Loading...
1972/10/03City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES September 26, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Signed A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED LAKEVIEW ORANGETHORPE #2 ANNEXATION. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -436 duly passed and adopted. RECESS EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the request of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Thom moved to recess to Executive Session to consider a personnel matter. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3 :55 P.M,) ADJOURNMENT: At the conclusion of Executive Session, and upon return of all Councilman to the Council Chambers, Councilman Thom moved to adjourn, Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 5 :40 P.M. )71 City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim me L L. COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley. rcc a and Dutton COUNCILMEN: None ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Lowell Linden, First Presbyterian Church gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Mark A. Stephenson led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Mayor Dutton issued plaques to the following CI. Employees in recognition of best suggestions received during the past year: SUGGESTION PROGRAM AWARDS: Sneegas, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None Stephenson Nell Bowman, City Clerk's Office, (retired), for suggestion that a hand rail be placed on both sides, instead of one, on steps on the 1st floor at the rear entrance of City Hall.. Joan Laursen, Personnel Department, for the suggestion that plastic liners be placed in those trash can located in areas where food may be consumed. 72 -631 regular session. v 72 -632 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES: Mr. Frank Campagnoni, of the City Personnel Department, introduced new employees attending the Council meeting as part of the City's orientation program. Mayor Dutton welcomed the new employees. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held September 12, 1972, were approved on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilman unless, after reading of such title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands ngainst the City, in the amount of $205,430.97, in accordance with the 1912 -i3 Budget, were approved. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS: Reference was made to the misunderstandings and problems created as result of the State Supreme Court ruling regarding the requirement of Environmental Impact Statements and Mr. Geisler was requested Lo rcndcr an opinion as to the proceed- ings scheduled for public hearing this date. Mr. Geisler submitted a written opinioo as to how the Courts' decision affects zoning matters where a city does not have an open space element to the general plan and advised that under the Supreme Court's decision prior to hearing Variance No. 2384 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1323 an Environmental Impact Report would be required to be acted upon by the City Council. He further advised that there was no way to proceed without said statement, except to deny the variance and conditional use permit. He outlined a possible procedure for handling the reports, noting that fees for filing can be established since considerable additional staff time will be required and stated,in his opinion,the most practical method would be to review the Environmental Impact Reports and staff analysis in conjunction with conditional use permit, variance and reclassification applications. Public opinions relative to these reports can be considered at the Planning Couauission and Council hearings. The City Council may then adopt or modify the Environ- mental Impact Reports, which would, once adopted by the City Council become the Environmental Impact Statements of the Council. Following Council discussion, it was determined that the policy recom- mended by Mr. Geisler, for processing Environmental Impact Reports, be adopted. Additionally, it was decided that in cases where zoning action has already been determined, which now require Environmental Impact Reports, the reports will be filed directly with the City Council for consideration. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the following fee schedule for filing of Environmental Impact Reports was established: (a). For the Environmental Impact Report, when filed with the initial filing of application for reclassification, variance or conditional use permit, the fee will be $25.00. (b). In those cases which have already been heard and acted upon by the City Planning Commission, but not the City Council, the fee will be $50.00. (c). All other Environmental Impact Reports required, where zoning decisions have been rendered by both City Planning Commission and City Council, and report is determined necessary for completion of action, and reports come only to the City Council, the fee will be $75.00. MOTION CARRIED. As to the time involved, Mr. Roberts advised that as soon as the developer submits the Environmental Impact Report to their staff an approximate 72 -633 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. 28 days will be needed to analyze the information and report thereon to the City Planning Commission or City Council; the time it takes to get before the City Planning Commission or City Council will depend on the applicant in filing the required report. PUBLIC HEARING VARIANCE NO. 2384 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1323: Submitted by Primus Holding Company, to establish a recreational vehicle sales and service complex and to establish a restaurant with cocktail lounge on property briefly described as follows: Parcel 1 located at the southwest corner of La Palma Avenue and Shepard Street, presently zoned R -A. Parcel 2 located at the southeast corner of La Palma Avenue and Shepard Street, presently zoned M -l. Requesting waivers of: a. Minimum distance between signs. b. Minimum distance of a proposed sign to a property line. c. Outdoor use screening. d. Permitted uses. e. Parking area improvement standards. f. Minimum sign. height. g. Maximum number of signs in the 50 -foot setback. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -227, denied Variance No. 2384 and pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -228, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 1323. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Jack Love Associates, Incorporated, Agent for the Applicant and public hearing scheduled this date. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, it was the finding of the City Council that prior to hearing and action on Variance No. 2384 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1323, an Environmental Impact Report must be filed by the Applicant together with a filing fee in the amount of $50.00 for staff analysis and report by the City Planning Commission and that the public hearing on the two applications be continued to November 28, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Love addressed the Council and advised that they have requested an Environmental Impact Report in anticipation of this requirement and were advised that they could receive the report within ten days to two weeks. He noted the cost involved and requested the Council to proceed with the public hearing, withholding the building permit pending the filing of the required report. Mr. Geisler advised that most City Attorneys feel that even though the interpretation of the Supreme Court is questionable, there is no question that the reason for the report in connection with the zoning actions is for the City Council to determine that the proposed activity or zoning is not harm- ful or that the harm to the environment would be justified by the project, and if the report is to be of any value, it must be considered prior to Council action. PUBLIC HEARING VARIANCE NOS. 2407, 2408, 2409, 2410, 2411, 2412, 2415, 2416, 2417, 2421, 2422, 2423 and 2424: After careful consideration of the above numbered variance requests, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, it was the finding and statement of the City Council, that action granting or denying said variances would have no significant impact on the environment and that public hearing could proceed as scheduled on said variances. MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. 2407: Submitted by Standard Oil of California to construct two lighter box signs in conjunction with existing free standing sign on property presently zoned C -1, located at the northeast corner of Brookhurst Street and Katella Avenue, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. b. Maximum number of free standing signs. c. Minimum sign height. 72 -634 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -193, denied Variance No. 2407. VARIANCE NO. 2408: Submitted by Standard Oil of California to construct two lighter box signs and four canopy signs in conjunction with an existing free- standing sign on property presently zoned M -1, located at the southeast corner of Katella Avenue, and State College Boulevard, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. b. Maximum number of free- standing signs. c. Minimum distance to adjacent property line. d. Minimum sign height. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -194, denied Variance No. 2408. VARIANCE NO. 2409: Submitted by Standard Oil of California to construct three lighter box signs and four canopy signs in conjunction with an existing monument sign on property presently zoned C -2, located at the northwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Harbor Boulevard, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. b. Maximum number of free standing signs. c. Minimum distance to a property line. d. Minimum sign height. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -195, denied Variance No. 2409. VARIANCE NO. 2410: Submitted by Standard Oil of California to construct two lighter box signs in conjunction with an existing free standing sign on property presently zoned C -1, located at the northeast corner of La Palma Avenue and Brookhurst Street, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. b. Maximum number of free standing signs. c. Minimum distance to a property line. d. Minimum sign height. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -196, denied Variance No. 2410. VARIANCE NO. 2411: Submitted by Standard Oil of California to construct one lighter box sign and two canopy signs in conjunction with an existing free- standing sign on property presently zoned C -1, located at the southeast corner of Crescent Avenue and Magnolia Avenue, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between free standing sign. b. Maximum number of free standing signs. c. Minimum sign height. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -197, denied Variance No. 2411. VARIANCE NO. 2412: Submitted by Standard Oil of California to construct two lighter box signs and four canopy signs in conjunction with an existing free- standing sign on property presently zoned M -1, located at the southeast corner of Via Burton Street and State College Boulevard, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. b. Maximum number of free standing signs. c. Minimum distance to adjacent property lines. d. Minimum sign height. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -198, denied Variance No. 2412. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. VARIANCE NO. 2415: Submitted by Standard Oil of California to construct one lighter box sign and two canopy signs in conjunction with an existing free- standing sign on property presently zoned R -A, located at the southeast corner of Freedman Way and Harbor Boulevard, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. b. Maximum number of free standing signs. c. Minimum distance to adjacent property line. d. Minimum sign height. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -201, denied Variance No. 2415. VARIANCE NO. 2416: Submitted by Standard Oil of California to construct two lighter box signs and two canopy signs in conjunction with an existing free- standing sign on property presently zoned C -1, located at the southeast corner of Dale Avenue and Ball Road, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between free- standing signs'. b. Maximum number of free standing signs. c. Minimum sign height. d. Minimum distance to adjacent property line. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -202, denied Variance No. 2416. VARIANCE NO. 2417: Submitted by Standard Oil of California to construct two lighter box signs in conjunction with an existing free standing sign on prop- erty presently zoned C -2, located at the southeast corner of Loara Street and Wilshire Avenue, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. b. Maximum number of free standing signs. c. Minimum sign height. 72 -635 The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -203, denied Variance No. 2417. VARIANCE NO. 2421: Submitted by Standard Oil of California to construct two lighter box signs and four canopy signs in conjunction with an existing free- standing sign on property presently zoned C -1, located at the southwest corner of La Palma Avenue and State College Boulevard, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. b. Maximum number of free standing signs. c. Minimum distance to a property line. d. Minimum sign height. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -207, denied Variance No. 2421. VARIANCE NO. 2422: Submitted by Standard Oil of California to construct two lighter box signs and two canopy signs in conjunction with an existing free- standing sign on property presently zoned C- l,located at the southwest corner of Orange Avenue and Euclid Street, with waivers of: a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. b. Maximum number of free standing signs. c. Minimum distance to adjacent property. d. Minimum sign height. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -208, denied Variance No. 2422. VARIANCE NO. 2423: Submitted by Standard Oil of California to construct two lighter box signs in conjunction with an existing free standing sign on prop- erty presently zoned C -1, located at the southeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and Knott Street, with waivers of: 72 -636 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1:30 P.M. a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. b. Maximum number of free standing signs. c. Minimum distance to a property line. d. Minimum sign height. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -209, denied Variance No. 2423. VARIANCE NO. 2424: Submitted by Standard Oil of California to construct two lighter box signs in conjunction with an existing free standing sign on property presently zoned County C- 1- 10,000, located at the northwest corner of Brookhurst Street and Lincoln Avenue, with waivers of a. Minimum distance between free standing signs. b. Maximum number of free standing signs. c. Minimum sign height. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC72 -210, denied Variance No. 2424. Appeal from actions taken by the City Planning Commission on the above enumerated variances, were filed by C. R. Rodeheaver, American Permit Service, Agent for the Applicant, and public hearing scheduled this date. Mr. Roberts,in briefing the Council on the hearings before the City Planning Commission, stated that all 13 variances were similar to the request of approximately one year ago when similar code waivers were requested to re- model the Standard station located at the southwest corner of Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard. He advised that the same type of signing was proposed in these variances. Mr. Roberts related the following findings of the City Planning Commission set forth in each case: 1. That signing as proposed is far in excess of signing permitted within the sign ordinance and to grant subject petition would be establishing an undesirable precedent wherein every other service station in Anaheim could request similar signing. 2. That the Planning Commission earlier in 1972, had denied a similar request with the finding that approval would establish a precedent for mass sign- ing of other service stations throughout the City, and no changes have occurred to warrant favorable consideration of this petition. 3. That the petitioner is proposing to increase the number of signs on these service station sites, from four to eight times that permitted by code, thereby automatically granting the petitioner a privilege not enjoyed by other commercial and industrial developments throughout the City. Mr. Roberts called attention to the memorandum of September 12, 1972, summarizing hearings before the City Planning Commission and recommends, should Council approve said variances, that dedication and improvement of streets of the sites under Variance Nos. 2410 and 2423 be made a condition. Inasmuch as the petitioner is proposing substantial improvements to the property, which could not be amortized over a period of ten years, it appeared to be justification for requiring the necessary street dedication and improvement. Councilman Pebley felt the reason that Standard Oil was requesting the variances, was to construct lighter boxes underneath the canopies of the subject service stations, to increase the visibility when working under the hood of an automobile. He informed the Council that he observed the lighting system was im- proved with the addition of lighter boxes at the station located at the south- west corner of Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard. Mr. Roberts called attention to the fact that in conjunction with the lighter boxes, there will be a logo printed on them, as well as other signing proposed. Council. The Mayor asked if the Applicant or his Agent wished to address the City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Mr. Carl Rodeheaver, representing Standard Oil Company, stated that in their opinion, their requests were for primarily lighting and in each instance, the signing proposed would represent a reduction in total sign area, and in no instance would exceed 300 square feet. He advised that this is a national program and the sign waivers requested are so that Standard Oil may renovate these stations to conform in appearance with other stations, which they feel will also enhance sales. The installation of the lighter box, they hope, would also improve security problems in addition to providing light under the canopy. The logo on the lighter boxes is to be less than 157 of the area of the lighter box, and so designed that no further lettering can be added in the future. He presented pictures of the renovated service station at the Harbor and Katella site, which were reviewed by the City Council and returned. Mayor Dutton asked whether Standard Oil would be willing to install the lighter boxes without the logo. Mr. Rodeheaver replied that since Standard Oil is a parent company, and the stations sell both Standard and Chevron products, it is the policy to display both signs together. He reiterated that Standard Oil has under- taken a national program to conform all stations to a uniform appearance and the lighter boxes and signs are an integral part of the program. Councilman Dutton inquired as to why Variance Nos. 2413, 2414, 2419 and 2420 had not been appealed, since they were the same in. nature. Mr. Robert Morgan, also representing Standard Oil Company, 1801 South Harbor Boulevard, replied that two of these stations have been closed and the other two stations,due to a low volume of business, the company was hesitant to dedicate property for street widening because of the possibility of an alternate use of the property in the future. The Mayor asked if anyone in opposition wished to be heard, there being no response, declared the hearings closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -437: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -437 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2407, subject to the following condition: 1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in con- formance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2407. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -437 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -438: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -438 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2408, subject to the following condition: 1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in con- formance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2408. 72 -637 72 -638 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -438 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -439: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -439 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2409, subject to the following condition: 1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in con- formance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2409. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -439 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -440: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -440 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2410, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim, a strip of land 60 feet in width, from the centerline of the street, along Brookhurst Street, with a 25 foot radius corner return and a strip of land 53 feet in width,from the centerline of the street along La Palma Avenue, for street widening purposes. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in con- formance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2410. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -440 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -441: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R 441 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2411, subject to the following condition: 1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in con- formance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2411. Roll Call Vote: City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -441 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -442: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -442 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2412, subject to the following condition: 1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in con- formance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Refer to Resolution Book. 72 -639 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2412. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -442 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R 443: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -443 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2415, subject to the following condition: 1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in con- formance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2415. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -443 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -444: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -444 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2416, subject to the following condition: 1 That subject property shall be developed substantially in con- formance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2416. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -444 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -445: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -445 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2417, subject to the following condition: 72 -640 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. 1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in con- formance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2417. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -445 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -446: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -446 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2421, subject to the following'conditon: 1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in con- formance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2421. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -446 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -447: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -447 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2422, subject to the following conditon: 1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in con- formance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2422. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -447 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -448: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -448 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2423, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim, a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the centerline of the street along Knott Street, with a 25 foot radius corner return, for street widening purposes. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in con- formance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2423. Roll Call Vote: 72 -641 AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -448 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -449: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -449 for adoption, granting Variance No. 2424, subject to the following condition: 1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in con- formance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2424. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -449 duly passed and adopted. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Application filed by Lynn Howard Oliver and Joanne Marie Oliver for entertainment permit to allow a guitar and /or piano player at Robert's Room, 819 South Euclid, daily from 9 :00 p.m. to 1 :30 a.m., was sub- mitted and granted for a period of one year, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT NOS. 7566, 7567, 7568, AND 7569 STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS: Request of Tim Van Winkle, Assistant Engineer, Grant Company of California, for permission to plant trees in the lot front yards of Tentative Tract Nos. 7566, 7567, 7568 and 7569 (Anaheim Hills), rather than have the City forces plant parkway trees, was submitted, together with reports from the City Engineer and Development Services Department. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, said request was granted, subject to the following conditions: 1. That these trees be a minimum of 15 gallon size and planted at least 7 feet clear from the sidewalk. 2. That regarding Tracts 7567 and 7568, the developer shall post a bond to guarantee the installation of said trees. The bond shall remain in effect until the trees have been approved by the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. 3. That regarding Tracts 7566 and 7569, having already been re- corded and street tree fees collected, that these fees be held until the developer has planted all trees per this request and then be returned to the developer upon approval of the Parkway Maintenance Superintendent. POLICY OF THE COUNCIL STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS IN HILLSIDE SUBDIVISIONS: On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the follow- ing policy regarding street tree requirements in hillside residential devel- opments was adopted: MOTION CARRIED. 72 -642 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. It shall be the policy of the City Council that in hillside residen- tial developments where the sidewalk is located adjacent to the curb that the street tree fee requirement as stated in Section 17.08.405 of the Anaheim Municipal Code may be waived provided that the developer shall plant trees of a minimum 15 gallon size at least 7 feet behind the sidewalk in the front yard of the residential parcel, and that the developer, prior to approval of the final tract map, shall post a bond to guarantee the installation of said trees. The bond shall remain in effect until the trees have been approved by the Park- way Maintenance Superintendent. In those recorded tracts where street tree fees have been collected, said fees to be held until the developer has planted all trees, and then be returned to the developer upon the approval of the Parkway Maintenance Superin- tendent. NOTE: The planting of the "street trees" on private property shall not be con- sidered as satisfaction of any portion of other landscaping or tree requirements contained in other sections of the Anaheim Municipal Code. MOTION CARRIED. APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS STATE COLLEGE STORM DRAIN: Upon report and recommendation of the City Engineer, Orange County Flood Control District plans and special provisions dated September, 1972, for the construction of the State College Storm Drain from Vermont Avenue through South Street, were approved, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Stephenson. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -450 DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -450 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Allfillish Construction Co., Westfield -Urban Company) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -450 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -451 EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS: On recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -451 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR, AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION, BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF REAL PROPERTY FOR HIGHWAY EASEMENT AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (south side of Orange, east of Knott) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -451 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R 452 EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS: On recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -452 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE ACQUISITION, CON- STRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY EXTENSION AND PUBLIC IMPROVE- MENT, CONSISTING OF ELECTRIC LIGHT, HEAT AND POWER LINES AND WORKS, IN CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, BY EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS OF CERTAIN PROPERTY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY IN SAID PORTION OF SAID CITY. (Remaining Southern California Edison facilities within the City) City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -452 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT ROLL -OVER PROTECTIVE STRUCTURES: The Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of 12 Roll -Over Protective Structures for certain City equipment in compliance with new State and Federal regulations,as follows,and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX D.A.K. Enterprises, Huntington Beach McCoy Ford Tractor Division, Anaheim Shepherd Machinery Corp., Irvine 8,103.37 10,486.35 12,701.85 72 On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman the low bid of D.A.K. Enterprises was accepted and purchase authnrizE-d in the amount of $8,103.37, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT DUAL AXLE TILT BED TRAILER: she Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of one Dual Axle Tilt Bed Trailer,as follows,and recommended acceptance of the low hid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX United Equipment Co., Ontario McCoy Motor Co., Tractor Division, Anaheim Carde Pacific Corp. Arnold Hooker Equipment. Pioneer Trailer Sales Clark Equipment Co. Utility Trailer Sales VENDOR Asplundh Equipment and Sales, Azusa Dearth Machinery, Baldwin West Point Ind. Arnold Hooker Equipment Kemp Yorke Equipment Company E -Z Go Car Textron Golf Carts of Ca. Harley Davidson Taylor Dunn Westinghouse Elect. Cushman Motor Sales $2,696.40 2,851.8C NO QIJOTE uo OIJ(1TE NO QUOTE NO QIJOTE NO QUOTE On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the low bid of United Equipment Company was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $2,696.40, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT BRUSH CHIPPER: The Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of one Brush Chipper as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid: TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX $4,342.31 4,413.15 NO QUOTE NO QUOTE NO QUOTE On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom, the low bid of of Asplundh Equipment And Sales Company was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $4,342.31, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT GOLF CARTS: The Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of Golf Carts for the Anaheim Hills Golf Course, as follows and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL COST PER UNIT $1,185.00 incl. standard battery 1,165.00 incl. standard battery 1,223.50 incl. standard battery 1,097.50 incl. heavy duty battery 1,095.00 incl. standard battery NO QUOTE 72 -644 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Davis advised that the golf carts are electric, and equipped with heavy -duty batteries which carry a 2 year warranty and guaranteed to go 36 holes per day, for 2 years, or the batteries will be replaced by the manufacturer. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the low bid of Taylor -Dunn was accepted and purchase authorized for 43 golf carts in the total amount of $49,551.91, including tax. To this motion Councilman Thom voted "no MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -453 AGREEMENT TOUPS ENGINEERING INC. WATER WELL FIELD FEASIBILITY STUDY: The Assistant City Manager reported on recommendation received from Mr. Gordon Hoyt, Utilities Director, that Toups Engineering, Inc. be employed to perform a water well field and reservoir feasibility study in the western part of the City. Such study is recommended at this time for the following reasons: (a.) it is considered to our advantage that we maximize our usage of underground water under the terms of the agreement with the Orange County Water District; (b.) should it become necessary that the water be treated in the future, it is more economical to perform this in a well field; (c.) there are no storage facilities in the water systems western- most two pressure zones; (d.) many wells are reaching the end of their estimated useful life and will require replacement. Mr. Davis further advised that Toups Engineering, Inc. is recommended to perform this study as they have previously done extensive investigation of the underground water basin in Orange County and are therefore already in posses- sion of much of the background information necessary for such study. The pro- posal indicated the fee will be on a per diem basis, but not to exceed $3,000.00. Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -453 authorizing the City Attorney to prepare a contract employing Toups Engineering, Inc. to perform a water well field and reservoir study in the western part of the city, on a per diem basis, not to exceed $3,000.00, as recommended by the Utilities Director. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE CONTRACT EMPLOYING TOUPS ENGINEERING, INC. AS WATER FEASIBILITY AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -453 duly passed and adopted. BUDGET CAPITAL PROJECTS CARRY OVER: Mr. Davis reported receipt from the Finance Director of a list of Capital Projects, Equipment and Services which had pre- viously been approved in last year's budget and not yet completed and requested authorization to carry -over the unexpended funds, as listed. Councilman Thom inquired whether items listed under "Stadium and Convention Center Projects" had ever been part of the Convention Center Better- ment bond project, to which question Mr. Davis assured him that these Convention Center items, (i.e. Parking Lot Controls, Parking Lot Canopies, Entrance Improve- ments, and Directional Signs) were not considered in the original program but were budgeted items anticipated to come out of General Fund revenues. Councilman Thom then requested clarification of items 1 through 3 under "Park Development Projects (Heating Control -Yard Building, Park Control Build- ings, and Site Improvements) and 442 910 -04, "Replace Capital Items" under "Public Works Equipment" title. Mr. Davis advised that item one under "Park Development Cit- Hall Anaheim California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Projects" concerns installation of a heating system in the Parks and Recreation Department's central yard building and item 2 applies to the small buildings located at park sites which are used to check out recreation materials and contains electrical distribution panels, and this sum would apply to some part of completion of such building. Regarding Item 3 "Site Improvement" he stated that this would be concerning Work Order No. 736 but he would have to check further as to the specific site or project in question. Under the "Public Works Equipment" title "Replace Capital Items" Mr. Davis explained that this category would include those items which through deterioration, need replacement and are unknown at the time budget items are appropriated. Following Council discussion, on the recouauendations of the Assistant City Manager, appropriations from the 1971 -72 Budget, as itemized in detail in communciation dated September 25, 1972 from the Finance Director and on file in the office of the City Clerk, were authorized to be carried forward and encumbered to the various accounts in the 1972 -73 fiscal Budget, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson. Councilman Thom withheld his vote at this time. MOTION CARRIED. Later in the meeting, it was reported that Work Order No. 736 pertains to lighting of the ballfield at Brookhurst Park. Councilman Thom then cast an affirmative vote to the foregoing motion. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ARROW CHARTER LINES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY: Public Utilities Commission Decision No. 80519 in the matter of Arrow Charter Lines, Inc., and Certificate of Public Conven- ience and Necessity to operate passenger stage service between Orange and Anaheim and Culver City, and describing the restrictions and routes, were ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas: a. Before the Public Utilities Commission Investigation on the Commission's own motion to adopt statewide plan and schedule for the under grounding of all electric and communication distribution system in proximity to state scenic highway pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 320. b. Before the Public Utilities Commission Application of The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, a corporation, for authority to increase certain intrastate rates and charges applicable to telephone service furnished within the State of California. c. Financial and Operating Reports for the Months of July and August, 1972. Electrical Division (August) Customer Service (July- August) d. Anaheim Public Library Board Minutes August 28, 1972. e. Cultural Arts Commission Minutes August 14, 1972. MOTION CARRIED. Refer to Resolution Book. 72 -645 RESOLUTION NO. 72R -454: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -454 for adoption requesting the Orange County Board of Supervisors to provide improved protection of Sanitation Districts Sewage Treatment Plants Nos. 1 and 2. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM URGING THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO ESTABLISH ADEQUATE PROTECTION FROM FLOODING OF SANITATION DISTRICT PLANTS NOS 1 and 2. 72 -646 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -454 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCES FOR FIRST READING: On recommendation of the City Attorney all ordinances scheduled for first reading, were held over pending receipt of, or determination of necessity for, Environmental Impact Reports. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS PENDING ZONING ACTIONS; BUILDING PERMITS: Following Council discussion of ramifi- cations of the California Environmental Quality act of 1970, as they apply to pending zoning actions and building permits the Council authorized the City Attorney and City Clerk to review said matters and report to the Council which, in their opinion, may require Environmental Impact Reports prior to further Council action. Mr. Geisler advised that his interpretation of the Supreme Court ruling is that building permits which are not issued in conjunction with a conditional use permit, reclassification, or variance may continue to be issued. Those building permits which were issued in conjunction with reclassifications, con- ditional use permits and variances subsequent to November 23, 1970 and prior to September 29, 1972, he recommended the City declare voidable, but not void, and the City itself take no action to void them. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council, on the recommendation of the City Attorney, declared that those building permits issued in conjunction with reclassifications, variances and conditional use permits subsequent to November 23, 1970 and prior to September 29, 1972 would be considered voidable but not void, the City taking no action to void them. AYES: NOES: ABSTAINED: ABSENT: MOTION CARRIED. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, Dr' the recommendation of the City Attorney, the City Council approved the policy of continuing to issue building permits which do not require Environmental Impact Reports. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION N0. 72R -455 ACQUISITION PARK LAND ANAHEIM HILLS: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R -455 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH TEXACO VENTURES INC., AND ANAHEIM HILLS, INC. FOR DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PARKS AND OTHER MUNICIPAL PURPOSES AND AUTHOR- IZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. (81 Acres) Roll Call Vote: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson and Dutton Thom Pebley None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -455 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -456 SANTA ANA CANYON #4 ANNEXATION, HEARING DATE: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -456 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 3, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A PETITION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TER- RITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, DESIGNATING THE TERRITORY AS THE SANTA ANA CANYON NO. 4 ANNEXATION DESCRIBING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE DAY, HOUR AND PLACE WHERE AND WHEN ANY PERSON OWNING REAL PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY SO PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SUCH TERRITORY SHOULD NOT BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Public Hearing November 21, 1972, 1 :30 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -456 duly passed and adopted. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Thom moved to adjourn, Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 3 :25 P.M. Signed City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 10, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert M. Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Daoust DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Alan G. Orsborn CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. 72 -647 INVOCATION: Reverend Arthur E. Harrington of the Trinity United Methodist Church gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Calvin L. Pebley led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Dutton proclaimed October 21, 1972 "United States Day said proclamation was unanimously approved by the Council. MINUTES: Approval of the minutes of September 19, and 26, 1972 and October 3, 1972 was deferred to the next meeting. WAIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Stephenson moved to to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that con- sent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.