1972/03/2172 -145
Citx Hall. gpnhpim. Californt CQVNCIL mug 2L 19J2. 1:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler
CITY CLERIC: Dene M. Daoust
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Frank Lowry
STADIUM AND CONVENTION CENTER DIRECTOR: Thomas F. Liegler
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts
Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order.
INVOCATION: Reverend Lowell Linden, of the First Presbyterian Church, gave
the Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Calvin L. Pebley led the Assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
PROCLAMATIONS The following Proclamations were issued by Mayor Dutton and
unanimously approved by the City Council:
"Walkathon Day" April 29, 1972
"Clergymen Appreciation Day" March 23, 1972.
ROTARY CLUB PRESENTATION FO1R WAY TEST: Janes Webb, President, Rotary
Club of Anaheim, presented a framed copy_of the "Four -Way Test."
Mayor Dutton accepted the framed document on behalf of the City
Council.
MUTES Minutes of the Anaheim City Council regular meeting held March 7, 1972,
were approved on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Roth.
Councilman Dutton abstained. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER Or READING ORDINANC$S AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to
the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after read-
ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading
of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion.
MOTION-UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST TIiE CITY: Demands against the City, in the
amount of $1,109,662.03, in accordance with the 1971 -72 Budget, were approved.
CamnItUEp PUBLIC MARINO ABANDONMENT MO. 71 -3A: Submitted by Fred J. Nove, to
abandon a portion of the previously dedicated roadway, commonly known as
Miraloma Avenue and the excess right -of -way acquired by the State of Cali
fornia for the Miraloma overcrossing, which has been relinquished to the
City of Anaheim.
Public hearing was continued from the meetings of December 7 and
14, 1971, for further investigation and to allow time for appraisal of the
property, and also continued from the meetings of January 4 and 18, and Feb
ruary 22, 1972, to review the appraisal report and determine if the Applicant
is interested in purchasing this City Fee -owned property.
Assistant City Manager Robert M. Davis advised the Director of Pub-
lic Works has recommended the matter be taken off the Agenda, inasmuch as
the Applicant has not yet indicated ih interest in purchasing the fee -owned
property.
Later in the meeting, at the suggestion of the Assistant City Mana-
ger, it was determined this it should be concluded, inasmuch as abandon-
ment of the road easement Mould revert to the City, fee owner of the property,
in any sweat, and the property then would be in *position to be disposed of
at ear future date, if desired.
72 -147
City Hall. Pah.*. California COHICIL HIMUTES March 2. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Roberts also noted that a series of vehicular accessways is
proposed, providing a perimeter drive around the entire project, tying into
the existing alley of the development to the north.
He concluded by stating that the density proposed is 15.4 units
per net residential acre, with 537. coverage, and it was on the basis of this
high density, the lack of open space, and the fact that the requested zoning
did not conform to the General Plan that the City Planning Commission recom-
mended denial.
Councilman Pebley noted that Orange County Fair Housing has stated
Anaheim does not have a sufficient amount of homes available in the $22,000.00
to $24,000.00 bracket; also, it was his opinion a medium-priced project such
as this is needed for young married people.
In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Roberts advised the 20 -foot
landscaped buffer between a multiple-family development and single family
homes was first evolved by the. Commission as an effect buffer at the time
a rental project was proposed for a 10 -acre parcel on the southeast corner
of Orange Avenue and Beach Boulevard, to which residents to the east were
opposed; since that time, attempts have been made to persuade developers
to provide the same type of buffer in similar instances, and it is now a
standard requirement of the City Planning Commission, although thus far
it has not been incorporated in the Municipal Code.
Mr. Roberts also advised that at the. City Planning Commission meet-
ing the previous day a similar project was considered with a proposed density
of 10.4 units per'net residential acre and, because of the low density and
substantial open space provided, the.Planning Commission did not feel the 20-
foot landscaped buffer was necessary.
Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and
wished to address the Council.
Harry Rnisely, 1741 South Euclid Street, Agent, advised that the
Applicant also owns the multiple family development to the north of subject
property. He added that, outside of the problems that were solved by the
purchase of the parcel of property on the southwest corner, the proposed de-
velopment meets Code requirements except for some technical variances, and
the major problem appears to be the landscaped buffer, which is not a require-
ment of the Code. He added that living area of the units will be located
between 60 and 72 -feet from the adjacent R-1 tract.
Referring to the condominium concept, Mr. Knisely advised that all
of the open area in the tract would be owned jointly by all of the property
owners.
He displayed a photograph of an almost- identical project on Orange-
wood Avenue and Brookhurst Street, with 3- bedroom, 2 -bath, double- garage
units, showing the recreation building and pool, priced from $25,000.00
to $30,000.00. He added that parking space for guests also is provided
in the form of one extra space for every three units.
Upon determining that no one else wished to address the Council in
favor.of the application, Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to speak in op-
position.
Mrs. William A. Grant, 1671 Ord Way, whose home is immediately south
of the proposed development, stated she recognised that subject property ul-
timately Mould be developed for multiple housing, but objected to any high
rise or high density project. She added that she was pleased with the exist-
ing development north of subject property, but not with the one across the.
street in the'City of. Garden Grove.
Mrs. Grant contended the single- family homes in the area are val-
ued at $40,000.00 to $50,000.00 and are owned by professional people, and
they did not want a development that would decrease the value of their pro-
perty.
1
72-149
City 4011. Anaheim. Calif, »ia COUNCIL mums larch 21. 1272. 1:30 P.M.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (70 -71 -56 R -3)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:, Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-99 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R-100: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R-100
for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1244, in part, granting
the use and Waivers "a" and "b," subject to the following conditions reconr
mended by the Interdepartmental Committee, Waiver "c" having been withdrawn
by the Petitioner:
1. That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the
completion of Reclassification No. 70 -71 -56 and Tentative Map of Tract No.
7439, now .pending.
2. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted
to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of
the Orange County Recorder.
3. Prior to filing of the final tract map, the Applicant shall
submit to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of
the proposed functioning of the operating corporation, including but not
limited to the articles of incorporation, by- laws, proposed methods of man-
agement, bonding to insure maintenance of common property and buildings,
and such other information as the City Attorney may desire to protect the
City, its citizens, and the purchasers of the project.
4. That the covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be sub-
mitted to and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to City Council
approval of the finat tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants,
conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final
tract map.
5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac-
cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim mar
ked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17,
and 18.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDI-
TIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1244, IN PART.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 721 100 duly passed and adopted.
TiNT4IV$ NAP. TRACT NO, 7439 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70 71 56 AND CONDITIONAL
U t PNRNIT NO. 1244) Developer William J. Krueger. Property located
on the east side of Euclid Street, sduth of Orangewood Avenue, and contains
49 proposed I-3 zoned lots.
The City Planning Camissidn, at their meeting held February 7,
1972, denied said tentative tract.
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Ten-
tative Map, Tract No. 7439 was approved, subject to the following condi-
tions recommended by the interdepartmental Committee:
I, 1,: M iIVY
fi
with Orange C b :and State Di�Jon of to 4co explore the ef-
F J� r m A R� 1 G 41, 6 r 4 Lao L A 4 d 8
sect o f 5 wa 1 ee a c c ess to Sa A oa i ad in trhe e ci-
:i Jd ti r K, a a S e lf .Sl it 3 FBI i
sioa"i f C e rt ax1 1 depi a ,p t and pxc� eed
Pet ones would a ba 2 o€ t d fit po nt e 1
)f'. !T 1� �3 r Y i r r :A i 1 4 i
r
eria ,i (Access Point N6-,-0;1#4.''°15°7,"°#:- ne;at So D
)as. f r�; r �jvy,
Fo nt "No.
e
,.state t hat ds,�ye1op n t of ,uljgct prop ty apparently would
a hedz two ,ps hase, the th ry j b a e a utldi }g complex
iN a S� e� a A:Tf ,A] er's
A J ex 7_).� d e 1 t:s c dr
1 t tx a r r, a ,Tt n LQ
su p y .,11,07 a atj ke ug tore and o r assorted p shop s and
e 4 fl arould_ t g d d }a l o a'
7 3 „TAT., 3 1 4 J S V "oJ S S 1
..5/1 4FIn R 1 f,rlouther poz t o, t a b ecau a th pro$gs s
!sclOrPq .e ocaC ed., a the in tersec t ou of en .aster 4l highway ,and a.
e a v 4 io ece- sxa� f a
t et r i e a p o� m.was n s
Mr. Roberts further noted that the Gemara *man inch ca need
for a community shopping center at Imperial Highway and the Santa Ana Can-
yo Road, and commercial zoning re ently a rova¢,. i:or the Yorba property
on the southwest corner of Imperial litghway. a n `the Santa Ana Canyon Road,
and a shopping center, proposed
f ganta �o an� �tlius g a�.so a F►ad 8 r
e t i.� s r two
see standing' signs on time y eques-
ted a variance, from. the Scenic Corridor Zone standards.
Referring further to the requested waivers, Mt. Roberts noted
the Scenic Corridor Zone requires a 100 -foot setback and the Applicant pro-
poses a 50 -foot setback at some points and in excess of 100 feet at another
point; however, because of the uncertainty of the future use of the State
owned property to the north, the setback requirement may not be too impor-
tant. A 6 -foot interior landscaped buffer is required and the Applicant
proposes some 4 •foot buffers in the parking area, some as long as 40 feet.
He added that, since the entire proposed shopping center would be visible
from the Riverside Freeway when passing over Imperial Highway, the rear
area probably warrants special consideration and attention, and the App-
licant presented revised plans at the last City Planning Commission hearing
indicating some changes in elevation.
Mr. Roberts reported an item of concern to the Staff was the
proposed phasing of the shopping center; the deletion from the proposal
of the State -owned property to the west could create accessibility prob-
lems because there are no access rights either to Santa Ana Canyon Road
or imperial Highway from it, and future requests may be made for addi-
tional access points.
In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Roberts advised that at the
time of the Santa Ana Canyon Road Access Point Study, cots id eration was
given to the fact that traffic on that road would be decreased by comple-
tion of the Riverside Freeway; however, the Traffic Engineer has predicted
that as the Canyon area becomes developed that traffic again will increase
to its present volume.
Councilman Stephenson expressed the opinion that, inasmuch as the
shopping center is proposed for the Yorba property, subject proposal may
be an excessive amount of shopping facilities.
PUBLIC ZING ARIA DEVELOPMENT PLAIT NO. 109 To consider vehicular cir-
culation and access for properties on the north side of Santa Ana Canyon
Road between Imperial Highway on the west, and the northerly prolongation
of Solomon Drive on the east.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72-32,
recommended approval of Area Development Plan No. 109, in accordance with
Exhibit "A."
72 -153
In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Rinker advised he had no ob-
jection to placing the proposed dedicated public street at the east property
line, and understood the owner of the property to the east also concurred.
Mr. Rinker objected to the recommended condition of a reciprocal
parking agreement, contending this could mean he would have to furnish park-
ing for a development that would not be his and is not practical nor enforce-
able. He also expressed objection to the recommended requirement of land-
scaping the centerline of Santa Ana Canyon Road unless the same condition
is required of other developers in the area, and he felt that, in
light of the large amount of landscaping proposed for the interior of the
shopping center, this was adding an unnecessary burden to the already- strin-
gent requirement.
He concluded by stating .hit proposed shopping center specifica-
tions were as high in quality as any other in Orange County.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in oppo-
sition.
William Wenke, 1055 North Main Street, Santa Ana, Attorney for
Mrs. Magg, owner of the adjacent property to the east, advised they have
no objection to the street as proposed by Area Development Plan No. 109,
Exhibit "A nor the access proposed to the west; however, they did ob-
ject to the street proposed by Mr. Rinker's Exhibit "C", which would al-
low them a restricted tie-in to it.
He further advised that they had no objection to the street not be-
ing continued across the north boundary of the property, which also is adja-
cent to Mrs. Magg's property.
Mr. Wenke stated that although his client has no definite plans at
this tine, she does not feel her property is ready for development..
That in a check with the State Division of Highways they would not
'commit themselves as yet to the plans for their property to the north.
City Engineer Janes Maddox stated that he understood the Division
of Highways land to the north'aay used for a high-speed interchange if
the Freeway goes that way, in which case the land may be available for park-
ing and other purposes because it aay'be more economical to support the high-
speed ramp on columns.
Referring to the proposed private driveway access requested by Mr.
Rinker, Mr. Maddox noted that there is a small island separating the through
traffic from the right -turn traffic on the east side of the intersection of
Santa Ana Canyon Road and Imperial Highway, and projections are to have three
lanes of traffic in either direction along Santa Ana Canyon Road; the exist-
ing left -turn pocket at that point begins at the east boundary of the State.
owned property, thus, it was his opinion allowing the second access point as
proposed would present a dangerous traffic situation.
In reply to Council questioning, Maddox stated it was his
opinion traffic would have no greater distance to travel to the State
owned property if it became a shopping center by using proposed Access
Point No. 6-A and traveling across the parking lot area, rather than
trawling. dawn Santa Ana Canyon Road to the second proposed access point.
Mr. linker stated tenants find business is such that if they
lose 5% or 7x this represents a major portion of their profit and, since
shoppers ordinarily would not go to the westernmost parcel if they had
to enter via the dedicated public street he would be unable to get a
major department store tenant for the property.
72 -155
aces*" point, and from Development Services Department regarding revised
conditions of approval, particularly as related to the extent of the road
at Access Point No. 6-A. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CAR
RIED.
Mr. RJ.nker advised that he would be out of town on April 4, and
requested that the decision be continued to April 11.
Councilman Stephenson amended his motion to continue the decision
to April 11, 1972, 1:30 P.M., as requested by the Applicant. Councilman Roth
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Thom moved for a five- minute Recess. Councilman Roth seconded
the motion MOTION CARRIED. (4:00 P.M.)
AFTER g$CZSS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order, all Councilmen being pre-
sent. (4:07 P.M.).
PUBLIC HEARING UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. 1970 EDITION. VOLOHE III: To .consider
adoption by reference of a Uniform Building Code, entitled "Uniform Building
Code, 1970 Edition, Volume III, Housing and the Appendix," to be known and
designated as the Anaheim Building Code, Volume III, Housing.
Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council; there
being no response, declared the hearing closed.
ORDINANCE N0. 3016: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 3016 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
OR WILDING OFFICIALS UIIFCRM BUILDING CODE, VOLUME III, HOUSING, AND THE
APPENDIX, 1970 EDITION, WITH AMENDMENTS THERETO, AND AMENDING TITLE 15,
COMER 13.36 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
WOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL/Oh None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3016 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLlEL 7RN' O1; On recesatends'Ct of the Assistant City Manager, Council-
man Roth offered Resolution No. 72R 101 for adoption, establishing the Anaheim
Fee Schedule of the Uniform Building Code, Volume III, Housing, 1970 Edition.
Wert(' Resolution loot.
A RESOLUTION Of TOR CITY ARIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM SETTING THE FEE
SCHEDULE Ot UNIT BUILDING CODE, VOLUME III, HOUSING, 1970 EDITION.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: C'll: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
SRS: 0 I Ilene
MOM mss Mose
The Mayer declared Resolution No. 72*-101 duly passed and adopted.
i*Itfon fil by nn
Preddie VHernandez, on behalf of Mid
night April 29, 1972, at Carpenter's
h �seeoifott *bile dance
lall, lbein 00 P.N. to 1:00 A.M. was submitted
aid w 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal
Col* J j m t U l f et .ding one ritren be hired to police
the arlaf of fslice, on motion by Councilman
lie« 1101=11 CARRIED.
72 -157
City Hall. Anaheim. Sal1for, a COUNOjj. 1+ NITIS March 24 19/2. 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Allee asked if a bond issue of under $1 would be
sufficient, since he felt such an issue would be approved by the voters,
and suggested the students work with the City in getting residents to
vote on a Library Bond Issue.
Councilman Pebley stated he would like a report from the City
Manager's office on the cost to build the two libraries mentioned, where
the land has been purchased, and the cost of placing a Library Bond Issue
on the November General Election ballot. He added he would prefer a bond
issue to raising Anaheim's taxes for these libraries.
Councilman Dutton stated he would like the cost figure to also
include expanding library facilities into the Canyon area in eastern Ana-
heim.
Councilman Roth concurred, but stated he preferred only the one
bond issue be placed on a ballot.
The City Clerk advised that a special election would cost between
$28,000.00 and $30,000.00, whereas the cost to place the issue on the Novem-
ber General Election ballot probably would be between $8,000.00 and $10,000.
Councilman Thom further requested a report on the current cost of
constructing the two libraries mentioned and one in eastern Anaheim, and the
possibility of including these libraries in next year's budget.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, the
City Manager's office was requested to report April 4, 1972, on the cost to
build the proposed library at Euclid Street and Palm Lane, and at Sunkist
Street and Wagner Avenue, and also one in the Canyon Area in eastern Ana-
heim, the cost of placing a Library Bond Issue on the November General Elec-
tion Ballot, and the possibility of including such libraries in next year's
budget. MOTION CARRIED.
THfTATIVE MAP. TRACT NO. 7370 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-13) EXTENSION OF
TINE: Request of C.J. Queyrel, Anacal Engineering Company, dated February 25,
1972, was submitted for a one -year extensioh of time to Tentative Map,
Tract No. 7370, together with reports of the City Engineer and Development
Services Department recommending a one -year extension of time be granted,
as requested, to expire April 27, 1973.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Roth, a one-
year extension of time for Tentative Map, Tract No. 7370 was granted, as re-
quested,to expire April 27, 1973. MOTION CARRIED.
TUB TOWN TOUR COMPANY ROUTE AND FARE CHANGES: Owner's Notification, dated
March 3, 1972,of change in Route 4 (Disneyland Area and Border of Anaheim
at North Beach Boulevard), and Change in Route 1 "Fun Bus Nite Life Excur-
sion") and amending the fares for Route 1, effective March 23, 1972, was
submitted and approved on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Coun-
cilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED.
FXNAL }SAP. TRACT NO. 7684 (RECLASSIFICATION NO .71-72 -17): Developer Butler
Housing Corporation; property located at the southeast corner of Kraemer
Boulevard and Orangethorpe Avenue, containing 17 R -3 proposed zoned lots.
The City Engineer recommended approval and reported that said
Final Map conforms substantially with the Tentative Map previously approved,
that bond has been approved by the City Attorney and required fees paid.
On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved
that Final Map, Tract No. 7684 be approved. Councilman Pebley seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
72 -159
City Hall. Anaheim, Caltjprn4 9ounga KEIWT/t- Match 21. 1972. -1:30 P.M.
COMDITXONAL JSE PERMIT NO. 107 WISED 4ANS: Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts
advised that the City Planning Commission, at its meeting the previous day,
had approved revised plans submitted by Zion Lutheran Church (Conditional
Use Permit No. 107) to permit construction of a snack bar behind the back-
stop of one of the two Little League Baseball Diamonds on their property.
Following Council discussion, Councilman Pebley moved that the
revised plans be approved, as recommended by the City Planning Commission.
Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RE$OLU7'ION NO 72R -103 AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 1241: In accordance with recom-
mendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No.
72R-103 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM-
PROVEEENT: THE PACIFICO AVENUE -LEWIS STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY
OF ANAHWIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1241. (The Beecher Construction Company
$6,074.50)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -103 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLI9 Immovram PRQJECTS Councilman Thom offered Resolution Nos. 72R -104 and
72R-105 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
E O ITIQN N0. 7p-104 WOB7 ORDER N0. 643-A: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVEN-
IENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCT/OM AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE WALNUT CANYON CHANNEL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER N0. 643 -A. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS,
PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZ-
ING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUB-
LISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids
to be Opened April 13, 1972, 2:00 P.M.)
JESOLUTION NO. 72R-105 WORK ORDER NO. 622 -B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMMNING THAT PUBLIC CONVEN-
IENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE SUNKIST STREET, CERRITOS AVENUE, HOWELL AVENUE
STREET AND STORM DRAIN IIPROVEMNT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO.
622 -B. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, L AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHOR-
IZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PRO
POSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened April 13, 1972,
2 :00 P.M.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUMCILM6N: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 72R- 104 and 72R -105 duly passed
and adopted.
1
City Sall. Ang Rim. Califo pia CQuCIZ. J S March 21. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
b. City of Tustin Resolution No. 72 -13 Urging the League
of California Cities and the County Supervisors' Association of Califor-
nia to support an increase in the amount of funds now being set aside for
undergrounding of existing utility lines.
c. City of Brea Concurring with the City of Costa Mesa in urg-
ing the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company to reconsider its proposed
method of charge for business telephone service, and further urging the
City Council of Anaheim to take similar action.
d. City of Buena Park Resolution No. 4550 Requesting prompt
acquisition of the Los Coyotes Park Site as proposed by the Master Plah of
Regional Parks for Orange County.
e. City of Costa Mesa Resolution No. 72 -23 Urging the Legis-
lature of the State of California to govern themselves in conformity with
anti- secrecy principles, in the conduct of all of their business as has been
required of Local Agencies and State Agencies, and stating the reasons there-
for.
f. Orange County Mosquito Abatement District Minutes March
3, 1972.
1972:
g.
Financial and Operating Reports for the month of February,
MOTION CARRIED.
Roll Call Vote:
Fire Department
Treasurer's Office
72 -161
cqpripmgmas FINANCIAL AND OPBwING REPORT FOR THE SDI SDNIp OF BRUARY 197 Z
ICR DEPA*TMBNT: Noting the rising rate of crime in the February, 1972, Police
Department Financial and Operating Report, Councilman Dutton requested Po-
lice Chief Michel to submit a report to the City Council advising them of
what they can do to help decrease the crime rate.
9DfSASPE NO. 3018: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3018 for adop-
tion.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66 -67- 61(52) C -R)
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3018 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3019: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 3019 for first read-
ing.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32,
SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING.
(No Parking At Any Time (79) Portions of Magnolia Avenue, (80) Portions
of Rampart Street)
ORDINANCE NO. 3020: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3020 for first read-
ing.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-13(5) R-1)
zfausuaz_magazALIZELI Request of Nelson J. Fry, Director of Mares
keting, Anaheim'Hills, Inc., dated February 21, 1972, to install four signs
on Anaheim Hills Road was considered at the March 14,, 1972, City Council
meeting and deferred to this date for further investigation and reports.
Report of the Development Services Department was submitted re-
commending that requested Sign Nos. I, 2, and 3 be approved, provided Sign
Nos. 1 and 2, upon completion,.shtll be offered to the City of Anaheim, and
that a variance be processed to determine whether Sign No. 4 would be ap-
propriate.
72 -163
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES MscJ 2],. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PLACING CERTAIN
DEED RESTRICTIONS UPON CERTAIN PARK PROPERTY. (Little People's Park)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-111 duly passed and adopted.
OF COMMERCE REQUEST UTILITY BILI, INSERTS: The Assistant City Manager
reported a request from the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce to insert in City
utility bills a complimentary ticket to "Anaheim Expo '72" to be held at
the Convention Center, April 6 and 7, 1972, displaying the products manu-
factured in Anaheim.
Council discussion revealed that, although the Exposition is a de-
sirable undertaking, the Council thus far has maintained a policy against
allowing any inserts in the utility billings, and particularly so in cases
such as this where a bank is given publicity as the supplier of the printed
ticket.
Councilman Pebley advised he would be more inclined to approve the
request if the back of the tickets had a notation urging people to do their
purchasing in Anaheim to keep 1% of the Sales Tax in the City.
Councilman Roth stated he would have had no objection if the bank
advertising had not appeared on the ticket.
Councilman Stephenson offered a motion denying the request, on the
basis this would set a precedent. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
MARCH OF DIMES WALKATHON: Request of the Orange County Chapter of the March of
Dimes, dated January 26, 1972, was submitted for permission to hold its Se-
cond Annual Waikathon, April 29, 1972, commencing at $00 A.M. from the Ana
heim Stadium, via Douglass Street, with marchers circling 20 miles through
Anaheim, Villa Park and Orange, and returning to the Stadium. Also submit-
ted was report of the Police Chief, stating no objection.
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the
Waikathon was approved as requested. MOTION CARRIED.
PRRML$JION TO LEAVE THE STATL J(&YOR =Mb On motion by Councilman Roth, se-
conded by Councilman Thom, Mayor Dutton was granted permission to leave the
State for 90 days. MOTION CARRIED.
REpCRT ON RECENT TRIP: Mayor Dutton reported briefly on his recent trip to the
Congressional -City Conference in Washington, D,C., and the Visitors and Con
vention Bureau promotional tour in Washington, D.C. and Ntw York, which fol-
lowed.
OURN? IT: Councilman Roth-moved to adjourn. Councilman Pebley seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 5:35 P.M.
signed )ff.
City Clerk
11
72 -164
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES March 28. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust
LIBRARY DIRECTOR: William Griffith
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts
Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman William J. Thom led the Assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
RESOLUTION- GOOD FRIDAY BREAKFAST: A Resolution urging all citizens to join
the Y.M.C.A. organization in observance of Good Friday, particularly
at their Fifth Annual Good Friday Breakfast, March 31, 1972, was
unanimously adopted by the' City Council, and presented to Herbert
Leo, Chairman of the Good Friday Breakfast Committee.
MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council regular meeting held March 14, 1972,
were approved on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley.
MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to
the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading
of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such
ordinance or resolution. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST TEE CITY: Demands against the City, in the
amount of $1,229,778.41, in accordance with the 1971 -72 Budget, were approved.
AWARD $8.000.000.00 ELECTRIC REVENUE BONDS JOHN NUVEEN COMPANY: The City
Manager reported on the nine bids received for the sale of $8,000,000.00
City of Anaheim, 1972 Revenue Series Bonds, as follows, and recommended the
low bid of John Nuveen Company, at an average 4.92637 Interest Rate be ac-
cepted:
John Nuveen Company Bid par and accrued interest to the date of delivery,
plus premium of $2,075.00. Bonds to mature July 1, in the years shown in the
following schedule, together with the amount of interest and interest rates
which the bonds are to bear, as follows:
YEAR AMOUNT INTEREST RATE
YEAR AMOUNT INTEREST RATE
1973 $200,000 7.007. 1983 $400,000 4.607.
1974 225,000 7.007. 1984 400,000 4.707,
1975 250,000 7.007. 1985 425,000 4.80%
1976 250,000 7.007. 1986 475,000 4.907.
1977 275,000 7.007. 1987 500,000 5.007.
1978 275,000 7.007. 1988 525,000 5.107.
1979 300,000 7.00% 1989 530,000 5.107,
1980 325,000 7.007. 1990 600,000 5.207.
1981 350,000 7.00% 1991 625,000 5.207.
1982 375,000 6.207. 1992 675,000 2.007,
72-162
Citv Hall, Anaheim. California CQpCIL =gm March 21.' 197 1:30 P.M.
Jim Barisic, 3453 Gabriella Street, Long Beach, Agent for the Ap-
plicant, advised that they were satisfied with the recommendations of the
Development Services Department.
Councilman Stephenson suggested that a maintenance agreement on
these signs also be included.
Assistant City Attorney Frank Lowry stated a $100.00 Bond could
be required to assure that if the signs became deteriorated they could be
removed.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts advised that the City Attorney
previously had indicated it would be appropriate for the City to accept the
signs when completed and then enter into an agreement with Anaheim Hills,
Inc. that they would provide maintenance for three to five years.
went.
Mr. Barisic stated he was agreeable to such a maintenance agree-
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Stephenson,
Signs Nos. 1, 2 and 3 were authorized according to the recommendations of
the Development Services Department, and further subject to execution of a
fiUe -year maintenance agreement on Signs Nos. 1 and 2, satisfactory to the
City Attorney; Sign No. 4 requiring a variance application. MOTION CARRIED.
Rj OI< l,Ol At'itE SONOUNITY Cj AD ZT�i cum now CENTER
ESP I CT FEES: On recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, Coun-
cilmen Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R =109 for adoption.
Refer' to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE COMMUNITY
CENTER AUTHORITY FOR AN ADVANCE TO PAY ARCHITECTURAL FEES FOR THE ANAHEIM
CONVENTION CENTER ADDITION AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXE-
CUTE SAID AGREEMENT. {$315,000.00)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -109 duly passed and adopted.
RESOWTIOI N0. 72R -110 AMENDING FORM OF AGREEMENT FOR PRIVATE_ F18C7RICAL CON-
TBACTORS. fTA IUMlCOMVENTION CENTER: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No.
72&.110 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVI* A FORM OF
AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF ANAHEIM STADXUM AND CONVENTION
CENTER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72*- 110 duly passed and adopted.
Councilmen Roth offered Resolution No. 72,411 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
72-160
Citv Hall. Anaheim. Gj grnia COUNCIL M(grch J1 •1,97,, 1 0Q 7.M.
FIJAL ACCE E PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS;, Upon receipt of certification
from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution Nos.
72R -106 and 72R -107 for. adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
REqpi NO 728 -106 W0 OED mow NO. 634-A: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL or THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PER
FORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE RAMPART STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM ORANGEWOOD
AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 1,140 FEET SOUTH OF ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, IN THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 634 -A. (R.J. Noble Company)
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -107 WORK ORDER NO. 637-B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PER
FORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE HARBOR BOULEVARD STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM APPROXI-
MATELY 725 FEET SOUTH OF VERMONT AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 413 FEET NORTH OF
BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 637 -B. (Silveri Ruiz
Construction Company)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILIE:N: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 72R -106 and 7211..107 duly.passed
and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -108 DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Thom offered Resolution
No. 72R -108 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANANEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN
DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Grace Missionary Baptist Church;
Sonja M. Gelo, et al; Magnolia School District; Pechter, et al; Richard,D.
Lewis; James M. Miller; Vladas Paziura; Fred T. Kahlen; Duncan S. Vanderbilt;
Nickolas J. Wingert; Clara V. Maass; Daniel P. McCartney; William Marr;
Harold M. Schmitz)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -108 duly passed and adopted.
CLAIM AGAJST THE'CITY: Claim submitted .by William P. Hannan, for purported per
sonal loss sustained on or about January 15, 1972, resulting from impound of
his car, as result of a parking violation, was denied, as recommended by the
City Attorney, and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by
Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Roth. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRF$OCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on
motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilmen Roth:
a. City of Tustin Resolution No. 72-12 Urging the League of
California Cities and the County Supervisors' Association of California to
modify the rules established by Public Utilities Commission Case No. 8209
for undergrounding existing utility limes.
72-158
City Dill. Mabel& California coma MINUTES March 21. 1972. 1:)0 P.M.
FINAL MAP. TRACT NO. 7103 (RECLA NO 69.70 -10 AND VARIANCE NO 2121)
Developer Kaiser Aetna of Irvine; tract located on the east side of Kellogg
Drive at Woodwind Lane, containing 43 R-2-5,000 proposed zoned lots.
The City Engineer recommended approval, and reported that said Final
Map conforms substantially with the Tentative Map previously approved, that
bond has been approved by the City Attorney, and required fees paid.
On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Roth moved that
Final Map, Tract No. 7103 be approved. Councilman Stephenson seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
VARIANCE N. 2302 CLgRIFIcATION (RECLASSIMATION NQ. 68- 69-98, VALIANCE NO.
2097, TENT&TIVE TRACT NOS. 7003 AND 7118): Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted
that approval of Tentative Tracts Nos. 7003 and 7118 on subject property al-
lowed 60 -foot lots widths; however, Condition No. 2 of Variance No. 2302, ap-
proved at a later date, states all lots shall have a minimum of 7,200- square
feet, and be 70 feet in width.
He submitted a report from the Development Services Department, re-
questing clarification on the required lot widths. He added that the Devel-
oper still proposes 7,200 square foot lots, but now wishes to develop 60 -foot
lot widths, as originally approved.
Councilman Dutton stated he had understood that lots would still
contain 7,200 square feet and 60 -foot widths were approved because of the
existing terrain, and he did not feel that the original permit to allow 60-
foot lot widths should now be changed to require 70 -foot widths.
Mr. Roberts advised that the Planning Commission, at its meeting
the previous day, had reaffirmed the wording of Condition No. 2 of Variance
No. 2302.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R-102: Following Council discussion, Councilman Dutton of-
fered Resolution No. 72R -102 for adoption, amending Condition No. 2 of Reso-
lution No. 71R -546, deleting the reference to the 70 -foot lot width.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION
N0. 71R -546, GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2302.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -102 duly passed and adopted.
REQUEST nig UZILJTIES SERVICE MOTEL. 9621 ERi0ORMIRST STREET: Zoning Supervisor
Charles Roberts submitted a Development Services Department report on a peti-
tion of the owner of the property at 9621 Brookhurst Street, located in the
County of Orange, to annex to the City of Anaheim and be provided sewer and
water services for a proposed six-building, 90 -unit motel, each unit having
kitchen facilities, and recommending that, although the use appears appro-
priate for the location, the Council may wish to consider the proposed develop-
ment as an inappropriate use, based upon the'design of the project and proposal
to have kitchens in each unit, since the development as projected appears to
be a substandard apartment project, rather than a standard motel.
Following Council discussion, Councilman Dutton moved that the re-
quest be denied, on the basis that the proposed development does not conform
to Anaheim Site Development Standards. Councilman. Stephenson seconded the
notion. POTION CARRIED.
72-156
Request of Jim Allee, Associated Student Body President,
Loare flL h' Se 1, was submitted to appear before the City Council to present
the topic "Th Need For Expanded Library Services In Anaheim."
The City Clerk reported that four individual petition letters had
been received regarding this same subject.
Mayor Dutton invited Mr. Allee to address the Council.
Jim Allee advised that the project to obtain expanded library ser-
vices is supported by all of the Anaheim Union High School District schools,
and the comity as well.
On the General Plan Map on the Council Cha+ober wall, Mr. Allee pointed
out the location of existing library facilities and stated that these facilities
are inadequate, and since there is no transportation available, elementary and
junior high school students cannot use them as they should.
Mr. Allee suggested that the future branch libraries proposed on City
owned property at Euclid Street and.Palm Lane (near Loara High School), and at
Sunkist Street and Wagner Avenue -(near Katelia High School), be constructed at
this time to .greatly improve the services, and that other branches should be
constructed particularly to serve the rapidly- expanding eastern section. He
advised that at present many students preparing school reports must go to the
Santa Ana Library and other libraries because Anaheim's facilities are inade-
quate.
He made reference to the audio visual equipment and film that the
Main Library has in storage at this time because of the lack of facilities and
funds to implement the service.
He read a letter from the Fifth Grade Class at Sunkist School, request-
ing additional facilities and presented it to the Council, along with over 2,000
letter petitions, allegedly signed by Anaheim registered voters, indicating in
terest in expanding library facilities..
Mike Lombardo, Vice President of the Loara Senior Class, stated that
a two -week surveillance of the Mein Library showed that there were between 300
and 400 persons using the facilities at the same time, and about 4,000 persons
visited the Library daily. He also noted that there are approximately 40,000
junior and senior high school students in Anaheim who must use the Library. for
reference materials in connection with their school work.
Diane Alexander, Senior Class President, added that Anaheim has the
largest school population in Orange County.
She referred to a statement made by Mrs. Marguerite Fereaud, at the
time she signed a petition letter, that her home at Euclid Street and Palm Lane
was condemned eight years previously for the proposed library and she hoped to
live to see it built.
Allee noted failure 0111Oli Mt Bond issues in the 1968 and
1970 sleds, assd stated he felt this wee due to .placing too many bond is-
saes en •dN 'Wilt. Hs ousiontsClithiriory llooda,,bo placed on a ballot alone.
to a 4Ms, 40i the petitions that there be a shar-
astvices hetwsea Q1*, cilia Park, Placentia and Yorba Linda,
C ted such a sitnati+ga would result in crowding Anaheim's library
sore services are
ProPerty for future
there 1.010 not beam sufficient funds
Seek
n
library. facilities Should be at
72 -154
City Hall Agtheis. California COMMCIL I11TES Bch 21. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
Mayor Dutton asked if anyone else wished to address the Council;
there being no response, declared the hearings closed.
Councilman Stephenson stated he felt allowing the second access
point so close to the intersection of Imperial Highway would be dangerous
and cause many traffic accidents.
Councilman Dutton advised he was not satisfied with Area Develop-
ment Plan Mo. 109, as proposed, since he felt that unless all of the property
was developed by Rinker Development Corporation, nobody would purchase the
State -owned property to the west, if.the access road was located as proposed
in Exhibit "A." Councilman Pebley concurred.
Councilman Roth suggested adopting the Area Development Plan as
recommended by the City.Planning Commission; however, to reserve the right
of additional access right to the northwest area.
Councilman Pebley stated he did not feel it was necessary that the
street proposed in Exhibit "A" of the Area Development Plan be extended. as
far north as projected.
Mr. Rinker suggested a "No Left Turn" sign could be placed at the
exit of the private driveway access he proposed at any time the traffic war-
ranted it and, the left -turn pocket at the intersection could be extended
so vehicles could not turn left from the exit.
Councilman Thom noted that in some shopping centers, such as South
Coast Plaza, shoppers must drive at least a quarter of a mile inside the park-
ing area from the closest ingress point.
In reply to Council questioning, Mt. Maddox advised that Mr. Rin-
ker's suggestion of an extended left -turn pocket might be feasible if a high
enough curbing was installed to dissuade drivers from attempting to cross
over; however, this procedure and the resultant necessary additional concrete
barrier would be costly to construct.
Councilman Dutton suggested the Area Development Plan 109, Exhibit
"A" be adopted as recommended, except that the entire road not be constructed
until the property to the northeast and northwest develops and requires access.
Mr. Roberts stated it might be possible to reserve the right of-way
for the extension of that road by requiring an irrevocable offer of dedication
from Mr. Rinker, and the street and shopping center then could be designed ac-
cordingly.
Deputy City Attorney Frank Lowry recommended an irrevocable offer of
dedication include an Access Point No. 6-A.
Mt. Rinker. advised that, in that case, he would include that right
of-way property in his landscaping plans.
He asked that the access point for the proposed private driveway
in the western section of the property be approved, to be constructed at the
same time as Access Point No. 6-A, subject to approval of the Traffic Engin-
eer; also, that additional consideration be given.to the two recommended con
dittoes of approval to rich he had voiced objections.
Mr..Eoberts suggested the Staff be allowed additional time to fur
ther study the :requests of W. &thker, particularly on the length of road of
Access Point Mo. 6-A. He added that, in. conversation with the City Attorney,
he hpd advised that if the second aacessi point is allowed, it should be granted
under rote foist of license *kith mould be revocable by the City if any problems
arose.
Councilmen Sin offered a•Ndtion to- contra the decision on
ifieatien lb. 11-12' 21, Varisasa 2310 and Area Development Plan
Mb. 109 to April 4, 1972, 1:30 P.M., for reports and recommendations of the
Traffic Ear.oa the foal bility of an extended left -turn pocket at Imper-
isi Nighpay.aod eta Ana Canyon Road, in connection with the proposed second
72 -152
Citv Ball. Analytta. California COUNCIL NINUTIS March 21. 197; ,1:30 P.M.
Planning Technician John Anderson advised that Area Development Plan
No. 109 comprises three major areas, the westernmost area, which is owned by
the State Division of Highways, comprising 8 acres, the center area, which is
the shopping center under consideration this date comprising 12 acres, and the
easternmost area'comprising 19 acres, currently in residential agricultural
use.
He advised it was the Staff's recommendation that an additional Ac-
cess Point (No. 6-A), along Santa Ana Canyon Road, be permitted, which is the
public dedicated street proposed for this shopping center. in connection with
Reclassification No. 71-72-21 and Variance No. 2310. Mr. Anderson advised
it was the Staff's recommendation a general policy be established of having
any additional access points along Santa Ana Canyon Road permitted at property
lines only, and extending to the rear of the property; if the entire Study
Area between Imperial_ Highway and Solomen,Drive is developed as a major shop-
ping center, the proposed Access. Point No. 6-A to serve the entire area by
extending the road through the other properties.
In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Anderson advised that a 54 -foot
street with a 1 -foot holding strip is projected on the eastern boundary line of
the proposed shopping center property, to be dedicated by the first property
owner to develop on either side of that boundary; additional right -of -way would
be required at the time adjacent properties were developed.
Councilman Dutton stated he concurred with the Staff recommendation
of allowing the one Access Point, but he was opposed to running the street nor-
therly to the State -owned property which may be used for a Freeway off -ramp.
Councilman Pebley contended extending the road to the State -owned pro-
perty to the north would greatly increase the value of that property.
Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant was present and wished to address
the Council.
Harry Rinker, Applicant, stated he felt the area under consideration
was a more logical location for a shopping center than the Yorba property, and
advised he was proposing full tile roofing on all of the buildings and split
faced stone on all exteriors, with heavy landscaping in the green areas to as-
sure a pleasing view of the center from the Freeway; that 28% of the area would
be landscaping and parking area, not counting the SAVI Channel, which would
bring the total of open area to 41X..
He referred to drawings posted on the wall of the Council Chambers
showing proposed Access Points, and stated he desired to have his original pro-
jection of two Access Points approved, (Exhibit "B" of his displays), since he
contended proposed Access Point No. 6-A alone would not be sufficient to serve
the State -owned property to the west in the event that is developed as a shop-
ping area; that if Area Development Plan No. 109 is adopted according to Exhibit
"A as recommended, he would have to construct an interior street of over 700
feet, which is 500 feet to 600 feet more roadway than is needed to serve the
proposed shopping center.'
He added that he still holds an option escrow on the State -owned pro-
perty to the west, and will pick up the option as.soon as they have a major ten
ant, and develop it with a 60,000- square foot store for one of the. major depart-
ment stores; however, he did not feel he could get a tenant unless he had the
additional access point, which he professed would be a private driveway and not
a public street
i
r. :Rinker outlined a three phase plan for developing the entire area
between Imperial Highway and Solomon Drive as a major regional shopping center;
Phase I.the proposal considered this date, Phase II the State -owned property to
the west, and Phase III the property to the north and east.
He added that the Phase II developiant could bs served by the proposed
private driveway access, and then the property to the eadt is developed,
streets could be brought over to.a the proposed Access Point No. 6-A; however,
he again stated that constructing the street as proposed in Area Development Plan
No. 109 would extend the street too far north for any useful purpose.
72 -150
Citv Hall. Au*eim. ,Salifornia COUNCIL MINUTES March 21. 1972. 1:30 P.M.
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7439 is granted
subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 70 -71 -56 and Conditional Use
Permit No. 1244.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub-
division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Council and. then be recorded in the office of the
Orange County Recorder.
5. That the covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be sub-
mitted to and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to City Council ap-
proval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, con-
ditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract
map.
6. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and /or alley
openings, to Euclid Street shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
7. That drainage of Tract No. 7439 shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
MOTION CARRIED.
CONTINUED IUBI4C HEARS RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71-72 -21 AND VARIANCE N0. 2310:
Submitted by Rinker Development Corporation, requesting a change of zone from
R -A to 0-1, to permit the construction of a shopping center and an automobile
service station at the northeast corner of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Imperial
Highway, with waivers of:
a. Free-standing signs in the (SC) Zone.
b. Time limit on lighted signs. (Withdrawn)
c. Required intersection for service station location,
d. Setback requirements along Freeways.
e. Setback requirements along collection and local streets. (With-
drawn)
f. Landscaping requirements along arterial highways. (Withdrawn)
g. Interior site boundary line setback. (Withdrawn)
h. Minimum dimension for planters in the parking area.
i. Minimum number of'required parking stalls. (Withdrawn)
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -33,
recommended. said reclassification be denied, and, pursuant to 'Resolution No.
PC72 -34, denied said variance.
Public hearing was scheduled for the meeting of March 14, 1972, and
continued to this date at the request of the Applicant. Area Development Plan
No. 109 also was scheduled to be considered concurrently with zoning applica-
tions.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject pro-
perty, consisting of between 11 and 12 acres, existing uses and zoning in the
immediate area, and advised that 5 of the original 9 requested waivers were
withdrawn by the Petitioner through submission of revised plans, prior to the
final conclusion of the City Planning.Commission.
He added that an additional parcel located between subject property
and Imperial Highway originally was included in the reclassification proposal
and now has been deleted; this parcel presently is owned by the State Division
of Highways, and apparently at one time the Applicant held an' option to acquire
the property, which the State has indicated is for sale at this time. Also, the
property to the north is owned by the State °!vision of Highways, for possible
freeway development; if the ultimate decision is to align the freeway farther
to the east, this northerly property may also be declared surplus.
Mt. Heberts noted thattbie plot plan admitted by the Petitioner cote-
forms with the minimum required studs and indicates two access points to
the Santa Ana Canyon Road, one dedicated *bile street at the southeast bound-
dary line, and the other- private road approxitttely:230 feet east of the west
property litre. He added that a study made several years ago in cooperation
72 -148
City 11011. Jnaheils. California COUNCIL magus tch 21. 1974. :30 P.M.
In reply to Mrs. Grant's questions, the Council assured her there
would be no two -story units within 150 feet of the single family homes.
Mrs. Linus Magee, 1682 Ord Way, inquired if there would be access
to the R -1 tract from the proposed development.
Mr. Roberts advised that one of the conditions of approval recom-
mended would be a six -foot masonry wall along the entire south boundary, and
that a modified cul- de-sac be constructed by the Developer so there would be
no ingress or egress to the property except via Euclid.Street.
Mrs. Magee also expressed objection to the Garden Grove development
across the street.
The Mayor invited the Applicant's Agent to again address the Council.
Mr. Knisely, in response to questions by Mrs. Grant, advised that
the common maintenance plan for the development includes exteriors of the
buildings, as well as the grounds, and thus the appearance would be kept up,
at all times.
He contended he was under the impression the property consisted of
5 gross acres, which would make the proposed density 1 or 2 units less than
reported by Mr. Roberts.
It was determined that sufficient evidence had been presented, and
Mayor Dutton declared the hearing closed.
Upon hearing the Interdepartmental Committee recommendations on con-
ditions of approval, Mrs. Grant stated she was satisfied that the project would
not be undesirable.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -99: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -99 for
adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone
as requested, subject to the following conditions recommended by the Inter-
departmental Committee:
1. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted
to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded the office of the
Orange County Recorder.
2. That the owners of subject property shall acquire access to the
alley along the north boundary of subject property.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined
to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
5: That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the south
and east property lines.
6. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded
from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent properties.
7. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
8. That a modified cul- de-sac shall be provided at the terminus of
Fostoria Street, subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
9. That the drainage of subject property shall be in a manner sat-
isfactory to the City Engineer.
10. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
11. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro.-
perty, Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions
or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of
the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from
the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
12. That Conditions Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, above mentioned,
shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
13. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is
contingent upon the granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 1244 and Tentative
Map of Tract NO. 7439.
72-146
City Sall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES March 21. 1912. 1:30 P.M.
Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council; there be-
ing no response, declared the hearing closed.
agsoLgTion no. 728-98: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -98 for adop-
tion, approving Abandonment No. 71 -3A for the Road Easement only, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Reservation of public utility easement including but not limited
to a sanitary sewer, storm drain and water line purposes.
2. Reservation of a 20 -foot easement'for the existing County Sanita-
tion District No. 2, 30 -inch trunk sewer and manhole located within the area pro-
posed for abandonment.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION
AND ABANDONMENT OF AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES. (No. 71-3A Miraloma Over
crossing.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-98 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 2993: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 2993 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF Tag ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE *ELATING TO ZONING. (61- 62- 69(47) 14-1)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2993 duly passed and adopted.
CONTLJED lJ3I C J again R4CLASSIF'ICATI0N NO. 70-7;;56 AND CONDITABAL USA PERMIT
NO- 1+ Submitted by Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter Day Saints, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R -3, to
establish a 57 -unit planned residential condominium development on property
located on the east side of Euclid Street, south of Orangewood Avenue, with
waivers of:
a. Requirement that a lot have frontage on a dedicated street.
b. Minimum building site area.
c. Maximum height within 150 feet of any R_A Zone. (Withdrawn)
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -16,
recommended said reclassification be denied, and pursuant to Resolution No.
PC72-17, denied said conditional use permit.
Public hearing was continued to this date from the March 7, 1972
meeting, at the request of Harry Rnisely, Agent for the Applicant.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject pro-
perty, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He added that the
proposed development, considered a planned -unit development by FHA, requires
Waivers "a" and "b," because ownership of individual postage- stamp lots will
be conveyed with each unit, thus distinguishing it from a statutory condomin-
ium development where there is a distribution of airspace only, and no convey-
ance of the actual ground beneath units.
Mr. Roberts advised that the area nip provided in the Council packets
is in error, seed dimensions of the property ahould 60$ feet deep, with a
329 -foot frontage on Euclid Street, making the property 4.7 gross acres, and
3.79 net acres. He further advised a stall parcel in the southwest corner
was not included in the original proposal; however, the Applicant indicated
he has purchased that parcel and it is now included in the proposal, render-
ing Waiver "c" no longer necessary.