1972/08/0872 -508
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES Au1ust 8 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 110: To consider an Area Development Plan
encompassing properties bounded on the north by Santa Ana Canyon Road, on the
east by Anaheim Hills (Walnut Canyon) Road, on the south by Nohl Ranch Road, and
on the west by Imperial Highway, to determine providing circulation and access
within said area.
The City Planning Commission,pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -148
recommended approval of Area Development Plan No. 110 in accordance with Exhibit
A.
Inasmuch as the property covered by Reclassification No. 71- 72 -34, and
Variance No. 2391 was included in Area Development Plan No. 110. These applica-
tions were considered at the same time.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71 -72 -34 AND VARIANCE 2391: Submitted by H. L. Budlong and
R. Joseph Maag, requesting a change in zoning from R -A to R -1, to allow a 162 -lot
tract on the south side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east of Imperial Highway, with
waivers of: (Tract No. 7769)
a. Minimum lot area.
b. Minimum lot width.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -150,
denied said variance, and pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -149, recommended
said reclassification be approved R -1 subject to the following conditions:
1. That a final tract amp of subject property shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the
Orange County Recorder.
2. That final elevations and floor plans for the proposed single
family dwelling units shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council.
3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the appropriate Park and Recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
4. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as
each parcel is ready to comply to conditions pertaining to such parcel, provided
however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing parcels of record
and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split.
5. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or
rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the
City Council unless said conditions are complied with within 180 days from the
date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant.
6. That subject property shall be developed substantially in confor-
mance with Area Development Plan No. 110, Exhibit "A
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject prop-
erty and advised that the purpose of this study on the Area Development Plan was
to investigate potential circulation and vehicular access problems. He added
that the Traffic Engineer had recommened there be only two access points to Nohl
Ranch Road, and the City Planning Commission had determined Exhibit A would be
the most efficient.
He noted that park and library facilities are proposed for the north-
east corner of Imperial Highway and Nohl Ranch Road; the 40 acres at the south-
east corner of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Imperial Highway are owned by the Orange
Unified School District and designated as a future high school site.
In reply to Councilman Pebley, the City Manager advised that, since the
western most street providing access from Nohl Ranch Road would traverse through
property potentially designated for a park, construction of that street and
dedication of the land therefor normally would be the responsibility of the City.
Referring to the tentative tract map for the proposed development
under the reclassification and variance application (Tract No. 7769, Revision
No. 1) Mr. Roberts advised that the tract map as proposed coincides with
Exhibit A of Area Development Plan No. 110.
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
Mr. Roberts further advised that, although the City Planning Com-
mission recommended the reclassification be approved, they had denied the
variance because they felt some of the lots being as small as 6,000 square
feet and having 60 foot widths would not be consistent with other develop-
ment in the area, and that homes proposed for these smaller lots would be
too large; that approving the variance would be granting a privilege not
enjoyed by other developers in the area since the petitioner had not proven
a hardship existed in development of the property.
He further noted that the City Planning Commission at their meeting
held July 10, 1972, had recommended all proceedings connected with Reclassif-
ication No. 67- 68 -21, covering the northern 13 acres of this property,
(Resolution of Intent to R -3 zoning approved per Resolution No. 67R -606,
amended per Resolution No. 68R -78) on the basis the proposed zoning did not
now meet the intent of the City Planning Commission and City Council for
development of the property on the south side of Santa Ana Canyon Road since
many changes had taken place since the property was annexed into the City in
1967.
Councilman Dutton, verifying that no other property in the area
had been approved for R -3 zoning, as had been the northern 13 acres under
Reclassification No. 67- 68 -21, noted that the higher density zoning had been
approved because the Council at that time felt this particular piece of prop-
erty south of the Santa Ana Canyon Road would be appropriate for multiple
dwellings, and thus he felt granting the request for some smaller lots would
not be setting a precedent.
The Mayor asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and wished
to address the City Council.
Tom Siffermann, S S Construction Company, 8383 Wilshire Boulevard,
Beverly Hills, Agent, contended that the original R -3 zoing on the northern
13 acres of the total 35 acres under consideration had been granted because
a high school was designated for the property to the west, a church and
parochial school to the east, and commercial property across Santa Ana Canyon
Road. He noted that the Resolution of Intent to R -3 zoing on that property
would not expire until January 1973, and a total of 328 units could be constr-
ucted on the property if the northern 13 acres were R -3 apartments and the
remainder R -1; that 232 units could be developed if townhouses were erected
on the northern parcel and R -1 homes on the southern parcel; or, if R -2 5,000
were requested for the entire parcel, there would be 187 dwelling units.
Mr. Siffermann stated that many of the proposed lots are over 6,000
square feet and that the average lot would be about 6,500 square feet; that
the proposed 60 foot widths would allow for three car garages with side
storage and the lot depths are sufficient to allow for patios, pools, play
areas, etc.
$45,000.
72 -509
He added that the price of these homes would range from $35,000 to
He advised that in a recent meeting with area homeowner groups they
had proposed an R -2 5,000 development on the property, and the only apparent
reaction was to request provision of an access to the Santa Ana Canyon Road
to alleviate traffic congestion, which has been done.
Referring to the City Planning Commission objection on the basis of
setting a precedent, Mr. Siffermann stated the tract to the east that his com-
pany is developing has 60 foot width lots, and their R development across
the street has a variance allowing 5,000 square foot lots.
C. J. Queyrel, Anacal Engineering, Agent for the Applicant, stated
he believed R -3 zoning would be even more appropriate today than at the time
it was granted for the northern portion of the property because there now will
be access to the Santa Ana Canyon Road and also the steel bleachers for the
high school football field are to be located 20 feet from subject property
line.
72 -510
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
He added that there were no other developments in the area at the
time the R -3 zoning was granted; thus the area residents were aware of that
zoning at the time they purchased their homes.
Mr. Queyrel noted that a representative of the homeowners groups
at the City Planning Commission meeting had stated that, although they preferred
the property be developed all R -1, 7,200 square foot lots, they would rather
have 6,000 square foot lots approved than a combination of R -3 and R -1.
He contended the owner of the northern parcel has paid higher taxes
on the property since R -3 zoing Was granted.
tion.
Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposi
Frank Raczek, 5917 Hadr&ans Crescent, stated he did not feel any
hardship existed in development of subject property, and the variance should
not be granted.
He advised that at the time the homeowners groups met with the Dev-
elopers the consenus was that they preferred an R -2 5,000 development to an
R -1 and R -3 combination; however, they desired an all R -1 development to main-
tain the integrity of the Canyon area.
Referring to the lot size variances in the existing tract mentioned
by Mr. Siffermann, Mr. Raczek stated there were only a few homes fronting on
Santa Ana Canyon Road that were involved.
The Mayor invited the Applicant to present a brief rebuttal.
Mr. Siffermann stated he felt the 22 additional lots that were
requested under this proposal were not excessive in view of the history of the
property and the fact that the integrity of the area would thus be maintained
by the quality of the homes to be constructed.
It was determined sufficient evidence had been presented and Mayor
Dutton declared the hearing closed.
Councilman Dutton stated that, although he would prefer all R -1 -7200
development south of Santa Ana Canyon Road, he would approve subject proposal
in light of the fact that R -3 zoning originally had been approved on a portion
of the property.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -331: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -331 for
adoption approving Area Development Plan No. 110 in accordance with Exhibit
A as recommended by the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AREA
DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 110, EXHIBIT "A
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -331 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -332: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -332
for adoption authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the
zone to R -1 as requested subject to the conditions recommended by the City
Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGED. (71 -72 -34 R -1)
Roll Call Vote;
AYES: COUNCIL
NOES: COUNCIL
ABSENT: COUNCI
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -332 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R 333: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -333
for adoption, granting Variance No. 2391, as requested subject to the
following conditions recommended by the Interdepartmental Committee.
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of
Reclassification No. 71- 72 -34.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in
accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim
marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 19.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 2391.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Thom
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -333 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -334: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -334
for adoption, terminating all proceedings on Reclassification No. 67 -68 -21
as recommended by the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL
PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67- 68 -21. (R -3 zoning)
Roll Call Vote:
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -334 duly passed and adopted.
72 -511
N: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
N: None
N: None
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7769, RE ISION NO. 1 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71 -72 -34 AND
VARIANCE NO. 2391): Develop r, S and S Construction. Property is located on the
south side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east of Imperial Highway and contains
162 proposed R -1 zoned lots.
The City Planning Commission at its meeting held July 10, 1972,
by motion denied said tentative tract.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
Tentative Map, Tract No. 7769, Revision No. 1 was approved subject to the
following Interdepartmental Committee recommendations= (To this motion,
Councilman Thom voted no.)
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7769 is
granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 71 -72 -34 and
Variance No. 2391.
72 -512
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub-
division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
3. That a 6 -foot high, landscaped, earthen berm shall be provided
along the north side of Tract No. 7769 adjacent to the Santa Ana Canyon Road.
4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
5. That the vehicular access rights except at street and /or alley
openings to Santa Ana Canyon Road shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
6. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior
to approval of a final tract map.
7. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall include construction of drainage
facilities of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating
from higher properties south of Santa Ana Canyon Road through said property to
ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Reimbursement agreements
may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request.
8. That a left -turn pocket for westbound Santa Ana Canyon Road
traffic and a median opening shall be provided at street "B".
9. That all streets shall conform to City of Anaheim standard
10. That reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities,
shall be installed in the median and unpaved portion of the Santa Ana Canyon
Road parkway in accordance with plans for said landscaping to be submitted to
and approved by the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. Following installation
and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for main-
tenance of said landscaping.
11. The City Council reserves the right to delete or amend the assump-
tion of landscape maintenance in the event Council policy changes.
details.
MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -73 -1 AND VARIANCE NO. 2382; TENTATIVE MAP,
TRACT NO. 6569: Submitted by Clark Walter and Nancy Jane Wingert Jr., requesting a
change in zone from R -A (Portions A B) to R -2 -5000 (Portion A) and R -2
(Portion B), to develop Portion A with 16 R -2 -5000 single family homes; and to
develop Portion B with a 70 -unit statutory condominium in addition to a 14 -space
recreational vehicle storage area. Property is located on the east side of
Sunkist Street, north of Lincoln Avenue, with waivers of:
a. Minimum floor area.
b. Permitted accessory uses.
c. Maximum building height within 150 feet of a single family resi-
dential zone.
d. Maximum wall height in the setback.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -157
recommended said reclassification be denied, and pursuant to Resolution No.
PC72 -158 denied said variance.
The City Clerk submitted correspondence from John W. Klug, President,
J. W. Klug Development Company., Inc., dated July 31, 1972, requesting that the
applications for Reclassification No# 72 -73 -1 and Variance No. 2382 be withdrawn
since they are in the process of redesigning a single family residential develop-
ment on subject property and anticipate refiling at an early date.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, reclass-
ification No. 72 and Variance No. 2382 were approved for withdrawal along
with Tentative Map, Tract No. 6569, submitted in conjunction with said
applications. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -73 -4 AND VARIANCE NO. 2386: Submitted by
V. L. and Kathryne K. Dauser, and Shu Ying and Margaret Wong, requesting a
change in zone from R -A to R -3, to establish a one and two -story, 114 -unit
apartment complex on the south side of Ball Road, west of Dale Avenue, with
waivers of:
72 -513
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
a. Maximum building height within 150 feet of a single family
residential zone.
b. Minimum distance between buildings.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -155,
recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That the oiner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street
along Ball Road including a 15 foot radius property line return and a strip
of land 30 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Fern Avenue
for street widening purposes.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along
Ball Road and Fern Avenue including preparation of improvement plans and
installation of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks,
street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work
shall be complied with a$ required by the City Engineer and in accordance with
standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer;
and that street light facilities along Ball Road and Fern Avenue shall be
installed as required by the Director-of Public Utilities and in accordance
with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director
of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the
City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of
the above mentioned requirements.
3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of 15 cents per front foot along Ball Road and Fern Avenue for
tree planting purposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file With the office of the Director of Public Works.
5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined
to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
6. That a six -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the
south property lines.
7. That All air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded
from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent properties.
8. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
9. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the appropriate Park and Recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
10. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a
manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer.
11. That subject property shall be developed substantially in
accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim
marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.
12. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property, Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be completed.
The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and
void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with
within one year from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council
may grant.
13. That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11, above mentioned,
shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -156,
granted said variance subject to the following conditions:
1. That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of
Reclassification No. 72. -73 =4.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in
accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim
marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject
property existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He added that the
R -1 property to the south is in the City of Stanton, which requires a minimum
distance of 75 feet separating R -3 property from R -l; that requests for similar
72 -514
Cit Hall Anaheim California COUNCIL MINUTES Au_ust 8 1972 1 :30 P.M.
waivers in this area have been approved as long as the Stanton regulation is
complied with.
Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and
satisfied with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission to which
he received an affirmative reply.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition;
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -335: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -335
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone
as requested subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEtEM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(72 -73 -4 R -3)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -335 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION N0. 72R -336: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -336
for adoption, granting Variance No. 2386, as requested, subject to the cond-
itions recommended by the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 2386.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -336 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -73 -5 AND VARIANCE NO. 2392: Submitted by
Adolph W. Lemke, requesting a change of zone from R -A to R -1, to subdivide
subject property into 50 R -1 zoned lots. Property is located between the
Riverside Freeway and the Santa Ana River, easterly of Lakeview Avenue in the
Santa Ana Canyon, with waivers of: (Tract No. 7911)
a. Minimum lot width.
b. Minimum lot area.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -159,
recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the
Orange County Recorder.
2. That final elevation and floor plans for the proposed single
family dwelling units shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council.
3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
72 -515
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
4. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property, Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be completed. The
provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void
by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within
180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may
grant.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -160,
denied said variance.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject
12 acres of property, e*isting uses and zoning in the immediate area. He
added that 40% of the lots as proposed would be less than 7,200 square feet,
although the overall average lot size is 8,450 square feet; 66% of the lots
would be less than the required 70 feet wide with some lot widths ranging
from 57 to 61 feet, although the majority of these narrower lots have a lot
area of about 9,150 square feet.
Mr. Roberts advised that the City Planning Commission denial of the
variance request was based on the limited access provided, which would be an
obstacle for emergency vehicles and also create difficulties in the event of
an emergency where homes must be vacated.
Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and
wished to address the Council.
Jerry Klein, K and W Development Corporation, 111 East Third Street,
San Dimas, stated their request for a variance was to allow development in
conformance with other tracts in the area that have been developed.
Mr. Klein contended a hardship existed in connection with developing
subject property because of its proximity to the Riverside Freeway and the
Santa Ana River, the unusual shape of the property caused by construction of
the freeway, the bisection of the property by the concrete line, open flood
control channel contructed by the highway department, and difficulty encount-
ered in attempting to design a development and street pattern that would
conform to the General Plan and Scenic Corridor requirements and still be
economically feasible.
He noted their intent to build a bridge across the flood control
channel, and construct a six foot earthen berm along the freeway with a six
foot decorative masonry wall on top of that to create a effective sound
barrier.
Mr. Klein advised they have been assured by the Flood Control
District that a favorable flood control letter would be received on the
property.
He further noted that the Santa Ana River affords a reasonable use
for recreational facilities such as equestrian trails, and that the smallest
lots are proposed in the vicinity of the river to take advantage of the open
space area.
Mr. Klein advised that his company currently is constructing iden-
tical homes on the tract directly south of subject property, and these homes
are priced at a minimum of $30,000.00; that they propose to construct the
smallest homes on the smallest lots. He further advised that his engineers
have indicated they could design the tract map so that the smallest lot would
be about 6,200 square feet.
At the request of the Council, Mr. Klein stipulated that no larger
than three bedroom homes would be constructed on the smaller lots, and that
a favorable flood control letter would be obtained.
Bob McQueen, 4831 McKinnon Drive, a resident of the tract immediately
to the west of subject property, stated that he had reviewed the plans of the
proposed project and felt the Developer did an exceptionally good job of
utilizing the odd shaped property.
72 -516
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition;
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -337: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -337 for
adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to
R -1 as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(72 -73 -5 R -1)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -337 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -338: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -338 for
adoption, granting Variance No. 2392 as requested, subject to the following
condition, and further subject to the stipulation by the Developer that there
be no larger than three bedroom homes constructed on all lots having less than
7,200 square feet and that a favorable flood control letter be obtained from
the Orange County Flood Control District:
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of
Reclassification No. 72
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 2392.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Thom
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -338 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 7911 (RECLASSFICATION NO. 72 -73 -5 AND VARIANCE NO. 2392:
Developer, K and W Development Corporation. Property is located between the
Santa Ana River and the Riverside Freeway, easterly of Manti Drive, which is
easterly of Lakeview Avenue and contains 50 proposed R -1 zoned lots.
The City Planning Commission at its meeting held July 10, 1972, by
motion denied said tentative tract.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson,
Tentative Map, Tract No. 7911, was approved, subject to the following conditions
recommended by the Interdepartmental Committee. To this motion, Councilman
Thom voted "no
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7911 is granted
subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 72 -73 -5 and Variance No. 2392.
72 -517
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one
subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form
for approval.
3. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6 -foot masonry
wall shall be constructed on the north property line separating Lot Nos. 1
through 26 and the Santa Ana River.
4. That all lilts within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
5. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted
to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the
Orange County Recorder, provided, however, that no final tract map shall be
approved until the Santa Ana River Channel is improved to Orange County Flood
Control District standards or until a favorable flood hazard letter is
obtained from the Orange County Flood Control District.
6. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior
to approval of a final tract map.
7. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
8. That a 6 -foot high, landscaped, earthen berm shall be provided
along the south side of Tract No. 7911 adjacent to the Riverside Freeway.
9. That a minimum 5 -foot parkway shall be provided on the north
side of the cul -de -sac at the eastern terminus of "B" street.
10. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a
manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer.
11. That a culvert shall be provided under "B" street at the exist-
ing drainage channel as approved by the City Engineer.
12. That a 6 -foot high, solid masonry wall or 6 -foot high, chain
link fence as approved by the Division of Highways shall be constructed on
both sides of the existing drainage channel.
MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL JSE PERMIT N0. 1324: Submitted by De Witt R. Lee,
et al, to establish a "self service" automobile service station with conven-
ience item retail sales within 75 feet of an R -A zoned residential structure;
C -1 zoned property is located at the southeast corner of Magnolia and Lincoln
Avenues.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -154,
denied said conditional use permit.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed
by M. A. Shea, Mobil Oil Corporation, Agent, and public hearing scheduled
this date.
Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject
property, existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and advised that
the City Planning Commission had denied the variance on the basis that the
proposed combined type of the use would not be appropriate, and that granting
said application would create a precedent.
Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and
wished to address the Council.
M. A. Shea, Mobil Oil Corporation, Agent, presented photos of a
station such as they propose4, and advised that they wished to redesign the
conventional service station for which they previously received a conditional
use permit (No. 1290) into a fully self service- station and include facilities
for the sale of six convenience items (milk, bread, beer, potato chips, soda
pop and cigarettes) in addition to motor oil.
He stated he felt the availability of these convenience items was
a needed service, and it would increase the tax base to the City by a minimum
of one -third over the conventional service station previously approved.
72 -518
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1;30 P.M.
Mr. Shea advised that the building proposed for this station would
be 350 square feet, which is much smaller than for a conventional station, and
thus traffic circulation and safety would be improved; that the noise would be
at a minimum because there would be no power tools used, and no repairs would
be made to automobiles, eliminating unsightly junk cars.
Councilman Pebley commented that granting this application could
encourage motorists to drive in, purchase beer to drink along with the purchase
of gasoline, and then drive off.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in oppostion;
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -339: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -339
for adoption, denying Conditional' Use Permit No. 1324 on the basis that granting
such an application would set a precedent for'future requests.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 1324.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared
With permission of
submitted photographs to Mr.
Resolution No. 72R -339 duly passed and adopted.
the City Council, the City Clerk returned the
Shea.
PUBLIC HEARING HOUSEMOVING: Submitted by Speech and Language Development Center,
Inc., requesting a special permit to move two portable classroom units from
11000 Wright Road, Lynwood (Mobilease Corp.) to 241 South Loara Street, Anaheim.
Also submitted was report of the Development Services Department
recommending the request be withdrawn pending action on a conditional use
permit application for the proposed expansion.
The City Clerk submitted correspondence from the Applicant dated
August 2, 1972, requesting permission to withdraw their request pending
application for a conditional use permit.
On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
request to withdraw the application was granted. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING HOUSEMOVING: Submitted by Renato Durigon, requesting a special
permit to move a structure from 14830 Piuma Street, Norwalk to 1615 Varna
Street, Anaheim.
Also submitted was report of the Development Services Department
recommending approval, subject to payment of the required Park and Recreation
in -lieu fees.
Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant was present and satisfied with
the recommendations of the Development Services Department, to which he received
an affirmative reply.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition.
John Greer, 1730 West Cris Street, submitted photos of typical homes
in the area and of the house about to be moved in. (These photos were returned
to Mr. Greer and not filed with thle City Clerk)
Mr. Greer expressed objeption to the proposed housemoviug on the basis
that the home to be moved into the neighborhood was inferior to those existing
in the area, as was a similar home recently moved in by the Applicant.
72 -519
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972 1 :30 P.M.
Following Council discussion, Councilman Dutton moved that this
public hearing be continued to August 22, 1972, to allow further investiga-
tion, Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PRIVATE PATROL PERMIT: Application for private patrol permit filed by John F.
O'Leary, for security service at the Anaheim Convention Center, was submitted
and granted subject to provisions of Chapter 4.60 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Thom,
seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED.
APPLICATION FOR PEDDLERS LICENSE: Application for peddlers license filed by
Robert C. Dueker, to sell flowers was submitted, together with report of the
City Attorney's Office.
The City Attorney reported that the Applicant presently has a
business license for retail sale of flowers at 916 South Harbor Boulevard;
however, they now are recjuesting permission to solicit the sale of flowers
from street corners.
Following review of all materials submitted, request for peddlers
license was denied, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Council-
man Pebley. MOTION CARRIED.
FINAL MAP, TRACT NO, 6734, REVISION NO. 1 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. ,68- 69 -40);
Developer, Westfield -Wal ut Company. Property is located on the west side
of Anaheim Hills Road, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road and contains 66 R -1
zoned lots.
The City Engineer recommended approval and reported that said
final map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously
approved, and the required fees have been paid. He further advised that it
was his understanding an agreement has been executed between the area
developers relative to completion of the Walnut Creek Drainage Channel to
ultimate disposal downstream from Tract No. 6734, at an estimated cost of be-
tween $200,000.00 and $235,000.00, although he had not reviewed the agreement;
that $165,000.00 bonds for this purpose were posted by S and S Development
Corporation and by Ponderosa Homes.
On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that
Final Map, Tract No. 6734, Revision No. 1, be approved. Councilman Stephenson
seconded by motion. MOTION CARRIED.
FINAL MAP, TRACT NO. 7728 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71 -72 -37 AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 1297): Developer, 'Johnson -Bell Enterprises. Property is located on
the north side of Broadway, east of Magnolia Avenue and contains 31 R -3
zoned lots.
The City Engineer recommended approval and reported that said
final map conforms substaEntially with the tentative map previously approved,
that bond has been forwarded to the City Attorney for approval,and required
fees paid.
On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that
Final Map, Tract No. 7728 be approved, subject to approval of required bond
by the City Attorney. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
FINAL MAP, TRACT NO. 7657 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71.72 -20 AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 1277): Developer, Westfield Company. Property is located on the east
side of Dale Street, south of the Santa Ana Freeway and contains 56 R -2
zoned lots.
The City Engineer recommended approval and reported that said
final map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved,
that bond has been forwarded to the City Attorney for approval, and required
fees paid.
72 -520
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Stephenson moved
that Final Map, Tract No. 7657 be approved, subject to approval of required
bond by the City Attorney. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -340 AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 641 B: In accordance with recom-
mendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No.
72R -340 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INC UDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: THE GILBERT STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
WORK ORDER NO. 641 -B. (R. J. Noble Company $16,832.30)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -340 duly passed and adopted.
WORK ORDER NO. 1510: On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Stephenson
moved that award of contract for Work Order No. 1510 (Anaheim Hills Golf Course
Snack Shop and Restroom Facility) be deferred to the next regular meeting.
Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -341 WORK ORDER NO? 655 A: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution
No. 72R -341 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: INSTALLATION OF MAGNETOMETERS
AND LOOPS AT THE INTERSECTION OF BALL ROAD AND BEACH BLVD., IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 655 -A. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES,
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF.
(Bids to be Opened September 7, 1972, 2 :00 P.M.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -341 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -342 WORK ORDER NO. 646 B: Upon receipt of certification from
the Director of Public Works, Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -342
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL
AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND
COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE MAGNOLIA AVENUE
STREET IMPROVEMENT, SOUTH OF BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER
NO. 646 -B. (Moses Galluzzo)
City Hall, Anaheim, Californif COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
72 -521
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution 72R -342 duly passed and adopted.
CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by
by Councilman Dutton, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested
to cancel County taxes on property acquired by the City of Anaheim for
municipal purposes, pursuant to Resolution No. 72R -302, formerly assessed to
D. M. Gardner and Martha Manuel Gardner. Deed recorded July 26, 1972, as
Document No. 24872, in Book 10242 at Page No. 946, Official Records of
Orange County, California. MOTION CARRIED.
EMPLOYMENT OF APPRAISERS PRpPOSED PARK, RIVERDALE AVENUE: The City Manager
reported a request had been received from Parks and Recreation for authoriza-
tion to employ two appraisers to appraise a proposed park sits between
Riverdale Avenue and the Santa Ana River, west of Lakeview Avenue, consisting
of approximately ten acres.
He noted that, although the possibility of a park in this area had
been discussed several times, the General Plan never had been changed to
reflect this. That currently a study is underway to analyze the entire
General Plan relative to the recreation element.
Mr. Murdoch advised the site proposed for a park on Riverdale Ave-
nue is one of the very few locations which may qualify for Federal funds
under the Housing and Urban Development Department's Legacy of Parks Program;
that because of the status of some of the Congressional action with respect
to possible change in the method of Federal funding, HUD has notified the City
that all applications fojr this coming. _fiscal year's allocations must be sub-
mitted by September 1, 1972. He added that one of the requirements of such
application is employment of two qualified appraisers to give an estimate of
the cost of acquisition of the land. He therefore recommended that if the
Council wishes application to be made for a possible park at this site, auth-
orization be granted to employ the two appraisers at an estimated cost of
approximately $2,000.00 each.
Councilman Thom noted an article in a recent Greenbelt project
report stated priorities of Federal funds probably would be assigned to ocean
beach projects, which could delay any action on the proposed park and also
on the proposed Five Coves Park project.
Mr. Murdoch advised that these Federal funds are allocated on a
need basis, and the Riverdale park site is located in an area with one of the
highest incidence of average number of households per 1,000 population,
blind and disabled persons, requirements for public health nurse services, aid
to dependent children services, and probation services in the City, which
probably would give it a priority almost as high as Manzanita Park.
Recreation Superintendent Lloyd Trapp advised that the ocean beach
projects are funded by the HUD Outdoor Recreation Program, whereas the pro-
posed park site would be considered under the Legacy of Parks Program.
Mr. Murdoch advised that a portion of the property under consider-
ation probably would be recommended for use as a library site.
In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Trapp advised that approxi-
mately 50% of the cost of land acquisition and development is returned to the
City under the Federal program if the project is approved; that the property
is under lease for use 4s a Christmas tree lot, and thus development of a
park could not take place for at least two years. He added that both Parks
and Recreation Department and Parks and Recreation Commission have proposed
a park site be provided in this area.
72 -522
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
In reply to Councilman Thom, Mr. Trapp advised that Cecil B. Chambers
is listed as the owner of the three separate parcels of land involved in the
proposed park site.
Mr. Murdoch advised that half of the cost of the proposed park was
included in this year's budget.
In reply to Councilman Sneegas' query on the possibility of providing
recreational areas along the Santa Ana River without removing more land from
the tax rolls, Mr. Trapp advised that the property available in the Greenbelt
area would be useable for only such things as equestrian and bicycle trails, if
for anything.
Following Council discussion, employment of two appraisers was auth-
orized as recommended by the City Manager, on motion by Councilman Thom,
seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT THERMAL DEMAND METERS: The City Manager reported on recom-
mended purchase of 44 thermal demand meters for the Electrical Division, and
advised that the one manufacturer, Sangamo Electric Company, has submitted a
quotation for said equipment in the amount of $5,006.82 including tax. He
thereupon recommended the purchase be authorized.
On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley,
purchase was authorized in the amount of $5,006.82 including tax as recommended
by the City Manager. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -343 QUIT CLAIM DEED: On report by the City Attorney, Councilman
Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72k-343 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A QUIT CLAIM DEED (ANAHEIM UNION WATER
COMPANY EASEMENT, SOUTHEAST CORNER LA PALMA AVENUE AND SHEPARD STREET).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -343 duly passed and adopted.
CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied, as recommended by the
City Attorney, and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by
Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Thom.
a. Claim filed by Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of
Southern California on behalf of Ethel Addington for purported personal property
damages sustained as a result of her automobile being struck from the rear by an
Anaheim Police vehicle, on or about April 25, 1972.
b. Claim filed by Raymond L. Campbell, General Associates, on behalf
of Frances Sweeney for purported personal property damages sustained when claim-
ant's parked car was hit by an Anaheim City truck,on or about June 14, 1972.
c. Claim of Samuel J. Denardo for purported personal property damages
to claimant's car by an Anaheim City street sweeper, on or about July 4, 1972.
MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on
motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson:
a. City of Seal Beach Resolution No. 2124 Supporting the intent
and concept of the 911 emergency dialing system and urging support of legislation
which would mandate the establishment of such a system in the State of California.
b. City of Costa Mesa Resolution No. 72 69 Urging adoption of leg-
islation to implement certain recommendations of the special committee on crim-
inal justice of the State Bar of California.
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
Resolution No. 72 -70 Urging adoption of legislation to
implement certain recommendations of the California State Select Committee
on trail court delay.
Resolution No. 72 -71 Urging adoption of Assembly Bill 702,
authorizing appointment of traffic trail commissioners.
c. City of Costa Mesa Resolution No. 72 -66 Urging the Board
of Supervisors of the County of Orange to name the park site to be opened
in the Fullerton Dam area the "Ted Craig Regional Park
d. City of Brea Resolution No. 72 -46 Expressing opposition
of the City to proposed airport in Chino Hills and urging an areawide effort
to eliminate any further consideration of an airport in the area.
e. State Policy for Water Control Resolution No. 72 -45.
f. Community Center Authority Minutes May 15, 1972.
g. Financial and Operating Reports for the Months of May
June, 1972:
Customer Service Division May June
Engineering Division June
MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 3072: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3072 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
"NO
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY! OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71 -72 -40 R -3)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3072 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3073: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3073 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE N0, 3064. (61 -62 -69
(50) M -1 Amending Description)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3073 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3074: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3074 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32,
SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING.
(No Parking at Any Time Streets Designated. Euclid Street, on west
side, from Cerritos to Cris Avenues.)
72 -523
PARKING" REQUEST EAST STREET FROM BALL ROAD NORTHERLY: Request of Richard
L. Shlemmer, Director of Relations, General Automation, Incorpor-
ated, 1055 South East Street was submitted at the August 1, 1972, meeting
for installation of "No Parking" signs on East Street along their property.
Request was deferred to this meeting for preparation of a report
from the City Engineer.
Councilman Pebley stated he understood that at one time all property
owners on the west side of East Street between Ball Road and Vermont Avenue,
had dedicated additional land for street widening purposes and to assure
there would be on street parking available on that street.
72 -524
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1:30 P.M.
Following discussion, action on this request was deferred to the
next regular meeting for report from the Traffic Engineer on discussions with
the property owners.
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATIOT AND CONNECTION CHARGES: The City Engineer
reported he understood the resol proposed by Sanitation District No. 2
for increased annexation and connection charges will be presented at the
Sanitation District meeting on Aujgust 9, 1972, in a form revised from the one
that previously had been furnished to the Council for consideration.
Following discussion, it was determined by general Council consent,
that the City of Anaheim would request no action be taken on the revised
resolution until the changes had been reviewed by the Council and involved
departments.
CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSION REPORT: The City Manager reported that the Community
Center Authority had awarded to Gust Newberg Construction Company the contract
for the proposed Convention Center expansion at a total cost of $4,495,000.00,
which is less than originally anticipated, and it is hoped construction will
begin around September 1, 1972.
He further noted that at the last Community Center Authority meeting a
proposal on the bond issue had been presented by John Nuveen Company, and the
price was listed at 5.58634 which will be an additional saving over original
estimates.
ANAHEIM HILLS GOLF COURSE GOLF PRO TNTERVIEWS: The City Manager advised that inter-
views with golf pro applicants for Anaheim Hills Golf Course will be conducted
on Wednesday and Thursday of this week, and invited all Councilmen to attend.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -344 EAST LA PALMA ANNEXATION (UNINHABITED): Councilman Dutton
offered Resolution No. 72R -344 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE
ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED
EAST LA PLAMA ANNEXATION.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -344 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -345 BROOKSIDE NO. 2 ANNEXATION (UNINHABITED): Councilman
Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R -345 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE
ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED
BROOKSIDE NO. 2 ANNEXATION.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -345 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 72R -346 TOPICS PROJECT AMENDMENT: Councilman Stephenson offered
Resolution No. 72R -346 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN AMEND-
MENT TO TOPICS PROJECT T -3041 (130) WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -346 duly passed and adopted.
CODE OF ETHICS AMENDMENT: Mayor Dutton, referring to the proposed amendment to
the City of Anaheim Code of Ethics presented by Councilman Thom at the
August 1, 1972 meeting, Stated he felt the existing code is all- inclusive
of all the items listed in the proposed amendment, and thus it was his
opinion the amendment would be unnecessary and unreasonable.
He thereupon offered a motion to drop the situation on the Code of
Ethics Amendment as presented by Councilman Thom. Councilman Stephenson
seconded the motion.
Roll call vote was requested by Councilman Thom.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley and Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Thom
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
MOTION CARRIED,
RECESS EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the request of the City Manager, Councilman
Stephenson moved to recess to executive session for the purpose of discussing
a personnel matter. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion, MOTION
CARRIED. (4 :10 p.m.)
ADJOURNMENT: At the conclusion of executive session and upon return of all
Councilmen to the Council Chambers, Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn,
Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 5 :05 P.M.
Signed C oT.� -c
City C1 rk
72 -525