1962/07/245968
City Hall~ Anaheim: California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 17; 1962~ 3~00 PoMo
PROCLAMATION - BOBBY SOX SOFTBALL W£EK~ In conjunction with the first
regional V.FoWo Bobby Soxers (girls) softball tournament, and at the
request of Jay Bo Combs, Commander of Veterans of Foreign Wars, Anaheim
Post Noo 3173, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman
Krein, the Mayor was requested to proclaim the week of July 21 through
July 28, 1962, "Bobby Sox Softball Tournament Week"° MOTION CARRIED°
ADJOURN~NI: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn° Councilman Chandler
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED~l1:00 P.M. ) , ,
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUIES - July 24~ 19627 3:00 PoMo
The City Council of the C~zy of Anaheim met in regular session~
PRESENT
ABSENT:
PRESENT
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons°
COUNCILMEN: None
CITY MANAGER: Ke~th A. Murdoch~
ASSISTANT CITY A[[ORNEY: John Dawson°
CiTY CLERK: Dene Mo Wil!lamso
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS~ Thornton Eo Piersallo
CITY ENGINEER: .lames P. Maddox,
PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A Ree~eo
Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: Mznutes of the regular City Council meeting held July 10, 1962 were
approved, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte.
MOTION CARRIED.
Approval of the minutes of: the regular City Council meeting held
July 17~ 1962 was deferred to the next meeting~ July 31~ 1962o
RESOLUTION NO. 62_R-666: Councilman Krein offered Resolution Noo 62R-666 for
passage and adoption
Refer to Resolution Book:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF JULY 24, 1962..
(Warrants Nos.. 19354 to 19586, both inclusive ~ totaling $1,612,189o46)
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC!LMEN~
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons°
None°
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 6ZE-666 duly passed and adopted°
SIGN APPLICATION - STANDARD OIL COMPANY: Application requesting permission to
erect a non-conforming sign (over-sized w~th four foot projection) at 2400
West Ball Road, together w~th plans, was submitted and reviewed by the
City Counc}l. Councilman Chandler moved ~id sign application be granted,
subject to the provision that there be no projection over the right-of-way
5969
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COL~CIL MINUTES - July24, 1962~ 3:00 PoMo
lined Councilman Dutton seconded the motion° MOIl[ON CARRIED°
SIGN APPLICATION - FLAMINGO MOTE[,: Application requesting permission to erect
a non-conforming sign (roof sign) at 1212 West Street, together with plans,
was submitted and reviewed by the City Council~
It was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman
Krein, that said sign application be denied°
Mr~ Edo Kron~n, representing Electrical Products Corporation,
1023 East Fourth Street, Santa Ann, requested permission to address the
Council, and further explained their plans and the locat:on of subject
property, and advised that the existing pole sign zs visible from West
Street only, and the Ball Road 'traffzc by-passes 'the motel° That they
have prepared a complete survey of this problem to determine the most
adequate location -to give proper advertise, rig and the roof sign, extending
12 feet above 'the roof as requested, would be the most adequate means of
signing the motel to be visible from Ball Road°
Mr:~ Krono_n requested the Council reconsider and approve said
slgn appl~.catzon~ as the Applicant is faced with an economic and financial
hardshzp because the motel is inadequately ,szgned.:.
In answer ~o Councilman Dutton's question, Mro Kronzn advised
that the ex'_~t[ng sign could not be extended ,as 'the height is limited
becau~,e o{ ~'te !oc:.t~on of' power i-nos
P]_~Jn~ were further reviewed by the C:_ty Council and discussion
he!ti, :~nn ;._r w~:u':, noted tha't the motel -~- adequ~elv ~,zgned from the West
Street [rc, n~.~ge, however, ~he requested roof -:.gn would prov:,_de sign
coverage :m ::*feet:- upon wh.t(;h the motel doe not tace~ and 'thereby
esfabL sb ~ precedent~
Councz!man Chandler moved %-dli_d szgn appi/.carLon be denied°
Counc:iman Kre!n seconded the motion MO!iON CARR.[EDo
.R. EqUEST - WAIVER OF REE!LiNG POLZCYa Request of Robert .Jo Smith for ~aiver of
the slx month warring period and allowing reappiicat:_on of Oonditional Use
Permi. t for the e.~ablishment of a beer t, ave~n at ]813C South Manchester
Avenue (Cond:csonai Use Perm:t. No. 259, Mauz~,ce P__nto, Appl:_cant, denied
by Ci. ty Plann!ng Commisszop on May 28, 1962} was submitted,
in onswer to Counczlman ~ ' ~ *~
u, hand~er ~ que ....... on as to why they
did not exerczse thezr right of appeal xithln the twenty-two period from
the date of the City Plannzng Commission's actLon, Mr, Pinto advised that
he was not. prepared for the oppositzon 'that ~as presented and he did not
xish to .ieopardize hzn exzstlng leases, '[hat he bas~ since discussed hzs
appizcat::uon with a representative of the tra~.ier park and has nox obtained
addztionai evidence and Lnformatzon dnd :~:, prepared to proceed xith the
f:lzng of a new application
Councilman Chandler mcved that the slx months waztlng period
polzcy be waived and chat Mr Pinto be granted permission to file a new
applicat{on xzthin sazd six months pets_od, Counc].lman Krein seconded
the mot~en MOTION CARRIED°
REQUEST - WAIVER OF PUBLIC HEARING, HOUSE MOVING APPLICATION: Request of G~ Lo
~erner, General Partner, Foster Sand & Gravel Company, for waiver of the
public hearing in connection with house moving appls, cation, as required
by Section 15o32o020 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, mas submitted, together
mitt consent to the proposed move [n and w~s[ver of 'the requirements of
notice of r~ub]~c he~r~.ng, s?gned by five proper~'y owner>. ~:~thin a distance
of 30Q feet of the oerimeter of the property owned by Foster Sand & Gravel
Comodny at: POi Ea>t Commerc'~,,i Street
Mr Ed Foster addressed the Counc:~l~ explafn::~ng the urgency of
sa2d reque~,t and advising that beca'~ise Wrs~ Ra ney, owner of property at
1314 Nortr Lemon St:reet~ is on v~c:~'.:.~.on? the~,,, ~,'e:re ur:;~bLe to obtafn her
5i.g~tu:?e on %.:~i(i '¢','~}ver, however, ~,'l:r~ ~,'.a.'n,e? ,~.,a o the onin~.on that the
5970
Q.itY Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINlrrES - July 24~ 1962:3:00 PoMo
movin9 in of the buildin9 would be agreeable to hero He further advised
that the building proposed to be moved has been inspected by the City
Building Department and approved for moving~
Inasmuch as the consent and waiver did not contain signatures
of 100 per cent of the property owners within the 300 foot radius~ Mro
Dawson~ Assistant City Attorney, recormmended that public hearing be
scheduled~ pursuant to the Anaheim Municipal Code°
Discussion was held by the City Council and it was determined
that if a written waiver is received on the appeal period~ the Applicant
may proceed with his buildin9 permit, and it was suggested to Mro Foster
that he try to obtain Mrs° Rainey's consent and waiver by mail~ and that
the schedulin9 for public hearing be withheld until Mrs° Rainey can be
contacted° Further, that Mr° Foster contact Mr° 3chh Dawson, Assistant
City Attorney, for approval of a form of agreement assuming all resonsibility
in the event the Applicant desires to proceed with said move-in at his
own risk°
TRACT NO. 3326 - MODEL HOMES: Request of John Do Griffith, Griffith Broso
Construction, for waiver of certain requirements set forth in Section
18o040°20, Sub-section (a), of the Anaheim Municipal Coder pertaining
to time limitation for maintaining model homes within a given tract,
and requesting an extension of time to February 1, 1965 to maintain
their model homes and tract sales office within Tract Noo 3326 (northeast
corner of Crone and Euclid Avenues, on Niobe Place) was submitted°
It was moved by Councilman Krein~ seconded by Councilman Schutte,
that said waiver and extension of time be granted~ subject to weed removal
and proper maintenance of the Euclid Avenue frontage° NDTION CARRIED.
CONDI/IONAL USE PERMIT NO° 195 - EXTENSION OF TIMF~ Request of Mo Mo Bitker
and Ro Vane for six months extension of time for compliance with conditions of
Conditional Use Permit No° 195, was submitted°
It was reported that pursuant to Resolution No° 623{-172, the
required right-of-way deeds and street improvement bond were forwarded to
the Applicant on March 22~ 1962 for signatures~ and have not yet been
returned to the Cityo
Mr° Mo Bitker advised that the contract for the construction of
the building, also includes the installation of the street improvements°
Councilman Chandler moved that a six months extension of time
be granted Conditional Use Permit No° 195, said extension to become
effective only after receipt by the City of dedication of the right-of-way
on Dale Avenue and Bali Road, and the bond guaranteeing the installation
of street improvements upon demand by the City° Councilman Krein seconded
the motion° MOTION CARRIED°
REQUEST - USE OF CITY PARKS~ POP WARNER FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION~ INC.j Communication
dated June 14, 1962, received by the Park and Recreation Department from
Stewart Ogborn, President, Anaheim Pop Warner Football Association,
questing permission to use certain park and recreation facilities for
practices and 9ames, as follows, and further requesting modification of
last years lighting bill, was submitted (copies furnished each Councilman)l
az Use La Palma Stadium on September 8th., 9200 A.Mo to 5800 P.M.
for Pea-Wee Milk Bowl Games.
b. Use Roosevelt Field, Lincoln School and Maxwell Park for practices
from August ~th through November~ 1962.
co Use Roosevelt Field every Saturday for games, beginning
September 15, 1962o
Mr. Robert Davis, Assistant City Manager, advised that the
outstanding bill totals $354~53 and covers use of lights and labor coats
for the preparation and clean-up of the field, in accordance with a modified
fee schedule°
5971
C~t¥ Hall~ Am h~im, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 24~ 1962~ 3:00
Discussion was held by the City Council and City Manager re-
garding the actual lighting and maintenance costs involved, and the
establishment of separate fee schedules for youth activity groups and
co~nercial groups° At the conclusion of the discussion, the Council
requested a study and report at their next meeting, July 31, 1962,
as to actual costs and fees charged for similar use of park and recreation
facilities in the past°
Councilman Krein moved that the Park and Recreation Department
be authorized to schedule the events requested by the Pop Warner Football
Association, provided they do not conflict with previous scheduled
activities, and that the policy to be established pertaining to fees
be determined after further study° Councilman Schutte seconded the
motion° MOTION CARRIED.
CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: On the recon~nendations of the Assistant City Attorney,
Councilman Dutton moved that claim filed by MtSo Helen Eo Lee, on behalf of
her daughter, Andrea, for injuries received at Loara and Crone Park on April
25tho, be referred to the City Attorney's office for appropriate action°
Councilman Schutte seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED.
Policy: The City Attorney's office was requested to prepare a Policy
for Council consideration at their next meeting, July 31, 1962, authorizing
the City Attorney to take whatever appropriate action deemed necessary in
those instances where a claim is insufficient or defective, and directing
the City Attorney to so advise the Claimant without action by the City
Council°
RESOLUIION NO. 62R~667: on the recommendations of the City Manager and the
Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-667
for passage and adoption, authorizing a one year extension to contract
with Anaheim Disposal Companw (Said extension will terminate June 30, 1964)o
Refer to Resolution Booko
A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IHE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THAI CERIAIN
CONTRACT ENTERED INTO ON JULY 1, 1958 WIIH Co Vo TAORMINA, DOING BUSINESS AS
ANAHEIM DISPOSAL COMPANY,FOR THE COLLEC/ION AND DISPOSAL OF RUBBISH AND WASIE
~ATERIAL IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, BY EXTENDING THE TERM THEREOF FOR A PERIOD
OF ONE YEAR°
On roi1 call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILN~N8
NOES: COUNCIL~N8
ABSENT~ COUNCIL~Nt
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons°
None o
None o
The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 62R-667 duly passed and adopted.
CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman
Schutte, Orange County Board of Supervisors were requested to cancel County
taxes on property acquired by the City of Anaheim for municipal purposes~
pursuant to Resolution Nco 62R-270, as recorded April 19, 1962 as Document
No. 14303 in Book 6080 at Page 27 (property formerly assessed to Benjamin
and Mercedes Po Alcala)o MOTION CARRIED.
CANCELLAIION OF CIIY IAXES~ On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman
Schutte, cancellation of City taxes was authorized on property acquired by the
Orange County Flood Control District by Final Order of Condemnation~ Superior
Court Case No° 88598, recorded June 11, 1962 as Instrument No. 7732in Book
6140 at Page 399, Official Records of Orange County (Project Nco B1 - Carbon
Creek Channel, Parcel No. 602o01)o MOTION CARRIED.
DEEDS OF EASEN~NT: Councilman Krein offered Resolutions Nos° 62R-668 to 62R-677,
both inclusive, for passage and adoption°
Refer to Resolution Book.
~97~
City Hall~ Anaheim: California - COUNCIL MINIFfE$ - July 24~ 1962:3:00
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-668, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Houston Land Coo, and William Ho Cies)
RESOLUTION NO. 62R,669~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ~
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRAN/ DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN £ ASEN~NT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(First Baptist Church of Stanton)
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-670! A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN £ASEN~NT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Lewis Lo and Camille So $inor)
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-671: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN E ASENLENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Dorothy Antes)
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-672~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEN~NT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Charles So and Majorie Cox - Lester Go and £o Roberta 3ones)
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-67~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING IO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL ~ROPERTY FOR AN EAS£~NT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Coordinanted Building Maintenance Coo and Visalia Industrial Co°)
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-674~ A RESOLUTION OF IHE CI/Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASE~NT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES°
(Floriene Sandersfeld and Donald Lee Sandersfeld)
RESOLUTION NOo 62R-675~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEN~NT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Fairton Development Company, Into)
RESOLUTION NO. 6~R-676; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASE. MEN/ FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Commerce Park Industrial Company)
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-677~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEN~NT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Vernon Oo Underwood and Edith Go Young)
On roll call the foregoing Resolutions Noo 62R-668 to 62R-677~
both inclusive, were duly passed and adopted by the following votes
AYES~ COUNCILMEN~
NO£S~ COUNCII3~EN~
ABSENT ~ COUNCILMEN
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons°
None°
None°
The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos° 62R-668 to 62R'677, both
inclusive~ duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-678~ Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Noo 62R-678 for
passage and adoption°
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING THE
DEDICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES, HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED, FOR STREET AND
ALLEY PURPOSES. (Portion of Lots B and C, Tract No. 3886 - Country
Development, Into)
5973
Qitv Hall~ An~heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 24? 196.2~ 3:00 PoM.
On roll call the foregoing Resolution Nco 623{-678 was duly
passed and adopted by the following votes
AYES: COUNCILMENt Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
NOES: COUNCIiN~N: None°
ABSENT: COUNCILM~N: None°
The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 62R-678 duly passed and adoptedo
RESOLI~ION NO. 62_R-679: On the certification of Thornton Eo Piersall, Director
of Public Works that John Co Warner, dba Gormmercial Lot Cleaning, has
completed Work Order Nco 419-8o0 in accordance with the general specifications,
Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Nco 62R-679 for passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
TH~ COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL LABOR, SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT
NECESSARY TO CONbOLETE THE CUTTING AND REMOVAL OF ALL WEEDS AND RANK GROWTH
UPON ALL LOTS AND AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 419-8.0
(Commercial Lot Cleaning) ·
On~oll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following votes
AYES~ COUNCILMEN~
NOESs COUNCILMENs
ABSENTs COUNCIL~AEN~
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, K~ein and Coons°
None.
None°
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-679 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 6~R-680~ On the certification and recommendations of Thornton E.
Piersall, Directo--~ of Public Works, that Griffith Company has completed
the Orange Avenue street improvement from Beach Boulevard to Western Avenue,
Gas Tax Project Nco 95, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-680 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE
COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND
EQUIPN~NT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRASPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER,
AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING
PURLIC IMPROVEMENt, TO WIT~ THE IMPROVE~AENT OF ORANGE AVENUE, FROM BEACH
BOULEVARD TO WESTERN AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. 950
(Griffith Company)
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote~
AYES ~ COUNCILMEN ~
NOES ~ COUNC I LNE:N,
ABSENT ~ COUNCI IJ~N ~
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 623{-680 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-681: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No° 62R-681 for
passage and adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE ACCORDING TO LAW INVITING
SEALED PROPOSALS FOR TH5 FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, NLATERIAL,
ETC., TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE A PUBLIC IMPROVEN~NT, TO WIT~ REST ROOM
ADDITION TO THE CITY HALL, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, JOB NOo 692° (Bids to be
opened September 6, 1962, 2500 PoM.)
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted
5974
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 24~ 1962~ 3:00 PoMo
by the following vote~
AYES: COUNCILN~N:
NOES: COUNCILMEN~
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons°
None°
None°
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-681 duly passed and adopted°
RESOLIfflON NOo 62R-682~ Councilman Krein offered Resolution Noo 62R-682 for
passage and adoption°
Refer to Resolution Booko
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT~ THE IMPROVEN~ENT OF STATE
COLLEGE BOULEVARD, FRCIM ORANGETHORPE AVENUE TO CIES STREET, IN THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO° 696! APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CON-
STRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVENENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS, ETCo; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING T~E CITY CLERK TO
PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF.
(Bids to be opened Auqust 16, 1962, 2~00 PoM.)
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote~
AYES: COUNCILN~N:
NOE$~ COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILN~N:
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons°
None°
None°
The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 62R-682 duly passed and
adopted°
RESOLUTION NOo 62R-682: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 62R-683 for
passage and adoption°
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION
AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVENE~[, IO WIT: THE STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD-
HOWELL AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT, MORE PARTICULARLY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED,
JOB NOo 694; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECI-
FICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF~ AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF
SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS,
ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE
INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOFo (Bids to be
opened August 16, 1962, 2:00 PoMo)
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYESI COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCIL~N~
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons°
None°
None°
The Mayor declared Resolution No° 62R-683 duly passed and
adopted°
RESOLUTION NOo 62R-684~ Councilman Chandler offered Resolution Noo 62R-684
for passage and adoption~
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONFIRMING THE
ITEMIZED WRITTEN REPORT OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS SHOWING THE COST
OF WEED ABATEMENT IN FRONT OF OR ON EACH SEPARATE PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED
IN THE CITY WHERE SUCH WEEDS HAVE BEEN REMOVED OR ABATED BY THE CITY, AND
5975
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINIIrES - July 24, 1962~ 3:00 PoMo
DIRECTING THE FILING OF A CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH THE COUNTY AUDITOR.
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coonso
None o
None°
The Mayor declared Resolution No° 62R-684 duly passed and adopted°
ORDINANCE NOo 1739: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance Nco 1739 for final
reading°
Refer to Ordinance Book°
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMHNDING TITLE 18 OF TH~ ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (61-62-64 - C~i)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Nco 1739 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the
reading in full of said ordinance be waived° Councilman Chandler seconded
the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED°
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN=
NOES~ COUNC!LMHNg
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~
Dutton, Schut'te, Chandler, Krein and Coons°
None°
None~
The Mayor declared Ordinance Nco 1739 duly passed and adopted°
ORDINANCE NOo 1738: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1738 for final
reading°
Refer to Ordinance Book.,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF .ANAHEIM AMHNDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (61-62-86 '~ C~,i)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Nco 1738 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the
reading ~n full of said ordinance be waived° Councilman Chandler seconded
the motion° MO/ION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED~
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN~
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN=
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons,
None,
None ~
The Mayor declared Ordinance Nco 1738 duly passed and adoptedo
ORDINANCE NO. 1740~ Councilman $chutte offered Ordinance Nco 1740 for final
reading°
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14o32,
SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING°
(No parking at any time -- Lemon Street on the east side from Los Angeles
Sro to 450' south of Commercial St~; Lido Street, on both sides)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Nco 1740 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Krein moved the reading
in full of said ordinance be waived~ Councilman Schutte seconded the motion°
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED°
5976
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINIfrES - July. 24, 1962~ 3sO0 PoMo
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL~EN~
NOES: COUNCILNIEN:
ABSENT: COUNCIIAIEN:
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons°
None°
None°
The Mayor declared Ordinance No° 1740 duly passed and adoptedo
CRDINANCE NOo 1741: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance Nco 1741 for final
readingo
Refer to Ordinance Book°
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AN~NDING TITLE 1, CHAPTER 1o04, SECTION
1o04o870, PARAGRAPH (g), AND SECTION lo04o380 OF THE ANAHEIM NRJNICIPAL
CODE. (Planning Commission - Powers and Duties .... Planning Commission
and City Council Members - Expense Allowances)
After h~ring read in full the title of Ordinance No° 1741 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said ordinance be waived° Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIEDo
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote~
AYES: COUNC I LMEN,
NOES: COUNC IL~EN t
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN s
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons°
Noneo
None°
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 1741 duly passed and adopted°
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed
on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman K~eino MOTION
CARRIED.
ac Resolution No° 62~769 - Orange County Board of Supervisors -
regarding incorporation of new city in the North Tustin area°
bo Orange County League of Cities meeting at Yorba Linda
Country Club - July 26, 1962o
Co Standard Oil Company of California, Western Operations, Inco,
dated July 16, 1962 - Abandonment of their Kellogg Nco 1 Well in West
Anaheim Area°
do Park and Recreation Con~ission Minutes of July 12, 1962.
CITY PLANNING CON~ISSION IT~$$ Actions taken by the City Planning Commission
at their meeting held July 9, 1962, pertaining to the following applications,
were submitted for Council information and considerations
~pNDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 262 - Submitted by Carolina Po Griffith,
questing permission to establish a service station on property located
at the southwest corner of la Palma Avenue and State College Bouleva~do
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution Nco 397,
Series 1962-63, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions.
Mr. Tom Brundage, Authorized Agent, requested clarification
regarding Condition No. 6 of City Planning Conm~ission Resolution No: 397.
CONDITIONAL USH P~R~IT NO. 265 - Submitted by Raymond Co and Florence Lo
Troutman, requesting permission to establish an automobile sales lot on
property located at 821 North Los Angeles Street. The City Planning
Commission, pursuant to their Resolution Nco 398~ Series 1962-63, granted
said conditional use permit~ subject to conditions.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO° 2 4~_- Submitted by First Southern Baptist
Church, requesting permission to construct an addftion to existing church
on property located at 1275 East Broadway° The City Planning Commission,
pursuant to their Resolution No. 399~ Series 1962-6~, granted said
conditional use permit, subject to conditions°
5977
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 24~ 1962~ 3:00
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 265 - Submitted by Mr~ and MtSo Calvin Eo Pebley,
requesting permission to construct a hospital and medical center on pro-
perty located on the south side of Ball Road, west of Oakhaven Drive, and
further described as 3354 Ball Road° The City Plannin9 Commission, pursuant
to their Resolution No. 400, Series 1962-63, 9ranted said conditional use
permit, subject to conditions°
Dr. Joseph Po Gleason questioned if approval of this Conditional
Use Permit would affect Council decision on a similar requested use in the
areao
Mayor Coons advised that the proper use of the property is the
only issue considered°
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 268 - Submitted by Carl Lo Rau, requesting per-
mission to establish a kennel for dogs and cats on property located at
3233 East Anaheim Road° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their
Resolution Nco 402, Series 1962-63, denied said conditional use permit°
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 269 - Submitted by William Lyon, requesting per-
mission to construct a walk-up restaurant on property located on the north
side of Ball Road between Gilbert Street and Roanne Street° The City
Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 403, Series 1962-63,
granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions°
VARIANCE NOo 1501 - Submitted by George Ac Martin requesting permission to
waive rear yard setback requirement on property located on the south side
of Willow Street, east of Dawn Street, and further described as 1226 East
Willow Street° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution
Nco 395, Series 1962-63, granted said variance, subject to conditions°
VARIANCE NO° 1502 - Submitted by William Jo Giehl, requesting permission
to waive rear yard setback requirement on property'located on the west side
of Syracuse Street~ north of Monroe Avenue and further described as 405
Syracuse Street° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution
Nco 409, Series 1962-63, granted said variance, subject to conditions°
VARIANCE NOo 1503 - Submitted by Leon Mo and Marjorie Co Wingfield, re-
questing permission to waive rear yard setback requirement on property
located on the north side of Gramercy Avenue, west of Hampton Street, and
further described as 2525 Gramercy Avenue° The City Planning Commission,
pursuant to their Resolution Nco 396, Series 1962-63, granted said variance,
subject to conditions°
The foregoing applications were reviewed by the City Council and
no further action was taken on the above numbered variance and conditional
use permit applications.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMI.T NO. 257 - Submitted by Mro and Mrs. R. Do Boggs,
questing permission to construct a semi-private club house and pool on property
located at the northeast corner of Turin Avenue and Toffy Place, and abutting
1102 South Toffy Place on the south° The City Planning Commission, pursuant
to their Resolution Nco 401, Series 1962-63, granted said conditional use
permit, subject to conditions.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was
quested by Councilman Chandler, and the City Clerk directed to schedule
said application for public hearing before the City Council.
BEVIS;D TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 14541 Subdivider, Monarch Construction Company°
Tract located near the northeast corner of the intersection of Euclid Avenue
and Buena Vista Avenue and contains 27, R-1 lots,
The City Planning Con~nission, at their meeting of July 9, 1962,
recommended approval of said tract, subject to the following conditions8
1~ Requirement that should this subdivision be developed as
more than one subdivision, that each subdivision thereof shall he submitted
in tentative form for approval.
5978
C.ity Hall: Anaheim: California - COUNCIL MINtff£$ - July 24~ 1962~ 3~00 PoMo
2o Dedication and improvements of Euclid Street in front of
"NOT A PART~o
Revised tentative map was reviewed by the City Council, and
Councilman Dutton moved that Revised Tentative Map, Tract Nco 1454~ be
approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commissiono
Councilman Krein seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED°
FINAL MAP: IRACT NOo 4647~ Subdivider~ Nelson Bo Reameso Tract located
at the southerly extension of Canoga Street, 903 feet north of Ball Road9
and contains 6, R-.1 lots~
The City Engineer reported on the boundaries of said final map~
that required bonds have been posted and necessary fees paid~ that said
~nal map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved~
and recommended the approval of said Final Map, Tract Nco 4647°
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Schutte
moved that Final Map, Tract NCo 4647 be approved° Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion° ~OTION CARRIED°
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS NOS° 407 AND 408_~_$ERiE$ 1962-63:
Ci~ Planninq Commission Resolution Nco 40"J~_Series 1962-63~ Recommending
amendment· to Iitle 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.· relative 'to side yard
and rear yard setbacks, parking areas~ and lot coverage a.1].owable in the
R~i, single family residential zone°
~P~ ___tanninq Commission R - 1 +~ ~
e~o~u~on Noo 408t Ser~es 1962-63~ Recommending
amendment 'to Title 18 of the Anaheim Mu.icipal Code~ relative to General
Provision~ parkin9 r~quirementso
I~' was moved by Councilmam Schutte~ seconded by Councilman Dutton,
that City Planning Commi~,s!on Reso!~'tion~ NOSo 407 and 408, Series 1962~63,
be .scheduled for public hearing.s before the City Council on August 14, 1962,
7~00 PoMo MOIiON CARR!ED~
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUfION NOo 41_~0 SERIES i962-~63~ Recommending a
land use policy relative 'to a delimitation of' the major commercial-
recreation area and the uses to be established therein°
RESOLUTION NOo 62R=685~ Councilman Chandler offered Resolution Nco 62R-685
for passage and adoption~ adoptin9 City Planning Commission Resolution Nco
410, Series 1962-63~ establishin9 a land use policy relative to a delimitation
of the major commercial-.recreation area, commonly known as the "Disneyland
Area", as shown on Exhibit Nco 1 on file in the City Plannin9 Department,
and the manner by which uses shall be established therein, as a Policy of
the City Council° Further~ that a copy of said Exhibit Nco 1 also be on
file in the office of the City Clerk°
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING RESOLUTION
NO. 410, SERIES 1962=63 OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ANAH£IM~ AS A LAND USE POLICY OF THE CITY COUNCiL~ RELATIVE TO A DELIMITATION
OF TH~ MAJOR COMMERCIAL~RECREATION AREA OF THE CITY OF ANAH~IMo
(Disneyland Area)
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote~
AYES: COUNCI LN~N ~.
NOES .. COUNCILMEN ..
ABSENT ~ COUNC IL~EN:
Dutton, gchutte~ Chandler, Krein and Coons°
Noneo
None°
The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 62_R~685 duly passed and adopted°
INTRODUCTION: Sgto Harold Bastrup~ Anaheim Police Department, introduced
several patrolman in attendance as part of the Recruit Training Program
for new patrolman of the Anaheim Police Departmento
5979
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES
RECESS: Councilman Schutte moved to recess to 7~00 PoMo Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED~
AFTER RECESS~ The meetin9 was called to order by Mayor Coons, 7~15 PoMo, all
Members of the Council bein9 present°
FLAG SALUTE~ Mayor Coons led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegience
to the Flago
CONDITIONAL USE PERMII NOo 250~ Submitted by Fritz Goossens, requesting
permission to establish a motel on property located on the east side
of Euclid Avenue~ approximately 300 feet north of La Pa!ma Avenue
(1154 North Euclid Avenue)°
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to 'their Resolution Nco
362, Series 1961-62~ denied said conditional use permit°
Public hearing was held by the City Council on July 10, 19629
at which time said hearing was declared closed and action of the City
Council deferred to this date to allow for a policy session with the
Motel-Hotel Division of the Visitors and Convention Bureau~ concerning
construction and operation of motels and hotels°
Plans were again reviewed by the City Council~ and the size
of units noted°
RESOLUTION NOo 62R-686g Councilman Chandler offered Resolution Nco
62R-686, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 250~ subject to the following
conditions~
Io Development subs%an%Jelly in accordance with Exhibit Noso
17 2~ ~ and 4~ with a further provision that the size of each individual
unit contain not less than a minimum of 700 square feet°
20 Construction of a six foot solid masonry wall along the
north, east and south property lines of subject property°
3o Filing of deed restric%ions~ limiting the structural height
of the proposed development to one story within 150 feet of the east boundary
of subject property°
4~ Dedication of 53 feet from the monumented centerline of
Euclid Avenue (30 feet existing)°
50 Preparation or.feet improvement plans and installation of
all improvements for Euclid Avenue~ subject to the approval of the City
Engineer~ and in accgrdance with the adopted standard plans on file in
the office of the City Engineer°
6o Payment of $2000 per front foot for street lighting purposes
on Euclid Avenue°
70 Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the
Department of Public ~orks, Sanitation Division~ which are adequate in size~
accessible to trash truck pickup~ and adequately enciosed by a solid fence
or wall~ prior to the final building inspection°
8o Provision of a five foot public utility easement and three
foot overhang easement along the northerly and southerly boundary of the
subject property~ and a three foot overhang easement along the easterly
boundary of the subject property to adequately serve the subject property
and other properties~ at the time of the installation of the service
facilities,,
9o Installation of fire hydrants~ as determined to be necessary
by the City of Anaheim Fire ~arshall, to provide adequate fire pro%ec~iono
10o Time limitation of 180 days for the accomplishment of
Items Nos° 3~ 4~ ~ 6 and 8o
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESDLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 250°
On roll call the foregoing Resolution wa~, duly passed and adopted
by the following vote~
5980
City Hall~ Anaheim: California - COUNCIL MINIIIES - July 24~ 1962~ 3~00
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES~ COUNCIIN~N:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
Nones
None°
The Mayor declared Resolution No° 62R-686 duly passed and adopted°
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 236~ Submitted by Mr.
and Mrs° Alban Holtz, requesting permission to establish a service
station on property located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue
and Rio Vista Street°
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution
NCo 334, Series 1961-62, denied said conditional use permit°
Public hearing was held by the City Council June 26, 1962
and continued to this date to allow for the submission of a Planning
Study of the area°
Mr° Richard Reese, Planning Director, called attention to
three planning studies placed on the east wall of the Council Chambers,
and noted the location covered by each of the studies, and also noted
the location of the interchange for the proposed Route 19 and Lincoln
Avenue° Regarding the planning studies~ he advised that his remarks
would refer to Conditional Use Permit Nco 236, the southwest corner of
Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street~ and Conditional Use Permit Nco 256,
the southeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street, as the
study affects both applications°
Mro Reese advised that at the City Plannin9 Commission meeting
held yesterday (July 23~ 1962) Resolution NCo 429, Series 1962~63, plan
4'7-122-5, Exhibit Nco 3, was adopted~ recommending the continued orderly,
low-density~ single family residentiel development of the area, with the
exception of the 18 acres at the northeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and
Rio Vista Streets, which is presently zoned C=I by the County of Orange°
That the studies referred to are intended to indicate how the area might
develop and not intended to dictate actual design of development°
Regarding the unusual size of the parcel at the southeast
corner of Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street, the City Planning Commission
recommended a deviation from the general policy of low-density residential
use to permit a limited co~erciai type development°
Regarding Resolution No° 428, Series 1962-63, adopted by the
City Planning Commission July 23, 1962, it was recommended that a land use
polify~ to serve as a guide, be established in the East Anaheim Area
during the interim period necessary to finalize and adopt a General Plano
Regarding Resoluzion No° 430, Series 1962-63, adopted by the
City planning Commission~ July 23, 1962, it was recommended to the City
Council that a land use policy, to serve as a guide, be established
relative to service station locations in the city, and that they be
established only in areas developed or proposed for commercial or industrial
use, and on the' merits of individual application, and be excluded from
areas developed or proposed for residential use°
Further discussion was held by the City Council and Mro Reese
concerning development in the East Anaheim area, and particularly the
proposed commercial development at the northeast corner of Lincoln Avenue
and Rio Vista Street, and also concerning the thinking on the part of the
Planning Commission since considering projected development in the West
Ball Road area°
Mro Nealey, 502 Stehley Street, advised regarding the area pro-
posed by the County for commercial development~ the northeast corner of
Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street~ that the people in the area have pre-
sented a petition to the County of Orange, requesting the area be re-
stored to the R-A zone°
The Mayor asked if the Applicant or his Agent wished to address
5981
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 24: 1962, 3500
the Council°
Mro Phillip Ro McGraw, Attorney representing the Applicants
for Conditional Use Permit No. 236, referred to his letter dated 3une 18,
1962 to the City Council, setting forth reasons why this particular parcel
of property should be considered separately, and how the requested use
fits into the scheme of things, and how the circumstances surrounding it
affects it and its use° He called attention to the traffic count at this
intersection, the close proximity of the proposed freeway and off-ramp
which has taken the greater portion of the Applicant's property, and the
fact that the County has commercially zoned eighteen acres across the
street from subject property, indicating the proper use for the areao
Regarding the petition of protest filed~ Mro McGraw referred
to a map designating the location of those protesting, and according
to his memory, recalled that only one objector was within the 300 foot
radius of the subject property°
He further noted that Lincoln Avenue was a main east-west
artery through the city, and in his opinion, residential use on a main
artery was not warranted°
Mro McGraw stated that a service station would open up the
corner by lighting the corner and actually make it safer for traffic
and pedestrians°
Pictures were presented of a Texaco Station similar to the
one proposed for %his location° Also presented were pe%itlons filed
by property owners in the area~ favoring the granting of the permit~
together with a plan indicating how %he entire parcel could develop
in conjunction with the service station°
Mro McGraw further advised that in hi~: opinion~ this develop-
ment would eliminate an eye-sore that sometimes developes as result of
neglected multiple or single family residential units~ as sometimes
seen where there is an off-ramp development from a freeway° Also,
those residences backing up to a freeway or main artery, are normally
the last to be sold or used° He stated that in his opinion~ this was
a logical development and a good transitional use which would be
compatible~ and also~ would be better from the standpoint of planning,
zoning and financing, and urged favorable consideration of their
application°
The Mayor asked if anyone else in the audience wished to
speak in favor of the application~ there being no response, asked if
there was a spokesman for the group to speak in opposition°
Gene Kyler, 2662 Carnival Avenue, asked if the permit were
granted, would the developers be bound by the plans of development
presented°
Mayor Coons explained that they would not be unless the plans
of development were made a part of the Council's action°
Kenneth Lindberg, 2718 Standish Avenue~ member of the Anaheim-
Rio Vista Homeowners Association~ addressed the Council in opposition~
stating that the granting of this permit would establish a precedent°
Mr° Stanley Winston, 2739 Verde Avenue, disagreed with the
statement made that the gas station would aid traffic, and stated that
an additional traffic hazard would be created by turning in and out of
the sta%iono He referred to the Texaco Station on Lincoln Avenue and
State College Boulevard, and advised, that in his opinion, this station
would meet their needs~ that every corner need no% be developed into gas
station siteso He further advised that gas stations are only beautiful
when they are new and first opened, and this would be serving tourists
who do not live in the area and do not have to suffer the lights and the
consequences of the station°
5982
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUT£S - July 24~ 19.62~ 3~00 PoMo
Mro Bob King, 557 Dune Street, concurred with Mro Winston's
statements, that the stations located on Lincoln Avenue and State College
Boulevard could adequately serve the area<. In his opinion, the recom-
mendations of the Planning Contmission, which is staffed by experts, should
be sustained°
Mro Leo Brajkovich, 552 Dune Street, addressed the Council in
opposition~ stating, in his opinion, the use of the gas station was
breaking up the orderly development of the area; that the property owner
is not being deprived of the opportunity of selling the property because
of the irregular shape° He reported that homes adjacent to freeways
have been built and sold and that they were not an eyesore°
Mr. Robert Graydon, 2807 Walnut Place, noted that no one but
the Applicant's representative addressed the Council favoring the granting
of the permit, and requested the Council take cognizance of the fact that
the petition submitted in opposition is the overwhelming majority of the
people that would be affected by this use°
Petition of opposition purportedly containing 695 signatures,
was submitted at open meeting°
Mro James Dugger, 2762 Ames Avenue, stated that they were
interested in the development of the entire area, and further advised
that some years ago this area was not suitable for development because
of a high flood hazard. He referred to the flood of 1938 and stated
that to prevent a recurrence a major flood control program was under-
taken and bonds were floated~ and as a result, the land was restored to
a greater value than it ever had. Because of the now greater value, he
questioned the implication of hardship° In his opinion, the area had
the potential of the finest residential area in ~outhern CaliforniaI
further, he felt any loss has been off-set by the gains already accrued
from the flood control program and the fact that the area can be used for
residential construction° In addition, in his opinion, a moral obligation
existed to maintain the area residentially, as most of the home owners were
advised upon purchasing their property, that the area would remain
sidentialo
Councilman Dutton asked the size of the parcel and if the pro-
ponents had a precise plan of development,,
Mr.. McGraw replied that the property contains approximately
three acres and the plan presented was a sketch of one method of developing
the property°
Mro James Weitzel, 2822 Virginia Avenue, reported that he had
attended the County Planning Commission meeting when the commercial
property zoning was considered, and advised that the County Planning Com-
mission had recommended denial° That the C-1 zoning was granted by the
Board of Supervisors°
Mayor Coons stated that with the staff reports and the evidence
presented by both the proponenis and opponents, in his opinion a good
cross section had been heard, and thereupon~ declared the hearing closed°
Discussion was held by the City Council and Councilman Dutton
stated that he felt an on-ramp and off=ramp was a proper place for a
service stati0n~ that every land owner is ~ntitled to the maximum use o£
his land, as long as it does not work to the detriment of his neighbor,
and according to the sketch presented, adequate protection would be afforded
the R-1 area°
It was also noted, that the sketch encompassed more area than
the application, and determined by the City Council that the plan sketch
of the entire parcel could not be incorporated in this action°
Plans in the file were again reviewed by the City Council°
RESOLLrfION NO. 62R-687: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 62R-687
for passage and adoption, 9rantin9 Conditional Use Permit Nco 236, subject
5983
~.ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINIffES - July 247 1962~ 3:00
to the following conditions:
i. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented
centerline of Lincoln Avenue (30 feet existing).
2. Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented
centerline of Rio Vista Street (30 feet existing).
3. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of
all improvements for Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street, subject to the
approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard
plans on file in the office of the City Engineer.
4o Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes
on Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street°
5o That a six foot masonry wall be constructed on the westerly
and southerly boundaries of subject property, prior to final building
inspection°
6o Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the
accomplishment of Items Noso 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANIING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NOo 236°
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES ~ COUNCILN~N:
NOES: COUNCI LV~EN l
ABSEN/l COUNCI LN~N,
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
Schutteo
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 62R-687 duly passed and adopted°
PUBLIC H~ARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 256: Submitted by Anne Henning Paulus,
requesting permission to establish a service station on property located at
the southeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street (2800 East Lincoln
Avenue )o
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 382,
Series 1961-62, denied said conditional use permit°
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed
by the Applicant, and public hearing scheduled°
(For Planning Commission's report concerning planning study and
recommendations, see page number 5980°)
The Mayor asked if the Applicant wished to address the Council.
Mro Irwin Paulus presented to each Councilman a map of the supject
property, and reported that the property was purchased in 1900 and has been
in the family since that timel that their plans are to lease the property,
retaining the ownership° He advised that the orange trees have died due to
quick decline, and if the property was utilized for any other purposes,
considering required setbacks for future street widening, there would
main approximately 2.4 acres° That because of the shape of the property,
the extreme east end could not be developed for residential purposes, how-
ever, it could be utilized for parking in conjunction with a commercial use°
Further, because o{ ~he many o{{e~s by major oil companies to ~.ease
corner, they have felt for many years that this would be the best and
highest use, however~ none of the offers until now~ would have Justified
destroying their home° He called attention to the eighteen acres of
commercially zoned property across the street~ and advised that construction
on the Alpha Beta Market has started° In their opinion, the best utilization
of the property would be a service station on the corner and possible com-
mercial fo~ the balance, which would also yield them the best financial
return°
Mrs° Paulus advised that there would be 55°7 feet between the
south line of the service station site and the south boundary of their
property.
5984
City Hall~ ADaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 24~ 1962~ 3100
Mro Ac O. Heldbloom of the Mobile Company (Los Angeles) ad-
vised that the natural site for a service station is a corner, providing
easy access to the residents in the area and those people who will be
usin9 a major east-west arterial highway (Lincoln Avenue), and those
people coming on and off the proposed freeway° He stated that service
stations are an aid to safety, as most stations are located well back
on the property, thereby providing a clear view to the motorists and
pedestrians approaching the intersection° Further, service stations
near a residential area do not conflict with the health, welfare of the
neighborhood, nor do they create any particular traffic hazard beyond
that created by any intersection, and will not create any more nuisance
or discomfort to its neighbors than some other type of establishment
where several people gathero
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
either favoring or opposing the permit°
Mro Jack Singer, 2722 Standish Avenue, called attention to
the many service stations advertised for sale in the newspapers, and
the possible condition of this station if it were boycotted by the
neighbors° He also called attention to the service station situation
in Los Angeles°
Petition purportedly containing 731 names was presented at
open meeting by Mro Allen, 2704 Alden PlaCeo
Mro Nealey advised that at 'this time, two service stations
have been approved for this intersection; the Shell Station approved
by the County across the street and the one approved tonight, and
if this application were approved, there would be three, and asked if
they could expect four° He felt opening up and lighting the corner
should not be at the expense of taxpayers and called attention to the
possibility of having to return to the Council in opposition to a re-
quest for a store, which could possibly be a liquor store, on the
fifty-five foot by one hundred five foot area remaining in the parcel°
Another objection to a service station at this location was that it
would draw people from the freeway into their residential area°
Councilman Krein asked Mro Nealey how he would develop
subject property if he owned it~
Mro Nealey replied, either for R-2 or R-3 use°
Marilyn Warner, 601 Marian, advised that she not only lives
in this area but teaches in the area, and in her opinion, one of the
real reasons that they have such a nice faculty and parents to work
with and nice children to teach, is because of the fact that they are
servicing an R-i, residential area° She advised that in her opinion,
multiple dwellings create school problems and if this station is
approved, there will be additional school taxes due to the fact that
multiple dwelling developments will be requested in this area.
Mr. Charles Warner, 601 Marian, stated that the reason
they moved from San Diego to Anaheim was because it was the nicest place
in Orange County° He reported his experience living next to a service
station and felt that adjacent areas to freeways should be kept clear
of commercial developments in order for free traffic flow on the freeway.
Mr. Sevey, 2732 Standish Avenue, regarding reference to buffer
zone, asked why, in both cases, was discussion held concerning a buffer
zone and felt it was a recognition that service stations are objectionable
and not compatible to an R-1 community°
Mro Harold Hyman, 1114 Groveland Place, stated that commercial
and apartment requests usually follow adjacent to gas station locations,
and asked if anyone knew the completion date of the proposed freeway°
Mr. James Maddox, City £ngineer, advised that according to their
information, it would be from four to five years for construction.
5985
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINI~ES -July 24~ 1962~ 3:00 PoMo
Mro Hyman asked that the concept of a buffer zone be explained
by the Council and also explained by a member of the Planning Staff°
Councilman Dutton reported that in both of these issues before
the City Council, only a portion of the property is in question, and in
both cases, when a precise plan is submitted for the balance of these
parcels~ it would probably be for commercial useo
Mayor Coons advised that it would be difficult for anyone to
define a buffer zone per se, as the conditions were different in each case°
Councilman Schutte stated that if the Applicant had sufficient
area remainin§ to build his home and live in it~ it would be a pretty good
buffer zone in this case°
Mro Jack Wo Singer asked if there was any contemplated R-1 area
in the City of Anaheim where a family could live without the threat of
hot rods, banditry, and other degradation, and asked why other communities,
such as the /ustin area~ are unmolested°
Mayor Coons advised, that in his opinion~ there wasn't a com-
munity in Southern California of any size that could assure anyone
against these conditions~ that these problems come with growth°
Mro Warner stated he was not against gas stations, for the gas
stations sake, entirely~ but also because of what it would lead to, and
asked what guarantee they had that when the next parcel of property is
considered, they would not be wasting their time by protesting, and asked
if they had representation by the elected officials of the city.
Mayor Coons advised Mro Warner that he has an opportunity to
represent himself at any hearing before the City Council° That when
applications are made for use of the other portions of the properties,
the property is posted, legal notices published and written notices mailed
to people within 300 feet of the subject property, however, as to a
guarantee of what is going to be determined, no one could advise because
there is no application before the Council°
Mr. Warner felt the decision made this evening was not a
democratic decision and further stated, regarding the use of the property,
that a medical center at this location would be of service to the area.
Mro Bob King asked what opportunity they had as citizens to
postpone the decision made this evening°
Mr° Dawson, Assistant City Attorney, advised that the decision
made was on an appeal basis from the Planning Commission, and the only
action that the citizens may have is a petition of mandate for the
capricious and irresponsible action of the City Council, if such it bec
Mro King advised of the improvements in the area and their homes,
thereby increasing taxation, and stated any consideration that could be
given to rescind the previous decision and deny the decision presently
before the Council, would be appreciated°
Councilman Chandler advised that it was his understanding that
in a zoning action, the citizen has the right of referendum° The variance
type activity is not subject to referendum because it is not a zoning
activity. The Conditional Use Permit, he felt, was a zoning type action
and felt it could be further clarified by consulting their own attorney.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Mayor Coons declared the
hearing closed.
Councilman Chandler made a statement concerning the progressive
growth of the City into an industrial and co~ercial center, which has
been largely due to the City's general policy° That everyone, including
Members of the City Council, are entitled to their own opinion, and where
there is a physical situation making it difficult to establish something
5986
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL M!NO-rE$ - July 24~ 1962~ 3:00
else, where there is a physical situation such as a freeway and a heavily
travelled ~treet~ that decision must be adduced from the comments made and
evidence submitted by the Planning Department and Planning Commission.
Further, the City Council endeavors to give good service to the citizens
and tries to make honest decisions on these problems, because it is for
this purpose that they are elected°
RESOLUTION NOo 62R-688~ Councilman Du't%on called attention to the fact
that when the freeway is developed, this property owner will be practically
liquidated and will have a very limited use of the balance of his property,
and thereupon offered Resolution Nco 62R=688, granting Conditional Use
Permit Nco 256, subject to the following conditions:
lo Dedication of fifty~three (53) feet from the monumented
centerline of Lincoln Avenue (30 feet existing)°
20 Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented
centerline of Rio Vista Street (30 feet existing)~ this shall include
a return radius of twenty-five (25) feet°
3o Preparation of street improvement plans and installation
of all improvements for Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street subject to
the approval of the City Engineer, and in accordance with the adopted
standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer.
40 Payment of $2°00 per front foot for street lighting pur-
poses on Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street°
5o Construction of a six foot masonry wall along the south
and east boundaries of subject property°
6o Time limitation of 180 days for 'the accomplishment of
Items 1, 2, 3 and 4o
Refer to Resolution Book°
A R£SOLUTION OF TH~ CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO° 2560
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYESI COUNCILMEN~
NOESI COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons°
Schutteo
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-688 duly passed and
adopted°
R~CESS~ Councilman Krein moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Schutte
seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED. (g~30 P.Mo)
AFTER RECESS~ Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all Members of the
City Council being present°
PUBLIC H~ARING - CONDITIONA~ USE PERMIT N0o_22~ Submitted by Thomas Ac Beyrle,
requesting permission to establish restaurant, banquet room, conference
rooms and lO0-unit motel on property located on the north side of Anaheim
Road, approximately 480 feet west of Miller Street (3141 Anaheim Road).
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 346,
Series 1961-62, granted said conditional use permit, subject to the
following conditions:
1o Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented
centerline of Anaheim Road (20 feet existing)°
2o Preparation of street improvement plans and i~tallation
of all improvements for Anaheim Road, subject to the approval of the City
Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the
office of the City Engineer.~
3o Payment of $2°00 per front foot for street lighting purposes
on Anaheim Road°
4. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the
Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in
5987
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL M'INU/ES - July 24; 1962~ 3~00 PoMo
size, accessible to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a
solid fence or wall, prior to final building inspection°
5o Access drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of
fourteen (14) feeto
6° Installation of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary
by the City of Anaheim Fire Marshall, to provide adequate fire protection°
7° Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the
accomplishment of Item Nos° 1, 2 and 30
80 Development substantially in accordance with plans submitted
with Exhibit Nos° 1, 2, 3 and 4~ except that shake roof shall be provided!
parking shall be provided in accordance wi~n code requirements and in
accordance with the open air parking space dimensions adopted by the Planning
Commission and on file with the Planning Department, prior to final building
inspection; that no swing-out type windows shall be permitted on the north~
east and west sides of the proposed building where said windows would encroach
into the driveway area of the proposed motel°
9o Installation of a twenty (20) foot strip of landscaping on the
right-of-way line of subject property, plans for said landscaping to be
submitted and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Main-
tenance and said landscaping to be installed prior to final building
inspection° '
10o Subject to the reclassification of subject property to the
Light Manufacturing Zone°
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered
by the City Council in order to review plans of development°
Mro Marvin Krieger, Assistant Planner~ noted the location of the
property and reported that revised plans received June 11, 1962 have been
checked and found to conform with the Code requirements°
Plans were reviewed by the City Council and it was noted that the
project was designed for two-story construction°
Mro Richard Reese, Planning Director, reported that action on
this application was taken prior to Planning Commission recommendation and
Council Resolution of Intention to zone the area M-l, and the statement of
policy that residential uses would be resisted. Further, a policy is pre-
sently being considered by the City Planning Commission, whereby these
types of facilities would be permitted only where they are incorporated
into an industrial service center of not less than five acres in size.
Regarding the requested restaurant, he noted that there is at present, an
existing restaurant facility on the adjacent property. Regarding the motel,
he reported that they are sleeping rooms and to the best of his knowledge,
will not have kitchen facilities.
The Mayor asked if the Applicant or his representative was present
and wished to address the Council.
Mary Stewart, 9333 Ralph Street~ Rosemead, California, appearing
on behalf of Dfc Toma and Mro Beyrle, advised that Autonetics had assisted
in the planning of this project, which will be designed to accommodate
the needs of the Research Center~
Further discussion was held by the City Council concerning the
proposed location and the establishment of a precedent fox other industries.
At the conclusion thereof, it was moved by Councilman Krein, seconded by
Councilman Dutton, that action on said application be deferred one week,
July S1, 106~, tot ~ur~her study. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC H~ARING - CONpi?i.ONAL US~ PSRM~7 NO. ~40t Submitted by Alpine Development
Company, requesting permission to, (1) allow on-sale beer and wine, and (2)
establish a dance studio on property located on the east side of State College
Boulevard, between La Palma Avenue and Underhill (402 and 406 North State
College Boulevard)~
The City Planning Commission, pursuant ~to their Resolution No. 347,
Series 1961-62, granted ~aid conditional use permit, subject to the fol-
lowing conditionsl
5988
City Hall~ ..Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINU/£S - July 24~ 1962~ 3200
1. Payment of $2°00 per front foot for street lighting
purposes on State College Boulevard~
2. Subject to the completion of the modification to
Reclassification Nog 58-59-84 as stipulated in Reclassification Nog
61-62-106o
30 Time limitation of one hundred eighty(180) days for the
accomplishment of Item No. 1o
4o Subject to the filing of deed restrictions limiting subject
petition to the sale of beer and wine in an Italian Restaurant by the
owners only; that no bar shall be installed, and that all beer and wine
be served at the tables only; that should said restaurant be sold, said
Conditional Use Permit Nog 240 shall become null and void and shall
not be passed on to the new owner°
5o Provision that Store Nog 4 be restricted to the use as an
Italian restaurant only; that store NOg 6 be designated as a dance studio°
60 Installation of landscaping in the unpaved portion of
subject property abutting the State College Boulevard right-of-way, approxi-
mately two feet in width, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to
the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said landscaping to be
installed prior to issuance of a business license for the requested
operation°
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was
ordered by the City Council, to further clarify Condition Nog 40
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council~ for
or against the issue~ there being no response, declared the hearing
closed°
R£$OLUTtON NOg 62R-689~ Councilman Chandler offered Resolution Nog
62R-689 for passage and adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit
Nog 240, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission,
however, deleting Condition No° 5, and amending Condition No° 4 to
read: Subject to the limitation that the subject Conditional Use Permit
permits the sale of beer and wine in an Italian Restaurants that no bar
shall be installed, and that all beer and wine shall be served at the
tables onlyo
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
US£ PERMIT NOg 240.
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the following votel
AYESI COUNCIL~EN~
NOES~ COUNCILNtEN~
ABSENT~ COUNCILNtEN~
Dutton, ~chutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
None°
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-689 duly passed and adopted~
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOs 25~ Submitted by LeGrand Do Spencer,
requesting permission to construct a walk-up Berger Chef on property
located on the west side of Los Angeles Street, approximately 40 feet north
of Cerritos Street (1475 South Los Angeles Street)°
The City Planning Commisslon, pursuant to their Resolution Nog
363, Series 19616-62, denied said conditional use permit.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was
filed by the Applicant and public hearing scheduled.
Mr. Don Swango, 1817 Commodore Road, Newport Beach, California,
representing the Applicant, addressed the Council, requesting this matter
he continued one week, as Dr. Spencer is presently out of town, and certain
information relative to parking is needed to properly present the issue.
Mayor Coons asked if there was anyone in the audience that had
5989
City Hall.~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINU/E$ - July 24.~ !962~ 3JO0 PoMo
appeared to protest th:is application° There was no response°
It was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman
Krein, that a one week continuance be granted, in accordance with the
verbal request° To this motion Councilman Chandler voted "no". MOTION
CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT NO. 259~ Submitted by Dale Do and Sally A.
Walker, requesting permission to establish a hofbrau restaurant and repair
garage on property located on the north side of Balsam Avenue~ between East
Street and the Orange County Flood Control Channel°
The City Plannin9 Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 385~
Series 1961-62, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to the
following conditions~
1o Recordation of the deed for dedication of Balsam Avenue.
2o Payment of $2o00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on
Balsam Avenue.
3o Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the
accomplishment of Item No. 2o
4o Installation of a six foot masonry wall on the west, north
and east boundaries of subject property prior to final building inspection
of the repair garage in order to shield from view any wrecked automobiles parked
awaiting repair in the parking area°
Revision to City Planning Commission Resolution No. 385 pertaining
to Finding No. 1, and ~inutes substantuating said revision~ were submitted
and read°
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission, denying
the hofbrau portion of the application, was filed, and public hearing
scheduled°
Location of subject property was noted.
The Mayor asked if the Applicant wi,.+hed to address the Council.
Mr. Dale Walker, 1118 North Rosemont, Anaheim, advised that the
reason for the denial of the hofbrau restaurant use was that the proposed
use was not compatible with the land use in the area° He did not understand
how a use could be permitted in a zone and yet be considered incompatible.
Mr. Walker presented and explained a map of the area, indicating
the zoning and location of subject property, and called attention to the
undeveloped land in the immediate vicinity° He also appealed the require-
ment of a six foot wall on the east, west and north sides of the property,
as on the west side there is a five foot setback and a chain link fence
along the Flood Control Channel: on the north~ there is an easement used
by the City of Anaheim, and on the east, it would be detrimental for
advertising purposes.
Discussion was held briefly, concerning the pipeline easement
purportedly used by the City of Anaheim, and Mr. Walker advised that an
easement was given by the oil station company, which fact could be verified
by Mr. Roquet, who was the agento
Mr. Harold Marks, 7231 Hannah Street, Downey, California, proposed
operator of the hofbrau restaurant, explained that he had been operating a
liquor store in the City of Downey for the past 14 years, and just recently
sold his interest in a chuck wagon operation in the City of Bell, California°
He explained the menu and stated that the chuck wagon operation had been
very successful° He further advised, that in his opinion, the area warranted
this type of business°
Mayor Coons pointed out that since the Flood Control Channel was
constructed, and unless some additional provision of access is provided,
the area west of the channel may not develop industrially°
599O
qity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 24~ 1962~ 3:00 PoMo
Discussion was held concerning the access to the area west of
the Flood Control Channet,~
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council on
this application, there being no response, declared the hearing closed°
Mro Reese advised that a planning study was presented to the
Planning Commission yesterday as result of the recent request for a
trailer park in the area, wherein it was determined that the highest and
best use was to retain it in its present classification°
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-690~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Nco 62R-690
for passage and adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit NCo 259, subject
to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and further
subject %o~ Condition Nco 5o That the permit is granted for the hofbrau
operation and the sale of food and incidentally for the sale of beer°
Condition No~. 6o That development be substantially in
accordance with Exhibit on fileo
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CON-
DITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2590
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote~
AYES: COUNCILMEN
NOES: COUNCILMEN
ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons°
None°
None°
The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 62R~690 duly passed and adopted°
PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NOo 1485~ Submitted by Dfc Elmer Gooel, requesting
permission to add brake alignment and muffler installation service to
existing store on property located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue,
approximately 266 feet west of Harbor Boulevard (524 West Lincoln Avenue)°
Pursuant to City Planning Commission Resolution Nco 354,
Series 1961-62, said variance was granted, subject to the following
conditions~
1o Development substantially in accordance with Hxhibit Noso 1
and 2, except as amended herein, and the provision that standard parking
requirements shall be waived°
2o Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the
Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in
size, accessible to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid
fence or wall, prior to final building inspection°
3o Revised plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
indicating that Lift has been enclosed in the structure, that present
structure has been extended to the south to enclose said Lift and that the
removal of and installation of mufflers shall be confined to the enclosed
structure as extended to the south°
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered
by the City Council to further consider the provision concerning the waiver
of parking requirements°
Revised plans, as checked by the Planning Staff, was presented
for Council review°
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council°
Mro Ro Ro Young, 400 Hast Olympic Boulevard, Los Angeles, employee
of the B. Fo Goodrich Company, advised that according to a clause in their
lease, they had the use of the adjacent community parking lot to the east
and, therefore, will be above parking code requirements°
5991
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINIff. ES -~ Jul_x_~ 1962~ 3~00 PoMo
Mr~ Marvin Kr~eger~ Assistant Planner~ reported that according
to the revised plans, parking provisions will meet code requirements°
/he Mayor asked if anyone else wished to ~adressa' the Council,.
there being no response~ declared the hearing closed~
RESOLU/ION NOo 62R-691: Councilman Schu'tte offered Resolution Nco 62R~691
for passage and adoption, 9ranting Variance Nco 1485~ subject to the
recommendations of the City Planning Commission, amending Condition No° 1
to read: Development substantially in accordance with revised plans
submitted to the City Council this date°
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF IHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING
VARIANCE NOo 1485o
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followzng vote:
AYES~ COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILN~EN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler~ Krein and Coons°
None°
None.
'The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 6~ ,69]. duly passed and adopted°
PUBLIC HEARING -, VARIANCE NOo 1488~ Submitted by Carmen Ssal:::o~ requesting per~
mission to establash an on~.sale liquor licensed restaurant on property located
on the east side of Harbor Boulevard~ approx~ma%e!¥ i180 feet south of
Midway Drive (1560 South Harbor Boulevard)°
Ihe City Planning Commission, pursuant 'to their Resolution Nco 356,
Series i961.-62~, granted said variances, subject 'to the following conditions~
Io Dedication of 60 feet from the monumenied centerline of Harbor
Boulevard (50 feet existing)°
~o Provision of trash storage areas as de~ermined by the Department
of Public ~orks~ Sanitation Division~ which are adequate in size~ accessible
%o trash, truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall~ prior
to final building inspection°
3, Time limitation of 180 days for the accomplishment of Item Nco 1o
~., Provision that all structures on the roof of the existing
restaurant be painted the same color as the ~lance of the roof in order to
maintain color harmony~
5.~ Provision that the "on-sale" of liquor is an incidental use in
conjunction with the restaurant operation by the owner of subject restaurant
and that said granting of the variance shall not be granted to a future owner
of subject property by virtue of the sale of subject property°
Review of ac'tion taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered
by the City Council to further consider a technical provision of Condition
No, 5o
Councilman Chandler, because of a possible conflict of in%crest,
withdrew from participating in the discussion of action on this issue°
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there
be:ns no response, declared the hearing closed°
RESOLUTION NOo 62R~692: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Nco 62R-692
for passage and adoption, granting variance No. 1488, subject to %he City
Planning Commission recommendations, amending Condition Nco 5 to read~
Provision that 'the "on-sale" of liquor is an incidental use in conjunction
with the restaurant operation.,
Refer to Resolution Book~
A RESOLU/ION OF TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF .ANAHEIM GRA~IING VARIANCE
NOo 1488~
5992
~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California ,~ COUNCIL MINUTES - July 24~ 1962~ 3:00, PoM.
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote~
AYES: COUNCILN~N: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Coons°
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Nones,
ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: None~
ABSTAINED FROM
VOTING: COUNCILMEN: Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-692 duly passed and
adopted°
PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE N0o 1492: Submitted by Mro and Mrs. Marshall Ro
Baucom, requesting permission to waive sideyard setback requirement to
allow the construction of a block wall on property located at the
southeast corner of Dale and Yale Avenues (1212 North Dale Avenue)°
'The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution
Noo 360, Series 1961=62, granted : ~id variance, subject to the following
conditions~
1o Dedication of 45 feet from the monumented centerline of
Dale Avenue (20 feet existing) including return°
20 Provision that a two=year bond be posted to insure the
installation of street improvements of sidewalks, curbs and gutters on
Dale Avenue~ and should property abutting to the south be developed
prior to the two years, said improvements shall be installed on subject
property at 'the request of the City Engineer~ that should property
abutting to the south no~ be developed within the said two-year guarantee
period~ the petitioner may request that said bond be renewed through
the City Engineer or City Attorne¥o
30 Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for
the accomplishment of Item NOSo i and 2o
40 Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Noo 1
provided that said six (6) foot wall shall be constructed parallel to
Yale Avenue and three (3) feet from the right-of-way line of Yale Avenue°
Revision of Condition No° 4 of City Planning Commission
Resolution No° 360, as noted in the fi].e~ was amended to read, "Development
substantially in accordance with Exhibit Noo 1'~o
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission
regarding certain conditions, was filed by the Applicant and public
hearing scheduled°
The Mayor asked if the Applicant wished to address the Council°
Mro Marshall Baucom addressed the Council, advising that he had
purchased the property in January of this year° That the request is to
construct a fence on the north side of the property for the protection of
his child who is ill. Further, he is financially unable to install the
street improvements at this time°
Discussion was held concerning the improvement of Dale and Yale
Avenues, and consideration was given to the possibility of improvement by
the 1911 Act. Consideration was also given to the fact that this particular
request did not change the use of the property°
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closedo
RESOLUTION NOo 62R-693~ Councilman Krein offered Resolution Noo 62R-693
for passage and adoption, granting Variance No. 1492, subject to the
following conditions: 1o Dedication of forty=five (45) feet from the
monumented centerline of Dale Avenue (20 feet existing) including return°
2. Development substantially in accordance with
Exhibit Noo 1~
3o Time limitation of 180 days for the accomplish-
ment of Item Noo 1o
5993
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 24~ 1962~ 3:00 P.M.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING
VARIANCE NOo 1492.
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES: COUNC I LMEN ~
NOES: COUNCILMEN ~
ABSENT.. COUNCILMEN.~
Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Coons°
Chandler°
None~
The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 62R-693 duly passed and adopted°
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICAIION NO. 61-62-122~ Submitted by Mro and MtSo
Robert S. Unger, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3~ property
located on the north side of Winston Road, approximately 635 feet east
of Magnolia Avenue (2533 Winston Road).
The City PlannTn§ Commission, pursuant to their Resolution
No. 387, Series 1961-62, recommended said reclassification, subject
to the followin9 conditions~
i. Dedication of thirty-two feet from the monumented centerline
of Winston Road, (20 feet existing).
2o Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of
all improvements for Winston Road subject to the approval of the City
Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plan on file in the
office of the City Engineer°
$o Payment of $2°00 per front foot for street lighting purposes
on Winston Rondo
4o Payment of a Park and Recreation fee of $25°00 per dwellin9
unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit°
5° Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the
Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division~ which are adequate in size
accessible to trash-truck pickup and adequately enclosed by a o.iid fence or
wall, prior to final building inspection~
6~ 'rime limitation of one hundred eighty days for the accomplishment
of Item Nos° l, 2 and 3o
7. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1o
8. Subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a
planned-unit muiz. iple family residential development on subject property°
9. Provision of a six foot masonry wall on the west and east
boundaries of subject property in order to maintain the residential integrity
of the development and protect the abuttin9 property to the east and to the
west of subject property..
10o Provision tha't the interior walls of the proposed carports shall
be stuccoed, that enclosed storage areas shall be provided along the rear
wall of each carport, and that adequate bumper guards shall be provided to
protect the rear of the proposed carports.
Letter of approval were filed by Robert Po and Laverna Clark (2543
Wo ~inston Street) and Clarence and Elizabeth Wagner (2513 and 2519 Winston
Street).
Mr. Marvin Krieger, Assistant Planner, noted the location of the
property, and reported on the zoning and development in the immediate area°
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council°
Mro ~illiam Wolsborn, Agent for the Applicant, addressed the
Council, advising that the writers of the letters of approval were the
owners on each side of the subject propertyo Further, a Conditional Use
Permit to allow carports instead of garages was granted by the City
Planning Commission ye~terdayo
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearin9 closed°
5994
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 24: 1962:3:00 PoM.
RESOLUTION NO. 62R-694~ Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Nco
62R-694 for passage and adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary
~dinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations
of the City Plannin9 Commission°
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE .AMENDED AND THAT TH~ BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGED° (61-62-i22 - R-3)
On roll call the foregoin9 Resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the followin9 votes
AYES: COUNCIL~EN~
NOES: COUNCILMENt
ABSENT: COUNCILMENg
Dutton, Schutte, Chandlery Krein and Coons°
None.
None.~
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 62R-694 duly passed and
adoptedo
VISITOR AND CONVEN/ION BUREAU: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by
Councilman $chutte, the City Attorney was authorized and instructed to
prepare necessary ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds, and
resolution setting forth specific amount to be expended° MOTION CARRIED°
SOUTHWEST ANNEXATION: The City Clerk submitted the following certificate
relating to the sufficiency of petitions requesting annexation of
inhabited territory designated as Southwest Annexation°
CERTIFICATE RELATING TO SUFFICIENCY OF PETiTiON FOR THE ANNEXATION OF
INHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM°
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )sso
CITY OF-:L'QA~{~ ? )
, DENE M~ WTL~:AMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that upon receiving in my office a petition requesting the
annexation to the City of Anaheim of certain territory known and designated
as SOUTHWEST ANNEXATION, I have checked said petition and have examined
the County Re9istration of Voters Records to ascertain the total number
of qualified electors residing within the territory described in said
petition, and
I FURTHER CERTIFY, that from such examination and inspection,
t find that the total number of qualified electors residing in said
territory is two thousand, two hundred eighty-four (2284) electors, and
t find that said petition is signed by five hundred forty-eight (548)
qualzfied electors residing within the territory described in said
petition, as shown by the County Registration of Voters of Orange
County, California, and
I FURTHER CERTIFY, that the last mentioned number of qualified
electors constitutes less than one-fourth of the qualified electors re-
siding within the territory proposed to be annexed, as shown by such
County Registration of Voters Records
I FURTHER CERTIFY that said territory described in said petition
is contiguous to the City of Anaheim and does not form a part of any
other incorporated cityo
DATED this 24th day of July, 1962o
(Seal)
/s/ Dene Mo Williams
City Clerk of the City of Anaheim
5995
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINIffES - July 24, 1962, 3:00 P.M.
Ihe City Clerk reported that a similar certificate has been
filed by Lo B. Wallace, County Clerk of Orange County°
Said reports were received and filed and in accordance with
the provision of the Government Code, ten days extension of time was
authorized for the filing of supplemental petitions, on motion by
Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Duttono MOTION CARRIED°
ANAHEIM N~EMORIAL HOSPITAL: Letter dated July 20, 1962 from D. Eo Heeb,
Administrator, was submitted and read, withdrawing the gift to the
City of the land and buildings of the Anaheim Memorial Hospital, due
to unforeseen difficulties and certain problems not previously aware
Cfc
Councilman Coons moved that the letter be received and filed
and that the Council express their appreciation to the hospital and to
the Citizens Committees for the time and service that they have spent
studying this problem° Councilman Dutton seconded the motion° MOTION
CARRIED. (Councilman Krein took no part on the above issue)
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY~ Request for ad to be ~ncluded in issue con-
taining 51 pages covering Southern California generally, at the rate
of, one page, $10,800.; one-eighth page, $1,350o, was submitted.
No action was taken by the City Council.
RESOLUTION NOo 62R-695k Councilman Dutton offered Resolution NCo 62R-695
for passage and adoption°
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH5 CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING TH~ EXECUTION OF AN AGRE£N~NT WITH ORANGE COUNTY STREET
LIGHTING Nt~INTENANCE DISTRICT NOo 8 FOR TH5 Nt~INTENANCE AND ENERGY FOR
STREET LIGHTS IN TRACT 2893 IN SAID STREET LIGHTING N~INTENANCE DISTRICT
NO° 8o
On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the following voter
AYES~ COUNCILMEN:
NOES~ COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Schutte, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None~
None°
The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 62R-695 duly passed and adoptedo
CRIMINAL LAW SYMPOSIU~ On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman
Schutte, two deputies of the City Attorney's Office were authorized to
attend the Criminal Law Symposium in San Francisco, August 11, 1962.
MOTION CARRIED.
PERMISSION TO LEAVE TH~ STATE - (COUNCILMAN KREIN)~ Councilman Krein was
granted permission to leave the State during the month of August, 1962,
on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION
CARRIED.
ADJOURNN~NT: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn° Councilman Schutte seconded
the motions. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED~'~ (11:3_5. PoM~: )
City Clerk