Loading...
1969/12/1669- 749 ~ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 9~ 1969, 1:30 P.M. City Attorney Joseph Geisler reported that it was felt that this was not a legal question; that for that reason, the Legal Department has re- ferred the matter to the City Planning Commission. He advised that the City Planning Commission has interpreted that the sale of trailers, restricted use w£thin the park, would be an "incidental" use. However, he concluded, if the sales were so restricted, then it becomes a policy matter and the findings of the Planning Commission will come before the Council for their interpretation. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURN[~,D: 2' 30 P.M. City Clerk City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 16~ 1969~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox UTILITIES DIRECTOR: Gordon Hoyt ASSISTAN'T DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Clark called the meeting to order. INVOCATION ° Reverend Timothy Coop, of the First Christian Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Schutte led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PRESENTATION ~ LA PALMA RECREATION BUILDING - ANAHEIM HOST LIONS CLUB: Mayor Clark, on behalf of the City of Anaheim, accepted with thanks a check in the amount of $1,500.00 from the Anaheim Host Lions Club, towards amortization of construction costs of the La Palma Recreation Building, which was presented by Mr. Jack Cahoon. PROCLAMATION~ The following Proclamation was issued by Mayor Clark,and re- ceived unanimous approval of the City Council: "Bill of Rights Week" - December 14 to 20, 1969. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meetings held November 25 and Decem- ber 2, 1969, were approved on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Council- man Pebley. MOTIDN CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES ANteD RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given 'by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANI- MOUSLY CARRIED ~ 69-750 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES - December 1.~_~,969~ 1:30 P.~. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMA~DS AGAINST THE C'ITY~ Demands against the City, in the amount o£ $1,049,571.78, in accordance with t',e 1969-70 Budget, were ap- proved. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ~. ABANDONqRENT: Pursuant to Resolution No. 69R-547, duly published in the Anaheim. Bulletin, and notices thereof posted in ac- cordance with law~, Public Hearing was held O~:tober 14, 1969, and contin- ued to this date to allow for luther investigation, as recommended by the City Engineer, on the proposed abandonment of an e×isting alley located we~t of Eucli~ Street~ between Crescent Av~:nue and Westmont Drive (Tract No. 1591.) R~port of the City Engineer was suLmitted~ recommending denial, setting ~orth rea~onz therefor. ~ '~ Mayor Clark aske~ if anyone wished to address the City Council; hearing no response, he declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 69R=711' Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-71i for adoption, denying Abandonment No. 69=12A, as reconnnended by the City Engineer. Refer to Resolution Book.. A RESOLUTiO!~ O~ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THAT AN EXISTI~G ALLEY' ~OT BE ABANDO~EDo (69~12A) Roll Call Vote' AYES° COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUi~'C ILMEN: None AB SENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-711 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 69-70~24' Submitted by Pohlman Enter- 'prises, Incorporated, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3, to es- tablish a 91-unit~ one and two-story apartment complex; R-A zoned property located on the nort'h side of Lincoln Avenue., east of Gilbert Street. The City Pl. anning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC69- 236, granted said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1~ That the owner of subjeet property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 60-feet in width along the proposed street in- eluding a standard 50-foot radius cul-de-sac and 25-foot radius property line returns at the Lincoln Avenue intersection for street widening pur- poses. Said 60-foot street shall have a 40-foot roadway width,-10-foot parkways, fully ce~ented except that treewells shall be provided at 40- foot centers, and t. hat the cul-de-sac portion of the street shall be de- veloped to normal City' of Anaheim street standards~ 2. Tb. at all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Lincoln Avenue and the proposed street, including preparation of improvement ~lans and installation of all im?rovements~ such as curbs and gutters, sidewal~s, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; that street lighting facilities along Lincoln Avenue and the proposed street shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office o~ the Director of Public Utili- ties, and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above mentioned requirements. 3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15C per front foot along Lincoln Avenue and the proposed street, for tree planting purposes. 4. That trash storage areas shall be pro'vided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 69-751 C.ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES .- December 16_z 1__969~ 1~30 P.M. 5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 6. That a parcel mao to record the aD,roved division of subject property be submitted to and. aTproved ty the City of Anaheim and then be re- corded in the office of the Orange County Recorder~ 7. That subject property shall 'be served b~' undarground utilities° 8~ That all air~cenditioning fa(~ilities shall ge properly shielded from view, and. the sound boffe~'ed from adjacent residential strmcture$~ 9. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro- perty, Condition Nos. l, 2, and 3, above mentioned~ shall be completed. ]0. That Condition Nos~ 4, 5~ 6~ 7~ and 8, above mentioned, shall be complied witN prior to final building and zoning inspections. 11. Th. at the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the su.m of $75.00 ~er multiple~=family unit~ tm be used for park and recreation purposes~ sai~ amount to !.e paid a.'t the time the building permit is issued. !2~ That subject $~r~.Terty shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No. ]. Zoning Supervisor Charle~ Roberts noted the location of subject p~ro- petty, the e×isting uses and zoming in the immediate s~rea, and briefed the evi- dence submitted. ~o arLd considered by the City Planning Commission. Mayor Clark asked ~f the Applicant concurred with the recommenda- tions of the City Planning Co:~igsion, to Which he received an affirmative reply. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council; hearing no respon~e~ he dec. lared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO~ 69R.-7i2- £:oun~:ilman Pebley offered Resolution Nc.. 69R-712 for adoption> autborJ.zing the ~.reparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as reque$ted~ ~ubject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Com- mission~ Refer to R~.soiution Book. A RESOLD'TIO~' OF THE CITY COUI~'CIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE AS'AHEIM MUN'ICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONIN'G SHOULD BE AMEN'DED AND THAT THE BO'6~NDARIES O~ CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CtLANGED. (69-70-2~- ~-~) Roll Call Vote· AYES· COUN'CILME~': Dut'ton~ Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES $ COP'i\~C ILMEN ~ None B SE.NT COU,N'C I. LME',~~ ~ The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-712 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING ~ VARIANCE !NO. 2129~ Submitted by Ernst Krause, to expand an ex- isting motel, with waiver of minimum number of required off-street parking stalls. Property presently zoned R-A, located on the south side of Katella Avenue~ ease of 'Harbor Boulevard. (Resolution of Intent to C-R - 66-67-61), The City Planning Commission~ pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-220, granted said variance~ subject to the following conditions. 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Re- classification No. 66-67.-61. 2. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department~ ~ That subject property shall ~be developed substantially in accord- ance with ~!~ns and specificati~ons on file with the City of Anaheim, marked E×hibit Nos~ 1, 2~ 3, and 4~ provided~ however, that kitchen efficiency units with a maximum of 6-cubic foot refrigerators~ two-burner stoves, excluding oven and baking facilities; and single-compartment sinks may be installed; except that the manager~ unit wii1 be allowed to have full kitchen facilities. 69-752 City Hail~ Anaheim~ California- COU~CIL MINUTES - December 1.6, 1969~ 1'30 Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was re- quested by the City Council and public hearing ordered to be scheduled, Zoming Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject property', the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence subn:itted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He noted the request to waive one-third of the parking stalls on. subject property was deemed appropriate and granted~ baged on evidence submitted by the Petitioner, which substantiated his claims that more than 40% of his guests arrived h.y other than private automobiles° He stated it was felt that the granting of this variance would not set a precedent as any- one r~questing a similar waiver wo~ld have to ~u. bmit evidence supporting said request in the sam~ manner ~s this Petitioner. Mr, Robert'~ concluded bls remarks hy calli~g attention to the Develo'ioment Service DeFartment~s survey, relative to the adequacy of the present Farking require~ments for mo~tels and hotels i~,. the Co~ercial-Rec- reation Area. Mayor Clark asked if anyone wished to address the City Council; receiving no r~ponse~ he declared the hearing closed. Council discus~ion was held relative to survey made by the De- velopment Serviceg Department noting that 82% of the guests of smaller motels arrive by auto~obile and that many arriving by air rent cars on arrival. Coup~il~an Dutton was of the opinion that subject application ws~ not up. ique ~u~ a~ isolated case and if the variance was granted, and the owners'hip or o'~,e'ration of this motel changed, it would add to an ex- isting transports~tion 'problem in the area. He felt the requirement of one par~ing spathe per room should remain and if it is later learned that this is not an isolated situation, the requirement then be changed to af- fect allo Co~n~il~ar~. Clark noted the City Planning Co~nission action was based on audited evidence of use. RESOLUTIO)N B:'O. 69R~71i~· At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R-713 for adoption, denying Variance Noo 2129. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION~ OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE 2129. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Clark NOES: COU~CILMEN: Schutte ABSENT: COUNCILME~'~ None The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 69R-713 duly passed and adopted. Shortly after the above action, the City Clerk reported she had been handed a letter from the Applicant, wherein it was stated he had been unavoidably delayed and requested that the hearing be reopened so he could a~dress the Council. Councilman Schu~te moved that the public hearing on Variance No. 2129 be reopened as requested, finding that no one's rights would be impaired and that before the public hearing was closed an invitation to address the Council was extended by the Mayor and there was no response° Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED~ Mr~ Kenneth Krause, Agent for the Petitioner and Manager of the Ivanhoe Motel, 4.34 West Katella Avenue~ briefly' summarized the sequence of events leading to this publi¢~, hearing; mainly that at the start of operations t'hey had at first waited for "front~door" traffic~ this had not been very profital~le~ that in order to increase their business they had spent a grea~ deal of money, time, resear~h and effort~ and had 69- 753 City Hall, Anaheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES - December' 167 1969~j.:30 P~M. subsequent:ly 'built up their 'k~usiness al. ong the line of als'line traffic, and now they were working with tour agencies on a c'.ontract'. 'ga. sis; one agency guarantees 20 rooms par night. He remarked that at 'the Planning Com~:ission hearings he had been asked to submit audited records to substantiate his claim~ and that based on the results of the independent audit the variance had been granted. He re- ported the parking analysis ~bowed that over a two-year period the maximum number of automobiles on the premises between midnight and 1:00 A.M. was 24 for the 42 units. Mr'. Krause t:be:~, read a iett~r addressed to him from the Airport Coach Service, r~garding his type of service and the: fact that they projected to carry 500,000 ~assengers between International. Airport~ and the Disneyland Area, which number ]s ex~ec~:t:ed to increase When the major airlines put the new jumbo .jets into service next year. Also noted was letter from William Schneider, of the Anaheim,. Area. Visitor and Convention Bureau, wherein it was noted that 409 conYer.tions have been scheduled between 1969 and. 1982, with an anticipated attendance of 772,000, requiring 217~798 sleeping rooms. Mr. Gordon Fisher~ of the Waikiki Motel., 6S1 West Katella Avenue, commented that approximatel~ 8 years ago all his guests arrived by car, how- ever~ as time passes this num'~.er is dwindling, and now less than one-half of his guests arri'~'e in car~. In his ovin.£on, the present Code is outdated; how- ever, it was ap~ro~riate .at the time it was enacted; further that the require- ments were unr:ecessaril)' discriminatory for the reason that motels and hotels cater to the same trade, and hotels are permitted one parking space for two rooms~ Whereas motels are required to have one-for-one. With reference to those air travelers renting an auto upon arrival, Mr. Krause revorted that in all bis contracts with Air Travel Agencies he is required to furnish transportation once the guests arrive; that he provides vans and. a driver to take the guests to areas of interest. Cou'~..cilm. an Pe..bley again, called attention to the possibility of the motel being sold to another Who would not have the same operation or cater to the air traveler Which woald then create a parking problem. Mr. Krause replied that if the motel was sold, the sale would be the business, not necessarily the buildings al. one, and any purchaser would be foolish to revert to tlhe former operation; that the price of the business would in all probability assure the continuation of the present operation. Councilman Dutton again indicated he did not feel this to be a unique situation and was of the opinion that granting the variance would 'be establish- ing a precedent. May-ct Clark ren:~rk:~.d that, in his opinion, the Pe. titioner has sub.~ stan~iar.~] the fac:t be q. uali~i,.~.~ ~for ~ reduc~tion in ~arking requirements, 'based o~ the i~n'fa:rtl, a] aug. ired state'~ent submitted. Ca, un~.:il~zan Felle.~ £ndicated he would like a. Staff recon~endation rel. at i. ve to tb~. adequac':~' of t:he ~e~nt Code ~6arking requirements for motels and hotels in the C~R Zone, ar'lot to any action hein. g taken, and if the recom- mendation i, ndi~::at, esa chsng~ i'~ warrant~::d i,t would s~",~,ly to all motels.. In conclusion, Mr. Kr'a'use ad'v'ised that he is operating as a hotel, the onl>, difference 'Deing he does not look like a hotel. After additional discussion, Mr. Krause requested be not be required to wait for po~si'ble re'v'i, sion of an ordinance, as his need was now. Mayer Clark asked i.f anyone else wished to address the City Council; hearing no re::'~opse, be dec. i~red the bearing closed~ Councilman Clark, after hearing the evid,~.nce subn~itted by the Ap- plicant, offered a resol't~.tion~, appro¥ing Varianc. e No. 2129, and rescinding Resolution N'o. 69-754 City Hall~ Anaheim~ Californial-. COUNGIL MI~"~TES - December 1..6~ i969~ 1o30 P~I. Roll Call Vote' AYES: GOU757GILMEN: ScRutte and Clark NOES: COU~'CILME~'~ Dutton and Krein AB STAIIq~'.D: CiOUi~'C ILMEN' ~ Pebley ABSE~'T: COUNCILMEN': None The above resolution failed to carry. It was moved by Councilman Pet>ley, seconded by Councilman Schutte, that the Public Hearing on Variance No. 2129 be reopened and further con- tinued to the meeting of January 1.~, 1970, 1,~30 PoM., to allow for more comprehensive, in..-de~th study of the adequacy of the ~resent Code Parking Requirements for motels and hotels in the C-R Zone, and their recommenda- tions thereon. T~ this Motion~ Councilman Krein 'voted "No." MOTION CAR- RIED. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE ~'()~ 21.31: Submitted by Gulf Oil Corporation, to es- tablish automobile and motorcycle rentals in conjunction with an existing service station, with waiver of permitted uses in the C-1 Zone. Property located at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and Clementine Street. The CJt'>' Planning Co2~i.s$ion~ '~u.rsuant to Resolution No. PC69- 218, de~i~d said 'variance~ Zoning Suk~e~rvisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subjecn property, the exigtLng uses and zoning in the irmnediate area, and briefed the evidenc:e sut'~itted to and considered by the City Planning Commission, noting the 'bagi$ on. which said variance was denied, one being a special privilege not anjoyed l,y other service stations in. the City; and that the Petitione'r proposed ~o park the rental 'vehicles in the required front yawed setbs, ck, thereb'y enjoying a right not granted to the auto rental agency in~ediately to the east of subject property. Mr. Richard Weatherspoon, Attorney for the Applicant, 2333 North Broadway, Sa;~ta Ama, noted past activities of the Applicant advising that Mr. Weyland has 'oeen operating the station and renting motorcycles and automobiles fro:~: subject property since August 16~ 1968, for which he has a business license~ for each activity. Prior to this time he rented auto- mobiles and motorc~'cles at the Union Station approximately 2 blocks away; that during the years 1966 to 1968 Airway Rentals rented cars from the same Union Station 'under a Conditional Use Permit issued by the City of Anaheim. On October 1, 1969 the Applicant was notified by Development Services Department that this activity was not a permitted use and that he should apply for a variance. He thereupon made application for a use that has been in existence in the area since 1966. At the City Planning Commission hearing both subject variance and that of National Rental Agency to establish service facilities in conjunction with car rental were denied. Action of the City Planning Co~x~ission on application of National Rental Agency wasreversed by the City Council and their variance was granted. Mr. Weatherspoon remarked that the Planning Commission's actions seemed highly inconsistent, in view of previous decisions on similar issues, noting that on January 1, 1966, the Planning Commission, on a 6 to 1 vote, granted Cond'£tional Use Permit No. 803 '~o the Union Service Station at Katella and Harbor Boulevard for car rentals; that the vehicle supplier in that instance is the same supplier that Mr~ Weyland uses, and that five of the same member~ are still on the Planning Commission. He concluded his remarks by noting that the variance requested is permissible under the ordinance, that it would create a hardship on the Petitioner and to the City if the operation continued without this access- ory use¢ He further remarked that Mr. Weyland offered the only rental service for young people between, the ages of 21 and 25, most of them being 69-755 ~ity Hall~ Anabeim~ California- COUNCIL MIi~UTES - December 16, 1969, 1~.30 P.M. servicemen, not old enough to rent automobiles from o'the'r agenc:ies~ and pro- vides them a 'means of trans?ortation while visiting the Com~zercial-Recreation Area, In conclusion~ Mr. Weatherspoon stated that service stations renting cars are common today' and further, nc neighbors are hurt and none have complained. Therefore, granting the variance will hurt no one~ it 'will benefit the public, the City and tourist, and wii1 relieve hardship and permit the continued opera- tion of an activity conducted ~y' Mr. We'd'land and recog~.ized by' the City since 1966, " In response to C©~c;il questioning, Mir. Weyland~ Petitioner, 231 West Katella Avenue~ stated that~ in his opinion, 10 rental cars and 10 motor- cycles wo'uld be an adequate working inventory; that motorcycles would be gar- aged indoors at night.. Mayor Clark asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, hearing no response; declared the hearing closed. Discussion 'was held by the Council, during which Mayor Clark remarked he felt a study should be made of the definition of "Service Station Use," that, in his opinion, rental cars and motorcycles should be permitted i.n the tourist area. He added~ however, the limitation should be imposed on the number ef each type vehicle rented and it should be further stipulated that either trail- er rentals only or csrs and motorcycles rentals only, be permitted, and not both. Councilman Pebley remarked he preferred permitting service station. accessory' uses by variance or' conditional use permit, rather than an amendment to the Service Station Ordinan~e~ RESOL'UTION N'O. 69R-71.4: Councilman Pebiey offered Resolution No. 69R-714 for adoption., gra. nt. ing Variance Nc. 2131~ subject to development substantially in accordance wit'h F. laas and s~.ec~ifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No. 1. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 212'1. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COU:~CILM]~N: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES° CO'U~'C ILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-714 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - AREA DEVELOPMEN'T PLAN NO. 104' To consider an Area Development Plan for local circulation in the southeast industrial area between Ball Road on the north, Cerritos Avenue on the south, Lewis Street on the east, and the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks on the west. The City Planni~8 Co~nission~ pursuant to Resolution No. PC69-227, recommended approval of Exhi. kit ~A~ for Portions "A" and "C" only, to estab- lish a logical, local street system through the study area in the southeast industrial area; recon~'mending, however, that no precise alignment be adopted for Portion "B", in order to allow more flexibility' of the development. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of the subject property with the aid of a map i~osted, on the east wall of the Council Chambers, described the surrounding uses and zoning in the imm~.ediate area. In briefing the evidence considered b~ t'he City Planning Co~mi~sion he noted that the pro- perty ow~ ,. Monsanto Co~'~.an~', ~.brc',ugh which Por'tion "B" is projected, has no immediate plane fo.r dc. ve!<?'?n~ent, therefore, said portion should be omitted from the ~lan at: this Mayor Cl.s. rk s~sked l.f snyone wished to address the C:ity Council. City Hall, Anaheim~ Cali£ornia - CO'U~CIL MINUTES ~ December 16, 1969, Mr. Gerald T. Kennedy, Plant Manager of Monsanto C,'om~oany, 61i. East Cerritog Avenue, stated that there is no opposition on t'h~ part of Monsanto to the proposed Area Development Plan., so long as specific align- ments not be developed for Portion "B". Mayor Clar'~ asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council; hearing no regponse, 'he declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO~ 69R.-~;:'15: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 69R- 715 for adoption, approving Ares. Development Plan RS. 104, in accordance with E;i.m;~b~.t ~ as reco',T~ended by the City Planning Co~mission. Re£er to Reso£ution Bo~Ko A RESOLUTIOY OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TN.E CiTY OF ANAIiEIM APPROVING AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 104 FOR THE LOCAL CIRCULATION IN THE SOUTHEAST IXDUSTRIAL AREABETWEEN BALL ROAD ON T~E NORTH, CERRITOS AVENUE ON THE SOUTH, LEWIS STREET O!~ THE EAST, AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS ON THE WEST~ (Exhi.~it "A") Roll Call Vct:eo AYES~ CO0'5~CILMEN~ Dutton, Krein~ Schutte, Pebley and Clark NO.E S: C OUi<i'C ILME'.~'; None ABSE)~T' (~O[)'[~'C IL~N' None Mayer declared Resolution No. 69R-71.5 duly passed and adopted° PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18: To consider proposed Amendment to Chap- ter 18.37, Cozmmarcial-Recreation Zone, b.y the addition of Adto Rental Agencies to Section 18.~'~' .:~.020, permitted uses. The City Planning Con~ission~ pursuant to Resolution No. PC69- 2117, recommended said Amendment to include auto rental agencies as a pri- mary use in the Commmrcial-Recreation Zone be disapproved, based on the following findings,~ 10 That an auto rental agency should be permitted as a matter of right only where it is an accessory use to motels and hotels, and as a conditional use wb. en operated independently as a primary use or in con- nection with any other primary uses in the C-R Zone. R. That service station sites are generally inadequate in size to permit combining the uses together with auto rental agencies, due to need for parking said vehicles on the site, within the setback area, along with other customers~ vehicles. 3. That permitting auto rental agencies in combination with service stations in the C-R Zone only, would be granting a privilege not enjoyed by service stations established in. other zones. 4.~ That permitting auto rental agencies by right in any com- mercial zone, could lead to the conversion of many existing operating and non-operating service stations into rental facilities for not only auto- mobiles, but campers, travel trailers, boats, and utility rental trailers. The Mayor a~ked i.f anyone wished to addres.s the City Council; hearing no re~'.~on~ he declared the hearing closed° The foregoing actio~ was reviewed by the City Council and no fu'rthcr a¢.tion taken~ FUBL£C HEARING - AMEi'~.'DMENT TO TITLff 18~ To conside:r proposed Amendment. to Ti'tie ]8~ Chapter 18.[~8, Co~m,ercial-Office Zone~ and Chapter 18.40, C-l, General Commercial Zone - Par~'.ing Requirements for' high-rise structures. Ti~e Cit'y ~la:nning Commission. O'ursuant to Resolution No. PC69~ 228, recommended said Amendment: be approved, 69~757 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUbiCIL MI!~'~CTES - Decemi~er 16, 196~9~ I150 P.M. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts briefed the Council, noting that at the adoption of the C-R Zone an efficiency fac~tor of 75% had been estab- lished, whereas when the CMO and C-1 Zones were established a 100% factor was determined~ City Manager Keith Murdoch noted that the requirements for off- street parking for officio buildings would be substantially higher than the surrounding areas, all of which seemed to be having greater success in high- rise development~ and asked if the conditions recommended might be too severe. In response to Mr. Murdoch~s question, As~.istant Director of Devel- opment Services Ronald Thon~son reported that the Staff had undertaken an independen~ study of the parking standards and found tbem to be appropriate for Anaheim at this ti~e. He noted that it was felt by developers in Los Angeles and Long Beaah that ~eople utilizing office baildings in most cities were in car pools, whereas in Orange County the ratio was a one-to-one situa- tion. He concluded b]y remarking that the Cities of Costa Mesa, Santa Monica, Inglewood, and the City' of Orange~ who now have new high-rise developments have parking standards consistent with those being proposed. Mayor Clark asked if anyone wished to address the City Council; hearing no response, he declared the hearing closed. ORDIN'AS'CE ~O~ 2761: Coancilman Krein of£ered Ordinance ~o. 2761 for first reading. AN ORDIS~A!~'CE OF THE CiTY OF Ai'~fAHEIM AME~5~DIN'G TITLE 18, CHAPTERS 18.38 AN~D 18.40 OF THE AM'AHEIM M0'~'ICIPAL CODE BY THE ADDITION' OF SECTIONS 18~ 38 . 050 (4) (A-6) A~'D 18~40.070(4~a) (1-.d)~ (Parking Requirements - High Rise) ~EQUEST TO HANG BANdY. RS - A>~HEIM D'NION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT: Request from Mr. Ro Ken Wines. Superintendent, Anaheim Union High School District, was sub- mitted requesting permiss~.on to hamg two street banners in the City, advising the public of the Bond and Tax Election for one week prior to the election. On motiop Dy Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte, said request was gramted subject to conditions and approval of the location by the Public Utilities Director~ SPECIAL USE PERMIT NOS. ~5 AND 59: Request was submitted by Mr. James C. Dixon for a refund of the bond for a 6-foot masonry wall in conjunction with Special Use Permit Nos~ 45 and 59. The Developmemt Servic~es Department recommended said bond be held until the property to the east thereof is developed. Councilman Krein moved that the request be denied, as recom~cnded. Councilman Pebley secc~nded tlhe motion. MOTION CARRIED° Mr~ James C. Dixon, Associate Minister, Central Church of Christ, 1590 West Ball Road, requested permission to address the City Council. He stated that this request 'was beJ.ng made based on the fact that the owner of the property to the east has an easement ower the Church property, and con- sequently the Church was unable to build a fence. It was moved by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Pebley, that motion for denial be rescinded and the matter continued to the meeting of December 23, 1969, 'to allow for further investigation° MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68=69-85 ~ EXTENSION OF TIME' Request of Mr. and Mrs. Walter Fluegge was submitted for a 6-month extension of time on Reclassification No. 68-69-85~ together with report of the Development Services Department, recom- mending said extens~.on. On motion by Counc~ilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Krein, a 6-month extension of ti~e wss granted~ to expire June 17~ 1970. MOTION CARRIED. 69-758 _City }tall~ Anaheim, Califoz'.,'.ia- COUi~GIL MIS'UTES- December 16z_u.i.:?_69, 1'30 CONDITIONAL USE PEBi4IT NO. 1098 - EXTE'.~SIO~ O~' TTME.': Request of H~nry R~iehert, of Ro~hert & Son, Developer, was submitted requesting a 60-day e×tensio'i~ of time to Conditional Use Permit ~o. 1098, together with report of tho City Engineer and Development §ervlces Department, recon~.ending a 6=month extension of tiu..e 'be granted. On mot:ton 'oy Councilman Dutton, seconded 'my Councilman Krein, a 6-mont'h e~tensi, on of time to expire June 5~, 1.97'0, was grantedo MOTION CARRIED. SIDEWALK WAIVER~- 805 SOUTH MAG"_gOLIA AVE~UE' ,.- (65~66-85): Request of Harry Laf- foon f.~r t~:r:?or.~rv ~ide'walk waiver at 80j Sout~ Magnol. ia Avenue was sub~ mitred and grant, ed a],>:~.g Magnolia Avenue~ subject to oo permanent plant- lng oz im'prov:~r.;e~,.c~: b~ permitted within_ the area ra~serv~d for futur~ sida- walk, o.n mot[or, by Cc,~nc. ilman Dutton~ seconded ty C~ur:.cilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. VARIAi~CE ~'O~ 2125: Petir. ior.~ requesting rehearing on Variance No. 2135, con- taining reaso'.ns t'~erefor~, was sabmitc, ed. It was noted in the request that a'i:t.ivities de, ied by the City Planning Conm',ission and subsequently granted by the City Council., such as the pumping of gas, minor repairs and car' washing wc~uld have a deleterious off,ct on the sleeping units o£ the: adj ac. ent Rehearin. g was authorized to be resc'heduled~ on motion 'by Council- g).on Er'el.n, secc',nded by C3anci. im..an Schutte, and th,~ Cit?;' Clerk was requested tc im:.,~ed.iately notify Aiz. 7~:lic. onts accordingly° MOTIO'_x; CARiRIED. ORANGE COU~iTY '.['SE VARIAXCE NO. 62:;57~ Requesting permission to establish a 'mo- bile home as a residance in addition to an existing single-family dwell- ing at i0942 Berry Ave~.ue (County' R-D-2-Family Residence District) was submitted> rogether with City Planning Commission recommendations that said variance be denied on the basis of State of California Code prohib- iting use of $ mobile home as li'ving quarters when not located in a bona fide mobile hom~ park. City' Planning Commission recomm, endations were sustained and or- dered forwarded to Orange County Planning Conm~ission for their informa- tion, on motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. WORK ORDER NO. 346: Award of contract for the addition to Anaheim Convention Center storage facility was ordered held in abeyance, as recommended by the City Engineer, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. WORK ORDER NO. 346~1: Award of contract for the addition to Anaheim Convention Center office was ordered held in abeyance, as recommended by the City Engineer, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutteo MOTION' CARRIED° RESOLUTION' Nee 69R-71~ - WORK ORDER NO. 347° In accordance with recommenda- tions of the City' Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 69R- ~16 for adoption. Refer 'co Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF %'HE CIT'¥ COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED ~'ROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FgRis. ISH[~,iG OF ALL E'LANT~ LABOR, SERVICES, ~TERIALS Abed EQUIFME~T A~D ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION', I5~CLUDING PO~R, FUEL AND WAT~;R, AND ~'E_RFORMING ALL WORK N'tiCESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLEIF TH~ FOLLOWING P[~BLIC IMPR.OV~]MEixI~ THE GILBERT=LA PAL~ AVEN"0E STREU~ IMPROV[:(PiL~T, IN GILBERT STREET FROM APPROXI~TE;L'Y 700 Fl'ET ~'OR.TH OF LA PAL~ AVF,,;q"UE TO APP~.OXI~TE. LY 100 FF. ET SOU~ THEREOF, AND IN LA PALMA AV~;'~x~;."E ~:~'.OM APPROXI~TELY 500 FEET EAST OF GILBERT STR~;ET ]'O AE'[-.~(j:,41MAI't:'.L~ 50 Fk'ET EAST THERE;OF, IN THE CI~ OF ANAHEIM, WOg. K OLDER NO, ~;.~',:, (~.. 3, So'tl~ Compa. n)- -- $18,821, 69- 759 City Halls Anaheim, California - CO['XCIL MIN'UTES - December 16:, 1969, 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Krein~ Scbucte~ Pebley and. Clark ~OES: GOU>idih~ ~one ABSENT: COU~CIL~: None The Mayor deciare2 Resolution No0 69R~,710 Ouly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-717 .- WORK ORDER. NO. 503: In accordance with recommendations of the City Engineer.. Coo~ilvmn Schutte offered Resolution No. 69R-717 for adoption. Refer co R~.::sola'C. ion Bock. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COi;NCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL A¢SD AWARDING A CO5tT~,ACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHI!~G OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM- PROVEM>.;i~T: THE IMPROVEMEYT OF FEE ANA STREET, FROM LA PALMA AVEIYUE TO APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET SOUTH THEREOF, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 503. (R.J. Noble Cota!?any .- $7,615.00) Roll Cs. il Vote: AYES: COUNCILBt]Si: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark ~OE S: C Gi)'~'C ILME!7: !forte ABSENT: C OUSiC ILF[E~%': 5.~c n e The May~t,r de~:l, ar=:d kesol'ution No. 69R~-717 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTIOi~' NO. 69R-'/18 ~ W~)RK ORDER i~'0o 579A: In accordance with the recommen- dations of the City Engir:eer:~ Cc,,ancilman Krein offered Resolution No. 69R- 718 for adcT'.tion. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION O[ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL A:S'D AWARDIi~liG A COiqTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHI!~!G OF ALL PLA.~iT~ LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM- PROVEME[qT: THE LEWIS STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT FROM APPROXIMATELY 650 FEET SOUTH OF KATELLA AVElq'gE TO PAC. IFICO AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1219. (R.J. Noble Company - $28,486.30) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-718 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R.~719 - WORK ORDER NO, 1219: In accordance with recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Clark offered Resolution N'0. 69R-719 for adoption. Refer to R;~so!utien Book, A RESOL[,TION OF Tt~E CITY CO(;NCiL OF TH[J CIT]' OF Ai~'AHEIM ACCEPTING A SEAl,ED PROPOSAL A'~'D AWARDI)~C A C.3i_~'TRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHIS~(~ OF ALL PLA.T?, LABOF, SERVICES, MATERIALS Aix;D EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TI;.A'i'SPORTAFIO':4, INCLUDING POWER., FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NEC:ESSA~Y TO CONSTRUCT AND COMFLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM- PROVEMET!T: THE LEWIS STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT EROlVf APPROXIMATELY 650 FEET SOUTH OF KATELLA AVEN'ii-E T.) FAC IFICO AVENUE, I.N THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER YO 1219. (Bar't: ?i:~:ti. ne:, Inc. - $6:742.40.) 69-760 C~ty Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 16~ 1969~ 1-30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-719 duly passed and adopted. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Nos. 69R-720 to 69R- 723, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO, 69R-720: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEME~Ff GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Ann Prentice) RESOLUTION NO. 69R-721: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Gene E. and Dianna L. Stinson) ~ RESOLUTION NO. 69R-722: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Johanna Domries) RESOLUTION NO. 69R-723: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Johanna and Bernard O. Domries) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 69R-720 to 69R-723, both in- clusive, duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 69R-724: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 69R-724 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXCHANGE OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN PIONEER PARK IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM; AND AUTHOR- IZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN ACCORD- ANCE THEREWITH. Roi1 Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES: COUNCILMEN: Non e ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R-724 duly passed and adopted. 69-761 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 16, 1969~ 1'30 P.M. PURCHASE OFEt~UIPMENT~ : On the recommendations of the City Manager, purchase of used Fairbanks-Morse Pump, in good condition and carrying a new pump guaran- tee from Water Well Supply, in the net amount of $4,775.00, including tax, was authorized on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE--CONVENTION CENTER BROCHURES.: Purchase of 3,500 Brochures, in conjunc- tion with the Anaheim Area Visitor and Convention Center order from Gardner- Fulmer Lithograph, in the amount of $5,307°80 wa~ authorized, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE:_ The followin6 correspondence was ordered received and filed on motiOn by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein: a. Application of Southern Pacific Company before the Public Utilities Commission,to modify the]requ£~'ements, of General Order No. 75-B, relating to the use of backlights in connection with the operation of Stand- ard No. 8 grade crossing signals. b. Treasurer's Report for the month of November, 1969. c. Minutes - Cultural Arts Commission - Meeting of November 10, 1969. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2756: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2756 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68-69-14 - C-1 and C-O') Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES. COUNCILMEN' None !BSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2756 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2757: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2757 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61(36) - C-R) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES. COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2757 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2758: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2758 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-85 - C-l) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES' COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2758 duly passed and adopted. 69-762 City Hall~ Anahei~ {']alifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 16, i969, 1'30 ORDIN~.;CE NO. 2759: Councilman ;{chutte offered Ordiaance No. 2759 for adop- ~..ion, Refer to ll)r(!i_nan~:e Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE ~Y AJ.~!>ING 'tHERETO CHAPTER 3.49 AND INCLUDING THEREIN SECTIONS 3.49.0].~.i} ~i£; 3.49.090 i~.Oi'~ i~4CLUSIVE RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERHiTS FOR VLNDORS TO DO BUS.Li~ESS DURING THE ANNUAL HALLOWEEN PARADE AND FESTIVAL. ~oll Call Vote: ,iYES: COUNCILMEN' Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES' COUNCILMEN' None ABSENT; COUNCILMEn' None The Mayor declared ()L-dinance No. 2759 duly passed and adopted. NO. 2-/60' Councilman ])utton offered Ordinance ~!o. 2760 for adoption. Refer Co Ordinance Book. A.~, ORD.,.~,~AM...? OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 1.4, CBAPTER 14.32, SECTI{':N 14. '3'2. 179 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAl., CODE, RE'!..ATii~.G TO C1TY PARKING LOTS - PERMIT PARKING ONLY - TWO HOUR P/'~t~K]N& LIMIT. R...:'~!! Cail Vote: .~...S' COUNCILMEN" !¥atton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NeE S- COUNC I LIvIE N· None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: l~one The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2760 duly passed and adopted. ORDI~'4ANCE NO. 2762. Councilman Krein offered Ordinance ~4o. 2762 for first read- ing. JN ORDINANCE OF THE (:ITt OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION i4.32~190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (Dale Avenue, on the west side, from Lincoln Avenue to Academy Avenue.) ORDINANCE NO. 2763' Councilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2763 for first read- iug. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF f~.NAHE]M AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61(37) - C-R) ALCOHcq~IC i~EVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by John and Eliz~beth McPartlin, for Off-Sale Beer and Wine, Person-to-Person Trans- fer, £or Un-named business, 2]69 West Lincoln Avenue, was submitted for Council information. No further action was taken. RECESS: Counci!raan Krein moved for a 'ten minute Recess. Councilman Dutton secon(!e~ the motion. MOTION CARRIED (4'00 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayoz~ Clark called the meeting to order; all members of the Council being present and ~he basiness before the Council resumed. (4.15 P.M,). RE~OLUTi~C,N NO, 69R-725" Councilman l)utton offered Resolution No. 69R-725 for adoption. Refer 'to R~solution Book. A RESOL[;TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AMENI)M~'NT TO THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT AUTHORIZING THE EM- PI~OYMENT OF NICHOLAS CASSA, JR., AS A GOLF PROFESSIONAL TO RENDER SERVICES F(?R AND ON i;i~HALF (~F THE CITY OF ANAHEIM Al' THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL GOLF (',OURSE. 69-763 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 16, 1969, i~30 PoM. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark NOES' COUNC ILME~': None ABSENT: COU~'C ILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 69R=725 duly passed and adopted. PROPOSED BALLOT MEASURES: Mr. Murdoch referred to meeting with the Chairmen of the Capital Improvement Committees and Staff members~ wherein discussion was held on the various Bond measures included on the ballot of November, 1968, General Election, for the purpose of considering the pogsibility of again including some of the measures on the forthcoming April election. 1. CITY HALL ISSUE ($5~000~000o00): Mr. Murdoch reported that the discussions seemed to indicate that consideration should be given to a bond measure briefly as follows: "Shall the City build a City Hall and issue General Obligation Bonds therefor?" A second part, which would be a separate issue, would be along the lines of: "Shall a City Hall be built on Site "A" (Harbor Boulevard), or Site "B", (Lincoln Avenue)?" Councilman Clark moved that the City Hall issues, as outlined by Mr. Murdoch, be placed on the April ballot. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. To this motion, Councilman Krein voted "No." MOTION CARRIED. 2. ELECTRICAL REVENUE BONDS ($8,650,000.00): Mr. Murdoch reported that this issue would be to complete the purchase of those electrical facili- ties in the areas of Anaheim currently served by the Edison Company, in ac- cordance with an agreement with the Edison Company entered into some years ago, and would also provide for the construction of necessary' 69/12 KV electrical substations to provide f~r load growth as projected by the Capital Improvement Committee. At the invitation of Councilman Krein, Mr. Gordon Hoyt, Director of Public Utilities, addressed the Council in reply to questions asked, and advised that the purchase of the facilities projected to be acquired the first year would produce a revenue of approximately one million dollars a year, over and above all expenses, including cost of operation and debt amortization; this is based on the current rate structure and the current price paid for power. Councilman Schutte moved that the Electrical Revenue Bond measure be placed on the April ballot. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. Under discussion and prior to vote, Councilman Clark suggested the measure include a provision whereby the revenue above expenses be earmarked for the street lighting improvement program. Mr. Murdoch stated that this would be more money than required for street lighting, however, it could be worded that a portion of the revenue from this activity would be used first for upgrading the street lighting sys- tem throughout the City. Mr. Hoyt reported that at the time of the Capital Improvement Com- mittee Study it was estimated that the cost to bring the City Street 1. ighting up to Code Standards would be slightly over $1,900,000.00. Further, at the time of the Study,it was determined that a bond issue for this improvement would not be necessary as it was felt the Electrical Revenue Bonds would be successful, however, it was recommended that a portion of the revenue be used to carry out the street lighting program over a 5-year period. It was further explained that the street lighting program would not include ornamental lighting, which is the obligation of the property owner, if such a system is desired. 69-764 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTiES - December i~ ..... I!~69~ 1:30 2.h... Mr~ Geisler advised against setting aside a certain percentage in the measure for any single purpose as the revenue, or amount set aside~ could never be used for any' other purpose after this specific improvement was accomplished. He further advised that the Council could make such a commitment in the argument for the measure or in a Resolution o£ Policy~ or consider a second issue on the ballot, an issue which would be advisory and non-binding to the effect whether the voters would rather have the revenue used for' street lighting or some other purpose. Councilman Krein asked if the acquisition of the Edison Company £acilities was a cash transaction or would payment be e×nended over a per- iod of years. Mr. Murdoch r~,lied that a long-term contract ~or the acquisition of the facilities would result in the City ~aying a higher rate of interest than the int:erest that: would be paid on the issuance o£ revenue bonds. As to earmarking funds {or a specific program~ Mr. Murdoch ad- vised that this could be discussed with the Bond Attorneys. At the conclusion of the discussion, the Mayor restated the mo- tion. MOTION CARRIED~ ~. SEWER CONSTRUCTION BONDS ($700~000.00): Mr. Murdoch reported that, in his opinion, the Sewer Construction program can operate from the annual budgeted allocation for at least the next two years as the area pre- viously projected for rapid growth and heavy demand now appears to be ex- panding at a normal rate that can be taken care of in the Annual Budget. He thereupon recommended this issue not be included on the April ballot. The City Council concurred in the recommendations of the City Manager. 4. STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION BONDS ($4~50~,000.00): Mr. Murdoch reported that the Storm Drain. Construction Program could not be handled from current Budgetary allocation, however, another method would be to apply for and hopefully receive a Federal Grant for a portion of the cost of the construction of the storm drains. Councilman Pebley moved that the Storm Drain Construction Bonds be included on the April, 1970 ballot. Councilman Krein seconded the mo- tion. Under discussion, and prior to vote, the need for the bonds thus far discussed was noted. Also noted was the increase in interest rates since the measures were defeated by the voters November, 1968. Question on the motion was called for. Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that the issue had not been sufficiently discussed and there- upon abstained from voting. MOTION CARRIED° 5. LIBRARY BONDS ($700~000.00) - PARK BONDS ($4~000~000.00): Mr. Murdoch noted that at the meeting held with the Steering Committee the apparent indications were that perhaps these more directly "People'oriented" type activities should be considered at a later date. (a) LIBRARY: Councilman Pebley was of the impression that the desire for a Library in the East Anaheim area was so great that it could jeopardize the success of the other measures if omitted, and thereupon moved that the Library Bond issue be included on the April ballot. Coun- cilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° (b) PARK BONDS: Councilman Pebley moved that the Park Bond issue be placed on. the April ballot. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. To this motion~ Councilman Clark voted "No." MOTION CARRIED, 69-765 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUiNCIL MIN~UTES - December 16-3 1969, 1:30 P.M. Prior to 'vote on. tire two former motions the following discussion was held: At the invitation of the City Council, Mr. Glenn Fry, representing the Parks and Recreation Com~.ission, advised it was not their intention to give the impression that a bond issue was not wanted or needed~ it was their feeling that the A~pril timing was poor and that it would be better to place this measure on a ballot at a later date. He thereupon requested it not be included on the April ballot. Mr. Fry further advised that it was his per~cnal opinion that the Library issue Should also be o:~itted from the April ballot for the same rea-- son as the Park issue. Councilman Pe'~ley stated it was his oF. inion that none of the former issues should be cons~idered at the April elect£on, 'but single some of them were, all of them should. Discussion was held relative to the Budgeted Allocation for the ac- quisition of a Library site in. East Anaheim and Mr. Murdoch advised that ac- cording to his infor~.ation, the Library Board has approved of the location in an existing park site, however, there were no funds to build the Library~ At the conclugion of t'he discussion on the proposed bond issues was agreed th. at t'he precise wording and amounts would be determined and brought back for fo'rmal action t~y ordinance and/or resolutions. ARCHITECT - CITY HALL ~ ADRIAN WILSON ASSOCIATES: Mr. Robert M. Davis, Assistant City Manager, reviewed proposal submitted by Adrian Wilson Associates, ad- vising that the servit~e would include schematic plans and rendering for the two sites. Preparation of the schematic plans, rendering, and necessary space studies for the first site would be $8,000.00, and for an alternate site $4,000.00. If bonds were approved and contract for construction entered into the $8,000.00 figure would be absorbed into the contract figure of 6-1/2% of the total, construction c~st. On motion by' Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, employment of Adrian Wilson Associates was approved, and contract authorized in accordance with proposal dated December 8, 1969, and verbal authority to proceed hereby given. MOTION CARRIED~ EMPLOYMENT o BOND ATTORNEYS - O~MELVENY AND MYERS: On the recommendation of the City Manager, employment of the firm of O'Melveny and Myers, Bond Attorneys, on the same terms and conditions for services rendered in conjunction with bond issues on the November, 1968 General Election, was authorized on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED'CITY MEASURE ~ AMENDMENT TO STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT CONTRACT (POLICE AND FIRE)_[ As requested by the Arm heim Peace Officers Association and Anaheim Firemen~s Association, and in accordance with Council instructions, the City Attorney submitted and read two drafts wording ~ proposed measure to be con- sidered at the April, 1970 ~lection, as follows: "Shall the City provide retirement of 50% of salary (average of 3 highest consecutive years pay) for police and fire personnel with 20 years' service, at age 50 instead of at age 55, and pay the additional cost incUrred thereby from general tax revenues?" "Shall the City pro¥ide special benefits for qualified dependents of retired police and fire personnel (present or future) by providing them with 50% of such persom~nel~s retirement benefits upon death of the retired person and pay the additional cost incurred for suc:h s'pecial benefits from general ta~.~ r~ve~es?" I~'~ answer to Coun~il inquiry, Mr. Murdoch re~orted that in the meet- ing and conferring se~sio~s wit~ the Poli¢~.e and ?ire Associations he agreed to reco.nnnend to the City Council[ that. these messures be pla¢':ed on the April ballot, 69-766 City Hall~ Anaheim, Califor:ni.~- COUi~'GIL MI!~STES- De?.em'!er ~: ~ !~~1..3() i~.. /... and also pointed out that ',e was in disagree~:~ent with 'the principles in-~ volved in bot'h requests and would do everything in his ~.ower to bring to the attention of the public the costs involved ap.d tlha.t he would oppose the measures. Council'~na.n Krein moved that the~e two measures not be placed on the ballot. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. E'rior to 'vote on the aEove motion~ Mr. Murdoch further reported that according to hi~s understanding the desire to have these two measures on the ballot m~y not be as strong as wa~ indicated during the negotiating sessions, and reco~z~ended he check this w~th the two organizations involved~ that unless they wished 'to actively suFport these measures they should, with- draw' their request. At the conclusion of further discussion that followed, the motion and second were withdrawn and the matter ordered continued to the next meet- ing, (December 23, 1969) to allow further investigation, as recommended by the City Manager. TRANSFER OF FUNDS: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dut- ton, transfer of $16,000.00 from the Capital Outlay Fund for refencing of the driving range aa.d revisions to the Pro Shop at the Anaheim Municipal Golf Course w~ authorized, as reco'rmr_ended by the City Manager. MOTION CARRIED. TRANSFER OF FUNDS: On ~notion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dut- ton~ transfer of $7~667.25, from the Council Contingency Fund, to satisf~ judgment fcr inverse cgndemnaticn proceedings 'taken in conjunction with the widening of East Street, was authorized. MOTION CARRIED. H.U.D~ - PARKS~IN~CITIES PROGRAM: Mr. Murdoch ~riefed the City Council on ex- panded "Parks~In-Cities" progran~ designed under the authority of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, providing for matching funds for the development of small and moderate~sized parks within the City. He stated that a general request would be required prior to January 1, 1970, and if favorable action is obtained the application would then be finalized. M~~. Murdoch further reported the following three areas which it was felt wouId qualify under this program, as follows: 1~ City-owned property north of La Palma Park, currently used for overflow parking. This area could be developed as a multi-u-se athletic field, with 4 baseball diamonds, regulation soccer field, field lighting, and one park control building. Estimated cost - $135,000.00. Mr. Murdocb stated that with this improvement the area could still be utilized for overflow parking. 2. City.-owned property of approximately one-third acre on Patt Street, could be developed as a mini-park wit'h playground equipment and multi-use court area, and lighting. Estimated cost - $30,000.00. .$. Two lots in the vicinity of Elm and Clementine Streets, also could be developed as a mini-park. Estimated cost of development - $35,000.00. Mr. Murdoch was of the opinion that with the development of the mini-parks neighborhood participation would be available. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Clark, letter of int:ent was authorized. Discussion was held, and roll call vote requested by Council- man Dutton. AYES' COUiNCILMEN: Schutte and Clark NOES: CO'UT~'CILMElq'~ Dutton, Krein and Pebley 69-767 69-768 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 16, 1969, 1:30 P.M. Said motion failed to carry. EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the request of the City Attorney, Councilman Schutte moved to recess to Executive Session to discuss a matter concerning litigation. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:35 P.M.). ADJOURNMENT: The City Council returned to the Council Chambers from Executive Session and adjourned, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Council- man Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 6: 15 P.M. City Clerk City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 23~ 19697 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session~ PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Pebley and Clark ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams CITY ENGINEER: James P~ Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Clark called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Ragon T. Flannery, of the First Christian Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Pebley led the Assembly in the Pledge of Alle- giance to the Flag~ RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS: On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, and unanimously carried, Resolution con- gratulating Councilman and Mrs~ Fred T~ Krein on the occasion of their 53rd Wedding Anniversary was authorized. MINI'TES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held December 9, 1969, were approved on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Peb- ley. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Schutte moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $169,329.12, in accordance with the 1969-70 Budget, were approved.