Loading...
1972/09/1972-594 Aqoh( m ,<al ifc)rri) COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1.972, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. Pt SENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson PRESENT: ADMINISTRATIVE; ASSISTANT: John Harding CITY ATTORNEY; Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph 0. Pease ASSISTANT DiRT<�CTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Paul Keller of the First Presbyterian Church gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman W. J. Thom led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. R;S(LIJT1ON OF CONGRATULATIONS: A Resolution of Congratulations to Miss Dana Schoenfield was read by the Mayor and in addition he presented her with a stflbol of the Anaheim Stadium "A with appropriate message on reader board, in recognition of her achievement as a swimmer and winner of ;Elver Medal at the 20th Olympiad. MINUTES: Councilman Thom requested that the minutes of September 5, 1972, page 7-570, (Anahei m Hill;, grading, Northridge No. 7 be amended and further clarified as the present. wording did not indicate what the precedent was; that it was in fact, proceeding to grade without a permit to do so and prior to corrections and final approval of grading plans. The City Attorney advised that the reason the indemnity agreement was f i led was due to the fact that the permit had not been issued and they were d)c rmitted to prcceed without it pending the checking of plans. At the conclusion of the discussion, on motion by Councilman Pehloy, seconded by Councilman Thom, Minutes of the regular meeting held August 29, 1 .972 were approved and Minutes of the regular meeting held September 5, 1972 were approved as amended, clarifying action taken pc I tr_aini_ng to NorthriAge No. 7 grading to read as follows: "That the City Engineer be authorized to proceed to allow grading of Northridge No. 7 without permit." MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive t reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ;EPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $1,248,518.32, in accordance with the 1972 -73 Budget, were approved. 0t:r <iir HEARINt RECLASSIFICATION NOQ 72 -73 -2 and VARIANCE NO. 2393: Submitted h% James E. Jordan, requesting a change in zone from R -A to C -1 to con- struct combination retail and couutiercial office building on property 1t:,c ted the we >t ,i de cif Brookhurst Street, north of Katona Avenue, t h wi ver of: (h0-61-51) Zone boundary (rE en landscaping lh. Maxinun building height within 150 feet of a single- family zone. c Minimum zone boundary wall height. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC /2 -220 recommended that Reclassification No. 72 -73 -2 be approved subject to the following conditions: City Hall, Anaheim, (,aliifornia COUNCIL MINUTES Se tember 19, 1972 1. :30 P.M. L. hat al engineering requirerry nts of the City of Anaheim along Brookhurst Street, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all :improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities or other appurtenant wo"4 shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; that street lighting facilities along Brookhurst shall be instal'ed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance: with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anatltim shall be posted with the City- to guarantee the in: t :.111a- tion of the above. mentioned requirements. Z. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15e;: per front foot along Brookhurst Street for tree planting purposes. 3 TI it t r -a.sh storage areas shalt be provided in accordance: w th approved plan, on file with the office of the Director of Public Work 4. That ,ire hydrants shall be inst it led as required and determined to he= 11( sary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 5. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from and the sound buffered from adjacent residential properties. 6 'hat_ subject property shall be served by underground ut i 1 t .t it :s. That any parking area lighting proposed shall he down- Lighting c f a maximuu: ire iglit: of 6 feet, which lighting shall be directed away from the property 1 7es lo lrotect, the residential integrity of the area. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro perty, Condition Nos. 1 and 2 above mentioned, shall be completed. The pro vi.sions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within 180 days frIn the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. 9. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, above mentioned shall be. complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. The City Planning Cotinaission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC -72 -221, granted Variance No. 2393, in part, denying waiver "a and granting waivers "b" and "c" as they pertain to the south property line only, subject to the following: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 72 -73 -2. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accord- ance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1., 2, 3 and 4. Mr. Charles Roberts, Zoning Supervisor, noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission. He advised that the proposed structure would be situated in the middle of the property and would meet code requirements for distance from the R Zone to the west. Councilman Dutton questioned the Planning Commissions recommendation of denial of waiver "a", due to the fact that the builder proposes the driveway to be located at the south boundary and the tree screen would make the drive- way too narrow and block vision so as to make it hazardous. Mr. Roberts stated he was not sure of the intent of the City Planning Commission in denying waiver "a" since the southern lot will undoubtedly be used for commercial purposes in the future. 73 -595 v li;; i i An 1 California UNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1:30 P.M. the Mayor );F 1 the applicant was pre,;F nt and whether he was -t >I =icri with the rep omr[(ndations of the Planning Commizision. Mr. Fin MIL" L'2f:i outh Euclid, represent:inv, the applicant, stated that they they were satisfied with the recommendations, }however they wished to h e r.1arification regarding the tree screen required on the south boundary. He stated that the area between the building and the street will be unplanted, fur that plantings will he placed along the remainder of this boundary. Th, ti c requirement along the entire south boundary would reduce the width of r- t c way from 21 feet to 17 feet. At. this time, in light of the fact that much of the opposition r'xL)r at. thy, -i,;,.�; t +'c)rr;i i hearing was dire to loss of privacy in tlis abuttin at r 7 c'caA: of thl K proposed twd! -story building, he of.ferc t 1,c additional information, that the plans call for no windows in the rear of this building. The Mayor asked it there WAS anyone in opposition who wished to :act r os,; tic City Courc i.1 Mr, Robert i i kp r j ,k. 172C Orme Street. whose property abuts the propcyed development is :i A 12 foot strip along the northwest corner, expressed the following points pposition, to the rezoning; the possibility of ,b 1 i shment of a trend to two-story buildings near. residential. homes 1. )n t the lot n parti- >out i of the subject parcel; the possibility that the six foot mo onry wall wor;1.,:i not match hir; existing wall; the location of the trash rotoi)tae Lc I pl £pnned Atf ny hi, property and th tnrrft;ld be a nuisance to him. The Mayor ,-;Rod ,1 orcyone e1:e wished to address the City Council; there h ing no respo, ec .tared the hearinL closed. d. ounci.lmt�rc Dutton i h n o;,ked if the developer would consider moving they trash storage tita to a petnt on his property closes to the structure and less o})trusi_ve to Mr. Kirkpatrick and also stipulate that the masonry wall o he built along the we;t side of the property would match Mr. Kirkpatrick's wall as closely as possible. Mr. Dills replied that they would he agreeable to these sti.pulation.s. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -426: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 7 2R -426 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone a: requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Com- mission, with the addition of the following condition as stipulated to by thc That the six -foot masonry wall required along the portion of the north boundary and along the west boundary of subject property shall match as closely as possioie the color and type of the existing masonry wall located along the west boundary of the commercial parcel immediately north of subject property. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE .AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (72 -73 -2 C -1) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor. declared Pesr No. 72R -426 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -405: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R-405 granting Variance No. 2393 in part, approving waivers "b" and "c" and granting "a" in part, by not requiring tree screening along that portion of the southern boundary between the structure and the street; subject to the conditions recom- mended by the City Planning Commission and in accordance with the stipulation of the developer that the trash storage area shall be re- located adjacent to the structure. 7?-597 City Hall Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CI'CY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2393 IN PART. Roll Cal Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor. declared Resolution No. 72R -405 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -73 -10 AND VARIANCE NO. 2426: Submitted by Woodman Farming, Company, requesting a change in zone from R -A to R -3 establish a 2- story 552 -unit statutory condominium complex at the northwe: -;t corner of Cerritos Avenue and Walnut Street, with wivers of: a. Lot frontage on a public street required. h. Building setback abutting an arterial highway. c. Minimum distance between buildings. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -218, recommended that the reclassification be disapproved, and pursuant to their. Resolution No. Pc72 2P), denied Variance No. 2426. Mr. Roberts, Zoning Supervisor, noted the location, the surrounding land uses, and zoning of subject property, using the aerial maps and illus- trations presented by the developer. He 1-�xp1 wined that the Planning Commission felt that the proposed reclassification would not be in conformance with the land use designation for the entire property on the General Plan, and that there had not been significant land use change in the area to warrant change to greater density but rather evidence submitted indicated there should be a trend to lessening of density in ttiis area Traffic projections for Walnut Street and Cerritos Avenue, in light of this proposed development and the completion of the Disneyland Hotel. Convention Center, were also taken into consideration by the Planning Commission. Mr. Roberts advised that the project is planned to be a statutory condominium rather than a planned residential development, which means that ownership of air space is conveyed to the buyer together with an undivided interest in the open spaces and recreation areas, rather than a postage stamp lot subdivision arrangement as seen in a planned residential develop- ment. The Planning Commission felt that since the ownership situation is not the same, the development standards should also be different. The Mayor asked if the Applicant was present and wished to address the Council. Mr. Robert Kendall, representing Leadership Housing Systems, 350L Harbor Boulevard, Santa Ana, and Mr. Stewart Woodard, Stewart Woodard Asso- ciates, 1.781 Skypark Circle, Irvine, addressed the Council regarding the proposed development. In support of the petition, they cited the fact that they felt this particular parcel of land is uniquely suited to this develop- ment because of its location near the highly commercial sections of the city. They stressed that this development offers amenities not usually found in a planned residential development or an R -1 tract, explaining that the use of a perimeter drive will produce four open spaces at the corners of the develop- ment which will be parks permanently maintained by the homeowners association, at no expense to the City. Further, because of the perimeter drive, no units will abut the R -1 tract to the north. In addition, the developers contended that the proposed over all density of 17.6 units per net acre was within the General Plan designation for this area, if the density intended for this entire parcel is averaged together instead of considered separately. Their project also meets require- ments for open space and for square footage in individual living units for a planned residential development. Upon questioning by the Council regarding the bylaws and structuring of the Homeowner's Association Mr. Kendall answered that this traditionally is begun by the developer, who retains control until it becomes an operating body 72 -598 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. on its own, when control would be turned over to the homeowners. He stated that he would be happy to submit any documentation used in setting up such an associa- tion to the Council and the City Attorney for approval. Mr. Geisler, City Attorney, reported that by -laws and covenants, conditions, and restrictions of homeowner associations are now regulated by state law, so that now there is adequate protection for the city, as to building maintenance, and up keep of the grounds. He remarked that this was not the case in the past, and difficulties were encountered with earlier developments. The Mayor asked if there was anyone in opposition who wished to address the Council. Mr. Gerald Pine, 1.430 Chalet, resident adjacent to the north of subject property stated that in his opinion this type of project would become an instant slum. He stated also that the area had been plagued by power fail- ures in the recent past and this additional development would further drain the already inadequate utilities. He also mentioned the perimeter drive stating in his opinion this would become a race track. Mr. Robert Varbito, Sr., 1426 Chalet, addressed the Council in oppo- sition stating he would like, the Council to consider the detrimental Effect to the environment of the area that a project of this density would have. He mentioned the fact that the additional traffic generated would be dangerous to children in the area. He felt that the owners of the property in the R -1 tract to the north would lore a considerable amount of privacy. He noted also that the plan provides for no exits to the north for emergency vehicles and this was of concern to him. Raymond Alvarez, 1 424 Gilbuck Street, appeared in opposition to the project feeling that high density and low income would add to crime and does not wish to see such an element added to their neighborhood. Mr. Ken Burkindine, 1331 Hampstead Street, in opposition, stated that many children in attendance at Ball Junior High School use the railroad right -of -way on the eastern boundary of the subject property for access to the school and adding additional families to the area would only increase this problem. He also noted the traffic problem on Walnut Street. Joanne Stanton, 1509 W. Harle Place, concurred with the aforemen- tioned statements and stated that this development would add, according to statistics from the school district, 300 junior high and high school students to Ball Junior High and Loara High Schools, which are almost to capacity at the present time. Mr. Jesse E. Clark, 1316 W. Chalet, concurred with previous statements made and objected to the proposed street south of his property and suggested a buffer of R -1 lots. The Council and several interested parties from the audience reviewed the plans at the Council table. It was noted there was provided 150 foot set- back from the north property line to any building. In rebuttal Mr. Kendall stated that his company would install speed bumps on the peripheral drive to insure against speeding. He presented sta- tistics compiled by his company that this type of project would actually bring a smaller population into the area and generate less traffic than a 12 unit per acre development. The Mayor felt sufficient evidence had been submitted and thereupon declared the hearing closed. Councilman Sneegas inquired what safeguards the City would have that these four open space areas would not become the City's responsibility. Mr. Geisler explained that the best protection would be with a Conditional Use Permit, however, these are no longer required on development of R 3 property unless subdivided and in order to require one in this instance, the ordinance would have to be chant, 1. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: Thom, Pebley ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson 72 -599 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION: At the conclusion of Council discussion, Councilman Dutton offered a resolution for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone, as requested, subject to the condi- tions recommended by the Interdepartmental Committee, plus the additional condition that speed bumps be installed in the circular peripheral drive. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (72- 73 -10, R -3). The Mayor declared the foregoing resolution failed to carry due to a tie vote. Councilman Pebley stated he would consider changing his vote if there was significant assurance regarding the maintenance of the green areas, comparable to the protection afforded by a conditional use permit. Mr. Geisler suggested thatthe Reclassification could be granted subject to additional condition such as Condition No. 2 on the Variance, i, e., "That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. I., 2, 3, 4, and 5. RESOLUTION NO. 7 2R -406: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -406 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone, as requested, subject to the following conditions as amended and recommended by the Interdepartmental Committee; adding condition that speed bumps be installed in the circular peripheral drive, and adding Condition No. 2 of the Variance. 1. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 5. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent properties. 6. That a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the northerly property line with pedestrian accessways at Feather Street and Hampstead Street. 7 That the existing sewer easement across subject property shall be abandoned and re- dedicated and the existing sewer abandoned and recon- structed as required by the City Engineer. 8. That the order of development of the subdivisions filed on subject parcel shall be 7945, 7946, 7947 and 7948. 9. That precise plans for the development of the property shall be submitted to the Development Services Department for review and approval by the Planning Commission and the City Council. 10. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. 11. That speed bumps be installed in the circular peripheral drive to reduce speed, as stipulated to by the applicant, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 72 -600 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1!30 P.M. 12. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition Nos. 1 and 9, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said condition is complied with within 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. 13. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, .5, 6, 7, 10 and 11, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (72- 73 -10, R -3). Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -406 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -407: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -407 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2426, subject to the following conditions recommended by the Interdepartmental Committee. 1. That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 72- 73 -10. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accord- ance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2426. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Tract Tract Tract Tract COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -407 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS. 7945, 7946, 7947 and 7948 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -73 -10 and VARIANCE NO. 2426): Developer, Leadership Housing Systems, Inc. Property located north and west of the intersection of Cerritos Avenue and Walnut Street and contains: No. No. No. No. 7945 7946 7947 7948 Sneegas, Pebley, Dutton Thom Stephenson Sneegas, Pebley, Dutton Thom Stephenson 1 proposed R -3 1 proposed R -3 1 proposed R -3 1 proposed R -3 zoned lot. zoned lot. zoned lot. zoned lot. The City Planning Commission on August 21, Tentative Tracts. 1972, denied said TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 7945: Councilman Dutton moved that Tentative Tract No. 7945 be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 7945 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 72 -73 -10 and Variance No. 2426. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 72 -601 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That the covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be sub- mitted to and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 5. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is s at: i .;factory to the City Engineer. 6. That. Lhe vehicular access rights, except at the driveways to Walnut Street:., ,fiali hr dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 7. That rnodified cul -de -sac shall be provided at the terminus of Feather Street sul, jQct. to the approval of the City Engineer. Gounciliaan Sneegas seconded the motion. Councilman Thom voted "No MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACI MAP NO. 7946: Councilman Dutton moved Tentative Tract No. 7946 be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Th. +t t..h€: approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 7946 is granted, subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 72 -73 -10 and Variance No. 2426. 2. That ,hould this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, 1/41- sul i i-i sion thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. 'h =t all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. Tht ':.lip covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be sub- mitted to and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 6. That a rnodified cul -de -sac shall be provided at the terminus of Hampstead Street subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. Councilman Thom voted "No MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 7947: Councilman Dutton moved Tentative Tract No. 7947 be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7947 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 72 -73 -10 and Variance No. 2426. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That the covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be sub- mitted to and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 5, That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 6. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and /or alley openings to Cerritos Avenue, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. Councilman Thom voted "No MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 7948: Councilman Dutton moved Tentative Tract No. 7948 be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 7948 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 72 -73 -10 and Variance No. 2426. 72 -602 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1 :30 p.m. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That the covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be sub- mitted to and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 5. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 6. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and /or alley openings to Cerritos Avenue and Walnut Street, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 7. That a right -of -way transition on the north side of Cerritos Avenue from Walnut Street westerly shall be provided as required by the City Engineer. Councilman Sncegas seconded the motion. Councilman Thom voted "No MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Dutton moved for a 5- minute recess; Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED (3 :45 p.m.). AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order, all members of the Council being present, with the exception of Councilman Stephenson. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -73 -12 and VARIANCE NO. 2400: Submitted by Frank R. Krogman, requesting a change of zone from R -A to R -1, to construct a nine -lot single family tract on property located at the southwest corner of Wagner Avenue and Sunkist Street, with waivers of: (Tentative Tract No. 7932) a. Single family structures adjacent to arterial highways required to rear onto arterial highways. b. Minimum lot width. c. Minimum lot area. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -222, recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following con- ditions: 1. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 3. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and /or alley openings to Wagner Avenue and Sunkist Street, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 4. That Reclassification No. 72- 73 -22, rezoning the adjoining R -A parcel to R -1, be completed. 5. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject prop- erty, Condition Nos. 1, 3 and 4, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -223, granted Variance No. 2400, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 72- 73 -12, now pending. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in confor- mance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, Revision No. 1, and Exhibit Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location and the existing single family uses to the south and west of subject property. Cit Hall Anaheim California COUNCIL MINUTES Se•tember 19 1972 1 :30 P.M. Mayor Dutton questioned the zoning of the parcel immediately to the west of subject property. Mr. Roberts replied that one of the conditions of approval for Reclassification No. 72 -73 -12 was that the adjoining R -A parcel to the west be rezoned to R--1. He stated that the Planning Commission held public hear- ing yesterday on this adjacent parcel and has recommended approval. Mayor Dutton asked if the applicant or his agent was present and if he was satisfied with the Planning Commission recommendations. Kit Kenyon, Sunburst Development, 9502 Greenwich Street, stated conditons of approval were satisfactory to them. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone in oppositioLL wished to be heard; there being no response, he declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -406: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -408 for adoption, approving Reclassification No. 72 -73 -12 and authorizing prepar- ation of necessary ordinance changing the zoning as requested, subject to the City Planning Commission recommendations. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER MINING THAT TITLL lb OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. 2- 7 3 -12, R -1) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson Tiie Mayor declared Resolution No. /2R 408 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -409: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -409 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2400, subject to the City Planning Commission recommendations. Refer. to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF TITE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2400. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -409 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 7932 REVISION NO. 1: Developer, Sunburst Development Company, Inc., location of property described in Reclassification No. 72 -73 -12 and contains approximately 2.1 acres proposed for subdivision into nine R -1 zoned lots. 72 -603 The City Planning Commission recommended approval of said Tentative Tract Map No. 7932, Revision No. 1, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7932, Revision No. 1, is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 72 -73 -12 and Variance No. 2400. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the north property line separating lot Nos. 1, 6 and 8 from Wagner Avenue, and on the east property line separating lot Nos. 1, 2 and 3 from Sunkist Street, except that a pedestrian opening shall be provided in said wall at the terminus of Clarence Street to Wagner Avenue. 72 -604 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsiblity for maintenance of said landscaping. 4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 5. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and /or alley openings to Wagner Avenue and Sunkist Street, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 6. That a strip of land 45 feet in width from the centerline of Wagner Avenue fronting the "not -a- part" parcel shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim for street widening purposes. 7. That all engineering and street lighting requirements of the City of Anaheim along Wagner Avenue fronting the "not -a- part" parcel shall be con- structed with the irriprr?wment.s of Tract No. 7932. 8. That a 10 -foot wide pedestrian easement shall be provided and improved between lot Nos. 1 and 6, 9. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 10. That the cul -de -sacs at the ends of Ambridge Street and Clarence Street shall be constructed as approved by the City Engineer. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, Tentative Tract Map No. 7932, Revision No. 1, was approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION N0. 72 -73 -13 AND VARIANCE NO. 2425: Submitted by Catherine A. Liles, requesting a change of zone from R -2 to C -1, to establish a 4136 square foot retail conmrtmercial building on property located at the north- west corner of Broadway and East. Street, with waivers of: a. Minimum building >e tback adjacent to an arterial highway. b. Minimum required number of parking stalls. c. Required 3 -foot parking area screen planting. d. Required 6 -foot solid masonry 70-e boundary wall. e. Required 2'4 11 ,r parking landscaping. City Planning- Corrunission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -211 recommended denial of said reclassification, and pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -212, denied said variance. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject prop- erty, explaining the L- shaped parcel has frontages on East Street, Broadway and Rose Street. He pointed out that the subject property is surrounded by single family dwelling units and briefed the Council on the requested waivers. Mayor Dutton asked if the applicant or the applicant's agent was present and wished to be heard. Lew Sinor, Real Estate Broker representing the owner, stated they have now reduced the size of the building by two feet, thus regaining six parking spaces, bringing the total number to 17 parking spaces. Mr. Sinor was of the opinion that East Street from the Riverside Freeway to Ball Road was predominantly commercial and that the requested C was in conformity with the Anaheim General Plan. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, either in favor or in opposition to the reclassification; there being no response, he declared the hearing closed. ensued. Councilman Sneegas asked to see the plot plan and Council discussion Mr. Sinor again addressed the Council stating he had talked to the surrounding property owners, and they are in complete harmony with the proposed development. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -410: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R -410 for adoption, denying Reclassification No. 7 2- 73 -13, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (72- 73 -13) The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -410 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -411: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R -411 for adoption, denying Variance No. 2425. Council. Refer to Resolution Book. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson Refer. to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 2425. Roll Call Vote: 72 -605 AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 7 2R -411 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -73 -17 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1336: Submitted by Herman L. Lenz, requesting change of zone from R -A to R -2, to develop an 85 -unit planned residential development at the northeast cor- ner of State College Boulevard and Wagner Avenue, with the folkowing waivers: (Tentative Tract No. 7878) a. Minimum building site area. h. Minimum building site width. c. Required frontage on a dedicated street. d. Minimum distance between buildings. e. Minimum front setback. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -224, recommended disapproval of subject reclassification and pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -225, denied said conditional use permit. Mr. Roberts noted the location of subject property and zoning in the immediate area. He reported this to be a planned unit residential develop- ment and small lot subdivision and that the first three requested waivers were typical. He further reported that the approximate ten -acre parcel would have a density of 11.3 units per net residential acre and a coverage of slightly higher than 35% of the net buildable area. He explained that purchasers would on a lot and unit and have a common interest in the recreational area and open spaces; an assessment would be levied by a homeowners association for costs of building and landscape maintenance; that no two -story unit would be within 150 feet of the single family areas. In reviewing the plans, Mr. Roberts noted that the 20 -foot landscape area along the north and east boundaries had open bays for additional guest parking and also trash storage; and that there is provided two covered parking spaces, plus one and one -half open spaces for each unit. In conclusion, Mr. Roberts reported that the City Planning Couauission's recommended denial was based on density which they felt was greater than should be allowed in the area. The Mayor asked if the Applicant or his Agent wished to address the 72 -606 Cit Hall Anaheim California COUNCIL MINUTES Se.tember 19 1972 1:30 P.M. Mr. Tom Sifferman representing S and S Construction Company, 8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills, California, addressed the Council and in explaining the plans advised that there were eight separate floor plans ranging from 950 square feet to 1,700 square feet. He reported that the City Planning Commission approved the plans and that their only concern was whether the site was feasible for this type of use. Mr. Sifferman compared the proposed plan to that of a single family development and stated that the distance of their project from the single family residential area to the north and east was greater than if the property was developed into single fatally homes and that no two story construction would be within 250 feet on the north and 190 feet on the east, which will preserve pri- vacy far greater than a single family development. Mr. Sifferman stated there were approximately 16 occupied homes adja- cent to the proposed site and that many of the occupants indicated no objection, however were reluctant Lo sign a petition. He thereupon filed a petition con- taining eight signatures favoring the zoning and use. As to density, Mr. Sifferman reported that another similar townhouse development experienced a population of 2.2 person per unit compared to 4.4 per unit in a single family hom' or 195 people versus 185 people in a single development. He further stated that because of the high price of the homes, it had been their experience that this type project attracts only one child for each four units or a total of 22 school age children compared to 84 school age children if developed as a single family residential area. Mr. Sifferman noted the need for quality townhouses and was of the opinion that based on population and effect on public utilities, the proposal was within the spirit and intent of the City's General Plan. Mr. Herman Lenz, owner of the property, felt the proposed use was the highest and best use tor the property and advised that they plan to live in one of the townhouses. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition. Mr. Larry Baiden, q25 Nordica Street, addressed the Council in opposi- tion and was of the opinion that his privacy would be invaded by the peripheral drive and guest parking spaces provided close to the fence. He further objected to the location of the trash storage areas adjacent to the fence. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Mr. Sifferman advised that if the trash areas were a concern, they would stipulate to relocating them in an area west and south of the peripheral drive. Mr. Ronald Martin, 2212 Dupont Drive, Architect and Engineer for the project called attention to revised plans in which the drive on the north and east had been increased from 20 feet to 25 feet so that the green area excluding parking would be equal to a 20 foot strip. Plans were reviewed by the City Council. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -412: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -412 for adoption authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested subject to the following interdepartmental recommendations, plus the additional condition that trash areas be relocated as stipulated to by the Applicant: 1. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works; that trash areas along the north and east peripheral drive be relocated to the west and south sides of said drive as stipulated to by the Applicant. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1:30 P.M. 4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 5. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view. 6. That a six -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north and east property lines. 7. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject prop- erty, Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council, unle.s said conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 8. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (72 -73 -17 R-2) Roll Call. Vote: 72 -607 AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -412 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -413: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -413 for adoption, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 1336, subject to the following interdepartmental recommendations: 1. That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 72 73 17. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accor- dance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1336. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -413 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7878: Developer, S and S Construction Company. Property lo- cated at the northeast corner of Wagner Avenue and State College Boulevard as described in Reclassification No. 72 -73 -17 and contains 85 proposed R -2 zoned lots. The City Planning Commission at their regular meeting held August 21, 1972, denied Tentative Map of Tract No. 7878, on the basis that the Planning Commission recommended disapproval of Reclassification No. 72 -73 -17 and Condi- tional Use Permit No. 1336. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, Ten- tative Tract No. 7878 was approved subject to the following conditions as recommended by the Interdepartmental Committee. 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 7878 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 72 -73 -17 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1336. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 72 -608 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. 5. That the covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to the City Council's appro- val of the final tract map and further that the approved covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 6. That prior to filing the final tract map, the Applicant shall sub- mit to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to the articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to insure maintenance of common property and buildings and such other information as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens and the pur- chasers of the project. 7. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 8. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -73 -19 AND VARIANCE NO. 2428: Submitted by Tom I. and Edith Miyadi and Joan and Hazel Campbell, requesting a change in zone from R-A to R -3 to develop a two story, 134 -unit multiple family complex on the west side of Knott Avenue, north of Ball Road, with waivers of: a. Maximum building height within 150 feet of an R -A zone. b. Minimum distance between buildings. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -213, recommended Reclassification No. 72 -73 -19 be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Knott Avenue for street widening purposes. 2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Knott Avenue, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifi- cations on file in the office of the City Engineer; that street lighting facil- ities along Knott Avenue shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above mentioned requirements. 3. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and /or alley openings to Marian Way, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 4. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15 cents per front foot along Knott Avenue for tree planting purposes. 5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 6. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 7. That a 6 -foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north and west property lines. 8. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties. 9. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 10. That a modified cul -de -sac shall be provided at the terminus of Marian Way subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 11. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactroy to the City Engineer. 12. That subject property shall be developed substantially in confor- mance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. 13. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. 14. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition Nos. 1, 2, .3 and 4, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. 15. That Condition Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspec- tions. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -214, granted Variance No. 2428, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 72- 73 -19. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accor- dance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. The Council noted the Location of subject property and the findings of the City Planning Commission. The Mayor asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and con- curred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Mr. Don Kenny of The Richards Group Multihousing West, Incorporated, Post Office Box P, Newport Beach, representing the Applicant, replied they were in complete agreement with the recommendations of the Planning Commission. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -414: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -414 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (72 -73 -19 R -3) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -414 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -415: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -415 for adoption granting Variance No. 2428, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. 72 -609 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2428. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -415 duly passed and adopted. 72 -610 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72 -73 -20 AND VARIANCE N0, 2429: Submitted by Keith Nosack and W. L. Hohensee, requesting a change in zone from R -A to C -R to develop a 75 -unit two -story motel with manager's suite in addition to a 4000 square foot restaurant on the west side of Harbor Boulevard, south of Vermont Avenue, with waivers of: a. Required building setback from a single family residential zone. b. Required 6 -foot solid masonry zone boundary wall. c. Location of free standing sign. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -215, recommended Reclassification No. 72 -73 -20 be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Harbor Boulevard for street widening purposes. 2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Harbor Boulevard, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifi- cations on file in the office of the City Engineer; that street lighting faci- lities along Harbor Boulevard shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above mentioned requirements. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15 cents per front foot along Harbor Boulevard for tree planting purposes. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 6. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties. 7. That a parcel map to record the approved division of subject prop- erty be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. q. That subject property shall be developed substantially in confor- mance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3. 10. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such parcel pro- vided, however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split. 11. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. 12. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. 13. That Conditions Nos. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 11, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -216, granted Variance No. 2429, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 72- 73 -20. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accor- dance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Nos. 1, 2 and 3. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. The Council noted the location of subject property and the findings of the City Planning Commission. The Mayor asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and con- curred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Mr. Ray Chermak, 2082 Business Center Drive, Irvine, Agent for the Applicants, replied in the affirmative. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -416: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R 416 for adoption authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. 72 -611 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 15 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (72 -73 -20 C -R) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -416 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -417: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -417 for adoption granting Variance No. 2429 subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2429. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -417 duly passed and adopted. APPLICATION ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Application filed by Herbert Waltman, for entertainment permit to allow a piano bar at Dandels Restaurant, 1490 South Anaheim Boulevard, Monday through Saturday, from 8 :00 p.m. to 2 :00 a.m. was granted for a period of one year, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 4693, REVISION NO. 4 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72- 73 -15): On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the conditions of Tentative Tract Map No. 4693, Revision No. 4 were amended to add the following: 8. That an agreement shall be reached between the Developer of Tract No. 4693 and the Placentia Unified School District, concerning their respective responsibilities in the dedication and construction of Cresthill Drive. MOTION CARRIED. 72 -612 Cit Hall Anaheim California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19 1972 1 :30 P.M. CITY OF PLACENTIA USE PERMIT NO. 72/38: City of Placentia Use Permit No. 72/38 for the establishment of a central facility to be utilized in water drive secondary recovery oil production on the south side of Orchard Drive, west of Highland Avenue, was submitted, together with the City Planning Commission's action of September 18, 1972, recommending that the Placentia City Council be urged to retain the conditions of approval as being necessary in maintaining a compatible relationship with the residential development proposed for the area within both the cities of Placentia and Anaheim. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the Council concurred with the recommendations of the Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -418 AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 803: In accordance with recommen- dations of the Assistant City Engineer, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -418 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE MAXWELL PARK PARKING LOT ADDITION, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 803. (Sully Miller Contracting Company $20,928.78) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -418 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -419 WORK ORDER NO. 801 REJECTION OF BIDS: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -419 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED UP TO THE HOUR OF 2 :00 P.M. ON THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1972, FOR A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: DUPLICATING AND PRINTING SHOP ADDITION, PURCHASING BUILDING, 901 E. VERMONT AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER N0 801. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -419 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -420 WORK ORDER NO. 801: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -420 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE DUPLICATING AND PRINTING SHOP ADDITION, PURCHASING BUILDING, 901 EAST VERMONT AVENUE IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 801. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened October 26, 1972, 2 :00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson Refer to Resolution Book. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson 72 -613 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -420 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -421 DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -421 for adoption. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Daniel Webb Construction Company; Yorba Orange Growers Association; Dennis Aase Dave Aase; Marion Schlund Lindsey, John J. Tuttle Jack H. Bennett; Donald H. Yoder Patricia Yoder, Frank H. Yoder, Jr., Aria A. Yoder) The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -421 duly passed and adopted. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied as recommended by the City Attorney and ordered referred to the insurance carrier on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton. 1. Claim submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth E. Bridgford, 703 Grafton Place, Anaheim, for purported property damages to block wall, and trash in pool, caused by City employees working on transformer, on or about September 7, 1972. 2. Claim submitted by Mr. George 0. Fowler, 707 Grafton Place, Anaheim, for purported property damages to block wall, caused by City employees, on or about September 7, 1972. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -422 RIGHT OF WAY CONTRACT: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolu- tion No. 72R -422 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN RIGHT OF WAY CONTRACT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (West side of Douglas Road, South of Katella). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R 422 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -423 EASEMENT DEED: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R -423 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN EASEMENT DEED FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE ORANGE FREEWAY. 72 -614 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -423 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas: a. State Department. of Public Works To the Supervisors Requesting provision of FAU Projects that 1971 -72 and 1972 -73 FAIJ allocations b. Orange County Mosquito Abatement District August 21, 1972. MOTION CARR 1 D ORDINANCE NO. 3083: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3083 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO SAID CITY OF ANAHEIM OF CERTAIN INHABITED TERRITORY KNOWN AS KATHRYN LINDSAY ANNEXATION. Roll Call Vote: AYES COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None Stephenson Minutes Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None Stephenson Orange County Board of will obligate the entire The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3083 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3084: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3084 for adoption. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING SECTIONS 17.06.110(c) -AND 17.06.120(g) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE AND AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.06 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO NEW SECTIONS 17.06.110(c) AND 17.06.120(g). (Terracing cut slopes and fill slopes) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas and Thom ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared said ordinance failed, having not received a majority affirmative vote. Councilman Thom expressed the opinion that the City Council should have more unbiased information before taking any action which may effect the physical environment. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the final reading of Ordinance No. 3084 was held over for full Council. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 3085: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3085 for first reading: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70 -71 -47 (4) M -1) ORDINANCE NO. 3086: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3086 for first reading: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (68 -69 -40 (2) R -1) 72 -615 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 3087: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3087 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70 -71 -27 R -A) REPORT CROSSING GUARD EUCLID AND CRESCENT, PILOT PROJECT: Reports were received from the Assistant City Engineer Ralph Pease and Chief of Police regarding the pilot project in which a school crossing guard was stationed at a signalized intersection (Euclid and Crescent). According to the reports there was no significant change in the safety factor, as evidenced by accident statistics and field observation of student awareness of traffic, with or without the school crossing guard, and assignment of crossing guards at signalized intersections should not be made. Mr. Martin A. Sklar, President, Anaheim Elementary School District and Mr. Jim Brier, Superintendent of Anaheim City Schools, were present at the meeting and expressed the opinion that the school crossing guard did indeed significantly improve bafety conditions for the elementary school children at this intersection. Mr. Brier jointed out that traffic conditions have changed consid- erably since the e;solution establishing policy regarding crossing guards at signalized intersections was adopted, and related statistics regarding traffic flow at this; corner. A brief film, prepared by the Elementary School District, was shown to the Council which demonstrated the activities of the school crossing guard while on duty at the intersection of Euclid and Crescent. After viewing the film, the Council agreed right -turn traffic at this location could 'r lent a danger. At the i Oiicll:3ion of the discussion, contrary to the recommendations of the Police Department and Assistant City Engineer, due to the concern and insistance of the representatives of the Anaheim Elementary School District, Councilman Pebley moved that the crossing guard be reinstated at the corner of Crescent and Euclid. Councilman Thom seconded this motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -424 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT ORANGE COUNTY COOPERATIVE LIBRARY SYSTEM: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -424 for adoption. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AGREEING TO JOIN AND BE BOUND BY A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE ORANGE COUNTY COOPERATIVE LIBRARY SYSTEM. (Santiago Library System) Roll Call Vote: SANTA ANA CANYON ENVIRONMENTAL COST- BENEFIT STUDY: Mr. John Harding presented an outline of the proposed Environmental Cost Benefit Study for development in the Santa Ana Canyon and Santiago Creek areas. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the Council approved the recommendations of the steering committee regarding this study, as were approved by the Orange County Board of Supervisors. MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT DESALTING PLANT: Mr. John Harding informed the Council that Mr. Gus Lenain had extended an invitation to Council members to tour the desalting plant under construction in Fountain Valley. Mr. Harding was requested to arrange a date for the tour. Refer to Resolution Book. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -424 duly passed and adopted. 72 -616 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -425 CRESTHILL DRIVE ANNEXATION: Pursuant to authority granted by the Local Agency Formation Commission Resolution No. 72 -121, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -425 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Rook. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED CRESTHILL DRIVE ANNEXATION. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: Nine ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson The Mayor dec iared RE= solution No. 72R -425 duly passed and adopted. JOINT MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL AND CITY PLANNING COMMISSION: The City Clerk informed the Council that the City Planning Commission had requested a joint meeting on September 26, 1.972, 7 :00 p.rn, to discuss the following: 1. Setback and parking in residential areas. 2. Signing policies on filling stations. 3. The Northeast Industrial Area. Said meeting was deferred for a full Council, and a tentative date of October 10, 1972, was established. CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION: Councilman Dutton reported the resignation of Rabbi Aaron J. Tofield from the Cultural Arts Commission, and recommended the appointment of Mr. Ragon Flannery for thc unexpired term ending June 30, 1973. Resignation of Rabbi Tofield was accepted with regrets, and appointment of Pastor Ragon Flannery to the Cultural Arts Commission to fill the unexpired term of Rabbi Tofield was unanimously approved on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas. MOTION CARRIED. PARK LANDS ANAHEIM HILLS: Mayor ILitton reported on the meeting he and Councilman Sneegas and John Harding, representing the City, had with Bill Stark, Dick Owens and John Kogler, Attorney, representing Texhills or Anaheim Hills on the change in park land concept and an amendment to the agreement to acquire property for public purposes in the Anaheim Hills area. He stated the proposed amended agreement will satisfy the needs of Service Area No. 1 and provide a total of 81 acres, or approximately four times the City's requirement, in exchange of the park and recreation in -lieu fees assessment ($676,200.00) on the estimated 4300 -units projected in this area. 27 of the acres would be outside Service Area No. 1 and would be adjacent to the school site on Santa Ana Canyon Road, three of which will be used for a branch library site; 51 acres will be in Oak Canyon; three acres near the reservoir, two and one half of which to serve a boat landing and parking, the other one half acre being a well site. In addition, the $100,000.00 contributed by Anaheim Hills setforth in the original agreement for the construction of a swimming pool and tennis courts will be used to immediately develop the park sites. The $200,000.00 payment required of the City for the acquisition of 65 acre of park lands in the original agreement would be eliminated. Councilman Sneegas noted the proposal represents a considerable saving of tax monies the City will not have to expend on park land acquisition and development. Mr. Harding also noted that taking advantage of the Metropolitan Water District easement, the hill and canyon park sites are so located as to be tied together. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Discussion was held and Councilman Thom noted the average value was $8,345.00 per acres for the 81 acres, including Oak Canyon. He was of the opinion that this was an excessive amount for the undevelopable canyon area. Aerial photos were presented indicating an identical canyon area to Oak Canyon, showing the area before development and the area presently under construction. Mr. James Barisic, Vice President of Anaheim Hills reported that negotiations between them and the Council Committee were difficult and the agreement to dedicate 81 acres is twice as much as required over the entire ranch and four time as much as required for Service Area No. 1, however, it was agreed to in the interest of the beautiful area. RESOLUTION: At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Dutton offered the following resolution for adoption: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH TEXACO VENTURES INC., AND ANAHEIM HILLS, INC. FOR DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PARKS AND OTHER MUNICIPAL PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. Roll. Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: r )7/ X Signed .r City Clerk Sneegas and Dutton Thom Pebley Stephenson 72 -617 The Mayor declared said resolution failed to carry. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, said resolution was ordered held over for a full Council. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn, Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 5 :45 P.M.