Loading...
1972/10/31Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REJECTING AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION. (Lot A, Tract No. 7185) Roll Call Vote: 72 -699 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 31, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held October 3, 1972 were approved on motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $431,484.70, in accordance with the 1972 -73 Budget, were approved. ENVIIIONMSNTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 16 ARMANDO CIRCLE ABANDONM*NT NO. 72-3A: E.I.R. was submitted by Larry Armour, President, Armour Building Company, together with analysis prepared by the E.I.R. Review Committee, regarding request to abandon a dedicated roadway commonly known as Armando Circle and a portion of an existing sanitary sewer easement, located approximately south of the Riverside Freeway, east of Park Vista Street. Mr. Roberts informed the Council that one of the conditions of Conditional Use Permit No. 1303, was that the Applicant initiate said abandonment proceedings. He further stated that in the opinion of the E.I.R. Review Committee, the report submitted conformed to the guidelines and demonstrated that no significant impact would result if the abandon- ment were approved. The street and sewer will be replaced when Tract No. 7802 is developed. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council accepted E.I.R. No. 16, as submitted, and adopted that portion which pertains to Abandonment No. 72-3A, Armando Circle, as the City Council's statement in compliance with recent State Supreme Court ruling. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 68-69-13. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7802 EXTOSION OF TIME: Request of Larry Armour, President, Armour Building Company, dated October 25, 1972, for an extension of time to Reclassification No. 68 -69-13 and Tentative Tract No. 7802, to allow time for recording of said tentative tract recently delayed due to requirement of an E.I.R., was submitted. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, one year extension of time to Reclassification No. 68-69 -13 and Tentative Tract No. 7802 was granted, as recommended by Development Services Department. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R- 498 REJECTING IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION. TRACT NO. 7185: On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R-498 for adoption, rejecting the irrevocable offer to dedicate Lot A of Tract No 7185, in that the property owner now holds the property on both sides of Lot A, and proposes to develop said properties together as Tract No. 7802, making this offer no longer necessary. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -498 dully passed and adopted. 72 -700 City Hall, Aalaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 31, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING ABANDONMENT NO. 72 -3A: In accordance with application filed by Larry Armour, President, Armour Building Company, public hearing was held on proposed abandonment of a dedicated roadway known as Armando Circle, and a por- tion of an existing sanitary sewer easement, located approximately south of the Riverside Freeway, east of Park Vista Street, pursuant to Resolution No. 72R -463 duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin and notices thereof posted in accordance with law. Report of the City Engineer was submitted, recommending approval of proposed abandonment, subject to the following conditions: 1. That new public utility and sanitary sewer easements required for re- lignment of said utilities and sanitary sewer line be dedicated via Tract No. 7802. 2. The subject abandonment to be approved and recorded concurrently with the approval and recordation of Tract No. 7802. 3. That any and all costs to relocate existing utility facilities and /or sanitary sewer line will be done at no cost to the City of Anaheim. Mayor Dutton asked if the applicant was present and was satisfied with the recommendations of the City Engineer. Mr. Armour replied in the affirmative. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council either for or against said abandonment. There being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -499: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -499 for adoption, approving Abandonment No. 72 -3A, as recommended by the City Engineer. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND RESERVING THEREFROM CERTAIN EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (72 -3A) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -499 duly passed and adopted. 'ENVIROVIONN. INFACT REPORT NO. 16 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 7802: Submitted by Larry Armour, President, Armour Building Company, in regards to plans for 160-unit planned residential development on proposed R-2 zoned lots, located at the southwest corner of Frontera and Armando Streets, south of the River- side Freeway and east of Park Vida Street. Presented with this E.I.R. was written analysis dated October 31, 1972, prepared by the E.I.R. Review Committee. Mr. Roberts briefed the Council on the finding and recommendations of the E.I.R. review committee, stating that the report appeared to address itself adequately to all items required and was in conformance with the interim guide- lines. He stated that Council may wish to further consider the noise factor as this would be the primary environmental concern due to location of the proposed development near the Riverside Freeway. The noise study incorporated in the E.I.R. states that this location falls within "normally acceptable" category as defined in HUD /FHA Circular No. 1390.2. However, on examining the data, it is found that it also comes close to being in the "normally unacceptable" category. He noted additionally that interior sound levels were not considered in the E.I.R. 72 -701 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 31, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. It was the opinion of the E.I.R. review committee that sound attenuation techniques, such as construction of an earthen berm with six foot wall within the setback of the project adjacent to Frontera Street, should be considered. Add- itionally, the noise which may be generated by the air conditioning equipment used in this project, especially if the air conditioners are proposed to be roof mounted or placed on patios, should also be considered. Mr. Larry Armour, 2731 West Lincoln Avenue, owner and developer of the property, reiterated that this location did fall into the acceptable categories as far as noise standards set by HUD /FHA were concerned. He further related that the nearest boundary line of the property is 200 feet from the travel lane of the freeway, and pointed out that there are three natural barriers present between the property and the travel lanes of the freeway; Frontera Street, the landscaped area of the freeway, and the free- way off 'ramp. City Attorney Joseph Geisler advised that it is not within the scope of the E.I.R. to estimate what effect the environment will have on the proposed project, but the opposite, i.e., whatever impact either beneficial or detrimental, the proposed project might have on the existing environmental situation. Therefore, he stated that the noise generated by the freeway would have no bearing because the proposed project would not have caused the noise from the freeway. In approving zoning, however, you might wish to consider the effect of neighboring facilities and conditions. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, E.I.R. No. 16 as it pertains to Tract No. 7802, as submitted by the developer was received and adopted as the City Council's Environmental Impact Statement in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP, TRACT NO. 7802: Developer, Armour Building Company, tract located on the south side of Frontera Street, west of Armando Street, containing 162 pro- posed R -2 and R -3 zoned lots. The City Engineer recommended approval and reported that said final map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved, that bond has been forwarded to the City Attorney for approval, and required fees paid. On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley moved that Final Map, Tract No. 7802 be approved, subject to approval of required bond by the City Attorney. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -500- DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R -500 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Armour Building Co.; Placentia Unified School District of Orange Co.; Executive Industries, Inc.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -500 duly passed and adopted. RECESS EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the request of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton movedto recess to executive session for the purpose of discussing personnel matters. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (2:15 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Councilmen being present. (2:28 P.M.) 72 -702 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 31, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. SALARY RATE. PERSONNEL RULE AMENDMENTS I.B.E.W. EMPLOYEES: Mr. Garry McRae, Personnel Director, reported that settlement had been reached in the negoti- ations with I.B.E.W., and submitted and explained the following resolutions pertaining to salary increases and amended personnel rules which apply to employees in the utilities employees unit. RESOLUTION NO. 728-501 ESTABLISHING SALARY RATES FOR UTILITIES EMPLOYEES 1: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -501 for adoption, providing for 5.25% salary increase for employees in the utilities division represented by I.B.E.W. effective October 20, 1972, and providing for the first pay period only to be at an increase of 10.5%. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING AND ESTAB- LISHING RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR VARIOUS JOB CLASSES, AND SUPERSEDING POR- TIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 71R -471, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO. I.B.E.W.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -501 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -502 AMENDMENT TO PERSONNEL RULE NO. 3: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R -502 for adoption, amending Personnel Rule No. 3, which amended rule will now apply to employees in the utilities employees unit (I.B.E.W.), as well as to other employees in the classified service, by prior resolution. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION -OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 72R -475, PERSONNEL RULE NO. 3 COMPENSATION. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -502 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -503 AMENDMENT TO PERSONNEL RULE NO. 12: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R -503 for adoption, amending Personnel Rule No. 12, which amended rule will now apply to employees in the utilities employees unit I.B.E.W.), as well as to other employees in the classified service, by prior resolution. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 72R -476, PERSONNEL RULE NO. 12 REINSTATEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -503 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 72R -504 AMENDMENT TO PERSONNEL RULE NO. 17: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R -504 for adoption, amending Personnel Rule No. 17, which amended rule will now apply to employees in the utilities employees unit I.B.E.W.), as well as to other employees in the classified service, by prior resolution. 72 -703 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 31, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 72R -477, PERSONNEL RULE NO. 17 SICK LEAVE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -504 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -505 AMENDMENT TO PERSONNEL RULE NO. 19: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R -505 for adoption, amending Personnel Rule No. 19, which amended rule will now apply to employees in the utilities employees unit (I.B.E.W.), as well as to other employees in the classified service, by prior resolution. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 72R -478, PERSONNEL RULE NO. 19 BEREAVEMENT LEAVE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -505 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -506 AMENDMENT TO PERSONNEL RULE NO. 29: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R -506 for adoption, amending Personnel Rule No. 29, which amended rule will now apply to employees in the utilities employees unit (I.B.E.W.), as well as to other employees in the classified service, by prior resolution. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 72R -479, PERSONNEL RULE NO. 29 OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -506 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -5Q7 AMENDMENT TO PERSONNEL RULE NO. 31: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R -507 for adoption, amending Personnel Rule No. 31, which amended rule will now apply to employees in the utilities employees unit (I.B.E.W.), as well as to other employees in the classified service, by prior resolution. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 72R -480, PERSONNEL RULE NO. 31 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -507 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -508 AMENDMENT TO PERSONNEL RULE NO. 6: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 72R -508 for adoption, amending Personnel Rule No. 6. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 70R -504, AMENDING RULE NO. 6 PREMIUM PAY. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -508 duly passed and adopted. 72 -704 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 31, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUMS I.B.E.W. EMPLOYEES: Mr. Garry McRae submitted proposal for payment of increased health insurance premiums, and recommended that the City Council approve an increase in the City's contribution towards the Blue Cross Health Insurance premiums for all employees in certain job classes in the utilities employees unit, beginning with premium due November 1, 1972, as per the following schedule: Employee only $18.30 Employee with one dependent 35.05 Employee with two or more dependents 43.21 He further recommended that the City Council authorize the Finance Director to refund to all employees in certain job classes in the utilities employees unit, the increased deduction made from their October 27, 1972 pay- checks for payment of the premium due, November 1, 1972, as per the following schedule: Employee only 3.40 Employee with one dependent 8.39 Employee with two or more dependents 10.81 On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City Council approved increase to the City's contribution of Blue Cross Health Insurance Premiums for utilities employees unit personnel beginning with premium due November 1, 1972, and authorized the Finance Director to refund increased deductions withheld from the October 27, 1972 paychecks of the affected employees as outlined and recommended by Mr. McRae. MOTION CARRIED. BLUE CROSS HEALTH INSURANCE CONTRACT PREMIUMS: Mr. Garry McRae reported that nego- tiations have not yet been concluded with Blue Cross regarding establishment of the City's maximum liability for the policy year, and recommended that the proposed Blue Cross premium Deposit Rate be approved for the month of November, 1972 only. He stated that he anticipates completion of negotiations and report to Council for appropriate action prior to December 1, 1972. The proposed premium rates for the month of November are: Employee only $18.30 Employee with one dependent 45.20 Employee with two or more dependents 58.31 On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the proposed Blue Cross Health Insurance Premium Deposit Rates as presented by Mr. McRae, for the month of November 1972, were approved. MOTION CARRIED. SALARY MAN4GEMENT CLASSES: Mr. Garry McRae submitted proposals recommending increase of 5.25% for all employees in the management classes schedule, with exception of the Recreation Superintendent, who is to receive 5.257. plus an additional 2.5% due to added responsibilities incurred as a result of the golf course. RESOLUTION NO. 72R- 509: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -509 for adoption, adjusting the salary schedule for management personnel upwards 5.257. with the exception of the Recreation Superintendent, who will receive increase of 5.25 plus an additional 2.5 effective October 20, 1972. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING AND ESTAB- LISHING RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR VARIOUS JOB CLASSES, AND SUPERSEDING POR- TIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 71R -471, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO. Councilman Thom qualified his "aye" vote on above resolution, requesting the records to show that his vote excluded the following positions: The City Manager; Director of Public Works; Director of Development Services; and Assistant City Manager. Roll Call Vote: 72-705 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES October 31. 1972. 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -509 duly passed and adopted. ST(RiM FLOW CRITERIA SANTA ANA RIVER. WEST OF IMPERIAL: Request of Mr. C. J. Queyrel, Anacal Engineering Company, was submitted asking that Council clarify storm flow criteria in the Santa Ana River for projects downstream from Imperial Highway, particularly the property located between the Riverside Freeway and the Santa Ana River, east of Lakeview Drive. Also submitted was report from City Engineer. On invitation by the Mayor, Mr. Queyrel addressed the Council concerning his position that 100 -year storm frequency criteria should not apply downstream from Imperial. He stated that the 100-year storm criteria was originally established for the area east of Imperial because the canyons would confine the water flow and the rate of grades are steeper there, thus making the velocity of the water greater. He stated that according to the area designated as a flood plain by the Army Corps of Engineers, subject property would not be effected since the river theoretically would break before reaching that far downstream and flow through the east industrial section, causing the water surface level at the Lakeview Drive property to actually drop. Mr. Queyrel in giving the background for his request, noted that one of the conditions originally imposed on the tentative tract map in question, was that it could not be recorded until the levee improvements were installed, and that after one year's delay, these improvements are now under construction. When he requested the flow criteria for their tract, he was given the figure of 36,000 cfs. Based on this information the property was purchased and funds expended, now, he was most recently told that his engineering plans must meet criteria for 100 -year storm frequency flood or 48,000 cfs. Mr. Queyrel displayed a chart which indicated the water surface levels based on design criteria for 36,000 cfs (80 -year storm) and 48,000 cfs (100 -year storm) with the required respective pad elevations. If re- quired to design to 100 -year storm, plus an additional two feet as now required by Orange County Flood Control for a safety factor, he indicated the level at which the pads would have to be built would be 3 feet or 4 feet above water surface level of an 80 -year storm, and 61 feet above the water surface level of a 100 -year frequency storm. Mr. Queyrel brought attention to the fact that the Prado Dam has recently been judged by the Army Corps of Engineers to be inadequate, and in fact the situation is critical, so that protection measures presently in force are interim measures and may be curtailed when dam improvements are completed, and the river able to carry 36,000 cfs as originally designed. In conclusion, he felt Tract No.7370 is being penalized since no other adjoining property has been required to design to meet the 100 year specifications, and this tract will be raised to a level at least four feet above the surrounding developments. He requested that the City Council permit design of this tract to flow into the river based on the design criteria of the river which is 36,000 cfs, in which case the pads would be 265.50, which would be three feet or more above the surface of the river, based on flow of 48,000 cfs and consequently even in a 100 -year frequency storm, the property would remain protected' Councilman Thom pointed out that using Mr.. Queyrel's own statement if the present situation at Prado Dam is critical, then it is logical to require every extra precaution possible. He then requested further informa- tion regarding wave action. 72-706 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES October 31. 1972, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Queyrel answered that County flood control included wave action in its computations, east of Imperial, because there are no drop structures in that area, whereas drop structures are present west of Imperial and would curtail the flow of water, so that there would be no wave action affect expected at subject property. Councilman Sneegas left the Council Chambers. (3:00 P.M.) Mr. Dale Stuard, President, American National Housing Corporation, 9092 Talbert Avenue, Fountain Valley, requested that the Council consider per- mitting them to develop Tract No. 7370 using 36,000 cfs for the following reasons: 1. That the property would not be endangered even under the worst flood conditions, according to Mr. Queyrel's findings. 2. That requiring higher pad elevations would result in an unsightly appearance. 3. That there is considerable construction activity going on in the surrounding area which has not been designed to meet the criteria being imposed on them, The Council requested the opinion of the City Engineer regarding Mr. Queyrel's presentation. Mr. James Maddox stated that to his knowledge no developer has been given the 36,000 cfs criteria. He did concur that the pad elevations computed by Mr. Queyrel would be correct and stated however, that according to recommen- dations received from the Orange County Flood Control District regarding this matter, the only recommendation their office can give would be the 100 -year frequency storm or 48,000 cfs criteria for this property. On questioning by Councilman Thom regarding other construction in this same area, especially Canyon General Hospital, Mr. Maddox stated that the older tracts (nine to ten years old) were not developed to meet the 100 -year criteria, however, all of those over which the City of Anaheim has had juris- diction, including Canyon General Hospital, were required to be designed to meet the l00-year frequency storm criteria. Mr. William Devitt, Design Engineer, stated that in every discussion with any private developer or engineer who has requested what the criteria would be on the river, the 100 -year frequency storm criteria has been given. Regarding the additional two feet requirement added in the last eight to nine months, this has been done primarily because, with the velocities estimated to be coming down the river, there would be some movement of sand, and this compiled with the channels that would be discharging into the river may cause blockages. Councilman Thom asked W. Devitt whether 100 -year frequency storm was synonymous with 48,000 cfs. W. Devitt replied "yes" as it pertains to that portion in the Santa Ana River and under discussion, however, 100 -year frequency storm would produce different criteria in other areas. Mr. Devitt further stated that in his opinion it would be reasonable and prudent to establish a criteria on the river that any of the drain areas draining to the Santa Ana River, be required to design to a 100 -year frequency flood. Councilman Dutton inquired as to what effect this particular tract would have on the surrounding property being elevated four to five feet above the surrounding property. Mr. Devitt answered that it is recognized that the rdquired elevations of the building pads has caused some problems in this particular tract, and that perhaps four feet of fill would be needed, as a result, the City Engineering Department has conceded some of its own criteria regarding catch basins, etc, and do not feel the 100 -year frequency storm criteria is an area in which the City should consider a compromise.' City pall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MII1UTES October 3j. 1972. 1:30 P.M. 72-707 In rebuttal, W. Queyrel stated that if this tract is elevated above those in the area in the event of flood conditions, water would actually be diverted by the elevated section. He reiterated that it was never implied that a 100-year criteria be applied to the area below Imperial Highway and this tract will be penalized by requiring protection beyond the requirements of other tracts. In addition, the Flood Control District is not telling them to design to a 100 -year flood, it is the City making the requirement. Councilman Thom stated that in view of the vast construction presently in the canyon areas and in view of the fact that every acre developed produces that much more runoff, and Prado Dam is less capable of handling the additional runoff., .he felt the Engineering Department was justified in requiring design to an acceptable risk level which they have set at 48,000 cfs. Mr. Maddox reported the ultimate solution will be the up- stream control by the raising of Prado Dam. This project has been studied for the last twelve years to his knowledge and nothing accomplished. In light of the fact that the subject property is one of the last undeveloped parcels in that area, Mr. Murdoch asked the City Engineer what additional safety element would be gained by requiring this parcel to be built at a level higher than that of the surrounding property. Mr. Devitt replied that the Council has established a 100 -year storm flow criteria upstream (east of Imperial) and it would be illogical where the quantity of water is increased causing greater problems not to require the same downstream (west of Imperial). He reiterated that the Engineering Department would be willing to compromise in areas such as the technical design of the onsite storm drainage system, but felt drainage with the 100-year storm criteria should apply. Councilman Stephenson remarked that if the recommendation of the Orange County Flood Control, Army Corps of Engineers, and City of Anaheim Engineering Department is to require design to 100 -year frequency storm then he would concur and would not be prepared to invalidate their position and thereupon moved that the design criteria be 100 -year flood frequency, as recommended by the City Engineer. The Engineering Department advised the Council that it would be preferable for them if Council would define the area for which they intend this policy of 100 -year storm frequency criteria to apply. Following some discussion, foregoing motion to state that along Avenue upstream, the design criteria the 100 -year storm frequency flood. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Stephenson amended his the Santa Ana River from Lincoln is to be established on the basis of Councilman Thom seconded this motion. RECESS: Councilman Thom moved for a five minute recess, Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:45 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order, all Councilmen being present with the exception of Councilman Sneegas. (3:50 P.M.) CROSSING GUARDS JULIETTE LOW SCHOOL: Request of Mrs. Jacqueline Dudek, Juliette Low PTA Health and Safety Chairman, that the City Council consider the placement of school crossing guards and installation of cross walks at certain intersections within the Juliette Low attendance area considered hazardous by the parents, was submitted together with report from the Traffic Engineer Mrs. Dudek explained that the problem at the Juliette Low School came about when the Magnolia School District discontinued bus service, thus making it necessary for many elementary school children} in the Juliette Low attendance area to travel to and from the school using the intersections at Lincoln and Monterey, Lincoln and Gilbert, Crescent and Gilbert, Lincoln and Dale. She stated that presently there are 132 students who live south 72-708 City Hall. Awheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES October 31. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. Lincoln, one-half of whom are in grades kindergarten through third, and 229 students who live north of Lincoln, half of whom are in grades kindergarten through third, who must use some of these intersections traveling to and from school. The problem is compounded by the location of Savanna High School on Gilbert Street, to which it is estimated 300 to 350 students drive to school at approximately the same time as the Juliette Low students are traveling back and forth. Mrs. Dudek stated that this problem was brought before the Magnolia School 'Ward who advised her that their resources are severely limited, and cut- backs throughout the district have been necessary. She was advised to contact the City with the following requests: 1. Painting of pedestrian crosswalks (preferably yellow) on Lincoln Avenue at Monterey. 2. Posting of signs east and west thereof, identifying this as a school crossing. 3. Assignment of crossing guards to serve during school hours, at the intersections of Lincoln and Monterey, Lincoln and Gilbert, Crescent and Gilbert, and Lincoln and Dale. In support of these requests, Mrs. Dudek informed the Council that the Juliette Low School is located far enough away from Lincoln Avenue that motorists traveling on Lincoln are not aware that there is a school in the area because there are no crosswalks or signs posted. Furthermore, the traffic signal at Lincoln and Dale is of 23 seconds duration which is not long enough for 130 small children to cross. Mrs. Dudek stated she has received much favorable response from the parents in support of these requests, having had a 75% reply to a mailing in September of 220 letters to parents of kindergarten through third grade children. She added that traffic generated by car pools formed by parents since the buses were cancelled has increased the traffic in the immediate area of the school contributing to the problem. Mrs. Dudek noted that the school district has reinstated partial bus service temporarily for kindergarten through third grades but that the parents are anxious to secure a permanent solution to this problem, and therefore request that the City Council take some action on their behalf. Councilman Pebley stated that perhaps the cost of the crossing guards as requested would exceed the cost of reinstatement of the buses, and this possibility should be investigated. Mr. Murdoch explained that the reason there are no signs posted on Lincoln Avenue noting the location of the Juliette Low School, is that its location exceeds the distance within which the State vehicle code would permit such posting, and Lincoln Avenue being a State highway is governed by the State code. Therefore, there is nothing the City would be able to do in the way of painting crosswalks or posting signs on Lincoln Avenue. Alternate solutions were discussed and the Council was of the opinion that some measures should be taken to alleviate the situation for those children walking to and from Juliette Low School and traversing hazardous routes. Recog- nizing whatever measure is taken, it would be paid for by either City taxes or school taxes, it was agreed that the economic trade -offs should be analyzed to determine which would be the most economical to the tax payer, the reinstatement of buses or the assignment of crossing guards, and the Traffic Engineer was requested to compile the comparative costs for further Council consideration November 14, 1972. DINNER Am= PLACE PERMIT: Application filed by Mr. and Mrs. Lynn H. Oliver for dinner dancing place permit to allow dancing nightly from 7:00 p.m. to 2 :00 a.m. at Roberts Room, 819 South Euclid, was submitted and granted subject to the pro- visions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson. MOTION CARRIED. 72-709 City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES October "1. 1972. 1:30 P.M. REQUEST FOR REHEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72-73-10 AND VARIANCE NO. 2426: Request of Mr. R. H. Bevins, 136 West Whiting Avenue, Fullerton, dated October 24, 1972, for rehearing on the reclassification and variance to change the zone from R -A to R-3 to establish a 552 -unit statutory condo minium complex on property located at the northwest corner of Cerritos Avenue and Walnut Street. (Resolution of Intent No. 72R-406 and 72R -407 adopted at the meeting of September 19, 1972). It was further requested by W. Bevins that the property owners in the vicinity and also Mr. Robert Messe, 1523 South Bayless, Anaheim, be notified as to when the Environmental Impact Report regarding said project will come before the City Council. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the request for rehearing on Reclassification No. 72 -73-10 and Variance No. 2426 was denied without prejudice, and the City Clerk instructed to notify only Mr. Bevins and Mr. Robert Nesse as to the time and place that the Environ- mental Impact Report regarding said reclassification and variance will be considered by the City Council. MOTION CARRIED. JOINT CONSTRUCTION HIGH SCHOOL SWIMMING POOLS: Communication of the Park and Recreation Commission was submitted requesting the Council allocate funds to be used with the Anaheim High School District for the joint construction of swimming pools at the Loara, Magnolia, Savanna and Katella High Schools in accordance with former plans. Mr. John Collier, Director of Parks and Recreation advised this would be finalizing an agreement reached approximately five years ago at a joint meeting with the High School District regarding sharing the construc- tion costs of swimming pools at the four high schools that do not yet have pools. He further reported that the High School District is now financially able to build five pools (one outside the City, Cypress area,) and is now requesting joint participation with the City building two of the four pools at an estimated cost of $160,000 per pool ($320,000); the schools to maintain said pools after construction and the City to operate the pools during the summer season. Mr. Dave Peeler, Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission, reported on the needs of additional swimming pools. Mr. Murdoch reported on the possibility of the High School District proceeding with the construction of all of the pools at this time with the City paying their proportionate share of the cost over a period of two fiscal years. He further noted the possibility of the High School District with- drawing from one of the existing Joint Power Agreements and recommended before an agreement is entered into to construct the swimming pools there be assur- ance of a long range commitment so that the amortization of the City's in- vestment is reasonably assured. By Council consent the proposed construction of the two swimming pools as recommended were ordered to be included on the capital improvement list for further evaluation as to their priority. PROPOSED SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH: Communication of the Parks and Recreation Commission recommending the "City enter into negotiations for the purchase of the Zion Lutheran Church for a Senior Citizen Center, was submitted. Miss Patsy Ray, Recreation Supervisor, addressed the Council r"- advising of the problems currently encountered at the Chartres Recreational Center in that the limitations of the facility has been reached long ago and Senior Citizens can no longer be adequately accommodated even by rescheduling and doubling up programs. She reported that 207 of the population of the City are senior citizen's age and that this percentage is increasing. Further .'C]ub membetship presently exceeds 2,000 with an average monthly attendance of over 8,000. She noted that many of these people live in the downtown area and are without transportation and to them a recreational program within walking distance to their homes is very important. 72- 710 City Ha13. Anaheim. galifornia mown, MI UTES October 31. 1972. 1:30 P.M. With the use of an area map and plot plan Miss Ray noted subject property being the southeast corner of Chartres and Philadelphia Streets which is centrally located for a great number of senior citizens and estimated the facility would accommodate their needs for five to ten years. She called attention to the square footage of the building being 12,996 as compared to the present facility of 4,210. The church building will provide for a larger kitchen and additional rest room facilities. Regarding the Chartres Street Recreational Center, Mr. Collier advised that it would be used for other needed recreational programs as the City now has less use of some of the school facilities that were used formerly. As to the cost, Mr. Collier advised that the building was .built in 1955 and has.been appraised at $241,000. Mr. Dave Peeler, Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission, reported that the Commission has been concerned with the Senior Citizen's problems for the past couple of years and recommended the possibility of the Zion Lutheran Church be explored. As to other possible locations Mr. Murdoch advised that as buildings in the downtown area become available an analysis is made and the former White Temple Church, the Clinic north of Lincoln Avenue on Claudine Street, and the former Kress Store building all have been analyzed and so far the Zion Lutheran Church building appears to offer the most possibilities. It was agreed by the City Council that there was interest without commitment in the possibility of purchasing the Zion Lutheran Church and that the staff should proceed to determine price and'cost of necessary remodeling. It was further agreed to consider this item on the list of capital improvements for further determination as to priority. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 7 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72-73-12. VARIANCE N0. 2400 AND TRACT ND. 7932: Environmental Impact Report No. 7, pertaining to a proposed nine -lot single family tract to be constructed at the southwest corner of Wagner Avenue and Sunkist Street was submitted, together with the Environmental Impact Review Committee Analysis. Mr. Roberts reported on the findings of the E.I.R. Review Committee and noted it was their consensus of opinion, that this project would have no significant environmental impact. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Council received and adopted Environmental Impact Report No. 7 and the Committee Analysis as their statement in compliance with the recent State Supreme Court ruling on the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRAL IMPACT REPORT N0. 8 (RECLASSIFICATION N0. 71 -45. VARIANCE N0. 2405 AND TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 6931) E.I.R. No. 8 pertaining to a proposed 40-lot single family home development located on the east side of Sunkist Street, approximately 200 feet north of Ball Road, was submitted together with the Analysis of the E.I.R. Review Committee. Mr. Roberts briefed the findings of the E.I.R. Review Committee, noting that said report does cover the major areas of consideration adequately and the project would have no significant impact on the environment. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council received and adopted Environmental Impact Report Rio. 8 and Commit- tee Analysis as their statement, in compliance with the recent'State Supreme Court ruling on the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT N0. 11 (RECLASSIFICATION N0. 71-72-33 AND VARIANCE N0. 2337): E.I.R. No. 11 pertaining to the development of a 74-unit apartment complex located on the south side of La Palma Avenue, 500 feet west of East Street, immediately east of and adjacent to The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway right of way, together with an Addendum thereto and the E.I.R. Review Committee Analysis, was submitted. 72- 711 Cits Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES October 31. 1972. 1:30 P.M. Mr. Roberts outlined the findings of the Review Committee advising the addendum adequately covers the deficiencies noted regarding noise and vibration considerations and alternative land uses. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council received and adopted Environmental Impact Report No. 11, Addendum and Committee Analysis as their statement, in compliance with the recent State Supreme Court ruling on the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. MOTION CARRIED. ENV ONMENTAL IMPACT REPOT NO. 13 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71 -56. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1244 AND TRACT NO. 7439): E.I.R. No. 13 pertaining to a proposed 57- unit planned residential development to be located on the east side of Euclid Street approximately 660 feet south of Orangewood Avenue, and Analysis thereof by the E.I.R. Review Committee, was submitted. Mr. Roberts presented the findings of the E.I.R. Review Committee noting it was their opinion that since this is a small tract in a developed area, the impact on the environment would be primarily limited to those factors associated with increased population. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, Environmental Impact Report No. 13 and Committee Analysis was received and adopted as their statement in compliance with the recent State Supreme Court ruling on the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 14 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71 -47 (4): E.I.R. No. 14 refers to property located in the Northeast Industrial Area on the south side of La Palma Avenue approximately 1,537 feet west of the centerline of Imperial Highway with a frontage on La Palma Avenue of approximately 800 feet. Several industrial buildings have been erected on this parcel and this E.I.R. has been submitted in conjunction with an application for a building permit for additional industrial buildings. Mr. Roberts briefed the Analysis of the E.I.R. Review Committee finding the proposed structure would not have significant impact on the environment. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Council received and adopted Environmental Impact Report No. 14 and Committee Analysis as their statement in compliance with the recent State Supreme Court ruling on the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 20 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70 -71-30 AND VARIANCE NO. 2231): E.I.R. No. 20 refers to approximately 2.85 acres of land located on the south side of Orange Avenue approximately 800 feet east of Knott Street and submitted in conjunction with an application for building permit for a 67- unit apartment approved under Variance No. 2231. Mr. Roberts reviewed the findings of the E.I.R. Review Committee and briefed the contents of an Amendment to the original report relative to noise impacts on adjoining properties and mitigation measures proposed, and any impact on and from the Orange County Flood Control Channel adjacent to the southerly boundary of the project. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Council received and adopted Environmental Impact Report No. 20 and Committee Analysis as their statement in.compliance with the recent State Supreme Court ruling on the California Environmental quality Act of 1970. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRONMENTAL PACT REPORT NO. 21 (VARIANCE NO. 2274): E.I.R. No. 21 pertains to the proposed addition to a warehouse of approximately 5,800 square feet on C-2 zoned property located on Manchester Avenue between the Santa Ana Freeway and Lincoln Avenue. Mr. Roberts noted the findings of the E.I.R. Review Committee that no adverse or beneficial environmental impacts would result due to the similarity of land use existing in the area. 72 -712 Citv Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES October 31. 1972. 1 :30 P.M. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Council received and adopted Environmental Impact Report No. 21 and Com- mittee Analysis as their statement, in compliance with the recent State Supreme Court ruling on the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 35 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71-72 40 AND VARIANCE NO. 2350): E.I.R. No. 35 pertaining to the development of a 72 -unit apartment complex on R -3 zoned property located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue, approximately 800 feet east of the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Magnolia Avenue to- gether with E.I.R. Review Committee Analysis, was submitted. Mr. Roberts briefed the E.I.R. Review Committee's report, finding the most significant impact of this project would be the additional traffic, parking and noise problems which the increased population would possibly generate. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Council received and adopted Environmental Impact Report No. 35 and Committee Analysis as their statement in compliance with the recent State Supreme Court ruling on the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION N0. 72R-510 WORK ORDER NO. 801 REJECTION OF BIDS: On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -510 for adoption rejecting all bids received for Work Order No. 801. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED UP TO THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1972, FOR A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE DUPLICATING AND PRINTING SHOP ADDITION, PURCHASING BUILDING, 901 E. VERMONT AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 801. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -510 duly passed and adopted RESOLUTION NO. 72R■511 WORK ORDER NO. 647 A: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 72R -511 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. Roll Call Vote: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOW- ING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE GERDA DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM APPROXI- MATELY 849 FEET WEST OF TO APPROXIMATELY 2279 FEET WEST OF PINNEY DRIVE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 647 -A. (R. J. Noble Company) AYES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -511 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 72R -512 DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 72R -312 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Peterson Aurand; Golden West Equity Properties, Inc.; Sandman Motels, Inc.; Moskowitz- Moskowitz; Bledsoe- Bledsoe; 72 -713 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 31, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Stanley Phillips; Silverman Silverman; Knobbe; Carden, Jr.- Carden- Gray, Jr.- Gray -Lae; Palmall Properties, Inc.; Kneip Kneip; Critchfield- Critchfield; Bowers; Barnes; West; Virro Virro; Eisenhauer; West; Bowers; Zimmer Zimmer; Schroeder; Hodges) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R -512 duly passed and adopted. LETTER AGREEMENT MOORE TABER: On motion by Councilman Pebley the Mayor and City Clerk were authorized to execute a letter agreement to employ Moore Taber to perform soil studies at the North Substation site at a cost of $1,200.O0,and at the West Substation site at a cost $850.00, as per their letter proposal dated October 27, 1972, as recommended by the City Engineer. Councilman Thom seconded this motion. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT SUPERVISORY CONTROL EQUIPMENT, NORTH AND WEST SUBSTATIONS: The City Manager reported on the recommended purchase of supervisory control equipment for the North and West Substations, and advised that the one manu- facturer, Westinghouse, has submitted a quotation for said equipment in the amount of $33,056.00, including tax,and thereupon recommended the purchase be authorized. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, purchase was authorized in the amount of $33,056.00, including tax, as recommended by the City Manager. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT FIVE ONE -HALF TON PICK -UP TRUCKS: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of five one -half ton pick -up trucks as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX Santa Ana Dodge, Santa Ana McCoy Ford, Anaheim Woods G.M.C., Anaheim Guardian Chevrolet Anaheim Dodge $13,871.81 15,006.71 15,046.50 NO QUOTE NO QUOTE On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the low bid of Santa Ana Dodge was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $13,871.81, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT 15 3/4 TON PICK -UP TRUCKS: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase 15 3/4 ton pick -up trucks as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX Santa Ana Dodge, Santa Ana $45,294.17 Woods G.M.C., Anaheim 49,842.45 McCoy Ford, Anaheim 51,384.72 Guardian Chevrolet NO QUOTE r Anaheim Dodge NO QUOTE On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded Councilman Dutton, the low bid of Santa Ana. Dodge was accepted and purchase aut in the amount of $45,294.17, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT TWO CARGO VANS: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of two cargo vans as follows and recommended accept- ance of the low bid: 72 -714 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 31, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX McCoy Ford, Anaheim Santa Ana Dodge, Santa Ana Guardian Chevrolet Woods G.M.C. Anaheim Dodge 7,120.28 7,270.10 NO QUOTE NO QUOTE NO QUOTE On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the low bid of McCoy Ford was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $7,120.28, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT ONE 3/4 TON, 4 X 4 PICK -UP TRUCK WITH FOUR WHEEL DRIVE: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of one 3/4 ton, 4x4 pick -up truck with four wheel drive as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX Santa Ana Dodge, Santa Ana McCoy Ford, Anaheim Woods, G.M.C., Anaheim Guardian Chevrolet Anaheim Dodge 4,031.69 4,335.04 4,368.00 NO QUOTE NO QUOTE On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the low bid of Santa Ana Dodge was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $4,031.69, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT ONE 10,000 G.V.W. CAB AND CHASSIS: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of one 10,000 G.V.W. cab and chassis as follows: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX International Harvester Co., Anaheim Santa Ana Dodge, Santa Ana Woods G.M.C., Anaheim McCoy Ford, Anaheim Guardian Chevrolet Anaheim Dodge 3,412.50 3,463.06 3,545.85 3,588.34 NO QUOTE NO QUOTE On recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Stephenson moved that the bid of Santa Ana Dodge in the amount of $3,463.06, including tax, be accepted and purchase authorized as the lowest and best qualified bid, as the low bid received did not meet specifications. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT ONE 30,000 G.V.W. CAB AND CHASSIS TILT CAB: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of one 30,000 G.V.W. cab and chassis tilt cab as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid: VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX International Harvester Co., Anaheim Woods G.M.C., Anaheim Santa Ana Dodge Guardian Chevrolet Anaheim Dodge $10,552.50 11,200.35 NO QUOTE NO QUOTE NO QUOTE On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the low bid of International Harvester Co. was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $10,552.50, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT TWO 24,000 .G.V.W. CAB AND CHASSIS TILT CAB: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase two 24,000 G.V.W. tilt cab and chassis as follows, and-recommended acceptance of the low bid: City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 31, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT, INCLUDING TAX International Harvester Co., Anaheim McCoy Ford, Anaheim Woods G.M.C., Anaheim Santa Ana Dodge Anaheim Dodge Guardian Chevrolet On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the low bid of International Harvester Co. was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $16,090.20, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied as recommended by the City Attorney and ordered referred to the insurance carrier on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. Claim submitted by Alicia J. Richer, for purported personal in- jury caused by improper seating arrangements at Anaheim Convention Center,on or about August 22, 1972. b. Claim submitted by Billie Jean La Lama for purported personal property damage caused by collision with city vehicle, on or about September 8, 1972. c. Claim submitted by Roger W. Tapley, for purported personal property damage caused by city vehicle, sustained on or about August 30, 1972. MOTION CARRIED. City Treasurer Engineering Division e. Annual Report for the period 1971 -72. Engineering Division MOTION CARRIED. Refer to Ordinance Book. $16,090.20 16,667.47 17,131.80 NO QUOTE NO QUOTE NO QUOTE ORDINANCE NO. 3090: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3090 for adoption. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71-72-20 (1) R-2 72 -715 CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson: a. Before the Public Utilities Commission Investigation on the Commission's own motion into rules governing the construction and maintenance of crossing at grade of railroads with public streets, roads, and highways in the State of California. b. Before the Public Utilities Commission Joint application of Southern California Gas Company and Pacific Lighting Service Company for auth- orization to revise rates from time to time as necessary to reflect expendi- tures and revenues associated with gas exploration and development activities. c. Anaheim Public Library Board Minutes September 18, 1972. d. Financial and Operating Reports for the Month of September, 1972. BEFORE TEE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PINK BUS LINES: Inasmuch as a portion of the proposed route of The Pink Bus Lines. is within Anaheim City limits, the City Council requested a member of the City Attorney's staff attend the public hearing before the Public Utilities Commission November 15, 1972 in the Council Chambers, in the matter of the application of Paul Arthur Kadletz and Michael Anthony Kadletz for certificate of public convenience and neces- sity to operate a passenger service between two points in the County of Orange. 72 -716 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES October 31, 1972, 1 :30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3090 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3091: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 3091 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71 -72 -39 R -1) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3091 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3092: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3092 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.272(g) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING. (No Parking During School hours Glenview Avenue, area of Glenview Elementary School) ORDINANCE NO. 3093: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 3093 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING: (68 -69 -98 (2) R -1) WESTIM GOLF ASSOCIATION PRO TOURN ENr ANAHEIM HILLS GOLF COURSE: Mr. Murdoch reported on proposal received from the Western Golf Association for use of Anaheim Hills Golf Course for a pro tournament for the months of January through May, 1973. The terms and conditions include that the Western Golf Association pay a license fee of $10,000.00 for this period, plus an addi- tional $100.00 per tournament day which license fee includes practice rounds, and the City to furnish 30 golf carts for tournament days. The tournament play is planned for Tuesdays and practice play to be scheduled by the city will also be played on weekdays. It is expected that the tournament will involve no more than 100 players. Mr. Murdoch stated that a study of the comparable receipts for estimated play on the days proposed for the tournament, together with appli- cable golf cart rental fees comes to approximately 5/6 of the total amount which will be paid by the Western Golf Association. He further stated that in his estimation this seems to be a reasonable approach to assuring play at the Anaheim Hills Golf Course during a usually slow period, and for this reason plus the added advertising benefits, would recommend that the City Council approve this agreement. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Attorney was authorized to prepare an agreement with the Western Golf Association for use of the Anaheim Hills Golf Course under the terms as out- lined. MOTION CARRIED. _GREEN FEES ANAHEIM HILLS GOLF COURSE: Mr. Murdoch reported on rat/mended green fees for the Anaheim Hills Golf Course, at an approximate rate of 50 cents higher than those presently charged at Anaheim Municipal Golf Course. RESOLUTION NO. 72R-513: At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Stephenson offered Resolution No. 72R -513 for adoption, establishing green fees at Anaheim Hills Golf Course as follows: City hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES QQtober 31 1172. 1:30 P.M. Weekdays: Saturdays, 9 holes $2.50; 18 holes $4.00; 9 hole replay $2.00; After 4:30 p.m. $2.50. Sundays and Holidays: 9 holes $3.50; 18 holes $6.00; 9 hole replay $3.00; After 4:30 p.m. $3.50. Refer to Resolution Book. 72- 717 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ESTABLISHING GREEN FEES TO BE CHARGED AT THE ANAHEIM HILLS GOLF COURSE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Sneegas The Mayor declared Resolution No. 72R-513 duly passed and adopted. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Thom moved to adjourn. Councilman Stephenson seconded the motion. LOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 5:45 P.M. Signed )»t CEO -ica City Clerk