Loading...
1963/02/19 6487 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 19. 1963. 3:00 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT : ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: K&ith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt. Mayor Coons called the meeting to ord&r. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held February 5, 1963, were approved on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING. PROPOSED VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF PORTION OF ALLEY AND EASEMENT FOR ALLEY PURPOSES: Public hearing was scheduled pursuant to Resolution No. 63R-77, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin February 7, 1963, and notices thereof posted in accordance with law. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-129: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-129 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF AN ALLEY AND AN EASEMENT FOR ALLEY PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS AND ALONG THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-129 duly passed and adopted. TRAFFIC SIGNAL. BALL ROAD AND GILBUCK DRIVE: As result of petitions submitted at the City Council meeting held February 13, 1963 by Mrs. Mildred A. Campbell, signed by approximately 4?O residents in the area, requesting a traffic signal at the intersection of Ball Road and Gilbuck Drive, action of the City Council was continued to this date for receipt of reports from the PolicE Department Traffic Bureau, and the Traffic EngineerVs office. The City Clerk reported that Mrs. Campbell submitted this date a supplement to said petition. Mr. Edward Granzow, Traffic Engineer, summarized the contents of the report submitted to the City Council this date; that in order to make equitable decisions determining the degree of urgency at all locations where trdffic ~ignal~ havG b~Qn p~titioned, or where the City has determined a signal might be required, a priority rating system has been established, based on accepted warrants used by the State and by other major cities. Such a system takes into considpration volume of traffic, interruption of continuous traffic, pedestrian volume, ability to coordinate into a system to provide progressive movement, accidents, special conditions, and special factors such as adjacency to schools, places of assembly, large traffic generators, etc. The budgeted funds available allow only a limited number of signal installations each year, therefore those with top priority rat- ing are accommodated as soon as funds become available. .._..-"......"..,~~=',-_~.~~..,~"';~ic.,~~_.._.,'_.~J~ 6488 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 19. 1963. 3:00 P.M. Mr. Granzow further advised that there are 29 locations on the priority list at the present time, with the subject location listed as number 14. He called attention to other factors, such as new development and construction, which sometimes tend to change locations on the priority list, or remove them entirely. Other Junior and Senior High Schools have similar situations as the subject location, with the possible exception of the sight distance problem, due to the railroad track elevation. The report recommended the relocation of the crosswalk westerly approximately 500 feet to the front of Ball Junior High School, allowing additional visibility of the crosswalk from the crest of the railroad track, which will include installation of proper signing, until such time as this intersection can be signalized. - Mrs. Campbell addressed the Council, stating that in her oplnlon, the danger of school children in this area was more critical than other locations, and agreed that there werp similar problems at other schools. In her opinion, before school sites are purchased, a meeting should be held by the City Traffic Engineer and school trustees to make plans fOT adequate protection of the students. Mr. Ken Wines addressed the Council, advising that the problem at the subject location is exagerated, compared with other schools, due to elevation of the railroad track blocking vision of the approaching cross- ing; further, he has worked with the Traffic Bureau of the Police Depart- ment in an effort to resolve the problem, and has observed rapid traffic at the location. He advised that moving the crosswalk westerly would be no problem to the school, however the students would have to be educated to use the crosswalk at the new location. In answer to Councilman Chandler~s question, Mr. Granzow reported that subject intersection would probably be signalized next year. Discussion was held by the City Council and Mr. Granzow regarding the feasibility of placing a portable type of traffic signal in service to alleviate the situation. Cost of portable temporary signals was compared to the costs of regular wire hung signals. Also discussed was cost of labor to place and recharge batteries of the portable type signal. Councilman Chandler moved that the City place the portable mech- anical signal at the existing crosswalk, located at Ball Road and Gilbuck Drive, for a trial period of thirty days, and continue said matter to March 19, 1963, for report on results achieved. If the portable signal is not satisfactory, the crosswalk will be relocated westerly until such time as the intersection can be permanently signalized. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. YORBA LINDA ANNEXATION - BOUNDARY COMMISSION REPORT: Report from the Orange County Boundary Commission minutes, dated February 18, 1963, finding that the boundaries of the proposed annexation (revised) are reasonably definite and certain as to Section 35002 of the Government Code, although it cuts property lines, was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. RlVERVIEW ANNEXATION: Excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held February 18, 1963, was submitted and read, recommending River- view Annexation be approved, and if successful, the area develop substantially in accordance with the land use proposals contained on the proposed General Plan. Councilman Chandler moved that the recommendation of the City Planning Commission concerning approval of the proposed annexation be received, and that the portion of the recommendation concerning proposed zoning and land use be stricken and considered superfluous. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-130: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-130 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. ..~="-._=""t......,..."-.....*,"-,.,.._-,..,<~,..~,.,-",.<.... '~ 6489 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 19. 1963, 3:00 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONSENTING TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF INHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNC I LMEN ~ COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-130 duly passed and adopted. REQUEST - STAY OF PROCEEDINGS: Discussion was held concerning pending zoning actions before the Orange County Board of Supervisors of areas within the proposed Riverview Annexation. At the concl~sion thereof, Councilman Chandler moved that the City Attorney be authorized and requested to direct a letter to the Orange County Board of Supervisors requesting they stay further zoning proceedings in the general vicinity of the northeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street, and the northeast and northwest corner of Lincoln and Sunkis~ in accordance WiTh former City of Anaheim recommendations, until such time as it can be determined by the vote of the people whether or not this area will become a part of the City of Anaheim. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST: Application was submitted by Texaco, Incorporated, for permis- sion to erect a sign at the southwest corner of Rio Vista and Lincoln (2790 East Lincoln Avenue). Plans were reviewed by the City Council and report from the Building Department noted. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte, said request was granted as requested. MOTrON CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST: Application was submitted by Douglas Oil Company for permission to erect a sign at the northwest corner of Ball Road and Magnolia Avenue (2601 Ball Road). Plans were reviewed by the City Council along with report from the Building Department. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, said request was granted, subject to no projection over the right-of-way. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST: Application was sUbmitted by Southland and Bates, Inc., for permission to erect a sign at 621 South Manchester Boulevard, to be placed seven feet above the roof. Plans were reviewed by the City Council along with report from the Building Department, and discussion was held regarding visibility of the proposed sign from the freeway. Mr. Byron Bates, applicant~ advised that an addition to their building is proposed, at which time parking is to be provided for each lessee; further, that according to their agreement with the owner, parking facilities south of subject property are to be used until said addition is completed. Councilman Chandler moved said sign request be held in abeyance until the applicant can provide proof of sufficient parking facilities. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ~_..,;",...j,,,""",,,,,"~, ~ 6490 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 19. 1963. 3:00 P.M. AMERICAN LEGION. ANAHEIM POST NO. 72 - REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF LICENSE FEE: Request of American Legion, Anaheim Post No. 72, for waiver of license fee to paint numbers on curbs, as a fund raising project, was submitted together with recommendation from the City License Collector. The City ManRger reported that the City Licenses are issued to individuals in districts assigned by the License Collector to avoid duplica- tion of service upon the payment of required license fee. He further reported that the City Treasurer, Mrs. Spencer, recommended the license fee not be waived. However, in checking the record, it was found one waiver of license fee was previously granted to the Boy Scout s. Mr. Samuel Eazor, representing the applicants, advised that the funds raised from the proposed project would be used to purchase equipment and other necessities for maintaining the recently organized California Senior Drum and Bugle Corps. under the sponsorship of the American Legion Post No. 72, and would also be used for the establishment of a Junior Drum and Bugle Corps., that ninety per cent of the returns will be spent in the City of Anaheim. ~ Councilman Dutton moved that the license fee for this activity be waived on condition that all funds derived be used for the Drum and Bugle Corp~ in the City of Anaheim, being for a charitable and instruc- tional beneficial purpose. Further, that a report on this activity be furnished the City Council at the end of one year. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CYPRESS STREET DIVIDER STRIP - REQUEST FOR REMOVAL: Request of Jacob F. Kreps, 312 North Vine Street, Apt. C, for removal of divider strip on East Cypress Street west of East Street, was submitted together with report from the City Engineer's office, accompanied by maps and photographs of the area. Discussion was held by the City Council and City Manager, and it was noted that the dividers were installed on order of the City Council in 1956. Further discussion was held by the City Council, at the conclusion thereof, it was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, to take no action on said request. MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO. 5108: Excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held February 19, 1963, regarding Orange County Use Variance No. 5108 proposing location of a 64 unit apartment development on property located at the northeast corner of Blue Gum and Orange Streets, south of Anaheim Road, was submitted. Mr. Martin Kreidt presented maps and plans, and advised that the City Planning Commission recommended to the Orange County Planning Commis- sion that said variance be denied, on the basis that it would be a residen- tial encroachment in the northeast industrial area. Mr. Kreidt further reported that the County of Orange has pending an emergency Ordinance zoning this area M-l for the protection to this industrial district. Councilman Dutton moved that the City Council concur with the City Planning Commission recommendations and advise the Orange County Planning Commission accordingly. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIJ:D. ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECTS: On the certification of the Director of Public Works that the following projects have been completed in accordance with plans and specifications, Councilman Krein offered Resolutions Nos. 63R-131 to 63R-136, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. ~Al~>;';fi,"~-";-'.'.j~,~:',:"",:,,",~ 6491 City Hall. Anaheim4 California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 19. 1963. 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-131: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTA- TION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTROCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, FROM STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD TO APPROXI- MATELY 1355 FEET EAST OF STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 695. (R. J. Noble Company) RESOLUTION NO. 63R-132: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTA- TION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF EUCLID STREET AND ROMNEYA DRIVE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT AND/OR JOB NO. 71~. (AEC Los Angeles dba Allen Enginepring Company) RESOLUTION NO. 63R-133: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF LA PALMA AVENUE AND WEST STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 720. (Steiny and Mitchel, Inc.) RESOLUTION NO. 63R-134: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY 'ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTA- TION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BALL ROAD, FLORE STREET, AND WEST STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. 105-1. (Steiny and Mitchel, Inc.) RESOLUTION NO. 63R-135: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQillPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTA- TION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: A STEEL RESERVOIR TANK, NEAR THE OLIVE HILLS RESERVOIR, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 4083. (West and Wiggs, Inc.) RESOLUTION NO. 63R-136: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTA- TION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF ANAHEIM ROAD, FROM LINDA VISTA STREET TO JEFFERSON STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 609a, UNIT "B". (Griffith Company) On roll call the foregoing resolutions were duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN~ COUNC ILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. Mayor Coons declared Resolutions Nos. 63R-131 through 63R-136, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Nos. 63R-137 to 63R-140, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. "~,:,',:'--"-""C'_!:"''''''''''"'_f'--''''_'''_:i .,:--_"*'.,7-;:.....:;.:,:-,.,.:..:.:<~~"Y'... --'!IIi: lltllr-....."".,~."'''''.......:f~..,_-.:_,;..." "':11. UI! ...., 6492 City Hall. Anah~im. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 19_ 1963_ 3:00 P,M. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-137: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, (w. D. Newman, et al) RESOLUTION NO. 63R-138: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, (Twaits-Wittenberg Co.) -, i I RESOLUTION NO. 63R-139: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Star Dust Homes, Inc.) RESOLUTION NO. 63R-140: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Sytze Sybrandy, et ux) On roll call the foregoing resolutions were duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler. Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 63R-137 to 63R-140, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-141: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-141 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ESTABLISHING A "NO PARKING" ZONE ON THE WEST SIDE OF LOS ANGELES STREET IN THE VICINITY OF PALAIS ROAD. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUOCILMEN: COUNCI LMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-141 duly passed and adopted. PARKING - WILSHIRE STREET: Discussion was held regarding parking congestion along Wilshire Street near Loara Street, and the City Traffic Engineer was requested to investigate and report his recommendations to the City Council regarding the establishment of a "No Parking" zone in this area. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-142: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-142 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO MAKE AN ESTIMATE OF THE INCREASE IN POPULATION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-142 dUly passed a~d adopted. ~,;;;~~";~",.c".""",,,,;;i;<,i;"'I_F::*-,,~'!~- ~ I 6493 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 19. 1963. 3:00 P.M. CORRESPONDENCE - RAPID TRANSPORT PLAN: Correspondence from John R. Mansell, Long Beach City Manager, concerning a possible meeting to consider the Rapid Transport Plan of J, Jamison Moore. was submitted. Councilman Dutton moved said correspondenc& be rec~ived and filed, and the Long Beach City Manager be requested to advise the City of Anaheim if such a meeting is scheduled, Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY: City of Fountain Valley Resolution No. 1155, opposing re-apportionment of the State Senate, and Resolution NOt 1156, opposing State Withholding Tax, was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Council.man Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested to cancel County taxes on the following property acquired by the City of Anaheim: Lots A, B, C, D and E, Tract No. 2738, recorded January 25, 1963, as Document No. 21368, in Book 6409, at Page 323, Official Records of Orange County, California. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED: Feather River Project Association - Minutes, Meeting of January 4, 1963 Notice of Board of Directors Meeting, March 1, 1963 Statement of Receipts and Disbursements Standing Committees of the Senate INTRODOCTION: Mr. Wes Hughes, of the G?rden Grove Daily News, introduced his "replacement" for the day in conjunction with News Annual Youth Program, Miss Jan Jensen. ANAHEIM BULLETIN ARTICLE: Mayor Coons complimented Mr. Jerry Teague, Reporter, on the article appearing in the Anaheim Bulletin February 18, 1963, regarding Rex Bruhns, Property Maintenance Superintendent for the City of Anaheim. ORDINANCE NO. 1815: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1815 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (60-61-96 and 61-62-30, C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1815 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1815 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1816: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1816 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-6?-117 - R-3) '-~"... "",<""_~,'.'d'"",, ."'," .".,," ~~'_'."""""-"""':~"'. _ ;,;>"~~__,,.,c;.~~. 6494 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 19. 1963. 3:00 P.M. After hearing read in full the title of Ordindnce No. 1816 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton ~econd~d the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vot~: AYES: NOES; ABSENT: COUNC ILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. -, Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1816 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1817: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1817 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-37 - C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1817 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOE S : ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1817 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1818: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1818 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-24 - C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1818 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-143: The City Manager recommended the City request connection to the Metropolitan Water District East Orange County Feeder No. 2 at Jefferson Street be included in the design of said line. He further advised that said request would require a deposit of $60,000. which is the estimated cost of the connection; however, only the actual cost of the connection will be paid by Anaheim. Said connection will serve as a second point of delivery, and will be used for the purpose of filling the existing SIxty million gallon reservoir and to service lines on both sides of the Santa Ana River. Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-143 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. --- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING CONSTRUC- TION OF SERVICE CONNECTION A-6 ON EAST ORANGE COUNTY FEEDER NO. 2 AT JEFFERSON AVENUE AND DELIVERY OF WATER IN THE MANNER AND UPON THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS PRESCRIBED IN THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALI- FORNIA RESOLUTION 6225. ~"';~'~~"~~"""-'-"-*""""."-''''''''-'~'''''''''~' -..:::r 6495 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 19. 1963, 2:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT : COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None, The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-143 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Krein moved to recess to 7:00 P,M. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:55 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the Council being present. INVOCATION: Rev. Cooper, Pastor of the West Anaheim Methodist Church, gave the invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Fl?g. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-54 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 342: Submitted by Stanton Nursery, Incorporated, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-2, and a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a single story low density planned unit development on property located on the south side of Ball Road, the western boundary of subject property being approximately 670 feet east of the centerline of Holder Street, and further described as 3730 West Ball Road. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolutions Nos. 596 and 597, Series 1962-63, denied said applications. Public hearing was held February 13, 1963, and as result of a tie vote by the Council, continued to this date for action by a full Council. Mayor Coons stated that the property in question is well known to him, having been considered at two previous hearings, and that he has reviewed and listened to the entire fifty-one minutes of the tape recording of the meeting of February 13, 1963, pertaining to said matter, and has read all the correspondence submitted at said hearing, reviewed the plans submitted by the applicant and the amendments thereto, again driven around and through the area, and given this request much thought and consideration during the past few days. That by reviewing the entire proceedings as he has, he felt he was as familiar with the evidence presented as the other members of the Council who were present at last \~repk v s hearing, and therefore, if there were no objections from the audience, he would like to consider the heaTing closed. There being no objections from the audience, and with the consent of the City Council, Mayor Coons declared the hearing closed on Reclassifi- cation No. 62-63-:4 and Conditional Use Permit No. 345. Mayor Coons summarized the application before the Council and the previous actions on said subject property, as follows: That this property 15 a very controversial piece of land: thg Council vote last week on the application was a tie vote; City Planning Commission was unanimous in their denIal; and the property o~'ners in the area are divided in their opinlons. That some of the definite merits to this application are as follows: 1. The Planning Staff in its findings states that "It must be noted that the proposed plan of development is a good one". 2. This development would eliminate an ugly eye-sore which exists in the midst of this single family residential area. -- ~"""''''-'''''''~~'',~#O;~~~'';''~'""....~_.,'''''~Qj;jjb_.,_,.... vv .....,- t..~ 6496 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 19~ 1963~ 3:00 P.M. 3. This proposed development would also eliminate one source of aggravation that has been voiced by cul-d~-sacing thi; short street and thereby pre- venting a through traffic street from the South. 4. This application would also eliminate one source of irritation to some property owners by removing the breeding ground for snails, bugs and flies, etc. 5. It would develop the land and provide additional tax base for the support of schools, City, County and others in excess of the normal tax base pro- vided by developing the land as R-l. 6. It would provide for its own streets and own street maintenance and would reduce the City's cost as against the cost of maintaining street; in an R-l area. 7. It would provide its own recreational area and reduce the load factor on our City parks and recreational areas. 8. Because of the increase in land values in the area, it becomes obvious there will be little chance of the property developing as an R-l area, even if a variance was granted for 6,000 foot lots as they now exist in the area. ~ A closer look at the situation presents the following: 1. The land is 4.63 acres, or ?Ol,458.53 square feet. Q. It is entirely surrounded by R-l, 6,000 square foot lots, developed ~'ith homes of three End four bedroom design, varying in size from 1,000 ;quare feet to approximately 1,200 square feet in area. 3. None of the lots and none of the houses in the area comply with the mini- mum requirements of our R-l Ordinance, and were granted a special variance by this Council to build. 4. If this area developed as R-l, this Council would be morally obligated to grant the sa~e variance to the developer, and as result, the area could develop into twenty R-l lots. By continuing Berkley Street to the North, the property could be divided into ten lots on each side of said street. As R-l, it could develop with twenty houses with seventy bedrooms, and using the factor of 1.52 people per bedroom, would be approximately 106 people. This would also result in approximately thirty additional automobiles in this area, using the ratio It autos per dwelling unit. The applicant proposes fifty-six units on the plan, less four units deleted by Mr. Knisely's letter,. leaving a net of fifty-two dwelling units, which is 160% increase over an R-l development. The fifty-two units would probably develop with approximately ninety-eight bedrooms, which would be a 40% increase. Using the applicant's factor of 1.45 people per bedroom, this type of development could have 142 people or a 34% increase. Using the factor of It automobiles per dwelling unit, would be eighty-four automobiles, or 17~~ increase in the traffic factor. These figures represent a rather alarming increase in the number of dwelling units and automobiles; however, under this proposed plan of development, the cars would probably not be parked on the street because the drivers would not walk that far to their apartments. Subject property is presently zoned R-A, and under this zoning, the applicant has the right to develop under Section 18.16.030, Paragraph 4, Subsection C of the Anaheim Municipal Code, which allows one dwelling unit for each 6,000 square feet of developable land area. The Planning Staff under their findings state that their analysis shows only 3.56 acres of net residential area; however, ~~ayor Coons was of the opinion that land not dedicated for street and public right-of-1Nay is developable land; hence, ?01,458.53 square feet divided by the factor of 6,000 equals 33.58 units, or thirty-four dwelling units. Further, if this property is to be zoned R-2 or R-3, the follow- ing points should be considered: 1. Would not be in compliance with the Preliminary General Plan, now under hearings before the City Planning Commission, that has been worked out between the Planning Commission and Planning Staff, and in close cooperation with the various citizens' groups, such as Realty Board Committee, Chamber of Commerce Committee, Industrial groups, and many of the homeowner as;ociations. ~~."....;f;;;'~"'%;;:;4,c'";::;;""'F'"",,,,,";,';,~:o.-".,~.:.:...;;,.~,',~ .'W 6497 City Hall~ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 19. 1963. 3:00 P.M. 2. Have recently had similar requests for development of land surrounded by R-l, which requests have been denied on the basis of non-conformance and non-compatibility with the plan and adjacent are~s (~re~ on Western Avenue just south of the Flood Control Channel~ John Wright property on South Euclid Avenue, and property at Ball Road and St~te College Boule- vard) . 3. All things being equal, action should be consistent. As result of the foregoing complete analysis, Mayor Coons was of the opinion that the reclassification request and the conditional use permit as now presented should be denied, but allow the applicant to present a new conditional use permit application that would comply with the provisions of existing zoning. If such an application was made, the applicant would then have thirty-four dwelling units ( an increase of 70% over R-l ), have approximately sixty-eight to eighty~ive bedrooms (approximately ~l% increase), have approximately 119 people (l?% increase) and approximately 51 automobiles (21% increase). The above proposal would: 1. Following the existing zoning. 2. Allow the cul-de-sacing of the dead end street. 3. Eliminate the source of bugs, snails, fly breeding, etc. 4. Allow the owner to have a reasonable development of his land and get a reasonable return on his investment. 5. Would develop the land and provide the tax base that is needed for support of various agencies. 6. Would provide its own recreational area. 7. In general, would improve the tenor of the entire area and still comply with the present zoning. Councilman Chandler commended Mayor Coons on his complete analysis of the problem, and felt his proposal for development was good. However, he questioned whether it was necessary to deny their request, as the Council could grant the application subject to the presentation of revised plans, or the matter could be continued to allow the presentation of revised plans. Mayor Coons was of the opinion that the applicant has the right to develop one dwelling unit per 6,000 square feet under his present zoning, with a Conditional Use Permit. That he would hesitate to also rezone the property, as in future consideration of like parcels with similar problems, implications might arise along the lines of establishing a precedent. Councilman Schutte suggested that the developers be given time to prepare new plans and review them with the neighborhood. Councilman Chandler moved that action on this matter be continued for two weeks, March 5, 1963, for the express purpose of allowing the applicant time to submit revised plans to conform to the density require- ments of the present R-A zoning, being one dwelling unit per 6,000 square feet, or thirty-four units, said revised plans to also conform with the eleven conditions that were included in the resolution which failed to receive a majority vote at the meeting of February 13, 1963. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicant, stated that their revised plans would be in the City Planning Department within one week, and could be reviewed there by any interested party. PUBLIC HEARINGS. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-56 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 345: Submitted by Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Owner, LeRoy Rose, Agent, concerning an irregular shaped parcel of land with approximately 400 feet frontage on the northerly side of Wilshire Avenue, and approximately 230 feet frontage on the east side of Loara Street (400 North Loara Street). _....-4I$..-'i..;;..;."._..~.._,;;I.iii'F~~,.."',,.~ '<i'r Vi 6498 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 19. 1963. 3:00 P.M. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-56: Requesting change of zone from R-O to R-3, property described above. The City Planning Commi~~ion pursuant to Resolution No. 599, Series 196~-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. Removal and/or reconstruction of curbs, gutters, and paving on Loara Street in accordance with the adopted standard plan~ on file in the Office of the City Engineer. 2. Installation of sidewalks and driveways on Wilshir& Avenue and Loara Street in accordance with adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. 3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Wilshire Avenue and Loara Street. 4. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 5. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart- ment of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. 6. Subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 345. 7. Installation of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary by the City of Anaheim Fire Department, to provide adequate fire protection. 8. Provision of a three (3) foot overhang ea~ement along the easterly boundary of the subject property to adequately serve the subject property and other properties, at the time of the installation of the service facilities. 9. Provision of a modified cul-de-sac at the terminus of Beverly Drive subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 10. Provision that the developer request an abandonment of a portion of the existing fifty (SO) foot sewer easement. 11. Provision of a ten (10) foot drainage easement and providing for the drainage from the east in a manner which meets the approval of the City Engineer. 12. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp- lishment of Item Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 9. 13. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No.1 as amended herein. 14. Provision that the interior walls of the proposed carports shall be stuccoed, that enclosed storage cabinets shall be provided along the rear wall of each carport, and that adequate auto bumper guards shall be provided to protect the interior wall of the proposed carports from damage, prior to Final Building Inspection. 15. Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the north and east boundaries of subject property. 16. Relocation of proposed structures in order to provide guest parking spaces on the southern edge of the proposed turn around area. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 345: Requesting permission to establish a single story planned unit development on property described above. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 600, Series 1962-63, granted said conditional use permit, subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 62-63-56. Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of subject property, the zoning and existing uses in the immediate vicinity. He summarized the evidence presented to the City Planning Commission concerning landscaping, drainage and the proposed location of the swimming pool. He further advised that Mr. Rose submitted revised plans to the Planning Staff as requested by the City Planning Commission. Memorandum concerning revised plans, together with said plans, were reviewed by the City Council. The Mayor asked if the applicant or his authorized agent wished to address the Council. .b:].I.jt:;~.~'-'1i,ji,iL~T';,j."",,,i!#c_'~;'CC;"';;"'~"#~ -~',,~j7 6499 City Hall. Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 19. 1963~ 3:00 P.M. Mr. LeRoy Rose, Architect, 600 North Euclid Street, TeprGs~nting the owner, addressed the Council advising that the present zoning of the property is R-O, but it was his understanding that the intended futurG zoning of the property would be for professional use. In his opinion, the requested use and development of the approximately three acre~ into 32 single story multiple units, which is about one-third of the density allowable in R-3 Zone, would be a more limited use of the property a~d would be more compatible to the adjacent R-O Zone. Mr. Rose felt that the plan would be most desirable to the area, and by ter~inating Beverly Drive by means of a cul-de-sac, through traffic would be eliminated and the traffic load would be less on Loara Street than it would be by many other uses of the land. Mr. Rose showed a rendering of the proposed development, and further advised that the entire project will be enclosed with an attractive brick wall. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition to the application, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held concerning the sewer easement of sixty feet in width. A gentleman from the audience reported that the Engineering Department advised that the easement could be reduced to ten feet. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-144: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-l44 authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63-56 - R-3) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNC ILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-144 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-l45: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-145 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 345, subject to the following conditions: I. Subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 6?-63-56. ? A ten o'clock closing limit for the recreation area. 3. Recreational area light standards shall not exceed six feet in height and light shall not shine into adjacent residential lots. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 345. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein, and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-145 duly passed and adopted. ."---'--'''"'-~'-''''''''-''-'_"'IO'~I!::'_~_1:.~~~_.~~~~.,,-,~,_'<;'-~'-----'''-.:t 6500 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 19. 1963. 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-57: Submitted by Charles and Ida Levy, requesting change of zone from R-l to C-l, property briefly described as located on the west side of Harbor Boulevard, approximately 125 feet north of South Street (719 South Harbor Boulevard). The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 601, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, except as amended herein. ~. Time limitation of five (5) years for the use of the existing structure for commercial (real estate office) use, and upon the expiration of said time limitation, the existing structure shall be removed and replaced with a commercial structure with final building plans to be submitted to the City Council for approval. 3. Installation of a minimum six (6) foot wide landscaping strip abutting the front property line of subject property, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said landscaping to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection. 4. Posting of a three (3) year bond to insure the installation of a wall along the southerly boundary line of subject property where subject property abuts property classified in the R-l, One Family Residential, Zone. 5. Maintenance of a fifty (50) foot setback from the westerly boundary of the alley for any two-story structure established on subject property, and further provided that no windows shall be installed at the rear of the second story of said two-story building. 6. Limitation that any signs, other than unlighted signs having a maximum area of eight (8) square feet, shall be submitted to the City Council for approval. 7. Rpcordation of Deed Restrictions by the owners of subject property limiting the use of said property to business and professional office use only. 8. Provision of off-street parking facilities in accordance with Code requirements prior to Final Building Inspection. 9. Prohibition of the use of any rpsidential structure for commercial or combined residential and commercial use unless remodeled to commercial standard s. 10. Dedication of seven (7) feet at the rear of subject property for alley widening and establishing one-way traffic in the alley, untiJ such time as all dedications along the alley are received, and the improvement of the alley to commercial standards, as required by the City of Anaheim, or the posting of cash or security deposit, on a cash face value in the amount required for said improvements when requested by the City, provided, however, that this condition shall be recorded against the property at the County Recorder's office. II. Dedication of all the vehicular access rights to Harbor Boulevard. 12. Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented centerline of Harbor Boulevard (34.75 feet existing). 13. Repair of damaged and/or hazardous sidewalks on Harbor Boulevard in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineer. 14. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart- ment of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. 15. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Harbor Boulevard. 16. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplish- ment of Item Nos. 4, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property, and advised that the entire area was recently considered by the City Planning Commission and City Council, and that a Plan Study was prepared at that time. As result, some of the area has been rezoned C-l. ~"""~"';'~'~.F;-',,",.,,,,,,, ...._,:;"...";;,;;iIjjfji"'.-.,'-'.,,.""~~_."" - 6501 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FebTuarv19_ 1963. 3:00 P.M. He reported that there seemed to be some misunderstanding con- cerning the use of the p:roperty, whether it be for purely commercial u~e or a combined commercial and residential use, and further reported that it was the intent of the City Planning Commission to prohibit a combined residential-commercial use. Mr. Kreidt stated that the Commission attempted to repeat the conditions prerequisite to the C-l zoning on the abutting property to the North (61-6?-49). He further summarized the action of the City Planning Commission calling attention to Conditions No. '- and 10. The Mayor asked if the applicant or his authorized agent wished to address the Council. Mr. Stephen Gallagher, Attorney representing the applicant, addressed the Council advising that his client does not intend to use the property as a combined real estate office and residence. Concerning the conditions, Mr. Gallagher objected to Condition No.2, stating his reasons therefore, and further advised that concerning Condition No.4, there is at present a fenc& between the property to the North and South. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council for or against said reclassification, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-146: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-146 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, with the following amendments: Condition No. ? - be eliminated. Condition No. 4 - be eliminated. Condition No.9 - to read: Prohibition of the use of any residential structure or commercial use unless remodeled to commercial standards. Condition No. 10- to read: That a sufficient building setback from the existing alley shall be established to permit proper turning radius into the parking spaces, and pipes or concrete posts shall be installed on the side of the alley opposite the subject property to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and Superintendent of Streets, to protect the residential properties from damages to fences by cars that might be turning into or back- ing out of subject property into the alley. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (6?-63-57 - C-l) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed a~d adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-146 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 6~-63-58: Submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Pete Hiltscher, Owners, Richard M. Polentz, Agent, requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-l, property briefly described as located approximately ?53 feet north of La Palm~ Avenue, and approximately 470 feet east of West Street (1011 West La Palma Avenue). "~-,-~~",,,,,,,,,,""-"',,,",,~.,., _""""_'_".,"~C"""'" ~":;r--~,,,,~~ ~--~ 6502 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 19. 1963~ 3:00 P.M. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 602, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, sUbject to the following conditions: 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos, 1, 2 and 3, except as amended herein. 2. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, access- ible to trash-truck pickup and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection. 3. Installation of fire hydrants as determined to be necessary by the City of Anaheim Fire Department, to provide adequate fire protection. - Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and summarized the evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission resulting in their recommended approval. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Mr. Polentz was present for the purpose of answering any questions. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-147: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-147 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as requested, in accordance with the City Planning Commission's recommendations. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63-58 - C-l) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: A YES: NOES: ABSENT : COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-147 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1819: As all conditions prerequisite to the change of zone (Reclassification No. 62-63-58) are to be complied with prior to Final Building Inspection, Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1819 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1819 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARINGS. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-59 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 347: Submitted by Mr. Dave Domries, Owner, Neil Reitman, Agent, concerning property briefly described as located on the east side of Knott Avenue, approximately 790 feet south of Orange Avenue (706 South Knott Avenue). RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-59: Requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3, property described above. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 603, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be denied. ~'~~T;"-""'..'''' 6503 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 19. 1963. 3:00 P.M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 347: Requesting permission to construct a two- story planned unit development and waive one-story height limitation on property described above. The City Planning Commission purGuant to Resolution No. 604, Series 1962-63, denied said conditional use permit. Mr. Kreidt noted the location of sUbject property, also noting zoning in the immediate area. He reported that the Preliminary General Plan indicates this area for low density development; that because of th~ deep narrow lot, there is a possible land development problem unless the parcels are developed in groups. Mr. Kreidt further reported that the City Planning CommiGsion's concern in their recommendations of denial was due to the narrowness and depth of the property; however, the CommisGion felt a medium denGity development would be suitable in this area if proper consideration were made for the abutting properties. The Mayor asked if anyone wiGhed to address the Council. Mr. Domries addreGGed the Council requesting this matter be temporarily postponed approximately four weeks to contact the agent to endeavor purchase of the property to the South. He further advised according to his information, the property to the North is not for sale. Mr. John Anderson, 3429 Faircrest Drive, advised that he did not object to multiple dwellings, but did object to multiple Gtory struc- tures because of the invasion of their privacy. Mr. John Simpson, 3309 Deerwood Drive, representing the Westridge Home Owners Association, advised that they were in general agreement with the City Planning Commission?s findings, and asked if a precise study could be made of the area between Orange Avenue and the Flood Control Channel to end similar problems before they arise. Mayor Coons noted that it had been previously mentioned that this area was presently under an "Open Land Area Study" by the Redevelopment Committee. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council either for or against said applications, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Councilman Krein moved that action of the City Council be deferred six weeks (April 2, 1963, 7:00 P.M.) to allow the Planning Department an opportunity to meet with the adjacent property owners in an effort to resolve this problem. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRI ED. PUBLIC HEARINGS. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-60 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 348: Submitted by Gulf Oil Corporation of California, in care of MRC DeveloperG, Inc., Owner, LeRoy Rose, Agent, concerning property briefly described as located on the west side of Dale Avenue, approximately 253 feet north of Lincoln Avenue (?Ol North Dale Avenue). RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-60: Requesting change of zone from C-I to R-3, property described above. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 605, Series 196?-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented centerline of Dale Avenue (20 feet existing, including a fifteen (15) foot corner return) . 2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improve- ments for Dale Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer. ---'----"~-~.._~-.~'-~~:-.,,''''.~.:~.O''~~_,__.o..~~. 6504 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 19. 1963. 3:00 P.M. 3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Dale Avenue. 4. Payment of a Park and Recreation fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part of the Building Permit. 5. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart- ment of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection. 6. Subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 348. 7. Installation of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary by the City of Anaheim Fire Department, to provide adequate fire protection. 8. Provision of a three (3) foot overhang easement along the westerly boundary of the subject property to adequately serve the subject property and other properties, at the time of the installation of the service facilities. 9. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp- plishment of Item Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 8. 10. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3, as amended herein. 11. Development in accordance with all R-3 Code height limitations. 12. Redesign of the proposed driveway at the intersection of Tyler Avenue dnd Dale Street, so that there is a minimum offset of five (5) feet from the BCR. 13. Provision that the interior walls of the proposed carports shall be stuccoed, that enclosed storage cabinets shall be provided along the rear wall of each carport, and that adequate auto bumper guards shall be provided at the rear of each carport to protect the interior wall of the proposed carports from damage prior to Final Building Inspection. 14. Improvement and dedication of the westerly portion of the Dale Avenue property extending southerly from the subject property to the northerly boundary of Lincoln Avenue, as stipulated by the owner, and said improve- ment and dedication to be accomplished simultaneously with the develop- ment of subject property. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 348: Requesting permission to construct a planned unit development on property described above. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 606, Series 1962-63, granted said conditional use permit, subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 62-63-60. Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of subject property, the zoning and existing uses in the immediate vicinity, and summarized the evidence presented to the City Planning Commission, resulting in their recommended approval. Plans indicating two four-unit two-story structures on the west side of the property and within 150 feet of the single family residences were reviewed by the City Council. Setbacks originally established in the reclassification zoning of the property to C-l were discussed. The Mayor asked if the applicant or the applicant's agent wished to address the Council. Mr. LeRoy Rose, Architect, 600 North Euclid Street, Anaheim, representing the applicant, advised that a revised plan was submitted placing the two-story structures around the pool area to be established in the center of the development, which would be 150 feet from all sides of the property. (Council noted that a note in the file indicated the original plans were destroyed) Mr. Rose further reported that the chief objections from the residents to the West of the property were to the perimeter driveway, and agreed to place the wall to any height requested for their protection. He further advised that Gulf Oil Corporation contemplates developing the front portion of the property commercially. - "]__;',;'~~_-'_t._,_.L.....-""-,-._."____._~~-,,,,-,_,~j....+_._,;:"~~"''-O''';~''~~':'_'''''>" 6505 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 19, 1963, 3:00 P,M, Mr. Rose stated the density planned is about 30% of that allowable in an R-3 Zone; there will be no access rights to Tyler Avenue~ th~ d~v~lop- ment will be compatible to the area, and in his opinion, much nicer than if developed entirely commercial. Mr. M. R. Baucom, 212 North Dale Avenue, asked IMhat would happen to the irrigation valve used for the irrigation of the property on the east side of Dale Avenue. which is located in the area to be dedicated. Mr. Ja~es Maddox, City Engineer, advised that it is the developer's responsibility to relocate, lower or remove irrigation lines; however, proof that permission has been obtained is required before a line can be crushed, and no line can be crushed that is still in use. Mr. John Krylo, 2846 Tyler Avenue, advised that he had no objec- tions to the multiple dwellings, but did object to the two-story construction. He felt that the project would overburden the schools, and objected to the periphery drive. He stated that if the reclassification is granted, it should be limited to one story dwellings, o~itting the periphery drive, and restricting the use of the recreational area to 10:00 P.M. Mr. Ed McClure, 2851 Tyler Avenue, endorsed statement made by Mr. Krylo, and advised that he has a swimming pool close to the rear fence. He stated that relocating the two-story structures is certainly more satisfac- tory, but does not meet with his approval; becausefrom~ General Plan this area is projected for R-l, not C-I. He further advised that the R-l area represents more than a Two Million Dollar investment. He referred to statements made at the City Planning Commission hearing concerning the general type of apartment tenants, and felt that this development would overload school facilities. In conclusion, Mr. McClure stated that if the reclassification is granted and the wall constructed, he would like to have a gate placed in the wall. Concerning the overcTowding of schools, Mayor Coons advised that statistics indicate there are less students per acre fro~ apartment projects than from single family residential developments. Councilman Chandler asked if the periphery drive was the major objection, would they rather have the garages placed on the property line, which would afford a higher wall protection. Those interested were invited to the Council Table to review the plans, and discussion was held. Mr. McClure also requested the dust be controlled if the property is developed. Mr. Rose, in rebuttal, advised that the proposed development represents over One Million Dollars, and that the property is presently zoned C-l, allowing a building height of thirty-five feet; that their request would place the two-story structures, twenty-two feet in height, in the center of the development, which would be well below what is pres- ently permitted. He further agreed to comply with the higher wall requirement and the relocation of the garages to the other side of the property. Bonnie Scott, 2853 Polk Avenue, asked if Dale Avenue is to be widened. Mayor Coons replied that dedication for the future widening of Dale Avenue was a condition of the rezoning. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. ~-_"""""""""~ ............._.,__~,.,.."c~ 6506 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 19. 1963. 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-148: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-148 authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as r~quested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and further subject to the following conditions: 15. Provision of a six foot masonry wall along the north property line of subject property, to be stepped down to forty-two inches at Dale Avenue to provide adequate sight distance, and provision of a masonry wall on the westerly boundary of the property, to be six feet in height above the grade of the property to the west of subject property. 16. The intersection of Kendor and Tyler be constructed into a modified knuckle. Said improvements to be installed by the developer, the necessary plans therefor to be prepared by the City Engineering Division. - Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63-60 - R-3) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCI IlviEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-148 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-149: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-149 for adoption granting Conditional Use Permit No. 348, subject to the com- pletion of Reclassification No. 62-63-60. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDI- TIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 348. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCI LMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None, The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-149 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Chandler ~oved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9:45 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council present. JOB NO. 4600 - CHANGE ORDER NO.3 (POLICE FACILITY BUILDING): Mr. Murdoch reported on Items 1 to 10, inclusive, of Change Order No.3, and recommended said Change Order be approved with the exception of Item No. ? On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman SChutte, Change Order No. 3 was approved, deleting therefrom Item No.2, as recommended. MOTION CARRIED. SANITARY CONDITIONS - CONCESSION OPERATIONS. LA PALMA BASEBALL STADIUM: Report of Mr. John J. Collier, Director of Park and Recreation, was submitted and briefed by Mr. Murdoch (copies th&reof furnished each Councilman). Said report outlined requirements that must be met for the sale of package food and for the sale of food prepared on the site. Mr. Collier recommended that the La Palma Concession Stand be remodeled at an estimated cost of $3,000. to ~"!'~~'f.i+'--""',*,-"_;""_0"''''''_'''~'''.''-~'''_>-~1~ .,~..".,.~to-",.~."..j 6507 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 19. 1963, 3:00 P.M. meet nec~ssary requirements for the sale of food prepared on the site. Mr. Murdoch recommended the remodeling of the faci1itie~ of the La Palma Football concession stand to meet requirements for food prepared on the site, as soon as possible; this item to be included in the prepara- tion of next year's budget, and advised that the minor changes recommended for the concession stand of the baseball stadium for the sale of package foods would be made immediately. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-150: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-150 for adoption, authorizing commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of approximately ten acres of property located on the south side of Broadway, approximately 660 feet west of Euclid Street (Stanky) . Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR, AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF, REAL PROPERTY FOR PARK AND RECREATION PURPOSES. (Stanky property) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote; AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNC I LMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-150 duly passed and adopted. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE APPLICATIONS: The following applications were submitted to the City Council for their information. No action was taken by the City Council: Person to Person transfer, On Sale General License, Sherwood Inn, 401 South Brookhurst Street. New On-Sale Beer License, The Holiday, 806 North Los Angeles St. Person to Person and Premises to Premises transfer of On Sale General License, Un-named business, 1050 West Ball Road. Person to Person transfer of On Sale Beer License, The Tiki Room, 910 North Los Angeles Street. TRASH STORAGE AREA STANDARDS: On nlotion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, minimum acceptable trash collection area standards for multiple family residential, commercial and industrial use, was adopted as prepared and recommended by the Director of Public Works. MOTION CARRIED. POLICY OF THE CITY COUNCIL - PROXIES: On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, it was determined that it be the policy of the City CouncIl to designate the Director of Public Utilities as the authorized representatIve of the CIty of Anaheim in all of the Water Company Stock- holder meetings in companies in which the City of Anaheim owns an interest. flOT ION CARRI ED. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-lSl: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-151 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRLCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY EXTENSION AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, CONSISTING OF A DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM IN CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND IN CERTAIN AREAS CONTIGUOUS THERETO AND THE /\CQUISITION THEREOF B ( THE CITY OF ANAHEIM BY EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS OF CERTAIN PROPERTY OF DYKE WATER COMPANY IN SAID CERTAIN PORTIONS WITHIN AND CONTIGUOUS TO SAID CITY. -_....".._".~~'>.,._~,.",."~".;,.~......',i..~~,, 6508 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 19. 1963. 3:00 P.M. Councilman Schutte left the meeting, 10:45 P.M. RESOLUTION COMMENDING THE NATIONAL ORANGE SHOW: Councilman Chandler offered a resolution commending the National Orange Show. Said resolution was adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons. Schutte. The Mayor declared said resolution duly passed and adopted. I RESOLUTION NO. 63R-l52: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-152 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 62R-829 AND MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL, BY SUBSTITUTING THE TERM "REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY" FOR THE TERM "URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY". On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons. None. Schutte. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-152 duly p~ssed and adopted. COUNTY TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT NO. 4427: Located south of the Santa Ana River, north of the Riverside Freeway, containing 339 single family residential lots, 44 multiple family residential lots, and one six acre neighborhood commercial lot. Subdivider, Melvin B. Johnson. Said map was submitted together with excerpts of the City Planning Commission meeting held February 18, 1963, setting forth theIr findIngs and recommendations. No further action was taken by the City Council. ADJOURN: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 10:50 P.M. SIGNED~ };(. d)~ City Clerk ~",~,"';-;~"'""-~~''''-_::'-':;-'""'''W' .