Loading...
1969/06/2469-376 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17~ 1969~ 1:30 P.Mo ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: On-Sale Beer and Wine, (Bona Fide Eating Place), Premises-to-Premises Transfer, submitted by Armand Joseph Girard, for the "Old Belgium" at 1126 North Anaheim Boulevard. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Attorney was requested to advise that the City Council did not protest the serving of beer and wine in conjunction with meals, similar to the former operation of the Triangle Restaurant, but would protest a bar operation on the basis of the close proximity of La Palma Park and Stadium. MOTION CARRIED° LITIGATION: On the recommendation of the City Attorney, Orange County Counsel was authorized to represent a~ appear on behalf of the City of Anaheim in the case of Young's Market Company, vs. City of Anaheim and County of Orange, Case No. 167237, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Coun- cilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn° Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 4:20 P.M. City Clerk Citz_Hal_~l Anaheim_= California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 24a 1969,--1:30 P M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session~ PRESENT~ ABSENT: PRESENT~ COL~CILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Mo Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts FINANCE DIRECTOR: Douglas Ko Ogden Mayor Clark called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Duane Riley, of the First Southern Baptist Church, gave the Invocation. FlAG SALUTE: Ccuncilman Schutte led the Assembly in the Pledge of Alle- giance to the Flag. PROCLAMATION: Proclamation marking the 193rd Anniversary of the Declara- tion of Independence, July 4, 1969, and also California's Bi- Centennial, was unanimously ratified by the City Council. MINUTES: City Council Minutes of the meetings held May 27~ June3, and June 10, 1969~ were approved on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Coun- cilman Dutton~ MOTION CARRIED~ 9-377 i_~ Hall~ Anahei~__California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 24, 1969~ 1:30 P.M. AIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Krein moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such or- dinance or resolution° Councilman ?ebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNAN?]- MOUSLY CARRIED. EPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $1~739~587.75, in accordance with the 1968-69 Budget, were approw~d. 9NVENTiON CENTER - INSURANCE - SCOREBOARD AND REARER BOARD - BANK LOAN, $636~000,00: Mr. Murdoch reported, in accordance with previous Council authorization, in~- formal bids were received for the borrowing of $636,000.00, for the prepaid 5-year insurance premium for Fire and Extended Coverage, (2/5ths required - $156,000.00)~ and for the installation of the Scoreboard and Reader Board, (4/5ths required - $480,000.00), at the Convention Center. Mr. Douglas Ogden, Finance Director, reported three bids were re- ceived, all in the amount of 6%: Security Pacific National Bank, United Cali- fornia Bank, and Bank of America; that the Bank of America, in addition to the 6%, offers a $9~00 premium, and thereupon recommended acceptance of the bid of the Bank of America, as low bidder. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-363: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-363 for adoption, accepting bid of Bank of America, as recommended. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION CF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A NEGOTIABLE NOTE IN THE AMOUNT OF $636,000.00. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-363 duly passed and adopted. [!BLIC HEARING - RECIgSSIF!CATION NO. 68-69w88 AND VARIANCE NO. 2090 - TENTATIVE RACT NO. 6978: Submitted by Horace E. Morlock, requesting a change of zone from County A-i to City R-2~5,000, with waiver of orientation of single-family residential structures adjacent to arterial highways, to establish a single- famil? residential subdivision on property briefly described as located north amd west o~ the ~orthwest corner of Orchard Drive and Orangethorpe Avenue. ~h~ C~itv P]annim. g Commission~ pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-126, recommend~d ~aid reclassificatiop~ sobject to the following conditions: ii. Tha~ these reclassification proceedings are granted subject to compie~zc~ .,f a~exatiozz cf subject property to the City of Anaheim~ 2, That a ~'inal Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City (ii~u~ii snd recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 3o That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and recreate, on fees of $125,00 for each dwelling unit, as re- quired bW City Co~lpci] Reso!utiom, which shall be used for park and recrea- tion p~rpos~;~ said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is is~ soed. Tb~ Cit? Pla~ming Commissio~ pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-12P, granted said varia~ce~ subject to the fo]lowing conditions: ]. ~Ihat this ~'ariance is granted subject to the completion of Re- 2 That subject ~?ropert? ~:ball be developed substantially in corda~ce with plates and spe~..'.ifi~':ations on file with the City of Anaheim, tnarked E×hib[t No. 69-378 ~i__t~_~l__~a~_Anaheim~ Caiif~prnia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 249 19699 1:30 P.M, The City Planning Commission, in accordance with Minute action taken June 2, 1969, recommended Tentative Map of Tract No. 69787 subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6978 is granted subject ts the approval of Reclassification No. 68-69~88 and Var-~ lance No. 2090. 37 That in accordance with City Council policy~ a 6-foot mason- ry wall ~hail be constructed on the south property line separating subject tract and Orangenhorpe Avenue and on the east property line separating Lot Nos. 26 and 27 and Orchard Drive, except that Corner Lot Nos. 26 and ~7 shall be stepped down to a height of thirty inches in the front yard setback. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the ~ncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Mainten~ ante. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by under- ground utilities. 5. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Orchard Drive shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 6. That pedestrian and vehicular access rights to Orangethorpe Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim° 7. That the north-south street shall be cul-de-saced north of Orangetborpe Avenue. 8~ That retaining walls as are deemed necessary for the regrad- lng of Orangethorpe Avenue shall be constructed on the south property line separating subject property and Orangethorpe Avenue, as required by the City Engineer. 9. rhat drainage facilities shall be constructed as required by the City Engineer. Mr. Roberts noted location of subject property and existing and pending zoning on adjacent parcels~ In summarizing the action taken by the City Planning Commission, Mr. Roberts reported that variance was granted by the City Planning Commission on the basis of access to the property. Councilman Dutton asked if applicants were the owners of the pro- perty to the south, not included in said application, Mr. Roberts replied they were not, however, a land exchange has been accomplished to provide subject property access to Orangethorpe Ave- ~ue. Mayor Clark asked if the Applicant was satisfied witb condition, s recommended by the City Planning Commission~ to which he received an affir- mative reply, The Mayor then asked if anyone wished to address the Coun- cil in opposinion, hearing no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTIO~ NO. 69R-36A: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 69R~36A for adoption, authorizing preparation o£ necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to completion of annexation proceedings, and in eccordance with ccnditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-88 - R-2-5,000). Roll C~ll Vote: ~9-379 ~i__tz_Hall~ Anaheim_z_~alifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 24~_~1~69, 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-364 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-365: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 69R-365 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2090, subject to the conditions recom- mended by the City Planning Commission, Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2090. Roll Call ¥ote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-365 duly passed and adopteC. TENTATIVE TRACT NO~ 6978: Developer - Alfred Edelsohn; property located at the northwest corner of Orangethorpe Avenue and Orchard Drive, (Reclassifi- cation No. 68-69-88), containing 49 proposed R-2-5,000 zoned lots. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, said Tentative Map, Tract No. 6978 was approved in accordance with conditions recom- mended by the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. 'UBLIC HEARING t. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-89 AND VARIANCE NO~ 2081: Submitted by Hare T. Kishiyama, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3, to estab- lish a 40-unit apartment complex on property generally described as located on the west side of Western Avenue, south of Lincoln Avenue, with waivers of the following: 1. Maximum building height within 150 feet of R-A zoned property Minimum side yard setback, (patios) 3. Minimum side yard setback, (carports) 4. Adequate access for fire and trash vehicles 5. Distance of living units from standard street The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69- 117, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all en- gineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Western Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall, be completed as required by the City Engin- eer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfac- tory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements~ 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per ~ront foot along Western Avenue, for street lighting purposes. 3~ That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Western Avenue, for tree plant- ing purposes, 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 5~ That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department~ 6. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes. 69-380 ~__Hal~z_.Anaheira~ California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - June 24~ 196.9~. 1:30 P.M. 7. That any parking area lighting shall be lighted with down- lighting a maximum 6-feet in height and shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity of the area. 8 That the owner of subject property shall acquire access to the alley along the west boundary of subject property. 9o That Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 10, That C~ndition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 11. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and recreation fees of $75°00 per dwelling unit, as per City Council resolution, which shall be used for park and recreation pur- poses, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69- 118, granted said variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 68-69-89. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with revised plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, (Revision No. 1). Mr~ Roberts, in noting the location of subject property, advised that the parcel was 99 feet wide by 617 feet deep. He noted existing zon- ing and uses in the immediate area, and stated that the requested zoning was in accordance with the General Plan. Mr. Roberts also reported that waiver No. 4 has been eliminated, as redesigned plans submitted to the City Planning Commission make this waiver no longer necessary. Mayor Clark asked if the Applicant was satisfied with the condi- tions recommended by the City Planning Commission, to which he received an affirmative reply. The Mayor then asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition~ Mr. Mc Bride, resident directly across the street from subject property, addressed the Council in opposition, being of the opinion that 2-story development would be incompatible with the area and would aggra- vate the presently existing on-street parking problems. Mr. William S. Phelps, 914 East Katella Avenue, representing the Applicant, advised that because of the depth of subject property, a front parking area and a rear parking area has been provided so that ten- ants are less distant from their garages, and will be encouraged to use them. As to waiver of height limitations, Mr. Phelps reported that this was a technical waiver, in that the area on which this would encroach is projected on the General Plan for other than R-1 zone. He further advised that no units are within 150 feet of an R-1 use. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to be heard, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO~_69_,,R-,~6_i Councilman Krein offered Resolution No, 69R-366 ~or adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF T~E ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69-89 - R-3). ~-38i :!y_H__al]__~_~.nahein3.z California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 24~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote~ AYES:~ COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor dedared Resolution No. 69R-.366 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R.367: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R~367 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2081, deleting therefrom Waiver #4, and sub- 3oct to recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2081. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-367 duly passed and adopted. BLIC ItEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-96 AND VARIANCE NO. 2091: Submitted by Jerry Victor Maler, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3, to estab- lish a 52-unit apartment complex on property briefly described as located (~n the north side of Lincoln Avenue, west of Gilbert Street, (2441 West Linc- oln Avenue)~ and waiver of the following requirements: 1 Minimum side yard setback 2. Living units within 200 feet of a standard street The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-128, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engin- eering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Lincoln Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer~ and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installa- tion of said engineering requirements~ 2. That the owner of subject property shall install street light- ing almng Lincoln Avenue as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities, and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guaran- tee the installation of said street lighting. 3~ That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim ~he sum of 159 per front foot along Lincoln Avenue, for tree planting purposes. a That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined tc be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 6. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded frown view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential hemes, 7. That a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject property shsll be submitted to the City of Anaheim for approval and then be recorded in the office cf the Orange County Recorder, 8.. That Condition Nos~ 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be com- plied with within a period ¢~f 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 69-382 City ~al__~l _~naheim~. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 24~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. 9 That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, and 7, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 10. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and recreation fees of $75.00 per dwelling unit, as required by City Council Resolution, which shall be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. ties~ 11. That subject property shall be served with underground utili- The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69- 129, granted Variance No, 2091, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No, 68-69-96. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos_ 1, 2, and 3. Mr. Roberts noted the location of subject property and briefly summarized the hearing held before the City Planning Commission. The Mayor asked if the Applicant was satisfied with the City Planning Commission's recommended conditions. He received an affirmative reply The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in op- position. Mr, Timothy E, Dailey, owner of property to the east of subject property, advised that he did not oppose the requested apartment complex, but requested clarification of certain requirements, In answer to Mr, Dailey's questioning, he was advised that the front yard setback on Lincoln Avenue would be 35 feet, and that the car- ports would be adjacent to the east property line. Mr. Dailey advised of a pending transaction on his property, for commercial on the front and apartments to the rear, and asked if he could expect approval of similar waivers on his property. Mr. Dailey was informed that the City Council could not prede- termine what action would be taken on his request. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council hearing no response, declared the hearing closed. ' RESOLUTION NO, 69R-368: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No, 69R-368 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED~ (68-69-96 Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES~ COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution No, 69R-368 duly passed and adopted. )-383 Hall, Anaheim~ California ~ COUNCIL MINIIfES - June 24~ 1969~ 1~30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-369: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 69R-369 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2091, subject to the conditions recom- mended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2091. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COi~CILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-369 duly passed and adopted. ~BLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-69-97 - VARIANCE NO. 2093~ AND CONDITIONAL E PERMIT NO. 1117: Submitted by the Seventh Day Adventists, concerning property briefly described as located at the southeast corner of Ball Road and Sunkist Street, requesting a change of zone from County A-1 to City R-3, on Portion A; from County A-1 to City C-l, on Portions B and C, to establish a 196-unit ap- artment complex on Portion A; an automobile service station within 75 feet of a residential zone on Portion C, and a convenience market on Portion B, with the following waivers for Portion A: 10 Maximum number of main buildings on a site 2. Maximum building height within 150 feet of R-A or Single-Family zoned property 3. Location of accessory buildings Minimum distance between buildings 5. Minimum number of required covered parking spaces The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-130, recommended said reclassification be disapproved, and pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-133, denied Variance No. 2093, and pursuant to Resolution NOo PC69- 134, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 1117. Mr. Roberts noted the location of the approximately 10-acre parcel, encompassing the area included in the Ball-Sunkist Annexation No. 2, on which a reclassification to R-A is pending, subject to completion of annexation pro- ceedings, (68-69-82), and noted zoning in the immediate vicinity. He reported that the General Plan projectslow-medium density, or 18 dwelling units per acre, and that the proposal projects 27 residential units to the net residential acre. In summarizing the action taken by the City Planning Commission, Mr. Roberts advised that R-3 zoning was recommended for denial on the basis of density, and that commercial zoning was recommended for denial on the basis of the close proximity of a commercial development in the area. Mr~ Roberts further reported that the Applicants have submitted re- vised plans tn be considered by the City Council which, if approved, would eliminate the necessity cf Waiver No. The Applicant was invited to address the Council. Mr. Ralph Jensen, Executive Vice-President of Apollo Development Company, representing the Applicant, addressed the Council, presenting a re- duced site plan, and referring to Plot Plan Maps and artist's rendering posted cn the east wall of the Council Chambers, explained their plans of development, advising approximately 871/2 acres would be devoted to R-3, with Commercial at the corner. He noted the rental schedule and that parking ratio exceeded Code requirements, and ~urther stated that revised plans no longer encroach within the 150~ioot area to the north or east° Mr. Jensen reported that they were the developers of the existing R~2-5,000 s~bdivision tc the north, and that present plans were designed to prevent traffic from ~he proposed project into the subdivision to the north, as access would be limited to Ball Road and Sunkist Street; that the commer- cial development at the corner would be architecturally controlled to meet the mood of the apartment project. 69-384 City Hall, Anaheim, California i COUNCIL MINUTES - June 24~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Jensen further advised that they have contacted the people directly adjacent to the proposed R-3, finding some opposed, some neutral, and others not objecting. Mr. Joseph Grafues, 1103 Chaucer Street, spokesman for the Sunkist- Ball Road Homeowners, addressed the Council in opposition, for the follow- ing reasons: 1~ The General Plan projects the area for Low and Low-Medium Residential Development° To them, this guide would indicate that they could expect something other than 2-story apartments in the area. 2. The developer of the tract in which many of them live was also the developer' of the proposed project; that most of them had been advised by sales personnel, prior to the purchase of their homes, that homes were projected for subject area~ In their opinion, this was a delib- erate misrepresentation of facts. 3. Attention was called to a similar parcel of property at the northeast corner of Ball Road and Sunkist Street, recently zoned R-I~ and the question was asked w~at difference there was between that parcel of property and the one at the northwest corner of the same intersection. Mr. Grafues felt that a precedent was established, and to grant subject applications would be inconsistent with the present configuration of the neighborhood. 4. What guarantee would the neighborhood have that the units would remain "Adult Units." 5~ What guarantee would the neighborhood have that the units would be maintained and look as presently depicted. Mr. Grafues questioned the concern of a tenant to appearance and condition of their dwelling, com- pared to those of a homeowner. 6. Since apartments are projected south of Ball Road, Mr. Grafues questioned whether apartments between their homes and Ball Road would be appropriate and asked what better boundary could be found than Ball Road a major thoroughfare. 7. He stated that in their opinion, the thinking that homes should not be built next to a major street was not in keeping with previous planning that has occurred. He further reported that the proposed Devel~- oper had just completed a tract of expensive homes, bordering Pacific Coast Highway, in Seal Beach. 8~ Reference was made to petition of opposition containing ap- proximately 150 signatures, presented to the City Planning Commission. In conclusion, Mr. Grafues advised that they felt the piece-meal programming of this area left a lot to be desired, and that present plans were incompatible with their neighborhood, and thereupon requested the ac- tion taken by the City Planning Commission be sustained and subject re- quest be denied~ ' Councilman Krein asked how many people were approached by the Apollo Development Company, offering to refund the money paid for their homes. Mr~ Grafues advised of knowing people living on Chaucer and Cli~fpark 'Way that were mot approached. He stated that they were con- cerned, even though their homes were not adjacent to the proposed develop- ment, because the development will reflect in the resale values of their property. Mr. Chmrles O~Brien~ 2504 East Whidby Lane, addressed the Council in oppositiom, urging denial of said application° He advised that, in his opi,ion, there was no need of another service station, calling attention to the many vacant service stations in the City of Anaheim° He advised that many of the people to whom he talked stated they did not Oppose apart- ments south of Ball Road. Mr. O'Brien stated that he was informed no money had yet been appropriated for the freeway construction~ 9-385 .ity Hall, Anaheim, .California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 24, 1969, 1:30 PoMo Councilman Pebley asked Mr~ O~Brien if he would purchase a $35,000o00 home backing onto Ball Road, especially in the south 5 acres, when the freeway is constructed and in operation; that this is a situation the City Council must take into consideration, that perhaps the north 5 acres should be R-2-5,000, and the south half Commercial and apartments~ Mro O'Brien advised that he would not purchase a home rearing onto Ball Road~ Councilman Schutte stated that he had received notice from the State to remove the pumping plant on his property by August 29, 1969, because the con- tract to construct the Freeway will be awarded by February 1, 1970. He further reported that he was advised that the State money is available for the construc- tion of this portion of the Freeway° Mayor Clark referred to the Staff evaluation reported to the City Planning Commission, noting that presently at the intersection of State College Boulevard and Ball Road, approximately 1/2 mile to the west, there are 3 ser~ vice stations and a community shopping center, and that secondly, the question to be considered is whether R-3 density should be permitted in this area, des- ignated on the General Plan for low-medium development. Mrs. Carlo Windsor, 2312 Cliffpark Way, noted the pending subdivision development at State College Boulevard and Wagner Street, in answer to Councilman Krein's question relative to an offer from Apollo Development Company to purchase back their homes, Mr. Windsor advised that no such offer was made to them. In her opinion, Apollo Development Com- pany misrepresented the facts when they purchased their home, as they were told homes would be built cn subject property, and when this was related to a rep- resentative of Apollo Development Company they agreed, that in all probability, this is what was told to them, but it was told by an Agent, and they were not liable~ Further, Mrs. Windsor stated that had they known of the pending apart- ment project, they would not have purchased their home in this area. She felt apartments should be restricted to south of Ball Road° Councilman Pebley felt the situation could be compromised by develop- ing the north 5 acres R-2~5,000, and the south 5 acres R-3, and the Public Hearing should be continued to revise plans accordingly. Mr. Fred Metzler, 1136 Chaucer Street, questioned the ownership of the gentleman residing at 2424 Cliffpark Way, in that records indicate owner- ship in the name of Apollo Development Company. Mr. Dean Moore, 2424 Cliffpark Way, reported that their escrow on the property closes this coming Friday; that their property is adjacent to subject property, and they favor the proposed development. He felt that R-1 development was unrealistic, and preferred the proposed project to R-2-5,000o In his opinion, the apartments were well designed° He further advised that the developer has agreed to construct a concrete block wall between the car- ports and their property. As to the service s.~ation, Mr.~Moore~s only objection was to the. possi- bility cf a 60-foot high sign. He felt that any signing of the service station should be within the sign ordinance regulations~ In conclusion, Mr~ Moore advised of talking to three or four people who signed the petition of opposition~ stating that they signed the petition withoun seeing the design of the complex, and that they also agree it would be better tc have subject development than to chance a different type of de- velopment. 69-386 City Hall~ Anaheim~ Californi~ - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 24, 1969, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Albert Toussau, 6672 Richfield Road, owner of property within the area, addressed the Council, favoring the proposed develop- ment. Mr. Larry Matzick, employee of Apollo Development Company, sub- mitted and read a letter received from Gary L. Watson, owner of property on Cliffpark Way, favoring subject development. Mr. Tom Wilson, representing Apollo Development Company, in charge of F.H.A. and VoA. finance processing, advised of the financing procedure employed by F.H.A., and reported that subject development has been approved for 90% financing, over a 40-year period,and that continu- ing controls are exercised over maintenance, design and decor.. To him, F.H.A. participation and financial interest would alleviate any fears of deterioration of the project. Mr. Jensen~ in rebuttal, noted that if the property was devel- oped R-2-5,000, building could be within 5 feet of the property line which, in his opinion, would not be a satisfactory situation to the subdivision to the north. Mro Jensen agreed to construct the back wall of the parking area in masonry, to follow the decor of the wall on Sunkist Street. Mr. Jensen requested the record to show that he would establish a program to purchase or make up any difference of anyone's loss of any- one's property that abuts subject property, should they decide to sell their home between now and the time the apartments are completed. It was determined that sufficient evidence had been submitted, thereupon Mayor Clark declared the hearing closed. Councilman Krein offered necessary resolutions denying Reclassi- fication No. 68-69-97, Variance No. 2093, and Conditional Use Permit No. 1117, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Prior to Roll Call, discussion was held by the City Council. Councilman Schutte felt it unrealistic to expect R-1 develop- ment on subject property, especially considering the projected traffic on Ball Road, and also felt that the developer was fair in offering to purchase or make up lost revenue to those wishing to sell their property. Mayor Clark was of the opinion that the projected development was a good one, however, he felt this was not the area in which it should be established. Councilman Dutton advised that it had always been his opinion that Ball Road should be the dividing boundary between residential and industrial; residential to the north, and industrial to the south. In his opinion, residential also included R-3. Councilman Pebley reported that it had always been his opinion that anything bordering Ball Road was losical for R-3 development. He again referred to the suggested compromise, and stated that apparently the people bordering subject property would rather have the proposed apartment complex than R-2-5,000. He further felt that the proposed project would be much better than a standard R-3 development. Roll Call once resolutions denying said request: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Krein and Clark Dutton, Schutte and Pebley None The above resolutions failed to carry. ~9-387 ]itS Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 24~ 1969~ 1:30 PoM, RESOLUTION NO. 69R-370: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-370 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the Interdepartmental Committee and Development Services Department: 1o That these reclassification proceedings shall be subject to completion of annexation of subject property to the City of Anaheim. 2o That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width on Ball Road, and 45 feet in width on Sunkist Street~ including a 25~foot radius property line return, for street widening purposes~ 3, That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineer- ing requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ball Road and Sunkist Street, such as curbs and gutters~ sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage fa~ cilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satis- factory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 4. That the owner(s) of subject property shall install street light- ing along Ball Road and Sunkist Street, as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said street lighting. 5. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Ball Road and Sunkist Street, for tree planting purposes. 6. That a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject pro- perty be submitted to the City of Anaheim for approval and then be recorded in the office cf the Orange County Recorder. 7. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with ap- proved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 8. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 9o That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north and west property lines of both the R-3 and C-1 parcels. 10t That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes. 11. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and recreation fees of $75.00 per dwelling unit, as required by City Council Resolution, which shall be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. 12. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such parcel; PROVIDED, however, that the word "Parcel" shall mean presently existing par- cels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split. 13. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant° 14. That Condition Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (68-69- 97 - RoJ, Portion A; C-l, Portions B and C~) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: Krein and Clark ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No, 69R-370 duly passed and adopted, 69-388 City Hall~. Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 24~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-371: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R- 371 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2093, subject to Interdepartmental and Development Services Department recommendations: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 68-69-97~ 2. That in the event subject property is subsequently split for purposes of sale or financing, a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject property shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim for approval and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Re- corder, and a mutual easement agreement for common drives shall be sub- mitted to the City Attorney for approval. 3~ That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans a~d specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, Revision No. 1, 2, and 3. 4. That a masonry wall shall be constructed along the north and west property line at the rear of carports, similar in design and decor to the existing wall along Sunkist Street. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2093. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte and Pebley Krein and Clark None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-371 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-372: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-372 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1117, subject to Inter- departmental and Development Services Department recommendations: 1~ Tt'~at this conditional use permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 68-69-97. 2. That the proposed service station shall be developed sub- stantially in accordance with adopted Service Station Minimum Site De- velopment Standards. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDI- TIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1117. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte and Pebley Krein and Clark None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-372 duly passed and adopted° RECESS: Councilman Krein moved for a 10-minute Recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° (3:15 P.M.). AFTER RECESS: Mayor Clark called the meeting order, all members of the City Council being present. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 2083: Submitted by Grand Marnier Company, re- questing permission to construct three free-standing signs on property presently zcned C-l, located at the northeast corner of Euclid Street and Tedmar Avenue, with the following waivers to Code requirements: ,9-389 iity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 24~ 1969, 1:30 P.M. a. Section 18.620090 (B-i) - number of free-standing signs Section 18.62.090 (B-l) - distance between free-standing signs Section 18o62.090 (B-2) - maximum height of free-standing signs The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-104, denied said variance. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed on behalf of the Applicant by Gene Jenkins, Federal Sign & Signal Corporation, and public hearing scheduled. Mr. Roberts noted the location of subject property; the existing zoning and uses in the immediate vicinity. In summarizing the public hearing before the City' Planning Commission, he advised that the Applicant withdrew requested Waiver No. "c"~ and with further clarification it was determined that 2 free-standing signs were requested, rather than 3. The signing pro- posed was a free-standing sign at the corner,and within 40 feet thereof an order box on another pole~ which was also considered a free-standing sign, as it contained advertising. Mr. Roberts reported that denial by the City Planning Commission was on the basis that signing could be accomplished within the regulations of the Sign Ordinance° Mr. Steve Sharp, 195 West Benedict, San Bernardino, representing Federal Sign & Signal Corporation, addressed the Council on behalf of the Applicant, and advised that the order box is also a menu sign; it is a 4 ft. by 4 ft. box, with a speaker box on top. He stated that the menu sign at the location proposed was necessary and could not be incorporated with the sign at the corner, as it would be on the passenger side of the vehicle, and most difficult and awkward for customers to place orders. File was reviewed by the City Council. It was noted that the sec- ond sign planned a menu on both sides of the driveway with a connecting over- head sign worded "Drive Through." The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-373; At the conclusion of Council discussion, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-373 for adoption, authorizing the free- standing sign at the corner and the menu and order box sign only, which menu- order box sign is to be cut off at the top of said sign, and the balance of the projected sign denied, subject to the following conditions: 1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, as revised. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2083. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-373 duly passed and adopted. IBLIC HEARING - 1969-70 BUDGET: Public Hearing was held on the proposed 1969-70 Budget for the City of AnaheJ. m, in accordance with legal notice thereof pub- lished in the Anaheim Bulletin on June 12, 1969m 69-390 Ci~Hall: Anaheim,. California - COL~CIL MINUTES - June 24~ 1969~ 1:30 P.Mo ~oliowing is Budget Message of the City Manager: "To the City Council and Citizens of Anaheim: The recommended budget for the City of Anaheim for the fiscal year 1969-70 is herewith submitted for your consideration and approval in accordance with Section 604 (b) of the City Charter~ The budget represents appropriations in the amount of $38~199~- 940.00; 5.4% increase over the previous fiscal year. The budget contemplates an estimated three percent increase in population to 1709000, and the same level of service provided in the cur~ rent fiscal year for a population of 165,000. Anaheim in November, 1968, like other communities throughout the nation, felt the impact of voter rejection of bond issues. The amount of $18.5 million which was rejected would have provided additional im- provements in electrical service, sewer and storm drain construction, ac- quisition and development of park sites, and recreational facilities, and the construction of two branch libraries. The expenditures proposed were for life long £acilities to be paid over an extended period. The failure of these bonds requires the construction and acquisition of most of these facilities to be postponed or ignored, lessening Anaheim's ability to pro~ vide a well-rounded environment. Facilities which are required for con~ tinued growth of the City must be provided and will be financed from cur- rent and future years~ budgets~ placing an undue strain upon present ta~ payers~ Only eleven employee positions have been added to handle in~ creased work loads generated by continuing development and population growth, and to continue the efficient management of City affairs. New capital expenditures reflected in this budget have been held to a minimum. Those included will provide for replacement of worn-out, antiquated rolling stock, other materials and equipment which are beyond economical repair limits, and the purchase of new special purpose equip-~ ment with consequent labor saving methods to sustain electrical and water service, and street and property maintenance service. Acquisitions of property proposed i~ this budget, other than the continuation of such programs funded under prior years' authorizations, are limited to $2009- 000~00 for park land and $400,000.00 for the acquisition of a small por~, tion of the Southern California Edison Company facilities within the City limits. Construction projects to keep pace with development are mentioned in succeeding paragraphs. Utilizing gas taxes and some general fund monies, the roadway construction program will support the widening of portions of several streets including Brookhurst Street and Ball Road; an underpass for Lewis Street under the Santa Fe Railway; the extension of Sunkist Street sou~ therly to Howell Aven~e and Lakeview Avenue from Riverdale to Orangethorpe; and the installation and improvements of several traffic signals.. Because o~ the voter rejection of bonds, the storm drain program has been significantl~ reducad to include only new installations demanded by state highwa7 and county construction programs which involve the City of Anaheim. Accordingly, only the construction of the Chantilly drain i~ the vicinity cf the Orange Freeway and the Lewis Street drain between Kanella and Cerritos is contemplated in this budget. Expansion of the utilities system will be continued at the same level as last year. This includes necessary construction and development of electrical underground lines in new subdivisions; continuation of new electrical meter installations; increased transformer capability at the Lewis Substation to meet system load growth, service, and reliability re- quirements, fine new power sales representative is included in this year~s budget to provide assistance in developing increased electrical power con~ sumption, a substantial net revenue advantage. 59-391 ]ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California ~ COL~CIL MINUTES - June 24~ 1969, 1:30 P~M. Several water projects will be financed in this budget including a 21-inch water main 3,750 feet long to be installed at Imperial Highway from Orangethorpe to Santa Aha Canyon Road to provide better distribution of water for the City; and a combination 12-and 14oinch main 8,900 feet long in the vicinity of Ball Road and West Street to provide more water because of the increasing numbers of hotels and motels locating in that area. Operation of the City's new 860 million gallon reservoir and adjacent treatment plant will be included for the first full year. The continuation of the level of service achieved during the past year is indicated in the highlights of this year~s budget discussed in the paragraphs which follow. The City continues its orientation to better mapmgement in updating the data processing program. Preparations are being made for the installa- tion of more sophisticated equipment than currently in use. The program in- cludes a major change in location and an additional programmer to support more and more programs being adapted to automation to provide accurate~ timely~ and precise information on which to base decisions; and to provide efficien- cies in routine billings, payrolls, reports, accounting data, and other in- formation required to manage daily operations° The audit program will undergo a major change to achieve audit in- dependence and improved control of accountability for the City's operating agencies. The audit program will be removed from the accounting division and placed under an audit supervisor responsible directly to the Finance Director. The City produces forms and reports which have reached a volume of nearly seven million impressions annually at the rate of 300 job orders per month. Such volume, unless otherwise provided for, increases labor and con- tractual printing costs substantially~ An offset press and folder are included in this year's budget to increase printing capacity and to reduce labor and contractual costs. It is anticipated that a savings of 25 percent will result. Annexations and new housing, commercial, and industrial developments create the need for tight control on public works programs. Anaheim, during fiscal year 1969-70 will repair, clear, and provide weed control programs for 439 miles of City streets and 56 miles of alleys; maintain 392 miles of sanitary sewer systems; sweep 686 curb miles of City streets and 40 curb miles of state highways; and provide refuse collections for an anticipated increase of nearly 2,500 living units. The program for fiscal year 1969-70, in con- tinuation of last year's level of service, will provide for resurfacing of 1,800,000 square feet of streets; cleaning 150 miles of sewer lines; sweep- ing residential areas once weekly, commercial-recreational areas three times per week, and the downtown business area daily. The parkway maintenance program supports 90 landscaped traffic is- lands and buffer landscaping zones; freeway berms and areas adjacent to resi- dential areas; and landscaping in and around electrical substations and water reservoirs. Parkway crews also trim limbs of trees adjacent to power lines in a program to reduce outages from line breakage and transformer blowouts caused by tree debris during high winds and severe storms. These constantly growing functions require the addition of a three-man crew this year. Except for the possessory interest tax payment currently under liti- gation, the Stadium program for fiscal year 1969-70 reflects a reduction of 11 percent in operating Costs. 80 professional baseball events projected to draw a paid attendance of nearly 1,000,000 and attendance from 20 other events make up the program. The Convention Center program reflects a reduction of 20 percent in its operational budget and will continue to serve the convention-trade show ac- tivities at its current levels with the funds provided in this budget. The rapid increase in conventions provides a real boost to Anaheim's economy, but does adversely affect the direct net revenue to the facility, since fewer dates are then available for the rent paying uses. This trend will likely continue to the substantial overall benefit of the community. 69-392 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 24? 1969~ 1:30 P.M. The public safety program of the Police and Fire Departments will continue at the same level of performance achieved last year. There are no increases in the number of personnel, equipment, or facilities other than for such programs previously approved° It was hoped that heli- copter patrol could be started this year in an effort to reduce crime. This important deterrent must apparently be postponed. In the area of community enrichment programs, the Library will continue to previde public and technical service through the Central Li- brary, Haskett Branch, and the bookmobile programs. Parks and recreations programs will be able to support commun= ity activities at last year's level. The funding provided in this budget will permit implementation of two new playground programs in the Savanna School District and provide the capability to expand a pilot program ori- ented to the senior high school age-group from one to all six high schools in the City. Only $17,500.00 is shown in this budget for improvement and development of park sites, since prior allocations in the amount of $300,000.00 are available to sustain the park development program using present crews. The City Clerk has been provided with funds for the municipal election scheduled for April 14, 1970, anticipating ballot preparation and other activities necessary for the registration of approximately 70,000 voters amd operation of 120 precincts. This budget is in balance on a pay-as-you-go basis under the current tax structure. However, many programs in public works, utilities, police, fire, parks, recreation,and library service require expansion simply to maintain pace with increased demands for service. Capital im- provement programs, to provide safety and reduce inconvenience from flood conditions, require continued effort to complete a storm drain system, not possible without long-term financing. Similarly, sewerage, streets and other facilities need upgrading and extension. As construction in the area continues, sites for future public facilities are absorbed. It is impera- tive that these sites be acquired before construction eliminates them from availability for public usage. This includes park sites, branch library and fire station sites as well as possible cultural facility locations. Considerable expenditure is required to maintain unpaved alleys. This expenditure is almost a complete waste, since no permanent improve- ment results. Previous attempts to get the alleys paved through a coopera- tive program between property owners and the City have not been success- ful. This program, which could be started for about $100,000.00, should be implemented but may require a different approach to assessment. This approach has yet to be discussed and formulated, hence the program is included in the budget. Revenue bonds for the acquisition and extension of electrical facilities are essential to Aaaheim's ability to provide a desirable total environment for its people. These acquisitions and extensions provide the greatest source ot revenue for the City's operation and development, without increasing the tax burden. Revenue bond financing provides mone~ for capital investment wherein the utility itself pays the bonds from re- venues on a long term basis The acquisition of facilities will allow all Anaheim residents to enjoy the lower rates charged by the City~ simul- taneously returning a greater net revenue to the general ~und ~or develop- ment and operation of non-revenue producing activities. These are the ac- tivities requiring large monetary outlays, since they include most City services. Police, fire, library, recreation, public works and many, man~ other services are ali non-revenue producers normally supported from tax~s. Anaheim has the unusual ability to keep its tax rate low, if its citizenry recognizes the importance of its electrical utility and its need for capi- tal improvement funds on a b~siness-like basis~ Surplus funds in the amount of $958,066.00 have been incorporat~ ed in the appropriations for this budget. A contingency fund of $250,000,00, or 2/3 of 1% of the budget is provided for. The contingency fund, under the direct control of the Council may not be spent without specific Council authorizacion. 69-393 City Hall~ ~naheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 24~ 1969~ 1:30 P~Mo Of the $38,199,940.00 in revenue required to support this budget, light and power revenue of 36~1 percent ($13~778,000.00) will continue to be the major source of income followed by sales tax revenue which accounts for 12.0 percent ($4,611,250.00). Only 11.5 percent ($4,370,649.00) will come from real and personal property taxes. There is no provision in this budget for salary adjustments. In the past, employee negotiations were held prior to the next budget year. Negotiated salary levels were drawn from the contingency fund and reflected in the published budget~ This fiscal year, the salary review is scheduled for October, 19697 since the 1968-69 employee negotiations resulted in a 15-month cycle for salary review for most employees. Salary adjustments cannot be pre-determined prior to July 1, 1969, the effective date of this budget, therefore funds to provide any salary adjustments will require a future budget adjustment. More complete narratives and detail of revenues and expenditures are shown in the body of the budget. The plan of operations and the programs proposed in this budget were formulated after an extended review of all activities and detailed dis- cussion with all departments. This budget as a result reflects the dedication of the department heads, supervisors~ and their assistants to the purpose of making Anaheim the model of American cities. I have the highest regard for the staff and line personnel of the City of Anaheim. Their professionalism, dedication to public service, and sense of community responsibility are outstanding at- tributes contributing to the efficient management of the City. Their devo- tion to duty is inspiring. The aggressive leadership of the Council and high interest and sup- port of the citizens of Anaheim continue to be the pillars upon which the CityVs administrative staff rely. This budget adheres to the policies and programs indicated by the Council and electorate. It is limited only by the financial structure an- ticipated for the forthcoming fiscal year. It is hoped that the Council and community leadership can alert the residents and business people to Anaheim's abilities and limitations to provide that which they desire. Respectfully submitted, S/ KEITH A. MURDOCH, City Manager" Mr. Murdoch noted that the proposed Budget was submitted to the City Council~ May 27, 1969, for review prior to this hearing~ In briefing the proposed Budget, Mr~ Murdoch noted that the total amount was $38~199~1~0~00, or an increase of 5~4% and that it did not include any wage or salary adjustments? fringe benefits~ etc~ that might be approved approximately October 1, 1969; that should a wage and salary adjustment be approved at a later date~ an additional supplemental allocation would be re- quired. Mr. Murdoch pointed out that the bond issues submitted to the v0tars last year for capital improvements did not succeed, and that those items fait particularly essential are included and will be included annually, rather than on a long-term financing basis~ this was indicated by slightly higher costs shown in Capital Impr~vement Accounts; these amounts, in his opinion, were minimal. He gave as an example, the amount set aside for acquisition of park land, and acquisition of a small portion of the Edison Company facilities within the City Limits. He reported that the acquisition of the Edison Com- pany facilities was in accordance w~th the agreement with the Edison Company, but not at the rapid rate indicated in the agreement. 69-394 ~ity Hall.~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 24~ 1969~ 1:30 PoM. Mr~ Murdoch stated that the City Council may wish to consider some of the capital items that are included in the five-year program through some other type of financing other than a bond program~ He fur- ther advised that these improvements anticipated for the Fiscal Year, 1969-70, were approximately 8-1/2 million dollars, and that a little les~ than five million is included in the proposed Budget. Some of these items can be at least partially financed through Federal programs, such as storm drains, etc. Another approach for additional revenue would be the tax rate, however~ no additional tax sources are proposed in the Budget° Mr~ Murdoch noted that the State is presently considering new tax sources, one being the proposed 5% Utility Tax, and several cities have alread~ ad~,pted this tax. Regarding the Convention Center, Mr~ Murdoch noted that the posed Budget reflects a reduction of 20% in its operational budget. In answer to a Council question, Mr. Bill Snyder advised that an average survey i~dicates $150.00 per day, per delegate, for a 3~9 day con- vention is spent~ and that this is based on a 1966 survey averaging state, regional and international meetings~ He further reported that the Bureau's bookings for the first five months of this year involve 153,000 delegates; that this can be compared to the bookings of 1966, 1967, and 1968 combined, which were 200,~500 delegates~ financially, the first five months of this 7ear represents approximately $24,000,000.00 in initial expenditures by delegates. Regarding the alley program, Mr. Murdoch advised that this couid be commended for approximately $100,000.00 per year~ and probably concluded in 8 to 10 years, and would be, in his opinion, money well spent; however, this would ~equire a change in policy as it relates to cooperative parti- cipation by the property owner and City. He reported that this program has not been included in the proposed Budget, but was one which he felt was worthy of Council consideration. Mr. Murdoch requested the Council to carefully consider the re~ venue bonds for the acquisition and extension of the electrical facilities, which he considered essential. In answer to Mayor Clark's question, Mr. Murdoch replied that the proposed Budget did not include an allowance for the expansion of the audit. Mr. Ogden reported that the audit was purposely left at the pres- ent level., pending receipt of proposals, after which the City Council could supplement the necessary amount from the Contingency Fund. The Mayor asked if anyone in the audience wished to address the Council. Mr. Jim Townsend, 808 North Pine Street, Chairman of the Tele- phone Taxpayers Committee, advised that he could not understand the Budget, as written, however, with reference to the audit that was just discussed, recommended that the a~uditor for the C~ty be changed each year. He ad- vised that in the past he has noticed appropriations which he could never determine if they had been spent. He suspected a number of appropriatioas were not spent, and that this was something the taxpayer would like to ~now. Reference was made to the recently-defeated bonds, and Mr. Town- send noted that shortly thereafter a proposal was considered to expend approximately $2,000,000.00 for a public golf course. He felt that this money could be well spent to accomplish some of the improvements that the taxpayers were asked to approve through bonding. 69-395 C_~i~y Hall~ Anaheim_~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 24~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Townsend called attention tc the estimated revenue projected from the Stadium, and asked if the amount of $281,500.00 was an indicated profit. Mr. Murdoch advised that this amount was from events other than baseball, and is a part of the estimated $1,545,459,00, representing revenue from all sources. Mr. Townsend asked what the annual loss amount was to the City re- suiting from the Stadium operation. Mr. Murdoch replied that this varies from year-to-year; that the revenue figure estimated is based on ancitipated activity. He pointed out that the revenue previously estimated from baseball would not, in all proba- bility, be obtained this year, unless attendance increases for the balance of this season~ and that both revenues and expenditures will be somewhat less than appears in the Budget. Mr. Murdoch further advised that from a strictly revenue and ex- penditure approach, the loss could be estimated at approximately $600,000.00 per year, however, if the principal payment on the Stadium is considered an investment, rather than an expenditure, a different answer would be obtained. Mr. Townsend stated, that in his opinion, the Newsletter was a wasted expense~ as the news is reported in the local newspapers, and was of the further opinion that the Newsletter was used as a City propaganda organ at taxpayers' expense~ Councilman Pebley expressed surprise that exception had not been taken tc the Park and Recreation portion of the Budget. He reported that he personally never used the hundreds of acres that the City owns as parks, but he and many other citizens use the Stadium, and that the Stadium could be con- sidered a part of the Park and Recreation Program, as this was a form of rec~ reation to many citizens. Mr. Townsend replied that programs were normally designed to bene- fit the citizens within the community~ and he personally was little concerned about the benefits to the City thirty years hence~ Councilman Dutton~ regarding loss versus gain, advised that the $600,000~00 for 35 years, cr $21,000,000.00, would give to the City a paid facility of 176 acres, whicb will be constantly increasing in value. In ad- dition to this, the national publicity of the City of Anaheim was invaluable, and the increased dollars brought into the economy must be recognized. He stated that many other intangible benefits accrue, as a result of the Stadium. Mayor Clark, in support of the beneficial advertising for the City, noted the forthcoming Billy Graham event, and the thousands of people this meeting will attract. Mr. James L. Webb, President of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, briefed the operation of the Chamber and their committees and sub-committees that study certain topics. He stated that it was difficult to review a Bud- get such as this in such a short time. Mr. Webb advised that the Chamber of Commerce has a mutual interest in the economic health of the City, and hoped to contribute in a positive way to a balanced~ steady and wholesome growth of the community. Mr Webb thereupon read a letter setting forth their position, rec- commending that the Budget be adopted as presented, agreeing with the overall concept of the Budget, feeling that individual elements of the Budget would bear further scrutiny and study throughout the coming year. Mr~ Donald Douglas, 123& South Loara Street, reported that he has been a member of the Chamber of Commerce Study Committee, and advised that it would be most helpful if the Budget could be obtained earlier, so that it could be given more study. 69~396 ~Anaheim~__Calif:~rnia- £~.OUNCIL MINUTES- June 24, 1969, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Murdoch reported that the Budget preparations start in the first part of January, and it is published and submitted to the City Coun- cil as quickly as possible~ when in balanced formo Regarding a capital expenditure involving a new City Hall, Mr Douglas suggested investigation of the possibility of housing County, State and Federal organizations that are planning to move into this area. He ~elt this would be a logical approach to the taxpayer and would supple- ment the cost of a new City Hall. Mr. Douglas noted the $17,000.00 postage appropriation, budgeted for the Public Information Of£ice, and the $2~,500o00 postage appropriation budgeted for Customer Service, and suggested that the Newsletter and util- ity billings be combined. Mr. Murdoch advised that this has been investigated on at least two occasions and the reason it was not put into effect was due to the fact that the utilities are on a bi-monthly cycle, and mailings are made every day requiring two months to complete the cycle. It was felt that this was not adequate for a Newsletter-type of publication. Mr. Sam Campbell, 232 South Lemon Street, advised of three re~ servations to the Budget. One, timing; two, form; and the third, some of the contents, Mr. Campbell noted appropriation for the Stadium and Convention Center is indicated as approximately 2ol million dollars, and that the es- timated requirements noted in Schedule 3, was approximately 4.2 million dollars. He advised that the Finance Director explained that a part of this is included in capital financing. Attention was called to the Non-Profit Corporation, under which the Stadium was developed, and Mr~ Campbell felt that the current Budget now reflects a mingling of capital investment between the Non-Profit Cor~ poration and the City: He asked if this would not constitute a gift from the City of Anaheim to the Stadium corporation. Mr. Campbell was of the opinion that the Budget was only a par- tial Budget, and that it was not really known whether or not it was in balance. Referring to the Budget Message and the necessity of revenue bonds for the extension of the electrical distribution system, Mr. Camp- bell felt that this was only Mr. Murdoch's opinion, and was not known whether this was a fact. He noted there was no indication of what was deleted from the tax base of the schools as a result of the acquisition of this utility. Mr. Campbell stated that government was a committee appointed by the people, however, :in the case of the Stadium this entity was being used to make a capital investment which, in 30 or 50 years, could be sold as a business venture. In his opinion, this was the Socialistic or Com- munistic theory. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council hearing no response~ declared the hearing closed. ' Councilman Krein moved that the Budget be approved as submitted. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion~ MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6066 EXTENSION' OF TIME: One-year extension of time to Tentative Tract No. 6066 was granted, as recommended by the City Engineer, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Kreino MOTION CAR- RIED. 69-397 C__ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES ~ June 24, 1969~ 1:30 P~Mo BEAUTIFICATION: CENTER DIVIDER - LINCOLN AVENUE: Consideration of petition re- questing beautification of the center divider on Lincoln Avenue~ between Euclid Street and Crescent Way, was deferred two weeks (July 8, 1969) on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED° DINNER DANCING PLACE PERMIT: Application for dinner dancing place permit, sub- mitted by Co Robert Milihouse, for the Country Girl, 226 North Manchester Avenue, was granted, subject to provisions of Chapter 4016 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Council- man Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley~ MOTION CARRIED. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held June 2~ 1969, pertaining to the following applications, were submitted for Council information and consideration: VARIANCE NO. 2092: Submitted by Downey Savings and Loan Association, re- questing waiver of minimum front yard setback on property presently zoned R-l, located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue, east of Rio Vista (Tenta- tive Tract No. 6820)~ granted by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution NOd PC69-121~ subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 2094: Submitted by Frank John Hertel, requesting waiver of maxi- mum permitted buildings within 150 feet of single-family zoned property, mini- mum side yard setbacks~ and minimum lot width, to establish 18 multiple-family fourplexes on property presently zoned R-A, located on the north side of Orange- wood Avenue, east of Haster Street, (Reclassification No. 68-69-77), approved in part, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-122, (waiver of maximum permitted buildings within 150 feet of single-family zoned property denied) subject to conditions. ' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1119: Submitted by Century Properties, to permit on-sale liquor in a proposed restaurant, located on the east side of Beach Boulevard, north cf Lincoln Avenue, presently zoned C-1. Granted, pursuant to Resolution No~ PC69-125, subject to develop~ ment substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim. VARIANCE NO. 2064: Submitted by Max H~ Resnick Construction Company, request- ing waivers of minimum floor area, building height, required landscaping in front yard setback, minimum set back from interior property line, minimum distance between buildings, minimum width of pedestrian passageway, minimum number of covered parking spaces, minimum width of parking spaces, and ade- quate screening of parking facilities from the adjacent street, to establish a 151-unit, two-story, multiple-family residential development on property presently zoned R-3, briefly described as located at the southeast corner of Glenoaks and Greenleaf Avenues~ Terminated by the City Planning Commission, at the request of the Petitioner. The above proceedings were reviewed, with no further action by the City Council. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. i115: Submitted by First American Trust Company, to establish a 152-space~ ~dult mobile home park, on property presently zoned R-A~ located at thc southwest corner 0~ Crescent Awnu~ and Cilb~rt ~treet. Mayor Clark requested review of action taken by the City Planning Commission~ and the City Clerk was directed to schedule the issue for public hearing~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1116: Submitted by G. Sidney Barton, to estab- lish a =8~space travel trailer park, on property presently zoned R-A, lo- cated on the west side c~ West Street, south of Ball Road, (Reclassification No. 66~67-61). 69~398 Ci.__~t~ Hall, Anaheim~ California -COUNCIl. MINUTES June 24[~_j:30 P.M. Mayor Clark requested review of action taken by the City Plann- ing Commission~ and the City Clerk was directed to schedule the issue for public hearing. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6984~ Developer - Income Property Specialists, Inc,; subject property located on the north side of Orangewood Avenue~ east of Haster Street, containing 18 proposed R-~3 zoned lots (Reclassification Nc. 68-69-77 and Variance No. 2094). The Cit.y Planning Commission recommended approval of said tentaD tive map, subject to the following conditions: 1~ That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval~ 2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No~ 6984 is granted subject to the approval cf Reclassification No. 68-69-77 and Var~. iance No. 2094. 3. That Street "A" shall be recorded as Nautical Street. 4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by under- ground facilities° 5. That public utility easements shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Utilities. On motion by C~3uncilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Krein, Tentative Map, Tract No.. 698a was approved, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission° MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE Tkg. CT NO. 6972; Developer ~ Westport Development Company; sub-. ject property 1Gc.ated at the northeast corner of the Riverside Freeway and Miraloma Way~ contain.lng 20 proposed R-3 zoned lets, (Reclassification On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Tentative Map~ Tract No. 6972 was approved, subject to the following recom- mendations of the City Planning Commission: 1.. That 3he,id this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision~ each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That the owners o~ subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and recreation fees of $75.00 per dwelling unit, as required by City Council Resolution, which shall be used for park and recreation purposes~ said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. 3. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wail shall be constructed on the south property line separating Lot Nos. 16A through 20A and Miraloma Avenue, except that pedestrial openings shall be provided ~n said walls where cul-de-sacs abut the planned highways right~ of-way line cf an arterial highway. Reasonable landscaping, including ir- rigation facilities~ shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall~ plans for said landscaping t~ be submi, tted to and subject to the approval of the Superin- tendent of Parkway Maintenance Following installation and acceptance~ the City cf k~aheim ~hal] assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping, 4. That Lcn Ncs~ 16A through 20A~ one foot in width, shall be located along the sounherly line of alley "C" for the construction o~ a masonry wall. 5. That Lcn Nos. lA through 4A, one foot in width, shall be !o- cared along the northerly line of alley "A" for the construction of a masonry wall. 6~ Ihat all lots within this tract shall be served by under~ ground utilities. 7. Ihat draiaage of subject property shall be discharged in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer~ 8. That ali. masonry walls adjacent to alleys shall be designed to resist damage from a~tomobileso 69-399 Ci__~t~Hall~ Anahei~ California- COgNCIL MINUTES - June 24~ 1969, 1:30 P,M. MOTION CARRIED~ TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5501~ REVISION NO. 3: Developer - Westport Development; subject property located at the northeast corner of the Riverside Freeway and Miraloma Way, containing 19 proposed R-3 zoned lots (Reclassification No. 63-64-5). ' On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Ten- tive Map No~ 5501, Revision No. 3, was approved subject to the following recom-. mendations of the City Planning Commission: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and recreati:pn fees of $75.00 per dwelling unit, as required by City Council Resolution~ which shall be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. 3. Tb~t in accordance with City Council policy, a 6~foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the southerly property line separating Lot Nos° lA through 8A and 9, Miraloma Avenue and the Riverside Freeway, except that pedestrian openings shall be provided in said walls where culude-sacs abut the planned highway rightsoof=way line of an arterial highway. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the un= cemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the appro- val of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance~ the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for main- tenance of said landscaping. MOTION CARRIEDo TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 4241: Developer .: Rinker Development Corporation; subject property located north of Orangethorpe Avenue and southeast of Orchard Drive, containing 104 proposed R-2~5~000 zoned lots (Reclassification No. 66-67-1, and 66-67--a6). On motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Pebley, Ten- tative Tract No, 4241 was apprc;ved, subject to the following recommendations of the City Planning Commission: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Ana- heim park and recreation fees as required by City Council Resolution of $125.00 per dwelling unit~ which shall be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. 3. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the east property line separating Lot No. 1 and Orchard Drive, except tImt said wall shall be stepped down to a height of thirty inches ~n the front yard setback, and except that pedestrian openings shall be provided in said walls where cui~de-sacs abut the planned highway rights-~.f-way line c.f ~ arterial highway. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be ipstalled in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said land- scaping tO be submitted t0 and subject to thm approval of the ~uperintendent of Parkway Mainte2ance, F,bllowing installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. ~]tilities.4, That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground 5 That adequate storm drain facilities shall be provided from the existing Atwood Flood Control Channel to Orchard Drive as required by the City Engineer. ' 6. That the vehlcuiar access rights except at street and/or alley openings to Orchard Drive shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 69-400 Ci_~t~Hall~ Anaheim_z_California _ COb~NCiL MINTrfES - June 2~__~_~196__9, 1:30 PoM. 7. That public utility easements shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Utilities. 8~ That a 6-foot high chain link fence or masonry wall shall be constructed to separate Lot Nos° 14 through 17 and 86 through 104 and the Orange County Flood Control Channel~ MOTION CARRIED° TEMPORARY OFFICE - MOBILE TRAILER - R & B DEVELOPMENT COMPANY: Request of R & B Development Company for permission to use a 60-foot mobile trailer as a temporary rental office for a period of 6 months, was granted subject to conformance with all pertinent requirements of the Anaheim Building Code, on motion by Councilman Febley, seconded by Councilman Schutte~ ~not voting~ Councilman Kre~n)~ MOl%ON CARRIED~ AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 102: Pursuant to City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC69~136, Public Hearing was scheduled July 8, 1969, 1:30 PoMo, on Area Development Plan No. 102, encompassing an area north of La Palma Ave- nue~ between Lakeview Avenue and Trinidad Lane, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED° ORANGE COUNTY USE PERMIT NO. 6244: To establish a mobile home park on property briefly described as located on the east side of Douglas Road~ south of the Southern Pacific Railroad. Mr~ Norman Smedegaard, Attorney representing the Applicant, ad- dressed the Ccuncil~ requesting reversal of their recommended denial, pre- ¥iously made to the Orange County Planning Commission. Mr~ Smedegaard reported that the owners of the property have granted a 65~year lease of the property to his client, and both the owners and proposed developers are agreeable to annex the property to the City of Anaheim. He further advised that the mobile home park would be an in~ terim use~ and the lease provides for conversion to a higher use at any time within the 65-year period. He stated that four such parks in Orange County have been converted to commercial or industrial development. He advised that he has been General Counsel for Western Mobile Home Associa- tion, representing approximately 25 parks, for 10-1/2 y~ars and knows, for a fact, that when a higher use is available, the conversion is accomplished. By general consent, it was determined that the previous action and stand taken by the City Council on this issue not be changed. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1120 PROPOSED METROPORT; It was r~ported that the City Planning Commission ha~ closed the public hearing on Conditional Use Permit No. 1120, and will r~nder a decision in all probability by July 14, 1969~ On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Public Hearing was ordered to scheduled on Conditional Use Permit No. 1120, Monday, July 28, 1969, 7:00 P.M., in the Santa Ana Room of the Convention Center. MOTION CARRIED. REVISED CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 - WORK ORDER NO. 6005~ On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Revised Change Order No. 4, to Work Order No. 6005 (Lenain Filtration Plant), adding $1,491.45 was authoriz~do MOTION CARRIED. ' CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 WORK ORDER NOo 700]: Change Order No~ 2, to Work Order No. 7001 (Anaheim Convention Center Scoreboard), adding $1,944.00, was authorized, on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Schutte left the meeting, (5:35 P.Mo). 69-401 City Hall~_Anaheim,_California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 249 1969~ 1:30 P.M. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Krein offered Resolution Nos. 69R-374 through and including 69R-377 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NOc 69R-374: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A DEED OF DEDICATION CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (Anaheim Union High School District) RESOLUTION NO. 69R~375: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES~ (Clarence and Alice Wagner) RESOLUTION NO. 69Ro~76: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES~ (Woodman Farming Company) RESOLUTION NO. 69R-377: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (William and Ruth Jeanette Veprin, Norman and Sondra Berris) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 69R-374 to 69R-377, both inclu- sive, duly pas. sed and adopted~ PURCHASE - UNDERGROUND RESIDENTIAL DISTRIBUTION CABLE: The City Manager reported on the following informal bids received for the purchase of 20,000 feet of 2-strand Aluminum Primary Cable, and 20,000 feet of 4-strand Secondary Cable, and recommended award be made to the low bidders; Essex Wire, for the 2-strand Primary Cable, in the amount of $5,040~00, including tax, and General Electric Supply Company~ for the 4-strand Secondary Cable, in the amount of $8,342.2.5 including tax: ' VENDOR ~ABLE, INCL, TAX 2-STRAND PRIMARY 4-STRAND SECONDARY CABLE, INC, TAX Graybar Electric, Anaheim ........ $5,859.00 General Electric Supply Co., Anaheim - - - 5,808.60 Rome Cable, Los Angeles ........... 5,418.00 Alcan Cable, Fullerton ............ 5,775.00 Garland-Affclter, Los Angeles ...... No Bid Essex Wire~ Anaheim .............. 5,040.00 $8,4OO.OO 8,342.25 9,870.00 11,151.00 11,025.00 10,500.00 Purchase was authorized as recommended by the City Manager, on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. ~OLUTIO______N NOo 69R-378: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 69R-378 for adop- tion, authorizing renewal of agreement with the Visitor and Convention Bureau. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF CERI~IN FUNDS FOR ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND DESIGNATING AND APPOINTING ANAHEIM VISITOR AND CONVENTION BUREAU AS AGENT FOR THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM TO HANDLE THE EXPENDITURE OF SAID FUNDS AND AUTH©RIZING A CONTRAC% %O BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY AND SAID AGENT~ Roll Csll Vote~ 69-402 ~![¥ Hall~ Anahei_~m California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 24~ 196--9, 1:30 P.?~____~ AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No, 69R-378 duly passed and adopted, R__EP__O~i Anaheim Area Visitor and Convention Bureau Budget for 1969-70 was ordered received and filed. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-379: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No, 69R-379 for adoption, authorizing renewal of agreement with the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROPRIATING CERTAIN FUNDS FOR ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM; AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT WITH THE ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR THE DOING OF SAID ADVERTISING; AND PROVIDING FOR COMPENSATION TO THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR SERVICES TO BE RENDERED TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-379 duly passed and adopted° CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton: a. Minutes - Anaheim Parks and Recreation Commission - Meeting of May 15, 1969. b, Minutes - TASC Executive Board Meeting - May 29, 1969. c. City of NewPort Beach - Resolution No. 7004 - Opposing dis- solution of Orange County Harbor District. d. City of Buena Park - Resolution No. 3753 - Approving the Orange County Civil Defense and Disaster Relief Plan - Emergency Fire Services. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO, 2699; Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2699 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-73 R-3) ORDINANCE NO. 2697: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2697 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-62 - Parcel 1 C-O) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebtey and Clark NOES: COL~CILMEN: None ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEN: Krein ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2697 duly passed and adopted~ 69-403 C__i~ Hall~ Anaheim_z' California - COUNCI~ MINUTES ~- June 24~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 2698: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2698 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-78 - C-i) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2698 duly passed and adopted. ~IN__COL___~NPARK SAFETY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The City Engineer submitted report on review and analysis made of recommendations from the Lincoln Park Safety Committee. It was the opinion of the City Council that the recommendations of the City Engineer were generally' those requested by the Lincoln Park Safety Committee. Thereupon, by motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Krein, said report was ordered received and filed. MOTION CARRIED. iONDITI______~ONAL USE PERMIT NO, 1098: The area designated as "not a part" of Condition- al Use Permit Nc. 1098, currently in County territory, was ordered reviewed to determine whether 2 collector streets would be necessary for better cir- culation of traffic. The City Engineer submitted a map and report, recommending that an east-west collector street be provided for better distribution of traffic, reduction of congestion at the major intersection, and making entry into and out of the area south of Frontera Street relatively easier. Mr. Murdoch advised that if it was felt the installation of east- west collector street should be deferred, consideration should be given to the widening of Frontera Street by two lanes. It was noted that the widen- ing of Frontera Street would require additional dedication by the Armour Devel- opment Company subdivision to the east. This matter was ordered continued for one week (July 1, 1969) to allow Council inspection of the area. ~QPOSED PURCHASE OF PROPERTY_~T_RAVI__~_~ Mr, Murdoch reported on the proposed pur- chase of property to es~abl'~sh a 27-hole public golf course on the north side of the Santa Ann River, advising that the Local Agency Formation Commission ruled that Anaheim should not annex anything north of the Santa Ann River. It was determined that the property owne~be advised of the Local Agency Formation Commission's rulings, and unless they, as owners, wanted to pursue the issue, successfully reversing the decision of the Local Agency Formation Commission, the City would be no longer interested in acquiring the property. ~GATIO~ - VILLALOBIS VS. CITY OF ANAHEIM: On motion by Councilman Krein, sec- onded by Councilman Pebley, settlement and payment of $250.00 was authorized, in exchange for dismissal of appeal and entering Judgment in Superior Court in favor of the City of Anaheim, in the matter of ~illalobis vs. City of Anaheim, as recommended by the City Attorney. MOTION CARRIED. ~E~S~--L-~XECUTIVE SESSION: At the request of the City Manager, on motion by Coun- cilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Krein, the City Council recessed to Executive Session, for the purpose of discussing candidates for the position of Chief of Police. MOTION CARRIED. 69-4O4 _City.. Hall, Anaheim, Ca.liforgia- .COUNCIL MINUTES- June 24~ 1969, 1:30 P.M. ADJOURNMENT: Upon return of~ the City Council from Executive SessiOn, and on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Krein, said meeting was adjourned to 3une 25, 1969, 10:00 A.M. MOTION'CARRIED. (5:55 P.M.). City Clerk City Hal!, Anaheim,.Californiia COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25~ 1.969, 10:00 A.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in adjourned regu- lar session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams Mayor Clark called the meeting to order. TOWN TOURS - REQUEST TO EXTEND SERVICES: Request of Town Tours to extend ser- ~ t~ ~e ~rea of B~ac~ Boulevard and Lincoln Avenue was submitted, and action deferred to 3uly 1, 1969, to allow for telephone notification to other interested transportation services of said'request. EXECUTIVE SESSION: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, said meeting was recessed to Executive Session, to consider ap- pointment of Chief of Police, to fill the vacancy August 1, 1969, created by the retirement of Chief Mark A. Stephenson. MOTION CARRIED. (!0:20 AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION: The City Council returned to the Council Chambers, all members being present. (11:18 A.M.). Mayor Clark called the meeting to order. APPOINTMENT - CHIEF OF POLICE:. In accordance with City Charter, it was dem termined that.appointment of Chief of Police will be announced by the City Manager. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 1i: 20. A~M. ,City, Clerk