1962/03/275584
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 20, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons and Fry.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-295 duly passed
and adopted.
REFUNDS - TRACTS NOS. 3438, 3706, 3824, 3854, 4095, AND 4165 (Marian Develop-
ment~ Inc.): On report and recommendation of Mr. Dawson, Assistant City
Attorney, Councilman Chandler moved that it be the finding of the City
Council that delays in annexation proceedings in the area of subject
tracts were caused by the City; therefore, time limits for water refunds
on subject tracts are extended and refunds hereby authorized. Councilman
Coons seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-17: The City Attorney's Office was requested to
investigate the conditions pertainin9 to Reclassification No, 61-62-17
to determine if the owner is in a position to complete the proposed
project,
HOUSE MOVING PERMIT, 1825 WEST ORANGE AVENUE: The City Attorney's Office was
requested to investigate the status of the House Moving Permit granted
pursuant to Resolution No. 5964, in April, 1960, as said dwelling remains
in an unfinished condition.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Coons moved to adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 8:10 P.M.
SIGNED:
City Clerk
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry and Schutte.
COUNCILMEN: Thompson.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Joe Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
MINUIES: Minutes of the regular meetings held March 13, 1962 and March 20, 1962,
were approved on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Chandler.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-296: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-296 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
5585
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIR-
ECTING THE PAYMENT O~ DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF MARCH 27, 1962.
(Warrants Nos. 17215 to 17413, both inclusive, totaling $446,640.08)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNC I LMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNC I LMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry and Schutte.
None.
Thompson.
'The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-296 duly passed and adopted,
PUBLIC HEARING, PROPOSED ABANDONMENT: Pursuant to Resolution No. 62R-207, duly
published in the Anaheim Bulletin in accordance with law, and posted notices,
public hearing was held on the proposed abandonment of a portion of an
existing alley located briefly, south of Midway Drive between Zeyn Street
and Los Angeles Street.
The City Clerk reported that a request to maintain a permanent
easement was filed by the Southern Counties Gas Company and later withdrawn
when it was learned that this easement was no longer required by them to
serve this area.
The Mayor asked if' anyone wished to address 'the Council, there
being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-29'7: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 69R-297 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE
VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF AN ALLEY AND AN EASEMENT FOR
ALLEY PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS AND ALONG THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL
PROPERTY.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry and Schutte.
None.
Thompson.
'The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-297 duly passed and adopted.
DINNER-DANCE PERMIT - BIG DUDE RESTAURANT, 10879 SANTA ANA FREEWAY (MANCHESTER
AVENUE): Notice to L. E. Cole to appear and show cause why Dinner-Dancing Permit
previously :ssued should not be revoked, was submitted and read.
It was reported that said notice sent by certified mail had been
returned undelivered.
~,Ir. Geisler, Assistant City Attorney, reported that he had con-
tacted Mr. Hugh Proctor, one of the principals, by telephone, and was
advised that the establishment was closed, and that they probably would
not appear on this issue.
Councilman Chandler reported he had aisc advised Mr. J. C.
Proctor of this pending action.
Mayor Schutte asked if Mr. Cole or any of the other principals
in the business was present. There was no response.
5586
~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27~ 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Councilman Coons moved that the Dinner-Dancin9 Permit previously
9ranted August 8, 1961, to L. E. Cole for Dinner-Dancin9 at the "Bi9 Dude"
Restaurant, 10879 Santa Ann Freeway, be revoked on the 9rounds of the
violation set forth in the Notice to Appear and Show Cause, and also on
the 9rounds of the Police Department investigation' which is to be included
as a part of this action. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
POLICY OY THE COUNCIL: Policy of the Council regardin9 the use of City equip-
ment and materials in the development of recreational facilities on
privately owned property was deferred to the next meetin9 (April 3, 1962)
to allow the City Manager an opportunity to review the City Attorney's
opinion.
EAST ANAHEIM BABE RUTH LEAGUE: Request for City assistance in the development
of a baseball field on privately owned property was ordered deferred to
the next meeting (April 3, 1962) pending report of the City Manager,
USE OF LA PALMA PARK: Request of Orange County Campfire Girls to have "overnight
campout" in La Palms Park, August 9, 1962, was submitted and recommended by
the Park and Recreation Department, subject to the followin9 conditions:
1. All tents to be located in one area of the park, preferably the
interior and definitely away from adjacent homes.
2. No tent pegs over 8" to be used without checkin9 with park personnel to
ascertain location of existing water lines.
3. No fires be allowed on turfed areas. Fires should be built in brazier
units provided or on dirt area north of developed portion of the park.
4. Portable rest rooms located on the premises are to be used for all
sanitation requirements.
5. All dressing or disrobing must be done inside tents or special enclo-
sures they might provide.
6. Keep all activities (organized or unorganized) away from shrubs, trees
and/or flower beds.
Said request was granted in accordance with the recommendations of
the Park and Recreation Department on motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by
Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED.
.ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Application of Willard C. Compton for Entertainment Permit
at 1827 West Katella Avenue ('The Twenties) was submitted.
Chief of Police Mark A. Stephenson verbally recommended the grant-
ing of said permit, however noted that the business was not yet established
as the structure was in final s~age of completion.
Councilman Coons moved on the basis of the Chief of Police's
recommendation said permit be 9ranted when the establishment is opened for
business. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
SIGN APPLICATION: Application from Dace Construction Corporation for permit to
erect a roof sign at 1600 West Broadway advertisina "Sherwood Riviera
Garden Apartments" was submitted. ~
Said permit was granted on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded
by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED.
After further investigation it was learned that this was an R-3
area, a zone wherein roof signs are normally prohibited.
Councilman Coons moved that the previous action taken granting said
sign permit be rescinded. Councilman Fry seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
5587
~.jty Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Further discussion was held regarding the possibility of more than
one sign on the project~ inasmuch as one twenty foot sign would be allowed
in this zone for each buildin9.
Mr. Bob Duerrosse, representing the proposed manufacturer of the
sign, addressed the Council stating he was certain Mr. Buccola would agree
that there would be no other advertising sign in the apartment development.
He further advised that the face of this sign would be sheet metal and the
only illumination would be the letters on the sign.
Further action by the City Council was ordered deferred to the
next meeting (April 3, 1962) for the filth9 of a letter of agreement by Mr.
Buccola.
SIDEWALK WAIVER: Request of Robert Clagett for waiver of sidewalks at 1057 West
Ball Road and 92 feet on the west side of West Street at Vermont, extended,
was submitted.
Mr. Maddox recommended temporary waiver be granted and stated
installation of sidewalks would be requested when 'the property to the East
develops.
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, temporary waiver of
sidewalk requirement was granted on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded
by Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED.
SIDEWALK WAIVER: Request of B. W. Stevens for sidewalk waiver at 3305 Thornton
Avenue was submitted.
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, temporary waiver of
sidewalk requirement was granted on motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by
Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
FINAL MAP~ TRACT NO. 4408: Final Map was submitted by Greschner Investment
Corporation, developers, located at the northwest corner of Lewis and
Cerritos Streets, containing 18 M-1 lots.
City Engineer James Maddox recommended approval of said Final Map
and further reported that the tract contained a "Lot A" on the westerly
portion of the tract and a satisfactory irrevocable offer to dedicate has
been obtained, that bonds have been posted, necessary fees paid, and the
Final Map conforms substantially with the Tentative Map previously approved.
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Final Map of Tract
No. 4408 was approved on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by
Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED.
NEW COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODF: Mr. Murdoch recommended regulations governing
types of industrial development in areas zoned M-1 be considered by the City
Attorney in the preparation of the new Comprehensive Zonin9 Code.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 56-57-48 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT NO. 81: Correspondence
dated March 21, 1962, submitted by Mr. L. A. Mucken%haler requesting per-
mission to remove Deed Restriction~ recorded June g, 1957, and stating
reasons therefor, was submitted.
Subject files were reviewed by the City Council.
Mr. David Collins addressed the Council stating that they were
only askin9 for removal of the Deed Restrictions on the northerly 230 feet
of the Muckenthaler property, being that portion of the property to be
developed as a Post Office, and agreed to furnish the description of the
property affected by this request. He further advised that the C-1 Zoning
5588
~ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M,
now pending would be finalized upon 'the payment to the City of Anaheim
of $1,922.15 for sidewalk installation, and that there are instructions
in the escrow for the sale of the property to pay this amount to the City
of Anaheim from the proceeds of the sale.
Discussion was held by the City Council and it was determined
that the Special Use Permit would not be valid unless reclassification of
the property was completed. Mr. Geisler suggested the sellor deposit a
certified check in the amount owing the City with the City Attorney's
Office to be refunded when the money is paid from the escrow. Suggestion
of Mr. Geisler was agreed to by Mr. Collins.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Chandler moved
that it be the findin9 of the City Council that plans submitted June 20,
1961, are sufficient to fulfill the requirements qf the Architectural
Control Committee, that no further review of the plans be necessary unless
substantial changes are made, and further moved that revocation of the
Deed Restrictions as to the north 230 feet of the subject property be
approved at the time of the issuance of 'the Occupancy Permit. Councilman
Coons seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 186: Pursuant to Resolution No. 62R-27, permission
was 9ranted to construct, use and maintain a Theater-Convention Hall on
property briefly described as located east of Harbor Boulevard, north of
Katella Avenue (east and adjacent to the Charter House).
Mr. Leo Freedman addressed the Council requesting permission to
proceed at this time with a temporary canvass top to the theater project
for a three year period commencin9 November 1, 1962, after which the
permanent concrete dome would be constructed~ all of the conditions and
requirements of 'the Conditional Use Permit to be met at this time.
Discussion was held, and Mr. Geisler was of the opinion that if
this was permitted under the Conditional Use Permit, the amendment made
would be a substantial change and recommended re-opening of the hearing.
Mr. Geisler further reported that Section 3.32.020 regulated temporary
tent shows, however required a business license of $100.00 the first
day, and $50.00 per day thereafter.
It was determined that the earliest date a re-hearing could be
scheduled would be four weeks from this date.
Mr. Freedman explained the urgency of his request and that
further delay would cause probable loss of the project.
Mr. Geisler further explained the provisions of Section 3.32.020
regulatin9 a temporary tent show, which is specific. He stated that the
re-hearing on the Conditional Use Permit, which is a permanent activity and
outside this provision~ could be held.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was noted by
Councilman Coons that the applicant would be able to start his construction,
however would be runnin9 the risk that the 'use he requested would be
denied, that any action taken by the City Council on the temporary tent
provision would in no way pre-determine the result of the hearing.
Councilman Chandler felt that any temporary structures should have a
very strong reason for them, and stated he was opposed to temporary struc-
tures of all types.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Coons moved that
~r. Freedman be granted a temporary permit for a tent under the provisions
of Section 3.32.020 for a period of 1.20 days from June 1, 1962, and that
Conditional Use Permit No. 186 be set. for re-hearing April 24, 1962, 7:00
P.M., to consider his request for the use of a tent on a temporary basis
for the period of time requested. Councilman Fry seconded the motion.
¥o this motion Councilman Chandler voted "No". MOTION CARRIED.
(See page 5605 for further action on this matter.
~itv Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 97~ 1962, 3:00 P.M.
HI NEIGHBOR DAY: Communication dated March 27, 1969, submitted by Jack Barber,
Gentry Brothers Circus, requesting permission for the Anaheim Lions Club
to sponsor their performance in La Palma Park Friday night, May 18, 1962,
from approximately 7:30 P.M. to 10:00 P.M., stating the types of shows to
be presented, the measures that would be taken by them for protection,
requesting access to the grounds at 3:00 P.M. in the afternoon of the
18th, was read by Mr. Murdoch.
The Park and Recreation Director, Mr. William Stronach,
recommended the request be granted, subject to the following provisions:
1. Right to waive the 3:00 P.M. Friday, May 18 "move in" time until
after the C.I.F. Baseball playoff game in the event Anaheim makes the
playoff.
2. Location of stakes, rings, etc., to be determined by Park and Recrea-
tion Department to preven[ damage to sprinkler iines, etc.
3. Right to require additional padding in any riding rings, etc.
4. Subject to existing fees and charges scheduled.
Wr. Warren L. Schutz introduced Mr. Jack Barber, operator of the
show, who stated in the event there was a ballgame played in the park at
that time, a later time for "move in" would be perfectly agreeable to them.
If necessary, they could set up the show as late as 5:00 P.W.
Councilman Fry moved that the reques[ be granted, subject to the
recommendations of the Park and Recreation Director, and further subject to
an adjustment in the time to set up the facilities. Councilman Schutte
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Coons did not vote on 'the above issue.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 54-55-6: Request of Loran D. Covinqton of Covington Brothers
Construction Company for permission to post a bond ~n lieu of constructing
a wall at this time, and stating his reasons hherefor, was submitted.
On motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Fry, the
applicant was granted permission to post a bond for a period not to exceed
six months in lieu of constructing the required wall at this time. MOTION
CARRIED.
LEASE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY FOR THE PRODUCTION OF OIL~ GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBONS:
Mr. Joseph Geisler, Assistant City Attorney, submitted and read opinion of
the City Attorney's Office pertaining to 'the bids received from Standard Oil
Company for the lease of City-owned property, which in conclusion found the
bids of the Standard Oil Company to be leqal and recommended their accep-
tance. -
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-298: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-298
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A LEASE TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE LEASING
OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY FOR OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES WITHIN
THE LEASE KNOWN AS THE STANDARD OIL COMPANY KELLOGG LEASE. (Kellogg Exploratory
Area, Resolution 62R-139)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILWEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry and Schutte.
None.
Thompson.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-298 duly passed and adopted.
5590
~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 2?, 1962~ 3:00
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-299: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No, 62R-299
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITTM O? AUAHEI~ ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWAPF, tNG A LEASE TO THE LOWFSF RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE LEAS-
lNG OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY FOE OIL, GAS AND OIliER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES
WIIHIN T[~E LEASE KP,~OWN AS THE STANDARD OIL COMPANY NAGNOLIA LEASE.
(~?iagnolia Exploratory Area, Resolution No. 62R-140)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry and Schutte.
None.
Thompson.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-299 duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-300: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-300
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND A~ARDING A LEASE TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE LEAS-
ING OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY FOR OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES
WITHIN THE LEASE KNOWN AS THE STANDARD OIL COMPANY BROOKHURST LEASE.
(Brookhurst Exploratory Area, Resolution No. 62R-lal)
On roll call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNC i LMEN:
NOES: COUNC I LMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILE~EN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry and Schutte,
None.
Thompson.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-300 duly passed and adopted.
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their
meeting held March 5, 1962, pertainin9 to the following applications, were
submitted for City Council information and consideration:
VARIANCE NO. 1440 - Submitted by Robert H. Miles, City Planning
Commission Resolution No. 250, Series 1961-62, 9ranting Variance No. 1440.
VARIANCE NO. 1450 - Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Robert W. Hahn,
,City Plannin9 Commission Resolution No. 251 Series 1961-62, granting
Variance No. 1450.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 210 - Submitted by Rhea R. Sparlin9,
City Planning Commission Resolution No. ~52, Series 1961-62, 9rantin9
Conditional Use Permit No. 210.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 211 - Submitted by Mr. and Mrs.
Richard D. Calvert, City Planning Commission Resolution No. 253, Series
1961-62, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 211.
No further action was taken by the City Council on the above
numbered applications.
POLICY OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REGARDING WALL REQUIREMENTS: Excerpts
of the City Planning Commission meeting,held March 5, 1962, setting forth
the policy of the Planning Commission unanimously adopted by the Commission,
pertaining to wall requirements and landscaping wherever tracts are being
developed adjacent to an existin9 or proposed freeway or arterial highway,
was submitted.
5591
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
It was considered that periodic joint meetings between the City
Council and City Planning Commission would be helpful in considering zoning
policies, and that such a meeting should be scheduled as soon as possible
after the Municipal Election. As result~ Council action on the above policy
was deferred until after joint meeting is held.
CITY PLANNING CON~ISStON OFFICERS: The City Planning Commission reported the
following re-appointments:
Melbourne A. Oauer, Chairman.
Robert W. Mungall, Vice-Chairman.
Jean Page, Secretary.
Said report was ordered received and filed on motion by Council-
man Coons, seconded by Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED.
PLANNING STUDY 15-21-1: Planning Study of the area located on the south side
of Ball Road extending easterly from Dale Avenue to the Edison Company
easement was forwarded to the City Council for approval.
Mr. Martin Kreidt explained said study, and advised of the pending
R-3 Reclassification 61-62-84 and Variance No. 1452. He further advised
that the City Plannin9 Commission recommended Exhibit No. 3.
Councilman Coons suggested that the Study be received and taken
under advisement, to be considered at the time of a public hearing on
Reclassification No. 61-62-84 and Variance No. 1452 (April 17, 1962).
PLANNING STUDY 33-28-3: Pertaininq to the area located on the east and west
sides of Webster Avenue between Orange Avenue and Ball Road,
Mr. Martin Kreidt reported that the study was initiated resulting
from applications for Reclassification 61-62-52 and Conditional Use Permit
No. 184 (said applications withdrawn at the City Planning Commission meeting)~
that the people in the area were not presently interested in having their
properties rezoned; however, the City Planning Commission recommended a low
density of multiple family be projected for this area, providing the density
does not exceed Code requirements, thereby allowinq the establishment of
more 'than one dwelling on these parcels of property, and recommended and
requested Council endorsement of Exhibit No. 4 projecting low density in
the area with business and professional on the Ball Road frontage.
Discussion was held and consideration given to the size and shapes
of the parcels in the area. At the conclusion thereof, Councilman Coons
moved to accept the Planning Commission's recommendations and Planning Study
No. 33-28-3, Exhibit No. 4, as a guide for the development of the area.
Councilman Fry seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: Councilman Coons moved to recess to 7:00 O'Clock P.M.
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Schut%e called the meeting %0 order.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry and Schutte.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Thompson.
Councilman Fry
IN MEMORIAL - COUNCILMAN JOSEPH R. THOMPSON: Reverend Saville of St. Michael's
Episcopal Church, in memory of Councilman Joe R. Thompson, read a passage
from the Scriptures which was a favorite of Mr. Thompson's, from the 8th
Chapter of Epistles of St. Paul to the Romans. At the conclusion of the
reading of the Scripture, those present stood and the invocation was given
by Reverend Saville.
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Schutte led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag.
RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCF: The following Resolution of Condolence was offered
by Councilman Chandler:
A RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE
WHEREAS, Divine Providence has seen fit to remove from our
midst our fellow councilman, Joseph R. Thompson; and
WHEREAS, during the years of his residence he devoted his
efforts and gave unsparingly of his time to the upbuilding of the commun-
ity in which he lived without any thought of the personal sacrifice, or
the effect upon his health, or his own personal interests of the time and
effort devoted to the public service; and
WHEREAS, he served the people of Anaheim as a member of the
Anaheim School Board from 1954 to 1957, and as a member of the City
Planning Commission from 1949 to 1959, and as a member of the City Council
from 1959 to the time of his death; and
WHEREAS, the loss of the association and helpful guidance of
Joe as a friend and fellow councilman will be keenly felt by the members
of the City Council and the officials of the City of Anaheim who held
him in high esteem for his integrity, clear judgment, and fairness in the
conduct of the affairs of the City of Anaheim.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Anaheim that it deeply mourns the passing of Joseph R. Thompson and
on behalf of the people of Anaheim, it extends its deepest sympathy to
his wife, Mary, and to his son, Joseph Thompson, Jr., and other members
of his family.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be spread upon the
minutes of the City Council and a copy thereof be forwarded to his wife~
Mary Thompson.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this
27th day of March, 1962.
ATTEST:
/s/ Dene M. Williams
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM
/s/ A. J. Schutte
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
/s/ Odra L. Chandler
COUNCILMAN
, /s/ Rector L. Coons
COUNC I LMAN
(SEAL
/s/ Glenn G. Fry
COUNCILMAN
The foregoing resolution was unanimously adopted.
Mayor Schutte requested two minutes of silent prayer.
5593
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-62: Submitted by Francis W. and
Margaret D. Elliott, requesting permission to chanue C-l, Restricted Access
to Cemetary Road to C-l, Unrestricted Access to Cemetary Road; property
located on the northeasterly corner of Lincoln Avenue and La Plaza Street
and further described as 1400 East Lincoln Avenue.
The City Plannin9 Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
233, Series 1961-62, forwarded said Reclassification Application to City
Council without recommendation.
Communication dated March 6, 1962, from Robert MacMahon,
Attorney, requesting continuance of said public hearin9 for a period of
one month, for the reason that Leo J. Friis, Attorney representing Mr.
Elliott is in the hospital, was submitted and read.
Councilman Coons moved that said request of continuance be
9ranted~ and that the public hearin9 on Reclassification No, 61-62-63 be
continued to April 24, 1962, 7:00 O'Clock P.M. Councilman Chandler
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Ira Richards, 1497 Birch Street, addressed the Council in
opposition to the continuance, being of the opinion that preferential treat-
ment was being given as the applicants have had sufficient time to prepare
their case as this matter has been before the Council several times.
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-79 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 203:
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-79: Submitted by Edward J. and Helen J. Fisher,
requesting permission to change zones from R-A to C-3 on parcel number 1,
and from R-A to R-3 on parcel number 2, property located on the north side
of Orange Avenue between Knott Avenue and Holder Street, its southeast corner
being approximately 172 feet west of the northwest corner of Orange and
Knott Avenues.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
246, Series 1961-62~ recommended that reclassification to C-3 on parcel
number 1 be denied, and that reclassification to R-3 on parcel number 2
be approved~ subject to the following conditions:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit ~os. 1, 2 and 3
subject to the written approval of the Fire Chief of the Anaheim Fire
Department.
2. Subject to the approval of Petition for Conditional Use Permit No.
203 for the establishment of a planned unit development on Parcel No.
2 of subject property and the establishment of a service station on
Parcel No. 1 of subject property.
3. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the west, north, and
209 foot portion of the easterly boundary line prior to Final Building
Inspection.
4. Dedication of 45 feet from the monumented centerline of Orange Avenue
(40 feet existing).
5, Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all
improvements for Orange Avenue and Knott Avenue, subject to the approval
of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans
on file in the Office of the City Engineer.
6. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting PUrposes on Orange
Avenue.
7. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be
collected as part of the Building Permit.
8. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public
Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible to
trash-truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall,
prior to Final Building Inspection.
9. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment
of Item Nos. 5, 6 and 7.
~.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 202: Submitted by Edward J. and Helen J.
Fisher, requesting permission to construct a multiple family planned unit
development and service station on property described in Reclassification
No. 61-62-79.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
24V, Series 1961-62, 9ranted said Conditional Use Permit for the erection
of a service station on Parcel No. 1, and a planned unit development on
Parcel No. 2, subject to the following conditions:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3
subject to the written approval of the Fire Chief of the Anaheim Fire
Department.
2. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the west, north and 209
foot portion of the easterly boundary line prior to Final Building
Inspection.
3. Dedication of 53 feet from the monumented centerline of Knott Avenue
(30 feet existing).
4. Dedication of 45 feet from the monumented centerline of Orange Avenue
(40 feet existing).
5. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all
improvements for Orange Avenue and Knott Avenue, subject to the approval
of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans
on file in the office of the City Engineer.
6. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lightin9 purposes on Orange
Avenue and Knott Avenue.
7. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwellin9 unit to be
collected as part of the Building Permit.
8. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible
to trash-truck pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall,
prior to Final Building Inspection.
9. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment
of Item Nose. 3, 4, 5 and 6.
Mr. Martin Kreidt indicated on the map the location of subject
property and the existin9 land uses in this area, and briefly summarized
the evidence presented to the City Planning Commission at their hearing,
and their findings and recommendations resulting therefrom, and specifically
referred to Finding No. 3 of City Planning Commission Resolution No.246,
which reads as follows:
That it is hereby recommended that the proposed reclassification of
Parcel No. 1 to the C-3, Heavy Commercial Zone, be denied, and that
said Parcel No. 1 remain in the R-A, Residential Agricultural' Zone,
and that the establishment of a service station on said Parcel No. 1
be established under the conditions of Conditional Use Permit No. 203.
Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council and the
Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mr. Jack Wolgen, 3353 Aida Lane, representing the third district
of the Westridge Civic Association, addressed the Council advising that the
owners of single family residential property in this area are of the opinion
that they are slowly being engulfed by multiple residential units, which are
not compatible to the area as to zoner architectural design or quality of
construction; that regarding the request for service station, he advised of
the number of existing stations in this immediate area, and was of the
opinion that the community need did not warrant any additional service
s~atlons.
Mr. Bill Asawa, 925 South Beach Boulevard, Authorized Agent,
addressed the Council explaining the proposed garden type development, and
advised that subject property is not a large parcel of land and that their
development would be limited to the precise plan submitted.
5595
Cit Hall Anaheim California - COUNCIL MINU/ES - M_Arch 27 1962 3:00 P.M._
Mr. Benzer, 509 South Knott Avenue, property owner adjacent to
subject property, addressed the Council being of the opinion that there
should be a master plan for the entire strip of property from Orange Avenue
to Lincoln Avenue, that he was opposed to the service station as'being a
very undesirable use in this neighborhood. He further advised that he had
approached his adjoining neighbors regarding a possible development on their
combined three parcels, but such development did not materialize.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearth9 closed.
Mr. Chip Chasen, one of the developers, addressed the Council
calling attention to the Power Station across the street, which he con-
sidered an M-1 use, and advised that they would not have proposed a service
station at the corner if their studies had not shown such a use was
warranted. He further explained their proposed plans for the garden type
apartments, and advised that the only two story construction would be over
the recreational and utility area.
Discussion was held by the City Council regarding the need for
a survey and analysis of the existing R-3 in the City of Anaheim, and the
relationship to the R-1 areas.
R~ESOLUTION NO. 62R-30]: Councilman Coons offered Resolution'No. 62R-301
for passage and adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance
changing the zone from R-A to R-3 on Parcel No. 2, subject to the recommen-
dations of the City Planning Commission, with the following amendment to
Condition No. 9 thereof:
9. Time limitation of 180 days for the accomplishment of Items Nos. 4, 5
and 6.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (61-62-79 - R-3)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followirg vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons and Fry.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Thompson.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-301 duly passed and adopted.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council on matters
pertaining to Conditional Use Permit No. 203, there being no response, de-
clared the hearing closed.
In answer to Councilman Coons' question, Mr. Mercado, Agent,
advised that the proposed two story construction would be three units in the
center of the planned unit development, and within 150 feet of R-A property~
however, because of the type of construction, he did not believe they would
be undesirable in any way to the adjoining property.
R~ESOLUTION NO. 62R-307: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-30~ for
passage and adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. ~03, subject to
the recommendations of the City Planning Commission with the following
amendment to Condition No. 1 thereof:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibits Nos. 1, 2 and 3,
subject to the written approval of the Fire Chief of the Anaheim Fire
Department, and further subject to the provision that /he entire develop-
ment be limited to one story construction.
5596
~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CON-
DITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 203.
On roll cal.1 the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, Fry and Schutte.
None.
Thompson.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-302 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-80: Submitted by LeRoy B. and Bonnie
L. Penhall, requesting a change of zone from C-2 to M-1 on property located
on the southerly side of Center Street between Manchester Avenue and the
Santa Ana Freeway, its northwesterly corner bein9 approximately 150 feet
east of the southeasterly corner of Center Street and Manchester Avenue
and further described as 1408 West Center Street.
The City Plannin9 Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
248, S~ries 1961-62, recommended said reclassification subject to the
following conditions:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1,
2. Provision of a ten (10) foot decorative block wall on the northerly
property line as indicated on Exhibit No. 1 with the installation of
landscapin9 in accordance with said Exhibit.
3. Installation of adequate landscaping alon9 the easterly boundary of
subject property to screen subject property from the freeway right-
of-way, plans for said landscapin9 to be submitted to and subject to
the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance,
Mr. Martin Kreidt indicated on the map the location of subject
property and the existin9 land uses and zonin9 in this area, and briefly
summarized the evidence presented to the City Plannin9 CommisSion at their
hearing, and advised that the Commission was ~f the opinion that the pro-
posed use was a reasonable request because of the size of the property and
the proximity of existing M-1 property. He specifically referred to
Findin9 No. 5 of City Plannin9 Commission's Resolution No. 248, Series
1961-62, which reads as follows:
That due to the proposed industrial use of the subject property, it is
hereby recommended to the City Council that the installation of sidewalks
be waived.
Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council, and the
Mayor asked if the applicant was present and wished to be heard.
Mr. Penhall, applicant, indicated his presence in the audience,
and advised he would be willing to answer any questions the Council might
have.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response~ declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-303: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-3-3
for passage and adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance
chan9in9 the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City
Planning Commission with the following amendment to Condition No. 2 thereof:
2. Provision of ten lineal feet of ten foot high decorative block wall on
the northerly property line as indicated on Exhibit No. 1, with the
installation of landscaping in accordance with said Exhibit.
5597
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANCED. (61-62-80 - M-i)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons, Fry and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Thompson.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-303 duly passed and adopted.
Mayor Schutte left the meeting, 8:05 P.M. Mayor Pro Tem Fry called
for the next item of business.
PUBLIC HEARING~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 209: Submitted by Chip Chasen,
requesting permission to establish a service station on property located on
the southwest corner of Ball Road and Dale Avenue.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 242,
Series 1961-62, denied said Conditional Use Permit. Appeal from action taken
by the City Planning Commission was filed by the authorized agent, and
public hearing scheduled this date before the City Council.
Communication dated March 14, 1962, from Mr. Ray Mercado acting
as Agent for Chip Chasen, applicant, requesting continuance of said public
hearing to the meeting of April 24, 1962, was submitted.
Councilman Coons moved that the applicant's request be granted,
and that the hearing on Conditional Use Permit No. 202 be continued to
April 24, 1962, 7:00 P.M. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing was ordered scheduled to further consider
requirements of dedication and improvement of alley pertaining to the
following applications:
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-46, located at the southeast corner of the
intersection of Harbor Boulevard and Water Street, further described as
600-608 South Harbor Boulevard (Ordinance No. 1679, Baney property only).
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-49, located on the westerly side of Harbor
Boulevard between Water a~nd South Streets, and further described as 715
South Harbor Boulevard (Ordinance No. 1686).
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-64, located on the westerly side of Harbor
Boulevard between Water Street and South Street, and further described
as 625 South Harbor Boulevard (Resolution of Intent No. 62R-197).
Communication dated March 26, 1962, from Allen D. and Ruth D.
Brakke, 714 South Pine Street, requesting that the owner of the property
at 715 South Harbor Boulevard (Reclassification No. 61-62-49) be required
to place steel posts set in cement along the alley at %he rear of their
property as a protection for their fence and lot from cars using the alley
as an exit or entrance to subject commercial property, was submitted and
read.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
5598
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27~ 1962~ ~..:.00 P~.M.
Mr. Delmar Pebley, owner of property at 600 South Palm Street
(Reclassification Not 61-62-46) addressed the Council advising that his
commercial business at the southeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and Water
Street was presently operating under a variance; that if widening of the
alley was required, his parking area off the alley would be practically
eliminated. He was of the opinion that any expense for the improvement
of the alley should be shared by property owners on both sides of the
alley.
Mr. Ted Williams, 609 South Helena Street, questioned why at
this time it is necessary to make the alleys one-way traffic; that these
alleys to many of the residences act as exclusive access to their homes;
that if the articles could be removed from the alleys, and the alleys cleaned
up, then in essence, they could become s+reets instead of one-way 911eys.
Mr. Earl Vipond, 605 South Harbor Boulevard (Reclassification
No. 61-62-46) concurred with the statements of Mr. Pebley and Mr. Williams~
and was of the opinion that the need for widening the alley or making the
alleys one-way traffic does not exist at the present time.
Mr. George Baney (Reclassification No. 61-62-46) asked whether
the requirement for alley improvement would be blacktop or concrete. He
advised that he would have no objection to the additional dedication for
alley requirements, as his development is presently set back nine feet from
the alley.
Mr. Murdoch advised that the alley standards to be required on
this particular alley has yet to be determined.
Mr. E. G. Cook, 724 South Pine Street, representing the home
owners on the west side of the alley which serves Pine Street (61-62-49
and 61-62-64) was of the opinion that whether or not the traffic goes one
way in the alley is not too material except that it would be safer for the
children, and in any event, requested that speed limits be properly
enforced. He further asked which property owners would bear the cost of
improving the alleys.
Mr. Cook was advised by the Council that the alley improvement
would be a requirement of the commercial zoning.
Mr. George Neamy, 710 South Pine Street, questioned if a portion
Of the alley would be improved with each new zoning application.
Mr. Murdoch explained that in accordance with the Resolution of
Intent, the alleys must be improved or cash or negotiable security deposited
covering the cost of the improvements, prior to actual rezoning of the
property. Mr. Murdoch also read portions of the Traffic Engineer's report
dated 3anuary 10, 196~.
Mayor Pro T%m Fry declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-304: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-304
for passage and adoption, rescinding Resolution No. 62R-182 in Reclassifi-
cation No. 61-62-a9, and rescinding Resolution No. 6~R-184, in Reclassifi-
cation No. 61-62-46; amending Resolution No. 62R-197 in Reclassification
No. 61-62-64 to eliminate the condition which requires recordation of said
resolution; and deleting Condition No. 11 of Resolution No. 62R-33~
Condition No. 14 of Resolution No. 62R-183, and Condition No. 10 of Resolu-
tion No. 62R-197, which conditions require the dedication of a strip of
land seven feet wide for alley widenin9 purposes~ and in lieu thereof, in
each case, the property owners shall provide sufficient setback from the
existin9 alley to provide for proper turning radius into the parking spaces
provided; and shall provide sufficient area to the satisfaction of the
Director of Public Works for the storage of trash containers and receptacles
on the private property~ and not in the alley; further that the property
owner shall install pipes or concrete posts to the satisfaction of the
Director of Public Works on the opposite side of the alley to protect the
residential properties from damage to their fences from cars that might
be turnin9 in or backing out in the alley. That in all other respects,
5599
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
%he conditions of Resolutions Nos. 62R-32 and 6~R-183 in Reclassification
No. 6t-62-46, Resolution No. 62R-33 in Reclassification No. 61-62-49, and
Resolution No. 62R-197 in Reclassification No. 61-6Q-64 shall remain in
full force and effect.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLU-
TIONS 62R-183, 62R-33 AND 62R-197 BY DELETING THEREFROM THE REQUIREMENT
FOR DEDICATION OF ADDITIONAL LAND AT THE REAR OF THE PROPERTIES FOR ALLEY
WIDENING PURPOSES~ AND RESCINDING RESOLUTIONS 62R-184 and 62R-18~.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons and Fry.
None.
Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 6~R-304 duly passed and
adopted.
DEDICATION DEED - ACCESS RIGHTS, HARBOR BOULEVARD: Councilman Coons moved that
the dedication deed of John L. and Eiizabeth J. Waite for all vehicular
access rights which they might have for access on or to Harbor Bouievard
(Reclassification No. 61-62-49) be accepted by the City Council. Councilman
Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Coons
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (8:55 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Pro Tem Fry called the meeting to order, Councilmen
Chandler, Coons and Fry being present; absent, Councilmen Thompson and
Schut%e.
PUBLIC HEARING~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 206: Submitted by C. E. Hurley,
requesting permission to establish a children's Day Nursery School on
property located on the south side of Orange Avenue between Magnolia Avenue
and Webster Street (2510 West Orange Avenue).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 243,
Series 1961-62, denied said Conditional Use Permit. Public hearing before
the City Council was scheduled, resulting from appeal from action taken by
the City Planning Commission, filed by the Authorized Agent.
Mr. Martin Kreidt pointed out the location of the property and
stated that the subject property was located in that area covered by
Planning Study 33-28-3, which was considered earlier in this meeting by
the City Council. He stated the present uses of the properties in the
area and further reported on the evidence submitted to the City Planning
Commission resulting in their findings and denial of the application.
Mrs. Nola Hatch, 436 East Commonwealth, Fullerton, California,
addressed the Council noting on the area map the property owners favoring
the nursery school and also noted the location of schools already in the
area. She explained changes in their plan since the City Planning Commi-
sion meeting, one being to place all the playground area at the rear of
the property, thereby maintaining the front yard in the same manner as
other residences in the area. Curbs and 9ut~rs would be installed, and
the front yard beautifully landscaped. The parking area to be at the front
with a circular driveway.
5600
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
A drawing of the prooosed development was shown to the City
Council. Mrs. Hatch advised if the requested use was 9ranted, they would
purchase the propert% and noted that although the property is presently
zoned R-l, it is four times larger than an R-1 lot. She stated this
location would be easily accessible for the workin9 mothers to brin9 their
children to the nursery. Mrs. Hatch reported she presently owned a school
in Fullerton, "Sunny Day School", and reported statistics graphically
}11ustratin9 the need for nurseries in Anaheim, briefly, the City of
Fullerton with a population of approximately 60,000 people can accommodate
210 children, compared to the City of Anaheim with a population of over
11~,000, and facilities to care for 184 children. She called attention to
the possibility of federal schools providing for this need if the needs are
not met privately.
She further reported that all affected departments have checked
the property, and that verbal approval has been obtained, and showed
remodeling plans of the building, remodeling the present home into three
large rooms, eachac~mmodatin9 one teacher and ten children.
Mr. Clifford Black, 2467 Orange Avenue, representinq people in
the area, stated they wish the area to remain R-1 and didn't ~elieve this
to be a good location for a nursery school.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry asked if anyone else wished to address the
Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-305: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No, 62R-305
9ranting Conditional Use Permit No. 206, subject to the followin9 require-
ments:
1. Dedication of 32 feet from the monumented centerline of Orange Avenue
(30 feet existing).
2. Preparation of street :mprovement plans and installation of all improve-
ments for Orange Avenue, subject to the approval of the City En9ineer,
and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office
of the City En9ineer.
3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lightin9 purposes on Orange
Avenue.
4. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible
to Trash-Truck Pick-up, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall
prior to the Final Buildin9 Inspection.
5. Subject to the written approval of the 9overnin9 a9encies of the State
of California and County of Orange.
6. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibits Nos. 1 and 2,
provided that adequate fencin9 be installed and maintained alon9 the
west, south and east boundaries of subject property.
7. Waivin9 the requirements of provision 18.04.090 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code to allow parkin9 in the side yard as shown on plot plan marked
Exhibit A, signed this date by Councilman Coons.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 206.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILWEN:
Chandler, Coons and Fry.
None.
Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-305 duly passed and
adopted.
5601
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINLrFES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-69-69. Initiated by the City Planning
Commission to consider a change of zone from R-A to M-1 and P-L, property
located within the City Limits of the City of Anaheim, bounded on the South
by the Riverside Freeway, on the North by Placentia-Yorba Boulevard, on the
West by State College Boulevard, and on the East by Jefferson Street.
Concurring with the recommendations set forth in Exhibit No. 1,
Industrial Areas Analysis, and Exhibit No. 2, Planning Study No. 34-110-20,
the City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. ~63~ Series
1961-62, recommended said reclassification of the area described as lying
east of the proposed Route 19 Freeway Right-of-Way, from R-A to M-1 and P-L
(excepting those properties already zoned M-1 and P-L) subject to the fol-
lowing conditions:
a. Dedication to be given on all streets within the area according to
Circulation Element of General Plan Highway Right of Way, prior to
adoption of ordinance rezoning property.
b. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all im-
provements in accordance with the adopted Standard Plans on file in
the office of the City Engineer at time of development.
c. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes at time
of development.
d. Preliminary title report, containing legal vesting, legal description
and map shall be submitted prior to finalization of ordinance.
Correspondence signed by Frank Sagara and Werner Franz protesting
said reclassification was submitted and read together with correspondence
from W. S. Messenger of the John B. Kilroy Company urging said reclassifi-
cation.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mr. Richard Reese, Plannin9 Director, stated that this action
before the City Council and recommendation of the City Planning Commission
is the result of a Council directive December 5, 1961, that the Commission
initiate a zoning and planning study of the northeast area. The industrial
area analysis as prepared by the Planning Staff was presented %o the City
Planning Commission and the City Council, and at the March 5, 1962 City
Planning Commission's meeting, a summary of the findings was presented
resulting in their adoption and recommendation to the City Council of
Exhibit No. 1 of the Industrial Area Analysis Report, and Exhibit No. 2,
which is Planning Study No. 34-110-20.
Mr. Reese displayed several maps of the area, one being the
recently adopted Yorba-Linda General Plan, showin9 proposed M-1 Zoning in
the adjacent areas of other jurisdictions, and further advised in accord-
ance with City Plannin9 Commission's Resolution 263, Series 1961-6Q, the
following recommendations be considered by the City Council:
1. That the City establish the Route 19 Orange Freeway Right-of-Way to be
the westerly boundary and the Riverside Freeway to be the southerly
boundary of the Northeast Industrial Area.
2. That the entire area delimited by Orangethorpe Avenue and Placentia-
Yorba Boulevard on %he Nor%h, the Riverside Freeway and Santa Aha River
on the Sou%h, the Orange Freeway Right-of-Way on the !Nest, and the
Imperial Freeway Right-of-Way on the East be designated for industrial
use on the Anaheim General Plan.
3. That the entire area delimited by Ball Road on the North, Los Angeles
Street and the Santa Aha Freeway on the West~ and the Santa Aha River
on the ~as{ be designated {or industrial use on the Anaheim General
Plan.
5605
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M,
4. That the entire area within the Anaheim City Limits bounded by Orange-
thorpe Avenue and Placentia-Yorba Boulevard on the North, the Riverside
Freeway on the South, Jefferson on the East, and the Route 19 Orange
Freeway on the West be zoned M-l, Light Manufacturing; with the exception
of those areas lying immediately along and parallel to all arterial
streets and highways as designated on the adopted Circulation Element
of the General Plan, such areas to be zoned P-L, Parking-Landscaping,
to a depth of 50 feet on each side of the planned highway right-of-way
line.
5. That the County of Orange be requested to establish industrial zoning
~hich prohibits all residential use~ on all areas lying within their
jurisdiction in the above described areas; and to establish standards
of property development similar to those of the P-L, Parking-Landscaping
Zone.
6. That the City of Placentia be requested to establish industrial zonin9
which prohibits all residential uses on all areas 1yin9 within their
jurisdiction in the above described areas; and to establish standards of
property development similar to those of the P-L, Parking-Landscaping
Zone; further that the areas lying between Placentia Avenue and the
Orange Freeway Right-of-Way and south of Orangethorpe Avenue, designated
Medium Density Residential, includin9 trailer parks as it now appears
on the preliminary General Plan.
7. That any desirable industry-related commercial uses be established by
Conditional Use Permit rather than spot reclassification to commercial
zoning; and that within the Northeast and Southeast Industrial areas as
specified above, all requests for non-industrial uses be by Conditional
Use Permit only.
8. That any trailer parks established in the Northeast Area as a result of
actions precedin9 this report be considered legal non-conforming uses,
and that no further residential uses, includin9 trailer parks or
expansion of trailer parks previously approved be permitted in the
Northeast Industrial Area.
9. That the County of Orange be requested to conduct an "Orange County
Industrial Areas Analysis", further explorinq the industrial potential
of the entire County with respect to regionai competition to establish a
framework within which other individual cities may determine and project
their industrial land needs and potentials.
He reported that letters have been received from the Committee of
the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce and the Board of Realtors Concurring in this
recommendation, and recommending its adoption, and further advised that
consideration is being given as to the size of lots, property standards,
setbacks, etc. Mr. Reese stated the City Planning Commission has requested
the Resolution of Intention be adopted to allow individual owners to prove
up on the requirements and secure zoning on their individual parcels of
property.
Discussion was held regarding the establishment of an Architectural
Control, and it was pointed out that at the present time the only review of
plans of development would be when an individual owner requested the rezon-
lng be completed.
Mr. A1 Edmund, representing Shonn Company, Wholesale Nursery,
15282 Orangethorpe Avenue, addressed the Council statin9 that at this time
they were not in favor nor protesting the rezoning, their reason being,
first, if the area was zoned W-l, in his opinion it would be the responsi-
bility of the City to take care of the traffic as all it mould require is
one or two parcels on a street to be unimproved, and the original street
width would exist. He felt if this area was rezoned M-l, the City should
assume the responsibility of serving ~he area wi~h adequate sewers and
streets. He referred to cross streets that have been planned for years and
have not yet materialized; and also referred to the commercial use in the
area that could develop before the industrial use. In his opinion, more
thought and additional planning should be made of the entire area.
5603
C..ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Kenneth Boyce, of Investment and Evaluation Counselors,
representing Gilbert Kraemer, owner of property in the area bounded by the
Riverside Freeway and La Palma Avenue~ advised that an economic and
feasibility survey of the property and land use study made by them'in 1960
of the general area~ ascertained that the highest~ best and most profitable
use of the land was commercial, and requested this twenty-seven acres to be
shown on the master plan as commercial,
Mr. Harry Knisely addressed the Council advising he was concerned
about a parcel of property in this area that is in County territory and not
in the City, and urged no particular recommendations be made to the County
at this time.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry asked if anyone else wished to address the
Council, there bein9 no response, declared the hearing closed.
Discussion was held and it was recognized that there would be
other compatible uses in the area which should be handled on specific
Conditional Use Permits, and in the adoption of this recommendation, it
would not be the intent of the City Council to prohibit commercial or' any
other uses from the area.
Mr. Reese advised that the City Plannin9 Commission hoped that
the adoption of commercial development would be a planned type development
and not spot commercial. Councilman Chandler stated that it seemed to him
Mr. Kraemer's request for his property to be used for commercial would
depend on his ability to show that the commercial development proposed by
him would serve this area; that any action taken by the City Council on this
recommendation would not preclude anyone from making an application for any
use they desired.
Land Use Maps again were reviewed by Mr. Reese concerning Pla-
centia, Yorba Linda, and the proposed Anaheim area, notin9 the present and
proposed uses for the properties. Further discussion was held, and the City
Council determined that some measure of control should be considered before
action is taken by the City Council, and also consideration should be given
to the testimony received at this meeting; and thereupon Councilman Coons
moved to commend the Planning Staff and Planning Commission for the work in
preparin9 the study and recommendations, and defer action on this matter
for two weeks (April 10, 1962, 3:00 P.M.). Councilman Chandler seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO. 4939: Excerpts of the City Plannin9 Commission
meeting held March 5, 1962, containin9 recommendations to the Oran9e County
Planning Commission that said variance be denied, was submitted.
Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney, related the history pertaining to
the issuance by the County of Orange of Use Permit No. 4477, which had %he
City of Anaheim endorsement and permitted the establishment of a Mobile
Home Park consisting of 265 spaces on a parcel of property located in the
vicinity of La Palma and Dowling Avenues. He explained %hat in May, 1961,
the applicant purchased a total of three parcels of property a% this loca-
tion, subject %o a variance for a Mobile Home Park, and in June, 1961,
County Use Variance No. 4477 was granted; however, it applied to only one of
the three parcels involved. He further advised that immediately at%er the
purchase of this property, the applicant left for Europe and left
acquisition of the Use Variance in the hands of his broker, and as resul%~
application was made only on the one parcel. Upon the return of the appli-
cant from Europe, this error was discovered, and they presently have before
the County Planning Commission necessary applications to complete their
project. Ihe Orange County Planning Commission has taken this application
under submission as result of a let%er filed by the Anaheim City Planning
Commission. He further advised that the applicant is ready to build the
265 unit park, and the purpose of his present application and the original
intent was to scale off the property. He stated the applicant's Architect
advised that this would be the best use of the land, and to omit the other
parcel would create a waste. Ne further reported that at the Orange
5604
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
County Plannin9 Commission hearin9 there was no opposition, and if they
could acquire an expression of approval from the City of Anaheim, the
improvement of La Palma and Dowlin9 Avenues would be realized,
Mr. Richard Reese, Planning Director, addressed the Council and
summarized the evidence submitted before the City Council resulting in
their endorsement of Conditional Use Variance 4477, comprisin9 approximately
20 acres. He stated that at the time it was presented, it was presented as
an unfortunate parcel of triangular shape, with limited access and very
limited usability for industrial purposes; that following the action of the
City Council, not to oppose the application, it was discovered that the
applicant actually owned 46 acres of land and the triangular portion was
nothing more than a lot included in his total ownership. He related other
points considered representing the thinkin9 of the City Planning Commission
in their recommendations to the City Council regardin9 this application,
such as what would happen to the 300 foot strip along Dowling Avenue,
omitted from the application. He stated the Commission felt no future
trailer parksshould be permitted in the northeast and southeast industrial
area, and those that have been permitted should not be revOked'~
however~ recommended against approval of any future expansion. Mr. Reese
further reported on the City Plannin9 Commission's thinking regarding the
location of trailer parks.
Discussion was held by the City Council regarding the position
they might have taken had the total acreage been in the original request
presented.
Mr. Knisely explained that the total acreage was requested, and
the broker was advised to apply later on the remaining property when the
plans had been prepared.
Mr. George Strachan reported that the Zoning and Planning Committee
of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce took a very active interest in this par-
ticular area when it was learned that the permit had been applied for from
the County for a trailer park operation. He further advised that they had
previously requested both the City of Anaheim and the County of Orange to
consider the elimination of residential uses from M-1 areas to give industry
some protection. He felt if the City did not stay firm with their beliefs
as expressed originally, that the County would not extend the same coopera-
tion to the City.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Coons moved to
take the request of Mr. Knisely under submission and defer action on a
recommendation to April 10, 1962, 3:00 O'Clock P.M. Councilman Chandler
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NOS. 61-62-30 and 60-61-96: Request of Mr. Walter A. Mills for
amendment of Condition No. 3, Resolution No. 7353, to allow the reduction of
the fence at the rear of Lot 8 to a height of 42 inches, and an amendment to
Condition No. 4 to allow a change of driveway entrance between Lots 2 and 3,
due to an existing power pole at this location, was submitted.
It was determined by the City Council that the reason the drive-
ways were located where they were was due to the fact %hat these two
locations are the only two locations with twenty feet of separation between
the houses. Regarding the removal o£ the power Dole, it was determined this
would be done for the benefit of the property owners and is to be done at
their expense. Regarding the reduction of the wall height, i~ was determined
that the block wall should be reduced at the sidewalk area as a safety
measure and in accordance with the Code.
Request of Mr. George D. Reish for clarification and interpreta-
tion as to whether the establishment of a beauty parlor in %he C-1 zone
restricted to business and professional offices would be permitted~ was
submitted.
5605
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Joseph Geisler, Assistant City Attorney, stated in his opin-
ion, a beauty parlor activity was not an office, although a cosmetologist
is a professional person, and for another illustration, stated that a'
druggist is also a professional person, but a drug store is not an office.
Councilman Chandler noted that the use was limited to business
and professional in this reclassification, and a beauty parlor is a
specified use allowable in the C-1 Zone. It would seem by interpretation
if it was intended to allow any of those uses other than offices, it would
have been specified.
At the conclusion of the discussion, it was moved by Councilman
Coons, seconded by Councilman Chandler, that the request to establish a
beauty parlor in the restricted C-1 Zone be denied, on the basis of the
analysis given by Mr. Geisler. MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 186: Mr. Leo Freedman addressed the Council stating
that to show good faith that a permanent structure will be erected, requested
this Conditional Use Permit be amended to state that within two years from
November 1, 1962, the permanent facilities a~ approved in the Conditional~Use
Permitwlll be placed upon the property, and that a bpnd in an amount of $201000,
to show good faith be posted; said bond to be released when the permit for
the permanent building is released by the City. Mr. Freedman further
requested that the proposed street be named Freedman Way.
For clarification, Councilman Coons asked if he was proposing in
lieu of the permanent structure above the ground, that a bond be posted to
guarantee installation. Mr. Freedman replied, "Yes." Councilman Coons
further asked if he was proceeding at this time to improve the parking lot,
street and sub-surface facilities permanently. Mr. Freedman replied, "Yes."
Mr. Geisler reported that this bond would probably require a
special type, such as a faithful performance bond or penalty type bond
or liquidated damages to the City, if Mr. Freedman fails to comply. Council-
man Chandler was of the opinion 'that a negative type bond would more nearly
be in conformity with the rule of reason, that the maintenance of the project
on the property in violation of the permit could constitute a nuisance, and
if the bond was in a negative fashion and the project not completed within
a certain period of time, the bond would be for the removal of the structure
or anything determined to be a nuisance on the property, and replacing it in
its original condition. Mr. Geisler reported that the $20,000. would be
paid to the City for liquidated damage if Mr. Freedman didn't comply with the
Conditional Use Permit by reason of instituting suit or otherwise to eliminate
a nuisance, which would be created by an unfinished buildinq. Mr. Geisler
further reported that this would allow use and occupancy of-the building
prior to final completion.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Coons moved that
Mr. Freedman be allowed the use and occupancy of the incompleted structure,
upon providing a canvass or tent-type roof to the structure, for a period to
November 1, 1963, subject to the posting of a bond in the amount of $50,000.
for liquidated damages to pay for the Court costs and other items involved
by the City if suit must be brought against him to require his completion of
the buildin9 at that time; further subject to the presentation of a rendering
or drawing showing the type and color of the tent for Council review and
approval. Work on the permanent structure shall commence by November 1, 19631
further, that all other items of the Conditional Use Permit, except the above-
ground structure~ shall be completed at this time. Councilman Chandler
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (Refer to page 5588 for previous action
on this matter.)
STREET NAME - FREEDMAN WAY: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by
Councilman Coons, the Council approved the proposed street be named
"Freedman Way" upon its completion (street shown in plans of Conditional
Use Permit No. 186). MOTION CARRIED.
5606
~.ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-65: Application returned to the City Planning Com-
mission by the City Council February 6, 1962 for further report and
recommendation was submitted to the City Council without further recommen-
dation, as no new evidence had been presented.
Letter received at open meeting from Mr. Edward Rose withdrawing
said application was submitted and read.
Withdrawal of Application No. 61-62-65 was approved by the City
Council on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Fry.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-306: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-306 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO INIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF BALL ROAD~
FROM BEACH BOULEVARD TO KNOTT AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ JOB NO. a803;
APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVE-
MENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Project No. 86 and Job No. 4803; Bids to
be opened April 19, 1962, 2:00 P.M.?
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons and Fry.
None.
Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-306 duly passed
and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-307: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-307 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE FURNISHING~
INSTALLATION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT~ TO WIT; FURNISH AND
INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCING AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE LINDA VISTA RESERVOIR,
WORK ORDER NO. 4068a, IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND CONFORMING IN GENERAL TO
PRELIMINARY PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEER AND ON
FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER, DETAILED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CONFORMING THERETO TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE BIDDER; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUC-
TION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
THEREOF. (Work Order 4068a; Bids to be opened April 19~ 1962~ 2:00 P.M.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons and Fry.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Thompson and Schu%te.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-307 duly passed
and adopted.
5607
~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-308: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-308 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL
AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF DURST STREET,
FROM LEMON STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 1350 FEET EAST OF LEMON STREET, IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 501.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, and Fry.
None.
Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-308 duly passed
and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-309: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-309 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL
AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE WESTERN-ORANGE AVENUE SEWER
IMPROVEMENT, IN WESTERN AVENUE FROM STONYBROOK DRIVE TO ORANGE AVENUE, AND
IN ORANGE AVENUE FROM WESTERN AVENUE TO BEACH BOULEVARD, JOB NO. 1230.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons and Fry.
None.
Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-309 duly passed
and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-310: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-310 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL
AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO NIT: CONSTRUCTION OF A STORM DRAIN
REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT, AT MAGNOLIA AVENUE AND GREENLEAF STREET,
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. 106.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Coons and Fry.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-310 duly passed
and adopted.
5608
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
PURCHASE.- COPPER TUBING: Mr. Murdoch reported on the following informal bids
received for the purchase of 6,000 feet of one inch copper tubing, and
recommended the acceptance of the low bid, that of the M. E. Gray Company,
$2,919.42.
M. E. Gray Company, Bell Gardens, Calif.
Howard Supply Co., Los Angeles
Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Anaheim
Morrison Co., Santa Aha
Chas. A. Estey, Anaheim
SUSCO, Fullerton
Republic Supply Co., Los Angeles
$ 2,919.42
2,964.00
3,057.60
3,007.68
2,982.72
2,948.40
2,995.20
On the recommendations of the City Manager, purchase was
authorized from the M, E. Gray Company in the amount of $2,919.42, on
motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED
PURCHASE~ STEEL CYLINDER PIPE AND FITTINGS: Mr. Murdoch reported on the following
informal bids received for the purchase of 480 feet reinforced steel cylinder
pipe and fittings, and recommended the acceptance of the low bid, that of
American Pipe & Construction Company (South Gate), $2,919.28.
American Pipe & Construction Co., South Gate
Southern Pipe Co., Azusa
United Concrete Pipe Co., Baldwin Park
$ 2,919.28
3,261.86
6,836.96
On the recommendations of the City Manager, purchase was
authorized from American Pipe & Construction Co. in the amount of $2,919,28~
on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Coons MOTION
CARRIED. '
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-31]: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-311 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL
PURPOSES. (Louis Oregal, et ux)
On roll call the foregoin!! resoid~io~n was duly Fassed and adopted
~'~ the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons and Fry.
None.
Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-311 duly passed
and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-317: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-312 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TME CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL
PURPOSES. (Alice B. Fitch)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons and Fry.
None.
Thompson and Schutte.
5609
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P,M,
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-312 duly passed
and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO, 62R-313: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-313 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL
PURPOSES. (Rafael P. Valencia~ et ux)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons and Fry.
None.
Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-313 duly passed
and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-314: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-314 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT
FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Marion C. Henry~ et ux)
On roll call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons and Fry.
None.
Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-314 duly passed
and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-315: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-315 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT
FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (George E. Baney, et ux)
On roil call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons and Fry.
None.
Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-315 duly passed
and adopted.
5610
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-316: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No, 69R-316 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT
FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Clyde Hunter~ et ux)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons, and Fry.
None.
Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-316 duly passed
and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-317: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-317 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A DEDI-
CATION DEED GRANTING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS
TO HARBOR BOULEVARD. (Geor9e E. Baney, et ux)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons and Fry.
None.
Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-317 duly passed
and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO, 62R-318: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-318 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON~ TOPEKA
AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY GRANTING TO THE CITY A LICENSE TO USE CERTAIN
LAND SITUATED AT OR NEAR ANAHEIM FOR THE WIDENING AND IMPROVEMENT OF BALL
ROAD. (Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
adopted.
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN;
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons and Fry.
None.
Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Resolution No. 62R-318 duly passed and
CANCELLATION OF CITY TAXES: Cancellation of City Taxes was authorized on motion
by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Chandler on property acquired
by the Orange County Flood Control District, Project B-l, Carbon Creek
Channel, Parcel No. 524 as recorded in Book 6025, page 2a2, and Parcels 525.01
and 525.1 as recorded in Book 6015, page 621, Official Records of Orange
County. MOTION CARRIED.
5611
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by
Councilman Coons, request to the Orange County Board of Supervisors for
cancellation of County Taxes on property acquired by the City of Anaheim
as listed below, was authorized. MOTION CARRIED.
Orange County Flood Control District, Project B-1. Carbon Creek Channel,
pursuant to Res° 62R-138, recorded March 13, 1962, Document No~ 9152,
Book 6037, Page 504°
Deed from Ernest M. Cisneros and Martha A. Cisneros pursuant to
Resolution 62R-171, and recorded in Book 6027, pages 576 through
and including 578, Official Records of Orange County.
Deed of J. Paul Recinos and Theresa O. Recinos, pursuant to
Resolution 62R-170, as recorded in Book 6028, pages 860, 861
and 862 of Official Records of Orange County.
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim against the City for proposed power failure
February la, 1962, totaling $2a2.00, filed by the International Platin9
Corporation, was submitted.
Said claim was denied by the City Council and ordered referred to
the City Attorney and Insurance Agent, on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded
by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim against the City in the amount of $66.82 filed
by Freda E. Adams for damage to automobile February 25, 1962, was submitted.
Said claim was denied by the City Council and ordered referred to
the City Attorney and Insurance Agent, on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded
by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on
motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED.
a. Harry I. Horn, commendin9 personnel of the Maintenance Dept.
b. Goodwill Industries - Annual Report, 1961.
c. Minutes, Orange County League of Cities Executive Committee
Meeting, March 8, 1962.
d. Feather River Project Association - News Letter.
ORDINANCE NO. 1688: Councilman Coons offered Ordinance No. 1688 for final reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS PERALTA HILLS ANNEXATION.
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1688 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Coons moved the reading
in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the
motion. MO/ION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler~ Coons and Fry.
None.
Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Ordinance No. 1688 duly passed and
adopted.
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 1689: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1689 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-75 - R-S)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1689 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Coons seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Coons and Fry.
None.
Thompson and Schutte.
Mayor Pro Tem Fry declared Ordinance No. 1689 duly passed and
adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1690: Councilman Fry offered Ordinance No. 1690 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-29 - C-l)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1690 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Fry moved %he reading
in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the
motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE - APPOINTMENT: On the recommendations of the
City Manager, Mr. Marvin Krieger (Plan Checker in the Planning Department)
was appointed to the Architectural Control Committee replacing Mr. Robert
Mickelson, on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Chandler.
MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-17: In accordance with Council request for investi-
gation to determine if the owner is contemplating completion of the project
authorized pursuant to Reclassification No. 61-62-17~ Mr. Murdoch read
report received from the Building Department that the 3. P. Long Cons%ruc-
tion Company has finished remodeling the interior of the building~ and is
presently starting the remodeling of the exterior of the building.
HOUSE MOVING PERMIT - 1825 WEST ORANGE AVENUE: Report regarding the status of
the dwelling moved in at 1825 West Orange Avenue was deferred, as Mr.
Patin has not yet been contacted regarding this matter.
PLAN PROPOSED BY PROPERTY OWNERS - 100 BLOCK WEST LINCOLN AVENUE: Mr. Murdoch
reported a summary of the program for the establishment of a "Shoppers'
Lane" for the block on the north side of Lincoln running west from Los
Angeles Street, as indicated by the Councilmen at their morning meeting
with the owners of property in this block. The summary was as follows:
In order to promote the general welfare of the City of Anaheim,
particularly as it is affected by retention of values and business activity
in the downtown area~ the City Council desired to encourage the improvement
of the 100 block, West Lincoln~ as suggested by the property owners of the
north side of Lincoln. This plan calls for the improvement of the buildings
in this block so that business activity will be oriented to the parking lot,
5613
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 27, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
and a conversion of existing alley to a planted sidewalk area %o provide
a pleasing transition between the business activity and its related off-
street parking.
So that the property owners can proceed with the plan submitted,
the City Council is willing to do the following, if the property owners
proceed with %he balance of the project substantially in accordance with
the plan submitted:
It is the City's obligation to reconstruct the
alley to commercial standards. This would cost
an estimated
$21,400.
As a long term program, the City also plans to
place the electrical system underground in the
downtown area. The estimated cost to place
these facilities underground in the 100 block is
40~000,
Therefor, the City will undertake the responsi-
bility without reimbursement for these parts of
the proposed program, totaling approximately
$61,400.
The remaining parts of the program on City owned
land or easements may be financed by the City
advancing funds to be recovered through some
method or combination of methods such as meter
revenue, leasing of parking area with or without
validation, assessment districts, or other means
to accomplish the desired purposes for the
following items:
Parking area
$53,000.
Electrical service connections
10,000.
Underground telephone lines
10,000.
Balance of Mall construction in excess of
$21,400, amount to be paid by the City
30,000.
Estimated total
$103,000.
Councilman Coons moved that 'the Council express to the seven
property owners involved in this block, that it be the intention of the
City Council to cooperate with them in this venture through a satisfactory
arrangement for the accomplishment of the venture. Councilman Chandler
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
VARIANCE NO. 1170: Mr. Joseph Geisler reported on progress made by the Telephone
Company in accordance with Var:ance No. 1170 granted for a period of two
years, December, 1959; that they have been working and have installed a
parking lot; however, present plans indicate a probable delay in obtaining
the buildin9 permit, and thereupon recommended a six months extension to
the Variance.
On the recommendations of the Assistant City Attorney, six months
extension from this date to Variance No. ll70. was granted, on motion by
Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOIION CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Coons moved to adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 12:25 F.~V~.
S I GNED :/~~-.-~-~ ~
City Clerk