Loading...
1965/12/14" 9110 City Hall. Anah.eim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- December 14, 1965, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in reuular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler (entered the meeting 1:45 P.M.) and Krein. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: 3oseph Geisler. CITY ~L£RK: · Dene M. Williams. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. CITY ~NGINEER: 3ames P. Maddox. UTILITIES DIRECTOR: Gordon Hoyt. FINANCE DIRECTOR: Douglas Ogden. ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Ronald Thompson. Mayor Krein cail~d the meeting to order. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held November 23, 1965, were approved, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLU. TIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title~ specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, payment of demands against the City, in accordance with the 1965-66 Budget, in the amount of $1,391.,263.69, was authorized. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDONMENT: Pursuant to Resolution No. 65R-815, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin November 18, 1965, public hearing on proposed abandonment of 16-foot easement (formerly Anaheim Union Water Company easement), located northerly of Vermont Street, west of East Street (north 16 feet of Lots 7 and 8, Tract No. 3042) was continued from the meeting of November 30, 1965. ~ Due to a possible conflict of interest, Councilman Pebley withdrew from the discussion and action on this issue. The City Engineer reported that the proposed abandonment has been cleared by all agencies and departments concerned, and that he recommended said abandonment° The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-911: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-911 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES UPON, ALONG, OVER AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schut~e and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEN: Pebley ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandl er The Mayor declared Resolution. No. 65R-911 duly passed and adopted. 9111 City Hall. Anaheim. California- COUNCIL MINU/£S- December 14. 1965. 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-61: Inititated"by the Anaheim Planning Commission for change of zone from P-L to C-l, property located at the north- east corner of Ball Road and Lemon Street. Recommended for approval by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1867, Series 1965-66, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Ball Road and Anaheim Boulevard, including a 25-foot radius corner return at the corner for street widening purposes. 2. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 32 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Lemon Street, including a 15-foot radius corner return at Ball Road, for street widening purposes. 3. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Ball Road and Lemon Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 5. That Condition Nos. 3 and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection. 6. That Gondition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with ~ithin a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. (Councilman Chandler entered the meeting, 1:45 P.M.) Associate Planner Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property, consisting of a strip 60 feet in depth extending from Anaheim Boulevard to Lemon Street on the northside of Ball Road, and a strip 15 feet in depth along the east side of Lemon Street from Ball Road to the apartment development on the north. He advised that in initiating subject petition, the Planning Commission felt that Site Development Standards of the C-1 zone would provide for orderly development of the properties, and allow g~'eater flexib~2ity than the P-L Zone. ~ The City Clerk submitted into evidence communication dated December 9, 1965, from Burton Zoul, owner of service station property at the northwest corner of Ball Road and Anaheim Boulevard, expressing his objection to any further dedication of property for street widening purposes. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council. Mr. Ken Bryant, 2020 North Broadway, Santa Aha, Attorney repre- senting Mr. Zoul, advised that letter from the Mobil Oil Company, lessees of Mr. Zoul property, points out that any further dedication of his property for street widening would make it impossible to operate the service station at that location. Mr. A. O. Hedblom, Mobil Oil 'Company Real Estate Representative, referred to a plot plan and advised that the corner radius return dedication would require relocation of existing sign standard and both pump islands~ and would restrict automobile maneuverability and turning radius on the property. At this point, the hearing was continued for a short time to allow the City Engineer to review the plot plan displayed by Mr. Hedblom. Later in the meeting, the City Manager reported that the service station property is of sufficient size to relocate the improvements, however the street widening was not so urgent that it warranted the expense of such changes within 180 days. He suggested that the 180 day time limit be removed, thereby allowing the resolution of .intent for C-1 zoning on all the subject properties with dedication for street widening and corner radius return to be made prior to issuance of a building permit. Mr. Lee Webb, owner of property at the northeast corner of Lemon Street and Ball Road, and also representing Mr. Collins, owner of the 9112 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 14. 1965. 1:30 P.M. nursery property to the east, advised' of plans to develop, the corner parcel in the near future, and requested that all subject prOperties be included, if the length of time for dedication is changed. He further requested clarification of responsibility for the cost of relocating curbs, gutters and sidewalks., when the streets are widened, Mr. Webb was advised thai on properties where the.owner has previously payed for such improvements, it'would be the City's oblige/toe to absorb ihe cos'ts o£ additional widening. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-912: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 65R-912 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the ~ zone as recommended, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, amending Condition No. 6 thereof, and adding a further condition, as follows: "6. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit. 7. That each parcel may be zoned separately under provisions of this reclassification." Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-61 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-912 duly passed and adopted. DRAG STRIP AND AUTO RACE 'tRACK PROPOSALS - ANAHEIM STADIUM SITE: Discussion was held by the City Council regarding proposals received for drag strip and auto race tracks at the Anaheim Stadium Site, and at the conclusion thereof, it was moved by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, that the proposals received be tabled for a period of one year° MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED ABANDONMENTS: Councilman Pebley offered Resolutions. Nos. 65R-913 and 65R-914 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO..65R-913: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON THAT PORTION OF A FORMER ANAHEIM UNION WATER COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT OVER, ACROSS, ALONG AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION ~ OF THIS RESOLUTION. (Public hearing January 4, 1966, 1:30 P.M. - 8 foot water easement along the west and north.boundaries of Tract No. 1599) RESOLUTION NO. 65R-914: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON THAT PORTION OF AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER, ACROSS, ALONG AND THROUGH THE HEREIN- AFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY ; FIXING A TIME AND 'PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION. (Public hearing January 4, 1966, 1:30 P.M. - Drainage easement, Tracts Nos. 1178 and 255) Roll call vote: 9113 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTF-$ - ,~ Dec ember ,, 14, ,1965, 1~30 P.M. AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN~ None ABSENT~ COUNCILMENt' None The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 65R-913 and 65R-914 duly passed and adopted. , F_NTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Application filed by Wes Sorensen for Entertainment Permit to allow piano bar, with bass and/or one other instrument, at the Linbrook Bowling Center, 201 South Brookhurst Avenue, was submitted and granted for a period, of one year, subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman $chutte MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 557: Request of Elizabeth Lancaster for waiver of street improvements required by the Building Department, and release of United California Bank Time Certificate of Deposit No. 48365, dated August 20, 1965, to insure said improvements, was submitted; R,A property located on the west side of Beach Boulevard, between Orange and Lincoln Avenues. Mrs Lancaster addressed the Council advising that although Conditional Use Permit No. 557 permitted expansion of an existing trailer park on subject property, the Beach Boulevard frontage was still an orange grove, and with the Flood Control Channel adjacent on the South, she was of the opinion that it was unneccessary to construct street improvements at this time. She further reported that the bridge over the Flood Control Channel is not wide enough to accommodate any additional lanes of traffic. Attention was called to report from the City Engineer, noting that the development of property and street improvements immediately to the North will cause a drainage problem on subject parcel~' Mr; Maddox advised that when dedication is received and the highway is widened, the bridge will be widened by the State Division of Hi9hwayso ' Mrs; Lancaster advised that it is planned to develop the front portion of the property in the future, at which time street improvements would seem more.feasible. She requested waiver of the requirements at this time, and release of the time certificate deposit. At the conclusion of the discussion that follo~ed, Councilman Chandler moved that the request to waive street improvement requirements and release United California Bank Time Certificate of Deposit No. 48365, be denied, and that a six month extension of time, or until the property to the North is developed, be granted°" Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. To this motion, Councilman Schut'te voted' "No". MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 785; Submitted by Pacific Conference of Seventh Day ' Adventists, requesting permission to establish an office building with waivers of maximum height within 150 feet of a single family zone boundary, and mini- mum required parking; R-A property located on the east side of Harbo~ Boulevard south of Katella Avenue. Granted by the City Planning Commission, ,subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. 1856; Series 1965-66. Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was requested by Councilman $chutte to determine if height standards formerly established for the Commercial-Recreation area should be modified, and the City Clerk was instructed to schedule Conditional Use Permit No. 785 for public hearing before the City Council. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM$~ Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held November 22, 1965, pertaining to the following applica- tions,, were submitted for City Council information and consideration& CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 786~ Submitted by Joseph Tseu requesting permis- sion to establish a church edifice and educatioDai unit; R-A property located on the west side of Dale Avenue, south of Crescent Avenue. ' Granted by th~ Cit? Planning Commission, subject to conditions, Pursuant to Resolution No. 1957; Series 1965-66. 9114 City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- December 14, 1965, 1:30 P.M. cONDITIONAiJ USE PERMIT NO. 78'7:. S_ubmitted by Raymond B,_ Terry:.and Amde×, Incorporated, requesting permission to expand an existing motel, and to establish a restaurant with on-sale liquor; C-1 property located at 631 West K'atella Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1858, Series 1965-66, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE pERMIT NO. 789: Submitted by Charles G. Schlegel, et al, for permission to establish an on-sale liquor use at restaurant under construction; C-1 property located at the northeast corner of Lincoln and Wilshire Avenues. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. 1859, Series 1965-'66. VARIANCE NO. 1746: Submitted by Walter R. Hemphill requesting waiver of minimum lot area and minimum lot width; R-A property located at 951 North Gilbert Street. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. 1860, Series 1965-66. VARIANCE NO. 1747: Submitted by L.G.S. Corporation for waiver of requirement of 300-foot distance between free-standing signs on the same parcel; C-1 property located at 1245 West Lincoln Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1861~ Series 1965-66, granted said variance, subject to conditions. VARIANCE NO. 1749: Submitted by James Emmi, requesting waiver of minimum yard setback on R-A property (R-3 zone pending, Reclassification No. 64-65-65), on the east side of Palm Lane, south of Ball Road. Granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. 1862, Series 1965-66. CONDITIONAL USE PERMII NO. 734: City Planning Commission ResolutiOn No. 1868, Series 1965-66, was submitted~ amending Condition No. 11 of Resolution No. 1729, to provide that Conditions Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 of said resolution shall be complied with prior to final building inspection. VARIANCE NO. 1736: City Planning Commission Resolution No. 1869, Series 1965-66, was submitted amending Condition No. 5, Resolution No. 1783, to provid'e that the required parcel map be approved by the City of Anaheim, and recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder prior to final building inspection. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 505: Excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held November 22, 1965, was submitted noting the Commission~s approval of revised plans (Revision No. 1, Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4) for theater and office building with dual use of parking spaces; property located on the east side of Euclid Street, north of Crescent Avenue. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council,. and no further action taken on the above mentioned conditional use permits.' ar~ variance applications. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-915: On the recommendations of the Director of Public Works, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 65R-915 for adoption. Refer to ResOlution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITf COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS FOR CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE BY THE CITY UNDER THE STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1931. (Street Light District 1965-3 - Tract No. 2876, 3ob No. 993) 9115 City Hall. Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- December 14, 1965. 1:30 P.M. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-915 duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION NO. 65R-916: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 65R-916 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF /HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1931, DESCRIBING THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE, NAMING THE STREETS UPON WHICH THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE MADE, REFERRING TO THE REPORT OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, FIXING THE PERIOD OF TIME FOR WHICH THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE MADE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS. (Public Hearing 3anuary 18, 1965, 1:30 P.M.) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, $chutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-916 duly passed and adopted. CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 - WORK ORDER NO. 6004: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved that Change Order No. 5, Work Order No. 6004, consisting of extra work at Walnut Canyon Reservoir, together with two deductions as noted on ~he City Engineer's memorandum December 3, 1965, in the increased amount of $68~0~,46, be authorized. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-917: In accordance with recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-917 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF IHE CITY COUNCIL OF /HE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER- FORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: /HE MILLER STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM APPROXIMATELY 2200 FEET NORTH OF MIRALOMA AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 236 FEET NORTH OF MIRALOMA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM 30B NO. 1294. (Far Western Pipeline, Inc. $8,908. ) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ,~BSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-917 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-918: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Chandler-offered Resolution No. 65R-918 for adoption. Refer to ReSolUtion BoOk. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR /HE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL 9116 City Hall, Anaheim. California- COUNCIL.MINUTES- December 14, 1965, 1:30 P.~4. UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATERy AND PER- FORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY IO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF CRONE AVENUE AND EUCLID STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ PROJECT NO. 334-B. (Steiny and Mitchel Inc., $5,035) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-918 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-919 - S.S. PROJECT NO. 304-A. UNIT NO. 1: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 65R-919 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVF~ENT~ TO WIT: RELOCATION OF HOUSES ON KATELLA AVENUE --1021 AND 1201 EAST KATELLA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, S.S. PROJECT NO. SOa-A~ UNIT NO. 1; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES~ DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS~ SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened January 6, 1966, 2:00 P.M.) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-919 duly passed and adopted. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolutions Nos. 65R-920, 65R-921 and 65R-922 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-920: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (H. E. and Marjorie J. Balmer) RESOLUTION NO. 65R-921: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ThE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Ralph W. and Myrtle B. James) RESOLUTION NO. 65R-922: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 65R-90~ ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED FROM PAUL E. HATFIELD~ DOROTHY 3. HATFIELD, ROBERT I. PATCHIN AND DORIS 3. PATCHIN. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolutions~Nos. 65R-P20, 65R-921 and 65R-922, duly passed and adopted. 9117 City Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES -December, 14~ 1965,~1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-923.~ On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman ' Dutton offered Resolution No.~65R-923 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ESTABLISHING A "NO PARKIN(~' AREA ON LINCOLN AVENUE IN FRONT OF 1780 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES.. COUNCILMEN.'-None ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN:' None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-923 duly. passed and adopted. ENGINEERING STUDY~. Councilman Chandler requested the Traffic Engineer to study and make recommendations to the City Council relative to the feasibility of establishing: "No Parking" zones for certain distances from corners where visibility is restricted. SAN BERNARDINO WATER CON~ISSION RESOLUTION - PRADO DA~.' On report and recommen- dation of the Utilities Director~ Resolution No. 156 of the San Bernardino Board of Wate~ Commissioners, urging all interested entities to join in a cooperative agreement urging the United States Corps of Engineers to close the gates of PradO Dam, continued from the meeting of November 30, 1965, for further investigation, was ordered received and filed, on motion by Council- man Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCEs' The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton~ a.' City of Fountain'Valley - regarding League of California Cities; Orange County Division. b. International Conference of Building Officials - expressing appreciation in allowing Homer Wallace to attend 43rd Annual Business Meeting. c. Minutes Orange County MosquitoAba~ment District '- Meeting of November 18, 1965. d. Minutes - Anaheim Stadium Commission ~ Meeting of November 18, 1965. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2224~ Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2224 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING' (65-66-40 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN:' Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES~ COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN.' None Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2224 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2225: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2225 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-15 - C-l) 9118 City Hall. Anaheim. California- COUNCIL MINUTES- December 14. 1965. 1:30 P.M. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2225 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2226: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2226 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-23 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCI L~EN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None Mayor Krein declared Ordinance No. 2226 duly passed and adopted, ORDINANCE NO. 2227 - INTERIM ZONING, LA PALMA AND RIO VISTA ANNEXATION: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2227 as an urgency ordinance for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (La Palma and Rio Vista Annexation) 'i :~.' Said Ordinance No, 2227 was read in full by the City Clerk?: Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Kr-ein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ' - · ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None Mayor Krein declared .Urgency Ordinance No. 2227 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2228: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2228 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-39 - C-l) ORDINANCE NO. 2229: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2229 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-52 - C-l) RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:25 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order', all members of the City Council being present with the exception of Councilmen Pebley and $chutte. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-924: On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 65R-924 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 9119 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 14, 1965. 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT EMPLOYING CHARLES R. HILLER~ ARCHITECT, TO RENDER ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF FIRE STATION NO. 8. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley and Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-924 duly passed and adopted. REQUEST - CALIFORNIA TIME AIRLINES: Mr. Robert Davis reported on communication received from Urbanus Associates, Civic Consultants, requesting City Council support of application before the California Public Utilities Commission by California Times Airline for permission to operate four scheduled round trip flights between Orange County Airport and San Francisco International Airport. It was determined by the City Council that consideration of the fore9oin9 request be continued one week, December 21, 1965, for further information. REQUEST - INDEPENDENT BANK OF ANAHEIM: Regarding request by the Independent Bank of Anaheim, dated June 14, 1965, to consider their organization as a depository for demand funds from the City of Anaheim, Finance Director DougLas Ogden reported on the four active accounts of the City of Anaheim, each maintaining a minimum amount in various local banking institutions. He advised the only change he-mould' suggest, would be to rotate these active · . accounts periodically between the various local banks, rather than increase the number of active act-cunts. At the conclusion of the discussion that followed, Co6ncil action o'n the request of the Independent Bank of Anaheim was deferred, and the Finance Director was requested to make report and recommendation concerning 'the feasibility of rotating the City'~s active accounts between the local banks. . TAXIC AB 'PERMITS: Appl.i.cation submitted by 'Yellow Cab Company of Northern Orange County, INC., for four new unit permits, was granted on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Council'man Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: Councilman Dutton moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:12 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: M~yor Krein called the meeting to order. .. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, ~handl'er and Krein. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: SChu~te. PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Ronald Thompson. ~ INVOCATION: Reverend Ray S. Jones, of the Knott Avenue Christian Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Chandler led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the FI ag. 9120 City Hall. Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- December 14, 1965, 1:30 P.M. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-48. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 769 AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 48: Submitted by Grace Elizabeth Dickerson requesting change of zone from R-A to R-2, and permission to construct a 42-unit planned residential development at 1651 East Broadway. (Continued from the meeting of November 23, 1965~ at the request of the Attorney for the petitioner). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1816, Series 1965-66, recommended denial of said reclassification; and pursuant to Resolution No. 1817, Series 1965-66, denied said Conditional Use Permit, and further recommended disapproval of General Plan Amendment No. 48~ pursuant to Resolution Noo 1818, Series 1965-66. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject.property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He summarized the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission, and made reference to the CommissionJs findings in recommending denial of subject petitions. Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council, and Mayor Krein asked if the applicant or her agent wished to address the Council. Mr. Robert MacMahon, 1695 West Crescent Avenue, Attorney re- presenting the applicant, advised that the proposed development was being brought back for f~rther consideration after being denied by the City Council approximately one year ago (Reclassification No. 64-65-66 and Conditional Use Permit No. 659), as the applicant believed that the proposal would be the soundest and best development for subject property. He noted that the planned residential development meets all requirements of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and contains only 42 units; whereas the R-3 reclassification requested in 1963 for subject property proposed a considerably higher density. That the units are not apartments but are individual living units having a common wall, and :the one,two-story ~ studio type building, located 150 feet from any existin9 residential development in the area, have only sleeping quarters on the second floor. Mr. MacMahon explained future plans of the developers to sell the units under the condominium ordinance, the land remaining on a long term lease to the developers from the owner. He advised that every effort will be made to limit the residents to adult families. With regard to the opposition expressed by residents of the area, Mr. MacMahon was of the opinion that the proposed development would be compatible with surrounding single family homes; that R-1 development of subject property would not be practical, and would bring more children to the area; further, economics would require two-story homes adjacent to the existing single story residences. He called attention to the quality of construction proposed, and the fact that full garages were planned in lieu of carports, and noted the advantages to the City in development of the property and the improvement of Broadway. In conclusion, Mr. MacMahon stated that they had interviewed a number of residents in the area and found that some were not opposed, and many were in favor of this proposal. He thereupon requested favorable consideration of subject applications. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition. Mr. Stanley Hankins, 223 Wayside Place, speaking for the opposition, noted findings of the City Planning Commission, and briefed t. he history of subject property, calling attention to the fact that C-1 zone' on the Lincoln Avenue adjacent to subject property has never been developed although the zone was accomplished approximately five years ago. He was of the opinion that the proposed reclassification was not necessary or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the surrounding community, that there is a tremendous surplus of rental units in the City of Anaheim, and the general economy is suffering, due to the poor response being given to local condominium developments. He particularly objected to the proposed perimeter drive around the planned residential development, 'which would have access to and from Broadway at two separate points. 9121 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 14, 1965, 1:30 P.M. ....... ~r. Hankins furfher advise~ that-the area in 'questiOn has been ~r°jected by the City Planning CommissiOn for single family residential use for the past ten years, and based on Ghat fact,:'-a~'gr~eat~-deat Of ~ money has been invested in homes in"%he area by citizens in%mrested in a residential neighborhood in close-proximity to schools and a park. In his opinion, homes are always depreciated by the 'addition of multiple family units to a neighborhood, and subject property would accommodate 22 to 24 single family homes, as illustrated by sketches prepared by the Planning Division Staff, depicting five possible layouts for R-1 development. In conclusion, Mr. Hankins stated that to grant the R-2 request would be contrary to the general plan, and he requested that the action taken by the City Planning Commission be upheld. 'Mr. Ronald Barker, 247' Date Street, West, adjacent to subject property, concurred with statements of Mr. Hankins, advising that they purchased their homes in good faith that the area was strictly family residential. He expressed the desire to see the property developed, but objected to multiple units adjacent to his home. In rebuttal, Mr. MacMahon was of the opinion that the economics involved were the concern of the applicants, and that the individual, self contained units would be well received. He noted plans to develop the C-1 property on the north at such time as the development of subject property is resolved. Relative to the Broadway access, he noted that a single family residential development would probably require the two openings, and in his opinion, subject application was the best possible development for the property. Mayor Kreinannouncedthat a good cross section of evidence had been presented, and thereupon declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTIONS: Discussion was held by the City Council, Councilman Dutton being of the opinion that the development proposed was satisfactory, and it was in the interest of the City's general welfare to develop the property as proposed. He thereupon offered resolutions to approve subject applica- tions, with the exception of requested waiver of 150 foot distance between two-story development and R-1 property° Mr. Geisler advised of his concern that there be adequate pro- vision for the maintenance and upkeep of subject property~ should the .property be sold under the Condominium plan. Mr. Mac~ahon stated that another conditional use permit applica- tion would be submitted, stipulating as to covenants, conditions and restrictions, which would be necessary for filing under the state law, that all state provisions would be complied with, and he suggested that said stipulations be made a condition of the reclassification, if granted. In addition, he offered to furnish the City with a copy of the paid-up ground lease° In answer to Councilman Pebley's question, Mr° MacMahon advised that they could incorporate a single drive through the center of the pro- perry, however it would require the loss of a major portion of the re- creational area. Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that the property should be restricted to single-story units only, so as to resemble the surrounding area as much as possible. Further discussion was held and possible revision of the Plans for development considered; at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Dutton withdrew resolutions to approve subject applications. On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Chandler moved that the hearing be reopened, and continued to February 15, 1966; that in the interim period, revised plans of subject property be submitted to the City Planning Commission for their recommendation to the Council. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRI£D. 9122 City Hall. Anaheim. California- COUNCIL MINU/ES- December 14. 1965, 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC-HEARING - cONDITiONAL USE P£RMIT NO. 778: SHbmitted by Gran. Columbia Corporation requesting permission to establish a restaurant with on-sale beer and wine; C-1 property located at 1000 North ~uclid Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1841, Series 1965-66, granted said conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions. 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Euclid Street, for street widening purposes. 2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim 15¢ per front foot along Euclid Street, for tree planting.purposes. 3. That the sidewalks and driveways shall be installed along Euclid Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined %o be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 6. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Euclid Street, for street lighting purposes. 7o That Condition Nos. 1, 2, s. nd 6, above mentioned~ shall be complied with prior to the time that the building permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east pro- perty line to close Francis Drive. That Vehicular and pedestrian access rights to Francis Drive shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 10. That a modified cul-de-sac be provided at the terminus of Francis Drive subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 11. That Condition Nos~ 3, 4, 5, 8, 9 and 10, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection. ® e Appeal of action taken by the City Planning Commission relative to requirement of block wall fence at Francis Drive was filed by owners and operators of the various businesses located at the southeast corner of Euclid and La Palina Avenues, and public hearing scheduled this date. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property, and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, noting that Francis Drive stubs into the southerly portion of subject property on the east. He called attention to City Planning Conditions Nos. 8, 9 and 10, and advised of a study conducted by the Development Services Department Staff and the Traffic Engineer, which reveal that many vehicles are using the private street on subject property to gain access to Francis Drive, an improved public street; therefor the Commission felt the wall should be a requirement. Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council and Mayor Krein asked if the applicant wished to address the Council. Mr. Harry Schumacker, 2124 Vista Laredo, Newport Beach, owner of the property, advised that he agreed in principle with the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. He reported that as many as 1700 vehicles in a 24 hour period were counted using the private drive on the property to gain access to Francis Drive. In response to Council questioning, Mr. Schumacker advised that it is intended to construct and operate a pizza restaurant on subject property. The Mayor asked for a show of hands regarding closing off Francis Drive at the commercial property line, and a substantial majority indicated their wishes to keep the access open. 9123 City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 14, 1965. 1:30 P.M. ' " The Ma~or asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition to the requested conditional use permit. Mr. E. R. Markson, represeoting Alpha Beta Markets, 777 South Harbor Boulevard~ in La Habra~ addressed the Council in opposition to the closing of the access to the property from the east, advising that the Alpha Beta Corporation considers the access to Francis Drive a definite asset to business and to the dev.e, lopment of the commercial area. He briefed the history of the property~ originally being a larger parcel including property to the east, which was sold and subdivided into a single family residential development; and he noted that Francis Drive was left open with the approval of the City of Anaheim, as condition of the property sale. Regarding the reported 1700 traffic count, it was Mr. Markson's understanding that this was a two-way count, each vehicle being counted twice, upon entering and leaving the property. He advised that most people did not use the private driveway and Francis Drive as a through- way, but as a convenience in shopping on the premises, and the Alpha Beta Corporation felt that the drive should remain open as a necessary con- venience and safety factor to the neighborhood residents. Mr. Markson submitted a petition in favor of retaining the Francis Drive access, purportedly signed by over 600 persons~ and was of the opinion that an overwhelming majority of the interested residents desire to retain the opening to the shopping area. He requested omission of conditions requiring that the opening be closed. In answer to Councilman ChandlerVs question, Mr. Markson advised that the petition signatures were partly obtained from shoppers on the premises~ and partly by calling at homes in the neighborhood. Mr. James W. Smith, 931 Dresden Street, adjacent to subject pro- perty, addressed the Council advising that he originated the request to close Francis Drive, which was signed by the four residents adjacent to said street. That they objected to the constant flow of traffic passing their homes day and night, some of the vehicles having the R-3 development to the south as their destination. It was Mr. Smith's understanding than when the C-1 property was developed ten years ago, certain City of Anaheim's zoning ordinances re- quired the construction of a six-foot block wall adjacent to the R-1 zonej however the wall never materialized, and he objected to violation of municipal ordinances. He noted that according to the City EngineerVs Office, no other Anaheim shopping center has an opening ihto a single-family re- sidential area. Councilman Chandler noted a similar situation on commercial property located at Lincoln Avenue and M'dlier Street. Mr. Smith referred to .the sectional map posted on the east wall of the Council chambers, calling attention to.the negligible effect the closing of Francis Drive would have on the residents in the area, and on the merchants in the shopping center, noting the distance to other shopping areas. He requested that the block wall be required in accordance with the City's zoning regulations. In answer to Councilman Chandler's question, the City Attorney reported that. the City ordinance referred to wa~ in the general provisions section' of the zoning ordinance, having to do with improvement' of public parking areas; however in his opinion, the provision would not apply to street or driveway openings, unless so specified by the City Council; therefor there was no existing violation insofar as the street opening into the C-1 area was concerned. Original C-1 reclassification file pertaining to subject property was requested by the City Council. 9124 City Hall, Anaheim, California"-COUNCIL MINUTES- December 14, 1965, 1:30 RECESS-:- CoUncilman Pebley moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9:05 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order, and asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council for or against the requested conditional use permit, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Reclassification No. 53-54-6, establishin9 C-1 zoning on subject property, was reviewed by the City Council. Councilman Dutton referred to literature distributed by the sales people for the R-1 subdivision adjacent to subject property, which illustrated the location of the market to be constructed, and the opening of Francis Drive into the commercial area° Mr. James Wo Smith again addressed the Council advising that the sales agents assured purchasers of the new homes that the street was to remain opened on a temporary basis only, depending on the development of the property immediately to the west; that should that property also develop for R-1 use, the street would be extended through Euclid Street, but if developed commercially, the street would not be used as a thoroughfare. Mr. Willard H. Davis, 1019 Dresden Street, advised that when he purchased his new home, he was not told that the street would be closed; in his opinion this access to the shopping center should be retained as a convenience for the residents. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-925: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 65R-925 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 778, subject to the City Planning Commission'Js recommendations, with the exception that Conditions Nos. 8, 9 and 10 be deleted, and Condition No. 11 be amended to delete said condition therefromo Refer to Resolution Booko A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 778. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: S chutt e The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-925 duly passed and adopted, PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 783 AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 69: Submitted by Donald E. and Alice Jean Pierotti requesting permission to establish a medical hospital and center, and related uses, R-A property located on the east side of Jefferson Avenue, the northern boundary being south of Walnut Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1845, Series 1965-66, denied said conditional use permit; and pursuant to Resolution No. 18a6~ Series 1965-66, recommended disapproval of General Plan Amendment No. 69. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by the authorized agent, and public hearing scheduled this date. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property in the northeast industrial area~ and the adjacent paint and chemical manufacturing facility under construction, advising that much of the area is zoned residential agricultural, with a pending resolution of intent for M-1 zoning. He displayed an exhibit depicting those areas where the City Planning Commission felt the requested hospital could better serve the needs of the community while preserving the integrity of the northeast industrial area, and he reported that many of the properties in the suggested location are available for purchase. 9125 City Hail, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- December 14. 1965, 1:30 P.M. · . ...... Ali~ntion of the CounCil was called to letter dated December 14, 1965, rom the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce BOard of Directors urging support of City Plannin9 Commission's recommendations. - ~. Mayor Krein asked if the applicants or their agents wished to address the Council. Mr. O. Rotherham, 415 West Chapman Avenue, Placentia, Real Estate Agent, requested that the hearing be continued for 30 days to allow further consideration of the Planning Commission recommendations. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, public hearing was continued to 3anuary 25, 1966, 7:00 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-46. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 768 AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 64: Submitted by Doyle & Shields Development Company for a change of zone from R-A to C-1 on Portion A, and R-3 on Portion B, and permission to establish a multiple-family planned residential development with waivers of dwelling units more than 200 feet from a standard street, 6-foot masonry wall separating proposed C-1 and R-3 zones, maximum height of dwelling units within 150 feet of an R-A zone, and minimum distance between facing buildingsl property located at the northeast corner of Magnolia Avenue and Winston Roado Portion A - approximately 150 foot frontage on Winston Road and 495 feet on Magnolia Avenue, and Portion B - east of and adjacent to Portion A, with approximately 370-foot frontage on the north side of Winston Road. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolutions Nos. 1833, 1834 and 1835, Series 1965-66, recommended denial of said reclassification, denied said conditional use permit, and recommended disapproval of General Plan Amendment No. 64. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He noted findings of the Commision in their recommended denial~ and called attention to application initiated by the Planning Commission, Reclassification Nco 65-66-54, recommending R-3 zoning for the property in question. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposi- tion to subject petitions. Mrs. Marian Lewton, 12122 Telephone Avenue, Chino, owner of property located at 10221 Magnolia Avenue, advised of her objections to the C-1 zoning, and that she favored R-3 for both portions of subject pro- perty; and she suggested garden type apartments for the lots facing the street as being more compatible with the existing residential development in the area~ Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council, it being noted that Reclassification No. 62-63-124 and Conditional Use Permit No. 432 were previously approved for a multiple family residential development on subject property, and Resolution of Intent for R-3 zoning is currently pending. Mayor Krein asked if the applicant wished to address the Council. Mr. Russel A. Betker, of Fredricks Development Company, representing the property owner, displayed a rendering of an existing commercial building recently constructed in the city, advising that the proposed buildings will be very similar, and would be compatible with the area. In his opinion~ the proposed commercial buildings would be a good example of what can be done with small commercial areas. Mr. Betker submitted a plot plan for the record, which was for a commercial development on subject property together with property to the north, and was approved by the Orange County Planning Commission prior to annexation to the city. He displayed a photograph for Council review, of the existing commercial uses in the area of subject property, and felt that 9126 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 14. 1965. 1:30 P.M. R,3 development of the entire property would add more traffic than the use proposed. _ .. Councilman Chandler ~alled attention {o commercial building recently granted by the City of $tanton on the west side of Magnolia Avenue near Chanticleer Street. ,. Mr. Betker further advised that the garage structures would open towards the commercial development on-the west, and therefore a block wall separating the C-1 from the R-3 did not seem feasible. Concerning the waiver of the 6-foot masonry wall between C-1 and R-3 zones, he was of the opinion that the private drive would be more usable by trash collecting agencies and fire trucks if left open to both portions of property~ The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council. Mr. James R. Snead, 1344 South Magnolia Avenue, addressed the Council in favor of subject petitions because of the fine development proposed, and felt it would upgrade the area. He felt the commercial development would cause no more traffic problems than apartments. Mr~ Cecil Lewton, 10221 Magnolia Avenue, requested permission to review the plans, and advised that their main concern was the heavy traffic in the area. plans. Mr~ Lewton came forward to the Council Table and reviewed the The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response~ declared the hearing closed° RESOLUTION NO. 65R-926: At the conclusion of the discussion that followed, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 65R-926 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject %o the following conditions: 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Magnolia Avenue, for street widening purposes, including a 15- foot radius corner return. 2. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 40 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Winston Road, for street widening purposes. 3. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Winston Road, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and'paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Winston Road and Magnolia Avenue, for street lighting purposes. 5. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Winston Road and Magnolia Avenue, for tree planting purposes. 6. Subject property to be developed in accordance with plans on fileo 7. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25°00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 8. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof~ or such further time as the City Council may grant. 9. Ihat any air-conditioning facilities proposed for the commercial portion of subject property shall be properly shielded from view from abutting street. City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 14, 1965, 1:30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-46 - C-1 and R-3) Roll call vote: AYF$: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCI I~EN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-926 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-927: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 65R-927 granting Conditional Use Permit No. 768, subject to the followin9 conditions: 1. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Magnolia Avenue and Winston Road, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City £ngineer. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. That Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection. 5o That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No° 65-66-46. 6o That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 g 3. Refer to Resolution Book, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM .GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 768. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-927 duly passed and adopted. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Pebley, General Plan Amendment No. 64 was disapproved at this time, to be further considered at Annual Review. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-54: Initiated by the City Planning Commission for change of zone from R-A to R-3; property located at the northeast corner of Winston Road and Magnolia Avenue, being the identical property considered under the former public hearing. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1836, Series 1965-66, recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Magnolia Avenue, for street widening purposes. 2. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 40 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Winston Road, for street widening purposes. 3. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Winston Road, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer or that a bond in an amount and 9128 City Hall. Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- December 14, 1965, 1:30 P.M. form satisfactory t© the City of Anaheim shall-be posted With the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Winston Road and Magnolia Avenue, for street lighting purposes. 5o That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Winston Road and Magnolia Avenue, for tree planting purposes. 6. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Winston Road and Magnolia Avenue, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 7. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 8. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 9. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 10. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 11. That Condition Nos. 6, 7, and 8, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building inspection° Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed° RESOLUTION NO. 65R-928: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 65R-928 for adoption, denying said reclassification~ Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING /HAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (65-66-54) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None AB$ENT: COUNC I LMEN: Sc hut t e The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-928 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-55, VARIANCE NO. 1740, GENERAL PLAN A~ENDMENT NO. 65, AND TENTATIVE MAP TRACTS NOS. 575i, 6089, 6090 AND 6091, REVISION NO. 2: Application for reclassification and variance was initiated by the City Planning Commission to consider change of zone from R-A to R-l, and waiver of minimum required R-1 front yard setbacks; property briefly described as located on the east side of Brookhurst Street south of Ball Road, and further described, as Tentative Tract Map Nos. 5751, 6089, 6090 and 6091, Revision No. 2. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1839, Series 1965-66, recommended said reclassification subject to the following: 1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property or any portion thereof, be approved by the City Council and recorded in %he office of the Orange County Recorder. The City Planning Commission granted Variance No. 1740, pursuant to Resolution No. 1837, Series 1965-66, subject %o the following conditions: 1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassifica- tion No. 65-66-55. 9129 City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- December 14, 1965, 1:30 P.M. - Pu~suant t© ResolUtion No. '1838, Series 1965-66, the City Planning Commission re§ommended General Plan Amendment No. 65 be disapproved. City Planning Commission recommended approval of Tentative Tract Maps Nos. 5751, 6089, 6090 and 6091, Revision No. 2, as follows: Tentative Tract No. 5751, Revision No. 2: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one' subdivision, each. subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 5751 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 65-66-55 and/or Variance No. 1740. 3. That Tract Nco 5751 shall be developed after Tract No. 6089 and Tract No. 6091. 4o That sewer fa'cilities shall be provided by the Garden Grove Sanitary District. Tentative Tract No. 6089, Revision No. 2: 1. That should this subdivision be.developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval .. 2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6089 is"granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 65-66-55 and/or Variance No. 1740. 3. That Tract No. 6089 shall be developed prior to Tract Nos. 5751, 6090 or. 6091., Re vision Nco 2o 4. That vechicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Brookhurst Street, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 5. That sewer facilities shall be provided by the Garden Grove Sanitary District. 6. That in accordance with City Council policy, a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the westerly property line separating Lot Nos. 24, 30 and 98 and Brookhurst Street, except that Corner Lot No. 98 shall be stepped down to a height of twenty-four inches in the front one-half of the front yard setback9 and a height of for%y-two inches in the back one-half of said setback, as depic'ced or~ Revision No. 29 Tract No. 60899 approved November 8, 1965. Landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. Tentative Tract No. 6090. Revision No. 2: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision~ each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval° 2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6090 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 65-66-55 and/or Variance No. 1740. 3. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Brookhurst Street, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. That sewer facilities shalll be provided by the Garden Grove Sanitary District. 5. That Tract No. 6090 shall be developed after Tract Nco 6089. 6. That in accordance with City Council policy9 a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the westerly property line separating Lot Nos. 16 and 23 and Brookhurst Street, as depicted on Revision No Tentative Map of Tract No. 6090, approved November 8, 1965. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the ful'l distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 9130 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 14. 1965, 1:30 P.M. Tentative Map No. 6091. Revision No. 2: 1. That should this Subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6091 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 65-66-55 and/or Variance No? 1740. 3. That Tract NOo 6091 shall be developed after Tract No. 6089. 4. That sewer facilities shall be provided by the Garden Grove Sanitary District. Mr. Ronald Thompson noted the location of the approximate 40 acre parcel and the zoning in the immediate vicinity. He briefly summarized the hearing held before the City Planning Commission. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Robert Solomon, 5322 Princeton Avenue, Westminster, Developer, was present for the purpose of answering questions of the City Council, The Mayor .asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUIION NO. 65R-929: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-929 for adoption authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-55 - R-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNC I LMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-929 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-930: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 65R-930 for adoption, granting Variance No. 1720, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1720. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Kreln NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-930 duly passed and adopted. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 65: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler, General Plan Amendment No. 65 was disapproved. MOTI ON C ARR I ED. TENTATIVE MAP. TRACTS NOS. 5751, 6089. 6090 and 6091, REVISION NO. 2: On motion by Councilman Dut%on, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Tentative Map Tract No. 5751, Revision No. 2, proposed for 37 R-1 zoned lots, Tentative Map Tract No. 6089, Revision No. 2, proposed for 46 R-1 zoned lots, 9131 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 14, 1965, 1:30 P.M. Tentative'Tract N°. 6090, Revision N°. 2, proposed for 41 R-1 zoned lots and Tentative Tract No. 6091, Revision No. 2, proposed for 35 R-1 zoned lots, were approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commis- sion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-56, VARIANCE NO. 1748 AND TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 6101: Submitted by Marian Rasmussen, Carrie M. Rasmussen and Doris Brummett requesting a change of zone from R-O and R-1 to R-i, and waiver of . minimum required lot area on property briefly described as located at the southeast corner of East and South Streets, and further described as Tentative Map, Tract No~ 6101. ,. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1863, Series 1965-66, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following condition: 1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. The City Planning Commission approved Variance No. 1748, pursuant to Resolution No. 1864, Series 1965-66, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. Thay this Variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassifica- tion No. 65-66-560 Tentative Map Tract No. 6101, comprising 44 proposed R-1 lots, was recommended for approval by the City Planning Commission, subject to the following conditions. 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval° 2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6101 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 65-66-56 and Variance No. 1748. 3. That in accordance with City Council policy, a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the westerly property line separating Lot Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 14 on East Street, except that Corner Lot NOo 14 shall be stepped down to a height of 24 inches in the front one-half of the front yard setback, and a height of a2 inches in the back one- half of said setback. Corner Lot NOo 1 shall be stepped down to a height of 24 inches in the fronT, one-half of the front yard setback. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be instal'led in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscapin9 to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 4. That the vehicular access rights to East Street, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 5. That Lot A of Tract Noo 2368 shall be acquired. 6. That the westerly north-south street shall be named "Dawn Street"~ the easterly north-south street shall be named "Avocado Street", and the center street shall be named "Diana Avenue". Mr. Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property and zoning in the immediate area, and briefly summarized the hearing held before the City Planning Commission. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Cal Queyrel of McDaniel Engineering advised that he and Mr. Mc Michael, Developer, were present for the purpose of answering any questions. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposi- tion~ there being no response, declared the hearing closed. 9132 City Hall. Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINU/ES- December 14, 1965, 1:30 P.M,__ REsoLUTION NO.-65R-931: CoU~Ciiman chandler offered Resolution No. 65R-931 _ authoriz{ng preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as re- quested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (65-66-56 - R-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-931 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 65R-932: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No, 65R-932 granting Variance No. 1748, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CIIY COUNCIL OF /HE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 17 Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 65R-932 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 6101: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Tentative Map of Tract No. 6101 was approved subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE CQUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT: Mr. Murdoch reported that the City of'Fullerton declined to take action annexing the remainder of .their City to the Mosquito Abatement District, inasmuch as their Park Depar'tment carries on a program of mosquito abatement work. On recommendations of the City Manager, the City Attorney was directed to prepare necessary resolution commencing the annexation of City of Anaheim territory not already included in the Orange County Mosquito Abatement Dis%ric~ to sa~d district. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURN: 10:25 P.M. City Clerk