Loading...
1968/10/22 r r n l~1 PRESENT: ABSENT: PUSENT: SIGNED 68-614 Ci to adjourn. Councilman Clark seconded the Hall - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 8 1:30 P.K. T TION OF PRINTING SE mendation of the State Board of Eq that the printing! ington, not be su~ a commodity. Cou~ CE -.STATE BOARD OF E UALIZATION: On report and recom- y Attorney, Councilman Krein moved that a letter to the ization be authorized expressing .support of the position nducted by the Book Publishing Company, Seattle, Wash- ct to sales tax, on the basis that it is a service, not lman Clark seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. BEfORE THE PUBLIC UTILI ties Commission, General Telephone office. S COMH[SSION: Notice of hearing before the Public Uti1i- ge Industries, Inc., VB. Pacific Telephone Company and mpany, was received and referred to the City Attorney's ADJOURNMENT: motion. ADJOURNED: SIClNED Cit Hall Anaheim Cal ADJOURNED: 1:30 - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 15 1968 1:30 P.M. COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: DEPUTY CITY ne tton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley Alana M. Farrens The regul was called to ord~ a quorum to the ne meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim by the Deputy City Clerk, and adjourned for lack of regular meeting, October 22, 1968, 1:30 P.M. (../.-',\ J ,-' wv~;-rt-4'/ Y City Clerk . <.~,-"-,,, . ",t"(' 68-615 Cit eim California - C IL MINUTES ~ October 22 1968 1:30 P.M. in the Pledge of Allegiance to The City Council of e City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESEJIT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: None ASSISTANT CITY MANA CITY ATTORNEY: Jos CITY ENGINEER: J CITY CLEn: Dene M.: I ZONING SUPERVISOR: rein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley Robert M. Davis Geisler P. Maddox illiams na1d Thompson Mayor Pebley called e meeting to order. INVOCATIOI: Reverend cation. m, of Bethel Baptist Church, gave the Invo- FLAG SALU'l'E: Councilman the Flag. PROCLAMATJONS: The oclamations were issued by Mayor Pebley: "Key Club - Kiwanis 27th through November 2nd, 1968. "Navy .NUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim ct rected), and meetings held Oc~ Councilman Clark, seconded by 1 Council Meeting held October 1, 1968, <as cor- er 8 and 15, 1968, were approved on motion by uncilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Dutton rs voting approval of the October est~d the record to show that he abstained from , 1968 meeting as he was absent that date. WAIVER OF READ NG - ORDINANCES AND i reading in full of all ordinan of reading is hereby given by specific request is made by a resolution. Councilman Dutton SOLUTIONS: Councilman Krein moved to waive the s and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver 1 Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, uncilman for the reading of such ordinance or econded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST of $188,210.72, for the period the period ending October 22, approved. CITY: Demands against the City in the amount ndingOctober 15, 1968, and $1,328,108.96, for 68, in accordance with the 1968-69 Budget, were NTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASS mitted by Carl H. Lindgren, et and waivers of maximum bui1din location of accessory building standard street, to establish described as located on the we containing approximately 3.6 a CATION NO. 68-69-16 AND VARIANCE NO. 2002: Sub- 1, requesting change of zone from R-A ~o R-3, height, minimum distance between buildings, ~ and maximum distance of living units from a .llOl-unit, two-story apartment complex; property ~ side of Nutwood Street, south of Ball Road, 1es. ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-246, n be approved, subject to conditions, and granted o conditions. The City Planning Co recommended said reclassificat said variance in part, subject Public Hearing was h time revised plans were submit of single-family properties on story construction; and was co ject to one-story, garden-type \d at the meeting of September 17, 1968, at which !~' proposing 99 units, all units within 150 feet he east side of Nutwood Street, to be single- inued to this date to allow redesign of the pro- partments. The City Clerk submi received this date, requesting opposing subject reclassificat James Pierce, and Mr. and Mrs. aId Thompson, briefly described the location of ng uses and zoning in the immediate area, and o and considered by the City Planning Commis- ed into evidence :two items of correspondence emova1 of the signers' names from the petition n; said correspondence signed by Mr. and Mrs. .W. Hornback. Zoning Supervisor, R the subject property, the exis briefed the evidence submitted sion. o n n r r ,..., ~ ~ i, 68-616 Cit Hall - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 22 1:30 P.M. The if the applicant wished to address the City Coun- cil. Mr. Wilt applicants, state~ to reflect Councii that would be eco~ submitted for Cou* already exceeded * m S. Phelps, 914 East Ratel1a Avenue, representing the hat he had spent five weeks attempting to redesign plans uggestions, but was unable to produce such a revision ically feasible. He pointed out that the revised plans 1 consideration, at the meeting of September 17, 1968, 'ode Standards. Council ject reclassifica for the express p$ which Mr. Phelps t it was an impossi~ Schutte noted that the Council was prepared to deny sub- n at that meeting, however, public hearing was continued ose of allowing time for further revision of plans; to lied that every effort had been made to do so, but felt task. files were reviewed by the City Council, and Mr. Thompson .lopment conforms basically to the intent of the recommendations. The Cit~ garden-type apart~ Phelps stated that sible with one-stq could be defined . Development, even ouncil questioned Mr. Phelps' contention that a one-story t development would be economically unfeasible, and Mr. and values dictate higher development than would be pos- construction. He felt that the developme~.', as proposed, a ga~den-apartment complex; that if considered as a Planned eater coverage could be allowed than is presently proposed. Council. reclassification f seven or eight of perty, and the mai street parking pro if the project con tutions were not w Clark ,.;t1led attention to the strong opposition to the m reside~lts in the area, and Mr. Phelps stated that only ose objecting lived within 300 feet of the subject pro- objection of those opposed seemed to center around off- sions. He noted that only 57 units could be developed rms with City Council recommendations, and lending insti- ling to finance such a development. Mayor City Council. ey asked if anyone in opposition wished to address the Mr. Rob~ tion signed by 502 those in the audie indicated. Eckes, 1867 Castle Avenue, called attention to the peti- ersons opposing the subject reclassification, and asked e in opposition to stand. Approximately 60 persons so ! i t Dutton asked how many of those opposing the reclassifi- 300 feet of the subject property; 8 persons remained I Council cation lived withi standing. Mr. Ecke who reside farther parking problems W spaces were provid perty is better su stated that the proposed reclassification affects those han 300 feet from the subject property, because of the ch he felt would result if only 1-1/2 off-street parking ~ as proposed. He further stated that he felt the pro- ed for R-l development. Mrs. Rob sub. ct property S for property on th that over 300 chi! way to school; and ties would better t Eckes, 1867 Castle Avenue, stated that she felt the uld be zoned in a manner which would also be appr~!ciate opposite side of Nutwood Street, owned by Mr. Eic~".lolt; en have been noted to pass the Eickholt property on the hat she felt R-l zoning on both of the Nutwood proper- intain the residential character of the neighborhood. Mr. Jack lived more than 30 density would affe would develop. He impact on the surr of the subjec: prQ increased tra~iic innick, 1907 Chanticleer Road, stated that although he feet from the subject property, he felt that the increased a larger area b ~e of the traffic congestion which elt that consideration should be given to the economic nding property owners, as well as owners and developers rty, as property valuescu~J '~ecline, as a result of d crowding of the schools. 68-617 Cit Hall Anaheim California- Mrs. Renee Madnick at home when the petition op and would have signed it, a~ terested in the safety of c~ velopment is not suited to t is only 40 feet, and many c~ Mr. Joe Edwards, 1 about the fact that the dev~ quested by the City Council. sented at the September 17, since that time. Mayor Pebley note~ ing, and felt that the preS$ Council's deliberations. Mayor Pebley aske4 classification. Mr. Joe Furr, 20S~ developer, stated that the t be suitable for the subject thus far, in designing the p. to approve a lesser develop~ proposed, they would of nece children, which is not the 4 the land is over $50,000.00 the developer does not wish Discussion ensued~ the City Engineer stated tha right-of-way is 64 feet wide Mrs. Carl Lindgren ject property, stated that t erably during the last 15 ye had themselves contributed t school population; that the of her property for R-l purp sell a home on a one-acre 10 called attention to a map of the location of those homes that she felt many of those substantially affected by th prime means of access for ma R-3 zoning, as recommended b The Mayor announce had been received, and thereu The City Attorney upon which parking requireme Planned Developments. He ad qui red under Planned Develop no streets within these deve! spaces; whereas with R-3 apa is taken into consideration, spaces per unit. His opinio would result from development commended that plans be revis which would correspondingly r to be developed. Councilmen for R-3 development, was not acceptable. UNCIL MINUTES - October 22 1968 1:30 P.M. 1968 Chanticleer Road, stated that she was not sins the subject reclassification was circulated mother and former P.T.A.President, who is in- dren. She felt that the proposed apartment de- area, since the present width of Nutwood Street dren travel that route on the way to school. 10 Woodworth Road, stated that he was concerned per had not submitted revised plans, as re- nd felt that the same information had been pre- 68 meeting, and the circumstances had not changed hat Councilman Krein was not present at that meet- ation of the evidence would be of value in the f anyone wished to speak in favor of the re- East Chapman Avenue, Orange, representing the nning Staff had indicated R-3 development would operty, and a great deal of money had been spent ject; that lending institutions were unwilling t than that submitted; that if fewer units were ity be larger, which would attract tenants with ire of the developer; that the selling price of r acre, and if it cannot be developed as proposed, continue with the project. 10nCerning the actual width of Nutwood Street, and ,the present street width is 40 feet, and the total i I I 1861 Castle Avenue, one of the owners of the sub- nature of the subject area had changed consid- s; that those who opposed the reclassification the increased traffic in the area and additional ximum price that she could receive for the sale es, is $39,000.00, and it is very difficult to ; that as acreage it is much more valuable. She he area, which she prepared, which designated ere the petition was circulated, and stated o signed the petition would not actually be :reclassification, as Nutwood Street is not a , She requested that the City Council approve ,the City Planning Commission. ! Ithat sufficient evidence from those present n declared the hearing closed. 'ted, for Council consideration, the criteria s were established for R-3 properties and .sed that two parking spaces per unit are re- ts Standards,due to the fact that there are ments which would provide additional parking ent developments available on-street parking . ereby reducing parking requirements to 1-1/4 ~as that a great deal of on-street parking pf the subject property, as proposed, and re- ~ to increase off-street parking provisions Fuire a decrease in the total number of units I Schutte felt that the property is suitable Fhe proposed development in its present form o n n r~','~',.1"'.',, '~J ~ 'i1 } ~ : [ ~ Cit Hall 68-618 ornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 22 1968 1:30 P.M. proval Dutton recommended granting R-3 zoning, subject to ap- evelopment by the City Council. RESOLUfION NO. 68 for adoption, den 26: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-626 g said reclassification, without prejudice. Refer A RESOLUTION OF T MINING THAT A C CITY HEREINAFTER CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CRIBED. (68-69-16). AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley Dutton None Resolution No. 68R-626 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 68 for adoption, den 27: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-627 g Variance No. 2002. Refer esolution Book. A RESOLtrrION OF NO. 2002. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE Roll Cal Vote: being no AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley Dutton None Resolution No. 68R-627 duly passed and adopted. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARl heim Engineering lic utility purpoa dale Avenue. - ABANDONMENT NO. 68-5A: I(li;.~,atcj by the City of Ana- artment, requesting abandonment of an easement for pub- , located in the vicinity of Jefferson Street and River- Public to allow posting ring was continued from the meeting of October 8, 1968, subject property. RESOLtrrION NO. for adoption. asked if anyone wished to address the City Council; there ec1ared the hearing closed. \ Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-628 Refer A RESOLUTION OF T AND ABANDONMENT OF ACROSS THE HEREI CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC urILITY PURPOSES OVER, UNDER AND ER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY. (68-5A). AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None Resolution No. 68R-628 duly passed and adopted. ,; j t 68-619 Cit Hall Anaheim California- UNCIL MINUTES - October 22 1968 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC ID~.\RING - RECLASSIFICATIO' by Eugenia Weston Dorian, e and waivers of fuaximum buil~ dentia1 zone, and minimum b4 fourplex apartment building~ Winston Road and Iris Street o. 68-69-24 AND VARIANCE NO. 2012: Submitted 1, requesting a change in zone from C-l to R-3, g height within 150 feet of single family resi- ding setback from the street, to establish three property located at the southeast corner of The City Planning' recommended said reclassifib ditions: mmission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-274, ion be approved, subject to the following con- 1. That the owner Anaheim the sum of 15~ per f for tree planting purposes. 2. That a parcel property be submitted to th~ corded in the office of the 3. That the owne~ Anaheim the sum of $25.00 pe tion purposes. 4. That Conditio with within a period of 180, as the Commission or City C f subject property shall pay to the City of nt foot along Winston Road and Iris Street, P to record the approved division of subject ity of Anaheim for approval and then be re- 8nge County ~~~ordere f subject property shall pay to the City of dwelling unit, to be used for park and recrea- os. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied ys from the date hereof, or such further time cil may grant. The City Planning r~ luested waiver of height 1 pursuant to Resolution No. mmission granted said variance in part, denying itation within 150 feet of single-family homes, 8-275, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Tha t classification No. 2. That trash st approved plans on file with 3. That any air-c shielded from view, and the homes. 4. That Conditio with prior to final buildi is granted subject to the completion of Re- ge areas shall be provided in accordance with e office of the Director of Public Works. ditioning facilities proposed shall be properly und shall be buffered from adjacent residential 3, above mentioned, shall be complied inspections. The City Clerk re Gunther, 150 Winston Road, questing that the waiver of homes not be granted. ted receiving a telephone call from Mr. W.K. uesting approval of R-3 zoning and further re- ight limitation within 150 feet of single-family Mr. Thompson uses and zoning in the imme and considered by the City ing Commission, in denying property could be developed . location of subject property, the existing . te area, and briefed the evidence submitted to nning Commission. He noted that the City Plann- .ver of maximum height limitation, felt that the accordance with this requirement. The Mayor asked i City Council. applicant or his agent wished to address the Kr. Frank Harlem, owners, stated that it was . ent C-l zoning, as no buyer in the past two years. He three separate four-unit bu. the request for waiver of h sists of only 12 units, two family residence. He noted of the subject property exis residences. He felt that t hood, since it would provid tion of that R-3 developmen photographs of that propert 136 West Fay Lane, Agent representing the property ractical to develop the property under the pres- s offered to purchase the property for that use ed that the proposed development consists of ings, ~ asked for favorable consideration of ht limitation, as the proposed development con- f which would be within 150 feet of a single- at a two-story, R-3 development to the south within 150 feet of the same single-family : proposed development would benefit the neighbor- ~ buffer by screening the unattractive rear por- ifrom view of the surrounding area. He provided Ifor Council information. (Photographs returned.) o n n [ ,..... ~ . ] ---____ __~_ ______n~'~_____ __._~_~___. __ _____ _,._~ ___ ____ C1t recommencted Conditfon No~ 2 of the reclassifica- .:he va:c:;'an.::c .:l..1l.~ ali4.enc.ed to read a'-i follows; 66-620 Anaheim Ca rnia - COUNCIL MINUTES - O~tober 22 1968 1:30 P.M. Mayor p~ dents had been ob~ replied in the ne~ ey asked if consent of the adjoining single-family resi- ned for waiver of height limitations~ to which Mr. Harlem ive. He subm to the one propos plan of developme corner lot, and t ternate, he noted in width by 5 feeti, back requirements. be economically fe event that the wail the Reclassificati: at a higher dens it. Th~ C~.t:y t :.on be 1ilCt:'.c a con.tI d photographs of a development in Costa Mesa, similar for the subject property, and also outlined an alternate , which would provide for a one-story fourp1ex on the tory fourpl@xes on the other two lots. With this a1- t the two-story fourp1ex lots would have to b@ reduced nd the development would then violate 6 side yard set- e felt that development on individual lots would not .ble, without the waiver of height limitations. In the is not granted, he requested that Condition No. 2 to be removed, to allow developmen~'ipn 'combined parcels a Parcel recorded to the sale or separate financing of any unit, that to the City of Anaheim for approval, and then be the Orange. County Recorder.1t The Mayot ject application.. if anyone wished to speak in opposition to the sub- Mrs. Mar. that she was not s. waiver of minimum ~ ready impaired at ~ see the subject prf development would i surrounding propert strict the subject provisions. et Lenny, 139 West Winston Road, Apartment C, stated sfied with the City Planning Commission's approval of lding setback from the street, since visibi1ityis al- intersection. She further stated that she would rather rty developed forcolllllercial use, as she felt an R-3 ensify parking problems and decrease the value of the in the area. She requested that the City Council re- velopment to one-story, and require off-street parking i I in noted that the proposed development meets all 1-3 and the setback waiver is only for a stairway projec- ,Planning Commission felt was of minor consequence. ohenhaus, 1206 North Hollydale Drive, Fullerton, owner bject area, stated that she felt there was no parkins jection to the proposed development. She felt it would ood, as the vacant property was presently beiDS ueed by . r parking purposes. Mr. Thomg parking requirement tion, which the Cit Mrs. Ruth of property. in the problem and had no benefit the neighbQ nearby auto dealer which was y offered the applicant an opportunity to speak .sain, Dd he thereupon declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-629 for adoption, auth, zing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone of the pr. ty, subject to the recolllllendations of the City Plann- ing Commission, .:t;::~, ~ . . ~1.Z Con-l::' tion No.2. I Refer Resolution No. 68&-629 duly passed and adopted. olution Book. A RESOLtTfION OF THE, MINING THAT TITLE 1 BE AMENDED AND THAT (68-69-24 - R-3.) TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AIm DETER- :r THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING. TO ZOIIRG SHOULD BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZODS SHOULD BI C1WfGED. Roll Call AYES: NOES: ABSD1T: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor 68-621 Cit Hall Anaheim California- RESOLUftON NO. 68R-630: C~ for adoption, grant5.f1~ said by the City Planning Commis prior to the sale or separa submitted to the City of Aq office of the Orange Count9, Refer to Reso1ut~ A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY cd NO. 2012. . Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILME~: NOES: COUNCILME~: ABSENT: t COUNCILME~; The Mayor declar~ RECESS: Councilman seconded the motion. AFTER RlCE~: Mayor Pebley Counctl being present. ORDINANCE ID. 2589: On report ~ man Krein offered Ordinanc~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY , INCLUSIVE, RELATING TO A C , Mrs. Ruth Salaets behalf of the Women's Divis tion and appointment of the Mayor Pebley not~ formation of the new Cultu~ been donated to the City, fi PUBLIC NG - VARIANCE NO. 20 requesting waiver of permit (~!tiles on R-l property, 1 The City Planning granted saiv variance, subj 1. That a maxim 10 feet in length may be rs 2. That in order process animals or any mean maintained in a live state 3. That all safe and locked garage, as stipu all times for the protectio 4. That no colle shall be maintained on the Review of by the City Council, Councilman Schutt Policy regarding review of proceeded to outline. He n body in matters concerning and variances, which may be for review by an Councilman City Council; such request of the City Council. He no for permission to allow wil ficient reason for orde: ,:ing for review is standard poli UNCIL MINUTES - October 22 1968 1:30 P.M. cilman Dutton offerc'l Resolution No. 68R-630 ariance, subject to che conditions recommended on, and further subject to the provision that financing of any unit, that a Parcel Map be eim for approval, and thc.l be recorded in the ecordero It OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None No. 68R-630 duly passed and adopted. a ten-minute recess. Councilman Krein (3: 20 P.M.). to order, all members of the City recommendation of the City Attorney, Council- o. 2589 for first reading. HElM AMENDING TITLE 1, CHAPTER 1. 04 OF THE ING THERETO SECTION 1.04.400 TO 1.04.460, BOTH URAL ARTS COMMISSION. 507 Dustin Place, thanked the City Council, on n, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, for .the forma- ultural Arts Commission. that as a result of a news article, citing the Arts Commission, several valuable items have cultural purposes. Submitted by William C. and Phyllis A. Burch, d uses to permit the keeping of non-poisonous ated at 2107 West Judith Lane. ommission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC68-270, t to the following conditions: of four (4) non-poisonous reptiles not over ined on subject property. o maintain a health factor, no related feeding by which the reptiles will be fed, shall be subject property. precautions, such as locked cages, locked rooms, ted by the petitioners, will be ~dhered to at of the children in the neighborhood. ion of reptiles for educational or show_"_~L' ases operty other than those above-mentioned. ~ken by the City Planning Commission was ordered ~ic hearing scheduled this date. ! j'requested the City Attorney to clarify Council ty Planning Commission items, which Mr. Geisler ed that the Planning Commission is an advisory ning, and may grant conditional ;':C;2 permits ppealed by an interested person, or requested nterested in having the matter heard before the r review is considered to be an uniform action d that the subject variance is the first request or exotic animals in the R-l zone, and is suf- eview. He str~~'~~J the fact that such a request of the City Council. o n n [ ",... r-- Cit Hall 1:30 P.M. 68-622 ornia - OOutTCIL ~NUTE5 - October 22 the City could be on briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by mmission, noting the recommendation that four animals subject to the conditions stated. cil. The May. asked if the applicant wished to address the City Coun- Mr. Will happy with the re c~ly with the c extensively for e repti Ie badges j t:~. he lived in Garde, difficulty with o~ Dutton, he read ai No. 255, expressi* the Burch residend c. Burch, 2107 West Judith Lane, stated that he was ndation of the City Planning Commission, and would itionsj that the reptiles kept at his home were used ational purposes, and enable Boy Scouts to earn their he has kept snakes for eight years, during which time rove and the City of Orange, where he experienced no ctions from neighbors. At the request of Councilman tter from Steve Baxter, a L~mber of Boy Scout Troop appreciation for being permitted to view the snakes at Mayor application. asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of the Council zoos and other p1 is not an appropr provided is very ~ a precedent for o~ the same privilege Clark pointed out that such benefits are availab,le at s where snakes are permitted; but that a residential area e location for this purpose. He felt that the servic~ thy, but granting a variance for this purpose would set rs, without the same goals and attitudes, to apply for Mr. Burq tive for such per~ be observed under tions. In ansve~ had never escaped locked room, insid County who keep s snakes from former against because of sonous and are har: replied that the $75.00 application fee would be prohibi- s, and stated that snakes which are kept in a zoo cannot rcumstances where they would display their normal reac- o other Council questions, he stated that his snakes e premises; that they are kept in locked cages, in a a locked garage; that there are many persons in Orange es; that he had received no complaints regarding the eighbors; that he felt he shc..ld not be discriJDli ':18.ted is preference for snakes, so long as they are not poi- esse Mrs.laul Burch residence, they were handled considered harmful. larke, 2106 Forest Lane, related her experience at the e she was invited to view the snakes. SQe stated that h extreme care, and could not see how they could be Gregory address as aboard of the Orange CouQ well qualified to He felt fear of s kept snakes at his do likewise, witho kman, a member of the military service, who save his p, in Long Beach, stated that he was a past president Herpetology Society, and that Mr. and Mrs. Burch are dIe snakes, and have been of great assistance to him. s is based on ignorance; and stated that he had always me; that approximately 10,000 people in Orange County any problem. Mrs. Sue a member of the sa snakes is behind th clean, and very int cker, 17219 Santa Barbara Street, Fountain Valley, also organization, stated that the public attitude toward times; that she has four boa constrictors that are docile, esting to observe. ~' y asked how many in the audience were in favor of the proximately 20 percons stood; when asked how many lived e Burch home, 5 remained standing. Mayor proposed variance; within 4 blocks of Mrs. Edwa had recently purcha knowing snakes were the possibility of in a residential ar precedent to permit Miller, 8890 Tina Lane, Apartment C, stated that she d the hOL3e next door to the Burch residence, without ept on the adjacent property, and was concerned about e snakes escaping. She felt that snakes did not belong , and that the granting of the variance would set a nakes in residential areas throughout the County. 68-623 Cit Hall 4naheim Ca1ifornia- Mr. Donald Foster. animals, and opposed the pr' home for handling and disp1. Mrs. Marie Wright~ surrouading the public hear~ neighborhood for 14 years, ~ the snakes. She stated tha* property values would be adv remain. Mrs. Winifred Be ienced difficulty in sellin$ sider living on a s~reet wh~ remove the snakes from the d Mrs. BettyGerald~ using the snakes for good Pq mitted in a residential are~ Mrs. Gloria Brand~ neighbor of the Burches, st. kept in their former home in She also related that she ha ~o work in Garden Grove, and of the snake could not be de felt that such occurrences a tial areas, and the fright i be harmful to some people. Mayor Pebley asked tion, that live in the area. opposition, who live outside Mrs. Phyllis Burch rebuttal to the opposition: That fire and prevent vandalism; that on all doors; that they are neighborhood; that they were they moved to the City; that petition supporting their re house, they are never left a survive in this climate, exc snakes, any person objecting caped from her home, she wou The Mayor been presented, and RESOLUTION NO. 68R-63l: Co for adoption, denying Varian Refer A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO NO. 2011. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared UNCIL MINUTES - October 22 1968 1:30 P.M. 119 Judith Lane, stated that snakes are wild ice of taking them from the garage into the 114 West Judith Lane, objected to the publicity , stating that she had been happy living in the was no longer happy, due to the presence of he is aware they are not harmful, but felt sely affected if the snakes are permitted to 2110 Judith Lane, stated that she had exper- er house, as prospective buyers would not con- snakes are kept. She noted that the Burches for the purpose of exhibiting them. 111 Judith Lane, felt that the Burches were oses, but felt that they should not be per- as the boa constrictors could harm children. 13831 Euclid Street, Garden Grove, a former d that one of the snakes escaped from the cage, arden Grove, while her daughter was baby-sitting. recently discovered a 5-foot python on her way as extremely upset by the experience. The owner rmined by the Police Department, and Mrs. Brandt possible where snakes are allowed in residen- uced by the discovery of such an animal could ow many in the audience opposed the applica- Nine persons stood. Three persons indicated he area, and twenty-five persons stood in favor. applicant, offered the following statement in r alarms have been installed in the home to e is guarded by a large dog, and padlocks are t trying to set a precedent, or disrupt the naware that snakes would not be allowed when 09 persons within a 4-block area had signed a st; that when the snakes are brought into the ne in the room; that boa constrictors could not t in captivity; that if allowed to keep their their request, who saw a snake which had es- donate the snakes to a zoo. Ithat a good cross-section of the evidence had declared the hearing closed. offered Resolution No. 68R-631 L OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE Schutte, Clark and Pebley solution No. 68R-631 duly passed and adopted. o n n [ ".... f ~ 68-624 C t Hall Anaheim denied filed. on the above resolution, Councilman Krein re- draft an ordinance prohibiting the keeping of for Council review within thirty days. - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 22 1968 1:30 P.M. Followi4 quested the City 4 snakes in residen4 Mr. and I pose of their sna~ ing kept in vio1a~ thirty days in wh~ is being made dur~ The City Council q 1er noted that if I could be requeste~ s. Burch inquired how long they will be allowed to dis- The City Attorney advised that the snakes are now be- n of the zoning ordinance; that his office would allow to dispose of them, provided a conscientious effort that time, and contact with his office is maintaine~o curred that thirty days is a reasonable time. Mr.Geis- unreasonable hardship develops, an extension of time PUBLIC HEARING - VARI waiver of maximum at 1105 East Kate~ NO. 2019: Submitted by Kate11a Associates, requesting ea of a free-standing sign; .M-l zoned property, located Avenue. 1anni'ng Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. i PC68-299, . Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission Mr. Tho isting uses and z mi t ted to and consl" was based on setti perty in the indus, n noted the location of the subject property, the ex- g in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence sub- red by the City Planning Conmission, noting that denial an undesirable precedent for similar requests on pro- .al area. Council. y asked if the applicant wished to address the City Mr. Mayn in hope of establi~ Commission granted was acceptable at t Kambak, stated that he acquired the property in 1965, ng a 24-hour coffee shop, for which the City Planning variance, but restricted signing to M-l standards, which t time. Since tha development to be i under construction, adjacent properties is inadequate to al He submitted photo~ property, to bear' 0 within a block of t time, an economic feasibility study showed the planned ractical, and a 9,200-squarefoot dinner house is now o open in November of this year. He noted that the 2 n Katella Avenue have residence on them, and the setback viewing of a sign which conforms to M-l standards 0 phs taken from Katella Avenue, approaching the subject this statement. Photographs of other commercial signs subject property were also shown to the Council. Mr. Kamba which conforms to C reduction size to 1 the revised design, substantially less perty is being dev~ displayed a rendering of the originally-proposed sign, development standards, within an overlay depicting a square feet. He requested that the Council approve hich exceeds M-l standards by 84 square feet, but is an allowed under C-1 standards, for which use the pro- pede I .y asked if anyone present opposed the request; there 'clared the hearing closed. cussion ensued, the consensus of which was to allow a onforming to C-l Site Development Standards. being no sign to RESOLUTION NO. 68R~ 2: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-632 for adoption, grant g Variance No. 2019, pcr~i.~tlriS ~~irl sign in accor~an~e with C-l standards7. Lject to ;.hc condition that a IS-foot Retbact from tUe curb be required, p s an additional 2-foot setback from the property line. Refer to solution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THS ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2019. 68-625 Cit California - UNCIL MINUTES - October 22 1968 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN ~ COUNCILMEN~ COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None Refer to No. 108 - Orangethorpe Avenue No. 109 - Cerritos Avenue The Mayor esolution No. 68R-632 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC - GENERAL PLAN Planniag COnmission, to con way Riahts-of-Way, of the A+ on the table of exceptions: HENTS NOS. 108 AND 109: Initiated by the City er amendment to the Circulation Element, High- eim General Plan, to list the following streets General Plan Amen4 General Plan Amen4 Mr. Thompson briet the City Planning Commissio~ Amendments. the evidence submitted to and considered by in recommending adoption of the two proposed The Mayor asked i~ being no response, declared! nyone wished to address the City Council; there e hearing closed. RESOL~ION NO. 68R-633; for adoption, approving Gen~ mended by the City Planning i1man Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-633 1 Plan Amendments Nos. 108 and 109, as recom- DI11ission. Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO MENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DE IL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIK APPROVING AN AMEND- NATED AS AMENDMENTS NOS. 108 AND 109. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared 68R-633 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDONMENT NO. donment of an existing pub Ii located north of Orangethorp Fe Railroad, pursuant to Res Bulletin, October 10, 1968, -lOA: Public hearing was held on proposed aban- utility easement within Tract No. 4703; property Avenue, east of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa ution No. 68R-634,duly published in the Anaheim d notices thereof posted in accordance with law. The Mayor asked if Jnyone wished to address the City Council; there being no response, declared ~e hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-634: On Krein offered Resolution No. ~commendation of the City ~8R-634 for adoption. I jBoOk. Engineer, Councilman Refer to Resolutio A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO AND ABANDONMENT OF THAT PORT UPON, ALONG, OVER AND THROUa IL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION OF AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY. (68-10A). I I Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared esolution No. 68R-634 duly passed and adopted. o n n r r r I ! r r I ! cil; wished to address the City Council. 68-626 Cit Hall Anaheim C fornia - COUNCIL MINUIES - October 22 1968 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - FINA the reversion to I by Final Tract N4 Boulevard, from & (Reclassificatio~ TRACT NO. 6646: Public hearing was held to consider reage of the R-3 portion of land previously subdivided 6409; property located on the west side of State College feet north of Ball Road, to 350 feet north of Ball Road, o. 66-67-68.) asked if anyone present wished to address the City Coun- response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLIJrION NO. 6 Schutte offered 635: On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman lution No. 68R-635 for adoption. Refer A RESOLUTION OF T MAP OF TRACT NO. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE FINAL 6. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton,Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None Resolution No. 68R-635 duly passed and adopted. LIC HEARING - WE proposed removal TBMENT: Public hearing was held to hear objections to weeds, pursuant to Resolution No. 68R-603. The Mr. Berti: concern regarding cated adjacent to property has been posting of notice~ of money removing ielsen, 4061 Aladdin Drive, Huntington Beach, expressed ceipt of a notice to remove weeds on his property, 10- e City's Street Sweeping Dump Site. He stated that his ed repeatedly as a dump site by the public, despite the o the contrary, and he has spent a considerable amount bris, as a result. He noted from the City-owne improvement of the dumping, and remov time as street wid hat weeds and other debris also blow onto his property Dump Site, and requested that the City Council authorize treet fronting his property, to discourage unauthorized trash and weeds currently on the property, until such ing takes place. Mayor lic works. y ordered the request referred to the Director of Pub- Mr. clarification of a ascertain whether i and also requested debris that accumul his property. Kline, owner of property at 715 Anna Drive, requested tice posted on his property line~ as he was unable to was intended for his property, or the adjoining parcel, at the City be responsible for removal of weeds and es on the utility easement on the easterly portion of The purposes, and that still be utilized ~ interfere with the t. tarney advised that the easement is for public utility e property in question is private property, which may the owner for a variety of purposes, which will not ~cess rights granted by the easement. I Mrs. used to notify William Lewis, Str~ notices are mailed perty; that there 4 cated by unauthori~ be considered as cd Kline, of the same address, questioned the procedures nts of necessary removal of weeds, and was advised by Maintenance Superintendent, that as a courtesy, written the owner of record, following the posting of the pro- occasions when the posted notice is removed or relo- persons, and that receipt of the written notice may irmation of the posted notice. 68-627 Cit heim California - C Refer Noo 68R-636 duly passed and adopted. elL MINUTES - October 22 1; 30 P. M. Mayor Pebley asked ,. there being no response, decl anyone else wished to address the City Council; d the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 68R-636: adoption. . man Schutte offered Resolution No. 68R-636 for A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUN ING THAT NO OBJECTIONS WERE ANY PARCEL OR PARCELS OF REAL' HElM; ANI) ORDERING THE SUPERI THE COSTS OF SUCH REMOVAL TO 1r ADJACENT TO THE STREETS OR AL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- TO THE PROPOSED RJM)VAL OF 'WEEDS GROWING UPON OPERTY OR ANY PUBLIC STREET IN THE CITY OF ANA- NDENT OF STREETS TO REMOVE SAID WEEDS AND CHARGE LOTS OR PARCELS CLEANED AND TO THE PROPERTY S CLEANED. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES ~ ABSBNT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley The Mayor declared 8InER D.AIK;IIti PLACE PERMIT: Appl~ Motor Lodge, for permit to al~ Boulevar4, was submitted and t of the Aaaheim Municipal Code~ by Councilman Dutton, seconded tion filed by Richard J. HoIsted, for Anaheim dinner dancing at Jacko's, 1220 North Harbor nted, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16, s recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion y Councilman Clark. MOTION CARRIED. IICLASSIFlCAT,ON NO. 67-68-39: Sub Otted by Ann T. Madison, requesting an exten- sion of time to comply with cb itions. Proposed C-l property, located on the south side of Ball Road, t the north side of Berry Avenue, 138 feet east of the centerline of Palm Stre On recommendation of extension of time was granted, man Clark, seconded by Council he Development Services Department, a 6-months o expire April 22, 1969, on motion by Council- n Krein. MOTION CARRIED. On motion by Council cation of vehicular access rig Zuletta Jane Collier, and Elit reclassification, was accepted authorized. MOTION CARRIED. n Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, dedi- s to Berry Avenue, by Maurice Gail Hartman, eth Ann Tremble, in conjunction with the above y the City Council and recordation thereof was SIGN RE UEST - 212 NORTH ANAHEIM B a 2-foot projecting sign, sub of Kitty's Cafe, 212 North Ana together with report of the De motion by Councilman Krein, se Application for permission to erect ted by Howell Neon Sign Company, on behalf im Boulevard, was reviewed by the City Council, lopment Services Department, and granted on nded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. RE UEST - TEMPORARY PARKING FACILI Street Baptist Church, for app R-A zoned property, located on ritos Avenue, was submitted, t Department. s: Request of Reverend Bryan Crow, Euclid val of temporary church parking facilities on he east side of Euclid Street, north of Cer- ether with report from the Development Services On motion by Council request was granted for a peri an application for a condition property for that purpose exte n Clark,seconded by Councilman Krein, said of six months, provided that applicant file use permit within that time, for use of the ing beyond the six-month period. MOTION CARRIED. /' r - Apollo Development Corporation; tract lo- t Street, north of Ball Road, and containing s. (67-68-38 and Variance No. 19280) I I I I I I I ! FINAL MAP - TRACT NO. 6512: cated on the west side 45 proposed R-2, 5,()1' L:oned 1 o n n [ ~ . ----- - -- - ----"'-~-------~------ ----- Cit COUNCIL MINUTES - October 22 1968 1:30 P.M. 68-628 The Cityj with the Tentativel forwarded to the C' paid, and recommen, gineer reported said Final Map conforms substantia,lly p previously approved; that bond has been posted and Attorney for approval; that required fees have been approval thereof. On reco that Final Map, Tr bond by the City A CARRIED. dations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved No. 6512, be approved, subject to approval of required rney. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION LASSIFICATION NO. 68 Agent, requested C Intent No. 68R-56l, the easterly propet -9 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1042: Mr. Dale Ingram, ci1 clarification of Condition No. 2 of Resolution of s it pertains to cost of development of the alley on line. i The Cityl will provide a one+ jacent properties t as such time as th+ torney advised that the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication ot holding strip, which will require owners of the ad- pay a proportionate share of the development of the alley, roperty develops. Mr. Thom~ the east property t 68R-562, granting q provide access to tt n recommended that construction of a block wall along e, as required under Condition No. 4 of Resolution N05 ditional Use Permit No. 1042, be waived in order to alley from the adjoining properties as they develop. On motion of required block. granted, and clarifi will provide a one~ MOTION CARRIED. y Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, waiver 1 on the east property line of the subject property was ation made that the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication ot holding strip along the easterly property line. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67~ thers, for permiss~ Condition No.5, of of the City Council inspection, will c moved by Councilman RE ST - WESTERN GREYHO a Greyhound Depot, a extending beyond 18 ized zoning was sub~ of the property will will be at the app1i by Councilman Dutton TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO Company; tract locat Avenue, containing 4 ~ -80 AND VARIANCE NO. 1974: Request of Covington Bro- to defer recordation of parcel map, required under esolution of Intent No. 68R-327 was submitted. Finding at recordation of Parcel Map, prior to final building itute substantial compliance with said condition was ein, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2590: reading. ouncilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2590 for first AN ORDINANCE OF THE CODE RELATING TO ZO TY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL G. (67-68-80 - R-3.) LINES: Request of Western Greyhound Lines to operate 1711 South Manchester Avenue, and erect a hanging sign ches from the front of the building, prior to author- ted and granted, with the understanding that such use ot predetermine the pending zoning application, and nt's own risk, on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded I MOTION CARRIED. 647 REVISION NO.2: Developer - Apollo Development on the east side of Rio Vista Street, north of Lincoln propo:"~ed 1:-2, 5,.<; zoned lots. (67-68-98.)' 1968, i i ,nning Commission, at their meeting held October 21, ~ntative Map, subject to the following conditions: ~uld this subdivision be devloped as more than one sub- 1sion thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for division, approval. approval' of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6647 is granted 1 of Reclassification No. 67-68-98. lots within this tract shall be served by underground 2. That ~ subject to the apprq 3. That a utilities. 68-629 Cit 1: 30 P. K. eim California- CIL MINUTES - October 22 Councilman Dutton No.2, be approved, subject tq sion. Councilman Krein secon4 d that Tentative Map, Tract No. 6647, Revision he recommendations of the City Planning Commis- the motion. MOTION CARRIED. tENTATIVE HAP - TRACT NO. 6784: cated on the north side R-2, 5,000 zoned lots. loper - Apollo Development Company; tract 10- east of Rio Vista, containing 69 proposed The City Planning cq approved said Tentative Map, ~ at their meeting held October 21, 1968, the following conditions: 1. That should thi~ division, each subdivision the approval. 2. That the approv4 subject to the approval of Re~ 3. That all lots w~ facilities. 4. That the vehicu] openings, to Rio Vista Street~ 5. That in accorda~ wall shall be constructed on U 1 thru 8 and 69 and Rio Vista shall be stepped down to a het and except that pedes trial ope de-sacs abut the planned highw Reasonable landscaping, includ the uncemented portion of the said wall, plans for said land approval of the Superintendent and acceptance, the City of An tenance of said landscaping. 6. That all lots sh ubdivision be developed as more than one sub- of shall be submitted in tentative form for of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6784 is granted ssification No. 67-68-98. in this tract shall be served by underground rights except at street and/or alley h4ll be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. with City Council policy a 6-foot masonry westerly property line separating Lot Nos. reet, except that corner Lot Nos. 1 and 69 t of thirty inches in the front yard setback, ngs shall be provided in said walls where cu1- rights-of-way line of an arterial highway. g irrigation facilities shall be installed in terial highway parkway the full distance of aping to be submitted to and subject to the f Parkway Maintenance. Following installation eim shall assume the responsibility for main- I I rear onto Rio Vista Street. Councilman Dutton ma proved, subject to the recomme cilman Clark seconded the moti d that Tentative Map, Tract No. 6784, be ap- tions of the City Planning Commission. Coun- MOTION CARRIED. CHANGE ORDER 11). 2 - WORK ORDER NO. Councilman Krein moved that Cb Filtration Plant, in the amoun seconded the motion. MOTION 05: On recommendations of the City Engineer, ge Order No.2, Work Order No. 6005, Anaheim of $4,171.29, be authorized. Councilman Dutton lED. WORK ORDER NO. 554-A: Award of Wor of October 8, 1968, to this No. 554-A was continued from the meeting The City quired, which will that additional right-of-way has been ac- vision of the plans. On recommendation of revision of plans, and readver Schutte, seconded by Councilma Engineer, all bids were rejected, for a later date, on motion by Councilman MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: 68R-640, both inclusive, offered Resolution Nos. 68R-637 through Refer to Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 68R-637: A RES FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT P, STRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PORTIONS OF KATELLA AVENUE AND NO. 557B. APPROVING THE DESIG FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; PROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH S AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bid ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM IC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CON- LIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF LNUT STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER , PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS HORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IM- PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING UBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR to be opened November 14, 1968, 2:00 P.M.) o ~ n [ r-- 68-630 Cit Hall Anaheim - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 22 1968 1~30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 68 ANAHEIM FINDING QUIRE THE CONSTRU RIO VISTA STREET LINCOLN AVENUE TO! ANAHEIM, WORK ORD~ INGS AND SPECIFI~ STRUCTION OF SAID I FICATIONS, ETC.; A NOTICE INVITING S opened November 14 38: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY RE- ON AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WI':f: THE ER IMPROVEMENT, FROM APPROXIMATELY 39 FEET NORTH OF PROXIMATELY 1,063 FEET NORTH THEREOF, IN THE CITY OF NO. 1212. APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAW- ONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CON- LIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECI- AlITHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A ED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be 1968, 2~00 P.M.). RESOLlITION NO. 68 ANAHEIM FINDING A QUIRE THE CONSTRU CHAPMAN AVENUE- IN THE CITY OF PROVING THE DESIGzt CONSTRUCTION THE~, MENT IN ACCORDANCH AND DIRECTING THE FOR THE CONSTRUCT] P. M. ) . 39: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY RE- ON AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE R BOULEVARD STREET, STORM DRAIN AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, 1M, WORK ORDERS NOS. 547-B, 556-B, 1213 and 5027.. AP- PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVE- ITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING TY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS THEREOF. (Bids to be opened November 14, 1968, 2:00 RESOLUTION NO. 68 ANAHEIM FINDING AND FITTINGS IS N8 CATIONS THEREOF; , THE FURNISHING OF 1968, 2:00 P.M.). 0: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ETERMINING THAT THE PURCHASE OF CAST IRON WATER PIPE SSARY FOR THE WATER DEPARTMENT; APPROVING THE SPECIFI- DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE INVITING BIDS FOR ID PIPE AND FITTINGS. (Bids to be Opened November 14, AYES: NOES: ABSENl' : Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor inclusive, duly pas eclared Resolution Nos.. 68R-637 through 68R-640, both d and adopted. RESOLUTION NO.. 68R-641"~ the Director of Pu 641 for adoption.. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Coun .lman Schutte offered Resolution Nos. 68R-642 to 68R- 655, both inclusiva, for adoption. n ORK ORDER NO. 546B: Upon receipt of certification from c Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R- Refer solution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE THE COMPLETION AND AND EQUIPMENT AND A AND WATER, AND THE PLETE THE FOLLOWING BROADWAY STREET I (R.J. Noble). ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER,FUEL RFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COM- UBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE ORANGE AVENUE AND VEMENTS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 546-B. Roll AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None Resolution No.. 68R-64l duly passed and adopted. olution Book. 68-631 Cit CIL MINUTES - October 22 1968 1~30 P.M. RESOLUT~N .1<<>. 681l-642: A REi UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT D CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR AND PUBLIC lITILITY PURPOSES. (Palmer C. and Blanche Sandeno, ~nd Mae C. V, erboss). RESOLUTlctN NO. 68R-643: A REi UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT D CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL ~~~TY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR RM DRAIN PURl'OSES. (Empire Financial Corpora- 0 RESOLtITION NO. 68R-644: A RE ACCEPrING AN EASEMENT GRANT D PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR Jj! Army) . UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (The Salvation RESOLUTIQIi NO. 68&-645: A RE ACCEPrINC AN EASEMENT GRANT D PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR IJJ and Clad. M. Pletz, Walter A. i UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIK CERTAIN REAL AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Paul H. Pletz oden and Eva R. Gooden). RESOLUTIt' NO. 68R-646: A RE~ urION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT Dt CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR i AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Sioux Honey Association, Cooperative). RESOLUTIqN NO. 68R -64 7: A RE~ tITION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTINC A GRANT DEED CONVEY~ TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND P LIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Malcolm A. and Naomi D. Townsend). RESOLUTION NO. 68R-648: A RES UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEY] TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. (E & Development Company). 0'........... i i ;,., RESOLUTION NO. 68R-649: A RES UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~NAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEY] TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND P LIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Ona M. Caspari). RESOLUTION NO. 68R-650: A RES UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEY] TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND P LIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Ona M. Caspari). RESOLUTION NO. 68R -651: A RE UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEY I TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND P LIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Gordon C. and Jewell E. Hammond). RESOLUTlqIf NO. 68R-652: A RE ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEY] FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND P UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Howard C. Hovey). RESOLUTIOIi NO. 68R-653: A RE ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYI FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND P Passante). UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Anthony J. and Virginia RESOLUTION NO. 68R-654: A RE ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYI FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND P UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Joseph and Ada Passante). n RESOLUTION NO. 68R-655: A RES lITION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYI TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND IC UTILITY PURPOSES. . (Joseph and Ada Passante). Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: ton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley e e c ~ 68-632 Cit fornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 22 1:30 P.M. elusive, declared Resolution Nos. 68R-642 to 68R-655, both in- d and adopted. DEDICATION OF VEHIC man Krein, secon rights to Harbor! in connection wi~ recordation therJ ACCESS RIGHTS - VARIANCE NO. l805~ On motion by Council- by Councilman Clark, dedication of vehicular access ulevard, by William C. O'Reilly and Patricia J. O'Reilly, Variance No. 1805, was accepted by the City Council, and was authorized. MOTION CARRIED. IRRKVOCABLE OFFER OF cation of the 20 cuted by Yilliam. Variance No. 1801 thereof authoriz~ Clark. MOTION C lCATION - VARIANCE NO. l805~ Irrevocable Offer of Dedi- ot alley on the easterly side of Harbor Boulevard, exe- O'Reilly and Patricia J. O'Reilly, in conjunction with as submitted and approved as to form, and recordation , on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman IED. he Assistant City Manager reported on the proposed pur- us Chance Equipment, and advised that one manufacturer, , had submitted a quotation for said equipment in the He thereupon recommended purchase be authorized at n Schutte moved that the bid of A.B. Chance Company, 119.25, including tax, be accepted and purchase author- tton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: ceived for the put acceptance of the he Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids re- Stump Cutter, as follows, and recommended Dearth Machinery Company: Vendor Amount~ Includin~ Tax Dearth Machinery e West Point Industt - - - - ~ $4,882050 -( 4,911069 (Model 2436) ( 5,976.73 (Model 2460) On the r Dutton moved that purchase authorize Krein seconded the $mmendation of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman e low bid of Dearth ,MaChinery Company be accepted, and in the amount of $4,882.50, including tax. Councilman tion. MOTION CARRIED. I The following claims were denied, as recommended by nd ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion , seconded by Councilman Krein: CLAIMS AGAINST THE CIT ,. the City Attorney, by Councilman Dutt a. Clai suIting from colli, b. Clai loss, purportedly about September 30, c. Clai damages, purportedly September 24, 1968. ubmitted by Raul Quintero, for damages purportedly re- n with an Anaheim Fire Truck, on or about July 20, 1968. ubmitted by Manuel W. Bowman, for personal property ulting from disruption of electrical service, on or 968. ubmitted by Anaheim Imports, Inc~, for personal property esulting from spraying of a City alley, on or about I I lED. RESOLUl'ION NO. 68R-656: adoption. ,-, ! ouncilman Clark offered Resolution No~ 68R-656 for Refer to solution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE IZING THE EXECUTION SANTA FE RAILWAY CO TAIN AND USE AN EL~ RAILWAY COMPANY AT ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AITrHOR- F A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND ~NY GRANTING TO THE CITY A LICENSE TO CONSTRUCT, MAIN- RIC SUPPLY LINE ACROSS OR ALONG THE PREMISES OF SAID NEAR THE STATION OF ANAHEIM, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Roll Call lte: I I ! -1 68-633 C1t Hall Anaheim California- UNCIL MINUTES - October 22 1969 1:30 P.M. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN COUNCILMEN COUNCILMEN Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None Refer The Mayor esolution No. 69R-656 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION 10. 68R-657: CGuncil tion. Krein offered Resolution No. 68R-657 for adop- A RlSOLUTION OF THE CITY CO IZING '!HE EXECUTION OF A SU AND SAlTA FE RAILWAY COMPA CONTRACT DATED NOVEMBER 24, TARY'S NO. 58261," RELATING IL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHOR- EMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA ND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THAT CERTAIN 53 AND DESIGNATED AS SANTA FE'S CONTRACT "SECRE- SPUR TRACK NO. 12. (901 East Vermont Street.) Roll Call Vote~ COUNCILMEN~ COUNCILMEN~ COUNCILMEN~ A YES ~ NOES: ABSENT~ Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor Refer esolution No. 68R-657 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION 10. 68R-658: adoption. Dutton offered Resolution No. 68R-658 for A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO NO. 681t-402 CHANGING THE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Su therly from Banyan Court.) IL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLtrrION OF CERTAIN STREETS IN THE NORTHEASTERN AREA ist Street to Sunkist Way, from Overpass nor- Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor declared No. 68R-658 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPOIDEltCE: The following co motion by Councilman Schutte, I espondence was ordered received and filed on seconded by Councilman Clark: ; i er - Public Employees' Retirement System. Public Employees' Retirement System. - opposition to the proposal that the County .re station for any municipality in the County ange General Fund. ter District Resolution No. 68-9-72 - opposing . 9, the Watson Amendment. Resolution No. 68R-159 - opposing the adoption n Amendment. Resolution No. 68R-157 - opposition to the pro- build and equip a fire station for any muni- e from the County of Orange General Fund. each: Resolution No. 6883 - endorsing Propo- State Legislature to provide that money allo- nd to any County or City may be used for local - supporting Proposition No. lA, which provides nters; Resolution No. 6866 - opposing the Wat- Otiative measure. of the Record of California Highway Commission 1968, covering freeway development of Route 39 1 Freeway and Lampson Avenue. Colony House Board - Meeting of August 6, 1968. a. Beatrice M. Mi George Oelkers b. City of Stanto of Orange build and equip a of Orange from the County of c. Orange County the adoption of Proposition d. City of Placen of Proposition No.9, the Wa e. City of Placen posal that the County of Ora cipality in the County of Or f. City of Newpor sition 7, which authorized t cated from the State General purposes; Resolution No. 688 tax relief to homeowners and son Property Tax Limitation i g. Volumes I and I Public Hearing, held July 26, in Orange County between Rout h. Minutes - Mothe o nl..... ""~,~ ' n l 68-634 C~t Anaheim Gal rnia - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 22 1968 1;30 P.M. ~"';.."",' : tj' , ~i ,; ., ,..., 1968. Orange County Mosquito Abatement District - Meeting and Operating Reports for the month of September, ORDINANCE NO. 2577: ilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2577 for adoption. dinance Book. ITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIK HURI- ZONING. (67-68-73 - R-3.) (Orange-Thistle Annexation.) Roll Call AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ORDINANCE NO. 2587: The Mayor clared Ordinance No. 2586 duly passed and adopted. ORllNANCENO. 2585: ,...., i. of September j. MOTION Refer tol ! AN ORDINANCE OF T~ CIPAL CODE RELATINf Roll ca1t AYES: NOES~ ABSBNT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None Ordinance No. 2577 duly passed and adopted. Refer ilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2585 for'adoption. dinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THa ITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10.98 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL d E, RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL WASTE. A YES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None ORDINANCE NO. 2586: ilman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2586 for adoption. Ordinance No. 2585 duly passed and adopted. Refer inance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE; TY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE A.~AHlIM MtJNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING ZONING. (67-68-4 - R-l.) lman Clark offered Ordinance No. 2587 for adoption. ~inance Book. TY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIMMUNI- ZONING. (67-68-72 - R-l.) Refer AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIPAL CODE RELATING Roll Call te: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ILMEN: I LMEN: I LMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor clared Ordinance No. 2587 duly passed and adopted. 68-635 Cit Hall Anaheim California ~ UNCIL MINUTES - October 22 1968 1:30 P.M. ORDINANCE 10. 2588: Councilman tton offered Ordinance No. 2588 for adoption. Refer to Ordinand AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY O~ CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZON~ NAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIMMUNI- . (68-69-7 - R-3.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILME~: COUNCILME : COUNCILME : Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None The Mayor No. 2588 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE :t<<). 2591: Councilman I ing. ORDINANCE MD. 2592: Councilman I tton offered Ordinance No. 2592 for first read- ing. in offered Ordinance No. 2591 for first read- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY O~ TION 17.08.110 OF THE ANA~ HEIM AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17. 08, SEC- MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO SUBDIVISIONS. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY O:F; CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONI HElM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM HUNI- (65-66-24 (8) - M-l.) ORDINANCE NO. 2593: Councilman readiog. utte offered Ordinance No. 2593 for first AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONI HEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- (61-62-69 (29) - M-l.) ALCOHOLIC ERAGE LICENSE APPLI Irene M. Baltzer, for Off- for Lynn's Meat Market, 216 by the Assistant City Mana ION: Application submitted by Howard E. and Beer and Wine, Person-to-Person Transfer, est Lincoln Avenue, C-l zone, was presented to the City Council, for their information. No Council s taken on said application. ANAHEIM J OR CHAMBER OF COMME Junior Chamber of Commerce game booths, in connection 24th through 27th, 1968, n' was submitted and approved . on motion by Councilman Kre. - ANNUAL CO ITY FAIR: Request of the Anaheim waiver of all licenses and fees for rides, and h the Annual Community Fair, to be held October the corner of Lincoln Avenue and East Street, accordance with City Council Policy No. 305, , seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE COUNTY BILLY GRAHAM CRUS The Assistant City Manager County Billy Graham Crusade heim Stadium for approximat fices are not constructed a Crusade Association contrac ish said office space to Ci lease agreement on this bas. . project to the Crusad8 Asso . ASSOCIATION - ANAHEIM STADIUM OFFICE SPACE: orted on a proposed agreement with the Orange sociation, to lease office space at the Ana- 10 months. He stated that the required of- the present time, and recommended that the Ifor the necessary labor and materia~s to fin- specifications, and negotiate terms of the He noted that the estimated cost of the tion is $17,304.00. Mr. Hudson Saffel Contractor, addressed the C is based on his offer topr sade Association, for the c I i ,I 3066 Enterprise Street, Costa Mesa, General y Council. He stated that the estimated cost ide his services, free of charge, to the Cru- struction of the proposed office space. On the recommenda tive approval to negotiate Crusade Association, for t Anaheim Stadium was granted, Councilman Dutton. MOTION . n of the Assistant City Manager, administra- agreement with the Orange County Billy Graham construction and lease of office space at the n motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by a n n [ r j I 68-636 Cit Hall Anaheim. The Councilman Krein of- COUNCIL MINUTES - October 22 1968 1~30 P.M. MlLODYLAND THEATRE; Mf the City Council, i rently being held! City may t~ke con~ Ronald Rice, 18632 San Felipe, Fountain Valley, addressed pressing his objection to the type of performance cur- Me10dyland Theatre, and asked what action, if any, the ning this and future shows of the same nature. The Cit* the City Council 11- with the show; th4 however, the City: time. ttorney advised that he has requested consultation with arding the possibility of legal action, in connection all-nude show would be in violation of State Law; es not have the authority to close the show at this R BOULEVARD PARKI sistant City Mana strictions on Har authorized by the! 1969, by general q RESTRICTIONS: On report and recommendation of the As- , Council action regarding the posting of parkingre- Boulevard, in conjunction with street-widening project ty Council on March 1, 1966, was deferred to mid-March, sent. LUTION NO. 68R-6S9 fered Resolution PARK AND RECREATION IN-LIEU FEES: . 68R-659 for adoption. Refer A RESOLUTION OF T NO. 66R-526 ESTAB TITLE 17, LAND D THE ANAHEIM MUNICI ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION ING FEES TO BE CHARGED BY THE CITY IN CONNECTION WITH PMENT AND RESOURCES, CHAPTER 1708, SUBDIVISIONS, OF CODE. Roll CallL AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Clark and Pebley Schutte None The Mayor Resolution No. 68R-659 duly passed and adopted. Prior to stated that he opp~ on the basis that i ting on the foregoing Resolution, Councilman Schutte d establishment of a $150.00 fee for apartment units, would curtail apartment development, if adopted. RESOLUIION NO. 68R-660: Councilman Dutton G n the recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, ered Resolution No. 68R-660 for adoption. Refer A RESOLUTION OF THE NO. 68R-426 AND ~ RIGHT-OF-WAY REPRES ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION ING RATE OF COMPENSATION FOR THE JOB CLASS OF SENIOR ATIVE. Roll Call AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley None None Resolution No. 68R-660 duly passed and adopted. TRANSFER OF FUNDS: On r Dutton moved to au from the Capital Ou ber 549-271-937-01. ,...., mmendation of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman ize transfer of funds in the amount of $600~000.00 y Fund to Convention Center Scoreboard, Account Num- ouncilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIE Mayor Pebley as vot~ the 45th Annual Co Orleans, Louisiana, By general consent, the City Council designated delegate, and Councilman Clark as alternate, to ss, National League of Cities, to be held in New cember 7th to 11th, 1968. 68-637 Cit naheim Ca1ifornia- UNCIL MINUTES - October' ~2 1:30 P.M. EXECUTIVE SISSION; At the reque~ to recess to Executive Sessl Schutte seconded the motion~ of the City Attorney, Councilman Krein mo'Ved , to discuss possible litigation. Councilman MOTION CARRIED. (6:55 P.M.). ADJOURNtllN'I: Yo 110wing reces s fp adjcura the meeting. Counct Executive Session, Councilman Dutton moved to n Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOUR.IfED: 7: 05 P.M. SIGNED Cit elL MINUTES - October 29 1968 1:30 P.M. fornia - The City Council he City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: None ASSISTANT CITY MANA~ CITY ATTORNEY: Jose CITY ENGINEER: Jame DEPtTrY CITY CLERK: ZONING SUPERVISOR: rein, Schutte, Clark and Pebley Robert M. Davis B. Geisler P. Maddox ona M. Farrens nald Thompson Mayor Pebley called e meeting to order. trber, of the Free Methodist Church, gave ted the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance I INVOCATION: Reverend Stanley the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Clark to the Flag. PRESUTAlION OF AWARD: The J extraordinary servic heim, was presented men t Commander, Haro s K. Fisk Perpetual Americanism Award, for to the youth, citizens and veterans of Ana- American Legion Post No. 72, by Past Depart- E. Heinly. WAIVER OF ING - ORDINANCES AND the reading in full of all or the waiver of reading is hereb ing of the title, specific req of such ordinance or reso1utio MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. SOLUIIONS: Councilman Krein moved to waive ances and resolutions, and that consent to tgiVen by all Councilmen, unless after read- st is made by a Councilman for the reading Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. ! o n n