Minutes-PC 2008/05/28/~
~P~lE1M
P
c~
_ <•~
0
z
\NDED~
Commissioners Present:
Commissioners Absent:
Staff Present:
CJ Amstrup, Planning Services Manager
Linda Johnson, Principal Planner
Mark Gordon, Assistant City Attorney
Kimberly Wong, Planner
Jamie Lai, Principal Civil Engineer
Grace Medina, Senior Secretary
Donna Patino, Secretary
Agenda Posting: A complete copy of the Planning Commission Agenda was posted at 2:00 p.m.
on Thursday, May 22, 2008, inside the display case located in the foyer of the Council Chamber,
and also in the outside display kiosk.
Published: Anaheim Bulletin Newspaper on Thursday, May 15, 2008
• Call to Order
• Preliminary Plan Review 1:30 P.M.
• STAFF UPDATE TO COMMISSION ON VARIOUS CITY DEVELOPMENTS
AND ISSUES (AS REQUESTED BY PLANNING COMMISSION)
• PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW FOR ITEMS ON THE MAY 28, 2008 AGENDA
• Recess to Public Hearing
• Reconvene to Public Hearing 2:30 P.M.
Attendance: 22
• Pledge of Allegiance: Commissioner Faessel
• Public Comments
• Consent Calendar
• Public Hearing Items
• Adjournment
City of Anaheim
Planning Commission
Minutes
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Council Chamber, City Hall
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, California
Chairman: Kelly Buffa
Peter Agarwal, Gail Eastman, Stephen Faessel,
Joseph Karaki, Panky Romero, Pat Velasquez
None
H:\TOOLS\PC Action Agendas -Minutes\2008 Minutes\2008 Minutes\AC052808.doc
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 2:30 P.M.
Public Comments: None
Consent Calendar:
Commissioner Velasquez offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Faessel and MOTION
CARRIED, for approval of Consent Calendar Item 1 A through 1 D as recommended by staff.
UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED
Reports and Recommendations:
ITEM NO. 1A
CEQA PREVIOUSLY-CERTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL Consent Calendar Approval
IMPACT REPORT NO. 330 AND ADDENDUM AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-05076
TRACKING NO. CUP2008-05313) Motion: Velasquez/Faessel
Applicant: Abel Avalos
Anaheim Redevelopment Agency VOTE: 6-0
201 South Anaheim Boulevard Commissioner Eastman absent
Anaheim, CA 92805
Location: 516 East Santa Ana Street: Property is Project Planner.•
a roximatel 12.6 acres, havin a fronts a of 685 feet on the
PP Y 9 9 Elaine Thienprasiddhi
ethien@anaheim.net
south side of Santa Ana Street and 785 feet on the east side of
Olive Street.
Requests a retroactive two-year extension of time to comply with
conditions of approval for apreviously-approved 135-unit
condominium project with waiver of required improvement of the
right-of-way.
05/28/08
Page 2 of 17
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
ITEM NO. 1 B
REQUEST TO TERMINATE THE FOLLOWING INACTIVE Resolution No. PC2008-63
ENTITLEMENTS: velasquez
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 200, 630, 1153, Approved
1219, 1489, 1861, 2331, 2802, 2981, 3135, 3408,
3424, 3538, 3813, 4045 AND 4125
(TRACKING NO. CUP2008-05320)
VARIANCE NOS. 2634, 3530 AND 4242 VOTE: 6-0
(TRACKING NO. VAR2008-04753) Commissioner Eastman absent
ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 138
(TRACKING NO. ADJ2008-00310)
1. Location: 2530 West La Palma Avenue
Applicant: Daniel Sun
The Church in Anaheim
2528 West La Palma Avenue
Anaheim, CA 92801
a) Conditional Use Permit No. 3424 (to permit a preschool in an Project Pianner.•
existing church and the construction of two 1,493 square foot Elaine Thienprasiddhi
ethien@anaheim.net
modular housing units for pastor's quarters with waiver of
minimum required yard, minimum number of parking spaces
and maximum structural height)
b) Conditional Use Permit No. 3538 (to permit a private
educational facility in conjunction with an existing church and
preschool with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces)
2. Location: 800 & 806 North Brookhurst Street
Applicant: Ann K. Jerhoff
The Home Depot
3800 West Chapman Avenue
Orange, CA 92868
a) Conditional Use Permit No. 2802 (to retain an auto towing,
impound and repair facility with waivers of structural setback,
permitted encroachments and yard requirements, minimum
dimensions of parking spaces and minimum number and type
of parking spaces)
b) Conditional Use Permit No. 4045 (to permit a portable food
service use (hot dog cart) in conjunction with a permitted retail
store)
05/28/08
Page 3 of 17
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
3. Location: 891 South Walnut Street
Applicant: Martin A. Lakatos
Front Porch Development Company
303 North Glenoaks Boulevard
Burbank, CA 91502
a) Conditional Use Permit No. 200 (to permit established home for
the aged and construct new buildings)
b) Conditional Use Permit No. 1861 (to expand a retirement home)
c) Conditional Use Permit No. 3135 (to permit a child day care center
for the children of employees of Walnut Manor only)
4. Location: 401 North Anaheim Boulevard
Applicant: William Taormina
128 West Sycamore Street
Anaheim, CA 92805
a) Conditional Use Permit No. 3813 (to permit a motorcycle sales
and service facility with waiver of minimum number of parking
spaces)
5. Location: 610 South Olive Street and 525 East South Street
Applicant: Cheryl Stump
Brookfield Homes
151 Kalmus Drive, Suite L-3
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
a) Variance No. 3530 (waiver of maximum number of compact
parking spaces and minimum number of parking spaces to
construct an industrial warehouse facility)
b) Variance No. 4242 (waiver of minimum number of parking spaces
to construct 49,615 square feet of office area within a 406,992
square foot industrial complex)
c) Administrative Adjustment No. 138 (waiver of maximum fence
height to construct asix-foot high wrought iron fence within the
required setback area)
05/28/08
Page 4 of 17
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
6. Location: 2150 South State College Boulevard
Applicant: John Luedtke
Archstone Smith
One Spectrum Pointe Drive, Suite 225
Lake Forest, CA 92630
a) Conditional Use Permit No. 4125 (to establish an outdoor swap
meet facility with waiver of required parking lot landscaping)
7. Location: 1448, 1450, 1460 North Red Gum and
2961 East La Jolla Street
Applicant: Don and Sidney Vidmar
8148 Trousdale Ferry Pike, Unit C
Lebanon, TN 37090
a) Conditional Use Permit No. 630 (conditioned operation of
landscape contractor's storage yard in M-1 zone)
b) Conditional Use Permit No. 1153 (to establish outdoor, heavy
equipment storage yard, with waiver of required six-foot high
masonry wall enclosing outdoor storage areas and requirement
that a lot have frontage on a public street or alley)
Applicant: Kathy G. Verburg
Roka, LLC
P.O. Box 121112
Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
a) Conditional Use Permit No. 1219 (to permit an outdoor automobile
dismantling yard with waiver of the required six-foot high masonry
wall )
b) Conditional Use Permit No. 2331 (to retain used auto storage,
contractor's storage yards and fertilizer manufacturing in the ML
Zone with waiver of required enclosure of outdoor uses)
c) Conditional Use Permit No. 3408 (to retain a temporary office
trailer)
Applicant: Ephraim Beard
57 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA 92660
a) Conditional Use Permit No. 1489 (to establish outdoor storage of
automobiles with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces)
05/28/08
Page 5 of 17
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
8. Location: 3150 East La Palma Avenue
Applicant: Lucy May
Premier Business Properties
6355 South Industrial Road
Las Vegas, NV 89118
a) Variance No. 2634 (waive permitted uses to establish a
sandwich shop
9. Location: 5464 East La Palma Avenue
Applicant: Karen Malec
Associated Commercial Brokers
3365 East Miraloma Avenue, Suite 203
Anaheim, CA 92806
a) Conditional Use Permit No. 2981 (to permit a church in the ML
Zone with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces)
05/28/08
Page 6 of T 7
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
ITEM NO. 1 C
CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-05111
(Tracking No. CUP2008-05317)
Applicant: BKM Development Company
3185 Pullman Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Location: 1097 North Patt Street
Requests to permit a retroactive extension of time to comply
with the conditions of approval to construct one of two
previously-approved stealth ground-mounted
telecommunications facilities with accessory ground-mounted
equipment in an industrial office park.
Consent Calendar Approval
Motion: Velasquez/Faessel
VOTE: 6-0
Commissioner Eastman absent
Project Planner:
Kimberly Wong
Kwong2@anaheim.net
05/28/08
Page 7 of 17
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Minutes•
ITEM NO. 1 D
Commissioner Velasquez offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Faessel to approve the
Minutes from the Planning Commission Meeting of May 12, 2008. Motion passed with 5 aye votes.
Commissioner Eastman was absent. Commissioner Karaki abstained from Item 1-D.
Receiving and approving the Minutes from the Planning
Commission Meeting of May 12, 2008. (Motion)
NOTE: Meeting minutes have been provided to the
Planning Commission and are available for review
at the Planning Department.
Consent Calendar Approval
Motion: Velasquez/Faessel
VOTE: 5-0
Commissioner Karaki abstained
as he was not present for the
meeting
Commissioner Eastman absent
05/28/08
Page 8 of 17
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Public Hearing Items:
ITEM NO. 2
CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED) AND AMENDMENT TO
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-04244
WITH WAIVER (Tracking No. CUP2007-05256) Agarwal
Applicant: Rob Chandler
Fairmont Private Schools
1575 West Maple Street
Anaheim, CA 92802
Location: 2200-2240 West Sequoia Avenue: Property is
approximately 5.7 acres, having a frontage of 895 feet on the
south and west sides of Sequoia Avenue approximately 180
feet east of the centerline of Siesta Street.
Request to amend the conditions of approval to permit
additional students and staff at apreviously-approved private
school (Fairmont Private School) with fewer parking spaces
than required by Code.
Continued from the April 28, 2008, Planning Commission
Meeting.
Kimberly Wong presented the staff report.
Chairman Buffa opened the public hearing.
Resolution No. PC2008-64
Approved, modifications to
Condition No. 4
VOTE: 6-0
Commissioner Eastman absent
Project Planner:
Kimberly Wong
kwong2@anaheim.net
Rob Chandler, Fairmont Schools, 1575 West Maple Street, Anaheim, clarified that they did not intend
to eliminate the junior high school but with the market conditions, the school would like the flexibility to
increase the high school enrollment without eliminating the junior high school. The school may
eventually have all high school students.
Chairman Buffa stated that they understood the request and the Planning Commission's is okay
either way. The Commission understands that there would be a maximum of 750 students and the
specific numbers could fluctuate over time.
Mr. Chandler had requested to increase their teaching staff from 49 to 55, and their administrative
staff from 27 to 30.
Chairman Buffa explained that during the preliminary hearing the Planning Commission discussed the
requested waiver of parking requirements. The Commission is concerned about parking during times
when there is a large event at the school, for example, a sports tournament, where other people
05/28/08
Page 9 of 17
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
would come from different schools. The Planning Commission wanted to know how the school would
manage parking.
Mr. Chandler stated that there are two events during the year which the school would consider
making parking adjustments. These events are Open House and Information Night. These are
events where the school would make arrangements with Home Depot and ask faculty and staff to
park there. The school will transport faculty back to the school creating enough parking space for
those events.
if Home Depot parking lot is not available, the school has made other arrangements with the Sa Rang
Church on Brookhurst Street to use their parking lot. Sports events happen after school when
students and staff leave, allowing enough parking for sports event. The school does not have other
outside agencies or groups coming to the campus where they would have mass parking demand
other than what they would have during the normal school day.
Chairman Buffa asked what kind of parking agreement the school has with the Sa Rang Church or
Home Depot.
Mr. Chandler explained that Home Depot is on a case by case basis and with Sa Rang Church they
have a written agreement.
Chairman Buffa asked how many cars come to the school when they have Information Night or Open
House.
Mr. Chandler stated that sometimes they accommodate ali the parking and other times they have had
some over-flow parking at Home Depot but he was not sure if they ever taken count. When the
school has these events, the faculty and staff park at Home Depot which opens up an additional 30 to
40 parking spaces. He found this question difficult because they are open to the community. The
school has not been in a position, in the four years he has been with the school, were parking has
created a major issue for the neighborhood.
Commissioner Faessel thanked Mr. Chandler for taking a positive step in having many outreach
meetings with the community. He asked if there was any possibility to share parking with Brookhurst
Junior High School.
Mr. Chandler stated he was not sure what parking availability they have. The school's headmaster
has a relationship with the principal of Brookhurst Junior High, but he does not think the subject has
been approached.
Commissioner Velasquez asked what the agreement was with the church. She wanted to know if it
was for a certain period of time.
Mr. Chandler stated that the agreement is open-ended because they have a close relationship with
the church. They have a number of families who attend Sa Rang Church and their children go to
Fairmont. At times the church has requested to use the school's parking lot as well. The agreement
is that the school can use their parking lot anytime they need it for school days or special events. If it
is a special event the school communicates with the church so that it is not overlapping any of their
events. They have approximately 840 parking spaces.
05/28/08
Page 10 of 17
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Commissioner Velasquez asked if the church had other activities during the week or do they have
service only on Sunday.
Mr. Chandler stated that they may have evening activities and weekend events but they do not
overlap their activities. They have been able to satisfy their needs for those two major occasions.
Commissioner Agarwal understood that the two events are scheduled for a period of three hours and
parents come to the school at various times. He asked if the parents came in at once or various
times.
Mr. Chandler stated that parents come in at various times, from 6:00 to 8:30 or 6:00 to 9:00 p.m. One
of the events is an opportunity for parents to become familiar with the curriculum and meet with the
teachers; this is not a one on one meeting. The parents move from class to class and the teachers
present what they are going over with the students in that classroom. They encourage new families
to come to get to know the campus and Fairmont at that time too. In the four years he has been with
the school they have not been in a position where it becomes overcrowded. They are pleased when
the school is crowded, but they have a plan to deal with the parking situation.
Chairman Buffa asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak to this item; seeing none;
she closed the public hearing.
Chairman Buffa appreciated the clarification that Mr. Chandler made with regards to the parking
situation. Often when the City contemplates a waiver of parking, the City wants to be sure they are
not left with the position of having a smaller parking supply than the future demand could create. She
stated that Mr. Chandler made good arrangements to deal with parking even though they were not
permanent. However, what Mr. Chandler explained helps her realize that their overflow is only about
40 parking spaces. This could be easily accommodated two or three times a year on public streets
around the school. If they did not park at Sa Rang Church for two nights a year and parked in the
neighborhood streets, she did not think this would not be an inconvenience for the neighbors to put
up with. Hopefully the school will continue to work with Home Depot and Sa Rang Church and the
parking agreements will work forever, but if for some reason in the future it did not, she thinks as a
school site it could still operate effectively.
Ms. Wong wanted to modify the wording of Condition No. 4 of the attached resolution. She requested
the elimination of the first sentence as discussed by Mr. Chandler. The condition should read; while
the senior high and junior high schools run concurrently enrollment should not exceed 750 students.
Commissioner Agarwal recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution to
determine that the Previously- Approved Negative Declaration serve as the appropriate
environmental documentation and to approve an amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 2000-
04244 with a waiver of minimum number of parking spaces and with a modification to Condition No. 4
as read into the record by Planning Staff.
Donna Patino, Secretary, announced that the resolution passed with 6 aye votes. Commissioner
Eastman was absent.
05/28/08
Page 11 of 17
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
OPPOSITION: None
Mark Gordon, Assistant City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights ending at 5:00 p.m. on
Thursday, June 19, 2008.
DISCUSSION TIME: 17 minutes (2:36 to 2:53)
05/28/08
Page 12 of 17
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
ITEM NO. 3
CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 323
(PREVIOUSLY-CERTIFIED) AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2008-05310 Faessel
Applicant: MCG Architecture
1055 East Colorado Boulevard, #400
Pasadena, CA 91106
Location: Southeast Corner of Lemon and Durst Streets:
Property is approximately 1.55 acres, having a frontage of 210
feet on the east side of Lemon Street and 315 feet on the south
side of Durst Street.
Request to permit a 2,675 square foot drive-through restaurant
and a 6,630 square foot commercial retail building in connection
with the existing Anaheim Gateway commercial shopping
center.
Resolution No. PC2008-65
Approved, modified
Condition Nos. 3, 4 ~ 8,
added condition pertaining
to the replacement of the
electrical room rollup door
with swinging doors
VOTE: 6-0
Commissioner Eastman absent
Project Planner:
Kim Wong
kwong2@anaheim. net
Kim Wong presented the staff report. She added a condition of approval "That the roll-up door for the
electrical room at the commercial retail center shall be eliminated. Plans shall reflect swing doors
designed consistent with the architecture of the building." She also indicated that modified conditions
of approval pertaining to clinging vines along the east elevation of the commercial retail center and
the public right-of-way improvements along Lemon Street were provided to the Planning Commission
during the preliminary plan review and a copy was also provided to the applicant.
Chairman Buffa requested clarification that the new condition of approval required the elimination of
the roll-up door for the electrical room and adds landscaping along the east side.
Ms. Wong indicated that prior to the public hearing the applicant clarified that the provided landscape
plan did not properly reflected the proposed landscaping on the east side of the commercial retail
building. Pockets of landscaping are proposed between the tenant doors on the east elevation. In
these landscaped areas, the applicant plans to provide clinging vines and additional landscaping as
proposed during the public hearing, such as shrubbery and if it is wide enough for a growing tree.
Chairman Buffa opened the public hearing.
Dinh Huynh, Robertson Properties Group, stated that he is available to answer any questions.
Chairman Buffa understood that staff discussed with him the proposed new condition and the
condition is acceptable.
Mr. Huynh stated that the first condition Ms. Wong mentioned is the roll-up door. He believes the roll-
up door provides a better clearance space for the electrical room. Staff was concerned that the roll-
up door provided an industria! look, but he believes that because north of Durst Street is an industrial
area, the roll-up door reflects similar treatment. The building sits back on the property and would not
05/28/08
Page 13 of 17
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
be visible on Lemon Street. The roll-up door sits in an area were there would be hedges and would
not be obtrusive to the view.
With regards to landscaping on the east elevation, the property owner too would like to deter graffiti.
He concurs with the condition regarding the addition of clinging vines and they will provide
landscaping along the east side of the building. They will also accept the condition pertaining to
modifying the awning on the facade of the commercial retail building. The awnings will shade the
west side of the building and will provide a better cooling area for the building.
With regards to the trash enclosure in the shopping center, the site is restrictive and the proposed
location of the trash enclosure is best to provide easy access for trash truck pickup. They provided a
trash enclosure detail which indicated trellises and vine surrounding the trash enclosure that would
shield the trash from view and prevent it from sticking out.
The final issue he would like to discuss is landscaping on Lemon Street. Staff's concern is that they
should shield the drive aisle from Lemon Street. They also share this concern and are providing palm
trees along the corner of Lemon and Durst Street. There are existing palm trees and hedges along
the drive-through aisle.
There is a homeless problem in the shopping center and thick hedges it tends to provide sheltering
for homeless people. They would like to stay away from creating opportunities for homeless to stay
there. The developer would like to create shrubs or planting that would accommodate what staff
requires and create a more appeasing view along Lemon Street.
Chairman Buffa stated the landscape plan shows that they propose one tall palm tree in front of the
restaurant pad. She asked if they would be willing to provide additional trees and different kinds of
trees and maybe take out the palm tree. She understands the concern about creating a sheltering
place for homeless people, but trees can be limbed up so that there is plenty of visibility under them
while also creating greenery above. She feels the drive-through window with a three foot high hedge
is going to be very visible. She personally believes there should be better screening between the
drive-through aisle and the street. She asked if they could replace the palm tree with something else.
Mr. Huynh stated that they could work with staff to find the appropriate landscaping for the street.
They are concerned that the shop building is recessed back and they want to provide visibility for the
retailers. He thinks if there is not enough visibility for the retailers in the back of the property, their
business may not be as successful in terms of creating visibility on the street.
Chairman Buffa stated that she was not sure the shops in the back are going to be visible from
Lemon Street anyway because they are far away from Lemon Street.
Mr. Huynh agreed. He stated that is why they are trying to create as much visibility as they can.
Ms. Wong stated that the Code requires a minimum of one tree for every twenty linear feet of street
frontage on Lemon Street. This property has a frontage of approximately 211 feet; that would be
approximately ten trees total. If the developer would like to provide less than Code requirements,
they would need to obtain a waiver.
Chairman Buffa stated that the Code will take care of her concern.
05/28/08
Page 14 of 17
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Chairman Buffa stated that she will switch to the opposite edge of the site which would be the eastern
edge along the back side of the shops building. She is glad there will be landscape pockets. The
plans provided to the Commission did not indicate any landscape pockets and she thinks there is
room on the back side to add significant landscaping. She understands the concern that they do not
want to create a place where people can take up residence over night, but she thinks they could get
some vertical elements in that will soften the back side of that building.
The roll-up door is the last issue of her concern. When people turn off of Durst Street into the
shopping center, they would be looking straight at the roll-up door. She is concerned about the visual
appearance. Even though there is an industrial use on the north side of Durst Street, this property is
not industrial, it is for commercial uses. She thinks it should be designed to be like a commercial
center and not like an industrial center. Her concern is with regards to the roll-up door and she would
prefer to see them replaced with swinging doors that open.
Commissioner Faessel stated that he agreed with Chairman Buffa's concern regarding the roll-up
door. He thinks the applicant delineated the other issues regarding the additional trees on Lemon
Street and the explanation of the landscaping pockets along the access road off of Durst Street. His
concern was also about the roll-up door because he thinks there are other ways to achieve the same
end. He concurs with the fact that the project has an industrial look and does not add to the building
at all. All of the commercial buildings off along Orangethrope need to be updated with a modern look.
The project is fine with an exception to the roll-up door.
Mr. Huynh replied that if the Commission wanted to go with double doors he is willing to work with
staff on that.
Commissioner Faessel suggested that staff could come up with a reasonable arrangement that would
meet the needs of the developer as well as the access that the utility needs, anything better than a
roll-up door would be better.
Commissioner Velasquez agreed.
Commissioner Agarwal concurred with regards to the roll up door. The applicant has accepted to
work with staff so he is in support of the project with the amended conditions.
Chairman Buffa asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak to this item; seeing none,
she closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Faessel offered a recommendation that the Planning Commission adopt the attached
resolution to determine the Previously Certified Environmental Impact Report No. 323 serve as the
appropriate environmental documentation and to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05310
with the changes as read into the record by staff.
Donna Patino, Secretary, announced that the resolution passed with 6 aye votes. Commissioner
Eastman was absent.
05/28/08
Page 15 of 17
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING_COMMISSION MINUTES
OPPOSITION: None
Mark Gordon, Assistant City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights ending at 5:00 p.m. on
Thursday, June 19, 2008.
DISCUSSION TIME: 16 minutes (2:53 to 3:09)
05/28/08
Page 16 of 17
MAY 28, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 3:09 P.M.
TO MONDAY, JUNE 23, 2008 AT 1:00 P.M.
FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW
Respectfully submitted:
~~c ~l~..
Donna Patino,
Secretary
~. __
Received and approved by the Planning Commission on June23, 2008.
05/28/08
Page 17 of 17