Loading...
1969/03/1169-134 City Hall, Anaheim' California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March z~ 1969, 1:30 P~Mo At the conclusion of discussion it was agreed that no further ac- tion would be taken on the matter at this time° ADJOURNMENT~ Councilman Clark moved to adjourn° Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 4:17 F.M~ City Clerk City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 11; 1969; 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley (entered the meeting at 2:00 P.M.). ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Will, ams CITY ENGINEER: James P. i.mddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Pro-Tem Schutte called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Bergeson, of Martin Luther Hospital, gave the Invoca- tion. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Dutton led the Assembly in ~%a Ple~.~ of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATION: Proclamation proclaiming the week of March 10 to 15, 1969, as "American Legion Week," was unanimously ratified. INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES: David Hill, of the City Personnel Department, introduced new employees attending the Council meeting as part of the City's Orientation Program. The Mayor Pro-Tem welcomed the new employees to the City Family. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held February 25, 1969, were approved on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Clark moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the w~'ver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANI- MOUSLY CARRIED. 69-135 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 11, 1969, 1:30 P.M. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY; Demands against the City, in the amount of $1,375,917.20, in accordance with the 1968-69 Budget, were ap- proved. SAVANNA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT - JOINT RECREATION AGREEMENT~ The City At- torney reported on the proposed Joint Recreation Agreement with the Savanna Elementary School District and recommended Council authorization. He fur- ther recommended that an amendment to the Agreement, requested by the County Counsel~ not be authorized, as it is not in conformance with agreements presently in effect with other School Districts. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-125: On recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman !~.-~'. offered Resoluti-on No. 69R-125 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND SAVANNA SCHOOL DISTRICT PROVIDING FOR A JOINT PROGRAM OF COMMUNITY RECREATION. ' Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-125 duly passed and adopted. ~UBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 2044 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-13): Submitted by A.Hemmerling, requesting waivers of minimum building setback from a lo- cal street, minimum setback from interior boundary line, minimum distance between buildings, minimum width of pedestrian passageway, two-story height within 150 feet of R-A zoned property, and distance of living units from a standard street, to establish a 694-unit apartment complex. R-A zoned property, located north of the Santa Ana River, and south of the Riverside Freeway, west of Kraemer Boulevard, said frontage being on the south side of Frontera Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-10, granted Variance for Phase I only, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 68-69-13. 2. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 3. That all streets within the development shall be constructed in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, except that the sidewalks may be located adjacent to the curbs, provided that the sidewalks are offset to the rear of fire hydrants on all streets and utility poles on Frontera Street. 4. That a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of a 6-foot masonry wall along all property lines where required by Code. 5o That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be pro- perly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent r~gidential homes. 6. That Condition Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. 8. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such parcel; provided, however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split. 69-1~6 City Mall~ Anaheim~ Californ.ia.- CO_UNCIL_MINUTES 9. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and recreation fees for each dwelling unit, as required by City Council resolution, which shall be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued° Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Armour Building Company~ Authorized Agent e~ the Appllcant~ requesting City Council approval of said Variance for the three phases encompassing the entire project, and further requesting that Resolution of Intent No. 68R-663, approving Reclassification Noo 68-69-13, be amended to allow the adoption of separate zoning ordinances as each phase is ready for development~ Letter dated March 10, 1969, from the County of Orange, Department of Real Property Services, was read biz the City Clerk, requesting that a par- cel approximately 2 acres in size, located to the east of the subject property, and owned by the Orange County Flood Control District, be considered in the approval of any street patterns and design of any public utility system, in- cluding sewers, on the subject property; advising of the possible sale of the County-owned parcel, and further requesting that the City consider R-3 zoning on the County-owned parcel~ to conform with requested use of subject property. Zoning Supervisor, Charles Roberts, noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He noted that the Commission's approval of Phase I only was based on the fact that no precise plans of development were submitted for Phases II and III; that the Developer has since submitted plans for Phases II and III, which have been reviewed by the Planning Staff~ and determined to be in basic con- formity to the variances approved by the Planning Commission for Phase I. In answer to Council questions, Mro Roberts stated that the subject area is indicated for Medium and Low-Medium-Density on the General Plan; that there is a Resolution of Intent to Zone R-3 on the northerly portion, and R-2 on the southerly portion, (68R-663). Plans and files were reviewed by the City Council and the May~r Pro-Tem asked if the Applicant wished to address the City Council. Mr. Larry Armour, 2731 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, displayed a plot plan of the proposed development and noted the location of each of the planned Phases° He emphasized that the project is one development and asked that the City Council grant the requested Variance on the entire development, so that the entire project can be planned under existing rules. He further advised that plans for Phases II and III have now been submitted, analyzed, and found to conform to the City Planning Commission action taken on Phase Io He noted that the three Phases will be developed in sequence, and estim- at~ -~he entire project would be developed ~-~ 1971, with financing and mar- ket dictating the progress. In answer to a question by Councilman Krein, Mr. Armour indicated that the property owned by the Orange County Flood Control District was stud- ied for possible inclusion in the development, as well as a small, triangu- lar parcel to the south; but it was determined that the Orange County Flood Control parcel was not useful to the development~ however, utilities are stubbed to the property, so it can be used by someone else. With reference to the request of the County of Orange, Mr. Murdoch reported that the Engineering Division and Development Services Department have made an analysis of the possibility of continuing the street pattern, ~ there appears to be no apparent reason to do so, as access will be avail- able from the frontage road~ however, utilities are required to be stubbed to the edge of the property~ as requested by the County. He recommended that if approval is granted for all phases, development be required in ac- cordance with the plans submitted, or as amended with the approval of the City Council. Mayor Peb!ey asked if anyone else wished to address the City Coun- cil' there being no response, declared the h~aring closed° 69-1.37 City Ha~l~ Anahgim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 11~ 1969, 1:30 P.M. Councilman Clark noted that according to General Plan Amendment No. 97, the parcel adjoining subject property to the south and west is desig- nated as suitable for R-2, 5,000 development; therefore, he felt that two- story development should not be allowed within 150 feet of the westerly boundary. Mr. Armour noted that the General Plan indicates Low-Medium Den- sity, which could be either R-2, or R-2, 5,000 development; that he did not believe single-family homes would ever be developed on that property, as the area is not considered to be suitable for that type of development by the Federal Housing Administration. Me further noted that a mobile home park is presently being proposed for this property. The City Manager called attention to a memorandum from the City Engineer regarding Condition No. 3 contained in. the Planning Commission Resolution, pertaining to development of streets in accordance with standard plans and specifications. He noted that the City iPlanning Commission ap- proved sidewalks adjacent to curbs, wi-_,~r~'~a? the City Engineer recommends that sidewalks be set back from the c'~rb, leaving an unpaved parkway strip. The City Engineer outlined the basis of their recommendation, being aesthetic value, pedestrian safety, and providing {or an area {or the location of utilties. Mr. Armour indicated the project is designed as an all-adult com- munity; that no driveway cuts are planned; that utilities will be under- ground; that street lights with extending arms will be located behind the sidewalks, and noted the convenience of having sidewalks next to the curb, where on-street parking will be prevalent. The City Engineer noted that utility poles are planned on Front- era Street, which must be taken into consideration. The City Manager reported on the recommendation of the Fire Chief and suggested a further amendment to Condition No. 3, if the variance is granted, to read "provided that the sidewalks are offset to the rear of fire hydrants placed within the sidewalk area and to the rear of any utili- ty poles on Frontera Street." Mr. Murdoch also noted that the City Planning Co~_mission is cur- rently studying a proposed change in the parking requirements for multiple- family areas; and that if the City Council does increase parking require- ments in these areas, as a result of this study, it is possible that changes will be required in the plans submitted at the time future developments take place in order to meet the Code requirements in existence at that time. Mr. Armour objected to this contingency, stating that he wished approval of the entire development according to existing requirements. The City Attorney advised that if the entire project is developed now he is entitled to develop according to the existing Code requirements; however, if he does not develop until a later date, he must develop accord- ing to the Code requirements in effect at that time, which could also be a change in the Building Code. Mr. Murdoch observed that such a change in Code requirements may not take place; but in the event it does, Mr. Armour would have the recourse of requesting a variance at the time Mr~ Murdoch also noted that the condemnation proceedings across the Huarte property to pro'vide a sewer line for the subject property, was rescinded or held in abeyance by the City Council approximately one month ago; that meetings with the principals have not produced a solution to the problem of serving the prop~rty'~ and thereupon recommended that the City Council authorize notice be given to Mr o Huarte that it is our intention ~o proceed with eminent domai~ proceedings, for the purpose of constructing a sewer line across the Hua~'te property to serve subject property. 69-138 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 113 1969~ 1;30 F.M. In answer to Council questions, Mr~ Murdoch explained that the au- thorization for condemnation proceedings wag withheld as it was felt that a more logical way to accomplish the purpose would be for the easternmost por- tion of the Huarte property, (1-1/3 acre), to be incorporated in the Armour development; but that negotiations failed to materialize and it is no longer possible to do this. He pointed out that it has been the policy of the City Council to bring sewer system to the property line of property to be developed; and it appears the only way this can be accomplished at this time is through an easement across the southerly portion of Mr. Huarte's property. Mr. Joseph Do Huarte, 1464 East La Palma Avenue, addressed the City Council. He related that Mr. Armour approached him approximately one year ago to purchase the pie-shaped piec~ of property in question; that he was willln$ to sell the property on the basis of ~27,000.00 per acre, on a thirty-day es- crow, but Mr. Armour submitted an offer for a six-month escrow, which was un-. acceptable; that he subsequently received notice from the City that condemna- tion proceedings had been authorized; that approximately one month ago he con- tacted the Mayor, the City Manager, and Mro Armour by letter, advising that he was willing to sell the property' to Mr. Armour at the previously agreed price and on the same terms; and that he had received no response to the letter. Ne stated that he did not believe it was right to use the power of eminent domain to obtain property for private gain to an individual when that property may be purchased at a fair price and the problem resolved between the parties affected. In this case he felt the power of government was being misused. Mr. Murdoch observed that there apparently was some misunderstanding between the two pr~ncipals; however, documents have been inspected, and it is not now felt to be appropriate to require Mr~ Armour to redesign the development to accommodate the alternative method of sewering the property. Mr~ Armour indicated that the offer to purchase a portion of Mr. Huarte's property was made at the same time as negotiations were in progress for the other two parcels~ that when it was found that it would be necessary to purchase the entire parcel from Mr. Huarte, rather than a portion of it, the project was designed without it, on the assumption that sewers would be provided by the City. He advised that he was unaware that the condemnation proceedings had not proceeded, and pointed out that escrow has closed on Par- cel "A" of the subject property, and will close shortly on Parcel "B"; that a considerable amount of money has been invested relying on the assumption that utilities would be provided the property. He did not understand Mr. Huarte's objections to a sewer easement, as it would be located immediately adjacent to the R-1 development, on the south, where there is a 10-foot set- back requirement, preventing construction of a structure in this area. Mr, Huarte advised the City Council that an application has been made, now pending before the City Planning Commission, for the development of a mobile home park on ] ~_? property~ and if approved, as soon as develop- ment takes place~ sewer connections to the Armour property will be available. Further~ it was their intention to proceed with the mobile home park as soon as possibl, eo Mr~ Armour replied it is his desire to obtain necessary sewer con- nections and receive Build~ng Permits before May 1st, and requested assurance he would be able to do so~ ~te stated his willingness to work with Mr. Huarte in any way possible to solve the problem, but failing the development of the mobile b0me park, he wished to know what alternate solution would be avail- abie~ to which he received general assurance that the policy of the City Coun- cil to Drov~de sewer connections to property to be developed would be adhered CO. RESOLUTION NO. 69R~126~ C~uncilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 69R-126 for adoption, granting Var~ance No. 2044, as requested by the Applicant, for Phase~ ~I~ II and ]£I, subject to the condition, s recommended by the City Planning Cor~ission, with the f~llowing amendmencs to Conditions Nos. 3 and 7; 69-139 City Hal!,.Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 11~.1969, 1:30 P.M. 3. That all streets within the development shall be constructed in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, except that the sidewalks may be located adjacent to the curbs, provided that the sidewalks are offset to the rear of fire hy- drants placed within the sidewalk area, and to the rear of any utility poles on Frontera Street. 7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications submitted or as amended with the ap- proval of the City Council. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRAi~TING VARIANCE NO. 2044. Roll Call Vote; AYES; COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Kreln, Schutte, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None RESOLUTION NO. 69R-127: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-127 [or adoption, amending Resolution o6 Intent No. 68R-663~ in Reclassifica- tion proceedings No. 68-69-13, as requested by the Applicant, to allow sep- arat~.~ "c~'.'~.: o~ L~..~ '?ro.'.~r'k5' a' c~ase J. ave?.oI- ~n~ occurs. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AME~ING RESOLUTION NO. 68R-663 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 68-69-13. Roll Call Vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCIIR4EN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-127 duly passed and adopted. .pUB~.I.~ H..F~RING - ABANDONMENT NQ.' 68-.13A: Public Hearing was held on proposed abandonment of an existing 10-foot public utility easement located from Brookhurst easterly to Empire Street, approximately 1,500 feet south of Ball Road, pursuant to Resolution No. 69R-87, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin, February 27, 1969~ and notices thereof posted, in accordance with law. Report of the City Engineer was submitted, recommending approval, and th~ Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council; there be- ing no response, he thereupon declared the.hearing closed. ~ESOLUTION NO. 69R-12.8: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-128 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY. (68-13A). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-128 duly passed and adopted. 69-140 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March. 11~ 19.69~ 1:30 TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO. 5751~ Request of K.W. Carlson, VTN Orange County, was submitted for an extension of time to Tentative Ma'p, Tract No~ 5751, located on the west ::~'~? of Empire Street, north of Woodworth Road, in a proposed R-2, 5,000 zone~ (Reclassification No0 67-68-47 and Variance No~ 1941)o On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, a one-year extension of time to Tentative Tract Noo 5751 was granted, as recom- mended by the City Engineer. MOTION CARRIED. THE TOWN TOUR COMPANi - REQUEST TO EXPAND SERVICE: Request of r?he Town Tour Company was submitted, ~or permission to expand their service to include a shuttle bus service from various motels and hatals on the periphery of Disneyland to the immediate entrance of the Disneyland Park, and charge a fee of up to twenty- five cents for service to guests of non-subscribing motels and hotels. Also submitted were letters of support from the following: Holiday Inn of Anaheim, The Grand Hotal~ Park Vue Motel, Carousel MoteLodge, The Sands Motel~ Tropicana Motel, and Whaler's Inn Motel. The City Clerk noted no letters of opposition were received, and Mayor Pebley asked if anyone preser, t was in opposition to this request. There was no response. The City' Manager suggested including the serving o~ the Convention Center also~ i£ said request is granted. Mr. Michael Valen, 1441 South West Street, indicated consideration is being given to the possibility of including shuttle service to the Conven- tion Center; however, it has not been determined whether it is economically feasible at this time. He noted that the company is in the process of acquir- ing additional equipment and displayed an illustration of a "double-decker" bus which will hold 6.5 to 70 passengers and will be available by next summer. Councilman Clark moved that said requ ~o provide shuttle service be granted as requested, with the authorization t~> serve the Convention Center alsoo Councilman Krein seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED° FINAL MAP - TRACT NOo 6771: Develo'per ~ Western Land Sales~ tract located on the west side of Walnut Canyon Road, from Santa Ana Canyon Road to 1,000 feet southerly, containing 39 lots in the R-1 zone, (Reclassification No. 68-69- 40). The City' Engineer recommended approval, and reported said Final Map conforms substantially with the Tentative Map previously approved; that bond has been posted and forwarded to the City Attorney for approval, and required fees paid. On recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that Fina] Map, Tract No. 6771 be approved, ~c.~' 'cct to approval of required bond by the City Attorney. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69~71 AND VARIANCE NO. 2057: Letter dated March 5, 1969, from Charles Co Woodall, was submitted requesting a night meeting of the City Council for Public Hearing on Reclassification No. 68-69-71 and Variance No. 2057. It was noted by the City Clerk that Reclassification No. 68-69-75 also covered the same property, and recommended public hearing be scheduled for the same time. By general consent o£ the City Council, Public Hearing on Reclassi- fication No. 68~69-71, Variance No~ 2057~ and Reclassification No. 68-69-75 was schadow]ed for the date of April 1, 1969~ at 7:00 P.M., in the Council Chambers~ CITY OF FULLERTON gONE AMENDMENT NO. A-~684__~. AND SITE PLAN USE PERMIT NO. SP 20-A: Excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held March iO~ 19~ was sobmitted recommending thmt the CitF of Fullerton Planning Com- ~nissio~ urged t~ approve Zone Amendment No~ A-684 and Site Plan. Use Permit No. S?-20-A~ as they are generally in ~onformance with the land uses estab- lished i~ thi~; a~ea. both ~n Fullerton a~d the City of Anaheim. 69-141 City Hall; Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Mar¢,h lit 1969~ 1:30 P.M. By general consent of the City Council, said recommendation was sustained and forwarded to the City of Fullerton Planning Commission. RESOLUTION NOG 69R-129 - WORK ORDER NOG 370: Councilman Dutton offered Resolu- tion NO. 69R-129 for adoption~ Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Ai]AHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE RED GUM-WHITE STAR STREET IMPROVEMENT, IN RED Co~-i STREET FROM APPROXIMATELY 750 FEET NORTH OF LA PALMAAVENUE TO LA PALMA T.], AND IN WHITE ~ AVENUE FROM LA PALMA TO BL'UE GUM Ci 2ET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 370. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUC- TION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DI- RECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF~ (Bids to be Opened April 3, 1969, 2:00 P.Mo)o Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte~ Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-129 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-130 - WORK ORDER NO. 249: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R- 130 for adoption. Refer to Resoluticn Book° A RESOLb~ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY FOR THE INSTALLATION AND COMPLETION OF THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS FOR THE ANAHEIM CONVENTION CENTER, 800 WEST KATELLAAVE- NUE, iN THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 249. (Viking Automatic Sprink- ler Company)~ Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-130 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-131 - WORK ORDER NO. 552A: Councilman Dutton offered Reso- lution No. 69R-131 for adoption, upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COM- PLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF KATELLA AVENUE AND NL~WOOD STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 552-A. (Steiny and Mitchell~ !nc~), Roll Call 'Vote: 69-142 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIl. MINUTES - March 1~, 1;30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krel. n~ Schutte~ Clark and Pebley NOES: COU1NCI'LMEN: None ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-131 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-132 - WORK ORDER NO0 .333: Upon receipt of ~ertification from the Director of Public. Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R- 132 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Bo:ok, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO[~CiL OF THE CITY' OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT~ LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND T~E PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COM- PLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT~ OAKRAVEN DRIVE AND SUNV!~ DRIVE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 333. (Industrial Contracting Company). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krei. n, Schutte, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN; None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-132 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of six black and white Police Units,as follows: VENDOR Mc Peek Plymouth, Anaheim Mc Coy Ford, Anaheim Anaheim Dodge, Anaheim Cone Brothers~ Anaheim NET TOTAL - INCLUDING TAX $11~502.29 11,532.63 NO BID NO BID On recommendation of the City Manager, CouncilmAn Krein moved that the low bid of Mc Peek Plymouth be accepted, and purchase authorized in the amount of $11,502.29, including tax and trade-in allowance. Council- man Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim submitted by Mr. Ernest Peterson, for personal property damages purportedly sustained on or about February 1, 1969, was denied as recommended by the City Attorney~ and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Clark. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The followi,~g correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein: a. City cf San Clemente Resolution No. 9-69 - expressing Council's opposit~o~ to ~il drilling ~f~shore from the Orange County coast. b. City of Orange Resolution No. 3116 - setting forth the position of the City Council of the City of Orange on the question of dissolution of the Orange Coun. ty Harbor District. c. Orange County Beard of Supervisors Resolution No. 69-.179 - declaring Surris Sand Pit to be a hazard and public nuisance. d. Orange County i~oard of Supervisors Ordinance No. 2299 - declar- ing Burris Sand Pit a danger and nuisance and establishing method of recov- ering ~'~ ,~f abatement~ ~. City of Stanton Resol~.tions~ No~ 797 - Urging the Board of S~perv~sor~ of Orange Co?~nty uo request the Southern California Association of Gn~e~nme~ts to ipc~]~de ~n its proposed study of the air traffic needs ~f tb~ So~t¼er~ Cs]ii?orn~a Metropolitsn Area a study of the feasibility of a~ o~i'-~hcre a.irport~ ~o~ 798 ~ Request'ir~g the Southern. California Associa- tion ~f (~ernments ~o ~nclude in it~ proposed study of the air traffic needs ~f the ~outber~ Ca]iforn~.a Metrc~p~'~lit'an area a study of the feasibility of an off-shor~i, airport~ 69-143 City,,,Hall~ Anaheim~ Califcrnia- COUNCIL MINUTES - March 11~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. f. City of Yorba Linda Resolution No. 117 - requesting the Board of Supervisors to provide full-time staff for Local Agency Formation Com- mission. g. Financial and Operating Reports for the month o£ January, 1969. MOTION CARRIED. LETTER OF OPPOSITION TO OFF-SHORE OIL DRILLING: Councilman Clark moved that a letter be authorized supporting Resolution No. 9-69, of the City Council of the City of San Clemente, California, expressing opposition to oil drill- ing off-shore from the Orange County Coast. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED~ ~.a~or Pebley left the Council Chambers and Mayor Pro-Tem Schutte assumed Chairmanship of the meeting, (3:52 P.M.). ORDINANCE NO. 2645: Councilman Krein o££ered Ordinance No. 2645 £or adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-100 - C-l). Cai! Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Schutte NOES: COUNCILMEN: None TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor Pro-Tem declared Ordinance No. 2645 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2646: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2646 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2188 IN RECLASSI- FICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 64-65-56. (Deletes Condition No. 6). Roll Call 'Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Schutte NOES: COb~CILMEN: None TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ Pebley ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayer Pro~-Tem declared Ordinance No. 2646 duly passed and adopted. i,DINANCE NO. 2647: Councilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2647 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM ML~!CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-104 - R-3). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COb~CILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Schutte NOES: COUNCILMEN: None TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor ?ro-Tem declared Ordinance No. 2647 duly passed and adopted. 69-144 City tlall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 11~, 1969~ 1:3,0 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 2648" Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2648 £or adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MIINICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (68-69-60 - R-A and. C-l). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Schutte NOES: COUNCILMEN: None TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley ABSENT: COUNCILI~EN: None The Mayor iPro-Tem declared Ordinance No. 2648 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2649: Councilman Clark offered Ordinance No.2649 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONINCo (67-68-45 - C-l). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Krein, Clark and Schutte NOES: COUNCILMEN: None TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: ~Pebley ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor Pro-Tem declared Ordinance No. 2649 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2650: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2650 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61 (21) - C-R). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Schutte NOES: COUNCILMEN: None TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor Prc-Tem declared Ordinance No. 2650 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NOo 2651: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2651 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance ook. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-10 - C-l). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Schutte NOES: COUNCILMEN: None TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley ABSENT: CEUNuILMEN~ None The Mayor Pro-Tem declared Ordinance No. 2651 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NOo 2652: Councilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2652 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANA2qEIM A2EENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIFAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (West Street, Western and Dale Avenues)° 69-145 City ~all~ Anaheim~ California.- COUNCIL. MINUTES - March 11; 1969, 1~30 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 2653: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2653 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OP THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING, (68-69-39 - R-2, 5,000 - Tract No. 6774). ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION~ Application submitted by Frank J. Leus- chon, for On-gale Beer, Person-to-Person Trans£er~ for The Old Holiday Bar~ at 806 North Anaheim Boulevard, C-3 zone, was presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information. No Council. action was taken on said application. REQUEST FOR CROSSING GUARD - DALE AVENUE AND STONYBROOK DRIVE; Report of the City Engineer was submitted, validating the earlier recommendation that no crossing guard be authorized for this location as vehicle speeds in the area are reasonable, no serious pedestrian-vehicle conflicts were observed during the study~ elementary school pedestrian volumes are minor, there are adequate gaps occurring at approximately one-minute intervals, and driver observation of the crossing is good. Councilman Clark. asked if anyone present wished to address the City Council. Mrs~ Bobbye Sneyd, 2831 West Stonybrook Drive, stated that a child had almost been hit in the subject intersection last week, and reported that the "Stop When Occupied" sign, authorized last week by the City Council, has evidently been struck by a car, as it is now dented. She pointed out that three of the four school crossings on Dale Avenue have crossing guards which, she felt, indicated that Dale Avenue is considered to be a dangerous thoro,.~'~b- fare. Mayor Pebley returned to the Council Chambers and resumed Chairman- ship of the meeting, (4:05 P.M.). Mrs. Marge Kato, 2784 Stonybrook Drive, felt that the sign in the crosswalk is ineffective~ and felt that a crossing guard is necessary because the intervals between cars are not long enough to allow children to cross safely~ She felt that the circumstances at this intersection were similar to those at the intersection of Dale Avenue and Broadway, at the Schweitzer School, where a crossing guard is stationed. Mrs. Pat Jacobs, 2791Wiiberta Lane, felt that the street is too wide to cross safely, and a crossing guard should be assigned. At the request of the City Council, the City Attorney advised that the City has neJ. ther the responsibility nor the authority to provide protec- tion for the children going to and from school' that a crossing guard is a part-time police officer who is assigned to a particular location where the v~lume~, of pedestrian traffic and vehicular traffic conflict so as to require ' · ~ . ~ control. Co~ncilman Clark pointed out that a thorough study of the location has been ~mde, which indicates there is no [r~ ~i~_ ~.~! for a ~ro~-~ing guard at this time. He suggested that the crosswazk be repainted and additional signs posted .~ warn approaching motorists. He also recommended that the free-standing sign remain in the crosswalk. Mrs~ Caroline Despain reported that the school board was asked ~o provide bus service for the children coming from the area east of Dale Avenue, but it was found that the children lived too close to justify bussing them. The City bia.~ager suggested the children be ~Iped to cross the street by a volunteer, until such ~e as warrants are met for a crossing g~ard~ 69-146 _City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTE__~,q_- March lit. 1969, 1:'}0 F.M. Mrs. Betty Ann. Naso, 2766 West Stonybrook Drive, stated that a two to three-minute wait is required each time she crosses Dale Avenue, and that children cannot judge distances or the speed of oncoming cars, in order to cross safely. She further stated that she does not 'want bus service for her children as they are unable to cross Stonybrook Drive safely in order to board a bus. · Councilman Schutte left the Council meeting, (4:40 PoMe). Following additional Council discussion, Cour~ilman Krein moved that a crossing guard be authorized at the intersection of Dale Avenue and Stonybrook Drive for the balance of the school year° Councilman Clark second- ed the motion, MOTION CARRIED (To this motion Councilman Dutton voted RESOLUTION NO. 69R-133: On report and recommendation of the City Manager, Council- man Dutton offered Resolution Nee 69R-133 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM URGING THE CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD TO GRANT ANY APPLICATIONS WHICH WOULD PROVIDE A FLIGHT SCHEDULE BETWEEN ORANGE COUNTY AIRPORT AND SEATTLE, WASHINGTON AND PORTLAND, OREGON. ' Roll Cai1 Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-133 duly passed and adopted. CONVENTION CENTER FEE SCHEDULR REVISIONS: Report of the Convention Center and Stadium Director, Thomas Liegler, was submitted, proposing revisions to the Anaheim Convention Center Rental Fee Schedule. On recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Cl. ark moved that said Fee Schedulea ; , dbe authorized as recommended. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° ORANGE COUNTY MUTUAL AID FIRE DEPARTMENT DEMONSTRATION: The City Manager reported that a Mutual Aid Demonstration is to be held in the parking lot of the Anaheim Stadium, Thursday, March 20, 1969, at 10:00 A.M., and announced that Anaheim will. be the Host City for the monthly meeting for the Orange County Fire Chiefs Association, to be held that evening at 7~00 P.M. at the Golden Pheasant Res taurant.~ ' - LEAGUE OF CALIffORNIA CITIES - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING: The City Manager re- ported that the Execrative Committee meeting of the League of California Cit- ies, wi]i be held Thursday, March ~ 1969, at which time a film will be shown by tha Committee on Solid Waste Disposal. CiT~ COLrNCiL REORGANIZATION: The C~t.v Clerk noted that the Legislative Conference is to be held in Saeramento~ April 1~ through 16~ 1.969, and wii1 conflict with the Cit? Council Reorganiza~:ion which, by CouncJ. 1 Policy, is scheduled for the th.i~-d Tuesday ,tn April each year~ B~ general; consent, of the Cit,?' Council r~organ{zae:_~n was scheduled mee.~ing of Tu~gdav~ Apr{1 8 ]969 when a full Council is expectad to ~e prese~:~t. ADJOii~RN~NT~ C~.uncilman Kre[n moved to adjourn. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. ?}0]~ Olq (~ARRll[ED,, ADJO~.~ZED: 5: 05 City Clerk.