1970/10/1370-535
City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL NIIRrI~S- October .13..1970, t;30 .P,M~
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRE SENT:
COUNCILI~N: Clark, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
COUNCILHEN: None
CITY HANACER: Keith A. ~turdoch
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Haddox
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts'
Hayor Dutton called the meeting to order.
INVOCATION; Reverend Harry F. grief, of Grace Lutheran Church, gave the In-
vocation.
FLAG SALUTE; Councilman Hark A. Stephenson led the Assembly in the Pledge
of Allegiance to the Flag.
LA PALHA PARK RECRI~ION BUILDING - ANAgRIN HOST LIQNS C. LUIIi Hr. Ausust
Lenain presented a check in the mmount of $2,000,00 from the Ana-
heim Host Lions Club to be.used toward ~morttzation of construc-
tion costs of La Palms Park Recreation Building.
Hayor Dutton, on behalf of the City Council, accepted the contri-
butionwith thanks.
HINUTES: Hinutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Heeting held September 22,
and Adjourned Regular Heetin~ held September 24, 1970, were approved on mo-
tion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Clark. HOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READ. lNG - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; Councilman Pebley moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to
the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read-
ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading
of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Thom seconded the motion.
HOTIONUNANXli0USLY C~RRIED.
R~P~T - FIBAJ/C.IAL DENANDSAg, AINST TRE CITY: Demands against the City, in the
amount of $956,275.35, in accordance with the 1970-71 Budget, were approved.
PUBLIC HEARING = HOUSEI~VING pEP. NIT: Application submitted by Rosalie Charette,
requesting permission .to move a house from 2423 Almond Avenue, Orange, to
3319 Thornton Street, Anaheim, was reviewed by the City Council.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts reported that since reevalua-
tion of subject property revealed more floor area than ori$tnally indicated,
the Development Services Department recommends said housemovtng permit be
granted, subject to payment of the appropriate Park and Recreation Fees.
Hayor Dutton asked if the Applicant .was present and vishedto ad-
dress the Council.
Hrs. Rosalie Charette, 2111 South Hanchester Avenue, Space No. 9,
Anaheim, asked if it would be necessary to install side~alks in connection
with this property.
City Engineer James P. Haddox advised it vould be necessary to
apply for a sidewalk waiver for the property if the Applicant did not wish
to install sidewalks at this time.
Hayor Dutton asked if anyone else ~r~shed to address the Council;
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
70-536
City Hall. A~aheim. California'- L~UHCIL HZNL~E$ -Occobex L3...1970. I~.P.H.
~$0~I~NO. 70R-494: ~ll~~ofbr~'lesoluct~. 70R-4~
for adoption, gr~Cing said H~s~vtng Pe~it, ~b~ecC Co the ~~n-
daCion8 of the ~velo~nC ~ceo ~ar~nc.'
Refer to Resolution.~. -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY cOUNcIL OF TI~ CITY OF AI~AI~IH ~ANTII~ A
HOUSEMOVII~ PERMIT TO ROSALI~ CHARETTE, TO ~ A I~%LI~ ~
2423 ALMOND AVENUE, ORATE, CALIFC~KIA, TO 3319 T~i~rN~ STREW,
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL~N:
NOES: COUNCILI~N:
ABSENT: COUNCII~N:
Clark, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 7OR-&94 duly passed and
adopted.
COnTINUED.APPLICATION- TAXICAB SERVICE FE~I~T; bquest of Larry J. O~dan
for a permit to operate the Black and ~htte Cab Company in the City
of Anaheim was discussed at the September 29, 1970 meeting and con-
tinued to this date for submission of additional infor~ation required
by Nunicipal Code.
The City Clerk introduced a Taxi Service ~mr~y report by
the A~plicant, received at this meeting.
In answer to a query by Councilman Thom, )fr. Sedan advised
that if the rates he submitted with his applicaCiea..h~l bees identical
to those nov in existence in this City - i.e., char$tm~ by time
and milease - he would be able to realize a fraction more than 50¢
a mile, and thereupon requested permission to mmemd his application
to make the rates the same as the existing rates in the City.
Councilman Dutton asked if a survey had bean made on a need
and necessity for additional taxis in the City, since a study by the
City Manager's office a fewmonth8 earlier sho~d the present service
in the City of Anaheim was satisfactory.
Mr. Osden advised that his survey Sho~ed Anaheim has a greater
number of people per taxi than'some cities.
He further advised that conversations ~th people in the
helm motel areas revealed the present taxi service did a good Job in
the off-season but there was.a need for more. service in the summer,
and at times when there is a larks in, lux.of visitors to the City.
Mr. Ogden stated he had talked to taxi drivers who reported
complaints from customers because of the length of tfoae it took to ~et
a taxi; hoverer, although he had talked to eerie, people, an. actual sur-
vey on this point was not made.
In answer to Councilman Stephenson., Hr. Osden advised his of-
fices would.be at 1.06 NO,~th Claudina Street, with a radio aerial on the
roof of that buildin$, cabs vould be parked at 1311 West Lincoln Ave-
nue, and since the cabs ~ould be dispatched by ragio,..no cab stands
wexe.i~tended. With resard to the Yellov Cab 'stands, he' stated there
seldom is a cab parked at the stand because they are too busy.
Councilman Stephenson asked iftheProPo~ed"cab storage lot
was zoned for that use. Zonin$ Supervisor Charles Roberts advised
the parcel in question is zoned C-2 at the present ti~e, ami outdoor
70-537
City Hall, inahet~ California - COUNCIL IIlNUTES.-. October 13,.. ~970,.1:30 PtM,
storage of equipment would require H-2 zoning, thus approval of a variance
~ould be necessary.
In reply to Councilman Clark, lit. Roberts advised the Development
Services Department had neither received requests for more cabs or better
cab service nor made a study regardin~ the need for additional taxi service
in Anaheim; however, the City Hanager's office had made such an investiga-
tion.
Councilman Dutton inquired where Hr. Ogden intended to operate
his taxi service. ~tr. Ogden replied that cabs would cruise outlying areas
or park in residential sections, awaiting calls.
Hayor Dutton asked if anyone representing the present taxi ser-
vice would like to address the Council.
Arthur Gray, 914 West Lincoln Avenue, Attorney for the local Yel-
low Cab Company, presented a packet purportedly containing 118 survey slips
returned to them by County citizens, which he claimed to be mostly favor-
able to Yellow Cab as proof that there is no need for additional taxi ser-
vice in Anaheim. With regard to fare rates, ~. ~ray stated he had under-
stood, according to the Anaheim~nictpal Code? a public hearingvould be
required to effect a rate change; since the rates submitted by Sr. Ogden
are higher than Yellow Cabts rates. Yello~ Cab's rates are 50¢ at the
drop of the flag, plus 40¢ for each additional mile. He added that Yellow
Cab presently has 72 taxis, 15 or 20 of which usually are idle except for
peak hours.
Hr. Gray stated investigation revealed the three taxis listed
in the application presently are owned by Tustin Cab Company, a.company
recently purchased by Gordon Wiggins frOm Hr. Brazer; also there' appears
to be a connection between Tustin Cab Company and a paper corporation by
the name of U.T.O., Inc., (United Tustin Operators), licensed to operate
in the City of Santa Ans. Hr. Gray also stated that Tustin Cab Company
and U.T.O., Inc. taxis are black and white in color, which is indicated
as the color of the taxis to be operated by Mr~ Ogden, making it possible
for taxis to be interchanged; also, he understood U.T.O., Inc. rents taxis
to independent drivers.
}ir. Gray advised Yellow Cab Company believes the application does
not show that the Applicant is financially capable of initiating a first
rate taxi service. It is also their contention that there are undisclosed
principals in the application; that if the application is granted it would
allow the Applicant to negotiate the franchise to another party.
Hr. Gray alleged that the only way the proposed company could
operate economically urith the small number of cabs listed would be to oper-
ate solely in the recreational area around Disneyland.
Hayor Dutton asked if anyone else wished, to address the Council.
Richard Grant, 16351 Nc Fadden, Tustin, stated he understood Yel-
low Cab rates include a time and mileage cost after the initial flag drop,
which would offset the final fare.
Ed Slagle, owner of Yellow Cab Company of Anaheim, advised that
their rates include an additional charge of 10t for each 1-1/2 .minutes of
traffic delay, in case the taxi either should be stoppedtn, traffic, or be
slowed to under 5 miles per hour. He used as ex~m~.les leavin~ the Stadium
after a ballgame, or returning from International Airport where traffic de-
lays could cost an additional 20¢ or 30¢. ~,
Hr. Sla~le claimed there is a total ~eturn today of 1-1/2 to 1.6
cents per dollar in the taxi business; hovever, an increase in rates vould
70- 5 38
City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL ~Hr~ES- 0ctgbe~ 13. 1970, 1:30 P.F,
be detrimental to the elderly and other tow income people ~ho rely on
taxis for transportation.
George H. Brazer, former owner of Tustin Cab Company, and former
'employer of Hr. Osden, hishly recmmended Hr. Ogden, and stated he believed
the only person ur ho could be hurt by his proposed taxi service would be
Hr. O~den, in the event it would fail.
With regard to registration of vehicles and taxi stands, Hr.
Brazer stated there could be no problem since any operator would have
to abide by the City ordinances.
Hr. Brazer advised he knew of no connection between Tustin
Cab Company and U.T.O., Inc.
In answer to Councilman Stephenson, Assistant City Attor-
ney John Dawson advised a taxi service license would not be transfer-
able.
Councilman Dutton stated that the City Council is responsible
for insurins adequate transportation facilities in the City of Anaheim;
however, it was his belief that alloying another taxi service could
sult in that additional taxi service concentrating service in the ~ore
profitable areas, thus inJurin~ the present service and possibly result-
ing in no taxi service at all.
Councilman Pebley asked that the records show it is the find-
ing of the City Council that proper need and necessity has not been pro-
ven, and thereupon made a motion that the subject request for permit to
operate taxicabs in the City of Anaheim be denied. Councilmen Tho~
seconded the motion.
Councilman Clark stated chat the Attorney representing the
present local taxi service actively is enEaged in his c~pat~n for
Oranse County Board of Supervisors and, therefore, he abstained from
votin~ on the issue. NOTION CARRIED.
.~BL~C .BAItCE PERI/IT: Application filed by Hrs. Isabel A. Lopez, on behalf
of Sociedad Prosresista Hexicana Logia ~24, for permit to conduct pub-
lic dance October 25, 1970, from 2:00 P.H. to 8:00 P.H., at Carpenters~
Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue, was submitted and granted subject to
~provistons of Chapter 4.16 of the Anahetm~hnicipal Code, as recom-
mended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Stephenson,
seconded by Councilman Thom. HOTIONCARRIED.
VARIANCE NO, 2113 - EXTENSION OF TIM: Request of Richard Scudamore, of
Walker & Lee, Inc., dated September 17, 1970 vas submitted for a 6-
month extension of time to Variance No. 2113, together with report
of the Development Services Department recmmendtng said extension
be granted to expire April 14, 1971.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom,
six-month extension of time to Variance No. 2113, to expire April 14,
1971, was granted as requested. ~0TION CARRIED.
,~USINESS LICENSE FEE WAIVER. - ST, JUSTIN HARTYR CA~HOLI~ C~JRCH: Request
of St. Justin Hartyr Catholic Church for waiver of business license
fee for their Fall Festival, to be held October 16 through 18, 1970,
at 2050 West Ball Road, vas submitted.
On motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Ste-
phenson, said request was granted in accordance with Council Policy
No. 305. I40TIONCARRIED.
70-539
City I~11, ~'h~1 California- C(XI~IL l~__.~rl~S.- October !5. 1970, 1:30
PROFOSAL - I~BLtC VR~!CLE NART ' S~ADIUN PAR~ING LOT: Proposal by Seiersen Invest-
ment Company co operate a public vehicle mart on Staditun Parking Lot on any
available Saturday and Sunday was submitted, together with report o£ the Sta-
dtu~-Convention Center Director, recommending approval o£ the proposal in con-
cept and also recon~nendin~ that the City Attorney and Stadium-Convention Cen-
ter Director be appointed to provide a contract agreeable to the Council and
the Public Vehicle ltart.
The City Clerk sutmitted correspondence received this date from
Charles K. Patterson, Patterson of Orange County Volvo, in opposition to the
proposal, and correspondence received October 1, 1970 from the AnaheflnCham-
bet of Commerce, requesting continuance of subject proposal to allow the Cham-
ber of C~erce to make a recommendation and local automobile dealers to study
the proposal.
On invitation of Mayor Dutton, James Gayle, 1718 Port Sheffield Place,
Newport Beach, addressed the Council.
Mr. Gayla, a management consultant, also reco~nended Chat the subject
proposal be continued, and that the City Manager's sCsi/make a study of the
potential revenues that could be derived from such a venture since the news-
paper reports indicated the revenues could be substantial. He claimed his
investigation of such a venture indicated revenues at this time might not be
as great as might be anticipated.
In answer to Council queries, Mr. Gayla advised he knew of no other
such venture in the United States, but for the past year he had .been develop-
ing financial pro forma and expectations, awaiting correct time .and develop-
merit to enter into such a business. He advised his expected charges would
not b~ as high as indicated in subject proposal, andrequeated an opportun-
ity to also submit a proposal for consideration by the Council.
Mr. Gayla offered to provide data on where desired information could
be secured and added that he doubted if such a venture could be profitable at
this trine.
Carl Seiersen, 17942 Butler Street, Irvine, Proposer, referenced a
newspaper advertising section listing 1,383 automobile ads by private persons
as an indication that such a venture is timely now, and stated the cost of
using the proposed facilities would about equal the cost of a newspaper ad.
Mr. Seiersen claimed he also had done considerable research on such a venture,
and added that he believed the Anaheim Stadiumparktng lot offered the finest
place in Southern California for such a project.
In reply to Councilman Pebley, Mr. Seiersen advised his corporation
proposed to offer chis service for any vehicle having a california registra-
tion which would include ney or used cars offered by automotive dealers; the
only exception being large mobile home trailers, used for living quarters.
On the recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Clark moved
to continue such a proposal to the first meeting of Nov_~__her, 1970, (Novem-
ber 3, 1970). Councilman Stephenson seconded ~h~motion. NOTION CARRIED.
CITY~a~__.__I!{C. CO}~ffSSION ITEKS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at
their meeting held September 21, 1970, pertaining to the following applications
were submitted for City Council information and consideration{
CONDIT!~ALUSE PERMIT NO. 1197: Submitted by Clads Pletz, to establish a child
nursery on R-A zoned property located on the north side of South Street, east of
Sunkist Street, with waiver of:
a. Permitted use of the side yard.
70-540
Ball. Anaheim. California - COU~C~ ~S.y'.~cto~.er !3~ 1970~ 1;30
The City Planning Comatssion, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-
171, ~ranted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions.
VARIANCE NO, 2206: Submitted by Frank J. Stueckle, proposing a 4-foot
by 24-foot pylon-type sign on C-1 zoned property located at the south-
west corner of Anaheim Boulevard and Water Street, with waiver of:
a. Ninimum display surface elevation.
TB~ City Plannin~ Comeissiou, pursuant to Resolution Ho. PC70-
174, granted said variance, subject to conditions.
VARIANCE HO. 22081 Submitted by BixbyLand Coa~any, to establish an auto-
mobile rental agency in conJunction vith an existing service station on
M-1 zoned property located at the northwest corner of ICatella Avenue and
Raster Street, with waiver of:
a. Permitted uses in the H-1 zone.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-
175, denied said variance.
yARIAliCE 50, 22091 Submitted by Marlo and Jean Famiza, to establish a
swimaing pool and ,fence within the required front yard setback on R-1
zoned property located at the northeast corner of Chanticleer Road and
Sherrill Street, with waivers of:
a. Ninimum required front yard setback.
b. Haximum permitted fence height.
The City Planning Comalasion, purauan~.~o.Re~olution .No. P¢70-
176, swanted said variance, subject to conditions.
The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no
~urther action taken.
VARL~t~:E NO. 220~ (RI;~ICI.TIOII ~0. 69-70'27): 8ubnd. tted by Frank
l~ller, to construct a lO~-unit apart~aent complex on 'H-1 zoned property
located on the east side of Nuller Street, north of Lincoln Avenue, with
waivers of:
a. Niniammbuilding site area per dwelling unit.
b. Minisaim distance between buildings.
The City Planning C~ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-
172, granted said variance, subject to conditions.
The City.~na~er advised several coeplaintS on noise from nighC-
time loading and unloadin~ activities had been received from owners and
residents of the apsrment complex north of subject proper~y, i~s~ediately
adjacent to the former Fed N art location, and although subject application
seemed appropriate from a zonins standpoint, a duplication o~ this situa-
tion could result, since ~he proposed apar~Jant complex would be tsmed-
lately adjacent to the present Fed Hart location and its loading and un-
loadi~ facilities.
In reply to Councilman Dutton, Hr. ~urdoch advised there is a
6-foot masonry wall between the present .apartment complex and the former
Fed Hart building, Just as would be required in this application. He added
that the Fed Hart was in existence at ~he time the apartment complex was
built, Just as the Phoenix Club was in existence at the time the neighbor-
in~ mobile home park was constructed, and yet there have been several com-
plaints from the mobile home park because of the noise from PhoeniX Club
activities. Hr. ~rdoch reco~saended a public hearing be set on subject
7O- 541
City ~all, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MIl/lITES - October 13, 1970, 1:30 P.M.
application to attempt to determinewhether additional protection could be
provided to avoid future complaints.
Councilman Pebley requested a review of subject application and
the City Clerk was instructed to schedule the matter for public hearing be-
fore the City Council.
TENTATIFE _~AC-TS NOS. 4427, REVISION NO. 7; 5827, REVISION NO. 3; AND 7284; De-
veloper - The Colwell Company. Property located on the north and south
sides of Riverdale Avenue, east of Bluerock and Sweetwater Streets, and
contain:
Tentative Tract No. 4427, Revision No. 7 - 41 proposed R-1
zoned lots.
Tentative Tract No. 5827, Revision No. 3 - 48 proposed R-1
zoned lots.
Tentative Tract No. 7284 - 41 proposed R-1 zoned lots.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, Ten-
tative Tracts Nos. 4427, Revision No. 7; 5827, Revision No. 3; and 7284 were
continued to be heard in conjunction with Variance No. 2205. ~DTION CARRIED.
O_RANGE COUNTY ZONE CHANGE NO. ZC70/64: Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts advised
notice had been received from the Orange County Planning Commission of a re-
quest for a zone change (Orange County Zone Change No. ZC70/64 - Leo Yorba),
from County A-l, Agricultural District, to County R-2-4,000, Group Dwelling
District, on property located on the north side of Santa Aha Canyon Road,
approximately 3,200 feet east of Walnut Canyon Road, and west of Mohler
Drive.
The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held October 5,
1970, b~ Motion, recommended the Orange County Planning Commission be urged
to deny Orange County Zone Change No. ZC70/64, on the basis that the Plan-
ning Commission, in adopting General Plan Amendment No. 122, Exhibit "~',
reaffirmed its position in maintaining the Santa Ann CanyOn areafor low-
density residential uses, and the proposed zone change would not be in con-
formancewith this development policy.
On motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Thom, the
City Planning Commission rec°~nendations were sustained and ordered for-
warded to the Orange County Planning Commission for their information.
MOTION CARRIED.
CI!RIFI~aA?t. ON - ~2~NDQ~NO. 69-29A: Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts re-
quested clarification of the Council's intent by their action of September
29, 1970, in initiating variance proceedings in connection with Abandonment
No. 69-29A.
Hr. Roberts advised it was his understanding the Council desired
variance proceedings to provide waiver of building setback of a building
intended to be constructed by Karl Sator, to provide a setback the same dis-
tance from the centerline of the street as his nei~hbor, even though Hr.
Sator already had dedicated 53 feet from the centerline, where his neighbor
would only be required to dedicate 42 feet, since the. street now had been
changed from a primary to asecondary street. He stated correspondence had
been received from Mr. Sator, requesting a review of the action taken by
the Council, since it was Hr. Sator's understanding the variance would also
include a landscaPing, waiver.
Mr. Roberts advised a review of the regUlating ordinance revealed
a setback variance would not be necessary since it states a building setback
7O-542
~t~.? ~r~11, ~he~m..Caltfo~J~a- ~~ ~S.--: ~o~r:::13. 1970.. 1:30
s~ll be ~asured fr~ ~he pl~ed h~y r~ght-o~way l~ne ~ch, ~n
~h~s case, ~uld be 4~ feet; ho~r, tf tt ~s the ~u~l's ~ntent ~o
institute a ~dscaptnS waiver,yardage proceed~nss sC~11 w~d be neces-
~. Roberts was advised ~he Counc~ts ~n~en~ was for
of any necessa~ vari~ce proceedin~s resard~ns bu~d~ setback on~y, ~d
d~d no~ ~nc~ude waiver of ~he ~0-foo~ m~n~m ~dscape requiring.
RESOL~IOHNO. 70R-495 - AR6RD_OF WORK(]~ER HO. 1225: In accordance with
recommendations of the City Ensineer, Councilman Clark offered Resolu-
tion No. 70R-495 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AHAHE~ ACCEPTING A
SEALED PROPOSAL AND AMARDING A COHTRACT TO THE LOb'EST'RES1N3HS'-.IBLE BID=
DER FOR THE FUP, HISH~C OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, HATERIALS AND
AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WOHK NECES~Y TO CONSTRUCT AND CONPI~
THE FO~ PUBLIC IMP~OVEMEIIT: TI~ CO~]~O ST~T'BLUE (H~M STREET
SEWER IHPRO~NT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORBl~ NO. 1225. (J.L.
Scott Company - $7,433.00).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILI~N:
NOES: COUNCILNEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILI~N:
Clark, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Du.tton
None
Hone
ted.
The Nayor declared Resolution No. 70R-495'"dUly passed and adop=
R~q0L~.l.i~q .]{~, 70~-496 - WO]U~ (3BJ:)I~ ]~). 1989= Upon receipt of certification
from the. IKrector of ~bl~ ~orks, ~ncil~n Pebley offered Resolution
No. 70R=496 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESO1/JTION OF THE CITY COIJEIL OF THE CITY OF ANAI[IH FINALLY ACCEPT-
I1~ THE CONPLETION AHD THE FUR~SHIXC OF ALL FLANT, LABOR, SERVICES,
MATERIALS AND EQU~PI~HT AND A?.T. UTILITIES AND TRANS~giq~INCI,UDI]~
PiMKR, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE FKRF(RM~CE OF ALL ~ HECESSARY TO CON-
STRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOb']3~ PUBLIC II~ROVEI~f, TO blT: IRILLIXG
OF FIVE TEST HOLES APPROXYJiATELY THREE-]~CH IH D~ AND 'CONDUCCINC
FIELD P~~LITY TESTS AND CONSTRUCTXOtq OF 0HE SIX-~ DIAMETER. OD=
SKRVATION WELL AT oLrTE HILLS RESERVOIR, IH THE CITY OF AHAH~I~I, I/ORE
ORI)~R NO. 1989. (Helton Enterprises).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUlee:
NOES: COUNCILlOr:
ABSENT: COUNC ~:
Clark, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
ted.
The Hayor declared Resolution Ho. 70R-496 .duly passed and adop-
B~-_q0LVTIOHNO, 70E-497 - I~KDSOF EASEMENT: Councilman Stephenson offered
Resolution No. 70R-~97 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
7O=5/43
City lla].l. _-4~_~hei.m. Cal:Lforn/.a - ¢0U~C~ P"r~R,.'TES - Oet:ob~r 13, .1970, 1:30 P,N,
A RESOLUTTON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIH ACCEPTING CERTAIN
GRANT DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Hack Jenkins, Don N. Jenkins,
Robert N. Rtndt end Jean K. Rindt; Le Chateau HaJorca, The Colvell Company,
J.~I. Klu$ Development Co., Inc.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILI~N: Clark, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dotton
NOES: COUNC~: None
ABSENT: C(XINCILI~N: None
The Nayor declared Resolution No. 70R-497 duly passed and adop-
ted.
..m~_m~__~'TXOH NO. 70a-498 - EiSEl~h'I TO ~E
Relolution ~. 70R-~98 ior adoption.
Refer to Resolution B~k.
Councilman Dutton offered
A lt~LUTIO~ OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF iNiH~lll ADTHOItIZZNG ~
DIIECTII~ THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERII TO EXECUTE AN EASEI~I~ DEED IN FAVOR
OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE (BROOIQiURST STREET AND ~OODLEY AVENUE).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILI~N:
NOES: COUNCILI~N:
ABSENT: COUNC ILI~N:
Clark, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and l)utt~
None
Hone
The Hayor declared Resolution No. 70R-~.98 duly Passed and adop-
ted.
RR~IZTIO~ NO. 70R-~99: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 70R-~99
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
I RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING EXECU-
TXON OF THE AGREEI~NT $1XTH THE GRANGE COUNTY I~ATER DISTRICT. (SHGRB WELL).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUHCILI~N:
NOES: COU~CIL~N:
ABSENT: COUI~IL~:
Clark, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Hayor declared Resolution No. 70R-199 duly passed and adop-
. 0 - 00- Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 70R-500 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RES(IIIYTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AtlAg~Ill AUTHORXZI~ EXE-
bELL NO. 8).
Roll Call Vote:
70~ ~66
City R~I1, A~ahet=, California -CO~__t_ ~..October. .13.. I~70,' 1;30 P.N,
~e ~yor ~clared ~I~tt~. ~'.' ~500.~duly p~ed ~d
the "Ci~ AttO~7', and '~der~ re~e~ ~..~. lm~ ~rier, on ~
ti~ by ~ncil~ ~y, ~ ~~ b~ ~ ~:
a. Claim f[l~ by ~s. ~te ~ert, .fer ~r~rted pers~al
injury d~ges sustained.on or ~t ~t~r I1, ~970, c~sed by fall=
ing on patched 'Sidewalk.
b. Claim ffiled by ~.L. Ba~, ~neral Res~ H~s Corporation,
for purported personal pro~r~ ~ e~ by ~n~ff~[ent voltage
received [r~ the 2fry of ~e~ [n or ~t ~at, 1970.
c. Claim filed by S. El~ and ~eth J. ~dby, on behalf
adop~ion.
, ~so~o~ o~ ~ c~ co~c~ ~ ~ c~ o~.~~ ~ow~ ~
Roll Call Vote;
pas,!e~: and adopted.
- ; ~ . , ' , ~'',-' ' ' t ', -' . ', ,: -
~a~o~ - ~~ ~aTmn(. Inc, - ~n.~. nU~.s.; ~ ~tt~ b~ ~n-
cil~ Clark, seconded ~ ~ilm' St~,...~~ts'~de by the
,~-.~.~ ~ .of~-~r~c~s,,. ~!'~ y~~. cr~at~., ~ the re-
:.: ~-- -~,?- -- -- :~ . ~ c~}r, clerk. ~t~
~soelatt~ o} Calif°~ia, ~.,
Frs.. :;inU .lae~,., ,,,oa,.,pre,~,nged~ to t~e: ¢i~ncii" .'i !~tter ~r~ the
g~ted increase of In Lieu Park '~eI~t Fees'tO $'~'.~"Per"R;1 .~it,
7~- 565
City ~1_1. A-__-.b~_tm. California- CO~HCXL ~F~_FTES- Oc. Zober 13. 1970. 1:30
$125.00 per R-3 Unit, and $100.00 per )tobile Hone Unit. Hrs.
vised their decision was based on the following:
a. Discussion FL~h the Butldin$ hdustry~Afsoei&tton indicated
a willingness to accept, at least in par~, the susZeeeed. ~ucreased fee
schedule.
b. It vas felt the sua~ested schedule was not out of line vtth
that charsed by other cities.
c. The method of collecttn8 the fees was' believed an equitable
way of having new citizens pay a fair share of the cost of parks acquisi-
tion.
d. The Board of Realtors felt Anaheim should acquire park sites
while land still was available and costs not too excessive.
Hrs. Hadison advised the Anaheim Board of Realtors suggested de-
velopers be given a three-mouth lead time on any increase.
Joe ~tte, 809 ~est Beoadmey, presented a Resolution of the Ana-
heim Chamber of C~merce. recomBeudin8 Ia LAou Foe0 bo raised Co the o~hed-
ule recouuended by the Citizens CourLttee iu 1968j ~hts oehedule to be re-
viewed annually to insure fees are kept at a rate coinciding with the for-
mula devised by the Citizens Co~,~ttee, and also that the ~n Lieu Fee be
vatved when a d~elling replaces one denoltahed or destroyed by fire or a
disaster.
Councilman Vebley advised that if the formula devised by the Citi-
zens Committee vere applied at this time, it ~ould place Anaheim's fees
hlsher than other cities.
Hr. ~hite replied the Chamber of Coumerce urges the ~oemula be
adopted as soon as possible. He added that there had been concern the re-
quirement of the payment of these fees, at the time the buildin$ permit is
issued, could present a hardship to builders.
Councilman Pebley advised that at the ti]ne the present In Lieu
Fee schedule ~as developed the representatives of the butldin$ trades were
present and stated they approved the method of payment with the 'building
permit, since the cost then could be included in the total presented for.
financing.
Hr. ~ite stated that the Chmber of Counerce concurred with the
fee schedule susgested at this time; however, they felt they should be
creased to the 1968 recommndations of the Citizens ConmELttee within a year
or
Royce Coin, representing the Oranse County Chapter of Building
Industry Association of California, Inc., advised that their orsantzation
concurred with the recomended fees for R-1 and R-3 units; however, they
were opposed to doublias the fees of mobile home units, since 't~ was felt
a mobile home park resident did not cause as much burdan to a community
as an avernge resident, inammch as most of those mabile home park resi-
dents are adults and the recreational facilities $enarally are provided
within the park. by the developer.
Councilman Pebley countered that more mobile home parks are being
built end the mobile homes themselves are larpr, thus it ts'~nttetpated
there will be more children in the parks in the future.
Hr. CoIn recounended a lead time si at least 90 days on all ~n
Lieu Fee increases, although it vvuld'be better' ~,£' ~he fees could be pay-
able upon ritual building inspection
70=546
¢~ B~ll. ~nahe~ Cal~forn~.a- P~I~C~L ~$- October 13. 1970. I:~0
Council-~- Pebley repli~l that a werson developtn~ a lOO'acr~
subdivision could take a year and longer to complete construction and
if park In Lieu Fees ~ere not paid until completion there ~ere would
be no ~oney with ~hich to purchase park sites in the area.
The City ~anager reco~=ended the schedule could be set up to
be effective in three ~onths tl~e, and the issue of requiring payment
at the time the building permit ts~.,taken out versus the certificate Of
occupancy date could be investigated at a later date.
John Willou~hby, 627 Pandora Place, a ~ember of the Citizens
Co~ittee on park development, recou=aended the fee schedule be .adopted
as suggested at the September 29, 1970 meeting, ~r~th revie~al set on an
annual basis, and that the full fee schedule formula recon~ended by the
Citizens Comittee be put into effect w/thin two years.
I~$OLUTIO~ NO, 70R-~02: Council~an Pebley offered-Resolution No; 70R-502,
establishing Park Development in Lieu Fees at $200.00 per R-1 Unit~ $125.00
per R-3 Unit, and $100.00 per N~bile F~me Park Space, effective January 1,
1971, such fees to be payable at the tt~e a building per~t is obtained.
F
Refer to Resolution Book.
A ~SOLlffION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF Tt~ CITY OF ANAI~IM AM~NDI~I~ C~RTAIN
I~SOLUTION~ OF TH~ CITY OF ANAI~I~' IN C0~flOll k-[TH TI~ PAIL~ AN]) ~C-
REATION FEES TO BE CHARGED BY T~'CITY P~tSUANT TO TITLE 17, LAND DEVEL-
OPI~NT AND RESOURCES, CHAPTER 17.08, SUBDMSIONS, OF THE ANAHEIM ~rh-~-
CIPAL CODE.
Roll Call Vote:
AY~S: OOt~CIL~:
NO~S:
~BS~'f: COtr~CIL~:
Clark, Stephenson, Pebley, Th~ and
None
None
ted.
The Nayor declared Resolution No. 70R-502 duly passed and adop-
The Council thanked the Anahet= Board of Realtors, Anaheim ~
ber of Con~rce, ~estern Nobileho~e A~sociation, and the Citizens Comit-
tee through John Willoughby for their assistance, and recommended the In
Lieu Fee Schedule be revie~ed, on an annual basis and the foregoing groups
notified ~d~en such revie~ w~ll take place.
CO~ES~O.~DE~CE; The follow/ns correspondence was ordered received and filed
on ~otion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Counctl~n Dutton:
a. Htnutes = Anaheim Public Library Board = August 17, 1970.
b. Financial and Operating Reports for month of Septe~ber,1970.
c. Report - Orange County Gr~mi Jury - Illegal Notor Vehicle
noise.
I~0TION CARRIED.
2862: Councilman Clark offered OrdinanCe NO. 2862 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE OF THE C~TY OF M~,~EIM A~IID/NG,*Ti~ 18 OF THE ANAI~IM
I~'NICIPAt CODE RI~ATII~ TO Z01~l~. (69',70-32.- i+-I) -
70,- 567
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: C0UNC ILl~al:
NO~S: C0tINCIL~N:
ABSEI~: COUNCILNE~I:
Clark, St~ph~usou, Pebley, Thom ~nd l)utton
None
The Nayor declared Ordinance I~o. 2862 duly passed md adopted.
ORD~ NO. 28~6: Councilman Stepheuson offered Ordinance No. 28~6 ~or cor-
rected first reading.
AN O~DINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAIIBIM AI~I~ TITLE 18 OF THE ANAMEIN
14~NICIPAL CODg RELATING TO ZONINC. (70-71-3 - C-l)
AI~,~OttOLIC B~V~E LICENSEi Application submitted by K R B of Anaheim, Inc.,
for New On-Sale Beer and Wine License for the Hungry Hermit, at 314 South
Brookhurst Street, was presented by ~he City 14~nager to the Council.
On motion by Councilman Dut~on, seconded by Councilman Stephen-
son,the City Attorney was authorized to file conditional protest with the
Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application,on the basis
that the premises presently are located in a C-1 zone ~hich does not per-
mit the On-Sale of alcoholic beverages. HOTIOH CARRIED.
A_~i_~g~ ~I~sP~RY BOARD - JOINT ~ETI~ RECO~B~TIOH: At the request of the
City tianaser, discussion and recmmendsttons resulting from the Joint
meeting with the Library Board was delayed, to allow for more threush
analysis.
a three-year memo of understanding hsd be~a signed wi~h the Fireman's Pro-
tective Association for 6% salary tacre&.s this year, amd the s~me per-
centase increase the next two years, ~ ~here~pon reeommended the City
Council adopt a resolution $overnin$ each memo of uuders~andin~.
I~OLU~IOHH0. 70R-503; Councilman
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUlqCXL OF TI~ CXTY OF AIt&HEXN AIqKNDXI~ AND ~
LXSH~ RATES OF COlqPKNSATXOtq 1~ VAB, XOUS J~ CLASSKS, AMD SUPKISKDII~ 1'~
TION,q OF RESOLUTION NO. 69R-600 AB3) AIsiimlf:MTS' THKR,KTO. (Fireman's Protec-
tive Association)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL~N:
NCKS: COUHC~N:
ABSEHT: COUHCIL~N:
Clark, Scopbemmon, Pebley, Thom ~nd Dutton
None
Hone
The Mayor declared Resolution NO. 70R-~03 duly passed and mtop-
RKSO~UEIOHNO. 70R-504.: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution.No. 701-50~
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CXTY OIV AMAREXN ~ING
TXON NO. 63R-910 AHD SUPERSEDIIF.. RESOLUTX01f NO. 701t,*/490,
NKL RULE NO. 6 - PREMIUM PAY.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCII2f~N:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCIL~:
Clark, Stephenson, Pebley,,.Thom and Dutton
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 70R-504 duly passed and adopted.
R~_SOLUTIOH_,NO. 70R-505:,; Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 70R-505 for
adoption.
Refer to ResolutLog. Rook,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIH~D~ RESOLU-
TIOHNO. 63R-910 AND. SUPERSEDINGRESOLUTION NO. 69R-'610, A2SHDINGRULE
NO. 15 HOLIDAYS.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Clark, Stephensou, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCIL~N.: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL~N: .None
The Mayor declared ~esoluttou'No, 70R-§05 duly passed and adopted.
I~sOLuTION NO. ?0R-506:. 'C~uncilman Clark offered Resolution 'No. 70R-506 for'
~doption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIIA~: Clark, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
COUNCILMEN: None
COUNCIL~/q:'None
The Mayor declared Resolution NO. 70R-506 duly pa~sed and adopted.
!~,SOLUT~OH NO, 70R-507.: cOuncilman StePhenson offered. Resolution No. 70R-507
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY.-CouNCIL OF TH~ CTTY OF ANAHEIM AI~NDING AND ESTAB'
LISHING RATES OF COM~ENSATIOH l~t VA~I~JS JOB' CIAS~ES, AND A~NDING SECTION
1 OF RESOLUTION NO. ?0R-472 (HUNC FRO. TUNC) - (Automotive Mechanic Leadman,
Data Processins Clerk, Key Punch Operator)
~11 Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL/~N: Cl~rk, Stephenson, Pebley,.Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCIL~N: None
ABSENT: COUHCIL~N: None
The Mayor declared Resolution' No. 70R-507 duly passed and adopted.
70- 549
City ~!1, ~..,i~hei~m~ California- ~0U~IL NI .!~TES' October 13. 1970. 1:30
BLU~ CROSS INSURANCE RATES: Upon reconuendatiou of the City l/anaser, Councilman
Pebley moved authorization be Kranted for renevin~ the Hospitalization and
Major Nedical Insurance contract with Blue Cross of Southern California,
for a term of two years connencing October 1, 1970, as outlined below:
First Year - October 1, 1970 to October 1, 1971.
Deposit Rates Emvlovee T~-p~rsy F~ntlv
$14.52 $35.88 $46.28
If incurred claims plus administration cost for the period October
1, 1970 to October 1, 1971 exceed income genarated by the above de-
posit rates, the City ~ould be liable for a single payment in the
amount of the excess, but, in no event, to exceed an amount produced
by the following formals:
A. Average number of single contracts in force during the year
times up to $.72 per month.
B. Average number of two-party contracts in force during the year
times up to $1.79 per month.
C. Average. number of family contracts in force during the year times
up to $2.32 per month.
The administration cost would be calculated at 9.45% of maximum in-
come. Any surplus or deficit developed in the first year, or any
unused portion of the additional liability, would be carried forvard
to the second year.
Second Year - October 1, 1971 to October 1, 1972.
Deposit l~,~es Emvlovee ~,o-Part¥ Family
$15.25 $37.67 ,~8.59
If incurred claims plus administration cost for the period October
1, 1971 to October 1, 1972 plus any deficit carried forvard from
the first year exceed income generated by the second-year deposit
rates, the City vould be liable for a single payment in the amount
of the excess, but, in no event to exceed an amount produced by the
follourlng formula:
A. Average number of single contracts in force during the year times
up to $2.25 per month.
B. Average number of two-party contracts in force during the year
times up to $5.56 per month;
C. 'Average number of family contracts in force during the year times
up to $7.18 per month.
The administration cost vould again be calculated at 9.45% of maxi-
l~lm income.
The folloving benefit liberalizations vould be provided:
70-550
City ~all, Anaheim, California - CiRrI~CIL ~WOT~$ , October 13,_ 1970, 1:30 P.H.
..... A. Increase the Payment under the baste hospital contract to 100~
for the 365 days.. ~,
B. ,Change the current ,24-h0ur emergency accident outpatient .provi-
sion .to 72 hours.
C. Increase the.major medical maximum to $.30,000.00.
D. Reduce,the catastrophic pzeEnancy deductible from $500.00 to
$50.00.
The deposit rates urill be paid by the City and employees according to the
... folloving schedule:
O~.to~er 1,197.0 to.. ,Oc~gb~r. 1, 1971
Total City EmplolMe,
Cost Pays Pays
Employee $14.52 $14.52- SNone
T~o-Party $35~88 $25.73 $10.15
Family ,~6.28 $31.18 $15.10
Councilman s~ephenson seconded the motion..
OctobsF 1, 1~1 co.~0ctober 1,1972
Total City -, ~mployee
,Cost Pays pay~.,
$15.25 $15.25 SNone
$37,67 $27.52 $10.15
MOTION CARRIED.
. GAIqYON I~L~E TOURi.. The Ci~7.Har~.,ger notified the City Council that the Direc-
tor of Public Works has arranged a Canyon Drainage Tour. for Council members,
co~nencing at 10:00 A.M. on Tuesday, November 24, 1970.
I~SOLUTION NO,. 70R-508 ~ .~D,~,ABAT~I~:,_ Councilman Tho~ offered Resolution No,
70R-508 for. adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTIONOF T~ITY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OF tNAI~I1/~[CIAII~L~
CR~, ~EDS, RUBBISH, REFUSE AND DIRT UP~ANYPA~C~L(~PARCELS OF REAL
PROFERTY OR ANY PUBLIC STP, BET IN THE CITY OF ANAHE~TO BE A I/UISANCE.
(Public Hearing -November 17, 19~0,- 1:30 P.N,).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
~SENT:
COUNCILMEN: Clark, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
COUNCILNEN: . .None
COUNCIL~N: None
The ltayor declared Resolution No. 70R, 508 duly passed and adopted.
~.ES0~TIO~ lt0. 70R-509:
for adoption.
Councilman Stephen~eon offered Resolution No. 70R-509
Refer to Resolution .Book.
A RI~SOLUTI(~OF TI~CITY COU~ICIL .OF THRCITYOFA~EINAUTRORZZINC AND
DIRECTING T~ ItqYORAND CITY ~TO E~I~CUTR AN~ I~ITH SOUTheRN
CALIFORNIA EDISON CONPAHYRRLATIV~ TOCONI~I~tTI(~ INV~ORY. (Conde~na-
tion No. 5)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIl: Clark, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
COtlNCI~: None
COO'NCIL~N: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 70R-509 duly passed and adopted.
70-551
City ~all, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL ~I~rflS - 0ctobeF 13~ i970~ 1:30 P,H.
RESOLUTION ~O, 70R-510: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 70R-510
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RBSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI~ CiTY OF ANA~IM AUTHORIZII~ AND
DIRECTING THE HAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXF~UTE AN AGR~E~Eh'T WITH SOUTHERN
CALIFORIIIA EDISON CONPANY RELATI-v~ TO SIT.~.S TAX OBLIGATIONS. (Conde~m_ a-
tion No. 5)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COI~CILI~N:
NOES: COUNClLI~N:
ABSElff: COUNCILI~N:
Clark, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
None
None
ted.
The ltayor declared Resolution No. 70R-510 duly passed and adop-
C0~E~II~ C~TER - EXHIBITION SPACE FEES:. On m~tion by Councilman Pebley,
~o~ded-'bY Councilman Dutton, action of September 8, 1970, lncreastn$ Con-
vention Center Exhibit Space Fees from 6¢ to 8¢ per square foot vas re-
scinded, to be reconsidered at a later date, as recmmended by the City
Hanager.
CO~ENTIOH CENTER - PARKING FEES: Folloving Council discussion, Councilman
Pebley moved to increase Convention Center parking fees from 50¢ to 75¢
per vehicle, effective November 1, 1970. Councilman Dutton seconded the
motion, lt0TION CARRIED. .-
ORANC~. COI~TY TRANSIT DISTRICT: By general Council consent, proposed Resolu-
tion urging passage of Proposition "A" (Orange County Transit District),
on the November 3, 1970 General Election Ballot vas held over.
A~OIN~ - ~ ~TATION DIS~R~CTS NOS, ~ AND 3_: Hayor I~tton appointed
Councilman Hark A. Stephenson as his Alternate on County Sanitation Dist-
ricts Nos. 2 and 3, to replace Councilman Pebley.
..AJ~~; Councilman Thom moved to adjourn. Councilman Pebley .seconded the
motion. I~OTIONCARRIED.
ADJOURNE~D: 3:55 P.M.
City Clerk