Loading...
1968-632 RESOLUTION NO 68.H.-632 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO 2019 WHEREAS, the City Planning Commlssion of the City of Anaheim did recelve a petitlon for zoning variance from _Katella Associate~wner of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County C1f Orange, State of California, described as follows: The West 240.00 feet of that portion of tne Southeast quarter of tne Southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho San Juan Cajon ae Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in book 51 page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the county recorder of said county, lying East of the East line of the West 1.00 acre of said southeast quarter of tne southwest quarter of the southeast quarter. EXCEPT from saia ~~est 240.00 feet that portion lying within the Nortn 10.00 feet of the East 60.00 feet of the west 336.00 feet of said southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of tne southeast quarter. AND WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Commission did hold a p'1blLc hearing at the City Hall l.n the City of Anaheim upon said petl tion on October 7, 19b8 , notice of which said public ---.~~""-.~-~-~-- 0 hear :mg was duly gl ven as required by law and the provislons of Title 18. Chapter 18,16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, sald City Planning Commission, after due .nspection, investigatlon and studies made by itself and in its behalf, and after due conslderatlon of all evidence and reports offered at saId hearing, dld adopt Resolution No. PC68-299 recommending that VarIance No 2019 be denied .._~ _~~ ,"oe __~.. _-'_~.~_.~""_.____.._C'''''''''_<'d''____._' .._,._" .....-".......... -'"'--~_...-.~ .............._,___...._~_'---..o_ i and WHEREAS, thereafter. wIthin twenty-two (22) days from the date of the adoption of said resolution, a written appeal was flIed wIth the Clty Council of the City of Anaheim protesting the c.F:t lon of the Ci ty Planning Commission denying said variance, and saId appeal was set for public hearing on October 22, ;968 . at 1:30 o'"::lock P.M. at the City Hall in the City of Anaheimf and notlce of such public hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18076 of t.he Anaheim Municlpal Code; and -1- ~~EREAS, after dcc InvestigatIon and studies made by ~tsolf and ln its behalf, ~nC after due conslderation of all the eVIdence and reports offered at saId hearing, the City CouncIl ~Ges fIne:; an,} deten,une that; 1. There are exceptIonal or extraorClnary Clrcum- stances or conditlcns applIcable to the property Involved or to the Intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use In the same VICInIty and zone. ) L , That such a variance is necessary for the preser- vaLion and enjoyment of a substantial property r~ght possessed by other property in the same VICInIty and zone and denied to the property in question 3. That the granting of such variance will not be materIally detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vIcinity and ~one in which the property is located. 1. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the comprehensIve general zoning plan. }\101iJ 1 cl'HEREFOPE, BE IT RESOLVED by the c~ty Council of t;,e CIty of l\nahelm that a cond 1 t lanaI zoning variance be I and ':1e same 18 hereby Jrantcd permitting the erection of a free- stanaing sign, on tne property ilereinbefore described, in accordance with C-l standards, subject to the following condition: That a IS-foot setbacK from the curb be prov~aea, plus an additional 2-foot setback from the property line. The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke sucn variance permit for good cause or failure of said owner successors or assigns, to comply wi tn the Anaheim r'1unicipal Code anct regulations and the condition herein. Said variance is qranted for the term prescribed by b1e Anaheim .i'1unicipal Code unless otnerwise specified nerein. 'fHL FOl{t;GOHJG RESOLU'I'IOi.\J is approved and signed by ~ne tnis 22nct aay of OctoDer, 1968. / f'i1J.1TbS1' : /-7 // ,/ ~/-_/ /" 1 , (/~/ / . ,---/ ----...' ~1~~ ..c l ,~~--- /' ~ :/ 2I<if~r CL-6R-'OF"~Ht. (~ITi 'OF ANAHEIIJI ,-- ____H -'2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 55. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, DENE ;,:. WILLIAI"~S, Ci ty Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 68R-632 was intro- du.ced and adopted at a regular c,eeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 22nd day a OCiDber, 196b, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES : CDUNGILJvlEN : Dutton, Krein, SChutte, Clark and Pebley NOES: OJ UNCI LM EN : None ABSENT: roUNCILMEN: None AND IFURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 68R-632 on the 22nd day of October, 196b. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 22nd day of October, 1968. ( ~>C~Eru<~ T~;-ANAHE;M ( SEAL ) I, DENE V. WILLIA~S, City Clerk of the City of Anahe~m, do hereby certify that the foregong is the original of Resolution No. 63R-632 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on October 22, 1968. I. ....~) j-:-_ , ~7"_..L- );( /~~~-~..' City Clerk