1963/06/25
6848
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte (entered the meeting 3:05
P.M.), Krein and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
CITY ATTORNEY: JQseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: DeneM. Williams.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall.
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: Councilman Dutton moved that minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting
held June 11, 1963, be approved. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-532: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-532 for
adoption~
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIR-
ECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF JUNE 25, 1963.
(Warrants Nos. 25428 to 25668, both inclusive, totaling $821,652.95)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUN:::; ILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-532 duly passed and adopted.
SIGN REQUEST - DUANEuS PIRATE CAVERN: Application submitted by Ray Spehar, 1031
North Euclid Street, requesting permission to erect a free-standing pole
sign, advertising Duaneis Pirate Cavern, was continued from the meeting of
June 18, 1963 to this date to allow Mr. Spehar to attend said meeting for
discussion of arrangements for an integrated 51gn at the shopping complex
on subject property.
Councilman Chandler briefed the Council discussion held at the
meeting of June 18, 1963, for the benefit of Mayor Coons, who was absent at
said meeting.
Mayor Coons asked if Mr. Spehar, owner of subject property, was
present and wished to address the City Council.
Mr. Raymond Spehar submitted a drawing indicating an integrated
sign Including the four businesses in the shopping center, and excluding
only the medical center which has an existing sign that was erected prior to
annexation of property to the City of Anaheim.
(Councilman Schutte entered the meeting, 3:05 P.M.)
In answer to Councilman Chandleris question relative to the
locatIon of the sign within the center ten per cent of the property, Mr.
Spehar advised that to locate the sign in the center ten per cent of the
property would place the sign quite close to the existing medical sign, and
also cause the loss of one parking space, and requested the sign be placed
approximately 30 feet from the north property lIne, which would be south of
the first driveway.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
said sign application was granted in accordance with revised plans (dated
this date and signed by Mayor Coons); further, subject to no projection over
the property line, and the sign to be located not less than 25 feet from the
south property line. MOTION CARRIED~
r'e:.;:,':,:',iij.iri,';,../-,,,," .........,..= .~-
1WiV"':o"~~.
.,. ... -.....
6849
City Hall. Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25_ 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
TAXICAB PERMIT APPLICATION - AMERICAN CAB COMPANY: Application by Gene Rogers
and Martin J. LockJney, dba "American Cab Company", was continued from the
meeting of May 21, 1963, to June l8, 1963, at which time a motion to deny
said application received a tie vote, and therefore decision was continued to
this date for a full Council.
Mayor Coons announced that although he was not present at the
previous meeting, he reviewed the complete testimony presented by means of
the tape recording. He advised that the City Ordinance requires a need and
necessity must be established; however, regarding subject application, there
was no indication of need and necessity shown, in fact, no evidence either
way.
In analyzing the situation, the Mayor felt that a taxicab company
was quasi or semi-public utility; its operation is contolled by the City
Ordinance as to the number of companies, number of cabs, their stand
locations, their operators, the type, nature and quality of equipment, and
the rates that may be charged. He stated that in reviewing the balance
sheets and profit and loss records of the existing company operating in
Anaheim, in his opinion, for the amount of investment and the nature of the
operation and gross sales, the net profit is very smaIl.
Mayor Coons was of the opinion that if the number of taxicabs
allowed in the City was not controlled, there could arise a situation where
cab drivers in competing for business could become antagonistic towards
each other during the hours of the day when there possibly was insufficient
business for two companies, thereby working to the detriment of their
companies and the City.
He further advised that the American Cab Company has applied for
only two cab stands - both in the Disneyland amusement area, where the
bulk of the summer business exists, and there was no indication that the
applicant intends to serve the entire community, as does the present
company.
Due to the lack of any additional need or necessity shown, and the
information that the present company has sufficient cabs to supplement their
fleet when there is a need for additional service, and although he is a
strong advocate of private enterprise, the Mayor felt he would have to vote
to deny subject application.
Councilman Schutte moved that the application of the American Cab
Company be denied. Councilman Krein seconded the motion.
Discussion: Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that some
evidence was presented by both parties; that the growth of the present taxi-
cab company is evidence that there is a need for further cab service, either
by that company or another company, and the growth of the City is evidence
of need for further transportation in the City. Also, the fact that Anaheim
has no public transportation other than the existing taxicab company and
private automobiles, and since this type of operation is in the nature of
a public utility and controlled by the City, the same control could be
exercised over any unfavorable operation, in that their permit could be
limited or revoked.
Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that the issue could be
decided eIther way, and to him it was a matter of principle.
Councilman Dutton concurred with Councilman Chandlervs statements,
and added that he would require that the applicant serve the entire City.
Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that insufficient evidence
of need and necessity was presented to justify a permit being issued to an
additional cab company.
The motion was re-stated, and Mayor Coons called for a roll call
vote.
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Schutte, Krein and Coons.
Dutton and Chandler.
MOTION CARRIED.
,....,,;;."~".d~""-~._--"-~.~~~...__..._.~~~_._."_
6850
City Hall~ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25~ 1963. 3!00 P.M.
BUSINESS LICENSE - COIN-OPERATED WASHING MACHINES: Request of Mr. Juliu~ S.
Austero, Attorney for Mr. E~nest Winter, for consideration of the $3.00
per machine per year license tax, was continued from the meeting of June
11, 1963, at the request of the applican~.
Mr. Geisler reported that a further request from Mr. Austero
has been received to again continue the matter pending consultation with
his office.
The City Manager reported that request has been received from
Mr. Norman H. Smedegaard, Attorney for Mr. Wallace E. Carr, for Council
review and possible amendment to the business license tax a~se~~ed to coin-
operated washing machines, and stated that Mr. Smedegaard was present and
wished to address the Council.
Mr. Smedegaard submitted and read in full his communication to
the City of Anaheim, advising that his client, Mr. Carr, is engaged in the
business of supplying coin-operated washing machines to privately owned
apartment buildings and mobil home parks, and compared the $3.00 per year
per machine license tax, or $600.00 per year license for an approximate
$18,000.00 gross business, with the $25.00 license paid by the owner of
an automatic laundry containing many machines. He called attention to the
fact that laundry rooms in said apartment buildings, etc., are not open to
the public as is the automatic laundry, and the gross business cannot
compare with those machines used by the general public.
He further advised that machines operated by his client gross
approximately $8.00 per month, as compared to a coin-operated game or vend-
ing machine that gross from $200.00 to $400.00 a month. He cited the
license taxes currently assessed by the Cities of Santa Ana, Tustin, Costa
Mesa, Newport Beach and Los Angeles for the same business as that of Mr.
Carr.
Mr. Wallace E. Carr, 1229 West Fifth Street, Santa Ana, addressed
the Council advising approximately five years ago, the City Attorney of the
City of Anaheim interpreted the license tax for this business should be
based on gross receipts, and for two years their license fee was $35.00 per
year; however, at a later date, this opinion was changed to $3.00 per machine
per year under the interpretation that the machines were vending machines.
Since that time, although Anaheim has grown, their business has not grown,
and they are not serving Anaheim as they could because of this license
structure, which in his opinion was inequitable.
Mr. Carr reported that some local appliance dealers on a gross
receipts basis were converting used washing machines and supplying them
without being assessed the $3.00 tax for each machine.
Mr. Roy Pharis of Ohlsen-Pharis Co. , 1113 E. Raymond Way, addressed
the Council advising that approximately five years ago his company opened
business and were licensed at the $25.00 per year rate, based on the
storage of laundry equipment. Last month the License Collectoris office
called and informed him that they were not licensed appropriately, since
their machines are placed in separate laundry rooms, and therefore they
would be charged a $3.00 license per machine per year for machines placed
in apartments, etc., plus the $25.00 for the storage business. Mr.
Pharis was of the opinion that theirs was a very necessary and competitive
business, and he protested the additional license fee on the grounds as
being excessive for such a small gross income. Further, the coin-operated
machine is the method found to be the most efficient both to the user of
the machine, to the property owner, and to them; that a percentage of the
income is paid to the property owner. Attention was called to the personal
property tax also paid on each machine.
Discussion was held by the City Attorney and City Council concern-
ing options under the present regulation and possible amendments to the Code;
at the conclusion thereof, Mayor Coons stated the matter will be investigated
as soon as possible in light of the new license period approaching, and the
interested parties advised accordingly.
'~~_..;"~~~~.",,.,~~
----, ---.,"'''-~,~,
6851
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
SIGN REQUEST - JOLLY RqGER INN: Application submitted by the Jolly Roger Inn,
640 West Katella Avenue, Anaheim, requesting permission to erect a sign
with four foot projection over the property line, together with plan~ and
report from the Building Department, were reviewed by the City Council.
Mr. E. C. Agnew, Santa Ana Neon Company, advised that this request
was for a sign to be placed on Harbo~ Boulevard frontage, approximately
200 feet south of Katella Avenue, at the east entrance to the Jolly Roger
Inn. He further advised that the planter box at the property line has be~n
extended from five to six feet to accommodate the pipe column of the
requested sign, that in any other location, the pole could be a traffic
obstruction.
Mr. Agnew called attention to other motels in the area with
projection signs and further advised that this request for a four foot
projection over the property line was not for the purpose of being se~n,
but for the safety of motorist entering and leaving the property. Attention
was also called to the width of the sidewalk and parkway.
Councilman Dutton moved that said sign request be granted as
requested, including the four foot projection, based on the evidence of
hardship presented. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion.
Discussion was held by the City Council and undeveloped property
south of subject property noted; at the conclusion, action by the City
Council was deferred to allow further inspection of the property during the
Council dinner reoess period. Councilman Dutton withdrew the above motion.
Councilman Chandler withdrew second to said motion.
Mr. Agnew was advised that the decision would be made later during
the evening session.
Later in the meeting, after inspection of premises on which
requested sign is to be erected, Councilman Dutton moved sign request be
granted, subject to no projection over the property line. Councilman
Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
SIGN REQUEST - KNOTT VILLAGE APARTMENTS: Application submitted by Mort Green,
Stanton, California, for permission to erect a non-conforming sign at 501
South Knott Avenue advertising Knott Village Apartments, together with
plans and report from the Building Department, were reviewed by the City
CO'Jncil.
Attention of the Council was called to the fact that standards
for signs have been drawn for commercIal signs, primarily for retail
activitIes; that resIdential signs are covered by the zoning ordinance.
Mr. Claude Murphy, 307 Canoga Place, of Triangle Electric Company,
advised that the applicant desires to list features and appointments offered
in the apartments.
DISCUSSIon was held by the City Council and City Manager, and at
the conclusion thereof, Councilman Chandler moved said sign request be
deniedo CouncIlman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
SIGN REQUEST - LA PALMA INSURANCE AGENCY: Application submitted by John Epp,
1753 West La Palma, requesting permission to paint a sign on the rear of an
existing fence at 1733 West Francis, together with plans and report from
the Building Department, were reviewed by the City Council~
Mr. Robert Von Esch, representing the applicant, advised that
the fence, although located in an R-3 Zone, faces towards and can be seen
only by a commercial area, and would be an improvement to the existing
wooden fence; it would provide better control and maintenance of the entire
area if a conditional permit was granted, and most important, the sign would
perform a service to the community by warning and notifying new people
coming Into the area that insurance is one of the necessities in the State
of California in order to preserve their drivers! licenses.
.""~,-_.",,--~..~.-.._,"~-~....,~,..-,..,.._,,,.,~~~.,.,...---~... IIiI
6852
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25_ 1963_ 3:00 P.MQ
Mr. Von Esch further advised that the applicant owns additional
properties in the area, and was of the opinion that this request would not
be detrimental to any other use in the area; that his client was in the
insurance business, and his business was dependent on the requested sign.
Mra Geisler, City Attorney, advised that the requested advertising
constitutes a billboard, and according to the Anaheim Municipal Code, is
allowed only in a commercial zone or manufacturing zones by conditional use
permIt; further, such a sign would be prohibited in an R-O, R-l, R-2 and R-3
Zone.
On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Chandler,
the continued use of subject sign was denied. MOTION CARRIED.
SIGN REQUEST - WATER WHEEL RESTA~RANT: Application submitted by Sam Rosen,
requesting permission to erect a non-conforming sign advertising the Water
Wheel Restaurant, 1144 North Euclid Street, together with plans and report
from the Building Department, were reviewed by the City Council.
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein,
said sign permit was granted as requested. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-29 - R~VIEW OF PLANS_ PARCEL 98: Plans marked
Exhibit !lA98" and uB98u, submitted by Thomas Keegan in connection with
Reclassification No. 62-63-29, for the development of Parcel 98, were
reviewed by the CIty CouncIl together wIth report of the City Planning
Depaytment, noting that said plans meet all provisions of the Anaheim Muni-
cipal Code relating to zoning.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte,
saId plans were approved as presented. MOTION CARRIED"
RECLASSIFICATION NO" 62-63-19 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Peter M. Elliott,
812 North Broadway, Santa Ana, California, on behalf of Fred and Jeanne
Howard, dated June 13, 1963, for SIX month extension of time to bond for
engineering requlrenlents, posted pursuant to Resolution No. 62R-86l,
Reclassification No. 62-63-19, was submitted.
Six months extension to bond was approved, as requested, on
motIon by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION
CARRIED.
REQUEST - WAIVER OF LICENSE FEE_ S1" MICHAELiS CHURCH FALL FESTIVAL: Request
dated June 3, 1963, was sUbmitted by Mrs. Charles E. Brauel, Co-Chairman of
St. Michaelis Episcopal Church Fall Festival, for waiver of license fee
for said event.
On motIon by Councilman SchLtte, seconded by Councilman Krein,
saId request was granted in accordance with the Council policy, that if the
attractions are operated by the church, license fees are waived, but for any
attractIons operated by an outsIde vendor, license fees are to be charged.
MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 59~60-l9 - EL COCO PALM MOTEL SIGN: Petition filed by
Mabel E. Betzsold, objecting to the rotating beacon sign advertising the
El Coco Palm Motel, 1919 East Center Street, was submitted.
DiscuSSIon was held by the City CouncIl; at the conclusion thereof,
said matter was deferred to the next meetIng, July 2, 1963, 3:00 P.M. for
review of original applicatIon (59-60-19) and report by the planning staff,
and the City Clerk was requested to so advise Mr. Reitman, owner of the
property, requestIng his presence at said meetIng.
RECLASSIFICATION NOQ 62-63-105 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 408 - TERMINATION:
Communication dated June 25, 1963, from Marquis E. Pitman, Jr., Agent for
Grace Dickerson, requesting wIthdrawal of Rec assification No. 62-63-105 and
Conditional Use Permit No. ~08 (property located between Broadway and Lincoln
near Date Street) was sUbmitted and read n f'.~ll by Mr. Kreidt.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein,
ReclassIficatIon No. 62-b3-105 and Condit ana Use PermIt No. 408 were
terminated w~tho'-Jt preJudice to a new application. MOTION CARRIED.
.~~;.:"~~""'d
':~"':L<!~:.<.'..L:..::,..,;!.,..~~.i"iii",F,t."""
,,*~~,,,.>~,.~~
6853
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO.. 5182: Mr. Martin Kreidt reported on County Use Variance
No. 5l82, proposing a 362 unit trailer park in M-l, Light Industrial
district, property located on the south side of La Palma Avenue, approximately
JOO feet east of Red Gum Street. He summarized the review of said case by
the City Planning Commission on June 24, 1963 and read their r~commendations
to Orange County Planning Commission, that said application be denied on
the grounds that the requested residential use would be detrimental to the
existing and projected industrial development of the Northeast Industrial
Area.
DIscussion was held, at the conclusion thereof, the City Council
authorized a letter to be written to the County Planning Commission
clarifying the Councilus positIon, that the Council policy on the original
application for a trailer park use was formulated prior to the industrial
zoning of the area; that when the subsequent petition was filed for an
addition to the trailer park, it was recommended by the City Council on the
basis that the entire parcel of property be allowed similar development.
Now that the variance has expired, it was the opinion of the City Council
that the basic policy when the property was rezoned to the industrial
zoning should now apply, and for this reason, recommended no further resi-
dential uses, including trailer parks, be permitted in the Northeast
Industrial Area.
COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO.. 5186: Mr. Kreidt reported on County Use Variance No.
5186, proposing to construct two single-family dwellings with attached
garages, to be used as model homes in connection with the sale of dwellings
of all units in Tehtative Tract No. ~427, located on the northerly side of
the Riverside Freeway, opposite and westerly of Cerro Vista Drive, in Santa
Ana Canyon. He summarIzed the review of said case by the City Planning
Commlsslon on June 2~, 1963~ and read their recommendations to the County
Planning Commission, that the Use Variance be approved, provided that the
two model dwellings are established in accordance with Tentative Map of
Tract No. ~427.
The City Council took no action on County Use Variance No. 5186.
COUNTY USE VARIANCE NO. 5169: Mr. Kreidt reported on County Use Variance No.
5169, requesting permission to construct a sand and gravel screening plant,
and storage or stockpile of materials in connection therewith in the M-l,
Light IndustrIal District, located approximately 2,000 feet east of Jeffer-
son Street, at a point approximately 200 feet north of the Riverside
Freeway, east of Anaheim.
Mr. Kreidt summarized the review of said application by the City
Planning Commission on June 2~, 1963, and read their recommendations to the
Orange County Planning Commission, recommending that consideration be given
to the possible noise} dust and truck traffic generated by the proposed use
and Its rela~ionship to the prOjected light industrial development of the
Northeast Industrial Area, and that appropriate safeguards for the ultimate
development of abuttIng properties be established, including a possible
tIme limitatIon on the requested use.
'[he City CouncIl concurred in the recommendations of the City
Planning CommIssion, and on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by
Councilman Krein, directed a letter be written to the Orange County Planning
CommIssion sugsestin3 that before said variance is granted, the depth, area
and scope of operation De submi~ted to tne Orange County Water District
Engineer Lo determine what effect thIS operation would have on OdT water
Teplenlsnment and water conservatIon program. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO~ 63R-i)33: On ~he certlflcatlon of trle Director of Public Works
that Sully-Mil er ContraCtIng Company has completed the construction of
the Improvement of two alleys and a park ng ot on Melrose Street, south
of B~oadway, Job No. 751, n accordance WIth plans and specifications,
CouncIlman Kre} offered ResolutIon No. 63R-533 for adoption.
Refer to Reso
lon Book.
..."._.M___......__.....I._._,
685~
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P,M.
(RESOLUTION NO~ 63R-533)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTA1ION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND
WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: IMPROVEMENT OF TWO ALLEYS NEAR
BROADWAY AND MELROSE STREETS, AND A PARKING LOT ON MELROSE STREET SOUTH OF
BROADWAY, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 75l. (Sully-Miller Contracting
Co.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUN:::ILMEN:
COUNCILMaN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-533 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO~ 63R-534: On the certification of the Director of Public Works
that Sanitary Pipeline Company, Inc. has completed the construction of the
Orangewood Avenue Sewer Improvement, Job No. 1261, in accordance with plans
and specifications, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-534 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND
WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE ORANGEWOOD AVENUE SEWER IMPROVE-
MENT, FROM NINTH STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 76~ FEET WEST OF NINTH STREET, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1261, INCLUDING CONTINGENT ITEM. (Sanitary
Pipeline Company, Inc.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, SChutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-534 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-535 - AWARD OF JOB NO. 1266: On the recommendations of Thornton
E. Piersall, Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution
No. 63R-535 for adoption, awarding construction of the Harbor Boulevard
Sewer Improvement, Job No. 1266, to Orange County Pipeline, Inc., the low
bidder, in the amount of $8,593.50.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT~ THE HARBOR BOULEVARD SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM LA PALMA AVENUE
TO APPROXIMATELY 510 FEET SOUTH OF LA PALMA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
JOB NO. 1266. (Orange County Pipeline, Inc. - $8,593.50)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
CO UNC I LMEN :
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-535 duly passed and adopted.
'~",,;~~"'CO"'"
"'''-'.'cX~'",c:"!,:_,-,~,, -=
-w~i4iI'~,....,.,;,;.~~,~
6855
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M~
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-536 - AWARD OF JOB NO. 1267: On the recommendations of thp
Director of Public Works, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-536
for adoption, awarding construction of the Brookhurst Street Sewer Improve-
ment, Job No. 1267, to Ralph de Leon Construction, Inc., the low bidder,
in the amount of $1~,533.60.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: THE BROOKHURST STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM CRESCENT AVENUE
TO APPROXIMATELY 1281 FEET SOUTH OF CRESCENT AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
JOB NO. 1267. (Ralph de Leon Construction, Inc., $1~,533.60)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC ILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-536 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO.. 63R-537- AWARD OF JOB NO It 4810: On the recommendations of the
Director of Public Works, Councilman&hutteoffeyed Resolution No. 63R-537
for adoption, awarding construction of the La Palma Avenue Street Improve-
ment, Job No. ~810, to R. J. Noble Company, the low bidder, in the amount
of $36,232.29.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF LA PALMA AVENUE, FROM APPROX. 1,3001 WEST
OF EUCLID ST. TO APPROXa l,3001 EAST OF BROOKHURST ST. AND FROM APPROX.
1,3001 EAST OF GILBERT ST. TO APPROX. 600v WEST OF MAGNOLIA AVE., JOB NO.
4810. (R. J. Noble Co., $36,232.29)
On Toll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-537 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-538 - AWARD OF JOB NO. ~808: On the recommendations of the
Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-538
fo' adoption, awarding construction of the Magnolia Avenue Street Improve-
ment, Job No. ~808, to Copp Paving Company, the low bidder, in the amount
of $90,SL1L1.49.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF MAGNOLIA AVENUE, FROM LINCOLN AVENUE TO
THE SOUTH CITY LIMITS APPROXIMATELY 155 FEET NORTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF
CERRITOS AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 4808. (Copp Paving Co,)
(Roll call, refer to page 6856)
~~~~;;-;, -""";";"':;_-::".i'__';""~~_,_""""~,_,,,;;:~,,~,"_,._.....-~,~,,__
6856
City Hall. Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25, 1963. 3:00 P,M,
(Resolution No. 63R-538)
On roll call, the fOregoing resolution wa~ duly pa~sed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILM8N:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No_ 63R-538 duly passed and adopted.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on informal bid~ received for
the purChase of one Skiploader, with four-way bucket, as follows, and
recommended acceptance of the low bid, that of Harron-Rickard & McCone Co.,
in the amount of $ll,787.96, including tax:
Harron-Rickard & McCone Co., Norwalk
Brown Bevis Ind. Equipment, Lo~ Angeles
Warnock-Bancroft Equipment Co., El Monte
Shaw Sales & Service, Los Angeles
Shepherd Machinery Co., Los Angeles
Orange County Tractor, Anaheim
Wallace Tractor, Anaheim
McCoy Tractor, Anaheim
$ 11,787.96
11,974.80
12,268.72
12,891.12
No Quote
" "
" n
" It
On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Krein
moved that the low bid of Harron-Rickard & McCone Co. be authorized in the
amount of $11,787.96. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion~ MOTION
CARRIED"
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for
the purchase of two Oil Circuit Breakers for the Lewis Sub Station, as
follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid, that of I. T. E.
Circuit Breaker Co., be authorized in the amount of $20,228.00, including
taxi
I.T.E. Circuit Breaker Co., Los Angeles
General Electric Co., Los Angeles
$ 20,228.00
20,384.00
On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton
moved that the low bid of I.T.E. Circuit Breaker Co., in the amount of
$20,228.00, be authorized. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for
the purchase of one 500 KVA Transformer, as follows, and recommended
acceptance of the low bid, that of Maydwel1-Hartzell, Inc., in the amount
of $lO,337.60, including tax:
Maydwell-Hartzell, Inc., Los Angeles
Westinghouse Electric Corp., Los Angeles
Parks & Co., Long Beach
$ 10,337.60
No bid returned
ll,440.00
On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Schutte
moved that the low bid of Maydwell-Hartzell, Inc., be authorized in the
amount of $IO,337.60. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
RENEWAL - FIRE INSURANCE (FIVE YEAR POLICY): On the recommendations of the City
Manager, it was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
that renewal of fire insurance under the five year policy plan, and extension
of said policy to include all new buildings, to be effective at the time of
acceptance by the City, be authorized. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
~.;d;"."'~ii;'*"~_-~ -a'~c,;;,.',~~ ''t_ 1 ,1].-~~
6857
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
CITY AT10RNEY: Joseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER: James p. Maddox.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin K-reidt.
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-~39: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-539 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING BUDGET
FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO CITIES.
On roll call the fOTegoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followIng vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-539 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-540: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-540 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AND AUTH-
ORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INDENTURE GRANTING TO THE CITY THE RIGHT TO
CONSTRUCT AND USE A STREET OR HIGHWAY UPON AND ACROSS CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY.
On Toll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC I LMEN :
COUNC I LMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-~40 duly passed and adopted.
DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Schutte offeTed Resolutions Nos. 63R-5~1 to
63R-5~6, both inclusIve, fo-r adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-5~1: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Elizabeth Wagner and Clarence S. Wagner)
RESOLUTION NO" 63R-5L12: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Double-Three Associates, George Q. Nelson, et al)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-5d3: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, INCLUDING A
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AND A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. (S. Marshall
Youngman)
(Roll call - see page 6858)
;.~. ..I...~~"",~.,'i1dii:','___~,'",,,,,,,~,,,,,,,,,",,,,-,~,~~_,.,._.,,_~
! .__._--
6858
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P,M.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-5~4: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Malcolm-Steinlauf, Inc., et al)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-545: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES,
(Olin K. Darnel, et ux)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-546: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Milton Katz, M.D., et ux)
On roll call the fOTegoing resolutions were duly passed and adopted
by the fOllowing vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Resolutions Nos. 63R-5~1 to 63R-546, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered yeceived and filed, on
motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler:
a. Feather River Project Association Resolution regarding the need for
re-evaluation of water demands.
b. Feather River Project Association Resolution opposing diversions of
money from the California Water Fund.
c. Feather River Project Association Legislative Memo #20 listing bills
affecting water development.
d. Feather River Project Association Minutes of Meeting held May 3, 1963.
e. AnaheIm Chamber of Commerce, Community Improvement Committee, commending
the City and property owners for mutual plans to Improve the 100 block
on the North side of West Lincoln, and the 100 block on the west side
of North Los Angeles StTeet, and offeTing services of said committee to
help expedIte the plans.
f. C. Dean Cole.
MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1860: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1860 for final
reading.
RefeJ to Oydinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-114 - R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1860 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Oydinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motlon. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1860 duly passed and adopted.
~-,",1:1~.c'~$~"";';:-:':"'''';'''-''''':"'''''''_~''''''~"''''''4-~':4'...'_' -w-
~,"_C'~j~",,",.-'i.i'-'M---.~._'-_'--'-:.'i
._".~~,"'~~-"-""~--~
6859
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 1861: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1861 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-75 - R-3 and C-l)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1861 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
A YES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUN:ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC ILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1861 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1862: Councilman Krein offered O-vdinance No. 1862 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-46 - R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1862 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NO ES :
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC ILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1862 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1863: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1863 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-66 - R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1863 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On Toll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
A YES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared O,dinance No. 1863 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 186L1: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 186L1 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
~"- '''-~_'-_'-_-~_--__~__~''''~-L~_-'--''-j-__~~,~_;.-_."__,~_'''''''''''''''__-.-_____M
6860
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P,M.
(ORDINANCE NO. 1864)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-78 - R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1864 and
having knowledge of the content~ therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 186~ duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1865: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1865 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinanc~ Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69 (6) - M-l & P-L)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1865 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1865 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1866: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1866 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE l~, CHAPTER 14.32 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARKING, BY AMENDING SECTION 14.32.190
THEREOF AND BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 14.32.150. (No parking at Any Time,
and Restricted Parking, portions of Harbor Boulevard, Santa Ana Street,
Janss Street and Broadway)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1866 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1867: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1867 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-11 - R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1867 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
~~-~;Jo~~,,,,,,-,,,'''i''~''''.':'',,",,:..,..-...,.:.>.,,,j>',,_,_.,....;,....4-
"IT 1>iI ~,""""'.I~. ' i
6861
City Ha11. Anaheim. Ca~ifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLAS~IFICATION NO. 62-63-24: Submitted by J. Tyson E11i~,
requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-l on property located on the
west side of Euclid Street, approximately 257 feet north of Sallie Lane
(1637-1645 South Euclid Street).
First ~aading of Ordinance No. ISI8, changing the zone as
requested, subject to conditions, was held February 19, 1963. Final
reading of said ordinance was deferred to review sign permit granted Dec-
ember 18, 1962, contrary to provision of said ordinance.
Public hearing was scheduled this date to reconsider Condition
No. 7 of Resolution No. 62R-888 (Condition No.5 of pending Ordinance No.
1818), regulating display material on subject property.
The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the Council.
Mr. Tyson Ellis addressed the Council advising that from his
standpoint, this has been an honest mistake on his part. He stated that
he was aware of the sign condition applied to the reclassification, and
after Council action on the application for reclassification, he asked a
member of the Building Department if this condition could be changed, and
was informed that the City Council were the only ones that could change
the requirement; as result, he filed an application for a sign permit,
thinking this was the method used for a waiver of this condition.
Mr. Ellis further advised that the sign had been constructed, and
no one in the area appears to object to it; that since the sign has been
erected, theIr business has increased as a result.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-547: Discussion was held by the City Council, and
with the explanation given, it was recognized how this error could have
occured; thereupon, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-547 for
adoption, deleting Condition No.7 of Resolution No. 62R-888.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 62R-888 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 62-63-24 BY DELETING THERE-
FROM CONDITION NOG 7.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-547 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1818: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 1818 for an
amended first reading, deleting Condition No.5 pertaining to regulation of
display material on the property.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-24 - C-l)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1818 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
"""i~."~~~:..::.;,:,.;,jjjj;.,~Ji;,."'..".~~:__._.....,,.,,".....~~...-,'_.'
6862
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING. CONDITIONAL USE fERMIT NO. ~l5: Submitted by David S. Collins,
requesting permission to establish automobile and truck overhauling,
painting, mechanical, body and fender r~pair service on property presently
zonGd M-l and P-L, located on the north side of Broadway, approximately
850 feet east of Loara Street (1531 West Broadway).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 752,
Series 1962-63, granted said conditional use permit, subject to th~ follow-
ing conditions:
1. Dedication of forty-fiv~ (45) fee.t from the monumented centerline of
Broadway (40 feet existing).
2. Preparation of streGt improvement plans and installation of all improve-
ments for Broadway, sUbject to the approval of the City Engineer, and
in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of
the City Engineer.
3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Broadway.
4. Provision of standard trash storage ar~as as detGrminGd by the Department
of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection.
5, Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplish-
ment of Item Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
6. Development substantially in accordancG with RGvision No. I: Exhibit No. I.
7. Establishment and maintenance of the proposed use of subject property in
accordance with all provisions of the M-l, Light Industrial, Zone.
Appeal from actIon taken by the City Planning Commission was filed
by Rlchard W. Gay, President, Anaheim Y.M~C.A., and public hearing scheduled.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and existing zoning,
and reported that the City Planning Commission considered the request on two
separate occasions; that resulting from evidence received, the Commission
granted the conditional use permit to establish an automobile and truck body
repair and paint shop, in accordance with revised plan submitted.
The Mayor asked if the appellant was present and wished to address
the Council~
Mr. William C. Poirier, General Secretary of the Y.M.C.A., addressed
the Council advIsing that the Executive Board of the Y.M.C.A. felt the
requested use would not be desirable in this area, which has changed since
the original M-I Zoning.
He called attention to the close proximity of the Loara School and
Fairmont School (private school) and stated that they have been advised that
a Junior High School is anticipated to be located at the rear of the Broadway
frontage across from the proposed Y.M.C.A. building, resulting in schools on
three sides of subject property.
Mr. Poirier was of the opinion that the intended use would be
more of a commercial nature than an M-I; further, in checking the plans,
that apparently no protection is to be provided to hide from view the cars
or trucks brought in needing repair, which are in very bad condition.
Attention was also called to the Riviera Apartments in the immediate
vicinity, and the plans of Mr. Berger to construct apartments directly across
the street from subject property.
(Mr. Poirier read letter of opposition submitted to the City
Planning Commission by Mr. Berge~)
Mr. Poirier further advised that this was a changing area, and that
Broadway was become a civic street, and the proposed type of development
should not be encouraged; further, the zoning on the Broadway frontage
considered for possible change.
List of allowable uses in the M-l Zone was read. Also noted was
that prior to a recently adopted OrdInance, commercial uses werG allowable
in an M-l Zone, and under present regulations, the use requested would be
allowable in an M-l Zone by conditional use permit.
^"~j**lijii>,,,. ;. =';;W;.i<1:.::'.~."- .. ~
1I--H""'~~_~;.iAIj-.1I
-- - \>,..;,~-...~
6863
City Hall. Anaheim. Californla - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
The Mayor asked If anyone else wished to address the Council in
opposition, there being no response, asked if the applicant or his agent
wished to address the Council.
Mr. David Collins introduced Mr. Nicholas p. Barletta, officer
of Cal-State Agencies, Inc., and Renbar, Inc., applicants and purchasers
of the property.
Mr. Barletta advised that he understood the action of the City
Planning Commlssion was official within twenty-two days, which was June ~,
1963, and advised that the day after June ~, 1963, they firmed their purchase
of the property on the basis of operating the requested body shop.
Mr. Barletta further advised that having been a member of the
Y.M.C.A., he was also concerned about young people, and also preferred to
see the Y.M.C.A. surrounded by R=3 Zoning; however, since the M-l zoning
has been in existence for some years and because, in his opinion, the
requested operation would not be detrimental to them, especially surrounded
by a block fence, urged favorable consideration of their application.
Discussion was held concerning the proposed fence and parking.
Plans were reviewed by the City Council, and it was noted that nine parking
spaces were indicated on the plans.
Mr. Barlerta felt certain that a block fence from the point of
the building to the rear of the property line on the west side would shield
any cars parKed in that area.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Correspondence dated June 21, 1963, from Mr. H. N. Berger opposing
requested use, was s~bmitted and read by the City Clerk.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-5~8: COJncilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-548
for adoption, granting CondItIonal Use Permit No. 415, subject to the
recommendations of tte City PlannIng Commission, and adding thereto an
add i tional candl t ion, to be rrJmbered No.8, to read, l'Erect ion of a si x
foot block wal along the westerly boundary of subject property, beginning
at the northwest Corner of the bUIldIng, and continuing northerly to the
north property lIne of subject prope , to be constructed prior to Final
Building InspectIon.
Refe" to ResolutIon Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NOw L115.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT~
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
D~tton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-548 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 427: Submitted by Duayne D. ChTisten-
sen, requestIng permission to establlsh a drive-through restaurant and
walve parking requirements on property presently zoned C-l, located on the
north side of Lincoln Avenue, approximately 770 feet east of East Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 777,
Series 1962-63, denied said conditional use permit. Appeal from action was
filed by the applIcant and publIc hearing scheduled.
~"""""""'''''~'''~--'--''''''''~;'~"~-'."""",",- .,.,.,.._~"-,~
686<'1
CItv Hall. Anaheim. C81ifonna - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 2CS, 1963, 3:00 P.M..
Mr. Kre~dt noted the locatIon of the property and uses in the
Immediate area, and reported that the Ci Planning Commission considered
the evidence submitted and denIed the petitIon on the basis of their find-
Ings contained in theiT resolLtlon.
Mr. KreIdt read excerpts of the Ci
minutes concerning said applIcation.
Planning Commission9s
The Mayor asked if The applicant wIshed to address the Council.
Mr. Duayne D. Christensen, 7907 Westminster Avenue, Westminster,
CalIfornia, owner of the pr~pe , addressed the Co~ncil, calling attention
to the commercial actIvities of the entIre area. He felt that the intended
use would not 8dversely affect the adjoln~ng property, and particularly since
no one appeared aT the Clty P ann ng CommIssIon in opposition.
Mr. Christensen further advised tn8~ the traffic flow from their
p8rklng lot and that of the Alpha BeLa Center was interchangeable, and a
recIprocal parking agreement between the two property owners has been
ntered Into, thereby provIding l J parkIng spaces that are not presently
required by the Alpta Beta str;]ct,":re.
RegardIng the arChIteCture of the p~oposed building, Mr. Christensen
aareed that perhaps It was ilnconVentlonal, but for the se proposed, con-
sidered it to be verv a tractIve, and i~rged the CouncIl to grant his appli-
cation.
Mr. \tlke Corley, of ttle JacK-in-th,e-Box, proposed lessees of the
property, reported tnat there are three Jack- n-the-Box restaurants in the
City of Anaheim, wt\ich. nave been receIved very satisfactorily by the people,
and requested favoraole cor1sideraTion by the C1 Council, thereby permitting
a fourth unIt to De added In ~ commUnIty.
Mr. ~e~a d Mi cnell, ~20 So~th E~c Id Street, appearing on behalf
of hIS father, owner of propert~ begInnIng 327 feet east of East Street
to East Street, advised that hl father approves this request, and feels
that the J8Ck- n-tr'e-Box resta ant wll De an asset Lo the shopping center.
request,
lhe Ma,/o
tnere oe~
a
ed _f an\one wIshed
re :,por.;e; de, are:j
to speak ~
~J e e 2 T~ 11 9
oppositIon to the
osed.
Comm,ni
a () d J. D300
SUOfTlltted.
, o.
;:L:1[ed .J ne L)O, 1.
owne
Tom Mr. R. G. Mitchell and Mr.
ravo dig :;a d application, were
RESOLUTION NOG b3R-5~9: CouncIlman offered Resolution No. 63R-5~9
f oy adopt 1 on 'I ~ fhj Cond tl 1 U 3e PerrI] No. ~ 27 t or a dri ve-through
restaurant, and dererm fhj thatc:ne pa'K ds:.)r,own un che plans is
a ate park ec to the fol cw~ng cond ions:
1
..L ,
Jhat the sldewa k sn
the C ty Eng1neeT.
lcatlons on f e jf
; be
and
:ita ed d
2(;COr dan,_e W:l
;:,e Lfle C1 ;',
Lncolrl Avenue as required
3Landard plans and speci-
f::r'J nee , prior to Final
1 d H1 gIn; pee 1 () n .
at the owner Jeet pTopert sha depd toe City of Anaheim a
rip of land >='13 feer l wld~h from U:'2 ce te1 lne of tne street along
Incoln Avenue for street widenIng p0rpOSe .
3. I'hat trash storage areas shal be pTo\ilded .L!; accordance wi th standard
plans on fIle n the offICE of The Director of P0bl c Works, prior to
nal BuildIng [nspe lIon.
~ That CondItion No.2 above men~loned al be complIed with within a
period of J80 days from date hertof, or s ....;h L,rLher time as the City
Council may grant.
r hat e e T pro pes n a 1 (; edt' vel 0 p e d..1 t):;'",t ant 2 1 y 1 n accordance
WIth pJans and spe 1 lcations on fl~e Wlt~ e CIty of Anaheim, marked
ExhIbit Nos. .l~ 2 and 3,
That a six foot strIp of land sha be~and caped and said landscaping
maintained, as IndICated on Exhl 1 No. tl e wl~h the City; that
ans for sa Id and ap n9 slal oe 3,.oml t Leej and approved by the
ere 01
",~-"'~,;:'i"F,-....,, ~''''-,;.;~',:c.;--~.,"';.:'.f';o.'. '"""<::I'"
-",~'W~.,,,,...,,.._. ,. -l
6865
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25_ 1963_ 3:00 P,M,
Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance; and that said landscaping shal1
be installed prior to Final Building Inspection.
7. That planted tree wells shall be provided at approximately ~O foot
intervals in the Lincoln Avenue parkway, abutting subject property;
that plans for said tree wells and landscaping therein, shall be
submitted to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance;
and that said tree wells shall be planted prior to Final Building
Inspection.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO~ 427.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUM::;ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-549 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING. VARIANCE NO~ 1572: Submitted by R. M. and W. M. Conklin, request-
ing permission topeTmit pa~king on the R-2 pOTtion of the property, waive
minimum parking requirements, and expand existing printing plant on C-2 and
R-2 property, subject p~operty located on the west side of North Los Angeles
Street, having a 120 foot frontage on Los Angeles Street, with a 20 foot
portion thereof extending westerly to Zeyn Street. The Southern boundary of
said property beIng approximately 375 feet north of North Street (831 and 835
North Los Angeles Stree~).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 755,
Series 1962-63, granted said variance, subject to the following conditions:
1. Dedication of forty (~O) feet from the monumented centerline of Los
Angeles Street (3~.75 feet existing).
2. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department
of Public Works, SanitatIon Division, prIor to Final Building Inspection.
3. Provisions of a six (6) foot public utility easement and a two foot
overhang easement on each side of said 6 foot easement, the centerline
of which is the southerly extension of the east line of the existing
alley to the north, to adequately serve the subject property and other
properties.
4 Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplish-
ment of Item Nos. 1 and 3.
5. Development substantIally in accordance with Exhibit Nos. land 2,
provided that a 20-foot wide passageway along the southerly boundary of
subject property be reserved for ingress and egress directly from Los
Angeles Street for customer and employee parking.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission pertaining
to condition requirIng a 20 foot alley dedication was submitted and public
hearing scheduled.
Mayor Coons advised that the public hearing would be on the ~ntire
application and not just the condition noted in the appeal, and asked the
applicant If he wished to proceed.
Mr. Conklin advised that he wished to proceed with the hearing.
Mr. Kreidt advIsed that the applicant request is to build on the
Los Angeles Street frontage with all site access to the rear of the property
from Zeyn Street; further, the twenty foot private alley proposed by the
City Planning Commission would be access through to Los Angeles Street, and
would provide ingress and egress for their patrons directly to the parking
area. Mr. Kreidt further reported that at the present time, the twenty foot
access and parking lot was fully improved.
~';::';C=~~4l'""'<;; . --.:.--_...:,...--.,....".~..-..t.,-,.~..;;:dt,~;~".."-';...IIII..ii~,,<.,~,_.<'..
6866
City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25, 1963, 3:00 P.M.
Plans of development were reviGwed by the City Council~
Council.
The Mayor asked if the 8pplicant wlshed to address the City
Mr. Conklin advi~~d th8t the proposed plan provides for parking
for twenty-five cars, or over 12,000 square feet, and further advi~ed that
six of their neighbors approved the proposed plan, and as far as he knew,
there was no opposition to the intended expansion.
He further advIsed that in his opinion, to open an alley way
through to Los Angeles Street would create a dangerous element, because of
the possible cross-traffic from Mills DYlve.
He stated that their p8rticular type of operation would not
requlre parking in the same manner as many other businesses, a~ a very
limited number of people come to them; that the majority of their contacts
are made by telephone and an outside representative who contact~ the
customer. In addition to that, most of the deliveries are made by them to
the customers.
Mr. Conklin further advised that they hope to h8ve a loan company
as a tenant occupying a part of the south property, and hope to expand the
present plant from 7,000 square feet to approximately 11,500 square feet on
the other portion. He stated that their proposed tenant is of the opinion
that four parking spaces will meet their r~quirements.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to offer any evidence for or
agaInst the application.
Mr. Elmer Thill, owner of one of the residences on Zeyn Street
adjacent to the parking lot, advised that although he did not object to
the expansion of the printing plant, he questioned whether the expansion
would create additional nOIse and activity in and out the access to Zeyn
Street, causing a nuisance to his tenants.
He stated that although he rented to adults, there were children
in the area, and he could vIsualize the opening onto Los Angeles Street becom-
ing a thoroughfareQ
Mr. Thill advised that he favored all ingress and egress be through
the alley, allowing the area extending to Zeyn Street for additional parking.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-550: CouncIlman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-550
fo~ adoption, granting VarIance No. 1572, subjec~ to City Planning Commlssionus
recommendations, amendirL:j CondItion No. 5 thereof, to read: "Development
substantIally Hi accordance with EXhibits Nos. 1 and 2. VI
Refer to ResolutIon Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 1572.
On roll call the foregoing resol~tlon was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote~
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCr LMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Rpsolutlon No. 63R-550 duly passed and adopted.
~~""~:di,<;,,;,;,,,'-"i+"<C;,-;~;::t:.}i';;:~<:.-;,-'c:J;,,,>:<;;~ 'v-'
.n.. .t
6867
City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 62-63-6~~ Submitted by Empire Financial
Corporation, ~equesting a change of zone from R-A to C-l and R-3, property
located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, approximately 660 feet west
of Beach BoulevaTd.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 772,
Series 1962-63, recommGnded said ~eclassification, subject to the following
conditions;
1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be r~cordGd in the office of
the Orange County Recorder.
2. That the completion of these recla~sification proceedings is contingent
upon the granting of a Conditional Use Permit No. 357.
3. That plans for the development of Portion i'A" of subject p:roperty shall
be subjecL to approval of Development Review, prior to issuance of a
Building Permit.
Mr. KTGidt reported that the City Planning Commission at their
meeting held yesterday (June 2~, 1963), continued to July 22, 1963
Conditional Use Permit No. 357 and Tentative Map, Tract No. 4230, which
were filed in conjunction with said application.
Correspondence dated June 25, 1963, from Stephen W. Bradford, for
Empire Financial Corporation, requesLing action on Reclassification No.
62-63-64 be deferred unLll such time as Conditional Use Permit No. 357 and
Tentative Map of Tract No. 4230 are presented to the City Council for
action, was sUbmitted.
Councilman Schutte moved that the public hearing on Reclassifica-
tion No. 62-63-64 be continued, as requested, to August 6, 1963, 7:00 P.M.
Councilman Kreln seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-107: Submitted by Robert G. Watkins
Tequesting change of zone from R-A to R-3, property located on the north
side of Anaheim Road approximately 1370 feet west of Blue Gum Street
(Revised Tentatlve Map, Tract No. 4081).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 773,
Series 1962-63, recommended approval, subject to the following conditions:
1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be recorded in the office of
the Orange County Recorder.
2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of $~5.00 per dwellIng unit, to be used for park and recreation
purposes, said amOGnt to be paid at the time the Building Permit is
Issued.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with standard
plans on fIle in toe office of the DIrector of Public Works, prior to
F -lnal BlUldul{j InspecL:__on.
4 That subject property shal be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and speclficatlons or: file with the City of Anaheim, marked
"Revision No.1, Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3".
5. That a six (6 foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the northerly
property lIne, pr or ~o Final Building Inspection.
6. 'That postIng of a bond, to Insure the construction of a wall along the
easterly property lIne of 5 eet property, prior to Final Building
Inspection.
Mr. Kreldt noted the lOCatIon of the property and summarized the
evidence submitted to and conSldered by the City Planning Commission,
resulting In their recommended approval.
Tne Mayor asked If the appllcant wished to address the Council.
~,'-'i....,~,..-.,.,...-.,.,.,...............___-..........,.."~~,,,,,~.,,,,,_C
Ij.,~ ,w--""
6868
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Robert Watkins, 8550 Garden Grove Boulevard, Garden Grove,
CalIfornia, urged approval of the request, advising that every attempt
was being made to comply with City requirements, and in his opinion, felt
this would be a very fine development.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-551: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-55l
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the
zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF fHE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(62-63-107 - R-3)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor dec~aypd ResolLtion No. 63R-55l duly passed and adopted.
HEVISED TENTATIVE MAP.1'RACT NO. L1081.: Developpr, RobeTt L. Farrow; property
located on the north side of AnaheIm Road, west of Blue Gum Street, and
contains 26 proposed R-3 lots.
The City Planning CommISSIon recommended approval of said revised
tentative map, sub]ectto the fo lowing conditIons:
1 .
That revised TentatIve Tract No. 4081 IS approved subject to the granting
of Reclassificat on No. 62-t3-107.
That should thIS sUbdiv Slon be developed as more than one subdivision,
each subdIvision tnereof shall be submItted in tentative form for approval.
That the alIgnment of Anaheim Road be approved by the State Division of
Highways.
That a predetermIned prIce for Lot Band C shall be calculated and an
agreement for dedication entered Into between the Developer and the
City of Anaheim prior ~o approval of the Final Tract Map. The cost of
Lot Band C shall Include and and a proportIonate share of the under-
ground utIlities and s~reet Improvements.
That all knucKles Sf1a11 conform to che requIrements of the City of
/\nahe im.
fhat street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering
requirements of the CIty of AnaheIm along Anaheim Road, such as curbs
nd gutters, sIdewalks, street gradIng and paving, drainage facilities,
or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City
EngIneer and In accordance with standard plans and specifications on
file in the Offlce of the Ci~y neer, unless the improvements are
constructed by the State DIvIsion of Highways.
2'.
v.
4.
6.
On motion by Councilman Kreln, seconded by Councilman Schutte,
Revised Tentative Map of Tract No. ~081 was approved, subject to the recom-
mendations of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 62-63-115: SubmItted by Matthew E. and
Josette Asta and Joseph and Neda E. Skelly, requesting a change of zone
from R-l to R-3, property located at 911 SOGth Loara Street (west side of
Loara Street, approximately 238 feet north of JJno Avenue).
";;';;'~':::':'..;':'",.-~,,~'U..:'-"':::' """"=_'::"-~".":.i'",,:,;,=:'~
.-'~':"-P-----]':":-:-:~~~
6869
City Hall, Anaheim, Ca!ifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
778, Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification be approved,
subject to the following conditions:
l. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation
purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is
issued.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provid8d in accordance with standard
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to
Final Building InspectIon.
3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
"Exhibit No. I", as amended.
~. That a six (6) foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north
property line abutting the R-I Zone, except that said wall shall be
reduced to forty-two (42) inches in the required front yard of subject
property, prior to Final Building Inspection.
Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property and
existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence
presented at the City Planning Commission hearing and noting that the
Commission found that the proposed development would not be an encroachment
on the single family development to the North, as subject property has
multiple family development abutting to the South and West.
The Mayor asked if the applicant was present and Mr. Joseph
Skelly, applicant, stated he had nothing to add to Mr. KreidtUs summary at
this time.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition.
Mr. Richard A. McGough, 907 South Loara, resident immediately
adjacent to subject property on the North, addressed the Council in opposi-
tion and outlined in detail the history of various zoning actions relating
to subject parcel, since it was originally zoned R-l in 1958, the last
action being denial of R-3 zoning by the Council in 1961. In his opinion,
matters have not materially changed SInce said denial, with the exception
of ownership; that he fully supported the Councilus previous rulings and
requested that, on the basis of previous facts submitted, said application
for R-3 Zoning be denied. He felt that in requesting the R-3 Zoning, the
applIcants have not presented any solution to the additional traffic and
parkIng problems, WhICh would be added to those already in the area, and
that multiple zoning would be detrimental to his adjacent single-family
property and two other R-l lots within the tract.
Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council.
Mr. Joseph Skelly, 915 South Loara Street, applicant, advised
that they propose to erect a triplex on subject property, each unit con-
taining two bedrooms; that from the street the building will give the
appearance of one single residence; further, that he and Mr. Asta plan to
make two of the units their homes.
Mr. Matt Asta, co-owner of subject lot, advised that he owned
ten of the multiple units directly to the South of subject property, and
Mr. Skelly owned sixteen of the units, and they do intend to make two of
the triplex units their homes. He submitted a letter of approval from Mr.
Taylor, 901 South Loara, being the second lot north of subject prop~rty,
and also advised that Mr. Lawrence Pitts, residing on the Beacon Street
cul-de-sac, whose property is directly behind Mr. McGough1s property and
borders subject lot for approximately twenty feet at the rear of the
north property line, did not object to the proposal, nor do the Herringtons,
who reside directly across the strept at the northeast corner of Loara and
Minerva.
~''''''''''~'''';'''''''''''''C''''''''''~''~'''''''''''~A...,~~.,~,.....",,",_ ~"_"'~
6870
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25~ 1963~ 3:00 P.Ma
Mr. Loar, 831 South Loara, was of the opinion that the majority of
the neighborhood in the immediate vicinity approved the construction of the
triplex as proposed.
Mrs. Joseph Asta addressed the Council urging favorable considera-
tion of their request.
Mayor Coons declared the hearing closed.
Discussion was held by the City Council and Mr. Geisler noted that
the Anaheim Municipal Code provides for a transitional use in the R-I Zone
where it abuts R-3 development, thereby allowing a duplex to be erect~d on
the southerly fifty-five fe~t of subject property under the existing zoning.
-
RESOLUTION NOQ 63R-552: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-552
authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as
requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission4
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE l8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(62-63-ll5 - R-3)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote~
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-552 duly passed and adopted.
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a fifteen-minute recess~ Councilman Krein
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (9:05 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the Council
being present.
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-117 AND VARIANCE NO. 1575: Submitted
by Joseph J. Guzak, et aI, requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-I to
permit the establishment of professional office buildings, and further
requesting a waiver of parking requirements on property located on the
east side of Euclid Street, approximately 200 feet north of La Palma Avenue,
and further described as 1112 North Euclid Street.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
779, Series 1962-63, recommended Reclassification No. 62-63-117 be approved,
subject to the following conditions:
1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a
strip of land 53 feet in width, from the centerline of the street along
Euclid Avenue, for street widening purposes.
2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of $2.00 per front foot, along Euclid Street, for street lighting
purposes.
3. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings shall be
subject to the granting of Variance No. 1575.
~ That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with
within a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days from date hereof,
of such further time as the City Council may grant.
5. That subject property shall be developed sUbstantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim , marked
"Exhibit No. 1 UI.
(Conditions continued on page 6871)
'1~~c...;;::Z::;;~~:~._._.~_.,.,._ --""'"'~""'''I''_''O_~"~;;...~..~~~,......;;;."_,,,,,,,,,~,.,,,:~'4___~
6871
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
6. That the owners of subject property shall place of record City of Anah~im
C-I deed restrictions, approved by the City Attorney, which restrictions
shall limit the use of subject property business and professional offices
only, and that said restrictions shall be completed within a period of
one hundred and eighty (180) days from date hereof, or such fUTther time
as the City Councilor Commission may grant.
7. That all air-conditioning facilities be contained within building or
shielded from view.
8. That planted tree wells shall be provided at approximately ~o foot inter-
vals in the Euclid Street parkway abutting subject property; that plans
for said tree wells and landscaping therein, shall be submitted to and
approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance; and that said
tree wplls shall be planted prior to Final Building Inspection.
9. That a two (2) foot strip of land shall be landscaped and said land-
scaping maintained, as indicated on Exhibit No. 1 on file with the City;
that plans for said landscaping shall be submitted to and approved by
the Superintendent of PaYkway Maintenance; and that said landscaping
shall be installed prior to Final Building Inspection.
10. That the existing irrigation ditch along the north property line shall
be placed underground subject to the approval of the City Engineer,
prior to Final Building Inspection.
11. That a six (6) foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east
property line extending from the existing masonry wall to the north
property line, prior to Final Building Inspection.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 780,
Series 1962-63, recommended Variance No. 1575 be granted, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That sidewalks shall be installed along Euclid Street, as required by
the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifica-
tions on file in the office of the City Engineer prior to Final Building
Inspection.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with standard
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to
Final Building Inspection.
3. That VarIance No. 1575 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassi-
fication No. 62-63-117 proceedings now pending.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be
necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department, to be installed prior to
Final Building Inspectlon.
Mr. Martin Kreidt outlined the location of subject property and
noted existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He summaTized the
evidence submitted at the City Planning Commission hearing, and advised that
the variance application was necessary to effect the waiver of one parking
space.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there
being no response, declared the hearing closed, on Reclassification No.
62-63-l17 and VarIance No. 1575.
Mr. Guzak, applicant, was present, and in answer to Mayor Coonsl
question, advised he purchased subject property from the Porter sisters
approximately one year ago.
Discussion was held by the City Council as to limiting the use
to business and professional offices, as recommended by the City Planning
Commission.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-553: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-553
authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as
requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission,
with the exception that Condition No.6 thereof be deleted.
Refer to Resolution Book.
"-_.~_,-,_,_,,,"__''V~r .~
6872
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25~ 1963~ 3:00 P,M,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT ruE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED,
(62-63-117 - C-l)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by th~ following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMEN :
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
Non~.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-553 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO, 63R-554: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 63R-554 for
adoption, granting Variance No. 1575, subject to the recommendations of the
City Planning Commission, and further subject to the following condition:
That subject variance allowing twenty-seven parking spac~s shall be applied
only to th~ requ~sted business and professional use.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 1575.
On roll call the foregoing r~solution was d01y passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-55~ duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-118 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. ~25:
Submitted by D. H. and Eunice M. Ables (Dave Delano - FoodmakeT Company,
Agent), requesting change of zone from R-l to C-I and permission to establish
a drive-through restaurant and waive parking requirements on property located
at the southeast corner of Euclid Street and Cerritos Avenue (1500 South
Euclid Street).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 781, Series
1962-63, recommended said reclassification be denied.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed
by Mr. Dave Delano on behalf of the Foodmaker Company.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and the uses in the
immediate vicinity, and read excerpts of the City Planning Commission9s
meeting concerning saId application, noting that the proposed landscaping
to the East and Sotith of the establishment and the proposed architecture of
the building. He fUTther advised ~hat It was the opinion of the City Plan-
ning Commission that the proposed use would be incompatible with the
surrounding R-l area, and could predetermlne the zoning for the Euclid
Street frontage s00therly to the AnaheIm City LimIts.
The Mayor asked If the applicant or his agent wished to address
the Council.
Mr. David S. CollIns, real~or, 1077 West Ball Road, addressed the
Council on behalf of Mr. Delano, Agent, advising that in his opinion, the
basic issue was whether or not the area facing Euclid Street is any longer
deslrable for R-l.
'_"""'~~"".d,;
:':"-'=,,",,.",,,,,,:::'.>:,!,--_:_;~
6873
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
He further advised that on the property there is an irrigation
well and pipe line, which is still in use, and this area will be land-
scaped; that lighting will be shielded, and in his opinion, sound would be
no problem.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to offer any evidence in
support of the application, there being no response, asked if anyone wished
to address the Council in opposition.
Mr. John Horner, 1587 Mels Lane, referred to Petition of Opposition
containing 137 signatures of residents in the immediate area, which was read
by the City Clerk.
Mr. Horner stated that he was active in land development, and had
no complaint against the Jack-in-the-Box type of operation; however, felt
that thIS type of operation had no place in an area surrounded by $25,000. to
$40,000. homes.
Also submitted and read was a letter from Tom Key, Realtor,
recommending applications be denied.
Mr. Horner referred to a statement made at a former hearing, that
7(JJ~ of the people take the food to their homes. In his opinion, a more true
statement would be that 70% of The people do not consume the food on the
premi ses.
AtTention was called to the fact that the proposed establishment
would be located across from a SChool, visualizing the litter condition
that could develop in the area. Attention was also called to the possible
traffic hazard created at the intersection and the difficulty of policing
the cigarette machine to be located oUTside the building from the use of
school chIldren.
Mr. Horner further advised that there were three homes in this
area, and although they were opposed to any spot zoning, they would be
willing to consIder a precise plan for the entire area, and thereupon
requested the applicat_ons be denied.
Mr. Earl Greer, It81 Mels Lane, addressed the Council advising
that he concurred with statemen~s made regarding the nuisance value of the
proposed use of the property; that he also opposed spot zoning, and recog-
nizing the zonIng problem In this area, felt consideration of reclassifi-
cation shocld De on an over-all plan.
Mr. Collins, In rebuttal, regarding statements made of spot zoning,
called attention to the commercial se of the property directly across the
street from sUbject property. He felt adequate protection by landscaping
was being provIded, and further, felt the owners of property actually
adjoining sUbject property were not objecting to the requested use (signa-
tures indIcating approval s gned to tne application were noted).
J\~ T.
"Off F
expla ned ti.at
supernsed; t
periodlca 1 at
,pprat.:on of '::3
J 1'--
,oerVl r for Foodmaker Company,
eased operation, and very closely
de Keep the litter down, and
cks IS polIced; that from the
restaurants in Southern California,
r~ 1 fiU i sance factor from thi s
varIOUS police departments have
arding the cigarette machines,
a ned steps Taken to control their
a 51 P
type
(:een r;:- ce d
they were awa
use.
o th::;
T f]E?
there being no
y () r a -; i e O.~ d n y (! n e
~esponse, dec~ared T
wis~ed to address the Council,
ear c osed.
"-~'---;--"""_'~~""i~~~__,~,-~~._, ._~
6874
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25_ 1963_ 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-555: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-555
for adoption, denying Reclassification No. 62-63-118.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE
CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (62-63-118)
On Toll call the fOTegoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-555 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-556: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-556,
denying Conditional Use Permit No. 425.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO~ 425.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-556 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-119: Submitted by Joseph Tseu,
requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-I, property located on the north
side of Lincoln Avenue, approximately 1150 feet west of Western Avenue
(3319 Lincoln Avenue).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 783,
Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering
requirements of the City of Anaheim along Lincoln Avenue, such as curbs
and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities,
or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City
Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file
in the Office of the City Engineer~
2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of $2.00 per front foot~ along Lincoln Avenue, for street lighting
purposes.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with standard
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to
Final Building Inspection.
~ That a perimeter drive shall be provided, a minimum of 21 feet in width
with adequate angle cut-offs, or a minimum of 28 feet in width if cut-
offs are not provided, and shall have a minimum vertical clearance of
1.1 feet.
5. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with
within a period of one hundred eighty (180) days from date hereof, or
such further time as the CIty Council may grant.
6. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
"Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6".
7. That the air-conditioning unit be located so as not to be visable from
Lincoln Avenue.
(Conditions continued on page 6875)
~~:;:,;;:.~~",~.'.,""";~~;<:,;;,,,~,:..~~,'," ""'.~rlW
6875
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
8. That a six (6) foot strip of land abutting the Lincoln Avenue right-of-
way, shall be landscaped and said landscaping maintained, as indicated
on Exhibit No. 1 on file with the City; that plans for said landscaping
shall be submitted to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway
Maintenance; and that said landscaping shall be installed prior to Final
Building Inspection.
9. That planted tree wells shall be provided at approximately ~O foot
intervals in the Lincoln Avenue parkway abutting subject property; that
plans for said tree wells and landscaping therein, shall be submitted to
and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance; and that said
tree wells shall be planted prior to Final Building Inspection.
10. That a six (6) foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north,
east and west property lines prior to Final Building Inspection.
11. That the owner of subject property shall place of record City of Anaheim
C-l deed restrictions, approved by the City Attorney, which restrictions
shall limIt the use of subject property to business and professional
offices only; and that said restrictions shall be completed within a
period of one hundred and eighty (180) days from the date hereof, or
such further time as the City Councilor Commission may grant.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property and summarized the
evidence submitted and considered by the City Planning Commission. He
reported that the petitioner at a subsequent City Planning Commission me~t-
ing requested that the two sixteen-foot driveways proposed by the petitioner
and increased to twenty-one feet each by the City Planning Commission be
substituted wIth one twenty-one foot wide driveway. The City Planning Com-
mission took no actIon on thIS request.
The Mayor asked If the applIcant wished to address the Council.
Dr. Joseph se~ requested the two sIxteen-foot driveways shown on
the plans be approved to a low Detter traffIc circulation and control.
Ji';.,~
Plans of the medlcal-professLonal complex were reviewed by the
CIty CouncIl, and it was noted that sufficIent turning radius has been
provIded to a~rommodate a six~epn-foot drive.
[he Mayor asked If anyone else wIshed to address the Council,
there being no response, declared ~he hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-557: CouncIlman Krein offe~ed Resolution No. 63R-557
for adoption, authorizIng preparat on of necessary Ordinance changing the
zone as requested, ect to ~he recommendatlons of the City Planning
CommIssion, ellmlnatlngtheT from Cand tion No. J
Ref r to Resol t on Book.
A RESOLUTION ()f lHE C COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDAFU ES OF CERTAIN lONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(62-63-1l9 - -I)
On roll cal.l tJl e fa, eqo 1 n;j re sol\.xt IOn wa s dul y pa s sed and adopted
by the followIng vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
fhe Mayor declared Resolu~ion No. 63R-557 duly p?ssed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-120 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. t126:
Submitted by Mary B. Doesken, Jack H. and Marjorie J. Wood, requesting a
change of zone from R-/\ ~-.:o R-3. and piCrmiss:lon to establish a one and two
story multiple family planned resIdential development with carports, and
waive one-story hel Ilmltat_ons; proper located on the south side of
Eall Road, approximately 083 feet east of D~le Street (27~8 and 2738 West
Ball Road).
~i;.(-,..~~_..,..,~_,~,~...,.,..~o;,._~~~~
6876
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 784,
Series 1962-63, recommended said reclassification subject to the following
conditions:
1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land fifty-three (53) feet in width, from the centerline
of the street, along Ball Road for street widening purposes.
2. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engine~ring
requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ball Road, such as curbs
and gutters, sidewalks, s~reet grading and paving, drainage facilities,
or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City
Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on
file in the Office of the City Engineer; and (b) that a bond in an
amount and form sa"tisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted
with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering
requirements.
3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Ball Road, for street lighting
purposes.
~. That a modified cul-de-sac be provided at the terminus of MacDuff
Street subject to the approval of the City of Stanton.
5. That the owners of subject property shall dedicate to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land forty-four (~~) feet in width along the easterly
boundary of subject property for street improvement purposes, which
street shall terminate in a cul-de-sac with a minimum radius of twenty-
seven (27) feet. An irrevocable agreement shall be entered into between
the developer and the City of AnaheIm as tJ the cost of the land of the
easterly fourteen (14) feet of saId street, and a proportionate share
of the underground ~Jtilitles and street Improvements, which agreement
shall provide that In conj~nction with tne dedication and improvement
of an additional s xteen (16) feet for an timate sixty (60) foot right-
of-way by the owner of the abutting property to the East, said abutting
property owner shal pay to the owner of ect property the agreed
upon pre-determ ned price for e easlerl fourteen (l~) feet of subject
property as a cond tIon 01 approva uf L~e development of said abutting
propert'! .
fhat the street Improveme~ play,s sra 1 ce prepared and all engineering
requirements of ~he CIty ot Anate~m d ~ne .ewly dedicated street,
such as c..rbs and,tter ~ .31dewalK:s~::'lJeet grading and paving, drainage
facll tIe:.;, or CJtheT app. rter:cH', WOrJ< ;:JIO be eted as required by
the Ci Eng..cneer and HI ac~oTdance wi sTandard pans and specifica-
tions on file the off,,-cE of tne C~.ty ineer; provided that a temporary
asphalt berm soa 1. De ns a led a tte easterLY one foot of said
street; and (b tha a bond t and form satisfactory to the
C 1 t of AnaheIm s h a be p () ::, t e d iN 1 . e C '=)....: a ran tee the Ins taIl a -
tlon of said engIneerIng reql,.:;remern .
fhat the owner of ect proper snaIl pay ~o the City of AnaheIm the
sum of $2.00 per front foot, along toe west sIde of the newly dedicated
street, for street ~ Ina p~Jposes; or the lOsta ation of street
light.s on the newstrpp j accoJdance w; a street ighting plan
approved by the DlreCl.Or f Puc c L.t eG.
That the camp etlOn of tr:e':Je 1'(C a::;,:,d 1 at proceedIngs shall be
subject to the ,=)ran-C.lrhj of CorjcL 1 a Use Perm1 t No. L126.
fhat CondItion Nos. 1, 2~ 3~ Li~ 5, and 7, dDove mentioned, shall be
complied WIUl wiU) a period of one r,r.dred and ighty (180) days from
date hereof, or S,..,J; f Lune as C~t COJncll may grant.
10. That development s~'al be stantlaJ'y ~n accordance with Revision No.
1: Exhibit Nos. , 2 and 3, provlded tha~ tDe 4-dwelling unit building
I mm e d 1 ate 1 y toto e 'N e 3 tot t n e r pc r e en J n are a Jf: a 1.1 bed e 1 e t ed, and
thai.: the threp dwe 1 r:9 ~L D ~ d:r-. j t,'J ,.r.,e NOT U; and South of the
rec re at 1 orl area '3h.a be ncre3.:;;ed l : 1- S, -'- n order to provide needed
:'ecreational fac 1 1~ie3 1 onJAlctlOfl We. ~ne development of the pro-
posed planned re identla devejopmen~.
The CiTY Plar:rnni;J Cormrusslon pJrSUdr)[ to ResolutIon No. 785,
SerIes 1962-63, granted Conditlona Use PeTmlt No. 426, subject to the
following conditIons:
"~ii€~""~~~~_~';f~i.;i"".~~~_.,,,,~;_" "-.---.
-""",,~~
6877
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
1. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation
purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is
i~sued.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with standard
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to
Final Building Inspection.
3. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be
necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department, to be installed prior to
Final Building Inspection.
d. That drainage shall be disposed of to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
5. That Conditional Use PeTmit No. ~26 is granted sUbject to the completion
of Reclassification No. 62-63-120 proceedings now pending.
6. That development shall be sUbstantially in accordance with Revision No.
1: Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3, provided that the A-dwelling unit building
immediately to the West of the recreation area shall be deleted, and
that the three dwelling unit building to the North and South of the
recreational area shall be IncTeased to ~ units, in order to provide
needed recreation facilities in conjunction with the development of the
proposed planned resIdential development.
7. That a six foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the west and
south boundary lines of subject property prior to Final Building Inspec-
tion.
~
Mr. K-reidt noted the location of the property and summarized the
evidence submitted to The City PlannIng Commission. He called attention to
the Interdepartmental Committee recommendations, that a fifty-four foot
dedication be acquired providing a forty-foot roadway and a ten-foot modified
parkway on the east side; and further referred to Condition No.5 of the
City Planning Commission!s resolution, requiring forty-four foot dedication
and an irrevocable agreement for the easterly fourteen feet, providing for
a sixty foot STreet when the property to the East is developed.
Mr. William Adams, 811 North Broadway, Santa Ana, representing
the developer of the project, Mr. Leonard Bouas, advised that Mrs. Edens
who previously opposed the project was now satisfied with the plans, as
there is provided that no two-story structure will be located within l50
feet; that Mr. Vogel who expressed the opinion that the area should be
consIdered potentially commercial, was advised by opinions expressed by
several of the planners that it is necessary to have the population to
support a commercial zone.
Mr. W. D. Pickerel, 2752 West Ball Road, requested pprmission to
see the plans, and asked if the masonry wall was a requirement, and also
requested information concerning dra nage.
RequIrements concerning these items werp explained to Mr. Pickerel.
Mr. JaCK Wood, 2738 West Ball Road, advised that since the City
Planning Commission meeting, he has talked with both Mrs. Edens and Mr. Vogel,
and from the explanations gIven by the City Planning Commission, neither one
now opposed the development; furTher, a letter was expected from Mr.
Sakahara, owner of property immediately east of subject property, who also
approved the proposed dpvp opment.
Mayor Coons asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there beIng no response, declared the hearing closed.
Plans were reviewed and dIscussion held by the City Council con-
cerning the width of proposed street, which presently provides for two lanes
of traffic and one row of parking; the radius of the cul-de-sac turn-around
at MacDuff Street, setback requirements, and the possible R-3 development of
the R-3 property to the East.
RESOLUTION NOg 63R-558: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-558
for adoption, authoriz ng preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the
zone as requested, subject to The recommendations of the City Planning Com-
mission~
*"~J!j,iIj;iS,",.,)'-.;.:-i'i#"-"""___f _~,_,..._~--'+_ ___~__
....--.~
6878
City Hall. Anaheim. CalifornIa - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
(62-63-120 - R-3)
On Toll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOE S :
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-558 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-559: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-559
for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. ~26, subject to the J~com-
mendations of the City Planning Commission, and further subject to the
requirement that the developer pay the cost of signing to prohibit parking
on the east side of the proposed street.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NOo 426.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followIng vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCI LMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
DLton, Chandler~ Schutte, Krein and Coons.
Noneo
None.
-...
The Mayor declared Resol~tion No. 63R-559 duly passed and adopted.
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICl INSPECTION lOUR: :c'he Cl ty Manager announced that the
Metropolitan Water District InspectIon TOvT faT ~ne Ci of Anaheim has been
scheduled for AprIl 2, 3, 4 and 5, 964.
FINANCE - UNCOLLECfABLE ACCOUN-:S: Or,tr!e recommendatIons of the City Manager,
uncollectable accoLnts total ng $8,805.~ , and also Jncollectable Customer
ServIcE AccoGnts ReceIvable lrl the amoun of $~,533.5~, were authorized to
be 'Nrl tt,en of f as bad debts, all mouon CO.;'ii.Lman Dutton, seconded DY
CouncIlman SCnLtte. MCHION CARRIED.
PROPOSED BUDGET - 1963-b~: C y Mdna~1eY KeItt M~rdo pre sented the proposed
budget for 1963-1964, wlththe fol oWln9 message:
To the Cl ty CouncIl and the Cl t zens of Anar,eim:
I, herewith, present to YOJ the program fOT operation of the
Ci of Anaheim for 1963-64, as presented In ~he Budget Proposal. This
balanced budget, total Ing $21~696,b80, retains Anaheim's traditional $1.10
City tax rate and recommends Increases in utllity rates, fees or charges.
Although the program o~,t Ined the budget 13 a good one, it is far from
being the entire actIon pTogTa~ to meet Anahelmis challenge.
Much has oeen accomplished since 1 50. We have provided sub-
stantial water reservo r capac ty, where none previously existed. We have
nearly completed a grid system of many mIles of water transmission and
distrIbution lines. ~hlS system has stabllIzed wat,er pressures and,
thereby, bettered fire prot,ecLion as well as adding immeasurably to the
citizens' convenlence. BJt we have fLrther to go. Water conservation and
storage stIll remain as the NJmber One challenge to Anaheim as well as all
of Southern California. Actions to carry OLt conservation methods should
be pursued.
...~.~.---.,...!;....,~ ..."..-
6879
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Eminent domain proceedings to acquire the Dyke Water Company
facilities were initiated to further preserve and replenish the underground
water basin, as well as to increase water pressures for those Anaheim
citizens on the Dyke system. Provision has been made in the budget for the
necessary court action to bring this to a conclusion. Funds for acquisition
are currently on hand~ therefore, they are not reflected in this budget.
Maintenance and operation funds are not included in this budget, since a
cut-over time to integrate the two systems cannot be estimated. The Dyke
portion of the system will be self-supporting; hence, it will provide at
lease a balance between revenue and expenditure after and including cut-
over.
We have added four branch fire stations and most recently con-
structed a new Fire Headquarters Building. The old facilities could no
longer house the necessary equipment and manpower for burgeoning Anaheim.
More stations are needed as we grow.
The demands upon the Cityis electrical system have been fantastic,
but they have been me~ with the building of five sub-stations and miles and
miles of transmission and distribution lines. We continue to grow. The
demand increases. We must be ahead of the demand. The possibility of
generation in cooperation with the Cities of Riverside and Colton, as
recommended in the Zinder report~ should be watched carefully in the event
that the Southern California Edison Company does not provide an equitable
rate for wholesale purchase.
The Library Building, which served the community since 1908, is
about to be replaced with the large new building at Harbor Boulevard and
Broadway. Bookmobile service has been provided for several years. The
first branch library was opened last year. Additional branches are needed.
With State wide recognitIon, the Police Department has done an
outstanding job In protectIng our citizens, even though the Departmentis
quarters were woefully antIquated and squeezed. Now the Department is about
to move into enlarged and up-to-date facilities. As our population con-
tInues to grow, the services required of police and all other City depart-
ments do likewise. So do the bUIlding requirements for these departments.
Our park system is the envy of most communities in California and
elsewhere. We have gone from a two-park system to a 2l-park system since
1954. Although none of OJr parks are anywhere near completion and a few
more need to be acquired, the pace of development must be geared to the
Cityis ability to maintain and operate them. This is a sound economic
princIple. Considerable pressure is frequently applied to the Council to
further accelerate the Cityis Park Development Program. The present policy
provides adequate, although not ideal, facilities. It is essential that the
pressures be resisted and the policy retained.
One type of recreational facility which more than supports itself
is the Municipal Gol.f Course. This facility provides activity for many
citizens, both beginners and veterans, but cannot meet the present demand.
Even with the opening of the second nine hole section, almost entirely
located within the Flood Control retarding basin, the present week end
demand will not be met. With the continuing growth of the community, at
least one more facility should be provided.
Traffic mushrooms and congests. Streets must be widened. Traffic
signals and other safety devices must continually be added. The budget
provides for a continuation of these projects.
The City Council took significant action to provide for the City's
immediate and long-range needs in 1958, when a 100 person Citizensi Committee
was appointed. The Committeeis responsibility was to study and analyze the
requirements of Anaheim as a community. The CommitteeVs job was well done,
culminating in their findings and report. The first action phase to fulfill
their recommendations was approved by the voters in the 1960 Capital Improve-
ment Bond ProgTa~. Nearly all of the projects included in that program are
now complete or very soon will be. Meanwhile, the pay-as-you-go portions of
the program have bepn steadily going forward.
""-,,,,"-~..+..,..:.....,
_-""'''''''~<1'';;f~_.,-:,._.-,_,.".
6880
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25, 1963. 3:00 P,M,
Now is the tlme for the second phase to begin. The Council has
set October 8 as an election date for a series of bond issues. These issues
should include a Water Issue to provide a large lake type water reservoir
for seasonal storage together with a treatment plant, the mains and distri-
bution lines pertinent thereto; an Electrical Issue to provide additional
capacity at each of our electrical sub-stations; a City Hall Issue to
provide for the services of our community; a Library Issue to provide for
two additional branches; a Sewer Issue to advance the funds for expansion
of our self-supporting sewer main extension program; and a Storm Drain
Issue to continue the construction program of major storm drains.
You may also prefer to include an Auditorium-Convention Hall
Issue instead of using funds available from private sources. This issue
should only be included, if General Obligation Bonds provide a substantial
saving over the other methods. Regardless of the method selected for pro-
viding construction funds, the building should be designed and construction
started as soon as possIble so that this adjunct to the tourist business
can be in operation before 1965.
The other needs outlined by the CitizensD Committee and those
which have subsequently become apparent should continue to be provided on a
pay-as-you-go program or be reserved for future action.
Those improvement proJects provided In this year's budget total
$3,344,825. Among the projects are such Items as the following: Fire
Station No.7 (No.6, about to go into construction, was provided for in
the 1962-63 budget) $56,000; street widenlng, lmprovement and construction
$706,500, including crossing gates at three ra road crossings; minor storm
draIns $153,000; traffic signals $102,000; sewer construction $250,000;
starting Downtown revitallzation, possiDly wlththe CityUs portion of the
"Shopper's Lane" project, $IOO,OOO; additional shop building at No.2 yard
$25,650; electric meters for new customers $100,000; transformers and
extensions to electric distributIon Ines $~50,OOO; purchase of Edison
Company facilities In accordance with current agreement $300,000; water
main extensIons $279,525; new water meters $191,900; additional street
lIghting $40,000; park acquisItion $125,000; park development, $221,100.
With previously approved Dond issce retirement and interest costs
totalling $1,285,764 this year; witn a contingency Item of $200,000; and
minor capital expenditures for new and replacement equIpment, vehicles,
etc., totalling $3l8,82b; the expenditures for capital items make up 24.9%
of this yearUs budget.
Purchase of electrici~y and water for resale makes up an additional
48.1% of the budget, or $9,950,000.
36.3% of the budget, or $7,510,777 is provided for salaries and
wages. ThIS includes a $300,000 contingency for adjustments to carry out
the Council policy regarding prevailIng wages and personnel practices.
Major policy decisions must be made soon by the Council regarding
Urban Renewal, particularly as it might affect the Central City or Downtown
area. Specific recommendations are expected from the Urban Renewal Advisory
Committee appointed by the City Council. The recommendations just made by
EconomICS Research Associates in their study and analysis Q'Economic Potential
of the AnaheIm Center City Area'! call for determined action on the part of
the Council and the support of Anaheimis citizens. Provision has been made
in the budget for implementation of these recommendations in addition to the
proposed Shopperis Lane. Preparation of a physical design plan to spell out
access and environmental Improvements IS the first step. Rapidly following,
and in many instances runnIng concurrently wltnthlS step, are incentive
zonIng and code enforcement. Land assembly emlnerlt domain should be used
only to a limIted degree. No f'Jnds nave been Hlcluded for assembly this
year but will be needed early ~ fiscal ']h.1, if revita zation potential is
to be realized.
~~~--1:."~_,,~,#____:c~~~~,;:*,,:,:,' "-w----
1W'"" "".-"--V-:-
,,;,.,.,." lWi7l-: I
6881
Cit
C lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25
3:00 P.M.
Decisions regarding expansion of the City further up the Santa
Ana Canyon will be important. Requirements for expan5ion during 1963-64
are included in this yearis budget. Future requirements will depend upon
type5 of development and zoning as well as rapidity of expansion.
The Charter Committee has been exploring the advantages and
di sadvantages of changing the form of Anaheim v s City government from
General Law to Charter. The CommitteeYs recommendations are expected to
be placed before the Council in sufficient time to include a Charter proposal
on the ballot next spring. The decisions made by the Committee, the Council
and the voters will determine the type of governmental operation for many
years ahead.
The Civil Defense Committee has recommended that the City seriously
consider shelter construction. The Council will have to determine a pOlicy
with regard to shelters before completion of plans for additional civic
buildings. ,
Altogether, it 100k5 like Anaheim is facing a year of opportunity.
Strong leadership by the City Council will point the way; community pride
will make accomplishment pos5ible.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Keith A. Murdoch
City ManageT
Concerning the proposed October 8, 1963, bond election, Mr.
MurdOCh recommended the following bond items be considered by the City
Council:
Water, $4,900,000. - Reservoir including land, roadways, trans-
mission lines, treatment plant, telemetering
and control building for telemetering,
utility yard and bUilding.
Power, $1,SOO,oOO. - For addition to sub-stations and power
department portion of utility yard and
buildingo
City Hall - $3,000,000 (approximately), depending on construction
of the entire building of approximately 100,000
square feet, and also depending on provision
for shelter basement as a portion of the
building and a possible contingent item for
parking and landscaping, architectural fees,
and furnishings.
LibraTY - $500,000. For construction of two additional branch
lIbraries and acquisition of library site in
Santa Ana Canyon area.
Storm Drains - $2,500,000. which would take care of the storm
drain program for approximately three years.
Sewers - $500,000.
Primarily for extension of sewers in the
canyon area.
AUditorium-Convention Hall:
Mr. Murdoch reported that this would be a matter upon which a
decision must be made after additional information is obtained.
Mr. Murdoch further rpcommended that the sale of the bonds be
planned in three phases, as funds are needed.
;,....c";,,..,_-,..._.;....:.;,t~
III' .,"_.~-".+~~,-..;;.",c.........~... "~-'-"'.!>-'.
6882
City Hall_ Anaheim_ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 25~ 1963~ 3:00 PeM.
Regarding the proposed budget concerning the salary portion
thereof, Mr. Murdoch stated that the salary portion of the proposed budget
is presently a lump sum total, and that specific salaries and specific
reclassifications have not yet been determined.
Mr. Coughlin from the audience asked if it would be possible
for them to be present when the salary portion of the budget is considered.
Mayor Coons answered concerning the salary portion of the budget,
it was his intention to call for an executive session to further consider
this portion of the budget and to further consider the information submitted
by the City Employees and their representatives, and if additional informa-
tion is required, they would be called upon.
The budget as presented was received for Teview and further study
of the City Council.
DISNEY SCHOOL ANNEXATION: Orange County Boundary Commission report dated June
17, 1963, finding and determining that the boundaries of the proposed Disney
School Annexation to be reasonably definite and certain as to Section 35002
of the Government Code, was submitted and ordered received and filed, on
motlon by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED.
CIVIC CENTER LOCATION: Mayor Coons briefed the history relative to the acquisi-
tion in 1957 of property located on Harbor Boulevard between Broadway and
Santa Ana Street for a future civic center site; the property on which the
present police facility building and central library building are located
and nearing completion. He reported the site was purchased with the inten-
tions well known, and since that time, two independent organizations and
two well-qualified research firms have made surveys, working completely
independently and unbiased, and have all recommended this site to be the
location of the civic center.
Mayor Coons, to resolve this lssue, thereupon moved to rescind the
motion made approximately one and one-half years ago to place the issue before
the vote of the people, and fUTtheT moved that the site on Harbor Boulevard
between the police facility building and the central library building,
located on the west side of Harbor Boulevard between Broadway and Santa Ana
Street be designated the site for the future City Hall. Councilman Krein
seconded the motion. To this motion, Councilmen Dutton and Chandler voted
"No." MOTION CARRIED.
Further discussion was held, and Councilman Chandler was of the
oplnlon that this matter should be placed on the Agenda, giving notice as a
regularly scheduled Agenda item.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Mayor Coons moved to rescind
the previous motion, and further moved that indication be given that considera-
tion of the definite location of the City Hall facility will be considered
at the 3:00 OIClock P.M. session of the meeting to be held July 9, 1963.
Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED~
The newspapers were requested to give proper notice of the above,
so that interested parties can be present.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Schutte moved to adjourn. Councilman Krein seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 11:35 P.M.
SIGNED:~~. 7J:1d~~
City Clerk
,J~;:<~'IfliiW~;:;:;'L~:";:';.J:;d~:.,.~',~;,,:~~k~c"
--,
-
, I
i
-