1963/09/10
7051
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: Dutton.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall.
CITY ENGINEER: James p. Maddox.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman SChutte, minutes
of the Anaheim City Council meeting held August 27, 1963, were approved.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-728: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-728 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF SEPTEMBER 10, 1963.
(Warrants Nos. 26,808 to 27,059, both inclusive, totaling $1,098,673.99)
On roll call the fOTegoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMAN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-728 duly passed and adopted.
RECLASSIFICATIONS NOS. 61-62-107. 62-63-44 AND 62-63-45. AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 243 - REVISED GRADING PLANS: Revised grading plans submitted by
Mr. Ted Fish, in connection with Reclassifications Nos. 61-62-107, 62-63-44
and 62-63-45, and Conditional Use Permit No. 243, were continued from the
City Council meeting held September 3, 1963, for further consideration by the
Engineering Department.
Mr. Martin Kreidt reported that revised grading plan has been
delineated fOT block walls and slopes on separate areas.
Said plan was reviewed by the City Council, together with memoran-
dum from the Engineering and Planning Departments recommending revised plan
be approved, subject to the following conditions:
10 Area 1: Installation of guard rail (as detailed on grading plan) or 3
foot reinforced concrete block wall with bumper guards on the
south side of wall, and installation of landscaping on the slope
northerly of guard rail.
2. Area 2: Construction of a 3 or 4 foot reinforced concrete block wall
(as detailed on grading plan as Type C).
3. Area 3: Construction of a 4 foot reinforced concrete block wall (as
detailed on grading plan as Type B)o
4. Areas 4, Construction of walls (as detailed on grading plan). All
5 and 6: guard rails shall be constructed with the proper bumper guards
to protect guard rail damage.
5. Area 7: Deletion of the block wall requirement along area 7. (Property
approved for R-3 development under Tract No. 5063.)
6. Area 8: That retaining wall or slope control will be necessary. These
conditions will be imposed on the street improvement plans and
completed as a part of that project.
7. The slope 1:1 indicated between the block walls and guard rails on the
grading plan and the slope It:l on the structural calculations are in
conflict. The future location of buildings or wheel loadings shall con-
form to the structural calculations or sufficient structural modifica-
tions made to safeguard the walls as designed.
'~~"",-~~,,,,,,~.'~,,,~"~"~-",- .
7052
City Hall. Anaheim. California - ~OUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1963. 3:00 PaMa
Mr. Ted Fish, 1234 East Lincoln Avenue, applicant, after briefly
reviewing the revisions made to the plan by his engineer in conjunction with
the City engineers, expressed approval of the revision.
Mr. Maddox referred to Condition Noo 6, Area 8, adjacent to the
Santa Ana Canyon Road and the alley, and advised that barricades and
additional grading to the same level of the alley may be required.
Mr. Fish agreed to engineering requirements, and advised that the
alley will be installed immediately, and requested that whatever was necessary
on the bank be deferred until construction takes place on the lot.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Chandler moved that
the request of Mr. Fish for approval of revised grading plan and conditions
of Reclassification No. 61-62-107, 62-63-44 and 62-63-45, and Conditional Use
Permit Noo 243, be granted in accordance with the recommendations of the
Engineering Department for the protection of the cut slopes and parking
areas as outlined in said recommendation dated September 10, 1963. Council-
man Schutte seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIED~
JOB NOo 1273. SANTA ANA CANYON SEWER IMPROVEMENT: Call for bids for Job N04 1273
was deferred one week (September 17, 1963) for final clearance of rights-of-
way, and payment of sewer assessment fees.
REQUEST. UNITED SHARE FUND. INCa: Request to place Share Banks in various
restaurants and places of business within the City of Anaheim was continued
from the meeting held August 27, 1963 for additional informationo
Councilman Chandler asked the City Attorney whether or not a
small container placed in business places under the control of the property
owner for the collection of funds was included in the provisions of the
solicitation regulations of the Anaheim Municipal Code, or was this type
of solicitation determined more or less passive, inasmuch as direct
solicitation is not made.
Mr. Geisler advised that the provisions of the Code was as broad
or as restrictive as the Council determined; that the Code specified "any
solicitation", and the Council could determine if this type of fund-raising
activity comes under the provision of the Code requiring a permit.
POLICY OF THE COUNCIL: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by
Councilman Krein, it was the finding of the City Council that the placement
of passive coin solicitation containers in restaurants, cafes and other
places of business, was not within the framework of Section 7.320010, and
that it be the policy of the City Council that approval or denial of such
requests be handled administratively by the City ManagerQs office; that
the administrative determination be gauged on whether or not the charity
is found to be a bona fide charity, and the placement of such containers
have the approval of the property owner. MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Wa E. Herring was present at the meeting, and was advised to
contact the City ManagerQs office for further consideration, in accordance
with Council policy just enacted.
SIGN APPLICATION - RANCHO SMORGAS~UFFET: Application to erect sign advertising
Rancho Smorgasbuffet Restaurant, 601 East Orangethorpe Avenue (east side
of Rancho La Paz Mobile Park) was submittedo
Plans were reviewed, together with report of the Building Depart-
ment noting the size of the sign to be 118 square feet, and did not project
over the property line.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte,
permit was granted as requested 4 MOTION CARRIED.
SIGN APPLICATION - FELRO UPHOLSTER~NG: Application for permission to erect sign
advertising Felro Upholstering, 231 North Euclid Street, was submitted.
'~'.-F'-~-_C,-,,''!_~:'';_''."di'''''~~iI.,,",:iI';,._~'ii''lii.jiF,'..~
-~
7053
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Plans were reviewed together with report of the Building Department,
noting the size of the sign to be 50 square feet, without projection over
the property line, 21 feet in height, and to be located south of the cent~r-
line of the property.
Mro Erwin Youngren - representing California Neon Sign Company,
advised that the property owner Tequests the sign be located eighteen feet
north of the south property line without projection over the property line,
and lowered so as not to interfere with other signs in the area, which would
allow the use of one of the parking spaces for the placement of the pole
type sign.
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein,
request was granted, subject to no projection over the property line and
the location of said sign to be eighteen feet north of the south property
line. MOTION CARRIED~
REQUEST - TAMASHA TOWN AND COUNTRY CLUB: Request of Loren Eo Wagner for permis-
sion to erect a two-inch galvanized pipe, eight feet in height, with a six-
foot crossbar at the top, to be located in the landscaped area betw~en the
street and wall in front of the Tamasha Club, providing space for service
club identification signs, was submittedo
In answer to Council question, Mr~ Murdoch advised that the area
between the wall and the dedicated property line was six feet.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman SChutte,
said request was granted, subject to no overhang over the street right of
way line. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST - USE OF TEMPORARY STRUCTURE - FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ANAHEIM: Request
to use air supported shelter as temporary structure from which to conduct
business for a period not to exceed thirty months~ together with photos
of said building, was submitted.
Mr. Otto Low~ representing Dr. Adler and other organizers of the
bank, presented additional photos (later returned to Mr. Low) and advised
that the structure is supported by two air conditioners, and was originally
used by Great Western Savings and Loan Association as a temporary branch
office in the City of Lakewood, which was approved by the State fire
Marshall.
Mr. Low further advised that the aerodome structure was made of
nylon with a vinyl coating over a superstructure, and the experience of
Great Western Savings and Loan Association in using the building for approxi-
mately ten or eleven months had been very satisfactory.
Discussion was held concerning the location of the temporary
structure, it being the general feeling of the City Council that the site
location would directly contribute to the decision madeo
Mr. Low advised that at the present time, four site locations are
under consideration which are generally in the southern area of Anaheim;
that the temporary site mayor may not become the permanent site.
At the conclusion of further discussion, Councilman Chandler moved
that the issue be placed off calendar, subject to re-scheduling at the
request of the applicant when a definite site location is established.
Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIEDo
RECLASSIFICATION NOo 62-63-103: Request for approval of plans for the northern
portion of property in accordance with Council directive (Ordinance Noo 1893)
was submitted by Mr. William P. Bregder, together with report of Planning
Department.
Plans were reviewed by the City Council.
""'~'-'--'"'".,-""""~,_.....,..,..,~,;,-""...,,,,".~,~,......;. -"~x",,,s~
7054
City Halla Anaheim. California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES ~ September 10. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney appearing on behalf of the applicant,
for clarification advised that the plan is for car ports for employee and
vehicle parking only, and not for the storage of equipment.
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein,
revised plans as submitted by Mr~ Bregner, stamped, dated and signed by
Mayor Coons this date, were approved. MOTION CARRIED~
WEBSTER STREET IMPROVEMENT AND FI~L MAP. TRACT NOa 5114: Petition from property
owners on Webster Street protesting the proposed lowering of said street for
drainage purposes, was submitted and read.
Mr~ Maddox reviewed the proposal as outlined on profile prepared
for sewer construction in the area, and advised that the grade shown would
alleviate drainage down Webster Street, and will establish a final grade
accommodating development along the street. He further advised that various
grades could have been established, but in his opinion, the proposed grade
submitted would be the most economical and best method of handling the water
run-off.
Typical cross section of the street was reviewed and explained.
Mr. Maddox further reported that two water lines exist in the
area, one serving the northern portion, the other serving the southern
portion, and in lowering the street in some areas, the water lines would be
removed.
He noted that the area covered by Tract No. 5114, which is a re-
subdivision of Lots 18, 19 and 20 of Tract No. 796, was located on the east
side of Webster Street, south of Orange Avenue.
Discussion was held concerning a swale in the northern portion of
the street, and the possibility of water trapped in the swale during a heavy
rain, and overflow from Orange Avenue.
Council.
The Mayor asked if anyone in the audience wished to address the
Mro George Glanzmann, 704 Webster Street, Anaheim, California,
representing the Eureka Water Company (northern line) stated he had been
informed by the EngineerOs office that the difference in the present grade
on Orange Avenue and the lowest point of the swale was l~ feet. In his
opinion, only a severe rain would over-flow this pointo He further advised
that the water accumulating in this area did not come from Orange Avenue,
but came from the surrounding area and drained through a drainage easement
through Tract No. 2062 to the West.
Mr. Glanzmann stated that in their opinion, the sewer alignment
had no direct connection with the design to lower the street; that according
to the signers on the petition, the majority of the people do not want the
street lowered, and felt that they knew what would be best for them. There
is no flooding of Webster Street at the present time, and regardless of the
water depth on Orange Avenue or Ball Road, Webster Street has always been
dry.
Regarding the proposed tract on the three eastern lots, Mr.
Glanzmann called attention to an article appearing in the Anaheim Bulletin
February 19, 1959, wherein application for a church was denied at that
time because the property was less than one acre in size. Subsequently
additional land was acquired (Lot 21) to comply with the one acre requirement.
He asked if the Council was now reversing their decision concerning this
requirement.
It was explained that at the time of the church application, a
parcel of land one acre in size in an R~A Zone was required; subsequently,
this provision was changed.
Mr. Glanzmann advised that the Webster Street tract was originally
subdivided in 1926, and that the street was not accepted for public use until
1937. The water mains are in place now, and are in use, have been there since
1924, and they claim prior rights in the area.
,<""~.....,.'.'"..;;,,,,-="d'.",~
;'~.',-:.._O'~~..;L;.;--,"'" .~.- ,
---~ """_.............__ v _. .,_
-
I
7055
City Hall. Anaheim. California ,., COUNCIL MINUTES ~ September 10. 1963. 3;00 P.Mo
Councilman Chandler asked what the specific objection was to the
lowering of the street, assuming that the Engineering Department was
attempting to better the area.
Mr. Glanzmann replied that they felt it would not be a betterment
nor improve the drainage, that it will cut a steep drop-off from their
property to the street; another objection was the expense of the water main~
He further stated that if the Council elected to ignore the wishes of the
people in the area and proceed, in his opinion, this should be done on an
assessment district basis for full street improvement to the ultimate width.
Mr. Dale Fowler, owner of property located at the northeast corner
of Ball Road and Webster Street, favored the improvement of Webster Street
complete with curbs and gutters, and felt that the time for making the
necessary improvements was before they were needed and not after. In his
opinion, the development of the area was on a minimum basis as far as the
amount of usable land was concerned.
The petition of objection was checked by the City Council, and
it was noted that it represented twenty-seven property owners. It was then
reported that the area represented forty-two property owners.
Mayor Coons asked what the result would be relative to drainage
if Tract No. 5114 was approved as engineered in conformance with the grade
plan on the profile.
Mr. Maddox advised that the street grade would not particularly
affect the development of the proposed tract.
The matter of street width was brought up, and Mr. Maddox reported
that on the e8st side of Webster Street from Orange Avenue and including the
first lot of Tract No. 5114, the ultimate width of thirty-two feet has been
obtained; that the balance of the street, both east and west sides, southerly
to Ball Road, thirty feet has been dedicated, and that an additional two feet
will be requiredo
Mr. Dale Fowler reported that he had received a call advising that
if the street improvement was approved, he would lose fifteen feet of his
property. Inasmuch as only two feet are in question, he felt that perhaps
some of the signers of the petition of opposition may have been misinformed.
Mr. Glanzmann asked if the approval of the subdivision would
affect the parking requirements of the church, inasmuch as a portion of the
church property will be incorporated in the proposed tract.
He was advised that it would not, as church parking is based on the
size of the congregatIon.
A meeting of the property owners in the area was suggested, and
Mr. Maddox reported that a meeting was held to explain the proposal, and at
the conclusion thereof, it was his understanding that the people were still
of the same opinion and did not want the street lowered.
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Schutte moved that
the area be inspected by the City Council and that determination on the
matter of lowering and improving Webster Street be deferred to October 1,
1963, 3:00 P.M. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIEDo
FINAL MAP. TRACT NO. 5114: Developer, J. & C. Development Company; tract
located on the east side of Webster Street, 260 feet south of Orange Avenue,
and contains nine R-l lots.
The City Engineer reported that fees have been paid and bonds
posted, and that the map is in order for Council approval.
'.......";""~_'''~~....,'~._i>....~..,...,..~_...."''.;,.,,''~..,'_._....._,.......,.,_,..",4..,~,;,."'*","""'^.,-......,,.. """'F'V'1I
7056
City Halla Anaheim. California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES ~ September 10. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Councilman Chandler asked if there would be sufficient parking for
the church with the incorporation of Lot 20 into Tract No. 5114.
Mr~ Hal Raab, 2741 West Orange Avenue, Anaheim, advised that Lot 20
has not been used, nor does the church intend to use any part of the lot for
parking; that the church is under charter and has presently reached its total
membership; further, at the present time, there is an existing fence along
the northern boundary of the proposed tract.
Mr. Kreidt reported that sufficient parking exists for the church,
as approved under Conditional Use Permit No. 133.
Concerning water service to the tract, it was reported that the
tract will be served by the City of Anaheim and that the Eureka Water Company
will continue its present operation. Discussion was held concerning the po~-
sibility of ditching or ramping to take care of the southern portion of the
proposed tract in the event it is decided that the grade of Webster Street
should not be lowered~
Councilman Krein moved that Final Map, Tract No. 5114 be approved
as recommended by the City Engineering Department. Councilman Chandler
seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved to recess to 7:15 P.M. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:15 P.MG)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to ordero
PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN: Dutton.
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A~ Murdoch.
CITY ATTORNEY: JO$eph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dene Mo Williamso
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E~ Piersall.
CITY ENGINEER: James p. Maddoxa
PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard Ao Reeseo
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
PLANNING COORDINATOR: Allan Shoffo
INVOCATION: Reverend Jones~ Pastor of Knott Christian ChuTch, gave the
invocationo
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Coons led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag"
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NOa 62-63-131, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 440 AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 44l~ Submitted by Ethel Ma Reed, Genevieve Ha
Burbank, Dorothy Jean Cowherd and Robert P. Burbank, Owners; Santa Fe Springs
Industrial Park, c/o John Bo Kilroy Company, Agent; property located at the
southeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and Orangewood Avenue, having frontages
of approximately 1293 feet on Orangewood Avenue and 640 feet on Harbor Boule-
vard; requesting change of zone from R-A to C-l on Parcel A (westerly 255
feet fronting on Harbor Boulevard), and from R-A to R=3 on Parcel B (easterly
balance of subject property), to allow establishment of a motel and four-story
office building and waiver of two and one-half story height limitation
(Conditional Use Permit No. 441), and a one and two story multiple family
planned residential development with carports and a variable setback (Condi-
tional Use Permit NOD 440and Tract No. 5302).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 858, Series
1963-64, recommended Reclassification No. 62-63-131 for approval, subject to
the following conditions:
1. That a final tract map of subject property be recorded in the office of
the Orange County Recordera
2. That a modified cul~de~sac be provided at the terminus of Bluebell Avenue,
Troy Street and Tiara Street, subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
3. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings shall be
subject to the granting of Conditional Use Permit Nos. 440 and 441.
4. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings
to Orangewood Avenue, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
Revision Noo 1, Exhibit Nos. 1 through 18.
",,"~c.;..-._..._;.:c.;:;r.'i';'<o_,_::.r
,'.' .,'C .-......___..,;;...".., ,-m---w-
-~.,~~'~~,:>.,;"'~~_v_ ._'~~~w~
7057
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1963. 3:00 P.Ma
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 859,
Series 1963-64, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 440, sUbject to the
following conditions:
1. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be used for park and recreation
purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is
issued.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to
final building inspection.
30 That Conditional Use Permit No. 440 is granted subject to the completion
of Reclassification Noo 62~63=13l.
4. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
Revision No.1, Exhibit Nose 1 through 14.
50 That a six (6) foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the south
and east boundaries of Parcel B prior to final building inspection.
6. That planted treewells shall be provided at approximately forty (40)
foot intervals in the parkway portion along the south and east
boundaries as indicated on Revision No.1, Exhibit No.1, that plans
for said treewells and landscaping therein, shall be submitted to and
approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and that said
treewells shall be planted prior to final building inspection.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 860,
Series 1963-64, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 441, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to
final building inspection.
2. That Conditional Use Permit No. 441 is granted subject to the completion
of Reclassification No. 62~63-13l.
30 That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
Revision No.1, Exhibit Nos. 1 through 18, except that the access drive
shall be eliminated on the Orangewood Avenue frontage.
4. That a six (6) foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the southerly
boundary, and along the easterl y boundary of Parcel qIA", except at access
drives which shall be stepped down to forty-two (42) inches in height,
prior to final building inspection of any construction on said parcel.
5. That planted treewells shall be provided at approximately forty (40)
foot intervals In the Harbor Boulevard and Orangewood Avenue parkways
of Parcel "APia
6. That the sidewalk proposed for the easterly boundary of Parcel OtA" shall
be eliminated and solid landscaping substituted, and further that Parcel
PIA" shall be landscaped and said landscaping maintained, as indicated
on Revision No.1, Exhibit No.1, on file with the City, that plans for
said landscaping shall be submitted to and approved by the Superintendent
of Parkway Maintenance, and that said landscaping shall be installed
prior to final building inspection.
7. That all air~conditioning facilities be contained within the building or
properly shielded from view.
Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of subject property and the
existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, briefing the evidence sub-
mitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission~ He called
attention to petition of oppositio~ containing 132 signatures, submitted to
th~ City Planning Commission, and reported that revised plans for subject
planned development were submitted at the second hearing on subject applica-
tions held before the City Planning Commissiona
Mayor Coons asked if the applicants or their agent was present
and wished to address the City Council.
'~""""""""""""""~""""'_'~""':'"""'~__'.J",:rI"~.~"~"_"""",,..,_.,._..,_~;,.:_~.
7058
City Hall~ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Sept~mber 10. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Mr. Harry Knisely, Attorney representing the applicants, submitted
renderings in color for Council review, and was of the opinion that the plans
call for thirteen units per acre of land, with forty per cent land coverage.
He advised of the quality of the proposed development, noting that the high
cost of the land precluded construction of single family homes and the use
requested represented the most compatible and highest and best use of the
land.
Mayor Coons asked if anyone else wished to address the Council in
favor of subject applications, there being no response~ asked if anyone
wished to speak in opposition.
Mr. Earl Haas, 2155 South Madrid, was of the opInIon that schools
in the area were presently overcrowded, with some classes having been held
on uhalf sessionsn last year; and asked where these children would attend
school.
Councilman Schutte advised that according to reports from school
authorities, single family home developments contain a greater density of
school age children per area than multiple family developments.
Mr. Richard Guthery, representing Southeast Mortgage Company, agent,
advised that planned units would contain one and two bedroom units.
Mro Haas asked what would prevent Madrid Street being extended by
the City through the apartment development.
Mayor Coons advised that Condition No. 4 of the City Planning Com-
missionvs reso1Gtion granting Conditional Use Permit No. 441 requires a
six foot masonry wall along the south and east boundary of Parcel B, which
would block any extension of Madrid Street.
Mro Frank McCormack, 229 West Bluebell Avenue, addressed the
Council objecting to multiple family development, and was of the opinion that
Orangewood Avenue was the southern boundary for R-3 developments9 and that
the boundary should be maintainedo
Mayor Coons asked if anyone else wished to address the City
Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed on Reclassifi-
cation No. 62~63-131 and Conditional Use Permits Nos. 440 and 441.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was noted that
Madrid Street was formerly named Tiara Streeto
RESOLUTION NOa 63R-729: At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman
Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R'-729 for adoption3 authorizing preparation
of necessary Ordinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the
recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and amending reference to
Tiara Street in Condition No.2 to read, "Madrid (Tiara) Street"G
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIfY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD
BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGEDo
(62-63-131 - R-3, Parcel B, and C-l, Parcel A)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
CO UNC I LMEN :
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMAN:
Chandler, Schutte~ Krein and Coons.
Nonea
Duttono
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R~729 duly passed and adopted.
~C~_"_~0__~_.
7059
City Hall. Anaheim~ California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NOQ 63R-'730: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-730
for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 440, subject to the
recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO" 440. (Parcel B)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES~
NO ES :
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN~
CO UNC I LMEN :
COUNCILMAN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-730 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R=731: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-73l
for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 441, subject to the
recommendations of the City Planning CommissionQ
Refer to Resolution Booko
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NOo 441. (Parcel A)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
CO UNC I LMEN :
COUNCILMAN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
Noneo
Dutton.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-731 dUly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NOQ 63-64-19 AND VARIANCE NO. 1596: Submitted
by Nicholas Jo Dovalis, Owner; Charles Jo Hinc~ley, Agent; requesting change
of zone from R-A to R'-3 to permit the establishment of a two-story apartment
building with carports.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 865,
Series 1963-64, recommended Reclassification No. 63-64-19 for approval,
subject to the following conditions:
1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a
strip of land 45 feet in width from the centerline of the street along
Western Avenue, for street widening purposes.
2. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering
requirements of the City of Anaheim along Western Avenue, such as curbs
and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities,
or other appurtenant work, shall be completed as required by the City
Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on
file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount
and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the
City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements.
3. That the owner of sUbject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of $2000 per front foot along Western Avenue, for street lighting
purposes.
4. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings shall be
subjer.t to the granting of Variance Noo 1596.
5. That Conditions Noso 1, 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied
with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time
as the City Council may granto
6. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 through 8.
~"~~""'C""'"'-'''''''''c.\>lit!inl;,.",",""!~,~_ '~+'~:~)''''''''''_'''''~~'':"'''''''''''-'='''''' '-_"__"";""'""'*'-'_'_;.'o.Ii~_~.~..".,.,._,....____
7C60
City Hall~ Anaheim. California = COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
70 That the two parking spaces at the southwest corner of subject property
shall be eliminated in order to provide an adequate turning radius.
8a That the petitioner shall initiate reclassification proceedings to
rezone that parcel fronting on Lincoln Avenue, west of the existing
service station and form~rly a part of subject property to the C-l,
Neighborhood Commercial Zone~ prior to the public hearing of Reclassi-
fication No. 63-64-19 by the City Council.
-"'-
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 866,
Series 1963-64, granted Variance No. 1596, subject to the following condi-
tions:
1. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be issued for park and recreation
purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is
issued.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to
final building inspection.
3. That Variance No. 1596 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassi-
fication Noo 63~64-19.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be
necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department, to be installed prior
to final building inspection.
S. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
Exhibit Nos. I through 80
6. That the interior walls of the proposed carports shall be finished with
exterior building materials, that enclosed storage cabinets shall be
installed along the rear wall of each carport, and that suitable bumper
guards shall be installed to protect the interior walls of the proposed
carports, all of which shall be done prior to final building inspection.
7. That a six (6) foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north,
west, and south boundaries, except where carport wall abuts property
line, prior to final building inspection.
Mr. Kreidt noted the location of subject property, existing uses
and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted to the
City Planning Commission for their consideration. Referring to Condition
No.8 of City Planning Commission No. 865, Series 1963-64, he reported that
a new C-l Reclassification Application, No. 63-64~37, has been filed on that
parcel of land, formerly a part of subject application, west of the existing
service station, and will be considered by the City Planning Commission in
the near futureo
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent were present and
wished to address the City Council.
Mr. Charles J. Hinckley; Jr. agent, advised that the proposed
development will contain single-story and two-story buildings. _
He called attention to the two persons who appeared before the City Planning
Commission in favor of subject applications~ stating that they were owners
of single-family residential property directly across the street from subject
property~ and the two nearest neighbors.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,either
for or against subject applications, there being no response, declared the
hearing closed on Reclassification No. 63-64-19 and Variance No. 1596.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-732: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-732,
authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the zone as
requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Booko
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (63-64-19 - R-3)
;;;~,;.::'"'~~"_.,J;...::.i".;~;"~';:...,.,",,,,.:}.'.M(~;,,,,-.,x':;."...}....~::>~,~......,...:
7061
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIlMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
CO UNC I LMAN :
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Duttono
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-732 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-733: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-733
for adoption, granting Variance No. 1596, subject to the recommendations of
the City Planning Commissiono
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 1596.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and ado~ed
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
CO UNC I LMAN :
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons~
None.
Dutton.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-733 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING: Pursuant to City Planning Commission Resolution No. 834, Series
1963-64, public hearing was held on the proposed adoption of a General Plan
for the City of Anaheim, and its environs, and to also consider an amendment
to the Circulation Element of the General Plan, theretofore adopted pursuant
to Resolution Noo 6111.
Among those present in the audience were the majority members of
the City Planning Commission.
Copies of the proposed General Plan and amendment to the Circula-
tion Element were distributed to members of the City Council and the
audience.
Mro Richard Reese, Planning Director, referred to resolution
adopted by the City Council in March, 1962, directing the planning staff to
use the map mounted on the west wall of the Council Chambers as a basis for
correction and bringing up to date a map that may be offered as a basis of
a General Plan for the City of Anaheim, and further directing the holding
of necessary public hearings thereon.
The City Planning Commission held their third and final public
hearing July 16, 1963, and has forwarded their recommendations to the
City Council, that the text on the document marked uGeneral Plan Guide for
Future Development, Anaheim, California", states the objectives, principles
and the standards of the General Plan and policy recommendations of the City
Planning Commission, in addition to the recommended amendment to the
Circulation Elemento
At the conclusion of the public hearings before the City Planning
Commission, it was found that underlying assumptions of the Plan relating
to the continued growth of Orange County and the City of Anaheim were still
valid, and had been recently reconfirmed by the Stanford Research Institute
updating the Orange County 1980 report for the Board of Supervisors, and the
recent Economic Research Association Report on the Anaheim Center City Area.
The Cities of Buena Park, Placentia and Orange, have recently
completed and adopted a General Plan.
read.
Community Goals, as related on the text of the General Plan, were
.~~...---~".'"~~....'."'..~;'.I!ii.."'4 ...~,. J
7(62
City Hall. Anaheim. California ~ ~OUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1963. 3:00 PaMa
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS: The objectives and policies were reconfirmed, and it
was noted that these purposef were maintenance of exclusive single family
areas, and at the $ame tim~ providing for mul tiple famil y developments in
those areas considered appropriate.
The proposed plan provides for 1,458 net acres of multiple family,
of which approximately 616 atres are presently developed~ 179 acres zoned,
but undeveloped9 and 363 acr~s vacant land proposed for multiple family
development, plus approximately 300 acres proposed for re-use within the
center city area.
The Commission reconfirmed their recommendations that multiple
family residential developments be proposed for and encouraged to be developed
as follows:
I, Where existing developments indicate a logical rounding out or filling
in of areas firmly established for multiple family use.
2. On deep lot situations9 where nor~al subdivision development is difficult.
30 On those highway frontage locations where internal subdivision has
resulted in remaining strips of lots fronting on the highway.
4, In the center city area9 where a logical transition from single family
homes to multiple development can be anticipated.
The Commission emphasized that this policy recommendation would not
close the door for multiple family development in other areas; that each
application would be considered on its own meritSn
Mr. Reese reported that the map on the west wall has taken into
consideratIon the existing land \lSe, pl~s consideration of vacant parcels of
lard within an area of thirty-four square miles, and does not reflect any
area located on the south side of the Santa Ana River.
INDUSTRIAL AREAS: The Commission has reviewed the industrial land use
proposal and original 1962 Industrial Area Analysis covering the areas within
the c~ty limits, and possible expansion.
Existing land se within the city limits is 1,340 net acres, or
19% of the total Co~nty of Orange Industrial Land Use of approximately
7~023 net acres.
The General Plan Proposal Includes an additional 3,240 net acres,
or a total of 4,580 net acres~ representing 25% of the 1980 County-wide
projection of 18,290 acres.
MrQ Reese explained that there is probably more land termed
uindustria1 land~v in the County than the proposed 1980 requirement, which
includes uses such as da:..ries, oil fields, etco, that much of this area
zoned or termed industrial will not be put to an ind~strial use. An accurate
f gure on land set aside and actually loned industrial in the County has not
been obtained. The amount zoned would be a misleading figure, because of the
fact that the property is not actJally sed for manufacturing, wholesaling or
warehousing~ and will be continued to be sed for such uses as agricultural,
dairies, oil fields, etc,
The figures used in the City's proposal are based on land use,
lndustrial land use needs derived from population projections, labor force
proJections~ and employee density proJections.
No specific recommendations are made on the General Plan for the
160 acres lying east of Jefferson Street, since this area is presently in the
jurisdictIon of the County of Orange, and is presently zoned M-l.
COMMERCIAL AREAS: The proposed plan provides for neighborhood, regional and
community shopping centers, in addition to special shopping centers (discount
type centers),
f.;~.m:':'..";.;,'''''-'::'~.;._."".__,,, .~~~.=..."~;....,"..",{~"'~, 17"
---.;;r . l7'J7 . ....,..,;~
7063
Cit
lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES ~ Se tember 10 1963 3:00 P~M
One of the policies will be to discourage the strip-type retail
commercial development in favor of the planned shopping center type of
development. The one exception to be made to this will be the automobile
sales and service areas along Los Angeles Street.
Consideration was given to the recent number of requests for
conversion of residential structures to commercial type uses along arterial
highways, and the Commission reconfirmed their belief that those conversions
that had been successful had been successful at a great expense to those
effectuating the conver~ion; and felt that where a conver~ion took place,
the policy should be to remove the residential structure and erect a new
commercial building with adequate and sufficient parking areas.
COMMERCIAL-RECREATION AREA: The Commission noted that the Commercial-
Recreational policy had been recently been up-dated to include high-rise
office buildings on freeway frontage locations, to provide a year-round
economic support fOT the facilities within the Commercial-Recreational
area.
BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE CENTERS: Business and professional office
centers are proposed providing for long-range service throughout the commun-
ity.
COMMUNITY FACILITIES: Attention was called to the proposed plan indicating
the need for one additional elementary school and junior high school.
PARK AREAS: Mr. Reese reported that the present park system has a total
of nineteen sites, and the proposed General Plan provides for three additional
sites, plus the expansion of three existing sites.
The major long range park development program of the General Plan
provides for a site extending along the west bank of the Santa Ana River~
from Ball Road northerly into the Santa Ana Canyon area (Riverview Park),
as this is an area that will remain open when total urbanization takes place
in subsequent years.
LIBRARIES: The plan reflects a main library and three branch libraries.
FIRE STATIONS: Mr. Reese reported that the network of nine fire stations
provided on the plan was based on the National Board of Fire Underwriters
standards, and as recommended by the 1959 Citizen Capital Improvement
Committee.
CIRCULATION ELEMENT PROPOSAL: Mr. Reese noted the map indicating the pro-
posed changes to the Circulation Element, General Plan, as adopted in 1960,
and advised that since its original adoption~ the main changes are the
addition of a system of collector streetso
VACANT LAND PROPOSALS: He explained the proposal applies to the remaInIng
vacant areas in the present city limits and the thirty-four square mile
area, and further advised that the land area is represented as follows:
Commercial:
Industrial:
Residential:
Total, 819 acres or 11.6%
3,973 acres, or 56%
2,260 acres~ or 32%
Low density - 21%
Low medium density - 2.9%
Medium density = 709%
USE OF THE GENERAL PLAN: Amendment procedures were explained, and Mr. Reese
advised that the General Plan would require an annual review of the document,
the first to be prior to the 1964~65 City Budget, and that the document must
be kept flexible in terms of reflecting community growth and changed conditions.
Total Gross Acreage, Vacant land awaiting development, 7,060 acreso
~~:~>"."'-,.';';""'~'-'*"_.~..,...:...+.~,.~.,,,.,,:,-,. +'~"''''''-';~,~-,......-. ~~.-~""""~';"!"""\""""'i''"''''-'
7064
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1963. 3:00 P",M.
SYMBOLS: Symbols of the General Plan should be interpreted as being general
in nature, and where minor deviations of the plan are approved without a
formal amendment to the Gen~ral Plan document, these matters should be
referred to the Planning Staff for review and consideration for appropriate
amendment to the General Plan map in conjunction with the annual reviews,
so that the map might reflect as nearly as possible the current development
trends throughout the community.
Mr. Reese advised that the primary means of implementing the
policies illustrated on the General Plan were~
IG Precise Plans (such as the Center City Area Plan).
2. New Codes and Ordinances reflecting adopted policies.
Councilman Chandler asked what the free-form designation on the
Plan indicated, as it is illustrated in that area of Katella Avenue and
Euclid Street.
Mr. Reese advised that this intersection of two primary highways
with the service area basically single family development, supporting that
area, there would be needed at least a neighborhood shopping center to
provide a minimum range of facilities to the residents who are living within
the primary service area of the intersection; and in this particular case,
there is an existing trend of multiple development around the shopping
center, and had it been an original proposal and vacant land, it would
perhaps still have been appropriate to have multiple family development
around a shopping center; that other symbols shown in this area represent
the community facilities needed to service the residential population in
the area.
Councilman Chandler asked what specific areas the free=form symbols
referred to, and asked if it included the possibility of all vacant
undeveloped land in the area for possible medium or high density development.
Mr. Reese replied it would include the possibility of multiple
family development because of the combination of land use factors that
presently exist.
Councilman Chandler asked how far the line would extend in a
precise plan permitting a m~ltiple family development, before it would be
determined that a multiple planned development would not conform to the
General Plan.
Mr. Reese advised that in a community as developed as the City of
Anaheim, precise plans are developed on physical and practical limitations,
such as streets and highways, flood control channels, drainage areas, or
sewer service areas3 or a line may be drawn as a reaction to a specific
zoning proposal, which would be analyzed in terms of the over-all General
Plan proposals.
As a specific illustration, reference was made to the hill and
canyon area, a totally undeveloped area, that has a capacity of 30,000 or
40,000 people. It is known that there will be a need of a shopping
center for each 10,000 people, and an elementary school for each 25,000
families. In an area such as this, no attempt to reflect a precise plan
is made.
Councilman Chandler explained that the reason for his questioning
was to determine, using the Katella and Euclid intersection as an illustra-
tion, if the General Plan would be used as a reason for granting or denying
a specific reclassification, as conforming or non-conformance to the General
Plan, and how would this be determined.
Mr. Reese advised that reference is often made by the Planning
Commission that a reclassification is inconsistent or not in accordance to
the General Plan. In his opinion, it was most important to remember that
the General Plan is not an animate object, and that it has no power in itself;
that it is nothing but a piece of paper, and through color symbols represents
at this particular time the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
'<~"""':"":'(;~.~i~~.:,,,,,
- J -...,---
7065
City Hall. Andheim~ California~" COUNCIL MINUTES ,~, SGPtemb~r 10. 1963, 3:00 P()Ma
When the City Planning Commission has made a stat~ment that "it is not in
accordance with the Gen8ral Plan", what they are saying in effect i~ that
it does not agree with their past land dev81opm~nt policy thinking.
Councilman Chandler stated that the 5e of that phraseology was
then misleading; that we are then talking about land development principles,
and asked how a determination would be mad8 in that specific area that it
does or does not conform to the General Plan.
Mr. Reese was of the opinion that this has been a case of improper
wording; that no one working with the Plan has misinterpreted the document
as having any power in itself; however he could see how other people could.
Many communities have referT8d to the General Plan as though it was a power
in itself; this should not be done. The Plan~ if adopted, should reflect
the policy thinking of the legislative body only.
Discussion was held concerning the practice of buffering, or step-
down zoning from commercial, high density, to low density. Mr. Reese was
of the opinion that the most effective buffer was not that of step=down
zoning, but open space~ such as parking lots or landscaping.
Reference was made to the Economic Research Associates report,
concerning industrial areas near the center city area, wherein it was
predicted that Anaheim area could be expected to capture the major portion cl
the indicated demands of lndustrial development in Northerp Orange County;
and factors of tne report were noted supporting this conclusion.
Discussion was also held concerning attracting major industries
to this area, and it was felt by Mayor Coons that this was dependent to a
great extent on the fiscal policies of the State of California and the water
situation; that eastern money or Wall Street interests require assurance
that water will be available during the critical period from now until water
is available from the North, by means of the Feather River Aqueduct.
Councilman Chandler asked if there was no appreciable industrial
development in any given length of time, ~1at would be the period of time
the land should be held for this particular use.
Mr0 Reese replied that he did not have the final answer to this
question this evening, and noted that the General Plan reflects the
industrial area policy adopted in 1962, as result of an industrial analysis.
He fGrther reported that it was the policy of industries to
purchase more and than actually developed, holding the undeveloped land
In reserve for future expansion when warranted; that it was reasonable to
believe the 3,240 net acres of addiTional new industrial use r8present~d
on the plan would be developed.
Mayor Coons asked if any of the other Councilmen had any further
questions to ask Mr. Reese~ there being no response, suggested a recess be
taken at this time.
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman
Krein seconded ~ne mot on. MOTION CARRIED. (9:15 P.Mu)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the
Council being present with the except on of Co~ncilman Dutton.
The Mayor asked if anyone In the audience wished to address the
Council relative to the proposed master plan.
Mr. WIllIam Walker, 1835 South Manchester Avenue, Anaheim, compli-
mented the Planning Staff on the preparation of the General Plan document,
and noted the two large Industrial areas of approximately 2,500 acres indi-
cated on the Plan, which ncluded portions of Anaheim, Fullerton, Placentia
and County terr tory.
~-,-",,,,-_.c~,-,"-j,"~~4_~;~~."~___,___,~_"~_,,,,..,.~~_,_
7066
City Hall. Anaheim. California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1963. 3:00 P.Mo
Mr. Walker was of the opinion that before the Plan is adopted, it
should be determined whether or not it was feasible to give people in and
out of the industrial area, and that a further study should be made to
determine this fact, which study should include the following:
1. The exact number of acres involved.
28 The average number of employees per acre.
3~ The number of lanes of travel leading into the area~ and the travel
capacity of these lanes.
4. The average number of people per automobile.
MrG Walker was of the opinion that if the entire area developed to
its maximum, and roads also developed to their maximum, it would not be
sufficient capacity to get p~ople in and out of the industrial area.
Mr. Murdoch reported that complete traffic information has been
obtained, and is included in the traffic projection, on all the streets
currently existing and those proposed within the present projected city
limits, with perhaps the exception of collector streets in the Fullerton
area and Placentia area~ north of Placentia~Yorba Roado
Regarding employee density, considerable study has been made, and
as was pointed out, this figure ~Quld vary considerably in the types of
industrial uses on the land. Much of the area will be developed into
industrial subdivisions, and will no doubt be of much lesser density than
Autonetics.
Regarding the Autonetics traffic situation, the present freeway
does not have sufficient capacity to accommodate this traffic, even if all
the on and off ramps were provided.
Mayor Coons reported that a committee under the chairmanship of
Mr. Koch, County Road Commissioner, is presently working on definite plans
for ingress and egress streets to the new freeway.
MrQ David Collins, 1077 West Ball Road, complimented Mr. Reese on
the presentation of the proposed plan, and the Staff on the preparation of
the document.
He advised that the proposed incompatibility of industry and
residential was not as serious a problem as believed, and felt that with
the creation of proper buffers, residential zones, industrial and commer-
cial could be intermingled.
Mr. Collins further advised that there should be a concern for
the individual property owner to permit development of his land to the
highest and best use, and suggested that more than low density residential
and medium density residential be considered, and that standards be
developed allowing density to seven or eight houses per acre in single
family residential areas; further, that high rise buildings, both offices
and apartments, be encouraged.
Reference was made to the policy allowing office buildings adjacent
to the freeway in the Disneyland area, and Mr. Collins was of the opinion
that this policy should be extended to other areas adjacent to all freeways,
as freeway exposure has particular value to commercial users and apartments.
Mro Collins stated that In his opinion, when an application for a
reclassification is considered, it should be considered on its own merits,
and it should also be considered whether or not the General Plan should be
modified.
He felt additional study should be given to the map, and questioned
whether or not there would be very much R.-l development west of the Santa Ana
River because of the land value. He also felt that the colors on the map
did not recognize the present development on the land, and related the
following specific areas;
a. Lincoln Avenue, west of the Santa Ana Freeway.
~i.i;"~';.~Oi.4'~~ii.,V',.,;;;;~",,,,~;;-,,,,,,,,,,,,,_,,,_,_,:,~_'b,;"';~~:;;;~-'n-
7067
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES = September 10. 1963. 3:00 P~Mo
b. Euclid Avenue south of Lincoln Avenue.
c. South Los Angeles Street south of Ball Road.
d. Placentia Avenue north of Lincoln Avenue (East side)o
Mr. Collins also felt additional consideration should be given to
the following areas;
a. Property directly west of Walnut Street, shown as R=l, because
of its close proximity to the Disneyland area, and the possible
future needs for additional hotel accommodations.
b. The northeast Corner of Harbor Boulevard and Ball Roada
c~ South side of the Riverside Freeway between Lemon Street and
Harbor Boulevard.
d. East of East Street, backing up to the Santa Fe Railroad tracks.
Mr. Richard Tevlin, 106 Echo Place, Anaheim, advised that in his
opinion the proposed plan should be adopted; that the proposed plan has been
pending for eight years and just because the plan does not reflect existing
development, the fact that the development exists did not necessarily make
it right.
This being a General Plan, to be revIewed annually, it can be
changed or modifiedo It is not a precise plan, and further, if some guide
line is not adopted, Mr. Tevlin felt the entIre plan should be abandoned.
In reiteratIng his stand, he favored the adoption of the plan and
opposed any further postponement. He stated that had there been some kind
of a plan eight years ago, he would not be living next to an industrial site
because he would have had a guide to determine the area in which to purchase.
Mr. Tevlin recognized that development of a General Plan for a
city developing as rapidly as Anaheim requires a lot of time, but felt
that the longer the adoption is postponed, the more the problems are
compounded.
Mayor Coons asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, explained that action would not be taken tonight,
that the Council woul.d lIke to have Councilman Dutton present before any
formal action IS taken; and thereupon suggested the public hearing be con-
tinued to a definlte date.
October
CARRIED.
Counci~man Chand er moved ~hat said public hearing be continued to
5, 19t3, 7:00 P.M. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION
SIDEWALK WAIVER c~FOUNLAIN_WA~TRAGi NO" 5078: Request of W" H. Jewett Company
for waiver of 5idewa ks tor twenty-one industrial lots on Fountain Way
~Tract No. 5078) wasubmltted.
On the recommendations of the City ~ngineer, Councilman Chandler
moved temporar~ waiver of sidewalk requirements be granted, as requested,
subject to no permanen~ planting (trees) in the area reserved for f'lture
sidewalks. Co;nc Ima Kre n seconded the mot on. MOTION CARRIEDu
SIDEWALK WAIVER ~ lOlt: EASl KAll:,hLA AVI:NUE:~ Reql.iest of Warren W. Jaycox for
waiver of sidewalks at 1016 East Katella Avenue, was submitted.
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein
moved temporary waiver of sidewalk requirements on industrial property at
1016 East Katella Avenue be granted, subject to the provision that no
permanent plantlng (trees) be placed n the area reserved for future side-
walks. CouncIlman Schctte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIEDo
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO" 102 EXTENSION OF lIME: Request of First Congregational
Church, 515 Nor~h Placentia Avenue, dated August 26, 1963, for extension of
time to Condit~onal Use PermIt No. 1~2 for compliance with certain conditions
pursuant to Ci s:ar'~:__;9 Commission Resolut on No. 30, Series 1961~629
granting said condltlona se permIt, was sUbmitted.
-""",,,,-,,,:,,,,,,,,,~.",,.O_'-_',"+o;J;'"-~'_"::""":":""'i,"j;k";,,",';';:':;!;':"~1!;;':"""","..~-""""",,. ',,', ......~~~_,._''''''':.\,I!tt:..,~--
7068
City HallQ Anaheima California - COUNCIL MINUTES = September 10. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
Councilman Chandler moved extension of time to Conditional Use
Permit No. 102 be granted as provided in the Anaheim Municipal Code~ and that
the applicants be informed of said Code requirement.
Mr. Murdoch report~d that subject property is immediately east of
Sycamore Junior High School, and that the City Engineer has recommended the
street improvements be compl~ted to provide sidewalks in the area.
Councilman Chandler withdrew his former motion, and thereupon moved
that said request be continued to September 249 1963, for further report from
the City Engineer. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
AMUSEMENT MACHINE PERMIT: Application filed by Melvin Hilliard, for Amusement
Machine Permit to allow four amusement machines at the Lil Dude, 1445 South
Los Angeles Street, was submitted and granted, sUbject to the recommendations
of the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman
Schutte. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST ~ ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES~ ASSOCIATION: Communication dated August
30~ 1963, from the Anaheim Municipal Employees~ Association, was submitted
requesting that the City Council establish a policy endorsing the perpetu~
ation of open meetings between the Anaheim Municipal Employees~ Association
and the City Council.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion
thereof, the following policy was adopted:
POLICY OF THE COUNCIL: Councilman Coons moved that it be the policy of
this City Council that one or more members of the City Council and the
City Manager will accept ~nvitation of the Anaheim Employees Association to
open meetings at such times as matters pertinent to employee-employer
relationship are disccssed. It being understood, that when such an invi-
tation is accepted by the City Council, the press be so notified.
ORANGE COUNTY CASE NOo 701: Orange County Case No. 701 (Sectional District Map
1-4-9, Exhibit I)~ proposing reclassification of subject property from the
80-AR~10~OOO Agricultural Residential District and the lOO=E4~15,OOO, Small
Estates District to the R=19 8,000 Single Family Residence District on
property located on the south side of the Santa Ana Canyon Road, about 2~000
feet east of Imperial Highway in the Santa Ana Canyon area of the County of
Orange.
Mr. Kreidt summarized the review of said case by the City Planning
Commission at their meeting held September 4, 1963, and read their recommen-
dations to the City Council that said application be approved9 subject to
conditions~
Councilman Chandler moved that the City Planning Commission letter
of recommendation9 dated September 109 1963, including conditions of approval,
be forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission with a letter of
transmittal from the City Council, advising that the City of Anaheim services
to this tract is conditioned upon development in accordance with City of
Anaheim standards; and that the subdivider be advised of the City Council
stipulation and firm position taken~ in the event of any ambiguity in the
requirements of the City and action taken by the County of Orange. Councilman
Krein seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED.
ORANGE COUNTY CASE NO. 678: The City Planning Commission at their meeting held
September 4, 1963, received correspondence dated September 3, 1963 from Mro
John Kent9 Attorney representing applicants for Orange County Case No. 678,
requesting consideration of the City Planning Commissionis recommendations
dated July 24~ 1963, concerning the density of development of property located
on the north side of La Palma Avenue, immediately west of the Orange Freeway,
and easterly of the trailer court located at the northeast corner of Sunkist
and La Palma Avenueo
'-i-"'W"C"~",_m__,:"': ".----.~".,;;;;.;~;._
~-::::;,c;;;:.~'J l
7069
Cit Hall Anaheim C lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES ... Se tember 10 1963 3!OO P M.
Said letter concerning their request for County R-2 Zoning,
stating their reasons therefore, was submitted and r~ad in full.
Mr. Kreidt further submitted excerpts of the City Planning Com-
mission meeting held September 4, 1963, re-affirming their recommendations
of July 24, 1963, relative to the density of the property, recommending a
maximum denSity of one dwelling unit per 2,~00 square feet; and further
explained that original recommendations were presented to the City Council
at their meeting held July 23, 1963, at which time no action on said
recommendations was taken by the City Council.
Mr. Kreidt advised that later, a second case, Orange County Case
No, 700, located on the east side of the Orange Freeway, on the north side
of La Palma Avenue, was presented to the City Council and recommendations
of the City Planning Commission were altered; and the City Clerk was
instructed to forward a letter to the Orange County Planning Commission
advising that the City of Anaheim took no position on the application and
requesting that should the reclassification be granted, all two-story
development be kept a minimum of 150 feet from any single-family residential
20ne~
Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was determined
that the recommendations concerning Orange County Case No. 700 should also
apply to Case Noo 678.
Mr. John Kent addressed the Council requesting a similar recommen-
dation concerning Case No. 700 be applied to Case No. 678, and further
requesting that it be noted that the recommendations previously forwarded
by the City Planning Commission were not the recommendations of the City of
Anaheimo
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Chandler moved
that the City Clerk be requested to inform the Orange County Planning Com-
mission that recommendations forwarded by the City Planning Commission
relative to Orange County Case No. 678 are Nithdra~, and in substitution
therefor, recommendations consistent with those filed concerning Orange
County Case No. 700 be forwarded: that no position on subject application
is taken by the City of Anaheim; however, if a change of zone is granted, it
is requested that all two'.story development be kept a minimum of 150 feet
north of the south boundary of La Palma Avenue. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIEDo
ORANGE COUNTY CASE NO, 711, Case No. 711 (Sectional District Map 1-4-10,
Exhibit G) proposing a change from the A-I, General Agricultural District
to the M'.l, Light Industrial District on property located on the west side
of Blue Gum Street approximately 330 feet south of Anaheim Road, in the
northeast Anaheim area.
Mr. Kreidt summarized the review of said application by the
City Planning Commission on September 4, 1963, and read their recommendations
to Orange County Planning Commission that the proposed reclassification was
in conformance with City of Anaheim development plans for the northeast
Anaheim area, and that consideration be given to requiring the proposed
development to la con. stent with City of Anaheim M-l, Light Industrial and
P-L, Parking Landscaping zone regulations.
On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Chandler,
the City Council concurred with City Planning Commission recommendations and
directed that a copy of tne CommIssion's recommendations be forwarded to the
Orange County Planning Commission by the Ci ty Clerk's office. MOTION CARRIED.
COUNTY INDUSTRIAL AREAS ANALYSIS: Mr. Kreldt read in full letter from the City
Planning Commission to the Orange County Board of Supervisors recommending
that the City of Anaheim Support the Board of Supervisors' proposal to con-
duct a County-wide industrial areas analysis to establish a regional
framework from which the individual communities can more accurately formulate
their long-range industrial programs, and further re0uesting the County of
Orange to give consideration to certain factors in the scope of their study
as outlined in said letter.
"'..i'..:.....;......."~~..:~~.d._...t.,_.....~_""~..,~,..~ih~~"._.-.....",iIiI!'
7070
City Hall. Anaheim~ California ,~, COUNCIL MINUfES - September 10. 1963. 3:00 P,Mo
Said letter from the City Planning Commission further recommended
that the County be requested to hold in abeyance applications for residential
development in the areas east of Jefferson Street until the completion of
their County-wide analysis, and that in the interest of affected property
owners in the area, the County be urged to complete such a study in as
short a time as possible.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was the consensus
of Council opinion that such a study would be valuable to all cities within
the County; however, it was also the opinion of the Council that the City
of Anaheim should not specifically request such an analysis be made, nor be
bo~nd by the results of such an analysis.
Mro Reese reported that MTo Bergh of the Orange County Planninq
Department has requested opinions and suggestions from all municipalities
as to the content and scope of the study, and the scope of the program that
the various cities felt would be useful, and the basis of preliminary dis-
cussions with consultants~
Councilman Chandler felt that by invitation, the City of Anaheim
could furnish the type of information that would be considered helpful to
uS9 but objected to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission as
proposed for forwarding, and thereupon moved that the recommendations be
referred back to the City Planning Commission for further study. Councilman
Schutte seconded the motIon. MOTION CARRIED.
CITY OF ORANGE ZONE CHANGE NOo 306 AND PRECISE SITE PLAN 101: Ci ty of Orange
Zone Change NOG 306 and Precise Site Plan 101 request reclassification from
R-l, Single Family Residential, 6000 square foot lots, to the R=3, Multiple
Family Residential Zone, for construction of one and two story 93 unit
apartment development on property located on the north aide of Chapman
Avenue, 615 feet east of Haster Street~
Mr. Kreidt read excerpt from the minutes of the City Planning
Commission meeting held September 6, 1963, taking no position relative to
said application.
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seoonded by Councilman Schutte,
the City Council concurred with recommendations, and instructed the City
C erk to forward said reco~mendations to the City of OTange Planning Com~
mlsslonG MOTION CARRIED~
GARDEN GROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMII-NO0 109-63: City of Garden Grove Conditional
Use Permit No. 109-63 requests permission to establish a car wash on
property currently zoned C~l, and located on the south side of Katella
Avenue west of Brookhurst Street.
Mr. Kreidt read excerpt from the City Planning Commission minutes
of their meeting held September 4, 1963, recommending that the Garden Grove
Planning Commission be advised that the Commission had no comment relative
to Conditional Use Permit No~ 109-63.
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein,
the Clty Council concurred with recommendations, and instructed the City
Clerk to forward said recommendations to the Garden Grove Planning Commis-
sion. MOTION CARRIEDo
FINAL MAP.. TRACT NOo 5090: Developer~ Mel McGaughy; located on the south side
of Lincoln Avenue~ approximately 671 feet east of Beach Boulevard, containing
17 proposed R-3 10ts9 1 proposed C-l lot and 1 Lot ~A".
The City Engineer reported that said final map conforms substan=
tially with tentative map previously approvedg bonds have been posted and
approved, and required fees paid~ He further advised that a proposed aban-
donment of an easement for Ridgeway Street within subject tract will be
considered by the City Council in the near future, and thereupon recommended
That the approval of Final Map, Tract No. 5090 be deferred to be considered
in conjunction with the public hearing on said abandonment.
"'__"....."""'1'-.-!O;'i-,.;.-~
';::':''^:::''':~''-''''-'''~
,~. -I-
-
I
7071
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES ~ September 10. 1963. 3:00 P.Mo
Discussion was held concerning proposed abandonment, and at the
conclusion thereof, Councilman Krein moved Final Map of Tract No. 5090 be
approved, subject to withholding recordation of said tract until the public
hearing has been held and action Is taken by the City Council on proposed
abandonment. Councilman Chandler seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIEDQ
RESOLUTION NO" 63R-734 ,- PROPOSED ABANDONMENT: Councilman Chandler offered
Resolution No) 63R~734 for adoption, setting date for public hearing on the
proposed abandonment of an easement for Ridgeway Street, in Tract No~ 5090.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON EASEMENTS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PUR~
POSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS, ALONG AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL
PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE fOR A HEARING THEREON; DIRECTING THE
POSTING Of NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTIONQ (Public
Hearing October 1, 1963, 3:00 P.M.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN:
TEMPORARILY ABSENT:
Chandler, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton.
COUNCILMAN: Schutte.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-734 duly passed and adopted.
TRACT NO. 4261 ~ IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION: On motion by Councilman
Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein, dedication of Lots A, C and E in
Tract No. 4261 and letter advising conditions have been met, were ordered
to be accepted upon recordation of final Map, Tract No. 5090. MOTION
CARRI ED.
TRACT NOQ 5102 - IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION: On the recommendations of the
City Attorney, Councilman Chandler moved that irrevocable offer to dedicate
Lots A and B in Tract No. 5102 be approved as to form, and the City Clerk
be directed to record said offers of dedicationQ Councilman Schutte seconded
the motion MOrlON CARRIED.
FINAL MAP~ TRACT NO~ 5102L Developer, Mel Mack; tract located on the west side
of Western Avenue, approximately 331 feet south of Lincoln Avenue, and
contains sixteen proposed R-3 lots.
The City Engineer reported said final map conforms substantially
with the tentative map previously approved, that bonds have been posted and
approved, and required fees paid, and recommended approval thereof.
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Chandler
moved Final Map of Tract NOQ 5102 be approved. Councilman Krein seconded
the motiono MOTION CARRIEDo
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION. Application submitted by Helen Alfield
Hawley and Jack Schwartz for new off-sale beer and wine license for
premises at the northwest corner of Ball Road and Harbor Boulevard (R-A
Zone) was presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their
informationQ
On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Chandler
moved that protest be filed by the City Attorney, with the Alcoholic Beverage
Control Board against said application, as the R~A Zone does not permit the
operation of an off-sale beer am wine premises. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
.~........~~--,.-~"""'*'~~~-
7072
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1963. 3:00 PIMa
ORDINANCE NOG 1903: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1903 for an additional
final reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONINGo (63-64-14 - C-O, Parcel 2)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1903 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading
in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Chandler seconded the
motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIEDo
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Schutte and Coons.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN: Dutton.
ABSTAINED FROM VOTING: COUNCILMAN: Krein.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1903 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NOQ 63R-735: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-735 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE
NECESSITY FOR, AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, OF REAL
PROPERTY FOR SEWER AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (South of Santa Ana River
east of Riverside Freeway)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMAN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-735 duly passed and adopted~
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-736: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-736 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Booko
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A QUITCLAIM
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL
PURPOSES. (Dyke Water Company)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMAN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-736 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-737: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-737 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL
PURPOSES. (Dyke Water Company)
~0&'~._..'-':,>T;l';;~,;.;,j:';.'_~;.. i .+";;"~'~""""'<""""~
--~;;,;;~;.:;.,
7073
Cit Hall Anaheim California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Se tember 10 1963 3:00 PQM.
On roll call the foregoing Resolution No. 63R-737 was duly passed
and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC ILMEN:
COUNCILMEN:
C OUNC I LMAN :
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-737 duly passed and adopted.
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman Schutte
seconded the motiona MOTION CARRIED. (12:10 A.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all members of the City
Council being present, with the exception of Councilman Dutton.
CANCELLATION OF CITY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by
Councilman Schutte, cancellation of City taxes was authorized on properties
acquired by the California Division of Highways for public purposes~ as
follows. MOTION CARRIED:
a. Property formerly assessed to Ernest Mathew Hirtz~ et ux; deed recorded
August 12, 1963 in Book 6670, Page 280 of Official Records, Orange
County, California.
b. Property form~rly assessed to Walter F. Brannan, et ux; deed record~d
August 12, 1963 in Book 6670, Page 275, Official Records of Orange County,
California.
CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims against the City were denied by
the City Council and referred to the City Attorney and City insurance
carrier, on motion by Councilman Chandler~ seconded by Councilman Schutte.
MOTION CARRIED:
a. Claim filed by Miss Mary Cochrane for damages received resulting from
electricity being turned off on August 25, 1963, at 1325 South Los
Angeles Street, Apartment A.
b. Claim filed by Roger Egdahl on behalf of himself and Nanette Karen
Egdahl, a minor, for injuries received while playing in, on and about
an empty wire or cable spool on May 20, 1963, in the vicinity of 938
South Hilda Street.
AWARD OF CONTRACT. JOB NO. 786. LA PALMA PARK RECREATION CLUB BUILDING ASSEMBLY
HALL FLOOR: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Chandler
moved that the award of contract for Job NOQ 786, improvement of Assembly
Hall Floor in the La Palma Park Community Recreation Club Building, be
deferred one week (September 17, 1963, 3:00 P.M.), for receipt of report
from the Engineering Department. Councilman Krein seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-738: On the certification of Thornton Eo Piersall, Director
of Public Works, that RQ JQ Noble Company has completed the construction of
the Mable-Adams Street Improvement, Job No. 761, in accordance with plans
and specifications, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-738 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL
AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COM-
PLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE MABLE-ADAMS STREET
IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 761. (R. J. Noble Company)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
(See page 7074)
~"+""""'''''''''''''*'''''''''~'iiI''''~-",~,~""",~"""."",_"""",,_~_
7074
City Hall~ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - SePtember 10. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC ILMEN:
C OUNC I LMEN :
COUNCILMEN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons3
None.
Dutton.
The Mayor declared Resolution NOa 63R-738 duly passed and adopted.
CITY PLANNING COIvlMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at
their meeting held August 19, 1963, pertaining to the following applications,
were submitted for City Council information and consideration:
VARIANCE NO. 1597: Submitted by George R. August, requesting permission to
waive the one story height limitation to permit the construction of an apart-
ment building on R-3 property located on the south side of Romneya Drive,
approximately 265 feet eaST of West Street (920 West Romneya Drive)a
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution Nos 879, Series
1963-64, granted said variance, subject to conditionsG
VARIANCE NO. 1598: Submitted by Giacomo and Agostina Lugaro, requesting per-
mission to waive front yard setback requirement to permit the construction
of a single family subdivision on R-A property located on the south side of
Crescent Avenue, approximately 277 feet east of Magnolia Avenue (2490
Crescent Avenue).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 880, Series
1963-64, granted said variance, subject to conditions~
VARIANCE NO. 1599: Submitted by Olin L. and Ruth M. Cramer, requesting waiver
of the 70 foot lot frontage requirement and waiver of the minimum area of an
R-A parcel to permit a single family subdivision on R-A property located on
the west side of Nutwood Street, approximately 130 feet north of Beacon Avenue
(815 South Nutwood Avenue).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 881, Series
1963-64, granted said variance, subject to conditionsa
VARIANCE NO. 1600: Submitted by East-West Development Corporation, requesting
waiver of garage requirements to permit construction of carports on R-3 property
located on the north side of Ball Road, approximately 553 feet west of Dale
Street (2841 West Ball Road)a
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution NOQ 882, Series
1963-64, granted said variance, subject to conditionsa
The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no
further action taken on the above numbered variance applications.
REV.TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT 5113: Developer, Jack McLean; tract located on the south
side of Crescent Avenue, approximately 275 feet easterly of the centerline of
Magnolia Avenue, covering 5g6 acres, and contains 24 R-l lots. (Variance No.
lS98Q
The City Planning Commission at their meeting held August 19, 1963,
approved said revised tentative map, subject to the following conditions:
1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision,
each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval~
2. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings,
to Crescent Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheima
3u That an underground storm drain system shall be installed to the satis-
faction of the City Engineer.
Councilman Chandler moved that Revised Tentative Map, Tract No.
5113, be approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Com-
mlssion~ Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
~..~;j;,..;:.;..;'.,...,:.':";'~",,~,.,:,..,.,..,"WI"9"
7075
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1963Q 3:00 P.M.
TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT NO. 5250: Developer, Lynn E. Thomsen; tract located on the
east side of Agate Street approximately 130 feet north of the centerline of
Beacon Avenue, and covering 2.6 acres, containing 11 R-l lots. (Variance No.
1599.)
The City Planning Commission at their meeting held Augu~t 19,
1963, approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions:
1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision,
each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval~
2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 5250 is granted subject
to the approval of Variance No. 1599.
3. That Street "AH shall be named Chateau Avenue.
4. That Chateau Avenue shall be a 60 foot right-of-way except adjacent to
the "Not A Part" where a 51 foot right-of-way will be permitted. The
street section adjacent to the "Not A Part" shall be a 10-foot parkway on
the Sout~ a 36-foot roadway and a 5-foot parkway with a full sidewalk
on the North.
Councilman Krein moved that Tentative Map~ Tract No. 5250, be
approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. Councilman Coons voted "No". MOTION
CARRIED.
TENTATIVE MAPS. TRACTS NOS. 5267. 5268. 5269 AND 5270: Developer, Manco
Development Company; tracts located at 1400 North Acacia Street~ and contain
a total of 31 proposed R-3 lots.
In accordance with requests signed by Loran D. Covington, agent
for the developer, action by the City Council on Tentative Tract Maps Nos.
5267~ 5268, 5269 and 5270 was deferred to be considered in conjunction with
Reclassification NOG 63-64-17, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by
Councilman Krein~ MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT NO. 5302: Developer, Southeast Mortgage Company; tract
located at the southeast corner of Orangewood Avenue and Harbor Boulevard,
and contains 1 C-l and 3 R-3 lots.
The City Planning Commission at their meeting held September 4,
1963, approved said tentative map, subject to the following conditions:
1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision,
each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approva1Q
20 That vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings to
Orangewood Avenue, shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
3. That a modified cul-de-sac be provided at the terminus of Tiara Street,
Troy Street and Bluebell Avenue. The engineering to be provided by the
City and construction by the developer, subject to the approval of the
City Engineer,
4. That Lots 2-A, 3-A, and 4-A, shall be incorporated on the final map.
These lots will be one (1) foot wide along the southerly and easterly
limi ts of Streets HE" and "DO! and to be designated as non-buildable lots
for the construction of a masonry wall only.
5. That the owners of subject property pay to the City of Anaheim ten cents
per front foot along Harbor Boulevard, Orangewood Avenue, and Streets
"A", vtB"3 "CH, "DH, and "EH. (The normal charge of $10,,00 per lot is
not adequate due to the nature of the development.)
6. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No" 5302 is granted subject
to the approval of Reclassification No. 62-63-131 and Conditional Use
Permit Nos. 440 and 441.
Councilman Schutte moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 5302, be
approved9 subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTrON CARRIED.
~......~;;",..""",-""~.,~,, ",""",-~~,,,,:;;"j'-;'''-'~~~-'',,'''~","--.i#~'''''.-''_''~.*,~~.;iI\ii
7076
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES ~ September 10. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT NO. 5307: Developer, California Pacific Construction Company;
tract located on an "L" shaped parcel of land with a frontage of 660 feet on
the south side of La Jolla Street and 1320 feet on the north side of Anaheim
Road9 and contains 97 proposed R-3 lots.
In accordance with request signed by Herbert WQ Phillips, agent for
the developer, action by the City Council on Tentative Map, Tract NOQ 5307,
was deferred to be considered in conjunction with Reclassification NOQ
63-64-26, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler.
MOTION CARRIED.
RIVERVIEW ANNEXATION NO. 2- CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
CONCERNING ZONING: Planning Coordinator Allan Shoff briefed letter from
the City Planning Commission transmitting excerpts from the minutes of their
meeting held August 19, 1963; advising that the letter was prepared prior to
Planning Commission approval of the minutes, and called attention to a correc-
tion made~ that the phrase "and that said zoning be applied to all properties
included in the Riverview Annexation No.2", appearing in the last paragraph,
was deleted.
Mr. Shoff further reported that the County zoning at the time of
annexation was determined, and the comparable City zoning was determined.
It was found that the City R-l and C-l zoning compared to the existing
County zoning at the time of annexation.
Mra Geisler recommended that the City Council adopt an Urgency
Ordinance establishing some type of zoning on the property, because at the
present time, the area has no zoning and-any use could be establisheda He
further advised of the types of zoning that might be considered, such as
R-A for the undeveloped area, and C-l and R-l for the developed area, which
would reflect the use of the land; or that all area with the exception of
that developed commercially could be considered R-A, in accordance with past
policy, and precise zoning determined at a later date after City studies are
made and public hearings held.
Also considered was the northwest corner of Rio Vista Street and
Lincoln Avenue, on which a service station is soon to be constructed a
MrQ Kreidt reported that the service station use was the result
of an action by the City of Anaheim by conditional use permit~ to become
effective upon completion of annexation, and not a County zoning actiona
MrG Shoff asked if the setbacks established by the County would
apply to the commercial area, and Councilman Chandler was of the opinion
that the setback requirements should apply to the City C-l zoning.
At the conclusion of the discussion, on motion by Councilman
Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler, the City Attorney was instructed
to prepare necessary Urgency Ordinance to reclassify the property within
the Riverview Annexation No.2, C-l and R-A, in lieu of the recommended
R-I zoning, to reflect the present use of the land. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on
motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED:
a. City of Los Angeles - adoption of report of the State, County and
Federal Affairs Committeea
b. City of Westminster - Resolution supporting the setting aside of the
Nike Base for recreation and park facilities.
c. Orange County Mosquito Abatement District - Minutes, August 16, 1963.
d. Southern California Water Company - transmitting their application
before the Public Utilities Commission for an order granting a certifi-
cate of public convenience and necessity to render water service in
certain unincorporated terrItory in Orange County~
e~ Feather River Project Association - Statement of receipts, disbursements
and net worth, July 31, 1963. Agenda and reports.
'i."'~:_"':=:d-_~_;:;W;;"':,~ _"._~'..,>#'~~...'_
7077
City Halle Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1963. 3:00 P.Me
FINANCIAL AND OPERATING REPORTS: Financial and Operating Reports for the month
of August, 1963, were ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman
Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED.
DEEDS OF EASEMENTS: Councilman Chandler offered Resolutions Nos. 63R-739 to
63R-743, both inclusive, for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-739: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Camille Allec, Jr., et al)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-740: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Walt Disney Productions)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-74l: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY AND TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. (Financial Federation, Inc.)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-742: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSESe
(Anavil Corp.)
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-743: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Lawrence W. Allen~ et ux)
On roll call the foregoing resolutions were duly passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC ILMEN:
COUNC ILMEN:
COUNC I LMEN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton"
The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 63R-739 to 63R-743, both
inclusive~ duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-744: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-744 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING THE
IMPOSITION OF ADDITIONAL HIGHWAY USERS TAXES AND FEES PURSUANT TO CHAPTER
1852, STATUTES OF 1963.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
C OUNC I LMEN :
COUNC I LMI;N:
C OUNC I LMEN :
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons a
None.
Dutton"
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-744 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-745: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No" 63R-745 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING AND SUB-
MITTING A BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY
FUND TO CITIES.
(See page 7078 for roll call)
'~*"~!'IIIIIh~..~,~.;.~_,._~",..;.;p_~o,.~_,:.,,,,,~
7078
City Hall~ AnaheimQ California - ~OUNCIL MINUTES - September lO~ 1963. 3:00 P.M.
On roll call~ the foregoing Resolution NOQ 63R-745 was duly passed
and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
C OUNC I LME N :
C OUNC I LMEN :
C OUNC I LMAN :
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons"
None.
DuttonQ
The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 63R-745 duly passed and adopted~
--,
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-746: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No~ 63R-746 for
adoptiono
Refer to Resolution BookQ
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A PERMIT,
GRANTED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT TO THE CITY, TO CON-
STRUCT AND MAINTAIN A STORM DRAIN INLET IN SAID DISTRICT is BOX CULVERT IN
THE CARBON CREEK CHANNEL AT HARBOR BOULEVARD.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNCI LMEN:
COUNC I LMAN:
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
NoneQ
Dutton"
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-746 duly passed and adoptedo
RESOLUTION NO. 63R-747: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-747 for
adoptionQ
Refer to Resolution Book~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTH-
ORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPART-
MENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, WITH REFERENCE TO THE MODIFICA-
TION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT CERTAIN INTERSECTIONS ON LOS ANGELES STREET
BETWEEN BALL ROAD AND LEMON STREET.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC I LMEN:
C OUNC I LMEN :
C OUNC I LMAN :
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None"
Dutton.
The Mayor declared Resolution No" 63R-747 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1905: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No~ 1905 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book"
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14,,40,
SECTION 14,,40,,050 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO SPEED LIMITS.
(Thirty Miles Per Houri Gilbert Street3 between Lincoln Ave. & Crescent Ave.)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1905 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
N OE S :
ABSENT:
COUNCI LMEN:
COUNC I LMEN:
C OUNC I LMAN :
Chandler, Schutte9 Krein and Coons"
None..
Dutton"
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance Noo 1905 duly passed and adoptedo
~"~,"."'~;~",".iiT~,-..;,;;,
7079
Cit Hall Anaheim California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Se tember 10 1963 3:00 P.Ma
ORDINANCE NO. 1906: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1906 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONINGa (60-61-96 and 61-62-30, C-l)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1906 and
having knowledge of the contents therein~ Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motiono MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC ILMEN:
C OUNC I LMEN :
C OUNC I LMAN :
Chandler~ Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None~
Dutton.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance NOQ 1906 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1907: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1907 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONINGQ (62-63-90 - R-2)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1907 and
having knowledge of the contents therein~ Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motionG MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIEDQ
On Toll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC ILMEN:
C OUNC I LMAN :
Chandler~ Schutte~ Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1907 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1908: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance NOQ 1908 for final
Teadingo
Refer to Ordinance Booko
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62~63-92 - R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1908 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motiona MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
N OE S :
ABSENT:
C OUNC I LMEN :
COUNCILMEN:
COUNC I LMAN:
Chandler~ Schutte, Krein and CoonSQ
None.
Dutton.
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1908 duly passed and adoptedQ
ORDINANCE NO. 1909: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1909 for final
reading.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69 (7), M-l and P-L)
(See page 7080 for waiver of reading in full and roll call)
----"", --.,~."'- --~-~~--...".-~-
7080
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1963. 3:00 P,M,
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1909 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the
reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded
the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCI LMEN:
C OUNC I LMEN :
C OUNC I LMAN :
Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons.
None.
Dutton~
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1909 duly passed and adopted.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Schutte moved to adjourn. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 1:08 A.M.
SIGNED:~ Ai. ~
Ci ty Clerk
City Hall~ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 17. 1963. 3:00 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandle~ Schutte, Krein and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None.
CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch.
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER: James p. Maddox.
PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard A. Reese.
ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
MINUTES: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Chandler, minutes
of the Anaheim City Council meeting held September 3, 1963, were approved.
MOTION CARRIED ~
JOB NO. 1273 - SANTA ANA CANYON SEWER IMPROVEMENT: Call for bids for Job No.
1273, continued from the meeting held September 10, 1963, was deferred one
week (September 24, 1963, 3:00 P.M.).
AWARD OF CONTRACTQ JOB NO. 786. LA PALMA PARK RECREATION CLUB BUILDING ASSEMBLY
HALL FLOOR: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, award of contract
for the improvement of the Assembly Hall floor in the La Palma Park Community
Recreation Club Building, Job Noo 786, was deferred one week (September 24,
1963, 3:00 P.M.).
PUBLIC HEARING. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 867. SERIES 1963-64 -
TRAILER PARKS: City Planning Commission Resolution No. 867, Series 1963-
64, recommended amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code
relating to zoning, by the deletion of Section 18.64.020 (3-t) Trailer
Parks, and the addition of Section 18.64.020 (2-d) Trailer Parks.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council,
there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion
thereof, Councilman Schutte moved that the City Council concur with City
Planning Commission recommendations and authorize the City Attorney's office
to preparg neG~$~pry gme.ndment tg Title 18, as recommended. Councilman
Kretn 5~Ggngeg the m~tion. MOTION CARRIED.
.~~.._T'~'~""-"'-~"""_'"~-"_"__'~~_;;.~