Loading...
83R-030 RESOLUTION NO. 83R-30 ^_. A RESOLU~ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHE~M GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2397. WHEREAS, ,the Ci ty Planning Commission of the Ci ty of Anaheim did receiv~ an application for a conditional use permit from CONTINENTAL P~CIFIC ENTERPRISES, INC., owner, to permit a hospital and medic~l office complex on certain real property located in the Cit~ of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, descri~ed as: PARCELS 1, 2, .3 AND 4, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 120, PAGES 25 AND ~6 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDaR OF SAID COUNTY; and WHEREAS, ,the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing upon said ~pplication at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim, notices o~ which public hearing were duly given as required by law an~ the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.03 of the Anaheim Municigal Code; and WHEREAS, ,said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and ~tudies made by itself and in its behalf and after due consider~tion of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, did ~dopt its Resolution No. PC82-2l9, granting Conditional Use Pe~mit No. 2397; and WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law, an interested part~ or the City Council, on its own motion, caused the review qf said Planning Commission action at a duly noticed public hearing; and WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public hearing, the City qouncil did duly hold and conduct such hearing and did give all p~rsons interested therein an opportunity to be heard and did rece~ve evidence and reports; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds, after careful consi- deration of the redommendations of the City Planning Commission and all evidence a~d reports offered at said hearing, that: 1. The propqsed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authdrized by the Anaheim Municipal Code. -- 2. The propqsed use will not adversely affect the adjoin- ing land uses and ~he growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located. 3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrime~tal to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and general welfare. - 4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. - 5. The gran~ing of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed !will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general !welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. NOW, THE~EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anahei~ that the action of the City Planning Commission grantin~ said conditional use permit be, and the same is hereby, affirmed and that Conditional Use Permit No. 2397 be, and the same is he~eby, granted permitting a hospital and medical office complex on ~he hereinabove described real property, subject to the following conditions: 1. That priqr to commencement of the use herein approved or issuance of a buil~ing permit whichever occurs first, the developer, as owned of the adjacent 2.2 acre parcel (Parcel 4), shall execute and r~cord a covenant as to Parcel 4, in a form approved by the Ci~y Attorney's office, agreeing that, prior to the application fori, or issuance of, any building permits for any commercial develop~ent on said Parcel 4, the owner of said Parcel 4 shall obtain appr~val from the Planning Commission or City Council of said commercial development with its associated vehicular traffic i~pacts, both individual and cumulative. 2. That pri~r to the issuance of building permits, and in addition to payment of regular traffic signal assessment fees, the developer shall pay for a traffic signal inner-connection in an amount of not less than $40,680. 3. That prio!r to final building and zoning inspections, the developer shall construct a deceleration lane on Nohl Ranch Road, I 200 feet long and 1~ feet wide with tire busters at the southern throat, and that copstruction shall be done in a manner to preclude left-turns from west bound traffic on Nohl Ranch Road. 4. That the incline of the service vehicle road shall not exceed 2% per 40 fe~t from the back of the side walk on Anaheim Hills Road, and tha~ the visibility clearance from both driveways on Anaheim Hills Ro~d shall be provided for a distance of 120 feet northerly and 80 feet southerly, 7 feet back from the sidewalk or crosswalk. 5. That prio!r to final building and zoning inspections, the handicapped parking spaces shall be provided conforming to the latest California and Federal Code, with said spaces to be a minimum of 12 feet wide with not less than 8 feet 2 inches height clearance, and with 4-foot ramps along the side having access to the building without wheel chairs transversing or entering the travel lanes. -2- 6. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the Office of the Executive Director of Public Works. _. 7. That fir~ hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior tq commencement of structural framing. 8. That subj~ct property shall be served by underground utilities. 9. That drailnage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisf~ctory to the City Engineer. 10. That the ~wner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic signal asselssment fee (Ordinance No. 3896), in an amount as determined by t~e City Council, for commercial buildings prior to the issuance of a building permit. II. That appr~priate water assessment fees as determined by the Office of Utili~ies General Manager shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior td the issuance of a building permit. 12. That the location and design of all vehicular ingress and egress driveway~ shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Traffic~ Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. That a pe~estrian access plan shall be submitted by the developer to the Ci~y Traffic Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuanpe of building permits. 14. That the design and development of any public street improvements shall pe subject to review and approval of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. IS. That the pwner(s) of subject property shall obtain from the City vehicular ~ccess rights to Nohl Ranch Road. 16. That subj~ct property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked E~hibit Nos. 1 through ID. ~. 17. That Cond~tion No. 15, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolutipn, or prior to the time that the building permit is issued, or within a period of one year from date hereof, whichever occurs fi~st, or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant. 18. That Cond~tion Nos. 4, 6, 8, 9, and 16, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. -3- 19. Prior to issuance of any building permits for the project, the developer shall submit satisfactory evidence to the City that any required certificate of need has been issued for the hospital. - BE IT FU~THER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of ~ny court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and ani approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this 25th day of January, 1983. M ATTEST: ~. ~,A)~ CITY CLERK OF THE C, OF ANAHEIM JLW: fm 062lM 2-14-83 - -4- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SSe CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, LINDA D. ROBERTS, City C~erk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No~ 83R-30 was introduced and adopted at a regular ~" meeting provided by law, of 'the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 25th day of January, 1983, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ~ickler, Bay and Roth NOES: COUNC IL MEN: BERS : ~aywood and Overholt ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None AND I FURTHER certify that ~he Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said Resolution No. 83R-30 on th~ 25th day of January, 1983. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have ~ereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 25th d4Y of January, 1983. ~. ..1".J~ CITY CL~RK OF THE CITY F ANAHEIM (SEAL) I, LINDA D. ROBERTS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 83R-30 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on January 25, 1983. ~ ~~J~ _n CITY CLERK" ~.