and adopted. ANAHEIM CIVIL DEFENSF: Mr. Kenneth E. Holloway, Chairman, Anah~m Civil Defense Committee, reported on work of the various committees and presented a General Plan to test the interest of the citizens in Anaheim in Civil Defense. In the General Plan, a survey will be taken to learn the extent of the knowledge of Anaheim citizens regarding Civil Defense affairs, so that further training programs can be formulated. He thereupon requested the week of February 19 to 23, 1962, be proclaimed Civil Defense Week. Councilman Thompson moved the Mayor b~ authorized to proclaim the week of February 19 ta 23, 1962, Civil Defense Week~ Councilman Coons seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED. DANCE PERMIT: Application for public dance permit was submitted by Mr. William S. McTavish, 135 Nest Center Street (McTavish Dance Studio). Mr. Murdoch advised that the dances a% the McTavish Studios have b'e-en pretty much limited %0 those persons obtaining dance instruction, and held regularly every Friday and Saturday night, that %he $1~00 charge is for instructions and not admission; however, the recommendation of %he Chief of Police appears to pertain to dances which are limited to those receiving instruction, and not to a public dance. Mr, Joseph Geisler reported it was his understanding that the dance studio has been in operation for quite some time; however, the Chief of Police recommendations may no% apply to this particular type of activity, as this is a group of teenagers who have only been holding their dances at this location for the last two or three weeks, Mr~ McTavish addressed the Council advising that the teen-age dances have only been within the last four weeks, In his opinion, these dances could not be considered public dances because dance instructions are given, and also because only those invited attend. He felt the more proper definition would be "Instructional Dance". Mr~ Geisler was of the opinion that "Public Dance" was the correct term, as approximately 150 to 200 people attend, and there is no evidence that instructions are given during the dance. The advertisement appearing in a local newspaper offering one- half price for admission was reported, and Mr. McTavish explained that this advertisement was placed in the newspaper without his knowledge. Further discussion was held and the possibility of police problems created by teenagers loitering on the street and alley was considered. At the conclusion thereof, it was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Coons, that this matter be continued one week for further inves- tigation (February 6, 1962, 3:00 P.M.). MOTION CARRIED. ENTERTAINMENT PEPd~IT: Entertainment Permit submitted by Robert W. Spence, Coral Roof Restaurant, 231W. Katella Avenue, was submitted and granted in accor- dance with recommendations of the Chief of Police on motion by Councilman Thompson, seconded by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED. 5441 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30, 1962~ 3:00 P.M. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Entertainment Permit submitted by Basil Bankes, Roberts Room, 819 South Euclid, was submitted and granted in accordance with recommendations of the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Thompson, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. 1422~ PLANS OF ELEVATIQN: Council approval of remodeling plans for the "Hofbrau" type restaurant, 417 South Brookhurst Street, was continued from the meeting of 3anuary 23, 1962 for further informgtion. Mr. Campbell addressed the Council advising that there will be installed two colored glass windows, and the Wood front of the building will be painted "driftwood gray"; that no change is planned for the upper stucco portion of the building. Notation of these details were made on the drawing submitted, and thereupon plans were approved by the City Council on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Coons. MO/ION CARRIED. APPOINTMENTS - CITY PLANNING COMMISSION: It was moved by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Thompson~ that the Mayor appoint Mr. 3ames Chavos member of the City Planning Commission for the four year term ending February~ 1966, replacing position formerly held by Mr. Lee Morris; and that Mr. Horace Camp also be appointed for the four year term ending February, 1966, replacing Mr. Ralph Summers~ MOTION CARRIED. Said appointments were made and unanimously ratified by the City Council. CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION: it was moved by Councilman Coons~ seconded by Councilman Thompson, that Certificate of Appreciation for years of service on the City Planning Commission, signed by all members of the City Council and the City Clerk, be issued to Mr. Raiph Summers. MOTION CARRIED. LEAGUE CONFERENCE ON METROPOLITAN ISSUES: It was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Thompson~ that Councilmen Coons and Chandler represent the City of Anaheim in discussion at the League Conference on Metropolitan Issues to be held in Sacramento~ February 2~ 1962. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-84: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-84 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE AND ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL USES. (Joe Rodriguez - $10,100.00) On roll call, the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None, The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-84 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-85: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-85 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. (Salvador R. Herrera) 5442 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-85 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO, 62R-86: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 62R-86 for passage and adoption. Refer %o Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE AND ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. (Ernest M. Cisneros, $2,360.00) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-86 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-87: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-87 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE AND ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. (Assembly of God of Anaheim, Calif., $250.00 - 5/59th interest in well site) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 62R-87 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE: Mr. Robert Davis, Assistant City Manager, reported on the following informal bids received for labor and material to install six complete street lighting units on Harbor Boulevard between Midway Drive and Katella Avenue, and recommended the acceptance of the iow bid, that of E. D. Johnson Company. E. D. Johnson & Co., Anaheim Gilbert & Stearns, Santa Ana $3~816.00 $3~912.32 Purchase Order was authorized to be issued to the E. D. Johnson Company, the low bidder, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE: Mr. Robert Davis, Assistant City Manager, reported on the following informal bids received for the purchase of two five thousand KVA Medium Sub Station Transformers, and recommended the acceptance of the low bid. 5443 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30~ 1962~ 3:00 Maydwell-Hartzell, Inc., Los Angeles General Electric Co., Los Angeles Parks & Co., Long Beach Garden Grove Electric, Inc., Garden Grove Garland-Affolter, Los Angeles $ 34,105.76 36,160.80 36,816.00 37,598.08 40,830.40 On motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Schutte, purchase was authorized from Maydwell-Hartzell, Inc., the low bmder, in the amount of $34,105.76. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE: Mr. Robert Davis, Assistant City Manager, reported on the following informal bids received for the purchase of 18,000 feet, 3/4" Copper Tubing, and further reported, with the 1% preferential local vendors, Charles A. Estey would be the low bidder. Chas. A. Estey, Anaheim Lord-Babcock, Santa Aha Bell Pipe Co., Anaheim Howard Supply Co., Los Angeles Park-Son, Inc., Los Angeles Haldeman Pipe Co., Anaheim Familian Pipe Co., Anaheim M. E. Gray Co., Los Angeles $ 5,765.76 5,728.32 5,801.33 5,726.45 5,709.60 5,829.20 5,881.82 5,941.73 On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Coons, purchase was authorized from Charles A. £stey, the low bidder. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE: Mr. Robert Davis, Assistant City Manager, reported on the following informal bids received for the purchase of brass fittings, and recommended the acceptance of the low bid~ that of Howard Supply Company. Howard Supply Co~, Los Angeles SUSCO, Fullerton Chas. A. Estey, Anaheim Park-Son, Inco, Los Angeles Republic Supply Coo, Los Angeles Taylor-Jeff, Inc., San Gabriel $ 3,988.40 4,071.60 4,191~20 5,033°60 5,075.20 5,137.60 On motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Schut%e, purchase was authorized from the Howard Supply Company, the low bidder, $3,988.40. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE: Mr. Robert Davis, Assistant City Manager, reported on the following informal bids received for the purchase of steel cylinder concrete pipe and appurtenance, and recommended the acceptance of the low bid. American Pipe & Cons%~ Co~, Los Angeles Southern Pipe Division, Azusa United Concrete Pipe Co~, Baldwin Park $ 5,631.08 5,780.63 9,239.36 On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Coons, purchase was authorized from %he American Pipe and Cons%ruction Company ($5,631o08) the low bidder. MOTION CARRIED. SALE OF CITY EQUIPMENT¶ CLEVELAND TRENCHER: Mr. Robert Davis, Assistant City Manager, reported on informal quotations received for the sale of Cleveland Trencher~ Model 110~ which has been replaced by a trencher recently purchased from the City of Fullerton, and recommended the sale be made to the high bidder, Dale Casada Construction Company of Garden Grove. Dale Casada Construction Co., Garden Grove Nofie Famularo, Capistrano Beach R. H. Nelson Pipe Contracting Coo, Anaheim $ 2,106.00 1,801.00 900.00 5444 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, sale of Cleveland Trencher was authorized to the high bidder in the amount of $2,106.00, plus sales tax, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Coons~ MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-88: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution Noo 62R-88 for passage and adoption, requesting the Orange County Board of Supervisors to permit the City Clerk to render services relating to the City Election. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO PERMIT THE COUNTY CLERK OF SAID COUNTY TO RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON APRIL 10, 1962. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 62R-88 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-89: Councilman Coons offered Resolution Noo 62R-89 for passage and adoption, calling for bids, Job 1241. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE BEACH BOULEVARD SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM APPROXIMATELY 330 FEET SOUTH OF THE CARBON CREEK CHANNEL TO ORANGE AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1241; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORD- ANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.I AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK lO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (B~ds to be opened February 2i, 1962) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutte. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-89 duly passed and adopted. MINUTES: Minutes of Orange County Mosquito Abatement District held January 19, 1962, submitted and ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED. MINUTES: Minutes of Orange County League of Cities meeting held January 11, ~ 6 · 9 2, were ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Coons~ MOIION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1675: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1675 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (60-61-80 - C-1 and R-l) 5445 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1675 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Coons moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded %he motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-90: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-90 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECU/ION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY FOR /HE PAVING OF BALL ROAD BORDERING THE BALL JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and $chutte. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 62R-90 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-91: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-91 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINIS- TRATION OF THE STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. On roll cali the foregoing resolution was duly, passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry, Thompson and Schutteo None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-91 duly passed and adopted. STANFORD RESEARCH REPORT - CONVENTION FACILITIES: Planning factors, projected use, and financial estimates for a major auditorium facility in Anaheim, dated January, 1962, prepared by Sou%hem California Laboratories of Stanford Research Institute, was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED. It was moved by Councilman Thompson, seconded by Councilman Schutte, that the Liaison Committee be continued for the purpose of study and evaluation of the report, and recommendations to %he scope of the project %ha% would be approved and possible ways and means of consumating the project. MOTION CARRIED. APPOINTMENT¶ ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL CO~[~ITTEE: On the recommendations of Mr. Murdoch~ Lester King of the Building Department was appointed Member of the Architectural Control Committee~ replacing Mr. George Jeffries~ who is no longer employed by the Cityl and Mr. V. C. Newton was appointed Alternate Member~ on motion by Councilman Thompson, seconded by Councilman Goons. MOTION CARRIED. 5446 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 30~ 1962, 3:00 P.M. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 57-58-31~ AND 61-62-35~ ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL: It was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler, that the Clty Council approve the plans submitted in Reclassification Proceedings No. 57-58-31 and 61-62-35, as meeting the requirements of %he Architectural Review Board and the conditions of the reclassifications; and that the Mayor and City CIerk be authorized to sign said approval. MOTION CARRIED. (Councilman Coons took no action and did not vote on the above because of a conflict of interest.) CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Nrc Jerry J. Nesmith, 405 South Ohio Street, reported damage to his house caused by a fallen limb during the recent windstorm. On motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Schutte, said claim was denied and ordered referred to the City Attorney and the City's Insurance Agent. MOTION CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE APPLICATION: Application for Double Transfer On-Sale Alco- holic Beverage License submitted by Henry F. and Marie Do Rozema, to be located at 1038 North Magnolia Avenue, Anah~m, California, was submitted. Mr° Geisler reported that this was a C-1 Zone, which does not permit an On-Sale Premise~ On motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Attorney was authorized to file protest on this application because 'the location is not in the proper zone for this use° MOTION CARRIED. CLARIFICATION OF COUNCIL ACTION~ RECLASSIFICATIONS NOS. 61-62-46 and 61-62-49: It was moved by Councilman Thompson, seconded by Councilman Coons, to clarify as follows the action taken January 16, 1962, on the above captioned Reclasslf~cat~ons, and that necessary resolutions be prepared accordingly~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 6].-62-.46 (Resolution No~ 62R-32): Cond:tlon No, 5 of City Planning Commission: The wall be a "six foot masonry wall". Condition No.. 8 of City Planning Commission: "Prior to Final Bull. ding Inspection" be omitted° Condition Nco i. 2 of City Planning Commission: To include numbers 5 and 8~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-49 (Resolut:on No. 62R-33): Condition No. 4: Wall referred 'to be a "six foot masonry wall". Condit:~on Nco I1: include numbers 7, 9, 12 and 13. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURN: Councilman Coons moved to adjourn~ Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 12:45 A. 1~4. Ci[,y Clerk