84R-250
,""""
.-,
. RESOLUTION NO. 84R-250
j
A RESOLUTIt'N OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 2564. 1
j
i
WHEREAS, t e City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive n application for a conditional use permit
with a waiver of cer ain provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code
from STEVEN D. HEINR CH and LEA ANNE HEINRICH, owners, to permit
a child day care cen er fdor a maximum of twelve (12) children on
certain real propert situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of Cal fornia, described as:
PARCEL 5, AS *H ON A PARCEL MAP FILED IN BOOK 24,
PAGE 19 OF PARC L MAPS IN THE OFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF 0 GE COUNTY; and
,~
WHEREAS, t
hearing upon said ap
Anaheim, notices of
required by law and
the Anaheim Municipa
WHEREAS, s
investigation and st
after due considerat
said hearing, did ad
Conditional Use Perm
WHEREAS, t
an interested party
caused the review of
noticed public heari
WHEREAS, a
hearing, the City Co
hearing and did give
opportunity to be he
did consider the sa
~-
WHEREAS, t
consideration of the
all evidence and re
the City Council, th
forth in Section 18.
not present for the
e City Planning Commission did hold a public
lication at the City Hall in the City of
ich public hearing were duly given as
he provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.03 of
Code; and
id Commission, after due inspection,
dies made by itself and in its behalf and
on of all evidence and reports offered at
t its Resolution No. PC84-87 granting
t No. 2564; and
ereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
r the City Council, on its own motion,
said Planning Commission action at a duly
9; and
the time and place fixed for said public
cil did hold and conduct such public
all persons interested therein an
rd and did receive evidence and reports, and
and
Council does find, after careful
action of the City Planning Commission and
rts offered at said public hearing before
t all of the conditions and criteria set
3.030.030 of the Anaheim Municipal Code are
ollowing reasons:
I"""
.-
1. That the P~oposed use will adversely affect the
adjoining land uses nd the growth and development of the
which it is proposedl to be located; and
area in
,,~,.
2. That the s
use is not adequate
use in a manner not
peace, health, safet
ze and shape of the site proposed for the
o allow the full development of the proposed
etrimental to the particular area nor to the
, and general welfare; and
3. That anting of the conditional use permit would
be detrimental to th peace, health, safety, and general welfare
of the citizens of t e City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, s~id application requests a waiver of the
following provision(~) of the Anaheim Municipal Code:
SECTION l8.06.0~O.0268 Required loading and
AND l8.26.0~6.0l0 unloading area for
. children. (on-site vehi-
cle loading and unloading
area required; off-site
proposed)
AND WHEREA
careful consideratio
and all evidence and
before the City Coun
all of the condition
Anaheim Municipal Co
waiver(s) should be
, the City Council does further find, after
of the action of the Planning Commission
reports offered at said public hearing
il regarding said requested waiver(s), that
set forth in Section 18.06.080 of the
e are not present, and that the aforesaid
enied, for the following reasons:
,
1. That the v~riance(s) will cause an increase in traffic
congestion in the imrediate vicinity and adversely affect
adjoining land uses;land
j
2. That the g~anting of the variance(s) will be
detrimental to the p ace, health, safety or general welfare of
the citizens of the ity of Anaheim.
NOW, THERE RE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim hat, for the reasons hereinabove stated, the
action of the City Panning Commission granting said conditional
use permit be, and t e same is hereby, reversed and that the
request of the appli ant to permit a child day care center for a
maximum of twelve (1 ) children with a waiver of certain
provisions of the An heim Municipal Code be, and the same is
..""",....., hereby, denied. i
BE IT FURTf. R RESOLVED that, pursuant to City Council
Resolution No. 79R-5 4, the time within which judicial review of
the aforesaid decisi n must be sought is governed by the
provisions of Sectio 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
-2-
I"'"
,4.---\
THE FOREGO~NG RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
Council of the ~ity of Anaheim this 26th day of June, ]..984.
~~~
MAYOR OF 'HE CITY OF' .
City
~
ATTEST:
~.
-3-
'J
r
r..
--"
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUlTY OF ORANGE' ) SSe
CITY OJ' ANAHEIM )
I~ ;LKOIIORA N. SOifL, Ci~y Clelk of the City of Anaheim~ do hereby certify that
the foietoing ResoluUOft No. 'S4R-250 was introduced and adopted at a regular
meetina provided by law, of .he City Council of the City of Anaheim held on
the 26th day of June, 1984~y the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay~ Overholt~ Pickler and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER certify that t~e Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 84R-250 on the 26th day of June, 1984.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF~ I have htreunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 26th dat of JuAe~ 1984.
~~~t~~.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, LEO.ORA N. SOUL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the originai of Resolution No. 84R-250 duly passed and
adopted by the Anaheim City touncil on June 26, 1984.
~*- 'it ~
. CITY CLERK
"
1