1963/02/26
6509
Cit Hall Anaheim California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februar 26 1963 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutt~, Krein and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis.
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson.
CITY CLERK; Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER: Jam~s p. Maddox.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: Councilman Dutton moved that the City Council dispense with reading
in full and approve the minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held
February 13, 1963, as mailed. Councilman Krein seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-153: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-153 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF FEBRUARY 26, 1963.
(Warrants Nos. 23?31 to 23455, both inclusive, totaling $493,363.15)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-153 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-l54: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-154 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACKNOWLEDGING
RECEIPT OF COpy OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CIRCULATE A PETITION RELATING TO
THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLI-
CATION THEREOF, AND APPROVING THE CIRCULATION OF SAID PETITION. (Riverview
Annexation)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
A YES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-154 duly passed and adopted.
SIGN REQUEST,- 2793 WEST BALL ROAD: Application was submitted by Foodmaker
Company for permission to erect four signs at 2793 West Ball Road, adver-
tising Jack-in-the-Box drive-through restaurant.
Plans were reviewed by the City Council and report from the
Building Department noted.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
said signs were granted, with provision that there be no projection over
the property right-of-way lines. MOTION CARRIED.
SIDEWALK WAIVER - 1200 EAST CERRITOS AVENUE: Request of the Ted R. Cooper
Company, Inc., for waiver of sidewalk requirement at 1200 East Cerritos
Avenue, was submitted.
~""~,.,.f,;c".""".".it"";:",.,..,,,;j;,;;,,-"~+.,,~.. T
6512
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 26. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-159: A RESOL~[ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT,
LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPOR-
TATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY
TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE
MABLE STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM LOARA. STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 870
FEET EAST OF LOARA STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1258, (Gene U.
Graven)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-160: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT,
LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPOR-
T ATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL A,ND WA,TER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY
TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, FROM BLUE GUM
STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 665 FEET WEST OF BLUE GUM STREET, IN THE COUNTY
OF ORANGE, JOB NO. 1255. (Staler, Inc.)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-161: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT,
LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTA-
TION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO
CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE
IMPROVEMENT OF GREENACRE AVENUE, FROM GILBERT STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 432
FEET EAST OF GILBERT STREET. IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 584.
(Electric and Machinery Service, Inc.)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-162: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT,
LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTA-
TION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL fiND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO
CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE
MILLER STREET-LA PALMA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF A,NAHEIM,
JOB NO~ 690. (Copp Paving Company, Inc.)
On roll call the foregoing resolutions were duly passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 63R-159 to 63R-16~, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
CANCELLATION OF CITY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by
Councilman Dutton, cancellation of City taxes was authorized on property
acquIred by the Savanna School District for public purposes, deed recorded
January l8~ 1963, in Book 6398. Page 972, Official Records of Orange County,
California. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed,
on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION
CARRIED:
Feather River Project Association
Copy of talk by Reginald C. Price, "The Role of Electric Power
in the State Water Project",
Resolution proposing five principles for the allocation of
Feather River Project costs and the pricing of project water.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City PlAnning Commission
at their meeting held February 4. 1963, pertaining to the following appli-
cations, werp submitted for City Council information and consideration:
~~~~~ -,-~
6511
CIty Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FebTuarv ~6. 1963, 3:00 P.M.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENi: Th~ Assistant City Manager reported on the installation
of a new filtration system and appurtenances for Pearson Park Swimming
pool. He advIsed thaT informal bids were requested from all firms that
;peciallze in this type of wOTk. HOINever only one bid was received, the
bid of Los Angeles W~teY' Conditioning, Inc.. in the amount of $10,198.9'::>,
including tax.
Mr. Davis f0r~her reported that the Park and Recreation Department
e1. provides $8,000 for this 1"orkj the difference of $?,198.92 can be
obtained by edJ stment withIn the departmental budget.
Orl the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman
Chandler moved Lnat ~he bid of Los Angeles Water Conditioning, Inc., in the
amount of $lO,IQS.92, including tax, be accepted. Councilman Krein seconded
the moLion. MO.ION CARRIED.
DEEDS OF EASEMENT: CouncIlman Krein offered Resolutions Nos. 63R-156 and 63R-l57
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
E~SOLU;ION NO. b?R-156: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
A.NAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Roger W. PannIer, et a1)
RESOLUTION NO. b3R-157: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEP~ING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY F'OR EASEMENTS FOR ROAD, PUBLIC UTILITY, ELECTRIC POWER
LINES AND OVERHANG PURPOSES. (Fritz Goossens, et ux)
On Toll call the foregoing resolutions were duly passed and
adopTed by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
A.BS ENT ;
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton. Chandler, Schutte, Krcin and Coons.
None.
None.
ale M?yor declared Resolutions Nos. 63R-156 and 63R-157 duly
passed and adopted.
RESOLUI10N NO. b3R-153: Councilman Dutton offered Rpsolution No. 63R-158 for
adoption.
D"Ae to a PossH)le conflict of interest, Councilman Chandler
w~thdrew from the dIscussion and action on this issue.
Ref r
ReSCH
on Book.
~
~., \IV
1 t:~:
E Cl~Y OF j\NAHEIM ACCEPTING AN
1 NC; TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
(}wa ts-WIttenbprg Co.- Reclassifica-
Pennll_ No. ')79)
solution was duly passed and adopted
- ~ .
rton. SChut~p. Krein and Coons.
Nor1G.
Nu:~Or)NC J UJ1EN: ChrJndler.
p
,- -jpc
1., on ~h. 63P-153 dul y pa s sed and adopted.
:n t.:'
r 1 i
10 of the Director of Public Works
completed in accordance with plans
e'ed Resol,jtions Nos. 63R-159 to
'1,
r 0
1 ve,
c;
~sc
))0 uk.
~'''-';;;;:'~'';:'4.<.."....",,,,,,",*",,,,~',, '~:;"'-''''-'.'''i~,...~,..,..".. -w
6510
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 26, 1963. 3:00 P.M.
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein
moved that temporary waiver of sidewalks be granted, subject to no permanent
plantIng (trees) in the area reserved for future sidewalks. Councilman
Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 260 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 6l-6?-l25) - REVISED PLANS:
Revised plans dated February 19, 1963, submitted by Jack J. Strickland,
Architect, in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 260, were reviewed
by the City Council together with recommendations of the City Planning
Department.
l
Councilman Schutte moved that revised plans marked "Exhibit A"
as submItted, be approved. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED. (Plans dated this date and signed by Mayor Coons.)
TENTATIVE TRACTS NOS. 4567 AND 4689 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Boyle
Engineering, dated February 13, 1963, for one year extension of time for
compliance with conditions pursuant to the granting of said tract maps,
was submitted.
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, one year extension of
time from the expiration date of each tract map was granted, on motion by
Councilm~n Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-155: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-155 for
adoption, amending Resolulion No. 62R-1046 in Conditional Use Permit No. 314,
correcting description of subject property.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 62R-l046 GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 314.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
A YES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-155 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1820: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1820 for first
reading, amending Ordinance No. 1798 in Reclassification Proceedings No.
62-63-36, amending description of subject property.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1798 IN
RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 62-63-36.
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1820 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
REQUEST - ANAHEIM SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: Request of the Anaheim Symphony Asso-
ciation for balance of the $5,000. allotted to the association for the fiscal
year 1961-62, was submitted.
Mr. Robert Davis submitted an analysis of payments made and reported
that there was a balance of $297.37 remaining in the fund, which could be
paid to the Anaheim Symphony Association upon proper request.
The City Manager was requested to advise Mrs. Loudon of the Anaheim
Symphony Association the procedure to be followed for payments from this fund.
No action was taken by the City Council.
~".;"~""w,-="",*;~',;",;,;~';\;i:.:~,:\t.'~
6513
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Fpbruary ~6, 1963. 3:00 P.M.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3'25 - Submitted by Signal Oil Company requesting
permission to establish a Used Car Lot and Parking Lot at the Northwe~t
corner of Cypress and Lo~ Angeles Streets (301 North Los Angeles Street).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
618, Series 1960-63, denied said conditional use permit.
"
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 358 - Submitted by Kenneth E. and Betty M.
Stussy, Owners, Forr~st and Elsie Holiday, Agents, requesting permission to
establish a home for elderly ambulatory persons on prop~rty briefly des-
cribed as located on the west side of BrookhUTst Street approximately 470
feet north of Katella Avenue (1745 South Brookhurst Street).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
602, Series 1960-63, granted said conditIonal use permit, subject to
conditions.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 359 - Submitted by Standard Oil Company of
California, O~ner. Duffy Motor Hotels, Inc., Lpssee, requesting permission
to establish the following on property briefly described as located at the
Southwest corner of Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard (640 West Kate11a
Avenue) :
1. To permit the establishment of a limited commercial artist
business,
0. Establish the following uses:
Ca) Off-sale liquor store
(b) Commercial Airline Ticket Office
(c) Drug StoTe and Gift Shop
(d) Florist Shop
(e) Clothing Store
(f) Radio Station FM-AM
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
623, Series 196?-63, granted said conditional use permit subject to
conditions.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 360 = Submitted by Chip and Norma Chasin,
Owners, John A. Maurice, Agent, requesting permission to use Unit No. 1
of Shopping Center located on the south side of Ball Road, approximately
195 feet west of Dale Avenue, as a HOFBRAU (2820 Ball Road).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
6':24. Series 196')-63. granted said conditional use permit, subject to
conditions.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIl NO. 265 - SubmItted by Bro~dway Village of Anaheim,
Owner; Harry L. Jenkins. Agent, requesting permission to permit the opera-
tion of a Health Studio (conditioning exercises and steam baths), property
bTiefly described as located at the nOTthwest corner of Crescent Avenue
and Euclid Street (603 North EuclId Street).
The City PlannIng Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
626, Series 1962-63. granted said conditional use permit, subject to
condi tions.
VARIANCE NO. 1547: Subrrllttedby Emil E. Mazanec, Owner, requesting the
following on properLY briefly describ8d as located on the south side of
Center Street, approximatel y 85 feet t^'est of CherTY Street (130') West
Center Street).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
6?0. Series 196?-63. granted said varIance application, subject to condi-
tions.
The foregoing 2ctions were reviewed by the City Council and no
further action was taken on the above numbered conditional use permits and
variance applications.
-~,'~~'''-*''_t'''''''''';QwA;.;,;..C'~~, .,.
6514
Cl1-V Hall~ Anahelm~ California - COUNCIL MINUfES ~ Februarv 26. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
CONDIJ'IONAL USE PERMIT NO. 361: Submitted oy FrederIck C. and Jeanne Howard,
Owners; Peter M. and Betty Jo Elliott, Agents, requesting permission to
constrJct a two-story planned-unit multiple fami residential unit and
wa~ve one-story height limitation on property briefly described as located
on the west side of Western Avenue, approximately 672 feet south of Lincoln
Avenue (145 South Western Avenue).
William C. Mueller, 3432 Via Oporto, Newport Beach, Architect
representIng the applicant, addressed the City Council requesting a
p0blic hearing before the City CouncIl ~n orderlo correct an error that
was made in the original survey of subject properLy. Because of the error
a ml Lmal rearrangement on the plans to accommodate roadwa'ys and swimming
POOL w_ 1 be necessary; however the plans will remain essentially the same.
Discussion was held by the CIty CouncIL, Ass stant City Attorney
and ZorlLng Coordinator, and It was determined 'thai: if no substantial changes
are made and revised plans are merely a rearrangement of buildings to
a~commodate the error in the survey, plans an be processed in the usual
manner.
No further action was taken on CondItional Use Permit No. 361.
IEN1'A1IJE MAP. TRACT NO. 5021: Subdivider: Mit-Mor Development Company, 300
North Wilshire, Suite 5, Anaheim; Engineer: McDaniel Engineering Company,
222 Ea5~ Lincoln, Anaheim; tract located on the north side of Wagner Avenue,
or1 ~ne east and west sides of Peregrine Place, and conta ns 15 proposed R-l
'::; (t
The City Planning Commission at their meeting of February l8,
1903, approved said tentative map, sUbject LoLhe followIng conditions:
Requirement that should this subdIvIsion be developed as more than one
;~Odlvislon, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative
form for approval.
Dedication of access rightsLo Wagner Avenue.
3. Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the planned highway
rl t-of-way line of Wagner Avenue, separac ng Lot Nos. 1 and 16 from
Wagner Avenue, provided that sa,d wa 1 soa 1 be stepped down to twenty-
to r (24) inches in the front one-half of the front yard setback, and
a (,e ght of forty-two (42) inches in the back one-half of the front yard
~e'back and said wall to De constr~cted prlor to Final Building Inspec-
~_l()r:.
4. Ins~allation of reasonable lands aping, nCJuding irrlgation facilities,
n :.he uncemented portion of the Wagner Avenue parkway, to full distance
of said walls, plans for said JandscapingLo be submitted to and subject
- the approval of the Superintendent of ParKway Maintenance and said
ndscaping to be installed prior to Fina 8011d n9 Inspection of the
;; eCl tract.
Mr. Martin Kreidt called attention to Condition No. 4 of the
CIty PlannIng Commission letter of transmltLal, and discussion was held.
Councilman Krein moved tha~ TentatIve Map, Tract No. 5021, be
approved, subject to the recommendaLtons of tne CIty Planning Commission,
amendIng Condition No.4 thereof by deletIng the words, "including irriga-
tlon fa lities". Councilman Sch0Tte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
fENTATI\1E MAP~ TRACT NO. 5024: Owner and SUbdivider: Home Land Company, 887
South Los Angeles Street, Anaheim, California; EngIneer: McDaniel Engin-
eerll1g Company, 222 East Lincoln Avenue, AnaheIm, CalifornIa. Subject tract
IS oeated on the north side of Orange venue, approximately 953 feet west
of the centerline of Euclid Street and coverIng approximately 3.1 acres, and
conLa ns 12 proposed R-l lots.
fhe Ci PI 1 Comml::;;
rcroved sa d tentar ve map,
'i f3 d F e b ru a r y 18,
condltions:
.... if;
reme'jt that ShOlJJd th 1 S
v~ lon, each suodJ lor
I, r for approval.
e
Joped as more than one
'm d-?d 1n tentati ve
. . r..c.iiiii>~~,~"'""'~:~}'-~
6515
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 26. 1963. 3:00 P_M.
2. Provi~ion of a five (5) foot drainage easement on Lot No.6 or Lot No.7.
3. Provision of a thirty (30) foot d8dication with the installation of
curbs twenty (20) feet from the centerline of Orange Avenu~.
The City Manager reported that property directly north of ~ubject
property is projected for a n8ighborhood park site in accordance with action
of the City Council at their meeting held February 19, 1963. He called
attention to the fact that although there is access to the proposed park
site from Broadway, no provision has been made for aCC8SS from the South,
and recommended that a fenced pedestrian walk-way be provided from the
northerly portion of the proposed cul-de-~ac in subject tract, between lots
6 and 7, to the edge of the property line. He advised that there is a five
foot drainage easement at this point, and the proposed walk-way would
require enlarging said easement to eight feet, or possibly a minimum of six
feet, which would not eliminate any buildable lots in the proposed subdivi-
sion.
Mr. John Jacobson, representing McDaniel Engineering Company,
advised that the proposed pedestrian walk-way would have to be discussed
with the developer; however he requested that the tentative map be approved
with conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission and City Manager.
Councilman Chandler moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 5024, be
approved, subject to the City Planning Commission recommendations, and
further subject to the dedication of an eight foot easement for pedestrian
access between lots 6 and 7 from the street northerly to the edge of the
property line. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
REVISED TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 4757 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 6~-63-72):
Developer: Fredericks Development Company, 524 West Commonwealth Avenue,
Fullerton, California; Engineer: Dan W. Heil; tract located at the
northeast corner of State College Boulevard and Ball Road, and contains
sixteen (16) proposed R-l lots, twenty-four (24) proposed R-3 lots, and one
proposed C-I lot.
At the request of Henry A. Fredericks, President of Fredericks
Development Company, and Leonard Smith, Authorized Agent, Council action on
said tract was deferred to be considered in conjunction with Reclassifica-
tion No. 62-63-72, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman
Chandler. MOTION CARRIED.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 193 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Communication from Silas W.
Lehmer dated February ?l, 1963, for 120 day extension of time for compliance
with certain conditions pursuant to Resolution No. 62R-394 granting
Conditional Use Permit No. 193, was submitted and read in full by the City
Clerk, together with communication from Meserve, Mumper and Hughes,
representing the Trustee of subject property.
The City Clerk briefed the background of subject property, and
reported that a ninety day extension of time was granted to said application
on October 30, 1962.
Discussion was held by the City Council and Assistant City
Attorney regarding time limits on conditional use permit applications;
at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Schutte moved that request for
extension of time be continued two weeks (March 12, 1963) and the City
AttorneyVs office be requested to make a finding concerning the legality
of granting a further extension of time to said application. Councilman
Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. l818 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-24): Communication from John
Rothman, representing home owners residing on West Cris Avenue, regarding
sign permit granted by the City Council on December 18, 1962 for property
at 1637 South Euclid Avenue, in conflict with provisions of Reclassifica-
tion No. 6?-63-?4 (Ordinance No. 1818), was submitted and read in full by
the City Clerk.
-'"'_.".'."-<-"'^i_"'..d_,...I,.,...,.........~ .'~ --- "-~"..,""...,. .' T
, r
6516
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 26. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion
thereof, Councilman Krein moved that final reading of Ordinance No. 1818,
which changed the zone of said property, be deferred for further review and
determination of proper course of action. Councilman Schutte seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1819: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1819 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-58 - C-I)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. l819 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
A YES :
NOES:
ABS ENT :
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMEN :
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. l819 duly passed and adopted.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY - REQUEST: The Assistant City Manager reported
that a request had been received from Southern Pacific Railroad Company
that the Anaheim City Council send telegrams to the Secretary of Labor and
the President of the United States, calling attention to the impact of the
impending strike on local economy.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was determined
that the City Council should take no position in this matter, as it was
felt to be beyond the realm of municipal affairs.
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: Application by Gerhard L. Schultz for
New On-Sale Beer License for the Ball-Dale Hofbrau, 2820 Ball Road (C-I,
Conditional Use Permit No. 360), was presented by the City Manager to the
City Council for their information. No further Council action was taken
on said application.
PROPOSED SHOPPERS' LANE - lOa BLOCK WEST LINCOLN AVENUE: The City Manager
presented plans for the proposed Shoppers' Lane on the North side of
Lincoln Avenue between Los Angeles and Lemon Streets, and extending
northerly to Chartres Street.
Plans were reviewed at the Council Table and discussion held
regarding Mayor Coons I suggestion that traffic be channeled one-way in a
circular pattern from Chartres Street. The Council noted that the plans
were essentially the same as the original proposed plan.
Councilman Chandler moved that plans for the development of the
proposed Shoppers' Lane marked "Exhibit A" be received and filed as a
tentative plan of development of the lOa block of West Lincoln Avenue to
Chartres Street, and tentati ve approval of the Council of Exhibit "A",
subject to review of the final plans and the financing of the project.
Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
OFFER TO SELL PROPERTY TO CITY: Offer was made by West Brothers to sell garage
building located at 112 West Chestnut Street.
Mr. Murdoch reported that such an acquisition has not been con-
templated in the budget, however since the offer was made, possible use of
the property has been investigated. That all of the possibilities are to
a degree contingent on future plans concerning the location, or housing of
the city activities, and the time schedule within which we should be working.
That many factors must be taken into consideration to justify the expenditure.
~4'
6517
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 26~ 1963. 3:00 P.M.
As of this time only a verbal offer to sell has been made, and there ha~
been no sale price mentioned.
Mr. Floyd G. West, 751 North Zeyn Street, advised that they would
prefer to have the City make an offer to them for the property a~ they have
not had an appraisal made on the property for many years and are not aware
of its present value.
Mr. West was advised that if a price for the property was submitted,
further consideration could be given by the City.
Mayor Coons was of the opinion that the City should make plan~
for a minimum number of moves, and seriously consider a bond election for
a new City Hall at the earliest possible date. That the bond issue ~hould
also include funds for the proposed new reservoir and other necessary
improvements.
The City Manager advised that a bond program keeping within the
present tax rate is being proposed, and calculations are based on a
relatively short period of time for a new building. The report may be
completed by May of this year.
RECESS: Cbuncilman Schutte moved to recess
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
to 7:00 P.M.
(5:15 P.M.)
Councilman Krein
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the Council
being present.
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 320: Submitted by Mrs.
Arthur E. Hemmerling, Owner; Lloyd E. Mount, Agent, requesting permission
to construct a planned unit development on property located briefly on the
west side of Euclid Street between Lincoln Avenue and Broadway.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 550,
Series 1962-63, denied said conditional use permit.
Public hearing was held January 2 and 29, 1963, and continued to
this date at the request of Mr. Stanley Rosen, Attorney, to allow for
additional report and recommendation from the City Planning Commission on
modified plans and additional evidence submitted by the applicant.
Mr. Stanley L. ROSSI, Attorney representing the applicant,
addressed the Council and on behalf of Mr. Lloyd Mount, Authorized Agent and
Mr. Clifford Hemmerling, representing the recorded owner, and pursuant to
telephone conversation as late as this evening, verbally requested complete
withdrawal of the application at this time, without prejudice to future
application; that Mr. Mount advised he has abandoned all interest in the
property and all parties concerned have requested said withdrawal; further,
this verbal request will be followed hy a written withdrawal request.
It was moved by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein,
that the verbal request for withdrawal and termination of all proceedings
on Conditional Use Permit No. 320 be accepted, subject to written confirma-
tion of said verbal request. MOTION CARRIED.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-50 AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 330: Submitted by Larramore Builders, Inc., requesting change of
zone from R-A to C-l and R-3, and Conditional Use Permit to construct a
planned unit development on property briefly described as located at the
northeast corner of Magnolia Avenue and Winston Road, 1250-1332 South
Magnolia Avenue.
The City Planning Ccmmission pursuant to their Resolutions Nos.
464 and 465, Series 1962-63, recommended approval of said applications,
subject to conditions.
-'~i..~ji;:_'_;;j.~,".~.<,.....,_",_",,,,,,,,,",_ """IiJ
6518
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 26. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Public hearing was continued from the meeting of January 22, 1963,
at the verbal request of Mr. Wilsey, Agent, to allow for revision of plans
to meet Code requirements, and again continued from the meeting of February
13, 1963 to this date for receipt of letter verifying the abandonment of the
project.
Communication dated February 15, 1963, from Doyle and Shields as
owners and applicants of the property requesting an extension of time to
March 12, 1963, to allow preparation of a revised plan, was submitted and
copies furnished each Councilman.
Communication dated February 21, 1963, from Doyle and Shields
requesting that inasmuch as the previous applicants have indicated their
intention to withdraw subject applications, that the firm of Doyle and
Shields be substituted as owners and applicants, was submitted and read.
Councilman Schutte moved that public hearing on Recla~sification
No. 62-63-50 and Conditional Use Permit No. 330 be continued to March 19,
1963, at 7:00 P.M., and that the substitution of the firm of Doyle and
Shields as applicants be approved. Councilman Krein seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-51 AND VARIANCE NO. 1545: Submitted
by Cris Menzie and Dr. William C. OiRielly, Own~ s, Richard L. Tom,
Architect, Agent, concerning property located at the southwest Corner of
Santa Ana Street and Harbor Boulevard.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-51: Requesting change of zone from R-3 to C-2.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 609, Series
1962-63, recommended C-l zoning, subject to the following conditions:
1. Dedication of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented centerline of
Harbor Boulevard (34.75 feet existing).
2. Installation of sidewalks on Santa Ana Street in accordance with the
adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer.
3. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart-
ment of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building
Inspection.
4. Provision of a three (3) foot public utility easement and a two (2)
foot overhang easement along the southerly and westerly boundaries of the
sUbject property to adequately serve the subject property and other
properties, at the time of the installation of the service facilities.
5. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Harbor
Boulevard.
6. Subject to t~e approval of Petition for Variance No. 1545.
7. TIme limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp-
lishment of Item Nos. 1, 2 and 5.
8. Development sUbstantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
9. Recordation of C-l Deed Restrictions limiting the use of subject
property to business and professional office use only.
10. Installation of tree wells at forty (40) foot intervals in the parkway
portion of Harbor Boulevard and Santa Ana Street rights-of-way abutting
subject property, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and
subJect to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance
prior to Final Building Inspection.
VARIANCE NO. 1545: Requesting waiver of two and one-half story height
limitations to permit construction of a three'~~story professional office
building, subject building not to exceed fifty feet in height.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
610, Series 1962-63, granted said variance, subject to the reclassification
of subject property to the C-l, Neighborhood Commercial Zone, as approved
under petition for Reclassification No. 62-63-51.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of sUbject property and existing
uses and zoning in the immediate area, and in summarizing the evidence
submitted to the City Planning Commission, noted said proposed three-story
offIce and professional building would be located directly across the
street from the new police facility building.
_:--...~-~-:;i.W~iiii,~*",,""'~#'..::..*4~,,'*,-;:;::
6519
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 26_ 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council.
Mr. Richard L. Tom, 1665 West Katella, Architect and Agent for
the owners, submitted an artist's rendering, in color, of the proposed
three-story building, which would front on Harbor Boulevard. He advised
that there will be a parking structure on Santa Ana Street, with one
level above ground and three levels below ground. In answer to Councilman
Chandler's question, Mr. Tom advised tr~t the uses proposed were professional
offices, such as lawyers, bail bondsmen, and so forth.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council, and in
referring to Condition No.9 of City Planning Commission resolution limiting
the use of subject property to business and professional offices only, the
Council questioned the advisability of placing such limited restrictions on
property fronting a commercial street where uses such as drug stores and
banks would be compatible with the area.
Mrs. Cris Menzie, applicant, advised that they have a major bank
interested in the first floor.
Discussion was held by the City Council and Assistant City
Attorney regarding uses permitted in a C-I zone, which would be incompatible
with the area, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Schutte moved that
action on Reclassification No. 62-63-51 and Variance No. 1545 be continued to
March 5, 1963, 3:00 P.M., to allow for the applicant to meet with Mr. Kreidt
for the purpose of preparing a list of acceptable C-I uses which would be
compatible with the area. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING_ RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 62=63-61: Submitted by David S. and Marion
G. Collins, Owners; John T. OVNeill, Agent, requesting change of zone from
M-I and P-L to C-3, on property located at 1541 West Broadway (north side of
Broadway approximately 668 feet east of Loara Street).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 616,
Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be denied.
Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property and
existing uses and zoning in the immediate area; noting the location of the
type of school to the north of the subject property and the Y.M.C.A. at the
northwest corner of Loara and Broadway. He advised that the Commission felt
the requested C-3 zoning to permit the construction of a motel and one-story
commercial building would be an encroachment of strip commercial in an area
reserved for industrial development.
Communication dated February 25, 1963, from H. N. Berger and
Fairfield Homes, Inc., owners of thirty acres of property on the so~h side
of Broadway east of Loara Street, opposing said C'-3 zoning as the property
owned by them is designated by the City for residential development, either
single or multiple9 was submitted and read in full.
The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council.
Mr. John T. OVNeill, Authorized Agent, 2053 Grayson Street,
addressed the Council stating they were not proposing strip development but
and office-professional development. He advised they have contacted the
registrar of the Orange State College, Fullerton Junior College, and
Chapman College and found that there is a great need for residential
housing of a dormitory type for students; that their proposal would make
such facilities available for $25.00 a week, room and board, with restaur-
ant facilities on the premises, which would be a price students could
afford. He stated their proposal is not a motel, and not a strip store
commercial development.
~"-~~~-.,.;,-~~,..""~",,",,,,"~,,,,41',;- - _ ,Il
1 I
65QO
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februarv 26. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Mr. O'Neill was of the opinion that their proposed use was far
more compatible to the area than would be an industrial development, and
noted the office-professional development and the R-3 development to the
West, the large acreage to the South of subject property, which would
develop residential, and felt the Y.M.C.A. would prefer office-professional
adjacent to them rather than an industrial use. Furtherg that said Y.M.C.A.
does not provide living facilities for young men, s"-,ch as they do elsewhere,
and therefore, -the proposed dormitory would be very compatible. The pro-
fessional building, containing thirteen offices} Is designed for a realty
center of related uses to a real estate development, such as real estate
offices, escrow company, draftsmen, building contractors, etc. He
advised that a dormitory is proposed for two-story over parking, and the
office building as single-story construction.
~
Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council, and Mr.
OgNelll came forward to the Council Table and further explained the pro-
posed development.
It was noted that the verbal evidence submitted by Mr. O'Neill
appeared to be a considerable different proposal than that: submitted to the
City Planning Commission.
Mr. David S. Collins, 1077 West Ball Road, was of the opinion
the proposed project should stand on its own merit, and consideration be
given also to modifying the proposed General Plan as it applies to this
area, as subject proposal would make a good transition between the residential
and the industrial zoning.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council.
Cora Lee Reagan, representing Kenneth W. Holt, owner of the private
sch.ool and al so owner of property to the rear of s'l.bj ect property which is
also intended for private school purposes, addressed the Council in opposi-
tion, feeling that the proposed establishment requested would definitely
be detrimental to the school students; that they would prefer an M-l develop-
ment as there would be fewer people to influence the students.
Mr. Wes Hughes, 435 West Katella, questioned if there were res-
trictions on the type of rentals proposed by the applicant during the
Slmmer months.
Mr. O'Neill replied that the dormitory would be rented to men only
on a monthly or bi-monthly basis, with a meal ticket; that they expect most
of the occupancy to be working men who carry their lunch every day; there
will be both students and working men. Further, they have checked the
economics thoroughly, and feel certain the dormitory could be operated for
a rental of $25.00 per week, room and board.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was noted in
revIewing the action and minutes of the City Planning Commission, the
evidence submitted this evening did not conform to the evidence which the
City Planning Commission considered as a basis for their action.
RESOLUTION: At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Krein offered
a resolution upholding the action of the City Planning Commission and
denYlng said application.
Mr. David Collins requested that the Council consider an action
on the requested commercial office building on the basis of a lesser C-l
Zone.
Further discussion was held by the City Council regarding the
possibility of a limited C-l Zone to allow only the proposed one-story
commercial office building on the westerly one hundred feet of subject
property, as indicated on the plans; the easterly eighty feet (proposed
boarding house location) to remain M~l Zoning.
-:~iiil_4Pii.__.~,;;w.).;,.,,;o0;~2,,:;'~~;;iii;;;;&
65'21
CIty Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINlJTES- February 26. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Councilman Krein withdrew his previous resolution, and moved the
entire file and proceedings be referred back to the City Planning Commission
for their consideration of the C-l use as indicated on the plans. Councilman
Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 344 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 349:
Submitted by Elvee, Inc., Owner, L. V. Bostwick, Agent, requesting permission
to expand existing trailer park facilities.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 344: M-l property (Reclassification No. 61-62-37)
located at the southeast corner of Midway Drive and Zeyn Street, 118 Midway
Drive.
The CIty Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 594,
Series 1962-63, denied said conditional use permit.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 349: R-I lots located at 1439 South Zeyn Street
and 1443 South Lemon Street.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 612,
Series 1962-63, denied said condItional use permIt.
Appeal from action taken by the CIty Planning Commission on
Conditional Use Permit Applications Nos. 344 and 349 was filed by Mr. L. V.
Bostwick, and public hearing scheduled to be heard this date.
Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of subject parcels of
property and summarized the evidence presentedlo the City Planning Commis-
sion resulting in their denial of both applications.
The Mayor asked If the applIcant wiShed to address the Council.
Mr. L. V. Bostwick, 200 West Midway Drive, briefed the history of
the Midway Drive trailer park, having purchased the trailer park in 1956
(sixty-one spaces), the property at that tIme being in the unincorporated
County area. He related the various agreements and permits from the City
of Anaheim allowing connection to the C1 sewer at the time of the first
requested expansion of the park, while still in County territory.
To contInue the expansion of the park, Mr. Bostwick advised that
he purchased the older residences in thIS area as they were put up for sale,
and now owns all but nine lots, this being why there are trailers between
the residential lots.
He advised that on the M-l property at the southeast corner of
Midway Drive and Zeyn Street, he intends to place a mobi~home to be used
only as an office for the trailer park.
In answer to Council's question, Mr. Bostwick advised that on
these two particular locations in question, he has sewer permits and part
of the work had been done before he was aware he must apply for a condi-
tIonal use permit.
Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council.
Mr. Ed Cronin, 11752 Garden Grove Boulevard, Garden Grove,
Architect, also related the history of the growth of subject trailer
park, that prior to annexation to the City, they met with with the then
City Attorney, City Engineer and City Pl?nning Director and worked out
the problems regarding connection to the CIty sewer facilities and a master
plan of development was approved; that as result of the approved master
plan, Mr. Bostwick in good faith has acquired the necessary permits for
expansion in keeping with saId master plan.
Mr. Cronin read in full communication dated February 25, 1963,
addressed to Mr. Bostwick from the State of California Division of Housing,
Santa Ana Office, Stanley E. Earl, Area Supervisor, advising of the
various State permits issued for the construction and operation of additional
trailer sites.
~'";-~~""t:....,...";..::..~.._...,.,.,"""","."~_..,"~,,,,, ~
I I
6522
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 26_ 1963_ 3~00 P.M.
The original over-all master plan of the trailer park was pres~nted
and reviewed by the City Council.
Mr. Cronin advised that they would be happy to comply with any of
the City requirements and endeavor to keep up the standards of the park;
that they are only asking for what they believe was originally agreed to in
the past.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council.
-
Mr. Robert G. Starrett, Attorney, from the firm of Richards,
Watson and Hemmerling, 615 South Flower, representing the home owners in the
area, addressed the Council in opposition, noting that the particular lots
in question are not contiguous to any lots that are now being used for trailer
purposes. On each side of these lots, there is property belonging to private
home owners who have lived on this property for some time and who intend to
remain in this area during retirement, which, until recently, has been a very
quiet and peaceful neighborhood for retirement. If the applicant's requests
were granted, tourist trailers would be parked on a lot which is between
residences of retired parties. Additional trailers would increase the
traffic in the area, which only has one entrance to Los Angeles Street.
The proposed expansion of the trailer park to these non-adjacent lots would
decrease the property values and make the area less desirable for living, due
to the noise and congestion.
Mr. Starrett referred to the area map prepared by the City staff,
and advised that there are private homes existing on the fourth and fifth
lots on the east side of Lemon Street (Aguirre and Coley property) rather
than trailers, as indicated. At the southeast corner of Lemon Street and
Midway Drive, there are trailers; however, the property is not owned by the
applicant but is owned by Mr. Martin and Mr. Switzler in joint tenancy, and
being held for the benefit of other home owners in the area, having been
purchased in order that a water well might be installed for the people in
the area; that he has been informed that the trailers are there without
permission from the owners, and he also questioned whether a City Conditional
Use Permit was obtained to allow the parking of these trailers on this R-I
lot, and also whether a House Moving Permit was granted and a variance
obtained to allow two houses on the second lot on the east side of Lemon
Street. He was of the opinion that the applicant has not considered the
welfare and rights of the people living in this particular area, in the
expansion of his operation, and has continued with his expansion plans on
subject properties after denial by the City Planning Commission of the
pending applications.
Mr. Starrett submitted that whatever permits were obtained by
Mr. Bostwick from the County in the past were not given in consideration of
current conditions and the rights of the people in the particular area, and
that if any expansion is permitted by the City, it should be in an orderly
fashion and not in the "hop-scotch" manner, as has been requested.
At the request of Councilman Chandler, Mr. Starrett in clarifying
the ownership of the lot at the southeast corner of Lemon and Midway Drive,
stated that the lot was held in trust only for certain land owners who have
houses in this area, who needed to have a water supply; that the people who
owned homes contributed money for the development of the water well, and
for convenience the title was taken by Mr. Martin and Mr. Switzler; that said
lot is not held in trust for the benefit of Mr. Bostwick.
Mr. Kreidt advised that the land use in the area has been rechecked
by the staff and corrected maps are being prepared.
Mr. Ben Switzler addressed the Council further explaining the
status of the ownership of the corner lot, which was purchased approximately
nIneteen years ago for the purpose of drilling a water well; that said water
system still serves the individual homes in this area and was originally
worked out with Mr. Vard Hannum, and was known as the South Anaheim Mutual
Water Company.
~'-;~4i"'''---;"-''-4i'""''-~-_",~,,,,-~;;,:~~---,,,--
6523
Cit Hall Anaheim
rnia - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februar
3:00 P,M,
Mr. Switzler objected to the parking and storage of trailers on
this lot, as they did not enhance the area. He was of the opinion that
to grant both applications as requested would only further the "hop-scotch"
expansion of the trailer court, and sooner or later force the adjoining
owners to sell their properties.
Mr. Switzler was advi;ed by the City Council that from the
evidence presented, it appeared that the parking of the trailers on this
lot referred to was a civil matter between the owners and Mr. Bostwick.
Mrs. Hastings, Mrs. Ada~s and Mrs. Coley, all residents on South
Lemon Street, adjoining the lots under consideration, addressed the Council
in opposition to subject conditional use permits, being of the opinion that
the requested trailer park expansion would devalue their homes, which may
not be new, but are very comfortable and pleasing for them, and they desire
to continue living there in peaceful and quiet surroundings.'
Mrs. Hastings also called attention to the fact that Lemon Street
is u;ed by the children going to school and the playground, and additional
trailers would create a traffic hazard. She stated that they were very much
opposed to the location of vacation trailers between their residences.
Mr. Peter Aguirre, residing at 1450 South Lemon Street for the
past seven years, addres;ed the Council in opposition, stating that it is
true these are pioneer houses, but they are also their homes and their
families are very happy there. He further advised there have never been
any trailers parked on his property, as was indicated on the map; however,
there are trailers on the lot fronting on Zeyn Street directly behind his
property.
The Mayor asked if anyone had anything new to offer.
Mr. Bostwick, in rebuttal, stated he had obtained permission from
Mr. Martin to park the trailers on lot number one, on the east side of
Lemon Street, and has planted shrubbery. Regarding the water well, Mr.
Bostwick advised that he has as much interest in the water system, in pro-
portion, as the remaining ten lots which he does not own.
Mr. Jack Kenny, 1441 South Los Angeles Street, owner of the M-l
property, was of the opinion that thp. twelve lots to the east of Zeyn Street,
of which he is owner of ten, also have an interest in the water system. He
advised that his main interest was to have entered into the record his opinion
that the placing of a trailer at the southeast corner of Zeyn Street and
Midway Drive for living purposes would be very undesirable, because of the
possible noise level emitting from the adjacent M-l industrial development.
Mrs. Martin addressed the Council in opposition, advising that
her husband did not grant permission to place trailers on lot number one on
Lemon Street, however did grant the applicant permission to plant shrubbery
on said lot.
The Council again noted that this, perhaps, was a civil matter;
that the City's interest would be in whether or not a permit was granted to
place trailers on an R-l lot.
In answer to Councilman Krein's question, Mr. Bostwick stated
he did not sell trailers from the storage lot at the southeast corner of
Lemon and Midway Drive.
Mayor Coons declared the hearing closed on Conditional Use Permit
No. 344 and Conditional Use Permit No. 349.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was noted that
from the evidence submitted, there appeared to be considerable expansion of
the trailer park and related activIties without benefit of required hearings
and permits. Mayor Coons felt that investigation and report as to the
expansion of related activities of the trailer park should be received prior
to any further action by the City Council.
'_~:''''''~b'~"'':."i':''':'''"'''''.:,.::_.-':dd_;~'''''~"" ......
'~,ffi..~"",,~,,J7q'.,
6524
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 26. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Chandler moved
that Conditional Use Permit No. 344 and Conditional Use Permit No. 349 be
referred back to the City Planning Commission for a complete report con-
cerning the facilities on all of the R-l lots in this area, between Los
Angeles Street and the Freeway, and that it be recommended to Mr. Bostwick
from this Council and from the Planning Commission that he take action to
institute conditional use permits on all of the property which he proposes
to use for a trailer park, so that the entire matter can be considered at
one hearing; any additional costs for advertising of new hearings to be at
the expense of the applicant. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
'""I
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman
Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9:30 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the
Council being present.
PERALTA HILLS AREA - REQUEST FOR MAINTAINING ZONING RESTRICTIONS: Excerpt from
minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held February 25, 1963,
regarding request from the Peralta Hills Estates Improvement Association
that the City Planning Commission take a position in support of the preser-
vation of the special character of the area known as Peralta Hills (County
E-l Zone), was submitted and read in full; noting that it would be inap-
propriate for the Commission to pass a resolution to this effect prior to
the holding of public hearings, and hearing the views of all the parties
concerned in the general area, and that it was undesirable to establish a
precedent in terms of a commitment of land use prior to annexation.
However, in considering the single use characteristics of the Peralta Hills
area, the Commission felt that it was appropriate for their individual view-
points to be a matter of record, as they unanimously agreed that the desired
type of development requested should take place.
Mayor Coons asked if a representative of the Peralta Hills
Association would like to address the Council.
Mr. Ja~es Nagamatsu, 17671 Peralta Hills Drive, Anaheim, President
of the Peralta Hills Estates Improvement Association, expressed appreciation
for the opportunity to address the Council. He stated that the Peralta
Hills area is an entity in itself containing approximately 400 hillside
acres with citrus and eucalyptus trees, and is the only area adjacent to
the boundaries of the City of Anaheim which is desirable for and presently
enjoys County E-l Zoning, requiring minimum one acre lots. The home owners
in this area would like to protect to the maximum this living condition as
indicated by their verbal presentation to the Council on January 8, 1963, and
by their previous resolution. Mr. Nagamatsu further advised that this area
is included in the proposed Yorba Linda Annexation, and expressed their
willingness to cooperate with the City of Anaheim.
Mr. Ward Howland, 17872 Peralta Hills Drive, Secretary of the
Association, advised that in the event of annexation to the City of Anaheim,
home owners residing in Peralta Hills are primarily concerned with the
question of zoning, the majority favoring the retention of County E-l Zoning.
He stated that City officials have indicated consideration is being given to
the establishment of a new zone in the city, R-5 - Residential Suburban, which
would include larger lot sizes, and would be applicable to their area, it being
their understanding said new zone would be finalized prior to annexation.
~e stated the residents feel special zoning provisions should be adopted
to Insure continued protection in the development of the Peralta Hills area,
and requested that the City Planning Commission opinions be formalized by a
City Council resolution, or ordinance, to be adopted immediately upon annexa-
tion of said territory to the City, thereby providing a guide for future
development by expressing the intentions of the present administration.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and the boundaries of
Peralta Hills defined by Mr. Murdoch.
~"<i*>""'-"_"*';-"':''''''':''~.,;'"_'.$;;...,,..,..t.'";'_''''-'_
6525
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 26. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
the City Attorney was instructed to prepare an Ordinance for consideration
by the City Council, containing the provisions that the limitation~ of
uses provided in any other political subdivision prior to annexation by
the City of Anaheim shall be recognized by the City upon annexation.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-l63: Further discussion was held, and at the conclu-
sion thereof, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-l63, finding
that there are particular characteristics in the area known as the Peralta
Hills which require that it be maintained a~ a homogeneous and contiguous
unit.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO ZONE THE PERALTA HILLS AREA, IN THE EVENT OF ITS ANNEXATION,
IN A MANNER WHICH WILL PRESERVE ITS PRESENT HOMOGENIZED INTEGRITY.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC I LM EN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-163 duly passed and adopted.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-55: Submitted by Robert L.
Wetzler, requesting change of zone from R-A to C-I, property located at
2052 West Ball Road ($\~tLiih side of Ball Road, east of Beach Boulevard).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
598, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be approved, ~ubject
to conditions (see February 13, 1963 minutes, page 6485).
Public hearing was continued from the meeting of February 13, 1963,
at the request of Mr. Swint, on behalf of Mr. Wetzler.
Mr. Wetzler addressed the Council and submitted a revised plan of
the over-all layout, which includes a super market (Michael's Market) on
the adjacent 100 feet to the East, to which he has obtained title. He
requested temporary waiver of the easterly wall requirement, contained in
the City Planning Commission's resolution, pending completion of Reclassi-
fication Proceedings on said easterly loa feet. He further advised that
the revised plans indicate a two foot landscaping strip in order to main-
tain the required parking, rather than a six foot strip as indicated by
the City Planning Commission.
Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council, and Mr.
Wetzler came forward to the Council to further explain the proposed
development. Regarding the six foot wall requirement, he advised that the
adjacent church has indicated they may desire to share parking facilities.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-164: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-164
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the
zone as requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of
Ball Road (30 feet existing).
2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all
improvements for Ball Road, subject to the approval of the City
Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in
the office of the City Engineer.
3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Ball
Road.
;;-"'~~~'11.,.,.,,,.,-_.,,...,,,,.,..-_...,.........._~"_
6526
Cit Hall Anaheim California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februar 26 1963 3:00 P.M.
4. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Depart-
ment of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building
Inspection.
5. Installation of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary by the City
of Anaheim Fire Department to provide adequate fire protection.
6. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomp-
lishment of Item Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
7. Development substantially in accordance with revised plans marked
Exhibit "Au, submitted this date, and in accordance with Exhibits 1 and
2, submitted with the application, so far as applicable.
8. Installation of a two foot strip of landscaping on the Ball Road property
line of subject property, prior to Final Building Inspection.
9. Installation of tree wells at forty (40) foot intervals in the parkway
portion of the Ball Road right-of-way abutting subject property, and
said landscaping to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection.
10. Installation of a two foot strip of landscaping and installation of
tree wells on the C-l property immediately to the West of subject
property, as shown on Exhibit "A", prior to Final Building Inspection.
II. Construction of a six foot masonry wall along the south and east
boundaries of subject property, prior to Final Building Inspection, said
easterly wall requirement to be waived unless demanded by the City.
1
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(62-63-55 - C-l)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABS ENT :
COUNC I LMEN :
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-164 duly passed and adopted.
APPOINTMENTS - CITY PLANNING COMMISSION: Mayor Coons recommended the re-appoint-
ment of Melbourne A. Gauer, member of the City Planning Commission, and the
aPPoIntment of James C. Craig to fill the position formerly held by Albert
Marcoux, and James A. Sides to fill the unexpired term of E. p. Hapgood,
deceased.
Mayor Coons based his recommendation for the appointment of Mr.
CraIg, who resides in the proposed Yorba Linda Annexation area, on the
grounds that in the event saId annexation is successful, a substantial time
may elapse before possible litigation with the City of Placentia can be
finalized, during which time it will be beneficial to all to have someone
on the Commission representing this area.
Councilman Dutton moved said appointments be made, as recommended
by the Mayor. Councilman Krein seconded the motion.
On request, roll call vote to the above motion was as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, ChandlQr, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared the above motion unanimously carried.
ORDINANCE NO. l821 - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-120: On report and recommendation
of Mr. John Dawson, Assistant City Attorney, that Mr. Ducoff, applicant, has
been unable to effect an applicable agreement with his neighbor as to the
installation of a wall along the west property line, Councilman Schutte
offered Ordinance No. 1821 for first reading, amending Ordinance No. 1786 by
deleting therefrom Condition No.3.
~'~'C.~~""c,;~~ ,~
6527
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 26. 1963. 3:00 P.M,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1786 IN
RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 61-62-120. (Ducoff Property)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. l821 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
INDUSTRIAL SALESMAN: Councilman Dutton requested consideration be given
regarding the employment of an industrial salesman for the purpose of
encouraging industries to locate in the City of Anaheim.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: ~O:50 P.M.
SIGNED:~A, :v~
City Clerk
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 5. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT :
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte (entered the meeting
3:15 P.M.), Krein and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER: James p. Maddox.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
ABSENT:
PRESENT :
Mayor Coons called the mepting to order.
MINUTES: Councilman Dutton moved to dispense with reading in full and approve
minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held February 19, 1963.
Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING. OLIVE HILLS RESERVOIR ANNEXATION: Public hearing was held
pursuant to Resolution No. 63R-81, published in the Anaheim Bulletin
February I and 8, 1963.
The City Manager advised that subject annexation was an exchange
of uninhabited property between the Cities of Anaheim and Orange, to allow
inclusion of the Olive Hills Reservoir site within the boundaries of the
City of Anaheim.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council with
regard to the proposed annexation, there being no response, declared the
hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-165: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-165
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A MAJORITY PROTEST HAS NOT BEEN MADE IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM KNOWN
AND DESIGNATED AS CITY OF ANAHEIM OLIVE HILLS RESERVOIR ANNEXATION.
~~';"'*""'.'""'''''''-'*''"''''''''''''"''''-''''''.':;i'~:,..,,,,,,:;;;,