Loading...
1972/10/1972 -668 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in adjourned regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Thom and Dutton ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Alona M. Farrens CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Garry McRae ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Mark A. Stephenson led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATIONS: Resolution of Congratulations was unanimously adopted by the City Council commending the Anaheim Host Lions Club on the occasion of its Golden Anniversary. Mr. Steve Schacht, President of the Anaheim Host Lions Club, accepted the proclamation and presented a check to the City Council in the amount of $1,500.00, representing a contribution towards the La Palma Recreation Center facility. ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE ONE MILLIONTH GOLFER: Mr. Charles Rosene was introduced to the Council by Mr. John Collier, as the one millionth golfer at Anaheim Municipal Golf Course. Mr. Rosene was presented with a symbol of the big "A with appropriate reader board and awarded complimentary green's fees for himself for one year at the Anaheim Municipal Golf Course. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held September 19 and September 26, 1972, were approved on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Thom. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions,and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $31$,399.99, for the period to October 17, 1972, in accordance with the 1972 -73 Budget, were approved. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -471 AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 1502: In accordance with recommen- dations of the City Engineer, Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -471 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: ANAHEIM HILLS GOLF COURSE CART PATHS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1502. (Sully Miller Contracting Company $29,376.56 Alternate B) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: Thom ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -471 duly passed and adopted. 72 -669 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 19 1972, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO, 72R- 472 AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT BANK OF AFRICA BUILDING: Mr. Alan Watts reported to the Council that the proposed amendment provides for a change in date of commencement of lease from August 30 to November 1, 1972. He further noted that this is the sole purpose of the amendment, which is necessary due to some delays in implementation of said lease. Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -472 for adoption, authorizing amendment to the Bank of America agreement. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH MERCHANTS NATIONAL REALTY CORPORATION TO PURCHASE AND LEASE CERTAIN LANDS AND BUILDINGS AND AUTHOR- IZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -472 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -473 ACCEPTANCE OF BANK OF AMERICA DEED: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -473 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -473 duly passed and adopted. NORTH SUBSTATION SITE PAULINE STREET, NORTH OF LA PALMA AVENUE: Mr. Alan Watts reported that subject parcel consisting of 2.64 acres of land, is located on the east side of Pauline Street, north of La Palma Avenue and adjacent to the Union Pacific Railway and is proposed to be purchased as the site for the North Substation at a cost of $80,000.00. Discussion was held as to the potential of this triangular shaped parcel of property because of the location immediately adjacent to the rail- road and north of a flood control channel, and by general Council consent, this item was held over for additional information to justify purchase at this price. POLICE MOTORCYCLE COURSE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL ACADEMY: Proposed agreement between the City of Anaheim and the State of California, regarding motorcycle training classes for Anaheim Police Officers at the California Highway Patrol Academy, was presented, and the terms and conditons reviewed. It was 72 -670 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. noted the first two week training period commences October 23, 1972, the City to pay for the living, dining and class facilities at a daily rate of $10.00 per student, and instructors, materials and equipment to be provided by the California Highway Patrol at a daily rate of $50.00 per student. The City Council was of the opinion,that further information was nec- essary before they could act on this proposal, and specifically requested that the daily rate of $50.00 per student be verified. Lt. Al Rogers of the Anaheim Police Department reported that the course is two weeks in length, for which time the police officers will reside at the California Highway Patrol facility. The course has proven to produce an improved safety record, reducing accidents 507 per million miles for the California High- way Patrol and the Anaheim Police Department feels they would also benefit as a result of less lost time from motorcycle accidents. Lt. Rogers further reported that P.O.S.T. (Police Officers Standards and Training, State of California) will reimburse the City for one -half the cost for meals and residence and one -half of the wages paid to the officer by the City for the period of time in which he is engaged in taking this course. He stated it is the intention of the Police Department to send two men to each of the sessions beginning October 23, November 2,and December 4, 1972 and eventually they hoped to have all of the officers assigned to motorcycles attend the course. Councilman Stephenson inquired as to the possibility of these men being transferred from the motorcycle division after having completed the course and stated that while he could envision this training as valuable for the new motor- cycle officer, he would hesitate to make such statement regarding an officer who has ridden a motorcycle for a number of years. Councilman Stephenson additionally was of the opinion that the accident rate of the Anaheim Police Department Motor- cycle Division was not significantly high as to warrant investment of the amount of money proposed in these motorcycle training course. Lt. Rogers informed him that he could not predict who would be trans fered or promoted, but that the policy has been that a motorcycle officer is assigned to this division for five years. Councilman Sneegas felt that each officer should have all of the training available which will enable him to improve performance in his capacity, and requested the cost of a commensurable motorcycle training course at a private facility for comparison. Lt. Rogers stated that he was not in possession of such information at this time. Mr. Murdoch then suggested that the Police Department defer enrolling two officers for the first session beginning October 23, 1972, to enable staff to prepare a report with the additional information and figures as requested by the Councilmen. By general Council consent, this item was held over for consideration when the additonal information is prepared and presented. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -474 BICYCLE SAFETY: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -474 for adoption, encouraging all citizen groups to participate in Programs of bicycle safety, as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ENCOURAGING PARTICI- PATION OF CITIZEN GROUPS IN PROGRAMS OF BICYCLE SAFETY. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -474 duly passed and adopted. 72 -671 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. INTERIM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GUIDELINES CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT 1970: Mr. Ron Thompson presented the interim guidelines, dated October 13, and marked Exhibit Nos. A and B, prepared by Development Services Depart- ment and proposed to be used as criteria for development and evaluation of Environmental Impact Reports (E.I.R.), deemed necessary under the California Environmental Quality Act and Supreme Court decision on Friends of Mammoth versus Mono County. Mr. Thompson noted that, according to the City Attorney, Exhibit No. A would meet the minimum legal requirements of the C.E.Q.A. and the recent State Supreme Court's ruling. Exhibit No. B entitled, "Additional Areas for Consideration ",lists area such as impact on public utilities, community fac- ilities, and public services, and impacts on the socio economic environment which the Council may wish to have discussed on some projects. In the opinion of the City Attorney and Development Services Department, the items listed under Exhibit No. B would not be mandatory on all E.I.R.'s, but desirable for inclusion in many E.I.R.'s and would be consistent with the intent of the C.E.Q.A. He further mentioned that these items are already required for consideration in E.I.R.'s by such agencies as Housing and Urban Development and the State Office of the Secretary of Resources. Mr. Thompson notified the Council that Development Services is now jointly engaged with the City Attorney's Office in attempting to establish reasonable interpretations of what is "significant" and "trivial" to assist the City Council in determining: 1. What projects might have significant impacts and therefore require a formal E.I.R. 2. What projects have only trivial impacts and therefore be exempt. 3. Procedural guidelines for submittal, review and evaluation of exemption requests and /or E.I.R.'s. Councilman Thom stated that in reviewing these proposed guidelines, he noted many items under Exhibit No. B, specifically public utilities, law enforcement, fire, transportation and traffic, which he thought were considered by the Interdepartmental Committee and then discussed at the Planning Commission and felt that perhaps requiring discussion of these and E.I.R.'s was duplication of effort. Mr. Thompson reported that Exhibit No. B items were included in the event that Council might require them on some projects and stated that when drawing up the guidelines, these items were considered desirable for inclusion in an attempt to attract adequate attention to them from the developer so anything unusual might be noted. Having these areas included in the E.I.R.'s would also produce a more formal handling of them and a written record proving they had been considered prior to any action. He also mentioned that it was assumed when outlining these guidelines, that a certain degree of common sense would be requisite in both their preparation and valuation. Councilman Stephenson moved that the interim guidelines, Exhibit Nos. A and B, as presented by the Development Services Department, be adopted as the guidelines required for preparation of Environmental Impact Reports. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Murdoch then inquired if it was Council's intent to require all of Exhibit No. B on every E.I.R. submitted. Following further discussion, it was evident that requiring both of these exhibits on all E.I.R.'s would prove quite a burden of paper work to be both prepared and evaluated. On Exhibit No. B, "impacts on the socio economic environment" in particular was considered to be a potentially cumbersome area. After careful consideration of the categories mentioned in Exhibit No. B, Councilman Dutton stated that he wished to withdraw his affirmative vote to adopt Exhibit Nos. A and B as mandatory for all E.I.R.'s. 72 -672 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Following further review of the interim guidelines, all Councilmen concurring that Exhibit No. B would not be necessary in all instances, Councilman Thom moved to rescind his previous motion adopting Exhibit Nos. A and B as man- datory for all Environmental Impact Reports. Councilman Dutton seconded this motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Thom then moved that the Council approve and adopt guide- lines designated Exhibit No. A as the basic requirements for preparation of all Environmental Impact Reports. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Thom moved that Exhibit No. B be approved and that all or part of the categories listed in Exhibit No. B may also be required for inclusion in Environmental Impact Reports for major projects. Councilman Stephenson seconded this motion. MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. 2384 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1323 WITHDRAWAL BY APPLICANT: Petitions submitted by Primus Holding Company, Applicant and Jack Love Associates, Incorporated, Agent, to establish a recreational vehicle sale and service complex and to establish a restaurant with cocktail lounge on R -A (Parcel 1) and M -1 (Parcel 2) zoned property generally located at the croner of Shepard Street and La Palma Avenue. The Deputy City Clerk advised this item was brought to Council's attention due to the fact that it lied been scheduled for public hearing on October 3, 1972, at which time due to necessity of E.I.R., said public hearing was continued to November 28, 1972. That a letter dated October 11, 1972, has been received from Primus Holding Company withdrawing the petitions for both Variance No. 2384 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1323. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, with- drawal of petitions for Variance No. 2384 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1323, was accepted and approved, and continued public hearing on said applications scheduled November 28, 1972, declared cancelled. MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT OCTOBER 26, 1972: The Deputy City Clerk reported further communication had been received from Mr. Platt of the Orange Unified School District regarding the tentatively scheduled meeting for October 26, 1972, 7 :30 P.M., stating that they prefer to meet in the school board office, 370 North Glassell, Orange, inasmuch as members of the Orange City Council and Yorba Linda School District had also been invited to attend. Following some discussion relative to whether or not this meeting would constitute any possible violation of the Brown Act, Mr. Alan Watts advised the Council that any statements made by them at any such gathering could be construed as a decision having been made and could be in violation of the Brown Act, the meeting being public and open to the press not withstanding. Mr. Watts advised that the safest possible course would be to attend the school board meeting as an adjourned regular session of this body. The Council concurred and agreed to confirm the date, place and time for said meeting as October 26, 1972, 7 :30 P.M., Orange School Board Office, 370 North Glassell, Orange. GREENBELT COMMITTEE PROPOSED BUDGET: Councilman Sneegas reported that the proposed budget of the Greenbelt Committee will come up for approval at their next meeting October 25, 1972, and that this budget totals $44,400.00 to cover the projected expenses for one year, including a staff of three people. The City's share of this is prorated on the basis of the number of acres involved in the program and is estimated to be $6,300.00 or 14.17. of the total budget. Councilman Sneegas stated that he has reviewed the proposed budget and the plans of the Greenbelt Committee and has found the breakdown of costs of operations reasonable and the plans realistic, and would recommend that the Council approve the City's portion of the budget. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City's portion of the Greenbelt Committee Budget in the amount of $6,300.00 was approved. MOTION CARRIED. 72 -673 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Following further discussion relative to the proper source for these funds, Councilman Sneegas brought to Council's attention the fact that the budget was not yet acted upon by the Greenbelt Committee, only proposed, and felt that his motion had been improperly worded. Councilman Sneegas then moved to rescind his previous motion to approve the City's share of the Greenbelt Committee Budget. .Councilman Thom seconded this motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Thom moved that Councilman Sneegas be authorized to vote positive on the proposed Greenbelt Committee Budget insofar as the City of Anaheim's participation in the approximate amount of $6,300.00. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. LEAGUE .OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CONFERENCE: Mayor Dutton expressed his appreciation to all of those people within the City of Anaheim who played such an important role in making the 74th Annual Conference of the League of California Cities, which has just concluded, so successful; and especially commended the wives of the Councilmen and various City Department heads who worked so hard to make the fashion show the huge success that it was. He concluded that the City of Anaheim had indeed made a very favorable impression as host of this conference, judging by the approbation he has received. RECESS EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the request of the City Manager, Councilman Thom moved to recess to executive session for the purpose of discussing personnel matters. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (2 :45 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order, all Councilmen being present, with the exception of Councilman Pebley. (3:40 P.M.) Garry McRae, Personnel Director, submitted and explained the following resolution pertaining to salary increases and amended personnel rules, the effective date of said resolutions to be October 6, 1972. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -475 AMENDMENT TO PERSONNEL RULE NO. 3: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -475 for adoption, amending Personnel Rule No. 3, which amended rule does not apply to those employees in certain job classes in the utility unit (I.B.E.W.). Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 69R -276, PERSONNEL RULE NO. 3 COMPENSATION. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -475 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -476 AMENDMENT TO PERSONNEL RULE NO. 12: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -476 for adoption, amending Personnel Rule No. 12, which amended rule does not apply to those employees in certain job classes in the utility unit (I.B.E.W.) Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 69R -910, PERSONNEL RULE NO. 12 REINSTATEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -476 duly passed and adopted. I 72 -674 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES October 19, 1972, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -477 AMENDMENT TO PERSONNEL RULE NO. 17: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -477 for adoption, amending Personnel Rule No. 17, which amended rule does not apply to those employees in certain job classes in the utility unit I.B.E.W.). Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 69R -612, PERSONNEL RULE NO. 17 SICK LEAVE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -477 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -478 AMENDMENT TO PERSONNEL RULE NO. 19: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -478 for adoption, amending Personnel Rule No. 19, which amended rule does not apply to those employees in certain job classes in the utility unit (I.B.E.W.). Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 68R -432, PERSONNEL RULE NO. 19 BEREAVEMENT LEAVE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -478 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION X10. 72R -479 AMENDMENT 1D PERSONNEL RULE NO. 29: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -479 for adoption, amending Personnel Rule No. 29, which amended rule does not apply to those employees in certain job classes the utility unit I.B.E.W.). Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 63R -910, PERSONNEL RULE NO. 29 OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -479 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -480 AMENDMENT TO PERSONNEL RULE NO. 31: Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -480 for adoption, amending Personnel Rule No. 31, which amended rule does not apply to those employees in certain job classes in the utility unit (I.B.E.W.). Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 67R -411, PERSONNEL RULE NO. 31 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -480 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -481 ESTABLISHING SALARY RATES OF MANAGEMENT CLASSES 465 OR BELOW: The Personnel Director reported on recommendations that management job classes currently assigned to salary schedule 465 (1,121.47 1,362.40) or below, indicating the specific job titles to the Council, be adjusted upward 5.25% effective October 6, 1972. Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -481 for adoption, making the salary adjustment upward 5.257. effective October 6, 1972 for job classes as indicated by the Personnel Director and currently assigned to salary schedule 465 or below. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING AND ESTABLISHING RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR VARIOUS JOB CLASSES, AND SUPER- SEDING PORTIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 71R -471, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -481 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -482 ESTABLISHING SALARY RATES OF MANAGEMENT CLASSES 466 OR ABOVE FIRE BATALLION CHIEF, POLICE LIEUTENANT: The Personnel Director reported on recommendations that the job management classes of Fire Batallion Chief and Police Lieutenant currently assigned to salary schedule 466 or above (1,149.20 1,397.07), be adjusted upward 6.0% effective October 6, 1972. Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 72R -482 for adoption, adjusting the salary rate of management job classes currently assigned to salary schedule 466, further delineated as Fire Batallion Chief, Police Lieutenant, upwards 6.0% effective October 6, 1972. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING AND ESTABLISHING RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR VARIOUS JOB CLASSES, AND SUPER- SEDING PORTIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 71R -471, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley 72 -675 The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -482 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -483 ESTABLISHING SALARY RATES OF MANAGEMENT CLASSES 466 OR ABOVE: The Personnel Director reported on recommendations that management job classes currently assigned to salary schedule 466 (1,149.20 1,397.07) or above, indicating the specific job titles to the Council, be adjusted upward 5.257., effective October 6, 1972. Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -483 for adoption, adjusting the salary rate upward 5.25 effective October 6, 1972, for job classes as indicated by the Personnel Director and currently assigned to salary schedule 466 or above. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING AND ESTABLISHING RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR VARIOUS JOB CLASSES, AND SUPER- SEDING PORTIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 71R -471, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley 72 -676 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 19, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -483 duly passed and adopted. CITY EMPLOYEES HEALTH INSURANCE: Mr. Garry McRae outlined the proposals received from Blue Cross, Travelers, Blue Shield /C.P.S. and National Prepaid Health Plan for City employees group health coverage which was specified to be precisely as we now offer from Blue Cross. He reported that two of the four companies submitted proposals which were substantially higher in cost than Blue Cross and the re- maining companies' proposal had an altered deductable amount upward from $50.00 to $100.00 and also provided for an employee option to select a closed panel of physicians for medical care. Mr. McRae recommended that the City Council reject these proposals and authorize him to negotiate exclusively with Blue Cross, his final report to be presented to Council for action on October 31, 1972. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the Personnel Director was authorized to reject the proposals received for City employees' group health insurance coverage and instructed to negotiate exclusively with Blue Cross relative to employees' health coverage, said proposal to be pre- sented to Council for action on October 31, 1972. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. McRae presented recommendation to the Council that the City increase its contribution towards the Blue Cross health insurance premium for all City em- ployees except those in certain job classes in the utilities'employees unit,to an amount equaling the difference between the premium rate and $10.15 for an employee with one enrolled dependent, and $15.10 for an employee with two or more enrolled dependents. It was further recommended by the Personnel Director that the City Council continue in effect the current amounts of City contribution towards Blue Cross health insurance premiums for employees in job classes in the utilities employees' unit and direct the City Finance Director to increase or initiate payroll deductions for the health insurance premium from these affected employees to: 1. Employee with no enrolled dependents 3.40 per month 2. Employee with one enrolled dependent 18.54 per month 3. Employee with two or more enrolled dependents 25.91 per month The increased deduction shall be effective immediately. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the increase in the City's contribution towards health insurance premiums as out- lined by Mr. Garry McRae in his memorandum dated October 19, 1972, was approved, and the City's contribution towards the Blue Cross health insurance premiums for job classes in utility employees unit was continued, thereby authorizing the City Finance Director to increase or initiate payroll deductions for these premiums from affected employees as per the schedule presented in the memorandum dated October 19, 1972. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Thom moved to adjourn, Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 3:55 P.M. Signed )n. tvgla Deputy City Clerk