Loading...
1968/02/27 n n n 68-103 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 20. 1968. 1:30 P.M. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 5:l5 P.M. SIGNED ~ Ix. 2t;~ ~.. <.,/ City Clerk City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 2.7. 1968. l:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT~ PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley COUNCILMEN: None ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER~ Robert Davis CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson FINANCE DIRECTOR: Douglas Ogden PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR: John Collier Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Thomas Pendell, of the First Methodist Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Dutton led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATIONS: Mayor Pebley made the following proclamations: "Clean-up, Fix-up, Paint and Plant Month" - March, 1968. "Arbor Week" - March 3 to 9, 1968. "Teen Time U.S.A. Week" - April 6 through 14, 1968. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION: Resolution congratulating the Dr. Albert Schweitzer School for attaining, for the fourth time, the George Washington Honor Medal awarded by the Freedoms Foundation at Valley Forge, for Outstanding Achieve- ment in Bringing about a Better Understanding of the American Way of Life, was unanimously adopted by the Anaheim City Council. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting of February 13, 1968, were approved, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that con- sent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for 68-104 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 27. 1968. 1:30 P.M. the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $1,374,868.15, in accordance with the 1967-68 Budget, were approved. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 992: Submitted by John Wright, request- ing permission to establish a trailer park, limited to adults only; R-A zoned 1 property, located at 1620 South Euclid Street. . The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-30, granted said permit subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Ana- heim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Euclid Street, for street lighting purposes. 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Ana- heim the sum of l5~ per front foot along Euclid Street, for tree planting pur- poses. 3. That the sidewalks and driveways shall be installed along Euclid Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 4. That the existing driveway depressions, which are not proposed to be used along Euclid Street shall be removed and replaced with curb and gutter, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 6. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 7. That the proposed development shall be in accordance with the re- quirements of the State Trailer Act, and plumbing shall be provided in order that the mobile home park will accommodate all trailers and shall not be re- stricted to "California-approved trailers" only. 8. That all wheels shall be removed from all mobile homes to be located in subject mobile home park, and the mobile homes shall be lowered in order to reduce the visual awareness of the mobile homes for abutting resi- dences. 9. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Ana- heim the sum of $25.00 per trailer space, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. lO. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the time that the Building Permit is issued or within a period of l80 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant. ll. That Condition Nos. 3,4,5,6, and 7, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. l2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac- cordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No.1, Revision No.1, and Exhibit Nos, 2, 3, and 4, provided that the depth of the screen planting buffer strip along the northerly boundary shall be increased to a width of 6 feet, and further provided that a 6-foot masonry wall as measured from the highest finished grade level of subject or abutting properties shall be constructed along the north and east property lines, prior to final building and zoning inspections. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by John F. Rothman, and public hearing scheduled this date. Due to a possible conflict of interest, Mayor Pebley withdrew from the discussion and action on this issue, and Mayor Pro-Tem Schutte assumed chairmanship of the meeting. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the exist- ing uses and zoning in the immediate area; summarizing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He compared dwelling unit and population density figures for the proposed park with those of normal R-l and R-2, 5,000 zoned developments on the same amount of land; the number of n n n ~ n 68-105 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 27. 1968. 1:30 P.M. persons in the mobile homes falling approximately half-way between an R-l and an R-2, 5,000 development. It was noted that many letters of opposition were received in the office of the City Clerk. Mayor Pro-Tem Schutte asked if the applicant or his representative wished to address the City Council. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the petitioners displayed a large artist's rendering of the proposed project, and advised that the Mobile Home Park Association figures currently showed that mobile home dwel- lers stayed in one location an average of 4.7 years, on a rented space, while regular home owners stayed an average of 4.6 years in one location, Approxi- mately seventy percent of the mobile home dwellers owned their mobile homes. Mr. Knisely noted consultations with the Development Services De- partment staff, in an attempt to achieve a plan acceptable to all. Five acres of the land were devoted to recreational facilities, oriented away from the residential area to the north and east, and he referred to the thirty-foot street and six-foot planted area, which would act as a buffer, along the. north and east property lines. He expressed willingness to in- stall whatever type of walls and screening would be requested, advising that when the grade of the property was lowered, and the park completed, nothing would be visible from the street except the wall. Mr, Knisely furthe~ advised that statistics showed 1.7 persons per unit, in adults-only mobile homes, and pointed out that this would be less density than if the 20 acres were developed R-l. He stated that there had been no R-l construction on the Euclid Street frontage for approximately six years, all construction having been either commercial or multiple-family dwellings, and he described the various existing developments on the street. In conclusion, Mr. Knisely advised that adult parks were trouble- free, and he described the type of mobile homes that would be permitted in the park, pointing out that there would be no streets connecting with resi- dential streets in the area, and no children added to the schools as a result of subject development, Mayor Pro-Tem Schutte asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council in favor of the conditional use permit, there being no response, asked if the opposition had a spokesman. Mr, John F. Rothman, Appellant, 1630 Cris Avenue, speaking on be- half of the 291 citizens who signed petition in opposition to Conditional Use Permit No. 992, submitted to the City Planning Commission, asked for a show of hands of those persons present in opposition. A large majority of those present raised their hands. Relative to the concept involved in this hearing, Mr. Rothman was of the opinion that the proposal was a deviation from the General Plan, with no evidence in support; that the proposed development would establish an un- desirable precedent in the area, and would be detrimental to existing and future development. Mr. Rothman pointed out that in taking action to approve subject permit, the Planning Commission had reversed their action taken in December of 1962, when subject property was determined to be better suited for R-l development, and that a trailer park would adversely affect land values in the area and would be detrimental to the growth and development of the community. He stated that R-l developments proposed for property adjoining an R-l area were not ordinarily required to provide screening and fencing to protect the existing R-l; however, these conditions of concealment were being imposed on subject development; further, he felt no changes had occurred in the area to support the changes in the Planning Commission's attitude, nor had the Plann- ing Study conducted by the City staff shown any substantial changes. 68-106 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 27. 1968. 1:30 P,M. In summarizing the opposition, Mr. Rothman stated that they would welcome single-story, restricted, business and professional offices, however, they would not be opposed to a mobile home park if the density was consistent to that of R.;.1. In answer to Councilman Dutton's question, Mr. Rothman advised that he was familiar with the ,density figures set forth by the Development Services Department staff. l Mayor Pro-Tem Schutte asked if anyone else had new or different evidence to' present, there being no response, asked if the proponent wished to address the Council in rebuttal. Mr. Knisely contrasted the character of Euclid Street in 1961 with the busy thoroughfare it was today, noting that eighty percent was now de- veloped with commercial or multiple-family residential uses. He pointed out that the walls and trees were offered to further improve the property, and was of the opinion that the residents of the proposed park would be high calibre people. Mr. Rothman returned to the stand to state that statistics now available on mobile home population would soon be obsolete, that dwelling unit densities were a factor which could be controlled, as opposed to popu- lation densities, and he requested statistical information from the staff regarding allowable densities for R-l on subject property, stating that if the proponents would reduce their projections to meet these R-l statistics they would no longer object. Mr. Thompson reported that the staff had found subject property would support 61 R-l dwelling units, or 4.4 units per gross 'acre, and 6.08 units per net residential acre; under the R-2, 5,000 zone, 81 dwelling units, or 5.4 units per gross acre, and 8.5 units per net residential acre could be :l., constructed. Mobile homes would be calculated differently as street require- . ments were not the same. Mrs. Phyllis Kopit, 1580 Pacific Place, requested permission to ad- dress the Council, and advised that finance companies had warned that single- family residential values would be reduced if the mobile home park was intro- duced into the neighborhood. She also questioned the difference in taxation. Mr. Aaron Shankman, 1617 South Loara Street, abutting subject pro- perty, pointed out that if an R-l development was placed on subject property, setback requirements would protect existing residential properties, however, these setback protections were not provided for mobile homes. Mayor Pro-Tem Schutte stated that a good cross section of the evidence had been presented, and thereupon declared the public hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-120: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-l20 for adoption, granting subject conditional use permit, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 992, Roll Call Vote: :l AYES: NOES: ABSTAINED: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Schutte None Chandler Pebley None Mayor Pro-Tem Schutte declared Resolution No, 68R-l20 duly passed and adopted, [, . .~' r r 68-107 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 27. 1968. 1:30 P.M. In casting their votes, the following statements were made: Councilman Krein cited the many times subject property had been before the City Council, and it was his understanding that the proposed de- velopment would be managed by responsible people, in a first class manner, Councilman Dutton advised he knew of no single-family residential development along Euclid Street since 1960; that many fine people of his personal acquaintance chose to live in mobile homes. Mayor Pebley returned and resumed chairmanship of the meeting, Councilman Schutte left the meeting, 2:23 P.M. PROPOSED COMPUTER OPERATIONS - CITY OF GARDEN GROVE: Determination on proposed joint computer operations between the cities of Anaheim and Garden Grove was deferred to this date from February 20, 1968, for further study. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, de- termination was continued two weeks, (March 12, 1968), for a more complete analysis and report to include possible participation by other Orange County cities, MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 977: Submitted by Raymond N. Rough, requesting permission to construct a three-story, efficiency apartment building with waivers of building site area per dwelling unit, coverage, building and structure height limitation, yards and building setbacks, off street parking ,requirements and minimum floor area per dwelling unit; R-3 zoned property located on the north side of Glenoaks Avenue, west of Euclid Street. Subsequent to denial 'of subject application by the City Planning Commission, appeal was filed by the petitioner, and public hearing held before the City Council on December 19, 1967, at which time said permit was granted as a hotel, (interim use), pursuant to Resolution No... 67R-692, subject to the following conditions: 1, That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 2. That any air conditioning facilities proposed shall be pro- perly shielded from view and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent resi- dential homes. 3, That any external lighting that may be provided shall be di- rected onto the property, away from abutting parcels. 40 That Conditions Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final Building and Zoning inspections. 5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibits Nos. l, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. 6. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Completion on the prem- ises, the applicant shall process to completion the necessary variance to cover the variation from the Code, for use as an apartment house only. On February 6, 1968, the Council authorized rehearing before the City Council as a result of meeting between the staff of the City Attorney's office and the petitioner. The City Clerk called attention to three letters and a telegram received in opposition to the proposed development, and one letter in favor, all received since February 23, 1968. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property, and the ex- isting uses and zoning in the immediate area. He reported that subject conditional use permit was readvertised as an apartment complex, rather than an apartment-hotel, in order to include the necessary waivers to allow the type of development proposed. Mayor Pebley asked if the applicant or his representative wished to address the City Council. 68-108 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 27. 1968. 1:30 P.M. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing Mr. Rough, advised that the Anaheim Municipal Code did not provide for "Bachelor" type apartments at the time subject petition was filed, therefore, the application was filed as an apartment-hotel. He further advised that the plans had not been changed, that today's hearing was to place the proposed use under the appropriate definition. Plans were reviewed by the City Council and the Mayor asked if any- one wished to address the Council. Mr, William H. Poole, 1738 Glenoaks Avenue, submitted a petition 1 ... .. of opposition containing 59 signatures representing property owners in Gramercy _ Park, or 77% of the individual owners. He advised that it is their attorney's opinion that the proposed apartments would be detrimental to the to~house project. Mr. Poole was of the opinion that the covenants, conditions and restrictions imposed on the town house development were not lived up to, and he requested that the proposed sub-standard development at the entran~e to Gramercy Park be denied. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to be heard, there being no response, asked if the Agent for the petitioner wished to address the Council in rebuttal. Mr. Knisely pointed out that at the last public hearing before the Council, 142 people supported the proposed development, including those im- mediately adjacent to subject property. At that time the permit was granted and construction authorized, today's hearing being held to apply the proper terminology to the development. Mr. Poole returned to the stand to challenge the point that 142 people had previously supported the proposal, being of the opinion that the proponent was referring to the 142 total units in Gramercy Park II and III. He stated that at the Gramercy Park Owners' Association Board of Directors meeting no resolution was authorized in support of the proposed development, nor was any authority given for anyone to represent the owners of these 142 units. He requested that the City Council take sufficient time to investigate the matter, prior to reaching a decision on this issue. Councilman Chandler was of the op1n10n that people moving into the area should be aware of the R-3 zoning, and of what type of development would be likely in an R-3 area. He felt that the proposed apartment complex would be an asset to the Gramercy Park entrance, recognizing, however, that this was a matter of opinion; further, that for some time there had been a need for efficiency-type apartments in this City. Mr. Poole noted that their petition stated, for the record, that they did not object to standard R-3 development; that they did object to the sub-standard "efficiency" apartments. He advised that parking was critical in the area, and the waiver of required off-street parking provisions was being requested for subject property. Mayor Pebley declared the hearing closed. Brief discussion was held by the City Council, and Councilman Dutton stated he had reviewed the minutes of the previous public hearing on subject permit, and it was his understanding that the issue had already been deter- mined and the application brought back on a technicality. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-12l: Councilman Chandler noted that any new innovation has opposition, and he could only try to determine whether a proposal was for something necessary, and whether it would unduly interfere with the neighborhood, and then vote according to his conscience; that the City of Anaheim could not interfere with financial affairs in the existing develop- ments which were a matter of private concern. He thereupon offered Resolution I I I I ~j 1 68-109 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 27. 1968. 1:30 P.M. No. 68R-12l for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 977 as an apartment couplex, subject to the conditions, as previously~ranted by the City Council. n Mrs. Helen M. Anderson, 1770 West Gl~noaks Avenue, requested per- mission to address the Council on behalf of a number of property owners, and inquired why there had been no notice of this public hearing forwarded to the property owners. She noted that the notice posted on the property had been missing since February 15, 1968, and she concurred with previous statements made by Mr. Poole. Mr. Poole stated he had received no legal notice of the hearing, Mr. J.W. Stone, 1743 West Greenleaf Avenue, advised that he had received no notice of the hearing. The City Attorney advised that the only notice required by law was the posting of the property and legal advertising of the public hearing. In answer to question by Mr. John Estey, 1764 West Greenleaf Ave- nue, the City Clerk reported that the Conditional Use Permit was granted as a hotel at the first Council public hearing, December 19, 1967. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 977. Roll Call Vote: n AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Chandler and Pebley None Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-12l duly passed and adopted, PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 58-59-65 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 998): Initiated by the City Planning Commission, proposing deletion of deed re- strictions which presently limit the use of the property to certain speci- fied uses; C-~ zoned property located at the southwest corner of La Palma Avenue and West Street. Pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-34, the City Planning Commission recommended the execution of a written consent to the Amendment of Deed Restrictions heretofore imposed on subject property, to add "hospitals" as a permitted use. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the exist- ing uses and zoning in the immediate area, advising that Conditional Use Permit No. 998 was approved by the Planning Commission to permit the Hillhaven Convalescent Hospital as a hospital annex for mUL'ulatory patients requiring minimal care; no action being taken by the City Council. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, for or against the proposed amendment to deed restrictions, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. n RESOLUTION NO. 68R-122: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-122 for adoption, authorizing Amendment of Deed.Restrictions imposed in Ordi- nance No. 1422, to include "hospitals" as a permitted use. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONSENTING TO THE AMENDMENT OF THE C-l DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS RECORDED NOVEMBER l2, 1959, IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 58-59-65. Roll Call Vote: 68-110 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 27. 1968. 1:30 P.M. AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT : COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Chandler and Pebley None Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-122 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-48 (TENTATIVE TRACT NOS. 5389 AND l',:,...... 5623): Submitted by William and Francis Dowling, requesting a change of zone from .: R-A to R-2, 5,000; property briefly described as located on the east side of Kraemer Boulevard, between Crowther and Orangethorpe Avenues. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-36, recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following con- dition: 1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the exist- ing uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He called attention to Reclassification Nos. 62-63-112, R-3 zoning previously approved for subject property, and recommended by the City Planning Commission for termination of all proceedings, (City Council action deferred from the meeting of February 20, 1968). Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, for or against the proposed R-2, 5,000 zoning, there being no response, de- clared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-123: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-123 for l adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone I, : as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. J Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- INGTHAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED: (67-68-48, R-2, 5,000). Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Chandler and Pebley None Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-123 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP. TRACTS NOS. 5389. REVISION NO.3. AND 5623. REVISION NO.4: Developer, R.A. Watt Company; tracts located at the northeast corner of Kraemer (Dowling) Boulevard and Orangethorpe Avenue, and proposed for sub- division into a total of l59,R-2, 5,000, one-family zoned lots. lENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5389. REVISION NO.3: Containing 14 acres, proposed for 83, R-2, 5,000 zoned lots. The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held January 29, 1968, approved said Tentative Map, subject to the following conditions: l 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 5389, Revision No.3, is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 67-68-48. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 68-111 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 27. 1968. 1:30 P.M. n 3. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings to Orangethorpe Avenue and Kraemer Boulevard, shall be dedi- cated to the City of Anaheim, 4. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the south property line separating Lot Nos. 1 through 14 and 77 through 83 from Orangethorpe Avenue, and on the west pro- perty line separating Lot Nos. 69 through 76 from Kraemer Boulevard. Reason- able landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the ap- proval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for main- tenance of said landscaping. 5. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utili ties. 6. That Tract No. 5389, Revision No.3, shall be developed prior to the development of Tract No. 5623, Revision No.4, in order that ade- quate drainage of subject property may be assured. 7. That Streets "A" and "F" shall be named Landfair Street; that Street "c" shall be named Rutherford Street;.that Street "E" shall be named Kent Street; that Street "G" shall be named Sheffield Street; that Street "H" shall be named Oxford Street; and that Street "B" shall be named Radcliffe Avenue. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 5623. REVISION NO.4: Containing approximately 13 acres and proposed for 76, R-2, 5,000 zoned lots. The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held January 29, 1968, approved said Tentative Map, subject to the following conditions: n 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 5623, Revision No.4, is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 67-68-48. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub- division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings to Crowther Avenue and Kraemer Boulevard, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 4. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the north property line separating Lot Nos. 6, 7, and 19 through 36 from Crowther Avenue and on the west property line separ- ating Lot Nos. 37 through 45 from Kraemer Boulevard, except that the walls for corner Lot Nos. 6 and 7 shall be stepped down to a height of 30 inches in the front yard setback, and except that pedestrian openings shall be provided in said walls where cul-de-sacs abut the planned highways right-of-way line of an arterial highway. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 5. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 6. That Tract No. 5389, Revision No.3, shall be developed prior to the development of Tract No. 5623, Revision No.4, in order that adequate drainage of subject property may be assured. 7. That Street "c" shall be named Rutherford Street; that Street "D" shall be named Lancaster Avenue; that Street "E" shall be named Kent Street; that Street "F" shall be named Landfair Street; that Street "G" shall be named Sheffield Street; and that Street "H" shall be named Oxford Street. I Councilman Dutton moved that Tentative Map Tracts Nos. 5389, Re- V1Slon No.3, and 5623, Revision No.4, be approved, subject to the recom- mendations of the City Planning Commission. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 68-ll2 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 27. 1968. 1:30 P.M. TERMINATION OF PROCEEDINGS - RECLASSIFICATION NOS. 62-63-112 and 64-65-86: VARIANCE NO. 1682. and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO:,794: On the recommendations of the Zoning Supervisor, termination of all proceedings on Reclassification Nos. 62-63-112 and 64-65-86, Variance No. 1682, and Conditional Use Permit No. 794, was authorized, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDONMENT: Public Hearing was held on proposed abandonment of 'l.....- road and public utility easement, extending northeasterly from State College . Boulevard along the northwest side of Placentia Avenue; pursuant to Resolu- tion No. 68R-84, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin, February 15, 1968, and notices thereof posted in accordan~ewith law. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-124: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-124 for, adoption, approving Abandonment No. 67-9A, as recommended by the City Engineer. Refer to, Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS AND ALONG THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; AND RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS A PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY. (Abandonment No. 67-9A; Northeast Corner State College Boulevard and Placentia Avenue.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORATILY ABSENT: ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Chandler and Pebley None Schutte None COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN~ COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-124 duly passed and adopted. AMUSEMENT MACHINE PERMITS: The following applications for amusement devices permits were submitted and granted, subject 'to provisions of Chapter 3.24 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler: A. Application submitted by A & E Music and Games to permit flipper- type amusement games at Family Recreation, 641 North Euclid Street. B. Application submitted by Darrell S. Pierson to permit an I.Q. Computer Machine at Anaheim Bowl, 1925 West Lincoln Avenue. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP - TRACT NO. 4567: Developer, Lusk Corporation of Whittier; tract located on the east side of Nohl Canyon Road, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road, and con- tains 34 proposed R-l zoned lots. The City Engineer reported that Final Map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved; that bond has been posted and approved by the City Attorney, and required fees paid, and he recommended approval thereof. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein moved Final Map, Tract No. 4567, be approved. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP - TRACT NO. 6496: Developer, Sunrise Homes of Santa Ana; tract located on the east side of Sunkist Street, l,OOO feet north of Ball Road, and con- tains 39 proposed R-l zoned lots. l l r ~ n n 68-113 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 27. 1968. 1:30 P.M. The City Engineer re,orted said Final Map substantially conformed with the tentative map previously approved; bond has been posted and approved by the City Attorney, and required fees paid, and he recommended approval thereof, On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein moved Final Map, Tract No. 6496 be approved. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2486: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2486 as an Urgency Ordinance for adoption. Said ordinance was read in full. Refer to Ordinance Baok.' . AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Sunkist Annexation). Roll Call Vote: AYES: NO ES : TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT : COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Chandler and Pebley None Schutte None ~ The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2486 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION No. 68R-125 - WORK ORDER NO. 226: Councilman Chandler offered Reso- lution No. 68R-125 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDI~G AND DETERMIN- ING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COM- PLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF PORTIONS OF EMPIRE AND NUTWOOD STREETS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 226, APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUB- LISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened March 21, 1968, 2:00 P.M.). Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Chandler and Pebley None Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-125 duly passed and adopted. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Nos. 68R-126 to 68R-132, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-l26: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Ray R. and Jessie B. Fuller). RESOLUTION NO. 68R-l27: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (James G. and Dorothy M. Jonah). 68 -114 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 27. 1968. 1930 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-128g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A WATER METER. (Emhart Corporation). RESOLUTION NO. 68R-129: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR CROSSARMS AND ELECTRIC POWER LINE PUR- POSES. (Charles A. and Sarah F. Pearson). RESOLUTION NO. 68R-130: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Anaheim School District of Orange County). RESOLUTION NO. 68R-lllg A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY .COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Albert T. and Alice T. Sugano). ~ RESOLUTION NO. 68R-l32g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR. ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPoSES. (Johnnie J. and Shurla B. Turek). . Roll Call Voteg AYES g NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMENg COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Chandler and Pebley None Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 68R-126 to 68R-l32, both inclu- sive, duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-133: On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 68R-133 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE NECES- SITY FOR, AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, OF REAL PROPERTY FOR HIGHWAY EASEMENT AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Dale Avenue Widening.) Roll Call Vote: AYESg NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Chandler and Pebley None Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-133 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids re- ceived for the purchase of one l,OOO KVA and one l,500 KVA, 3-phase, Pad- mounted Transformers, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid, that of General Electric Company, Los Angeles: General Electric Company, Los Angeles, - - - - - - - -$14,785.05, Parks & Company, Long Beach - - - - - - - - - - - - - -14,789.25, Garland-Affolter, Los Angeles - - - - - - - - - - - - -15,183.00, McGraw-Edison, Pico-Rivera - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15,556.80, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Los Angeles - - - - 16,247.70, Wagner Electric, El Segundo - - - - - - - - - - - -17,257.80, Including Tax. " " " II II " II " II " On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Chandler moved that the low bid of General Electric Company be accepted, and purchase authorized in the amount of $14,785.05, including tax. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. l l J l I 68-115 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 27. 1968. 1:30 P.M. PURCHASE OF GASOLINE: Mr. Davis advised that the County of Orange contract with Union Oil Company, for purchase of gasoline, has been renewed for one year, at the following rate: n Premium 200-300 gals. @ .221 400 gals. or more @ .2ll 5,000 gals. or more @ .2025 Regular 200-399 gals. @ .2002 400 gals. or more @ .1902 5,000 gals. or more @ .1782 On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager and the Pur- chasing Agent, Councilman Chandler moved that the City of Anaheim continue purchases of annua1~gasoline required under the Orange County Contract. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim submitted by Mr.V.A. Harris, for damages purpor- tedly resulting from improper termination of electrical service on or about January, 26, 19~8, was denied, as recommended by the City Attorney and ordered referred to the insurance agent, 'on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRiED. ORDINANCE NO. 2485: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2485 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS FIRE STATION NO. 7 ANNEXA- TION. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: ABSENT: COUNCIlMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Chandler and Pebley None Schutte None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2485 duly passed and adopted. LINCOLN-KNOTT ANNEXATION: Resolution No. 68-2 of the Local Agency Formation Commission, disapproving annexation to the City of Anaheim, designated as the Lincoln-Knott Annexation, was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein: 68-191 - per year a. Costa Mesa Sanitary District Board of Directors Resolution No. urging the County Disposal Facilities to remain open on a 365-day basis. b. Minutes - Anaheim Parks & Recreation Commission - Meeting of 8, 1968. c. Financial & Operating Reports for the month of January, 1968. February I MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Schutte returned to the meeting, 3:20 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 2487: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2487 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-36 - C-l). 68-116 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 27. 1968. l:30 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 2488~ Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2488 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-46 - C-l). ORDINANCE NO. 2489: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2489 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL l.... CODE RELATING TO ZONINGo (63-64-54 - R-3). . ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following Alcoholic Beverage License applications were presented by the Assistant City Manager to the City Council, for their information: a. Application submitted by Vela India and Herbert Jack Mateas, for Person-to-Person transfer of Off-Sale Beer and Wine License, at Mateas Market, 926 East Broadway. (R-2 zone, non-conforming use). b. Application submitted by Waltraut Zawodniak, J~ns-Juergen Zawodniak, Manfred Otto Zawodniak, for New On-Sale Beer License, at the Red Lion Inn, 120 East Lincoln Avenue, (C-2 zone). c. Application submitted by Marvin Norwood Liles, for Off-Sale Beer and Wine License, at M & M Market, 500 South Citron Street, (R-O Zone, Variance No. 1637). d. Application submitted by Paul Kirk Taber, William Edward Burns, Frank Brown Grant, and Raymond Glen Winsor, for Club License, at Fraternal Order of Eagles, Aerie No. 3322, 133\ North Anaheim Boulevard, (C-2 zone). e. Application submitted by Raymond Hoover Dancy, for Person-to- Person Transfer of On-Sale Beer License, at the Wishing Well, 1007 East Balsam Street, (C-O zone; C.U.P. No. 259). No Council action was taken on the foregoing applications. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by Barbara Jean and Duane Hartford Hess and Dolores Ann and Norman James Olson, for Person-to- Person and Premises-to-Premises Transfer of On-Sale General License, (Bona Fide Public Eating Place), for Duane's Pirate Cavern, 1031 North Euclid Street, (C-l zone - Conditional Use Permit No. 149, Beer and Wine), was presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information. l ) On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, the City Attorney was authorized to file conditional protest with Alcoholic Bev- erage Control Board against said application, on the basis of zoning. MOTION CARRIED. POLICY OF THE CITY COUNCIL - ART OBJECT DISPLAYS ON CITY PROPERTY: On report and recommendation of the Director of Parks and Recreation, it was moved by Coun- cilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte, that the following policy of the City Council be adopted. MOTION CARRIED: POLICY ON THE DISPLAY OF PRIVATELY OWNED ART OBJECTS ON CITY PROPERTY: DEFINITIONS: ART OBJECTS - Those objects which are usually classified as sculpture, ceramics, jewelry, paintings or other articles such as antiques which may be classified as art. ON LOAN - Designates any art object which is offered by one or more individuals ~~m:~OUPs for display on City property for an agreed upon specified period of l. RESPONSIBILITY - A hold harmless agreement will be required from the owner be- fore display. DISPLAY - The location of the display and the manner in which it is to be hung or shown must be approved by the City. The actual hanging and/or arrangement of the art objects is the responsibility of the owner or a designated represen- tative. r r I I , , n l 68-ll7 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES = Februarv 27. 1968. 1~30 P.M. SELECTION OF ART~ The approval of individual or group art object displays and the presenta- tion are the responsibility of the City Department upon whose facilities the presentation appears, subject to the definitions above and general rules covering such displays. If the Department desires a recommendation in determining the appropriate- ness of such a display before it is set up or after, it may refer the decis- ion to the Anaheim Art Display Advisory Committee for recommendations. GENERAL RULES GOVERNING ART OBJECT DISPLAYS~ 1. Privately owned art objects which are displayed on City property are to be presented for a specified period of time and may not be removed by the owner for the duration. Under certain circumstances the City reserves the right to have it removed. 2. No sale of such objects may be culminated on City property. No marking on the object to indicate sale price is permitted. The object may be iden- tified with the name of the artist and/or owner. 3. The Department upon whose facilities the display occurs may provide viewers a list of the objects and the owner's address. IF ART DISPLAY IS IN QUESTION~ If the appropriateness of any potential collection or single art object is in question~ it may be referred to the Anaheim Art Display Advisory Committee for recommendation to the City Council whose decision will be final. MEMBERSHIP OF THE ANAHEIM ART DISPLAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE: The Committee shall be appointed by the City Council as follows: 1 member recommended by the Anaheim Art Association. 1 member recommended by the Women's Division of the Chamber of Commerce. 1 member recommended by the Anaheim Schools. These three recommend two additional members, one of which shall be from an art department of an Orange County college or university. The other to be recommended at large. All members shall serve for a period of four years on an overlapping term basis. The Cultural Arts Supervisor of the Park and Recreation Department shall act as Secretary and be an ex-officio member of the committee, RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COMMITTEE: It shall be the responsibility of this Committee to review any art object upon request and recommend on the appropriateness thereof for display on City facilities; to promote display of art on City facilities and if any art object or display is determined to be objectionable, to recommend its immediate removal to the appropriate department head and to the City Council. WAIVER OF LICENSE FEES - JUNIOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE COMMUNITY FAIR~ Request of Anaheim Junior Chamber of Commerce, received February 26, 1968, for waiver of all licenses and fees for l2-ride carnival, and game booths sponsored by community service organizations, at the annual Community Fair, February 28, 29, and March 1, 2, and 3, 1968, at the corner of Euclid Street and Katella Avenue, was submitted and approved in accordance with City Council Policy No. 305, on motion by Councilman Krein~ seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST - TEMPORARY PARKING ON CITY-OWNED PROPERTY~ Mr. Davis reported on re- quest received for approximately 90-day temporary use of the oiled portion of the Convention Center parking lot by construction workers during the per- iod the Holiday Inn Motel is in construction on the east side of Harbor Boulevard. He advised that they have agreed to park elsewhere during any time that the parking was needed by the City. At the conclusion of brief Council discussion, no action was taken by the City Council, it being determined that said request could be handled administratively, 68-ll8 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 27. 1968. 1:30 P.M. WAIVER OF BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS - ANAHEIM STADIUM: The City Council, on , February 6, 1968, discussed waiver of Building Code requirements pertaining to rail height to allow three to five-inch lowering of guard rails at Anaheim Stadium, at which time it was determined that approval of said waiver be sub- ject to approval by the City Manager and in compliance with State Building Code Regulations. On report by Mr. Davis that the City Attorney's i~ve~tigation showed l... that the State Code would allow lowering of the guard r~ils ~t the, view level between the first and third-base, lines, as proposed, Coun~ilma~ Kre~n moved that the alteration be approved. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CITIZENS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE: The Assistant City Manager reported that the following persons had volunteered to serve on the Capital Improvements Committee: Daniel Mac Lean, Arthur Tiffany, Loretta Harvey. Councilman Dutton suggested Mr. Tom Hoag, be appointed to the Public Buildings Sub-committee. Addition of the foregoing members to the Capital Improvements Com- mittee was approved by the City Council, on motion by Councilman Dutton, secon- ded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. ACTING CITY MANAGER - JOHN HARDING: On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Krein moved that the City Manager's appointment of John Harding, as Acting City Manager, from February 28 to March 2, 1968, be rati- fied. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PROJECT NO. 153 - RETURN OF BONDS: Pursuant to request of James M. Christensen, of Industrial Indemnity Company, the City Council authorized return of Faith- ful Performance Bond and Labor and Material Bond Nos. YS-028078, each in the amount of $17,924.50, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. l PERMISSION TO LEAVE THE STATE: On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Coun- cilman Krein, Mayor Pebley was granted permission to leave the State for a period of three days, (March 1 to 3, 1968). MOTION CARRIED. CONVENTION CENTER DEDICATION COMMI'ITEE: As Chairman of the Anaheim Convention Center Dedication Committee, Councilman Dutton requested an expression of the City Council as to their preference of the manner in which plaques of appreciation would be presented to members of said committee. Council discussion was held and Councilman Schutte suggested in- viting the recipients to a Council meeting for the presentation. Councilman Chandler called attention to the fact that many people gave of their time and talents toward the development of Anaheim Stadium and of the Convention Center, being of the opinion that some sort of luncheon or dinner meeting should be held, honoring not only the Dedication Committee, but the former Stadium Commission and Non-Profit Corporation, the Joint Author- ities Committee, etc. At the conclusion of the discussion, it was determined that Council- l:,. man Dutton would take the responsibility for presenting plaques to the members of the Convention Center Dedication Committee. ADJOURNMENT: motion. Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Chandler seconded the ADJOURNED: 3:55 P.M. SIGNED flL )X, )~~....J City Clerk