Loading...
1969/09/026 9 ,~ 3 4, 2 City.. Hall~ Anahei:m,~ California ~ COUNCIL Ihe City Count, il of '[h~ City of Anahe{m met i'n regular PRESEN'T~ COUNCILMEN~; Dutton Kr'ei.n~ §chutte~ Pebley and Clar'~. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Non~ PRESENT: CITY M/LNAGER: Keith Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Josep, B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Done M Williams CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Ronald Thompson ~'INANCE DIRECTOR~ Douglas Ogden ZONING SUPERVISO~ Charles Roberts Mayor Clark called the meeting to order, INVOCATION: Reverend Bedman. of the West Anah~iim ~Nazarene Church~, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE' Councilman Pebley led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag~ WAIVER OF READING -~ ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS' Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of ail ordinances and resolutions, and that con- sent t:o the waiver of reading is 'here~y given by all Council~nen,, unless af'ter reading of 'the title:, speci£x~ request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordiaanc= or.' r(-solution. Councilman Krein seconded the motion, MOTION' ([x~';D~'IMOUSLY CARRIED REPORT ~ FIN'ANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CIT'Y~ Demands against the City~ in the amount of $144. 7 288 ~ 55 :, in accor'dant,,e w~th the 1969-70 g~*ldget~> were a;:proved, PUBLIC HEARING -. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68~¢9=99 (AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN' I~'O. 103): Submitted Ev the Fir:st .;ational Bank of Orange Count'y~ requesting a change .~n zone from iR-A to R.-.2, to establish a lO~,unit single-story apartment complex on propert:y located on the south side of Orangewood Avenue~ west of Ninth Street~ The City Planning Cornmission~ t,~ur.suant to Resolution No,. PC69~159~ recommended said re,~].assif5c;arion be d£sapproved, AREA DEVELOPMENT PLA_N NO., 103' Ini. tiated by the City Planning Commission to consider an Area Development Plan. for seven deep~ narrow lots locat~;d. on the south side of Orangewood Avenue~, west of Ninth Street; said property having afrontage of approximatel, y 850 feet and a maximum depth of approxi= mately 295 feet~ and to consider' alternate methods of development and pos- sible circulation pattern~. The City Planning Commissiop., pursuant to Resolution No. ~C69~!58~ recommended adoption of said Area Develo[:~ment: Plan.~ in accordance with Ex= hibit "B" In answer to Council questions regardi'ng the scope of the subject hearing, Zoni~:g Supervisor Charle~ Roberts reported that the reclassi£Sc:ao tion 68-69-99 invol't~'ed only one, of the seven parc'els included ur~d~r Area Development Plan No. 105' that when said reclassifiea~:ion Eet[tion was first consider~.:d '~v th~ City Pl ' s,{ [~ublx, c was ,=t~n t ng Co~'{ s on 0 hearing continued and the Staff was directed [o advertise an Area Development Plan to be heard in conjunction with the reclassification., Mr'.. Thompson? Assistant Director of Dev'eloEment Services~ noted that the purpose of initiating th~: Area Development Plan was to of~ar al- ternative methods of development .in the subject area for Council considera= tlon if the subjec, t re<:lassificatLc~t-~ is denied as ret. o~mnded. If an al- ternate is adopted it would then ofi~r the property owners in the sutject area an in.dicat:ion of' what the [it~v considers to be an orderly plan of velopment 69-543 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 2~ 1969~ 1'30 P~M~ Mr. Roberts noted that the two proposals are separate, and will re- quire two Council actions. It was the opinion of Councilman Krein that each proposal should be heard separately~, Councilman Schutte favored a continuance to reexamine the subject property in order to determine which parcel is the subject of the re- classification application. At the conclusion of Council discussion it was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley that public hearings on Reclassifica- tion No. 68-69-99 and Area Development Plan No 103 be continued to the meet- ing of September 10, 1969, at 1:30 P.~M.~, to allow reexamination of the subject property by the City Council; said public hearings to be inserted as the first agenda items, before those regularly scheduled that date~ MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Clark announced for the information of interested parties pre.- sent that no further notice would be required, as public hearing was continued to a date and time certain~ PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 69-70-3 AND VARIANCE NO. 2105: Submitted by Howard P~ House, requesting a change from C-1 to R-3, on property generally located on the north side of Broadway, east of Magnolia Avenue, and further requesting the following waivers to establish a 66-unit, 2~story apartment complex: 1 Minimum number of required covered parking stalls 2. Maximum distance of dwelling units from a standard street 3. Location of accessory buildings 4. Minimum building site area per dwelling unit The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Nog PC69o168, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following con- ditions' 1. That street lighting facilities along Broadway shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utili- ties. 2 That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Broadway, for tree planting pur- poses~ 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 4 That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 5. That any air conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes. 6. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 7 That Condition Nos~. 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be com- plied with prior to final building inspection 8o That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and recreation fees as required by City Council Resolution of $75 00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued~ The City Planning Commission~ pursuant to Resolution No~ PC69-169~ granted waivers Nos~ 1, 2, and 3 above~ (denying waiver No.4, minimum'building site area per dwelling un~ ,) subject to the following conditions: 1o That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Re- classification No~ 69-70-3~ 2 That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos~ 1, 2, and 3, provided, however, that the minimum building site area per dwelling unit is in conformance with Code requirements~ 69-544 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ Californi~ - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 2~ 1.~69~ 1'30 P.M., Mro Thompson noted the location of the subject property, described the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area~ and summarized the evi- dence considered by the City Planning Commission° Mayor Clark asked if anyone present wished to address the City Council, receiving no response, he thereupon declared the hearing closed~ RESOLUTION NO. 69R-501: Councilman Krein offered Resolution ~o~ 69R-501 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, sUbject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to ResolUtion Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ~COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED ~AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (69-7!0-3 - R-3)~ Roll Call Vote' AYES' COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN' None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 69R-501 duly passed and adopted~ RESOLUTION NO. 69R-502: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R-502 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2105, in part, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2105o Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN' None ABSENT: COUNCILM~N: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-502 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 69-70-4 AND VARIANCE NO. 2107: Submitted by Alfred Seehusen, requesting a change in zone from R-A to R-3, on property generally located on the south side of Ball Road, east of Western Avenue, and requesting the following waivers to establish a 45-unit apartment com- plex: Minimum distance between buildings and property lines Minimum accessory building setback 3. Maximum distance between dwelling units and a standard street 4~ Minimum number of covered parking stalls 5~ Minimum parking stall dimensions 6. 2-story structures within 150 feet of R-A zoned property The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69- 166, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the follow- ing conditions' 69-545 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES ~ September 2~ 1969..~ 1:30 PoM~ 1. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ball Road, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters~ sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work, shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above mentioned requirements. 2o That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Ball Road~ for street lighting purposes. 3~ That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 159 per front foot along Ball Road, for tree planting pur- poses. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works° 5~ That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department° 6~ That subject development shall be served by underground utilities. 7. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east, west and south property lines. 8. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes. 9. That Condition Nos~ 1= 2= and 3, above mentioned, shall be com~ plied with within a period of 180 days from. the date hereof~ or such further time as the City Council may grant~ 10o That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8~ above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 11. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and recreation fees as required by' City Council Resolution of $75:00 per dwelling unit, which shall be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued° The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-167~ granted said variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Re- classification Noo 69-70-4. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos~ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8~ 9, and 10. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and recreation fees as required by City Council Resolution of $75.00 per dwelling unit, which shall be used for park and recreation pur- poses, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued° Mro Roberts described the location of the subject property, noting that although 2 parcels are included in the variance application, the reclas- sification involves only Parcel 1o Parcel 2 is presently zoned R-3 (Reclas- sification No. 66-67-29)~ Mr~ Roberts described the surroundin$ land uses and zoning~ and summarized the evidence considered by the City Planning Commission. He noted that the projected land use for the surrounding area was more intense than that which presently exists~ Mayor Clark asked if the Applicant was present and concurred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission~ to which he received an affirmative reply. He then asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council; receiving no response, he declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO~ 69R-503: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No° 69R-503 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Com- mission. Refer to Resolution Book. 69-546 City Hal!~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 2~ 1969~ I:30P.M~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (69-70-4 - R-3). Roll Call Vote; AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-503 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69Ro504: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 69R-504 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2107 as requested, subject to the con- ditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITYCOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO~ 2107. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 69R-504 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL ~SE PERMIT NO~. 1124: Submitted by Grace Bible Church, to establish a private educational institution in an existing church structure with waiver of minimum required interior setback. R-A zoned property located at the southwest corner of Orange Avenue and Velare Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69- 153, granted said variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2~00 per front foot along Orange Avenue and Velare Street, for street lighting purposes. 2~ That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Orange Avenue and Velare Street, for tree planting purposes. 3~ That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 4~. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be pro- perly shielded from view~. 5. That the structure shall be brought up to the minimum stand- ards of the Uniform Building, Plumbing,and Electrical Codes as adopted by the City of Anaheim. 6. That Condition Nos~l, 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be completed prior to the commencement of the use approved under this con- ditional use permit. 7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No. 1 8~ That the maximum enrollment shall be 100 students. Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was or~ dered by the City Council and public hearing scheduled this date.. 69-547 City Hall: Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 2, 1969, 1:30 P~M~ Letter of opposition from Mr~ and Mrs. Johnnie Go Coates, which was received in the morning mail, was read in full by the City Clerk. Mr~ Roberts described the location of the subject property, the surrounding land uses and zoning in the immediate area, and noted that presently-existing facilities would be utilized for the proposed use° Councilman Dutton recalled that the facilities were once used for a nursery school before the Church utilized them for a Bible School. Mro Roberts indicated this was correct; that a conditional use permit was granted in 1958 for a Church and related uses. Mayor Clark asked if the Applicant was present and concurred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, to which he received an affirmative reply. He then offered those in opposition an opportunity to ad- dress the City Council. Mrs.James Clark, 2565 Roven Avenue, asked and received confirmation that her letter of opposition was received, read by the City Council and placed on file~ She also called attention to a petition in opposition to the subject proposal signed by residents in the immediate vicinity and in- quired as to whether the petition in support of the proposal also was signed by local residents. Mrs~ Clark was informed by the Mayor that the addresses appearing on the petition in favor were in the immediate vicinity of the Church. There being no further statements in opposition, Mayor Clark of- fered the Applicant an opportunity to speak. Reverend Harold Peterson, Pastor of the Grace Bible Church~ offered the following information in support of the application. The facilities were originally intended to be used as proposed in the subject application; the request is felt to be reasonable as the land is be- ing developed in accordance with the existing permit; the physical appearance of the property will not basically be changed; a similar use was previously allowed before the property was acquired by the Grace Bible Church; an invest- ment of $100,000 is presently being used only one day per week, and appro- val of the requested permit would allow a return on this investment, as well as provide a needed service to the community; there is ample off-street park~ ing with 2 entrances,and City Traffic Engineering data indicates that accord- ing to latest counts Orange Avenue is not approaching its peak capacity; traf- fic generated by the school would be using the street during periods other than peak hours; children will be transported in small buses and the noise will be minimal; there will be only one 15-minute recess and a half-hour lunch period, during which time activities will be supervised by teachers; the playground area is bounded by the Church building, a street and vacant property; at least 10 other churches in the area operate such schools in similar residential areas without complaint from surrounding residents; many residents of the subject area are in favor of the proposed use, as evidenced by the petition of support,and were willing to appear in behalf of the Church. Reverend Peterson advised that the Michael Kent Private School is proposing to operate the school for educationally-handicapped children who have either depth perception or hearing problems~. He stated that the school has the backing of leading educators throughout the County as well as several outstanding medical men from the Orange County Hospital and Los Angeles County Hospital, upon whose recommendation children will be referred~ He noted that there are no other similar schools in the area and those that do exist have long waiting lists. Reverend Peterson indicated the school would serve children from kindergarten age through the eighth grade; a tuition fee would be charged° The School District from which the student is referred pays the tuition and is then reimbursed by the State as publi~ schools do not have the facilities to meet this need; and the school will be in operation 5 days a week from 9:00 A.M. to 2:30 P.M. 69-548 City Hall, Anaheim~ Californi~ - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 2~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. Dr. G~L. Evans, 2545 Orange Avenue, directly north of the T-inter- section of Velare Street, addressed the City Council in favor of the sub- ject application. He stated he would rather see the property used for the education of children than developed for multipIe-family residential use,~ He felt the proposed use would be beneficial to the area. There being no further requests to address the City Council, Mayor Clark declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO~.. 69R-505. Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 69R-505 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1124 as requested~ sub- ject to the conditions racommended by the City Planning Commission° Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDI- TIONAL USE PERMIT NOD 1124~ Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT' COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-505 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - REVERSION TO ACREAGE - PORTION OF TRACT NO, 5688 (TRACT NO. 7035): Public Hearing was held to consider reversion to acreage of a portion of the land previously subdivided by Final Tract No. 5688. FINAL MAP - TRACT NO. 7035: Developer - American West, of San Bernardino, tract located on the west side of Harbor Boulevard, south of Orangewood Avenue, and containing one lot in the R-3 zone (Reclassification No. 63- 64-103). The City Engineer recommended approval and reported said Final Map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved, that bond has been posted and approved, and required fees paid. Mayor Clark asked if anyone present wished to address the City Council, receiving no response, he declared the hearing closed~ On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley moved that Final Map, Tract No. 7035 be approved. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT: Application filed by Mr~ Charles Ao Mull, for permit to conduct public dance September 19, 1969, at the Nordic Buffet, 218 West Lincoln Avenue.was submitted. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte, action on said application was deferred to the meeting of September 10, 1969, pending further investigation. MOTION CARRIED. ANAHEIM ART ASSOCIATION - SIXTM ANNUAL FALL ART FESTIVAL' Request of Anaheim Art Association for permission to ~11 wor~g of art and to sell re{resh- ments during the Sixth Annual Fall Art Festival, to be held in Pearson Park on October 18 and 19, 1969, was submitted. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by CoUncilman Krein~ said request was granted to sell works of art in light of the fact that the primary purpose of the Festival is to exhibit art for cultural pur- poses and the sale of art is incidental to the main purpose° For this reason, prohibition against displaying price, name, and telephone number of the artist was waived by the Council, on condition that consummation of the sale or delivery not be made while art is displayed in the Park. Further, permission was granted for the sale of refreshments, providing that the net income be used for youth activities. MOTION CARRIED. 69-549 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 27 1969~ 1'30 P,M, CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held August 11, 1969, pertaining to the following applications~ were submitted for City Council information and consideration. VARIANCE NO. 2109: Submitted by Standard Oil Company of California, to ex- pand an existing service station structure, with waiver of minimum front set- back from an arterial highway on M-1 zoned property, located at the southeast corner of Kraemer Boulevard and La Palma Avenue. The City Planning Commission~ pursuant to Resolution No, PC69-171 granted said variance, subject to conditions. ' VARIANCE NO. 2110: Submitted by Joan Belisle, to establish an auto rental agency as a primary use, with waiver of location of a free-standing sign, on C-R zoned property, located on the south side of Katella Avenue, west of Has- ter Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-172 granted said variance, subject to conditions. ' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1130' Submitted by Forest Lawn Cemetery Associa- tion, to expand an existing medical and hospital center, with waiver of maxi- mum building height on R-3 zoned property located on the south side of Romneya Drive, west of Euclid Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No~ PC69-173, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no fur- ther action taken. FINAL MAP - TRACT NO, 6984 (68~69-77): Developer - Orangewood Villas of Fullerton, tract located on the north side of Orangewood Avenue, west of Spinnaker Street, containing 18 R-3 zoned lots. The City Engineer recommended approval and reported said Final Map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved, that bond has been posted and approved, and the required fees paid° On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that Final Map, Tract No. 6984, be approved. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - WORK ORDER NUMBERS 522-A: 247 AND 954: On the recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that Change Order No. 1, to Work Order Numbers 522-A, 247 and 954 for West Street and Convention Way street improvement, in the amount of $4,403.05 be authorized~ Councilman Krein seconded the motion_~ MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-506 - WORK ORDER NO. 7002' Councilman Pebley offered Resolu- tion No. 69R-506 for adoption~ Refer to Resolution Book, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO~. 69R-473 BY EXTENDING THE DATE FOR THE RECEIPT OF SEALED PROPOSALS ON WORK ORDER NO~ 7002. (Extend Bid Opening Date from September 4 to September 18, 1969. Walnut Canyon Channel Filtration Plan Slope and Reservoir Road~) Roll Call Vote' AYES: COUNCILMEN' Dutton, Krein, Schutte~ Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT' COUNCILMEN. None The Mayor declared Resolution No~. 69R-506 duly passed and adopted= 69-550 ~i~y Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 2~ 1969, 1'30 P.M,~ RESOLUTION NO~ 69R-507 - WORK,ORDER NO. 419' On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 69R-507 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED UP TO THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK, PoM., ON AUGUST 28, 1969, FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF VERMONT AVENUE, FROM APPROXIMATELY 960 FEET EAST OF DAKOTA STREET TO APPRaXIMATELY 278 FEET EAST THEREOF, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 419, Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-507 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-508 - WORK ~ORDER NO. 424: In accordance with recommenda- tions of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No~ 69R- 508 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY .COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE REPAIR OF THE LINCOLN AVENUE BRIDGE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 424° (Hunt Process Company - $8,968.00~) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos 69R-508 duly passed and adoptedo RESOLUTION NO~ 69R-509 - WORK ORDER NO~ 1216: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-509 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPT- ING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES,~ MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE WEST STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT, IN WEST STREET, FROM BALL ROAD TO AP- PROXIMATELY 755 FEET NORTH OF BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO 1216~ (Lynam-Wood Construction, Inc.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-509 duly passed and adopted° 69-551 City Hall~ Ana'heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 2~ 1969~ 1'30 PoMo RESOLUTION NO. 69R-510 - PROPOSED ABANDONMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolu- tion No. 69R-510 for adoption. ' -- Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON AN EXISTING ROADWAY FORMERLY KNOWN AS WALNUT CREEK ROAD AND PRESENTLY KNOWN AS NOHL RANCH ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE PURPOSE EASEMENTS UPON, OVER, ACROSS, UNDER, ALONG AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DES- CRIBED REAL PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING THEREON; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION. (69-11A, Public Hearing September 23, 1969, 1:30 P~M., Vicinity of Nohl Ranch Road and Santa Ana Canyon Road~) Roll Call Vote' AYES' COUNCILMEN- Dutton, Krein, Scbutte~ Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN' None The Mayor declared Resolution No,~ 69R-510 duly passed and adopted. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, filing fees in connection with said proposed abandonment were waived° MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied, as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. a. Claim submitted by James R~ Carpenito, for personal property damages purportedly sustained on or about August 5, 1969. b. Claim submitted by Mrs. Ardelle Burrie, on behalf of Bonnie and Sheri Burrie, for personal injury damages purportedly sustained on or about June 21, 1969. MOTION CARRIED. METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA - RESOLUTION NO. ?200' Metro- politan Water District of Southern California Resolution No. 7200 levying a tax for the fiscal year of 1969-70 on taxable property lying within the City was submitted for Council information. Upon motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, said Resolution was ordered received and filed. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO~ 69R-511' Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-511 for adop- tion. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO WITH THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF GRADE CROSSING AND PROTECTIVE DEVICES AT THE CROSSING OF BROADWAY STREET OVER TRACKS AND PROPERTY OF RAILROAD. (CROSSING NO~, BAA-509-0', West of Manchester.) Roll Call Vote. AYES' COUNCILMEN. Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT' COUNCILMEN' None The Mayor declared Resolution No,. 69R-511 duly passed and adopted~ 69-552 C_~ty Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 2~...1969~ 1:30 P.M. CORRESPONDENCE- The following correspondence was ordered received and filed~ on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein: a. Minutes - The Anaheim Public Library Board Meeting - July 22, 1969. b. Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of Cali- fornia - Investigation four the purpose of establishing a list for the year 1970 of railroad grade crossings of city streets or county roads most ur- gently in need of separation~ or existing separations in need of altera- tion or reconstruction as contemplated by Section 189 of the Streets and Highway Code c. City of Redondo Beach - Resolution No. 4820~ requesting the resolution committee of the League of California Cities to submit a reso- lution to the League's Annual Convention opposing any change in current tax exemption on State and Local Government Bond Interest. d~ Greyhound Lines - West: Notice of application before Fublic Utilities Commission for increase in passenger fares~ MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO., 6244: The City Manager reported receipt of a letter from Attorney Harry Knisely, representing owners of property lo- cated at 10472 West Douglas Road.. Said letter requests that the City of Anaheim provide services to the subject property, since City sewer and water lines are located in the street in front of the property. Said property was recently granted a Use Variance by the Orange County Plann- ing Commission to establish a mobile home park (Orange County Use Variance No. 6244). Mr Murdoch noted that the City Council, at their meeting held June 3, 1969, by a 3-2 vote sustained the recommendation of the City Plann- ing Commission to urge the Orange County Planning Commission to deny said Use Variance on the basis that the proposed use would be deleterious to the existing and future development of the southeast industrial area, due to the incompatibility of the industrial and residential uses, and that the City Council state for the record that the City of Anaheim would not provide services or utilities to the proposed mobile home park in the event the County approved the request. The Orange County Planning Commission, in granting the Use Var- iance over the objections of the City, attached a condition (No. 17) which requires the development to connect to a public sewer as specified in the Uniform Plumbing CodeT Councilman Pebley noted that the subject property was bounded by the future Orange Freeway to the west and the Santa Ana River and City of Orange to the east, which afforded a certain amount of isolation from the industrial area. Councilman Krein observed that he would be opposed to the request if the City of Anaheim had control over the zoning of the subject PrOperty; however, inasmuch as the political body that does control zoning on the property has approved the proposed land use, he would be inclined to grant the request He noted that a cesspool may be used to serve the property if the subject request is denied~ It was noted by the City Attorney that connection to a public sewer was made a condition of the Use Variance. It was the opinion of the City Council that if the requested service is refused, the conditions may be amended to allow an alternate solution. Mr. Knisely addressed the City Council in support of the subject request, and posted a map of the area on the exhibit wall. He reported that discussions with representatives of the City Water Division indicate it would actually be cheaper to the owner of the subject property to dig his own well than to connec~t to the City water lines; however~ this would have an adverse effect on the City. It was Mr~ Knisely's opinion that the action taken by the City Planning Commission was illegal and improper in 69-553 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 2~ 1969, 1:30 P~M. that their responsibility lies in the determination of land use only; that the determination of utility and sewer services is normally handled adminis- tratively. It was his opinion that the City had never denied a similar re- quest in past, unless a development failed ~ meet Code requirements. He stated that the owner of the subject property is agreeable to annexation to the City of Anaheim at any time. Councilman Dutton expressed opposition to the interim use of indus- trial property for a mobile home park, and pointed out that such an applica- tion in City territory was recently denied~ even though the parcel was isolated and oriented in a similar manner~ Councilman Dutton noted that although the isolation factor must be taken into consideration~ if the subject request is granted it could set a precedent whereby similar uses could be approved in County territory adjacent to City industrial areas. Mr. Knisely noted that no one appeared in opposition to the proposed development, and reported that all property surrounding the subject parcel has been placed in an agricultural preserve for ten years, and the use variance was granted for a 15-year period. The City Manager noted that the iPhoenix Club, immediately to the south of the subject property, did oppose the variance application. Mr. Knisely replied that the reason for the opposition was only be- cause they do not want complaints resulting from their Saturday night parties. The City Manager advised that the City could not serve electricity to the subject property until annexation is consummated, and recommended that no sewer connection be made until and unless the City can also provide the electrical utilities. Councilman Pebley suggested deferring action on the subject request for one week to obtain an estimate of the capital expenditure necessary to serve the property, as compared with the anticipated revenue based on a com- parable 25-acre mobile home park. Mr~ Murdoch also pointed out that it may be the prerogative of the County to permit development of a mobile home park in agricultural preserves, and suggested this contingency be included in the study to be made., as if this is correct, the consequences of the land use on the subject property would not involve just one isolated parcel, but would have implications upon a very sub- stantial area. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Krein, action on the subject request was deferred to the meeting of September 10, 1969, at 1.30 P.M., for additional information on capital outlay, estimated revenue, and permitted uses in an Agricultural Preserve. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NOo 2722: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2722 for first readimg. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-77 - R-3 - Tract No~ 6984~) ORDINANCE NO. 2723: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2723 for first reading~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-72 - C-1.) ORDINANCE NO. 2724: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2724 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-62 - R-3.) ORDINANCE NO~ 2725: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No,, 2725 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-6q-65 - R-3 Portion Only.) 69-554 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 2, 1969~ I:30'PoM. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS' The following applications were pre- sented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information: a. Application submitted by Norman and Ruth Lamoroeaux~ and Norman and Carol LamoreauX, for On-Sale General, Bona Fide Eating Place,. Person-to-Person Transfer for Rossario's,1224 South Magnolias C-1 zone. b. Application submitted by Richard John and Barbara Cornelia Bulawa, for Off-Sale Beer and Wine, Person-to-Person Transfer for Richard's Market, 926 East Broadway, R-1 zone, (non-conforming use). No Council action was taken on the above applications. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-512: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No 69R-512 for adoption. · Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TRANSFERRING THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FROM THE JURISDICTION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. Roll Call Vote. AYES- COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES- COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declar~ed Resolution No~ 69R-512 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-513. Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No 69R-513 for adoption. · Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM URGING THE sANTA ANA RIVER BASIN WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD TO ESTABLISH AND ENFORCE HIGH STANDARDS OF QUALITY FOR WATER IN THE SANTA ANA RIVER. Roll Call Vote. AYES' COUNCILMEN' Dutton~ Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution Nov 69R-513 duly passed and adopted. DIEHL-EVANS AND COMPANY - AUDITING AGREEMENT: Finance Director Douglas Ogden reported that proposals have been received from several auditing firms pursuant to Council request, and interviews could be arranged in accordance with the wishes of the City Council~ He noted that one or two Councilmen could be appointed to a committee to conduct the interviews, or interviews could be conducted by the full Council in executive session. Council discussion ensued regarding the relative advantagas and disadvantages in changing auditors periodically. Councilman Clark favored ordering a more extensive audit every fifth year~ which would include a breakdown of the various facilities, a study of manpower allotments and charges, utility operations, etc.~ Councilman Krein noted that most firms in private industry do not change auditor's. In answer to Council questioning Mr. Ogden briefed the standards under which all C.P.A~ firms by their own professional Code must operate~ and advised if there ~s confidence in these rules and regulations there would be no reason to change auditors. However, if it is felt there is possible collusion on the part of an auditing firm~ and in this case~ the Finance Director, a change should be made~ He further advised~ that to h~s knowledge there had never been such a case of collus~.on in the State of California. 69-555 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 2~ 1969~ 1'30 P.M. Councilman Clark was o£ the opinion that a more extensive audit would be in the interest of good business practices, and recalled that the possibility o£ such an expenditure had been discussed during budget hearing,s. Councilman Schutte indicated he was opposed to changing auditors at this time. Councilman Pebleyconcurred, noting that he would favor chang- ing present procedures at such time as a member of the City staff recommended that the need exists. Mr. Murdoch noted that the financial audit is ordered by the City Council, and it would be inappropriate for either the Finance Director or the City Manager to make a recommendation in this regard~ He also pointed out that renewal or extension of the present auditing agreement was deferred to consider the possibility of combining the financial audit with an efficiency study, as suggested by the Mayor at the meeting o£ April 297 1969. At the conclusion of Council discussion, it was moved by Councilman Krein~ seconded by Councilman Pebley, that an amendment to the continuing agreement with the firm of Diehl-Evans and Company be authorized for the au(i- it of City books and records at a cost not to exceed $4,800°00 per year. MOTION CARRIED. (To this motion Councilman Clark voted "No.") RECESS' Councilman Pebley moved for a 10-minute Recess~ Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3'40 P M.) AFTER RECESS' Mayor Clark called the meeting to order, all Councilman present (3'50 P.M.) ' THE TOWN TOUR COMPANY - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL ROUTES' Councilman Dutton noted that material was submitted by the Town Tour Company in support of their re- quest for additional routes in the City of Anaheim, as follows. 1. Extension of Hotel/Motel Shuttle Route to serve Greyhound Ter- minal on Haster Street and Manchester Avenue. 2 Route for a tour of the Anaheim Shopping Center from the Grand Hotel. 3~ Revision of route to Beach Boulevard motels to avoid transvers- lng County territory. It was noted that request No. 2 above~ required immediate action on the part of the City Council as the route is planned for inauguration on Octo- ber 1, 1969, if approved, and an advance advertising campaign is planned. ]in- terested parties were notified by the Town Tour Company and City Clerk's of- fice and were present to hear the presentation by Mr. Valen~ Mr. Michael Valen, President of the Town Tour Company, described the three proposals as outlined in correspondence addressed ~ the City Council, dated August 27 and 28, 1969, with enclosures as noted, on file in the office of the City Clerk. He noted that by granting Request No. 3, the service would be extended to the Anaheim Municipal Golf Course; Request No.2 above, would allow operation of a scheduled shopping tour 3 days a week, Monday, Tuesday and Friday; and Request No. 1 would allow service between the Greyhound Bus Depot, Disneyland Park and the motels and hotels in the Commercial-Recreation Area. Mr. Tom Bristow, owner-operator of the Greyhound Bus Depot, Anaheim, addressed the City Council. He stated that he operates the depot on a commJ, s- sion basis and that it was his opinion that there was a definite need for the type of operation outlined by Mr~ Valen. Approximately 30 to 40 people per day were delivered to the Bus Depot, wishing to visit motels and Disneyland Park, and on weekends approximately 1,500 service men arrive, whose prime interest is to get to Disneyland. He reported that he requested an extension of the Southern California Rapid Transit District line to serve the depot, but has received no response as yet and has used the services of the Anaheim Jitney Systems during the interim period. U.e stated he wished to remain a neutral party in the discussion as his first reponsibility is to his passengers, whose 69-556 City Hal.l, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 2~ 1969~ 1.'30 P.M. good will is essential to the success of this operation., but pointed out that the proposal offered by Mr. Valen would provide service to a point inside Disneyland Park where a connection could be made with the R.T.D. Buses, whereas the Jitney Bus delivers passengers to the Disneyland Hotel. In answer to Council questions Mr. Bristow reported that although Anaheim Jitney Systems has been providing service to the Depot, he had never been furnished with a schedule; that he does not know from day' to day what the operations will be even though Jitney headquarters are near his property; therefore, he was not satisfied with the service provided by the Jitney operation. He indicated that the Town Tour Company has agreed to provide an established schedule which will meet all incoming and out- going buses. Mr. Tom Jaeger, ~of the Anaheim Jitney Systems, reported that Mr. Bristow has had several different managers of the Depot since the service was initiated; that when the Depot came into being it was explained to Mr Bristow that the Jitney Town Route operated 6 days par week, and could serve the Bus Terminal. He stated that service men comprise approximately 90% of the volume of business and most of those coming in on weekends wish to go to motels and hotel8~ therefore~ a separate section was added on Sat- urdays to exclusively serve the Creyhound Bus Terminal. He explained that the Jitney Buses did not enter Disneyland Park, at the request of a Disney- land official, as Disneyland did not wish to make a bus terminal in the Park itself~ however, a free shuttle service is provided from the Disney- land Hotel to the Park. He stated that there is a Jitney schedule posted at the Greyhound Depot and that he gave the Depot a public address system to announce that Jitney service was available as each bus came in, He indicated he was be- wildered by the statements made, and that he has copies of billings made on a monthly basis which will bear out the fact that the volume does not indicate additional service is necessary. Mr. Jaeger briefly related the difficulties faced by his company since originally applying for a franchise operation in the City of Anaheim, approximately 4 years ago, at which time he felt he had Council assurance that he would be protected from others encroaching into this servicer He stated that the Jitney service has maintained the original routes, with the exception of one, and that the most lucrative route was the Knott's Berry Farm route. Mr Jaeger noted his opposition and the opposition of others to former requests of Mr. Valen He indicated he had no objection to the existing Fun Bus-Hotel/Motel Route, or the proposed Shopping Tour, but did object to Town Tours extending service to Knott's Berry Farm and the Greyhound Bus Terminal. He thereupon requested the additional routes proposed by Town Tours be denied, and that no change be made in any of the routes until after June 30, 1970, which is the expiration date for all services presently in existence. Mr. Jaeger reported that the Anaheim Jitney Systems now has 7 buses in operation and is operating every 20 minutes from the Disneyland area to Knott's Berry Farm, and is presently adequately serving the Grey- hound Depot. Further, Jitney puts into service a special bus on Sunday to serve the Greyhound Terminal to Disneyland and the churches in the area, every 20 minutes. He stated that Greyhound billings average between $200.00 and $300.00 per month, serving a maximum of approximately 1,000 people in any one month, with Saturday being the largest day. It was noted by Councilman Krein that many of the statements made were at variance with other evidence presented, He suggested a study be made by the City Manager's office to ascertain Whether the present service adequately meets the existing demand, and that the matter be continued to allow for said study. 69-557 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 2, 1969, 1:30 P.M. In answer to Council questions Mr. Jaeger stated his service is in operation every day of the year, exCept Christmas Day; all Greyhound buses are met; the service is adequate to meet the demands, and if it is desired, the Jitney buses could enter Disneyland Park. He noted that in June an operat- ing statement and all existing Jitney routes were filed with the City. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing Jitney Systems, stated that apparently the request of Mr. Valen will be continued and asked if someone could be designated to work with them on this matter. Mr Knisely was referred to the City Manager° Mr~ Knisely further advised that they had no objections to the Broad- way Tour as proposed by Mr Valen. At the conclusion of Council discussion, Councilman Krein moved to grant a temporary permit to the Town Tour Company to provide a tour of the Anaheim Shoppin$ Center, as outlined in their letter dated August 28, 1969, and the attached letter from the Anaheim Center Merchants Association, said permit to expire June 30, 1970, and to defer action on the remaining two pro- posals for two weeks, for £urther study and report from the City Manager's office, Councilman Pebley seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED~ Mr. Bristow informed the City Council that in order to be in a neutral position he had discontinued the services of the Jitney Systems, and no longer sells their tickets~ He asked if he had the right to refrain from allowing the Anaheim Jitney buses to come onto his leased property~ The City Attorney advised that Mr. Bristow does have the right, how- ever, the Jitney buses can stop on the street, at their scheduled time, and sell their own tickets. He noted that whatever private arrangements are made they were outside of both the Jitney approval and Town Tours, and service to the Greyhound Bus Depot is not included under any' previous permit granted by the City Council to either the Anaheim Jitney Systems or Town Tours. Mr. Bristow stated he had been allowing the Jitney buses to go onto his property and collect cash fares, however, he wished to be served by better equipment and wanted better service for his passengers~ Mr~ C.J. Holzer, representing Southern California Rapid Transit Dist- rict, addressed the Council from a neutral standpoint. He indicated his com- pany is not interested in deviating their Route 58 to serve the Greyhound Bus Terminal, because there is not the potential patronage to justify the incon- venience to their through passengers. Further, it would also cause problems in maneuvering a 40-foot bus on and off the Freeway and City streets. Mr~ Holzer noted that it was common knowledge within the transporta- tion industry that competition is good only to a point. Beyond that point, no one is able to complete successfully for the limited transportation dollar that is available. He reported that when Mr. Jaeger's line was extended to Buena Park it caused the R.T~D. to remove their line on Ball Road and Dale Avenue, as the route began to operate at a loss, and that this hurt a 53-mill- ion dollar corporation. Mr. Holzer felt that one factor had been 0verl00ke~ in th~ pr~viou~ discussion, noting that Mr. Valen~s Beach Boulevard route was in violation of the Cali£ornia Public Utilities Code. He cautioned that all factors should be taken into consideration ~n ma~ing the study~ not only type and frequency o£ service, fares~ etc~, but also the kind of equipment used and the kind of service that is being offered~ He thereupon offered the services of the R.T~D~ offices in making the requested, study and solving the problem which confronts the C~ty Council, but indicated that R~T D. would make no recommendation in this matter. 69-558 City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES - September 2~ 1969'~ 1:30 P,M. ADJOURNMENT' Councilman Pebloy moved to adjourn. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 4' 40 P · Mt · kx City Cler[ City Hall~ Anaheim~ Californiai_ COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10.~. 1969, 1'30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark ABSENT: COUNCILMEN. None PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M, Williams ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph O. Pease ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ASSISTANT PLANNER: Darwin Brown Mayor Clark called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Dorman Buttram, of the Town Church, gave the Invo- cation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Krein led the Assembly in the Pledge of Alle- giance to the Flag, RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION~ The City Council unanimously adopted a Resolution of ApPreciation to George "Pop" Miller, for his many civic contributions to the City of Anaheim. INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES: Mr, Lee Sale, of the City Personnel De- partment, introduiced new employees attending the Council meet- ing as part of the City's orientation program. Mayor Clark welcomed the new employees to the City Family. PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE C.~TY COUNCIL - TIME LIMIT: Pursuant to Council discussion held JUly 29, 1969, Mayor Clark announced that pre- sentations before the City Council from 'the public will be lim- ited to 5 minutes. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held August 26, 1969, were approved on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein.. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES 6ND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Schutte moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that con- sent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $756,760.19, in accordance with the 1969-70 Budget were approved. '