Loading...
1972/05/0972-274 City Hall,. Anah t Ca]4 ornia COUJICIL MINUTES May 9. 1972. 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph 0. Pease ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. TRIBUTE TO CHAS, A. PEARSON: Mayor Dutton asked that a minute of silent medi- tation be observed in tribute to former Mayor and Councilman Chas. A. Pearson. INVOCATION: Reverend Richard Carmen of the West Anaheim Baptist Church gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Calvin L. Pebley led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. RESOIiYTION OF CONDOLENCE; The following Resolution of Condolence was unani- mously adopted by the City Council: "WHEREAS, the City Council of the. City of Anaheim has learned with sorrow of the untimely death of Chas. A. Pearson; and WHEREAS, Chas. A. Pearson faithfully served the City of Anaheim from 1927 as the first Secretary of the City Planning Commission to the time of his passing as Anaheim's Representative and Director of the Metropolitan Water District; and WHEREAS, he served as member of the City Council from 1935 to 1960; nineteen of those years as "Mayor and during a period of Anaheim's greatest growth; and WHEREAS, space on the written page prohibits the recording of the countless worthwhile projects and activities he actively and unselfishly con- tributed to, to the betterment of the City and community he so dearly loved; and WHEREAS, because of his leadership and unprecedented contribution in a lifetime dedication to public service, Chas. A. Pearson was affectionately and rightfully called: "MR. ANAHEIM" WHEREAS, we are keenly aware of the inadequacy of the written or spoken word to express our feelings of loss, sympathy and love. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim and on behalf of the citizens of Anaheim and the entire City family that it deeply mourns the passing of Chas. A. Pearson, and extends sincere sympathy to his beloved wife, Sarah, and son, James. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be spread in full upon the minutes of the City Council and a copy thereof forwarded to his wife,Sarah. The Foregoing Resolution is unanimously adopted this 9th day of May, 1972. S/ JACK C. DUTTON. MAYOR S/ ,MAR( A. STEPHENSON. MAYOR PRO TEM S/ CALVIN L. PEBLEY. COUNCILMAN S/ RALPH G. SNEEGAS. COUNCILMAN S/ W.J. (BILL) THOM. COUNCILMAN ATTEST: rep M, DAOU CITY CLERK CITY OF ANAHEIM 72-275 qty Anaheim. California COUNCIL NLNI TES May Q, k972 1:30 P.M. PROCLAMATIONS: The following Proclamations were issued by Mayor Dutton and unanimously approved by the City Council: "Insurance Women's Week" May 21 through 27, 1972. "National Public Works Week" May 14 20, 1972. "Buck Bag Days For Horace Mann School" May 13 16, 1972. S9I1U ON OF APPRECIATION: A Resolution offering sincere gratitude, re- spect and affection to retiring Water Superintendent August F. "Gus" Lenain, was unanimously adopted by the City Council. ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTR.IC PETITION RE SANTA AN& CAI+IYON WATERSHED: Water Superintendent "Gus" Lenain asked that the City Council take ac- tion favoring a recent petition to the State Water Resources Con- trol Board by the Orange County Water District, relative to the Santa Ana Canyon Watershed, and introduced Langdon W. Owen, Sec- retary-Manager of the Orange County Water District. Mr. Owen stated that their petition is not an attempt to stop the discharge of Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) from upstream, but a request for judicial review of the situation. He listed the 5 major points of the petition with respect to Regional Board ac- tions: 1. Since 1969 there has been only one TDS requirement on a waste discharge standard and that one was Orange County Water District's; consequently, different health agencies are prohibit- ing the use of some of the water. 2. They are not protecting the downstream people in the way they set incremental waste discharge standards. 3. They do not look nor relate to what is happening down- stream in each water discharge standard. 4. They are setting standards that do not comply with the Regional Water Quality Control Board plan. 5. They do not require an environmental impact report from City and County governments on each waste discharge standard, as is set forth in the State Environmental Quality Act. Mr. Owen reported that when he appeared before the Regional Board on these points six weeks earlier, they had acted on each point without making any modification; in the appearance before the State Board last week, that body had denied the request for a study and for requiring an environmental impact study, and had referred the other four points of their petition to staff for study. He advised that they presently are.preparing a complaint to be filed in Superior Court, requesting judicial review, and would like Anaheim to assist through the services of Dr. Moore, Anaheim's Water Biologist, in preparing and presenting their case, and also through the assistance of the City Attorney's office. Following Council discussion, the City Attorney.suggested that staff assistance could be authorized at this time, by motion, and if, at a later date, Anaheim wished to join in Orange County Water District as a party to the law suit, authorization could be made by resolution of the City Council. Councilman Pebley moved to authorize staff cooperation in any manner possible to assist in prosecution of the Orange County Water District lawsuit. Councilman Stephenson seconded the mo- tion. MOTION CARRIED. i Minutes of the Anaheim City Council regular aeetings held April 11, 18 and 25, 1972, mere, approved, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson. MOTION CARRIED. 72-276 City Hall, Amileim6 California giUNQ L MINUTES Mav 9. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. WAIVER OF REAM ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPOT F/N4NCIAL DADS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $1,074,688.55, in accordance with the 1971 -72 Budget, were approved. CONTINUED PU4LIC WRING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71 -72 -38 AND VARIANCE NO. 2346: Submitted by Peltzer, Sprague, Skelton, Rosetto and Peltzer, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3, to construct a 98- unit,' one and two -story apartment complext on property located at the southeast corner of Crescent Avenue and the Santa Ana Freeway, with waivers of: a. Maximum height within 150 feet of a single family residential zone. b. Minimum setback requirement. c. Minimum distance between parking space dwelling unit. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -69, recommmended said reclassification be approved, subject to conditions. Public hearing was held May 2, 1972, and continued to this date, at the request of the Developer, to allow time to modify plans to reflect additional dedication recommended by the City Engineer for the proposed Crescent Avenue overcrossing to the Santa Ana Freeway. Report of the City Engineer, dated May 9, 1972, was submitted ad- vising that in subsequent discussion with the Developer it was determined the additional dedication requirement would have no adverse effect on the project. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RES9LUT,XON NO. 72R -170: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -170 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Plan- ning Com amending Condition No. 9, as follows: 9 That the alignment of the southwesterly property line ad- jacent to the Santa Ana Freeway and the northerly property line adjacent to Crescent Avenue shall be approved by the California Division of Highways, and that the owner of sub- ject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim the right of way and access rights required for the future Crescent Avenue overcrossing of the Santa Ana Freeway as has been determined necessary by the California Division of Highways." Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER MIN'ING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (71 -72 -38 R -3) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-170 duly passed and adopted. R 3QLIITIOp j4O. 72R -171: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -171 for adoption, granting Variance INo.2346, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. C $v ball. Anaheim. 9al4ornia C 4I,L,NUTE Jay 9, 1972, 1:30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2346. Roll Call Vote: 72 -277 AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -171 duly passed and adopted. mimic DANCE PERMIT: Application filed by Frances B. Gonzales, on behalf of Sociedad Progresista Mexicana #24, for permit to conduct public dance on May 14, 1972, at Carpenter's Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue, from 4:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M., was submitted and granted on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and that two officers and one matron be hired to police the dance, as recommended by the Chief of Police. MOTION CARRIED. E INWNT PER1�T: Application filed by Ambrose B. O'Connell, for entertain- ment permit to allow two models at Lord Dean's, 409 West Katella Avenue, Monday through Friday, 12 :00 Noon to 2:00 P.M. was submitted and granted for a period of one year, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom. MOTION CARRIED. CZIWED REOUEST: Submitted by Thomas T. Lacy, Southern California Edison Com- piany, requesting a written statement from the City Council setting forth their position concerning proposed construction of additional transmission lines to be situated within the City of Anaheim. Subject was continued to this date at the request of Thomas T. Lacy, of Southern California Edison Company. The Deputy City Clerk submitted correspondence from Thomas T. Lacy, Southern California Edison Company, requesting that this item be con- tinued to May 30, 1972, to allow time to obtain additional information. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, sub- ject request was continued to May 30, 1972, as requested. MOTION CARRIED. BUS LSS LICENSE FEE WAIVER ST. ANTHONY CLARET SCHOOL FIESTA Request of T.H. Thompson, Jr., General Fiesta Chairmax},St. Anthony Claret School, dated April 18, 1972, was submitted for waiver of business license fee in connec- tion with the 15th Annual St. Anthony Claret School Fund- Raising Fiesta, to be held May 19, through May 21, 1972, on the St. Anthony Claret School Grounds, 1450 East La Palma Avenue. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Snee- gas, said request was granted in accordance with Council Policy No. 305. NOTION CARRIED. AmIeTION TAXI CA4 PERMIT: Submitted by Gordon P. Wiggins, Blue -White Cab Company. The Deputy City Clerk reported a request of the Police Chief that subject be continued to the next. regular meeting to illow time to complete investigation. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, request was continued to May 16, 1972, as requested by the Chief of Police. NOTION CARRIED. v�TSey ctn A 1" I�iAI. PBRIQTS 1 ADDIT? Request of Larry E. Slagle, Yellow Cab Company, was submitted for 5 new 'permits for 5 addi tional taxi cabs. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, request was approved.' NOTION CARRIED. 72- 278 City 1141. Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES May 9. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. BANZAI MINI -CYCLE PARK: Request of George Collins, of Collins Son, was sub mitted to petition to retain in operation until an alternate site is avail- able the Banzai Mini -cycle Park, presently scheduled to be closed by June 1, 1972. Mayor Dutton invited Mr. Collins to address the Council. George Collins, 1824 East Diana, displayed two petitions, which he stated solicited a public hearing before the City Council on a request to continue operation of Banzai Park until the matter of a cycle park is completely and permanently resolved, one petition purportedly from Anaheim residents and the other from Orange County residents outside Anaheim. Councilman Dutton noted that records show 50% of the users of Banzai Park are from outside Anaheim, and thus it was his opinion a cycle park should be a regional undertaking. He recommended Mr. Collins and his associates urge the Board of Supervisors, and particularly Supervisor Clark, under whose jurisdiction this area falls, to cooperate in trying to estab- lish a cycle park at the Newkirk Dump Site, once considered an appropriate site, or elsewhere. He added that another possible location the City had considered was the 53 -acre Shorb Wells property, farther out in the Canyon. Councilman Dutton stated that since the decision already has been made to close Banzai Park, effective June 1, 1972, a public hearing would not be in order; however; a public discussion. could be helf if the Council so desired. Mr. Collins requested an evening meeting. Councilman Sneegas stated he would be willing to have a public discussion on this subject; however, he questioned whether this might lead people to believe there is a possibility the park could remain in operation when, in fact, this is not the case. In reply to Mr. Collins, Councilman Sneegas stated it was his opinion a cycle park should be the responsibility of the cycle owners, and not the City; that land probably could be made available for this purpose on lease from the City for a very nominal fee, and the interested citizens could develop and operate such a park and carry the liability for it. Councilman Stephenson stated he could see no reason for a public discussion when the decision to close the park already has been made; that the noise from the park operation was excessively annoying to the nearby mobile home park residents. Councilman Dutton expressed the opinion a public'discussion could result in enough publicity and pressure from the interested people to prompt the Board of Supervisors to take action. Mr. Collins noted that effective July 1, 1972, all motor driven cycles, regardless of size or use, will be subject to a registration fee, and a large portion of that revenue is to be returned to communities that set up recreational facilities. In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Collins advised that he operates a small motorcycle accessory shop, adding that the cycle shops, as a whole, also are requesting this public hearing. Councilman Pebley stated he felt a cycle park should be a private enterprise operation and there was a possibility the City could lease the Shorb Wells property for that purpose. By general Council consent, with the exception of Councilman Ste- phenson, the City Clerk was requested to schedule the subject on the May 23, 1972, 1:30 P.M., Council Agenda for public discussion as to the need for a motor bike park and a possible location therefor. It was again noted by the Council members that June 1, 1972, was the cut -off date for all operations of Banzai Park at the present location. POLITICAL CA4PAI SIGNS: Resolution of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce was pre sented, urging all Council candidates to thoroughly remove all signs of their campaign by May 1, 1972, and requesting the City Attorney be asked to pre- pare an ordinance requiring removal of political signs after all elections. 72-279 Citv lalJ. Anaheim. Ca4€o ;niq COUNCIL MINUTES May. t 430 P.M. Councilman Thom stated he was in favor of an ordinance relating to removal of political signs by candidates and further that candidates be required to post a bond with the City prior to erection of the signs. The City Attorney advised that such an ordinance was prepared some time ago, although never adopted by the Council; that campaign signs are not covered by the existing Zoning Sign Ordinance. He added that the proposed ordinance requires a bond on the part of the candidate prior to posting any signs to insure that if the signs are not removed as required there are sufficient funds available to pay for their removal; that he felt a $100.00 bond would be a nominal amount. Councilman Sneegas noted that the cost of advertising has been prohibitive for some candidates and suggested some other method could be used than requiring a bond. Mr. Geisler replied that if the candidates were not required to post a bond for this purpose, the cost of removal would have to be borne by the taxpayers. In reply to Couneil questioning, Mr. Geisler advised that the pro- posed ordinance originally had been prepared after the 1970 election, and rewritten as an urgency ordinance about three months ago because some signs already had been erected for the recent Councilmanic election; however, it now would not be an urgency ordinance. ORDINANCE M0. 3041: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3041 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 4 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO CHAPTER 4.07 ENTITLED "POLITICAL SIGNS AND ADVERTISING STRUCTURES" AND BY AMENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.62, SECTION 18.62.040. CITY tIONING COMMISSION ITEMS:. Actions taken by the City Planning Commission, at their meeting held April 17, 1972, pertaining to the following applica- tions were submitted for City Council information and consideration: VARIANCE NO. 2345 Submitted by the Hertz Realty Corporation, to estab- lish a sales facility for used Hertz rental cars in conjunction with exist- ing rental operation on C-1 zoned property located northeast of the north- east corner of Clementine Street and Katelia Avenue, with waivers of: a. Permitted uses. b. Number of free-standing signs. c. Location of free standing signs. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -74, granted said variance, subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 2239: The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -75, recommended termination of all proceedings on said variance, on the basis that the Petitioner no longer is exercising the rights granted under said petition, and inasmuch as Variance No. 2345 was approved for the same property. VAR;AZICE NO. 2348: Submitted by Aldor Corporation, to establish an auto- mobile polishing and waxing business as a conforming use on M-1 zoned pro- perty located at the southwest corner of Miraloma Avenue and Kraemer Boule- vard, with waivers of: a. Permitted uses. b. Minimum landscape setback along an arterial highway. c. Minimum arterial highway building setback. d. Interior. landscaping requirement. e. Minimum number of required parking stalls. 72 -280 City Hall Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES May 9. 1972. 1:30 P.M. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -76, granted said variance in part, denying Waivers "b," "c," "d," and "e," and granting Waiver "a," subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 2349: Submitted by Collins Limited Partnership, to permit a center for the sale of handcrafted art objects and related merchandise with food sales on M-1 zoned property located on the southeast corner of Broadway and the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way, with waivers of: a. Permitted uses. b. Minimum landscaped setback along an arterial highway. c. 5-foot setback requirement along Adams Street. d. Outdoor uses to be screened. e. Minimum number of required parking spaces. f. Parking area improvements. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 77, granted said variance in part, denying Waiver "f," granting Waivers "a" and "e," for a period of one year, and granting Waivers "b" and "d," subject to conditions, Waiver "c" having been declared unnecessary. CONDITIONAL USE PERNXT NO. 1298: Submitted by Grace Lutheran Church, to establish an existing church and Christian day school as conforming uses and permit their expansion on R -A zoned property located at the southeast corner of South Street and Citron Street, with waivers of: a. Maximum permitted height. b. Minimum number of required parking stalls. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 72, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1301: Submitted by Ledger Smith, to establish a private recreational facility and tennis club on 14- 1 zoned property lo- cated at the northwest corner of Katella and Howell Avenue, with waivers of: a. Arterial highway landscaping. b. Minimum number of parking spaces. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -71, granted said conditional use permit in part, denying Waiver "b," and grant- ing Waiver "a," subject to conditions. Councilman Thom asked that it be noted that, contrary to recent newspaper articles, the Applicant had stipulated he does not intend to use this facility for Jai Alai games or Roller Derby. Councilman Stephenson remarked that Jai Alai games never have been licensed by the State, and thus would be an illegal operation. CIDITIONAL U §E PERMIT NO. 1305: Submitted by Sam and Tokiko Nakamura, to establish a semi-enclosed restaurant on 0-2 zoned property located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue, west of Magnolia Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 73, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. V4 ANCE NO. 1633: Request of Raymond Patscheck, of Patscheck -Veiga Construction Company, for approval of revised plans and an extension of time, to construct 16 dwelling units on R -3 zoned property located on the south side of Orange Avenue, west of Knott Avenue, and further described as 3614 West Orange Avenue. The City Planning Commission, by Motion, approved the revised plans, subject to conditions, having determined that no extension of time was necessary. 72 -281 C f,tv Hall. Anaheim. California m o m TES Mav 9. 1JJ2. 1:30 P.M. wigumcg NO. 1892: Request of Joseph Truxaw, dated March 18, 1972, for an extension of time to complete conditions of approval to permit the expan- sion -of an existing single-family residence and to permit the creation of one R -1 and two R-3 lots from the two lots that existed. Subject property located at the northeast corner of Lemon Street and Vermont Avenue. The City Planning Commission, by Motion, granted a retroactive extension of time and an additional extension of time, to extend from Sep- tember 12; 1970, and expire September 12, 1973. VARIANCE NO. 2282: Request of Joseph Truxaw, dated March 18, 1972, for an extension of time to complete conditions of approval to construct one two story fourplex and one one -story triplex on R-3 zoned property located on the northeast corner of Vermont Avenue and Lemon Street. The City Planning Commission, by Motion, granted a one -year ex- tension of time to expire February 23, 1973. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 340: Request of Carl Karcher Enterprises for approval of revised plans for modification and expansion'of an existing "walk -up" restaurant on R -A zoned property located at the southeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and Dale Street. The City Planning Commission, by Motion, approved the revised plans, subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1216: Request of John F. Berry, AID, Incorpora- ted, for an extension of time, to permit the development of a child day- care center on R -A zoned property located on the south side of Orangewood Avenue, west of Spinnaker Street. The City Planning Commission, by Motion, granted a retroactive extension of time and an additional one -year extension of time, to expire March 27, 1973. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council, and no further action taken. smug LIGHTING STANDARDS SANTA ANA CANYON: The City Planning Commission, at its meeting held April 17, 1972, recommended City Council consideration of standardizing street light standards in the Santa Ana Canyon, by approving the "Traditionaire" type unit approved for Anaheim Hills, in order to es- tablish uniform lighting in the Canyon area, extending from Villa Real Drive to Imperial Highway, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road, excepting the Peralta Hills area, and for all undeveloped areas within the existing and future boundaries of the City of Anaheim, east of Imperial Highway. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts presented for Council inspec- tion photographs of the type of lighting recommended by the City Planning Commission. In reply to Council questioning, W. Roberts advised that the Peralta Hills area is excepted in this recommendation because Council Pol- icy No. 207 indicates there will be no street lighting facilities in the Peralta Hills area, and if the Peralta Hills Homeowners Association desires some type of street lighting, it would be appropriate to bring the request to the City Council to determine if it would be desirable to incorporate it with subject area. Councilman Thom noted that the Development Services Department re- commendation to the City Planning Commission explained the "Traditionaire" unit (McGraw-Edison) was used for description purposes only and units manu- factured by other companies that would meet AU specifications would be ac- ceptable. He took exception to use of the word "all" because he felt other competitors would be eliminated. Assistant Director of Development Services Ronald Thompson advised it was the Planning Commission's intent to have other manufacturers meet =enerai specifications and not Al specifications. 72 -282 City Hail. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES Mav 9. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, Street Lighting Standards in the Santa Ana Canyon were approved as recom- mended by the City Planning Commission. Units manufactured by companies other than McGraw Edison that meet general specifications would be accept- able. MOTION CARRIED. PRPPOSEE Ampampla TO TITLE 18. R- 2-5.000. ONE FAMILY ZONE: On motion by Coun- cilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, public hearing was scheduled May 30, 1972, 1:30 P.M., to consider amendment to Title 18, Chapter 18.26, R- 2- 5,000, One-Family Zone, of the Anaheim Municipal. Code, pursuant to City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC72-80. MOTION CARRIED. ENCROAL`PT PERMIT N0. 71-7E: Submitted by Dick Sikkenga, of Swan Pools, on behalf of Michael J. and Lucille M. Schwartz, owners, to encroach into an existing public utility easement for the purpose of installing a swimming pool within Lot 14, Tract 3346, located at the east side of Valley Street, south of Orange Avenue (620 South Valley Street.) Also submitted was report of the City Engineer, recommending ap- proval, subject to height limitation of 15 feet, as measured perpendicularly from the natural level of the ground. RRSOLAT O1 N0. 72R-172: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -172 for adoption, granting Encroachment Permit No. 71 -7E, subject to recommendations of the City Engineer. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WITH MICHAEL J. AND LUCILLE M. SCHWARTZ. (71-7E) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson,Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -172 duly passed and adopted. RECLASSIPIIATION N0. 69- 70 -44 BUILDING PERMIT: Request of LeRoy Rose and As- sociates, dated May 2, 1972, was submitted for authorization for issuance of a building permit for a three -story medical office building on C-0 pro- perty, located on the north side of Riverdale Avenue, west of Lakeview Avenue (Reclassification No. 69- 70 -44). Also submitted was report of the City Engineer and report of the Development Services Department, recommending Applicant be required to either: 1. Revise the plan to conform to the requirements of the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone, or 2. To apply for a variance from the Code, as provided in the ordinance. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts advised that the proposed medi- cal complex is an appropriate use for this zone; that the zoning was approved about a year before the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone was adopted, although no building permit was applied for until recently. He noted that the sub- mitted plans, which are the same as those originally submitted with the application, do not conform with the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone in that height of the building is proposed to be 48 feet, whereas the Scenic Cor- ridor Overlay Zone sets the maximum height at 35 feet; that interior land- scaping does not meet minimum requirements, and the mechanical equipment is not in conformance with Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone requirements. Mayor Dutton invited the Petitioner to address the Council. 72-283 City 44, Anaheim. palifornis G9Snil+ MINUTES Mav 9. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Councilman Pebley, in reply to Mr. Roberts' statement that the De- velopment Services Department recommendations were based on the fact that the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone has been in effect for almost a year, and thus they did not feel they had the administrative prerogative to issue the permit, stated it sometimes takes a year for a developer to obtain financing and be prepared to start construction. LeRoy Rose, 1440 South State College Boulevard, advised that one of the reasons the building permit had not been requested was they were not assured of financing for their project; however, they had spent approximately $110,000.00 thus far in construction of the medical center. Mr. Rose stated that the elevation of the building itself was pro- posed to be 34 feet, but that the penthouse which houses the mechanical equip ment brought the height to 48 feet; that the site was about 1'k feet below the curb line. He advised that they would comply with the landscaping requirements of the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone; that all but a small section of the pent- house is covered, and that small section is screened, and they would be will- ing to cover it if Council so desired. He added that the section of the penthouse that is not covered faces the Channel on the north side. The City Attorney advised that the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone was designed to assure a pleasing view from the Highway, which is north of the proposed building. Mr. Geisler noted that generally the City Council has permitted developers to proceed with original plans if the developers have diligently worked on the project, even though subsequent Council action makes those plans nonconforming. Mr. Rose stated he felt his company has a vested right in the pro ject in view of the fact that they already have spent $45,000.00 for plans, $40,000.00 for the storm channel, have dedicated land for street improvements and have installed sewers and utilities for the project. Following Council discussion, and on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom,authorization to issue building permit was gran- ted, subject to the landscaping and mechanical equipment coverage,complying with the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone, as stipulated by the Petitioner. MO- T/ON CARRIED. RECLA8S4FICATION No. 64-65-05 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1163 AMENDMENTS: Request of Mervyn A. Phelan, of Village Inns, dated May 1, 1972, was sub- mitted to amend Condition No. 6 of Resolution No. 65R- 231 (Reclassification No. 64-65-85) to require provision of a six-foot masonry wall along the north, west and south boundaries of the parcel fronting on Coffman Street, prior to final building and zoning inspection, rather than prior to introduction of an ordinance, as presently required, and also deletion of a portion of Con- dition No. 7 of Resolution No. 70R-307 (Conditional Use Permit No. 1163) which requires provision of a vehicular access easement to Center Street, in connection with a proposed 64 -unit motel on the easterly portion of the property located west of State College Boulevard, north of Center Street, and extending west to Coffman Street. Also submitted was report of the Development Services Department, recommending first reading of the ordinance for P-1 Zoning on the Coffman Street property if the requests are approved. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts advised that subsequent to action on these applications the Petitioner has acquired the motel property to the South, and the City Attorney has declared he cannot be required to provide easement over his own property. 72- 284 City Hall. Ajeim. California COUNCIL MINUTES May 9. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Mr. Roberts further advised that another condition of approval of the zoning action was the requirement that plans for the small parcel of land on Coffman Street be approved by the City Council, prior to any develop- ment, and it was Staff's determination that since the Council approved the plans for the conditional use permit, indicating that parcel would be used for parking, this would satisfy the requirement. In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Roberts advised that the un- usual requirement that the wall be constructed prior to introduction of an ordinance was included at the request of the resident immediately to the south. The City Attorney advised that the condition of the wall cannot be eliminated but it could be postponed if the Council desired by requiring a bond to be posted; however, the vehicular access condition that does not af- fect any other person could be deleted at the Council's discretion. Mayor Dutton invited the Applicant or his Agent to address the Coun- cil. Jim Carter, 3191 North Tustin Avenue, Orange, Agent for the Appli- cant, stated he would start immediate construction on the masonry wall if the Council would authorize issuance of the building permit; that there pre- sently is a temporary fence erected to protect the adjoining properties. Mr. Roberts noted that if Council has first reading on the ordin- ance zoning the property on Coffman Street at this meeting, and final reading at the next regular meeting, it still would be 30 days before this zoning became final and the Applicant could begin construction. Mr. Geisler stated that, in his opinion, the Council would be jus- tified in allowing the Applicant to proceed immediately. MOTION: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, is- suance of building permit was authorized. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION N0. 72R-173: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R- 173 for adoption, amending Condition No. 6 of Resolution No, 65R -231, approv- ing Reclassification No. 64-65 -85, as follows: "6. That a six -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north, west and south property lines of Parcel 2, hereinbefore described,to insure that no commercial traffic will be utiliz- ing the residential street, and that said wall shall be con- structed prior to final building and zoning inspection." Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 65N-231 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 64- 65-85. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-173 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 72R -174: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No.72R -174 for adoption, amending Condition No. 7 of Resolution No. 701-307, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 1163, as follows: That a perpetual easement agreement for a strip of land 20- feet wide for vehicular access purposes to State College Bou- levard through the medical center property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's office, and then be filed and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder prior to the issuance of a building permit." "7 City 1(41J Asehelm.141ifornia COUNCjk IrIIINuyS Mey 9. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. 72-285 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 70R -307 GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1163. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson,Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -174 duly passed and adopted. first ieadidg. O DINANgE NO. 3042: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3042 for -adtpri T.A -4-- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64 -65 -85 P-1 Lot 11) cappgjom fi SF immiT NO 1285 REVISED PLANS: Request of William J. Herrick, Etrioirbzmiental Leisure Corporation, dated April 25, 1972, was submitted for approval of revised plans for the proposed motel to be located on M-1 pro- perty on the south side of Via Burton Street, east of State College- Boule- vard, approved by Conditional Use Permit No. 1285. Also submitted was Development Services Department report recommend- ing approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. That in the event subject property is to be divided in any way for purposes of conveying title, a parcel map to record the approved division of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall conditionally dedi- cate to the City of Anaheim a 15 -foot radius property line return at the north- east corner of the motel property, conditioned upon a public street being provided along the easterly portion of subject property. Said dedication shall be made prior to the issuance of a building permit for the motel. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts advised that the original plans indicated the easterly 50 feet of subject property was being held out for either future expansion of the motel or possible provision of vehicular ac- cess for a landlocked parcel to the south. He noted that the revised plans submitted indicate a decrease in the size of the property by an additional ten feet, increasing the 50 -foot strip to 60 feet, which would be adequate for a standard public street if desired. Mr. Roberts advised that the Developer has had discussion with the property owner to the south, on either making a land trade or selling the 60- foot strip to the property owner so that access could be provided. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom, revised plans were approved, subject to recommendations of the Development Services Department. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION N0. 72R -175 AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 793: In accordance with recom- mendations of the Assistant City Engineer, Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -175 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLAINT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM- MOVEMENT: THE MANZANITA PARR GRADING (NORTH END' OF RIVIERA STREET) IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 793. (Frank H. Clark $6,768.00) 72-286 City Hall, AneheJ,m, California COUNCIL MINUTES Mav 9. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R:175 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION] NO. 72R -176 WORK ORDER NO. 646 -B: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R- 176 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COM- PLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVE, TO WIT: THE MAGNOLIA AVENUE STREET IMPROVE- MENT, SOUTH OF BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 646 -B. AP- PROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVE- MENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened June 1, 1972, 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-176 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTIOP NO. 72D-177 WORK ORDER NO. 1241: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -177 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COM- PLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE PACIFICO AVENUE-LEWIS STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1241. (The Beecher Construction Company) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Agsmunam NO. 72R DEEDS OF No. 72R -178 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Hub City Construction Company; Covington Bros.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None Resolution No. 72R-177 duly passed and adopted. EASEMENT Councilman Thom offered Resolution Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -178 duly passed and adopted. Refer to Resolution Book. Roll Call Vote: Roll Call Vote: Refer to Resolution Book. Roll Call Vote: MOTION CARRIED. Electrical Division March Water Division February 72 -287 Ci y Ball. Seim. C4ifornia COUNCIL NIIVUTES May 9. 1972. 1:30 P.M. NO. 72R -179 DEED OF EASEMENT. ANAHEIM HILL4. INC. AND TEXACO S. ;NC. Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R-179 for adoption. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTINGG A CERTAIN EASEMENT DEED AND ORDERING ITS RECORDATION. (Santa Ana Canyon Road to Nohl Ranch Road.) AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -179 duly passed and adopted. RZS9I TION NO. 72R -180 AGREEMENT. LEAR- SIEGLER. INC.: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R-180 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN LEAR- SIEGLER, INC. AND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STREET AND PROVIDING DEDI- CATION THEREFOR. (City Yard Gramercy and Valley) AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -180 duly passed and adopted. RESOLVTION NO. 72R -181 AGREEMENT. SOUTHERN PACIFj,C TRAN8P0RTATION COMPANY: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -181 for adoption. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE SST PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY. (CONSTRUCTION OF TEN WATER PIPELINE BENEATH TRACKS AND PROPERTY OF RAILROAD AT SOUTH ANAHEIM STATION, MILE POST BK- 512.66) AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-181 duly passed and adopted. gamspcomps: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom: a. City of Brea Endorsing and actively supporting early land- scaping of the Orange Freeway and further requesting and urging that steps be taken to expedite this worthwhile project at an early date. b. Cultural Arts Commission Minutes April 6, 1972. Cultural Arts Commission Agenda May 1, 1972. c. Financial and Operating Reports for the months of February and March, 1972: 72-288 City Hall L An*eim. California COUNCIL MINUTES MINT 9. 1972. 1:30 P.M. ORDINANCE )10. 3036: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3036 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32 BY RESCINDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARK- ING DURING SCHOOL HOURS AND ADDING SECTION 14.32.272 IN THEIR PLACE. (Portions of Broadway, Cerritos Avenue, Chaucer Street, Citron Street, Cypress Street, Gilbert Street, Illinois Street, Midway Drive, Orange Avenue, Romneya Drive, Wagner Avenue, Walnut Street, Western Avenue.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3036 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3037: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3037 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68- 69- 32(1), Tract 7676 R -2- 5,000) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: Thom ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3037 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3038: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3038 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64 118(4) C-1) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3038 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3039: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3039 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-62(13) R-3) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3039 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3043: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3043 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE or THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 4, CHAPTER 4.40 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 4.40.030 AND ADDING THERETO SECTION 4.40.050. (4.40.030 Fortune Telling, Spiritualism, Magic-Teaching For Con- sideration Prohibited. 4.40.050 laemption Members of Professional Groups) 72-289 Citv !AU. Awls*. Califstraia ogicuopyTig Mav 9. 1972, 1:20 P.M.. ORDINAICE JO, 3044: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3044 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SEC TIONS 14.32.110 AND 14.32.152 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING. (14.32.110 Delete Paragraph 8. 14.32.152 Portions of Manches- ter Avenue.) URDINaC8 N0. 3045: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3045 for first read- ing. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-24(16Y- Ng) ORDINOCE NO. 3046: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3046 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-45 R- 3) Opp NO. 3047: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3047 for first read- ing. AN ORDINAL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71-72-29 C-1) somisulmjgAAL Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3048 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-47(2) M-1) mumpaajloo 3040 pawiarippmp REIATIONq The City Manager reported that, after considering the comments by the various employee organizations and the Council at the meeting of May 2, 1972, on the draft of the proposed ordinance on Employer Employee Relations, the following amendments are recommended: Page 2 Amend subsection (g) of SECTION 1.06.030 DEFINITIONS to read as follows: (g) EMPLOYEE, MANAGEMENT: Means (1) any employee having significant responsibilities for formulating and administering City policies and programs, including but not limited to the City Manager, de- partment heads, assistant department heads, division heads, as- sistant division heads, administrative staffs, police captains, police lieutenants, ggd fire battalion chiefs and, (2) any emr ployee having authority to exercise independent judgment to ap- point, transfer, suspend, lay -off, reinstate, promote, demote, dismiss, assign, reward, or discipline subordinate employees, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action. Page 4 Amend first paragraph of SECTION 1.06.090 MEET AND CONFER to read as follows: SECTION 1.06.090 MEET AND CONFER. The City Management Representa- tive and representatives of recognized employee organizations, shall have the mutual obligation personally to meet and confer in order to exchange freely information, opinions and proposals and to endeavor to reach agreement on matters within the scope of representation. No h4 hera or_scludss Algal of aDy i 21111111 21261ftla ntachad e Sks And conferring 2 lbi of aucb lawn ansabu Atit, City y�� Rtwresentative 3u Al recognised 1 elg prganization. 72-290 City Hall, Alta iej t. Caljfornia COUNCIL MINUTES Mav 9, 1972, 1:30 P.M. Pages 6 and 7 Amend the third and fourth paragraphs of SECTION 1.06.120 DETERMINING APPROPRIATE UNIT to read as follows: In the establishment of appropriate units: (a) Management employees shall not be included in the same unit with non management employees for the purpose of meeting and conferring, nor may they represent such employees on matters within the scope of representa- tion. (b) Confidential employees who are included in the same unit with non confidential employees may not represent such employees on matters within the scope of repre- sentation. (c) Peace Officers shall not be included in the lame unit with npeace officers for the purpose of meeting and conferring, nor „maw they represent such .emplovees for the purpose of meeting and conferring. (d) Professional emplovees shall not be denied the right ,2 k. represented separately from non professional employees. Peace Officers may form, join, participate in, and be rep- resented by employee organizations of their own choosing for the purpose of representation on all matters of em- ployer- employee relations as provided by this chapter, provided such employee organizations: (a) Co ncern themselves solely and exclusivelv with the wages, hours, working conditions, welfare programs, and advancement of the academic amid vocational train- ing in furtherance of the peace officers' profession. (b) Are not subordinate to other organization. In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Murdoch advised that the var- ious employee organizations had been given copies of the proposed amendments that morning. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council in re- sponse to the proposed amendments to which there was no reply. OR,DCB 40. 3040 Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3040 for amended first reading, amended as recommended by the City Manager. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 1 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO CHAPTER 1.06 RELATING TO EMPLOYER EMPLOYEE RELATIONS. AIM (p4 CTTEE CITIZEN APPOINTMENTS: Upon determining that all Councilmen had not yet received consent of the person they wished to appoint to the Anaheim Greenbelt Committee, the subject was deferred to the next regular meeting by Council consent. CARROUSEL OF ANAHEIM BUDGET: The City Manager reported that the Women's Division of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce has presented the 1972 Carrousel of Ana heim Budget, showing a total of $9,272.00. He noted that $1,014.50 of that budget would be the normal charge for equipment and material owned by Ana heim and this would not be an out -of- pocket expense, thus the actual budget figure should be $8,257.50, which he recommended be approved. In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Murdoch advised that he had discussed with the Chamber of Commerce the unexpended funds from last fiscal year which presently are on the books and had been advised that these funds would not be needed by the Chamber this year, thus those monies would be re- turned to the Unappropriated Reserve Account at the end of this fiscal year. 72 -291 City Hall. Anaheim. California CO J C ;L maws Mav 9. 1972, 1 :30 P.M. He stated he felt the difference between the $7,500.00 budget au- thorized by the Council and the final budget could be accounted for by the fact that printed programs were used, part -time secretarial help was re- quired, and the Carrousel was a four -day event, as compared to the usual three days. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, the Carrousel of Anaheim budget was approved as presented, as recommended by the City Manager. MOTION CARRIED. WELFARE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT: The City Manager reported that the County has ad- vised they have received an offer to participate in the One -Year Welfare Demonstration Project, funded by a $5,000,000.00 Federal Grant, this Project directed at placing able bodied welfare recipients in jobs, primarily with local governments or other public agencies; that a total of $20,000,000.00 will be allocated to California, $15,000,000.00 to Los Angeles County and $5,000,000.00 to Orange County. He added that this program would be operated similar to the Public Employment Program, presently in effect, wherein the funds could be used and jobs provided only where the jobs are not normal to the organization, and thus would be considered "created" jobs, such as in the case where it would be deemed desirable to add more persons to a job than is normally needed. Mr. Murdoch advised that part of the program provides for train- ing of these persons up to a maximum of two hours per day, so that they would be eligible to move into such a job as skilled workers. In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Murdoch advised that there must be an intent on the part of the employer to retain 50% of these workers at the cessation of the program, just as is the case in the PEP program, although it is not mandatory; that City of Anaheim residence is not required of any person the City hires under this program. Mr. Murdoch stated that, in his opinion, the PEP program has been a worthwhile project and the normal turnover of personnel has allayed their apprehension about the requirement to retain 507 of the participants as regu- lar employees. He added that the Welfare Demonstration Project may be more diffi- cult than the PEP program, since most of the participants will not have a great deal of skill because approximately three fourths of the people on welfare in Orange County are females with families. Mr. Murdoch noted that part of the program which would be respon- sibility of the County and not the City, is to provide day-care centers for the children of working pothers who participate; that the entire labor cost of these people is paid for by Federal funds, with the City providing 10% in -time costs, such as leadership. In reply to Councilman Stephenson, Mr. Murdoch stated it would not be possible to indicate a willingness to participate and then withdraw from the program. He advised that the County has requested an indication as to whe- ther or not Anaheim favors participation in this program and the number of persons the City could employ. He recommended that if the Council approves participation in this program, the County be informed that Anaheim could employ approximately twenty. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Manager was authorized to inform the County. that Anaheim is in fa- vor of the Welfare Demonstration Project and could employ approximately twenty. MOTION CARRIED. jgralria_-__WggZUMalgaLak At the request of the City Attorney, Councilman Pebley moved to Recess to Executive Session, for the purpose of discussing a litigation matter. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:40 P.M.) 72 -292 City Ra11 MAW& califor COUNW MINUTES Max?. 1972 3:30 P.M. ADJ0UR At the conclusion of Executive Session, and upon return of all Coun- cilmen to the. Council Chambers, Councilman Stephenson moved to adjourn to 10 :00 A.M., Tuesday, May 16, 1972, in memory of former City Councilman, Mayor and Number One Citizen, Chas. A. Pearson. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned; 4:26 Fat City 1a1]. Anaieii. California cOUNCTL MINUTES Mav 16, 197Z. 10 ;00 A.M. The City Council of the City. of Anaheim met in Adjourned Regular Session for an informal meeting with the Anaheim Public Library Board of Trustees. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust LIBRARY DIRECTOR: William Griffith MEMBERS OF THE LIBRARY BOARD PRESENT: Mrs. Elizabeth J. Schultz, Chairman, Glenn P. Fry, Mrs. Joanne Stanton, Mr. Earl E. Dahl ALSO PRESENT: Jim Allee, Student, Loara High School Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. Mrs. Schultz referred to report of the Joint School /Public Library Research Committee on the proposed after- school-hours "'library project, whereby high school libraries would remain open after school hours in an effort to reduce the present student overload at the Anaheim Central Public Library. It was noted in the report that Retelia and Loara High Schools were suggested as possible pilot schools for the "after school- hours" program to serve students in the seventh to twelfth grades at an approximate cost to the City of $25,000.00 per school location. Councilman Thom, in referring to the Committee's report, felt the recommendations therein were not what he had in mind in expanding library services and did not necessarily encompass the Public Library image desired. Although he recognized the need for services to students, expansion, in his opinion, should be to serve everyone and not only those in the seventh through twelfth grades. Irks. Schultz agreed the limited clientele did not warrant the pro- jected expenditure of tax funds, and explained that the school facilities were not large enough to accommodate the needs of everyone.