1970/12/0870-681
City ltall, Anaheim` California - C.(~CIL ,NtI~T~S - December 8, 1970, 1;30 P.H,r
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESEHT:
COUHCILI~N: Clark, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
COUNCIl: Detton
CITY NAHAGKR: Ketth A. Nurdoch
ADNIlqlS~T~ ASSISTANT: John Harding
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler
DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Aloha H. Farrens
CITY EI~IHEKR: James P. Naddox
ASSISTAlqT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOP~NT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson
ZONING SUPKRVISCR: Charles Roberts
FINANCE DIRECTOR: Douglas Ogden
Nayor Pro Tem Pebley called the meeting to order.
INVOCATIOI~.; Reverend Naxie Dunnam, of the West Anaheim ltethodist Church,
gave the Invocation.
FLAG S.ALUT~; Councilman Ralph B. Clark led the Assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
MINUTES: lttnutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held ~ovember 17, 1970, were
approved, on motion by Counciluan Clark, seconded by Councilman Thom. NOTION
CABRXED.
WAIVBR OF REAplNG -QRDINANCE$ AND I~SOLUTIONS: Councilman Clark moved to waive
the reading in ~ull of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to
the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read-
ins of the title, specific request is made by a Councilmen for the reading
of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion.
~OTION~II~XISLY ~RRIED.
P~P~tT - ~]~IAL DEll~IDS AC, AIHST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the
amount of $1,127,&85.03, in accordance with the 1970-71 Budget, were approved.
PUBLIC~e__!~.e~_ - n~!~$IFICATIONNO, 70-71-12 ~V~CE NO. 2203; Su~tted
by ~lli~ ~d Elsie ~, requastin~ a ch~ge in zone fr~R-A to R-3, to
pe~i~ ~he devel~nt o~ a ~l~o~, 36-unt~ ap~n~ c~l~ ~ pr~er~y
l~a~ed ~ the north side of Pl~la Argue, east of S~ate College Boulevard,
~h ~tvers of:
a. Naxtnmm building height within 150 feet of an R-A Zone.
b. Building site area per dwelling unit.
c. Minimum floor area per dwelling unit.
d. Mini]man required parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC?0-198,
reco~ended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following con-
ditions:
1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 45 feet in vidth from the centerltne of the street
along Placentta Avenue, for street widening purposes.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along
Placentia Avenue, including preparation of improvement plans and installation
of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street sT&ding and
paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with
as .required by the City Engineer and in aCcordance with standard plans and
specifications' on file in the office of the City Engineer; that street light-
ing facilities alon~ Placentta Avenue shall be installed aa required by the
Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and spe-
cifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities, and
Chat a bond in an a~ount and formsatisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall
be posted rich the City to ~uarantee the installation of the above-mentioned
requirements.
3.. That eiSa. ornate of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot alon~ Placentta Avenue, for tree plant-
ins purposes.
70-682
~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL NIl/UTES ~ December 8~ 1970, 1:30 P,M.
6. That vehicular access rights except at approved access
points shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
5. ..That fire hydrants shall be;tnstalled~as required and de-
termined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
6. That trash storage areas ~hall be p:rovided in accordance
urith approved plans on file vith the office oi the Director of Public
Works.
7. That subject property shall be served by underground utili-
ties.
8. That the o~ners of subject, property shall pay to the City
of Anaheim the appropriatepark and recreation in-lieu fees as determined
to be appropriate by the City Council.
9. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly
shielded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent residential
uses.
10. That drainage shall be disposed of in a manner satisfac-
tory to the City Engineer.
11. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be completed.
The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become nell and
void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied
with within 180 days or such further time as the City Council may grant.
12. That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10, above mentioned,
shall be complied vith prior to final building and zoning inspections.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-
199, approved Variance No. 2203, in part, granting Waivers a, b, and c,
subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of
Reclassification No. 70-71-12, now pending.
2. That subject property shall be devel°ped substantially in
accordance with plans and speCifications on file vrlth the City of Anaheim
marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Revision No'. 1.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject
property, the existing uses and zoning in.~the immediate area, and.briefed
the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Comission.
He advised that on the basis of revised.plans submitted to ~he Planning
Con~nission only three waivers of Site Development Standards were required,
and the requested (d) Waiver was withdrawn by the Petitioner.
Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if'anyone wished to address the City
Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 70R-576: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 70R-576
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the
zone as requested, subject to the conditions recon~mnded by the City Plan-
ning Co~znission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM~ICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AI~ED AItD THAT THE BOUI~DARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED.' (70-~1-12 - R-3) ~_
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIl: Clark, StephensOn,'Thom and Pebley
NOES: CO~CILI~N: None
ABSENT: ~IL~N: Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution NoJ 70R-576 'duly passed
and adopted.
RESoLuTI0~ NO. 70R-577: Councilman.Thom offered Resolution No. 70R-577
for adoption, granttn8 Variance No. 2203, in part, subject to the condi-
tions recmmended by the City Planning Con~ission.
70-683
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIb HINUTES - December 8, 1970, 1:30 P.M.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 2203.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL~N:
NOES: COUNCIL~N:
ABSE1/T: COb~CI~N:
Clark, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
Non~
The Hayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 70R-577 duly passed and
adopted.
PUBLIC I~E.A~ING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71-17 AND VARIANCE NO. 2215: Submitted by
Hughes Harkets, Incorporated, requesting a change of zone from c-1 to R-3 for
the establishment of a two-story, 306-unit apartment complex; property located
at the southeast corner of Orange Avenue and Beach Boulevard, with waivers of:
a. Htnimum distance between buildings.
b. lttnimum distance from a covered parking space to a dwelling unit.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Nos. PC70-195
and PC70-196 reconanended approval of said reclassification and approved said
variance in part, subject to conditions.
The Deputy City Clerk submitted correspondence dated December 1, 1970,
from Hughes Markets, Incorporated, Petitioners, requesting permission to with-
draw subject reclassification and variance; and further noted correspondence
dated December 8, 1970, from Hiller Financial Corporation, Developer, request-
ing public hearing on subject applications be cOntinued 30 daYS,
Brief discussion was held by the City Council and City Attorney Jo-
seph B. Geisler advised that there was an existing escrow at the time appli-
cation for zoning was filed, and the purchaser under said escrow was the equit-
able owner who, if said escrow were still in process would enjoy all rights in
connection with the property, and he thereupon recommended that the request to
continue public hearing be granted.
On recon~ndations of the City Attorney, Councilman Clark moved that
the public hearing on Reclassification No. 70-71-17 and Variance No. 2215 be
continued to January 12, 1971, at 1:30 P.M. Councilman Stephenson seconded
the motion. HOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC MR~__II~ - VARIAHCE NO, 2211: Submitted by Jay O. De Armond, to erect a new
36-foot high, free-standing sign on C-1 zoned property located on the east side
of Beach Boulevard, south of Ball Road, and further described as 1238 South Beach
Boulevard, with waivers of:
a. Maximum permitted stgn height.
b. Maximumnumber of free-standing signs permitted.
c. Permitted freestanding sign location.
Pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-190, Variance No. 2211 was approved
in part by the Planning Coesaission, denying Waivers "a" and "b," granting
Waiver "c."
'Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject pro-
perty, the existing uses and zoning in the tm~ediate area, and briefed the evi-
dence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He repor-
ted that at the Planning ~issionheartng the Applicants stipulated that roof
signs would be removed which eliminated.the necessity for Waiver "b;" that the
existing free-standing si~n along the south boundary of the property was to be
removed and replaced by the proposed sign, 30 feet to the north. He further
reported that the City of Stanton had advised the property to the south was
zoned
70-684
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 8, 19'70, 1:30 P,M'
Hr. Walter Brooks, of gxcell-Ad:Electric Signs, 2312 South SuSan
Street, Santa Ann, advised that the proposed sign would be 35 to 36 feet
in height,, and he sub~ttted for Council. review a plOt'iplan of the property
indicating the location of the sign, together with an elevation plan illus-
trating panels to identify small shops, noting that four additional panels
were now planned without exceeding the allowable sign area. He advised
that there are two existing residences in the City of Stanton, to the
south, within 300 feet of the"proposed sign'location, however, Stanton
did not have a height limit for signs in the C-2 zone and the property
owners have no objection to the height requested. That the only other
residence involved was in a mobile home park to the north, and the owner
had written a letter stating they had no objections to the sign.
Mr. Brooks submitted for Council review two photo displays, one
of five separate signs along Ball Road which exceed the 25-foot ltmi. t~
within 300 feet of residences, the other illustrating the small businesses
within the Hobby City shopping center, which would be identified on the
proposed sign.
In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Roberts advised that the
residential trailer park.on C-lzoned property to the north was a non-
conforming use.
Hr. Jay O. De Armond, 1238South Beach Boulevard, Anaheim, ovmer
of the shopping center, advised that much of their business comes-from
out-of-to~n customers and he pointed out the many complaints received from
customers vd~o experienced difficulty in locating the shops, and he further
noted the change in numberi~ of addresses on Beach Boulevard Just south
of subject property, from four digits to five. He displayed plans drafted
for four new stores in the rear of the property which would also have to
be recognized on the sign.
Mr. De Armond briefly described some of"~he features of the
unique shopping center, and was of the opinion that the present sign was
obsolete and inadequate.
Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked ifanyone else wished to address the
Council, for or against subject petition; there being no response, declared
the hearing closed.
R~SOLUTION NO, 70R-578: Councilman Pebley offered .Resolution No. 70R-578
for adoption, grantingVariance No. 2211, Waivers '~a"and "c," denying
WaiVer "b," subject to the following conditiOns:'
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in
accordance with plans and specifications;on file with the City of Anaheim,
marked Exhibit No. 1, provided, however,:that all existing roof signs with-
in 300 feet of the proposed sign shall be removed.
2. That Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall becomplted with
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 2211, IN PART.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL~N: Clark, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
NOES: COUNCII~N: None
ABSENT: ~COUNCII~:~ Dutton
(Plot Plan and Elevation was dated this date and retained on file;
phot° exhibits were ordered returnedto Hr. Brooks.)
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolition No. 70R-578.duly passed
and adopted.
70-685
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 8, 1970, 1:30 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1206: Submitted by Lela Hatton, to
permit the conversion of existing mobile home spaces into 22 additional over-
night travel trailer spaces, on R-A zoned property located north and east of'
the northeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and Wilken Way, and further described
as 2170 South Harbor Boulevard.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-189,
granted said conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions:
1. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined
to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
2. That the proposed development shall be in accordance with the
requirements of the State laws pertaining to travel trailer parks, and that
plumbing be provided in order that the travel trailer park shall accormmodate
all trailers and not be restricted to "California approved trailers" only.
3. That the proposed travel trailer spaces shall be limited to re-
creational vehicles only as defined in Section 18.215.5 of the California Ad-
ministrative Code, and that the recreational vehicles shall be allowed to re-
main within said spaces for a maximum of two weeks for any single time.
4. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac-
cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
Exhibit No. 1.
5. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
6. That the proposed use is granted for a period of three (3) years,
and upon request by the petitioner, an additional period of time may be granted
upon approval by the Planning Commission and/or City Council.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered
by the City Council and public hearing scheduled this date.
The Deputy City Clerk called attention to petiti°n in favor of sub-
ject application filed November 16, 1970 and signed by approximately 60 perma-
nent tenants of the trailer park, together with letter in favor received No-
vember 30, 1970 from Chelson Enterprises, Inc., dba Arby's Roast Beef Restau-
rant, 2144 South Harbor Boulevard. Also noted was letter received December
1, 1970 from West America Construction Corporation in opposition to subject
petition.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject pro-
perty, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the
evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission.
Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if the Applicant was present and concur-
red with the reco~nendations of the City Planning Co~nission.
Mrs. Lela Hatton, 2170 South Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, owner of
subject property, stated she was satisfied with reco~nendations of the City
Planning Co~mnission.
Mayor Pro TemPebley asked if anyone wished to address the City Coun-
cil in opposition; there was no response.
Mayor Pro Tem pebley repeated the question, inasmuch as opposition
was indicated at the meeting of November 10, 1970; there being no response,
declared the hearing closed.
RESoLuTION NO; 70R-579: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 70R-579 for
adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1206, subject to the conditions
recommended by the City Planning Co~nission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 1206.
Roll Call Vote:
70-686
City Mall, A, aheimi California- C~CIL ~INUTES- December 8, 1970, 1:30 P.M.
AYES: COUNCIl: Clark, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
NOES: COUNCIl: None
ABSENT: COUNC IL~N: Dutton
The Hayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 70R-579 duly passed
and adopted.
REQU~S~ - TE~_ATIVE TRACTS NOS, 4427~ 5827 AND 7284: Submitted by Harold L.
Raab, requesting deletion of conditions requiringthe submission of a
favorable flood hazard letter from the Orange County Flood Control Dist-
rict, prior to approval of final tract maps; R-1 zoned property, located
on the north and south sides of Riverdale Avenue, in the area generally
west of Lakeview Avenue.
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Clark
moved that Condition No. 12 of the approval of Tentative Tract No. 5827,
Revision No. 3, and Condition No. 11 of the approval of Tentative Tract
No. 7284, be deleted as requested; flood hazard letter does not apply to
Tentative Tract No. 4427, Revision No. 7. Councilman Thom seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RE¢I.ASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-64 - EXTENSION OF TIHE: Request of Bernardo M.
Yorba, dated October 20, 1970, was submitted for a one-year extension of
time to leclassificationNo. 64,65-64, for compliance with certain condi-
tions, pursuant to Resolution No. 65R-29, together ~rlth report of the De-
velopment Services Department recon~nending six months extension of time
be granted.
On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom,
a six-month extension of time to ReClassification No. 64-65-64 was granted,
as recon~nended by the Development Services Department. MOTION CARRIED.
~ITY PLAN~ING CO~/ISSlO~ ITEl/S: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission
at their meeting held November 16, 1970, pertaining to the following app-
lications were submitted for Council information and consideration:
VARIANCE NO. 2213: Submitted by Humber Oil and Refining Company, to re-
locate an existing free-standing si~n, 40 feet in height, from its pres-
ent location at the pump island to the southeast corner of the property
located at the northwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street,
zoned C-l,with waiver of:
a. Maximumpermitted free-standing si~n height.
Denied by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution
No. PC70-203.
VARIANCE NO, 22!7; Submitted by Southern California Edison Company, to
erect a 16-1/2-foot high, 48-square foot, free-standing directional sign,
only 48 feet from the easterly property line on C-R zoned property loca-
ted at the northeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and Freedman Way, further
described as 1656 South Harbor Boulevard, with waiver of:
a. Permitted free-standing si~n location.
Pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-206, the City Plarming Commis-
sion granted said variance, sublect to conditions.
The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council, and no
further action taken.
VARIANCE NO, 2218; Submitted by Grant O. Hood, to expand an existing one-'
operator beauty salon, with comnercial si~nin$ identifying the use on R-I
zoned property located on the east side of East Street, south of Santa Aha
Street, and further described as 506 South East Street, with waivers of:
a. Permitted uses.
b. lttntn~mntmber of require/iparktng spaces.
c. Maximu~ permitted si~n ~rea.
70- 687
City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- December 8, 1970, 1:30 P.M.
Pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-207, the City Planning Comantsston
denied said vart~ce.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was requested
by Councilman Thom and the City Clerk was instructed to schedule the matter
for public hearing before the City Council.
'RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71-13, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 1202, TENTATIVE
TRACT NO, 7288: Co~unication dated December 7, 1970, from Harry Knisely,
Attorney representing Petitioners for Reclassification No. 70-71-13, Condi-
tional Use Permit No. 1202 and Tentative Tract No. 7288 was submitted, re-
questing rehearing on said applications which were disapproved by the City
Council December 1, 1970.
Discussion was held by the City Council, with reference to the Coun-
cil Policy of a six-month waiting period before refiling the same basic zoning
application on a parcel of land without new evidence, and the setting of a re-
hearing if there is new evidence; that where there are revised plans, the pro-
cedure has been to refer the plans to the City Planning Commission for a re-
port and recommendation.
Question was raised as to whether the proposed rehearing would in-
clude the complete property originally considered, and Mr. Harry Xnisely,
Attorney for the Petitioners, advised that there are several property owners
involved and he was not certain whether all parcels would be included in the
revised plans.
It was pointed out that if the property description was altered,
public hearings would be necessary before the Planning Commission as well. as
the City Council.
Mr.-Bernardo Yorba, one of theprel~rty owners~iwve4ved,~requested
clarification of the six-month delay, and was informed that revised plans
could be the basis for waiving that policy.
Mr. Yorba explained the difficulties of processing a development
where several owners were involved, and stated it was his understanding that
at the previous public hearing on the matter, some members of the City Council
had expressed the suggestion that the area in the townhouse portion of the
proposed development be reduced.
At the conclusion of the discussion, it was moved by Councilman
Clark that if the revised plans to be filed are for the entire acreage as
originally included in Reclassification No. 70-71-13, that said plans be sub-
mitted to the City Planning Commission for report and reco~anendations; that
upon receipt of said recommendations, the City Clerk be authorized to set
the matter for rehearing before the City Council, subject to the payment of
a $50.00 fee. Further, that in the event the revised plans filed are for less
than the original acreage and substantially altered, new applications may be
filed inm~edtately for public hearings before the City Planning Co~nission and
City Council. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
VARIANCE NO. 2144: The City Manager briefed memorandum dated December 8, 1970,
from the Development Services Department, finding that dedication of Euclid
Street and Cerritos Avenue to their ultimate widths within 60 days from the
granting of permit to continue operation of a produce stand, as required by
condition of Variance No. 2144, and reco~nending that the Applicant be ad-
vised to remove the structure and cease operation.
The City Attorney advised that inasmuch as the Applicant's 60-day
period in which to make street-widening dedication had expired April 24, 1970,
and subsequent notifications thereof had not been acknowledged by the Peti-
tioner nor the property owners, the produce stand operation was now in fact,
illegal.
CoUncilman Clark moved that the City Attorney's office deliver to
the property owners and to the operators of the produce stand a 30-daynotice
70-688.
City Mall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MIKOTES- December 8, 1970, 1:30 P.M,
to complete required dedication or cease~..and desist operation. Council-
man Stephenson seconded the mOtion. MOTION CARRIED.
OI~ANGECOUI~Y Z01/E. CttAI~E NO, ZC70~2; Property located on the north side of
Santa Aha Canyon Road, opposite Mohler Drive; proposing a zone change
from County A-l, General Agricultural District, to the R-2 (4,000) Group
Dwelling District, for several parcels totaling approximately 32 acres.
Said proposal was reviewed by the City Council at their meet-
ing held July 21, 1970, at which time the Orange County Planning Con~is-
sion was urged to defer any decision on the matter until such time as
the City of Anaheim Development Services Department Staff completed Scenic
Highway and Density Studies in the Santa Ann Canyon Area, and the findings
and recommendations were presented to the City Council for action.
Memorandum report from the Development Services Department,
dated December 8, 1970, was briefed by Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts,
advising that the matter was to come before the Orange County Board of
Supervisors this week; that the Anaheim Scenic Highway and Density Study
for the Santa Ana Canyon area would be before the Council again in Feb-
ruary of 1971; and it was suggested that the City Council recounnend to
the Orange County Board of Supervisore that action on Orange County Zoning
Case No. ZC70-2 be continued until such time as the Scenic Highway and Den-
sity Studies have been considered.
Discussion was held, and it was reported by Assistant Director
of Development Services, Ronald Thompson, that the Petitioners have indi-
cated their plans to apply for a conditional use permit to allow a mobile
home park development if subject zone change is approved; that the Anaheim
Hill and Canyon Area General Plan currently shows low density for the area,
pending results of these studies to be considered in February.
Councilman Thom mOved'that't~e Cit~i'~g~ii~eCo~mend to the
Orange County Board of Supervisors that action be deferred on the reques-
ted zone change until such time as the City of Anaheim's Scenic Highway
and Density Studies of the Hill and Canyon Area have been considered.
Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
DEEDS OF EASEMENT - RESQLUTION NO. 70R-580; Councilman Pebley offered Resolu-
tion No. 70R-580 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A-RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN
~ DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Hax and Hary Leinfelder,
American Nobile Home Corporation, Rinker Development Corporation.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL~N: Clark, Stephenson, Thom and pebley
COUNCILMEN: None
COUNCIl: Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 70R-580 duly passed
and adopted.
PURCI~ASE OF EqUIPP~NT: City. Manager Ketth HurdoCh reported on the recon~nended
.purchase of various Leapfrog Underground Transformers and advised that the
one'manufacturer, General Electric Company, has submitted a quotation for
said equipment in the total amount of $52,531.50, including tax. He there-
upon recommended said purchase be authorized.
On the recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Stephen-
son moved that the quotation from General Electric Company in the amount
of $52,531.50, including tax, be accepted and purchase authorized. Coun-
cilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
70-689
City Hall, Anaheim, California -. COUNCIL MINUTES - December 8, 1970, 1:30 P.M.
PURC~ASE - CENTRAL LIBRARY AIR,CONDITIONING REPAIRS: Mr. Murdoch reported on neces-
sary repairs to the generator section of the Central Library Air Conditioning
equipment, advising that Carrier Air Conditioning Company, City of Industry,
California, has submitted a quotation in the amount of $3,443.00 for the work,
plus an additional $422.00, if it is found during the repairs that new tube
support sheets are required; further, that this company has been performing
maintenance work on said equipment.
On the recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Stephenson
moved that the quotation of Carrier Air Conditioning Company be accepted,
and repairs authorized as proposed, in the amount of $3,443.00, with the pos-
sible addition of $422.00. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for
the purchase of 2,910 feet of Concrete Cylinder Pipe and Fittings and Appur-
tenances, as follows:
VENDOR
TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX
United Concrete Pipe, Riverside
Ameron Pipe Products, South Gate
$26,097.75
29,547.74
On the recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Clark moved
that the low bid of United Concrete Pipe be accepted and purchase authorized
in the amount of $26,097.75, including tax. Councilman Thom seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
MANAGm~NT SYSTEMS AND DATA PROCESSING STUDY AND EVALUATION: Systems and Research
Director Douglas Ogden advised that contracts with T. Tamaru and Associates,
for survey of Management Systems and Data Processing had been previously au-
thorized by the City Council, however, that,firm was unah. l~.~,~lfill the
contract and additional proposals were solicited; that of the four proposals
received, it was his recommendation that contract be awarded to the firm of
Ernst and Ernst, for a total cost not to exceed $9,850.00.
CouncilmanThom was of the opinion that there should be included
in the evaluation a study of the possible contracting to an independent firm
of all, or a portion of the City's data processing.
On the recommendations of the Director of Systems and Research and
the City Manager, Councilman Clark moved that the Letter Agreement submitted
by the firm of Ernst and Ernst to perform the study and evaluation of the or-
ganization and operations of the City's Data Processing Division and Systems
Office at a total cost not to exceed $9,850.00, be approved, provided however,
that the recorm~ended study of possible contracting data processing services
be included, and further that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign
said agreement on behalf of the City of Anaheim. Councilman Stephenson se-
conded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
APPLICATION TO FILE LATE CLAI~ It was moved by Councilman Thom, seconded by
Councilman Stephenson, that permission to present late claim submitted by
Albert A. Knox, Attorney at Law, on behalf of Lee Winberger, for purported
personal injury sustained on or about June 13, 1970, be denied as recommended
by the City Attorney's office. MOTION CARRIED.
CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY; The following claims were denied, as recommended by the
City Attorney, and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by
Councilman Thom., seconded by Councilman Stephenson:
1. Claim submitted by Irene B. McDonald for personal property
damage purportedly resulting from a flare used by the Anaheim Police Depart-
ment in connection with an automobile accident, on or about November 21,
1970.
2. Claim submitted by Gaye W. Herriniton, for personal injury
damages sustained on or about August 28, 1970.
3.' Claim submitted by Robert R. DeHart, for personal property
damages purportedly sustained on or about November 4, 1970.
70-690
Clt~ Ball, An~h.~t~, .California C0~IL NINUfES - December 8, 1970, 1:30
&. CLaimoub~ittedbyGarrett~&'Dtmino, Inc., A~torneys at
Law, on behalf, of John Preston Woolf, for pers0naI;inJury and property
damases purportedly sustained on or about August 28, 1970.
~0TION CARRIED.
CORRES~E: The followin$ correspondence was ordered received and filed
on motion by Councilm~n Pebley, seconded by Councilman Clark:
a. City of Hodesto - Resolution No. 70-1148 - Ur$in~ the League
of California Cities and the County Supervisors' Association of Califor-
nia to seek action to alleviate the problem of litter and waste disposal
created by the sale of beverages in disposable, non-returnable containers.
b. Minutes - Anaheim Public Library Board - October 19, 1970.
HOTIONCARRIED.
~DI~EE NO, 2878: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 2878 for adop-
tion.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
i~ ~DII~CgOF ~ CITY (~ ANA~EIN~~TI~ 18, C~APT~ 18.63,
8~'~1~ 18.63.0~0 ~ T~ Alt~EINH~TICIPAL CO~. (Billboards - ~atella
Avenue - Scenic Boundaries)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL~N: Clark, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
NOES: COUBCILI~N: None
ABSEHT: COUBCIL~N: Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tern declared Ordinance No. 2878 duly passed and
adopted.
~DINANCE NO. 2879: Council__~s__n Thom offered Ordinance No. 2879 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANABEIM~~ TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.68,
SRCTION 18.68.030 OF THE ANAHEIM H~NICIPAL CODE. (Required Shovings -
Variances.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCII2~N:
NOES: COOIfCI~:
ABSEffT: CO~CI~:
Clark, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
None
l~tton
The Mayor Pro Tern declared Ordinance No. 2879 duly passed and
adopted.
~D~E NO. 2880: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance NO. 2880 for adoption.
R~fer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHETH A~lqDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32
.OF l~E AitM~II! )~ICIFAL CO~ BY ADDIlql THERETO SECTI~q 14.32.195 RELAT-
13~ TO PARKII~. (Iio Perkins - Sundays Excepted - Portions of Elm and
Helena Streets and Harbor Boulevard. )
Roll Call Vote:
A~BS: C(KI~~: Clerk, $~ePheus°u, Thoa and Pebley
lOgS: CGUBC~: Hone
ABSBIIT: CGUBCZLt~II: Dutton
The )hyor Pro Tam declared Ordinance Ho. 2880 duly passed and
70-691
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 8,. 1970, 1:30 P.M.
ORD~NANC~ NOt 2881: Councilm~' Clarkoffered Ordinance No. 2881 for adoption.
RefertoOrdinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE '14, CHAPTER 14.32,
SECTIONS 14.32.150 AND 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING
TO PARKING. (No Parking and One-Hour Parking - Portions of Elm Street,
Broadway, and Harbor Boulevard)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCII2~N:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
Clark, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
None
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Ordinance No. 2881 duly passed and
adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2882: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 2882 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
HRTIclPAL'coDE RELATING TO ZONING. (?0-?1-15(1) - M-l)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNC ILD~.N:
ABSENT: COUNClLD~N:
Clark, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
None
Dutton
aa°~t~[ .... Th9.~y0r Pro Tem declared 0rdinanc! ~o., ~8~
ORDINANC~ NO, 2883: Councilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2883 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AN
AMENDMENT TO TH~' CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE BOARD OF AD-
MINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES~ RETIREMENT SYSTEM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Clark, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: ,,COUNCILD~N: Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared ordinance No. 2883 duly passed and
adopted.
RESOLUTIQNNO. 70R-581 - ESPERANZA-ROTHANNEXATION (UNINHABITED)i Pursuant to
authority granted by the Local Asency Formation CmmniSsion, Resolution No.
70-157, Councilman Stephenson offered ResolutionNo. 70R-581 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTIONOF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFANAHEIMAPPROVINGTHE
ANNEXATION TO'THE CITY OF ANANEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED
AS ESPERANZA-ROTHANNEXATION. (Uninhabited)
Roll Call Vote:
AYEk COUNCILI~N:
NOES: COUNCII/qEN:
ABSI~NT: COUNCILI~N:
adopted.
Clark, Stepheuson, Thom and pebley
None
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 70R-581 duly passed and
70- 692
Cit~ Hall. Anaheim, C~I,~,£~oFALa .- COUMC~:L .~S,- December 8. 1970. 1:30 P.H.
flmnTuiu~ __~_. 2__~4- =~mam'~.,__~l *~m~AT!_~_.- ~__A~___~_.~_: Councilman Pebley
off-lead Oedluanea Bo. ~ as mi Urgency Ordinance for adoption. Said
Ordinance was read in full by the Deputy City Clerk,
Refer to Ordinance Book,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUHCIT. OF THE CITY OF AKAg~.IN. RELATING TO
zoe~Hc mm DECh~R~HO THE ~RGEHCY THEREOF !ESFERANZA-ROTH ANhTXAT~OS -
R-A ZOm~C)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUI~CI~I~*.
HOES: COUNCII~N:
ABSEHT: COUNCIL~N:
Clark, Stephenson, Thom and Pebley
Hone
Dutton
The Mayor Pro Tam declared Ordinance Ho. 288~ duly passed and
adopted.
~0~S~DORAN~ COUHTyHUM&HRKLATIOHS COMMISSION; A~nistrative ~sistant
Jo~ ~rd~brtef~ draft of Star--nC of ~als ~d ~santzatt~, and
EsCOrted Budget for the proposed ~ge ~nty H~n Relations C~is-
si~, as contained Lu co~tcation dated N~er 2~, 1970, fr~ the
~i~ of the It~ TMk Force ~or said pressed ~llt~. He ad-
v~o~ that tho butLu b~d of Mroatora of ~o ~e Catty ~vt-
8i~, ~ltfo~ia ~a~e of Cities, would consider the proposal aC their
Meti~ to be held ~c~er 10, 1970.
Brief discussion followed, and Counc(lm-~ Stephenson expressed
opposition to the clause contained in the State~ent of Coals and Organiza-
tion, Section Ill, Duties and Pavers, Subsection 'G," settin$ out the
right of the proposed organization to call a formal hearing and use the
paver of subpoena to require uttueooo8 1~o..8ppeer.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilmen Clark and Thom
expressed their intent to attend the League of Cities Board moating, and
the City Council requested the City Manager to attend said meeting and
express the City of Anaheim"s position w~th regard to the proposed Com-
mission.
AI~J~: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Thom seconded the
motion. MOTIO~qCARR~KD.
ADJOU~IED: 4:20 P.M.
Deputy City Clerk