Loading...
1972/08/0872 -508 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES Au1ust 8 1972, 1 :30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 110: To consider an Area Development Plan encompassing properties bounded on the north by Santa Ana Canyon Road, on the east by Anaheim Hills (Walnut Canyon) Road, on the south by Nohl Ranch Road, and on the west by Imperial Highway, to determine providing circulation and access within said area. The City Planning Commission,pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -148 recommended approval of Area Development Plan No. 110 in accordance with Exhibit A. Inasmuch as the property covered by Reclassification No. 71- 72 -34, and Variance No. 2391 was included in Area Development Plan No. 110. These applica- tions were considered at the same time. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71 -72 -34 AND VARIANCE 2391: Submitted by H. L. Budlong and R. Joseph Maag, requesting a change in zoning from R -A to R -1, to allow a 162 -lot tract on the south side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east of Imperial Highway, with waivers of: (Tract No. 7769) a. Minimum lot area. b. Minimum lot width. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -150, denied said variance, and pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -149, recommended said reclassification be approved R -1 subject to the following conditions: 1. That a final tract amp of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. That final elevations and floor plans for the proposed single family dwelling units shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council. 3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate Park and Recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 4. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each parcel is ready to comply to conditions pertaining to such parcel, provided however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split. 5. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. 6. That subject property shall be developed substantially in confor- mance with Area Development Plan No. 110, Exhibit "A Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject prop- erty and advised that the purpose of this study on the Area Development Plan was to investigate potential circulation and vehicular access problems. He added that the Traffic Engineer had recommened there be only two access points to Nohl Ranch Road, and the City Planning Commission had determined Exhibit A would be the most efficient. He noted that park and library facilities are proposed for the north- east corner of Imperial Highway and Nohl Ranch Road; the 40 acres at the south- east corner of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Imperial Highway are owned by the Orange Unified School District and designated as a future high school site. In reply to Councilman Pebley, the City Manager advised that, since the western most street providing access from Nohl Ranch Road would traverse through property potentially designated for a park, construction of that street and dedication of the land therefor normally would be the responsibility of the City. Referring to the tentative tract map for the proposed development under the reclassification and variance application (Tract No. 7769, Revision No. 1) Mr. Roberts advised that the tract map as proposed coincides with Exhibit A of Area Development Plan No. 110. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Mr. Roberts further advised that, although the City Planning Com- mission recommended the reclassification be approved, they had denied the variance because they felt some of the lots being as small as 6,000 square feet and having 60 foot widths would not be consistent with other develop- ment in the area, and that homes proposed for these smaller lots would be too large; that approving the variance would be granting a privilege not enjoyed by other developers in the area since the petitioner had not proven a hardship existed in development of the property. He further noted that the City Planning Commission at their meeting held July 10, 1972, had recommended all proceedings connected with Reclassif- ication No. 67- 68 -21, covering the northern 13 acres of this property, (Resolution of Intent to R -3 zoning approved per Resolution No. 67R -606, amended per Resolution No. 68R -78) on the basis the proposed zoning did not now meet the intent of the City Planning Commission and City Council for development of the property on the south side of Santa Ana Canyon Road since many changes had taken place since the property was annexed into the City in 1967. Councilman Dutton, verifying that no other property in the area had been approved for R -3 zoning, as had been the northern 13 acres under Reclassification No. 67- 68 -21, noted that the higher density zoning had been approved because the Council at that time felt this particular piece of prop- erty south of the Santa Ana Canyon Road would be appropriate for multiple dwellings, and thus he felt granting the request for some smaller lots would not be setting a precedent. The Mayor asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and wished to address the City Council. Tom Siffermann, S S Construction Company, 8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills, Agent, contended that the original R -3 zoing on the northern 13 acres of the total 35 acres under consideration had been granted because a high school was designated for the property to the west, a church and parochial school to the east, and commercial property across Santa Ana Canyon Road. He noted that the Resolution of Intent to R -3 zoing on that property would not expire until January 1973, and a total of 328 units could be constr- ucted on the property if the northern 13 acres were R -3 apartments and the remainder R -1; that 232 units could be developed if townhouses were erected on the northern parcel and R -1 homes on the southern parcel; or, if R -2 5,000 were requested for the entire parcel, there would be 187 dwelling units. Mr. Siffermann stated that many of the proposed lots are over 6,000 square feet and that the average lot would be about 6,500 square feet; that the proposed 60 foot widths would allow for three car garages with side storage and the lot depths are sufficient to allow for patios, pools, play areas, etc. $45,000. 72 -509 He added that the price of these homes would range from $35,000 to He advised that in a recent meeting with area homeowner groups they had proposed an R -2 5,000 development on the property, and the only apparent reaction was to request provision of an access to the Santa Ana Canyon Road to alleviate traffic congestion, which has been done. Referring to the City Planning Commission objection on the basis of setting a precedent, Mr. Siffermann stated the tract to the east that his com- pany is developing has 60 foot width lots, and their R development across the street has a variance allowing 5,000 square foot lots. C. J. Queyrel, Anacal Engineering, Agent for the Applicant, stated he believed R -3 zoning would be even more appropriate today than at the time it was granted for the northern portion of the property because there now will be access to the Santa Ana Canyon Road and also the steel bleachers for the high school football field are to be located 20 feet from subject property line. 72 -510 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. He added that there were no other developments in the area at the time the R -3 zoning was granted; thus the area residents were aware of that zoning at the time they purchased their homes. Mr. Queyrel noted that a representative of the homeowners groups at the City Planning Commission meeting had stated that, although they preferred the property be developed all R -1, 7,200 square foot lots, they would rather have 6,000 square foot lots approved than a combination of R -3 and R -1. He contended the owner of the northern parcel has paid higher taxes on the property since R -3 zoing Was granted. tion. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposi Frank Raczek, 5917 Hadr&ans Crescent, stated he did not feel any hardship existed in development of subject property, and the variance should not be granted. He advised that at the time the homeowners groups met with the Dev- elopers the consenus was that they preferred an R -2 5,000 development to an R -1 and R -3 combination; however, they desired an all R -1 development to main- tain the integrity of the Canyon area. Referring to the lot size variances in the existing tract mentioned by Mr. Siffermann, Mr. Raczek stated there were only a few homes fronting on Santa Ana Canyon Road that were involved. The Mayor invited the Applicant to present a brief rebuttal. Mr. Siffermann stated he felt the 22 additional lots that were requested under this proposal were not excessive in view of the history of the property and the fact that the integrity of the area would thus be maintained by the quality of the homes to be constructed. It was determined sufficient evidence had been presented and Mayor Dutton declared the hearing closed. Councilman Dutton stated that, although he would prefer all R -1 -7200 development south of Santa Ana Canyon Road, he would approve subject proposal in light of the fact that R -3 zoning originally had been approved on a portion of the property. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -331: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -331 for adoption approving Area Development Plan No. 110 in accordance with Exhibit A as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 110, EXHIBIT "A Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -331 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -332: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -332 for adoption authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to R -1 as requested subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (71 -72 -34 R -1) Roll Call Vote; AYES: COUNCIL NOES: COUNCIL ABSENT: COUNCI The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -332 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R 333: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -333 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2391, as requested subject to the following conditions recommended by the Interdepartmental Committee. 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 71- 72 -34. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 19. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2391. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: Thom ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -333 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -334: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -334 for adoption, terminating all proceedings on Reclassification No. 67 -68 -21 as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67- 68 -21. (R -3 zoning) Roll Call Vote: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -334 duly passed and adopted. 72 -511 N: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton N: None N: None AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7769, RE ISION NO. 1 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71 -72 -34 AND VARIANCE NO. 2391): Develop r, S and S Construction. Property is located on the south side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east of Imperial Highway and contains 162 proposed R -1 zoned lots. The City Planning Commission at its meeting held July 10, 1972, by motion denied said tentative tract. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, Tentative Map, Tract No. 7769, Revision No. 1 was approved subject to the following Interdepartmental Committee recommendations= (To this motion, Councilman Thom voted no.) 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7769 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 71 -72 -34 and Variance No. 2391. 72 -512 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1:30 P.M. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That a 6 -foot high, landscaped, earthen berm shall be provided along the north side of Tract No. 7769 adjacent to the Santa Ana Canyon Road. 4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 5. That the vehicular access rights except at street and /or alley openings to Santa Ana Canyon Road shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 6. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 7. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall include construction of drainage facilities of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 8. That a left -turn pocket for westbound Santa Ana Canyon Road traffic and a median opening shall be provided at street "B". 9. That all streets shall conform to City of Anaheim standard 10. That reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the median and unpaved portion of the Santa Ana Canyon Road parkway in accordance with plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and approved by the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for main- tenance of said landscaping. 11. The City Council reserves the right to delete or amend the assump- tion of landscape maintenance in the event Council policy changes. details. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -73 -1 AND VARIANCE NO. 2382; TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 6569: Submitted by Clark Walter and Nancy Jane Wingert Jr., requesting a change in zone from R -A (Portions A B) to R -2 -5000 (Portion A) and R -2 (Portion B), to develop Portion A with 16 R -2 -5000 single family homes; and to develop Portion B with a 70 -unit statutory condominium in addition to a 14 -space recreational vehicle storage area. Property is located on the east side of Sunkist Street, north of Lincoln Avenue, with waivers of: a. Minimum floor area. b. Permitted accessory uses. c. Maximum building height within 150 feet of a single family resi- dential zone. d. Maximum wall height in the setback. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -157 recommended said reclassification be denied, and pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -158 denied said variance. The City Clerk submitted correspondence from John W. Klug, President, J. W. Klug Development Company., Inc., dated July 31, 1972, requesting that the applications for Reclassification No# 72 -73 -1 and Variance No. 2382 be withdrawn since they are in the process of redesigning a single family residential develop- ment on subject property and anticipate refiling at an early date. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, reclass- ification No. 72 and Variance No. 2382 were approved for withdrawal along with Tentative Map, Tract No. 6569, submitted in conjunction with said applications. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -73 -4 AND VARIANCE NO. 2386: Submitted by V. L. and Kathryne K. Dauser, and Shu Ying and Margaret Wong, requesting a change in zone from R -A to R -3, to establish a one and two -story, 114 -unit apartment complex on the south side of Ball Road, west of Dale Avenue, with waivers of: 72 -513 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. a. Maximum building height within 150 feet of a single family residential zone. b. Minimum distance between buildings. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -155, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the oiner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Ball Road including a 15 foot radius property line return and a strip of land 30 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Fern Avenue for street widening purposes. 2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ball Road and Fern Avenue including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with a$ required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that street light facilities along Ball Road and Fern Avenue shall be installed as required by the Director-of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above mentioned requirements. 3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15 cents per front foot along Ball Road and Fern Avenue for tree planting purposes. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file With the office of the Director of Public Works. 5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 6. That a six -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the south property lines. 7. That All air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent properties. 8. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 9. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate Park and Recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 10. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 11. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. 12. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. 13. That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -156, granted said variance subject to the following conditions: 1. That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 72. -73 =4. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject property existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He added that the R -1 property to the south is in the City of Stanton, which requires a minimum distance of 75 feet separating R -3 property from R -l; that requests for similar 72 -514 Cit Hall Anaheim California COUNCIL MINUTES Au_ust 8 1972 1 :30 P.M. waivers in this area have been approved as long as the Stanton regulation is complied with. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and satisfied with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission to which he received an affirmative reply. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -335: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -335 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEtEM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (72 -73 -4 R -3) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -335 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 72R -336: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -336 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2386, as requested, subject to the cond- itions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2386. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -336 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -73 -5 AND VARIANCE NO. 2392: Submitted by Adolph W. Lemke, requesting a change of zone from R -A to R -1, to subdivide subject property into 50 R -1 zoned lots. Property is located between the Riverside Freeway and the Santa Ana River, easterly of Lakeview Avenue in the Santa Ana Canyon, with waivers of: (Tract No. 7911) a. Minimum lot width. b. Minimum lot area. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -159, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. That final elevation and floor plans for the proposed single family dwelling units shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 72 -515 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. 4. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -160, denied said variance. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject 12 acres of property, e*isting uses and zoning in the immediate area. He added that 40% of the lots as proposed would be less than 7,200 square feet, although the overall average lot size is 8,450 square feet; 66% of the lots would be less than the required 70 feet wide with some lot widths ranging from 57 to 61 feet, although the majority of these narrower lots have a lot area of about 9,150 square feet. Mr. Roberts advised that the City Planning Commission denial of the variance request was based on the limited access provided, which would be an obstacle for emergency vehicles and also create difficulties in the event of an emergency where homes must be vacated. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and wished to address the Council. Jerry Klein, K and W Development Corporation, 111 East Third Street, San Dimas, stated their request for a variance was to allow development in conformance with other tracts in the area that have been developed. Mr. Klein contended a hardship existed in connection with developing subject property because of its proximity to the Riverside Freeway and the Santa Ana River, the unusual shape of the property caused by construction of the freeway, the bisection of the property by the concrete line, open flood control channel contructed by the highway department, and difficulty encount- ered in attempting to design a development and street pattern that would conform to the General Plan and Scenic Corridor requirements and still be economically feasible. He noted their intent to build a bridge across the flood control channel, and construct a six foot earthen berm along the freeway with a six foot decorative masonry wall on top of that to create a effective sound barrier. Mr. Klein advised they have been assured by the Flood Control District that a favorable flood control letter would be received on the property. He further noted that the Santa Ana River affords a reasonable use for recreational facilities such as equestrian trails, and that the smallest lots are proposed in the vicinity of the river to take advantage of the open space area. Mr. Klein advised that his company currently is constructing iden- tical homes on the tract directly south of subject property, and these homes are priced at a minimum of $30,000.00; that they propose to construct the smallest homes on the smallest lots. He further advised that his engineers have indicated they could design the tract map so that the smallest lot would be about 6,200 square feet. At the request of the Council, Mr. Klein stipulated that no larger than three bedroom homes would be constructed on the smaller lots, and that a favorable flood control letter would be obtained. Bob McQueen, 4831 McKinnon Drive, a resident of the tract immediately to the west of subject property, stated that he had reviewed the plans of the proposed project and felt the Developer did an exceptionally good job of utilizing the odd shaped property. 72 -516 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -337: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -337 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to R -1 as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (72 -73 -5 R -1) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -337 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -338: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -338 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2392 as requested, subject to the following condition, and further subject to the stipulation by the Developer that there be no larger than three bedroom homes constructed on all lots having less than 7,200 square feet and that a favorable flood control letter be obtained from the Orange County Flood Control District: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 72 Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2392. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: Thom ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -338 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 7911 (RECLASSFICATION NO. 72 -73 -5 AND VARIANCE NO. 2392: Developer, K and W Development Corporation. Property is located between the Santa Ana River and the Riverside Freeway, easterly of Manti Drive, which is easterly of Lakeview Avenue and contains 50 proposed R -1 zoned lots. The City Planning Commission at its meeting held July 10, 1972, by motion denied said tentative tract. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, Tentative Map, Tract No. 7911, was approved, subject to the following conditions recommended by the Interdepartmental Committee. To this motion, Councilman Thom voted "no 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7911 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 72 -73 -5 and Variance No. 2392. 72 -517 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1:30 P.M. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the north property line separating Lot Nos. 1 through 26 and the Santa Ana River. 4. That all lilts within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 5. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder, provided, however, that no final tract map shall be approved until the Santa Ana River Channel is improved to Orange County Flood Control District standards or until a favorable flood hazard letter is obtained from the Orange County Flood Control District. 6. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 7. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 8. That a 6 -foot high, landscaped, earthen berm shall be provided along the south side of Tract No. 7911 adjacent to the Riverside Freeway. 9. That a minimum 5 -foot parkway shall be provided on the north side of the cul -de -sac at the eastern terminus of "B" street. 10. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 11. That a culvert shall be provided under "B" street at the exist- ing drainage channel as approved by the City Engineer. 12. That a 6 -foot high, solid masonry wall or 6 -foot high, chain link fence as approved by the Division of Highways shall be constructed on both sides of the existing drainage channel. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL JSE PERMIT N0. 1324: Submitted by De Witt R. Lee, et al, to establish a "self service" automobile service station with conven- ience item retail sales within 75 feet of an R -A zoned residential structure; C -1 zoned property is located at the southeast corner of Magnolia and Lincoln Avenues. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -154, denied said conditional use permit. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by M. A. Shea, Mobil Oil Corporation, Agent, and public hearing scheduled this date. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject property, existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and advised that the City Planning Commission had denied the variance on the basis that the proposed combined type of the use would not be appropriate, and that granting said application would create a precedent. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and wished to address the Council. M. A. Shea, Mobil Oil Corporation, Agent, presented photos of a station such as they propose4, and advised that they wished to redesign the conventional service station for which they previously received a conditional use permit (No. 1290) into a fully self service- station and include facilities for the sale of six convenience items (milk, bread, beer, potato chips, soda pop and cigarettes) in addition to motor oil. He stated he felt the availability of these convenience items was a needed service, and it would increase the tax base to the City by a minimum of one -third over the conventional service station previously approved. 72 -518 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1;30 P.M. Mr. Shea advised that the building proposed for this station would be 350 square feet, which is much smaller than for a conventional station, and thus traffic circulation and safety would be improved; that the noise would be at a minimum because there would be no power tools used, and no repairs would be made to automobiles, eliminating unsightly junk cars. Councilman Pebley commented that granting this application could encourage motorists to drive in, purchase beer to drink along with the purchase of gasoline, and then drive off. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in oppostion; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -339: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -339 for adoption, denying Conditional' Use Permit No. 1324 on the basis that granting such an application would set a precedent for'future requests. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1324. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared With permission of submitted photographs to Mr. Resolution No. 72R -339 duly passed and adopted. the City Council, the City Clerk returned the Shea. PUBLIC HEARING HOUSEMOVING: Submitted by Speech and Language Development Center, Inc., requesting a special permit to move two portable classroom units from 11000 Wright Road, Lynwood (Mobilease Corp.) to 241 South Loara Street, Anaheim. Also submitted was report of the Development Services Department recommending the request be withdrawn pending action on a conditional use permit application for the proposed expansion. The City Clerk submitted correspondence from the Applicant dated August 2, 1972, requesting permission to withdraw their request pending application for a conditional use permit. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, request to withdraw the application was granted. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING HOUSEMOVING: Submitted by Renato Durigon, requesting a special permit to move a structure from 14830 Piuma Street, Norwalk to 1615 Varna Street, Anaheim. Also submitted was report of the Development Services Department recommending approval, subject to payment of the required Park and Recreation in -lieu fees. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant was present and satisfied with the recommendations of the Development Services Department, to which he received an affirmative reply. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition. John Greer, 1730 West Cris Street, submitted photos of typical homes in the area and of the house about to be moved in. (These photos were returned to Mr. Greer and not filed with thle City Clerk) Mr. Greer expressed objeption to the proposed housemoviug on the basis that the home to be moved into the neighborhood was inferior to those existing in the area, as was a similar home recently moved in by the Applicant. 72 -519 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972 1 :30 P.M. Following Council discussion, Councilman Dutton moved that this public hearing be continued to August 22, 1972, to allow further investiga- tion, Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PRIVATE PATROL PERMIT: Application for private patrol permit filed by John F. O'Leary, for security service at the Anaheim Convention Center, was submitted and granted subject to provisions of Chapter 4.60 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. APPLICATION FOR PEDDLERS LICENSE: Application for peddlers license filed by Robert C. Dueker, to sell flowers was submitted, together with report of the City Attorney's Office. The City Attorney reported that the Applicant presently has a business license for retail sale of flowers at 916 South Harbor Boulevard; however, they now are recjuesting permission to solicit the sale of flowers from street corners. Following review of all materials submitted, request for peddlers license was denied, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Council- man Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP, TRACT NO, 6734, REVISION NO. 1 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. ,68- 69 -40); Developer, Westfield -Wal ut Company. Property is located on the west side of Anaheim Hills Road, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road and contains 66 R -1 zoned lots. The City Engineer recommended approval and reported that said final map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved, and the required fees have been paid. He further advised that it was his understanding an agreement has been executed between the area developers relative to completion of the Walnut Creek Drainage Channel to ultimate disposal downstream from Tract No. 6734, at an estimated cost of be- tween $200,000.00 and $235,000.00, although he had not reviewed the agreement; that $165,000.00 bonds for this purpose were posted by S and S Development Corporation and by Ponderosa Homes. On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that Final Map, Tract No. 6734, Revision No. 1, be approved. Councilman Stephenson seconded by motion. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP, TRACT NO. 7728 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71 -72 -37 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1297): Developer, 'Johnson -Bell Enterprises. Property is located on the north side of Broadway, east of Magnolia Avenue and contains 31 R -3 zoned lots. The City Engineer recommended approval and reported that said final map conforms substaEntially with the tentative map previously approved, that bond has been forwarded to the City Attorney for approval,and required fees paid. On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that Final Map, Tract No. 7728 be approved, subject to approval of required bond by the City Attorney. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP, TRACT NO. 7657 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71.72 -20 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1277): Developer, Westfield Company. Property is located on the east side of Dale Street, south of the Santa Ana Freeway and contains 56 R -2 zoned lots. The City Engineer recommended approval and reported that said final map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved, that bond has been forwarded to the City Attorney for approval, and required fees paid. 72 -520 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Stephenson moved that Final Map, Tract No. 7657 be approved, subject to approval of required bond by the City Attorney. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -340 AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 641 B: In accordance with recom- mendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -340 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INC UDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE GILBERT STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 641 -B. (R. J. Noble Company $16,832.30) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -340 duly passed and adopted. WORK ORDER NO. 1510: On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Stephenson moved that award of contract for Work Order No. 1510 (Anaheim Hills Golf Course Snack Shop and Restroom Facility) be deferred to the next regular meeting. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -341 WORK ORDER NO? 655 A: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -341 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: INSTALLATION OF MAGNETOMETERS AND LOOPS AT THE INTERSECTION OF BALL ROAD AND BEACH BLVD., IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 655 -A. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened September 7, 1972, 2 :00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -341 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -342 WORK ORDER NO. 646 B: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -342 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE MAGNOLIA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT, SOUTH OF BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 646 -B. (Moses Galluzzo) City Hall, Anaheim, Californif COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: 72 -521 AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution 72R -342 duly passed and adopted. CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by by Councilman Dutton, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested to cancel County taxes on property acquired by the City of Anaheim for municipal purposes, pursuant to Resolution No. 72R -302, formerly assessed to D. M. Gardner and Martha Manuel Gardner. Deed recorded July 26, 1972, as Document No. 24872, in Book 10242 at Page No. 946, Official Records of Orange County, California. MOTION CARRIED. EMPLOYMENT OF APPRAISERS PRpPOSED PARK, RIVERDALE AVENUE: The City Manager reported a request had been received from Parks and Recreation for authoriza- tion to employ two appraisers to appraise a proposed park sits between Riverdale Avenue and the Santa Ana River, west of Lakeview Avenue, consisting of approximately ten acres. He noted that, although the possibility of a park in this area had been discussed several times, the General Plan never had been changed to reflect this. That currently a study is underway to analyze the entire General Plan relative to the recreation element. Mr. Murdoch advised the site proposed for a park on Riverdale Ave- nue is one of the very few locations which may qualify for Federal funds under the Housing and Urban Development Department's Legacy of Parks Program; that because of the status of some of the Congressional action with respect to possible change in the method of Federal funding, HUD has notified the City that all applications fojr this coming. _fiscal year's allocations must be sub- mitted by September 1, 1972. He added that one of the requirements of such application is employment of two qualified appraisers to give an estimate of the cost of acquisition of the land. He therefore recommended that if the Council wishes application to be made for a possible park at this site, auth- orization be granted to employ the two appraisers at an estimated cost of approximately $2,000.00 each. Councilman Thom noted an article in a recent Greenbelt project report stated priorities of Federal funds probably would be assigned to ocean beach projects, which could delay any action on the proposed park and also on the proposed Five Coves Park project. Mr. Murdoch advised that these Federal funds are allocated on a need basis, and the Riverdale park site is located in an area with one of the highest incidence of average number of households per 1,000 population, blind and disabled persons, requirements for public health nurse services, aid to dependent children services, and probation services in the City, which probably would give it a priority almost as high as Manzanita Park. Recreation Superintendent Lloyd Trapp advised that the ocean beach projects are funded by the HUD Outdoor Recreation Program, whereas the pro- posed park site would be considered under the Legacy of Parks Program. Mr. Murdoch advised that a portion of the property under consider- ation probably would be recommended for use as a library site. In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Trapp advised that approxi- mately 50% of the cost of land acquisition and development is returned to the City under the Federal program if the project is approved; that the property is under lease for use 4s a Christmas tree lot, and thus development of a park could not take place for at least two years. He added that both Parks and Recreation Department and Parks and Recreation Commission have proposed a park site be provided in this area. 72 -522 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. In reply to Councilman Thom, Mr. Trapp advised that Cecil B. Chambers is listed as the owner of the three separate parcels of land involved in the proposed park site. Mr. Murdoch advised that half of the cost of the proposed park was included in this year's budget. In reply to Councilman Sneegas' query on the possibility of providing recreational areas along the Santa Ana River without removing more land from the tax rolls, Mr. Trapp advised that the property available in the Greenbelt area would be useable for only such things as equestrian and bicycle trails, if for anything. Following Council discussion, employment of two appraisers was auth- orized as recommended by the City Manager, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT THERMAL DEMAND METERS: The City Manager reported on recom- mended purchase of 44 thermal demand meters for the Electrical Division, and advised that the one manufacturer, Sangamo Electric Company, has submitted a quotation for said equipment in the amount of $5,006.82 including tax. He thereupon recommended the purchase be authorized. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley, purchase was authorized in the amount of $5,006.82 including tax as recommended by the City Manager. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -343 QUIT CLAIM DEED: On report by the City Attorney, Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72k-343 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A QUIT CLAIM DEED (ANAHEIM UNION WATER COMPANY EASEMENT, SOUTHEAST CORNER LA PALMA AVENUE AND SHEPARD STREET). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -343 duly passed and adopted. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied, as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Thom. a. Claim filed by Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern California on behalf of Ethel Addington for purported personal property damages sustained as a result of her automobile being struck from the rear by an Anaheim Police vehicle, on or about April 25, 1972. b. Claim filed by Raymond L. Campbell, General Associates, on behalf of Frances Sweeney for purported personal property damages sustained when claim- ant's parked car was hit by an Anaheim City truck,on or about June 14, 1972. c. Claim of Samuel J. Denardo for purported personal property damages to claimant's car by an Anaheim City street sweeper, on or about July 4, 1972. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson: a. City of Seal Beach Resolution No. 2124 Supporting the intent and concept of the 911 emergency dialing system and urging support of legislation which would mandate the establishment of such a system in the State of California. b. City of Costa Mesa Resolution No. 72 69 Urging adoption of leg- islation to implement certain recommendations of the special committee on crim- inal justice of the State Bar of California. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Resolution No. 72 -70 Urging adoption of legislation to implement certain recommendations of the California State Select Committee on trail court delay. Resolution No. 72 -71 Urging adoption of Assembly Bill 702, authorizing appointment of traffic trail commissioners. c. City of Costa Mesa Resolution No. 72 -66 Urging the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange to name the park site to be opened in the Fullerton Dam area the "Ted Craig Regional Park d. City of Brea Resolution No. 72 -46 Expressing opposition of the City to proposed airport in Chino Hills and urging an areawide effort to eliminate any further consideration of an airport in the area. e. State Policy for Water Control Resolution No. 72 -45. f. Community Center Authority Minutes May 15, 1972. g. Financial and Operating Reports for the Months of May June, 1972: Customer Service Division May June Engineering Division June MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 3072: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3072 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. "NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY! OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71 -72 -40 R -3) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3072 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3073: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3073 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE N0, 3064. (61 -62 -69 (50) M -1 Amending Description) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3073 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3074: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3074 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING. (No Parking at Any Time Streets Designated. Euclid Street, on west side, from Cerritos to Cris Avenues.) 72 -523 PARKING" REQUEST EAST STREET FROM BALL ROAD NORTHERLY: Request of Richard L. Shlemmer, Director of Relations, General Automation, Incorpor- ated, 1055 South East Street was submitted at the August 1, 1972, meeting for installation of "No Parking" signs on East Street along their property. Request was deferred to this meeting for preparation of a report from the City Engineer. Councilman Pebley stated he understood that at one time all property owners on the west side of East Street between Ball Road and Vermont Avenue, had dedicated additional land for street widening purposes and to assure there would be on street parking available on that street. 72 -524 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1:30 P.M. Following discussion, action on this request was deferred to the next regular meeting for report from the Traffic Engineer on discussions with the property owners. SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATIOT AND CONNECTION CHARGES: The City Engineer reported he understood the resol proposed by Sanitation District No. 2 for increased annexation and connection charges will be presented at the Sanitation District meeting on Aujgust 9, 1972, in a form revised from the one that previously had been furnished to the Council for consideration. Following discussion, it was determined by general Council consent, that the City of Anaheim would request no action be taken on the revised resolution until the changes had been reviewed by the Council and involved departments. CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSION REPORT: The City Manager reported that the Community Center Authority had awarded to Gust Newberg Construction Company the contract for the proposed Convention Center expansion at a total cost of $4,495,000.00, which is less than originally anticipated, and it is hoped construction will begin around September 1, 1972. He further noted that at the last Community Center Authority meeting a proposal on the bond issue had been presented by John Nuveen Company, and the price was listed at 5.58634 which will be an additional saving over original estimates. ANAHEIM HILLS GOLF COURSE GOLF PRO TNTERVIEWS: The City Manager advised that inter- views with golf pro applicants for Anaheim Hills Golf Course will be conducted on Wednesday and Thursday of this week, and invited all Councilmen to attend. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -344 EAST LA PALMA ANNEXATION (UNINHABITED): Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -344 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED EAST LA PLAMA ANNEXATION. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -344 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -345 BROOKSIDE NO. 2 ANNEXATION (UNINHABITED): Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R -345 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED BROOKSIDE NO. 2 ANNEXATION. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -345 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -346 TOPICS PROJECT AMENDMENT: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -346 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN AMEND- MENT TO TOPICS PROJECT T -3041 (130) WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -346 duly passed and adopted. CODE OF ETHICS AMENDMENT: Mayor Dutton, referring to the proposed amendment to the City of Anaheim Code of Ethics presented by Councilman Thom at the August 1, 1972 meeting, Stated he felt the existing code is all- inclusive of all the items listed in the proposed amendment, and thus it was his opinion the amendment would be unnecessary and unreasonable. He thereupon offered a motion to drop the situation on the Code of Ethics Amendment as presented by Councilman Thom. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. Roll call vote was requested by Councilman Thom. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: Thom ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None MOTION CARRIED, RECESS EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the request of the City Manager, Councilman Stephenson moved to recess to executive session for the purpose of discussing a personnel matter. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion, MOTION CARRIED. (4 :10 p.m.) ADJOURNMENT: At the conclusion of executive session and upon return of all Councilmen to the Council Chambers, Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn, Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 5 :05 P.M. Signed C oT.� -c City C1 rk 72 -525