Loading...
1972/05/30The City Council of the City of Amabeim met in regular session. PRESENT: :j .11M a. Maximum building height within 300 feet of a single-family residential zone. b. Minimum side setback. c. 6 -foot solid masonry wall required where C-0 abuts a resi- dential zone. d. Minimum number of parking stalls required. 72- 331 COUNCILMEN: Sneegas (entered the Council Chambers at 1:40 P.M.), Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT: John Harding CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts CITY CLERK: Done M. Daoust CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverent Arthur Krebs, of the First Congregational Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALLT$: Councilman Mark A. Stephenson led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. limumismi The following Proclamation was issued by Mayor Dutton, unani- mously approved by the City Council and prebented to Cecil J. Marks, Official Goodwill Ambassador for the Orange County Fair, represent.- ing the Fair Board, "Orange County Fair Time June 16 25, 1972. MINOT$S: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held May 9, 1972, and the Adjourned Regular Meeting held May 16, 1972, were approved on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. jurasz Demands against the City, in the amount of $371,826.55, in accordance with the 1971 -72 Budget, were approved. Submitted by Maurice Gale Hart- man, et al., and Alfred L. Canclini, to expand an existing motel on 0-0 zoned property located on the south side of Ball Road, east of Palm Street, with waivers of: The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72-82, granted the use only, denying Waivers "a," "b," "c," and "d." Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Charles E. Gibbs, Agent, and public hearing scheduled this date. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject property, existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and advised that in 1967 a Resolution of Intent was approved for C-0 Zoning for all parcels fronting on the south side of Ball Road between Claremont Street and Palm Street, including the two parcels frosting on Palm Street, south of Ball Road. -72-332 He reported that subsequent to City Planning Commission action the Applicant submitted revised plans which would add two motel units, making it a total of 42, and delete the necessity for requested waivers "a" and "c," and although these had not been reviewed by the City Planning Commission, they had been checked by Staff. He added that with the revised plans the Applicant still is two parking spaces short of the requirement. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and wished to address the Council. William P. Bowman, 833 Dover Drive, Newport Beach, Agent, pointed out an error in the revised plans which showed a building less than 37 feet from a single family residential zone when, in fact, it did comply with the Code and Waiver "a" would not be required. Lee Webb, 13901 Yorba, Tustin, former operator of the existing motel on the property, stated there were several motels in the Disneyland area whose parking spaces were not provided on a one:one ratio per unit; that some on Estella had a ratio of two parking spaces for every three units. In support of his contention that the required parking spaces ratio is net necessary, Mr. Webb noted that recently the Samoa Motel, which has 41 units, was completely filled and yet had only five automobiles parked on the lot. Re added that the normal situation is two parking spaces used for every three units filled, resulting from large parties using two units and arriving in one car or customers arriving by other means of transportation. Alfred L. Canclini, 414 West Ball Road, operator of the existing motel on subject property, stated they had averaged two open spaces for every ten.. available. position. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council in op- Will Blaine, 1208 South Pala Street, whose home is located immed- iately to the west of subject property, advised that his objection had been to the two story building located less than 45 -feet from his home; however, he understood the revised plans had corrected that situation, and if so, he had no further objections. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 729r204: Councilman Pebley stated he felt the requested wai- vers were technical in nature, since there are only two parking spaces less than required And the property to the west has .a Resolution of Intent to C-0 Zoning. He thereupon offered Resolution Mo. 721204 for adoption, grant- ing Conditional Use Permit No. 1306, in part, denying Waivers "a" and "c" (no longer necessary per Exhibit 1, Revision 1) and granting Waivers "b" and "d," subject to the following interdepartmental Committee recommenda- tions, amended to reflect revised plans: 1. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Ball Road and Berry Avenue for street lighting purposes. 2. That the developer shall pay water assessment fees as deter- mined by the Director of Public Utilities prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. ;hat trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plains on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter wined to be necessary by the Chief of the Piro Department. 5. pat a 6-foot nesoaty wall shell be constructed along the south property line. 1 72-313 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES May 3Q, 1972. 1:30 P.M. 6. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shiel- ded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent residential properties. 7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, (Revision 1), 2, 3, 4, and 5. 8. That Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the commencement of activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to the time that the building permit is issued, or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 9. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDI- TIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1306, PART. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and. Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -204 duly' passed and adopted. PUBLIQ BRING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71-72-43 AND VARIANCE NO. 358: Submit- ted by Katella Realty, Incorporated and Mrs. George E. Opstelten, request- ing a change of zone from R -1 (Parcel 2) to C-1, to establish an office building (Parcels 1 and 2) on property located at the northwest corner of Varna Street and Katella Avenue, with waivers of: a. Minimum front setback. b. Setback opposite R-1 along a local street. c. Minimum number of required parking stalls. The City Planning Commission,pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -90, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along the northerly 60 feet of Varna Street for street lighting purposes. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north property line and to the rear of the required 3-foot planting strip separating the parking area from Varna Street. 4. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent residences. 5. That any parking area lighting proposed shall be down lighting of a maximum height of 8 feet, which lighting shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity of the area. 6. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 7. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Varna Street as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 8. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim' marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. 9. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be completed. The pro visions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. 10. That Conditions Nos. 2,3,4,5,6,7, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 72-334 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES Mav 30. 1972. 1:30 P.M. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -91, granted said variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Re- classification No. 71-72-43. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim mar- ked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. 3. That Condition No. 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject pro- perty, existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and advised that the southern parcel (Parcel 1) is zoned C-1 and has been used for office space, and that the Applicant has indicated an intent to remove the existing struc- tures =Parcel 1 and construct new facilities on both parcels with the major- ity of Parcel 2 to the north being used for parking. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and satisfied with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, to which he received an affirmative reply. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposir tion; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTWN NO. 72R 205: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R-205 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Com- mission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (71- 72 -43 C-1) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson,Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -205 duly passed and adopted. RES4IUTION NO. 72R-206: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R- 206 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2358, subject to the conditions recom- mended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2358. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson,Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-206 duly passed and adopted. PUBIC aim= GENERAL AST NO. 123 -A: Initiated by the City Planning Commission, to consider updating the Anaheim General Plan relating to the Anaheim Hills Community. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -92, recommended General Plan Amendment No. 123-A be approved. 72- 335 City gall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL LUTES Mav 30. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberta recommended that inasmuch as Reclassification No. 71 -72 -44 involves the same property as General Plan Amendment No. 123-A, that these two be considered together. PSTBLIC BLARING- RCLASSIFICATION NO. 71-72-44: Submitted by Anaheim Hills, Incorporated and Texaco Ventures, Incorporated, requesting a change of zone from County of Orange Al, and City of Anaheim R- A, to City of Anaheim PC, on property located in the Santa Ana Canyon, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road, between Anaheim Hills Road and Weir Canyon Road, extending southerly to ap- proximately the Santa Ana Mountains separating the Cities of Anaheim and Orange. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -93, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following con- ditions: 1. That these reclassification proceedings are granted subject to the completion of annexation of subject property to the City of Anaheim. 2. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such par- cel provided, however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split. 3. That prior to the introduction of an ordinance to establish the PC Zone on a specific parcel or parcels within the Planned Community area, there shall be submitted to the City development standard criteria and specific plans of development for the area(s) involved. 4. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. Mr. Roberts displayed a map of the area and noted that the Gen- eral Plan Amendment encompasses approximately 650 acres of the 4,200 acres contained in General Plan Amendment No. 123 and at the hearing before the City Planning Commission it became evident that the total plan warranted updating and as a result it has been readvertised and will be heard by the Commission June 12, 1972. He advised that Anaheim Hills, Inc., has submitted all of the necessary documents for a Planned Community development; that the original land use and housing elements which established the maximum number of dwel- long units that could be constructed over the entire 4,200 acres owned by the parent company, Grant Corporation, has been further refined and the entire area is divided into eight neighborhoods,' with each neighborhood sub planned. Mr. Roberts noted that all appropriate City departments have re- viewed the plans and indicated approval, except that Parks and Recreation has reserved until a later date an opinion on the use of a portion of Oak Canyon; that the Orange Unified School District stated they could make no recommendation until there is a demand for school facilities. He added that presumably there would be acreage available either within or outside the planned community for schools. Referring to the Circulation Element, Mr. Roberts advised that he understood Anaheim Hills, Inc. has abided by all of the recommendations of the Traffic Engineer. Mr. Roberts also noted that the population element submitted in- dicates a substantial reduction in the total number of dwelling units an- ticipated for the entire Anaheim Hills complex; that under General Plan No. 123, a maximum of 15,000 dwelling units was established, whereas Gen- eral Plan Amendment No. 123 -A reduced that to 12,747. In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Roberts advised it was his understfndin` Anaheim Hills, Inc. has stipulated they would comply with all regulations; that none of the area within General Plan Amendment No.___ 123-A is in Agricultural Preserve. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council.. 72-336 City Hall,,, ADih{Sm. Californif COUNCIL Mg= Mav 30. 1972. 1:30 P,M. James L. Biiisic, Agent for the Applicant, stated he felt the Planned Community Zone offered excellent control over developments. Bob McQueen, 4831 McKinnon Drive, representing the Santa Ana Canyon Improvement Association, stated the basic concern of his organization was at- tempting to maintain the agreed -upon density of 4.2 units per acre, although they realized some areas would be higher. He further advised he felt the concept of the proposed development looked favorable and he approved the higher density for this area with the larger lots to be maintained to the east and `rest of subject property. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there being no response, declared both hearings closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-207: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R- 207 for adoption, approving General Plan Amendment No. 123-A, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 123-A. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-207 duly passed and adopted. RESO40TION NO. 72R-208: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R- 208 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER MIND TEAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANCED. (71-72-44 PC) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN:" None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72k-208 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC 1IB,iitil� S TO TITLE 18. ZOILING: To consider amendments to the Anaheim Municipal Code, Title 18, Zoning, Chapter 18.26, R- 2 -5,000 One Family Zone. The City Planning Commission, pursuant +to Resolution No. PC72 -80, recommended amendment to Title 18, Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.26, R-2-5,000 One- Family Zone, per Exhibit A. Assistant Director of Development Services Ronald Thompson noted the City Planning Commission had indicated eleven areas of study for the R-2-5,000 Zone. Councilman Dutton took exception to Finding No. 9 of City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC72 -80, wherein it stated "particularly in the Canyon area," since he felt no specific area of Anaheim should be singled out in the zone. 72-337 City pall Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES Mav 30. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Mr. Thompson reviewed the City Planning Commission's proposed changes for the zoning, dated April 17, 1972. Referring to garage setback requirements, photographs of various existing driveways were shown and discussion held. The Council indicated agreement with designating the zone R -S- 5,000, instead of R- 2- 5,000. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Richard L. Owen, Executive Vice President of the Grant Corpora- tion, 500 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, referred to the proposals for R -2 -5,000 Zone change dated May 22, 1972, that his company had submit- ted after reviewing the City Planning Commission recommended changes to the zone. He advised that his company basically agreed with the City Plan- ning Commission recommendations except for the areas of front yards, build- ing site area and lot coverage. He thereupon presented slides of various front yard setbacks with the aid of diagrams placed on the Council wall to explain their recommended changes which would provide for a larger house, smaller front yards and more usable area in the rear yards. Mr. Owen stated he felt a varying setback of 6 feet to 10 feet would materially assist in providing more backyard play area as present requirements result in larger front yard areas that are not utilized. The City Manager commented he felt the City Planning Commission and Grant Corporation both were attempting to provide more living area by different approaches; however, he objected to trying to specifically de- sign every house by the ordinance and felt Grant Corporation's suggestion to limit second stories to 50% of the first floor area was highly restric- tive. W. Owen stated the recommendation that the second floor be lim- ited to 507. of the area of the first floor was an alternative to the Commis- sion's suggestion that each additional bedroom require additional lot area. Larry Matzick, representing Ponderosa Homes, Developers, stated he was in accord with most of the Grant Corporation's suggestions; however, he preferred a minimum front yard setback of 23 feet because the building pad area proposed and the 337. maximum lot coverage does not allow a devel- oper to build under FHA, since it would be virtually impossible to build a one story, 1,250 square foot living space house on a 5,000 square foot lot and still provide the FHA required garage with cabinet and storage space. Mr. Matzick asked if the proposed changes are adopted would he be allowed to proceed under previously-approved tract maps that do not con- form to the proposed changes. quired. The City Attorney advised that revised tract maps would be re- Mr. Matzick stated he did not feel he could revise the tract maps and make the changes recommended and be under construction before the rainy season; also, he was not certain the house they have presently designed for R-2 -5,000 Zoning would look appropriate with a 6-foot front setback. He added that he probably could build under the changes recour .ended by Grant Corporation, except he would have to have a second floor that would exceed 507. of the first floor of a house since the home they have designed, with a maximum of four bedrooms, would require a second floor as large as 65% to 707. of the first floor area. 72-338 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES Mav 3Q. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Mr. Matzick specifically requested that lot coverage be set at 40%, rather than 33%, the same as the FHA limitation. He felt that the requirement of submitting precise plans for review should eliminate some of the past problems. Bob McQueen, 4831 McKinnon Drive, stated he was in agreement with the varying front yard setback of 6 to 10 feet with automatic garage door openers, or a minimum of 25 feet_ with nothing allowed in between. W. McQueen stated he felt the proposed R- S -5,000 Zone would not apply to development in the Santa Ana Canyon area since that is designated low- medium density, and the Canyon has been designated for R-1 or low den- sity south of the Santa Ana River. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Councilman Dutton stated he was agreeable to changing the desig- nation to R- S but he wanted to be certain the pad or building site is a full, buildable 5,000-square feet; he agreed with the front yard setback as recommended by the Grant Corporation, and felt the lot coverage should be 407., rather than 33%. Councilman Stephenson agreed, and stated he felt the front yard setback should be 6 to 10 feet, and 23 or 25 feet, with nothing in between. Councilman Thom stated he understood the 5,000 square foot build- ing pad meant level or flat buildable area. Mr. Matzick advised that pad size meant 5 feet outside the founda- tion and a definition of level land would cover the situation. Mr. Geisler recommended the Planning Commission Resolution No. PC72 -80 be sent back to -.the Planning Commission for a determination of what is meant by building pad or site. He noted that the ordinance as recommended establishes the number of bedrooms and approval of plans which may not be enforceable nor sustained in a court of law. Mr. Thompson reported that recent legislation now provides for approval of specific plans. Councilman Thom stated that in addition to a clearer definition of building site, he would like the Commission to also consider changing the front yard setback to 6 to 10 feet, or 25 feet with nothing in between; also, he requested more information relative to 33% lot coverage versus 40% coverage. Mr. Thompson advised that the recommendations of the City Plan- ning Commission were that any additional floor space in excess of 33% cov- erase of the lot would have to be provided by a second floor. went. Councilman Thom stated he preferred the 33% lot coverage require- On notion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom, decision on amendment to Title 18, Chapter 18.26, R -2 -5,000 One- Family Zone was continued to June 13, 1972, 1:30 P.M., and Resolution No. PC72-80 was referred back to the City Planning Commission to more clearly describe the definition of building pad or site, and also to consider front yard setback requirements as recommended at this meeting. MOTION CARRIED. I 1 M' 1 .s,, .1 1): /4 1).; 72-339 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES M(v 3Q, 1172. 1:30 P.M. James' L. Norris, Chairman of the Community Redevelopment Commission, presented Resolution No. CRC -71 -1, recommending the entire City Limits, including any future air nexations, be designated as the Study Area of the Community Redevelopment Commission. Mr. Norris stated it was felt that if the study area was limited to a specific area at this time it could give a connotation that area is blighted; also, the Commission is an ongoing organization, and at some time in the future an area not under consideration at this time could require it. Mr. Norris advised that at a later date the Commission would desig- nate specific project areas for consideration. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council accepted the recommendation of the Community Redevelopment Cour mission and referred to the City Attorney for preparation of the necessary documents. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Morris stated the Commission would be happy to meet with the Council at any time they desired. PRIVATE PATROL PERMIT FtULLERTON MERCHANTS POLICE: Application filed by William Adair McNamee, for stationary guard service on the Royal Coach Inn property located on Ball Road, west of the Santa Ana Freeway, was submitted and gran- ted, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.60 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, se- conded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. CODED REQUEST. CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL TRANSMISSION LIN$S SOUTHERN cALI- Fc* iIA EDISQN COMPANY: Submitted by Thomas T. Lacy, Southern California Edison Company, requesting a written statement from the City Council setting forth their position concerning proposed construction of additional transmission lines to be situated within the City of Anaheim. Subject request was continued from the meetings of April 25 and May 9, 1972, at the request of the Petitioner. Upon report by the City Clerk of a telephone conversation with the Petitioner, Councilman Pebley moved that subject request be removed from the Agenda, to be rescheduled at a later date, as requested by the Petitioner. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. 71-6E: Submitted by Jim Williams, proposing to encroach into a portion of an existing public utility easement located within Lot 11 of Tract No. 5611, south of South Street, east of State College Boulevard. Also submitted was report of the City Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-209: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R- 209 for adoption, granting Encroachment Permit No. 71-6E. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERNS AND CONDITIONS OF AN ECROACHMENT PERMIT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WITH JIM WILLIAMS. (71- 6E) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIU EN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:. None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-209 duly passed and adopted. 72-340 y, 1 OWTIOE Id. 721- 210 ARD W0� a� mn_ 9 In accordance with recom- mendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R- 210 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE. LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM- PROVEENT: THE WALNUT CANYON SEWER IMPROVEMENT, PHASE II, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1239. (Dateline Pipe Contract, Inc. $162,977.00) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -210 duly passed and adopted. RESOWTION J0. 74 -211 DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R-211 for. adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Virgil L. Lonadale) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-211 duly passed and adopted. !DECEASE OF EOUIPIi NT LOADER TRACTOR: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of a Loader Tractor for the Anaheim Hills Golf Course, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid: Min McCoy Motor Company, Anaheim T H Equipment Company, Santa Ana Milo Equipment Company, Santa Ana On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the law bid of McCoy Motor Company was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $8,019.90, including tax. To this motion, Councilman Thom voted "No." MOTION CARRIED. The City Manager reported on the recommended purchase of a Fischer Porter Traffic Data Translator and advised that the one manufacturer, Fischer Porter Company, has submitted a quota- tion for said'equipment in the amount of $8,400.00, including tax. He there- upon recommended the purchase be authorized. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley, purchase was authorized in the amount of $8,400.00, including tax, as recour mended by the City Manager. MOTION CARRIED. r011 Resolution No. 721r212 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. TOTAL AMOUNT- INCLUDING SAX $8,019.90 8,132.25 NO QUOTE Councilman Stephenson offered 72- 341 City Hall. Anaheim. Califorpia COUNCIL MINUTES Mav 30, 1972. 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY THAT CERTAIN FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTANTS' AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES ON THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 1970, RELATING TO THE "TOPICS STUDY." (Donald Frischer Company $13,200.00 Maximum) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -212 duly passed and adopted. RESOLLUTION NO. 72R-213 WORK ORDER NO. 649-B: Councilman Dutton offered Reso- lution No. 72R -213 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE CONSTRUCTION, MODIFICATION AND INTERCONNECTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS ON BROOKHURST STREET, LA PALMA AVE- NUE TO BALL ROAD, HARBOR BOULEVARD, BALL ROAD TO SILKEN WAY AND LA PALMA AVENUE, CITRON STREET TO MAGNOLIA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER N0. 649 -B. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND,. DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened June 22, 1972, 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-213 duly passed and adopted. THE PINK NUS LINE APPLICATION: Request of Michael A. Kadletz, President of The Pink. Bus Line, was submitted for approval of their application to the Public Utilities Commission to operate a beach bus run from Brea to Newport Beach during the summer months, and also that if approved, notification of such approval be forwarded to the Public Utilities Commission. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom, application of The Pink Bus Line was approved. MOTION CARRIED. smingingui the following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. Decision on application before the Public Utilities Commis- sion Investigation for the purpose of establishing a list for the year 1972 of railroad grade crossings of city streets or county roads most ur- gently in need of separation, or existing separations in need of alteration or reconstruction as contemplated by Section 189 of the Streets and Highways Code. (Case No. 9257) b. City of Stanton Resolution Expressing its opposition to Proposition No. 9 on the June 6th Ballot. c. City of Buena Park Resolution No. 4625 Expressing support for the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972, A.R. 14370. d. Orange County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 72 -495 That the request for a moratorium on residential construction within the sore of influence" of Naval Air Station, Los Alamitos, is considered un- necessary for the unincorporated County are in view of the existing zon- ing and land uses, as well as the regulations and procedures required for a sons change 72-342 J e. Anaheim Public Library Board Minutes April 17, 1972. f. Community Redevelopment Commission Agenda, Minutes (April 19 and May 3, 1972) and pertinent correspondence. g. Financial and Operating Reports for the month of April, 1972: Engineering Division. MOTION CARRIED. R$8OLUTI0, NO. 72R -214 RECLASSIFICATION ND. 71- 72-15: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R-214 for adoption, amending Condition No. 3 of Resolution No. 71R -466 (Reclassification No. 71-72-15). Refer to Resolution Book. A RE$OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 71R -466 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 71 -72- 15. (Amending Condition No. 3) AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None Roll Call Vote: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-214 duly passed and adopted. I1RK 0!m OF DEDICATION RECLASSIFICATION ND. 71-72-15. (TB4CTS, NO. 7566 AID Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of an easement for equestrian and hiking trails, in conjunction with Reclassification No. 71- 72-15, Tracts No. 7566 and 7569, was submitted and approved as to form and recordation thereof authorized, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas. MOTION CARRIED. C1I INANE NO. 3050: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3050 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71-72-15(1) R -H- 10, 000 Tract No. 7566) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3050 duly passed and adopted. augagGLA Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3052 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-30 I-3) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3052 duly passed and adopted. summum_3021 Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3053 for first reading. AN ONDI] NCE OF TEE CITY OF MANE= MEWING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71-72-2E F'3) City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES Mav 30. 1972,_1:30 P.M. 171!AhT_TC I vinry LICgUgg A- LWATT.eM'►_ Application filed by Floyd E. and Hilda F. Furrow, for New Off -Sale Beer and Wine, for premises located at 1250 North Red Gum was presented by the City Manager to the City Coun- cil for their information. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Attorney was authorized to file a conditional protest with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application on the basis that the premises are presently located in an R -A Zone, which does not permit the Off-Sale sale of Beer and Wine. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-215 HORACE MANN SCHOOL LEASE: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R-215 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EXERCISING AN OPTION TO LEASE CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FROM THE ANAHEIM SCHOOL DISTRICT. (Horace Mann School) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley;' Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R- 215 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-216 SUBLEASE HORACE MANN SCHOOL. ANAHEIM FOUNDATION FOR CULTURE AND THE ARTS: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -216 for adop- tion. Refer to Resolution Book. Roll Call Vote: thto 1 trip IV. 72-343 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE SUBLEASING OF THE HORACE MANN SCHOOL TO THE ANAHEIM FOUNDATION FOR CUL- TURE AND THE ARTS. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No.72R -216 duly passed and adopted. SAN=TATION FEES C01dRCIAIrkESIDENTrIAL PROPERTIES: The City Manager presented a report from the Sanitation Department regarding residential property which has a commercial operation as an integral part, and proposing that the following revised charges be applied to all similar commercial -resi- dential establishments: Residential Fee $1.75 Commercial Sanitation and Sewage Fee 1.50 Total $3.25 He advised that both he and the Director of Public Works recom- mend approval of the proposed revised charges' as set forth by the Sanita- tion Department. By general consent, the Council approved the proposed revised charges as recommended by the City Manager and Director of Public Works. .,it The City Manager advised that Staff now is ready to report on Underground Utilities Policies. Assistant City Attorney Alan Mitts suggested that inasmuch as there are rather strong financial implications involved, the City Council may wish a joint rating with the City Planing Commission on this matter. 72-344 City HH11,, Anahjim. California QIUNCIL MINUTES Mav 39. 1972..1:30 j'.M., Councilman Thom requested advance copies of reports to be used at such a meeting to allow time to study them. Following Council discussion, a tentative meeting with the City Planning Commission was set for 7:30 P.M., June 6, 1972, and the Development Services Department was directed to invite representatives of developers to also attend. RESOWTICI NO, 72R- 217 SYLVANIA ANNEXATION (UNINHABITED) Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R-217 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXA- TION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED SYLVANIA ANNEXATION (UNINHABITED) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Refer to Resolution Book. Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-217 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 721 218 NOBLER DRIVE ANNEXATION (INHABITED) Councilman Stephen- son offered Resolution No. 72R -218 for adoption. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION'S CONSENT AND AUTHORIZING PROPONENTS TO CIRCULATE PETITION RE MOILER DRIVE ANNEXATION. (INHABITED). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-218 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC DAZE PERMIT: Application filed by Jack D. George, on behalf of Garden Grove Police Association, for permit to conduct public dance June 2, 1972, from 10:00 P.M. to 12:00 Midnight at the Anaheim Convention Center, was sub- mitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and that 6 officers be hired to police the dance, as recom- mended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Stephenson. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE N0. 3054: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3054 for first read- ing. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADDING CHAPTER 1.04 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 1.04.345. (Filing For Council Deemed Resignation From Commission) RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved to Recess to 6:30 P.M., in the Huntington Beach Rood of the Anaheim Convention Center, for a joint meeting with High School District Board of Trustees and the Community Center Authority. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:12 P.M.). AFTER SECFSS• PRESENT: ANOINT: PRESENT: 6:30 P.M., Huntington Beach Room, Anaheim Convention Center. COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts 72- 345 Huntington Beach Room, Anaheim Convention Center COUNCIL MINUTES May 30, 1972. 6:39 LB, PRESENT: CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall STADIUM AND CONVENTION CENTER DIRECTOR: Thomas F. Liegler FINANCE DIRECTOR: M.R. Ringer COMMUNITY CENTER AUTHORITY: Ben Schroeder, William Currier, Robert Hostetter ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES: Robert Bark, Dean H. Pritchett, M.D., John Barton, Edward M. Hartnell, James P. Bonnell, and Kenneth Wines, Superintendent of Schools ADRIAN WILSON ASSOCIATES: Alden Becker, Vice President /Operations Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. City Manager Keith Murdoch stated this meeting was being held to bring all parties up to date on proposed Convention Center expansion and the attendant bond issue therefor. He briefed statistics on convention activities in Anaheim for 1971 and those proposed for 1972 and the resultant delegate spending, not- ing that about two thirds of the delegate spending in 1971, and about 78% of the projected spending for 1972 is from conventions held in the Conven- tion Center. Mr. Murdoch advised that one of the primary reasons for wanting to move ahead on the Convention Center addition was to enable handling larger conventions and also to increase the flexibility in conventions and Convention Center activity by providing for a multiple use of the Con- vention Center facilities, such as having two or more conventions simultan- eously. He also noted several major conventions that have been booked since the announcement of the expansion plans. Director of Finance M.R. Ringer, with the aid of a slide pre- sentation, outlined the May 30, 1972 revisions to the February 15, 1972 tentative budget and time schedule for the proposed expansion and stated they hoped to call for bids in the next two or three weeks and start con- struction soon thereafter._ Referring to parking facilities, Mr. Ringer advised that the ori- ginal budget allowed for a parking structure which would provide 1,500 additional spaces; there currently are 2,284 spaces available, with provi- sion for an additional 700, which would more than compensate for the 502 spaces that would be lost by construction of the addition. He stated that the bond counsel and John Nuveen and Company, during preparation of the official statements, had suggested, rather than finance the "interest during construction" and "bond reserve" outside of the bond issue, the budget be revised to include these in the bond issue and remove "purchase and improvement of land" for parking, thus providing higher security to the bondholders and improving the marketability of the bonds. He stated this suggestion has been incorporated in the revised budget. Mr. Ringer further noted the Orange County Room has been elim- inated in the revised budget as was discussed in an earlier meeting. Referring to the $960,000.00 listed in the revised budget for change orders and contingencies, Mr. Ringer advised that this sum had been requested by the bond.attorney for interest during a 24 -month construction period; however, it was hoped construction would be completed in 15 months, requiring ohly $600,000.00 of that amount and, adding the anticipated $360,000.00 revenues from bond proceeds to the unused amount would mean approxiiately $720,000.00 that would be available for land purchases, equipment, etc., not now.included in the budget. In reply to W. Barton, Mr. Murdoch advised that it was his uir derstanding the funds for that purpose would not be tied up for the entire 24 swaths if construction was completed in 13 months, but would be avail- able upon completion of construction. 72-346 Huntington Beach Room, Anaheim Convention Center COUNCIL MINUTES May 30, 1972. 4 J0 P_ M_ Alden Becker, of the architectural firm of Adrian Wilson Asso- ciates, in reply to Mr. Bark, advised that the price escalation figure pro- vided in the revised budget was based on the usual increase trend of 11 Mr. Barton asked if there are any parking problems foreseen by not including the originally proposed additional parking at this time. Thomas F. Liegler replied that there are times when the parking lot is full and some vehicles park in the Disneyland lot; however, this is primarily for consumer type shows and concerts and this situation does not occur for convention -type events because travel is usually by other means. In reply to. Mr. Bonnell, Mr. Ringer stated it rtes estimated ap- proximately 1,500 additional parking spaces were required. Assistant City Attorney Alan Watts distributed copies of a draft of a Second Amendment Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement authorizing the Community Center Authority to issue the additional series of revenue bonds and also stipula ting that the Convention Center will be reserved for not less than three days in the spring of each year for the purpose of conduct ing graduation exercises. Also included in the Amendment is the statement that the additional obligation of the Anaheim Union High gchool Board would be $550.00 per year which bears the same proportion to the eight million dollar issue that the $1,000.00 did to the original fourteen and one -half million dollar issue, and clarifying the specific limitations defined on the liability of the High School Board. He also distributed copies of a draft of the official statement. He- stated it was anticipated the documents would be available the following week for consideration by the City Council and Board of Trustees. Mr. Schroeder noted that the listing of the Governing Board of the Anaheim Union High School District on page 3 of the draft of the Official Statement was incorrect and asked that it be corrected before presentation. Director of Public Works Thornton Piersall advised that prelimi- nary specifications have been reviewed by all parties and final plans are expected to be completed the following week; that the Community Center Au- thority then could call for bids around June 12th, bonds could be sold and contract awarded the latter part of August or early part of September, with completion of construction scheduled for the latter part of 1973 or early 1974. Dr. Pritchett .suggested that if bids prove the $539,000.00 set aside for price escalation is not necessary, the bond sales should be re- duced accordingly. In reply to .Mk. Murdoch, Dr. Pritchett stated he did not feel any unneeded funds should be used to purchase land if it is possible to operate without additional parking space. Mr. Murdoch replied that it was felt additional parking space was necessary because there already are complaints from nearby hotels and motels because their parking space is used by Convention Center attendees, and this situation will occur more often with the additional Exhibition Hall area. Mt. Bonnell estimated at least an additional $1,000,000.00 prob- ably would be needed for the necessary. additional parking.spaces. Mr. Geisler stated he felt the required funds would be around 1.5 to 2- million dollars. Mk. Schroeder stated he felt the expansion should be constructed first and parking requirements determined later. 1*. Murdoch advised that one method of financing that has been considered is purchasing property over a period of time, utilising existing parkin` lot revenues as a source of payment. 72-347 Huntington Beach Room, Anaheim Convention Center COUNCIL MINUTES May 30, 1973, 0:30 g Brief discussion was held on possible available property to be acquired in the future for parking purposes. In reply to Councilman Thom, Mr. Schroeder advised that the ar- chitect's fee is based on a fixed percentage of 6t% and the amounts vary between the two budgets because the first draft was an estimate of the cost of construction and the revised budget shows the actual charge. Mr. Piersall stated a breakdown of fixed and estimated fees could be provided, if desired; that after bids are taken the fees are fixed, al- though "fixed fees" will include other fees as well as the architect's fee. Mr. Liegler announced that the next Convention Center Authority meeting would be June 12, 1972, at which time the necessary documents for the proposed bond issue would be considered. He distributed the Convention Center Statement for the first ten months of Fiscal Year 1971 -72, and noted that parking at the Convention Cen- ter, as at the Stadium, provides the highest source of revenue since it amounts to over 20% of total revenue, and that the food operation for the past month had over $1,000,000.00 gross revenue, as has happened twice be- fore. A. schedule of events for June and July for the Convention Center also was' distributed. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Stephenson moved to adjourn. Councilman Pebley secon- ded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 8:35 P.M.