Loading...
1962/05/155740 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Way 8~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Mr. John Dawson, Assistant City Attorney, reported that the City Attorney's Office has been working with the State on this matter, and the State requires an Ordinance definin9 the boundaries of the Freeway within the limits of the City. Councilman Coons moved that the City Attorney's Office be instructed to immediately take all possible steps to remove all signs from the Freeway in accordance with the City Ordinance. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURN: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. M~ION CARRIED. (8:50 P.M.) SIGNED: City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINIrrE$ - May The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Kei'th A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: 3oseph Geisler. CiTY CLERK: Dene M, Williams° DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR: Mar%in Kreidt. Mayor Coons called the meeting %o order. MINUIES: Minutes of the regular Council meeting held May 1, 1962, were approved as corrected~ on motion by Councilman Chandler~ seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT, 1226 SOUTH BROOKHURST: Application filed by Jim L. Kuhn for Entertainment Permit (piano and banjo) at "The Can Can", 1226 South Brookhurst, was submitted at the meeting of May 8, 1962, and continued to %his date for further investigation and report. Mr. Murdoch reported that subject permit was to allow entertain- ment by two musicians in an operation which presently exists; that upon investigation, it appears no food has been served on the premises, and the question arose as to whether or not it was the intention of the Council in the original rezoning to require a restaurant operation, or allow a beer parlor without service of food. Mr. Martin Kreid'% reported that pursuant to Ordinance No. 1562, in Reclassification No. 60-01-57, ~ubject property was zoned C-2~ subject to development substantially in accordance with plans presented, and further subject to the recordation of deed restrictions limiting the uses of the property to on-sale liquor sales of malt liquors only, or any C-1 USES, In answer to Councilman Chandler~s question, Mr. Kreidt further advised that upon investigation of 'the premises, no food was being served, nor was there any dancing~ 5741 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Plans filed with Reclassification No. 60-61-57 were reviewed by ihe City Council, which plans indicated the construction of a restaurant with a proposed kitchen. Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Chandler moved that said Entertainment Permit be granted subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Police; that any enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance on subject property be referred to the City Planning Department and the City Attorney's office~ Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. SEWER ASSESSMENT, ANAHEIM ASSISi'ANCE LEAGUE, 1341 WEST LA PALMA AVENUR: Communi- cation from Mrs. Charles Bush, President, Assistar~eLeague of Anaheim, regardin9 a sewer assessment charge in the amount of $273.00 against the League property at i34i West La Palma Avenue, was submitted at the meeting of May 8, 1962, and continued for further investigation and report. Mr. Murdoch briefed the report of the City Engineer and Assistant City Attorney indicating that a connection was made to the sewer line upon payment of the permit fee in January, 1954, prior to the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2632, in February, 1955, which established the $300.00 per acre sewer charge; that in the opinion of the Assistant City Attorney Joseph Geisler, legislation pursuant to said resolution can not be retroactive, and therefore a sewer connection fee is not due. Mr. Murdoch further advised that the Assistance League has been notified of said opinion. No f~rther action was laken oy the City Council. SIGN APPLICATION - ANTHONY SCHOOLS: Application filed bF' Fritz Goosens, for permission to erect a non-conforming sign (projection and oversize) at 125 East Ball Road~ together with plans, was submitted and reviewed by %he City Council. Also submitted and read was memorandum dated May 8, 1962, from the City Building Department, suggesting that as said request for sign is for one office only, consideration should be given for one sign for the entire building. The Mayor asked if the applican% or his representative was present. There was no response. Councilman Chandler moved thai sign application be continued for one week, May 22, 1962, and that the City Manager's Office contact Mr. Goosens regardin9 the proposal of the Building Department relative to a directive type sign for the entire building° Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 6t-62~50 - EXTENSION OF TIMF: Request of Earl S. Hiler, Secretary-Treasurer, A%hruz, Inc.~ da%ed May 9, i962, for a ninety-day extension of time to Reclassification No. 61-62-50, was submitted. Said reclassification file was reviewed by 'the City Council and it was noted that pursuant to Resold%ion of lnie~t:!on No. 62R-17 the applicant was given a period of 180 days from January 2, 1962, to comply with conditions of rezoning. Mr. Bryan Marsion, representing Athzuz, Inc., addressed the Council requesting further clarification as '~o the requirement for a street improvement bond, and advised iha% they will immediately comply with the dedication requirements; that the request for exLension of time was %o allow for the preparation of additional plans by %he proposed lessee. 5742 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. Councilman Schutte moved that an additional ninety day extension of time be 9ranted commencing July 2, 1962. Councilman Dui[on seconded the motion. Councilman Chandler voted ~'No~'. MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. 1392 - EXTENS~ION OF TIM~; Request of Melvin W. Nitz and Robert M. Mueller~ new owners~ for a six months extension of time to Variance No, 1392~ was submitted and granted on motion by Councilman Chandler~ seconded by Councilman Schut%e. MOTION CARRIED, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-!5, REVISED PLANS: Revised plot plan submitted by Robert W. YacMahon were reviewed by the City Council and compared with the plans previously approved. Mr. MacMahon advised that said revised plans require the removal of the existing structure and indicate fewer and smaller store buildings to be located closer to the western boundary of subject property because of 'the dedication requirements for the widening of Knott Avenue. Councilman Dutton moved said revised plans submitted this date be approved, Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (Revised Plans dated and initialed Dy Councilman Chandler.) TRASH CON/AINER AND COLLECTION SERVICE: Consideration of the modification of the trash collection ordinance was continued from the meeting of May 8~ 1962~ Mayor Coons reported that during the past week numerous letters have been received both favorable and unfavorable to the proposed amend- ments; that basically the general consensus of opinion is that %he 55 gallon barrels are too large and heavy; '[hat we should have a set size and weight for trash containers which is accepiable; that each individual should be allowed io purchase his own con%airier, whether of plastic or aluminum con- struction, however conforming to the specifications which are established; that if anyone continues %o use a non-conforming container, a trash collec- tor should not be required to collect 'the trash; and that many of the residents have abandoned their 55 gallon containers and have purchased light weight con[ainerso Mr. Piersall briefed 'the amendments contained in the proposed Ordinance considered by the Council in March, 1961, and the recent recom- mendations and program submitted as to the period of time for the abolition of the 55 9alion containers, and the type, size and weight of the trash containers to be usedl that additional information is bein9 compiled as to the price of the various types, sizes and weights of containers available. Discussion was held regarding reasonable specifications as to size~ weight and type of containers~ and Mayor Coons stated that he believed each Council member was against 'the City embarking on a program of buying and furnishing %rash containers, however~ was of the opinion that each individdal should purchase his own coniainers conforming to certain established specifications and made available to them through private enterprise. The Council memoers concuzred with Mayor Coons' statement and Mr. Piersa]i was requested ~%c prepare an addllional amendment to 'the pro~ posed Ordinance, specifying aliowaD2e size and weight limitations of the trash con'[,ainez5, and that the 'type of 'the container be cretion o[ the ~ndivzdual, Mr. D¥'singez addressed the Council suggesting that the iron lifts of the trash Lrucks be covered wi'Lb hard rubber to prevent damage ±.o ~he trash containers. 5743 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Mr. A. R. McDaniel addressed the Council being of the opinion %hat the retail stores should be clearly advised and furnished the detailed specifications so that the individuals will have some assurance that the containers they purchase will comply with the City Ordinance. The City Council requested that said matter be placed on the May 22, 1962 Agenda for further consideration, FINAL MAP, TRACT NO. 4597: Subdivider, Mit-Mor Development Company; tract located north of Wagner Street~ east of Sunkist Avenue, south of South Street, and abuts a future freeway, and contains thirty-one proposed R-1 lots. Mr. Maddox, City Engineer, briefed the location of subject tract and reported that required bonds have been posted, necessary fees paid~ and that said map conforms substantially to the Tentative Map previously approved, and thereupon recommended the approval of said Final Map. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved %hat Final Map, Tract No. 4597, be approved, subject to the provision that a six foot masonry wall be constructed along the tract boundary abut- ting the Freeway right-of-way; that if the City Engineer and City Attorney determine the bond posted is of sufficient amount to include the wall requirement, then no additional bond guaranteeing the construction of said wall will be required. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP, TRACT NO. 4619: Subdivider, Virginia C. Boggs; tract located on the east side of State College Boulevard, south of Wagner Avenue, and contains thirty-five R-1 lots. Mr. Maddox, City Engineer, briefed /he location of subject tract and reported that necessary fees have been paid~ bonds posted, and that said map conforms substantially to the Tentative Map previously approved, and recommended approval of said Final Map, subject to the preparation and approval of an irrevocable offer to dedicate Lot A at a pre-determined price~ That Mr. Lenz, owner of the property directly north of subject tract, verbally indicated that he did not wish to participate in the development of the street paralleling Lot A. He further advised that Lot B, being the stub end of the street, is indicated on the map title sheets to be deeded in fee to the City. Mr. Lenz addressed the Council being opposed to the tract plan, and to any construction of a block wall alon9 the northerly boundary of the tract as such a wall would predetermine future development on the corner of his property. Mayor Coons recalled that at the time the tentative map was filed a planning study indicating ultimate development of the entire area was requested. Mr. Martin Kreidt reported on consideration and recommendations by the City Planning Commission at their meeting of May 14, 1962 on Planning Study No. 45-114-4 of the area bounded on the North by South Street, on the South by Ball Road~ on the West by State College Boulevard~ and on the East by the proposed Freeway; that said Study indicated a minimum six acre neighborhood shopping center at the northeast corner of Ball Road and State College Boulevard, and projected residential development northerly including the Lenz property; that if Mr. Lenz desires to develop other than residen- tial, such as commercial or a medical center, a block wall could be erected by him along the northerly boundary of subject R-1 tract. 5744 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - M~y 15, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Further discussion was held by the City Council and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Dutton moved that Final Map, Tract No. 4612, be approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Engineer and subject to the approval by 'the City Attorney of an irrevocable offer of dedication on Lot A, and that Lot B as shown on the title sheet deeded in fee to the City of Anaheim,be accepted. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO, 62R-45I: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-451 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. (Mel-Ken Corporation - Lots B and D, Tract 4261) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Du%ton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 62R-451 duly passed and adopted. CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schu~te, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested to cancel County Taxes on property formerly assessed to Jose and Augustina M. Cisneros, acquired by the City' of Anaheim for municipal purposes pursuant to Resolution No. 62R-.313; deed recorded April 257 1962 as Document No. 18426, in Book 6086, page 537. MOTION CARRIED. APPOINTMENT - PARKS AND RECREATION CO~I~ISSION: Notification by the Anaheim City School District of the appoin±ment of their Board Member, David M. Snow, to serve as theiz official representa-[ive on the Anaheim City Parks and Recreation Commission7 replacing member Charles Bush, was submitted. Said appointment was ratified by the City Council on motion by ,Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim filed by Elizabeth S. Moroughan for damages resulting from a traffic accident on or about February 26, 1962, intersec- tion of Katella Avenue with Santa Aha Freeway overpass, was submitted. Councilman Chandler moved said claim be denied by the City Council and referred to the City Attorney and the City's insurance carrier. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED~ TRANSFER OF FUNDS: On the recommendations of Mr. John Woodstra, Accounting Officer, dated May g, 1962, transfer of $536,061.25 from the General Fund to the Bond and Interest Redemption Fund~ was authorized as follows, on mo%ion by Councilman Kreln, seconded by Councilman Schu~'te: Park Improvemont City Hall Building Joint Outfall Sewer 1951 Sewer Improve. 1952 Waterworks Ext. 1952 Electric Ex/, 1955 Improvement 1960 Improvement "A" 1960 Improvement "B' 1960 Park Improvement Interes'~ $ 6~.50 Interest 25.00 Interest 100.00 Interest 4,900.00 Interest 3,000.00 Interest 3,000.00 Interest 22,093.75 Principal 330,000.00 Interest 112,860.00 Interest 33,680.00 Interest 267390.00 $158,8'73,93 to the Anaheim Library Fund. 5745 Hall Anaheim California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Ma 15 1962 3:00 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. FINANCIAL AND OPERATING REPORTS: Financial and operating reports for the month of April, 1962, were ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. DEEDS OF EASF~ENT: Councilman Schutte offered Resolutions Nos. 62R-452 to 62R-460, both inclusive, for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-457: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A G~ANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Edward J. Fisher et ux.) ~ESOLUTION NO. 62R-453: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN. REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Max C. Graves, et ux.) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-45d: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING 'TO THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Tony R. Infanti, et ux.) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-455: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES (Kenneth J. Harris, et ux.) ' ~ESOLUTION NO. 62R-456: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Harley E. McVey, et ux.) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-457: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING 'TO 'iHE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC LrI'iLiTY PURPOSES. (Bernard J. Smith, et ux.) RESOLUTION NO. 62R-458: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Eugene Jo Jette, et ux.) ~ESOLU/ION NO. 62R-459: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANI DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (George C. Dena, et ux.) ~ESOLUTION NO. 62R-460: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Nelda S. Quarre) On roll call the foregoing Resolutions Nos. 62R-452 to 62R-460, both inclusive, were duly passed and adopted by %he following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Du%ton, Krein, Schutte and Coons NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. · ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 62R-452 to 62R-460, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. 5746 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15, 1962, 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO, 62R-461: On the recommendations and report of the City Engineer, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-461 for passage and adoption, Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY FUNDS TO CITIES. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-461 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-462: On the recommendations and report of the City Manager, Councilman $chutte offered Resolution No. 62R-462 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF REAL PROPERTY FOR A FIRE STATION. (Page Property) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-462 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-463: On report and recommendations of the Assistant City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-463 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO WITH THE NORTHERN ORANGE COUNTY COUNCIL, COUNCIL NO. 37, REGION XII, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, FOR THE USE OF LA PALMA STADIUM FOR THE PRESENTATION OF A SCOUT-O-RAMA. (May 31 to June 4, 1962) On roi1 call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-463 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte: a. Annual Report of Financial Transactions Concerning City of California, Fiscal Year 1960-61, from Alan Cranston, State Controller. b. Tim Ingram, President, Associated Student Body~ Western High School. c. Earl R. Howard, General Manager, State Compensation Insurance Fund. 5747 ~itv Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held April 30, 1962, pertaining to the following appli- cations, were submitted for City Council information and consideration. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 229 - Submitted by Grace C. Romo, requestin9 permission to establish a C~ildren:s Day Nursery at 1340 West La Palma Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 305, Series 1961-62, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to con- ditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 224 - Submitted by Marion C. Henry, requesting Permission to establish a service station at the southwest corner of Ball Road and Gilbert Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolut~n No. 306, Series 1961-62, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 22B - Submitted by R. L. Luecke, requesting permission to construct a motel on property located at 820 South Los Angeles St. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 300, Series 1961.-62, granted said Conditional Use Permit subject to conditions. , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 229 - Submitted by The Owen Company, requesting permission %o establish a retail automobile dealership on property at the southeast corner of Ball Road and Los Angeles Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 307, Series 1961-62, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 1466 - Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Harold E. Fox, requesting permission to waive minimum front yard setback requirement at 2428 West Transit Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 302, Series 1961-62, 9ranted said variance application, subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 1470 - Submitted by Robert W. Joyce, requesting permission to waive rear yard setback requirements on property located at 601 South Helena Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 303, Series 1961-62, 9ranted said variance application, subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 1471 - Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Robert H. Hudson, requesting permission to waive rear yard setback requirements on property located at 1001 Irene Place. /he City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 304, Series 1961-62, granted said variance application, subject to conditions. The foregoing applications were reviewed by the City Council and no further action was taken on the above numbered Conditional Use Permits and Variance applications. TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 4679: Developer, Buccola Investment Co.; Engineer, McDaniel Engineering Company; tract located on Glen Holly Drive east of Western Avenue and north of Ball Road, and contains twenty-eight proposed R-1 lots. The City Planning Commission at their meeting of April 30, 1962, approved said Tentative Tract, subject to the followin9 conditions: 1. Requirement that should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. Subject to the approval of plot and building plans by the Plannin9 and Building Departments. 5748 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. 3. Provision that Glen Holly Drive be a 64 foot right-of-way easterly of Harding Avenue. 4. That there be provisions of an adequate drainage plan, which shall be handled in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. 5. Provide that the northern most parcel abutting the west boundary of subject tract be included as a lot within the tract. Map of said Tentative Tract was placed on %he bulletin board and reviewed by the City Council. Councilman Dutton moved Tentative Map, Tract No. 4679 be approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-464: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-46a for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLEIION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVF~ENT, TO WIT: THE NUTWOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT, FROM APPROXIMATELY 745 FEET NORTH OF WOODWORTH ROAD TO WOODWORTH ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 684. (Bids to be opened 3une 7, 1962 2:00 P.M.) ' On roi1 call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schu%te and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-464 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1708 - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 60-61-66: Final reading of Ordinance No. 1708 was withheld Dy the City Council upon report by %he City Engineer that field inspection determined that engineering requirements have not been fully complied with (drive approaches). ORDINANCE NO. 1709: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1709 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-44 - C-1 and C-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1709 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schu%te moved %he reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutfon, Krein, Schu%te and Coons. None. None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1709 duly passed and adopted. 5749 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15, 1962, 3:00 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 1710: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1710 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1679 iN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 61-62-46. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1710 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roi1 call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1710 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1711: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1711 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1686 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 61-62-49. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1711 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSEMY: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1711 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1719: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1712 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 6, CHAPTER 6.60 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE. (Fly Controi) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1712 and having knowledge of the contents therein~ Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1712 duly passed and adopted. 5750 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California .- COUNCIL MINIffES - May 15, 1962, 3:00 ORDINANCE NO. 1713: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1713 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY O? ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 14.32.157 RELATING TO PARKING. (Parking restricted, area of State Department of Motor Vehicles Office, La Palma Avenue and Mohican Street.) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1713 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COU?~ILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1713 duly passed and adopted. APPOINTMENT - DEPUTY CITY CLERK: City Clerk Dene M. Williams appointed Roy E. Heissner Deputy City Clerk, serving without pay, for the purpose of administering Oaths of Allegiance to newly employed personnel. Said appointment was ratified by the City Council on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATION - PROJECT NO. 104: On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, the Mayor and City Clerk were authorized to sign right-of-way certification in connection with Project No. 104, La Palma Avenue from Jefferson Street to the City Limits west of Dowling Avenue. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-465: On report and recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-465 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT FOR DEDICATION BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND R. D. TAYLOR AND NINA VIOLA TAYLOR. (Ball Road) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-465 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUIION NO. 62R-466: On the report and recommendation o£ the City Manager, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-466 for passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Anaheim Schooi District of Orange County, California) 5751 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15, 1962, 3:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-466 duly passed and adopted. INVITATION TO MEETINGS: The following invitations and notices of meetings were extended the City Council: a. Communication dated May 4, 1962, from Allan K. Jonas, Director, State of California Disaster Office, extending to the City of Anaheim an invita- tion to participate in a Pilot Test of the new Medical Self-Help Program. b. Invitation from Anaheim Chamber of Commerce to participate in the Ground Breaking ceremonies and luncheon in honor of the new Anaheim Central Library and Anaheim Police Facilities Building, Monday, May 21, 1962, 11:15 A.M. de Invitation from Fire Chief Edward J. Stringer as Host Chief to attend the California Fire Chiefs~ Fourteenth Annual Convention to be held May 24, 25 and 26, 1962 at the Disneyland Hotel. Meeting with the City Council and Urban Renewal Committee to be held Tuesday, May 22, 1962, at 9:00 A.M. in the City Council Chambers. Invitation from the City of Garden Grove to attend dedication ceremonies of Eastgate Park. Invitation from Autonetics Division of North American Aviation to attend formal dedication of their new Research Center at Anaheim Road and Miller Street June 1, 1962, 9:00 O'Clock A.M. %o 1:00 P.M. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Schu%te seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:50 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: The Meeting was called to order by Mayor Coons, 7:00 O'Clock P.M., all members of the Council being present. INVOCATION: FLAG SALUTE: Rev. Cooper of the West Anaheim Methodist Church gave the invocation. Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-78: Submitted by Alex L. Fishman and Jerry Marks, requesting change of zone from R-A %0 C-2 and C-l, property briefly described as located on the west side of Empire Street between Lincoln and Hiawatha Avenues, approximately 250 feet south of Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 231, Series 1961-62~ recommended reclassification to P-l, Parking Only, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1 with appro- priate modification for compliance with the conditions outlined herein. 2. Dedication to the City of Anaheim of all vehicular access rights from the subject property to Empire Street. 3. Provision and maintenance of a twenty (20) foot wide access driveway City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15~ 1962~ 3:00 extending northerly from subject property to Lincoln Avenue with the installation of suitable concrete barriers not less than one and one- half (14) feet in height abuttin9 and parallel to both sides of said driveway, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to Yinal Building Inspection of the parking iota 4. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall, where said walls do not exist, alon9 the southerly boundary of subject property and the install- ation of a five (5) foot wide strip of landscaping including tree wells with the installation of trees therein at forty (40) foot intervals, as indicated on Exhibit No. 1, plans for said landscapin9 to be subject to 'the approval of 'the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and said walls and landscaping 'to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection of the parking lot~ 5. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall five (5) feet westerly of and parallel to the easterly boundary of subject property on Empire Street with the provision of landscapin9 in said five (5) foot setback together with landscaping in the parkway portion of Empire Street abutting subject property, said landscaping to include trees at forty (40) foot intervals, and further provided that the plans for all land- scaping shall De submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and said landscaping and walls to be installed prior to ?inal Building Inspection of the parking lot. 6. Provision that should lighting de installed in the P-l, PARKING, ZONE area of subject property, iight standards shall not exceed a maximum height of six (6) feet, shall be directed and reflected away from adjacent residential properties, and shall be subject to the approval of and inspection by the Chief Building Inspector. 7. Dedication o~ 30 feet from the monumen~ed centerline of Empire Street (22 feet and 30 feet existing). 8. Preparation of street improvement plans and the installation of all improvements on the Lincoln Avenue and Empire Street frontage of the parcel of property located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Fmplre Street, subject to the approv'al of 'the City Engineer, and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer, as stipulated by the pe%itionerso 9. Installation of sidewalks on Empire Street abut%lng subject property in accordance with ~he adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer~ 10. Provision of a five (5) foci utility easement on south property line and eight (8) feet on west property line ±o adequately serve the subject property and other property, at the time of the installation of service facilities~ 11. Relocation of existin9 irrigation line if necessary, prior to Final Building Inspection of the parking iota 12. Dedication of Lot "A" along ~mpire Street. 13. Time limitation of one hundred eight? (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 2, 7, 8, 9 and 12. Public hearing was reopened at the request of newly elected Councilmen April 24, 1962, and continued since that date in an effort to work out mutual problems and rezone %he entire area. Sectional map of the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Empire Street, including subject property, was placed on the bulletin board for all to review. Mayor Coons noted the location of subject property on the sectional map and also noted other parcels in the area involved in this action. He stated that ~the property located %o the south of the Lin-Brook Hardware establishment, formerly in the name of Groover, was now owned by Mr. and Mrs. Rowe, and due to the location, would be difficult to develop. Mayor Coons reported on a meeting held with Mr. Fishman, Mr. Rowe and representatives of the Lincoln Park Civic Association, and as a result of the meeting it was determined that consideraiion be given to the entire area. Mr. Fishman and Mr. Rowe were requested to prepare plans based on an exchange of propertzes. All parties concerned appeared to agree to the fol- lowing suggested zoning: 5753 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES .- May 15~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. C-1 Zoning at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Empire Street~ Immediately south of the C-1 zone at 'the corner of Lincoln Avenue and Empire Street, the property fronting on to Empire Street be zoned R-3, subject to the following: 1. Limited to a planned unit development under a Conditional Use Permit, developed in accordance with the present R-3 regulations~ 2. Limited by deed restrictions %o one story construction or a maximum height of fifteen feet° 3. The R-3 development to be surrounded by six foot concrete block walls, where walls do not presently exist. 4. Parking for the R-3 be limited to tenants and their visitors. 5. Proper landscaping and setbacks. Because of the parking limitations in the C-1 Zone, and in order to expand the present building of Lin=Brook Hardware Store to include all storage they now require stored outside, ii was suggested that the north fifty feet of the Rowe property be zoned C-~i, and the balance of 150 feet be zoned P-l, and by deed restrictions limited to parking only, and further subject to the following: Adequate landscaping on the south line of the Rowe property with mature trees placed at twent¥--~five foot centers, and plantings interspersed with oleander or other shrubs satis- factory to the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. It was further recommended that the present property housing the Lin-Brook operation under variance be zoned C-i, and that a three foot concrete block wall be constructed along the westerly boundary of the pro- posed C-1 on Lincoln Avenue and Empire Street, to channel traffic from the parking lot to Lincoln Avenue. Mayor Coons asked Councilmen Krein and Dutton if they had reviewed the actions affecting this property. Councilmen Krein and Dutton stated that they had and were ready to proceed. Mayor Coons invited one spokesman for each side of the issue to express their opinions on the proposal. Mr. Alex Fishman advised tha~ the'~ were in complete accord with the proposal. Mrs. Stella Chavos, representing the Lincoln Park Civic Associa- tion, addressed the Council stating although they felt ±he area adjacent to Empire Street should be R~i, for the sake of development agreed to the planned unit R-3 as suggested, howe~er requested the development take place at the same time as the parking area is impro~ed~ She stated that if 'the small lot proposed for R-3 was owned b'y a second owner, it could remain undeveloped and eventually be incorporated in the C.-i area to the North. Mrs. Chavos further requested only one opening on to Empire Street to service the corner C.-1 property. 'The question was asked if Mr. Rowe was present~ There was no response. With the approval of the City Councii~ ~ar~oD COOn§ declared the hearin9 closed, Mayor Coons reported that he learned this morning that Mr. Rowe and Mr. Fishman have entered in to escrow for the exchange of property~ however, negotiations have not been completed for %he small parcel %o %he North. 5754 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15, 1962, 3:00 Discussion was held regarding the possibility of the small parcel being incorporated in the planned unit project proposed by Mr. Rowe~ and the possibility of its development by a different owner. Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that neither the pro- ponents nor opponents would approve the action contemplated unless the entire transaction was completed, and the entire area as outlined on the sectional zoning map considered at the same time. Further discussion was held relative to the urgency of parking relief at this time for the Lin-Brook Hardware Store, and the possibility of permitting the area of this reclassification intended for P-1 Zoning to be utilized prior to final Council action. Regarding the necessity of Mr. Rowe~s acquisition of the small parcel referred toy it was a consensus of Council opinion that with the same restrictions and requirements applying to the small area it could be developed by a second party. Councilman Krein asked Mr. Fishman if he would be willing to sell the small parcel a% an appraised price. Mr. Fishman replied that they had tried this approach once before without success; however, they would be willing to try again. He further stated that the exchange of property is in escrow subject to the rezoning. CouncilmanC~.~ moved that action on Reclassification No. 61-62-78 be deferred 'to 3uly 3, 1962, to allow sufficient time for public hearings on the reclassification on the balance of the area. Councilman Schut%e seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLU/ION NO. 62R-467: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-467 for adoption, initiating reclassification proceedings of the unzoned areas as indicated on the sectional map, and as recommended by Mayor Coons~ and also initiating Conditional Use Permit for a planned unit dev~opment for that area recommended R-3. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PURSUAN/ TO THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODEr AND THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODEr INITIATING AND PROPOSING THE ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMEhrf TO TIILE 18 OF SAID MUNICIPAL CODE, CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN OF THE ZONES THEREBY ESTABLISHED AND INITIATING AND PROPOSING THE CONSIDERATION OF THE GRANTING OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED, AND REFERRING THIS PROPOSAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR A REPORT, On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNC I LM EN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, $chutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-467 duly passed and adopted. TEMPORARY PARKING PERMIT: On motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Krein, Mr. Alex Fishman was granted temporary parking permit on the parcel proposed and recommended for P-1Zoning~ subject %0 the ins%al- la, ion o£ adequate bumper strip ~o prevent access to Empire S~ree~. MOTION CARRIED. 2~o3, GIRL SCOUT TROUP NO. 74: Recognition was given by Mayor Coons to Girl Scout Troup No. 7~, who were present to observe the City Council in action. CounciimSn Schutte left the meeting, 8:07 P.M. 5755 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU/ES - May 15, 1962, 3:00 P.M. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-89 AND PUBLIC HEARING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 920: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-69-82: Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Frank M. Del Giorgio, requesting permission to change zone from R-A to R-3, property located on the north side of Broadway between Euclid Avenue and Loara Street, approximately 300 feet east of the southeast corner of Euclid Avenue and Broadway. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 220: Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Frank M. Del Giorgio, requesting permission to construct a planned unit development on property described above. The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 256, Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification subject to the fol- lowing conditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2 subject to the submission and approval of revised elevation plans by the Building and Planning Departments. 2. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the southerly, easterly and westerly boundaries of subject property where said walls do not presently exist prior to final building inspection. 3. Subject to the approval of a Petition for Conditional Use Permit in order to establish a multiple family planned unit residential development. 4. Dedication of 45 feet from the monumented centerline of Broadway (30 feet existing). 5. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Broadway, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer. 6. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Broad- way. 7. Provision of a five foot utility easement along the easterly and southerly boundaries of subject property to adequately serve the subject property and other properties at the time of the installation of service facilities. 8. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 9. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access- ible to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection. 10. Provision of necessary fire hydrants as required by the City of Anaheim Fire Marshall. 11. Time limitation of one hundred eighty <180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 4, 5 and 6. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 287, Series 1961-62, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 220. Public hearing on Reclassification No. 61-62-82 was continued from the meeting of April 17, 1962, to be heard in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 220. Councilman Chandler, representing the applicant's agent, withdrew from the meeting. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of subject property, the zoning in the immediate vicinity, and summarized evidence presented %o the City Planning Commission and their action taken. He reported that subsequent to the action taken by the City Planning Commission on the reclassification, an application for conditional use permit was filed, and hearings on %he con- ditional use permi~ were continued three times, as neither the applicant nor his representative was present to submit proposed plans. Plans were sub- mitted just prior to the final hearing of the City Planning Commission, however, too late to be considered. City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.' Plans were reviewed by the City Council. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Robert Balen, representing Dykstra and Drake, Inc., Agents for the purchasers, addressed the Council explaining proposed plans for single story construction at the front, and two story construction at the rear of the project. Mr. Dave Beckler, 447 Arden Street, presented a petition of opposition containing forty-five signatures, and called attention to the precedent that would be established for the adjacent vacant ten acre parcel, and the over-loading of R-3 development in this general area. Mrs. Daniels, 602 Alvy Street, addressed the Council in opposition to the reclassification. Mayor Coons asked if anyone else wished to address the Council~ there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Councilman Schutte returned to the meeting, 8:20 P.M. Further discussion was held by the City Council, and plans were again reviewed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-468: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-468 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Plannin9 Commission, amending Condition No. 1 thereof to read: "Development substan- tially in accordance with Exhibits 1 and 2, subject to the submission and approval of revised elevation plans by the Building and Planning Departments; further subject to the filing of deed restrictions limiting the development to one story construction." Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (61-62-82 - R-3) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: TEMPORARILY A~SENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. COUNCILMEN: Chandler. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-468 duly passed and adopted. RESOLU/ION NO. 62R-469: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-469 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 220, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibits Nos. 1 and 2, subject %0 the submission and approval of revised elevation plans by the Building and Planning Department; said development shall be limited by deed restrictions to one-story construction. 2. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the southerly~ easterly and westerly boundaries of subject property where said walls do not presently exist, prior to Final Buildin9 Inspection. 3. Subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 61-62-82. 4. Dedication of 45 feet from the monumented centerline of Broadway (30 feet existing). 5757 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINLFfES - May 15, 1962, 3:00 P.M. 5. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Broadway, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 6. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lightin9 purposes on Broad- way. 7. Provision of a five foot utility easement along the easterly and southerly boundaries of subject property to adequately serve the subject property and other properties at the time of the installation of service facilities. 8. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 9. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by %he Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access- ible to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior %o Final Building Inspection. 10. Provision of necessary fire hydrants as required by the City of Anaheim Fire Marshall. 11. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 4, 5 and 6. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 220. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. COUNCILMEN: Chandler. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-469 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 218: Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. R. W. Reyes, requesting permission to construct a church and related buildings on property located on the wes% side of West Street between La Palma Avenue and Romneya Drive (1171-1171~ North West Street). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 282, Series 1961-62, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to the following con- ditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with the plans presented, with the revision of plans to provide a 24 foot wide driveway access. 2. Garage removed from the premises before Final Inspection of the first phase. 3. Dedication of 32 feet from the monumented centerline of West Street (20 feet existing). 4. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for West Street, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 5. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Wes~ Street. 6. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for lhe accomplish- ment of Item Nos. 3, 4 and 5. Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was requested by the City Council and public hearing scheduled. 5758 ~it¥ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and summarized the evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission resulting in their action. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-470: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No, 62R-470 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 218, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 218. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNC I L~vfEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-470 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING, VARIANCE NO. 1454: Submitted by M. Doualas, requestinq permis- sion to waive garage door requirements on forty-six of the fifty-One garages on property located on the south side of Pampas Lane, between Euclid &venue and Loara Street (1666 Pampas Lane). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 276, Series 1961-67, ~ranted sa~d variance, subject to the following conditions: ]_. That garage doors be ,-aired on the rear and side, but that the front five (5) be retained. Provision of stucco interiors on the side and rear walls of all garages on subject property with installation of cabinet areas therein prior to Final Buildin~ Insoection, ~. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1, said exhibit indicatina provision of doors on the five garages extending sou'therly from the fifteen foot setback abuttina Pampas Lane. a. Provision of trash storage areas as determined 6y the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access- ible to trash-truck p~ckup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection. 2xcerpts of the City Plannino Commission meeting held April 16 1969, were submitted and read amendinq Condition No. 2 as follows: "2. Provision of stucco interiors on the side and rear walls of all garages on subiect property with installation of cabinet areas therein and installation of bumper auards at the rear of each marage, prior to Final Buildino Inspection." -' I'.~r. Kreidt noted the location of the property and stated the request would eliminate garaqe doors from all garages except five on the front of the property. He further advised that the garages from which the doors would be eliminated would have f~nzshed ~nteriors,. D~scussion was held between the City Council and Mr. Douglas, petitzoner, pertainzng to the merit of garage doors as compared to finished marage ~nieriors, considering the cost of finished garages and the problem of maintenance. 5759 ~.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15, 1962, 3:00 P.M. Mr. Douglas explained that the five garage doors are already installed and can be kept closed, but doubted if they would be able to keep fifty-one garage doors closed when they are not in use. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-471: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-471 granting Variance No. 1454, subject to the Planning Commission's recommen- dations as corrected April 16, 1962. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1454. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Krein, Schutte and Coons. Chandler and Dutton. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-471 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING~ VARIANCE NO. 1460: Submitted by Irving Marcus, requesting per- mission to waive single story height limitation on property located on the north side of Wilken Way, between Haster and Vern Streets (147 East Wilken Way). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 279, Series 1961-62, denied said variance. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed in the office of the City Clerk, and public hearing scheduled. Communication from Raymond J. Faubus dated May 11, 1962, received at open meeting, was submitted and read, advising that he was the owner of the adjacent seven acres and was preparing to file an application for garden type apartments on this property. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and summarized the evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission resulting in their denial, as in their opinion, to permit two story multiple family on this property would prejudice development to the East in the event it was developed for single family residential. Mr. Metcalf of the Don Lee Land Company, the Real Estate Company that sold the adjacent property to Mr. Faubus' Company, and also representing the applicant, addressed %he Council reporting on other two-story construc- tion in the immediate vicinity, and explained that the property %o the East has already been cleared for development. In his opinion, insufficient evidence was presented %o the City Planning Commission and had %he entire situation been presented, he felt they would have granted the variance. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearth9 closed. Discussion was held by the City Council, and Mr. Metcalf was informed that the variance before the Council stands on its own merit, that there was no assurance that the planned unit development proposed for the property to the 5ast would be approved by the City Planning Commission or the City Council. 5760 City Hall, Anaheim, Califor. nia - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15, 1962~ 3..~00 P.,M, RESOLUTION NO. 62R-477: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 62R-472 denyin9 Variance No. 1460. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1460. On roll call the foregoin9 resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein,' Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-472 duly passed and adopted. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-84~ VARIANCE NO. 1452 AND PLANNING STUDY 15-21-1: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-84: Submitted by Mary B. Doesken, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3, property located on the south side of Ball Road between Dale and Magnolia Avenues (2748 West Ball Road). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 259, Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification be denied. VARIANCE NO. 1452: Filed in conjunction with Reclassification No. 61-62-84, requesting waiver of single story height limitations and waiver of wall requirements. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 260, Series 1961-62, denied said Variance. Public hearing was held April 17, 1962, at which time said hearing was closed and action of the City Council deferred tO this date for an overall study and report by the Planning Department regarding the R-3 Zoning and existing apartments in the City of Anaheim. PLAN STUDY NO. 15-21-1; indicating land use, present zoning, and recommended zoning was placed on the bulletin board for all to review. Mr. Richard Reese, Planning Director, addressed the Council, reporting that from information obtained from the 1961 Summer Land Use Inventory, a map was prepared of the City of Anaheim indicating in red numerals the number of existing multiple family dwelling units as of August 1961, which totaled 9,521 units. Since August 1, 1961, and through checking Building Department records, an additional 2,035 units have been authorized as of May 1, 1962, for a present total of 11,556 units. Regard- ing the vacancy factor, and through the Santa Aha F.H.A. office, a copy of the 1959 and 1960 Survey was submitted, which indicates 3anuary, 1960, the vacancy factor was 22.8 per cent, which survey only takes into consid- eration apartment dwellings two years or under in age. Mr. Reese stated that the Santa Aha F.H.A. office is presently undertaking a County wide survey of vacancy factor, which will probably be available in 3une of this year. Consideration was given to the total number of dwellings in the City of Anaheim. It was estimated that approximately 30 per cent of the total number of dwelling units were apartment units. Mr. Murdoch reported that the figure used by the State in determining the estimated population of 123,800 as of March 1, 1962, shows 39,258 occupied dwelling units, and also figures a ten per cent overall vacancy factor, which would indicate the total number of dwelling units to be 43,000. Using these figures, it could be estimated that approximately 25 per cent of the total dwelling units were multiple family dwelling units. 5761 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINLrfES - Nay 15, 1962, 3:00 P,M, Mr. Reese noted on the Planning Study that this was an area with deep lots, creating problems of development. The plan recommended by the Planning Commission was that the frontage on the south side of Ball Road to a depth of 200 feet be permitted to develop for R-D, with provision for an alley at the rear, and the remainder be retained in the R-A Zone, until such time as those properties can be assembled and developed in a conventional R-1 development. He further reported that the drainage was a major factor in this area, and referred to other factors taken into consideration by the Plannin9 Commission in the study. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicant, requested a two-weeks continuance on this application in view of the recommended plan submitted by the City Planning Commission. Mrs. Loretta Ogden, 8631Lola Avenue, Stanton~ referred to the petition of protest filed with the City Planning Commission. Mr. H. D. Ellis, 8591Lola Avenue, $tanton, addressed the Council in opposition, calling attention to the overcrowding of schools, invasion of privacy, and stated he preferred the chicken ranches to apartment units. Mr. Jack Woods, 2738 West Ball Road, Anaheim, favored the reclassification and felt development would assist in alleviating drainage problems in the area. Mr. W. D. Pickerel, 2752 West Ball Road, stated that they personally did not wish to be annexed to the City of Anaheim, and hoped that the City would keep in mind that the chicken ranch was their means of livelihood. Mrs. Herring, resident directly behind Mrs. Doesken, addressed the Council in opposition because of the invasion of their privacy and also devaluation of property. Mr. Frank Blender, 2757 West Ball Road, addressed the Council relating the circumstances under which he purchased his property for a permanent home. Mr. Knisely stated regarding the Plan Study recommended by the City Planning Commission, that this plan would require at least ten property owners to unite in a single plan of development. In his opinion, no one person would purchase the entire area and develop according to these plans. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Further discussion was held by the City Council, and Councilman Dutton felt it unfair to hold up the development making it contingent on compliance with conditions by others. Councilman Chandler felt the main objection to the existing multiple development in the area was to the two- story construction, and suggested this project be considered limited to single-story construction. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-473: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-473 sustaining recommendations of the City Planning Commission, denying Reclassification No. 61-62-84. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (61-62-84) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: 5162 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES .' COUNC I LMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Krein, Schutte and Coons, Chandler and Dutton, None, 'The Mayor declared Resolution No, 69R-473 duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION NO. 62R-474: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-474 sustaining action taken by the City Planning Commission, denying Variance No. la52. Refer %o Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1454. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by ~he following vote: AYES: COUNC ID4EN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-474 duly passed and adopted. PLAN STUDY 15-21-1: Plan Study 15-21-1 was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Chandler. seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. FLY ABATEMENT PROBLEM: Mr. Groat addressed 'the City Council thanking them for the action taken to farther regulate fly control in the City of Anaheim. RESOLUTION NO. 62R-475: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-475 for adoption, authorizing an amendment to the State Employees' Retirement Contract to include the 1957 Survivor Benefits to be effective May 1, 1969. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT PURSUANT 'TO THE PARTICIPATION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIId IN THE SIArE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM MAKING ITS EMPLOYEES MEMBERS OF S~ID SYSTEM. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followinq vote: AYES: COUNC I Lf4EN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-475 duly passed and adopted. AWARD - NATIVE SONS OF [HE GOLDEN WESI: l',,layor Coons reported that Councilman Dutton received on behalf of the City of Anaheim an award given by the Native Sons of the Golden X,lest, which award is qiven to those cities that fly the State Flag. ~ ADZOURNMENY: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. motion. !v1OYION CARRIED. f lO:O0 P ~ ~ City Clerk Councilman Schutte seconded the