Loading...
1965/08/318889 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 31, 1965. 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. CIT.¥ ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler· CITY CLERK: Den, M. Williams. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph Pease. TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Edward Granzow. PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Grudzinski. ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Ronald Thompson. Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City CoUncil meeting held August 17, 1965, were approved, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTI ON CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; Councilman Pebley moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-32 AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 60: Submitted by the Chrysler Corporation requesting change of zone from R-A, C-1 and C-2 to M-l; property briefly described as located at the northwest corner of Brookhurst Street and La Palms Avenue (1111 North Brookhurst Street). The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1742, Series 1965-66, recommended disapproval of General Plan Amendment No. 60, and pursuant to Resolution No. 1741~ Series 1965-66, recommended approval of reclassification, subject to the following conditions: i · e · · . 7~ That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 60 feet in width, from the center line of the street~ along Brookhurst Street, for street widening purposes. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Brookhurst Street for street lighting purposes. That vehicular access rights to Rhodes Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Brookhurst $treet~ as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. That a modified cul-de-sac be provided at the terminus of Rhodes Avenue subject to the approval of the City Engineer· That the owners of subject property shall place of record City of Anaheim Deed Restrictions, approved by the City Attorney, which res- trictions shall limit the use of subject property as follows: "Any manufacturing, processing or treatment of products permitted on the property described in Exhibit "A" shall be of a limited nature and shall be conducted wholly within the building in such a manner that any objectionable noise, odor, smoke, vibration, etc., shall not be detected by the normal human senses at the boundary line of said property. "Limited manufacturing, processing or treatment of products shall be defined to include: "1) Research laboratories and facilities, developmental laboratories and facilities. "2) Manufacture, assembly, testing and repair of components, devices, equipment and systems of an electrical~ electronic or electro- mechanical nature, such as, but not limited to: a. Television and radio equipment and systems. b. Phonographs and audio uni%.s. c. Metering instruments, equipment and systems. 889O City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUT£S - August 3t, 1965, 1:30 . d. Radar, infra-red and ultra-violet equipment and systems-. e. Coils, tubes, valves, semi-conductors, filters, and similar components. f. Scientific and mechanical instruments. g. Data processing equipment and systems. h. Communication, navigation control, transmission and reception equipment, control equipment and systems, guidance equipment and systems. "3) Cafeteria, cafe, restaurant, or auditorium accessory to any permitted use. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. Mr. Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning CommisSion. He called attention tic findings which were the basis for approval re- commended by the Planning Commission, noting that dedication for the widening of Brookhurst Street would be required, that the proposed use was considered less intense than some uses currently allowed in the new C-1 zone, and would be similar to the previously established uses of subject property. Mayor Krein asked if the applicants or their representative wished to address the City Council. Mr. John Leafy, 615 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, addressed the City Council representing Chrysler Corporation, and noted representa- tives present from James, Pond and Clark, the firm which intends to operate the facility. He advised that the Chrysler Corporation utilized the center as a training center for retail personnel in Glasses o{ approxima- teiy'165 employees at a time, who af~ter training, went to Various!ar','aS"7 In contrast, the proposed facility will .employ approximately 200 permanent em- ployees. Mr. Leary further advised that noise, odors, etc., will be controlled in accordance with deed restrictions recommended by the City Planning Commission (copies thereof furnished each Councilman), and he displayed samples of the products to be manufactured, assembled, tested and repaired, which are of an electric, electronic or electromechanical nature. He noted that no major changes would be made to the subject property, with the exception of those recommended by the City, and it was his opinion that the facility will be an asset to the community. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council .in opposition to the requested zoning. Mrs. Virginia Allen, 2238 Falmouth Avenue, addressed the Council advising that she was not opposed to the use, but objected to the manner in which .the applicants and the city staff submitted their presentation and findings. She stated that her concern as to the termination of and access to Rhodes Avenue had been resolved by conditions imposed by the City Planning Commission. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council for or against the proposed reclassification, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-658: Council discussion was held, and at the con- clussion thereof, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 65R-658 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and further subject to the renumbering of Condition No. 8 to No. 9, and inserting the following c'ondition.to be numbered "8". Condition No. 8. "That the owners of subject property shall file an agreement with the City of Anaheim that they will take such protective measures as are necessary, if it is found and determined that noise, odors, smoke or vibration, are. objectionable at the property line." 8891 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 31, 1965, 1:30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING. AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-32 - M-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein · NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-658 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-659: Councilman Pebley offered' Resolution No. 65R-659 for adoption, sustaining the action of the City Planning Commission and disapproving General Plan Amendment No. 60 at this time, to be further considered at the General Plan Annual Review. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DISAPPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 60. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-659 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-22: Initiated by the Anaheim Plan- ing Commission to rezone from R-A to M-1 that portion of the Northeast Annexation Nco 3, located between the north bank of the Santa Aha River on the South and the center line of Orangethorpe Avenue on the north· Pursuant to Resolution No. 1725, Series 1965-66, the City Planning Commission recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: · · · . · · That dedications shall be made to the City of Anaheim on all streets within the area, according to the Circulation Element of the General Plan Highway Right-of-Way, prior to the adoption of the Ordinance rezoning the property. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required.by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer at the time the property is development. That the owner of the property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the property is developed. That a preliminary title report shall be furnished prior to the adoption of the ordinance rezoning the property, showing legal vesting of title, legal description, and containing a map of the property. That all plans for development of the property shall be submitted to and approved by the Development Review Committee on the basis of compatibility of development, both structurally and architecturally. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such parcel; PROVIDED however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split· " Mr. Ronald Grudzinski called attention to a map posted on the east wall of the Council Chamber, illustrating the area under considers- 8892 City Hall. Anaheim. California- COUNCIL MINUTES- Auqust 31. 1965. 1:30 ., t~'on. He noted that on August 10, 1965, the City Council cqncurred with recOmmeQdations of the City Planning Commission for zoning of.the annexa- tion tezritory (Reclassification No. 65-66-13), and a resolut'ion~of intent to rezone said territory was adopted. _ Mr. Grudzinski further advised that subject reclassification is the culmination of a State required zoning study of territory annexed to the City, and proposes a resolution of intent to-reclassify from the R-A zoning established in Reclassification No. 65-66-13 to the M-1 zone, thereby allowing individual property owners to meet conditions of the proposed resolution of intent~ complete the zoning, and develop their properties for industrial uses. In answer to Councilman Dutton's question, Mr. Grudzinski advised that no trailer parks have been approved in the area, nor are there any existing. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council for or against the proposed reclassification, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-660: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-660 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL COD£ RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-24 - M-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Kretn NOES: COUNCILMEN'. None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-660 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-25: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission to rezone, from R-A to M-1 that portion of the Yorba Annexation located between the north bank of the Santa Aha River on the south, the tenterline of Orang,thorpe Avenue on the north, the centerline of Imperial Highway on the east, and the westerly boundary of the Yorba Annexation, as described. The City Planning Commission', pursUant to Resolution No. 1726, Series 1965-66, recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: l. e ® . That dedication shall be made to the City of Anaheim on all streets within the area, according to the Circulation element of the General Plan Highway Right-of-Way, prior to the adoption of the Ordinance rezoning the property. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage. facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer at %he time the property is developed. That the owner of the property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the property is developed. That a preliminary title report shall be furnished prior %o the adoption of the ordinance rezoning the property, showing legal vesting of title, legal description, and 'containing a map of the property. 8893 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 31, 1965, i:30'P.M. . 6, That alI pi. ans for develOpment of the property shall be Submitted to and approves by the Development Review-Committee on the basis of compatibility of development, both structurally and archltectura11y. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to'such parcel; PROVIDED, however~ that the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split. Mr. Grudzinskl reported that his comments made concernina Re- classification No. 65-66-24, would basically apply to subject reclassi- fication, that on'August 17, 1965, the City Council concurred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and adopted resolution of intent to reclassify territory described in the Yorba Annexation, pursuant to Reclassification No. 65-66-17. Subject reclassification proposes to establish a resolution of intent to rezone property designated R-A in Reclassification No. 65-66-17, to M-1. No one wishing to address the City Council, the ~4ayor declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-661: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-661 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission: Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD B5 AMENDED AND YHAY IH5 BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (Reclassification No. 65-66-25 - M-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-661 duly passed and adopted. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Application filed by Jack S. Stansfield and Edward M, Williams, for entertainment permit to allow musical entertainment at the Tap City Restaurant, 1116 Fountain Way~ was submitted and granted for a period of one year, subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST - 1001 NORTH EUCLID AVENUE: Application for sign permit, submitted by H. 3. Walker, for The Beef Eater Restaurant~ was reviewed by the City Council together with reports from the Building and Planning Divisions. Mr. Paul Taylor, of Rich Sign & Neon Company, advised that the proposal is to add to an existing sign which projects three fee% over the right-of-way, and the addition will reduce the projection to 2 feet. He defined subject property, noting that property adjacent on the north has an' existing sign which projects further over the right-of-way than the proposed sign addition. In answer to Council questioning, the Director of Development Services reported that there is a three foot variation in dedicated pro- perry lines, as the street in front of subject property is three feet wider than the parcel to the north. "On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler, said sign permit was granted, as requested. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65-56 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 652 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Albert Gudes, dated August 10, 1965, was submitted for six .months extension of time to Reclassification No. 64-65-56 and Conditional Use Permit No. 652, for compliance with certain conditions pursuant to Resolution No. 65R-8. 8894 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTt~S - Auqust 31. 1965. 1:30 Six months extension of time from July 1, 1965, was granted by the City Council, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Council- man Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 64-65_-1 AND VARIANCE' NO. 1647 - EXTENSION OF TIME..~ .Request of Tom. Weeda~ dated August 2, 1965, was submitted for one year extension of time to Reclassification No. 64-65-1 and Variance No. 1647 for com- pliance with certain conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. 65R-598. Discussion was held by the City Council and the City Manager, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Pebley moved one year extension of time be granted from this date, subject to compliance with Condition No. 1, Resolution No. 64R-598, within 30 days. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO. 5602: Proposing to convert a temporary sales ._ office in an existing garage of a model home, into a family room; property located at the southeast corner of Beauty Drive and the southerly extension of Starfire Street, in the Santa Aha Canyon area (R-1 Tract No. 5332)o Mr. Ronald Thompson noted the location of the property, re- porting that the City Planning Commission recommended that the Orange County Planning Commission be urged to deny subject variance, and to require that the property be developed in accordance with parking re- quirements of T~.tle 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Council discussion was held, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Chandler moved that the recommendations of the City Planning Commission concerning Orange County Use Variance No. 5602 be disapproved, and that no recommendation be forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission° Councilman Du%ton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. POLICY OF THE CITY COUNCIL: On August 17, 1965, the Council adopted a policy that the new C-1 Ordinance adopted March 1, 1965, obviates the necessity for the filing of deed restrictions for C-1 zoning, except in those cases limiting the use and the height of structures on properties. Attention of the Council was called to the fact that the cancellation of deed restrictions requires approval by the City of Anaheim. It was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler, that the following be added to, the foregoing policy: "The Mayor and the City Clerk are authorized ito~'~evidence the consent of the City to cancel deed restrictions falling, within .... ~ the policy enunciated by the City Council.:" ~ : ~.... · MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC IMPROVEM£NT PROJECTS: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolutions Nos. 65R-662 and 65R-663 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-662: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPL£TION AND TH£ FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANS- PORTATION INCLUDING POWFR, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLET£ TH£ FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROV£MENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF HARBOR BOULEVARD', FROM APPROXIMATELY 253 FffT SOUTH OF MANCHESTER AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 468 FEET NORTH OF MANCHESTER AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 310. (Sully-Miller Con~tracting Company) 8895 ~itv Hall, Anaheim, California- COttNCIL MINUTES- .Auqust 31, 1965, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 65R~663: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT,. LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTA- TION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER., AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO. CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE. THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVFJ~ENT, TO WIT: MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT INTERSECTION OF HARBOR BOULEVARD AND ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. 146A, UNIT 7, (William R. Hahn) Roll. call vote:_ AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Kretn NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None '- The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 65R-662 and 65R-663 duly passed and adopted. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Chandler offered Resolutions Nos. 65R-664. and 65R-665 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-6~.. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Adolf Schoepe and Virginia Schoepe) RESOLUTION NO. 65R-665: A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Arthur R. and Thelma L. Do~rtngton) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 65R-664 and 65R-665 duly passed and adopted. CANCELLATION OF CITY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley, cancellation Of city taxes was authorized on property acquired by the State of California Division of Highways, for public purposes, formerly assessed to Sioux Honey Association, Final Order of Condemnation No. C6012 (Baggo%t, RW-VII Ora-5-PM 36.4, Supreme Court Case 125034, Parcel 2}, recorded June 25, 1965, in .Book 7571 at Page 588, Official Records of Orange County, California. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED PURCHASE OF PROPERTY: Mr. Murdoch reported that the Optimist Club build- ing, located at 113 West Chartres Street, may be placed on the market in the near future. Discussion was held relative, to the advisability of the City's purchase of the property. At the conclusion of the discussion, the City Council instructed the City Manager to proceed with negotiations on said property, working 'within the City's ability to finance the purchase., with current funds RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. M©TION CARRIED. (2:52 P.M.) Councilman Schutte left the meeting, 2:52 P.M. AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present with the exception of Councilman Schutte. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-666: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 65R-666 for adoption. 8896 City Hall. An.~heim.. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 31, 1965, 1'.30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO CITIES. 11965-66 ) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMAN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-666 duly passed and adopted, CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred to the City Attorney and Insurance Agent, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Chandler: a. Claim submitted by Shell 0il Company for damages purportedly resulting from an accident involving a city-owned vehicle, on 3uly 28, 1965. b. Claim submitted by Abe L. Greenbaum for damages purportedly resulting from inadequate barricading at storm drain excavation on Ball Road, on March 30, 1965. MOTION CARRIED. PERALTA HILLS ANNEXATION NO. 2: Request for consent to commence proceedings for the annexation of certain territory to the City of Anaheim was presented by the City Manager.. Councilman Dutton moved said request be referred to the City Planning Commission for report and recommendation. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT - 1965-.66 TAX LEVY: Metropolitan Water District Resolution No. 6724, levying a tax for the fiscal year 1965-66 upon taxable property lying within the City of Anaheim, was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTI ON CARRIED. Councilman Schutte entered th'e meeting. 3:00 P.M. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Pebl'ey, seconded by Councilman Dutton~ a. Before the Public Utilities Commission, Case No. 8244, investigation for the purpose of establishing a list for the year 1966 of railroad grade crossings of city streets or country roads most urgently in need of separation, or existing separations in need of alteration or reconstruction as contemplated by Section 189 of the Streets and Highways Code. b. Before the Public Utilities Commission, Case No. 8249, investigation to establish procedure for making allocations to local agencies under the "Crossing Protection Maintenance Fund', provided for in Public Utilities Code section 1231.1, and to determine methods for ascertain- ing maintenance costs of automatic crossing protection. c. Metropolitan Water District, list of municipalities, proportional participation and votes, as of August 20.,~ 1965. d. Minutes - A~heim Stadium Commission meeting of August 12, 1965. e.~ Minutes - Community Center Authority meeting of August 9, 1965. MOTI ON CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2183: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2183 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. 8897 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 31, 1965, 1:30 P.M. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-118 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schu%te, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 9183 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2185.. Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No.. 2185 for first reading. ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-130 - R-3) ORDINANCE NO. 2186: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2186 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (59-60-98 - C-I) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE ,APPLICATIONS: The following applications were pre- sented by the City Manager to the City Council' for their information: ao Submitted by Mardel Rp.y ;Mones for New Off-Sale Beer and Wine license at Mardel's Food Market,~'%t 855 South State College Boulevard (C-1 zone). " b. Submitted by John: J. Cote for New Off-Sale Beer and Wine license, ~i'. for the .,Tic Toc Market~ located on the north side of Orange Avenue, 175 feet ess% of Beach Boulevard (C-1 zone). No Council action was taken on the foregoing applications. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by Leartod E. and Sofia G. Winder, for New On-Sale Beer and Wine license at 518 North State College Boulevard (C-1 zone), was presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Attorney was authorized to file conditional protest with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application, on the basis that the C-1 zone does not permit "on-sale" of alcoholic beverages. MOTION CARRIED. SIDEWALK WAIVER - 808 WEST VERMONT STREET: Request of 3. B. Allen & Company for waiver of sidewalk requirements at 808 West Vermont Street, and per- mission to remove existing sidewalk, was continued from the meeting of August 24~ 1965~ for submission of a sketch or drawing of the proposed development (Page 8875). Mr. Bill Ellermeier, representing the applicant, came forward. the Council Table and presented plans and photographs for Council 'review. At the conclusion of Council discussion, Councilman Schutte moved that the City Council approve the removal of the existing sidewalk, and that temporary waiver of sidewalk requirements be granted, subject to the provisiOn that no permanent planting or permanent type improvements be permitted within the area reserved for future sidewalks. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. The foregoing motion failed to carry by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley and Chandler ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None Request for sidewalk waiver was declared denied. 8898 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 31, 1965'. 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTIoN-NO' 65R-~67: O~ the recommendations of the City Attorney, Council- man Duttbn offered Resolution No. 65R-667 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED TO REAL PROPERTY AND THE IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED THER£'ON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO ON DECEMBER 8, 1964 BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND LUSK CORPORATION.. (Drainage way construction - $23,173.67) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Kretn NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-667 duly passed and adopted. ; 65R-668: On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Council- R~SOLUTION NO, man Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-668 for adoption. ~ Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THAT CERTAIN CONTRACT FOR GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING AND CONSULTAIION SERVICES ENTERED INTO ON 3ANUARY 26, 1965 BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND DAMES AND MOORE. (Increase, not to exceed $21,000) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte and'Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None ABSTAINED: COUNCILMAN: Chandler The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-668 duly passed and adopted.. LIBRARY BOARD APPOINTMENT: Mr. Murdoch reported that at %heir .next meeting, the Library Board will consider recommendations to fill the vacancy on the Board created by the resignation of Mr. Arthur Gray, WATER MAIN INSTALLATIONS AND EXTENSIONS: The City Manager reported on pro- posed change in the method of fixing rates for water main extensions from a "front foot basis" to an "acreage basis", to provide for the same charges current%y being made to be made on a more equitable basis. He advised that a resolution has been prepared for Council consideration, to be presented September28, 1965, after copies thereof have been con- sidered by interested organizations, such as the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce and the Home Builders Association. SALE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM WATER FACILITY TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY: Mr. Murdoch reported on negotiations with the Southern California Water Company relative to the sale of a portion of the city-owned water system, lying within the city limits of the City of Stanton, acquired in the purchase of facilities from the Dyke Water Company. (Report of valuations and agreed upon negotiated cost was furnished each Councilman). Mr. Murdoch recommended that the sale Of the 565 services and the acquisition of 99 meter services from the Southern California Water Company, serving the Thornton-Brady area, be authorized. Further, that the agreement with Southern California Water Company to purchase 136 services in Tract No. 4379 and Tract No. 4181 be extended for a minimum of one year with two additional one year options on the part of the City. 8899 City Hall, Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 31, 1965, 1:30 P.M. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Manager Was authorized to proceed with the sale, acquisition and extension of agreement as recommended. Councilman Pebley abstained. MOTION CARRIED. On the recommendation of the City Manager, no-action was taken at this time on the sale of city-owned facilities (144 services), in the area generally described as the west side of Gilbert Street, south of Cerrttos Avenue, pending determination of whether or not this area wished to annex to the City of Anaheim. TRAFFIC FACILITIES - HARBOR BOULEVARD: Mr. Edward Granzow, Traffic Engineer, reported on study made of traffic facilities on Harbor Boulevard extending northerly from Ball Road to Anaheim Boulevard. Slides of Harbor Boulevard showing present conditions created by the narrow 53-foot width street, were presented. Sketch of recommended proposal designed to establish two lanes of traffic in each direction with left-hand turn pockets at intersections, and designating "N° Parking Zones" in certain locations, was submitted and reviewed by the City Council and audience. Discussion was held regarding the possibility of widening the street block by block as required dedication is obtained, and removing the "no- parking" restrictions from the widened areas. In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Granzow estimated that traffic would be adequately taken care of for 20 to 25 years if the planned widening program could be realized. Also considered was temporary waiver of dedicated vehicular access rights to Harbor Boulevard,' thereby providing for front yard parking. Dr. Kott addressed the Council advising that he represented ten people in the area, and that they were not opposed to the widening of the street, however, if parking is restricted, in his opinion, small businesses would never develop along Harbor Boulevard. Dr. Kott was advised that the street was originally designed as a residential street, and that commercial use was an adjunct. Dr. Kott was of the opinion that business establishments in this area should be provided city-owned off-street parking lots, in the same manner as the down-town section. At the conclusion of the discussion, it was determined that public hearing on the matter should be held, and that a report be furnished as to how much dedication along Harbor Boulevard has been obtained by the City, and how much in addition would be needed to effectuate a widening program. Also desired was information on adjacent alleys which are. a part of the total Problem. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, public hearing was ordered to be scheduled October 19, .196.5, 7:00 O'clock P.M. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENTz Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:55 P.M.) City Clerk