1962/06/195842
C__ity Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson.
CITY CLERK~ Dene M. Williams.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: 'Thornton E. Piersall.
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: Minutes of' the regular City Council meeting held June 12, 1962, were
approved on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein.
MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING, PROPOSED ABANDONMENT: Pursuant to Resolution No. 62R-533,
duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin in accordance with laws and posted
notices, public hearing was held on the proposed abandonment of a portion
of Homer Street and Romneya Drive (curve, southwest corner).
The Mayor asked zf anyone wished to address the Council, there
being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-56~: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-56a
for passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUFION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE
VACATION AND ABANDONMENT ~: A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC
UiILITY PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS, ALONG AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER
DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY, (Portion of Homer Street and Romneya Drive)
On roll call ~Lhe foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-56a duly passed and adopte~
SIGN APPLICATION - PAUL~S RECORDERS: Application filed by Norman Wenzel, A-1
Neon Sign Company, for permission to erect a non-conforming sign (oversize
and roof sign extends nine feet above building), at 1763 South Harbor
Boulevard, was submitted to and denied by the City Council at their meeting
of June 12, 1962.
Communication dated June 1~,'1962, from Norman Wenzel, requesting
reconsideration of said sign application, was submitted.
Mr. Wenzel addressed the Council urging favorable consideration of
said sign application, as in his opinion by erection of the sign on the
building, it would not interfere wi~h any surrounding signs, would meet
minimum public safeguards, and would minimize the amount of sign structure
which will be hidden behind the parapet wall; further that all businesses
in this area have both flat wall signs and pole signs, and a free-standing
pole s~gn on Harbor Boulevard would interfere with surrounding signs.
Plans were reviewed b'?' the City Council, and Councilman Dutton
moved that Mr. Wenzel~s request for reconsideration of said sign applica-
tion be denied. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
~843
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962, 3:00
In reply to Mr. Wenzel~s inquiry as to what type of signing would
be agreeable to the City, the Council suggested that an application be made
for a single, integrated, free-standing sign for the entire development.
SIGN APPLICATION - LEO~S RESTAURANT: Application requesting permission to erect
a non-conforming sign at 101 West Center Street was submitted to the City
Council at the meeting of June 12, 1962, and was 9ranted subject to the
condition that the overhang of the right-of-way not exceed four feet.
Communication dated June 14, 1962, from Leo's Restaurant request-
ing further consideration of said sign application was submitted.
Mr. Fred Schroeder, Orange County Neon Sign Company, addressed
the Council requesting an alternate sign and submitted a revised plan of
the proposed sign and the revolving clock, which would replace the existing
restaurant sign.
Mr. Schroeder was invited to the Council Table to further explain
his proposed plan.
Councilman Chandler moved said sign application be granted,
subject to the condition that no portion of the sign project more than four
feet from the building. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
EN/ERTAINMENT PERMIT: Application for Entertainment Permit filed by James L,
Brush for a piano bar at the Embassy, 300 West Lincoln Avenue, was submitted.
Councilman Dutton moved said Entertainment Permit be granted for
a period of one year, and subject to the recommendations of the Chief of
Police. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MO/ION CARRIED.
REQUEST, WAIVER OF CURB RADIUS AND DRIVEWAY OFFSET REQUIREMENT: Request of
American Oil Company, G. W. Sandquist, Area Engineer, for reduction of the
curb radius to twenty-five feet and allow the driveways %o start at the
beginning of curb radius, at their proposed service station site at the
southwest corner of Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road, was submitted. (Con-
ditlonal Use Permit No. 254.)
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman'Chandler
moved that [he request for a twenty-five foot radius on the curb return be
granted, and that the request for waiver of the five-foot offset from the
beginning of curve of the curb return, be denied. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-55: Request of Joseph C. Stephenson for approval of
revised plans pursuant to Ordinance No. 1720 in Reclassification Proceedings
No. 61-62-65, was submitted~ together with notice of intention to grant
continued right of ingress and egress in the event the ownership of the
apartment buildin9 is divided.
Revised plans were reviewed by the City Council, and it was noted
that it now appears to be the intent of the applicant to divide the property
in an east-west direction, making two parcels fronting onto Citron Street,
thereby creating two sub-standard R-3 lots~ rather than providing frontage
on to La Verne Street, as was originally represented.
Councilman Chandler moved said revised plans be disapproved by
the City Council. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
5844
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962~ 3:00
AWARD - GRADING PARK SITE~ CRESCENT AND GILBERT: The City Manager reported
on informal bids received for grading sixteen-acre parksite at Crescent
and Gilbert, and recommended the acceptance of the low bid, that of Post
Brothers Construction Company, in the amount of $5,056.65.
Post Brothers, Santa Aha $ 5,056.62
Wm. C Mason, Bell Gardens 8,844.00
Boeck Paving Co., Orange No Quotation
On the recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton
moved that the low bid be accepted, and award made to Post Brothers
Construction Company in the amount of $5,056.62. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 58-59-83 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT NO. 83: Communication from
G. L. Hodge was submitted requesting release of UniLed Pacific Insurance
Group Bond No. 53~60, covering certain improvements pursuant to Reclassifi-
cation No. 58-59-83 (M-1 Zoning, Ordinance No. 1~12, requiring a six foot
block wall on the north property line), inasmuch as the property is now
developed under Special Use Permit No. 83 with the Veterans of Foreign
Wars Building.
Mr. Murdoch reported that all of the items covered by said bond
have been completed with the exception of the six foot block wall on the
northerly property line.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion
thereof, Councilman Chandler moved that the applicant be advised that upon
construction of the block wall, in conformance with conditions, said bond
will be released. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 125: In accordance with Council action on June 6,
1962, Mr. Murdoch submitted and read in full communication dated JuneilS,
1962, from C. M. Belinn, President, Los Angeles Airways, Inc., advising
of actions taken 'to prepare for the installation of certain improvements
including the immediate provision of passenger facilities at the Heliport,
and requesting a conference with City officials at this time to further
discuss the reducing or sharing of certain cos+~swith regards to installation
of sidewalks, street lighting, and widening of Cerritos Avenue.
Mr. Murdoch reported that required right-of-way has been obtained
and necessary street improvement bonds posted; that Los Angeles Airways have
submitted preliminary plans of ultimate development; however, he has not
had an opportunity to compare the plans with those originally presented.
Councilman Chandler noted that said Conditional Use Permit was
contingent upon development substantially in accordance with plans presented,
and that rest room facilities were included on said plans.
Mayor Coons was of the opinion that inasmuch as Los Angeles Air-
ways' lease with Disneyland requires Disneyland's approval on any construc-
tion plans, it would be well for the Council to withhold action on the plans
submitted until said approval has been obtained.
Further discussion was held by the City Council, and the preliminary
plans reviewed. At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Schutte
moved that any further action pertaining to Conditional Use Permit No. 125
be continued for two weeks, July 3, 1962. Councilman Dutton seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Regarding the conference with City officials, the City Manager
was requested to represent the City Council and report his recommendations
at the July 3, 1962, meeting.
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
PROPOSAL, ANAHEIM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: Councilman Krein stated that
on advice of counsel, bein9 a member of the Citizens~ Advisory Committee,
Anaheim Memorial Hospital, he desired to withdraw from any discussion or
action on this matter.
Mayor Coons acknowledged Councilman Krein~s withdrawal.
Communication dated June 7, 1962, from Robert L. Francoeur,
Francoeur and Company, Incorporated, Investment Securities, Chicago~ Illi-
nois, regarding the proposed financing and operation of the Anaheim Memorial
Hospital, was submitted (copies having been furnished each Councilman).
Mayor Coons referred to the communication dated June 18, 1962,
received by all members of the Council, and signed by the members of the
Citizens~ Advisory Committee, Anaheim ~lemorial Hospital.
Communication dated June 18, 1962, from John E. Miller, M.D.,
710 North Los Angeles Street, was read in full by Mayor Coons.
Mayor Coons asked if any members of the Citizens' Advisory Group
wished to address the Council.
Mr. Bill Walker thanked the Council for their consideration of
subject proposal. He advised that the Board of Directors of Anaheim Memorial
Hospital had been very cooperative with the Advisory Committee, and that the
hospital is under good financial management, as not only has the indebtedness
been reduced materially, but 'they have also purchased new equipment and
maintained the hospital on a sound financial basis; also, the doctors have
accepted ~he hospital as indicated bF' the large number of patients; that
this particular hospital is truly a non-profit hospital, not only in respect
to the operation, but in the physical properties as well, therefore this
hospital is in a position that it can expand and still be a good, qualified
non-pro~it hospital, and they feel all of 'the community must look ahead to
provide for the needs of those who will follow.
Mr. Walker explained the Internal Revenue Department rules which
permi[ an organization of this type, through givin9 this hospital to the
Citi~, to receive tax exempt bonds, and urqed favorable consideration of the
proposal at this time to provide better a~d more service for the citizens
of Anaheim.
Mr. Howard Louden advised that the Advisory Committee desired
to have a private enterprise hospital in the City of Anaheim, realizing
that if it is not provided, eventually the City may be forced into hospital-
ization, either by City or County.
Mr. Clyde Cromer reported he had talked to Mr. Francoeur in
Philadelphia on Friday, and was advised that the company had recently
completed favorable negotiations with taxing authorities in Washington on
a similar proposal in a Midwestern city.
Mr. Heed extended on behalf of the Board of Directors of Anaheim
Memorial Hospital their appreciation for time given on this proposal, and
urged acceptance of their program.
Mayor Coons asked Mr. Turner, City Attorney, if he had reviewed
all the agreements and documents presented, and if they were acceptable.
Mr. Turner advised that he has reviewed the agreement and has had
conferences with the attorneys representing the group which proposes to
take over the hospital, if this negotiation is completed; that they have
submitted various forms of agreements, which have been amended several
times, the last bein9 dated May 29, 1962; that essentially what this group
proposes to do is to form a non-profit corporation and to issue bonds, part
of which are non-secured notes and part of which are secured by mortgages on
the property, to have a maturity date of not to exceed forty years, to
acquire the hospital facility and to use their best efforts to enlarge and
improve this facility. The agreement also provides that when the debt of the
corporation has been paid and the mortgages released, except in case of
default, that the facility and all properties and assets of the corporation
58a6
city Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
shall become the property of the City, free and clear of the indenture;
they also propose, to insure that the City will acquire the property~
to deposit a deed with a trustee to be delivered to the City at the time
the debts are paid; also provision has been inserted in the agreement to
declare that the City shall not be liable or responsible for the principle
or interest, or any of the indebtedness of the corporation or pledge of
the City's credit; that they agree to remove all patients from the hos-
pital property at least thirty days prior to the time that possession of
the facility is delivered 'to the City, if requested to do so by the City.
Mr. Turner advised that he understands from the bond attorney
that the Internal Revenue Service, on the basis of an agreement whereby
the City is to become vested with the property, will authorize the issuance
of tax exempt bonds.
Mr. Turner related his conversations with the bond attorney,
Mr. Ramspeck, concerning California law requiring the vote of the electorate
prior to acceptance and operaiion of a hospital facility by a municipality,
and whether or not said proposal would constitute lending the credit of the
City to a private group; that every attempt has been made by the bond
attorneys to eliminate all of the objections which have been presented
with reference to the agreement.
Mr. Turner further reported that in order to obtain a ruling from
the Internal Revenue Service, allotting issuance of tax exempt bonds~ there
must be some sort of an agreement between the City and the corporation,
whereby the City acquires the property or operates the property, or that it
is a City facility. That if this does not conflict with the constitutional
provisions against lending the credit of the City, then essentially it is
an agreement 'that the City could enter into, and with minor changes, could
provide for either the submission of the matter of the acquisition of it as
an operating hospital to 'the voters sometime prior to the time ih at the
facility is accepted, or could specify that as a condition of acceptance,
ihat it be discontinued as a hospital and delivered to the City as a vacant
parcel of property. He again advised that it was his understanding that
in order to receive a tax exempt ruling, that it must be either a municipal
facility or operated or acquired as a municipal facility, or have an
agreement to acquire as City property or City facility, and in this case,
they have provided that the property will become the property of the City
immediately upon the payment of the bonds and the release of the mortgage
on the property, with the one exception in case of default. That the deed
is placed in escrow or with a 'trustee to be delivered with title vested in
the name of this City wher~ tge bonds are paid.
Discussion was held by tge City Council and City Attorney con-
cerning the terms and legal ramifications of the proposals and the possi-
bility of including 'this measure on the coming November general ballot.
Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that immedia%ely upon
execution of the agreement, the City would in fact own the hospital
facility, even though possession is not delivered for forty years.
Mr. Dick Johnson addressed the Council, advising to the best of
his knowledge, there has not been a similar proposal of this precise
nature in the Sta'te of California. He suggested a provision be written
into the agreement to the effect that before the City be required ~o accep~
the actual legal title, thai the City may make any reasonable request for
the hospital [o perform whatever necessary in order that the property be
in condition for any public purpose within the laws 9overnin9 the City. He
asked if an additional non-profit organization could be formed at this
time for the sole purpose of re-selling the property and facility, at
perhaps a stipulated amount, concurrently with accepting title, for the
purpose of operating the hospital in the event the City does not wish to
operate it, or in the event of electorate disapproval.
Mayor Coons felt that the two points in question were:
5847
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
1. The legality of extending the credit of the City of Anaheim, and
2. Councilman Chandler's point that immediately upon signing this agreement,
the City of Anaheim is in the hospital business.
At the conclusion of further discussion by the City Council, it
was moved by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, that this
matter be taken under advisement for two weeks (July 3, 1962) to allow
further research by the City Attorney. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: Councilman Dutton moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Schutte
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
AFTER RECESS:
PRESEnt:
ABSENT:
Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, 7:00 P.M.
COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: Schutte.
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag.
REQUEST~ ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - NEWCOMERS' NAMES: Communication dated
June 8, 1962, from George E. Strachan, General Manager, Anaheim Chamber of
Commerce, requesting that the City of Anaheim reconsider the previous
action discontinuing the publication of names and addresses of newcomers
in "The Credit Bulletin" and aqain make said lis% a matter of public record,
was sdbmitted (copies furnishe~ each Councilman).
POLICY: Councilman Krein moved that it be 'determined by this City Council
that the names and addresses of new residents, as obtained from the Utility
records, are not a public record, and will no longer be made available by
the Finance Department %o anyone. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion
MOTION CARRIED. ·
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim filed by Kenneth L. Ritchotte on behalf of his
son, in the amount of $50.00 for injuries sustained at Roosevelt Park on
March 24, 1962, was submit%ed. Councilman Dutton moved said claim be
denied by 'the City Council and referred to the City Attorney and the City's
insurance carrier. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
TRANSFER OF FUNDS: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman
Krein, transfer of funds from Traffic Safety, In Lieu, Parking Meter~
Recreation, Special Gas Tax Improvement and Parksi%es, Playgrounds and
Recreation Funds to the General Fund for reimbursement of amounts advanced
by the General Fund during the fiscal year, as recommended by 3chh
Woodstra, Accounting Officer, was authorized. MOTION CARRIED.
STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded
by Councilman Krein, renewal of State Compensation Insurance Fund,
Continuous Policy No. 2396~1-CC for 'the period of July 1, 1962 tO July 1,
1962 was approved, and payment of initial premium in the amount of $8,000.
was authorized. MOTION CARRIED..
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-565: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-565 for
passaqe and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
5848
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1962~ 196~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
C~APLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF ORANGE-
THORPE AVENUE, FROM EAST STREET TO LEMON STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
PROJECT NO. 103; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR TH~ CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION
OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS,
ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE
INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be
opened July 12, 1962, 2:00 P.M.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC I LMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-565 duly passed and adopted,
RESOLIPfION NO. 62R-566: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-566 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE NUTWOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT,
FROM APPROXIMATELY 558.70 FEET SOUTH OF CERRITOS AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY
1335.50 FEET SOUTH OF CERRITOS AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO.
686; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING ;THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING
SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened July
12, 1962, 2:00 P.M.)
On roll call the foregoing rpsolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vo~e:
A'~IE S: COUNC I LMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-566 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-567: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-567 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF tHE CIIY COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCT'ION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, 'TO WIT: THE BLUE GUM STREET SEWER
IMPROVEMENT, FROM ANAHEIM ROAD lO APPROXIMATELY 330 FEET SOUTH OF CORONADO
STREET, IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, .!OB NO. 1250; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS,
PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTH-
ORIZING THE CONSTRLCTION OW SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SaID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK I0 PUBLISH A NOIICE INV!I!NG SEALED PROPOSALS FOR IHE CONSTRUCTION
THEREOF. (Bids 'to be opened July 12, 1962, 2:00 P.M.)
On roll call the foreqoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by %he following vote:
58a9
city Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte.
the Mayor declared Resolution No. 6~R-567 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-568: On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman
Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-568 for passage and adoption, awarding
contract for the purchase of book shelving for Anaheim Branch Library No.ir
Work Order No. aSOOc, to the low bidder, California Structures, Inc., in
the amount of $10,~84.00.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF LIBRARY SHELVING FOR DELIVERY AND
INSTALLATION AT ANAHEIM PUBLIC LIBRARY, BRANCH NO. 1, LOCATED AT 2650 WEST
BROADWAY, WORK ORDER NUMBER ~500c. (California Structures, Incorporated)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein, and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-568 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-569: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman
Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-569 for passage and adoption, awardin9
contract for %he La Palma Avenue Street Improvement from Jefferson Street
to the City Limits west of Dowlin9 Avenue, Project No. 104, to the low
bidder, Sully-Miller Contracting Company, in the amount of $99,555.45.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF LA PALMA AVENUE, FROM JEFFERSON STREET TO
THE CITY LIMITS WEST OF DOWLING AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO.
104. (Sully-Miller Contracting Company)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC I LME N:
~BS ENT: COUNC I L~{EN:
Chandler. Dutton, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schu%te.
~he Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-569 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO.62R-570:' On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman
Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-570 for passage and adoption, awarding
contract for La Palma Avenue Sewer Improvement from Dowling Avenue %o 430
feet w~o%~o of Dowling Avenue, ,lob No. 12m8, to the low bidder, Orange County
Se~ers Inc. in the amount of ~ 275.95.
Pefer to Resolution Book.
585O
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT IO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: THE LA PALMA AVENUE SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM DOWLING AVENUE
TO APPROXIMATELY ~30 FEET WEST OF DOWLING AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
JOB NO. 12A8. (Orange County Sewers, Inc.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons,
None.
Schut%e.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-570 duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-571: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman
Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-571 for passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A PROPOSED
~EVIS!ON IN THE FREEWAY AGREEMENT RELATING TO STATE HIGHWAY ROAD VII-ORA-
!9-A, BETWEEN THE ORANGE CITY LI~dITS AT SYCAMORE STREET AND THE ORANGE-LOS
,aNGELES COUNTY LINE.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons,
None.
Schutte,
The Pdayor declared Resolution No. 62R-570 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-577: On report and recommendations-of the City Manager and
Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-572
for passage and adoption.
!{efer to Resolution Book.
.~ RESOLLTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
A.I~HORIZING THE EXECbU'ION OF A PROPOSED FREEWAY AGREBMENT WITH THE STATE
OF .~AL~xORNIA~ RELY'lING TO CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE FREEWAY, STATE ROUTE
VII-OR~-iT~, ~dORE PARTICULARLY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (Portions -
'liverside Freeway)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
~YES: COUNC ILI,4EN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
~BSENT: COUNC t L~'~ EN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The ~4ayor declared Resolution No. 62R-572 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLLUION NO. 62R-573: On report and recommendations of the City Manager,
Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-573 for passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
5851
g.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS
INTENTION, IN CO-OPERATION WITH THE CITY OF ORANGE, TO COMMENCE CERTAIN
ANNEXATIONS WHICH WILL RESULT IN CROSS-ANNEXATIONS THE BETTER TO DELINEATE
THEIR RESPECTIVE BOUNDARIES TO FACILITATE PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES BY THE
RESPECTIVE CITIES.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by ~he following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-573 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-57~: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-574 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA
AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY GRANTING TO THE CITY A LICENSE TO USE CERTAIN
LAND SITUATED AT OR NEAR ANAHEIM FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ANAHEIM ROAD
ACROSS THE RIGHT OF WAY AND 'TRACK OF SAID RAILWAY COMPANY.
On roi1 call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-574 duly passed and adopted.
RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATION - PROJECT NO. 129: On the recommendations of the City
Engineer, Councilman Chandler moved that the Mayor and City Clerk be author-
ized ko sign, on behalf of the City of Anaheim, a right of entry license
certification in connection with the right-of-way for Project No. 129,
Anaheim Road from Linda Vista Street to Jefferson Street. Councilman
Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-575: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman
Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-575 for passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA
FE RAILWAY COMPANY WITH REFERENCE TO THE EXTFNSION OF ANAHEIM ROAD ACROSS
SAID RAILWAY COMPANY'S RIGHT OF WAY AND TRACK.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
~O~S. COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
No~e.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-575 duly passed and adopted.
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-576: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-576 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A
GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR
MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. (Manuela B. Correa and Dolores B, Cortes)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly pa~sed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: .COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-576 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-577: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-577 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A
GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR
MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. (Thomas and Esperanza A. Torres.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC IL~EN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-577 duly passed and adopted.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for
the purchase of one three phase transformer, as follows, and recommended
the acceptance of the low bid, that of Line Material Company, Los Angeles,
in the total amount of $4,657.12, includin9 tax;
Line Material Co., Los Angeles
Maydwell-Hartzell, Inc., Los Angeles
General Electric Co., Los Angeles
Parks & Co., Long Beach
Moloney Electric, Los Angeles
4,657.12
4,797.52
4,981.60
5,246.80
5,304.00
Councilman Krein moved that the low bid of Line Material Company
be accepted, and purchase authorized in the amount of $4,657.12, including
tax. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-578: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-578 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT
FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Coordinated Building Maintenance
and Visalia Industrial Co.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
5853
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-578 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-579: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-579 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT
FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Harold and Elsie Q. Gelber)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-579 duly passed and adopted.
CITIZENS~ CIVIL DEFENSE COMMITTEE OF ANAHEIM: Communicationsdated June 13, 1962,
received from David A. Calef, Acting Civil Defense Coordinator, advising of
verbal resignation received from Mr. Stanley Weintraub and Mr. Harry C.
Barnes, Members at Large of the Citizens~ Civil Defense Committee of Anaheim,
were submitted.
As said resignations were verbal, no action was taken by the City
Council.
MINUTES: ~inutes of the Citizens~ Civil Defense Committee meetings of May 2,
16 afd 23, 1962, were ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman
Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED.
MINUTES: Minutes of the Orange County Boundary Commission dated June 11, 1962,
regarding the proposed incorporation of North Tustin area were submitted and
ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by
Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on
motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler.
a. Mrs. Robert Haneline, 3a21 West Ball Road, dated June 12, 1962.
b. Claude M. Owens, Judge, Anaheim-Fullerton Judicial District,
dated June 12, 1962.
At the request of Councilman Dutton, the City Clerk read in full
the communication received from Mrs. Robert Haneline regarding newspaper
article in the Anaheim Bulletin on June 7, 1962, which article indicated
that it was suggested to the doctors that have been considering a possible
location for a hospital in the Ball - Knott area, that they should first
contact the Westridge Homeowners A~sociation and explain their proposed
development plans.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and Mayor Coons and
Councilman Dutton assured Mrs. Haneline that the Anaheim City Council did
not recognize any organization as a pressure group, and if such a suggestion
was made, it was in the area of understanding.
Qity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 1724: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1724 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE COhTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE BOARD OF
ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM.
(1957 Amendmentt
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1724 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by /he following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Dutton, Krein and Coons,
None.
Schutte.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 172a duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1725: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1725 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF [HE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-17 - C-l)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1725 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Krein moved the read-
ing in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the
motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1726: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1726 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (5~-55-~0 - C-l)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1726 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Krein moved the read-
ing in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the
motion. ~..~OTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
POLICY OF THE COUNCIL - ROLL CALL VOTING: It was moved by Councilman Chandler,
seconded by Councilman Krein, that it be the policy of this City Council
that roll call voting will be in the following order: From the City
Clerk's right to the left, with the Mayor voting last. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCF: The following Resolution of Condolence was offered
by Councilman Coons:
RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE
WHEREAS, the governing body of the City of Anaheim has learned
with sorrow of the untimely death of Oscar W. Heying; and
WHEREAS, Oscar W. Heying will be remembered as an active citizen
and community leader, serving on the Anaheim City Council from October 23,
19aS, to the date of his retirement, 3anuary 26, 195~; and
5855
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
WHEREAS, Councilman Heying's judgment and guidance were of great
value to the City of Anaheim.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City
of Anaheim that it extends to the Family sincere sympathy and condolence;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution be spread upon the
minutes of the City Council and a copy thereof be sent to his wife, Mary.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this 19th
day of June, 1962.
ATTEST:
/s/ Rector L. Coons
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
/s/ Dene M. Williams
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
/s/ Odra L. Chandler
COUNCILMAN
~s/ Jack C. Dutton
COUNCILMAN
/s/ Fred T, Krein
COUNCILMAN
/s/ A. J. Schutte
COUNCILMAN
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, VARIANCE NO. la63: Submitted by Supreme Investment
Company, requesting permission to obtain vehicular access from certain
streeis on property described as follows:
Parcels 1, 2, 3, Lots 1, 4, and 22, Tract No. 3611, located as
follows:
Lot 1, northwest corner of Mountain View Avenue and Orangewood
Ave nue.
Lot 4, southwest corner of Pearson Avenue and Mountain View Avenue.
Lot 22, northeast corner of Orangewood Avenue and Mountain View.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
288, Series 1961-62, denied said Variance. Appeal from action taken by the
City Planning Commission was filed in the office of the City Clerk and public
hearing held May 22, 1962, and continued to June 12, 1962, and again con-
tinued to this date at the request of Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney for the
applicant.
Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property and
reviewed the history of the zoning and approval of plans under Reclassifica-
tion Proceedings No. 59-60-56.
Application and plans were reviewed by the City Council, and it
was noted that at the time revised plans were submitted under Reclassifica-
tion No. 59-60-56, they were approved for layout, and it was not noted at
that time that the access openings had been changed from the original plans
submitted.
$856
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Yr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicants,
addressed the Council urging favorable consideration of said variance
application; however, stating as an alternate the access openings %o
Orangewood could be eliminated by curbing, and the garages used for
storage, which would provide one garage per unit.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-580: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No.
62R-580 for passage and adoption, granting Variance No. 1463, as
requested.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO, 1463.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No, 62R-580 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-58: Submitted by Mrs. Florence
Melanson, et al, requesting change of zone from R-A to C-1 and C-3;
property briefly described as located wes% of Dowling Street between
Orangethorpe Avenue and Placentia-Yorba Road.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 311,
Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification be denied.
Communication dated June 16, 1962, from Anna A. Hathaway, and
Lucy K. Coniglio, owners of Parcel No. 3 and a portion of Parcel No. 4,
requesting amendment to legal description eliminating their property, was
submitted and read.
Written protest filed by Mr. Edward P. Backs was submitted
(copies furnished each Councilman).
Mr. Kreidt briefly summarized action of the City Planning Com-
mission on the reclassification and referred to plans which incorporated
subject property and property rezoned pursuant to Reclassifications Nos.
60-61-85 and 60-61-109. He reDorted the final plot plan to justify further
commercial development was submitted to the Commission in May, 1962, and
the Commission felt this plan did not meet the original intent for the
area. He further reported that it was recommended by the Commission that
the area be considered for M-1 Zoning in accordance with the Industrial
Area Analysis and Reclassification No. 61-6~-6q, and that any further
compatible commercial uses in the area be established by Conditional Use
Permit. He stated that the reason the matter was continued by the Commis-
sion from March until Wa¥~ was to allow the developer to produce specific
plans and evidence indicaiinq economic support for such a development.
Mrs. Geora[a Manes~ar. representing property owners, presented
the Council wiLh revised ploL plan. She related the history of zoning
on the property, and the dlfficulties encountered in finalizing the project.
She called attention to the description of 'the property in the published
legal notice, and advised that it contained property that had been withdrawn
from the application. She stated that all of the prospective commercial
tenants recognized the industrial area and the need for commercial in %he
area, and was prepared to submit letters of intent to locate from the
variety store and drug store.
b857
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU/~S - June 19~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Mrs. Manestar reported that there is proposed for Parcel No. ~ a
public passenger Heliport; Parcel No. 2, a service station as originally
plannedt Parcel No. 4, a discount house, which would be operated by the
present owners of the property, a motel, small office building, bank,
gymnasium, theater, drive-in restaurant, recreation arcade, post office~
cafeteria restaurant, barber shop, beauty shop, pharmacy, ice cream store
and stationery store; that the total project encompassed approximately
thirty-seven acres. She advised that the shopping center would be developed
at one time, and would be unique and in line with use the City now desires
for the property.
In answer %o a question of Councilman Dutton, regarding economic
support for the development, Mrs. Manestar stated that accordin9 to the
Orange County Progress Report, within a radius of three miles, there are
45,000 people in the area at the present time; and with the expansion of
North American, there is projected an additional fifteen thousand people.
She further advised that the subject reclassification was the
balance of the property previously zoned, and was under the same ownership
as the previously zoned property.
File pertaining to the previous zoning and original plans were
compared with the revised plan by the City Council. Also noted by the City
Council was Resolution of the City of Placentia and letter from Placentia
City Administrative Officer, Mr. Warren, protestin9 any additional commer-
cial zoning in the area.
Mrs. Manestar advised that previous uses projected would no
longer be approved by the City Council, and according to her discussion
with Mr. Reese and Mr. Kreidt, the revised plan and projected uses were
in line with the City:s plan for the industrial area.
In answer to Councilman Chandler's inquiry, Mr. Kreidt advised
that the Planning Department did not make any categorical statements as to
what might be proposed for the property. Their discussion was in line of
an interpretation of the policy statement made by the City Council support-
ing commercial uses in this industrial area.
Mr. Richard Reese, Planning Director, presented a map submitted
by the City of Placentia together with a resolution indicating proposed
land use to the North and surrounding subject property, and the probable
lack of economic support for this commercial development. He further
stated that normally a ten acre shopping center obtained seventy-five
per cent of its economic support from a one-mile radius.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLU/ION NO. 62R-581: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-581,
upholding recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and denying
Reclassification No. 61-62-58.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLLFflON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF
THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (61-62-58)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-581 duly passed and adopted.
5858
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-65-102: Submitted by Albert E. Hughes
requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-l, property located on the east
side of Jefferson Street, approximately ab0 feet north of Santa Ana
Canyon Road (8232 Jefferson Street).
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 321,
Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification, subject to the follow-
ing conditions:
1. Subject to annexation to the City of Anaheim.
2. Dedication of fifty (50) feet from the monumented centerline of
Jefferson Street (20 feet existing).
3. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all
improvements for Jefferson Street subject to the approval of the City
Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in
the Office of the City Engineer.
a. Payment of $9.00 per front foot for street lightin9 purposes on
Jefferson Street.
5. Subject to the recordation of Final Map of Tract No. a644.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and advised that
this is a parcel of property less than one acre in size, withheld from
Tentative Map, Tract No. a6aa, and would reclassify that area noted "Not
a Part" on the tract map, to R-1 zoning.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council on this
issue, there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 6~R-58~: Councilman Du%ton offered Resolution No. 62R-582
authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changin9 the zone as
requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.'
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (61-62-102 - R-l)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSEMr: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-582 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-103 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 230:
Submitted by Harry R. Deitschman and Evelyn I. Deitschman, concerning
property located on the west side of Haster Street north of Orangewood
Avenue (11231Haster Street).
Reclassification No. 61-62-103 requests a change of zone from R-A to R-3,
property described above.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 322,
Series lO61-62, recommended said reclassification, subject to %he followin9
conditions:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1 (revised),
except as amended herein.
2. Dedication of forty-five (~5) feet from the monumented centerline of
Haster Street (30 feet existing).
5859
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
3. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve-
ments for Haster Street subject to the approval of the City Engineer
and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office
of 'the City Engineer.
4. Payment of $?.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Haster
Street.
Payment of a Park and Recreation fee of ~25.00 per dwelling unit to be
collected as part of the Buiid:ng Permit.
6. Subject to the approval of Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 230.
7, Installation of fire hydrants as required by the City of Anaheim Fire
~arshall.
8. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Di'vis:on, and which are adequate in size,
accessible to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enciosed by a solid
femce or wall prior to Final Buildinm Inspection.
g. Fime limitation of one hundred eight~ (180) days for the accompiishment
of Item Nos 2, m 4 and 6
10. Completion of 'the interior wails of the proposed carports with stucco,
installation ct proper bumper guards to protect the interior walls
from damage, and the installation of enclosed storage cabinets in the
carport areas.
il. Installation of Landscaping in the parkway portion of the Has%e~
Street right-of-way, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and
subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance,
and sa~d landscaping 'to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection.
12o Development o~ subject property with a minimum of five different
elevations, subject to the approval of the Architectural Control Com-
m~[~:ee, provided that the three buildings fronting on Haster Stree~
sh~i be constructed with 'three different elevations.
Condztional Use Permit No. 230, requesting permission to construct a
multzpie housing development on property described above.
Fhe City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 323,
Series i':!51-62, granted said Conditional Use Permit subject to the follow-
ing condo%ions:
1. ,evelopment substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1, except as
amended herein.
2. Dedica~ion of forty-five (4%) feet from the monumented centerline of
~aster Street (30 feet existing).
3. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of ail improve-
ments for Haster Street subject to the approval of the City Engineer
and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office
of 'the City Engineer.
4. Payment of ~2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Haster
StreeL.
5. Pawmen't. of a Park and Recreation fee of ~25.00 per dwelling unit to be
coliecLed as part of the Building Permit.
6. Subject to the approval of Petition for Reclassification No. 61-62-103.
7. Installation of fire hydrants as required by the City of Anaheim Fire
8. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, and which are adequate in size,
accessible to trash-track pickup, and adequateiy enclosed by a solid
fence or wall prior to Final Building Inspection.
'~>. rime i~mitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for ~he accomp-
lishment of Item Nos. 2, 3, ~ and 6.
lO. Completion of the interior wall of the proposed carp0rt~ with ~tucco,
installation of proper bumper guards to protect the interior wails
from damage, and the instailation of storaae cabinets in the carport
areas.
11. Installation of landscaping in the parkway portion of the Haster Street
right-of-way, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject
to the approval of 'the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said
landscaping to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection.
12. Development of subject property with a minimum of five different ele-
vations, subject to the approval of the Architectural Control Committee,
provided that the three buildinqs fronting on Noster Street shall be
constructed with three different elevations.
5860
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and present uses
in the area, and stated that plans are for two-story construction.
Plans were reviewed by the City Council.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mr. Bob Unger, 35a Orangewood Avenue, representing the applicant,
advised that the property owner to the West was in agreement with the plan,
and development would be studio type apartments of seven different exteriors.
He called attention to the large recreational area, and advised that they
had exceeded the prescribed requirements of square footage recreational
facilities per unit.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there bein9 no response, declared the hearth9 closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-583: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No, 62R-583,
authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as
requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission,
amending Condition No. 7 to read: "Installation of fire hydrants as and
when required by the City of Anaheim Fire Marshall." Condition No. 9 to
read: "Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the
accomplishment of Items Nos. 2, 3 and 4."
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(61-62-103 - R-3)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons,
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-583 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-58~: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-584,
granting Conditional Use Permit No. 230, subject to the recommendations of
the City Plannin9 Commission, with the followin9 amendments: Condition No.
7 to read: "Installation of fire hydrants as and when required by the City
of Anaheim Fire Marshall." Condition No. 9 to read: "Time limitation of
one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Items Nos. 2, 3
and a."
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 230.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC I LMEN:
ABSEMf: COUNCID4EN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-58a duly passed and adopted.
S861
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1962~ 3:00 P,M.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-104: Submitted by Larry E. Moore and
Patsy P. Moore, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3, property located
on the north side of Sycamore Street, approximately 121 feet east of Century
Drive (1609 East Sycamore Street).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 324,
Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification be denied.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of subject property, and zoning in
the immediate area, and called attention to Finding No. 6, wherein it was
planned to lease the existing structure and garage. He stated the City
Planning Commission felt the property was suitable for R-3 development, but
that all existing structures should be replaced with a new single story
construction.
Revised pla~submitted since action by the City Planning Commis-
sion and checked by the Planning Department were presented.
The Mayor asked if the applicant was present.
Mr. Don Robertson, 500 Primrose, Anaheim, representing the
applicant, advised that the entire property would be developed as shown on
the revised Exhibit No. 1.
Said revised plans were signed by Mr. Robertson and dated June
19, 1962.
Revised plans were reviewed by the City Council.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there bein9 no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-585: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 62R-585
authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changin9 the zone as requested
subject to the following conditions:
1. Subject to development in accordance with revised plans submitted June
19, 1962, and si9ned by Mr. Robertson.
2. Subject 'to removal of existing structures on the property.
3. Installation of sidewalks and driveways on Sycamore Street and in
accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the
City Engineer.
4. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Sycamore
Street.
5. Payment of a Park and Recreation fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be
collected as part of the Building Permit.
6. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible
to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall,
prior to Final Building Inspection.
7. Dedication of thirty-two (32) feet from the monumented centerline of
Sycamore Street (30 feet existinq).
8. Time limitation of one hundred a~d eighty (180) days for the accomplish-
meni of Items Nos. 3, s and 7.
9. Construction of a six foot masonry wail along the west property line,
prior to Final Building Inspection.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINI~,JG THAT TITLE 18 OF THE AhIAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE A~.!ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(61-62-10~ - R-3)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followina vote:
5862
~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962~ 3:00 P,M.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons,
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-585 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-105: Submitted by C. S. Baumstark
and Ansel F. Bell requesting change of zone from R-A to C-l, property
located at the northwest corner of Orange and Knott Avenue, (3423-3a27
West Orange Avenue, and a22 South Knott Avenue).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 325,
Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification be denied.
Correspondence dated May 31, 1962, from the applicant, justi-
fying approval of their request was submitted (copies furnished each
Councilman).
Mr, Kreidt noted the location of the property and zoning in
the immediate vicinity, and called attention to City Planning Commission
Finding No. 5. He stated the Planning Commission indicated this area to
be suitable for R-3 development.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mr. Harold Duff, representing the applicant, stated there are
approximately 600 apartments in the area, and to develop this property
R-2 or R-3, after street dedication and setback, would eliminate the
highest and best use of the property. He agreed that the area across the
street is proposed for commercial, and a sign statin9 "Eight Stores to be
Built Here" has been posted there for a long time. He further advised
that they plan to proceed with immediate development.
Mr. Tom Moore, a921 Puttee, Pico, California, speaking for
the petitioner, stated that this area is one of the heaviest multiple
unit development areas in Western Anaheim, and felt that the highest and
best use of the land in accord with 9cod urban plannin9 would justify a
departure from the general plan in this specific instance, inasmuch as
this area has a high density in terms of population, that the arterial
traffic is very heavy, and a development on this corner at this point
would help to keep traffic in the neighborhood shopping center, rather
than feeding it into the arterial at Lincoln Avenue.
He submitted five pictures of the intersection Knott and Lincoln
Avenue; 1, the northwest corner; 2, west side of Knott showin9 North;
3, northeast corner (subject property); 4, southeast corner; and 5,
southwest corner.
Mr. Moore further advised that approval of this plan would provide:
1. Immediate development and widenin9 of the street;
2. Deter the traffic arterial flow into the upper area;
3. Prevent a hardship to the owner by devaluein9 his property in case he
cannot move it at this time.
A rendering of the proposed development was presented, and approval
requested.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Discussion was held, and the City Council agreed with the City
Planning Commission,s determination, that this would be a logical area for
R-3 development.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-586: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-586,
upholding the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, denying
Reclassification No. 61-62-105.
5863
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF
THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (61-62-105)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: C ~
OUNCILMzN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-586 duly passed and adopted.
In accordance with the verbal request of Mr. Moore to the City
Clerk, it was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
that the artist~s rendering of the proposed commercial development be
returned to Mr. Moore. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a ten-minute recess. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9:00 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the
City Council being present, with the exception of Councilman $chutte.
PUBLIC HEARING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 232: Submitted by Agnes and Jerry
Dolan, requesting permission to establish a child care nursery on property
located on the north side of La Palma Avenue, approximately 176 feet east
of Citron Street (723 West La Palma Avenue).
Ihe City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 318,
Series 1961-62, 9ranted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to the follow-
ing conditions:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1, except that
the structure be painted completely on all sides, repair work to be
done on all sides of subject structure, overhang on front of structure
to be cut back to three inches and facia board to be placed on front of
said overhang.
2. Provision for a solid board fence painted a redwood finish, to be
erected on the east, south and north side of subject property, and a
chain link fence erected across the front of subject property facing
La Palma Avenue.
3. Provision for parking facilities for two cars at least ten (10) feet
by twenty (20) feet, plot plans for said parkin9 facilities to be
submitted to the Planning Department for approval.
4. Installation of landscaping in the parkway portion of subject property,
plans for said landscapin9 to be submitted to and subject to the
approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said land-
scaping installed prior to issuance of a Business License.
5. Subject to Building Department inspection and approval of the existin9
structure for the proposed use, and that the improvements as stipulated
by the applicant be approved be{ore the issuance of a business license.
6. Limitation of children's play area to the side and back of subject
property.
7. Subject to the written approval of the State Department of Social
i~el£are prior to the issuance of the Business License.
8. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of
La Palma Avenue, (50 feet existing).
9. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment
of Item No. 8.
586~
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962~ 3:00
Modification of City Plannin9 Commission's requirements and
public hearth9 before the City Council was requested by the applicant.
Communication dated May id, 1962, from Mr. and Mrs. Leslie
E. Buck, 719 !Nest La Palma Avenue, requestin9 a six foot concrete block
fence on the east side of subject property was submitted (copies furnished
each Councilman).
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and summarized
evidence and findings of the City Planning Commission resultin9 in their
conditional approval.
The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council.
Mr. Dolan stated they objected to conditions required by the
City Planning Commission with the exception of Condition No. 7, as
follows:
Condition No. 1. The exhibit referred to indicates considerable altera-
tions to the building, includin9 stone work facia on the front, vertical
siding and electrical changes. After learning that half of the dwellin9
could not be adequately used as a roomin9 house, and the other half for
a nursery, we have abandoned plans of remodeling according to Exhibit No.1.
2. Noted the requirements include a solid fence on the south side of
subject property in error, as this is the front of the residence. He
explained 'their plans of ~encing, and questioned the necessity of a solid
block wall adjacent to the West.
3. Provision for parkin9 facilities would require cutting into the front
lawn, and is unnecessary, as the breeze-way on the West will accommodate
two cars.
~. Landscaping would be difficult to maintain, because of commercial
establishments in the area.
5. Building Department Inspections could require costly additional
improvements not anticipated. He felt in approximately three years the
present building would be removed and replaced by a new commercial
structure.
6. Requested the children's play area be allowed in the front for
advertisin9 purposes.
8. Regarding dedication requirements, he felt the La Palma Avenue front-
age was too valuable for any additional dedications.
Mr. Dolan further advised that in a sense, the use of the property
has been for child care for many years, in the raising of his eight children,
and agreed to the additional street frontage dedications, if the breeze-way
area can be used to meet the parking requirements.
File and plans were reviewed by the City Council and discussion
held concerning the various requirements of the City Planning Commission.
Mr. Kreidt reported that it was the intention of the Commission
to reserve the side and rear yards for play area, and the front area be
devoted to parking and landscaping.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-587: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 62R-587
9ranting Conditional Use Permit No. 233, subject to the recommendations of
the City Planning Commission, amendin9 Condition No. 2 to read, "Provision
for a solid board fence painted a redwood finish, to be erected on the east
and north side of subject property, and a six foot chain link fence erected
from the front corners of the residence to the side property lines."
5865
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962, S:O0 P.M.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 233.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler. Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-587 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 235: Submitted by Charles R. Simon,
requesting permission to establish a service station on property located on
the southeast corner of La Palma Avenue and East Street (120a East La Palma
Avenue).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 320~ Series
1961-62, denied said Conditional Use Permit.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed
in the office of the City Clerk by David A. Russell, Agent.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and summarized
evidence presented to the City Planning Commission, callin9 attention to
Findings 6 and 7.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address
the Council.
Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicant, submitted
as evidence a letter from Frank R. Brice, of the George Elkins Company,
substantiating the fact that the property can no longer be considered
residential, wherein a loan commitment was denied because of the traffic and
probaDle difficulty in resale. Mr. Knisely noted, according to a traffic
count, that twelve thousand cars travel East Street and eight thousand cars
travel La Palma Avenue daily. He further reported that he had learned that
the County of Orange has approved, and the City of Anaheim is diligently
proceeding with, the proposed La Palma Avenue extension, which will extend
La Palma Avenue from Buena Park to the Freeway, and will ultimately carry
as many cars as East Street.
A picture was submitted of a Shell Oil Company Station, which was
recently designed to be compatible with the nicer residential areas. Mr.
Knisely stated a similar station is presently constructed in Sunny Hills,
Fullerton.
He further advised that the property owner to the immediate East,
and two property owners to the immediate West, favored the reclassification,
and were present tonight to testify. He stated the size of the property is
192 feet by 190 feet, and after dedication, the net lot area would 192 feet
by 177 feet; that plans are to develop an area 150 feet by 150 feet, the
balance of the land to serve as a buffer.
Mayor Coons questioned the maintenance of the area ~2 feet by 27
feet~ not included in the proposed development.
Mr. Knisely replied that this area could be maintained as a buffer
or incorporated in the development, and further stated in his opinion, this
presently hazardous intersection would be greatly alleviated by this project.
5866
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1962~ 3:00
Mr. Cedar, of Shell Oil Company, presented a picture of the
servzce station proposed for subject property, and stated this was an
entirely new concept of service station design. It is to be built of
redwood bat and board, and palos verdes stone, and will be limited to
better areas. Regarding the size of the lot, he advised it could be
utilized according to the Council's wishes, and the block wall can be
placed at the property line.
Mr. Fred Jeter, 1028 East North Street, addressed the Council
in opposition, and requested the area be maintained as a residential
area. He referred to Conditional Use Permit No. 234, also for a service
station, across 'the street from this location, that is scheduled for
public hearing June 26, 1962. Regarding the traffic situation, he failed
to see how this development could decrease traffic or improve the condi-
nion of the intersection.
Mr. T. E. Gelker, 1025 East North Street, advised that the
entire neighborhood opposed this request, with the exception of the
nearest parties who anticipate a monetary gain, and referred to the
petition of protest filed with the Planning Commission. He further
advised that within a one-mile radius, there were over eighty stations
at the present time.
Mr. Kreidt reported that the petition of protest referred to
is filed with Conditional Use Permit No. 23J, which was considered
by the City Plannin9 Commission prior to this application.
Mr. Knisely questioned the opposition in view of the pending
ia Palma Avenue extension and the decrease of traffic on North Streets
reverting North Street to a residential street.
Wt. Murdoch briefed the City Council on the status of the La
Palma Avenue extension, and stated that at the City's request~ the
County of Orange included this improvement as one of the arterial projects,
sharing in the cost of the extension, which includes a grade crossing.
The extension is tentatively scheduled for the coming year. He further
reported that ultimately a grade separation will be requested after
traffic experience has been established.
Mr. Thomas Wieldon, 1007 East North Street, regarding traffic
count, stated the traffic count encompassed an approximate three-hour
period during the morning and evening, when people were traveling to and
from work; otherwise the traffic is normal. He also advised that those
in the neighborhood are planning 'to retain their homes; only one house has
been sold in this area in the last eight years. In his opinion, a gas
station will add to the danger of the intersection, because of the three-
way signal, and the inability to determine right of way upon leaving the
service station property.
Wt. Charles Cornbloom, 10in East North Street, addressed the
Council in opposition, stating in view of 'the number of already established
service stations, in his opinion another was not needed.
Wt. Cedar advised that one of his duties with the Shell Oil
Company is to propose locations, which includes traffic count and other
factors. Bis survey indicated eight service stations within a mile area.
He felt this addi'tion would be a service to the people and an asset to the
City.
~4r. Jeter reminded the Council that the homes in the area were
relatively new.
The Wayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Mr. Knisely, in answer 'to Councilman Dutton's question regarding
signalization of this intersection after the La Palma Avenue extension,
stated that the traffic from North Street would be diverted to La Palma
Avenue extension and North Street will revert to a residential street.
5867
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 69R-588: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-588
upholding recommendations of the City Planning Commfssion, denying Condi-
tional Use Permit No. 235.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 235.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Du~ton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-588 duly passed and adopted.
POLICY OF THE COUNCIL - BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDERS - PUBLIC BUILDINGS:
On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, the City
Engineer and Architect were authorized to approve minor change orders on
public buildings, not to exceed $100.00 in cost in any one instance, or a
total of $2,500.00 per project. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST~ LA PALMA PARK: Communication from James N. Townsend, Co-Chairman of
"Old-Fashioned July nth Committee" composed of private citizens from all
sections of Anaheim, requesting permission to use La Palma Park July 4, 1962,
was submitted and granted, subject to the recommendations and requirements
of the City Manager and Park and Recreation Department, on motion by
Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED.
A.B.C. APPLICATION - U-TOTE ~M MARKET~ 541 SOUTH PLACENTIA AVENUE: Protest filed
by the City Attorney on the basis that the property was zoned R-A was
authorized to be withdrawn, due to the fact that [he property is now zoned
C-l, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler.
MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICAFION NO. 56-57-39: Mr. John Dawson, Assistant City Attorney, reported
on request of Attorney for the applicant to change Item No. 3 of proposed
C-1 Deed Restrictions concerning "No residential use of property unless
rezoned", requesting the change to be "No building constructed for commer-
cial purposes shall be used for residential purposes, unless rezoned, and
no building constructed for residential purposes shall be used for commer-
cial purposes, unless rezoned."
History of the application was reviewed, and it was noted that the
prcperty was proposed for a major shopping center. Under the plan, it was
determined by the City Council that change in the original deed restrictions
required should not be made.
PROPOSED PARKING RESTRICTIONS - LEMON STREET, LOS ANGELES TO RIVERSIDE FREEWAY:
Councilman Chandler moved that proposed parking restrictions be referred to
the City Manager and Traffic Engineer for reappraisal and resubmission.
Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
EXECUTIVE SESSION~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIl,: At the suggestion
of Councilman Dutton, an Executive Session of the City Planning Commission
and City Council was scheduled, 9:00 O~Clock A.M., Tuesday, June 26, 1962,
concerning statements allegedly made at a Commission meeting by a member of
the Planning Commission, pertaining to City administration.
ADJOURN: Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the
motion. ~TION CARRIED. (10:45 P.M.)
City Clerk