Loading...
1968/06/11 I I r 68-309 Citv Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 5. 1968. 1:30 P.M. Councilman Dutton questioned the Council's action, and noted pos- sible litigation, due to the fact that in each instance Councilman Schutte voted before the vote became tied. Councilman Dutton thereupon read excerpts from papers prepared for the City Attorney, Division of tl1e League of California -Cities, as duplicated for each Councilman, covering briefly the following: 1. Paper presented by Robert Costello, City Attorney of Redwood City, on "An Analysis of Conflict of Interest - Statutes Adopted by the 1963 Legislature," relative to a non-contractual matter, wherein prosecution may result under certain sections of the Government Code and Penal Code. 2. "Ethics in Public Life," statements of former President Herbert Hoover. 3. Synopsis of specific cases where participation was ruled a conflict of interest, and where participation was required. 4. Description of "Personal Interest," as contained in the Palo Alto-Code. Councilman Dutton advised that in reading the contents of the pa- pers submitted, in his opinion, Councilman Schutte's participation in sub. ject zoning case was misconduct in office. He further stated that he would have preferred to have the case referred back to the City Planning Commis- sion, in that the City Council operated on a basis different from that of the City Planning Commission. Discussion was held, and Mr. Geisler noted that in none of the papers presented is there legislation on a specific case law on disqualifi- cation, except as it refers to contracts. Further, should the action be contested, proof that the action was contrary to the public interest would be required. He noted that the action taken by the City Council was as recommended. by the'City Planning Commission, and in his opinion, it could be defended as legal. Councilman Dutton felt there should be an amendment to the Charter, to clarify this point, or an ordinance enacted setting forth clearly when a conflict of interest exists and does not exist. Councilman Dutton further reported onv::"r:ious statements permitted by Coun,~:t:'_nlen,. w::. th complete immunity, and. 'felt that rather than making d~ging insinuations about a fellow Councilman, if it were felt certain con- ditions were facts they should be referred to the District Attorney. Councilman Clark concurred with the recommendation than an ordin- ance be enacted to clarify this situation beyond any doubt, so that there would never be e recurrence of a similar incident. PROPOSED BUDGET. 1968-69: On motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Dutton, public hearing was scheduled on the proposed'r'D~' .June 18, 1968, 1: 30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. VISITOR ANp CONVENTION BUREAU DIRECTOR: Mr. Murdoch reported that costs for re- cruitment for a_Director for the Visitor and Convention Bureau by a consult- ing firm to be $10,000.00. As the estimated cost was considered excessive, the City Personnel Department was authorized to proceed with recruitment, as recommended by the City Manager. ADJoUllOlENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn. 'Counci1man Schutte seconded ehe motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:55 P.M.) SIGNED' J!(- ,- "he. ~.! l" ....- City Clerk _ 68-310 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MIBUTIS - June 11. 1968. 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ZONI~G SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson Mayor Pebley dllled the, ,..,et:iC' t~:()rder. UWOCAnON: Reverend Alfre2'- .....!!, of the First Baptist Church, gave the Invocation. ,. J FLAG SALUT,: Councilman Krein led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Pebley proclaimed "Angel Booster Day" at Anaheim Stadium, June l4, 1968. IIITRODUCTION - NEW EMPLOYEES: Mr. Da,?id Hill, of the City Personnel Depart- .ent, introduced new employees attending the Council meeting as a part of the City's orientation program. Mayor Pebley welcomed the new employees to the City family. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held May 14, 1968, were ap- proved on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER. OF RlADIIG - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Schutte moved to waive l the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to . the waiver of reading is hereby given by a11Councilm.en, unless after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. 1<<)TION UNAlfi1<<)USLY CARRI ED. REPORT - r At DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY. Demands against the City in the amount of $34 ,924.93, in accordance with the 1967-68 Budget, were approved. CONTI~D PUBLIC HEARING - iECLASSIFlCATION NO. 67-68-67 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1019: Submitted by' Edward and Vivian Simoneaux, Ephrem and Rose A. Laplante, and Emily E. O'Keefe, requesting a change in zone from R-1 to C-1 and per- mission to establish an automobile service station within 75 feet of a resi- dential zone, with waivers of maximum building height within 150 feet of a single-family residential zone, and maximum permitted sign height. Property described as those lots fronting on the east side of Magnolia Avenue between Crescent Avenue and Glencrest Avenue, and further described as 604, 608, and 612 North Magnolia Avenue. ~, Public hearing was continued from the meeting of May 7, 1968, at the request of the applicant. Communication dated June 6, 1968 from George L. Argyros and E. Lee Schult~, was submitted, requesting an additional two weeks continuance of subject hearing to redesign plans, as recommended by the City Engineer. n On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte, pub- lic hearing was further continued to June 25, 1968, 1:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFIC4TIONNO. 67-68-42. CONDITJg~ USE PERMIT NO. 988. AND VARIANCE NO.l935: Submitted by Dick Ables, Leonard Saith and Frank Clayton, Jr., requesting a change of zone from R-l to C-l and permission to establish a service station within 75 feet of a residential zone (Portion No. 1 only) and permission to erect two free-standing signs with waiver of minimum distance permi~ted be- tween free-standing signs (Portion Nos. 1 and 2). Property located on the east side of Euclid Street between Cerritos Avenue and Hells Lane. r r n 68-311 City Ball. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES ~ June ll. 1968. 1:30 P.M. Public Hearing was held January 30, 1968 and continued to April 30 and May 14, 1968, at which time public hearing was closed and decision continued to this date. Communication dated June 6, 1968, from Harry S. Rinker, authorized agent, wassubmitted requesting decision be further continued two weeks~ in- asmuch as petitioners would be- unable to be present. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, decision on this matter was furth~r continued to June 25, 1968, 1:30 P.M. KYrION CARRIED. JITNEY BUS SERVICES: Council consideration of proposals and requests for permits to operate jitney services continued to this date to allow Council review of projected routes, fares and other pertinent data: a. Taylor School Bus Service (Continued from April 2 and April 16, 1968.) b. Yellow Cab Company (Continued from April 2 and April l6, 1968.) c. Valen Parking Management Company (Continued from April 23, 1968.) d. Anaheim Jitney Systems, Inc. (Continued from March 19 and April 16, 1968.) Councilman Clark briefed the Council on meetings he. and the City Manager held with each of the applicants, stating that he felt that estab- lished jitney routes should be continued and that the permit should be granted to someone who could guarantee their continuance. Further, Council- man Clark felt that the Valen proposal for a luxury night club tour should be considered by the Council, as this proposed service would not be in com~ petition with the existing jitney routes, but would complement them. He suggested the City of Anaheim and Anaheim Chamber of Commerce publicnze jitney routes and schedules in newspapers and at stops around the City, similar to the practice followed successfully by the City of Ing1ewood. With the aid of a map posted on the east wall of the Council Chamber, City Manager, Keith Murdoch, outlined presently established Rapid Transit District bus routes, including the Flyer Service route to begin June 16, 1968; and the three Anaheim Jitney Systems ro~tes, two of which are presently in operation. Rapid Transit District routes were shown to offer one-half hour interval service; jitney routes, one hour interval ser- vice. Mayor Pebley invited representatives from each company submitt~ng proposals to .address the City Council. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT: At Councilman Clark's request, Mr. Howard Beardsley, Superintendent of Southern California Rapid Transit District Planning Department, first briefed the City Council on the new Flyer service beginning June 16, 1968, for which the company purchased a fleet of air conditioned buses which will offer non-stop service from Los Angeles via the Santa Ana Freeway to Buena Park, Knott's Berry Farm, Stanton, Anaheim, Anaheim Convention Center and Disneyland; then continue via the Santa Ana Freeway south to Santa Ana. He noted the service would be in operation seven days per week, 8:00 A.M. to Midnight, and would augment service presently provided by Line 58. Mr. Beardsley distributed maps and timetables to members of the City Council, and pointed out the connecting features provided for patrons coming from outside the area. He called the .Counci1's attention to a bro- chure from the City of Inglewood containing route and s'chedule information, and strongly recommended consideration of this idea for the City of Anaheim. In answer to Councilman Schutte's question, Mr. Beardsley stated that six buses would be in the Flyer operation, and a total of 18 or 19 would be used to service this area. 68-312 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTBS - June 11. 1968. 1:30 P.M. TAYLOR SCHOOL BUS SERVICE: Mr. Ernest Rose, representing Taylor School Bus Service, briefly outlined the experience and qualifications which would en- able them to provide efficient service. His proposal was to operate two- story buses, in view of the planned International Theme for the downtoWn area. In answer to questions from the City Council and City Manager, Mr. Rose indicated operations would be along whatever routes and with as much equipment necessary for a successful operation, and that twenty buses would be available from London as soon as they could be converted to a left-hand drive. These b~a~ would not be air conditioned. ~~.. '1 In conclusion, Mr. Rose stated their proposed service would not conflict with Rapid Transit District service as the routes would be differ- ent. Further, they would operate on a fixed schedule, rather than an un- scheduled basis. YJLLDW CAB COMPANY: Mr. Ed Slagle, representing Yellow Cab Company, proposed operating a Jitney service over three routes, as yet unspecified, utilizing transit type bus equipmen~. He did not feel that there was a neBu for two jitney systems in the City. In answer to Council questions, Mr. Slagle re- plied that specific routes were best adopted after a short period of opera- tion, but the routes they would establish would basically serve the same area as the present routes. He .felt that sollie of the runs could be operated at a profit, but doubted whether the downtown run would ever show a p~flt. V~~NG MANAGBHENT COMPANY: Mr. Mike Valen, of Valen Parking Manage- ment.. . any, outlined the proposal of the Town Tour Company to provide a tour service which would not be designed as a transit system for local resi- dents, but rather as a tour service for hotel and motel guests who want to visit entertainment and dining establishments. He felt that this service would not be in competition with a local transit system. Mr. Va1en distributed a fact sheet to the members of the City Coun- cil and briefly outlined the major points. The equipment, which could also be used in charter operations to Anaheim Stadium and Convention Center, were described as deluxe minibus units. Features included tape music systems, air conditioning, and carpeting. Pictures of the inside of the buses were dis- played, as well as renderings of the exteriors. l In answer to Council queries, Mr. Va1en indicated tours would be scheduled mainly during evening hours, 6:00 P.M. to 2:30 A.M., at eventual lO-minute intervals. Charge would be $1.00 for a ticket book, with no extra charge for reboarding after stops. The service would start with two buses, and increased as needed. He outlined two proposed routes, and explained that the bus would not stop to pick up people along the prescribed routes; it would only carry subscribers to the tour. To Mr. Lee Vaughan, operator of Brook Restaurant, 1233 South Brook- hurst, Mr. Valen replied that service could be extended to outlying areas if the need existed, and the service contracted accordingly. Mr. Dardeen, President of Minibus Company, addressed the Council, calling attention to the fact that tour services such as the one proposed by Mr. Valen are currently operating in Los Angeles, California, St. Louis, Mis- ~~~~~~.and that the Tanner Gray Line Company has offered this service in many ~ Mr. Dennis Menke, Attorney, representing Va1en Parking Management Company, spoke in favor of the proposal, advising that the equipment has been ordered, and should be available July 5th for operation by July 15, 1968. Councilman Dutton requested an opinion from the City Attorney on the question of what types of transportation operations would require a per- mit from the City. n n , ' n 68-313 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES.- June 11. 1968. 1:30 P.M. , City Attorney, Joseph Geisler, advised that any vehicle for hire is covered under either the transportation ordinance. or. the taxi cab ordi- nance; that when the contract service is with a passenger it is a convey- ance and a service to the public and would require a permit. He further advised that a hotel offering transportation to guests as a service at no charge, or a company contracting with hotels only would not be a transpor- tation service to the pub,lic, it would be a transportation service to the hotel. ANAHEIM JITNEY SYSTEMS. INCORPORATED: Mr. Harry Knisely, representing Anaheim Jitney Systems, advised that the issue before the City Council was the granting of a permanent permit for the system currently in service. He gave a brief history of the. operation and indicated that the company is now showing a profit, even though the downtown route is operating at a loss, and it was their intention to expand routes and service as the demand is apparent. He noted further that their operation presently serves the Disneyland and Knott's Berry Farm areas, the only routes at the present time showing a profit. Mr. Tom Jaeger, Anaheim Jitney Systems, described the routes and' timetables of the three lines currently in operation. Mr. Jaeger and Mr. Knisely both expressed opposition to the night tour proposal on the basis that the existing service can be expanded to meet the demand as it arises; that the jitney operates four vehicles and one'back-up bus daily until mld- nigpt. Mr. Knisely questioned the need for the service proposed by Mr. Va1en, as the Yellow Cab operates twenty-four hours daily. In answer to Councilman Schutte, the City Attorney advised that according to City ordinance, fares must be approved by the City Council at. the time a franchise or permit is granted and cannot be changed without Council permission. Following Council discussion of rates, Mayor Pebley asked if the same routes operating at present would be followed or if they would be ex- panded should the City Council gra~t an additional one-year temporary per- mit. Mr. Knisely responded that it was his understanding that a temporary permit is granted for purposes of experimenting with routes and rates, and a permanent permit would cover particular routes. and rates. He stated that the company wants to expand, and such expansion is within the present frame- work. He questioned whether a one-year extension would be sufficient time. Councilman Dutton wished to have additional time before granting a permanent franchise to further study the report in order to determine whether these routes were meeting the existing demand. In answer to Councilman Clark, following Council discussion, Mr. Jaeger replied that posting schedules at regular stops along the routes would help the operation tremendously, and that if the City would provide the signs, he would post them himself. He felt that the 50~ rate currently in effect should not be raised and stated that increased validation by mer- chants would .be advantageous. He stated that additional support in this respect would be preferable to a subsidy. MOTION: At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Krein moved that the temporary permit be extended for one year from July 1, 1968, under the same terms and conditions, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Dutton asked if there was an dissatisfaction expressed by the public since jitney operations resumed, and was advised by the City Manager that there were none but minor ones from users of the cancelled route; that generally service was described as good. Councilman Clark suggested that the Rapid Transit District sched- ules also be posted, particularly in the area previously served by a jitney route. Councilman Clark moved that the City accept the Night Club Tour as outlined by Mr. Va1en. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. 68-314 City Hall. Anahei.. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 11. 1968. 1:30 P.M. Discussion was held prior to vote on the above motion. At the con- clusion thereof, said motion and second were withdrawn, as additional time was requested by Councilmen Pebley, Dutton and Krein to further investigate the following: (a) (b) Mr. Valen. (c) Costs and amount of the fare. Study of additional information presented at this meeting by The hotels' position and reaction relative to the proposed service. Councilman Krein moved to continue consideration of the tour bus proposal for two weeks, (June 25th), for further study. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. K>TION CARRIED. Mr. Valen was requested to furnish additional information, as out- lined in his presentation. AMUS~T DIYICE PERMIT: Application filed by George William Craven, dba George's Vendini, requesting permission to install amusement devices at Family Hofbrau, 1652 West Lincoln Avenue, was submitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chapter 3.24 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. lC)TION CAIUlIED. .i~ , DINNER DANCING PLACE PERMIT: Application filed by Leehman H. Vaughan, to allow dinner dancing at The Brook, 1233 South Brookhurst, was submitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recom- mended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. K>TION CARRIED. REQUEST - PJRMlSSION to USE TRAILER: Request of Robert Martin, Percy H. Goodwin Compan,~ to install a trailer at 2535 West Lincoln Avenue, for security rea- sons, to be used by a gardener who will also act as a security guard was de- nied, pursuant to recommendation of Development Services Division, on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST - OUTDOOR FLOWER SALES: Request by Federal Sign and Signal Corporation, for petmissioQ. to establish a "Thot'fu11 Stop Flowers" Kiosk on the parking lot of the Ba1l/Brookhurst Shopping Center, for display andse'le'.o.f. flowers was submitted. Report of the Development Services Department was read by the City Clerk, recommending denial of said request. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone present would like to address the City Council. Mr. Roger Leach, Vice President, Thot'full Stop Flowers, displayed a model of the Kiosk which he proposed to install, and gave a brief background of his company and its operation. He explained that the low. overhead allowed lower costs for flowers and plants to the public, and that such a service is not now available in that shopping center; he also felt that the colorful dis- play would be an asset to the parking area. In the ensuing Council discussion, it was pointed out that such an operation is in conflict with existing zoning ordinances. Zoning Supervisor, Ronald Thompson, indicated that similar opera- tions in the Disneyland Hotel complex were approved on the basis that it was a part of the complex and not out on the parking area. In light of the foregoing discussion, the matter was referred to the Planning staff for their recommendation to the City Planning Commission and Council, relative to an amendment to the existing ordinance regulating this activity. D n D r n n 68-315 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINutES - June 11. 1968. 1:30 P.M. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held May 20, 1968, pertaining to the following applica- tions, were submitted'for City Council information and consideration: CONDITION!:.::" USE PERMIT NO. 1027: Submitted by Kjell H. Qva1e, requesting permission to establIsh a golf driving range and pitch and putt golf facil- ity; M-1 zoned property, located on the west side of Anaheim Boulevard, on the east side of Santa Ana Freeway, south of Midway Drive. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68- 135, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. l030: Submitted by Dr. Eldon Skolil, requesting permission to install and automatic car wash; C-l zoned property, located at 1211 South Dale Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No.PC68-l36, denied said conditional use permit. VARIANCE NO. 1978: Initiated by the City Planning Commission, requesting 'waivers of minimum lot area, minimum lot width and minimum front yard set- back. R-A zoned property, located at the northeast corner of Dale Avenue and Broadway. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution ~o. PC68.13l, granted said variance. VARIANCE NO. 1982: Submitted by Texa~o, Incorporated, requesting permission to allow the outdoor storage of rental trucks; C-l zqned property, ~ocated at .100 South Brookhurst Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l33, denied said variance. VARIANCE NO. 1983: Submitted by Texaco, Incorporated, requesting permission to allow the outdoor storage of rental trucks;' C-l zoned property, located at lOOl North State College Boulevard. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-l32, denied said variance. VARIANCE NO. 1984: Submitted by Neighbors Ranches, requesting permission to allow the outdoor storage of pool chemicals in conjunction with the bperi- tion of an existing pool supply company; C-l zoned property, located at l7l9-1723 West La Palma Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant .to Resolution No. PC68- l34, granted said variance. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken on the above numbered conditional use permit and var- iance applications. TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO. 6603: Developer - Orange County Development Corpora- tion; tract located at the northeast corner of Dale Avenue and Broadway, and contains 14 proposed R-l zoned lots. The City. Planning Commission, at their meeting held April 22, 1968, approved said Tentative Tract Map, subject to~e following conditions: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6603 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 67-68-72 and Var- iance No. 1978. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings to Broadway and Dale Avenue, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 68-316 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 11. 1968. 1:3Q P.M. 4. That in accordance with City Council policy, a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the southerly and westerly property line separat- ing Lot Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, and 14, and Broadway and Dale Avenue, except that corner Lot Nos. l, 7, 8, and 14 shall be stepped down to a height of 30 inches in the front yard setback, and except that pedestrian openings shall be pro- vided in said walls ~ere cul-de-sacs abut the planned highways right-of-way line of an arterial"highway. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation n facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial ,,'.: . highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Park- way Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, ,the City of Anahelm shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 5. That the proposed streets shall be a:minimum of 60 feet in width and the cul-de-sac shall have a minimum radius of 50 feet. 6. That streets A and B shall be recorded as Tola Avenue and Trojan Place. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, Ten- tative Tract No. 6603, was approved,subject to conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT NO. 6646: Developer - C. Michael, Incorporated, tract located west of State College Boulevard, north of Ball Road; proposed reversion to acreage, '(R-3 zone .- ::.Z ;;,;lassification No. 66-67-68.) The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held May 20, 1968, approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions: 1. That drainage shall be discharged in a manner which is satis- factory to the City Engineer. 2. That a 15-foot easement for sewer, public utilities, and drain- age be retained along the westerly tract boundary. Councilman Dutton moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 6646, be ap- proved, subject to the recommendations of the.Cit, Planning Commission. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. KlTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE ~T NO. 5123: Developer - Westport Dev~lopment Enterprises, Inc., tract located at the southwest corner of Orangewood and Lewis Streets, and contains 48 proposed R-2, 5,000 zoned lots. On motion by Councilman Schutte. seconded by Councilman Clark, Ten- tative Tract No. 5123 was continued to be considered in conjunction with Re- classification No. 67-68-9l. MOTION CARRIBD. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-84 - TERMINATION: Submitted by Betz Corporation, re- questing change of zone from C-1and c-o to C-3; property located w~st of Euclid Street and north of Westmont Drive. The City Planning Commission, on motion duly adopted, terminated subject reclassification, as requested by Agent for the petitioner. Councilman Dutton moved that action of the City Planning Commission in te~inating Reclassification No. 67-68-64 be ratified. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 84 RESOLUTION 10. 68R-316 - WORK ORDER NO. 541-B: In accordance with recommendations of the City Engine~r, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-316 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PaOPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WOlK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: FURNISH AND INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROGRESSION SYSTEM ON EAST STREET, FROM LA PALMA AVENUE TO VERMONT AVENUE~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 541-B. (Steiny & Mitchel - $3,399.00.) n n n n r 68-3l7 City Hall.. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 11. 1968. 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: .COUNCI LMEN : COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-316 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-317- WORK ORDER NO. 226: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R- 317 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COM- PLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF PORTIONS OF EHPIRE AND NU'IWOOD STREETS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 226. (Griffith Company.) . Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-317 duly passed and adopted. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Clark offered Reso1ution'Nos. 68R-318 to 68R-320, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-3l8: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CER- TAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EAS~ FOR POLES AND ELECTRIC: POWER LINES. (Fredricks Development Corporation.) RESOLUTION NO. 68R-319: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY. OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Archdiocese of Los Angeles Education and Welfare Corporation.) RESOLUTION NO. 68R-320: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILI,ty PURPOSES. (LaRoy A. and Mildred E. Turner.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 68R-318 to 68R-320, both in~ clusive, duly passed and adopted. CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Council- man Dutton, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested to cancel County taxes on property acquired by the City of Anaheim for municipal pur-' poses, pursuant to Resolution No. 68R-299, formerly assessed to Louie J. Heffner, deed recorded June 3, 1968, as Document No. 748, in Book 8619, at Page 193, Official Records of Orange County, California. MOTION CARRIED. 68-318 City Hall. A_aheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 11. 1968. 1: 30 P.M. PURCHASE - TlANSFORMERS: Mr. Murdoch reported on the following iafoL"_:,a"~t'-:L~a- tions received for the purchase of four 69,000 volt and one 4,200 volt Trans- formers: Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Los Angeles - -_- - - $9,4l5.77, incl. tax General Electric Company, Los Angeles (Incomp1ete)- - - - 9,240.00, incl. tax Parks & Company, Long Beach (Not F.O.B.Yorba Sub-station, as per specifications)- - - -9,345.00, incl. tax On the recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that the bid of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, in the amount of $9,4l5.77, be accepted and purchase authorized as the lowest and best qualified bid, as the low bid did not meet delivery specifications. Councilman Krein s~conded the motion. K>TION CARRIED. [J CLAIMS ~NST THE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred to the in- surance carrier, as recommended by the City Attorney, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte: a. Claim submitted by Protective Association of Governmental Em- ployees for damages purportedly in the publication of certain statements in document entitled "Police Review Board Committee," dated February 13 and 14, 1968, filed by Kenneth P. Babcock, Executive Secretary. b. Claim filed by Donald P. Brown for damages purportedly resulting from false and defamatory statements in document entitled "Police Review Board COIIIIlittee," dated February 13 and 14, 1968. MOTION CARRIED. TRANSFER or FUNDS: On the recommendations of the Accounting Officer, it was moved by Councilman Clark, seconded by Councilman Dutton, that transfer of funds f~om Traffic Safety, In Lieu, Parking Meter, Recreation, Special Gas Tax Im- provement, and Parksites, Playgrounds and Recreation Funds to the General Fund for reimbursement of amounts advanced by the General Fund during the fiscal year, to be determined at the end of the fiscal year, be authorized. MOTION CARRIED. n CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion hy Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein: a. City of Newport Beach Resolution No. 6776, expressing its policy concerning the use and development of the Orange County Airport. b. Minutes - Orange County Mosquito Abatement District Meeting of May 16, 1968. MOTION CARRI ED. ORDINANCE NO.. 2527: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2527 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.62, OF THE ANAHEIMMDNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 18.62.030, PARAGRAPH (f), AND BY ADDING SECTION l8.62.076.(Signs, Advertising Signs, and Str~ctures; Future Establishment Signs.) AYES: NOES: ABSENT : COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None n Roll Call Vote: The l'~nyor declared Ordinance No. Z52Tduly passed and adopted. n r r 68-319 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 11. 1968~ 1:30 P.M. ORDINAlCE NO. 2528: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2528 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE l4, CHAPTER 14.32, SEC- TION14.32.190, PARAGRAPH 58, AND SECTION 14.32.243 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (No Parking - Portions of Gilbert Street.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN:' Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2528 duly passed and adopted. ORDINABCE NO. 2529: Councilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2529 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE. CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TI TLE 14, CHAPTER 14. 32, SEC- TIoN 14.32.190, PARAGRAPH 23 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (No Parking -Portions of Crescent Avenue.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2529 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2530: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2530 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER l4.32, SEC- TION 14.32.190, PARAGRAPH 39 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING. (No Parking - Portions of Lincoln Avenue.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2530 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 253l: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2531 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AMENDING TITLE l8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-108 - R-l.) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following applications were presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information: a. Application submitted by R.V. Wills, for Person;..to-Persaft Trans- fer 'of' Off:'t~llSt~eft,~"":'W"fteLt~e., I fc;t-:~eace Brothers ,Market at 2564 West Broadway, (C-l zone.) , b. Application submitted by HenryK. and Loretta G. Carlson for Person-to-Person Transfer of On-Sale Beer License, for Kozy Korner, 300 East Lincoln Avenue, (C-2 zone.) c. Application submitted by Clarence Edwin Elkins for Person-to- Person Transfer of Off-Sale General License, for Dellco, 1287-A East Lincoln Avenue, (C-l zone.) 68-320 City Hall. ADaheim. California - COUNCILMINUTIS - June1l. 1968. 1:30 P.M. d. Application submitted by Frank Leo Bretfor Person-to-Person Transfer of On-Sale General License, for Wrather Enterprises, Inc., at 1441 South West Street, (R-A, Conditional Use Permit No. l54.) e. Application submitted by National Convenience Stores, Inc., for Person-to-Person Transfer of Off-Sale Beer and Wine License, at Stop ~N Go Market, 1107 West South Street, (C-1 zone.) f. Application submitted by National Convenience Stores, Inc., for Person-to-Person Transfer of Off-Sale Beer and Wine License, for Stop 'N Go Market, l827 West La Palma Avenue, (C-l zone.) g. Application submitted by William Yancy for Person-to-Person Transfer of On-Sale General License for Bill's Ranch House, Inc., at 1490 South Anaheim Boulevard, (M-l zone, Conditional Use Permit No. l7l.) No Council action was taken on the above applications. REQUEST - C~TY OF IRWINDALE: Consideration of request for support of opposition to AB-2017 - 2023 by the City of Irwinda1e was continued from meeting of June 5, 1968 to this date. No Council action was taken at this time on subject request. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-321: Following report and recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-321 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OPPOSING THE PLACING OP PUBLIC DISTRICTS CONCERNED WITH WATER, GAS, OR ELECTRICITY UNDER THE JURIS- DICTION OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION AS PROPOSED IN ASSEMBLY BILL l460 AND ASSEMBLY CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 42. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN : COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-321 duly passed and adopted. ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR DISTRICT: The City Clerk called Council's attention to com- munication dated June 7, 1968, announcing that a report on the Status of the Orange County Harbor District will be heard before the Board of Supervisors, on June 12, 1968, at 10:30 A.M. APPOINTMENT - PLANNING COMMISSION: With the unanimous consent of the City Council, Mr. Floyd Parano was re-appointed to the City Planning Commission for the en- suing four-year term ending June 30, 1972. STREET WIDENING: Councilman Schutte requested the City Manager obtain information regarding widening of 17th Street in Santa Ana, to determine if said widening is being accomplished by the formation of a district. WATER WASTE - LOARA STREET: Councilman Schutte reported on apparent excessive water use as evidenced by runoff on Loara Street, and requested investigation of same. RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilman Krein moved to recess to executive session as requested by the City Manager to review labor negotiations, and at the conclusion thereof to recess to 7:30 P.M. Councilman Clark seconded the mo- tion. MOTION CARRIED. AFTER RECESS (7: 30 P. M. ): Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order, all members 0 f the City Council being present. PRESENT: ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST: John Harding. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson .1i'.... " . ~ n I"~ J 68-321 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 11. 1968. 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-64. VARIANCE NO. 1960. (TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6607. REVISION NO. 1): Submitted by Richard W. Henning, requesting a change in zone from R-A to R-3 and waiver of :;_aximum building and structural height limitations. Property located on north side of Lincoln Avenue, east of Rio Vi~ta Street. l The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-129, recommended approval of said reclassification in part, recommending R-3 for the westerly 324 feet and the 30 x 382 foot strip north of the shopping center, the balance to R-l, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved ~y the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit for the R-3 zoned portion only, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued. 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building and zoning inspections. The City Planning Commission recommended said variance for denial, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-130. Zoning Supervisor, Ronald Thompson, called attention to p'u.Jlic hearing on General Plan Amendment No. 97 on the Council Agenda June l8, '1968. He noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission in arriving at a judgment on subject property. I He explained the purpose of the proposed General Plan Amendment was to review the City's statement of land use policy and ~>~termine whether there has been a change in the character of land use in the area under con- sideration, specifically as related to multiple-family density development in one portion. The multip1e-familj' area report considered by the City Planning Commission concluded that rather than cluster large concentrations of multiple-family uses in a r,,;~a~:'.\;:,',y few areas of the City, it would be preferable to disperse multiple-family land uses throughout the City at locations and in concentrations which would not adversely affect the charac- ter of each particular area. Various proposed General Plan Amendments con- sidered by the City Planning Commission as depicted in Exhibits A, B, C, D, E and F, posted on the Council wall, were described for Council infor- mation. Mr. Thompson reported that two additional applications concern- ing property located to the north and west of subject property had been received by the City Planning Commission since public hearing was held; one requesting R-2, 5,000 zoning on approximately 20 acres, (Dinkler), and another requesting R-l zoning with variable lot sizes from 6,000 square feet, (Wingert.) r \ . " P~ans submitted by petitioner for development of subject property were briefly described, followed by alternate layouts prepared by the Plann- ing Staff, which were felt to be closer to the intent of the City Planning Commission. Mr. Thompson reported that the City Planning Commission felt the alternate layout in Exhibit "D" would reflect the best possible development of the area, providing 11 acres of R-3 surrounding the shopping center, transitioning to R-l single-family, and therefore recommended approval of ExhiD:~t ,ID" pertaining to the General Plan, and approval of the westerly 324 feet of subject property for R-3 development and the remainder for R-l development. Mayor Pebley asked if the applicant wished to address the City Council. 68-322 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 11. 1968. 1:30 P.M. Mr. Joe Furr, 20522 East Chapman Avenue, in Orange County, represent- ing Bayport Development Company, addressed the Council, advising that their original desire was to develop the property entirely as an R-3 development, as preferred by the lenders involved. He pointed out that revisions to the plans had been made at the request of the City Planning Commission to better protect adjoining single-family residences, although this was not the first preference of the developer. Mr. Furr stated that the firm's developments n have not been a detrUpent to any area in which they have heen built, and I showed photographs in illustration. He felt the project had been ~ut down .. as far as was financially feasible, but would be acceptable if approv~d. In answer to Councilman Schutte's question, Mr. Furr stated that R-2, 5,000 zoning for the entire parcel would be unacceptable, as most of the financing was committed for an R-3 project. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone else wished to speak. Mr. William S. Phelps, 914 East Katella Avenue, asked if the ex- hibits used by the Zoning Supervisor accurately depicted the proposed develop- ment plan submitted to the City Planning Commission, for which approval was recommended; and was advised by Mr. Thompson that they were precisely the same, providing for two.story R-3 graduating down to single-story, with R-2, 5,000 around the perimeter. Mr. Phelps explained plans of development as file was reviewed by the Clty Council. Following Council discussion, Mayor Pebley asked if anyone w~shed to speak in opposition. Mr. James Geriak, 2913 Hempstead Road, expressed the opinion that the Ci~y P1annin6 Commission recommendation was not a realistic reflection of their actual thinking, in view of a motion by Mr. Farano at the previous meeting to deny subject reclassification, and since Mr. Farano was not pres- ent at the meeting in which the final vote took p1ac~, Mr. Geriak felt the City Planning Commission recommendation did not reflect the majority of the CoDllli.ssion. n Mr. Geriak called attention to a petition with 250 signatures sub- mitted in opposition to 'any change in zoning or any General Plan Amendment which would affect the property under consideration. He showed slides of several homes in the vicinity of subject property and stated that only homes of equally high quality would be compatible with the area already developed; that either R-1 or R-2, 5,000 would be appropriate, but any other type of zoning would change the character of the neighborhood. Additional slides of the nearby shopping center were shown, and Mr. Geriak pointed out the large buffer zone provided by an alley and a presently unused E~~tion of the park- ing area, which he felt would protect abutting development of a single-family residential nature. He expressed opposition to any amendment to the General Plan in that area, feeling it would be unfair to those in the existing single- family development, (many of whom have large fa~ilies with several small chil- dren,) to allow even one street of multiple-family development, since it would substantially affect both the traffic pattern and the nature of the residential area, (permanent vs. transient). He also felt that when an annexation of the area took place, the home owners were influenced by the existing General Plan; that to amend it at this time would be in violation of good faith. Mayor Pebley asked if the group represented by Mr. Geriak would ap- prove of R-2, 5,000, even though development under such zoning could lower property values, to which Mr. Geriak replied that he felt that the point was well taken, and he would hope that should the City Council deny subject re- quest for R-3 zoning, the developers would take this into consideration and act according1y~ as in addition to zoning, quality of development must be considered. n 68-323 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 11. 1968. l:30 P.M~ n In answer to Councilman Schutte's question whether approval of plans could be tied to a reclassification, the City Attorney advised that it could be done if the plans were presented by the developer as a part of the action; but expressed doubt as to whether standards of quality could effectively be enforced above that which is' set forth in the Building Code and other codes. Councilman Dutton pointed out to Mr. Geriak that although the shopping center is small now, future development would bring more business, making R-1 development on the adjacent property undesirable. To this Mr. Geriak replied that he felt high quality R-2, 5,000 with 2~000 square foot houses would be more appropriate and compatible with the neighborhood, and again stated his opposition to R-3. Councilman Dutton explained the problem that the City Council faces in providing a broad range of housing; that there is currently a shortage of multi-family residences and it is the responsibility of the Council to bring this back into balance. He felt that R-3 development, when buffere4, is proper. Mr. Geriak replied that there was a shortage of R-l developments, and this is one of the last close-in areas that could be deve~oped with high quality R-I. Councilman Clark stated that since the land to the west will be developed as R-I, and the land to the north as R-2, 5,000, he saw no reason why the property in question should not stay in the same cate~ory. r Council discussion followed, and Councilman Schutte favored ap- proval of R-2,5, ':; development for the entire property, as the cost of the land would assure high quality development. Mayor Pebley askec. if anyone else wished to speak in opposition. Mrs. Ann Nealy, 502 Stehly Street, (south of subject property, across Lincoln Avenue,) expressed opposition to two-story ~onstrut~tion on Lots 1, l6 and 17 of the proposed development on the grounds of ' visual in- trusion. Mr. William E. Heiner, 227 South Kingsley Drive, spoke in oppo- sition to R-2, 5,000 development, stating that he favored standard R-l zon- ing for the subject property. Councilmen Schutte and Dutton pointed out that R-l developments on high-value property such as this were difficult to sell. Mr. Heiner advised that quality single-family Jomes:'were needed to attract executives into Anaheim. Following Council discussion, Mr. Devore, 235 South Kingsley Drive, also registered opposition to any mode of development other than R-l, and stated, in his opinion, the existing high quality homes to the east had made subject property valuable. r f \ Mayor Pebley, being of the opinion that a good cross section of evidence had been presented, invited the applicant to speak in rebuttal to the objections stated. Mr. Joseph Ercek, 520 North Citron, representing the applicant, pointed out that the economic welfare of the owner of subjecf property should be considered, and that the environment of the area has changed in view of the four-lane, heavi1y~travelled thoroughfare which would make the property unsuitable forR-l development. He felt R-3 zoning, with an R-2, 5,000 buf- fer zone, would be the most appropriate zoning. He pointed out the diffi- culty experienced by the developer of the adjacent homes to the east in sell- ing these homes when they were completed. He further reported that a physi- cal inspection of the homes to the east would find them to be anything but the "executive type." In his opinion, the value of the existing homes would be raised by the proposed development, and thereupon asked on behalf of the applicant that R-3 and R-2, 5,000 zoning be approved, as recommended by the 68-324 City Hall. ADaheim. ;California- OOUNCIL:MlNmES'. June 11...1968. 'l:-30,P~K. City Planning Commission. Mr. Furr again addressed the Council" stating that.<~t\e sybject property was much more suitable to R-3 development than tbeproperty to the north, due to the fact that Lincoln Avenue was such a heavily-travelled street. He felt that the property could be developed in a manner that would not be detrimental to Other property in the area, and if necessary, the plan l could be changed to allow better traffic circulation. He pOinted-out that there is a demand fnr good housing on lots smaller than those in a-I;' 07 . 2Co : . square feet zones. He felt that R-3 development surrounding the shopping center was the best plan. Mr. Dick Henning, 2861 East Lincoln Avenue~ owner of subject pro- perty, addressed the Council. He pointed out that when the residential property to the east was developed, his entire acreage waE:ZO_.:: , ":::,",, (Cour,,..y), and that he cooperated with the developer of that property by granting neces- saryeasements to serve 'the tract., He explained that his 0l'igina1 desire was to develop his property as a sports center, which was also objected to. He described' the'adjacent resident:f"a.l propetty'ashaving j:~C) _~ieJ,tiD,g qn", " desirable boundaries; and felt that opposition'to his proposed development on a third 'boundary was 1.lnfair~ in view"of the demonstrated acceptance of tbe existing undesirable features. He pointed out that he aad borne the expense of paving Rio Vista Street from Lincoln Avenue to La Palma Avenue and granted all necessary easements' for street widening, ,and had annexed his:propettyto the City 'two years before the residential property tC);the east 'was annexed ~ : " , Councilman Schutte asked'Mr.' Henning if he felt he would apply for an R-2, 5,000 zoning on the entire parcel should the Council deny sub- ject request without prejudice. Mr. Henning replied that he was not sure; tbat he had not been offered a comparable price forhisproperty,f.or th.at type of development. ' There being no further evidence submitted,:Mayer Pebley 'declared tbe hearing closed. RISOLUTION: Councilman Schutte offered a resolution denying Recla~sifica- tionNo. 67-68-64 without prejudice. Council discussion followed" wlthCouncilman "Duteon_,pointing,out ' that Council policy relating to zoning upon, anneXation of County property has been to establish City zoning as ':'>:;~(~':'/, as possible to County zoning; that R-3 zoning is a lesser use than the C-1 zoning which existed on sub- ject property until 1963; therefore, in his opinion, the request for R-3 zoning with R-2, 5,000 as a buffer to the adjoining R-1 property is a logi- cal request. The foregoing resolution failed to carry by the following Roll Call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN : COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Clark Dutton, Krein and Pebley None ~SfJ.unON NO. 68R-322: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-322 for adoption, denying Reclassification No. 67-68-64 in its entirety. Refer to Resolution Book. A RlSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (67-68-64.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley Dutton None COUNCILMEN: COUNCIUIEN : COUNCILMEN: l n r r n 68-325 City Hall. An~eimL~*~~fornia .-CX)UNCI1,~NUTIS- June 11. 1968. 1: 30 P.M. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-322 duly passed and adopted. .,RESOLUTION NO. 68R-323:. Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-323 for adoption, denying Variance No. 1960. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF . ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1960. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 68R-323 duly passed and adopted. TENT~TIVE MAP. TRACT NO. 6607. REVISION. NO. 1: Bayport Financial Corporation, developer; .tract located easterly of .the intersection of Rio Vista .Street and Lincoln Avenue, and contains 30 proposed R-3 and 23 proposed R-2, 5,000 ~oned lots. Consideration of Tentative Map" Tract No. 6607,Revision No.1, wae continued fr~ the meeting of May 21, 1968, to be consi4ered in con- junction with Reclassification No. 67-68-64 and Variance No. 1960. On motion by Councilman ~rei~, seconded by Councilman Clark, said Tentative Map was denied. I<<>TION CARRIED. ADJOURNMBNT: motion. Councilman .Krein moved to adjourn. K>TION CARRIED. Councilman Clark second~d the ADJOURNED: 9: SO-P.M. SIGNID. ~..< )y A);M- . City-Clerk J_~ 68-326 'City Hall. Anaheu.. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 18. 1968. 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson CONVENTION CENTER AND STADIUM DIRECTOR: Tom Liegler l Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order. INVOCATION: Reverend Kenneth Fischer, of Magnolia Baptist Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Dutton led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PRESENTATION: Mr. Donald Porter, Director of the Kingsmen Drum and Bugle Corps, introduced two members of the Corps, Jan Fluback and Bob Britton, who presented a trophy to the City of Anaheim. The trophy, in the shape of a giant chessman, was presented to the Kingsmen following their recent performance at Chino, California, and bore the inscription, "Presented to the City of Anaheim, in Appreciation of the Kingsmen by the Men at California Institute for Men, May 28, 1968." Mayor Pebley accepted the trophy, on behalf of the City of Anaheim. PROCLAMATIONS: The following Proclamations were issued by Mayor Pebley: "Chef's Week" - June 23-29, 1968. J "Remember Our Freedoms and Heritage Day" - July 4, 1968. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION: Mayor Pebley offered a Resolution of Commenda- tion to the Downtown Anaheim Kiwanis Club for sponsoring a Hearing Mobile, June 21 and 22, 1968. Said Resolution was unanimously authorized by the City Council. RESOLUTION OF WELCOME: Mayor Pebley offered a Resolution of Welcome to the Young Americans on June 2l, 1968, at the Brookhurst Theatre. Said Resolution was unanimously authorized by the City Council. INTRODUCTION: Mrs. Mary Freck, President of the American Field Service, in- troduced the following Foreign Exchange Students attending Anaheim Union High School District schools: Lena Branholm, from Sweden; Karen Greng, from Austria; and John Lert, from Thailand. Carlos Morales, from Brazil, was unable to be present. The students presented gifts to the Mayor from their respective countries, and the Mayor presented each of them with a Key to the City of Anaheim. n MINUTES: Approval of the Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held May 2l, 1968, were approved, on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Council- man Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.