70R-166
RESOLUTION NO. 70R-166
,-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2158
WHEREAS, tije City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive ~ petition for zoning variance from
Joyce Landford 0 ner 1158 Hazelwood Anaheim
of certain real proprty situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
Lot No. 101 of Tract No. 1247, in the
City of IAnaheim, County of Orange,
State o~ California
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said
petition on Mar~ 9. 1970 , notice of which said public
hearing was duly gi . n as required by law and the provisions of
Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, slaid Ci ty Planning Commission, after due
inspection, investiglation and studies made by itself and in its
behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. PC70-36
denying Variance No. 2158
,
; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty-two (22) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, a written appeal was
filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim protesting the
action of the City Planning Commission denying said variance,
and said appeal was set for public hearing on April 7 ,
19 70 , at 1:30 o'clock PoM. at the City Hall in the City of
Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing was duly given as
required by law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
-1-
-..-..-..,...._-,
""..,.....
I'JHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consIderation of all the
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City Counc~l
does find and determine that:
1. There are e~ceptional or extraordinary circum-
stances or conditions applicable to the property
involved or to the intended use of the property
that do not apply generally to the property or
class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
2. That such a var1ance is necessary for the preser-
vation and enjoyment of a substantial property
right posse~sed by other property in the same
viC1nity and zone and denied to the property in
question.
3. That the g~anting of such variance will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious tp the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located
4. That the granting of such variance will not adversely
affect the comprehensive general zoning plan.
NOW, THEREF10RE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counc:d of
the city of Anaheim that a conditional zoning variance be, and
the same is hereby g~anted permitting the continued operation of
a beauty shop in the attached two-car garage on R-l (single family
residential zone) property with waivers of the following Anaheim
Municipal Code requirements and subject to the conditions hereinafter
set forth:
Section 18.24.010(1)
Section 18.24.030(5)
Permitted uses in the R-l Zone
Required two-car garage
That this variance is granted subject to the following conditions:
1. Operation to remain a one-operator shop, not to exceed
three customers being served at one time.
2. No adve~tising on the premises.
3. No commercial listing in the telephone directory.
4. All debris from the operation which accumulates on
the property be properly placed in trash receptacles.
5. That subject property be developed substantially in
accordance with plans and specifications on file with
the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No.1.
The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke such variance
permit for good cause or failure of said owner, her heirs, successors
or assigns to comply with the Anaheim Municipal Code and regulations
and the conditions herein. Said variance is granted for the term
prescribed by the Ananeim Municipal Code unless otherwise specified
herein.
-2-
THE FOREGOI~.G RESOLUTION is ~proved and signed by me
7th day of . April , 19 70 .
I _
this
ATTEST:
@1rd
ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, DENE M. ~ILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a regular ~eeting of the City Council held on the 7th
day of April , 19 70 , by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein, Pebley
Clark
NOES: C()UN CI LMEN : None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
AND I FURTH~R CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of
Anaheim approved and signed said resolution on the 7th day OF
April , 19~.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 7th day of
April , 19~.
~~~~~
CIT CLE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the f9regoing is the original of Resolution No.
70R-166 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on April 7, 1970.
~M.~~~~
City Clerk
FAL;jl 5/5/70
-3-
_~c.,-_~..