Loading...
1969/05/2769-311 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 27~ 196~.~. 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, (entered meeting at 1:35 P.M.), Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Alona M. Farrens CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Alan Orsborn ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Clark called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend A.M. Engle, of the First Baptist Church, gave the In- vocation~ FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Pebley led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Clark proclaimed the week of May 25 - 31, 1969, as "School Nurse Recognition Week." MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meetings held April 29 and May 6, 1969, were approved on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutteo MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Schutte moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen~ unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANI- MOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $342,472.08, in accordance with the 1968-69 Budget, were approved~ QON~INp~D PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1102: Submitted by Robert J. Marshall, to establish a 157ospace mobile home park, with waiver of required setbacks on R-A zoned property, generally located northeast of the intersection of Jefferson Street and the Riverside Freeway. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-58, denied said conditional use permit. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Rutan and Tucker, Attorneys representing the Applicant, and public hearing was continued from the meeting of May 6, 1969, for a full Council, at the re- quest of Applicant's Agent. The Deputy City Clerk noted a letter of protest was received May 26, 1969, from the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company. Councilman Dutton entered the Council Chambers, 1:35 P.Mo 2oning §upervisor Charles Roberts described the location of the sub- ject property noting that a 40-foot frontage road provides access to the par- cel, as the State has acquired all access rights to Jefferson Street from the subject property. He reported that the basis of the City Planning Commission's recommendation Was that the proposed use would adversely affect the adjoining land uses in the northeast industrial area; that the geographic £solation of the parcel could be desirable to an industrial operation; that the requested use would set an undesirable precedent; that the site does not meet the cri- teria outlined by the Trailer Coach Association; and that school districts do not anticipate residential development in industrial areas. 69-312 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNq~L MINUTES - May 27, 1969~ 1:30 P.M. In the ensuing Council~discussion it was noted that there would not be any industrial development to the east and south of subject property and that it is sometimes a hardship to hold land for many years for future industrial development. Councilman Schutte noted the potential sales tax revenues that could accrue to the City should the proposed development be allowed, based on a report issued by the Development Services Department. Mr. Alan Orsborn, Director of Development Services, clarified the conclusions which could be drawn from the report, noting that per capita revenue for the sales tax in the City of Anaheim is influenced by the fact that there are ten million visitors to the City each year; that residents of mobile home parks actually have a lower average income than those in single-family homes, due to the higher percentage of senior citi- zens and military personnel living there. Mayor Clark asked if the Applicant wished to address the City Council. Mr. Leonard Hampel, of Rutan and Tucker, Attorneys for the Ap- plicant, reported that revised plans had been submitted since the appli- cation was considered by the City Planning Commission, which reduced the number of proposed spaces from 157 to 144. He stated that the Applicant was willing to accept the condition that the park be limited to adults only, and be subject to a reasonable time limit. He felt that the geo- graphic isolation of the parcel would sufficiently protect the integrity of the northeast industrial district, noting that it is almost completely surrounded by the Riverside Freeway, the Santa Ann River, Warner Spread- ing Basin, and the Southern California Edison Company easement, which he noted would be completely landscaped. He pointed out that a mobile home park is -a use which is specifically permitted in the M-1 zone with a conditional use permit, and felt that the parcel was ideally suited for the use proposed and would be difficult to develop for industrial purposes. He outlined the need for additional mobile home parks in the area, noting that there were none within a two-mile radius, and those in the surrounding area had waiting lists. He noted that the only adjacent land use that is visible from the subject property is the R-1 development directly across the Santa Ana River. He pointed out that the average length of residence in a mobile home park is 5-1/2 years, (which is higher than single-family homes); and that revenue from taxes paid by the tenants in the form of vehicle registration fees, sales taxes on the purchase of the unit, etc., more than offset the slightly lower per capita sales tax revenues estimated in the report of the Development Services Department. Mr. Hampel further reported that he contacted Mr. David Lyons, of the Trailer Coach Association, who was of the opinion that mobile home parks were appropriate in low-density manufacturing areas, such as the M-1 zone. Councilman Dutton noted that the revenues derived from vehicle registration fees decline as the structure depreciates~ whereas real estate increased in value. He agreed there is a need for additional mobile home parks, but felt that the proposed location was not suited for residential land uses. He also noted that there are no shopping facilities in the im- mediate area. Mr. Hampel stated there are many residential developments along the Santa Ana River and that he personally resides in the general area; he felt that with the proposed block wall and landscaping provided where indicated on the proposed plot plan, the property would be well suited for residential use. He pointed out that the park would have its own recrea- tional facilities and would be a self-contained unit. i9-313 Hall, .Anaheim, C.a.lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 27, 1969, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Robert Marshall, 367 Via Lido Soud, Newport Beach, owner of the subject property, reported that he has explored the possibility of industrial development for his property but was advised by industrial builders and real estate brokers that industrial use of the property appears to be some years away~ He felt that since the Resolution of Intention to zone M-1 was adopted, the adoption of the spreading basin, and construction of the freeway on-ramp have altered the uses of the property, since it would be difficult to erect an industrial building on the site and it is located on the periphery of the designated industrial area. He asked that the Council approve the development, subject to the conditions outlined by Mr. Hampel, if necessary, so that his property may be utilized at this time. Mr. Don Glazer, 7800 Bolero Drive, Riverside, of Coordinated Com- munications, Inc.,~ submitted an independent market study of the proposed de- velopment prepared at the request of the Applicant's Attorney, which he sum- marized, outlining the suitability of the site for the proposed development, available shopping facili~ies~ demand for mobile home parks, and answers to objections stated by the Planning Department. He pointed out that the State of California Legislative Analyst has stated that residents of these developments pay their fair share of taxes; that new and ~arger units are being sold each year to replace older ones; and that the period of depreciation for a mobile home unit has been increased to 18 years. Mr. Craig Grainger, 125 South Claudina Street, Anaheim, Agent of the Applicant, outlined the history of the northeast industrial area, and noted it was Mr. Marshall's original intention to develop the property for industrial use; however, since it has been isolated from the other industrial property he did not believe it would be detrimental to the other industrial properties if developed for the proposed use. Mayor Clark asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. Mr. Gordon Cutler, Industrial Representative of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway, stated that the 23 acres opposite the subject property on Jefferson Street,owned by his company, is being considered by a major in- dustry and approval of the subject application could have an adverse effect on their decision. He felt that the northeast industrial area is next in the path of progress as there is presently very little remaining property avail- able in La Mirada and Buena Park for such development. Mr. Cutler felt that the future of the area was insured if the in- dustrial integrity was maintained. He pointed out that the subject property has good freeway access and visual exposure, even though it is below the level of the Freeway. He predicted that commercial development in the area would follow if the requested land use is approved and questioned the legality of restricting occupancy to adults only, in the proposed development. Mayor Clark requested Mr. Orsborn to clarify predictions that maxi- mum development of M-1 land would not occur for 28 years. Mr. Orsborn replied that he disagreed with this estimate, noting that the City has endeavored to keep an inventory of current prices, terms, and other information on property located in the northeast industrial area that is for sale, and that an increase in activity has taken place in the past 2 years in that area. He cited several instances where land was sold at prices in excess of $25,000.00 per acre. He felt that in view of recent accelerated activity, which he described parcel by parcel with the aid of a map posted, the former estimate of a 28-year supply of industrial property is no longer a valid prediction. He estimated that at least 250 acres of this industrial reserve has been utilized in the last 2 years. Mayor Clark asked if the Applicant wished to present information in rebuttal, Mr. Hampel stated he believed it would be legal to place the condi- tions described earlier on a conditional use permit, and asked that the Council grant the subject request. 69-314 ~.ity Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - May 27, 1969, 1:30 P.M. Mayor Clark felt that sufficient evidence had been received from those present and thereupon declared the hearing closed. The City Attorney advised that the proposed conditions limit- ing occupancy to adults only and imposing a time limit on the requested use of the property would be both impractical and difficult to enforce. RESOLUTION: Councilman Schutte offered a resolution for adoption, grant- ing Conditional Use Permit No, 1102, subject to the conditions recommended by the Interdepartmental Committee, deleting Condition No. 13 therefrom. The foregoing resolution failed to carry by the following Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte NOES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None RESOLUTION NO. 69R-303: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-303 for adoption, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 1102, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDI- TIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1102. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-303 duly passed and adopted. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 113: Initiated by the City Planning Commission, to consider an Amendment to the General Plan, Circulation Element - Highway Rights-of-Way, to extend Sunkist Street southerly from Cerritos Avenue to Howell Avenue, as a Secondary Highway; and to amend the Highway Rights- of-Way Map and Resolution No. 67R-376 to include that portion of Cerritos Avenue extending easterly from the Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way to Douglas Road, as an exception to a Secondary Highway. Further, to consider the Precise Alignment of Sunkist Street between Ball Road on the north, and Howell Avenue on the south. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. PC69-63, recommended the adoption of General Plan No. 113, establishing Sunkist Street between Cerritos and Howell Avenues as a Secondary Highway, and Cerritos Avenue, extending easterly from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Douglas Road, as a Secondary Highway with exception, on the Circulation Element - Highway Rights-of-Way and Arterial Streets and Highway Maps; and further recommended Council Resolution No. 67R-376 be amended to include that portion of Cerritos Avenue on the Table of Exceptions as a Secondary Highway, with a specified width of 70 feet, having a 30-foot half width on the north and 40-foot half width on the south. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. PC69-64, recommended that the Precise Alignment for Sunkist Street extend- ing from Ball Road to Howell Avenue, as depicted on Exhibit "A", be adopted; and further recommended that the Orange County Board of Supervisors be re- quested to amend their Ordinance No. 2243, which adopted the Sunkist-Cer- ritos Precise Alignment known as Exhibit "B", to coincide with that adopted by the City of Anaheim. Public Hearing was held April 29, 1969, by the City Council and decision was twice continued to allow analysis of dedication requirements on Cerritos Avenue as they affect an existing industrial complex. 69-315 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES May 27, 1969, 1:30 P.M. The Deputy City Clerk noted receipt of a letter of opposition to the extension of Sunkist Street as a Secondary Highway, from Mro and Mrs. A.M. Robin, and reported that the Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company re quested a further continuance of decision to the meeting of June 10, 1969. Councilman Schutte requested the record to show that he did not participate in the discussion nor vote on this issue, and left the Council table, (3:05 P.M.). Mr. Thompson reported that the industrial complex in question is located at 2220 East Cerritos Avenue; that a condition of the zoning ordi- nance requires dedication at the time each parcel is developed; that when a building permit was issued in November, 1966, for development of a portion of Lot 9, abutting Cerritos Avenue, the developer was notified of this dedi- cation requirement, and no final building inspection has been issued. Mr. Thompson noted, with the aid of a map posted, that the proposed alignment would have even less of an effect on the industrial complex than the old alignment, and recommended no further continuance for the purpose of considering dedication requirements. The City Council concurred with the recommendation that no further 'continuance be granted. Mayor Clark noted that the public hearing was closed at the meeting of April 29, 1969, and asked if there were any further Council questions before making a determination. In response to protesting statements from the audience, the Deputy City Clerk was requested to read from the Minutes of the meeting of April 29, 1969, where it was stated that Public Hearing was closed and decision contin- ued. An unidentified man requested that the hearing be reopened; and the City Attorney advised that although the hearing was closed, any Councilman has the right and privilege to ask a question of someone present; however, since the gentleman stated he was not present at the public hearing he could not know whether the information he wished to present was new and different. The City Attorney further advised that the hearing could be reopened by the Chair; however, to insure the fact that all interested parties are pre- sent, the hearing should be readvertisedo Mayor Clark indicated he did not wish to reopen the public hearing, however, he would ask the man why he opposed the proposed General Plan Amend- ment. Mr. Stewart Noble, 2526 Whidby Lane, stated that most of the persons present had not been aware the public hearing held April 29, 1969, included the precise alignment of Sunkist Street, therefore, did not express their cp- position. He outlined, with the aid of a map posted, an alternate method of providing adequate traffic circulation south of Ball Road, whereby Sunkist Street would follow the Schutte-Gregg property line, and a proposed east-west street, previously approved by the City Planning Commission under Area Develop- ment Plan No. 94, (Alternate "B"), would be extended to intersect with State College Boulevard. Mr. Noble read from the Minutes of the City Planning Commission public hearing on Area Development Plan No. 94, to support his contention that traffic should not be circulated as indicated in Exhibit "A"; and re- quested the City Council to adopt his alternate proposal in order to prote¢.t the residential integrity of the area north of Ball Road. He further proposed that that section of the proposed Sunkist Alignment between Winston Road a~d Howell Avenue be developed immediately. Following Council discussion, Mayor Clark invited Mr. Charles W. O'Brien, 2504 East Whidby Lane, to address the City Council. Mr. O'Brien requested that the General Plan Amendment and Precise Alignment be disapproved at this time and that a new public hearing be scheduled and advertised so that all interested parties may attend~ 69-316 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES May 27., 1969, - - 1:30 P.M. It was moved by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Clark, that public hearing be reopened and readvertised; said Motion failed to carry, receiving a tie vote, (Councilmen Dutton and Krein voted "No"). Councilman Pebley indicated he is not in favor of the propose4 alignment, noting there are schools located on Sunkist Street. The City Attorney noted the schools were constructed after Sun- kist was designated as a Secondary Highway. Councilman Dutton noted that it is the City's responsibility to provide adequate streets for future needs. The City Manager stated it was essential to provide streets to handle all types of traffic, both industrial and residential; that the conflict between pedestrian and vehicular traffic will always'be with us, and that experience has shown it is advisable to have through streets at approximately one-half mile intervals. He pointed out that most of the homes do not front on Sunkist Street, which keeps pedestrian traffic at a minimum. He noted that if the City were being planned "from scratch" such conflicts could be resolved much more easily; however, the best solution must be found in view of the problems which already exist. Mayor Clark observed that the proposed freeway which is expected to be completed at approximately the same time will carry much of the traf- fic that might otherwise use Sunkist Street. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-304: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-304 for adoption, approving General Plan Amendment, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY' OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 113. (Sunkist Street between Cerritos and Howell Avenues as a Secondary Highway, and Cerritos Avenue, extending easterly from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Douglas Road as a Secondary Highway, with exceptions). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEN: Schutte ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-304 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-305: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-305 for adoption, Amending Resolution No. 67R-376 as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLU- TION NO. 67R-376 TO INCLUDE A PORTION OF CERRITOS AVENUE ON THE TABLE OF EXCEPTIONS AS A SECONDARY HIGHWAY. (Cerritos extendin8 easterly from Southern Pacific Railroad to Douglas Road). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEN: Schutte ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-305 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-306: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-306 for adoption, adopting a Precise Alignment for Sunkist Street from Ball Road to Howell Avenue, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. 69-317 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 27~ 19~9~ 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING THE PRECISE ALIGNMENT FOR SUNKIST STREET BETWEEN BALL ROAD ON THE NORTH AND HOWELL AVENUE ON THE SOUTH. (Exhibit "A"). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEN: Schutte ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 69R-306 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Schutte returned to the Council table, 3:55 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - WEED ABATEMENT: Public hearing was held to receive any objections to the proposed removal of weeds, pursuant to Resolution No. 69R-238 and 69R- 249, relative to Weed Abatement in the City of Anaheim. Mayor Clark asked if anyone present wished to address the City Coun- cil; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-307: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-307 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT NO OB3ECTIONS WERE MADE TO THE PROPOSED CUTTING AND REMOVAL OF RANK GROWTH AND WEEDS AND REMOVAL OF RUBBISH, REFUSE AND DIRT UPON ANY PARCEL OR PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY OR ANY PUBLIC STREET IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM; AND ORDERING THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS TO CUT AND REMOVE SAID RANK GROWTH AND WEEDS AND REMOVE SAID RUBBISH, REFUSE AND DIRT, AND CHARGE THE COST OF SUCH CUTTING AND REMOVAL TO THE LOTS, PARCELS OR STREETS CLEANED. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-307 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Krein moved for a 10-minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:00 P.M.). AFTER RECESS: Mayor Clark called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present. .~UBLIC HEARING - BROADWAY-BROOKHURST ANNEXATION: Pursuant to Resolution No. 69R- 302, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin on May 21, 1969, public hearing was held on proposed annexation of uninhabited territory known and designated as the Broadway-Brookhurst Annexation. The Deputy City Clerk reported that no written protests had been filed in the Clerk's office. Mayor Clark announced that under procedures established by State Law, only owners of real property within the City of Anaheim, who do not also own property within the territory proposed to be annexed are eligible to be heard; and reminded those present that the public hearing is for the purpose of determining whether or not the territory should be annexed to the City of Anaheim, and is not concerned with the intended land use or zoning of the subject property4 A map of the subject area was examined by the City Council and Mayor Clark asked if anyone present wished to be heard; receiving no res- ponse, declared the hearing closed, 69-318 C__ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 27, 1969~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-308: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R- 308 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS THE BROADWAY-BROOKHURST ANNEXATION. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-308 duly passed and adopted. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-51 AND VARIANCE NO. 2030: Rehearing was held May 13, 1969, to consider additional information and evidence pertaining to petitions requesting a change in zone from R-A on Parcel A, and R-3 with deed restrictions on Parcel B, to unrestricted R-3 on Parcels A.a~d B;· also requestidg waivers'of maximum bUilding'height, minimum building set- back, and maximum permitted number of main buildings per ~ite, to permit~ a 30-uhit, one,and two-story apartment complex, .on property located on the east.side'of Loara Street, south of Orangewood Avenue. Public Hearing was held January 7, 1969, resulting in Resolu- tion of Intent No. 69R-5 to zone R-3, limited to single-story construction, (Parcel A), and Resolution No. 69R-6, granting Variance No. 2030 in part, (Parcel B zoned R-3, limited by deed restrictions to single-story con- struction, pursuant to Ordinance No. 1338 - Reclassification No. 58-59- 7). Public Hearing was closed at the meeting of May 13, 1969, and action deferred to this date for further consideration as the result of a tie vote. In answer to Councilman Pebley, Mr. Roberts reported that the City Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the application, with one member of the Commission absent.. Mr. Jack Rogoway, 2200 South Loara Street, was given permission to address the City CouncilJ He pointed out that the Applicant's request to reopen the hearing was granted on the basis of new evidence, in the form of a petition purportedly signed by surrounding property owners who favored approval of the subject applications. He stated that he has ex- amined that petition and talked to property owners in the area and has found that there was no basis for reconsideration, since most people op- posed the development, as evidenced by signatures on the petition which he circulated in opposition° In answer to Council questions, Mr. Rogoway indicated that some of the signatures on his petition were obtained from the same persons who signed the earlier petition in favor of the development; that the remain- der are from others in the subject area who are opposed. It was noted by the City Manager that the decision of the City Council to grant a rehearing of subject applications was soundly based, in that the petition which was submitted specifically stated the feeling of those who signed it at that time. The City Attorney concurred, noting that if those who signed the petition have since changed their mind, it may influence the decision of the City Council at this time; however, the validity of granting a rehearing is not altered by this contingency. 69-319 Cit~ Hall,. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 27.~ 1969, 1:30 P.M. Additional discussion ensued, during which Mr. Rogoway indicated from the audience that approximately 25 of the signatures on the Applicant's petition, representing both husband and wife, were actually signed by only one of the spouses indicated. Councilman Krein moved to continue decision for two weeks, to allow further examination of the petitions submitted. The City Attorney noted that some of those who signed the earlier petition in favor of the proposed development were present at the rehearing; and that none of these persons were present today. It was his opinion that Mr. Rogoway's allegations, if correct, would not be sufficient to constitute fraud, and that the earlier petition could be considered valid. Council generally concurred with this opinion. Mayor Clark noted the motion to continue decision failed to receive a second. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-309: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-309 for adoption, authorizing the removal of deed restrictions recorded on Par- cel B, pursuant to Ordinance No. 1338, Reclassification No. 58-59-7, and amending Resolution of Intent No. 69R-5, by deleting Condition No. 3, (re- quiring deed restrictions), and amending Condition No. 8 to require parks and recreation in lieu fees in the amount of $75.00 per unit. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 69R-5 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 68-69-51. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte and Pebley Krein and Clark None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-309 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-310: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-310 for adoption, amending Resolution No. 69R-6, granting Variance No. 2030 to in- clude waiver of maximum building height, as requested by the Applicant. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 69R-6 GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2030. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte and Pebley Krein and Clark None The Mayor declared Resolution Not 69R-310 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2690: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2690 for first reading, Amending Ordinance No. 1338 by deleting the deed restriction re- quirement limiting one-story construction on that portion described as Par- cel B, in Reclassification No. 68-69-51. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1338 IN RECLASSI- FICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 58-59-7. Mr. Rogoway submitted his petition to the City Attorney and requested that it be placed on file. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-81 AND VARIANCE NO. 2070: Public Hearing was held May 13, 1969, and decision continued to this date, to allow further study and recommendations regarding the proper zoning vehicle for the intended use and preparation of a list of acceptable M-1 uses. 69-320 Ci__ty Hall. Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES May 27~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Roberts submitted a list prepared by the Planning Staff, indicating those uses felt to be acceptable in a restricted M-l, Light Industrial Zone, as follows: 1. Architectural, engineering, research and testing firms and laboratories 2. Bakery, wholesale 3. Bottling plant 4. Garment manufacture 5. Laundry 6. Mail order firm 7. Motion picture studios, laboratories, and film processing 9'-~'--~~$-~~-hin-e~---(Photo engraving, photo copying, ~ 10. Printing establishments (photo processing, and blueprinting 11. Radio broadcasting studio or statzon 12. 13o 14. 15. 16. Shoe manufacture Telephone exchange, studios, offices and equipment build- ings~ Television broadcasting studio or station Wholesale business, storage buildings and warehouses Manufacture of electric and gas-powered vehicles and related wheel and accessory equipment Following Council discussion it was recommended by the City Manager that Item No. 16 be amended, and that an additional item be in- cluded, as follows: 16. The manufacture of golf carts or similar industrial elec- tric and gas-powered vehicles, and related wheel and ac- cessory equipment. 17. Other uses, as may be approved by the City Council The Mayor asked if the Applicant concurred with the restrictions, as recommended. The Applicant, Mr0 Davi Taylor, indicated agreement with the list of restricted uses as amended~ RESOLUTION NO. 69R-311: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-311 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the condition that Applicant file deed restrictions permitting only those uses set forth in the Amended Recommendation of the Planning Staff, and also subject to the following conditions recommended by the Interdepartmental Committee: 1. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all en- gineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ball Road, such as c~rbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facili- ties, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Ball Road, for street lighting purposes. 3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Ball Road, for tree plant- ing purposes. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and de- termined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 6o That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the west, east and south property lines. 7. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be pro- perly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes. 69-321 Qity Hall~.Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 27~ 1969, 1:30 P.M. 8. That any parking area lighting shall be lighted with down- lighting a maximum 6 feet in height and shall be directed away from property lines to protect the residential integrity of the area. 9. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 10. That Condition Nos, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 11. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69-81, M-l). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-311 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-312: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-312 for adoption, granting Variance Noo 2070 as requested, subject to the com- pletion of Reclassification No. 68-69-81. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2070. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R=312 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Schutte left the Council Chambera, (4:45 P.M.). ~ECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-35 - EXTENSION OF TIME; Request of Mr. William David Prichard was submitted for an extension of time to Reclassification No. 68- 69-35, for compliance with conditions for the payment of street tree and lighting fees, together with recommendations of the Development Services Department. One year extension of time was granted by the City Council, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. P_~R!VATE PATROL PERMIT - L & J SECURITY., INC.: Application for private patrol permit, submitted by Lloyd Overton Ashburn, President of L & J Secur£~y, Inc., was granted for patrol and guard service at a truck stop, ~ocation not stated on application) as recommended by the Chief of Police, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.60 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, MOTION CARRIED. ~UBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Application filed by Frank Ramirez, on behalf of Sociedad Progresista Mextcana, ~16, for permit to conduct public dance, June 1, 1969~ at Carpenters' Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue, was submitted and granted subject to the provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. 69-322 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES May 27, 1969~ 1:30 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held May 5, 1969, pertaining to the following applications were submitted for City Council information and consideration: VARIANCE NO. 2080: Submitted by Donald Wo Shaw, requesting the construc- tion of a rotating, free-standing sign with waivers of distance between an adjacent property line and a free-standing sign. M-1 zoned property, located north and west of the La Palma Avenue overcrossing and the Santa Ana Freeway. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69- 98, granted said variance, subject to one condition. VARIANCE NO. 2022: Submitted by Demetriou and Del Guercio, requesting an extension of time to permit temporary mobile home sales on property located at 2300 South Manchester Avenue. The City Planning Commission, by Motion, granted a six-months extension of time, to expire October 21, 1969. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 300: Revised plans for construction of main offices were submitted by Global Van Lines, Inc~ Property located on the south side of Ball Road, at the west side of the Santa Ana Freeway. The City Planning Commission, by Motion, approved revised plans, marked Revision No. 3, Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken~ TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO~ 6809, REVISION NO. 1: Developer - Nathan Shapell, property located on the north side of Wagner Avenue, east of State College Boulevard, containing 175 proposed R-2, 5,000-zoned lots. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Tentative Map was continued to be heard in conjunction with Reclassifi- cation No. 68-69-91 and Variance No. 2087. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-313 - AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 565-A: In accordance with recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-313 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE LA PALMA-BROOKHURST STREET IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 565-A. (Griffith Company $23,000.90). Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark None Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-313 duly passed and adopted. ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE CONCESSION: Report of the Director of Public Works was submitted, recommending that Rockland Investment Company, Inc., be awarded operation .of the public concession at the Anaheim Municipal Golf Course, on the basis of competitive bids received May 22, 1969. 69-323 City Hall, Anaheim~ Cal~ornia - COUNCIL MINUTES May 27~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. At the request of the City Manager, Mr. C. Matthew Rach, President, addressed the City Council and indicated he will supervise the operation per- sonally and would be on the premises most of the time. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-314: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 69R-314 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE HIGHEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE RIGHT TO OPERATE THE PUBLIC CONCESSION AT THE ANAHEIM GOLF COURSE IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Rockland Investment Company, Inc. - 8.2% of Gross Sales). Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark None Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-314 duly passed and adopted. ~ROPOS~p. SALE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY: The Deputy City Clerk reported that no bids were received for the purchase of an improved vacant lot at the southwest cor- ner of Cerritos Avenue and Nutwood Street, (Lot 11, Tract No. 3308). Mr. David Collins, 1077 West Ball Road, a realtor, suggested that the Anaheim Board of Realtors carry the listing and the City Attorney recom- mended listing on a net-net basis at the minimum price of $9,250.00 to the City, with appropriate commission and other costs added by the Board of Real- tors. It was suggested by Councilman Pebley that the City Manager first contact Mrs. Pfeil, owner of a home which must be moved from its present location, before listing the property with the Board of Realtors. By general consent, the City Council concurred with the foregoing recommendations. gE~0LUTIO~ NO. 69R-315 - WORK ORDER NO. 338: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R- 315 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO FURNISH AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE FURNISHING OF SOUND SYSTEM COMPONENTS FOR THE ANAHEIM CONVENTION CENTER, 800 WEST KATELLA AVENUE, ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 338. (Fairfax Electronics, Inc.). Roll Call Vote: AYES; NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: CO UNC I LMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark None Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-315 duly passed and adoPted. 2HANGE ORDER NO. 1 - WORK ORDER NO. 533-A: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that Change Order No. 1, Work Order No. 533-A, improvement of Lincoln Avenue, adding a net amount of $2,480~60, be authorized° Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 69-324 .qity Hall, Anaheimz_California _ COUNCIL MINUTES ~ May 27, 1969, 1:30 P.M. PROPOSED ABANDONMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 69R-316: Councilman Dutton offered Reso- lution No. 69R-316 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON A PORTION OF CERTAIN EASEMENTS FOR WATER LINE PURPOSES UPON, ALONG, OVER AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DES- CRIBED REAL PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING THEREON; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION. (69-3A Public Hearing June 17, 1969, 1:30 P.M.; Public Utility Easements located north of Romneya Drive, west of Euclid Street). Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark None Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-316 duly passed and adopted. PROPOSED ABANDONMENT - RESOLUTION NOr 69R-317: Councilman Dutton offered Reso- lution No. 69R-317 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON A PORTION OF VERMONT AVENUE AND AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS AND ALONG THE HEREIN- AFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WATER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRI- BUTION LINES AND SANITARY SEWERS AND STORM DRAINS, OVER, UNDER, ACROSS, ALONG AND THROUGH SAID PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING THEREON; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION. (69-6A - Public Hearing June 17, 1969, 1:30 P.M.; Portion of Vermont Avenue lying between West Street and Santa Aha Free- way). Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark None Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-317 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-318: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No 69R-318 for adoption. ~ Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF MONIES HELD iN TRUST FOR THE RELOCATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON FACILITIES IN CLAUDINA STREET NORTH OF KATELLAAVENUE, Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark None Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-318 duly passed and adopted. 69-325 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim,. California - COUNCIL MINUTES ~_May 27, 1969, 1:30 P.M. ~LAIMS ~A~.AINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied, as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. Claim of L.M. Orosco for purported personal property damages, date not given. b. Claim of E.Ao Daniell Company, for personal property damages, purportedly sustained on or about February 24, 1969. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-319: On report and recommendation of the City Engineer, Coun- cilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 69R-319 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING T}IE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO WITH THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF GRADE CROSSING AND PROTECTIVE DEVICES AT THE CROSSING OF CERRITOS AVENUE OVER TRACKS AND PROPERTY OF RAILROAD (CROSSING NO. BAA-510.3). Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark None Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-319 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Schutte returned tome Council Chambers, (4:55 P.Mo). CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. City of San Juan Capistrano Resolution No. 6913-10-2 Urging Congressional hearings in Southern California on the subject of narcotics traffic between Mexico and California. b. Minutes - Anaheim Parks and Recreation Commission - Meeting held April 10, 1969. c. Minutes - Orange County Mosquito Abatement District. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2685: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2685 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (66f67-61(29) C-R). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No~ 2685 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2686: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2686 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (66-67-61(30) - C-R). 69-326 ~ty Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 27~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2686 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2687: Councilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2687 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-8 - C-l). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No, 2687 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2688: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2688 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-67 - C-I). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2688 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2689: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2689 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-71 - R-3). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: Clark ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2689 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-320: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-320 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Mary Jane Pfeil 68-69.67) Roll Call 69-327 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 27, 1969~ 1:30 P~M. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark COUNCILMEN: None COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-320 duly passed and adopted. _REC.LASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-67: On recommendation of the City Attorney and on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Council accepted release relative to the payment of fees in connection with Irrevocable Offer of Dedication executed by Empire Financial Corporation, for Lots B and C, Tract No, 4230~ and authorized the recordation thereof. MOTION CARRIED° QRDIN~NCE NO, 2691: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance Not 2691 for first read- ing, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-67 - R-3). pgDINANCE NO. 2692: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2692 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2539, IN RE- CLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 62-63-64. (Condition No. 7). ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following applications were sub- mitted by the City Manager to the City Council for their information: a. Application submitted by Dorothy Louise Viaes, for On-Sale Beer, Person-to-Person Transfer, for an Un-named business located at 300 East Lincoln Avenue, C-2 zone. b. Application submitted by John Joseph Kuhne and Carma Jo Kuhne, for Original On-sale Beer and Wine, (Bona Fide Eating Place), for the Wild Goose, 1160 North Kraemer Boulevard, M-1 zone, (Conditional Use Permit No. 188). No Council action was taken on the above applications. Application submitted by Louis John Maragliano, for On-Sale Beer, Original Application, for Alphy's Fish and Chips, Inc., at 426 South Euclid Street, C-1 zone, was presented by the City Manager. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Attorney was authorized to file Conditional Protest with the Al- coholic Beverage Control Board against said application, on the basis that the premises are presently located in the C-1 zone, upon which a conditional use permit application is pending to allow the sale of beer. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED CITY HALL BALLOT MEASURE: At the request of Councilman Dutton, discuss- ion was held regarding a proposal to place the City Hall measure on the bal- lot at the next municipal election in April, 1970. Mr. David Collins, Chairman of the Citizens Capital Improvements Committee, addressed the City Council. He called attention to the report submitted by the Public Buildings Sub-committee, which unanimously recom- mended a new City Hall, but could not agree on the appropriate site. He expressed the opinion that the City Council should determine the most ap- propriate site, rather than submit this question to a vote of the people. Mr~ Collins called attention te the recommendations contained in the Victor Gruen report relative to the establishment of a direct link be- tween Downtown Anaheim and the Disneyland Area, and s~ggested the City Coun- cil defer consideration of site se]~cti~ ~end~ng decision on General Plan Amendment No. 115 amd the pro?~sed ~eai~g~me~t cf West Street~ He also felt that a comprehensive study should b~ ~nade to investigate where the City is going and what will happen tc the Dow~t~wr~ Area, etc. 69-328 City Hall~ Anaheim, California 'c . CDUNCiL MINUTES - ~_1969, 1:30 P.M. Mrs. Florence Michael, 130 South Philadelphia Street, favored submitting a City Hall measure to a vote of the people, and reported the opinions that have been expressed to her by long-time residents of the City, indicating the need for a new City Hall is not apparent to them. In answer to her questions regarding the establishment of the existing City Hall, the City Attorney advised that the land was donated on the condition that a City Hall be built; since that requirement was met, it is not true that the property would revert back to the heirs if the City Hall is relocated. The City Manager observed that the success of such a measure on the ballot would depend upon whether the citizens of Anaheim have suf- ficient community pride to provide a new facility; that the City could continue operation in the present diverse quarters for many years, or by renting additional space in other buildings. He noted that several floors of the proposed Bank of America Building could be rented, in which case it would, in effect, become a new City Hall. Councilman Schutte left the Council Chambers (5:30 p.m.). Councilman Pebley pointed out that it is not sound business to rent at 10% when yOu can buy at 3~9%. He felt that the City Council should decide on the appropriate site for a new City Hall; that the citizens should be informed of what it costs the City to operate in the present quarters; and that a measure should be placed on the ballot next April to build a new City Hall on a site determined by the City Council. Councilman Dutton concurred. Councilman Krein left the meeting (5:35 p.m.). At the conclusion of discussion, it was determined by general consent of the City Council that public hearing on General Plan Amend- ment No. 115 would be held at the meeting of June 10, 1969, 1:30 p.m. ANAHEIM STADIUM OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT - LOS ANGELES RAMR: On report and recom- mendation of the City Manager, Councilman Pebley moved that the Stadium Occupancy Agreement with the Los Angeles Rams, for an Exhibition Profes- sional Football Game, on September 13, 1969, be authorized on the same basis as approved for the event held August 2, 1967 and August 1, 1968, calling for advance payment of $5,000.00 to cover Stadium operation costs provided by the City, plus 10% of the gross admission revenue, and 50% of the City's share of the concession revenue; the City to retain all parking lot proceeds. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED, LIBRARY BOARD - RF~PPOINTM~NT$: Reappointment of Elizabeth J. $chults and Earl B. Dahl, as members of the Anaheim Library Board for the ensuing term ending June 30, 1973, was unanimously ratified by the City Council. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 5:45 P.M. Deputy City Clerk