Loading...
1963/09/17 7080 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1963, 3:00 P.M. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1909 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCI LMEN: COUNCILMEN: C OUNC I LMAN : Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. Duttona Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1909 duly passed and adopted. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Schutte moved to adjourna Councilman Krein seconded the motionG MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 1:08 A.M. SIGNED:~~ A1 ~~/ City Clerk City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 17. 1963. 3:00 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandle~ Schutte, Krein and Coons. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. MurdochG CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. WilliamsG CITY ENGINEER: James p. Maddox. PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard AG Reese. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin KreidtG Mayor Coons called the meeting to order. MINUTES: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Chandler, minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held September 3, 1963, were approved. MOTION CARRIED. JOB NO. 1273 - SANTA ANA CANYON SEWER IMPROVEMENT: Call for bids for Job No. 1273, continued from the meeting held September 10, 1963, was deferred one week (September 249 1963, 3:00 P.M.). AWARD OF CONTRACT~ JOB NO. 786. LA PALMA PARK RECREATION CLUB BUILDING ASSEMBLY HALL FLOOR: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, award of contract for the improvement of the Assembly Hall floor in the La Palma Park Community Recreation Club Building, Job Noo 786, was deferred one week (September 24, 1963, 3:00 P.M.). PUBLIC HEARING, CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 867. SERIES 1963-64 _ TRAILER PARKS: City Planning Commission Resolution No. 867, Series 1963- 64, recommended amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to zoning, by the deletion of Section 18.64.020 (3-t) Trailer Parks, and the addition of Section 18.64.020 (2-d) Trailer Parks. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response9 declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Schutte moved that the City Council concur with City Planning Commi$sion recommendations and authorize the City Attorney's office to pr~par@ n~G~~~p.ry 9m~ndll1@ni; tg Title 18, as recommended. Councilman Kr~1n seG~nged the m~t1gn. MOTION CARRIED. -:~~;;;:,,,,:c"..C-i;':"'_"'::',..,_,,.,...=,_,,,".._..,,_,:..::;-:""':'-"~-""~.,..,4.:~,;"~,,..,.;, ""-"",~'"'-:':.''''':.''k",,''r'''',.I-.-',',''' 7081 City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 17. 1963. 3!OO P.M. SIGN REQUEST - WAYNES STEAK HOUSE: Application submitted by Wayne~ Steak Hou~e reque~ting permission to erect a non-conforming sign at 33l South Magnolia Street, together with plans and report from the Building Departmen~ was reviewed by the City Council. Discussion was held by the City Council relative to the desirability for an integrated sign, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Dutton moved said sign request be denied~ and and the applicant be advised to attempt to integrate his sign with the existing Randall Plaza Sign. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. FAMILY BILLIARD CENTER APPLICATION (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 431): Application filed by Otho Ra Parmer for permission to conduct a Family Billiard Center at 831 South Knott Avenue9 under the provisions of Conditional U~e Permit Noo 431, was submittedo The City Clerk reported that no recommendation has been received from the Chief of Police regarding subject requestG Said request was deferred one week (September 24, 1963) pending report and recommendation from the Chief of PoliceG REQUEST FOR USE OF ROOSEVELT BASEBALL FIELD: Request of Joseph Stephenson for permission to use Roosevelt Park Baseball Field on Saturdays and Sundays, October through FebruarY9 for winter youth baseball leagues, Anaheim Red Sox team sponsored by the Boston Red Sox~ was submitted together with recommendations of the Parks and Recreation Director. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler, said request was granted for this location or alternate location, as deter- mined by the Director of Parks and Recreation, and further subject to a $10000 per day charge to cover the cost of maintenance and lining the fieldG MOTION CARRIED. TRACT NO. 3017 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Robert Co Miller, dated September 4~ 1963~ for extension of time to Improvement Bond No. 456615, posted in compliance with block wall requirement on Tract No. 30179 was submitted. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Chandler moved one year extension of time be granted to said bond and requirements of Tract No" 3017 Councilman Krein seconded the motiona MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 59-60-53 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Joseph J. Loza9 dated September 2~ 1963, for extension of time to Improvement Bond No. B-717129 posted in compliance with Resolution NOG 6016 in Reclassification No, 59-60-53~ was submittedu On the recommendatlons of the City Engineer9 Councilman Schutte moved one year extension of tIme be granted to said bond be granted9 as requested0 CounCllman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 56-57-49 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Robert Wasserman, dated September 89 19639 for extension of time to Improvement Bond posted in compliance with requlrements of Reclassification No. 56-57-49 and Condi- tIonal Use Permit No, 2939 was submittedo Dlscusslon was held by the City Council~ City Manager and City Attorney, and it wa; notGd that thQ bond was prapared several years ago, and is now ins~fflclent to cover costs of Improvements required by said reclassiflcatlon and condItIonal lJS~ permit. On the recommendation~ of the City ~ngineer, Councilman Dutton moved that ninety day ext~nsiQn of time tQ $aidbond be granted, subject to increasIng the amount of the bond to $6~OOOoOO~ Councilman Schutte seconded the motiona MOTION CARRIEQ. .... ~.~ "".,.~:&... ,'.11I 7082 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September l7, 1963. 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-748 - AWARD OF JOB NO. 790: On the recommendations of the Director of Public Works, Councilman Krein offered Re~olution NOa 63R-748 for adoption~ awarding construction of the Ball Road Street Improvement, Job No. 790~ to RQ Ja Noble Company~ the low bidder3 in the amount of $99553~70. Refer to Resolution Booko A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM- ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF BALL ROAD, FROM APPROXIMATELY 202 FEET EAST OF STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD TO APPROXIMATELY 1380 FEET EAST OF STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ JOB NOo 790~ (R. J. Noble Co., $9,5530700) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: N OE S : ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ COUNCILMEN: C OUNC I LMEN: Dutton3 Chandler~ Schutte, Krein and Coons. None~ Noneo The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-748 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOG 63R-749: Co,jncilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-749 for adoptiono Refer to Resolution Booko A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT THE PURCHASE OF CAST IRON WATER PIPE AND FITTINGS IS NECESSARY FOR THE WATER DEPARTMENT; APPROVING THE SPECIFICATIONS THEREOF; AND DIRECT- ING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE INVITING BIDS FOR THE FURNISHING OF SAID PIPE AND FITTINGSo (Bids to be opened October 10, 1963~ 2:00 PGM.) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: C OUNC I LMEN : COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Chandler, Schutte, Krein and CoonSa NoneQ None. The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 63R-749 duly passed and adopted. DEEDS OF EASEMENTS: Councilman Krein offered Resolutions Nos~ 63R-750 to 63R-754, both inclusive~ for adoption~ RESOLUTION NO. 63R-750: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Weeda- Lewi s Con sLr ,jC Li on Co 0 ) F,ESOLUTION NO. 63R-751: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REAL PROPERTY FOP AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Arthur Herbert Shipkey, et ~X) RESOLUTION NO~ 63R-752~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF /\NAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTI LITY PURPOSES. (Claude Go Crosby, et ux) CESOLUTION NO" 63R"""753: ,q RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Jack H~ Wood~et ux) ~."'~"'_'.'~".."....."-""':"li'.'~;+:":... -~ ~ ,. 7083 Citv Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September l7. 1963, 3:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 63R-754: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Mary B. Doesken) On roll call the foregoing resolutions were duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNC ILMEN: COUNC ILMEN: C OUNC I LMEN : Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coon~. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 63R-750 to 63R-754, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-120 - IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION: Irrevocable offer of dedication of one foot strip of land, as described therein, executed by Jack HG Wood and Marjorie Jean Wood, in conjunction with Reclassificatlon NOa 62-63-120, was submitted and approved as to form, and the City Clerk authorized to record said irrevocable offer of dedication, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandlero MOTION CARRIED (j WORK ORDERS NOS~ 4501 AND 4600: On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Schutte moved that the City AttorneyVs office be authorized to prepare and serve written notice to the William Greschner Company that the City of Anaheim intends to assume completion of work on the Police Facilities and Central Library buildings in accordance with provisions of the contract. COJncilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. DYKE WATER COMPANY SETTLEMENT: Mr. Geisler reported that escrow closed on the Dyke Water Company facilities acquisition, September l6, 19630 However, in order to avoid complications of making a change over in the middle of the month, by separate contract with Dyke Water Company, possession of the facilities was taken by the City of Anaheim September 1, 19630 MIa Geisler stated that the separate contract with the Dyke Water Company authorIzed deposit in escrow $500,000.00 of the total purchase amount with the Ti~le Insurance & Trust Company for the payment of approxi- mately $240,000.00 pJmp tax, due September 3, 1963, to the Orange County Wa ter D s tl t. Wd3 the n on of both the Ci ty of Anaheim and the Dyke Wat~:r ',; tha"r\,::? d.Cq;~ 1 .Lon of the facl J i ties September l, 19633 f1 teen the clo58 of escrow) and in return the payment of the Dlstrlc~ ~ax prIor ~o penalty assessmentsg would be Dotf pa _C~j HoweveIj the payment of the pump tax was not made thE, Ie ;lTanC2 & s Company; and the tax became delinquent and approxImately $~290,00 pena ty was assessed. Mr. ueisler rther reporTed on a meeting held with representa- t:::ves ot th(:' ke \N ompany, and it was the mutual feeling that a 50% dlvls~on of the pend assessed would be a reasonable method of handling f~ll settlement for ~ecelvlng the fac lilies prior to the close of escrow. Or 1he_ [-on of the C Attorney, this matter was ordered jef lIed September 24, 1963, pend ng the receipt of formal claim by the e Water Company a WORK ORDER NO. 4bOO - CHANGE ORDER NO. 13: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Co~ncllman D1Jtton moved that Change Order No~ 13 in the amount of $879.00 ered t, al + Pui~cp Fac ] lIes building~ Work Order No. 4600, be approved nCll n J<re~n:)econded the motIon" MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1910~ Cc~nc<_ man readinq. ton offered Ordinance No. 1910 for first AN ORDINA.NCE OF THE TY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER l7.08, SECTION 7.ns.(Y?o UBSECfrOI\ (d); SECTION 17.08.080, SUBSECTION (a); AND SECTION ,08.220, UBSEC ON (f)OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, AND BY ADDING THERE 1'0 SEC ON 1 <,08,080" SUBSECTION (d)" RELATING TO ENCROACHMENT INTO AN EASEMENT. Al]ey;~ Utili Easements, Dedicated Areas - Improvements) ~_"'''~~'''~"~,_.,,,.,~,~.~.~~;.k....,~.,..~,-,..~. 7084 City HallQ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September l7Q 1963, 3:00 P.M. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1910 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motiona MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1911: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1911 for first readingG Refer to Ordinance Book. AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Riverview Annexation No.2 - R-A & C-1) Said Ordinance was read in full by the City Attorney. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: C OUNC I LMEN : Dutton, Chandler~ Schutte, Krein and Coons. None<J None. adopted. Mayor Coons declared urgency Ordinance No. 1911 duly passed and ORDINANCE NO. 1912: Councilman Kre n offered Ordinance No. 19l2 for first readingo Because of a possible conflict of interest, Mayor Coons withdrew from the discussion and action on this issue, and Mayor Pro Tem Chandler took the chair. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE l8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-121 - C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1912 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waivedo Councilman Dutton seconded the motiono MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Mayor Coons resumed chairmanship of the meeting. ORDINANCE NO. 1913: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance Noo 1913 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-86 - R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance NOG 1913 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motiono MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. RESOLUTION NOo 63R-755: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 63R-755 for adoptiono Refer ~o Resolution BookG A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLU- TION NO. 63R-558 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 62-63-120. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly pa$$ed and adopted the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNC I LMEN: C OUNC I LMEN : COUNC I LMEN: Dutton, Chandler9 Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None<J The Mayor declared ResolutIon No~ 63P-755 duly passed and adopted. ~C~"''"'''''~'"''''<iJ",".."..'.,^''ift\,,'.........~,...,.p.'',;,W~ 7085 City Hall~ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September l7. 1963, 3:00 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 19l4: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1914 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING~ (62-63-120 - R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1914 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motiono MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1915: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1915 for first reading~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE l8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-7 - C-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1915 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton ~econded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY; Amended claim filed by Ralph G. Pagter, Attorney for Mrso Ll~cille C" Hittle~ for injuries and damages received when her automo- b Ie cOllided wi~h a C_ty pol ce ~n~t and a third vehicle, on April 16, 1963~ was::Jc,bmJ.tied, SaId claIm was denIed and referred to the City Attorney and City ins~rance carrie~, on motion by ouncilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, MOI~ON CAFFIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVEHAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following applications for Alcoholic Beverage Licenses were submitted by the CIty Manager to the City Council for theIr ~nf0rma on and considera~ion: a" Appl cat on sjbm ~ ted oy and Wine License for the Applicat_on sUbmitTed by fl'ansfer 01 On-Sale Beer Aven~e (C-3 Zone)" FredericK Vincent Drane for New Off-Sale Beer peedee Mart~ 2437 West Ball Road (C-l Zone). Charles Oswaldo DiAgostino for Person to Person License for Family Hofbrau, 1652 West Lincoln b, t'JO -:t ':. '~.l. was aken on the above Alcoholic Beverage License application;:,,, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by William and Elsie Venctik for New Off~Sale Beer and Wine License for The Friendly Market, 81 South Phllaoelphla S~reet (R-3 Zone), was presented by the City Manager to ~he C t CouncIl for ~heir information. CC.-\[;Cll dlSC,_:53lon was held~ and the City Attorney advised that the market at 811 SOJtn Philadelphia Street is an existing non-conforming Jse, which may be expanded or changed to a use no greater than the one already 1 n t:X sten ce j f contained with In the original non-conforming bJlid nqJ No further aCTlon was ~aken on the above Alcoholic Beverage License app lcation. INVITATION: The CIty ClerK I'ead invitation from the Anaheim Junior Chamber of Commerce to the City CouncIl, requesting their presence at activities and ceremonIes connected with ~'Anaheim Salute to the Aero-Space Industry and The Unlled States Air Force", September 19, 1963. RECESS~ CouncIlman Chandler moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARPIED. (5:00 P.M.) ,.ooIIiJi;_,....,."..,';'~."'."~....""~,...~.,..,,,..._~ ~ 7086 City HallQ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September l7~ 1963G 3:00 P.M. AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order~ PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER~ Keith AG MurdochG CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James p. Maddox~ PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard AG Reese. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidto INVOCATION: Reverend Cooper of the West Anaheim Methodist Church gave the invocationJ FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag~ CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-10 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 456. AND PUBLIC HEARINGQ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 457: Mayor Coons announced that inasmuch as zoning applications referred to were in the same area, evidence on all would be considered at this time. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-.64-10: Ini tiated by the Ci ty Planning Commission to consider change of zone from R-A and R-l to R-3, property briefly described as Portion 1, being an rregular portion of land 490 feet by l200 feet, with frontage of approximate 490 feet on the east side of the Santa Ana Freeway, the northern boundary being adjacent to stub ends of Dickel, Clementine, Lemon and Zeyn Streets; Portion 2, being a triangular portion of land having a frontage of 295 feet, located on the south side of Midway Drive, and a fron~age of 445 feet on the east side of the Santa Ana Freeway (Midway Trailer Park) 0 The City Planning Commiss on pursuant to Resolution NOG 850, Series 1963-649 recommended said reclassification~ sUbject to the following condi- tions: 10 That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land twenty-eight \28) feet in width, from the centerline of the street, along Midway Drive extending from the Santa Ana Freeway to 290 feet9 more or less9 easterly, for street widening purposes. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the CiTY of Anaheim along Zeyn Street9 Lemon Street, Clementine Street9 Dickel Street9 and Midway Drive, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalksg street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work) shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. That a six (6) foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the westerly boundary of Portion q'BV! where said property abuts the Santa Ana Freeway rlght-of-waYG Payment of $2.00 per along Zeyn, Lemon, C where those port ens tlonso fhat the owner 0 3' 25.00 for the ~ec accordance with the 1963~ That CondItion Nos. ~9 2, J, 4 and S3 above mentioned, shall be complied wIth within a perlod at 180 days from date hereof9 or such further time as the C COLncil may grant. 2. 3Q 40 front foot~ or the installation of street lights ementine) and Dickel Streets and Midway Drive9 have no~ been paId under previous zoning applica- eet ~Ioper~i shall pay to the CIty of Anaheim 3s51ficatlon of those properties of Portion >>8" in resoluL on passed by the City Council on March 12, (- CONDITIONAL USE PEPMlr NO~ 456: InitIated by the City Planning Commission and flIed In conjunctIon with Peclass f CatIon No. 63-64-10 to consider the establishment of a tTa er parK on proper briefly described as an Irregular paree 01 and naving a frontage of 200 feet on the easterly sIde of the Santa Ana Freeway, and a frontage of 414 feet on the south side of M~dway DrIve) a frontage of 200 feet on the weSt side of Dickel Street (310 West MIdway Dr ve and L43Q, ~43, ~44/ and 1451 South Dickel Street). ""'"~:-_'W"'J<\f~;":";!-1 ";'-""'-":::'~;'_':::.c~ ~ ,;,;:,;"",-~,......,,,-~,,~:J,.~_; 7087 City Halla Anahelm<i California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 17. 1963, 3:00 P.M. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Pesolution NOQ 85lg Series 1963-649 granted Conditional Use Permit No. 456, subject to the following conditions: l~ That a six (6) foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the westerly boundary of subject property where it abuts the Santa Ana Freeway right-of-wayo 2. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 28 feet in width, from the centerline of the street, along Midway DrIve extending from the Santa Ana Freeway to 290 feet, more or less, easterly for street widening purposes. 30 That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Dickel Street and Midway Drive, s~ch as CJrbs and gutters9 sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facillties, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specificatIons on file in the office of the City Engineer. 4~ That Condition Nos. Ii 2 and 3 above mentioned shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereofj or such further time as the C CouncIl may grant. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO~ 457: Initiated by the City Planning Commission to consider the expansion of existing trailer park, located briefly as follows: Parcel 1 - Having a frontage of 114 feet on the south side of Midway Drive, and a frontage of 50 feet on the west side of Zeyn Street. Parcel 2 - HavIng a frontage of 50 feet on the west side of Zeyn Street, and a depth of L4 feet~ the northerly boundary of Parcel 2 being approximately 278 feet SO~th of Midway Orive~ Parcel 3 - Having a frontage of 50 feet on the east side of Lemon Street, and a depth of 114 feet, the northerly boundary of Parcel No. 3 being approximately 278 feet south of Midway Oriveo Parcel 4 - Having a frontage of 50 feet on the west side of Lemon Street9 and a depth of 114 feet, the northerly boundary of Parcel 4 being approxi- mately 78 feet south of Midway Driveo The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No~ 874, Series 1963-64, granted said conditional use permit~ subject to the follow- ing conditions~ 1. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Zeyn and Lemon Streets, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalkS9 street grading and paving, drainage facilities~ or other appurtenant work (except where said improvements exist) shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 2a That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2,00 per front foot for street lighting purposes along Zeyn and Lemon Streets9where those portions have not been paid under previous zoning applications~ 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim $75.00 for the processing of subject Conditional Use Permit in accordance with the ResolutIon passed by the City Counci19 March 12, 1963. 40 That Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 3 above mentioned shall be complied with within a poriod of one hundred and eighty (180) days from date hereof, or such f_:rther time as the Commission and/or the City Council may grant, 5. That the eXisting 5tr~ctures on Lot No. 21, Block 2 shall be removed~ and saId property be developed in accordance with Exhibit No. 1 within one hundred and eighty (180) days. 6. That planted treewells shall be provided at approximately forty (40) foot intervals in the Zeyn and Lemon Street parkways abutting subject property, that plans for said treewells and landscaping therein shall be submitted to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, end that said treewells shall be planted prior to final building inspection I ~"-~"'-";'-'~~':-i4ii:~~""'>>'~____i>~_"",;,,,,,,,,:~ I 7088 City Hall. Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 170 1963Q 3:00 P.M. 70 That any existing sewerage and water connections existing on Lot No.1, Block 2 and Lot NOa 2~ Block 3, shall be reduced to ground level and capped within one hundred and eighty (180) daysa 8. That the alley between Lemon and Clementine Streets be re-studied for proper drainage northerly to Midway Drivea 9. That the existing six (6) foot masonry wall on the southerly property line of Lot Noo 29 Block 3, shall be stepped down to forty-two (42) inches in the front yard setback to conform with existing Code require- ments within one hundred and eighty (180) dayso 10. That the existing six (6) foot masonry wall on the northerly property line of Lot Noo 21, Block 2, shall be stepped down to forty-two (42) inches in the front yard setback to conform with existing Code require- ments within one hundred eighty (180) days3 unless within said period of -cime~ the southerly fifty (50) feet of Lemon Street is requested for abandonmento ll~ That the alley between Lot No.6 and 21, Block 2, of Tract No. 419 be requested for abandonment by -che owner of said parcels. Mra Kreidt referred -Co two maps, one indicating the land use in the area, and the other indicating land use permits for trailer park pur- poses, either granted under County of Orange or City of Anaheim jurisdiction. With reference to map of area covered by Rpclassification No. 63-64-10, MrG Kreidt reported that ~he City Planning Commission recommended R-3 Zoning on Portion Noo 1 (north of Midway Drive), and in accordance with Finding NOG 3, recommended certain portions of Portion NOG 2 be reclassified R-3, subject to conditions; but that other lots within this area upon which single family residences exist, or ljpOn which trailer park use formerly or presently existed, where no land use permits were issued, be retained in the single family residential zoneo Mr. Kreidt briefly summarized the City Planning Commission hearings and called attention to an error in the legal description relative to Con- ditional Use Permit No. 456, as contained in City Planning Commission Resolution NOa 851~ Series 1963-64~ advising that the description described the entire parcel of property~ but fa led to add Lots 19 2, 3 and 4 of Block 59 Tract Noo 4l9~ MrG Kreidt called attention to City Planning Commission Resolution recommending to the Ci-cy Council that the City Attorneyis office be directed to investigate all uses made of certain properties in this area~ In summary: Area No. 1 - Recommended for reCIas; ricatIon to R-3 Zoning under Reclassi- f cat or No. 63-64-1 5 and that the area between the areas noted as Nc i, be ng Lots Ij 2, 3 and 4 ot Block 5, Tract No, 419, De excluded trom saLd reclassif cation and Conditional Use PermIt No. 456. Areas 2, 3, 4, 5, 69 and 8 - Recommended rezone to R-3, under Reclassifi- cation Noy 63-64-10. Area No. 9 - (ConditIonal Use PermIt No. 344) Recommended termination of Sd d condit onal 5e permlt as appl cant has no longer interest in sald property. Area Nos, 10 and 1 - Recommended terrninat~on of Conditional Use Permit No. 349 (Areas 10 and 11 WhIch have been sUbsequently included in applicat:on for Conditional Use Permit NOa 457. It was further :ecommended that...n the event Conditional Use Permit No. 457 (Areas 89 0 and ~l) be granted by the City Council, these properties be included in R-3 Reclassification No. 63-64-10. The Mayor aSked if anyone wIshed to address the City Council. Mr. Dale He~nlY~ Attorne~9 b~l West Eighth Street, Santa Ana, CalIfornia, representing Mr. Bostwick owner of Midway Trailer Park, advised that with the exception of ond~t anal Use Permit NOa 457, Mra Bostwick did not fIle the applicat~on for rec~assif~cat on; that the application for reclassi- ficatlon and Condl~ onal Use Perm t No. 456 were lnLiated by the City Planning "'.~'''~~''~-;'';'',''i:,. '.",., .h....~"',..~<..'_;,<.;i..-~ 7089 Cit Hall Anaheim California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Se tember 17 1963 3:00 P.M. Department, and their presence at this meeting was as an owner of property drastically affected; and their part in this proceedings was only for the purpose of furnishing information to the City Counci1~ He further advised that Mr. Bostwick had applied for and received all necessary permits from the County of Orange and State of California to operate a trailer park within the "orangeU and ubrown" area south of Midway Drive, as shown on the exhibit map, and that records of the County of Orange will verify this factG Mr. Heinlv advised that his client has what is termed as a pre- existing, non-conforming use~ and that by action of the City Planning Commission~ conditions are trying to be imposed which could not be imposed on a pre-existing Jse, specifically: the dedication for and improvement of Midway Drive, and the block wall along the freewayo Mr. Heinly further advised that the Midway Trailer Park has been operating for some tIme, and that it was true that property has been pur- chased at various times for the purpose of expansion, and at the present time, his client owns approximately 97~ of the property in the area. In his oPinion, all ~he area southerly of Midway Drive should be zoned R-3, as all of the area along Clementine and Lemon Streets is destined for trailer park use, and it wo~ld be impossible to get individuals to invest in the development of these properties for other purposes. He specifically referred to Area No. 5~ which is nicely land- scaped and presently used for trailer park purposes3 and further advised that he understood that there have been complaints concerning the use of overnight campers on Areas 6 and 11; that according to his review and inspection of the operation, In his opinion, the operation has been con- sistent with the State laws and City ordinances, and in accordance with good zoning practice0 My Heinly stated that they had no objections to the abandonment of Conditional Use Permi~ Nose 344 and 349~ on condition that Conditional Use Permit Noo 457 is approved; as it was their desire to expand the trailer park to Midway Drive, which would be consistent with good planning. Concerning the contention that expansion and development has been made without obtaining necessary permits from the City of Anaheim, Mra Heinly advised that he doubted if it could be found that such development and expansion was done without the knowledge and consent of the Building Department of the City of Anaheim. Regarding the existing six foot wall~ he stated that it was true the six foot walls extend to the property line, which is inconsistent with and in violation of the regulations of the City of Anaheim, and although the walls were inspected, Mr. Bostwick will be advised to reduce the height of the walls ln the setback area~ Regarding the requirement of the block wall along the freeway~ in his opinion this wall was not needed as there is a chain link fence presently existing along this areaa Mr. Heinly recognized that a clerical error on the part of a City employee was not binding upon the City; however also recognized that when an applicant ob~ained a permi~ for various improvements, the applicant has operated In fa~ Concerninq the ss~e ~onLgnt, Mra HeInly stated that the issue was the determination of the hIghest and besT use of the property, and in his oplnion~ e faIled LO see how t could be determined that a trailer park use was :-"yt the!L e,::>T and best use for the property. The i\1<3 or a ed f anyone e1 se We ;hed to offer any evidence~ ooerr Angeles, C3 ~ orn a, briefly revLewed the that the perm ; s; lack of propel zonln people IlV n~ ~n the Slarlett~ Attorney, 611 Wilshire Boulevard, Los repre ;en t nc) some of the home owners in the area 3 pa3l SLO of the tra ler park expansion~ and felt ~he tj of AnaheIm were invalid, because of and ques r ._oned whether or not the rights of the '=1 ea r1dd been ~(m5IderedJ ~;;"',*,i~",,~.~__~.. ~*'~d""~-~"'>e""'_"_i>!f""=Y,..a v- 7090 City HallQ Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 17. 1963. 3:00 P.M. Regarding statements made concerning "good faith", Mr. Starrett questioned Mr. Bostwick was acting in good faith when he moved trailers on to a lot for which he had no right, and which was an actual trespass; or installed the plumbing facilities in the area noted as number 11, before any right was obtained; or tore up an alley making its use difficult for the adjacent neighbors; tore up sidewalks, built walls that do not conform to City requirements without wondering about the rights of other people in the area or the legality of the actions& He further advised that in Area 8, a trailer park is actually operated without benefit of any permitQ He wondered if these things have been done without worrying about the consequences, as the consequences seem to be that once they are done, a permit could be obtained to legalize thema This seems to be what is recommended by the Planning Commission and requested by the applicant. In his opinion, this was entirely improper~ and the people had suffered as result, many having moved out because this had been going on for a long time. He felt under the circumstances it would not be difficult to convince people to sell and move out when trailers are established on the adjacent property, moving in and out all hours of the night, creating disturbances. Mr. Starrett called attention to the request to use Area 11, located between two existing residences, and to continue to use Area 8 next door to another private residence. Mr. Starrett stated that trailers should certainly not be allowed in Areas 8, 10 or 11, and that the Council should not be influenced by the fact that these areas have been occupied by trailers9 when in his opinion these trailer parks have been established illegally; that now is the time to consider whether or not these areas used for trailers violate the rights of other people living in the area. He briefly reported the method used by Mr. Bostwick as related to him in an effort to force sale of those lots adjacent to Area llG Mro Starrett stated in his opinion, rezoning and conditional use permits should not be granted in any areas where Mr. Bostwick has not originally obtained proper conditional use permits and conformed to the laws at the beginning~ when the trailer park was established. Councilman Chandler advised Mr. Starrett that much of the property in the City of Anaheim so~th of Vermont Avenue has only been within the city limits of Anaheim approximately ten years, and according to our ordinance, those uses that existed prior to annexation to the City of Anaheim are legal uses. Mra Starrett advised that he was objecting to those areas for which Mr. BostWlck d d not obta n permIts from the County or the City of Anahelm~ and spec ficall A.rea No.8.. n answer to Co~ncil q~est oning, Mr~ Kreidt reported that permits have been ob~ained from the CiTY of Anaheim on Areas 5, 6 and 7G Mr. Starrett was ofLhe opinion that permits granted by the City of Anaheim were not proper, as they were granted in areas not properly zoned for trailer park iJse~ Mayor Coons adVlsed tnar it would requIre research to determine whether or not at the date permits were granted a trailer park was an allowable use in an P-l Zone. Mr~ Geisler was of the opInIon that those permits granted by the City CouncIl should be cc~s dered valid permits as far as the City was concerneda The Mayor aSked if anyone else wished to address the Council. -'C'<i<!~",C'"',,,,,,,,~,",,,,,",,,:t..,,.., """"'":ii~:,:;:...,:.;"~,-_'_'~ ~,~-"-,, 7091 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 17. 1963. 3:00 P.M. Mrs. Adams, owner of property at the Corner of Midway Drive and Lemon Street, addressed the Council in opposition, advising that her bed- rooms were located on the south side of her home, and the placement of vacation trailers on the adjacent lot would be a disturbing nuisance. Mrs~ Adams reported that she has lived in this residence for thirty years, and requested the area remain residential so that they could live in peace and not be crowded out by the placement of trailers between houses~ and thereupon named others who in her opinion were forced to sell by this method of placing trailers adjacent to their homes. Mrs. ColeY9 owner of property located atM54 South Lemon Street, adjacent to Area 8 (Lot 22) addressed the Council in opposition, objecting to the existing six foot fence located four feet, seven inches from her home, and requested this situation be remedieda Mrs. HastIngs, 1447 South Lemon Street, (Lot 3) south of Area ll, addressed the Council in opposition, calling attention to the traffic hazard on Lemon Street to the school children in the area going to and from schoolt The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held and it was the general feeling that the areas most specifically in question were Areas 89 9, 10 and 11, and that additional time was needed to further study the issue; thereupon, Councilman Schutte moved that decision on Reclassification No. 63-64-10 and Conditional Use Permits Nos. 456 and 457 be deferred two weeks (October 1, 1963, 3:00 09C10ck P.M.). COJnci1man Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 439: Submitted by John H. Kinney, Jr., requesting permission to establish an employeeVs parking lot on R-I property, located on the west side of Zeyn Street approximately 78 feet south of Midway Drive (1443 South Zeyn Street). The City Planning Commission granted said Conditional Use Permit subject to conditions, and upon appeal filed by the applicant concerning certain conditions imposed by the City Planning Commission, public hearing was held before the City Council August 27, 1963~ and action by the City Council deferred to thl~ date. RESOLUTION NO~ 63R-156~ CouncIl reVIew was held concerning the issues considered at the publIc hearIng, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Schutte offered Resol ion No. ~756 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 439, ect to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission~ ::imendi ondCLon No, 4 thereof, to read, "That subject property shall be improved ror off-STreet parking in accordance with all Code requirement5~ prov~dedthat a ; x ( ) foot masonry wall be constructed along the so' th bo~ndarLes of ect propertY"3 and eliminating Condition No. 5 ttlereo~) Pe er to eso~ ~on Book. A FESOLUTION Of THE C COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 439. On roll CdJ] the foregoIng resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following VOle: A\' F~~~ : OUNC LMEN: COUNC I LMEN: C:OUNC LMEN: DutTon, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. NOES: ABS EN r: The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63P-756 duly passed and adopted. ~"""~"""""'."'~"'>'__''''''''''''''''O,~, 7092 City Halla Anaheim~ California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - September l7a 1963a 3:00 PiMa PUBLIC HEARING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 461: Submitted by Marjorie L4 Hamm, requesting permission to establish a boarding house for the aged on R-A propertY9 located on the west side of Magnolia Avenue, approximately 212 feet south of Westhaven Drive (645 South Magnolia Avenue). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 864, Series 1963-643 denied said conditional use permita Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered by the City Council and public hearing scheduledG Communication from Mrsa Marjorie LG Hamm3 received at open meeting this date3 was submitted and read, advising that the conditional use permit was no longer desired~ On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein9 request to withdraw application for Conditional Use Permit No~ 461 was granted withouT prejudice~ and all proceedings of said permit were terminated~ MOTION CARRIED. RECESS~ Councilman Chandler moved for a fifteen minute recess~ Councilman Dutton seconded the motionG MOTION CARRIED~ (8:45 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order" all members of the City Council being present" PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 62-63-112 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 422: Submitted by Robert Ro Dowling, et al~ requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3 and permission to constrLct a two-story multiple family planned resi- dential development with carports) and walver of one~story height limitation, on property briefly descrlDed as a port on of that triangular parcel of property located at the northea3t ~orner of Orangethorpe and Dowling Avenues extending northerly to P13cent a-Yorba BOL~evardo The Clty Plannlng Comm~_;s on pc'-:Ys'..ant to Resolution No" 8839 Series 1963-64~ recommended sald ree assiflcaTion be denied~ and pursuant to ResolutIon Noo 884) SerIes 1963-b4~ den:ed Conditional Use Permit No~ 4224 The CI ClerK ;~bmittej and read The following correspondence: d C"_ 01 Fldcent'i.::J P2S0J Llor, No) 1209 dated August 139 1963, !~rg ng den a of presen~ and future requests for rezoning of d:lY of tne~nd'Jstri a proper ties tor res denti al use in the AnaheIm No the3S~ ind~3~rial zone to Letter approving apPlications) subrr;itted by Mrs. Margaret AG Payne) 5402 OrangeThorpe Avenue Mrg Kreidt) by means of SectLona~ District Maps, noted the location of the property, the zoning and ses In the immediate areao In summarizing the hearing held before iDe Ci PLanning Commiss on, he referred to findings as set forth In Ci~! PianniY)9 Ccmmi3sion resolv~ions) reaffirming position taken by the Commission Ie a~ive to RecommendatIon NOa 8 of the Industrial .4reas Analysiso Mr. Kreidt further advised that ne had been requested to clarify the lette~ submitted by the AnaheIm Chamber of Commerce and thQ Anaheim Board of Realtors~ which may have been misconstrued as direct opposition to subject applIcaTIons, and further advised that the letters referred to had reference only to the Ie-ana ys~s of the Indus~rial Areaa A resume of stacements made by each Commissioner, as set forth in CIty PlannIng COmmIssIon mlnDtesj after the close of the hearing and prior to ommlSSlon action) was reado The Mayor asked If the appl cant or his agent wished to address the CouncIl., ~.",:,:;..iii;iii;"!.;ii'ii4""";;!:!_'~~'""'~'~,j",~_'_-'_' ~ 7093 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 17. 1963. 3:00 PaM. Mr~ Robert Dowling, applicant, 15622 Placentia-Yorba Boulevard, stated that the Council was fully aware of the location of the property, what the property is bounded by, and if it is properly segregated from the M-1 land to expand R-3 zoning, and thereupon requested the R-3 Zoning be approved~ Mr. E. AG Ralston~ President of Heritage Construction Company, addressed the Council advising that after denial by the City Plannin9 Commission9 he contacted the Manager of Coldwell-Banker and Company, Mattocks and McFarland Realtors~ and Mr~ Norman Fry of the Kilroy Company, to see if he had misjudged the use of the land. All three contacted advised that they would not list for industrial purposes, and all agreed to a precise planned 39000 PD planning development, and stated that they would sell or purchase his option for that useG As a brief resume of the history of the companyis background, Mrt Ralston reported that they were builders and designers of apartments, and designed for approximately seventy developers; that recently they purchased approximately 1300 acres from the Union Oil Company in the Brea area, which is proposed to be developed within the next five years. In explaining the proposed develoDment~ Mr. Ralston advised that the plan submitted this evening was a revision of the plot plan submitted to the City Planning Commission~ and incorporated suggestions made by the Planning Department and Attorney concerning interior streets. As the plan was reviewed by the City Council, Mr~ Ralston explained that the approximate thirty acres would have ninety-two buildings of four units each, or 368 units plus the recreational building9 with a common area, and are to be sold as individual units; that bedrooms are located on the second flooT9 and twenty-five per cent are to be two-bedroom units, twenty- five per cent to be four-bedroom units, and fifty per cent to be three- bedroom units" The maintenance of the common area and exteriors of the buildings will be through a trustee~ the Union Bank~ which cost to the individual owner will be approximately $26~12 a monthQ Mr~ Ralston noted that the project was built from one recreational mall, in small mall fingers9 each mall containing seven or less buildings of different elevations~ Each building is to be soundproofed, and is expected to be sold under F.H.A" terms or conventional terms to people with annual incomes not exceeding $7,OOO.00~ Mr., RalsTo:l f~rther reported that according to a survey made by Sanford GoodKln concerning the needs of Orange County, housing is needed for people of Income of jOOO,OO per year or less, which represents 58 per cent of the people in Orange County. He f0rther advised that the entire perimeter of the development will have a decorative block wal19 and that sufficient access has been pro- vided for fire trucks, delivery trucks, and guest parking. Mr., Ralston stated that the plan and elevations are the same as presented to the City PlannIng Commission; that the revision submitted this evening is to the plot plan3 and thereupon agreed that these plans become the precise plan of development, and further agreed to meet all City requirements) In answer Co~ncll quest oning concerning the ownership of the easterly portIon of tne triangular parcel, Mr. Dowling named the several indIvidual owners of properties to the east~ comprising approximately fifteen acres. The Mayor asked if anyone else wIshed to address the CouncilG -..........,,"Z'~..,,~;,..,."~ 7094 City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 17a 1963Q 3:00 P.M. Mra Lou Herbst9 1036 Liberty Lane, Anaheim, industrialist in the area, addressed the Council that they have endeavored to attract industries to this prime industrial area, and that subject property is located on the edge of the Anaheim industrial zone, but if the City of Placentia industrial zone was considered, it would be termed 3S in the industrial zoneG He further advised that this zone has been set up as a long-range program, and millions of dollars have been spent in the area~ In his opinion, this long-range program must be consideredG Mr. Herbst felt that any high density movement in this area would downgrade the industrial area~ and create additional traffic problems. He stated that Anaheim will not grow from apartments, and will grow from industry~ He further advised that should this reclassification be granted, many more requests will be submitted for the fringe area of the industrial zone9 as property value has been raised because of the presently developed industrieso Mr. Herbst felt that the industry should be provided protection, and that in the future other fine industries will be developed in this area. Mr. Ralston advised that they were the developers of the Milbrae- Burlingame industrial area and the Mills Estates, and the success of these developments was due to the fact that housing had been provided for the indU!;tries 0 He further reported that Budd Manufacturing Company, Mr. T. J. Ault, is presently seeking 168 acres in the Fullerton-Anaheim area; that he drove Mr. Ault through the area and the question was9 where the people receiving the salary they pay would live3 The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to offer any evidence con- cerning this issue, there being no response, declared the hearing closedQ Councilman Dutton referred to facts contained in report dated August 199 1963, of the Re-Analysis of the Northeast Industrial Area, and read excerpts from said report, which re-analysis resulted in favorable consideration of multiple family development on subject property. He noted that action of the City Planning Commission was continued for four weeks for the submission of a plot plan, after which the proposed develop- ment was recommended for denial by the City Planning CommissionG Reference was made to City of Placentia Resolution No. l20, and Councilman Dutton was of the opinion that the findings contained therein were not necessarily against the proposed development9 but in fact supported the proposed development, as it recognized the major, primary and secondary highways which indicated tremendous traffic in the areao Councilman Dutton stated that he was a staunch supporter of the industrial area9 but questioned how long the owners of the property in this area would be asked to hold their land for industrial developmentG He noted that the property across Dowling Street on the west side has been zoned for commercial use, and also noted the trailer park development west of the proposed commercial property; also, that subject property was bounded by a major9 primary and secondary highway~ and south and across Orangethorpe Avenue~ approximately 100 feet, the existing flood control channelG All these factors, in his opinion, isolated the subject property from the industrial areaa Councilman Dutton further advised that residential zoning granted to other parcels in the ndustrial area, which are isolated and not encroach- Ing Into the indus~rial area9 wOl.ld oe no basis ~o grant other residential zoning. In conclusIon, CouncIlman DJTton stated the subject property was an Isolated area and did not encroach particuJarly in the industrial area, because of the fOllowIng physical barriers: ~"~~;;f2":K"jJ'iii<t:--_____;"b6&~;,:...'" 7095 Citv Hall" Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 17. 1963. 3:00 P.M. ao Placentia-Yorba Boulevard~ plus a railroad track, to the North~ b. Dowling Street, a secondary highway, to the West and on the west side of Dowling Street~ the projected commercial useo cG Orangethorpe Avenue to the South~ plus a flood control channel approxi- mately 100 feet south of Orangethorpe AvenueQ Because of these factors~ the granting of residential zoning to subject property would not be a basis to extend residential zoning in the industrial area, and thereupon Councilman Dutton offered resolutions authorizing the preparation of necessary Ordinance changing the zone as requested, and granting Conditional Use Permit No. 422, subject to conditions, the conditions to be determined and outlined before Council votea Mr. MurdoCh was asked to comment on the issue, and advised that in his opinion, it was important that the maintenance of the integrity of a subs~antial industrial area be continued; that Councilman Dutton has pointed out the isolated position of this particular piece of property~ and the space bands around this particular piece of property, and perhaps the balance of the triangle; that ~he removal of this particular triangle from the proposed industrial zone would not adversely affect the integrity of the industrial zone~ Mr. Murdoch recommended that the resolutions proposed be quite specific on th s, so that assurance can be given industrial prospects and currently located industrialists that the City is not changing its direction or the community attitude approach on industryo Mayor Coons reviewed the physical separation of subject property from the industrial area, and noted further that there presently exists a strip of land approximately 100 feet by 1300 feet between Orangethorpe Avenue and the flood control channel. In his opinion, that property would be used for other than industry because of its size and shape; and that this in itself would break the integrity of the area. Mr. Coons agreed with Mr. Murdoch that any action taken by the City Council should be well defined. Mr. Geisler advised that their office would require assurance that adequate financial provision has been made for the maintenance of the common area to insure the permanent and con~inued maintenance of these areas. Mra Murdoch reported that the Planning Staff have been working for some time with developers preparing a set of minimum standards for planned unit developments for consideration by the City Planning Commission and the City Council~ and inasmuch as the plans for the conditional use permit have not been considered in detail by the City Planning Commission, wondered if they sh.ould not be sent back to the Commission for report and recommendationso Councilmen Chandler and Dutton noted that no detailed recommen- dations have been prepared by the Interdepartmental Committee in the event the applications were granted. Mra Kreidt reported that at the meeting it was indicated that it would be separate sales and separate ownerships, and further advised that they attempted to interpret the plans, and on close analysis it was impos- sible to determine the proposed development. He further reported that the Interdepartmental Committee recommended the recordation of a tract map. Mayor Coons suggested that the plans be referred back to the City Planning Commission and Planning Staff for an Interdepartmental report, as the plans submitted this evening differ from plans originally consideredQ Councilman Chandler stated that the applicant has the feeling of the Council, and suggested the matter be continued for complete plans and to allow the applicant to contact the appropriate departments to determine necessary requirements. '"""~;..~~",,,,"~.j">je'=~.; 7096 City Hall. Anaheima California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 17a 1963Q 3:00 P.M. At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Dutton withdrew former resolutions offered and moved that the City AttorneyVs office be directed to prepare resolution concerning reclassification, setting forth certain findings outlining points of isolation as noted; requirements of dedication as delineated on the Master Plan of Streets, and other conditions normal to reclassificationG Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. Councilman Chandler asked for a roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: C OUNC I LMEN : COUNCILMEN: Dutton9 Chandler~ Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. NoneG Mayor Coons declared the above motion carried. To clarify the record, the applicant was advised that the above action indicated the Councilvs intent~ and that reclassification of the property has not yet been accomplished. Councilman Chandler moved that Council action on Reclassification No. 62-63-l12 and Conditional Use Permit No. 422 be deferred to the next meeting (September 24, 1963, 3:00 P.M.) Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-125 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 433: Submitted by Morten Ma and Maude Ao Dizney~ requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3 and permission to establish a single story multiple family planned residential development with carports, on property located on the south side of Ball Road approximately 406 feet west of Dale StreetG The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 871, Series 1963-64, recommended Reclassification No. 62-63-125 for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land fifty-three (53) feet in width from the centerline of the street, along Ball Road~ for street widening purposes. 2. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ball Road, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks9 street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2000 per front foot, along Ball Road, for street lighting p'urposes. 4. That the complet on 01 che.;e recias;:..f cation proceedings shall be ~;llbject to the grant ng of Conditlonal Use Permit No. 433. 5. fhat: Condition Nos, ~ 2 and 3, above men-c oned~ shall be complied with within a period ot l80 days from date nereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 6. That the proposed street shall be developed to the City of Anaheim standards, including plan checking and inspection, that metered street lights shall be installed on said street, and that the street shall be posted at the 8all Road enTrance by the developer, with a sign indicating that the propos ed stT eet i::.; "Not a Thro:~gh Street~' and is a "Pri vate Street". 7. That subject property shall oe developed substantially in accordance with plans and specIfications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked evision No.1, Exhibit No. I, as amended herein. 8. That a minimum ten (10) foot buildIng 3etback from the proposed street be incorporated nto sUDjecT development. 9. That all pedestr~an passageways between buildings be a minimum of ten (10) feet in width. ,~.;;.,',~~~;:;'.r..F"'~. i,;'.::i'~,,_:.,r,:::i,C=~'- 7097 City HallQ Anaheima California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 17. 1963, 3:00 P.M. 10. That the proposed driveways into the carport areas shall be reduced to twenty (20) feet in width, and that landscaping shall be installed on either side of said driveways to shield~ as much as possible, the carport complexes from view, 11. That the distance between the proposed recreational and laundry building, adjacent to carports, be increased ten (10) feet, or that the two buildings be joined togethero The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 872, Series 1963-64, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 433, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25~OO per dwelling unit to be used for park and recreation pur- poses9 said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issueda 2G That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection~ 38 That f re hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Ch ef of the Fire Department, to be installed prior to final building inspectiona 40 That Conditional Use Permit No. 433 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 62-63-125. 5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Revision Noo ~9 Exhibit No.1, as amended herein. 6. That a minimum ten (10) foot building setback from the proposed street be incorporated into subject development. 7. That all pedestrian passageways between buildings be a minimum of ten (10) feet in width. 80 That the proposed driveways into the carport areas shall be reduced to twenty (20) feet in width, and that landscaping be installed on either side of said driveways to shield as much as possible, the carport complexes from viewo 9. That the distance between the proposed recreational and laundry build- ing9 adjacent to carports~ be increased ten (10) feet, or that the two buildings be Joined together. 10. That the interior walls of the proposed carports shall be finished with exterior building materials, that enclosed storage cabinets shall be installed along the rear wall of each carport9 and that suitable bumper guards shall be installed to protect the interior walls of the proposed carports~ all of which shall be done prior to final building inspection" ll~ That planted treewel1s shall be provided at approximately forty (40) foot intervals in the Ball Road and the proposed street parkways abutting subject property, that plans for said treewells and landscaping therein, shall be submitted to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance3 and that said treewells shall be planted prior to final bUilding inspection. 12. That a six (6) foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east, south and west bo~ndaries~ a ndlcated on Revision No.1, Exhibit No. Ij pr~or f dl d _n~pectlon. Mr. Martl Kle~d~ noted the location of subject property and the eXIstIng .se and Z the immedIate area, briefing the evidence submitted ~o and considered by the C Plann ng Commission. P~an3 and the f_ es were reviewed by ~he City Councilo The Mayor a~Ked _f the appllcants or their agent was present and wIshed to addre 5 tne CLtf C00nCl~. j~J1r" Ray Mercado> 130J( EuclId Street9 Garden Grove, agent, was present and reqLested that the \_-' ty Council concur wi th recommendations of the C ty Planning Comm:ssLon. The Mayor a3ked ~f anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being nc response, declared the hearing closed on Reclassification No. 62-63--125 and Cond iu (jna 1 Use Perrrlll No. 433. ~....+'~_..._,..,.~-.".~.......~C~"'~_"...,..",..'-"_______~., 7098 City Hall. AnaheimQ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 17. 1963. 3:00 P.Ma RESOLUTION NO. 63R-757: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-757 for adoption~ authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commissiono Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED~ (62-63-125 - R-3) ~ On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: C OUNC I LMEN : C OUNC I LMEN : C OUNC I LMEN : Dutton~ Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coonsa Noneo None~ The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R~757 duly passed and adopteda RESOLUTION NO,. 63R~'758: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 63R-758 for adoptionG Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO,. 433. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: C OUNC I LMEN : COUNCI LMEN: C OUNC I LMEN : Dutton, Chandler, Schutte9 Krein and Coonso None. Nones The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-758 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICIATION NOo 62-63-126: Submitted by Walker and Lee, Inc., et aI, requesting a change of zone from R-A to C-l, on an "L" shaped parcel of land with frontages on Lincoln and Magnolia Avenues. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 873, Series 1963-64~ recommended Reclassification No~ 62-63'-126 for approval, subject to the following conditions: 10 That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Lincoln and Magnolia Avenues, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer~ and that a bond in an amount and fOIm satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirementso 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot, along Lincoln and Magnolia Avenues, for street lighting purposesG 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspectionG 4. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Revision No.1, Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. -"'iF~"'"-:;::,'4':;;;;;;-;;;;;:~';:.q;:".;~,'",....._,,,,,_.,_"_...-,",.;,,,,,~,+,_".+,"",_",,~~~ C~""'_~''''.'.1;''''''''''''';_7~<.. ""~"",'..,"~,.,.....,,,.,;;,,.,,;.". 7099 City Hall. Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 17, 1963, 3:00 P.M. 6. That planted treewells shall be provided at approximately 40 foot intervals in the Magnolia and Lincoln Avenue frontages abutting subject property~ that plans for said treewells and landscaping therein shall be submitted to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Mainten- ance, and that said treewells shall be planted prior to final building inspectiona 7. That a 6-foot strip of land shall be landscaped and said landscaping maintained, as indicated on Revision No.3, Exhibit No. l, on file with the City, that plans for said landscaping shall be submitted to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and that said landscaping shall be installed prior to final building inspection. 8. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be contained within the building or properly shielded from viewa 9. That a 5-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the easterly property line and at the request of the petitioner and abutting property owner a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the southerly property line prior to final building inspection. Mr. Kreidt noted th~ location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, briefing the evidence submitted to and considered by the CIty Planning Commission, and reporting that revised plans were approved by the Commission. SaId revised plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council. Mayor Coons asked if the applicant was present and wished to address the Counclla A representative of Walker and Lee, Inc., indicated his presence in the audience and stated he had nothing further to add. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council for or against the proposed reclassification, there being no response, declared the hearing closed~ RESOLUTION NO. 63R-759: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 63R-759 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Pefer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (62-63-126 - C-I) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNC I LMEN: C OUNC I LMEN : Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 63R-759 duly passed and adopted. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Schutte moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNM:40 P.M., . . SIGNED: ft. ~_~ Ci ty Clerk .'f i",,~_.~~iII.W',iC,'"