70R-125
-
RESOLUTION NO. 70R-125
,....~'--...
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 2121
WHEREAS, th~ City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive a petition for zoning variance from
Jeffrey H. Millet as .t.aqent for George A. Coll1lU!ln, owner
of certain real propetty situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
PORTION 'JAil
Being the nortJ1erly 524.00 feet of all those certain
parcels of lanid in the County of Orange, State of
California, as shown as "Emma Bayha Morlock" 8.336
acres and "Ida! Maussnest" 7.938 acres on a map filed
in Book 7, page 12 of Records of Surveys in the Office
of the County !Recorder of said county.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said
petition on _ Februa~ 9 1970, notice of which said public
hearing was duly give as required by law and the provisions of
Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due
inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its
behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. PC70-11
approving Variance No. 2121, subject to the conditions
therein set forth ; and
-"
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty-two (22) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, the City Council
did elect, upon its own motion, to review the action taken by
the City Planning Commission in 9r~n~;nq____ said variance and
did set a public hearing thereon to be held on the 10th. day
of March , 19....10._, at 1:30 o'clock p.r'1. in the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim and notice of such public hearing
was duly given as required by law and the Provisions of Title 18,
Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
-
-
\'mEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by
itself and In its behalf, and after due consideration of all the
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City Council
does find and determine that:
L)
1. There are exceptional or extraordinary Clrcum-
stances or conditions applicable to the property
involved or to the intended use of the property
that do not apply generally to the property or
class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
2. That such a variance is necessary for the preser-
vation and enjoyment of a substantial property
right possessed by other property in the same
ViCl.nlty and zone and denied to the property in
question.
3. That the gr~nting of such variance will not be
materially ~etrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to the property or imprbvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
4. That the granting of such variance will not adversely
affect the comprehensive general zoning plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counc~l of
the City of Anaheim that a conditional zoning variance be, and
the same is hereby granted permitting the establishment of a
44-lot, subdivision with a waiver of the following Anaheim
Municipal Code requirement or limitation and subject to the
conditions hereinafter set forth:
Section 18.04.075 - Development of single-family resi-
dential structures adjacent to
arterial highways.
That this variance is gran~ed subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance is granted subject to the.comple-
tion of Reclassification No. 69-70-10, now pending.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially
in accordance with plans and specifications on file
with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No.1,
Revision No. 1, for Portion "A" only.
The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke such
variance permit for good cause or. failure of said owner, his heirs,
successors or assigns to comply with the Anaheim Municipal Code
and regulations and the conditions herein. Said variance is granted
for the term prescribed by the Anaheim Municipal Code unless otherwise
specified herein.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION i!=,_approved and signed by me this
lOth day of March, 1970.
r
ATTEST:
~)n.~
.CI CLERK OF THE CIT OF ANAHEIM
FAL:jl 4/24/70
-2-
_... -'" ~~
,.-,.~
... dO .......
..... ... .. ""'!"" ~". w~_ ...,.. ~"'.. 'v",:
-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s s .
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of ,Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 70R-125 was intro-
duced and adopted at a regular meeting, provided by law, of the City
Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 10th day of March, 1970,
by the following vote of the members thereof:
--...,
)
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Pebley and Schutte
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Clark
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor Pro-Tem of the City of
Anaheim approved and si$ned said Resolution No. 70R-125 on the 10th
day of March, 1970.
IN WITNESS WHtREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the official seal of tht City of Anaheim this 10th day of March, 1970.
~ 'M. ~...;~
. TY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No.
70R-125 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on
March 10, 1970.
~ ')1. 21:M..~
.. City Clerk
"