78-723
f"~ ......."
'''-''''!
RESOLUTION NO. 78R-723
A RESOLUTIQN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANftHEIMGRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO . 1 9 , .
t
WHEREAS, t~e City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive ~n application for a conditional use permit
from DALE E. AND SARAjH ANN FOWLER, owners; and CREVIER IMPORTS,
INC., agent, to permi.t an automobile sales, service and restora-
tion facility on certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Californi.a, de.scribed as:
That portion of Lot 20 in Block K of the Kraemer
Tract, as shown on a Map recorded in book 12, pages
78 and 88 of Mis~ellaneous Records of Los Angeles
County, Californda, described as follows: Parcel
No. 2 as shown on a Map filed in book 55, page 47
of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder
of Orange County" California; and
/.-",
.."
-1-
ATTY-26 (Page 1 of 3 pages)
r-,
~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing upon said application at the City Hall in the City of
Anaheim, notices of ~hich public hearing were duly given as re-
quired hy law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.03 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code~ and
,A''-''
WHEREAS, s~id Commission, after due inspection, investi-
gation and studies m~e by itself and in its behalf and after due
consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing,
did adopt its Resolut+ion No. PC78-226, granting
Conditional Use Permi't No. 1~B9 ~ and
MIEREAS, t~reafter, within the time prescribed by law,
an interested party ~ the City Council, on its own motion, caused
the review of said Pl~nning Commission action at a duly noticed
public hearing~ and
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City Coupcil did duly hold and conduct such hearing
and did give all pers~s interested therein an opportunity to be
heard and did receive evidence and reports1 and
WUEREAS, th~ City Council finds, after careful consider-
ation of the recommenaationsof the City Planning Co~i$s.ion and
all evidence and repo~ts offered at said hearing, that:
1. The proposed use is properly one for which a conditional
use permit is authori~ed by the Anaheim Municipal Code.
2. The proposea use will not adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the gro.th and development of the area in which it
is proposed to be located.
3. The size an. shape of the site proposed for the use is
. adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a
manner not detrimental to the particular,area nor to the peace,
health, safety and ge'eral welfare.
4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not im-
pose an undue burden .pon the streets and highways designed and
improved to carry the traffic in the area.
5. The grantin9 of the conditional use permit under the
conditions imposed wi~l not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general we1fare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
.~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim tijat the action of the City Planning Commission
~ranting said conditional use permit be, and the same is
here y, modified and that Conditional Use Permit No. 1889 be,
and the same is hereby, granted permitting an automobile sales,
service and restoration facility on the hereinabove described prop-
erty, subject to the fOllowing conditions:
--2-
ATTY-26 (Page 2 of 2 Pages)
.r-
.-,
,~
I
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially
in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City
of Anaheim marked EXhibit Nos. 1 through 3.
2. That Condition No.1, above mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
3. That there shall be no on-site signs advertising auto-
mobiles for sale on the subject property.
4. That all 'Work on, storage and sales of automobiles shall
be conducted wholly' inside the building.
5. That the use of said property shall be limited to a sales,
service and restoration facility for Ferrari and Maserati auto-
mobiles only.
6. That the use, as granted, is permitted for a period of
approximately twenty (20) months to expire May 22, 1980 unless an
extension of time i$ granted in conjunction with Conditional Use
Permit No. 1837. TJ.I!at said time limitation is to determine whether
the use has had a detrimental effect on the area; and thatexten-
sions of time may be granted by the City Council upon written re-
quest by the petitioner, fOllowing a determination that the use has
not had a detrimental effect.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby re-
serves the right to revoke such Conditional Use Permit for good
cause or failure of said owners, their heirs, successors or assigns
to comply with the !naheim Municipal Code and regulations and the
conditions therein.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this 7t da November, 1978.
ATTEST:
~:fJ.l.J~\~~~- ..~
C~CLERK O~F ANAHEIM
JLW:fm
.~
-3-
.~
.......
.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUN'l'I OF ORANGE ) SSe
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
.
I, LIJ,DA D. ROBERTS, City C erk of the Ci~y of Anaheim, QO hereby.certify that
the foregoing Resolution l'io 78R-723 was introduced an.d adopted at a regular
meet:i:ag provided by law, of the City Counci1.of the City of Anaheim held on
the 7th day of November, 19 ~" by the followi.ng vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: erholt, Kaywood, Kott and SeYVlour
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ~one
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: th
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that
Reso1.tion ~. 78R..,723 on
. .
e Mayor of the City of Anaheim s.igned said
e 7th day.of November, 1978...
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have ereunto set,my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 7th da of November, 1978:.
CI~'~~IM
(SEAL)
I, LIIDAtD. ROBERTS, City C~~rk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the ~relOiD8 is the or~gin ~of Resolution No. 78R-723 duly passed and adopted
by the Anaheim City Council on November 7, 1978.
~.)&~
ITY CLERK
"
')