Loading...
1972/09/1272 -574 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 12, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton COUNCILMEN: None ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER; Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph 0. Pease ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Garry McRae PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: INVOCATION: Reverend Arthur Krebs of the First Presbyterian Church Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Calvin L. Pebley led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were unanimously approved and adopted by the City Council: MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held August 22, 1972, were approved on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $1,226,988.77, in accordance with the 1972 -73 Budget, were approved. KATHRYN LINDSAY ANNEXATION: Comprising approximately 40.459 acres located briefly north of Lincoln Avenue, both sides of Gilbert Street. The City Clerk reported the Election results of the semi official returns of votes cast at the polls as 114 in favor and 27 opposed to said annexation and announced two absentee ballots were received. The City Council thereupon proceeded to count the absentee votes and canvass returns by the following board appointed by the Mayor: the two Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. a. Anaheim Hunting and Fishing Day September 23, 1972. b. Anaheim Memorial Hospital Week September 17 to 24, 1972. (received by Mrs. Leonard Bouas, secretary, Anaheim Memorial Hospital Development Foundation and Co- Chairman of the forthcomming Bob Hope show and William L. Bush, Assistant Hospital Administrator.) c. Modern Volunteer Army Month September (Received by Sargeant SSG. Laurent) Inspector: Judge: Clerk: Clerk: At the absentee Councilman Mark A. Stephenson Councilman Ralph G. (Gerry) Sneegas Councilman Calvin L. Pebley Councilman W. J. (Bill) Thom conclusion of the canvass, Councilman Stephenson votes favored the Kathryn Lindsay Annexation. announced that gave the RESOLUTION NO. 72R -391: Councilman Thom offered the following Resolution No. 72R -391 for adoption. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 12 1972, 1:30 P.M. ATTEST: /s/ Dene M. Daoust CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM RESOLUTION NO. 72 -391 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CAUSING A RECORDiOF CANVASS OF RETURNS OF SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE ENTERED UPON ITS MINUTES. (KATHRYN LINDSAY ANNEXATION) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Anaheim that said record of canvas$ of returns of said election be, and the same is hereby ordered entered upon the minutes of said City Council. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 12th day of September, 1972. /s/ .Tack C. Duttop MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 72R -391 on the 12th day of September, 1972. /s/ Dene M. Daoust AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO SAID CITY OF ANAHEIM OF CERTAIN INHABITED TERRITORY KNOWN AS KATHRYN- LINDSAY ANNEXATION. 72 -575 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim has canvassed returns of a certain special annexation election held on the 5th day of September, 1972, in certain unincorporated territory sought to be annexed to said City of Anaheim, and WHEREAS, the City Council has caused a record to be made of the canvass of returns of said election, which record is entitled, "RECORDS OF CANVASS OF RETURNS OF SPECIAL ANNEXATION ELECTION HELD SEPTEMBER 5, 1972." WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the total number of votes cast in said election was 1.43 including two absentee ballots; that the total number of votes cast in said election in favor of annexation was 116; that the total number of votes cast in said election against annexation was 27. I, DENE M. DAOUST, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 12th day of September, 1972, by the following vote of the Members thereof: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 12th day of September, 1972. (SEAL) CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -391 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3083: Counc$i.lman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3083 for first reading. 72 -576 City Hall, Anaheim, California COTTNCIL MINUTES September 12, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING ABANDONMENT NO 72 -1A: Filed by James E. Rodgers, Westfield Develo- ment Company, requesting an abandonment of public utility easements located briefly east of Dale Avenue, north of La Palma Avenue was submitted together with report of City Engineer, recommending approval. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council for or against said abandonment, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -392: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -392 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. (72 -1A) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -392 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING ABANDONMENT NO. 72 -4A: Initiated by the Anaheim City Water Depart- ment to consider an abandonment of an existing public utility easement located south of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east of Solomon Drive, lying within Lot 13 of Tract No. 7118 was submitted together with report of the City Engineer recom- mending approval. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council for or against said abandonment, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -393: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -393 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. (72 -4A) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -393 duly passed and adopted. WAIVER OF FILING FEES: In accordance with request contained in report submitted by the City Engineer relative to Abandonment No. 72 -4A, required processing fees were waived on motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Stephenson. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO, 72 73 15 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 4693: Sub- mitted by State Division of Highways Owner, American National Housing Cor- poration Agent, requesting change of zone from City R -A (parcel 1) and County Al (parcel 2) to City RS -5000, property briefly described as located on the south side of Imperial Highway (Yorba Linda Freeway), east of Kellogg Drive and north- easterly of the Esperanza High School site (Tentative Tract No. 4693). The City Planning Commission recommended said reclassification pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -184, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 12, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. 2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate Park and Recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 3. That these reclassification proceedings are granted subject to completion of annexation of subject property to the City of Anaheim. 4. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro- perty, Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. Mr. Roberts noted location of the property and reported that there presently is a resolution of intent to zone R -2 5000 on approximately 7 acres of subject property under Reclassification No. 68- 69 -32, however, additional property has been acquired and incorporated in subject reclassification, there- by covering the entire property. In summarizing the hearing held before the City Planning Commission, Mr. Roberts advised that the Applicant would be responsible for development in accordance with the newly adopted RS -5000 zone, site development standards. The Mayor asked if the Applicant or Agent was present and satisfied with the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Mr. Cal Queyrel, Anacal Engineering, Engineer for the project replied in the affirma- tive. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, for or against said reclassification. There being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -394: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -394, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance reclassifying subject property as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission and further subject to development in accordance with RS -5000 zone, site development standards. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (72 -73 -15 RS -5000) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -394 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 4693, REVISION NO. 4: Developer, American National Housing Corporation. Location of property described above (Reclassification No. 72 73 15) and contains approximately 12.3 acres proposed for subdivision into 60 RS -5000 zone lots. The City Planning Commission recommended approval of said Tentative Map of Tract No. 4693, Revision No. 4, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 4693, Revision No. 4, is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 72 73 15. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 72 -577 72 -578 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 12, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. 4. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 5. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 6. That Cresthill Drive shall be extended through Lot 61. 7. That Lot 61 shall be added to adjacent Lots 50 through 54 to the west. Or, should the developer of Tract No. 4693 acquire the parcel adjacent to the east, Lot 61 may be developed as a part of that parcel. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Tenta- tive Map, Tract No. 4693, Revision No. 4 was approved subject to conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -395 TERMINATION, BALANCE OF RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68- 69 -32: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -395 for adoption, terminating Reclassification No. 68- 69 -32, with the exception of Tract No. 7676, reclassified under Reclassification No. 68 -69 -32 (1) pursuant to Ordinance No. 3037. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68- 69 -32, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF TRACT NO. 7676. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -395 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -73 -3: Submitted by Thomas E. Yellis, requesting a change of zone from R-►A to C -1. Property located at the southeast corner of Crescent Avenue and Brookhurst Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -177, recommended said reclassification be disapproved. Mr. Roberts noted subject property actually fronts on four streets; Brookhurst, Crescent, Valley and Alameda. He noted the zoning and uses in the immediate area and reported that the Applicant proposes a service station at the intersection of Brookhurst and Crescent, with a supermarket to the south on the remainder of the property. He further reported that the development plans conform with the C -1 site development standards. In summarizing the hearing before the City Planning Commission, Mr. Roberts reviewed their findings and advised that the Commission recommended disapproval primarily on the basis that the C -1 zoning was not in conformance with the General Plan designation and multiple family uses would be more appropriate. Discussion was held by the City Council and Councilman Pebley referred to the normal zoning transition of C to R -3 to R -1. He was of the opinion that subject property was a logical location for C -1 and could be financially suppor- ted by the R -3 in the area and would give the City a better tax base than res- idential. On learning there were approximately 500 units in the apartments to the east and south, Councilman Sneegas noted the possible ecological benefit by 500 families being within walking distance to a store rather than having to drive. He personally favored some use other than apartments on subject property. Councilman Thom felt the corner was potentially a commercial possi- bility, however he objected to the proposed service station planned for the corner. The Mayor asked if the Applicant or his Agent wished to be heard. 72 -579 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 12, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Mr. Leonard Smith, 125 South Claudina Street, representing the Applicant, advised that when the balance of the property was developed R-3, subject property was withheld for commercial use, this being evident by the six -foot concrete block wall at the south as would be required with a C -1 development; street widening and a p the 40,000 cars that daily pass thisrintersection. been made to accommodate Mr. Smith noted the General Plan was a plan in anticipation of the general development of the City and as conditions change the General Plan should be changed and updated. He called attention to the many residential structures in the area now converted to various commercial uses. In conclusion, Mr. Smith advised that commercial use of subject property was the highest and best use and would be an asset to the area. Mr. Louis Dexter, 8791 Ranchito, addressed the Council in approval, being of the opinion that there were sufficient apartments in the area and that a service station with a commercial complex would tend to slow traffic in the area. As to the General Plan, Mr. Dexter felt even with an adopted General Plan, the unique situation must be considered and this is a unique situation. In conclusion, Mr. Dexter advised his home was in close proximity to the proposed site for the service station and he favored the proposed devel- opment and felt the service station would not bother him. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council either in favor or opposition to the reclassification. There being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION N0, 72R -396: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -396 for adoption, approving Reclassification No. 72 -73 -3 and authorizing p of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested subject to the followin interdepartmental recommendations as amended: g 1. The street lighting facilities along Brookhurst Street, Valley Street, and Alameda Avenue shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above mentioned requirements. 2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15C per front foot along Brookhurst Street, Valley Street, Alameda and Crescent Avenues for tree planting purposes. 3. That sidewalks shall be installed along Crescent Avenue, Valley Street, and Alameda Avenue as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 6. That all air conditioning facilities and mechanical equipment shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent properties. 7. That any parking area lighting proposed shall be down- lighting of a maximum height of six feet, which lighting shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity of the area. 8„ That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 9. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 10. That the owner shall reimburse the City of Anaheim for the owner's share of street improvements which were constructed by the City under agreement with the owner dated May 1, 1967 and approved by the City Council by Resolution No. 67R -265. 11. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accord- ance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. 72 -580 Cit Hall Anaheim California COUNCIL MINUTES Se.tember 12 1972 1 :30 P.M. 12. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro- perty, Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 10, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 13. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 11, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Amended conditions of rezoning were accepted by Mr. Smith on behalf of the Applicant. During the discussion that followed, Councilman Thom advised that he did not dispute the logic of C -1 zoning on the property and even though he was voting for the C -1 classification, he was opposed to the service station. Councilman Stephenson felt subject property was no longer desirable for residential use due to the heavy traffic on Brookhurst Street. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (72 -73 -3 C -1) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -396 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -73 -6 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1325: Submitted by Floriene Sandersfeld, requesting a change of zone from County 100 -C -1- 10,000 to City C -1, to establish a 58 -unit motel lounge south portion portion A) and to establish a restaurant with cocktail loun ortion B), g (northeast corner P property located on the west side of Brookhurst Street, south of Orange Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72-178, recommended approval of said reclassification subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 60 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Brookhurst Street for street widening purposes. 2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Brookhurst Street, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specif- ications on file in the office of the City Engineer; that street lighting fac- ilities along Brookhurst Street shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be postzd with the City to guarantee the installation of the above mentioned requirements. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15 cents per front foot along Brookhurst Street for tree planting purposes. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 6. That a six -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the west property line. 7 That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent residences. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 12, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. 8. That a parcel map to record the approved division of subject property be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 9. That any parking area lighting proposed shall be down- lighting of a maximum height of six feet, which lighting shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity of the area. 10. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 11. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 12. That these reclassification proceedings are granted subject to completion of annexation of subject property to the City of Anaheim. 13. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibits Nos. 1 and 2, 3, 4, 5, Revision Nos. 1. 14. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 12, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. 15. That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 13, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 16. That ordinances reclassifying the Y g property shall be adopted as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such parcel provided, however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -179, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 1325 subject to the following conditions: 1. That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 72 73 6, now pending. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, and 2, 3, 4, 5, Revision Nos. 1. Mr. Roberts noted the location of subject property and reported it had been recently annexed to the City of Anaheim by the Brookside #2 Annex- ation; that the proposed development complies in all respects to the C -1 site standards and that four of the 58 -units in the motel would have kitchen facilities in conformance with Council policy. Mr. Roberts further reported that at the first public hearing before the City Planning Commission, the manager of the Brookside Winery objected on the basis of setback and as a result the proposed motel structure was moved back nine feet from the right of way, thereby affording the winery more street exposure. The Mayor asked if the Applicant or Agent was satisfied with con- ditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Mrs. Sandersfeld replied in the affirmative. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either in favor or opposition to said reclassification and use. There being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -397: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -397 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone of the property as requested subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (72 -73 -6 C -1) 72 -581 72 -582 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 12, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Roll Call Vote; AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -397 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -398: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -398 for adoption granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1325, subject to the recommenda- tions of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1325. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -398 duly passed and adopted. PU]3LAC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -73 -16 and VARIANCE NO. 2406: Sub- mitted by Mr. and Mrs. Donald L. McIntosh, requesting a change in zone from R -1 to C -1, to establish an office in an existing residential structure and a convenience market on property located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Gilbert Street, with waivers of: a. Requirement that all parking be provided to the rear of a residential structure. b. Minimum 8 -foot separation for pedestrian access. c. Minimum 2% interior parking area landscaping. d. Required 6 -foot, solid masonry wall abutting a residential zone. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -186 recommended denial of said reclassification and pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -187 denied said variance. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location and briefed the Council on past zoning requests and action on subject property,advising there presently is a resolution of intent to C -0 zoning on the property. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant or the Applicant's Agent was present and wished to speak. Rill Asawa, 806 South Beach Boulevard, Agent, stated it is their intention to establish a compatible commercial use with existing uses in the immediate area. He stated that recently numerous residential units have been constructed and there is a definite need for a convenience -type market to service the area. Mr. Asawa disployed pictures depicting the present condition and proposed development of subject property. He stated that the plans for development are for a specific use and they have a lease agreement with the 7 -11 Markets, who have investigated and studied the area extensively and in their opinion this is a good location for a convenience -type market. Mr. Asawa pointed out that because of the size of the lots, development of the property is limited and it was decided use of the two lots would be necessary, with the convenience -type market on one and an office use to act as a buffer to the residential area on the remaining portion. He explained that upon numerous occasions the property has been up for sale, but because of the commercial use in the area, no lending institution would make a loan for residential use of the property. He stated that the rear of the subject parcel is landscaped and would remain so, thus fulfilling the City's land- scaping ratio requirement. 72 -583 Cit Hall Anaheim California COUNCIL MINUTES Se.tember 12 1972 1:30 P.M. It was Mr. Asawa's opinion that if the property is reclassified to commercial use, the property owners in the immediate area will have a convenience -type market, the City will have a larger tax base, and the proposed development is a logical use of the property due to its size and location. Mayor Dutton questioned utilization of the house as a buffer for the adjoining residential area. Mr. Asawa explained that because of the City's parking require- ments, the market plans overlapped onto the second lot and they are utiliz- ing the whole lot as a unit, with commercial use on the north portion and C -0 use on the south portion. Councilman Stephenson asked if any plans had been made to remodel the existing house to make it look more like an office. business placed in a home on a commercial street is inappropriate. n his opinion a pp Mr. Asawa explained that the garage and block wall would be removed and the swimming pool filled in, and any requirements of the Building Division would be complied with, Mayor Dutton asked if anyone in opposition wished to be heard. Dean Graham, 133 South Gilbert Street, presented and read a pet- ition containing 33 signatures of registered voters or landowners in the immediate area who are in opposition to the proposed zoning changes which would allow construction and operation of a neighborhood grocery store and establish a precedent for additional encroachment of other commercial activities in the existing residential area. Mr. Graham stated they felt there was no need for a convenience -type market as there are 11 markets in the immediate area. They would prefer to see the entire property utilized for commercial- office use. He stated there has been no apparent effort to utilize the property as C -0 which had been approved by the Planning Com- mission and City Council and acceptable to the affected residents. Mayor Dutton questioned Mr. Graham as to how knowledgeable he was about the owner's plans for development of the property. Mr. Graham replied he could only answer that question by stating he has never seen any advertising signs on the property for C -0 use. Mr. Graham asked what type of business was proposed for the existing house. He stated that it was the feeling of the property owners in the area that use of the property as C -0 would generate less in- and -out traffic than a market operation. Mayor Dutton asked the Applicant's Agent if he would like an opportunity for rebuttal. Mr. Asawa stated that since the study made in 1967 prior to devel- opment of the adjoining property, the character of the area has changed a great deal. The Southland Corporation (7 -11 Markets) has since made a study of the area, and they feel a convenience -type market within walking distance for residents is needed. No one else wishing to address the Council, Mayor Dutton declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -399: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -399 for adoption, denying Reclassification No. 72- 73 -16, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. 72 -584 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 12 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (72- 73 -16) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson and Thom NOES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -399 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -400: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -400 for adoption, denying Variance No. 2406. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO,. 2406. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson and Thom NOES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -400 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 123A (71- 72 -44): To consider amendments to the General Plan by amending General Plan No. 123 -A by increasing the area to include the entire 4200 acres of land, commonly known as the Anaheim Hills community, situated in the Santa Ana Canyon generally south of the Santa Ana Canyon Road and east of the Newport Freeway, and to consider the adoption of a zoning element and revised land use and density element for said area. The City Council, by Resolution No. 71R -127, adopted General Plan Amendment No. 123, changing the general description and extent of land uses and increasing the densities for the area known as the Anaheim Hills community, and by Resolution No. 72R -207, dated May 30, 1972, adopted General Plan Amend- ment No. 123A covering approximately 652 acres of the Anaheim Hills area, changing the general description and extent of land uses and decreasing the densitites from those projected under General Plan No. 123. On June 12, 1972, the City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. PC72 -123, recommended the general description be increased to approximately 4200 acres, and pursuant to their Resolution No. PC72 -226 on August 21, 1972, recommended the adoption of the zoning element Exhibit No. 12, and the revised land use and density element Exhibit No. 11, Revision No. 1. Mr. Charles Roberts outlined the boundaries of the entire 4200 acres under consideration and briefed the proposed planned community development encom- passing 675.5 acres under 71 72 44. He noted that subsequent to the Planning Commissions approval of General Plan 123A and Reclassification No. 71- 72 -44, the City Attorney advised the department of his concern as to the legality and enforcement of certain portions of the existing Planned Community Zone, being of the opinion that the flexibility and potential lack of uniformity within the Planned Community Zone would present legal problems. That rather than approve the PC Zone over an area, some existing City of Anaheim zone would have to be applied to the specific areas proposed for development. As a result, it was the opinion of staff that the best way to handle the situation would be to require a zoning plan or element, whereby the developer would designate at the outset the City of Anaheim zoning that he intends to apply in implementing the planned community. That to further alleviate the legal concern and to comply with the proposed language of the Planned Community Zoning, Anaheim Hills has submitted 72 -585 Cit Hall Anaheim California,- COUNCIL MINUTES Se•tember 12 1972 1 :30 P.M. a zoning element for the 675.5 acres designating the zoning to be employed in the development of each of the specific areas within their planned community. Y Mr. Roberts further advised that the City Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the Planned Zone on September 18, 1972. Communit Y Mr. Roberts advised of planned community development proposals of S S Construction Company for approximately 107 acres within the Lakeview area; 70 acres of this property proposed for conventional subdivisions of single family, detached units with minimum lot sizes of 6,000 square feet with the balance of the acreage proposed for patio homes and /or townhouses of 8 to 12 units per acre respectively. As the patio homes /townhouse area may exceed the densities approved, S S Construction have indicated they will average the single and multiple developments so that the aggregate densit for the total 107 acres will not exceed the density approved o y icular areas and that further applications would include theseproposalsain the Lakeview area. P Mr. Roberts summarized matters before the City Council this date involving the Anaheim Hills area as follows: a. Consider General Plan Amendment No. 123 -A as it pertains to the entire 4200 acres rather than just to the area included within the planned community. b. Whether or not the zoning element as submitted designating City of Anaheim zones for certain areas in the planned community would be a ro- priate. pp c. Whether or not the additional 23.5 acres should be included with- in the boundaries of the planned community area (71- 72 -44). In answer to Councilman Thom, Mr. Roberts advised that all of the area including in the proposed planned community is outside the Agricultural Preserve. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. James Barisic, Vice President, Anaheim Hills Inc., advised they are satisfied with the findings and recommendations of the City Planning Commission. There being no one else wishing to address the Council, the Mayor declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held by the City that the General Plan amendment including at this time, however, the implementation accomplished until appropriate revisions Zone. Council and the City Attorney advised the zoning element could be approved of the zoning element could not be are made to the Planned Community RESOLUTION NO. 72R -401: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -401 for adopting General Plan Amendment No. 123A as it pertains to the entire 4200 acres known as the Anaheim Hills Community, and further adopting the zoning element Exhibit No. 12 and the revised land use and density element Exhibit No. 11, Revision No. 1 as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ABPROVING AMENDMENTS TO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 123 -A, ADOPTING A ZONING ELEMENT AND REVISED LAND USE AND DENSITY ELEMENT AND INCREASING THE AREA COVERED. Roll Call Vote; AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN; Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -401 duly passed and adopted. 72 -586 C Hall Anaheim California COUNCIL MINUTES September 12 1972 1:30 P.M, PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71 -72 -44 (REHEARING): Submitted by Anaheim Hills, Inc., and Texaco Ventures, Inc., requesting a change in zone from County Al and City R -A to City PC, Planned Community Zone, including R -3, R -2, R -1 and C -H zoning districts on property consisting of approximately 675.5 acres located south of Santa Ana Canyon Road, between Anaheim Hills Road and Weir Canyon Road and extending southerly to approximately the ridge line of the Santa Ana Mountains separating the cities of Anaheim and Orange. Subject application was readvertised to amend the description to include an additional 23.5 acres, 652 acres having resolution of intent to zone PC pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -208 on May 30, 1972. It was noted that the additional area proposed for inclusion in the Planned Community boundary is comprised of two separate parcels: an 18 -acre parcel located west of the Lakeview development and south of the Parkview development, and a 5.5 -acre parcel located southwest of the Eastridge develop- ment and southeast of the Lakeside development. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there being no response declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -402: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -402 for adoption amending Resolution No. 72R -208 by amending the description therein to include the entire 675.5 acres as recommended by the City Planning Commission, amending Condition No. 4 of said Resolution No. 72R -208, to read as follows: 4. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accor- dance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (Revision No. 1) and 9. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 72R -208 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS N0, 71- 72 -44. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -402 duly passed and adopted. APPLICATION ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Application filed by James J. Campbell for casual guitar players at the Stables, 121 S. Anaheim Boulevard, seven days per week from 6 :00 a.m. to 2 :00 a.m. Councilman Dutton questioned the 6 :00 a.m. to 2 :00 a.m. time factor and his query was answered by Dene M. Daoust, City Clerk, that there would be no regular scheduled entertainment but rather the public in general would be invited to play, on a casual basis, and the hours noted are the hours of operation. On recommendation of Police Chief Michel, Councilman Dutton moved the permit be granted for a period of one year subject to provisions of Chapter 4.18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Motion was seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED APPLICATION PUBLIC DANCE: Application by Elvin H. Williams for the Fourth Annual Anaheim Police Association Show and Dance at the Anaheim Convention Center, 800 West Katella Avenue, September 16, 1972 from 11 :00 p.m. to 1 :00 a.m. was sub- mitted to the Council and granted subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code as recommended by the Chief of Police. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, providing that six officers be hired to police the dance. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP, TRACT NO. 5674: Developer, Lusk Corporation. Property located at the northwest corner of Nohl Ranch Road and Royal Oak Road and contains 51 R -H- 10,000 zoned lots. 72 -587 Cit Hall Anaheim California COUNCIL MINUTES Se•tember 12 1972 1 :30 P.M. The City Engineer, James P. Maddox recommended approval and stated that the final tract map has been checked and found to be technically correct and in substantial conformance with the tentative map previously approved and required fees have been paid. He further reported that drainage of Tract No. 5674 will be by street flow and reinforced concrete pipe into an existing storm drain in Royal Oak Road. Final Map, Tract No. 5674 was approved as recommended on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Stephenson. MOTION CARRIED. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held August 21, 1972, pertaining to the following applications were submitted for Council information and consideration: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 1338: Submitted by Century Properties, to estab- lish on -sale beer and win in an existing Italian restaurant on C -1 zoned property located on the east side of Beach Boulevard, north of Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -190, granted said conditional use permit subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1339: Submitted by J. A. D. E., Incorporated, to establish on -sale beer and wine in conjunction with an existing restaurant on C -1 zoned property located on the north side of Ball Road, east of Beach Boulevard. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -191, granted said conditional use permit subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 2413: Submitted by Standard Oil of California, to construct three lighter box signs and four canopy signs in conjunction with an existing free standing sign on C -1 zoned property located on the southwest corner of Ball Road and Anaheim Boulevard, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. b. Maximum number of free standing signs. c. Minimum sign height. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -199, denied said variance. VARIANCE NO, 2414: Submitted by Standard Oil of California, to construct two lighter box signs in conjunction with an existing free standing sign on R -A zoned property located on the southeast corner of Ball Road and West Street, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. b. Maximum number of free standing signs. c. Minimum sign height. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -200, denied said variance. VARIANCE NO. 2418: Submitted by Standard Oil of California, to construct one lighter box sign and one free- standing sign in conjunction with an existing free standing freeway sign: a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. b. Maximum number of free standing signs. c. Minimum sign height. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -204, denied said variance. VARIANCE NO. 2419: Submitted by Standard Oil of California, to construct one lighter box sign in conjunction with an existing free- standing sign on C -1 zoned property located on the southwest corner of La Palma Avenue and Harbor Boulevard, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. 72 -588 Cit Hall Anaheim California COUNCIL MINUTES Se'tember 12 1972 1 :30 P.M. b. Maximum number of free- standing signs. c. Minimum sign height. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -205, denied said variance. VARIANCE NO. 2420! Submitted by Standard Oil of California, to construct two lighter box signs in conjunction with an existing free standing sign on C -2 zoned property located at the southeast corner of Broadway and Manchester Avenue, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. b. Maximum number of free- standing signs. c. Minimum sign height. d. Minimum distance to a property line. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 206, denied said variance. VARIANCE NO. 2431: Submitted by Ronald R. Cosby, et al, to permit minor repair, testing and storage of mobile homes out -doors on R -A and M -1 zoned property located on the west side of Kraemer Boulevard, south of Miraloma Avenue, with waivers of: a. Permitted outdoor uses. h. Outdoor storage screening requirement. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -192, granted said variance, subject to conditions. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RESOLUTION NO. PC72- 217: The statement adopted by the City Planning Commission finding that the proposed flood control and drain- age improvements in State College Boulevard between Vermont Avenue and South Street within the City of Anaheim will have no significant effect on the envir- onment,and that said improvements are in conformance with the adopted Anaheim General Plan was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Stephenson. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6733: Owner, Harold M. Williams, Martin S. Roberts and Fred M. Kay. Property is located on the north side of Orangethorpe Avenue, east of Lakeview Avenue and contains 52 R -2 -5000 proposed zoned lots. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, action on Tentative Map, Tract No. 6733 was continued to be heard in conjunction with Reclassification No. 71- 72 -53. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 7929, REVISION NO. 1: Owner, Anaheim Hills /Texaco Ventures. Property is located on the east side of Nohl Ranch Road, north of Serrano Avenue and contains 162 R -2 proposed zoned lots. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, action on Tentative Tract Map No. 7929, Revision No. 1, was continued to be heard in conjunction with Reclassification No. 72 -73 -11 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1332. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 6931, REVISION NO. 3: Owner, Albert S. Toussau. Property is located on the east side of Sunkist Street, north of Ball Road and contains 40 RS -5000 proposed zoned lots. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, action on Tentative Tract No. 6931 was continued to be considered in conjunction with Variance No. 2405. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -403 AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 655A: In accordance with recommen- dations of the City Engineer, Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -403 for adoption. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 12, 1972, 1230 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATtON, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER- FORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: INSTALLATION OF MAGNETOMETERS AND LOOPS AT THE INTERSECTION OF BALL ROAD AND BEACH BLVD., IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 655 -A. (Baxter Griffin Company $3,370.00) Roll Call Vote: 72 -589 AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -403 duly passed and adopted. WORK ORDER NO. 801 DUPLICATING AND PRINTING SHOP ADDITION: Motion was made by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton to defer award of Work Order No. 801 for one week. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -404 WORK ORDER NO. 661 -A: Councilman Pebley offered Res- olution No. 72R -404 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE RIO VISTA STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM APPROXIMATELY 418 FEET NORTH OF TO APPROXIMATELY 136 FEET NORTH OF DUTCH AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 661 -A. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IM- PROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTH- ORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened October 5, 1972, 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -404 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT TWO CUSHIAN TRUCKSTERS: The Assistant City Manager, Robert Davis reported on the recommended purchase of two Cushman Trucksters for the Anaheim Hills Golf Course and advised that Cushman Motors, the sole vendor, has submitted a quotation for said equipment in the amount of $4,410.00, including tax. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, purchase was authorized in the amount of $4,410.00 including tax, as recom- mended by the Assistant City Manager. To this motion Councilman Thom voted "no MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT TWO THRE -PHASE POWER TRANSFORMERS: The Assistant City Manager reported the following informal bids received for three-phase power transformers, and recommended acceptance t of the low e bid; two, VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX Wagner Electric, El Segundo $170,973.60 Westinghouse Elect., Los Angeles 180,600.00 McGraw Edison, Los Angeles 187,897.50 Allis- Chalmers, Los Angeles 205,590.00 General Elect. Co., Los Angeles 227 692.50 72 -596 Cit Hall Anaheim California COUNCIL MINUTES September 12 1972 1 :30 P.M. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the low bid of Wagner Electric was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $170,973.60, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim filed September 1, 1972 by Beverly Hills Transfer and Storage Company for damages in the amount of $538.74, purportedly resulting from bursting of water main, on December 8, 1971, was denied as recommended by the City Attorney and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed by motion of Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas: a. City of Buena Park Resolution No. 4731 Endorsing the concept of a wilderness park in the Chino Hills. b. City of Newport Beach Resolution No. 7802 Requesting re -eval- uation of existing ocean water quality control standards in connection with recent promulgation of a water quality control plan by the California State Water Resources Control Board. c. City of Orange Resolution No. 3701 Requesting the City of Anaheim and the Orange County Board of Supervisors to authorize environmental impact and cost /benefit studies in order to determine the environmental and economic effect of development in the Santa Ana Canyon. d. City of Villa Park Resolution No. 72 -261 Endorsing an envir- onmental /cost benefit study of Santa Ana Canyon. e. Orange County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 72 -968 Re: Comprehensive policies for the development of the Santa Ana Canyon. f. Orange County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 72 -967 Approving an agreement for development and operation of Five Coves. g. Community Center Authority Minutes August 29, 1972. h. Anaheim Public Library Board Minutes July 17, 1972. i. Anaheim Public Library Board Minutes July 13, 1972. j. Financial and Operating Reports for the months of July and August, 1972. Engineering Division (July) Building Division (August) MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 3081: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3081 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RESCINDING SECTION 18.26.050 (3) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 18.26.050 (3) IN ITS PLACE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No, 3081 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3082: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3082 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70 -71 -56 R -3) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None building. 72 -591 City Hall, Anaheim, California, COUNCIL MINUTES September 12, 1972 1 :30 P.M. The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3082 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3084: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3084 for first st AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING SECTIONS 17.06.110(c) AND 1 7.06.120(g) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE AND AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.06 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO NEW SECTIONS 17.06.1.1 AND 17.06.120(g). (Terracing cut slopes and fill slopes) 0(c) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 658,- REPORT: City Council requested report on actions taken by Trinity Lutheran Church, 420 Fern Hill Lane to comply with the con- ditions set forth under Conditional Use Permit No. 658. Mr. Roberts stated that field survey indicates that the full height curb and gutter forms have been installed and are ready for concrete, and in addition, the area of asphalt behind these has been removed, fulfilling Con- dition No. 3. g The church has also put in additional landscaping at the eastern edge of the lot adjoining the grass play area and these plants should rovide an adequate screen on this edge of the property when mature g fulfilling Con ition No. 5. Mr. Roberts submitted photos taken on field survey to supplement his report. Mr. Conradson, the Minister of the church, reported from the audience that the concrete had already been poured. Mr. Roberts also mentioned that it was noted that a very small portion of the parking lot (northern section) was used for certain recreational activiti es (tetherball, volleyball) and the question arises as to whether this area is in cluded in Council's intent as a recreation area. He minister of the church indicated these markings have been for that the for games for some time and have been used as such. P he asphalt Following discussion by the Council, it was determined that the Church has taken steps to comply with the conditions set forth in Resolution No. 71R -335 and no further action was deemed necessary by the Council at this time. GREENS FEES ANAHEIM HILLS GOLF COURSE: Councilman Pebley offered a motion auth- orizing the City Attorney to prepare a resolution which will establish greens fees at Anaheim Hills Golf Course, said fees to be 50 cents higher than those presently charged at Anaheim Municipal Golf Course. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stephenson. To this motion, Councilman Thom voted "no" on the basis that the proposed greens fees were too low. MOTION CARRIED. JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT ULTRA HIGH FREQUENCY LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM: Mr. Robert M. Davis reported on the proposed joint UHF communication system for the County of Orange and other cities within Orange County to be used jointl y by Police and Fire Departments and possibly other radio dispatch facilities. He advised that funds have been budgeted for the acquisition and installation of the radio equipment and recot►utended, with the change over, a new police communication center be constructed in the pistol range in the base- ment of the police building and that transfer of $10,000. from the Council Contingency Fund be authorized for modification work necessary for conversion Mr. Davis cited the following reasons for recommending conversion of the pistol range to a communication center: a. The range is not presently usable as a police practice range because of inadequate ventilation causing problems by the buildup of fumes and despite the spending of additional funds on ventilation, the Orange Count Health Department states it is still potentially hazardous to health to use y this area as a pistol range. b. The noise created in using the range is heard throughout the 72 -592 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 12, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. c. It appears that this area would be ideally situated for the loca- tion of a combined Police -Fire Communications Center, due to the fact that it is relatively inaccessible to the public thereby providing greater security. Councilman Stephenson was of the opinion that the loss of the use of the practice pistol range in the basement of the Police Department would be ultimately detrimental to the Anaheim Police Department as it would be difficult to insure that police personnel perform the required amount of pistol practice. He noted also the initial cost of the range and felt not to use it would be a tremendous waste and he would hate to see its use discontinued unless there was absolutely no way to ventilate and insulate for noise. On questioning by Councilman Stephenson as to what plans had been made for police pistol practice, Police Chief Michel described a program by which the officers would use the Orange County police officers' range, whereby officers would be required to go to the range once a month and this would be done during their working hours. They would be required to show a certain per certage of accuracy and if their accuracy is not up to established requirements, then they would be required to take additional practice on their own time, bringing their marksmanship up to standards. Chief Michel commented that the present space for communications is inadequate and vulnerable. The range is the most immediately available suitable space, he stated. Councilman Sneegas brought up the possibility of using the north end of the basement in the police building. Mr. Davis stated that this area is assigned to the Civil Defense and Disaster Services which was partially Federally funded and therefore, could not be relocated. Councilman Sneegas stated he hesitated to convert the pistol range into a communication center because he felt that within the next three years, use of the Orange County range will be discontinued due to mounting pressure from re- sidential areas because noise and fumes from the present Orange County police officers' range. Councilman Sneegas further noted the expenses involved in using the Orange County range because of the time factor in traveling to and from, which must be considered when the officers using the range are on duty. Councilman Pebley felt the costs of ventilation of the pistol range should be determined and compared with the cost of new construction for the communications center, possibly on the site between the Police Department and the Library. Councilman Sneegas concurred that a study should be undertaken to find out authoritatively how much it would cost to make the pistol range usable before a decision is reached, and further felt a portion of such study be devoted to calculating the amount of time it would take for the officers to travel back and forth to the Orange County police pistol range and the applicable costs to the City and that be projected for a five year period. At the conclusion of the discussion, it was moved by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, that a study of the situation be authorized to include, but not limited to, the following factors: a. Cost of ventilating and sound proofing the pistol range to restore it to usable condition. b. The cost of constructing a new facility in which to locate the emergency communication center. c. Recommended location of new facility. d. The costs involved in using the Orange County police officers' pistol range, including an estimate of the time and salaries paid in travel to and from this facility and other applicable City expenses, projected over a five year period. e. Investigate to determine if the EOC Facility can be jointly utilized with a communication center. MOTION CARRIED. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 12, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. REPORT CITY EMPLOYEES HEALTH INSURANCE: Mr. Garry McRae, Personnel Director, pre- sented specifications for quotations on City employee health and life insurance policies. If these are satisfactory to the council, they will be used to select the carrier prior to November 1, 1972, which is the expiration date on current health insurance. GOLF PRO ANAHEIM HILLS ANA.EIM MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSES: On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City Attorney and City Manager were authorized to negotiate a contract with Mr. Nick Cassa to operate a pro shop and furnish golf instructions for the Anaheim Hills Golf Course and the Anaheim Municipal Golf Course, said contract to be brought back to Council for final action. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. McRae reported that these specifications are written to conform with our present plan and do not preclude other carriers from submitting plans. He described the three options open to the City Council regarding negotiations with the insurance companies. He stated that the City does not have a broker of records for its health insurance policy with Blue Cross. Dealing directly with them, and not through a broker, saves the City one percent. Councilman Thom moved that the specifications for proposals for City employees' Group Hospital -Major Medical and Life Insurance, prepared and submitted by the Personnel Office be approved and that Mr. McRae be authorized to solicit proposals, and Council delay naming a broker of record until after the selection of the carrier. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. REPORT SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD 1AT EUCLID AND CRESCENT: Councilman Thom requested a report on the pilot study initiated last year stationing a crossing guard at the intersection of Euclid and Crescent, which is a signalized crossing. Councilman Thom stated he would like to have the results of this study pre- sented for the next Council meeting, September 19, 1972. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilman Dutton, at the request of the Assistant City Manager, moved that the Council recess to executive session to discuss a personnel matter. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4 :05 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order, all members of the Council being present. (4 :40 P.M.) ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Stephenson moved to adjourn. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. SIGNED ADJOURNED: 4 :45 P.M. 72-593