84R-362
",......
A RESOLUTI
OF ANAHEI
NO. 2574 (
!~
WHEREAS,
Anaheim did receive
with a waiver of ce
from CARLOS R. CON
child day care cent
a waiver of certain
certain real proper
Orange, State of Ca
LOT 66 OF TRAC
PAGES 26 - 28
OFFICE OF THE
WHEREAS,
hearing upon said a
Anaheim, notices of
required by law and
the Anaheim Municip
WHEREAS,
investigation and s
after due considera
said hearing, did a
Conditional Use Per
WHEREAS,
an interested party
caused the review 0
noticed public hear
WHEREAS,
hearing, the City C
hearing and did giv
opportunity to be h
did consider the sa
,-......
WHEREAS,
consideration of th
all evidence and re
the City Council, t
forth in Section 18
not present for the
,...-....
RESOLUTION NO. 84R-362
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
HEARING) .
e City Planning Commission of the City of
n application for a conditional use permit
ain provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code
and LEONOR CONANT, owners, to permit a
for a maximum of twelve (12) children with
rovisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code on
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
ifornia, described as:
2288 AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 69
CLUSIVE OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE
UNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY: and
e City Planning Commission did hold a public
lication at the City Hall in the City of
hich public hearing were duly given as
the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.03 of
1 Code: and
aid Commission, after due inspection,
4dies made by itself and in its behalf and
ton of all evidence and reports offered at
opt its Resolution No. PC84-98 granting
it No. 2574: and
hereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
or the City Council, on its own motion,
said Planning Commission action at a duly
ng: and
t the time and place fixed for said public
uncil did hold and conduct such public
all persons interested therein an
ard and did receive evidence and reports, and
and
City Council does find, after careful
action of the City Planning Commission and
orts offered at said public hearing before
at all of the conditions and criteria set
03.030.030 of the Anaheim Municipal Code are
following reasons:
,.....
,
,----
1. That theoposed use will adversely affect the
adjoining land usesnd the growth and development of the area in
which it is proposed to be located: and
2. That the s'ze and shape of the site proposed for the
use is not adequate 0 allow the full development of the proposed
use in a manner not etrimental to the particular area nor to the
peace, health, safet , and general welfare: and
SBCTIONS 18.06.050. 68 - Required loading and unloading area for
AlfD 1.26.066.0' 10 children.
(on-site required: off-site proposed)
.l............
following
3. That
be detrimental to th
of the citizens of
AND WHERE
careful considerati
and all evidence and
before the City Cou
all of the conditio
Anaheim Municipal C
waiver(s) should be
anting of the conditional use permit would
peace, health, safety, and general welfare
eCity of Anaheim: and
lid application requests a waiver of the
) of the Anaheim Municipal Code:
, the City Council does further find, after
of the action of the Planning Commission
reports offered at said public hearing
il regarding said requested waiver(s), that
set forth in Section 18.06.080 of the
e are not present, and that the aforesaid
enied, for the following reasons:
1. That the v riance(s) will cause an increase in traffic
congestion in the i ediate vicinity and adversely affect
adjoining land uses: and
2. That
detrimental to the
the citizens of the
anting of the variance(s) will be
ace, health, safety or general welfare of
ity of Anaheim.
NOW, THER ,ORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim hat, for the reasons hereinabove stated, the
action of the City anning Commission granting said conditional
use permit be, and t e same is hereby, reversed and that the
request of the appli ant to permit a child day care center for a
maximum of twelve (12) children with a waiver of certain
provisions of the heim Municipal Code be, and the same is
hereby, denied.
,~
BE IT FUR
Resolution No. 79R-5
the aforesaid decisi
provisions of Secti
ER RESOLVED that, pursuant to City Council
4, the time within which judicial review of
n must be sought is governed by the
1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
-2-
-
~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNn OF OIA.NGE ) ss.
CITY OF AlAHEIM )
I, I.ifNORA N. SOHL, CitYCltl'k of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the f!.reao:l.af Resolution 'Hci).h. 84R-362 wa. s introduced and adopted at a regular
meet~ provided by 1.-, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on
the Uth day of "Septellber, 84, by the following vote of the members thereof:
1
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS~ Bay, Overholt and Roth
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS ~ Kaywood and Pickler
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS ~ None
AND I FURTHER certify that ~he Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed s&ill
Resolution No. 84R-362 on t~e 11th day of September, 1984.
IN WItNESS WHEREOF, I have ~.ereunto se~ my hand and affixed th~ seal of the
City of Anaheim this 11th ~y of Sept~ber, 1984.
Cl~hHE~Y~~
(SEAL)
I, LEOIORA N. SOIL, City C;t. of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the origi ... of Resolution No. 84R-362 duly passed and
adopted by the Anaheim City. . uncil on September 11, 1984.
~~ 'It S--tL
clM cr.F.R:k
)
--.
-
.~.
,
I
THE FOREGtXNG RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this 11th day of September,
1984. ! fi.... ~
I ANM~ . .' .--
! MAydR OF TIlE cI AN :-:11
ATTEST:
C If
1'l06U
11/(>1184
IM
..,.,.
,,-..,\
-3-